M/s Syx Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East

2018 (10) TMI 163 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI – Cash refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit – input services – renting of immovable property service – refund rejected on the ground that the two invoices on which Service Tax was paid claimed to have been issued in the same month – Held that:- The two invoices were raised for the rent amount of ₹ 3,93,488/- in the name of each of the co-owners against which Service Tax was paid – Also, on going through the TDS certificate, it is clear that separate invoices are raised by each of the co-owners and Service Tax accordingly paid by each of the co-owner.

Therefore, there is no dispute about the admissibility of the CENVAT Credit on the Service Tax paid by the licensor to the extent of the own

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cumulated CENVAT Credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The present issue relates to denial of CENVAT Credit on Service Tax paid on part of the input services namely, renting of immovable property. The appellant has taken an office on rent from one Mrs. Payal Jain and Shri Manish Mehta with a monthly rent of ₹ 7,86,975/- for the disputed period. The said rent was distributed between the two co-owners namely, Mrs. Payal Jain and Shri Manish Mehta equally in the ratio of 50:50. Invoices are raised separately on each of the partner equally to the amount received by them. Alleging that since two invoices are raised during the same month, 50% of the rent amount ₹ 3,93,488/ was held to be inadmissible as credit. Consequ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

learned Commissioner (Appeals). 5. Heard both sides and perused the records. 6. The short issue involved in the present appeal for determination is whether the appellants are entitled to claim cash refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit in relation to renting of immovable property. The sole ground on which refund was rejected is that two invoices on which Service Tax was paid claimed to have been issued in the same month. On going through the invoices, I find that two invoices were raised for the rent amount of ₹ 3,93,488/- in the name of each of the co-owners against which Service Tax was paid. Also, on going through the TDS certificate, it is clear that separate invoices are raised by each of the co-owners and Service Tax accordingly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Manaksia Aluminium Company Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Bolpur

2018 (12) TMI 715 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI – Valuation – related party transaction – removal to sister units – Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules – time limitation – Held that:- The facts of the present case are covered by the decision of the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of Jay Yushin Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Central Excise, New Delhi [2000 (7) TMI 105 – CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI], where it was held that there is no dispute that clearance of excisable goods on short payment of duty had taken place. The fact that the differential duty was subsequently debited (albeit voluntarily) by the assessee before the issue of SCN will not debar the issuance of SCN in relation to the short payment occurring on the relevant date.

The appeal filed by the appellant is allowed on limitation. – Appeal No. E/76291/2018 – FO/76535/2018 – Dated:- 17-8-2018 – Shri P.K. Choudhary, Member (Judicial) Shri S.P. Siddhanta, Consultant for the Appellant (s) Shri S.S. Chattopadhyay, Suptd.(AR) for the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pearing on behalf of the appellant company submits that the entire dispute is on the removal to sister units following the valuation of Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules. The sale is not to unrelated buyer and hence the situation of revenue neutral is applicable to the facts of the present case. Ld. Consultant further submits that since the appellants have been filing RT-12 Returns on a regular basis, and if the department did not agree to their valuation, they could have issued the show cause notice in time. In this case the show cause notice has been issued beyond the normal period alleging suppression of facts. He relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sundram Fasteners Ltd. vs. Commr. Of Cus. & C.Ex, Hyderabad-I [2009(237) ELT 55(Tri.-Bang.)]. 3. Ld. D.R. reiterates the orders of the lower authorities and submits that in various decisions, on the aspect of revenue neutrality, it has been held that the demand and interest cannot be waived. 4. Heard both sides and peru

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ave been filing the RT-12 returns regularly. If the department had not agreed with their valuation, they could have issued the show cause notice in time. In this case, the show cause notice has been issued beyond the normal period alleging suppression of facts. On this ground alone, the entire demand is liable to be set aside. Moreover, we also find great merit in the contention of the appellant that in any inter-unit transfer, there is revenue neutrality and there cannot be any intention to evade duty. All the relied on case laws are applicable to the present case. Even in respect of two products wherein three invoices have been relied, they are only stray cases. In view of the above, we do not find merit in the impugned order. Therefore, we set aside the same and allow the appeal with consequential relief. 6. In view of the above discussions the appeal filed by the appellant is allowed on limitation. (Dictated and pronounced in the open court) – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Visa Resources India Limited Versus Commissioner of CGST & C. Ex., Kolkata North

2018 (12) TMI 861 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI – Rebate of service tax paid – export of goods – N/N. 41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 – Held that:- The issue is no more resintegra in view of the various decisions of the Tribunal holding a consistent view – this Bench in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax-II, Kolkata vs. SSK Exports Ltd. & others [2017 (11) TMI 299 – CESTAT KOLKATA], wherein under similar circumstances, Revenue has contended that the refund claim for each shipping bill should be examined on individual basis instead of overall basis – The Tribunal has upheld the order of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) wherein it was held that there is no requirement to determine FOB value shipping bill wise, to determine the formula enumerated in Para 1 (c) or in Para 3(i) of the notification and the rebate claim should be allowed in full when the assessee has specified the said condition on overall basis – appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. ST/75418/2018 – FO/76536/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount of ₹ 1,09,850/-, after making following discussions and findings: Discussion & Findings I have carefully gone through the claim for refund of service tax paid on specified services used for export of the said goods along with all the documents furnished by the said claimant in support of their refund claim of service tax under Notification No.41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 as amended for the period from 06.08.14 to 30.12.14 (LEO Date), the reasons of the Show Cause Notice and the submissions made by the said claimant. The findings are: I. -that the said claimant has filed refund claim for ₹ 2,48,482/- on 05.08.15, which is within one year from the date of export of the said goods in terms of para 3(g) of the said notification ; II. -that the said claimant declared that no CENVAT credit of service tax paid on the specified service used for export of the said goods has been taken under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004; III. -that the sale proceeds in respect of the expor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t above, I found that services in respect of the said invoices mentioned at the brief fact above are the specified services in terms of the said notification which has been rendered for the export of the said goods for the relevant period of claim and therefore, fulfilled the conditions/requirements of the said notification and the said amount is admissible for refund. VII. -that in the claim against all the Shipping Bills No.4181994 dated 31.07.14; 4322308 dated 08.08.14 & 4359653 dated 11.08.14, the difference between the amount of claim for refund against the shipping bill and the amount of rebate available under the procedure specified in paragraph 2 is less than twenty percent of the rebate available under the procedure specified in paragraph 2 of the said notification. Therefore, claim amount involving ₹ 1,05,059/- (Rupees One Lakh Five Thousand Fifty Nine) only, as detailed in Table-II Sl.No.1,2 &3 (Col.No.8), is not admissible for refund as it does not fulfill the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an amount of ₹ 1,38,632/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Two) only, claimed by the said claimant is admissible for refund of Service Tax paid on taxable specified services and an amount of ₹ 1,09,850/- (Rupees One Lakh Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty) only not admissible for refund in terms of the said notification there pass the following order: 2. On appeal the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has held the appellant eligible to get refund of ₹ 143/- paid to M/s. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. He however, up held the Order-in-Original and modified the same to the extent of sanctioning the refund of ₹ 143/-. Hence the present appeal before the Tribunal. Sl. No. Shipping Bill No. & Date Discrepancies (in terms of Notification 41/2012-ST dt. 29.06.2012 Amount involved (Rs.) Remarks 1. 4181994 Dt.31.07.14 The difference between the amount of claim (as per Para 3) for refund against the shipping bill and the amount of rebate avai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.12.14 The service provided by the input service providers M/s Inspectorate Griffith India Pvt. Ltd. does not fall under specified services as per the Notification No.41/2012-ST(supra) since the service has not been used beyond the place of removal 645 Inadmissible for refund 7. 6863903 & 6914649 dt.26.12.14 & 29.12.14 The service provided by the input service providers M/s Inspectorate Griffith India Pvt. Ltd. does not fall under specified services as per the Notification No.41/2012-ST(supra) since the service has not been used beyond the place of removal 2406 Inadmissible for refund Total 109707 Inadmissible and liable for rejection 3. Ld. Consultant appearing on behalf of the appellant company submits that since the Notification No. 41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 is a beneficial legislation, the intent to promote exports by granting exemption of the service tax paid on various services utilized by the exporter during the course of exports of the goods and has to be construed li

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

below: 3. The main contention of the ld. A.R. for the Revenue, is that the respondent had not complied with the conditions of the Notification properly. The ld. A.R. for the Revenue reiterates the grounds of appeal. The main contention of the Revenue is that the particulars furnished in each and every column, must be shipping bill wise. The ld. Counsel for the respondent placed synopsis of cases specifying the issues involved in each appeal. I find that the Commissioner (Appeals) had given a detailed finding as under: 6. The Department also observes that claim cannot be filed under Para 3 in the difference between the amount of rebate under the procedure specified in paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 is less than twenty per cent of the rebate available under the procedure specified in paragraph 2 in terms of Para 1 (c) of the Notification and accordingly. Accordingly, the refund of service tax of ₹ 1,64,163/- in respect of a few shipping bills under Para 3 is erroneous for the reason

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rt of the same is reproduced below for the sake of better understanding and clarity in the manner : (3) the rebate shall be claimed in the following manner, namely :- (a) rebate may be claimed on the service tax actually paid on any specified service on the basis of duly certified documents; (b) the person liable to pay service tax under section 68 of the said Act on the taxable service provided to the exporter for export of goods shall not be eligible to claim rebate under this notification; (c) the manufacturer-exporter, who is registered as an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) or the rules made thereunder, shall file a claim for rebate of service tax paid on the taxable service used for export of goods to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture in Form A-1; (d) the exporter who is not so registered under the provisions referred to in clause

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

service tax paid on the specified services used for export of goods shall be filed within one year from the date of export of the said goods. Explanation. – For the purposes of this clause the date of export shall be the date on which the proper officer of Customs makes an order permitting clearance and loading of the said goods for exportation under section 51 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962); (h) where the total amount of rebate sought under a claim is upto 0.50% of the total FOB value of export goods and the exporter is registered with the Export Promotion Council sponsored by Ministry of Commerce or Ministry of Textiles, Form A-1 shall be submitted along with relevant invoice, bill or challan, or any other document for each specified service, in original, issued in the name of the exporter, evidencing payment for the specified service used for export of the said goods and the service tax paid thereon, certified in the manner specified in sub-clauses (A) and (B) : (A) if the e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

accounts of the exporter for the purposes of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) or the Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), as the case may be; (j) where the rebate involved in a claim is less than rupees five hundred, the same shall not be allowed; (k) the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, shall, after satisfying himself,- (i) that the service tax rebate claim filed in Form A-1 is complete in every respect; (ii) that duly certified documents have been submitted evidencing the payment of service tax on the specified services ; (iii) that rebate has not been already received on the shipping bills or bills of export on the basis of procedure prescribed in paragraph 2; and (iv) that the rebate claimed is arithmetically accurate, refund the service tax paid on the specified service within a period of one month from the receipt of said claim : Provided that where the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deput

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

twenty per cent of the rebate available under the procedure specified in paragraph 2 . I find that in terms of Para 3, a claim may contain one shipping bill or it may contain more than 1 shipping bill. No restriction has been imposed as to the number of shipping bills to be covered in a claim. The only requirement is that details of shipping bill vis-à-vis details of goods exported and details of specified services used for export of goods have to be furnished. I find that in the Form A-1, details of shipping bill/bill of export, details of goods exported, details of specified services used for export of goods, documents evidencing payment of service tax and total amount of service tax paid and claimed as rebate have to be furnished. Again, under column total amount of service tax paid and claimed as rebate as a percentage of FOB value in shipping bill has to be shown. Therefore, from the Form A-1 and its table it is clear that claim is not shipping bill wise but only details h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Supplies to SEZ – The supply of non-alcoholic beverages/ingredients to such beverages, to SEZ units using coffee vending machines by the applicant, do not qualify as zero rated supply, as defined under Section 16 of the IGST Act 2017.

Goods and Services Tax – Supplies to SEZ – The supply of non-alcoholic beverages/ingredients to such beverages, to SEZ units using coffee vending machines by the applicant, do not qualify as zero rate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – Supply or not – distinct persons – The activities performed by the employees at the corporate office in the course of or in relation to employment such as accounting, other administrative and IT system maintenance for the units loc

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – Supply or not – distinct persons – The activities performed by the employees at the corporate office in the course of or in relation to employment such as accoun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

FCM and RCM under GST

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Prakriti Mish – Dated:- 16-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 28-8-2018 – A GTA service provider can opt for RCM in case of FCM anytime ? or there is some requirement by law. can he change his mechanism anytime ? – Reply By ANITA BHADRA – The Reply = In my view , option for RCM / FCM by GTA service provider is transaction based and not for specific period .No such requirement has been indicated in any notification / provisions under GST Act .Experts are requested to share their views – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = After browsing so many notifications/circulars/FAQs etc. I am also of the same view. – Reply By Himansu Sekhar – The Reply = When the supply is to the non specified category, suppose to an i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

? Client has supplied under both mechanism. How to correct his transactions ? – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = Logically from the beginning of a month or beginning of a year. – Reply By Ravikumar muthusamy – The Reply = If GST collected by GTA in his bill then no need for GST payable by receipient under RCM. Experts pls correct me if wrong – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = This is an extract from 20th GST Council Meeting on 5.8.17 8. Goods Transport Agency Service (GTA) Allowed option of 12% GST with full ITC under forward charge. 5% GST with no ITC will also continue. (However, the GTA has to give an option at the beginning of financial year – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = Yes, correct – Discussion-Forum – Knowledg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Query on GST to Foreign entity at Free Trade Warehosing Zone (SEZ)

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Thiruppathi K – Dated:- 16-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 27-8-2018 – Dear Sir,We are located in Sriperumbudur Free Trade Warehousing Zone as a SEZ Unit. One of the Singapore company is our account holder at our SEZ. We are providing them Warehousing services, Transportation and other services pertaining to warehousing activity, for that we have to raise Service charges Bill. Now we have a query that is GST is applicable to our Singapore client for providing S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of goods – Tarpaulins made of HDPE woven fabrics’ are, therefore, laminate of two materials – HDPE tapes woven into fabrics and LDPE sheets/film – Tarpaulins made of HDPE woven fabrics’ will not be classified under HSN 6306 of the

Goods and Services Tax – Classification of goods – Tarpaulins made of HDPE woven fabrics’ are, therefore, laminate of two materials – HDPE tapes woven into fabrics and LDPE sheets/film – Tarpaulins ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TOWARDS LESSER GST RATE SLABS

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – Time and again, there is a demand being raised by GST stakeholders from various quarters on the number of GST rate slabs in India. Under a now 14 months old GST regime in India w.e.f. 1st July, 2017, Goods and Services Tax (GST) is levied and collected under four broad tax rates, viz, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28%. However, there is a upper ceiling of 40% GST rate under the law upto which GST would be levied. Presently only a handful of nations have 3 or more rates. There are only 5 countries where four or more tax rates are in force. About 50 countries have just one tax rate while about 30 countries have two tax rates. Apart from these specific tax rates in India, we have zero rated supplies, exempt supplies and supplies with nil rate of GST. In certain cases, there are special rates as in case of textiles, footwear, jewellery etc. To top up the revenue and balance the tax rates, a Compensation Cess is also levied o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to have annual growth rate of 7-8 percent in next few years which is considered to be a fastest in last few years, rationalization of GST rates could benefit industry as well as tax administration, besides reducing possible litigation on rates and classification disputes. The IMF report has fore cast the GDP growth. @ 7.3 percent for financial year 2018-19 and @ 7.5% for financial year 2019-20 taking into account investment and strong private consumption. It states that India is recovering from the after effects of demonetization in November, 2016 and implementation issues in GST. India is also benefiting from good macro and stable economic policies backed by other socio economic reforms in recent past. International Monetary Fund (IMF) has recently in its annual report expressed that India is on a track to be one of the fastest growing economy in the world and that further rationalization of GST inter alia, would give maximum benefits including labour reforms for companies to expand.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e simplified without sacrificing progressively of the current GST and with potentially significant gains from lower compliance and administrative costs. Streamlining of exemption would also contribute to progressive tax regime. GST is also expected to increase the amount of economic activity taking place in the formal sector of the economy. Though GST Council, the apex decision making body for GST is seized of the matter and is authorised to make recommendations in this behalf, following form of rationalization may be looked at: Present Rate Proposed Rate Zero / Nil Zero / Nil 5% 6% 12% 15% 18% 28% 25% This may later be further rationalized with zero percent and 25% percent still being on the board. As the countrymen become used to GST, revenues build up, compliances increase and people respecting reasonable profiteering with seamless input tax credit mechanism, India should look at a median rate of 10 to 12 percent by converging all other rate slabs. Going forward, this should be the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CE, CGST, Delhi-III Versus National Informatics Centre Service Inc.

2018 (8) TMI 902 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI – Levy of service tax – outstanding advances along with interest – Consulting Engineer Services – Pure agent services – Held that:- The respondent has provided only “Consulting Engineer Services”, on which they have discharged the service tax liability.

The work order issued by the Government Department is in the nature of cost plus contract, wherein the respondent has been appointed as the implementing agency on behalf of the Government Department and the money has been received as a trustee. Further, the respondent is liable to account for every single rupee spent for on behalf of the Government. They are not entitled to appropriate a single rupee more than the agreed 7% as agency charge or administrative charges. Further, the activity of the respondent is held to be in the nature of pure agent. As such, no service tax can be demanded on the amount of advance received and /or on the amount spent out of that advance for the purpose of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d. Commissioner has, for dropping the demand, observed as follows: – ….The assessee is appointed by various ministries of Government of India & other autonomous bodies to co-ordinate & gets the projects such as computerization/networking completed from various vendors. The scheme is like this, that once some project is approved by the competent authority in the Government of India, its administrative approval is granted with a total estimate cost and the period within which it has to be implemented by National Informatics Centre (NIC)/National Informatics Centre Services Inc.(NICSI). The assessee identifies different vendors for execution of various items of work required to be done for complete execution of the project. Entire budget is put at the disposal of assessee by the Government Department or autonomous bodies which had approved the project. The assessee advertises and identifies the vendors and also negotiates the rate etc. by using their technical expertise. Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

T solutions to the Government Organisation. The primary aim of NICSI is to strengthen Government Services those are accessible to the common man through the medium of common service delivery outlets. NICSI provides state-of-the-art technology and cost effective solutions to ensure cost-effectiveness, efficiency, transparency and reliability of such services. As a leading e-Governance software solution provider, NICSI has the following main objectives:- a. to provide economic, scientific, technological, social and cultural development in India; b. to speed up e-Governance implementation across the various arms of the government at national, state and local levels; c. to enable government organizations to become e-Governance ready so that they can provide better services to the citizen through common service delivery outlets ensuring efficiency, transparency, reliability of services at affordable costs; 5. NICSI acts as an implementing /nodal agency or project management consultant for v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

see examines the kind of services to be provided and accordingly appoint the empanelled vendor. (ii) On the basis of above examination, assessee raises proforma invoice /quotation (which includes the estimated value of goods, services and admin charges, etc.) to the clients and assessee receives advance(s) from its clients. Further, as per the payment terms, any unspent portion of the advances has to be returned to the clients. (iii) After completion of the projects, the empanelled vendors raise invoices directly in the name of the clients (not in the name of assessee). As a consideration to implement the project, assessee charges only administrative charges from the clients. (iv) Presentation in the financial statement; It is pertinent to highlight there that neither gross amount received is shown as revenue nor payment made to vendor claimed as an expense. In other words, only the consideration charged by the assessee in respect of implementing the projects, is reflected in the Incom

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, there is short payment of service tax, as the taxable value, should have included the value of goods pertaining to all the projects undertaken by the respondent as implementing agency under the various contracts. Accordingly, demand for the period 2008 – 2009 to 2012-2013 of ₹ 389.02 crores was proposed. The taxable turnover calculated by adding the advance receipts pertaining to the project(s) involving exclusive services with advance receipt pertaining to the projects involving supply and service both. From such taxable turnover, the service tax was calculated at ₹ 474.55 crores and after reducing the amount of service tax already paid ₹ 85.52 crores, the balance demand was proposed at ₹ 389.02 crores. 7. Further, Revenue alleged that the respondent has not paid the tax on the advances at the time of receipts, thereby violating provisions under Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 read with rule 3 of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, as applicable during the perio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t. The Adjudicating Authority also erred in observing that the respondent themselves has not executed any of the projects but has acted as an intermediary in between the sponsoring agency and the executing agency. 9. He has further drawn our attention to the reliance placed by the ld. Commissioner on the ruling of this Tribunal in the case of Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd versus CCE- 2007 (7) STR 443 (Tribunal-Ahmd.), which is not relevant to the present case. In the above said decision, PLL (Petronet LNG Ltd.) entered into an EPC contract with M/s. Ishikawajma-Harima Heavy Industries Ltd., to develop, design, engineer and procure equipment, materials and supplies to erect and construct storage tanks of 5 MMPTA capacity, with potential expansion to 10 MMTPA capacity at the specified temperatures. The EPC contract also envisaged providing marine facility (jetty and island brake water) for transmission and supply of LNG to purchasers. The project involved, inter alia, offshore supply, offsho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ertake the entire range of activities, which, inter alia, comprises of procurement, installation of equipments, installation of hardware, installation of software, testing of equipments, hardware and software, running of pilot projects, commissioning of equipments, systems and network, handing over the operation of the equipment to the respective clients and repair and maintenance of installed equipments and systems, supply of skilled manpower. In the projects executed by the respondent more than one or all of the above activities are involved during execution of the projects. 12. The Department of Information Technology (MT), Government of India has awarded "National Knowledge Network (NKN) project to the respondent/ NICSI, as per the administrative approval dated 30/03/2010. The objective of NKN is to interconnect all universities, libraries, laboratories hospitals and agricultural institutions to share data and resources across the country over the high-speed (of gigabit capabi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

opping the complete demand of ₹ 3,89,02,36,342/- , which also included the demand of ₹ 50.17 crore on non-payment of service tax on the outstanding advance amount, without adequately discussing the nature of projects, whether these were on turnkey basis or otherwise. Further, there is no discussion in the order as to the appropriation of the amount deposited by the respondent of ₹ 50.17 crores prior to the SCN along with interest of ₹ 13 .94 crores. 14. The ld. Counsel for the respondent/assessee further submits that the respondent is providing Consulting Engineer Services and is discharging service tax thereupon. They are engaged in advising and assisting the sponsoring agency in selecting various vendors for supplying and commissioning of various items of work, which are in the nature of computer technology. The personnel, working with the respondent, are also by and large professionally equipped computer engineers, one of the prime requirements of any service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

40 crore towards grant-in-aid to the respondent, to incur expenditure towards the said project. Further, in para-3, it is stated the grant-in-aid given to respondent will be regulated in accordance with the provisions contained in the terms and conditions of the Department of Information Technology and are subject to Chapter 9 of General Financial Rules, 2005, as amended from time to time. It is further provided that the accounts of the respondent, NICSI and NIC shall be audited by C&AG or by any person authorized by him on its behalf in accordance with the statutory provisions. Further, the accounts of respondent shall be open for inspection by the Sanctioning Authority and Audit, both by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India under the provisions of C & AG (DPC) Act 1971 and Internal Audit party by the Principal Accounts Office of the Ministry or Department, whenever it is called upon to do so. Further, the Utilisation Certificate of sanctioned amount of ₹ 240 cro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ology, Government of India and others, acted as a pure agent. It is established law that the expenses incurred as a pure agent are not liable to be included in the gross value of services under section 67 of the Finance Act read with Rule 5 of STR 2006. Further, the respondent has rightly discharged the service tax liability on the administrative charges charged and received from the Government Department, as implementing agency, and has also paid service tax in respect of other services under the head Consultancy Engineering Services . Further, the appellant paid service tax on the income recognized in their accounts and has shown in the profit and loss account. The Revenue has erred in demanding service tax on the gross amount received from Department of Government of India, out of grant-in-aid. 18. The ld. counsel further relied on the ruling of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd versus CCE – 2007 seven STR 443 (Tribunal-Ahmd.), wherein under similar fact

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the project. Foster was in the role of advisers/consultant to petronet so that the work of EPC contractors are as per the requirement and standards envisaged by Petronet. This Tribunal held that from a close reading of the agreement and the report submitted by Foster in the records, sought to maintain, are all of technical nature and, therefore, there is no doubt that the services rendered are essentially, predominantly in the field of engineering. Accordingly, it has been rightly held that Forster surrendered services of Consulting Engineer. 19. The learned Counsel also relied on the ruling of another Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. IRCON International Ltd. versus CCE, Patna- 2017 (4) TMI 903 CESTAT-KOLKATA. Accordingly, the ld. Counsel urges that the appeal of Revenue is without merits as the activities of the respondent/assessee are not liable to be classified under ECIS. It is further urged that under similar facts and circumstances, for the subsequent period,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and the said invoice have shown 7% administrative charges, on the invoice amount. Further, they have paid the service tax on such administrative charges. 21. The ld. Counsel further states that the show cause notice is bad and not maintainable for invoking the extended period of limitation. The appellant is a regular assessee registered with the Service Tax Department, for consulting engineer services, and filed their returns from time to time and have maintained proper books of accounts and have recorded all the transactions therein, which is an admitted fact. Thus, in the facts and circumstances, the conditions precedent for invocation of extended period, being not available like suppression, fraud, intention to evade the duty liability etc, the show cause notice is fit to be held not maintainable. 22. Having considered the rival contentions, we are satisfied that the respondent has provided only Consulting Engineer Services , on which they have discharged the service tax liability.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Constitution of Standing Committee under sub-rule (4) of rule 97 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 -reg.

Goods and Services Tax – 03/2018 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – F.No. CBEC-20/05/01/2018-GST Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs GST (Policy Wing) ***** New Delhi, the 16th August, 2018 Order no. 3/2018-Central Tax Subject: Constitution of Standing Committee under sub-rule (4) of rule 97 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 -reg. In excise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (4) of rule 97 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 read with Section 168 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 the Government hereby constitutes the requisite Standing Committee. 2. Constitution of the Committee:- The Committee shall consist of the following members: a. The Secretary,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SGST rate on intra-State supply of Handicrafts goods

GST – States – 21/2018 – State Tax(Rate) – S.O. No. 57 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT Notification 16th August, 2018 Notification No. -21/2018 – State Tax(Rate) S.O. No. 57 Dated. 17th August, 2018- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Government of Jharkhand, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby exempts the intra-state supplies of handicraft goods, the description of which is specified in column (3) of the Table below, falling under the tariff item, sub-heading, heading or Chapter, as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2), from so much state tax leviable thereon under section 9 of the Jharkhand Goods and Service Tax, 2017 (12 of 2017) as is in excess of the rate specified in column (4) of the said Table. Explanation – For the purpose of this notification, the expression han

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uding lathe and lacquer work, ambadi sisal craft] 6% 6. 4503 90 90 4504 90 Art ware of cork [including articles of sholapith] 6% 7. 4601 and 4602 Mats, matting and screens of vegetable material, basketwork, wickerwork and other articles of vegetable materials or other plaiting material, articles of loofah (including of bamboo, rattan, canes and other natural fibres, dry flowers (naturally dried), articles thereof, ringal, raambaan article, shola items, Kouna/chumthang (water reeds) crafts, articles of Water hyacinth, korai mat] 2.5% 8. 4823 Articles made of paper mache 2.5% 9. 5607, 5609 Coir articles 2.5 % 10. 56090020, 56090090 Toran, Doorway Decoration made from cotton yarn or woollen yarn and aabhala (mirror) with or without hanging flaps 2.5% 11. 57 Handmade carpets and other handmade textile floor coverings (including namda/gabba) 2.5% 12. 5804 30 00 Handmade lace 2.5% 13. 5805 Hand-woven tapestries 2.5% 14. 5808 10 Hand-made braids and ornamental trimming in the piece 2.5% 15. 5

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. 7326 90 99 Art ware of iron 6% 29. 7419 99 Art ware of brass, copper/ copper alloys, electro plated with nickel/silver 6% 30. 7616 99 90 Aluminium art ware 6% 31. 8306 Bells, gongs and like, non-electric, of base metal; statuettes, and other ornaments, of base metal; photograph, picture or similar frames, of base metal; mirrors of base metal; (including Bidriware, Panchloga artware, idol, Swamimalai bronze icons, dhokrajaali) 6% 32. 9405 10 Handcrafted lamps (including panchloga lamp) 6% 33. 9401 50, 9403 80 Furniture of bamboo, rattan and cane 6% 34. 9503 Dolls or other toys made of wood or metal or textile material [including wooden toys of sawantwadi, Channapatna toys, Thanjavur doll) 6% 35. 9504 Ganjifa card 6% 36. 9601 Worked articles of ivory, bone, tortoise shell, horn, antlers, coral, mother of pearl, seashell other animal carving material 6% 37. 9602 Worked vegetable or mineral carving, articles thereof, articles of wax, of stearin, of natural gums or natural resins or of mo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Telangana Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2018

GST – States – G.O.Ms.No. 166 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA Revenue (CT-II) Department G.O.Ms.No. 166 Dated: 16-08-2018 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 164 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No.23 of 2017), the State Government hereby makes the following Rules further to amend the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:- 1. (1) These Rules may be called the Telangana Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2018. (2) They shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from the 12th day of June, 2018. 2. In the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017,- (i) in rule 125, for the words Directorate General of Safeguards , the words Directorate Gener

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Selective Minerals & Color Inds. Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West

2018 (9) TMI 255 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI – Refund of Service Tax – export of goods and services – Held that:- The appellant could not substantiate their claim for refund of service tax paid on various services claimed to have been used in or in relation to export of goods before the authorities below, resulting in rejection of the refund claims – in the interest of justice, to verify these documents, the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority – appeal allowed by way of remand. – APPEAL Nos. ST/86647,86649/2018 – A/87104-87105/2018 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial) Shri R.V. Shetty, Advocate, for appellant Shri O.M. Shivalikar, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for respondent ORDER Heard both sides. 2. These two app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Learned Advocate, Shri R.V. Shetty, for the appellant submits that they have submitted almost all documents relevant to the refund claims indicating export of the goods. However, certain certificates like Chartered Accountant s certificate certifying various services used in relation to export of goods, could not be submitted before the authorities below, resulting into rejection of the refunds. He submits that now they are in possession of all the relevant documents by which they could establish that the service tax paid on various services were in fact used in export of the goods. He prays that the matter may be remanded to the adjudicating authority for verification of these documents. 5. Learned AR for the Revenue referring to the imp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Jaspal Singh Versus Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Kharagpur Range, Kharagpur & Ors.

2018 (9) TMI 542 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 22 (Cal.) – Validity of SCN – Petitioner submits that, the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle. The notice for confiscation was issued to the driver of the vehicle – Section 130(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Held that:- In the facts of the present case, it appears that, the petitioner as the owner was well aware of the confiscation proceedings. The driver of the vehicle was given notice to the confiscation proceedings. He participated in such confiscation proceedings – it cannot be said that, the petitioner was without any notice of the confiscation proceedings. The order emanating out of the confiscation proceedings has been assailed by the parties in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

passed for confiscation, therefore, is without any basis. He refers to Section 130(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in support of his contention. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that, the present writ petition is the third one in respect of the self‐same confiscation proceedings. The order in original has since been passed on May 18, 2018 on the basis of the notice for confiscation. The petitioner is aware of the confiscation proceedings as will appear from the averments made in the writ petition. The so‐called Courier had preferred an appeal against the order in original. Two writ petitions have since been filed which did not succeed. I have considered the rival conte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Navabharat Ventures Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam – GST

2018 (9) TMI 831 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI – CENVAT Credit – input services – works contract service after 01.04.2011 – Held that:- It is not in dispute that appellant had availed CENVAT credit on works contract services during the relevant period and that they were not eligible to avail the credit on works contract if they were used for the two purposes specified in the exclusion part of the definition of input services under Rule 2(l) of the CENAVT Credit Rules, 2004.

Appellant also concedes that they had wrongly taken credit but argues that all the invoices on which they have taken credit do not fall under the exclusion category. This is the factual matter to be verified by the original authority and find it a fit case to be remanded back to him for the purpose.

Appeal allowed by way of remand. – Appeal Nos: E/31216/2017, E/30038-30039/2018 E/30039/2018 – A/31008-31011/2018 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical) Shri G. Prahlad, Advocate for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

luded from the scope of input service in so far as they are used for (a) Construction of a building or a civil structure or a part thereof (or) (b) Laying foundation or making of the structures for support of capital goods except for the provision of one or more of these specified services. 4. The appellant herein is a manufacturer of sugar and had availed credit on the input services rendered on works contracts. Show Cause Notices were issued seeking to deny the credit and recover the same along with interest invoking the extended period of limitation. It is also proposed to impose a penalty on the assessee. 5. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no doubt that they had availed CENVAT credit on works contract services during the relevant period. However, the exclusion of service on works contract during the relevant period is confined to the services used for the construction of building or civil structure or a part thereof or laying foundation or making structu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rks contract services which were specifically excluded. It is his further submission that the ER-1 returns and ST-3 returns do not require the appellant to give invoice wise details of the credit taken. It is the appellant s responsibility to ensure that he takes credit as per the eligibility. In this case the appellant had taken credit in violation of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with the evident intent to evade payment of duty by taking ineligible credit. Therefore, he argued that demand as well as penalty is sustainable. I have considered the arguments on both sides. It is not in dispute that appellant had availed CENVAT credit on works contract services during the relevant period and that they were not eligible to avail the credit on works contract if they were used for the two purposes specified in the exclusion part of the definition of input services under Rule 2(l) of the CENAVT Credit Rules, 2004. Learned Counsel also concedes that they had wrongly taken credit but argues that al

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Al-Khair Co-operative Credit Society ltd.

2018 (9) TMI 1332 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, BIHAR – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 478 (A. A. R. – GST) – Taxable Supply – Borrowing Cost – Whether Consideration represented by way of Borrowing Cost received from members to whom loan was sanctioned, amounts to taxable supply?

Ruling:- In Service Charge or any other type of liability, loan or any other borrowings vide Sl. No. 27 of N/N. 12/2017 is not exempt – resultantly these services are liable to GST. – AR(B)-01/2017-18 Dated:- 16-8-2018

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Tata projects Ltd.

2018 (10) TMI 142 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, BIHAR – TMI – Rate of GST – Construction Services – Construction of factory for Madhepura Electric Locomotive Pvt. Ltd. which subsidiary of Indian Railways – Supply of services – Composite Supply – Special Purpose Vehicle – whether the construction services are connected to Railways or not?

Held that:- The nature of activity undertaking by the applicant is Works Contract – However, the work completed by the applicant company cannot be hel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Payment of taxes for discharge of tax liability as per FORM GSTR-3B.

GST – States – 14/2018 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT TGST Notification No. 14/2018 CCT s Ref No. A(1)/103/2017, Dt.16-08-2018 In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 168 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (23 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act) read with (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said rules) sub-rule (5) of Rule 61 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the Commissioner of State Tax, Telangana, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby specifies that the return in FORM GSTR-3B of the said rules for each of the months from July, 2018 to March, 2019 shall be furnished electronically through the common

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extending the time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1.

GST – States – 13/2018 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT TGST Notification No. 13/2018 CCT s Ref No. A(1)/157/2017, Dt.16-08-2018 Sub:- Extending the time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1. In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 37 read with section 168 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (23 of 2017) the Commissioner of State Tax, Telangana, on the recommenda

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Constitution of Standing Committee under sub-rule (4) of rule 97 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

GST – Order No. 3/2018 – Dated:- 16-8-2018 – F. No. CBEC-20/05/01/2018-GST Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs GST (Policy Wing) ***** New Delhi, the 16th August, 2018 Order No. 3/2018-Central Tax Subject: reg. In excise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (4) of rule 97 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 read with Section 168 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 the Government hereby constitutes the requisite Standing Committee. 2. Constitution of the Committee:- The Committee shall consist of the following members: a. The Secretary, Department of Consumer Affairs, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, who shall be the Chairman of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST credit on GTA services paid under RCM

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Ashwin Garg – Dated:- 15-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 28-8-2018 – Dear Experts,GST on GTA services is payable in cash under RCM on or before 20th of next month. Whether such GST credit is allowed on payment basis (i.e next month) or credit can be taken in same month (i.e accrual basis).May kindly reply with relevant section, rules, circular, clarification etc – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = Credit can be taken only after making payment of GST in cash in the same month. It means ITC is to be taken during the month in which tax paid in cash. – Reply By SHIVKUMAR SHARMA – The Reply = Please refer Issue Id: – 113373 – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = Pay tax on say, 17th , the cash ledger bala

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Supply of goods or services – Contract Management System (CMS) – Activities the Applicant proposes to undertake are services associated with manufacturing of metal, and may be termed as “continuous supply of service” within the meaning of Sectio

Goods and Services Tax – Supply of goods or services – Contract Management System (CMS) – Activities the Applicant proposes to undertake are services associated with manufacturing of metal, and may be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Challenge to Advance Ruling – Classification of Skin care preparations – the 31 products discussed, supplied or intended to be supplied by the Appellant, are not to be classified under Chapter 30, but are to be classified under Chapter 33 (Cosme

Goods and Services Tax – Challenge to Advance Ruling – Classification of Skin care preparations – the 31 products discussed, supplied or intended to be supplied by the Appellant, are not to be classif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Place of supply

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Archna Gupta – Dated:- 14-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 21-8-2018 – Dear ExpertsPlease reply to following query:Indian company is entering into an agreement with a German company for providing consulting services in India for a project going on in India. It will submit its report in India as well as to German company. Please suggest what would be its GST implications and what would be its place of supply with relevant section.RegardsArchna Gupta – Reply By DR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =