Manoj Kumar And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others

2018 (4) TMI 347 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (11) G. S. T. L. 32 (All.) – Seizure of goods – UPGST Act – It is the contention of the petitioner that he has not violated any provision of the UPGST Act – Held that: – subject to deposit of security other than cash or bank guarantee or in the alternative indemnity bond, equal to the value of tax and penalty, to the satisfaction of seizing authority, the goods of the petitioner along with the vehicle bearing registration number PB23T- 4366 may be released forthwith – petition disposed off. – Writ Tax No. – 134 of 2018 Dated:- 7-2-2018 – Ms. Bharati Sapru And Mr. Neeraj Tiwari, JJ. For The Petitioner : Nitin Kesarwani,Murari Mohan Rai For The Respondent : C.S.C.,A.S.G.I. ORDER The petitioner

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply