M/s Continental India Private Limited And Another Versus Union of India Thru Secy. And 3 Others

2018 (1) TMI 1245 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (10) G. S. T. L. 423 (All.) , [2018] 2 GSTL 36 (All) – Extension of time period for filing of GST Tran-1 – petitioner has alleged in the petition that despite making several efforts on the last date for filing of the application, the electronic system of the respondent no.2 did not respond, as a result of which the petitioner is likely to suffer loss of the credit that it is entitled to by passage of time – Held that: – the respondents are directed to reopen the portal within two weeks from today. In the event they do not do so, they will entertain the application of the petitioner manually and pass orders on it after due verification of the credits as claimed by the petitioner – decided in f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he necessary transactional credit. The petitioner has alleged in the petition that despite making several efforts on the last date for filing of the application, the electronic system of the respondent no.2 did not respond, as a result of which the petitioner is likely to suffer loss of the credit that it is entitled to by passage of time. It is the petitioner's case that he has also submitted his application for transitional credit manually on 10.1.2018. The respondents were served with a notice on 19.1.2018 with a copy of the petition and they have also obtained instructions today. They say that portal is likely to be opened but is unable to say that when the portal is likely to be opened. In view of the above, the respondents are dir

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leave a Reply