IGST Refund Simplification of Process – Elimination of Errors

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE No. 72/2018 – Dated:- 6-6-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS – IV EXPORTS ACC, SAHAR, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI-400099. F.No.-S/3-Misc-254/2017-18 DBK(EDI)/ACC Date: 06.06.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE No. 72/2018 Sub: IGST Refund Simplification of Process – Elimination of Errors-reg. Attention of Exporters/ Customs Brokers and General Public is invited to the Board's Circular no. 12/2018 dated 29.05.2018 and 08/2018 dt. 23.03.2018 and ICES advisories 05/2018, 20/2018, 21/2018, 22/2018 and 23/2018 on the above subject. These Circulars/DG(System)'s advisories address the various issues being faced by the Exporters in getting the IGST refund expeditiously. Based on these Circulars/Advisories, this Public Notice is issued for the knowledge and utility of all the stake holders concerned. 2. In terms of Para 2(ii) Board's Circular 08/2018 dt. 23.03.2018 , an option has been made available in ICES for sanctioning IGST refund in respect of those cases where th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

also be sanctioned through the Officer Interface. In such cases, the Exporters are required to submit to the Officer an undertaking obtained from the GST registered unit which has filed the returns that they have no objection to the refund being granted to the exporter who has filed the Shipping Bill and they will not claim any IGST Refund for under that SB separately. once satisfied, the officer will sanction the applicable IGST Refund through the Officer Interface. 4. Further. it has been noticed that despite the efforts to update the bank accounts with PFMS before generation of IGST Refund scrolls, some scrolls are still getting rejected at PFMS end and in some cases, the scrolls get accepted successfully but the crediting of amount fails for one or more exporters due to invalidation by the concerned bank to PFMS. An automated system of reversal/return of such 'Failed-after-Success' transactions from PFMS to ICEGATE system is under development. For the former kind of cases w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

)to obtain the correct Bank Account details of the beneficiary and update the same in ICES in CLK role. The correct account details shall then be sentback the duly verified/signed document to the Central DDO by email to cddo.customs@icegate.gov.in in the following format: Transaction ID: Name of the Beneficiary: IEC: Bank Account Details Already provided Corrected/Revised Account No: Account No: IFSC Code: LFSC Code: c. The DDO shall forward the scanned copy of the duly verified corrected Bank Account details to the PAO/e-PAO through email. The PAO/e-PAO shall, based on verified Bank account details, correct the account details and reprocess the failed bill for payments. 5. The above procedure is in line with the 0M dated 26.04.2018 issued by the O/o Pr CCA, CBIC on the above subject. It will be ensured that the verified account details are emailed to the above ID by the system manager through the official ICEGATE email id. No other communication shall be entertained by the Central DDO

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs – Dated:- 6-6-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTNIVE) 55-17-3, C-14, 2nd Floor, Road No.2, Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada – 520007 Phone: 0866-2551261 Fax: 0866-2551156 C. No. VIII/09/01/2017-Cus.Tech.(PF-I) Date: 06.06.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs Subject : Regarding. ***** Attention of all the Importers, Exporters, Customs Brokers, Steamer Agents, Custodians/Customs Cargo Service Providers, Trade Associations/Chamber of Commerce, Members of the RAC/PGC and the Public is invited to the Circular No. 12/2018-Customs dated 29.05.2018 issued from F. No.450/119/2017 by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs communicating procedure / guidelines for sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN to DG Systems. The said procedure / guidelines are as below: A number of representations have been received from the exporters / trade associations seeking resolutio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-3B. The exporters have also in certain cases short paid IGST vis-a-vis their liability declared in GSTRI. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-I and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases. 3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under: A. Cases where there is no short payment: (i) The Customs policy wing would prepare a list of exporters whose cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies, for the period July' 2017 to Mar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

STINs who have not submitted the CA certificate to the Board by the 15th November 2018. (v) Non submission of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter. (vi) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board. B. Cases where there is short payment: (i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-I for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs. (ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each exporter referred in para (i) above so as to inform the exporter that their records are held up due to short payment of IGST. The e-mail shall also advise the exporters to observe the procedure

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ered Account that the shortfall amount has been liquidated. (v) The exporter would give an undertaking they would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date. (vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements. (vii) The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system. (viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed / sanctioned as above would be required to submit another certificate from Chartered Accountant before 31st October, 2018 to the same Customs office at the port of export to the effect that there is no discrepancy between the IGST amou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l GST officers (both Centre / State) informing that these exporters have taken benefit of the procedure prescribed in this circular. The jurisdictional GST formations shall also verify the payment particulars at their end. 6 This Circular deals only with the cases where the records have not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system. Once the records are transmitted by GSTN to Customs System based upon the above mentioned procedure, the usual procedure adopted in case of sanction of IGST refunds would have to be followed. In cases where the errors like SB005, SB002, SB006 etc are encountered with the records so transmitted, the provisions of Circulars issued by Board earlier shall apply to them. 7. The officers of Kakinada & Krishnapatnam Custom Houses and ICD, Marripalem, Guntur District may, therefore, take necessary steps to bring these changes to the knowledge of exporters. 8. Difficulties, if any, may be brought to the notice of the undersigned. 9. Action to be taken in te

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Customs – Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems – certain guidelines

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs – Dated:- 6-6-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTNIVE) 55-17-3, C-14, 2nd Floor, Road No.2 Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada – 520007 Phone: 0866-2551261 Fax: 0866-2551156 C. No. VIII/09/01/2017-Cus.Tech (PF-I) Date: 06.06.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE No. 29/2018-Customs Subject : Regarding. ***** Attention of all the Importers, Exporters, Customs Brokers, Steamer Agents, Custodians/Customs Cargo Service Providers, Trade Associations/Chamber of Commerce, Members of the RAC/PGC and the Public is invited to the Circular No. 12/2018-Customs dated 29.05.2018 issued from F. No.450/119/2017 by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs communicating procedure / guidelines for sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN to DG Systems. The said procedure / guidelines are as below: A number of representations have been received from the exporters / trade associations seeking resolution

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

STR-3B. The exporters have also in certain cases short paid IGST vis-a-vis their liability declared in GSTR1. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases. 3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under: A. Cases where there is no short payment: (i) The Customs policy wing would prepare a list of exporters whose cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies, for the period July' 2017 to Marc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TINs who have not submitted the CA certificate to the Board by the 15th November 2018. (v) Non submission of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter. (v) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board. B. Cases where there is short payment: (i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-1 for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs. (ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each exporter referred in para (i) above so as to inform the exporter that their records are held up due to short payment of IGST. The e-mail shall also advise the exporters to observe the procedure un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed Account that the shortfall amount has been liquidated. (v) The exporter would give an undertaking they would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date. (vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements. (vii)The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system. (viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed / sanctioned as above would be required to submit another certificate from Chartered Accountant before 31st October, 2018 to the same Customs office at the port of export to the effect that there is no discrepancy between the IGST amount

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ST officers (both Centre / State) informing that these exporters have taken benefit of the procedure prescribed in this circular. The jurisdictional GST formations shall also verify the payment particulars at their end. 6 This Circular deals only with the cases where the records have not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system. Once the records are transmitted by GSTN to Customs System based upon the above mentioned procedure, the usual procedure adopted in case of sanction of IGST refunds would have to be followed. In cases where the errors like SB005, SB002, SB006 etc are encountered with the records so transmitted, the provisions of Circulars issued by Board earlier shall apply to them. 7. The officers of Kakinada & Krishnapatnam Custom Houses and ICD, Marripalem, Guntur District may, therefore, take necessary steps to bring these changes to the knowledge of exporters. 8. Difficulties, if any, may be brought to the notice of the undersigned. 9. Action to be taken in terms

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: R. VIDYASAGAR RAO CONSTRUCTIONS

2019 (1) TMI 1367 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, HYDERABAD TELANGANA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 482 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of services – “Works Contract” or “Composite Supply” – rate of tax – combination of services of excavation of sand including loading with machinery at reach, formation of Ramps and maintenance of Roads, transportation charges for the tractors/ tippers of sand from reach to stockyard and loading cost of sand from stockyard to lorries – difference of opinion.

Held that:- Since there is no uniform opinion arrived by the Members representing Central Tax and State Tax and they have expressed two different views on classification of services and applicable rate of tax on the services rendered by the applicant, the application filed by M/s. R. Vidyasagar Rao Constructions, Plot No. 98 & 99, Lumbini layout, near Euro School, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-36 (GSTIN No. 36AAGFR6627L12Q), is being referred to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for the State o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the rate of tax applicable on the consideration received there for. 2. The applicant submitted the application in Form GST ARA-01 and Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law & relevant facts and requested for advance ruling on classification of services rendered by them and rate of tax applicable. They have submitted a copy of Challan evidencing payment of application fee of ₹ 10,000/-. 3. A personal hearing was held in this case and the assessee have appeared for personal hearing on 3-4-2018 along with their Advocate Dr. T. Ramesh Babu and explained their case as under : (a) The applicant is a contractor to Telangana State Mineral Development Corporation Limited (TSMDC). TSMDC has entrusted the following work to the applicant: excavation of sand including loading with machinery at reach transportation of above sand from the reach to stockyard loading the so stocked sand to the lorries for further transportation by the contractee formation of ramps, ro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of the ramps and roads, the 'works contract' takes place. After formation of ramps and roads, the so formed immovable property would become the permanent property of the contractee. (d) The ramps and roads so formed, while certain of them would be submerged in water when the irrigation project comes into existence, certain of them would remain as they are for use by the public. (e) Therefore, the activity of the applicant would fit into the ambit of 'works contract' as defined under sub-section (119) of Section 2 of the GST Acts. Such works contract falls under paragraph No. 6(a) of Schedule-II to the GST Acts. (f) In respect of the rate of tax applicable, the applicant is of the view that they are required to pay CGST 2.5% + SGST 2.5% = 5% as given in the CBEC Notification No. 31/2017, dated 13-10-2017 issued in G.O. Ms No. 253, Revenue (CT-II) department dated 23-11-2017. (g) The applicant is also under strong belief that the activities they are rendering to the con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as L1 Bidder by quoting ₹ 74.36 per CBM of sand for excavation of 15,60,000 CBM of sand from Block III, Damerakunta-III, over an extent of 52 Ha., at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage, Kaleshwaram Project and transport the same quantity of sand to nearby stockyard (within 1 Km from the submergence area) and again loading of sand into Lorries at stockyard. TSMDC had issued the letter of intent to the contractor on 27-1-2017 for execution of the agreement for excavation of the sand as mentioned above. (a) On perusal of the scope of the work specified in the said agreement, it is found that the contractor shall excavate sand and transport the same to the stockyard and again load the same into the lorries at stockyard. The equipment/vehicles and manpower required for the said activities is the responsibility of the contractor. The services to be rendered by the contractor as part of the agreement consists of the following components. (i) excavation of sand; (ii) transportation of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sand Mining Rules, 2015, for execution of the work. (e) It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to lay/ form required road from stockyard to nearby connectivity road for plying of lorries/vehicles, any incidental expenditure incurred and involved thereon for laying & maintenance of roads shall be borne by the contractor. 2. Thus it is very clear from the agreement entered between the contractor and the contractee, the main work to be rendered by the contractor involves excavation of sand at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage and transport the same quantity of sand to nearby stockyard and again loading of sand into lorries at stockyard. Laying of roads from stockyard to nearby connectivity roads for plying of lorries is incidental to transport of sand excavated from the submergence areas of Annaram Barrage to nearby stockyard. Hence the claim made by the applicant that the activity rendered by them falls under works contract is not tenable. 3. The service supplied by the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

' and hence excavation of sand is the principal supply in the composite supply of the services rendered by the applicant. In view of the above discussion, the contention of the applicant that the impugned contract needs to be treated as 'Works contract' is not acceptable and hence the question of application of tax rate of 5% (2.5% + 2.5%) as per Notification No. 46/2017-CGST (Rate), dated 14-11-2017 and Notification No. 31/2017 of TGST Act in G.O.Ms. No. 23-11-2017 does not arise. 4. The alternate argument put forth by the applicant during the time of personal hearing is that even if the contract is treated as Composite supply other than 'Works Contract', the predominant and the object of the contract is 'transportation of goods' in a vessel i.e. container on which GST rate 5% (2.5% + 2.5%) is applicable and hence the applicant pleaded for the ruling of the same. 5. The Sl. No. 9 of the Notification No. 11/2017-Centra1 Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 is extract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alled. 2.5 Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)] (iv) Transport of goods in containers by rail by any person other than Indian Railways. 6 – (v) Goods transport services other than (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above. 9 – 6. The Tariff Heading 9965 (Goods transport services) specified against Sl. No. 9 covers five categories of services of goods transport. The claim of the applicant is that their composite supply falls under 'Transport of goods in a vessel.' Specified at (ii) under column (3) against Sl. No. 9. The said category of transport covers goods transport in a vessel. The 'vessel' referred to in the above said notification means ship/ large boat used for transport of goods by sea/inland waters. Hence the case on hand do not fall under '(ii) Transport of goods in a vessel.' as claimed by the applicant. The word 'vessel' has been defined u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

olumn (3) against Tariff Heading 9965 (Goods transport services) in the Notification No. 11/2017. 8. Thus in view of the above discussion, and the service rendered by the applicant being a composite supply with three components of services viz., (i) excavation of sand at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage, (ii) transportation of such excavated sand to stockyard nd (iii) loading of the sand into lorries at the stockyard; and the principle supply being excavation of sand as mentioned in the scope of work of the agreement between the applicant and TSMDC, theservices rendered by the applicant are classifiable as Excavating and Earthmoving Services under Heading 995433 of GST tariff and rate of tax applicable is 9% CGST + 9% SGST. II. Opinion expressed by the member representing State Tax: Facts: (a) The applicant is a contractor to Telangana State Mineral Development Corporation Limited (TSMDC). TSMDC has entrusted the following work to the applicant: Tender Document Reference: TSMDC/SAN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ding cost of sand from Stockyard to lorries: 30% Agreement Dated 18-3-2017: Contractee: TSMD Corporation – Contractor: R. Vidya Sagar Rao – Partnership firm) Contractee accepted the tender submitted by the Contractor, who emerged as L1 Bidder by quoting ₹ 74.36 per CBM of sand for excavation of 15,60,000 CBM of sand from over an extent of 52 Ha. At submerged areas of Annaram Barrage, Kaleswaram Project and transport the same quantity of sand nearby Stockyard and again loading of sand into the lorries at Stockyard…….Page 2 & 3. Laying roads: It is the sole responsibility of the Contractor to lay/ form required road from stockyard to nearby connectivity road for plying of lorries/vehicles, any incidental expenditure incurred and involved for laying & maintenance of roads shall be borne by the Contractor…… Page 8. Letter of intent dated 27-1-2017: At its page 1 the acceptance of price for CBM consisting the above contract fixed at ₹ 74.36 and accepted and commu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of Section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, involving predominantly earth work (that is, constituting more than 75 percent. of the value of the works contract) provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory, local authority, a Governmental Authority or a Government Entity. 2.5 Provided that where the services are supplied to a Government Entity, they should have been procured by the said entity in relation to a work entrusted to it by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority, as the case may be 2. Secondly, he states the supply being composite supply it is Goods Transportation supply on vessel as per notification No. 11/2017, dated 28-6-2017 as per G.O.Ms No. 110, Revenue (CT-II) Department, dated 29-6-2017, which is as under : Sl. No. Chapter, Section or Heading Description of Service Rate (percent.) Condition (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 9 Heading 9965 (Goods transport services) (i) Transport of goods by rail [other

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an Indian Railways. 6 – (v) Goods transport services other than (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above. 9 Analysis of the facts & Conclusions: 1. Before proceeding further, it needs to kept in view that in ₹ 74/- the same ratios as mentioned above are there for the independent components of supplies since there is no change in the denoted supplies in the tender and the agreement, the change is in overall price only. Basis for the agreement is the tender and such fact is not to be ignored. 2. For brevity in the foregoing paragraphs, TSMDC is referred to as 'receiver' and the applicant is as 'provider'. 3. In order to address the above questions, it is necessary to examine whether or not the work entrusted to the provider by the receiver is just for a supply simplicitor or does it involved with more than one 'supply' viz.: in combination of supply of goods and supply of services or 'supply of different services joined together' in the event of which the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of excavation as such and the same is to be ascertained out of ₹ 30/- referred for loading charges for machinery at reach i.e. source where from the sand acquired. Such fact makes it clear that out such ₹ 30/- only a portion whatsoever is to be apportioned excavating sand from the source and the rest such would remains to be for loading the sand so culled out to the machinery available for transportation. 6. Therefore the first part being the excavation and loading work in this contract. This activity to be started with laying ramps and roads to enable the containers in which the excavated sand is to be loaded reach the resource of sand. As the provider only to do this job with his cost which means it is to be born out of ₹ 74…agreed upon between him and the recipient. 7. Therefore, formation of these ramps and roads in which supply of goods and services involved which amount to composite supply of works contract as defined under Section 2(119) of the Act. Such WCT

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ontractual terms it is very clear that this service is to be done by the provider only. Then only the so loaded lorries would ply on the so formed roads which needs to be maintained by the provider only Hence the last actions of the provider ends with maintenance of roads formed by him only which too require men and material/ service and labour which again amounts to Works contract. These roads also facilitate the transportation of sand. 12. Important to notice laying ramps and roads and maintenance thereof is not for the provider himself but it is a part of the whole activity. 13. Thus formation of ramps, internal roads, formation of external roads and their maintenance are works contract only but they are facilitating supplies to the main supply of transportation of sand from one place to other. Hence, transportation of goods needs aid of laying ramps and roads rather than the excavation needing laying of ramps and roads. 14. In view of the above analysis, the request of the applican

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In a composite supply the taxability under the scheme of the Act is on the basis of principle supply 18. Sub-section (30) of Section 2 of the TGST Act, 'Composite supply' is defined as: composite supply means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply"; Example in for composite supply under the Act is as under : Illustration: Where goods are packed and transported with insurance, the supply of goods, packing materials, transport and insurance is a composite supply and supply of goods is a principal supply. 19. A plain reading of the above definition makes it clear that 'Composite supply' is one which consists more than one supply naturally bundled to each other and the example given above is one for the same amongst the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of services and it is possible in these types of contracts. 22. The intention behind the contract is to shift the goods viz. sand from one place to other distinguishable from 'excavation' simplicitor. 23. The value of transportation being 32.5% and the value 7.5% i.e. of formation of internal ramps and roads and external roads and their maintenance which are interlinked and for transportation of sand put together comes to 45%. 24. Here, it is pertinent to go through the Section 8 of TGST Act, 2017: Section 8. The tax liability on a composite or a mixed supply shall be determined in the following manner, namely: – (a) a composite supply comprising two or more supplies, one of which is a principal supply, shall be treated as a supply of such principal supply; and (b) a mixed supply comprising two or more supplies shall be treated as a supply of that particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax. 25. A careful reading of the above Section and keeping in view of the abov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)] (iii) Services of goods transport agency (GTA) in relation to transportation of goods (including used household goods for personal use). Explanation. – goods transport agency means any person who provides service in relation to transport of goods by road and issues consignment note, by whatever name called. 2.5 Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)] (iv) Transport of goods in containers by rail by any person other than Indian Railways. 6 – (v) Goods transport services other than (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above. 9 28. The applicant is not engaged in transpiration of goods or passengers by rail, not engaged as a Goods Transport Agency also. 29. The left over tariffs are Transportation of goods by Vessel i.e. 2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST, or 18% under residuary entry. 30. The applicant stated in the application for ruling and als

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r carry the disentitlement of input tax credit and the latter carries no such disentitlement. 35. In view of the above discussion, and the service rendered by the applicant supply with the components of services viz, (i) Laying internal ramps and roads, (ii) excavation of sand at submergence areas of Annaram Barrage, (iii) transportation of such excavated sand to stockyard and (iv) loading of the sand into lorries at the stockyard; and laying and maintenance of external roads within the price of ₹ 74/- per CBM is a composite supply and the principal supply being transportation of sand 'scope of work' of the agreement between the applicant and TSMDC, the services rendered by the applicant are classifiable as Goods Transporting by Vessel and GST tariff and rate of tax applicable is 2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST subject to condition that the applicant not entitled to ITC to the extent mentioned in the proviso in column 5 of (v) entry as mentioned above as per G.O.Ms No. 110, Revenue

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC wrongly availed

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Ankit TMI – Dated:- 5-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 8-6-2018 – What are the interest and penal liability in case a supplier has wrongly availed CGST / SGST credit against IGST. However, the same has been reversed before utilisation. Kindly quote specific section that affects the said scenario. Thanks – Reply By YAGAY and SUN – The Reply = If interest @24% is paid along with reversal of ITC which was wrongly availed before issuance of SCN then there would be no penal actions initiated by the Department. – Reply By Ankit TMI – The Reply = Thanks you sir for your response. Can you please help me out with exact provision which levy interest in such a scenario. Is your reply is in context of mismatch under Se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PORT CODE for GSTR 1 EXPORT Sheet

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – VIRAL SHAH – Dated:- 5-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 6-6-2018 – What is the port code for following transactionI am doing retail export from Indian Post ( i.e. sending parcels out of India through Indian Speed Post)Indian Post not giving me any Shipping Bill. – Reply By YAGAY and SUN – The Reply = Please check the following links for the details http://accmumbai.gov.in/aircargo/import/faq.html Further, vide Customs Notification No. 48/2018 dtd. 04th June 2018 Exports by Post Regulations, 2018 has been notified by the Hon ble under Secretary to the Government of India. These Regulations shall apply to export of goods by any person, holding a valid Import-Export Code issued by the Director General of Forei

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Chennai Ferrous Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & CCE (Chennai Outer Commissionerate)

2018 (6) TMI 325 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – Refund of double payment of duty made – For the month of June, 2014, the appellant paid duty of ₹ 17,44,041/- vide challan dated 02.02.2014, in the name of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries inadvertently. On realising the mistake on the same date, they paid the amount of ₹ 17,44,041/- in their own name – The refund has been denied stating that the amount so paid is lying in the PLA account of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries and, therefore, the appellant is not eligible for refund.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court of Madras, in the case of M/s. Sundaram Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE Madurai [2015 (5) TMI 416 – MADRAS HIGH COURT], had considered a similar issue, and on production of No Objection letter from the company concerned, it was held by the High Court that refund has to be granted – In the present case also, the disclaimer certificate furnished by the appellant along with the refund claim – rejection of refund is without any lega

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hk Steel Industries inadvertently. On realising the mistake on the same date, they paid the amount of ₹ 17,44,041/- in their own name. Pursuant to such double payment by the appellants, they filed the refund claim. Show Cause Notice was issued, proposing to reject the claim which, after due process of law, the original authority rejected. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence, this appeal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, the learned Counsel Shri S. Venkatachalam, submitted that the appellant has produced the bank statement to show that on 07.07.2014 the amount was wrongly paid into the Central Excise Account of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries Ltd. On realizing the mistake on the very same day, the appellant had paid the amount to their own Central Excise Account/ECC. The refund has been denied stating that the amount so paid is lying in the PLA account of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries and, therefore, the appellant is not eligible for refund. He adverted to par

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sponge Iron Division) 6. The only ground on which the refund has been rejected is that the amount is lying in the PLA account of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries and, therefore, without proper No Objection Certificate from the said company the appellant cannot be granted refund. The Hon ble High Court of Madras, in the case of M/s. Sundaram Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE Madurai 2015 (321) ELT 37 (Madras), had considered a similar issue, and on production of No Objection letter from the company concerned, it was held by the High Court that refund has to be granted. In the present case also, the disclaimer certificate furnished by the appellant along with the refund claim, reads as under: We hereby undertake that the amount of refund Viz., ₹ 17,44,041-00 (Rupees Seventeen lacks fourty four thousand fourty one only ) will not be claimed by us. The same may please be refunded to CHENNAI FERROUS INDUSTRIES LTD., Gummidipoondi. 7. Thus, it is stated by M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries Ltd. that th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Waiver Of Late Fee For Failure To Furnish Return In Form Gstr-3b

GST – States – G.O.Ms.No. 290 – Dated:- 5-6-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REVENUE (COMMERCIAL TAXES-II) DEPARTMENT G.O.Ms.No.290, Dated: 05-06-2018 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No.16 of 2017), the Government, on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council, hereby waives the late fee payable under Section 47 of the said Act for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B by the due

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mukesh Mulji Shah, Retired Partner of M/s. Mukesh Dye Works Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Central GST and ors.

2018 (7) TMI 328 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – 2018 (362) E.L.T. 993 (Bom.) – Attachment of Bank Property – penalty u/r 209A of the Central Excise Rules 1944 – petitioner retired from the firm but penalty was levied on the petitioner as a partner of M/s. Mukesh Dye Works – Held that:- Once that order is set aside and in which it included a personal penalty of ₹ 2 lakhs, we do not see how the Department can pursue that demand by attaching the bank account of the petitioner. More so, the petitioner's retirement from the firm with effect from 27th April 1990 is undisputed. Therefore, the request to the petitioner to pay a sum which is of ₹ 2 lakhs, but as a penalty under the order in original which was set aside does not arise at all. All that the petitioner is liable to pay is the balance sum stated before us by Mr. Dharmadhikari – petition disposed off. – Writ Petition No. 12216 of 2017 Dated:- 5-6-2018 – S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H.DANGRE, JJ. Mr. Hemant G. Dharmadhik

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ership firm has no existence independent that of the partner and that the partner until his retirement or resignation continues to be liable, still, the firm challenged the order of adjudication in appeal. That order in original was set aside by the Tribunal. Thereafter, the demand of tax did not survive. If the demand of tax or the liability or debt in that behalf did not survive, there was no question of imposition of any penalty. Hence, the penalty also does not survive. 4. As far as the past dues of the department is concerned from two bank accounts, a sum of ₹ 4,74,000/has already been appropriated or adjusted by the Revenue and the balance sum is of ₹ 7,76,708/which the petitioner will pay in a period of six months, but on payment, the attachment be raised. 5. On all these factual matters and aspects, we do not find that in the affidavit in reply, the respondents have brought material controverting it. In fact, it is stated that an order in original was passed confirm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

was set aside by the Tribunal. 6. Once that order is set aside and in which it included a personal penalty of ₹ 2 lakhs, we do not see how the Department can pursue that demand by attaching the bank account of the petitioner. More so, the petitioner's retirement from the firm with effect from 27th April 1990 is undisputed. Therefore, the request to the petitioner to pay a sum which is of ₹ 2 lakhs, but as a penalty under the order in original which was set aside does not arise at all. All that the petitioner is liable to pay is the balance sum stated before us by Mr. Dharmadhikari. 7. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to pay the balance sum as computed above within a period of three months from today and report compliance to the Commissioner. In the event compliance is reported, the attachment of the bank account shall stand raised and thereafter, the petitioner shall operate the said bank account. In t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments in the Order No. D.C.(A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8, dated the 10th October 2017.

GST – States – D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 – Dated:- 5-6-2018 – COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE, GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010, dated the 5th June 2018. Order No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 5 read with clause (91) of section 2 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Commissioner of State Tax, Maharashtra State, hereby with effe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments in the Order No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 dated the 10th October 2017

GST – States – D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 – Dated:- 5-6-2018 – COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010, dated the 5th June 2018. Order MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 5 read with clause (91) of section 2 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Commissioner of S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendments in the Order No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 dated the 10th October 2017

GST – States – D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8 – Dated:- 5-6-2018 – COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE, GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010, dated the 5th June 2018. Order MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. D.C. (A&R)-2/GST/PWR/Sections/2017-18/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 5 read with clause (91) of section 2 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Commissioner of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST & CCE, Trichy Versus M/s. EID Parry India Limited

2018 (8) TMI 1494 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – 100 % EOU – Exit from the 100% EOU scheme – duty liability to be paid by the appellants on in-process goods lying in stock – Held that:- The ratio laid down by the Tribunal in Tirumala Seung Han Textiles Ltd. [2008 (9) TMI 252 – CESTAT BANGALORE] will apply on all fours to the appeal on hand, where it was held that when appellant is opting out of scheme, demand in respect of in-process goods not justified – appeal dismissed – decided against Revenue. – E/713/2010 & E/CO/71/2010 – FINAL ORDER No. 41754/2018 – Dated:- 5-6-2018 – Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) And Shri P. Dinesha, Member (Judicial) Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AR) for the Appellant Ms. Cynduja Crishnan, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER Per: Madhu Mohan Damodhar The respondents were a 100 % EOU manufacturing neem based pesticides and organic fertilizers out of raw materials procured indigenously. They applied for exit from 100% EOU scheme for which the Developmen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nfirmed by the original authority. The Revenue has come in appeal against the setting aside of the demand in respect of the in-process materials. Respondents have also filed cross-objection against upholding of the remaining demand amounting to ₹ 88,97,261/-. 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, the Ld. AR Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC, reiterated the grounds of appeal. He drew our attention to Chapter 22 of the Central Excise & Customs Manual as per which, apart from the finished goods, raw materials and semi-finished goods, which were lying at the time of debonding had to be cleared on payment of duty. The Ld. AR further submits that the goods in-process are nothing but semi-finished goods. 3. For the respondents, Ld. Advocate, Ms. Cynduja Crishnan, submits that appellant is not pressing the prayers made in the cross-objection with respect to duty demand upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, in respect of the demand made in respect of in-process goods, she po

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

indigenous capital goods, raw materials, components, consumables, spares and finished goods in stock are mentioned. There is no mention about the in-process goods. In the absence of the mention of the in-process goods in the policy, there is no authority for demanding duty on the in-process goods. Hence, we set aside the demand of duty on the in-process goods. As informed by the Ld. Advocate, the appeal filed by the department against this decision has been dismissed by the Hon ble High Court of AP. 6. We do not find any new grounds or reasons to deviate from the ratio already laid down in Tirumala Seung Han Textiles Ltd. (supra). 7. In the event, there is no infirmity in the order of the lower appellate authority, for which reason the department appeal is dismissed. 8. The cross-objections filed by the respondent are dismissed as not pressed. (Order dictated and pronounced in the open Court) – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements – Orders – Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Unimech Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Coimbatore

2018 (8) TMI 1573 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – CENVAT credit – input services – GTA Service – place of removal – Held that:- The definition of input service underwent an amendment from 1.4.2008 where the words “from place of removal” was substituted with “upto place of removal” – the GTA services upto the buyer’s premises would not be eligible after 1.4.2008 – appellant would not be eligible for credit on outward transport upto buyers premises after 1.4.2008.

CENVAT credit – inward transportation – time limitation – Held that:- The department has failed to adduce any evidence to establish that the appellants have evaded duty by suppressing facts. Hence, appeal succeeds on limitation – appellant is liable to pay duty for the two months period beyond the normal period. – However, that being an interpretational issue, the penalty in respect of these months cannot sustain.

Appeal allowed in part. – Appeal No. E/42488/2017 – Final Order No. 41719/2018 – Dated:- 5-6-2018 – Ms. Sulek

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

before as well as after 1.4.2008. The issue with regard to the eligibility of credit on GTA service used for transportation of goods from the place of removal to buyer s premises has been considered in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Vs. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. – 2018 (9) GSTL 33 (SC). He submitted that the Hon ble Supreme Court has held that prior to 1.4.2008, an assessee would be eligible for credit of GTA service upto the buyer s premises whereas after 1.4.2008, the same would not be eligible pursuant to the amendment. It was also argued by him that the department has raised the demand disallowing the credit on inward transportation also. The definition of input service is very much clear that all the services which are used in or in relation to manufacture are eligible for credit. The inward transportation was used for bringing the inputs into the factory and therefore such activities being directly related to the activity of manufacturing, credit cannot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ute, the decision laid down in the case of ABB Ltd. as well as Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. was in force and therefore the appellant had availed the credit on the bonafide belief that they are eligible for credit. Only after the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra), the same has been held to be not eligible. The argument of the ld. Counsel is not without substance. The issue was in litigation and being an interpretational issue, it cannot be said that the appellants have suppressed facts to evade payment of duty. The department has failed to adduce any evidence to establish that the appellants have evaded duty by suppressing facts. Hence, appeal succeeds on limitation. The appellant is liable to pay duty for the two months period beyond the normal period. However, that being an interpretational issue, the penalty in respect of these months cannot sustain. 7. In the result, the impugned order is modified to the extent of setting aside the demand on the g

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Krishna Enterprises Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others

2018 (9) TMI 367 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 42 (All) – Seizure of goods – seizure order does not disclose the specific provision of law which has been violated in transporting the goods – Held that:- Learned Standing Counsel may seek instructions in the matter and file counter affidavit within a month. The petitioner may file rejoinder affidavit, if any, within two weeks thereafter – In the meantime the goods seized along with vehicle shall be released forthwith on furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of tax and penalty imposed. – WRIT TAX No. 904 of 2018 Dated:- 5-6-2018 – Mr. Pankaj Mithal and Mr. Jayant Banerji, JJ. Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Pandey Counsel for Respondent :-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: IMS Proschool Pvt. Ltd.

2018 (10) TMI 681 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 241 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of education services rendered by appellant – Appellant is approved by National Skill Development Corporation – National Skill Development Programme – whether merit classification under HSN 9992 or otherwise? – exemption under N/N. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017.

Whether educational courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC? – whether they are eligible for exemption from GST as per Serial No. 69 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 and if so, in respect of which services being provided by them would they be eligible for exemption under Sr.No. 69 of the above said Notification?

The Applicant offers certain educational courses for which qualificatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant?

If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 17/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions?

Whether the NSDC approved educational courses which are actually imparted by the business partners of the Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant as sub-contractor of Applicant, at various centres located across the country, will be considered as offered by the Applicant?

If answer to Q.6 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 17/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant?

Held that:- NSDC was set up as a part of National Skill Development Mission to fulfil the growing need in India for skilled manpower across sectors and narrow the existing gap between the demand and supply of skills. Its ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

exemption as given at Sr. NO. 69 of Notification 12/2017-CT (Rate) as claimed to be applicable by the applicant in the present case is in respect of any services provided by a training partner approved by the NSDC or the Sector Skill Council in relation to the National Skill Development Program implemented by the NSDC or any other scheme implemented by the NSDC.

The objective of the National Policy on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, 2015 will be to meet the challenge of skilling at scale with speed and standard (quality). It will aim to provide an umbrella framework to all skilling activities being carried out within the country, to align them to common standards and link the skilling with demand centres. In addition to laying down the objectives and expected outcomes, the effort will also be to identify the various institutional frameworks which can act as the vehicle to reach the expected outcomes. The national policy will also provide clarity and coherence on how skil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e ‘Skill Development Programme’ it becomes National Skill development Programme and it limits its scope and restricts it only to the activities/ efforts that are undertaken through Government funding, Government Schemes and specifically designed Government Programmes – National Skill Development Programme would consist of the schemes, actions and deeds that are actually done or are mandated to be done by various ministries, Government departments or their attached offices, Directorates or other institutions as per their instructions and for which expenses in that regard are to be incurred by the Central or State Governments through budgetary provisions.

The intent of the Notification No. 12/2017-CT provides that exemption would be available only in respect of “Any services provided by a Training partner approved by National Skill Development Corporation in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the NSDC.

If the intent of the Legislature had be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.

The Educational courses for which qualification standards / framework i.e. QP/ NOS has not been defined by NSDC will not be treated as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.

The modified version of NSDC approved educational courses will not be treated as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC.

The benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 14/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would not be available to the Applicant.

The Benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 17/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would not be available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions.

Other questions not answered. – GST-ARA-37/2017-18/B-44 Dated:- 5-6-2018 – SHRI B.V. BORHADE AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l courses and are eventually approved by NSDC, whether such courses will be treated as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC? Q.3.- In certain situations, NSDC approved educational courses are subsequently, upgraded by the Applicant within pre-defined QP/ NOS framework, by way of adding more topics/ content/modules. However, such modified version of NSDC approved educational courses have not been approved by NSDC yet. Whether such modified version will be treated as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC? Q.4.- If the answer to Q.1, Q.2 and Q.3 are Yes, then whether the benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant? Q.5.- If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corpor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

T ACT . 02. FACTS AND CONTENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus – STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS HAVING A BEARING ON THE OUESTION(S) ON WHICH ADVANCE RULING IS REOUIRED. II.1 IMS Proschool Pvt Ltd, the Applicant is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Mumbai, Maharashtra. II.2 The Applicant is an initiative of IMS Learning Resources and offers educational training and skilling courses through classroom training and virtual coaching, in many areas such as data science, digital marketing, IFRS, ACCA, Fitter – Mechanical Assembly, Basic Electrical, Sales Person Retail etc. across many cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad, Gurgaon, Kochi and several districts of Gujarat. II.3 The Applicant is engaged, in the business of skilling the youth with the objective of helping them find decent job, make them employable and to help them earn better living. This inc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uals, corporates. II.6 Applicant is an approved training partner of NSDC and till date, 12 educational courses offered by it have been approved by NSDC. Further, 2 educational courses for which QP/NOS have not been defined by NSDC yet, have been conditionally approved by NSDC. All such courses offered by the Applicant are directed for skill development and to increase employability in India. II.7 The Applicant has tie-ups with various educational institutes / Govt. organizations, including NSDC, National Stock Exchange Academy, Symbiosis International University, Indira Institute of Management, Lovely Professional University, Chartered Financial Institute, Chartered Institute of Management Accountant. II.8 Applicant has obtained registration under Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as GST ) regime in states of Maharashtra, Haryana, New Delhi, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Gujarat. STATEMENT CONTAINING APPLICANT S INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND OR FACTS AS THE CASE

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onal technical, vocational educational courses such as NCFM Financial Modelling, Financial Analysis, Management Accounting, Financial Planning, Business Analytics and various other post graduate programs in areas of finance, business analytics and marketing as well as technical programs such as Fitter, Basic Electrical and Sales Person Retail. Under GST law, the said education services rendered by the Applicant merit classification under HSN 9992. IV.3. The Applicant is also, an approved training partner of NSDC. The certificate in relation thereto, has been enclosed herewith as Exhibit 2. IV.4. The following educational courses (hereinafter referred to as approved educational courses ) till date, have been already approved by NSDC: (1) Financial modelling (2) Financial analyst (3) Management accounting (4) Strategic management accounting (5) Business accounting (6) Financial planning (7) Business analytics (8) Sales person retail (9) Basic electrical training (10 CGSC Fitter Mechanica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

any other Scheme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation transaction. Copy of the Notification has been enclosed herewith as Exhibit 4. IV.5. On simple reading of the Notification, it is apparent that GST exemption is available to an approved training partner of NSDC, only if education services rendered by such partner, is in relation to: (i) the National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC; or (ii) a vocational skill development course under the National Skill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme; or (iii) any other Scheme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation IV.6. The Applicant would like to submit that the Scheme mentioned above under Sr. No. (ii) and (iii), has been specifically implemented by the respective Govt. department /organisation. For example, NSDC has implemented various Schemes such as PMKK, PMKVY, Udaan, International Skill Training, etc., which would get covered under Sr. No. (iii) mentioned above. Further, variou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

duce unemployment in India and to fulfil the growing need of skilled manpower across various industries and sectors. Role of NSDC is to act as a catalyst for creation of quality skills training institutions across the country and also, to support private sector initiatives for skill development. IV.9. NSDC partners with various training institutions to achieve its mission and objectives of elevating skilled manpower. In this regard, NSDC develops partnerships with multiple stakeholders and build on current efforts of such stakeholders, rather than undertaking initiatives directly and duplicating efforts. IV.10. It is evident from the above that, NSDC to achieve its objectives, does not undertake / implement any schemes, programmes on its own, rather, it has partnered with various training institutions imparting training courses /programmes related to skill development. IV-11. Basis the information available on NSDC portal (hereinafter referred to as SDMS ), we understand that the educa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2012, notified by Ministry of Human Resource Development is enclosed herewith as Exhibit-5 . IV.12. On SDMS (i.e. NSDC portal related to skill development educational courses), QP / NOS for each type of job role within identified skill sector has been mentioned. Since there are innumerable job roles and defining QP / NOS is a continuing task hence, QP/ NOS for many job roles have already been defined by NSDC and for many other job roles, they are yet to outline QP / NOS. IV.13. NSDC training partners are required to align their education courses with defined QP / NOS within identified skill sector. Accordingly, at time of seeking approval for educational courses, each NSDC training partner is required to give an affidavit / declaration to NSDC, giving reference of pre-defined QP / NOS to demonstrate alignment of such course with that is contained in such educational courses. IV.14. Having said that, the Applicant would like to submit that keeping in mind the objective of NSDC of focus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Development and Entrepreneurship ( MSDE ). IV.17. In this connection, for each month, quarter, financial year, in relation to each of the approved educational courses, the Applicant is required to report and upload the following details, on the SDMS (NSDC portal): Applicant s progress towards yearly skill achievement targets; Annual and monthly performance of the Applicant such as number of students enrolled, trained, placed, up- skilled; Quarterly and yearly training and placements achievements of the Applicant; Details of each and every student who was enrolled with the Applicant such as personal details, date of enrolment, date of passing out, batch start and end date, training status, etc.; Status of active and inactive educational centres of the Applicant; Details of corporate training programs; Details of any other skilling schemes The documentary evidence of sharing the aforesaid information by the Applicant with NSDC has been enclosed herewith as Exhibit-8 . IV.18. Further, NS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

information of actual training and placements, comparison of yearly targets with the skill development achievements of approved training partners, are being undertaken by NSDC because it has not announced any programme which would be implemented by NSDC itself, to achieve its objectives of enhancing skilled manpower and reducing unemployment in India. Since, NSDC partners with training institutions and does not undertake any training programmes itself, therefore, achievement of approved training partners would be counted as accomplishment of the said objectives of NSDC. Accordingly, all the approved educational courses conducted by the Applicant should be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC. I. Question Of law: (2) The Applicant offers certain educational courses for which qualification standards / framework i.e. QP/ NOS has not been defined by NSDC and will be approved by NSDC as and when the relevant QP/ NOS would be defined by NSDC. I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

assurance framework that outlines different type of skill standards, a person should possess for a given job role and also, outlines learning outcomes to ensure particular target level of skill has been achieved in a training program. In this regard, NSDC has defined NOS / QP for many job roles. Such QP / NOS should be aligned to educational courses imparted by NSDC training partners. NSDC has defined QP / NOS for many job roles and they are in in process to outline QP / NOS for other job roles. NSDC s educational course approval process V.3. In connection to job role / educational course for which NOS / QPs has been already defined by NSDC, for the purpose of obtaining approval from NSDC, the approved training partner of NSDC is required to align their educational courses as per the listed QPs / NOS. V.4. At present, the step-by-step NSDC course approval process is explained by way of below flow chart: Identify QP on NSDC website for which course needs to be aligned Prepare affidavit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from NSDC for such courses. V.6. Therefore, both such courses have been conditionally approved by NSDC (hereinafter referred to as exceptional approved educational courses ) and the approval status of such courses appear as exception on the SDMS. Copy of the affidavit submitted to NSDC in relation to exceptional approved educational courses and the screenshot of the approval status of such course on SDMS appearing as exception, have been enclosed herewith as Exhibit-9 . V.7. The Applicant would like to submit that such exceptional approved educational courses are aimed to develop the skills of the candidates and help them to find a job or better job role. Further, the Company while reporting its achievement of skill developments targets to NSDC includes details of such courses as well. V.8. Given this, the Applicant is of the opinion that such courses are directed towards the objectives of NSDC of skill development and reducing unemployment in India and accordingly, should be equated a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ional Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC VI.2. For the purpose of remaining competitive in this evolving and dynamic world, the Applicant keeps on upgrading, modifying, adding variants to its already approved educational courses, by way of adding more topics/ modules / content to the same. As result of such modification, the basic premise of such modified courses remains constant, existing modules are not deleted from it, only, supplementary modules / programs are added to it and aligned with corresponding pre-defined QP/ NOS, in order to make the same, lucrative to the candidates, educational institutions, corporates, etc. VI.3. The Applicant has obtained approval from NSDC at inception however, subsequent to up- gradation, in connection with such modified versions of already existing approved educational courses, the Applicant is yet to receive approval from NSDC. VI.4. The Applicant would like to submit that the aforesaid modifications to the already approved educationa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be available to the Applicant? VII.1. The Applicant submits that in the present case, the Advance Ruling sought by the Applicant relates to the matter as to: If the answer to Q.1, Q.2 and Q.3 are Yes, then, whether the benefit of GST exemption as per notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant GST Notification VII.2. Entry 69 to the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June provides that: Education services (specified under HSN 9992) provided by: (a) the National Skill Development Corporation set up by the Government of India; (b) a Sector Skill Council approved by the National Skill Development Corporation; (c) an assessment agency approved by the Sector Skill Council or the National Skill Development Corporation; (d) a training partner approved by the National Skill Development Corporation or the Sector Skill Council in relation to- (i) the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the Nationa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. VII.6. Since, the approved educational courses including modified versions and conditional approved educational courses offered, by the Applicant who is an approved training partner of NSDC, are in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC therefore, the Applicant would like to submit that it is eligible for GST exemption in connection with such educational courses, in terms of the Notification. Question of law: (5) If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per notification No. 14/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions? VIII.1. The Applicant submits that in the present case, the Advance Ruling sought by the Applicant relates to the matter as to: If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to whom services should be provided so that the benefit of the Notification would be available. The Notification does not specify that the services should be rendered by the approved training partner of NSDC, to individuals or to corporates or to colleges or to Govt. organisations, for availing GST exemption. VIII.5. Accordingly, in absence of any such restriction it is evident that as long as the educational courses offered by the approved training partner are in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC, GST exemption would be available, irrespective of constitution of the recipient. VIII.6. The Applicant would like to submit that the educational courses which have been approved by NSDC and are reported to NSDC towards achievements of skill development targets of the Applicant and are in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC, regardless of being offered to business corporates or colleges or individuals and GST exempti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uch business partners has been appointed by the Applicant with the intention of increasing business and to manage its centers effectively and efficiently. IX.3. The business partners would provide infrastructural and other support services to the Applicant, for agreed fees. In this connection, the Applicant has entered into an agreement with business partners namely, Business Partner Agreement, wherein the scope of services rendered by business partners, responsibility and obligations of both namely, the business partners and the Applicant and other terms and conditions have been listed. Sample copy of the Business Partner Agreement and corresponding invoices raised by such business partners upon the Applicant have been enclosed herewith as Exhibit-10 . IX.4. The key features of the Business Agreement are elucidated below: business partner to conduct educational courses and training services for specified courses, under the instructions of the Applicant, in the designated area, for def

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssist business partner in preparing time table for programme and services to be rendered in connection therewith. The Applicant shall provide students course material application form, brochure, advertisement materials, student s identity card, login credentials to access course material electronically, to the business partner who in turn will give the same to the students. Business partner is required to maintain financial and Other records in the specified format, as required by the Applicant. The premises that will be used by business partner under the said agreement would be acquired by the Applicant, under a lease arrangement. In other words, the centre will be taken on lease basis for which lease agreement is in the name of the Applicant and the lease rentals will be paid by the Applicant. Business partner is required to make available requisite infrastructure such as office, classroom library, furniture, electricity, other amenities in the specified area as approved by the Appli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

business partner on behalf of the Applicant. In case of any issues, problems, issues faced by the students in course of training, the Applicant would be legally obligated to resolve the same. Copy of the following have been enclosed herewith as Exhibit 11 : agreement entered into between faculty and the Applicant, sample copy of invoice issued by such faculty upon the Applicant, lease agreement between landlord and the Applicant, sample copy of rent receipt issued by such landlord upon the Applicant. IX.6. On simple reading of the aforesaid, it is clearly evident that by and large, all the activities related to the centres run by business partners such as managing faculty, marketing, leasing of centres premises, providing educational materials, etc. are the responsibilities of the Applicant. Applicant has partnered with the business partner to share few of its obligations such as to provide educational courses to students using the materials, curriculum provided by the Applicant and u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.10. Since the educational courses imparted by business partners are on behalf of the Applicant, accordingly, such educational courses should be construed as being offered and conducted by the Applicant itself. IX.11. The Applicant would like to submit that the education courses which are conducted at centres managed and run by the business partner on behalf of the Applicant, are the same courses which have either been approved or conditionally approved by NSDC or the upgraded versions of such courses. Therefore, every year the Applicant has included such courses while reporting achievement of its skill development targets to NSDC and NSDC has not raised any objection to such inclusion. IX.12. Therefore, education courses imparted at centres by business partners on behalf of the Applicant should be construed as in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the NSDC and GST exemption should be available on the same. V. Question of law: (7) If answer to Q.6 is Ye

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a Sector Skill Council approved by the National Skill Development Corporation; (c) an assessment agency approved by the Sector Skill Council or the National Skill Development Corporation; (d) a training partner approved by the National Skill Development Corporation or the Sector Skill Council in relation to- (i) the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation; or (ii) a vocational skill development course under the National Skill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme; or (iii) any other Scheme implemented by the National Skill Development Corporation transaction X.4. Since, the educational courses by the Applicant through business partners, are in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC therefore, the Applicant is eligible for GST exemption in connection with such educational courses, in terms of the Notification. PRAYER IN ADVANCE RULING Given the facts and circumstances, the Applicant prays before the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

deems fit, proper and reasonable, on the facts of the case, may be granted. The Applicant be granted the opportunity of a personal hearing. 03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus- IMS Proschool Pvt Ltd the applicant is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Mumbai, Maharashtra. The Applicant is an initiative of IMS Learning Resources and offers educational training and skilling courses through classroom training and virtual coaching, in many areas such as data science. Digital marketing, IFRS, ACCA, Fitter-Mechanical Assembly, Basic Electrical, Sales Person Retail etc. across many cities in India Including Mumbai, Pune, Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad, Gurgaon, Kochi and several districts of Gujarat. The Applicant is engaged, in the business of skilling the youth with the objective of helping them find decent job, make them employable and to help them earn better living

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rporates. The Applicants is an approved training partner of NSDC and till date, 12 educational courses offered by it have been approved by NSDC. Further, 2 educational courses for which QP/NOS have not been defined by NSDC yet, have been conditionally approved by NSDC. All such courses offered by the Applicant are directed for skill development and to increase employability in India. The Applicant has tie-ups with various educational institutes/Govt. organizations, including NSDC.. National Stock Exchange Academy, Symbiosis International University, Indira Institute of Management, Lovely Professional University, Chartered Financial Institute, Chartered Institute of Management Accountant. The applicant has raised following query:- Qs.No. Questions raised by the applicant Submission as per ACT & RULE 1. Whether educational courses offered by the applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a Sales Associate, one of the NOS would be to To help customers choose right products QPs – A set of NOSs, aligned to a job role, called Qualification Packs (QPs), would be available for every job role in each industry sector. These drive both the creation of curriculum, and assessments. These job roles would be at various proficiency levels, and aligned to the NSQF. Example would be Qualification Pack of a Sales Associate Sector Skill Councils are responsible for the creation of QPs and NOSs. These Occupational Standards are open for public viewing for a month on http://www.nsdcindia.org/nos. All those who have participated in development and validation of standards as well as the industry are informed by the SSC that the Occupational Standards have been published for comments. All comments/ feedback received during the period will be responded to by respective Sector Skill Council under intimation to NSDC. After one month of public viewing, these standards Will be promulgated as Nati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to co orates and business institutions? No. 6. Whether the NSDC approved educational courses which are actually imparted by the business partners of the Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant as sub-contractor of Applicant, at various centers located across the country, will be considered as offered by the Applicants? Should be approved by the NSDC not for sub-contract of the applicant. 7. If answer to Q.6 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the applicant? Should be approved by the NSDC not for sub-contract of the applicant. NSDC (BACKGROUND) : Skill India is an initiative of the Government of India which has been launched to empower the youth of the country with skill sets which make them more employable and more productive in their work environment. Our National S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng the last one year. The target to train more than a crore fresh entrants into the Indian workforce has been substantially achieved for the first time. 1.04 Crore Indians were trained through Central Government Programs and NSDC associated training partners in the private sector. For the first time in 68 years of India s independence, a Ministry for Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE) has been formed to focus on enhancing employability of the youth through skill development. The skill ecosystem in India, is seeing some great reforms and policy interventions which is reinvigorating and re-energising the country s workforce today; and is preparing the youth for job and growth opportunities in the international market. The Hon ble Prime Minister s flagship scheme, Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) alone, has till date seen close to 20 lakh people get skilled and prepared for a new successful India. Skill India harbours responsibility for ensuring implementation of C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es that are being undertaken by NSDC under National Skill Development Programme and submit the same. Jurisdictional Officer, Ms. R. S. lyer Sales Tax Officer appeared and made written submissions. The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 24.04.2018, Sh. Santosh Dalvi, Advocate alongwith Ms. Shradha Didwania, Sh. Sanjay Choudhary CEO, Sh. Ajay Nayak, C.A., Sh. Tanveer Bhagat, C.A. and Ms. Aarti Shetty appeared and made oral contentions as per their written submissions which were taken on record, Jurisdictional Officer, Ms. R. S. lyer Sales Tax Officer appeared and stated that they have already made their written submissions. 05. OBSERVATIONS We have perused the records on file and have gone through the facts of the case and oral and written submissions made by the applicant as well as the department. We find that M/s. IMS Proschool Private Limited, the applicant is a company under the Companies Act. The applicant is claiming that they are in the business of skilling

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ional courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as NSDC ) would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC? And in continuation of the same their further query is that whether they are eligible for exemption from GST as per Serial No. 69 of Notification No. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 and if so, in respect of which services being provided by them would they be eligible for exemption under Sr.No. 69 of the above said Notification. We find that rest of their queries in the present application would rest on their above two main queries. In view of this we would first be required to ascertain if the educational courses that are being offered by the applicant and approved by NSDC can be taken to be in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC. We find that at the time of the preliminary hearing they were orally request

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervices of description as specified in column (3) of the Table below from so much of the central tax leviable thereon under sub-section (I) of section 9 of the said Act, as is in excess of the said tax calculated at the rate as specified in the corresponding entry in column (4) of the said Table, unless specified otherwise, subject to the relevant conditions as specified in the corresponding entry in column (5) of the said Table. From the details of the relevant Notification we find that the applicant is claiming that they are eligible for exemption as given in Sr. No. 69 of the above said Notification. We find that the specific exemption that the applicant is claiming is as under:- Any services provided by, _ (a) ………………… (b) ………………… (c) ………………… (d) a training partner approved by the National Skill Development Corporation or the Sector Skill

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wever as no such certificate is produced for the F.Y. 2018-19, and therefore for F.Y. 2018-19, it is not clear whether the applicant continues to be a training partner of M/S NSDC for the current Financial Year. Secondly we are required to examine if the applicant who is an approved training partner of M/s. NSDC is providing any services in relation to National Skill Development Program implemented by M/s. NSDC. With regard to the above we are required to ascertain as to what is the National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC. We find that M/s. NSDC is a non-profit company set up by the Ministry of Finance which aims to promote skill development by catalysing creation of large, quality and for profit vocational institutions. For this purpose it – 1. provides funding to build scalable and profitable vocational training initiatives 2. to enable support system which focuses on quality assurance, information systems and train the trainer academies either directly or through pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nal Skill Development Corporation (NSDC), has taken up multiple initiatives to connect with industries for partnership under the larger Skill India Mission. NSDC has a single-window facilitation system that offers a unique platform for the industries to partner on various such initiatives. NSDC works with diverse set of stakeholders such as Corporates, Foundations, Government and Community based Organisations in structuring high impact collaborative skill development projects. We find that the benefit of exemption as given at Sr. NO. 69 of Notification 12/2017-CT (Rate) as claimed to be applicable by the applicant in the present case is in respect of any services provided by a training partner approved by the NSDC or the Sector Skill Council in relation to the National Skill Development Program implemented by the NSDC or any other scheme implemented by the NSDC. Thus we find that the matter rests on the fact as to what is National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC. We fin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ance his technical expertise so that he is ready for day one of his job and companies don t have to invest into training him for his job profile. The Skill Mission launched by the Prime Minister on 15 July 2015, has gathered tremendous steam under the guidance of Shri Rajiv Pratap Rudy, Union Minister of State for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, during the last one year. The target to train more than a crore fresh entrants into the Indian workforce has been substantially achieved for the first time. 1.04 Crore Indians were trained through Central Government Programs and NSDC associated training partners in the private sector. For the first time in 68 years of India s independence, a Ministry for Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE) has been formed to focus on enhancing employability of the youth through skill development. The skill ecosystem in India, is seeing some great reforms and policy interventions which is reinvigorating and re-energising the country s workfor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t of the government policy on Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikaas and its commitment to overall human resource development to take advantage of the demographic profile of our country s population in the coming years. Developing a comprehensive and holistic policy document is an integral part of the process. This requires a fresh look at the already existing National Policy on Skill Development (NPSD), 2009. The objective of the National Policy on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, 2015 will be to meet the challenge of skilling at scale with speed and standard (quality). It will aim to provide an umbrella framework to all skilling activities being carried out within the country, to align them to common standards and link the skilling with demand centres. In addition to laying down the objectives and expected outcomes, the effort will also be to identify the various institutional frameworks which can act as the vehicle to reach the expected outcomes. The national policy will also provide clar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s being provided by them are not in relation to and are not covered under (ii) A Vocational Skill Developmental Course under the National Skill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme (iii) Any other scheme implemented by the NSDC. Thus it is clearly stated by them that they are not covered and are not eligible for exemption under Sr No (ii) and (iii) as mentioned in Sr. No. 69 of Notification 12/2017-CentraI Tax. We find that the applicant is further claiming in their application that NSDC has not announced explicitly any course programme which would be considered as part of National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC, It is reiterated that at the time of hearing they were requested to confirm and obtain in writing from NSDC as to what are the programmes that are being undertaken by NSDC under National Skill Development Programme and submit the same. However nothing in this regard had been submitted by the applicant from NSDC. Therefore in absence of any explicit Nationa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

programme is being implemented by NSDC it would mean that the services are being provided to NSDC by the applicant with respect to implementation of its programme related to National Skill Development Programme. But from the facts of the case as put up by the applicant before this authority, we find that some of the courses of vocational training that have been designed by the applicant are approved and certified by NSDC and thus we find that the services in this respect being in the nature of approval and certification of course being provided by NSDC to the applicant and not by the applicant to NSDC and thus there is no question of the applicant being eligible for any exemption in this respect as they are a services recipient and not service provider in relation to NSDC. In addition to this we also find secondly that, the claim of the applicant with respect to GST is also made by the applicant basing their contentions on the premise that there is no explicit National Skill Developme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pment and Entrepreneurship, 2015 provides as under:- Scope of the National Skill Development Policy a) Institution based skill development including ITIs/ITCs/vocational schools/ technical schools/ polytechnics/ professional colleges, etc. b) Learning initiatives of sectoral skill development organized by different ministries/departments. c) Formal and informal apprenticeships and other types of training by enterprises. d) Training for self-employment/ entrepreneurial development. e) Adult learning, retraining of retired or retiring employees and lifelong learning. f) Non-formal training including training by civil society organisations. g) E- web-based learning and distance learning. The objective of the National Policy on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, 2015 will be to meet the challenges of skilling at scale with speed and standard (quality). It would aim to provide an umbrella framework to all skilling activities being carried out within the country, to align them to common

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lopment Mission would not only consolidate and coordinate skilling efforts, but also expedite decision making across sectors to achieve skilling at scale with speed and standards. It will be implemented through a streamlined institutional mechanism driven by Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE). Key institutional mechanisms for achieving the objectives of the Mission have been divided into three tiers, which will consist of a Governing Council for policy guidance at apex level, a Steering Committee and a Mission Directorate (along with an Executive Committee) as the executive arm of the Mission. Mission Directorate will be supported by three other institutions: 1. National Skill Development Agency (NSDA). 2. National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) and 3. Directorate General of Training (DGT) – all of which will have horizontal linkages with Mission Directorate to facilitate smooth functioning of the national institutional mechanism. Seven sub-missions have be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

country – Industrial Training Institutes – play a vital role in the economy by providing skilled manpower in different sectors with varying levels of expertise. IT Is are affiliated by National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT). DGT also operationalises the amended Apprentices Act, 1961. 2. National Skill Development Agency (NSDA) The National Skill Development Agency (NSDA), an autonomous body, (registered as a Society under the Society s Registration Act 1860) was created with the mandate to co-ordinate and harmonise the skill development activities in the country, is part of the Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE). Functions : Gazette Notification of NSDA Take all possible steps to meet skilling targets as envisaged in the 12th Five Year Plan and beyond. Coordinate and harmonize the approach to skill development among various Central Ministries/ Department. State Governments, the NSDC and the Private sector. Anchor and operationalize the NSQF to ensure

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are as under: 1. Rationalization of the Skill Development Schemes of the Government of India 2. Creation of an integrated Labour Market Information System 3. Engagement with States 4. Skills Innovation Initiative 3. National Skill Development Corporation The National Skill Development Corporation India (NSDC) was setup as a one of its kind, Public Private Partnership Company with the primary mandate of catalysing the skills landscape in India. NSDC is a unique model created with a well thought through underlying philosophy based on the following pillars: 1. Create: Proactively catalyse creation of large, quality vocational training institutions. 2. Fund: Reduce risk by providing patient capital. Including grants and equity. 3. Enable: the creation and sustainability of support systems required for skill development. This includes the Industry led Sector Skill Councils. The main objectives of the NSDC are to: Upgrade skills to international standards through significant industry involv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

International Engagement – Investments, technical assistance, transnational standards, overseas jobs and other areas. Central Ministries – Participation in flagship programmes like Make in India, Swachh Bharat, Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, Smart City, Digital India and Namami Ganga, among many others. State Governments – Development of programs and schemes, alignment to NSQF and capacity building, operationalization Of program, capacity building efforts among others. University/SchooI systems – Vocationalisation of education through specific training programs, evolution of credit framework, entrepreneur development, etc. Non-profit organizations – Capacity building of marginalized and special groups, development of livelihood, self-employment and entrepreneurship programs. Innovation – Support to early-stage social entrepreneurs working on innovative business models to address gaps in the skilling ecosystem, including programs for persons with disability. Over 5.2 million students t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stem (SDMS) with 1400 training partners, 28179 training centres, 16479 trainers, 20 Job portals, 77 assessment agencies and 4983 empanelled assessors. Hosting infrastructure certified by ISO 20000/27000 supported by dedicated personnel. 4. National Skill Development Fund The National Skill Development Fund was set up in 2009 by the Government of India for raising funds both from Government and Non Government sectors for skill development in the country. The Fund is contributed by various Government sources, and other donors/ contributors to enhance, stimulate and develop the skills of Indian youth by various sector specific programs. A public Trust set up by the Government of India is the custodian of the Fund. The Trust accepts donation, contribution in cash or kind from the Contributors for furtherance of objectives of the Fund. The Fund is operated and managed by the Board of Trustees. The Chief Executive Officer of the Trust is responsible for day-to- day administration and manage

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rainer Programs, conduct skill gap studies and Assess and Certify trainees on the curriculum aligned to National Occupational Standards developed by them. As on date 37 Sector Skill Councils are operational. There are over 600 Corporate Representatives in the Governing Councils of these SSCs. In view of the above we clearly find that in broader terms there is National Policy on Skill Development which is very broad and has a very broad vision as well. It envisions the establishment of a National Skill Development initiatives with the following mission:- National Skill Development initiative will empower all individuals through improved skills, knowledge, nationally and internationally recognized qualifications to gain access to decent employment and ensure India s competiveness in the global markets. Within this broad policy framework, there is National Skill Development mission launched on 15.07.2015 by the Hon ble Prime Minister. The mission has been developed to create convergence a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

undertaken through Government funding, Government Schemes and specifically designed Government Programmes. We find that National Skill Development Programme would consist of the schemes, actions and deeds that are actually done or are mandated to be done by various ministries, Government departments or their attached offices, Directorates or other institutions as per their instructions and for which expenses in that regard are to be incurred by the Central or State Governments through budgetary provisions. The intent of the Notification No. 12/2017-CT as discussed above provides that exemption would be available only in respect of Any services provided by a Training partner approved by National Skill Development Corporation in relation to the National Skill Development Programme implemented by the NSDC. Here it would be worth to mention that NSDC is a non-profit company set up by the Ministry of Finance and its mandate is to promote Skill development in various ways and it is undertak

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ps Ability to leverage financial requirements Ability to leverage management capability Thus we find that the above functions of NSDC are in the nature of encouraging and supporting private sector in skill development which is also one of its mandate and functions. Apart from this it is also the implementing agency for various schemes such as Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana , Sankalp, Udaan, etc. Thus it can be easily seen that if the intent of the Legislature had been to extend the benefit of exemption of present Notification in respect of all activities in relation to skill development done by NSDC, in that case the wordings Of the Notification would not have been restrictive, which is very clear when we see that in the Notification, exemption benefit is restricted and would be applicable only in respect of services provided in relation to national Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC. In continuation of the above discussion, we find that the main schemes that would be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ces and organizations and cannot in any way be construed to be including each and every activity under the sun which enhances skills in one way or other. 06. In view of the deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass the order as under : ORDER (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) NO.GST-ARA-37/2017-18/B-44 Mumbai, dt. 05.06.2018 For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the question is answered thus – Q.1. – Whether educational courses offered by the Applicant which have been approved by National Skill Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as NSDC ) would be construed as in relation to National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC? Answer:- Answered in the negative. Q.2. – The Applicant offers certain educational courses for which qualification standards / framework i.e. QP/ NOS has not been defined by NSDC and will be approved by NSDC as and when the relevant QP/ NOS would

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cant? Answer :- No, in view of answers to Q.No. 1, 2 and 3 above. Q.5. – If answer to Q.4 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 17/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be still available if such educational courses are offered to corporates and business institutions? Answer:- No, in view of answers to Questions above. Q.6.- Whether the NSDC approved educational courses which are actually imparted by the business partners of the Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant as sub-contractor of Applicant, at various centres located across the country, will be considered as offered by the Applicant? Answer:- Not relevant and not being answered in view of the answers to question above. Q.7. – If answer to Q.6 is Yes, whether benefit of GST exemption as per Notification No. 17/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June 2017 would be available to the Applicant? Answer:- No, in view of answers to Questions above. – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Commercial Pilot License Training Fees

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – RAVINDRA SANCHETI – Dated:- 4-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 9-6-2018 – Hello One of the client is a company registered as Non Profit Organisation and providing services of Commercial Pilot License Training to students. Query – Whether the company is liable for GST on Training Fees collected from their students on Training for Commercial Pilot License ? Please give reference of circular or notification if exempt. – Reply By Alkesh Jani – The Reply = Sir, In my point of view GST is applicable.Our experts may correct me if mistaken.Thanks – Reply By Alkesh Jani – The Reply = Sir, The training of commercial pilot can be classified under HSN 99929. No Exemption is available. Therefore, GST is applicable. Our experts may correct me if mistaken. Thanks, – Reply By YAGAY and SUN – The Reply = We endorse the view of Mr. Jani. – Reply By RAVINDRA SANCHETI – The Reply = Sir,Thanks for reply In service tax commercial pilot training was exempted since it is cons

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s and other conveyances except when they are used- (i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:- (A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or (B) transportation of passengers; or (C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances; From above, it is clear that you are eligible to take ITC of motor vehicles and other conveyances (in your case air-craft, gliders etc.) and you can take ITC only if you are to make taxable supplies, i.e. imparting training on flying. The exemption by an educational institute to its student and staff is limited to services mentioned and is not applicable in your case, moreover, in your case, if skill development corporation has declared any such scheme then you can avail that exemption, but as far as my knowledge permits no such scheme is declared, therefore, you are not eligible for this exemption also. Concluding, it can be said that you are required to pay GST. Hope now it is be clear for you. Thanks, –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dents, faculty and staff; Nil Nil Term educational institute has been defined under Clause (y) of Para 2 of the Notification No. 12/2017 Central tax and Notification No. 12/2017State Tax (Rate) as educational institution means an institution providing services by way of- pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent; education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by law for the time being in force; education as a pat of an approved vocational education course; A perusal of the entry 66 of the exemption notifications make is very clear that the exemption provided therein is very broad in scope and a blanket exemption from levy of CGST and TGST has been provided on any intra-state supply of services by an educational institution to its student, faculty and staff. No restriction has been made on the basis of nature of services. Only criteria for availing exemption is that supplier of service must qualify as educational institu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rs Dictionary is bringing up or training; strengthening of the powers of body or mind; culture. In Advanced Law Lexicon (P. Ramanatha Aiyar, 3rd Edition, 2005, Vol.2) 'education' is defined in very wide terms. It is stated: Education is the bringing up; the process of developing and training the powers and capabilities of human beings. In its broadest sense the word comprehends not merely the instruction received at school, or college but the whole course of training moral, intellectual and physical; is not limited to the ordinary instruction of the child in the pursuits of literature. It also comprehends a proper attention to the moral and religious sentiments of the child. And it is sometimes used as synonymous with 'learning'. Hon ble Supreme Court in case of P.A. Inamdar and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors, AIR 1976 SC 10 while dealing with the basic concept of education has expressed the view as follows: Education is continued growth of personality, steady dev

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ein while dealing with the conception of education their Lordships have observed thus: Education means the systematic instruction, schooling or training given to the young in preparation for the work of life. It also connotes the whole course of scholastic instruction which a person has received…what education connotes is the process of training and developing the knowledge, skill, mind and character of students by formal schooling. D.4 From the above it is very clear that the term education as in literal sense and as defined by the Hon ble Supreme Court, is much wider. Term education encompasses every learning, experience and knowledge gained consciously or unconsciously. Education is a process by which latent capabilities and qualities of a person got polished and refined and makes that person a whole new one in terms of intellectual, social and moral. In a nutshell what education connotes is the process of training and developing the knowledge, skill, mind and character of student

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o service Tax on Flying Training Institute and Aircraft Engineering Institutes under Commercial Training or Coaching Services? (ii.) Whether, the course Completion Certificate offered by such Institutes, to successful students, qualifies as any certificate of diploma or degree or any educational qualification recognized by law for the time being in force or not? The assessee, namely M/s Garg Aviations Limited is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is running a Flying Training Institute and Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Institute at Kanpur. It is engaged in providing training and coaching to individuals in the field of flying of aircraft for obtaining Commercial Pilot License from the Director Civil Aviation (DGCA), New Delhi. It is also engaged in providing training for obtaining Basic Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Licence. A similar issue arose before the Delhi High Court in Indian Institute of Aircraft Engineering (Supra). The Delhi High Court held as follows

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n 65(27) making such exclusion has been deleted but the Notification dated 25th April, 2011 supra issued in exercise of powers under Section 93 of the Finance Act has exempted coaching or training leading to grant of a certificate or diploma or degree or any educational qualification which is recognized by any law from the whole of Service Tax leviable under Section 66 of the Finance Act . 14. We have wondered, what could be the reason for exempting from payment of service tax those training or coaching centres, even though commercial, whose certificate/degree/diploma/ qualification is recognized by law. The only plausible reason, according to us, can be to exclude from ambit of service tax those training or coaching centres which are otherwise regulated by any law in as much as recognition of certificate/degree/diploma/qualification conferred by such training or coaching centres will necessarily entail regulation by the same law of various facets of such training or coaching centres.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ose of eligibility for obtaining ultimate licence/approval for certifying repair/maintenance/airworthiness of aircrafts. The Act, Rules and CAR distinguish an approved Institute from an unapproved one and a successful candidate from an approved institute would be entitled to enforce the right, conferred on him by the Act, Rules and CAR, to one year relaxation against the DGCA in a Court of law. The inference can only be one, that the Course Completion Certificate/training offered by such Institutes is recognized by law. 26……….. 27……….. 28. We are therefore of the view that the Instruction aforesaid holding the petitioner to be assessable to Service Tax is contrary to Section 65(27) and the Notification dated 25th April, 2011. Accordingly the said Instruction and the show cause notices given to the petitioner are quashed. The Rule is made absolute and the writ petition is disposed of. Learned counsel appearing for the revenue has not been able to persuade the Court to take a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ining and coaching provided by flight training institutes are exempted from GST. it may be noted that words commercial training or coaching has not been used in GST. Hence there is no point in discussing whether any activity of imparting knowledge would qualify as coaching or training or education. any service provided by an educational institution shall be exempted and to qualify as an educational institution, such institution must provide education (which could be either pure theoretical knowledge or practical knowledge ore even training in some sport) which is part of the curriculam for obtainining a qualification recognised by law for the time being in force. it may gains be noted that under GST they do not words a degree diploma certificate but qualification which is wider in nature and very well covered commercial pilot license. services – Reply By Alkesh Jani – The Reply = Sir,I welcome the opinion expressed by Sh. Akash Deep ji, but the views expressed by him refer to Sl.No. 66

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Frequently Asked Questions on Banking, Insurance and Stock Brokers Sector – GST

Goods and Services Tax – GST – Dated:- 4-6-2018 – Q.1 Whether Banks are required to capture the details of ATMs in registration certificate as a place of business ? Ans. No. Banks are not required to provide the details of ATMs while applying for registration. For the purposes of registration, ATM on its own does not constitute a place of business, as defined in the CGST Act, 2017. Q.2 As per RBI guidelines, Banks can use third party ATMs, Business Correspondents (BC), Customer Service Points (CSP) or third party warehouses. Are Banks required to include these third party places also in their GST registration? Ans- No. Third party places are neither places of business nor fixed establishments from where Banks ordinarily carry on their business. These are independent service providers to the Bank which are subject to GST. Thus, these places are not required to be declared as place of business by the Bank. Q.3 What will be the time of supply in respect of services rendered upto 30th Jun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n made (prior to issuance of invoice) as advance before the 1st of July, 2017, the tax would be payable under the law prevalent prior to 1st July, 2017, as the point of taxation had arisen before this date to the extent of advance. Q5. Is it necessary for Banks / insurers to report the details of exempt and non-GST supplies in Table 8 of GSTR-1? Ans. Yes. In the absence of any specific exemption to the Banks / insurers, the information is required to be provided in the said table. Q6. Is it necessary for Banks / insurers to report the details of invoices in Table 13 of GSTR-1? Ans. Rule 54(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017 provides that in case of an insurer or a banking company or a financial institution, including a non-banking financial company, the tax invoice or any other document in lieu thereof, may not be serially numbered. But this does not mean that such document will not have any identification number which is required for the purpose of matching. The said entities are, therefore,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cases where the turnover in States/Union Territories for the previous financial year is not available. Therefore, in such cases, for the quarters after July 2017 to September 2017, the State/UT-wise turnover for the purposes of ISD can be determined based on the turnovers for the quarter of July 2017 to September 2017. For the months of July, August and September, 2017, the turnover for the month of July, 2017 may be considered for the purposes of distribution of credit. Q9- Is the condition to make payment for the value of supply plus the GST thereon required to be complied with by the recipient to claim the input tax credit where supplies for services are made between distinct persons? Ans. No, this condition is not required to be complied with by the recipient. As per the proviso to sub rule (1) of Rule 37 of the CGST Rules, 2017 the value of supplies made without consideration as specified in paragraph 2 of Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017 shall be deemed to have been paid for the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es / document for supply of its services, how will the service recipient get credit for GST on the services provided by the bank? Ans. Under Rule 54(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017 a banking company or a financial institution including a NBFC or an insurer can issue an invoice or any other document in lieu thereof whether or not serially numbered and whether or not containing the address of the recipient but containing other information as mentioned under Rule 46. There is no restriction on the invoice/document being a consolidated invoice/document but it must bear an identification number, which need not necessarily be serially numbered. The recipient of service will get the credit for GST so long as the bank, etc. uploads the details of the invoice / document under that number with GSTIN of the recipient in its statement if FORM GSTR-1. Q12. Is the registered person procuring goods or services from a supplier outside India required to raise a self-invoice, debit note or credit note in res

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it note for each such supply should be reported in the GST return of the month in which the supply takes place as per the provisions of section 12(3) or 13(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. As the import of goods would be under the cover of a bill of entry, there is no need to raise a self-invoice. It may, however, be noted that section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 / section 5(4) of the IGST Act, 2017 has been suspended vide notification No. 38/2017-Central Tax, as amended from time to time. Q 13. For supply of taxable services, can a digitally signed invoice be issued in duplicate, with the original being marked as Original and the duplicate copy being marked as Duplicate ? Ans. In the context of digitally signed documents, the requirement of issuing original and duplicate invoices does not arise. A digitally signed invoice can be retained by the supplier and also be made available to the recipient. Q 14. Is there a requirement to issue a payment voucher at the time of making payment to the for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he location of the third party service providers and after repairs, the equipment may be moved to a central / regional location for the purpose of programming, encryption, reconfiguration, etc. and thereafter to that place of business from where the equipment had been sent earlier. The equipment can be moved between such locations on the basis of a delivery challan . Q 16. Is a Bill of Supply to be issued by a bank for exempt services like interest on loans and advances, inter-se sale or purchase of foreign currency amongst banks? Ans. As per clause (c) of sub-section (3) of section 31 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 49 of the CGST Rules, 2017, there is a requirement for issuance of bill of supply for supply of exempt services by Banks. It may be noted, however, that there is no need to issue a separate bill of supply in case any invoice or document has already been issued in accordance with the provisions of any other law. Further, in view of the provisions contained in sub-rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for reversal of 5o percent will also apply to bullion purchased by the Bank? Ans. In terms of Section 2(94) read with Section 25(4)&(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, a person required to obtain more than one registration within a State or more than one State shall be treated as a distinct person for each such registration. Section 17(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 is applicable qua each registration and not for the Bank as a whole, provided each of the business verticals is separately registered. Therefore, a bank engaged in trading in bullion may not opt for 5o percent reversal in respect of its purchases of bullion, where it is separately registered as a business vertical. Q 19. Where there is a supply of goods or services between registered branches of a banking company on which GST is paid, will the recipient branch/office be eligible for i00% credit of the GST charged on such supply where the bank elects the 5o% option to avail input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services?

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

versal. Q 21. Whether the provision of section 18(6) for reversal of input tax credit availed on capital goods be applicable to banks only to the extent of the input tax credit availed? Ans. Yes. The provisions of section 18(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 for reversal of input tax credit availed on capital goods would be applicable to banks only to the extent of the input tax credit availed by it. In case the Bank opts to avail input tax credit to the extent of 5o% in terms of the second proviso to Section 17(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, reversal of credit would be in proportion to the actual credit availed by the Bank i.e. only with reference to 50% of the input tax credit availed by it on capital goods. Q 22. Can a Bank / insurer defer the availment of input tax credit for a month or quarter and avail of the same in subsequent months? Ans. Yes. As per section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, availment of input tax credit can be deferred and availed upto the due date of furnishing of return for th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds of the supplier of services if services are provided to an unregistered person. Address available on records of the insurance company, which is ordinarily used for communication with the customer, may be considered as the Place of Supply . Q 24. With respect to registered customers, whether the Bank / insurance company is required to ascertain the place of consumption of service or whether the Bank can rely upon the GSTIN provided by the Customer? Ans. The Bank / insurance company can rely upon the GSTIN provided by the customer. Q 25. Would intermediary services provided to an offshore client and services provided by a banking company to its offshore account holders be treated as an intra-State supply or an inter-State supply for payment of GST? Ans. Under clause (b) of section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017 the place of supply of such services is the location of the provider of services. As the location of supplier and place of supply are in same State, such supplies will be treated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ersonal use or for the use of the family members of diplomatic agents or career consular officers posted therein? Ans. Yes, the bank / insurer is required to charge GST in such cases. However, as per section 55 of the CGST Act, 2017, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed, such service recipients would be entitled to claim a refund of taxes paid on the notified supplies of services received by them. Q 29. Who is liable to comply with GST on charges levied by Overseas Correspondent Banks facilitating trade and other cross border transactions? Ans. In this case, there are two supplies namely, from bank in India to the importer/exporter and one from the overseas correspondent banks to the bank in India. So the liability to discharge GST on such supplies will be required to be determined accordingly. Q 30. Will the second proviso to Rule 28 apply in the case of a banking company that selects the 5o% option to avail input tax credit set out in section 17(4) of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ted without consideration. Therefore, where the services are supplied by a supplier without consideration to an unrelated recipient or a person other than a related or distinct person, the same would not amount to supply and not liable to GST. Q 32. Can value of services be enhanced by invoking the CGST Rules in case of services provided by banks at a concessional / differential rate to a recipient other than related party / distinct person ? Ans. Banks provide various services to customers for a charge. However, at times, account holders / customers are provided services free or at a concessional / differential rate. The free or concessional / differential rate is offered considering factors such as credit rating and stability of the customer, size of relationship, expected future business or the opportunity presented in the market elsewhere etc. As a result, the charges for the same service may differ from customer to customer. Such services provided to persons who are not related pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA). Derivatives are included in the definition of securities under section 2(h)(ia) of the SCRA. In terms of section 2(ac) of SCRA, derivative includes (A) a security derived from a debt instrument, share, loan, whether secured or unsecured, risk instrument or contract for differences or any other form of security; (B) a contract which derives its value from the prices, or index of prices, of underlying securities. The definition of derivatives in SCRA is an inclusive definition. As derivatives fall in the definition of securities, they are not liable to GST. However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for provision of service and chargeable to GST. Q 35. What is the nature of income / expenditure on Collateralized Borrowing and Lending Obligations (CBLO) transactions? Ans. In CBLO transaction, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

T Act, 2017, future contracts are not chargeable to GST. But where the future contracts have a delivery option and the settlement of contract takes place by way of actual delivery of underlying commodity/currency, then such forward contracts would be treated as normal supply of goods and liable to GST. Further, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for supply of service and chargeable to GST. Q 37. Would forward contracts in commodities or currencies be within the ambit of definition of supply ? Ans. A forward contract is an agreement, executed, to purchase or sell a pre­determined amount of a commodity or currency at a pre-determined future date at a pre-determined price. The settlement could be by way of actual delivery of underlying commodity/currency or by way of net settlement of differential of the forward rate over the prevailing market rate on the settlemen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rowing funds by selling securities with an agreement to repurchase the securities on a mutually agreed future date at an agreed price which includes interest for the funds borrowed. Section 45U (d) of the RBI Act, 1934 defines reverse repos as an instrument for lending funds by buying securities with an agreement to re-sell the securities on a mutually agreed future date at an agreed price which includes interest for the funds lent. Repos and reverse repos are financial instruments of short term call money market that are normally used by banks to borrow from or lend money to RBI. The margins, called the repo rate or reverse repo rate, in such transactions are nothing but interest charged for lending or borrowing of money. Thus they have the characteristics of loans and deposits for interest and are accordingly exempt from GST [serial no. 27 of the table of notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017, as amended]. Q 39. Would income from Commercial Paper (CP) or C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017, as amended]. Further, promissory note is included in the definition of money as given in clause (75) of Section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017 and hence not liable to GST. However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for supply of services and chargeable to GST. Q 40. Whether assignment or sale of secured or unsecured debts is liable to GST? Ans. Section 2(52) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines goods to mean every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim. Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017 lists activities or transactions which shall be treated neither as a supply of goods nor a supply of services and actionable claims other than lottery, betting and gambling are included in the said Schedule. Thus, only actionable claims in respect of lottery, betting and gambling would be taxable under GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

epresent taxable consideration and hence liable to GST. Q 43. To what extent is invoice discounting or cheque discounting or any other similar form of discounting exempt under GST? Ans. Discounting of invoices or cheques falls within the meaning of services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount . Such discounting is exempt from payment of GST, as such discounting is nothing but a manner of extending a credit facility or a loan. However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for supply of service and chargeable to GST. Q 44. Is interest on debt instruments exempt from GST? Ans. Yes. As debt instruments such as debentures, bonds etc. are in the nature of loans, interest thereon will be exempt from GST. Q 45. Is GST required to be paid on additional interest charged in case of default i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

osits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount (other than interest involved in credit card services) is exempt. But, in a financial lease the ownership of the asset is with the bank. In essence, it is a purchase the asset and lend it further transaction for bank. Therefore, neither the services are purely in the nature of extending loans nor the consideration for a financial lease is purely in the nature of interest. Thus, interest on finance lease transactions will be taxable under GST. Q 48. Where GST is charged on a supply of service and the amounts due from the customer become irrecoverable as a bad debt in commercial practice, would such GST paid on accrual basis be refundable to the service provider by the Government? Ans. The adjustment of GST already paid is allowed only by way of issuance of credit /debit note in terms of Section 34 of the CGST Act, 2017. The proviso to section 34(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rs located outside India is the location of the service provider i.e. banking company. Account has been defined in Explanation (a) to section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017 to mean an account which bears interest to the depositor, and includes a non-resident external (NRE) account and a non-resident ordinary (NRO) account. Services provided to holders of demand deposits, term deposits, NRE account and NRO account outside India will be covered by the definition of account referred to above. Examples of such services are: (i) services linked to or requiring opening and operation of bank accounts, such as, lending and deposits; (ii) transfer of money including telegraphic transfer, mail transfer, electronic transfer etc. Q 51. Which services do not qualify as services provided to account holder as per Section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017 and thus the place of supply will be the location of the recipient of services? Ans. Following are examples of services that are generally not provided by a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is the location of the supplier in case of banking and other financial services where multiple locations are involved in providing the services to a customer? Ans. Banking services emanate from the bank account opened by a customer with the branch of a bank or through a contractual relationship between the branch of a bank and the customer. The branch holding the customer s account is referred to as the Account Branch or the Home Branch . An account would include all types of accounts – viz. interest bearing, non- interest bearing, loan account, deposit account, etc. In the present day of anywhere banking , the customer avails banking services through mobile/ internet banking or by visiting any branch of the bank. At times the services are provided through branches / locations other than the Account Branch or the Home Branch . It is clarified that the services provided by the other branches are actually services provided to the Home branch and are ultimately billed to the home branch.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s like cheques, drafts, pay orders, promissory notes, letters of credit, etc. Therefore, activities that are only transactions in such instruments would be outside the definition of service. This would include transactions in Commercial Paper ( CP ) and Certificate of Deposit ( CD ) (as they are in the nature of promissory notes), issuance of drafts or letters of credit, etc. While these transactions would be outside the ambit of supply, the related activity, for which a separate consideration is charged, would be chargeable to GST if other elements of taxability are present. Therefore, GST would be levied on service charges normally charged for various transactions in money including charges for making drafts, issuance charges for letter of credit etc. Definition of securities includes derivatives . Transactions in instruments like interest rate swaps, and foreign exchange swaps would be excluded from the definition of supply since such instruments are derivatives, being securities, b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in view of the sub-clause (v) of section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017 read with Explanation 1 to section 8 of the IGST Act, 2017. Q 55. Will the management oversight or stewardship activities performed in relation to business operations by the Head Office of a Bank to a Branch in India be considered as a supply of services by the Head Office even when there is no consideration charged by the Head Office, nor any expenditure recorded in the books of account of the Branches? Ans. As per Schedule – I to the CGST Act, 2017, supply of services between distinct entities will be a taxable supply even in absence of a consideration. Q 56. If tax is payable on provision of management oversight or stewardship services by a related person, what shall be the value of supply when no invoice is raised, no payment is made by recipient or no entry is made in the books of accounts of the recipient of service? What will be the time of supply? Ans. As per Rule 28 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Bank may obtai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nce of gold by the Customs. Q 58. Will there be another liability for payment of GST when the gold (metal) is appropriated or drawn from the consignment stock by the Nominated Bank? Ans. The supply of gold (metal) is already deemed to have taken place in terms of para 3 of Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017 when the same was despatched by the overseas supplier to the Nominated Bank. Since the supply has already taken place, there will not be another supply when the gold is drawn or appropriated by the Nominated Bank from the stock. There will, therefore, not be another levy of GST. Q 59. In the case of gold (metal) loan, whether the supply of gold (metal) to the jeweller will be deemed to take place at the time of delivery of gold (metal) or at the time when the price of gold (metal) is fixed by the jeweller? Ans. The Gold (Metal) Loan Scheme approved by the Reserve Bank of India is a means of financing. The Banks deliver gold (metal) to the jewellers who appropriate and use the same in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g. The jewellers can purchase gold (metal) from the Banks on outright basis on payment of the price. The gold (metal) loan only provides an option to the jeweller to avail a loan and pay for gold (metal) at a future date. For this facility, the jeweller pays interest to the Bank. The grant of loan and levy of interest is dependent on the purchase of gold, and therefore, part of the same transaction or facility; therefore the interest, which is the consideration, will not be exempt as per provisions of section 15(2)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017. Q 61. What will be the place of supply in cases where the account is held in a bank in one State but some services are availed in a different branch of the same bank in another State. Ans. As per the provisions of Section 12(12) of the IGST Act, 2017, the place of supply of services for a bank is the location of the recipient of the services on the records of the supplier of services. In general, this will be the State in which the account exists. F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ange fees on card settlement fees paid/shared by banks? Ans. Fees charged for card settlement is a consideration which is part of a separate transaction between the banks which are parties to this transaction and shall be liable to GST. This is a B2B supply and credit of this transaction is available. Q 65. What is the leviability of GST on securitization transactions undertaken by banks? Ans. Securitized assets are in the nature of securities and hence not liable to GST. However, if some service charges or service fees or documentation fees or broking charges or such like fees or charges are charged, the same would be a consideration for provision of services related to securitization and chargeable to GST. INSURANCE SECTOR Q. 66 What is the location of the supplier of service for fund management charges in ULIP policies? Ans. The fund management charges are charges towards managing and administering the fund. These funds are managed by the Fund Management team. The location of the su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vertible foreign exchange or from the NRE Accounts? Ans. No. The amounts paid from the Non-Resident External Accounts are paid in Indian Rupees and are not received in convertible foreign exchange. Therefore, the conditions for export of services as provided under section 2(6) of IGST Act, 2017 are not satisfied. Life Insurance services in such cases would be treated as inter-State supplies and subject to GST. Q. 69. Will the requirements of Letter of Undertaking or Bond be required to be complied with in the case of Life Insurance Premium where the conditions of export of services are satisfied before or at the time of supply of the Life Insurance Service? Ans. Yes. As per Section 16(3) of the IGST Act, 2017, read with Rule 96A of the CGST Rules, 2017, an exporter is required to submit a Letter of Undertaking or Bond in case the export of service is made without payment of integrated tax. Q. 70. What would be the time of supply of life insurance services? Ans. Insurance policies are c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST Act, 2017 specifically provides for refund of tax paid under the Finance Act, 1994 in respect of services not provided. The same shall be disposed off in accordance with the provisions of the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. Q. 72. Can the input tax credit of Krishi Kalyan Cess be carried forward? Ans. No. It is not permitted in terms of section 140(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 117(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017. Q. 73. In the case of group insurance policies, a Master Policy is issued; the beneficiaries of the Master Policy may be located in more than one State. In such cases, what will be the place of supply of services? Ans. In the case of issuance of Master / Group Policy to a registered person where the premium charged is a single premium and not segregated based on the beneficiaries of the insurance policies, the place of supply for such policy will be the location of the registered person paying the premium. Q. 74. What is the time of supply of services for depos

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

case of stock broking, whether stamp duty or securities transaction tax or other Central or State taxes would be considered as a part of the value of supply as prescribed under Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017, for levy of GST? Ans. GST is not payable by the stock brokers on these recoveries as long as the conditions of pure agent as provided in Rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017 are met. If not, then valuation will be done as per section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 27 of CGST Rules, 2017. Q. 78. Is brokerage earned in stock broking service liable to Goods and Services Tax? Ans. Yes. Since the stock brokers are engaged in the business of supplying the stock broking service, appropriate GST is payable on the same. Q.79. Can a person take voluntary registration under the Act? Ans. Section 25(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 states that a person, though not liable to be registered under section 22 or section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017 may get himself registered voluntarily, and all provis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of supply shall be determined as per section 13(8) of the IGST Act, 2017 i.e. as an intermediary. Q.82. Do stock brokers fall in the definition of intermediary under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017? Ans. Yes. Since stock brokers arrange the supply of securities between two or more persons, stock brokers would be covered by the definition of intermediary Q.83. Would sub-brokers/ Authorized Persons fall in the definition of agent under Section 2(5) of the CGST Act, 2017? What would be the registration requirement for subbrokers/ Authorized Persons in the context of the Goods and Services Tax Regime? Ans. As per Stock Brokers and Sub Brokers Regulation, 1992 issued by SEBI, a subbroker means any person, not being a member of stock exchange, who acts on behalf of a stock broker as an agent or otherwise for assisting the investors in buying, selling or dealing in securities through such stock brokers . It is, therefore, apparent that the sub broker may not only be providing services to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or (ii) a place where a taxable person maintains his books of account; or (iii) a place where a taxable person is engaged in business through an agent, by whatever name called. In case of operations of a stock broker, it is required by law that all transactions would be via screen based trading on the Stock Exchanges. Therefore, the following would be the place of business in case of stock brokers: (i) All the branches of the stock broker where the Stock Exchange Trading terminals are located and where trade is carried out on behalf of clients; (ii) Main office/ Head office/ Registered Office/ Branch office where back office operations are carried out including issuing of bills/ contracts/ tax invoices/account statements to the clients. In case of sub-brokers / Authorised Person office, where the premises are neither owned by the stock broker nor rented/ leased in favour of the stock broker and there are no employees on the payroll of the stock broker in such an office, then such prem

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

17 a registered person who has paid integrated tax on a supply considered by him to be an inter-State supply, but which is subsequently held to be an intra-State supply, shall be granted refund of the amount of integrated tax so paid in such manner and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed . Under section 19(2) of the IGST Act, 2017 a registered person who has paid Central tax and State tax or Union territory tax, as the case may be, on a transaction considered by him to be an intra-State supply, but which is subsequently held to be an inter-State supply, shall not be required to pay any interest on the amount of integrated tax payable . Therefore, in case a registered person has paid Integrated tax instead of Central tax and State tax or Union territory tax, then he shall be granted refund of the amount paid as Integrated tax and he will have to pay Central tax and State tax or Union territory tax. Further, no interest will be payable on the Central tax and State tax or Unio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Can the stock broker continue to issue bills and contracts under the normal Stock Exchange mechanism and issue a monthly tax invoice for the purpose of Goods and Services Tax? Ans. The stock broker can issue bills and contracts under the normal Stock Exchange mechanism mentioning the GST amount but will have to issue a tax invoice as envisaged under Section 31(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 47 of the CGST Rules, 2017. Q.89. What is considered as securities under the Goods and Services Tax Act? Are they taxable under GST? Ans. Section 2(101) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines securities to have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. Section 2(52) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines goods to mean every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndividual goods or services or a group of related goods or services which is subject to risks and returns that are different from those of the other business verticals. Explanation.-For the purposes of this clause, factors that should be considered in determining whether goods or services are related include- (i) the nature of the goods or services; (ii) the nature of the production processes; (iii) the type or class of customers for the goods or services; (iv) the methods used to distribute the goods or supply of services; and (v) the nature of regulatory environment (wherever applicable), including banking, insurance, or public utilities . It is the choice of the taxable person to build all the services provided in one vertical or separate verticals based on their business models and requirements. They may choose to obtain separate registration as a business vertical in terms of the proviso to section 25(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. Q.91. Whether GST will be levied on the exit-load on m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TRANS-2 Details

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR – Dated:- 4-6-2018 Last Replied Date:- 7-6-2018 – To file Trans-2 due date is 30th June-18 Who is eligible to file trans-2 We have file Trans-1 for traders stock details. – Reply By Alkesh Jani – The Reply = Sir, The TRAN-2 is to be filed under Rule 117 (4) (b) (iii), same is given below:- (iii) The registered person availing of this scheme and having furnished the details of stock held by him in accordance with the provisions of claus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Nature of supply – divisible contract [Supply of goods & Supply of Services] or an indivisible contract [works contract] – Construction of power lines, erection of transmission towers and transformers – Held as works contract – liable to be taxe

Goods and Services Tax – Nature of supply – divisible contract [Supply of goods & Supply of Services] or an indivisible contract [works contract] – Construction of power lines, erection of transmissio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds (Second Amendment) Rules, 2018.

Goods and Services Tax – F. No. 31013/16/2017-ST-I-DoR – G.S.R. 524(E) – Dated:- 4-6-2018 – MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 4th June, 2018 G.S.R. 524(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 53 read with section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), sections 17 and 18 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (13 of 2017) and section 21 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (14 of 2017), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds Rules, 2017, namely:- 1. (1) These rules may be called the Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds (Second Amendment) Rules, 2018. (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. HCL Infosystems Ltd. Unit – III Versus Commissioner of GST & CCE, Pondicherry

2018 (6) TMI 247 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – GTA Service – CENVAT credit – input services – Outward transportation of goods up to the buyer’s premises – period involved is after 01.04.2008 – whether the appellant is eligible to avail the Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on the GTA service received by them for outward transportation of final products from the factory gate up to the premises of the buyer when the sales are on FOR basis? – penalty.

Held that:- The said issue has been decided in the case of M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 117 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] by the Hon’ble Apex Court, wherein it has been held that credit is eligible up to 01.04.2008 and after such date, the assessee is not eligible for credit – credit not allowed.

Penalty – Held that:- Taking into consideration that the issue was under litigation and was in favour of assessee at the Tribunal level as also decided by various High Courts and got settled only by the decision of the Hon’ble Apex C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e, show-cause notices were issued, proposing to recover the wrongly availed credit along with interest and for imposing penalties. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand, interest and penalties. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence, these appeals. 3. On behalf of the appellant, the learned Counsel Ms. S. Yogalakshmi submitted that the appellants had sold the manufactured products on FOR (Destination) basis, as the appellant had an obligation to deliver the goods at the customer s premises and the ownership of the said goods got transferred to their client only at that stage. The price quoted to their clients is inclusive of the freight charge incurred by the appellant for the outward transportation. The appellant had paid excise duty on the assessable value, which is inclusive of the freight charges thus incurred. It is submitted that the actual credit availed by the appellant pertains to service tax paid on 25% of the gross amount

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

th effect from 01.04.2008, an amendment has been made by notification 10/2008 CE NT dated 01.03.2008, wherein the words clearance of final products from the place of removal , is substituted with the words clearance of final products up to the place of removal . For the period prior to the above amendment, the issue is settled by the judgement in the case of CCE Vs. ABB Ltd., {2011 (23)STR 97 Kar.}. It was held therein that the expression clearance of the final products from the place of removal would cover such transportation services up to the customer s place, and the same cannot be restricted by the expression outward transportation up to the place of removal . The judgement has also made it clear that the position post 01.04.2008 is not examined. Hence, when the definition has been amended from 01.04.2008, restricting the credit entitled for clearance of final products up to the place of removal, read with outward transportation up to the place of removal, would lead to the meanin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sportation, the CBEC came out with another Circular No. 988/12/2014 dated 20.10.2014. The Circular clarified that the place where sale has taken place or when the property, in goods, passes from the seller to the buyer, is the relevant consideration to determine the place of removal. The effect of the above Circulars is that if the transfer of property in the goods happens to be at the buyer s place, in terms of the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, then such buyer s place would be the place of removal, and, hence, any service tax paid on GTA services availed for transporting the goods till the buyer s premises would be eligible for Cenvat Credit. 5. That, while this being so, it is submitted by her that the Hon ble Apex Court in the case of Ultratech Cement Ltd. (supra) has not noticed that the clarification contained in the Circular has got nothing to do with the amendment. The Circular only clarifies that the buyer s place can become place of removal if the three conditions

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

R, Shri K.P. Muralidharan, supported the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that the issue stands settled by the decision in the case of M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. 2018-TIOL-42 SC-CX. 7. Heard both sides. 8. The period involved is after 01.04.2008. The issue involved in both the appeals is whether the appellant is eligible to avail the Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on the GTA service received by them for outward transportation of final products from the factory gate up to the premises of the buyer when the sales are on FOR basis. The said issue has been decided in the case of M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. by the Hon ble Apex Court, wherein it has been held that credit is eligible up to 01.04.2008 and after such date, the assessee is not eligible for credit. Though the learned Counsel for appellant has put forward lengthy arguments in the written submissions, I am afraid the same does not find any merit in view of the decision of the Hon ble Apex Court in the case cited supra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai Versus BNP Paribas Sundaram Global Securities Operations Pvt Ltd.

2018 (6) TMI 676 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI – 100% EOU – Refund of CENVAT credit – denial of refund on the ground of Non-Registration of premises Held that:- Reliance placed in the case of MPORTAL INDIA WIRELESS SOLUTIONS (P.) LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX [2011 (9) TMI 450 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT], where it was held that Registration not compulsory for refund – refund allowed – appeal dismissed – decided against Revenue. – C.M.A. No. 1052 of 2018 Dated:- 4-6-2018 – S. Manikumar And V. Bhavani Subbaroyan, JJ. For the Appellant : Mrs. Aparna Nandakumar JUDGMENT ( Judgment of this Court was delivered by S. Manikumar, J. ) Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai (CESTAT) dated 31.07.2017 in Final Order No.41584 of 2017. 2. It is the case of the appellant that M/s.BNP Paribas Sundaram Global Securities Operations Private Limited, Chennai, respondent is an 100% EOU, engaged in pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

44 04 Unregistered premises at Mumbai 86947 The premises were not registered 05 Unregistered premises at Principal Tower, College Road, Chennai 11293 06 Services received at 4th and 5th Floor of Menon Eternity, New Door No.165, St.Mary's Road, Alwarpet, Chennai-18 1486920 The premises were not registered at the time of export but subsequently obtained Registration. 07 Services received at International Tech Park Unit No.1 to 4, 11th Floor, Taramani Chennai. 1144872 3. Aggrieved by the above orders, the respondent filed an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). The first appellate authority, Commissioner (Appeals) vide combined Order-in-Appeal No.24/2016 dated 18.02.2016 set aside a portion of the order of the original authority, and allowed refund as detailed above: S. No. Services Sanctioned by Commissioner (Appeals) Sl.No. As in table at para 2 above. 01 Car Parking charges 111240 2 02 Services received at 4th and 5th Floor of Menon Eternity, New Door No.165, St.Mary;s Road, Alwar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n respect of Car parking charges, Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the parking area cannot be considered as a separate area and it is a part of the premises occupied by the respondent. He also held that the service tax paid on the rental charges is eligible for CENVAT credit, then service tax paid on the car parking charges is equally eligible for CENVAT credit and set aside the disallowance of CENVAT credit and upheld the disallowance of CENVAT credit in respect of Event Management service. 6. While the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) allowing the credit in respect of Car Parking Charges was found acceptable, the decision in respect of credit availed on the inputs received in the premises which was not registered prior to export, but subsequently obtained Registration was found to be not legally correct and hence the Department filed an appeal before CESTAT. 7. Contentions of the appellant herein were not accepted by CESTAT, Madras and vide FO No.40778 dated 22/05/2017 dism

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

follows: 7.2. From the grounds of appeal and statement of facts at page 17 of the appeal folder, it is seen that Revenue is aggrieved that the Commissioner (Appeals) has not appreciated the judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Vs. Sutham Nylocots as reported in 2014(306) ELT 255 (Mad.). No doubt, the Hon'ble High Court in the said judgment had ruled that credit accrued can take effect only after the date of registration, however, the Hon'ble High Court in the subsequent judgment passed on 10.4.2017 in the case of Scioinspire Consulting Services, referred to supra, have distinguished the facts contained in Sutham Nylocots observing that the said case was dealing with the provisions of Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and that the only ground rejection of the refund therefor was that the additional building was not registered with the concerned authority. The Hon'ble High Court agreeing with the v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es, that has been pointed out in the present case, we follow the ratio already laid down in the above said final order of the tribunal and dismiss the appeal of the department." 8. Aggrieved over the same, instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed on the following substantial questions of law. 1. Whether the decision of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai (CESTAT for short) in allowing refund of CENVAT credit even without registration is correct? 2. Whether CESTAT, i.e. 1st respondent is erred in not considering the safeguards, conditions and limitations as stipulated in the Appendix to the Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT), dated 18.06.2016 . 9. Supporting the prayer sought for, Ms.Aparna Nandakumar, learned counsel for the revenue submitted that: (i) Registration is an act by which every manufacturer / assessee / service provider comes under the ambit of Central Excise Act, 1944 / Finance Act, 1994. In order to avail any substantive be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ification No.5/2006-CE(NT) dated 14.03.2006 {Condition No.3(b)} where in it is stated that refund of CENVAT credit shall be allowed only in respect of the registered premises of the service provider from where the output services are exported. (iv) It has been held that registration was not a pre-requisite to claim refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, the Larger Bench of CESTAT, New Delhi in the case of Steel Strips Vs. CCE, Ludhiana 2011 (269) ELT (Tri-Del) vide para 5.16 has categorically stated that Modvat law has codified procedure for adjustment of duty liablity against Modvat Account. That is required to be carried out in accordance with law and unadjusted amount is not expressly permitted to be refunded. In absence of express provision to grant refund, that is difficult to entertain except in the case of export. There cannot be presumption that in the absence of debarment to make refund, in other cases that is permissible. Refund results in outflow from tre

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ror by stating that the respondent was entitled to credit and refund in view of non-taxability of export service. This is for the reason that Rule 4 of Export of Service Rules, 2005 permitted a service provider to export services without payment of service tax, and thus, there is liability to pay service tax on export of service, but for this rule. Hence, for export of service by a service provider, registration is a sine qua non for procedural and substantive compliance. (vi)The judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai-III Vs. M/s.Scionispire Consulting Services (India) P Ltd., applied by CESTAT for deciding the appeal in favour of the respondent was accepted by the department due to monetary limit and not on merits, and therefore, it is humbly submitted that the ratio of the said judgment should not have been taken as a binding precedent in view of Section 35R (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ny credit it would accrue only subsequently to the date of the registration with the Department'. Hence, the refund of unutilized input CENVAT credit taken towards rendering the input services availed and used in providing the taxable output services exported, would not arise prior to the date of registration. 10. Heard Ms.Aparna Nandakumar, learned senior counsel for the revenue and perused the materials available on record. 11. Going through the material on record, and adverting to the submissions duly supported by the grounds of challenge, we are of the view that the issue is no longer res integra and is covered by a decision of this Court in Commissioner of Services Tax-III, Chennai Vs. M/s. Scioinspire Consulting Services India Private Limited, Chennai and another, in C.M.A.No.860 of 2017, wherein the following substantial questions of law were framed:- "1. Whether the decision of CESTAT i.e. Respondent No.1 in allowing refund of Cenvat credit even without registration is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

minds, a bare perusal of the said notification would show that it only sets out the procedure for claiming refund of unutilized input service credit. The only clause of the notification, which, perhaps, the Department could have relied upon, is Clause 3, which, to our minds, has no bearing on the issue arising in the instant case. For the sake of convenience, the relevant part of the said notification is extracted hereafter : "Notification No.05/2006-Central Excise (N.T.) 14th March 2006 G.S.R. (E) In exercise of the powers conferred by rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), and in supercession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.11/2002 – Central Excise (NT), dated 1st March, 2002, published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.No.150(E), dated 1st March 2002, the Central Government hereby directs that refund of CENVAT credit shall be allowed in res

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uated, along with a copy of the invoice and a certificate from the bank certifying realization of export proceeds." 7.2. A bare perusal of the clause would show that in so far as the provider of output services is concerned, for making an application for refund of CENVAT Credit, he is required to file an application in the prescribed form, i.e., Form A, which is annexed to the notification, and the said application is required to be made to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, or, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be. In so far as the jurisdiction of the concerned Officer is concerned, the same is fixed, in consonance with the location of the registered premises of the service provider, from which, the output service are exported. Furthermore, the application is required to be accompanied with a copy of the relevant invoices and a certificate from the bank, indicating therein, the realization of export proceeds. 7.3. Apart from the aforesaid, ther

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

laim relates, i.e., Maximum refund ? total CENVAT credit taken on input services during the given period X export turnover / Total turnover ………" 7.5. Therefore, there is no merit in the submission advanced on behalf of the Revenue that the said notification would disentitle the claim of the Assessee qua refund of CENVAT credit." 13. On Questions of Law 1 and 3, the Hon'ble Division Bench, at paragraph Nos.8.4 to 8.7, considered thus "8.4.What is relevant to note is that Rule 5 of the 2004 Rules does not stipulate registration of premises as a necessary prerequisite for claiming a refund. 8.5.In so far as the Assessee in this case, is concerned, it had obtained registration of its premises way back on 23.01.2009. The record shows that allegation of non-registration of premises relates to another building, which was taken on lease by the Assessee and is located in Alwarpet, Chennai. Concededly, services were exported to a overseas Company, from this building whic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and was located at Alwarpet, Chennai", was not registered. 14. After considering the provisions, relevant notifications and decisions in M/s.mPortal India Wireless Solutions Private Limited V. Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore, reported in 2012 (27) S.T.R.134 (Kar.); in Commissioner of Service Tax V. Tavant Technologies India Private Limited, reported in 2016 (3) TMI 535; in Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate V. Atrenta India Private Limited, reported in 2017 (2) ADJ 590; and in Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Vs. Sutham Nylocots, reported in 2014 (306) E.L.T. 255 (Mad), a Hon'ble Division Bench, answered the above said substantial questions of law, raised therein, against the revenue. 15. As facts and grounds of challenge are duly covered by the abovesaid decision, we have no hesitation in dismissing the instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, holding the substantial questions of law against the revenue. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No Costs. –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of Time limit for filing FORM GSTR-6

GST – States – 11/2018 – Dated:- 4-6-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT TGST Notification No. 11/2018 CCT s Ref No. A(1)/115/2017, Dt. 04-06-2018 Sub:- Extension of Time limit for filing FORM GSTR-6. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of Section 39 read with Section 168 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (23 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and in supersession of Commissioner of State Tax Notification No. 6/2018-State

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Hetero Labs. Limited Versus CCT, Hyderabad GST

2018 (7) TMI 1531 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI – Reverse Charge Mechanism – Classification of services are not clear – Demand is sought to be made on the ground that there is a difference between the ledger amounts and the amounts reflected in the Service Tax returns filed by the appellant – Held that:- Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited vs. Union of India [2011 (10) TMI 16 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], held that it is a well settled proposition of law that a fiscal legislation has to be construed strictly and one has to look merely at what is said in the relevant provision; there is nothing to read in; nothing to be implied and there is no room for any indentment”. The order fastening a liability on the assessee has to pass this test.

On going through the Order-in-Original, it is found that Ld. Commissioner has not examined as to how each of the items of expenditure discussed above amount to services received by the appellant in India and how they are ch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

with a specific direction to compute the demand after specifying how each of the items of the expenditure are chargeable to service tax – appeal allowed by way of remand. – Appeal No. ST/31175-31177/2016 – A/30677-30679/2018 – Dated:- 4-6-2018 – Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And Mr. P.V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri Y. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri Arun Kumar, Dy. Commissioner/AR for the Respondent. [Order per: P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO] 1. These appeals are filed by the appellant against the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Hyderabad. 2. The appellants are manufacturers of pharmaceutical drugs with manufacturing units located across India and also outside India. They have branches and associate companies in countries such as Mexico, Russia, Dubai and Vietnam. These Branches and the Associate companies are located in their own premises and maintain their infrastructure with manpower and are registered as permanent establishments

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ces are chargeable to service tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism and the appellant had not discharged the service tax on these services for which he had paid. As they have not disclosed these amounts in their Service Tax Returns, extended period of demand was invoked and interest under section 75 and penalties under sections 76 & 77 were also proposed to be imposed on the appellant. After following due process of law, Ld. Commissioner confirmed the demand and imposed penalties and interest upon them. The current appeals are against these orders of Ld. Commissioner. Earlier, vide Miscellaneous Order No. M/30081-30084/2018, dated 25.04.2018, the appellant s request for an early hearing was allowed as the amount of service tax liability confirmed is substantial. Accordingly, the matter was listed for hearing today. 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. 4. The appellants have submitted a list of 91 expenses incurred by them on various items on which the service tax is proposed t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ceipt of IPR through their branch offices. The appellant argues that these are not IPR charges and no IPR service is received in India. In fact, these are the amounts which they have paid to the Governments of those countries to register their intellectual proprietary rights in those countries. Since registration is a statutory function done by the Governments, these services are covered by the negative list of services under Section 66 D of chapter-V of the Finance Act, 1994. It is his further submission that during the relevant period, all services rendered by the government or local authority excluding some specified in that section were exempted. It is only w.e.f. 14.05.2015, the statutory definition for Government has been introduced through Section 65 B(26A) restricting the scope of government to the departments of Central Government, State Governments and Union Territories. Therefore, these services rendered by the respective governments and for which they have aid, appropriate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

so much amount on these charges and no claim for relief is made out by the appellant. The appellants argument is that salaries and other office expenditure are not liable to tax and at any rate without specifying the authority of law, no demand of service tax can be made on these amounts. (f) Sl.No. 35 to 45: These expenses pertain to Clinical Test Charges, Consultancy Charges, Consumption of innovatory samples and testing charges. The department sought to classify the clinical test charges as technical testing and analysis service and Scientific Consultancy Service and had not made any specific classification of the remaining services. Appellant argues that these services were received and consumed outside India and hence no service tax needs to be paid on them. (g) Sl.No. 46 to 91: These are pertain to variety of charges such as Factory Audit Expense, Translation Charges, Audit Expenses, Bank Interest, Factory Maintenance, Repair and Maintenance of computers, Membership and subscript

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ble service has been provided is not correct. In respect of the demand under the category of Business Auxiliary Service, it is alleged by the appellant that the amounts taken by the department for some orders were wrong in the first notice. In respect of one entry head under the head audit expenses , demand was made on an amount of ₹ 31,97,77,299/- whereas the actual amount was only ₹ 3,19,77,299/- thus inflating the amount by ₹ 28.00 crores. They further argued that the department found a difference between the ledger amounts and the ST-3 returns because the ledger amounts reflected the provision made whereas the liability to pay service tax in the case of reverse charge mechanism is on making the payment. The amounts mentioned in the Ledger would include the amounts paid, amounts for which provision was made, amounts relating to past period and amounts which are written off. Therefore, the demand of service tax simply based on the Ledger amount is incorrect. 6. The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rsed by them. The department s proposal to charge these as business promotion expenses and charge them under reverse charge mechanism is not correct. The appellant relied on the following case laws: (a) Milind Kulkarni and others vs. CCE, Pune [2016-TIOL-709-CESTATMumbai] (b) Genym biotech vs. CCE,Nasik [2016(42)STR 918 (Tri.-Mum.] (c) KPIT Cummins Info System Ltd. CCE Pune [2013-TIOL-1568- CESTAT-Mumbai] (d) CCE Bangalore vs. Pragati Concrete Products Pvt. Ltd [2015(322)ELT 818 (SC)] (e) Sunil Forging & Steel Industries vs. CCE, Belapur [20176(332)ELT 341 (Tri.-Mum.)] (f) CCE Bangalore vs. MTR Foods Ltd [2012(282) ELT 196 (Kar.)] (g) Trans Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Pune [2015(40)STR 490 (Tri.-Mum.)] 8. Ld. DR reiterated the arguments made in the Orders-in-Original and vehemently opposed the appeal. It is his submission that the appellant was bound to have filed the returns reflecting the actual amount of services and the service tax liability thereon and paid the service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ices. 9. We have considered the arguments on both sides and perused the records. The demand is sought to be made on the ground that there is a difference between the ledger amounts and the amounts reflected in the Service Tax returns filed by the appellant. The amounts in the Ledger reflects the amounts transferred by the appellant to their branch offices or associate companies in foreign currency. The Department viewed these as payments made for services rendered by the overseas service provider and consumed by the appellant in India. The appellant argues that the expenses included several expenses which are the office expenses including salaries incurred by their branch offices which are being supported by the appellant. It is also their argument that there were several services for which no classification was made by the department, hence it is impossible to understand and show why the service tax under reverse charge mechanism is not payable on such expenses. 10. As has been held b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

liable to charge to service tax under reverse charge mechanism. It has been held in the case of DHL Express India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) that consideration received from a recipient of service for the services rendered by the provider alone is taxable and the demand for alleged short paid tax must be based on a finding that a specific taxable service has been provided as agreed to be provided and on the consideration that was paid or payable by the recipient of the service to the provider of the service. Similarly, in the present case, where the appellant is supposed to have received the services and is liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism, it is essential that the department say what services were received by the appellant and how they were unclassifiable and how they were liable to be charged under reverse charge mechanism and compute their tax liability accordingly. This is an original work to be done with respect to each of the specific items of expenditure on which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =