Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corre

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 06/2018-GST (State) dated 19.04.2018 – reg. – GST – States – 11/2018 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – NO.F.1-11(8)-TAX/2015/8454-59 GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX PANDIT NEHRU COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI AGARTALA, TRIPURA WEST, PIN-799006. Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018. Circular No.11/2018 – GST (State) To The Additional Commissioner of State Tax / Superintendent of State Tax (All)/ Inspectors of State Tax (All) Subject: Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corresponding State Circular No

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

3/2017-GST Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs GST Policy Wing **** New Delhi, Dated the 21st June, 2018 To, The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners /Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All) Madam/Sir, Subject: Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 -reg. Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 was issued to clarify the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances. 2. In order to clarify certain issues regarding the specified procedure in this regard and in order to ensure uniform implementation of the provisions of the CGST A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

equently. Since the requisite FORMS are not available on the common portal currently, any action initiated by the State tax officers is not being intimated to the central tax officers and vice-versa, doubts have been raised as to the procedure to be followed in such situations. 3.1 In this regard, it is clarified that the hard copies of the notices/orders issued in the specified FORMS by a tax authority may be shown as proof of initiation of action by a tax authority by the transporter/registered person to another tax authority as and when required. 3.2 Further, it is clarified that only such goods and/or conveyances should be detained/confiscated in respect of which there is a violation of the provisions of the GST Acts or the rules made thereunder. Illustration: Where a conveyance carrying twenty-five consignments is intercepted and the person-in-charge of such conveyance produces valid e-way bills and/or other relevant documents in respect of twenty consignments, but is unable to pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re. Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.,

2018 (9) TMI 1107 – NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY – TMI – Anti-profiteering action – Failure to pass on the benefit of Input tax credit – Construction service – migration to GST Scheme – non-compliance of the provisions of Section 171 – Held that:- It is absolutely clear that the excess ITC was available to the Respondent the benefit of which he was required to pass on to the Applicants. The Respondent cannot appropriate this benefit as this is a concession given by the Government from it’s own tax revenue to reduce the prices being charged by the builders from the vulnerable section of society which cannot afford high value apartments. The Respondent is not being asked to extend this benefit out of his own account and he is only liable to pass on the benefit of ITC to which he has become entitled by virtue of the grant of ITC on the Construction Service by the Government.

Profiteering – calculation based on turnover – the Applicants had disputed these calculations and su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from the date of the receipt of the excess amount from each buyer, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of this order.

It is evident from the above that the Respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the buyers of the flats being constructed by him under the above Policy in contravention of the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus realized more price from them than he was entitled to collect and has also compelled them to pay more GST than that they were required to pay by issuing incorrect tax invoices and hence he has committed an offence under section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, he is liable for imposition of penalty.

The Authority, as per Rule 136 of the CGST Rules 2017 directs the Commissioner of State Tax Haryana to monitor this order under the supervision of the DGAP by ensuring that the amount profiteered by the Respondent as ordered by the Authority is passed on to the all the buyers. A report in compli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are:- S.No. S/Sh. Email ID 1 Sukhbir Rohilla* sukhbirrohilla001@gmail.com 2 Himanshu Sethi* winiscertain@gmail.com 3 Rajender Kumar* rajender.kumar20865@gmail.com 4 Deepak Kumar* fialok.deepak@gmail.com 5 Gaurav Rohilla, Nitesh Rohilla, Surender Rohilla* sukhbirrohilla001@gmail.com 6 Razia Hamind17@gmail.com 7 Aarek Mehrotra* smarty.aarekh@gmail.com 8 Neeraj Dale* neeraj.dale@gmail.com 9 Kuldeep Maan kuldeepmaan007@gmail.com 10 Alok Tyagi* aloktyagi53@gmail.com 11 Mayank Saxena mail.msaxena@gmail.com 12 Yogesh Upadhyay yogeshdus@gmail.com 13 Parteek Sharma* prateek.psharma@gmail.com 14 Kamal Valecha* kamal_valecha0211@yahoo.co.in 15 Narottam Singh* nrttm_singh@yahoo.co.in 16 Rahul Kapoor* rkapoor_87@rediffmail.com 17 Vinod Khanduja* vinoddhiraj@gamil.com 18 Pradeep Jangra* pradeepjangra87@gmail.com 19 Amarjeet Kumar* ca.amarjeet@gmail.com 20 Badri Narayan Meena* ritesbn@gmail.com 21 Harsh Awasthi hawasthi@gmail.com 22 Saurav Kumar Aggarwal* lavi22oct@gmail.com 23 Ravi Verma ravics136@g

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d from them as Service Tax was exempted, however, after the implementation of the above Act, 12% Goods & Services Tax (GST) was levied on the construction service in place of Excise Duty and VAT w.e.f. 01.07.2017, which was further reduced to 8% w.e.f. 25.01.2018 but the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) which was available to the Respondent and which was much more than the output tax liability of the Respondent had not been passed on to them and therefore the Applicants should not have been burdened with the entire GST of 12% or 8%. They had further alleged that the Respondent had not agreed with the contention of the Applicants that the Respondent was charging 12% and 8% GST and was simultaneously also enjoying the benefit of ITC and was not giving the benefit of the ITC, had claimed that the Respondent was contravening the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. Accordingly they had filed several applications with the Haryana Screening Committee for appropriate redressa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

der.kumar20865@gmail.com 5 Sukhbir Rohilla/Surinder Kumar* sukhbirrohilla001@gmail.com 6 Aarekh Mehrotra* smarty.aarekh@gmail.com 7 Neeraj Dale* neeraj.dale@gmail.com 8 Alok Tyagi* aloktyagi53@gmail.com 9 Kamal Valecha* kamal_valecha0211@yahoo.co.in 10 Narottam Singh* nrttm_singh@yahoo.co.in 11 Vinod Khanduja* vinoddhiraj@gmail.com 12 Amarjeet Kumar* ca.amarjeet@gmail.com 13 B N Meena* ritesbn@gmail.com 14 Saurav Kumar Aggarwal* star_sas2010@yahoo.com 15 Udayan kishore Mishra* udayankishoremishra@gmail.com 16 Zeeshan Ali Quazi* er.zeeshan99@gmail.com 17 Sunil Jha* lakshyaskjha@gmail.com 18 Rajesh Kumar* rajeshkumar.cs06@gmail.com 19 Vikas Garg* sperry.it@gmail.com 20 Bharat Bhushan* bbbadesra@gmail.com 21 Kamlesh Mishra kmishrabhu@gmail.com 22 Anil Dwivedi* anilcs250@gmail.com 23 Ravi Gumber ravigumber1985@gmail.com 24 Praveen Kumar Sharma praveensha77@gmail.com 25 Abhishek Yadav abhishekyadav.nnl@gmail.com 26 Ashish Gupta mnit.ashish2006@gmail.com 27 Rahul Rajoriya rahul.rajoriya08@gm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

njha80@yahoo.com 52 Ratnesh kumar Singh ratnesh6672@gmail.com 53 Vishal Kapoor vishalkapoor1983@gmail.com 54 Amit Kumar amitthakurlic@yahoo.in 55 Jitendra Kumar joyapuru@gmail.com 56 Kunal Malhotra malhotra.kunal91@gmail.com 57 Vidit Sharma vidit.sharma1@hotmail.com 58 Dikshant Singh dikshantraghav@gmail.com 59 Harindra Pal Nagda harindranagda@hotmail.com 60 Shamik Singha Roy shamik_sr@rediffmail.com 61 Smitha Sreekumar jofinmathew @gmail.com 62 Gaurav Kumar* gauravrohilla89@gmail.com 63 Rohit Chopra rohit.chopra@bestechgroup.com 64 Ashutosh Fotedar ashutoshfotedar@gmail.com 65 Kapil Aggarwal kapil_a2005@rediffmail.com 66 Gaurav Singla singla.gaurav9@gmail.com 67 Pankaj Kumar pankaj@nsk.com 68 Sandeep Sharma sandeep.121.sharma@gmail.com 69 Kiran Mishra kiranmishra.2007@gmail.com 70 Saurabh Jain saurabhs20@yahoo.com 71 Nitesh Rohilla* nitesh.rohilla001@gmail.com 72 Rajdeep Yadav yadav_raj7@rediffmail.com 73 Sachin Batheja sachin.batheja@yahoo.com 74 Souvik Ghosh souvik.ghosh@hotmail.co.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

udallar ganeshanec@gmail.com 98 Deepak Jain deepakjain20@gmail.com 99 Deepak Fialok* fialok.deepak@gmail.com 100 Gagan Nagpal writetogagan@gmail.com 101 Abhishek Kapoor abhishek.kapoorajm@gmail.com 102 Yogesh Kumar yogesh4697@gmail.com *Applicants who have filed more than one application. 3. The Director General Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), after completing the investigation has submitted his Report under Rule 129 (6) of the CGST Rules, 2017 on 24.05.2018 followed by his subsequent reports submitted on 01.08.2018 and 28.08.2018. The Report of the DGAP mentions 109 Applicants out of the 138 Applicants out of which in as much as 26 have filed duplicate applications and 2 have submitted triplicate applications. 4. The DGAP in his report has stated that a notice was issued to the Respondent under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 to submit his reply regarding the allegations that the benefit of ITC had not been passed on to the above Applicants on the purchase of the flats and also to suo moto

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ls purchased during Apr-Sept., 2017. 10. Annexure-1 (Pre-GST impact of Input Tax Credit on Cost). 11. Annexure-2 (Cost Sheet Performa for Goods/Services). 12. Input Tax Credit (VAT) Ledger Account for the period 2016-17. 13. Summary of purchased materials/inputs. 14. VAT and GST Returns 15. Project Report submitted to RERA 5. The report further states that the Respondent had admitted that the ITC was not available during the year 2016-17 but it was available from 01.07.2017 after introduction of the GST. The Respondent had also submitted the following data as has been depicted in the Table below to show that the ITC on Excise Duty, Countervailing Duty (CVD) and capital goods which was not available earlier was now available:- S. No. Nature of pre-GST Tax Total Amount (In Rs.) 1 Excise Duty/CVD included in cost, now available as ITC 46,91,507/- 2 Credit on Capital Goods capitalized not available earlier but now available 2,05,50,719/- 3 Central Sales Tax (CST) For material 12,04,661/- f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

also claimed that in the case of this Scheme the Respondent could charge only a fixed price not exceeding ₹ 4000/- per sq. ft. carpet area plus taxes, as had been provided under the Policy and in the present case, the maximum price had not been exceeded by him. The Respondent had further claimed that out of the total GST incidence, 50% (6% out of 12% GST) was towards SGST, whereas he was earlier availing ITC on the State VAT and the difference after utilizing the ITC was being paid in cash, therefore, the ITC being allowed was not an additional benefit and the GST liability was not entirely covered by the ITC available to the Respondent. The Respondent had also claimed that he was required to pay GST on the sub-contracted work which was an additional cost to him whereas Service Tax was exempted in the past. He had further claimed that there had been tremendous increase in the prices of inputs including Steel due to which no profiteering could be alleged against him. 7. The DGAP

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

thin 18 months of allotment 15-03-2017 12.50% 257955 0 13543 0 0 271498 6 Within 24 months of allotment 15-09-2017 12.50% 257955 0 0 15477 15477 288910 7 Within 30 months of allotment 15-03-2018 12.50% 257955 0 0 10318 10318 278591 Total 1805685 17634 67713 25796 25796 1942623 8. The DGAP has also informed that complaints were lodged in respect of the two projects viz. (1) Urban Homes, Sector 70A, Gurugram and (2) Urban Homes, Sector-86, Gurugram which are being executed by the Respondent under the above Policy. He has further informed that after perusal of the application filed by the Respondent before the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and as per para 5 (i) of the Policy, it was clear that the maximum sale price per sq. feet carpet area had been fixed at ₹ 4,000/- and no minimum rate had been prescribed and hence, the Respondent could not claim that there was restriction on reducing the price. The DGAP has also submitted that the Respondent s claim that Section

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on the Excise Duty paid on inputs or Service Tax paid on the input services, but the report also admits that post GST the ITC was available on all the goods and services, therefore considering the submissions of the Respondent that the net taxable value for the year 2016-17 was ₹ 1,64,52,87,429/- on which VAT liability on him was ₹ 14,91,04,173/-, the DGAP has estimated the VAT liability of the Respondent as 9% of the net taxable value (abated value) and 5.098% of the gross amount of ₹ 2,92,49,55,429/- received from the Applicants. 11. The DGAP has also reported that on examination of the GSTR-3B Returns filed by the Respondent it was revealed that the ratio between the taxable turnover and the ITC availed by him in the post-GST era w.e.f. July 2017 to February 2018 was 7.20%. 12. The DGAP has also mentioned that the Central Government had imposed 18% GST with effective rate of 12% in view of 1/3rd abatement on value on the Construction Service vide Notification No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

6853 86950611 Taxable Turnover 2924955429 76935214 3001890643 725620566 482186312 1207806878 ITC ratio to Taxable Value () 0.74 14.92 1.1 10.22 2.65 7.2 Addition al ITC availed (%) 6.1 Tax Rate 5.25% (VAT) 5.25%(VAT) 12%(GST) 8%(GST) 13. Based on above data the DGAP has concluded that the ITC available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period from April 2016 to June 2017 was 1.10% of the taxable turnover and during the post-GST period from July 2017 to February 2018, the ITC available to the Respondent was 7.20% of the taxable turnover and thus there was additional benefit of ITC to the tune of 6.10% (7.20%-1.10%) in the post-GST era, covering the period from July 2017 to February 2018 to the Respondent. The DGAP has also stated that for the period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 while the additional ITC available was 6.10% of the taxable turnover, the tax rate had increased by 6.75 % (12%-5.25%), leaving no benefit of ITC to be passed on to the Applicants. On the other hand, during

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the other allottees who had not filed complaints and this amount was required to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund as they were not identifiable. 14. After perusal of the DGAP s report the Authority in its meeting held on 5.07.2018 had decided to hear the Applicants and the Respondent on 23.07.2018. Accordingly notices were issued to all the interested parties. On behalf of the Applicants Sh. Rajesh Kumar Jain, Bharat Bhushan and 6 other Applicants appeared and the DGAP was represented by Sh. Akshat Aggarwal Assistant Commissioner and Sh. Bhupender Goyal, Assistant Director (Costs). On the request of the parties another hearing was held on 01.08.2018 wherein S/Sh. Bharat Bhushan and R. K. Jain along with 12 other Applicants had appeared. During both the hearings the Respondent was represented by Sh. Dinesh Sharma, Managing Director along with Sh. J. P. Gaur, Chief Finance Officer, who submitted their written submissions, on 1st August, 2018. 15. In his written submissions, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lready incurred or which were to be incurred. The Respondent has also claimed that the expenditure on land, license approvals and External Development Charges (EDC) was required to be incurred before start of the construction and hence the initial payments on application, allotment and few periodical installments were meant for funding the above mentioned costs which on an average amounted to 40-45% of the total revenue from the Applicants. The Respondent has also claimed that the percentage of expenditure on construction was far more than the percentage of collections made from the Applicants. He has also argued that besides construction cost there were other expenses as had been mentioned above which needed to be considered before arriving at the profit margin. 16. The Respondent has further submitted that though the benefit of ITC was made available, the basic cost of the raw material had increased abnormally which had resulted in setting off of the benefit of ITC. the Respondent ha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

this extra amount charged by subcontractors had not been considered as the part of the cost in the post-GST period. 18. The Respondent has also alleged that while he had received 62.50% of the payment due during the pre-GST period, the amount spent on construction during this period was only 25% of the total cost and hence he would receive 37.50% of total payment due during the post-GST period when he would have to spend 75% of the total cost on construction. The Respondent has also claimed that the initial consideration paid by the Applicants was towards the cost incurred/ to be incurred by him against the cost of land, licenses, approvals, administrative and financial expenses which amounted to 40-45% of the total revenue from the Applicants. He has also submitted that while calculating the ITC against the taxable value during the pre-GST period, the taxable value should be accordingly adjusted by giving effect to the above issues during the pre-GST and post-GST period and percentage

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

issions made by the Applicants are summarized below:- 21. The Applicants did not agree with the DGAP s report which stated that the profiteering was only to the extent of 3.35%. They claimed that the amount of profiteering was 6.10%. They also claimed that the Respondent had recovered VAT @ 5.25% from the Applicants but had paid the Government @ 5.09%. They also requested for imposition of penalty and for early disposal of the case so that the benefit if any was provided to them before the last installment was paid to the Respondent. 22. They also claimed that the increase or decrease in cost on account of the factors other than tax rate and ITC was not to be considered for the purpose of profiteering. They further claimed that the maximum rate of ₹ 4,000/- per sq. ft. carpet area was fixed and any escalation in the cost had already been taken into account at the time of fixing of the above rate. They also submitted that any increase or decrease in the raw material prices was a m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the Respondent had burdened them with extra tax when they were eligible for levy of reduced tax. 24. The Applicants have also pleaded that huge amount of ITC was available to the Respondent which had been availed by him from September, 2017 to February, 2018. This ITC was approximately ₹ 8.70 Crores and was utilized to the extent of ₹ 5.40 Crores for payment of GST by him. They also pleaded that the Respondent was fully aware that the ITC should have been passed on to the buyers after re-calibrating the price, which had not been done deliberately by him which attracted penal provisions under the anti-profiteering law. 25. The Applicants have also attached copies of the e-mail dated 14.07.2018 and reminders dated 21.07.2018 & 26.07.2018 sent by their Association to the Respondent requesting him to extend the benefit of ITC which the Respondent had failed to respond to. 26. Finally the applicants have alleged that during the period between 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 the b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s who had filed complaints as all the buyers were identifiable. 28. The Authority had sought certain clarifications based on the submissions made by the Applicants and the Respondent and in reply to the letter dated 11th June, 2018 and the directions given during the hearing held on 23rd July, 2018, the DGAP in his reply dated 1st August, 2018 has submitted that for the period before 01.07.2017 the output rate of VAT on the Respondent was 5.25% with an ITC of 1.1% and during the period between 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018, the output rate of GST was 12% but an additional ITC of 6.1% (7.2%-1.1%) was available to the Respondent, which should have been passed on to the Applicants and 12% GST should have been charged on such reduced amount and therefore, the effective output rate of tax for the Respondent would be 12% of 93.9 (100-6.1) =11.27%. He has also submitted that similarly, for the period after 25.01.2018, the output rate of GST was 8% but additional ITC of 6.1% (7.2%-1.1%) was availab

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7; 3756/- per sq. ft. He has further stated that during the period between 30.06.2017 to 24.01.2018, the installment including GST should be ₹ 3756+12% GST= ₹ 4207/-per sq. ft., however, the Respondent had charged ₹ 4000 + 12% GST i.e. ₹ 4480/- which amounted to profiteering of = 6.1% (4480-4207/4480 x 100). He has further stated that during the period between 25.01.2018 to 31.03.2018, the installment including GST should be ₹ 3756 + 8% GST= ₹ 4056/- per sq. ft., however, the Applicants had been charged ₹ 4000 + 8% GST i.e. ₹ 4320/- which came to profiteering of = 6.1% (4320-4056/4320 x 100) and hence 6.1% of the amount paid by the Applicants during the entire period from 01.07.2017 to 28.02.2018 was the profiteered amount. 29. We have carefully examined the DGAP s Report, the written and oral submissions of both the Applicants and the Respondent placed on record. The issues to be decided by the Authority are as under:- (a.) Whether there

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on 171 that it deals with two situations one relating to the passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax and the second pertaining to the passing on the benefit of the ITC. In the instant case though rationalization of tax had not resulted in the reduction in the tax rate, the benefit of ITC had been extended to all the goods and services which were utilized by any builder which was not available in the pre-GST era. This fact has not been denied by the Respondent. Since Section 171 not only deals with passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax but also deals with passing on the benefit of ITC therefore the contention made by the Respondent is legally not correct to the extent that there had been increase in the rate of tax from 5.25% to 12% and then 8% and no benefit could be passed on by him to the Applicants as the Respondent had become entitled to claim ITC the benefit of which was required to be passed on by him to the Applicants as per the provisions of Sect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and Medium Potential Towns ₹ 3600/ – per sq. ft. upto and limited to 100 sq. ft., as permitted in the approved building plans. c. Low Potential Towns ₹ 3000/ – per sq. ft. Based on the above Policy the Respondent had submitted his Project Report to the RERA stating that the maximum sale price for each flat would be ₹ 4000/- per sq. ft. carpet area. Therefore, the claim of the Respondent that the price was fixed at ₹ 4000/- by the Haryana Government is incorrect as he had himself made offer of selling the flats at the above rate. It is also clear from the perusal of the above para that the above price was the maximum price and there was no restriction on the Respondent to charge less price. The Respondent had chosen to collect the maximum rate fixed by the Policy and therefore his plea that the rate reduction was not possible was not correct. Moreover the rate offered by the Respondent did not include taxes and it is a fact that the Applicants had paid 5.25% VAT

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hich had become available to him on the GST which had been paid by the Applicants. 32. It is also revealed from the VAT returns filed by the Respondent that he had paid an amount of ₹ 14,91,04,173/- as VAT for a taxable turnover of ₹ 1,64,5287,429/- during the year 2016-17 and his VAT liability was 9% of the net taxable value and his liability was 5.098% of the unabated gross value of ₹ 2,92,49,55,429/-. During the year 2017-18 for the first quarter the taxable turnover was ₹ 7,69,35,214/- while the output tax liability was ₹ 39,21,893/-. Thus the total taxable turnover of these two periods was ₹ 30,01,89,06,44/- while the output tax liability was ₹ 15,30,26,066/- and the ratio of ITC to the taxable turnover was 1.10%. Similarly the taxable value for the period from July 2017 to February 2018 was ₹ 1,20,78,06,878/- while the tax liability was ₹ 12,56,42,894/- and the ITC ratio to taxable turnover was 7.20%. These facts have also not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d the entire amount of tax liability had been paid through ITC, which shows that the entire 12% GST liability was paid through ITC while 12% GST was being collected by him from the Applicants. Therefore this Authority is of the view that the ratio of the ITC to the taxable turnover calculated by the DGAP is correct and the Respondent has not placed any concrete facts or reasons on record to dispute the same. 33. The Respondent has pleaded that since the cost of Steel one of the major raw materials had increased this increase should have been accounted for before alleging profiteering. This argument of the Respondent is not tenable since he had himself offered the maximum price of ₹ 4000/- and there was no provision of revision of this price on the basis of escalation in the price of the raw material in the Policy. The Applicants have also rightly objected to this pleading stating that the price fluctuations were considered at the time of fixing of the rate of ₹ 4000/- per s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

application, 20% at the time of allotment and 75% balance of the total cost shall be paid in equated six monthly installments spread over three year period. One of the grievances of the Applicants is that 25% of total sale consideration which had been paid at the time of signing of the Buyer s Agreements had earned interest for the Respondent, which had not been taken into consideration while fixing the cost of the flats. Therefore the contention of the Respondent that the cost factor should be taken into account is not valid and justifiable as there is no escalation clause in the Agreement and the Respondent has also availed benefit of interest on the amount paid by the Applicants. 34. One of the arguments advanced by the Respondent is that in the pre-GST regime there was no tax liability on the sub-contractors and in the post-GST era the tax levied on the sub-contractors was to be borne by the Respondent. This argument is also not tenable because the entire amount is eligible for ITC

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be settled is that what was the extent of the profiteering. The DGAP had originally reported that the profiteering was nil for the period from July, 2017 to January, 2018 and 3.35% for the period between 26th January, 2018 to February, 2018 if the tax was levied @ 12% & 8% respectively. However the Applicants had disputed these calculations and submitted that the actual benefit that the Respondent has to pass on to all of them was to the extent of 6.1% for both the periods when the tax was levied @ 12% as well as when the tax was levied at @ 8%. In his subsequent report called for by the Authority from the DGAP, he has submitted the revised calculations which are reproduced below. The total amount of profiteering as calculated by the DGAP is also mentioned in the subsequent table:- Particulars Amount (in Rs.) Basic Sale Price Collected for both the projects (Rs.) Jul-17 A – Aug-17 B 72,49,48,683 Sep.17 C 1,59,171 Oct,17 D – Nov.17 E 2,58,475 Dec.17 F 2,54,237 Jan.18 G – Total Basic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount of ₹ 8,13,40,831/-. However, the Authority has taken the basic principle followed by the DGAP i.e. 6.1% of profiteering and accordingly the amount of profiteering has been calculated for each type of flat to arrive at the profiteering amount for each and every buyer depending upon the type of flat he has purchased. In view of the above the Authority determines the amount of profiteering as ₹ 8,22,80,998/- for all the 2476 flats. 38. The DGAP has calculated the profiteering @ 6.1% on the base price of ₹ 4000/- per sq. ft. and accordingly calculated tax amount on the reduced payment. The calculations made by the DGAP are placed below which are correct and the Authority is in full agreement with the same:- Head Row Profiteering Calculation X Calculation GST @12% GST @8% Rate (Per Sq. Ft.) A 4000 4000 Profiteering @6.1% B 244 244 New Rate (Per Sq. Ft.) C A-B 3756 3756 GST @X% D X% of C 450.72 300.48 Total Amount to Be Charged E C+D 4206.72 4056.48 Amount Already Ch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

buyer at the time of collecting the last installment along with the interest @ 18% per annum to be calculated from the date of the receipt of the excess amount from each buyer, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. 41. It is evident from the above that the Respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the buyers of the flats being constructed by him under the above Policy in contravention of the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus realized more price from them than he was entitled to collect and has also compelled them to pay more GST than that they were required to pay by issuing incorrect tax invoices and hence he has committed an offence under section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, he is liable for imposition of penalty. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice be issued to him directing him to explain why the penalty prescribed under Section 122 of the above Act read with rule 133 (3) (d) of the CGST Rules, 2017 should

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Real Value Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Ceebros Property Development, Prime Developers Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

2018 (9) TMI 1149 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – Construction Services – composite Works Contracts – pure services – Department was of the view that such payment is not proper for the reason that the services cannot be classified as Works Contract Service and also because appellants have not exercised their option for payment of service tax under Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007.

Held that:- The services provided by the appellant in respect of the projects executed by them for the period prior to 1.6.2007 being in the nature of composite works contract cannot be brought within the fold of commercial or industrial construction service or construction of complex service – For the period after 1.6.2007, service tax liability under category of ‘commercial or industrial construction service‟ under Section 65(105)(zzzh) ibid, ‘Construction of Complex Service‟ under Section 65(105)(zzzq) will continue to be attracted only if the activitie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under composition scheme under Works Contract Service – Held that:- The Tribunal in the case of Vaishno Associates Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise [2018 (3) TMI 417 – CESTAT NEW DELHI] had occasion to consider this issue and held for sole reason of not filing the intimation opting to pay service under Works Contract Service, the demand cannot sustain.

Appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – ST/723/2010, ST/350/2010, ST/528/2010 – 42436-42438/2018 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate, Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran for Appellant And Shri Ramachandra Rao, Consultant For the Respondent : Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR) ORDER PER BENCH The issue involved in all these appeals being similar, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order. 2. The appellant M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd. are involved in activity of constructing

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2007 to 31.3.2008 along with interest thereon as under. The show cause notice also proposed penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Name of the Project Allegation Tax liability Commercial PRGT Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to buyers Rs.34,38,337/- Residential The Lords Sananda Brindavan Sujeet Surya Skanda Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to buyers Rs.1,07,33,392/- Commercial PRGT Amarasri Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to land owners 48,98,579/- Residential Sai Brindavan Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to land owners Rs.15,49,944/- Total Rs.2,06,20,252/- 2.1 Another Show Cause Notice No. 570/2009 dated 20.10.2009 was also issued in respect of amount received towards construction of residential apartments and commercial complexes for the period from 1.4.2008 to 31.3.2008. It appeared to department from the nature of the services provided, that appellants are liable to pay service tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

who are the owners of the land for the development of residential complex comprising 432 apartments. The units in the complex are sold by appellant to ultimate buyers under separate agreements. Show cause notice dated 10.8.2009 was issued for the period January 2005 to August 2008 proposing to demand service tax under the category of Construction of Complex Service (CICS). After adjudication, the original authority confirmed an amount of ₹ 1,16,42,448/- holding that for the period prior to 1.6.2007, the appellant has to pay service tax under CICS and not under Works Contract Service (WCS) as the project was launched prior to 1.6.2007 and consideration was also received prior to 1.6.2007. For the period after 1.6.2007, the adjudicating authority held that Commercial or Industrial Construction Services / Construction of Residential Complex Services (RCS) were taxable even after 1.6.2007 and that appellant would have to pay under either RCS or WCS. 2.4 M/s. Ceebros Property Developm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

atter came up for hearing, ld. counsel Shri G. Natarajan, appeared for Real Value Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and took us to the history of introduction of service tax on various construction services and also made various contentions, submissions in respect of the matter under appeal. The submissions and contentions of the ld. counsel can be broadly summarized as under:- 3.1 Service Tax was introduced on the following taxable services from the dates mentioned against each: S.No Name of the service Section of the Finance Act, 1994 Introduced with effect from 1 Commercial or industrial construction service (CICS) 65 (105) (zzq) 01.07.2003 2 Construction of Complex Service (CCS) 65 (105) (zzzh) 16.06.2005 3 Works Contract Service (WCS) 65 (105) (zzzza) 01.06.2007 3.2 Section 65A of the Act deals with the principles of classification of services. As each of the taxable services are made taxable from different dates and the scope of abatement from value, exemption entitlements, valuation, rate of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rtion has been prescribed vide Rule 2A of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, framed under Section 94 (2) of the Act. An alternative in the form of Works Contract (Composition scheme for payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 has also been introduced to pay service tax at a lesser rate on the gross amount (including the value of transfer of property in goods). 3.5 The issue as to whether a composite contract involving provision of service as well as transfer of property in goods could be covered under CICS and CCS from the date of introduction of service tax levy on such services was, being litigated upon which was finally settled by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. 2015 (39) STR 913 SC. The Apex Court has observed that in as much as section 67 of the Act, dealing with valuation of taxable services, refers to the gross amount charged for service, the services of CICS and CCS would cover only pure service activities, as any c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ate authorities cannot travel beyond the scope of allegations in the show cause notice and confirm the demand under a different category of taxable service as the assesse was not at all put on notice on the new category of taxable service. These decisions were based on various decisions of higher appellate forums, where it has been held that the show cause notice is the foundation of allegations and the adjudication should be limited to the allegations. Further, as per Section 65 A of the Act, classification of service shall be based on the specific entries and the more specific description has to be preferred. In this connection, he invited attention to CBEC‟s Circular 128/10/2010 Dt. 24.08.2010. 3.8 If show cause notices are issued demanding service tax under CICS / CCS, on composite contracts, involving transfer of property in goods, for the period post 01.06.2007, the said demands of service tax cannot be sustained, as these services would cover only pure service activities,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stainable and liable to be set aside. Reliance is placed on the following decisions, wherein the demands under CICS/CCS for the period post 01.06.2007 have been set aside. a) URC Constructions Vs CCE – 2017 (50) STR 147 Tri-Chennai b) Mantri Developers VS CCE – 2014 (36) STR 944 Tri-Bang. c) Skyway Infra Projects VS CST – 2018-TIOL-360-CESTAT-MUM d) Srishti Constructions VS CCE – 2018-TIOL-337-CESTAT-CHD e) CST VS Swadeshi Construction Company – 2018-TIOL-1096-CESTAT-DEL f) Logos Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS CST 2018 (6) TMI 1361 – CESTAT CHENNAI 3.11 In the subject appeal, all the demands confirmed are in respect of composite contracts (commercial buildings, residential buildings, service provided to buyers and service provided to landowners). If the plea that such demands under CICS and CCS for the period both prior to and post 01.06.2007 is not sustainable is upheld, there is no need to advance any further arguments specific to the projects in question. 4. The above arguments advanced

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ut forward by appellants is that Union Government has for the first time decided to tax the service component of composite contracts such as Works Contract only with effect from 1.6.2007. The definition of Commercial Constructions Service (CICS / CCS) have not undergone any change after introduction of service tax on works contracts. While pure construction services (not composite involving supply of goods) which are not in the nature of works contract would be liable to service tax, prior to 1.6.2007, those in the nature of works contract (composite involving supply of goods) would be subject to levy only with effect from 1.6.2007. Let us proceed to examine the same. 7.1 Commercial or industrial construction was made exigible to service tax by insertion of Section 65(25b) of the Finance Act with effect from 1.7.2003. The definition when introduced read as under:- The said definition was amended with effect from 1.7.2010 vide Notification No. 24/2010-ST dated 22.6.2010 as under:- 25(b)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onstruction of Complex Service (CCS), defined under section 65(30a) ibid during the period of dispute as under:- construction of complex means – (a) construction of a new residential complex or a part thereof; or (b) completion and finishing services in relation to residential complex such as glazing, plastering, painting, floor and wall tiling, wall covering and wall papering, wood and metal joinery and carpentry, fencing and railing, construction of swimming pools, acoustic applications or fittings and other similar services; or (c) repair, alteration, renovation or restoration of, or similar services in relation to, residential complex; 7.3 Residential Complex‟ was defined in section 65(91a) ibid during the disputed period as under:- residential complex means any complex comprising of – (i) a building or buildings, having more than twelve residential units; (ii) a common area; and (iii) any one or more of facilities or services such as park, lift, parking space, community hall

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

any person, by any other person in relation to the execution of a works contract, excluding works contract in respect of roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams. Explanation. – For the purposes of this sub-clause, works contract means a contract wherein, – (i) transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of such contract is leviable to tax as sale of goods, and (ii) such contract is for the purposes of carrying out, – (a) erection, commissioning or installation of plant, machinery, equipment or structures, whether prefabricated or otherwise, installation of electrical and electronic devices, plumbing, drain laying or other installations for transport of fluids, heating, ventilation or air-conditioning including related pipe work, duct work and sheet metal work, thermal insulation, sound insulation, fire proofing or water proofing, lift and escalator, fire escape staircases or elevators; or (b) construction of a new building or a civil struc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

analysis‟ under section 65(105)(zzh) ibid; construction services‟ under section 65(105)(zzq); construction of complex services under section 65(105)(zzzh) would refer only to service contracts simpliciter and not to composite works contracts; that these five taxable services only would qualify without any other element. The Hon‟ble Supreme Court also observed that with introduction of works contract service as a separate taxable service, statutory mechanism to exclude the value of transfer of property of goods has been prescribed. The Apex Court held that since the Finance Act had not laid down any charge or machinery to levy and assess service tax on indivisible works contract prior to 1.6.2007, the levy on such composite works contract prior to that date has no constitutional validity. 7.6 The Larsen & Toubro (supra) judgment has been followed by this Tribunal in many numbers of cases to set aside the demand of service tax on services like commercial or industr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Based on the Hon‟ble Apex Court judgment in Larsen & Toubro, such composite works contract then will not be liable to service tax levy prior to 1.6.2007. On the same ratio, such composite contracts even for the period after 1.6.2007 disputed in these appeals will still have to be held as composite works contract only and not pure service simpliciter contracts that could be classified under commercial or industrial construction service, or construction of complex service. To put in another way, to merit being classified as CICS or CCS, the service provider concerned will be rendering only service simpliciter without any other element in them namely without any material or goods supply involved. That is definitely not the case in the facts of these appeals. The activities of the appellants will therefore continue to be in the nature of composite works contract services and hence even after 1.6.2007 for the periods disputed in these appeals they cannot be brought within the fold

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

composition scheme under which service tax will be levied at only 2 per cent of the total value of the words contract . 7.10 The issue was analyzed by the Hon‟ble Apex Court in Larsen & Toubro case (supra) and held that there can be no levy of service tax on composite contracts (involving both service and supply of goods) prior to 1.6.2007. This read together with the budget speech as above would lead to the strong conclusion that composite contracts were brought within the ambit of levy of service tax only with effect from 1.6.2007 by introduction of Section 65(105)(zzzza) i.e. Works Contract Services. As pointed out by the ld. counsels for appellants, there is no change in the definition of CICS/CCS/RCS after 1.6.2007. Therefore only those contracts which were service simpliciter (not involving supply of goods) would be subject to levy of service tax under CICS / CCS / RCS prior to 1.6.2007 and after. Our view is supported by the fact that the method / scheme for dischargi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rvice Works Contract service‟ was made effective, classification of aforesaid services would undergo a change in case of long term contracts even though part of the service was classified under the respective taxable service prior to 1-6-2007. This is because works contract‟ describes the nature of the activity more specifically and, therefore, as per the provisions of Section 65A of the Finance Act, 1994, it would be the appropriate classification for the part of the service provided after that date. 7.12 Thus, for example, while construction of a new residential complex as a service simpliciter would find a place under section 65(105)(30b) of the Act, the same activity as a composite works contract will require to be brought under section 65(105)(zzzza) Explanation (c). For both these categories for the definition of residential complex, the definition given in section 65(105)(91a) will have to be adopted as discussed above will have to be taken into account. 7.13 We find

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Hon'ble Apex Court in M/s L&T Limited. Even in the appeal, the Revenue submitted that the respondent were engaged in construction services liable to tax under tax entry Section 65(105) (xxq). The grievance of the Revenue is with reference to commercial nature of the construction undertaken by the respondent and not on the correct classification of taxable activity. b. In the case of Skyway Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai – 2018-TIOL-360-CESTAT-MUM, in respect of identical issue for the period from 2005 to 2012, the Tribunal in para 7 has held as under:- 7. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both the sides, we find that the issue falls for consideration is whether the services rendered by the appellant in respect of 52 contracts entered with various Govt. authorities need to be taxed under MMRC/CICS/ECIS or otherwise. It is on record and undisputed that the adjudicating authority has specifically held that all the 52 contracts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nfirmed by the adjudicating authority is liable to be set aside and we do so. c. In the case of URC Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem – 2017 (50) STR 147, the Tribunal in paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 has held as under:- 9. The Hon‟ble Supreme Court in re Larsen & Toubro & Ors. has decided thus 24. A close look at the Finance Act, 1994 would show that the five taxable services referred to in the charging Section 65(105) would refer only to service contracts simpliciter and not to composite works contracts. This is clear from the very language of Section 65(105) which defines taxable service as any service provided . All the services referred to in the said sub-clauses are service contracts simpliciter without any other element in them, such as for example, a service contract which is a commissioning and installation, or erection, commissioning and installation contract. Further, under Section 67, as has been pointed out above, the value of a taxabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er of the two show cause notices adduce to leviability of tax for rendering works contract service‟. On the contrary, the submission of the appellant that they had been providing works contract service‟ had been rejected by the adjudicating authority. Therefore, even as the services rendered by them are taxable for the period from 1st June, 2007 to 30th September, 2008 the narrow confines of the show cause notices do not permit confirmation of demand of tax on any service other than commercial or industrial construction service‟. It is already established in the aforesaid judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court that the entry under Section 65(105)(zzd) is liable to be invoked only for construction simpliciter. Therefore, there is no scope for vivisection to isolate the service component of the contract. d. In the case of Logos Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise as reported in 2018 (6) TMI 1361, the Tribunal has held as under:- 5.1 The paymen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntract for this period. The only argument brought forth by the Ld. Counsel is that they have discharged an amount of around ₹ 82 lakhs under this category after the visit of the departmental officers and therefore an amount of ₹ 36,88,611/- demanded in the impugned order should be considered as having been discharged. We find merit in his argument and hence the demand of ₹ 26,88,611/- under works contract service for the period 01.04.2008 to 30.09.2008 is required to be considered as having been paid, albeit subsequent to the visit of the officers. However, the interest liability if any that arise on this amount if not paid already will have to be discharged by the appellants. So ordered. 8. In the light of the discussions, findings and conclusions above and in particular, relying on the ratios of the case laws cited supra, we hold as under:- a. The services provided by the appellant in respect of the projects executed by them for the period prior to 1.6.2007 being in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te, proposing service tax liability on the impugned services involving composite works contract, under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service‟ or Construction of Complex‟ Service, cannot therefore sustain. In respect of any contract which is a composite contract, service tax cannot be demanded under CICS / CCS for the periods also after 1.6.2007 for the periods in dispute in these appeals. For this very reason, the proceedings in all these appeals cannot sustain. 9. The next issue that arises for consideration is with regard to the demand raised for the reason that appellants did not intimate the department about their intention to opt for payment of service tax under composition scheme under Works Contract Service. The Tribunal vide Final Order No. 50871/2018 dated 6.3.2018 in the case of Vaishno Associates Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise had occasion to consider this issue and held for sole reason of not filing the intimation opting to pay service under Works Co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. L

M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd., M/s. Navyug Airconditioning And M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 02 Others And State Of U.P. And 3 Others – 2018 (9) TMI 1261 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 193 (All.) – Seizure order – E-way bill not accompanied – various amendments brought in by various notifications – Notification dated 26.03.2018 – evasion of tax – Jurisdiction of state authorities to detain and seize the goods under inter-state movement under IGST Act.

Held that:- Rule 138, as initially enacted and made effective from 29.6.2017 read with Government Notification dated 21.7.2017, prescribing procedure, came into force on 16.08.2017 by Commissioner's Circular dated 22.07.2017 read with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ity but to regulate fiscal statutory provisions in order to avoid evasion of tax. Nothing has been placed on record to show that similar requirement of relevant documents was not provided by Central Government also in respect of inter-state transactions. There is also a principle that mere mention of a wrong provision will not make an order bad, if otherwise, power exists in the Statute.

We are not satisfied that the provisions made by Governor vide Rule 138 read with Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 are ultra vires of any Statute.

Orders of Seizure of goods for the period prior to 1.2.2018 set aside. – Decided in favor of petitioners.

Petition against seizure of goods that was challenged on the ground of Jurisdiction, dismissed – Decided against the petitioner. – Writ Tax No. – 587 of 2018, 454 of 2018, 455 of 2018, 462 of 2018, 458 of 2018, 559 of 2018, 560 of 2018, 478 of 2018, 464 of 2018, 55

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, have been challenged on the ground that there is no requirement of accompanying said E-Way Bill; provisions of Provincial Statute cannot override provisions of Central Statue and, in any case, omission is only indeliberate and unintentional. (I) Writ Tax No. 587 of 2018 2. This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 21st March 2018 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax, Mobile Squad, Unit-I, Shamli in purported exercise of powers under Section 129 (1) of UPGST Act, 2017 on the allegation that in respect of goods transported by Vehicle No. DL-1LW-5527, aforesaid authority has reason to believe that for evasion of State Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as SGST ) goods have been transported by said vehicle. Estimated value of goods constituting machines and parts, mentioned in the order is ₹ 9,85,000/-. Petitioner M/s. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited has transported six loading/u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as not available with goods, same were detained. Thereafter, Transporter downloaded said E-Way Bill on 21.03.2018 and presented the same before Assistant Commissioner but on the same date he passed seizure order impugned in present petition. A show cause notice under section 129 (3) has also been issued by Assistant Commissioner, requiring petitioner to show cause up to 28.03.2018 as to why tax and penalty of ₹ 1,87,300/- may not be imposed upon the petitioner. The aforesaid order of seizure has been challenged on the ground that mistake was unintentional, Assistant Commissioner has no jurisdiction to pass order of seizure as there is no requirement of carrying any other E-Way Bill under U.P.G.S.T Act, 2017 and Rules framed thereunder. (II) Writ Tax No. 454 of 2018 3. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. LG Electronics India Limited assailing interception memo dated 15.03.2018, seizure order dated 16.03.2018 and show cause notice dated 16.03.2018 issued by Assistant Commissi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ioner has a warehouse in Ranchi (State of Jharkhand). Goods in dispute were transported from Ranchi to Gautam Budh Nagar and intercepted. The goods were transported by M/s. Saluja Freight Carriers which is also registered with G.S.T Department bearing GSTIN- 06AUKPS7618E1ZC. The goods were loaded on vehicle no. HR3SV0769 against G.R. No. 3001-3002 dated 14.03.2018 issued by Transporter to petitioner. Tax invoices issued in respect to aforesaid goods were numbered as STNAKW2018647, STNAKW2018648 and STNAKW2018649 dated 13.03.2018. All the requisite details of transportation of said goods were mentioned in receipts issued by Transporter. Requisite documents were with driver of vehicle. The vehicle was intercepted by Mobile Squad Team of Uttar Pradesh Commercial Tax Division, (hereinafter referred to as UPCTD ) and detained at Raparganj, District Sonbhadra by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad III. Interception memo dated 15.03.2018 at 10:30 A.M was issued and handed over to driver of ve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Telecommunication Company, having its registered office at New Delhi. It is engaged in providing cellular telephony services in different areas of telecom pursuant to telecom license granted by Government of India Department of Telecommunication. It has various offices in State of U.P. including at Lucknow and Varanasi. It is duly registered under U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 having GSTIN No. 09AAACB2894GIZP. Petitioner transferred stock by two consignments of eight boxes each, of telecom goods from its New Delhi office to Varanasi. It generated two separate E-Way Bill-01 giving details of both the transactions including details of goods and vehicle number. These two E-Way Bills numbered as 1803W177918800367522 and 1803W177918800369265 dated 12.03.2018. The goods were transported through GIR Movers Pvt. Limited by vehicle no. UP32F/N6684. Petitioner also issued invoices-Cum-Challan no. DLG25723 and DLG25727 dated 12.03.2018 for two transactions after charging Integrated Goods and Service Tax (he

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dated 14.03.2018 and show cause notice of the same date have been challenged by this petitioner on the ground that goods were transported in interstate transaction governed by provisions of IGST Act and therefore, governed by Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act ) and Rules framed thereunder. The mechanism of E-Way Bill under Central Goods and Service Tax Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Rules 2017 ) have not been implemented by Central Government. Hence, E-Way Bill alongwith goods were not carried by Transporter and that cannot be a ground for seizure or imposition of penalty. Hence, there is no violation of any provisions of IGST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017 or the Rules framed thereunder. Therefore, provisions of section 129 (1) of UPGST Act cannot be invoked against petitioner. UPGST Act 2017 cannot transgress upon field occupied by IGST Act 2017 and Notification issued under Rule 129 is beyond the power conferred by UPGST Act 2017. (IV)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bill-01 dated 26.02.2018, prescribed under U.P. Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as Rules ) which was valid up-to 15.03.2018 and same was given by petitioner to Transporter. The vehicle was intercepted on 5th March, 2018 by Assistant Commissioner VI, Ghaziabad and goods were detained on the ground that State E-Way Bill- 01, was not being carried by transporter. Thereafter a seizure order was issued on 05.03.2018 alleging that without E-Way Bill- 01 goods were being transported in State of U.P. from outside U.P. A show cause notice under section 129 (3) of U.P.G.S.T. 2017 was also issued on 05.03.2018. It is also challenged on the ground that respondents have no authority to intercept goods, detain, and pass order of seizure as there was no requirement of carrying E-Way Bill- 01 and provisions of provincial Statute cannot override provisions of Central Statute. (V) Writ Tax No. 458 of 2018 6. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. RAS Polytex Pvt. Ltd havin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rs. Goods were being transported by truck no. UP63T-3207. Driver of vehicle was carrying requisite documents i.e. tax invoices, bilty and Central E-Way Bill. Goods were intercepted and detained on 09.03.2018 at 4:00 A.M. at Chandauli on the ground that same were imported in the State of U.P. from out side U.P. without E-Way Bill-01. Seizure order was passed under section 129 (1) on 09.03.2018 and it is also mentioned that U.P. E-Way Bill was not accompanied and Central E-Way Bill dated 07.03.2018 was generated on trial basis, therefore, it was not legally acceptable. Respondent 4 also issued notice under section 129 (3) proposing imposition of tax of ₹ 1,07,460/- and penalty of same amount i.e. ₹ 1,07,460/-. (VI) Writ Tax No. 559 of 2018 & Writ Tax No. 560 of 2018 7. Both these writ petitions have been filed by same petitioner M/s. Rimjhim Ispat Limited, having its manufacturing unit at Industrial Area, Sumerput, District Hamirpur (U.P.) and registered office at 123/360

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng tax of ₹ 77,314/- (CGST), 77,314/- (SGST) and penalty of same amount was issued. 8. In Writ Petition No. 560 of 2018 seizure order dated 07.03.2018 and notice under section 129 (3) is dated 13.03.2018 issued by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad Kannauj are under challenge. Here S.S. Rods purchased by M/s. Bansal Wire Industries Limited Unit-II, B-3, Site II, Loni Road Industrial, Mohan Nagar District Ghaziabad were being transported through Transporter M/s. Buland Road Transport Company by Truck no. UP78BT2199. Petitioner has generated tax invoice no. 08440 dated 28.02.2018 for goods worth ₹ 21,31,051/- which includes IGST. E-Way Bill-02 dated 28.02.2018 was also generated by petitioner giving all details. Same were intercepted and detained by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Kannauj on the ground that E-Way Bills had already expired. Consequently seizure order was passed on 07.03.2018 and a show cause notice under section 129 (3) were issued on the same date, prop

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8 at 7:01 PM and it was carried by driver of vehicle. On 19.03.2018 at 08:44 AM vehicle was intercepted at Kanpur by respondent 3, who found that validity period of E-Way Bill-02 had already expired. The goods were accordingly seized by him and seizure order was passed on 19.03.2018. Same day notice under section 129 (3) of UPGST was also issued proposing to impose tax of ₹ 1,23,764/- and equivalent amount of penalty. (VIII) Writ Tax No. 464 of 2018 10. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., Rave Multiplex Complex, V.I.P. Road, Kanpur. Petitioner placed an order for supply of certain goods (advertising material) to M/s. J.K. Advertising, J-10, Jahangeerpuri, New Delhi in respect of said goods. 7 invoices were prepared on 11/12.03.2018 and goods were transported through Transporter M/s. Maa Chamunda Devi Transport Service, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, through truck no. HR55AA-0252. Transporter issued four separate GRs on 12.03.2018 and also down

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

purchase order of compressor assembly with accessories-FOW to M/s. Tecumseh Products India Private Limited, 38 Km Stone Delhi-Mathura Road, Ballabgarh (Haryana). The said suppler prepared invoice no. IBW/DOM/SALE1555 dated 23.03.2018 for ₹ 10,14,139/- including IGST at 18%. The goods were handed over for transportation by truck no. DL-ILY-2278 for delivery at Ghaziabad. The goods were intercepted by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Unit-V, Noida on 24.03.2018 and detained on the ground that goods did not accompany E-Way Bill-01 prescribed under UPGST Rules 2017. A seizure order was passed on 25.03.2018 and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing levy of tax of ₹ 1,54,699/- and penalty of the same amount. (X) Writ Tax No. 87 of 2018 12. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd., Plots No. 274, 275, 280, 281, Ecotech-1 Extension, Kasna, Greater Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar. He has filed this writ petition cha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ngwith invoice, the details of documents supplied by petitioner as E-Way Bill-01. When vehicle entered U.P., it was intercepted at Noida, by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Sixth Unit, Noida and he detained goods on the ground of absence of E-Way-Bill-01, vide interception memo dated 19.01.2018. Thereafter, seizure order was passed on 20.01.2018 under section 129 (1) and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing tax of ₹ 31,17,500/- and penalty of same amount. 13. In order to give a consolidated bird eye view of details of invoices, seizure orders, show-cause notices and the amount of tax/penalty proposed, a chart is being given as under: S. N. Writ Petition No. Name of petitioner Date of invoice Date of interception/seizure order Date of show cause notice Amount of tax/penalty proposed Date of Final order 1. 587/2018 M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing co. Ltd. Hapur. 16.3.18 21.3.18 21.3.18 374600/- 2. 454/2018 LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. 13

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f e-way-bill under UPGST Act 2017 and Rules framed thereunder to be accompanied by the Transporters, hence, authority concerned has no jurisdiction to pass orders under Section 129 and orders impugned in this writ petition are patently without jurisdiction. (ii) Provisions of U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 will have to sub-serve to the provision of I.G.S.T Act 2017 when goods are transported in an Inter-State transaction, which is governed by I.G.S.T Act 2017. (iii) Fault in any case is unintentional and therefore, there could have been no seizure or imposition of penalty in the exercise of powers under Section 129. (iv) Tax having already been paid and shown in tax invoices, there is no occasion to levy tax again on aforesaid goods and it is wholly without jurisdiction and illegal. (v) Demand of penalty is illegal since applicable tax had already been paid prior to transportation of goods in the matters where the allegation is that e-way-bill has expired. (vi) The fact is that vehicle transportin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re to be prescribed by Commissioner for downloading e-way-bill-02. In the garb of prescription of procedure for downloading e-way-bill- 02, Commissioner vide circular dated 9 August, 2017 also prescribed 48 hours time period during which e-way-bill-02 shall remain valid and this prescription by Commissioner is ultra-vires and beyond the power conferred upon him as it is not contemplated either under the Act or the Rules or even Notification dated 21 July, 2017 issued by State Government. Prescription of time period of validity of e-way-bill-02 could have been done only by the State Government and not the Commissioner and this power exercised by Commissioner vide circular dated 09th August, 2017 is wholly ultra-vires. (ix) Rule 138 confers no power upon State Government to subdelegate power to Commissioner. (x) Commissioner in its circular dated 09th August 2017 has prescribed time period of validity for e-way-bill-01 for Inter- State movement and also for e-way-bill-02 for Intra-State

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

transactions within the State of U.P. i.e. Intra-state and not to the Inter-State transactions. It would be covered by the provisions of IGST Act 2017 and CGST Act 2017, hence, respondent-authorities had no jurisdiction to impose any conditions on Intra-State transactions and seizure orders and notices issued are wholly without jurisdiction. 15. Per-Contra learned Standing Counsel argued that a valid Notification was issued under Section 129 and petitioners having flouted the provisions thereof, in order to give opportunity, show cause notices have been issued after passing seizure orders and the same warrant no interference. 16. We have heard Sri V.K. Upadhyay, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Praveen Kumar, Sri Nishant Mishra, Sri Ritvik Upadhyay, Sri Tanmay Sadh and Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for Petitioners and Sri Manish Goyal, Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents. We have also perused record of all writ petitio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nd gambling and State Cesses and surcharges in so far as they relate to supply of goods and services. Aforesaid Constitutional Amendment inserted Articles 246-A and 269-A which read as under. 246-A. Special provision with respect to goods and services tax,-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in Articles 246 and 254, Parliament, and, subject to clause (2), the Legislature of every State, have power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or by such State. (2) Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of Inter-state trade or commerce. Explanation.- The provisions of this article, shall, in respect of goods and services tax referred to in clause (5) of Article- 279-A take effect from the date recommended by the Goods and Services Tax Council. 269-A. Levy and collection of goods and services tax in course of inter-State trade or commerce.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

x levied under clause (1), such amount shall not form part of the Consolidated Fund of the State. (5). Parliament may, by law, formulate the principles for determining the place of supply, and when a supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. 18. There are corresponding amendments in Articles 248, 249, 250, 268, 269, 270, 271, 286, 366, 368 and in Sixth and Seventh Schedules of the Constitution. Article 268-A has been omitted by the aforesaid Amendment. Provision of Constitution of Goods and Services Tax Council has been made by insertion of article 279-A. 19. Definitions of Goods and Service Tax and Services had been provided by insertion of clauses 12-A and 26-A in Article 366 and the aforesaid two clauses read as under: (12-A) goods and services tax means any tax on supply of goods, or services or both except taxes on the supply of the alcoholic liquor for human consumption;', (26-A) Services means anything other than goo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gation on electronic commerce operators to collect tax at source at such rate not exceeding one percent or not any net value of taxable supplies; to provide sale-assessment of taxes payable by registered person; to provide for conduct of audit of registered persons in order to verify compliance with the provisions of Act; to provide for recovery of arrears of tax using various modes including detaining and sale of goods, movable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person; to provide for powers of inspection search, seizure and arrest to the officers; to establish G.S.T Appellate Tribunal by Central Government; to make provision for penalties for contravention of the credit; to provide for an anti-profiteering clause in order to ensure that business passes on the benefit of reduced tax incidence on goods and services or both to the consumers and to provide for elaborate for transitional provisions. 23. IGST Act 2017 to some extent has replaced Central Sales Tax Act 1956. Articl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ceeding 40% as recommended by G.S.T Council; levy of tax on goods imported into India in accordance with the provisions of Customs Tariff Act 1975 read with Customs Act 1962; levy of tax on import of services on reverse charge basis; empower Central Government to grant exemptions; determination of nature of supply as to whether it is an Inter-State or an Intra-State supply; to provide elaborate provisions for determining place of supply in relation to goods or services or both; payment of tax by a supplier of online information and data-base access or retrieval services; refund of tax paid on supply of goods to tourist leaving India; apportionment of tax and settlement of funds and for transfer of input tax credit between Central Government, State Government and Union Territory; application of certain provisions of C.G.S.T Act 2017; and transitional transactions in relation to import of services made on or after appointed day. 24. Sections 1, 2, 3, 14, 20 and 22 of IGST Act 2017 were e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Joint Commissioners of Central Tax or Joint Directors of Central Tax, (g) Deputy Commissioners of Central Tax or Deputy Directors of Central Tax, (h) Assistant Commissioners of Central Tax or Assistant Directors of Central Tax, and (i) any other class of officers as it may deem fit: PROVIDED that the officers appointed under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) shall be deemed to be the officers appointed under the provisions of this Act. 4. Appointment of officers.- (1) The Board may, in addition to the officers as may be notified by the Government under Section 3, appoint such persons as it may think fit to be the officers under this Act. (2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the Board may, by order, authorise any officer referred to in clauses (a) to (h) of Section 3 to appoint officers of central tax below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of central tax for the administration of this Act. 5. Powers of officers.- (1) Subject to such conditions and limita

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the proper officers for the purposes of this Act, subject to such conditions as the Government shall, on the recommendations of the Council, by Notification, specify. (2) Subject to the conditions specified in the Notification issued under sub-section (1), (a) where any proper officer issues an order under this Act, he shall also issue an order under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as authorised by the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as the case may be, under intimation to the jurisdictional officer of State tax or Union territory tax; (b) where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by the proper officer under this Act on the same subject matter. (3) Any proceedings for rectification, appeal and revision, wherever applicable,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dations of the Council, by Notification, specify. 27. Section 20 of IGST Act 2017 applies provisions of CGST Act 2017 in relation to various aspects, detailed therein, in relation to Integrated Tax in the same manner as CGST Act 2017 applies in relation to Section 20 of IGST Act 2017 which reads as under:- 20. Application of provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act.- Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to,- (i) scope of supply; (ii) composite supply and mixed supply; (iii) time and value of supply; (iv) input tax credit; (v) registration; (vi) tax invoice, credit and debit notes; (vii) accounts and records; (viii) returns, other than late fee; (ix) payment of tax; (x) tax deduction at source; (xi) collection of tax at source; (xii) assessment; (xiii) refunds; (xiv) audit; (xv) inspection, search, seizure and arrest; (xvi) demands and recovery; (xvii) liability to pay in certain cases;

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

any law for the time being in force other than this Act, and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, if charged separately by the supplier: PROVIDED ALSO that in cases where the penalty is leviable under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, the penalty leviable under this Act shall be the sum total of the said penalties. 28. As we have already said section 3 of IGST Act 2017 was made effective from by 22.06.2017 and section 4 was made effective from 01.07.2017. Section 164 of CGST Act 2017 confers Rule framing power upon Central Government and pursuant thereto CGST Rules 2017 were made and enforced w.e.f 22nd June 2017. Similarly section 22 of IGST Act 2017 confers power upon Central Government to makes Rules and pursuant thereto Integrated Goods and Service Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as IGST Rules 2017 ) were framed and came into force w.e.f 22.06.2017. It is a smal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a and therefore, are being reproduced in the form of a comparative chart, as under: CGST Act 2017 UPGST Act 2017 129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance shall be liable to detention or seizure and after detention or seizure, shall be released,- (a) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to one hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to two per cent of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of such tax and penalty; (b) on payment of the app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

se (b) or clause (c). (4) No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard. (5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded. (6)Where the person transporting any goods or the owner of the goods fails to pay the amount of tax and penalty as provided in sub-section (1) within seven days of such detention or seizure, further proceedings shall be initiated in accordance with the provisions of Section 130: PROVIDED that where the detained or seized goods are perishable or hazardous in nature or are likely to depreciate in value with passage of time, the said period of seven days may be reduced by the proper officer. 129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods whi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not come forward for payment of such tax and penalty; (c) upon furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed: Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods. (2) The provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 67 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for detention and seizure of goods and conveyances. (3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyances shall issue a notice specifying the tax and penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order for payment of tax and penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c). (4) No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard. (5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub- section (3) shall be deemed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ods of value exceeding such amount as may be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed. (2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed. (3) Where any conveyance referred to in sub-section (1) is intercepted by the proper officer at any place, he may require the person in charge of the said conveyance to produce the documents prescribed under the said sub-section and devices for verification, and the said person shall be liable to produce the documents and devices and also allow the inspection of goods. 68. Inspection of goods in movement.- (1) The Government may require the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding such amount as may be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed. (2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

138. E-way Rule- Till such time as an E-way-Bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government may, by Notification, specify the documents that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage. 33. U.P. Government in purported exercise of powers under Rule 138 of UPGST Rules 2017, issued a Notification no. KA.NI-1014/XI- 9(52)/17-UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(31)-2017-Lucknow dated 21st July 2017 specifying documents required be carried by a person in charge of conveyance carrying any consignment of goods while in movement or in transit, storage in U.P. and it reads as under:- Uttar Pradesh Shashan Sansthagat Vitta, Kar Evam Nibandhan Anubhag -2 Notification No.-K.A.NI.-1014/XI-9(52)/17-U.P.GST Rules-2017- Order-(31)-2017 Lucknow : 21 July 2017 In exercise of the powers under Rule 138 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 framed under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Servic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hall be carried with the goods during the transportation or transit storage of the goods: a) Mentha Oil, Menthol and D.M.O., b) Supari, c) Iron and Steel, d) All types of edible oils and Vanaspathi ghee. (3) In case of transportation of taxable goods by ecommerce operators or their authorized transporters, courier agents or agents for delivery to a person within Uttar Pradesh, the enclosed form e-way bill-03 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or transit storage within State. (4) In case of transportation of taxable goods valuing ₹ 5,000 or more from a place outside Uttar Pradesh to a place outside the State, the form TDF-01 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or their transit storage within the State and on the exit of goods from the State, the information shall be provided in Form TDF-02. (5) The forms mentioned in clauses (1), (2), (3) and (4) above shall be downloaded by the procedure prescribed by the Commission

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

09.08.2017 was issued amending procedure for downloading relevant forms and it was also declared that Government Notification dated 21.07.2017 shall be effective from 16.08.2017. 35. Further in exercise of powers under Section 164 of UPGST Act 2017, U.P. Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'UPGST (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017') were published vide Notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/17- UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017-Lucknow dated 20th September 2017 and Rule 138 was substituted by following Sub Rule 1 to 14:- 138. Information to be furnished prior to commencement of movement of goods and generation of e-way bill.- (1) Every registered person who causes movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees- (i) in relation to a supply; or (ii) for reason other than supply; or (iii) due to inward supply from an unregistered person. shall, before commencement of such movement, furnish information relating to the s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees: Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this rule Provided also that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union territory from the place of business of the consignor to the place of business of the transporter for further transportation, the supplier or the transporter may not furnish the details of conveyance in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01. Explanation I. For the purposes of this sub-rule, where the goods are supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement of move

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ith the provisions of sub-rule (1), where multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods. (7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated FORM GST EWB-01 in accordance with the provisions of subrule (1) and the value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter shall generate FORM GSTEWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods. (8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who may utilize the sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Validity period (1) (2) (3) 1. Upto 100 km One day 2. For every 100 km or part thereof thereafter One additional day Provided that the Commissioner may, by Notification, extend the validity period of e-way bill for certain categories of goods as may be specified therein: Provided further that where, under circumstances of an exceptional nature, the goods cannot be transported within the validity period of e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the "relevant date" shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours. (11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the recipient, if registered, on the common portal, who shall communicate his acceptance or reje

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ding such amount as the Commissioner of State Tax in consultation with the Chief Commissioner of Central Tax may notify. Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS. 36. Rules 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 provides that amendment in the Rules notified on 20th September 2017 shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in official gazette appoint, By the aforesaid Amendment it also inserted Rules 138-A, Rule 138-B, Rule 138-C and Rule 138-D. 37. In furtherance of Rule 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 read with section 164 of UPGST Act 2017 and 21 of U.P. General Clauses Act, Governor by Notification No. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17- U.P. Act-1-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30.01.2018 appointed 1st February 2018 enforcing the amendment made in the provisions at serial no. 10 and 11 of notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/17- UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017-Lucknow- dated 20th S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e into force. 38. Perhaps this mistake was noticed by Government subsequently and, therefore, it issued another Notification no. KA.NI-177/XI-9- (42)/17-UP Act-1-2017-Order-(109)-2018-Lucknow- dated 6th February 2018, whereby Notification no. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1- 2017-Order-(101)-2018-Lucknow dated 30th January 2018 was rescinded. Notification dated 6th February 2018 reads as under: Notification KA.NI.177/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER (109)-2018, DATED 6-2-2018 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services tax Act, 2017 (U.P. Act no 1 of 2017) read with section 21 of the Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 (U.P. Act no. 1 of 1904), the Governor hereby rescinds, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such rescission, the Notification no. KA.NI.-2-138/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P.Act-l-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30-1-2018. 39. Before 06.02.2018, another Notification KA.NI-2-155/XI-9(42)/ 17-UPGST-Rules-2017-Order

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mmon portal and a unique number will be generated on the said portal: Provided that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State to a job worker located in any other State, the e-way bill shall be generated by tie principal irrespective of the value of the consignment: Provided further that where handicraft goods are transported from one State in another by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of obtaining registration under clauses (i) and (ii) of section 24, the e-way bill shall be generated by the said person irrespective of the value of the consignment, Explanation 1.-For the purposes of this rule, the expression "handicraft goods" has the meaning as assigned to it in Notification No. KA.NI.-2-1414/XI-9(15)/17-U.P. Act-1-2017- Order-(48)-2017 dated 27-09-2017 as amended from time to time. Explanation 2.-For the purposes of this rule, the consignment value of goods shall be the value, determined in accordance with the provisions of section 15, de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s the case may be. (3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relating to the transporter on the common portal and the e-way bill shall be generated by the transporter on the said portal on the basis of the information furnished by the registered person in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01: Provided that the registered person or, the transporter, as the case may be may, at his option, generate and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees: Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this rule: Provided also that where the goods are transported for a distance of less t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt and the transporter on the common portal. (5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consigner or the recipient, who has provided information in Part- A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter shall, before such transfer and further movement of goods, update the details of conveyance in the e-way bill on the common portal in FORM GST EWB-01: Provided that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union Territory from the place of business of the transporter finally to the place of business of the consignee, the details of conveyance may not be updated in the e-way bill. (5A) The consignor or the recipient, who has furnished the information in Part-A of FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter, may assign the e-way bill number to another registered or enrolled transporter for updating the information in Part-B of FORM GST EWB-01 for further movement of consignment: Provided that once the details of the co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

upply or delivery challan, as the case maybe, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods: Provided that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such ecommerce operator. (8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who may utilize the same for furnishing details in FORM GSTR-1: Provided that when the information has been furnished by an unregistered supplier or an unregistered recipient in FORM GST EWB-01, he shall be informed electronically, if the mobile number or the e-mail is available. (9) Where an e-way bill has been generated under this rule, but goods are either not transported or are not transported as per the details furnished in the e-way bill, the e-way bill may be cancelled electronically on the common portal, wi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rted within the validity period of the e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01. Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the "relevant date" shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours. (11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the – (a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or (b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter, on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case may be, shall communicate his acceptance or rejection of the consignment covered by the e-way bill. (12) Where the pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ltation with the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of central tax, may notify; (e) where the goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported are specified in the Schedule appended to Notification No.KA.NI-2-837/XI-9(47)/17-UP Act-1-2017- Order-(07)-2017 dated 30.6.2017 as amended from time to time; (f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel; and (g) where the goods being transported are treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act. Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS. 41. To complete the chain of the events, we may mention that UPGST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 (hereinafter referred to as (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 ) has been published vide Notification no. KA.NI.-2-487/XI-9(42)/17-U.P.GST Rules-2017- Order-(120)-2018 dated 26.0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be generated on the said portal: Provided further that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator or a courier agency, on an authorization received from the consignor, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such e-commerce operator or courier agency and a unique number will be generated on the said portal: Provided also that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State or Union territory to a job worker located in any other State or Union territory, the e-way bill shall be generated either by the principal or the job worker, if registered, irrespective of the value of the consignment: Provided also that where handicraft goods are transported from one State or Union territory to another State or Union territory by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of obtaining registration under clauses (i) and (ii) of section 24, the e-way bill shall be generated by the said person irrespective of the value of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y road, the said person shall generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 electronically on the common portal after furnishing information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01. (2A) Where the goods are transported by railways or by air or vessel, the e-way bill shall be generated by the registered person, being the supplier or the recipient, who shall, either before or after the commencement of movement, furnish, on the common portal, the information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01: Provided that where the goods are transported by railways, the railways shall not deliver the goods unless the eway bill required under these rules is produced at the time of delivery, (3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relating to the transporter on the common portal and the e-way bill shall be generated by the transporter on the said portal on the basis of the inform

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement of the movement of goods. Explanation 2.-The e-way bill shall not be valid for movement of goods by road unless the information in Part-B of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished except in the case of movements covered under the third proviso to sub-rule (3) and the proviso to sub-rule (5). (4) Upon generation of the e-way bill on the common portal, a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal. (5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consignor or the recipient, who has provided information in Part A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter shall, before such transfer and further movement of goods, update the details of conveyance in the e-way bill on the common portal in Part B of FORM GST E

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods. (7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 and the aggregate of the consignment value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter, except in case of transportation of goods by railways, air and vessel, shall, in respect of inter-State supply, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods: Provided that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

her that the unique number generated under sub-rule (1) shall be valid for a period of fifteen days for updation of Part B of FORM GST EWB-01. (10) An e-way bill or a consolidated e-way bill generated under this rule shall be valid for the period as mentioned in column (3) of the Table below from the relevant date, for the distance, within the country, the goods have to be transported, as mentioned in column (2) of the said Table:- Sr. No. Distance Validity period (1) (2) (3) 1. Upto 100 km. One day in cases other than Over Dimensional Cargo 2. For every 100 km. or part thereof thereafter One additional day other than Over Dimensional Cargo 3. Upto 20 km. One day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo 4. For every 20 km. or part thereof thereafter One additional day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo: Provided that the Commissioner may, on the recommendations of the Council, by Notification, extend the validity period of an e-way bill for certain categories of goods as may be specified there

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ils of the e-way bill generated under this rule shall be made available to the- (a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or (b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter, on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case may be, shall communicate his acceptance or rejection of the consignment covered by the e-way bill. (12) Where the person to whom the information specified in subrule (11) has been made available does not communicate his acceptance or rejection within seventy two hours of the details being made available to him on the common portal, or the time of delivery of goods whichever is earlier, it shall be deemed that he has accepted the said details. (13) The e-way bill generated under this rule or under rule 138 of the Goods and Services Tax Rules of any State or Union Territ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rom time to time; (f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel; (g) where the supply of goods being transported is treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act; (h) where the goods are being transported- (i) under customs bond from an inland container depot or a container freight station to a customs port, airport, air cargo complex and land customs station, or from one customs station or customs port to another customs station or customs port, or (ii) under customs supervision or under customs seal; (i) where the goods being transported are transit cargo from or to Nepal or Bhutan; (j) where the goods being transported are exempt from tax under Notification No. KA.NI.-2-853/XI-9(47)/17-U.P.Act-l-2017-Order-(20)-2017 dated 30-06-2017 as amended from time to time and Notification No. KA.NI.-2-1425/XI-9(47)/17-U.P.Act-1-2017-Order-(5

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

id Notification shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in the gazette, appoint. In furtherance thereof, State Government has issued Notification no. KA.NI-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1-2017-Order-(121)-2018-Lucknow dated 27.03.2018 appointing 01.04.2018 for giving effect to Rule 3 [other than sub-rule(7)] and rules 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 on (Fourteenth Amendments) Rules 2018. The said Notification reads as under:- Notification KA.NI.-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER-(121)- 2018, Lucknow Dated March 27, 2018 In exercise of the powers under sub-rule (2) of rule 1 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018 published with Notification No. KA.NI.-2-487/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P. GST Rules-2017, Order-(120)-2018 dated March 26, 2018, the Governor is pleased to appoint the 1st day of April, 2018 as the date from which the provisions of rule 3 [other than sub-rule (7)] and rules 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the said rules shall come into forc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are in movement or in transit storage. This rule 138 in U.P. GST Rules, 2017 came into force on 29.06.2017. In furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, first Notification was issued by Governor on 21.07.2017 but this Notification also declares that Notification itself shall be effective from such date as Commissioner, State Tax/Commercial Tax may mention in the circular prescribing procedure of downloading the forms mentioned in the said Notification. Thus in furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, which came into force on 29.06.2017, first Notification though issued on 21.07.2017 but it was not made effective from that date and, on the contrary, it was to be declared by Commissioner State Tax/Commercial Tax. In furtherance of State Government's Notification No. KA-NI-1014/XI- 9(52)/17-U.P.GST Rules-2107-order(31)-2017 dated 21.07.2017, Commissioner issued Circular No. Sa.Da.GST/Maal Parivahan/2017- 18/2017/Vanijya Kar dated 22.07.2017 laying down procedure for dow

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ires another Notification by State Government, appointing date of enforcement of substituted Rule 138. This substituted Rule 138 as notified on 20.9.2017 was sought to be enforced with effect from 01.02.2018 by Notification dated 30.01.2018 but a glaring error was committed and instead of giving effect to Notification dated 20.09.2017 , it mentioned the date as 20.10.2017 . Thus Notification dated 20.09.2017 did not come into effect and Rule 138 as sought to be substituted by Notification dated 20.09.2017 remained unenforced and inoperative. On 31.01.2018 UPGST (Thirteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, were published which came into force w.e.f. 23.1.2018, except otherwise provided in the Notification dated 31.01.2018. Substituted Rule 138 made by Notification dated 31.01.2018 was made effective from 01.02.2018. Therefore, Rule 138, as initially enacted and made effective from 29.6.2017 read with Government Notification dated 21.7.2017, prescribing procedure, came into force on 16.08.2017 by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dated 09.08.2017. Even the authorities concerned, it is evident, were not clear as to what are the correct Forms in these cases. 47. Further, it is not the case of respondents that the Forms consistent with Rule 138 made effective from 01.02.2018 were made available on the portal. 48. We also find that under Rule 138 (10) period of validity of e-way bill was clearly different than what was mentioned in Commissioner's Circulars dated 09.08.2017. Thus, Rule 138 as was brought in by Notification dated 31.01.2018 w.e.f. 01.02.2018 was operative during the period of transactions with which we are concerned in the present set of writ petitions, except writ petition no. 87 of 2018 which is governed by Rule 138, as initially enacted read with Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017, 27.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 since the invoice herein is dated 15.01.2018 and seizure was made on 20.01.2018. 49. Seizure orders, show cause notices and fin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E-way-bill 01 and/or 02 and its non compliance by referring to Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 read with Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 and also Rule 138 as substituted vide Government Notification dated 20.09.2017, though it was never imposed and made operative, was/is clearly erroneous and illegal. Notification dated 31.01.2018 whereby Rule 138 was completely changed by substitution and made effective from 01.02.2018, it appears, escaped attention of authorities concerned, though it is this provision which had to be complied by petitioners. Unfortunately, authorities concerned have completely failed to observe the same. It appears that for the field authorities there was a gross chaos on account of quick changes in relevant provisions, hence, authorities concerned could not appreciate, what provision is supposed to be followed by concerned person and what is actual default, if any, which has been committed by such person. Petitioners (exce

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

18. Thereafter, it stands substituted by another Rule 138 vide U.P. GST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, Notification dated 26.03.2018, made effective from 01.04.2018. Probably, the above pace of change derailed respondent authorities also in their understanding as to which provision has to be followed and implemented and what has to be observed/applied/obeyed by Petitioners and their Transporters. That is how impugned orders have been passed under a clear misconception of non-downloading of e-way bill 01 or 02, as the case may be, though under Rule 138, which had come into force on 01.02.2018, the Form(s) required to be downloaded by Dealers or Transporters are different. 53. In these peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in our view, neither it can be said that Petitioners have deliberately committed any fault or disobeyed law intentionally or fraudulently, particularly when respondent-authorities themselves were not very clear. It also cannot be said that there is/was any

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

We have already discussed relevant provisions of various Statutes and it is evident that the provisions are pari materia. Officers of State are also competent for search, seizure and imposition of penalty in respect of violation of Central Enactments. Moreover, provisions relating to search and seizure are not for the purpose of imposition of a new liability but to regulate fiscal statutory provisions in order to avoid evasion of tax. Nothing has been placed on record to show that similar requirement of relevant documents was not provided by Central Government also in respect of inter-state transactions. There is also a principle that mere mention of a wrong provision will not make an order bad, if otherwise, power exists in the Statute. In the circumstances, we are not satisfied that the provisions made by Governor vide Rule 138 read with Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 are ultra vires of any Statute. The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Governor of Haryana appoints the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall come into force

GST – States – 87/GST-2 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – HARYANA GOVERNMENT EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT Notification The 18th September, 2018 No.87/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the Governor of Haryana hereby appoints the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the said Act shall come into force. SANJEEV KAUSHAL, Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Har

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Under section 1(3) to bring Section 51 of the HGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force with effect from 01.10.2018 under HGST Act, 2017

GST – States – 86/GST-2 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – HARYANA GOVERNMENT EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT Notification The 18th September, 2018 No.86/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017) and in supersession of the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification no. 84/ST-2, dated the 22nd September, 2017 except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Gov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Under section 148 to extend the due date for filling of FORM GSTR-1 for taxpayer having aggregate turnover up to ₹ 1.5 crores under HGST Act, 2017

GST – States – 84/GST-2 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – HARYANA GOVERNMENT EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT Notification The 18th September, 2018 No.84/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act), and in supersession of – (i) the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification No. 129/ST-2, dated the 22nd November, 2017; (ii) the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification No. 47/ST-2, dated the 06th April, 2018; and (iii) the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification No. 75/GST-2, dated the 10th August, 2018, except as respects things done or omitted to b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

:- Table Serial No. Quarter for which details in FORM GSTR-1 are furnished Time period for furnishing details in FORM GSTR-1 (1) (2) (3) 1 July – September, 2017 31st October, 2018 2 October – December, 2017 31st October, 2018 3 January – March, 2018 31st October, 2018 4 April – June, 2018 31st October, 2018 5 July – September, 2018 31st October, 2018 6 October – December, 2018 31st January, 2019 7 January – March, 2019 30th April, 2019: Provided that the details of outward supply of goods or services or both in FORM GSTR-1 to be filed for the quarters from July, 2017 to September, 2018 by the taxpayers who have obtained Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) in terms of Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, noti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to bring section 52 of the MGST Act (provisions related to TCS) into force w.e.f 01.10.2018.

GST – States – 51/2018-State Tax – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya Mumbai 400 032, dated 18th September 2018 NOTIFICATION Notification No. 51/2018-State Tax MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. GST.1018/C.R.93/Taxation-1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), the Maharashtra Gove

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extending time to submit declaration in form GST TRAN-1

GST – States – 12894/CT.,/Pol-41/1/2017-Policy – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – Commissionerate of CT and GST, Odisha (At Cuttack) (Finance Department, Government of Odisha) No. 12894/CT.,/Pol-41/1/2017-Policy Dated 18.09.2018 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1A) of rule 117 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 read with section 168 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on the recommendations of the Council, l, Saswat Mishra, IAS, Commissioner of State Ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

GST – States – 49/2018-State Tax – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September, 2018 NOTIFICATION Notification No. 49/2018-State Tax MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. GIST.1018/C.R.91/Taxation-1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Maharashtra Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :- 1. (1) These rules may be called the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018. (2) They shall come into force with effect from 13th September, 2018. 2. In the FORMS to the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, after FORM GSTR-9A, the following shall be inserted, namely :- FORM GSTR-9C See rule 80(3) PART – A – Reconciliation Statement Pt.I Basic Details 1 Financial Year 2 GSTIN 3A Legal Name < A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

inning of the Financial Year (-) J Credit notes accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but are not permissible under GST (-) K Adjustments on account of supply of goods by SEZ units to DTA Units (-) L Turnover for the period under composition scheme (-) M Adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder (+/-) N Adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations (+/-) O Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not listed above (+/-) P Annual turnover after adjustments as above <Auto> Q Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9) R Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P) AT1 6 Reasons for Un – Reconciled difference in Annual Gross Turnover A B C Reason 1 <<Text>> Reason 2 <<Text>> Reason 3 <<Text>> 7 Reconciliation of Taxable Turnover A Annual turnover after adjustments (from 5P above) <Auto> B Value of Exempted, Nil Rated, Non-GST supplies, No-Supply turnover C D E F Zero rated supplies without payment of tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

B C Reason 1 <<Text>> Reason 2 <<Text>> Reason 3 <<Text>> 11 Additional amount payable but not paid (due to reasons specified under Tables 6,8 and 10 above) To be paid through Cash Description Taxable Value Central tax State tax / UT tax Integrated tax Cess, if applicable 1 2 3 4 5 6 5% 12% 18% 28% 3% 0.25% 0.10% Interest Late Fee Penalty Others (please specify) Pt. IV Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) 12 Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC) A ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN this should be derived from books of accounts) B ITC booked in earlier Financial Years claimed in current Financial Year (+) C ITC booked in current Financial Year to be claimed in subsequent Financial Years (-) D ITC availed as per audited financial statements or books of account <Auto> E ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9) F Un-reconciled ITC ITC 1 13 Reasons for un-reconciled d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nce in ITC A B C Reason 1 <<Text>> Reason 2 <<Text>> Reason 3 <<Text>> 16 Tax payable on un-reconciled difference in ITC (due to reasons specified in 13 and 15 above) Description Amount Payable Central Tax State/UT Tax IntegratedTax Cess Interest Penalty Pt.V Auditor's recommendation on additional Liability due to non-reconciliation To be paid through Cash Description Value Central tax State tax/UT tax Integrated tax Cess, if applicable 1 2 3 4 5 6 5% 12% 18% 28% 3% 0.25% 0.10% Input Tax Credit Interest Late Fee Penalty Any other amount paid for supplies not included in Annual Return (GSTR 9) Erroneous refund to be paid back Outstanding demands to be settled Other (Pl. specify) Verification: I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given hereinabove is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from. **(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor) Place: ………&helli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5A The turnover as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. There may be cases where multiple GSTINs (State-wise) registrations exist on the same PAN. This is common for persons/entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their GSTIN wise turnover and declare the same here. This shall include export turnover (if any). It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons/entities having presence over multiple States. 5B Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting in the last financial year and was carried forward to the current financial year shall be declared here. In other words, when GST is payable during the financial year on such revenue (which was recognized earlier), the value of such revenue shall be declared here. (For example, if rupees Ten Crores of unbilled r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cluded in the audited Annual Financial Statement for April 2017 to June 2017 shall be declared here. 5H Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting during the current financial year but GST was not payable on such revenue in the same financial year shall be declared here. 5I Value of all advances for which GST has not been paid but the same has been recognized as revenue in the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. 5J Aggregate value of credit notes which have been accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but were not admissible under Section 34 of the MGST Act shall be declared here. 5K Aggregate value of all goods supplied by SEZs to DTA units for which the DTA units have filed bill of entry shall be declared here. 5L There may be cases where registered persons might have opted out of the composition scheme during the current financial year. Their turnover as per the audited Annual Finan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be declared here. This turnover may be derived from Sr. No. 5N, 10 and 11 of Annual Return (GSTR 9). 6 Reasons for non-reconciliation between the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement and turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be specified here. 7 The table provides for reconciliation of taxable turnover from the audited annual turnover after adjustments with the taxable turnover declared in annual return (GSTR-9). 7A Annual turnover as derived in Table 5P above would be auto-populated here. 7B Value of exempted, nil rated, non-GST and no-supply turnover shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any. 7C Value of zero rated supplies (including supplies to SEZs) on which tax is not paid shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any. 7D Value of reverse charge supplies on which tax is to be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Annual Return (GSTR 9). Under the head labelled RC , supplies where tax was paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient (i.e. the person for whom reconciliation statement has been prepared) shall be declared. 9P The total amount to be paid as per liability declared in Table 9A to 9O is auto populated here. 9Q The amount payable as declared in Table 9 of the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here. It should also contain any differential tax paid on Table 10 or 11 of the Annual Return (GSTR9). 10 Reasons for non-reconciliation between payable / liability declared in Table 9P above and the amount payable in Table 9Q shall be specified here. 11 Any amount which is payable due to reasons specified under Table 6, 8 and 10 above shall be declared here. 6. Part IV consists of reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The instructions to fill Part IV are as under :- Table No. Instructions 12A ITC availed (after reversals) as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r shall be declared here. 12D ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of accounts as derived from values declared in Table 12A, 12B and 12C above will be auto-populated here. 12E Net ITC available for utilization as declared in Table 7J of Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here. 13 Reasons for non-reconciliation of ITC as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account (Table 12D) and the net ITC (Table12E) availed in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be specified here. 14 This table is for reconciliation of ITC declared in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) against the expenses booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account. The various sub-heads specified under this table are general expenses in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account on which ITC may or may not be available. Further, this is only an indicative list of heads under which expenses are generally booked. Taxpayers may add or delete any of these head

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

so be declared in this table. Lastly, any other outstanding demands which is recommended to be settled by the auditor shall be declared in this Table. 8. Towards, the end of the reconciliation statement taxpayers shall be given an option to pay their taxes as recommended by the auditor. PART – B-CERTIFICATION I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by the person who had conducted the audit : * I/we have examined the- (a) balance sheet as on ……… (b) the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from ………..…to ending on ……., and (c) the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ……..…to ending on ………, -attached herewith, of M/s …………… (Name), …………………….………… (Address), ..…

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit were not provided/partially provided to us. (B) In *my/our opinion, proper books of account *have/have not been kept by the registered person so far as appears from*my/our examination of the books. (C) I/we certify that the balance sheet, the *profit and loss/income and expenditure account and the cash flow Statement are *in agreement/not in agreement with the books of account maintained at the Principal place of business at ……………………and ** ……………………additional place of business within the State. 4. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the MGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the MGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No. GSTR-9C. 5. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to explanations

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;……………… ……………………………………… **(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor) Place: …………… Name of the signatory ………………… Membership No. …………… Date: …………… Full address ……………………… II. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by a person other than the person who had conducted the audit of the accounts: *I/we report that the audit of the books of accounts and the financial statements of M/s. ………………..…………………. (Name and address of the assessee with GSTIN) was conducted by M/s. ………………&h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the said registered person- *has maintained the books of accounts, records and documents as required by the IGST/CGST/MGST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder *has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/MGST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder: 1. 2. 3. 3. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the MGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the MGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No.GSTR-9C. 4. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to examination of books of account including other relevant documents and explanations given to *me/us, the particulars given in the said Form No.9C are true and correct subject to the following observations/qualifications, if any: (a) …………………………….…………&hellip

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to bring section 51 of the CGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force w.e.f 01.10.2018.

GST – States – 50/2018-State Tax – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September 2018. NOTIFICATION Notification No. 50/2018-State Tax MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. GST.1018/C.R.90 /Taxation-1. – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of Maharashtra, Notification No. MGST.1017/C.R.165(1)/Taxation-1 [Notification No. 33/2017- State Tax ],dated the 21st September 2017, published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette, Extraordinary, Part

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

GST – States – 48/2018-State Tax – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September 2018 NOTIFICATION Notification No. 48/2018-State Tax MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. GST. 1018/C.R.87/Taxation-1.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Maharashtra Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :- 1. (1) These rules may be called the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2018. (2) They shall come into force with effect from 10th September, 2018. 2. In the Mah

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR – 1 for taxpayers having aggregate turnover up to ₹ 1.5 crores.

GST – States – 43/2018-State Tax – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September 2018 NOTIFICATION Notification No.43/2018-State Tax MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. GST.1018/C.R. 92/Taxation-1.-In exercise of the power conferred by section 148 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (XLIII of 2017), (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act ), and in supersession of,- (i) Notification No. MGST.1017/C.R. /Taxation-1 [Notification No. 57/2017- State Tax], dated the 15th November 2017, published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette, Extraordinary, Part IV-B, No. 375, dated the 15th November 2017; (ii) Notificat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

class of registered persons who shall follow the special procedure as detailed below for furnishing the details of outward supply of goods or services or both. 2. The said persons may furnish the details of outward supply of goods or services or both in FORM GSTR-1 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, effected during the quarter as specified in column (2) of the Table below till the time period as specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table, namely :- TABLE Sr.No. Quarter for which the details in FORM GSTR-1 are furnished Time period for furnishing the details in FORM GSTR-1 (1) (2) (3) 1 July – September, 2017 31st October 2018 2 October – December, 2017 31st October 2018 3 January – March, 2018 3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to waive the late fee paid for specified classes of taxpayers for FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTR-4 and FORM GSTR-6.

GST – States – 41/2018-State Tax – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya Mumbai 400 032, dated 18th September 2018 NOTIFICATION Notification No. 41/2018-State Tax MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. GST.1018/C.R.94/Taxation 1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017),(hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), the Government of Maharashtra, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby waives the late fee paid under section 47 of the said Act, by the following classes of taxpayers :- (i) the registered persons whose return in FORM GSTR-3B of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

2018 (9) TMI 1342 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, WEST BENGAL – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 486 (A. A. R. – GST) – Input tax credit – railway freight for transportation of the goods from the its Haldia Refinery to the its export warehouse at Raxaul – export or not – distinct persons.

Whether or not the products transported and supplied by the Applicant are “non- GST products”, “non-taxable supplies” “exempt supplies” or “zero rated supply of goods”?

Whether the transportation to Raxaul warehouse is to be considered to be for export of supply to Nepal or transfer of goods to Indian Oil Corporation’s Bihar Unit for ultimate export to Nepal?

Held that:- The exporter, registered as export warehouse, can store goods that may be diverted for home consumption. As the nature of clearance, whether for home consumption or export, is finally determined only at the time of removal from the export warehouse, the Excise Authority shifts the incidence of duty to the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e transit point, but the point of storing and final clearance. The final clearance being made from the export warehouse at Raxaul, it is the Bihar Unit that is responsible for export or payment of duty if diverted to home consumption – Clearly, the transportation from Haldia to the export warehouse at Raxaul is no measure of actual export.

Input tax credit – export or not – distinct persons – Held that:- Transfer of ATF and other non-taxable supplies from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot are not, therefore, export of goods in terms of section 2(5) of the IGST Act, but exempted supplies from the West Bengal Unit to the Bihar Unit of the Applicant, who are distinct persons in terms of section 25(4) of the GST Act – Sections 16(1)(a) and 16(2) of the IGST Act are, therefore, not applicable. The Applicant cannot claim credit of the GST paid on the input services like railway freight on ATF and other non-taxable supplies from West Bengal to his Bihar Unit.

Ruling:- ATF and other

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the GST Act ) is seeking a ruling on whether or not GST paid on the railway freight for transportation of the above goods from the its Haldia Refinery to the its export warehouse at Raxaul can be availed as Input Tax Credit under the GST Act. Advance Ruling is admissible on this question under Section 97(2)(d) of the GST Act. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd further submits that the question raised in the Application is neither decided by nor pending for decision before any authority under any provisions of the GST Act. The officer concerned has not objected to admission of the Application. The Application is, therefore, admitted. 2. Indian Oil Corporation has its Registered Office in Mumbai, and is operating through its various offices, including its depots, terminals, LPG bottling plants, spread across India and are registered under the Goods and Services Tax, 2017, in all the States/Union Territories of India, except in the Union Territory o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

laid down in Circular No. 581/18/2001-CX dated 29/06/2001 issued by CBEC. The receiving location at Raxaul provides Haldia Refinery CT-2 for a lump sum quantity. Haldia Refinery prepares ARE-3 on the basis of such CT-2 and sends it along with Original Invoice and Railway Receipt as per Central Excise Rules. On receipt of the goods Raxaul Depot returns the ARE-3 duly signed by the Excise Authorities mentioning details of the quantity actually received. The Applicant states that the said ARE-3 is submitted to Haldia Range Excise Authority as proof of export. In its monthly returns in ER-1 the Haldia Refinery reports them as removal without payment of excise duty (under bond) to export warehouse. Similarly, the export warehouse (Raxaul Depot) submits ER-1 along with account/statement of export in Form Annexure-19. The bond register is maintained at the export warehouse. b. The goods so transported to Raxaul Depot are excluded from turnover under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinaft

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

umption. It is export within the meaning of Section 5 of the CST Act. Supply to the Bihar unit of Indian Oil Corporation by the Applicant is, therefore, zero rated supply within the meaning of section 16(1)(a) of the IGST Act, and input tax credit is admissible under section 16(2) of the IGST Act notwithstanding that such supply may be an exempt supply. 5. The officer concerned opposes the argument of the Applicant on the grounds that the goods have been transferred to a warehouse in Bihar and subsequently exported from the said warehouse. This is essentially a case of stock transfer of non-taxable goods of Indian Oil Corporation from its West Bengal Unit to its Bihar Unit, (these two units are registered as distinct persons under the GST Act), and as GST is not levied on the goods so transferred to Bihar, the supply to the Indian Oil Corporation s Bihar Unit is exempt supply for the Applicant and no input tax credit is available thereon. This is in accordance to Section 17(2) of the G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and other non-taxable goods from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot is not supply from the Applicant s Unit to the Bihar Unit of the same Company. Movement of goods for export commences from West Bengal and ends after reaching Nepal. The export warehouse at Raxaul is merely a transit point, where goods are re-warehoused to comply with the procedure prescribed under the Excise Law. The entire movement of goods is for export from India. There is no independent movement from West Bengal to Bihar and the latter, i.e. Indian Oil Corporation s Bihar Unit, has no control over the goods and there is no possibility of diversion for any other purpose. The Applicant states that the detailed procedure under the Central Excise law, as explained in the Application and subsequent submissions, clearly demonstrates that the sole objective of the movement from Haldia Refinery is export to Nepal and there is unbroken inextricable link of such movement to export warehouse for ultimate export to Nepal. Moveme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for export of supply to Nepal or transfer of goods to Indian Oil Corporation s Bihar Unit for ultimate export to Nepal. 9. Art 366 of the Constitution has been amended by the 101st Amendment of the Constitution and clause 12A inserted, which defines GST as tax on supply of goods and services or both except taxes on supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption. It does not exclude petroleum products, namely petroleum crude, HSD, ATF, petrol and natural gas, from the ambit of GST. However, under clause 5 of Art 279A of the Constitution these goods shall not be subject to the levy of GST till a date notified on recommendation of the GST Council. Provisions of section 9 (2) of the GST Act gives expression to this arrangement. This leads to introduction of the concept of non-taxable supplies under section 2(78) of the GST Act. It means supplies on which GST is not leviable. Exempt supplies, as defined under section 2(47) of the GST Act, includes non-taxable supplies. Under section 2(11

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not be treated as zero rated supply, and credit of GST paid on input services is not admissible. In the present context, therefore, discussion on export as defined under section 5 of the CST Act is relevant only so far as it helps in understanding export under the legal framework of GST. 11. Section 5(1) of the CST Act, 1956 states that a sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in course of export of the goods out of the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such export or is effected by a transfer of documents of tile to the goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontier of India. Notwithstanding anything contained in section 5(1), the scope of export is further widened in section 5(3) to include the last sale or purchase of any goods preceding the sale or purchase occasioning the export of those goods out of the territory of India, if such last sale or purchase took place after, and was for the purpose of complying with, the agreeme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it will be an inter-state supply to a distinct person as defined under section 25(4) of the GST Act, and the place of supply shall be determined under section 10(1)(a) of the IGST Act. If, however, Raxaul Depot is a mere transit point for trans-shipment of goods being moved from Haldia Refinery under specific export order, it will be export of goods from the West Bengal Unit to the recipient outside India (in the present context NOC). 13. The Agreement with NOC is no export order. It is, according to clause 3(a), an umbrella agreement between the parties for a period of five years with effect from 01/04/2017. According to the Agreement, NOC will raise specific Product Delivery Orders (hereinafter the PDO), which are the actual export orders or indents placed on a supply point for loading on any day by and large in line with the projected agreed allocation from that supply point. A supply point shall mean the location within India, closest to Nepal border, mentioned in the annexure to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ith the agreed allocation and communication from NOC. Raxaul Depot places order on Haldia Refinery to keep the supply at the optimum level. 15. The Applicant s submission that re-warehousing at Raxaul Depot is sufficient evidence of export is also far from true. It is also incorrect to submit that the goods re-warehoused at the export warehouse cannot be diverted for home consumption. A brief examination of the procedure followed for duty free removal from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot and related issues may help clarifying this aspect. 16. Raxaul Depot of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd is registered with the Excise Authority as an export warehouse and is the exporter in terms of clause 4.1 of Circular No. 581/18/2001- CX dated 29/06/2001of CBEC. It has executed B-3 Bonds before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Muzaffarpur Division, Bihar, for export of goods from the warehouse in terms of clause 4.2 of the above Circular. The Applicant can remove goods from Haldia Refinery

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Running Bond Account will be credited by an amount equivalent to the duty for the goods mentioned in ARE-1. If the goods are cleared for home consumption, the exporter pays the duty with interest from the date of clearance from the factory and credits the Running Bond Account to that extent. 17. It is clear from the above discussion that the exporter, registered as export warehouse, can store goods that may be diverted for home consumption. As the nature of clearance, whether for home consumption or export, is finally determined only at the time of removal from the export warehouse, the Excise Authority shifts the incidence of duty to the time of clearance from the export warehouse. Duty free removal from the factory is, therefore, allowed under prescribed procedure for goods being moved to the export warehouse. It is, therefore, not correct that submission of endorsed copies of ARE-3 to the concerned Excise Authority at Haldia, where the Applicant s factory is located, is evidence of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

serial no. 9B of Notification No. 30/2017 – CT (Rate) dated 29/09/2017 for services associated with transit cargo to Nepal, but has actually been charged and paid GST on the railway freight. Nowhere in the Application does he argue that such GST is not chargeable. 18. The above discussion makes it amply clear that the goods re-warehoused at Raxaul Depot are not moved from Haldia under specific export order and can be either cleared for home consumption or exported. It is, therefore, far from a mere transit point, but the point of storing and final clearance. The final clearance being made from the export warehouse at Raxaul, it is the Bihar Unit that is responsible for export or payment of duty if diverted to home consumption. In fact, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd admittedly reports the export in the GST returns of his Bihar Unit and not in the ones for the West Bengal Unit. If it were to be treated as export of the West Bengal Unit, export reported would have widely varied with the act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e, however, is of little help to the Applicant, as it is already discussed that the movement of goods from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot is not occasioned by an export order, nor is it inextricably linked with any such order. In Hindusthan Unilever Ltd (WPTT 636 of 2007) the petitioner purchased tea in Kolkata, transferred it to its branches at Pune and Cochin against declarations in form F, where the tea was blended and packed and exported out of India. Calcutta High Court observed that notwithstanding the intervening factors like transfer to other states or issue of declarations in form F, the tea purchased by or sold to the petitioner in Kolkata was the last sale preceding export within the meaning of section 5(3) of the CST ACT. The case is not relevant in the present context, as scope of export under section 2(5) of the IGST Act does not include the situations provided under section 5(3) of the CST Act. 20. Transfer of ATF and other non-taxable supplies from Haldia Refinery to R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : SMVD Polypack Pvt. Ltd

2018 (9) TMI 1343 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, WEST BENGAL – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 144 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of goods – Polypropylene Leno Bags (or mesh bags) – Applicant is of the opinion that the PP Leno Bags manufactured is classifiable under Tariff Head 63053300 of the GST Tariff which is aligned to the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Held that:- From the explanatory notes and clarification provided for determination of classification of goods it is seen that two main factors, apart from the raw materials, are to be considered, namely, the width of the tape used in the weaving and whether or not there is a layer/lining in these bags. The specifications of the PP Leno Bags being manufactured by the Applicant, therefore, become an important feature for determining their classification for the purpose of GST – IS 16187:2014 issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards specifies that, PP Leno Woven sacks for packaging and storage

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

red to as the the GST Act ). Advance Ruling is admissible under Section 97(2)(a) of the GST Act. The Applicant submits that the question raised in the Application has neither been decided by nor is pending before any authority under any provisions of the GST Act. The officer concerned raises no objection to the admission of the Application. The Application is, therefore, admitted. 2. The Application states that the Applicant manufactures Polypropylene Leno Bags which are mainly used for packing of agricultural produce such as, potato and onion. The Applicant also manufactures other woven PP/HDPE bags, FIBC bags which may be used for packing of cement, fertiliser and food grain. Ruling is, however, sought for the Polypropylene Leno Bags. The composition of these Polypropylene Leno Bags is i) Polypropylene (hereinafter referred to as PP ) – 88%, ii) Calcium-10% and iii) Colour Master Batch – 2%. The raw materials, namely, PP, calcium and Colour Master Batch, along with Additives, are fed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tics, namely, sacks and bags (including cones) made of plastics other than polymers of ethylene but not of poly (vinyl chloride). Tariff Sub Heading 63053300 under the GST Tariff covers sacks and bags, of a kind used for packing of goods, made, not of jute or of other textile bust fibres of Heading 5303, but of manmade textile materials which are not flexible intermediate bulk containers but are of polyethylene or polypropylene strip or the like. The product PP Leno Bags, if described as only such, can be placed under either Tariff Code if merely these Tariff descriptions are referred to. 5. The Applicant submits that Note 2(p) of Chapter 39 of the GST Tariff (Plastics and articles thereof) does not cover goods of Section XI (textiles and textile products). There is no other criterion stated to exclude goods from being included as Plastics and articles thereof vis-a-vis Chapter 63. The Applicant also submits that, Note 1(g) to Section XI of the Tariff Act states that the Section of Tex

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

with plastics or articles thereof, of chapter 39. 7. The Application submits that the Applicant manufactures PP Leno Bags with tapes not exceeding 5mm and the same are not impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with particles and articles thereof, of Chapter 39. 8. From the explanatory notes and clarification provided for determination of classification of goods it is seen that two main factors, apart from the raw materials, are to be considered, namely, the width of the tape used in the weaving and whether or not there is a layer/lining in these bags. The specifications of the PP Leno Bags being manufactured by the Applicant, therefore, become an important feature for determining their classification for the purpose of GST. 9. IS 16187:2014 issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards specifies that, PP Leno Woven sacks for packaging and storage of fruits and vegetables should have range of width from 2.0 to 2.5 mm. Since, the Ruling sought for is specifically for PP Leno Bags used fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Shree Rama Newsprint Limited Through Executive Director Siddharth Ganpatraj Chowdhury Versus Union Of India Through Secretary

2018 (9) TMI 1475 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 592 (Guj.) – Vires of Rule 89(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 as amended vide N/N. 21/2018-Central Tax dated 18.4.2018 and N/N. 26/2018-Central Tax dated 13.6.2018 – denial of grant of refund of unutilized tax credit in respect of tax paid on input services – Held that:- We are inclined to issue Notice returnable on 10.10.2018 – there shall be ad-interim relief as prayed for in para 17(D) meaning thereby the impugned demand notice dated 21.6.2018 and its operation and implementation is stayed hereby. – R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14155 of 2018 Dated:- 18-9-2018 – MR. ANANT S. DAVE AND MR. BIREN VAISHNAV JJ. Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI SR. ADV. With MS A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

attention is invited to Sections 53, 54 of Chapter XI pertaining to Refund of the Act, 2017 and specifically sub-section (3) (ii) along with un-numbered proviso of the very section in juxtaposition to definition of input , input services , input tax , input tax credit respectively under Sections 2 (59) (60) (62) and (63) of the Act and Rule 89 about application for refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount so existed which came to be later on amended vide notification No.21/2108 dated 18.4.2018 and notification No.26/2018 dated 13.6.2018 and without disputing the fact about existence of power of amending the Rule with retrospective effect, contentions are raised based on grounds of challenge that impugned amended Rule 89(5

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2018.

GST – States – 83/GST-2 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – HARYANA GOVERNMENT EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT Notification The 18th September, 2018 No.83/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the Governor of Haryana, hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:- 1. (1) These rules may be called the Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2018. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. 2. In the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter called the said rules), in rule 117,- (a) after sub-rule (1), the following sub-rule shall be inser

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

GST – States – 85/GST-2 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – HARYANA GOVERNMENT EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT Notification The 18th September, 2018 No. 85/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the Governor of Haryana, hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:- (1) These rules may be called the Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. 2. In the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, after FORM GSTR-9A, the following FORM shall be inserted, namely:- FORM GSTR-9C See rule 80(3) PART – A – Reconciliation Statement Pt. I Basic Details 1 Financial Year 2 GSTIN 3A Legal Name < Auto> 3B Trade Name (if any) <Auto> 4 Are you liable to audit under any Act? <<Please specify>> (Amount in ₹ in all tables) Pt. II Reconciliat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

unt of supply of goods by SEZ units to DTA Units (-) L Turnover for the period under composition scheme (-) M Adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder (+/-) N Adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations (+/-) O Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not listed above (+/-) P Annual turnover after adjustments as above <Auto> Q Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR-9) R Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P) AT1 6 Reasons for Un – Reconciled difference in Annual Gross Turnover A Reason 1 <<Text>> B Reason 2 <<Text>> C Reason 3 <<Text>> 7 Reconciliation of Taxable Turnover A Annual turnover after adjustments (from 5P above) <Auto> B Value of Exempted, Nil Rated, Non-GST supplies, No-Supply turnover C Zero rated supplies without payment of tax D Supplies on which tax is to be paid by the recipient on reverse charge basis E Taxable turnover as per adjustments above (A-B-C-D) <Auto> F Taxable turnover as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nder Tables 6,8 and 10 above) To be paid through Cash Description Taxable Value Central tax State tax/UT tax Integrated tax Cess, if applicable 1 2 3 4 5 6 5% 12% 18% 28% 3% 0.25% 0.10% Interest Late Fee Penalty Others (please specify) Pt.IV Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) 12 Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC) A ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN this should be derived from books of accounts) B ITC booked in earlier Financial Years claimed in current Financial Year (+) C ITC booked in current Financial Year to be claimed in subsequent Financial Years (-) D ITC availed as per audited financial statements or books of account <Auto> E ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR-9) F Un-reconciled ITC ITC 1 13 Reasons for un-reconciled difference in ITC A Reason 1 <<Text>> B Reason 2 <<Text>> C Reason 3 <<Text>> 14 Reconciliation of ITC declared in Annual Return (G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reasons specified in 13 and 15 above) Description Amount Payable Central Tax State/UT Tax Integrated-Tax Cess Interest Penalty Pt.V Auditor's recommendation on additional Liability due to non-reconciliation To be paid through Cash Description Value Central tax State tax/UT tax Integrated tax Cess, if applicable 1 2 3 4 5 6 5% 12% 18% 28% 3% 0.25% 0.10% Input Tax Credit Interest Late Fee Penalty Any other amount paid for supplies not included in Annual Return (GSTR-9) Erroneous refund to be paid back Outstanding demands to be settled Other (Pl. specify) Verification: I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from. **(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor) Place: …………… Name of the signatory ………………… Membership No……………… Date: &hel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e same PAN. This is common for persons / entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their GSTIN wise turnover and declare the same here. This shall include export turnover (if any). It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons / entities having presence over multiple States. 5B Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting in the last financial year and was carried forward to the current financial year shall be declared here. In other words, when GST is payable during the financial year on such revenue (which was recognized earlier), the value of such revenue shall be declared here. (For example, if rupees Ten Crores of unbilled revenue existed for the financial year 2016-17, and during the current financial year, GST was paid on rupees Four Crores of such revenue, then value of rupees Fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

unts on the basis of accrual system of accounting during the current financial year but GST was not payable on such revenue in the same financial year shall be declared here. 5I Value of all advances for which GST has not been paid but the same has been recognized as revenue in the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. 5J Aggregate value of credit notes which have been accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but were not admissible under Section 34 of the HGST Act shall be declared here. 5K Aggregate value of all goods supplied by SEZs to DTA units for which the DTA units have filed bill of entry shall be declared here. 5L There may be cases where registered persons might have opted out of the composition scheme during the current financial year. Their turnover as per the audited Annual Financial Statement would include turnover both as composition taxpayer as well as normal taxpayer. Therefore, the turnover for which GST was paid under the composit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

non-reconciliation between the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement and turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be specified here. 7 The table provides for reconciliation of taxable turnover from the audited annual turnover after adjustments with the taxable turnover declared in annual return (GSTR-9). 7A Annual turnover as derived in Table 5P above would be auto-populated here. 7B Value of exempted, nil rated, non-GST and no-supply turnover shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any. 7C Value of zero rated supplies (including supplies to SEZs) on which tax is not paid shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any. 7D Value of reverse charge supplies on which tax is to be paid by the recipient shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any. 7E The taxable turnover is deriv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iliation statement has been prepared) shall be declared. 9P The total amount to be paid as per liability declared in Table 9A to 9O is auto populated here. 9Q The amount payable as declared in Table 9 of the Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here. It should also contain any differential tax paid on Table 10 or 11 of the Annual Return (GSTR-9). 10 Reasons for non-reconciliation between payable / liability declared in Table 9P above and the amount payable in Table 9Q shall be specified here. 11 Any amount which is payable due to reasons specified under Table 6, 8 and 10 above shall be declared here. 6. Part IV consists of reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The instructions to fill Part IV are as under:- Table No. Instructions 12A ITC availed (after reversals) as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. There may be cases where multiple GSTINs (State-wise) registrations exist on the same PAN. This is common for persons / entities with presence over

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2B and 12C above will be auto-populated here. 12E Net ITC available for utilization as declared in Table 7J of Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here. 13 Reasons for non-reconciliation of ITC as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account (Table 12D) and the net ITC (Table12E) availed in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be specified here. 14 This table is for reconciliation of ITC declared in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) against the expenses booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account. The various sub-heads specified under this table are general expenses in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account on which ITC may or may not be available. Further, this is only an indicative list of heads under which expenses are generally booked. Taxpayers may add or delete any of these heads but all heads of expenses on which GST has been paid / was payable are to be declared here. 14R Total ITC declared in Table 14A to 14Q above shall be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Towards, the end of the reconciliation statement taxpayers shall be given an option to pay their taxes as recommended by the auditor. PART – B- CERTIFICATION I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by the person who had conducted the audit: * I/we have examined the- (a) balance sheet as on ……… (b) the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from ………..…to ending on ……., and (c) the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ……..…to ending on ………, -attached herewith, of M/s …………… (Name), …………………….………… (Address), ..…………………(GSTIN). 2. Based on our audit I/we report that the said registered person- *has maintained the books of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

provided to us. (B) In *my/our opinion, proper books of account *have/have not been kept by the registered person so far as appears from*my/ our examination of the books. (C) I/we certify that the balance sheet, the *profit and loss/income and expenditure account and the cash flow Statement are *in agreement/not in agreement with the books of account maintained at the Principal place of business at ……………………and ** ……………………additional place of business within the State. 4. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the HGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the HGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No. GSTR-9C. 5. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to explanations given to *me/us, the particulars given in the said Form No.GSTR-9C are true and correct subject to following obser

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

………………… **(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor) Place: …………… Name of the signatory ………………… membership No……………… Date: …………… Full address ……………………… II. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by a person other than the person who had conducted the audit of the accounts: *I/we report that the audit of the books of accounts and the financial statements of M/s. ………………..…………………. (Name and address of the assessee with GSTIN) was conducted by M/s. …………………………………………..………. (f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued there under *has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued there under: 1. 2. 3. 3. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the HGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the HGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No.GSTR-9C. 4. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to examination of books of account including other relevant documents and explanations given to *me/us, the particulars given in the said Form No.9C are true and correct subject to the following observations/qualifications, if any: (a) …………………………….…………………………….………&h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the Assam GST Act.

GST – States – 17/2018-GST – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM KAR BHAWAN DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 CIRCULAR NO. 17/2018-GST Dated Dispur the 18th September, 2018. Subject : Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the Assam GST Act – regarding. No. CT/GST-15/2017/182.- In terms of Schedule I of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Assam GST Act ), the supply of goods by an agent on behalf of the principal without consideration has been deemed to be a supply. In this connection, various representations have been received regarding the scope and ambit of the principal-agent relationship under GST. In order to clarify some of the issues and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across the field formations, the Commissioner, in exercise of its powers conferred under section 168 of the Assam GST Act hereby clarifies the issues in the succeeding par

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ents emerge from the above definition of agent: (a) the term 'agent' is defined in terms of the various activities being carried out by the person concerned in the principal-agent relationship; and (b) the supply or receipt of goods or services has to be undertaken by the agent on behalf of the principal. From this, it can be deduced that the crucial component for covering a person within the ambit of the term agent under the Assam GST Act is corresponding to the representative character identified in the definition of agent under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. 5. Further, the two limbs of any supply under GST are consideration and in the course or furtherance of business . Where the consideration is not extant in a transaction, such a transaction does not fall within the ambit of supply. But, in certain scenarios, as elucidated in Schedule I of the Assam GST Act, the key element of consideration is not required to be present for treating certain activities as supply. One such

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tative hat and is supplying or receiving goods on behalf of the principal. Since in the commercial world, there are various factors that might influence this relationship, it would be more prudent that an objective criteria is used to determine whether a particular principal-agent relationship falls within the ambit of the said entry or not. Thus, the key ingredient for determining relationship under GST would be whether the invoice for the further supply of goods on behalf of the principal is being issued by the agent or not. Where the invoice for further supply is being issued by the agent in his name then, any provision of goods from the principal to the agent would fall within the fold of the said entry. However, it may be noted that in cases where the invoice is issued by the agent to the customer in the name of the principal, such agent shall not fall within the ambit of Schedule I of the Assam GST Act. Similarly, where the goods being procured by the agent on behalf of the princ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s. XYZ, a banking company, appoints Mr. B (auctioneer) to auction certain goods. The auctioneer arranges for the auction and identifies the potential biddery. The highest bid is accepted and the goods are sold to the highest bidder by M/s. XYZ. The invoice for the supply of the goods is issued by M/S XYZ to the successful bidder. In this scenario, the auctioneer is merely providing the auctioneering services with no role played in the supply of the goods. Even in this scenario, Mr. B is not an agent of M/S XYZ for the supply of goods in terms of Schedule I. Scenario 3 Mr. A, an artist, appoints M/S B (auctioneer) to auction his painting. M/S B arranges for the auction and identifies the potential bidders. The highest bid is accepted and the painting is sold to the highest bidder. The invoice for the supply of the painting is issued by M/S B on the behalf of Mr. A but in his own name and the painting is delivered to the successful bidder. In this scenario, M/S. B is not merely providing

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

son who buys or sells the agricultural produce on behalf of his principal, or facilitates buying and selling of agricultural produce on behalf of his principal and receives, by way of remuneration, a commission or percentage upon the amount involved in such transaction. In cases where the invoice is issued by Mr. B to the buyer, the former is an agent covered under Schedule I. However, in cases where the invoice is issued directly by Mr. A to the buyer, the commission agent (Mr. B) doesn't fall under the category of agent covered under Schedule I. 9. In scenario 1 and scenario 2, Mr. B shall not be liable to obtain registration in terms of clause (vii) of section 24 of the Assam GST Act. He, however, would be liable for registration if his aggregate turnover of supply of taxable services exceeds the threshold specified in sub-section (1) of section 22 of the Assam GST Act. In scenario 3, M/S B shall be liable for compulsory registration in terms of the clause (vii) of section 24 of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC).

GST – States – 21/2018-GST – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM :: KAR BHAWAN DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 CIRCULAR NO. 21/2018-GST Dated Dispur the 18th September, 2018. Subject : Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC) – regarding No. CT/GST-15/2017/186.- Representations have been received requesting to clarify the following: (i) Mechanism for discharge of tax liability on trading of Priority Sector Lending Certificate (PSLC) for the pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/99 dated 12nd June

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/99 dated 12nd June, 2018) and Circular No. 11/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/117 dated 22nd June, 2018) – GST – States – 22/2018-GST – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM :: KAR BHAWAN DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 CIRCULAR NO. 22/2018-GST Dated Dispur the 18th September, 2018 Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/99 dated 12nd June, 2018) and Circular No. 11/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/117 dated 22nd June, 2018) – regarding No. CT/GST-15/2017/187.- Kind attention is invited to Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST- 15/2017/99 dated 12nd June, 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

red to as the Assam GST Rules ) requires that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding ₹ 50,000/- should carry a copy of documents viz., invoice/bill of supply/delivery challan/bill of entry and a valid e-way bill in physical or electronic form for verification. In case such person does not carry the mentioned documents, there is no doubt that a contravention of the provisions of the law takes place and the provisions of section 129 and section 130 of the Assam GST Act are invocable. Further, it may be noted that the non-furnishing of information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 amounts to the e-way bill becoming not a valid document for the movement of goods by road as per Explanation (2) to rule 138(3) of the Assam GST Rules, except in the case where the goods are transported for a distance of upto fifty kilometres within the State or Union territory to or from the place of business of the transporter to the place of business of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or the consignee but the GSTIN, wherever applicable, is correct; b) Error in the pin-code but the address of the consignor and the consignee mentioned is correct, subject to the condition that the error in the PIN code should not have the effect of increasing the validity period of the e-way bill; c) Error in the address of the consignee to the extent that the locality and other details of the consignee are correct; d) Error in one or two digits of the document number mentioned in the e-way bill; e) Error in 4 or 6 digit level of HSN where the first 2 digits of HSN are correct and the rate of tax mentioned is correct; f) Error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number. 6. In case of the above situations, penalty to the tune of ₹ 500/- each under section 125 of the Assam GST Act and the CGST Act should be imposed (Rs. 1000/- under the IGST Act) in FORM GST DRC-07 for every consignment. A record of all such consignments where proceedings under section 129 of the Assam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC)

GST – States – 45/2018 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES 14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015 TRADE CIRCULAR No. 45/2018 (Circular No. 62/36/2018-GST) DATED: 18.09.2018 Subject: Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC) Representations have been received requesting to clarify the following: (i) Mechanism for discharge of tax liability on trading of Priority Sector Lending Certificate (PSLC) for the period 1.7.2017 to 27.5.2018. (ii)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.

GST – States – 04/2018-State Tax – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES 14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA -700015 Order No. : 03/WBGST/PRO/2018 Dated: 18/09/2018 Order No. 04/2018-State Tax Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1A) of rule 117 of the West Bengal Goods and Service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.

GST – States – 04/2018-GST – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – File No. 12-19/2017-18-EXN-GST-(519)-27801 Government of Himachal Pradesh Excise & Taxation [Department Order No. 04/2018-GST Dated: Shimla- 171009, the 18th Sep., 2018 Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1A) of rule 117 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =