M/s Vardhman Acrylics Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, – Vadodara
Central Excise
2018 (5) TMI 1499 – CESTAT AHMEDABAD – TMI
CESTAT AHMEDABAD – AT
Dated:- 22-2-2018
Appeal No E/10068/2018 – A/10476/2018
Central Excise
Dr. D. M. Misra, Member (Judicial)
For Appellant (s) Shri Willingdon Christian, Advocate
For Respondent (s): Shri K.J. Kinariwala, AR
Per : Dr. D. M. Misra
Heard both sides.
2. This is an appeal filed against the order-in-appeal No. VAD-EXCUS- 002-APP-295-2017-18 dated 09 08.2017 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Central Goods and Service Tax-Vadodara
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant has availed Cenvat credit of service tax paid on Manp
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ing of finished goods from one godown to another godown and loading of trucks and trailers etc. It is his contention that the service received by the appellant has nexus with the manufacturing activity, therefore, the service tax paid on Manpower Supply Service by the service provider is eligible to credit.
5. L d AR for the Revenue reiterated the findings of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)
6. I find that undisputedly the appellant had received the services relating to Manpower Supply from the service provider and used the said service in or in relation to the manufacturing of finished goods, that is, shifting the raw-material finished goods from one godown to another godown, hence, definitely has nexus with the manufacturing activity, Acc
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =