Bharat Iron Store & Another Versus Union of India Secy. & 3 Others

2018 (4) TMI 1141 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI – Seizure of goods – E-way bill not produced – Penalty – Held that: – it is clear that the E-Way Bill itself was downloaded on 07.01.2017 i.e. four days after the seizure has been made – the petitioner has equally efficacious remedy of filing an appeal against the penalty order under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 – petition dismissed. – Writ Tax No. – 28 of 2018 Dated:- 12-1-2018 – BHARATI SAPRU AND NEERAJ TIWARI, JJ. Counsel For Petitioner: Shri J.P. Pandey, Advocate and Shri Vandeep Nath, Advocate Counsel For Respondent: C.S.C., A.S.G.I. JUDGEMENT We have heard Shri J.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply