2018 (3) TMI 739 – TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT – 2018 (10) G. S. T. L. 212 (A. P.) – Confiscation of seized vehicle along with certain quantities of beedies – Held that: – as the seized vehicle is not liable for confiscation in default of payment of tax that may be determined/already determined, no purpose will be served by keeping the said vehicle under continued detention – petition allowed. – WP No.38821 of 2017 Dated:- 17-11-2017 – MR. CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J. For The petitioner : Mr. G.Narendra Chetty For The respondents : Mr. Shaik Jeelani Basha ORDER: (per Hon ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed inter alia for the relief of declaring the seizure of the petitioner s vehicle bearing registration
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
vations as were made in Writ Petition No.35425 of 2017, After hearing learned counsel for both the parties, we are of the opinion that as the seized vehicle is not liable for confiscation in default of payment of tax that may be determined/already determined, no purpose will be served by keeping the said vehicle under continued detention. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is allowed. Respondent No.1 is directed to release the seized vehicle bearing registration No.KA 01 AE 1227 to the petitioner. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.48184 of 2017 is disposed of as infructuous. – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements – Orders – Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TM
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =