Cases where IGST refunds have not been granted due to claiming higher rate of drawback OR where higher rate and lower rate were identical

Customs – 26/2018 – Dated:- 26-10-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS: BENGALURU CITY COMMISSIONERATE P.B. NO. 5400: C.R. BUILDING, QUEEN'S ROAD, BENGALURU-5600 001 C.NO.VIII/09/ 16/2018 City Cus.Tech Dated: 26.10.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 26/2018 Subject: Cases where IGST refunds have not been granted due to claiming higher rate of drawback OR where higher rate and lower rate were identical- Reg. Attention of all Customs Brokers, Exporters, Importers, Members of the Trade and other s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGST Export Refunds- extension in SB005 alternate mechanism and revised processing in certain cases including disbursal of compensation cess

Customs – 28/2018 – Dated:- 26-10-2018 – OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CITY CUSTOMS COMMISSIONERATE, P.B. NO. 5400, C.R. BUILDING QUEEN'S ROAD, BENGALURU 560001 . C.NO.VIII/09/05/2018 City Cus. Tech Dated: 26.10.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 28/2018 Subject: IGST Export Refunds- extension in SB005 alternate mechanism and revised processing in certain cases including disbursal of compensation cess-Reg. Attention of all Customs Brokers, Exporters, Importers, Members of the Trade and other stake holders is invited to Board's Circular Nos. 05/2018-Customs dated 23.02.2018, 08/2018-Customs dated 23.03.2018, 15/2018-Customs dated 06.06.2018 And 22/2018-Customs dated 18.07.2018 and corresponding Public Notices Nos. 07/2018 dated 07.03.2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rectification of EGM errors (SB002 or SB006), SB005, SB001 & SB003 and filing of claim for IGST Refund on export of goods under Rule 96 of CGST Rules, 2017

Customs – Public Notice No. 98/12018 – Dated:- 26-10-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (AIR CARGO COMPLEX) NSCBI AIRPORT, DUM DUM, KOLKATA- 700 052 F.No.S41(Misc)-64/2017 CCX(Pt.) Dated: 26/10/2018 Public Notice No. 98/12018 Subject : Rectification of EGM errors (SB002 or SB006), SB005, SB001 & SB003 and filing of claim for IGST Refund on export of goods under Rule 96 of CGST Rules, 2017 reg. Attention of all the exporters, their authorised representatives, Customs Brokers, Airlines, Freight Forwarders, Export Promotion Councils and all members of Trade are invited to Public Notices Nos.08/2018 dated 06.02.2018, 12/2018 dated 19.02.2018, 50/2018 dated 31.05.2018, 54/2018 dated 08.06.2018 and 73/2018 dated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the exporters and their shipping Bills having EGM errors (SB002 or SB006) is enclosed herewith as Annexure-A for information of the concerned exporters. 4. The exporters may approach the concerned air lines and Shri D. Roy, Deputy Commissioner of Customs, IGST Refund Section or Superintendent EDI, Air Cargo Complex, NSCBI Airport for issues related to EGM errors. 5. A list of exporters and Shipping Bills having 'Invoice mismatch errors' (S13005) is enclosed herewith as Annexure-B. 6. The exporters who have not yet submitted their documents as per Circular No. 05/2018-Customs dated 23.02.2018 and No.08/2018-Customs 23.03.2018, are once again advised to submit self-certified copies of relevant GSTR1/Table6A, GSTR3B and Concordance

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGST Export Refunds – extension in SB005 alternate mechanism and revised processing in certain cases including disbursal of compensation Cess

Customs – PUBLIC NOTICE NO.- 44/2018 – Dated:- 26-10-2018 – OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS CUSTOM HOUSE: PORT AREA: VISAKHAPATNAM – 530 035 F. No. P3/06/2017-Stats (AM).Pt. II Date: 26.10.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE NO.- 44/2018 Subject: IGST Export Refunds – extension in SB005 alternate mechanism and revised processing in certain cases including disbursal of compensation Cess – reg. Attention of all exporters, customs brokers, members of general trade, and all other stakeholders is invited to refer this office s Public Notice Nos. 09/2018 dated 26.02.2018, 15/2018 dated 25.03.2018 and 24/2018 07.06.2018 wherein an alternative mechanism with officer interface to resolve invoice mismatches (SB005 error) was provided for the shipping bills filed till 30.06.2018. [Board s Circular No. 05/2018-Customs dated 23.02.2018, Circular No. 08/2018-Cus. dated 23.03.2018 and 15/2018 dated 06.06.2018 refers] 2 Exporters are availing the refunds of IGST paid on exports regularly for more than

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

orters are committing same mistakes again and again in spite of several sensitisation/outreach programmes. However, giving high priority to the interests of exporters, it has been decided by the Board to extend the rectification facility to Shipping Bills filed up to 15.11.2018. However, it has been reiterated that the exporters shall have to take care to ensure the details of invoice, such as invoice number, IGST paid etc. under GSTR 1 and shipping bill match with each other since the same transaction is being reported under GST laws and Customs Act. 4 It may be noted that SBs which have not been scrolled due to the IGST paid amount erroneously declared as NA are already being handled through officer interface as per Board s Circular 08/2018 – Customs dated 23.03.2018. However, no such provision was hitherto available in respect of those SBs which were successfully scrolled, albeit with a lesser than eligible amount. 5 CBIC has been receiving representations where the refund scroll ha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e only for cases where Shipping Bills have been filed till 15.11.2018. However, exporters need to be cautious while filing details in Shipping Bill as a similar facility may not be available in future for the same mistake for referred shipping bill. Also, Customs Officers while processing claims using officer interface should exercise due diligence so that mistakes are not repeated again. 7 In order to claim the differential amount, the exporter is required to submit a duly filled and signed Revised Refund Request (RRR) annexed to this circular to the designated AC/DC A scanned copy of the RRR may also be mailed to dedicated email address of Customs locations from where exports took place. The designated/concerned AC/DC will then proceed to sanction the revised amount after due verification through the option provided in ICES. Once the revised amount is approved by the designated AC/DC in the system, a fresh scroll will be available for generation for the differential amount only. 8 It

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final return in FORM GSTR-10 till 31st December, 2018

GST – States – 58/2018 – State Tax – Dated:- 26-10-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF SIKKIM FINANCE, REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE DEPARTMENT COMMERCIAL TAXES DIVISION GANGTOK No. 58/2018 – State Tax Dated: 26th October, 2018 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Sikkim Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (9 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act ), read with section 45 of the said Act and rule 81 of the Sikkim Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereina

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extends the time limit for furnishing the declaration in FORM GST ITC-04 for the period July.2017 to Sept,2018 till 31st Dec,2018

GST – States – CT/LEG/GST-NT/12/17/966 – Dated:- 26-10-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES NAGALAND: DIMAPUR Dated Dimapur, the 26th October, 2018 NOTIFICATION- 22/2018 In pursuance of section 168 of the Nagaland Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) and sub-rule (3) of rule 45 of the Nagaland Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), and in supercession of the notification of the Government of Nagaland, Office of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final Return in for GSTR 10 till 31st Dec,2018

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final Return in for GSTR 10 till 31st Dec,2018 – GST – States – FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08(Pt-1)(Vol.1)/297 – Dated:- 26-10-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND FINANCE DEPARTMENT (REVENUE BRANCH) F.NO.FIN/REV-3/GST/1/08(Pt-1)(Vol.1)/297 Dated: 26th October, 2018 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Nagaland Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (4 of 2017) (hereaf

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGST Export Refunds – extension in SB005 alternate mechanism and revised processing in certain cases including disbursal of compensation Cess – reg.

Customs – IGST Export Refunds – extension in SB005 alternate mechanism and revised processing in certain cases including disbursal of compensation Cess – reg. – TMI Updates – Highlights

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CLUBBING OF SERVICES FOR CHECKING GST EXEMPTION LIMIT

Service Tax – Started By: – rajesh singal – Dated:- 25-10-2018 Last Replied Date:- 26-10-2018 – Hello Sir,We are providing two types of one services i.e. one is providing tankers to Indian Oil Corporation for transportation of petrol/diesel. These tankers are provided for supply of product to our own petrol pumps. Although it is a taxable service under GTA but service tax is being deposited by IOC. So we do not do anything in this regard. Total amount of service provided is app. 28.00 lacs.Secondly we have one Maruti Service Station and annual receipts are around 6.50 Lacs. Which is very well below the exemption limit.Now query is whether both these services will be combined for looking into exemption limit.Rajesh Singal9417161882 – Reply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

– The Reply = In my view, the GTA turnover would not be considered to include it with the taxable service of service station. – Reply By rajesh singal – The Reply = Sir,but Assessing officer is doing so, what should be done in this regard.Rajesh Kumar Singal – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = You may receive a letter from the Department. You will not receive Show Cause Notice on the issue asked by you .Some other issues may be involved. It is your phobia on the issue. It is time to be silent and fearless. Notification is very much clear. All other experts are also of the same view. Nowadays Govt. is very strict regarding issuance of LAME SHow Cause Notice. Ask the officer to give in writing if the department is on right track on the pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

request for clarification on generation of invoice-gst

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Ramakrishnan Seshadri – Dated:- 25-10-2018 Last Replied Date:- 26-10-2018 – Dear Sirs,Good Morning.We need a clarification on generation of invoices. We are supplier of OEM Car company and supplying parts through generation of invoices like original for buyer and duplicate for transporter to them. Now the customer says you can supply the parts with duplicate for transporter copy and no need of original for buyer copy. Whether this is correct or not under gst. Any amendment has came that one invoice is ok .Please clarify.Thanks & Regards,S.Ramakrishnan – Reply By SHIVKUMAR SHARMA – The Reply = Tax Invoice have to be generated In Triplicate.Marked as Original for Recipient ,Duplicate for Transporter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ate copy being marked as TRIPLICATE FOR SUPPLIER. (2) The invoice shall be prepared in duplicate, in the case of the supply of services, in the following manner, namely,- (a) the original copy being marked as ORIGINAL FOR RECIPIENT; and (b) the duplicate copy being marked as DUPLICATE FOR SUPPLIER. (3) The serial number of invoices issued during a tax period shall be furnished electronically through the common portal in FORM GSTR-1. There is not change in section/rule of invoice. Original for recipient and dup. for transporter are meant for recipient only. But difference people are handling invoice in different way as their convenience. Some people issue dup.trnprt copy to truck driver and sending original to recipient by courier. Dup. trnp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Denial of carry forwarding of CESS credit into GST – Course of action

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – CA Venkata prasad Pasupuleti – Dated:- 25-10-2018 Last Replied Date:- 23-1-2019 – On introduction of GST, the credit of taxes under the existing law, predominantly Central Excise, Service Tax and Value Added Tax, was allowed to be carry forwarded vide the transitional provision either as Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) or State Goods and Service Tax (SGST) as the case may be accordingly taxpayers did carry forwarded the credit by filing transactional credit by filing Form Tran-1. The common observation of the department during the transitional credit verification is that the closing credit balance of the Education Cess, Secondary and higher Education Cess, Krishi Kalyan cess (herein after referred as Cess credit for brevity) is not eligible for the transfer into GST. However, Section 140(1) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that register person shall be entitled to take, in his electronic credit ledger, the amount of CENVAT credit carried forward in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Cess credit carry forwarded into GST becomes the transfer of irregular credit and requires to be paid back to the Government. The same may be paid back by way of reversal of CGST credit through Table 4(B)(2) of the GSTR – 3B and intimate the department in writing with a dated acknowledgement. In case there is no sufficient credit this gets reflected into to electronic output register and needs to be paid in cash. Interest liability: The consequential interest liability would vary in different scenarios which are discussed below: When CESS credit carry forwarded into GST but not utilized: As far as interest on input tax credit, the reference shall be made to the section 50(3) of CGST Act, 2017 which specifies that interest is required to be paid by a taxable person at 24% if he claims any undue or excess claim of input tax credit under Section 42(10) and Section 43(10). As these sub-section deals with the concept of matching, reversal and reclaim of input tax credit which are not in fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of utilization to actual date of reversal. Is there any waiver of the interest liability as the ineligibility was due to retrospective amendment? It Is very important to note that the Cess credit was eligible upto the enactment however it is becoming ineligible from the past date on the date of enactment, so non-payment of the output liability (to the extent of utilization) will be on the date of enactment, which has to be made good by making the payment and hence the question of interest arises. In general, whenever retrospective amendment was made, it was the practice of the Government to give a saving clause in terms of either waiver of the interest liability or specify the cutoff date from which the interest liability would attract. Unfortunately, no such saving clause is found in the present retrospective amendment made in the section 140, ibid. Judicially, the Hon ble Supreme Court in case of Star India Pvt Ltd Vs CCE, Mumbai 2005 (3) TMI 10 – SUPREME COURT held that interest lia

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Concept and Applicability of TDS and TCS provisions w.e.f. October 1, 2018

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Bimal jain – Dated:- 25-10-2018 Last Replied Date:- 8-3-2019 – After getting deferred till September 30, 2018, the Central Government vide Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 and Notification No. 51/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018, has appointed the 1st day of October 2018, as the date on which the provisions of Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 (i.e. Tax deduction at source) and Section 52 (i.e. Tax collection at source) shall come into force. For easy digests, we are summarizing hereunder the gist of provisions pertaining to TDS and TCS in GST: Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 66 of the CGST Rules, 2017 Particulars Applicable Section/ Sub-section/ Notification Provisions Who is required to deduct TDS (deductor)? Section 51(1) r.w. Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 Following persons are required to deduct TDS: a department or est

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r IGST] from the payment made or credited to the deductee Value of supply Explanation to Section 51(1) For the purpose of TDS specified above, the value of supply shall be taken as the amount excluding CGST, CGST/UTGST, IGST and cess indicated in the invoice Compulsory registration for TDS deductor Section 24(vi) TDS deductors, whether or not separately registered, are required to compulsorily register in GST irrespective of threshold limits. Form for TDS deductor registration Rule 12(1) Form GST REG-07 – Registration started from September 18, 2017(The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council, at its 21st meeting in Hyderabad) TDS applicants who do not have a PAN, can register on basis of TAN Payment of TDS by deductor Section 51(2) The amount of TDS shall be paid to the Government by the deductor within 10 days after the end of the month in which such deduction is made. TDS Certificate to deductee Section 51(2) and Section 51(3) r.w. Rule 66(3) The deductor shall furnish to the deductee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2,000/- per day subject to maximum of INR 10,000/- for CGST + SGST/UTGST] Recovery & Refund Determination of amount in default Section 51(7) In accordance with Section 73 (determination of tax in non-fraud cases) or Section 74 (determination of tax in fraud cases) of the CGST Act, 2017 Refund of excess deduction Section 51(8) Refund to deductee arising on account of excess or erroneous deduction shall be dealt in accordance with Section 54. No refund shall be granted if the amount deducted has been credited to electronic cash ledger of deductee. Collection of tax at Source (TCS) under Section 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 67 of the CGST Rules, 2017 Particulars Applicable Section/Sub-section/ Notification Provisions Who is required to collect TCS? Section 52(1) Every electronic commerce operator ( operator ), not being an agent, shall collect TCS at prescribed rate when taxable supplies are made through it by other suppliers and the consideration with respect to such suppl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d at the rate not exceeding 1% of the net value of taxable supplies of the goods/services supplied through the portal of the operator Meaning of electronic commerce operator Section 2(45) Electronic commerce operator means any person who owns, operates or manages digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce Meaning of electronic commerce Section 2(44) Electronic commerce means the supply of goods or services or both, including digital products over digital or electronic network Meaning of Net value of taxable supplies Explanation to Section 52(1) Net value of taxable supplies shall mean the aggregate value of taxable supplies of goods or services or both, other than services notified under sub-section (5) of section 9, made during any month by all registered persons through the operator reduced by the aggregate value of taxable supplies returned to the suppliers during the said month Compulsory registration for TCS collector Section 24(x) Every e-commerce operator

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ish a monthly statement in Form GSTR-8 by the 10th of the following month. The operator is also required to file an Annual statement in Form GSTR-9B by the 31st of December following the end of every financial year. The operator can rectify errors in the statements filed, if any, latest by the return to be filed for the month of September, following the end of every financial year or the actual date of furnishing relevant annual statement, whichever is earlier. ITC to supplier Section 52(7) The tax collected by the operator shall be credited to the cash ledger of the supplier who has supplied the goods/services through the operator. The supplier can claim credit of the tax collected and reflected in the return by the Operator in his [supplier s] electronic cash ledger. Matching of details of supplies Section 52(8) to 52(11) The details of the supplies, including the value of supplies, submitted by every operator in the statements will be matched with the details of supplies submitted b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Restoration of cancelled provisional registration – The Officer cannot throw their hands in desperation and blame the computer or the failure of uploading and consequently lead to cancellation of registration.

Goods and Services Tax – Restoration of cancelled provisional registration – The Officer cannot throw their hands in desperation and blame the computer or the failure of uploading and consequently lea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rate of GST – Classification – Ada – made from 'maida or rice flour' or 'maida and rice flour' – Ada” merits classification under HSN 1902 of the 1st Schedule [Sl No. 97 – Seviyan (Vermicelli)] – Liable to GST 5%

Goods and Services Tax – Rate of GST – Classification – Ada – made from maida or rice flour or maida and rice flour – Ada merits classification under HSN 1902 of the 1st Schedule [Sl No. 97 – Seviyan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – providing canteen services exclusively for their employees – The supply of food items to the employees for consideration in the canteen run by the appellant company would come under the definition of 'supply' and would be taxable u

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – providing canteen services exclusively for their employees – The supply of food items to the employees for consideration in the canteen run by the appellant comp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of Supply – Whether the parts/spares/equipments which are used on a ship are forming parts of the ship and therefore chargeable to reduced tax @ 5% of IGST – Held No

Goods and Services Tax – Classification of Supply – Whether the parts/spares/equipments which are used on a ship are forming parts of the ship and therefore chargeable to reduced tax @ 5% of IGST – Held No – TMI Updates – Highlights

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – Supply of services or not – activity of Liaison office – they are in fact working as employees of the foreign office – The liaison activities being undertaken by the applicant when strictly in line with condition specified by RBI p

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – Supply of services or not – activity of Liaison office – they are in fact working as employees of the foreign office – The liaison activities being undertaken by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Indian Potash Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central GST, Meerut

2018 (10) TMI 1367 – CESTAT ALLAHABAD – TMI – CENVAT Credit – time limit of invoices raised – the invoices, on the basis of which the credit was availed, was older than six months – N/N. 21/2014-CE(NT) dated 11.07.2014 made effective w.e.f. 01.09.2014.

CENVAT Credit – capital goods – availment of credit of 50% of the balanced credit required to be availed in the subsequent financial year – Held that:- Even though there is no such amendment in Rule 4 for availing the Cenvat credit of duty paid on the capital goods within a period of six months, the same stands denied by Commissioner (Appeals) even after observing that there is no such requirement of law – there is no justification for denial of credit – credit allowed.

Whether the demand is barred by limitation? – Held that:- The entire credit was availed by the appellant by reflecting the same in their Cenvat credit records. As such, there cannot be held to be any suppression or misstatement on their part with a malafide

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he date of issuance of the invoices. Inasmuch as, the appellant had availed the Cenvat credit beyond the period of six months, the revenue was of the view that the same is inadmissible to them. Similarly, in respect of capital goods, the appellant availed the credit to the extent of ₹ 6,04,672/-, which was 50% of the balanced credit required to be availed in the subsequent financial year. 3. Proceedings were initiated against the appellant by way of issuance of show cause notice dated 09.12.2016 proposing to deny the Cenvat credit availed by the appellant during the period December, 2014 to March, 2015. The appellant, during the course of adjudication took a categorical stand that prior to 01.09.2014, there was no restriction to avail the credit within the period of six months from the date of issuance of the invoices. Inasmuch as, in the present case the invoices in question were issued either in the year 2013 or in the first half of year 2014, the same would not be covered by s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssioner of Central Excise, Pune-I vide Final Order No.A/85346/2018 dated 16.02.2018 has observed that Notification No.21/2014-CE(NT) dated 11.07.2014 should be applicable to those cases wherein the invoices were issued on or after 11.07.2014 for the reason that notification was not applicable to the invoices issued prior to the date of notification, therefore, at the time issuance of invoices no time limit was prescribed and limitation of six months cannot be made applicable. As such, I find that the issue stands decided in favour of the assessee by the above referred decision of the Tribunal. 6. As regards the Cenvat credit in respect of capital goods, I find that the same was 50% remaining part of the total involved Cenvat credit in the capital goods. Even though there is no such amendment in Rule 4 for availing the Cenvat credit of duty paid on the capital goods within a period of six months, the same stands denied by Commissioner (Appeals) even after observing that there is no such

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notification under section 51 read with section 1(3) to exempt post audit authorities under ministry or defense from TDS compliance under HGST Act, 2017 (H and E)

GST – States – 96/GST-2 – Dated:- 25-10-2018 – HARYANA GOVERNMENT EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT Notification The 25th October, 2018 No.96/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), read with section 51 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the Governor of Haryana, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following further amendment in the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, notification No. 86/GST-2, dated the 18th September, 2018, namely:- AMENDMENT In the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, notification No. 86/GST-2, dated the 18th September, 2018,- (i) in item (c), for the sign . exist

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

troller / Office Code No. 1. Controller of Defence Accounts, Patna 00 2. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions), Allahabad 01 3. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts (Officers), Pune 02 4. Controller of Defence Accounts, (Army), Meerut 03 5. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts, Southern Command, Pune 04 6. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts, Bangalore 05 7. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts, Western Command, Chandigarh 06 8. Pr. Controller of Accounts (Factories), Kolkata 07 9. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts (Air Force), Dehradun 08 10. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts (Navy), Mumbai 09 11. Controller of Defence Accounts (Funds), Meerut 10 12. Pr. Controller of Defence Accounts, Northern Command, Jammu 12 13. Zonal Office (Pensio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Versus M/s. Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd.

2018 (10) TMI 1551 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – TMI – Condonation of delay of 639 days in filing appeal – Held that:- The Affidavit states that there is a delay in taking out the Motion seeking to set aside the order dated 25th August 2016 passed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master.

The Affidavit in Support does not state that it was not informed and/or not aware of the dismissal of its Appeal in August 2017. Nor does the Affidavit indicate the date when the Respondent for the first time came to know about the date of the rejection of Appeal by the Prothonotary & Senior Master. This date is crucial for considering whether the delay in making out this Application is required to be condoned or not. The change of panel advocates does not absolve that the officers of the Revenue to keep themselves abreact of the proceedings in this Court and/or taking appropriate steps to appoint new advocate for the first panel. Not taking steps in the above regard is itself evidence of negligence on the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n support states that as there was change in panel counsel handling the matters for the Excise Department in the month of June 2016. The earlier counsel engaged, ceased to be on the panel since 2016. Thereafter, in 2017 with effect from 1st July 2017, the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 came into force resulting in reorganisation of the department. Thus, in the above view, the Affidavit states that there is a delay in taking out the Motion seeking to set aside the order dated 25th August 2016 passed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master. 4. We find that the Affidavit in Support does not state that it was not informed and/or not aware of the dismissal of its Appeal in August 2017. Nor does the Affidavit indicate the date when the Respondent for the first time came to know about the date of the rejection of Appeal by the Prothonotary & Senior Master. This date is crucial for considering whether the delay in making out this Application is required to be condoned or not. The change o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in this Court. They hand over the papers to Advocates and thereafter are not bothered about the outcome of these appeals. It is for the Revenue or the Department to take the necessary action but they do not feel obliged to do so. They expect this Court to condone serious lapses in their functioning by accepting above cause as sufficient. The cause as set out and the explanation as forwarded today, on affidavit and belatedly, reflects total negligence and callousness of the Revenue officials. Their attitude shows that they are not at all vigilant and interested in pursuing the cases filed by the Department involving a tax effect of crores of rupees. They expect the Court to be lenient and liberal and pardon them every time. It is this approach of the Revenue officials which is not only strongly deprecated in the earlier order but this Court has refused to uphold it after it was noticed that this is the position in almost every matter. 9. This is no explanation for the delay of 1371 day

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HM LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS Versus UNION OF INDIA

2018 (11) TMI 142 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – TMI – Detention of goods alongwith vehicle – detention on the ground that E-Way bill was not updated – Held that:- By way of ad interim relief, it is provided that the respondent shall release truck along with goods upon the petitioner furnishing bank guarantee for the said sum of ₹ 6,17,760/ Notice returnable on 01.11.2018. – R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16571 of 2018 Dated:- 25-10-2018 – MR AKIL KURESHI AND MR UMESH TRIVEDI, JJ. For The Petitioner : KUNTAL A PARIKH (7757) For The Respondent : MR PRANAV TRIVEDI, AGP (99) ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Draft amendment is allowed. 2. Petitioner is a transporter. The goods being transported by the petitioner have be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petromarine NDT Engineers Versus CGST, C.E & C. C-Indore

2018 (11) TMI 453 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI – Time limitation for filing appeal – Demand of Interest on the late payment of service tax – Held that:- The Commissioner (Appeal), in the impugned order has not considered the aspect of limitation as demand is raised for the period from 2009 to 2012, vide the impugned Show Cause Notice on 29/1/2017 – the demand is well beyond the period of time limit prescribed under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 – appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. E/52494/2018-EX (SM) – Final Order No. 53173/2018 – Dated:- 25-10-2018 – Mr. Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical) Shri Prashant Sukhla, Adv. for the appellant Shri P.R. Gupta, DR. for the respondent ORDER Per: Bijay kumar The appellant h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

found that the appellant has failed to discharge service tax on the service provided for value of ₹ 35,79,315/- and thus there was no payment of service tax amounting to ₹ 3,63,669/-. For being pointed out, the appellant has paid the said amount on 23/11/2012. Thereafter, the Revenue has demanded the interest on the late payment of service tax by the noticee. The appellant has not paid the interest as demanded by the Revenue and accordingly, they were visited with the Show Cause Notice No. V(ST)3-81/SCN/Petromarine/2016 dated 29/5/2017. This case was adjudicated and the amount was confirmed. The appellant was not successful in appeal before Commissioner (Appeal) and hence this appeal. 3. Ld. Advocate, on behalf of the appellant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct, 1994. He further relied on the para 7.1 of the impugned order which is reproduced as below: 7.1 As such I do not find any substance in contention of the Appellant that they Service Tax calculation chart was not provided to them. This act of the Appellant shows the ignorance of law in their part and ignorance of law has no excuse. The Appellant has also requested to void the interest. In this regard I find that there is no any provision to void the liability of interest in any circumstances. Therefore, no relief on this account can be granted to the Appellant. As such I hold that the confirmation of interest on payment of service tax after being pointed out by the Audit is justified . Accordingly he justified the impugned order. 4. I hav

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s Nash Industries (I) Pvt Ltd.,

2018 (11) TMI 607 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 162 (A. A. R. – GST) – Valuation of goods supplied – inclusion of amortised cost of the tool in assessable value – Held that:- The transaction value carried out at an arms length, constitutes the value of supply. Further, Section 15(2) of the CGST Act provides for the inclusion of several other related / relevant amounts in the value of taxable supply.

There is no scope of any dispute in this situation about the fact that the cost of the tools is an essential element to be included in the cost of the component finally supplied by the applicant. This is also because without the tools the final component could not have been manufactured.

Ruling:- The amortised cost of tools which are re-supplied back to the applicant free of cost shall be added to the value of the components while calculating the value of the components supplied as per the Section 15 of the CGST / SGST / IGST Act 2017. – AAR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed cost of the tool to be added to arrive at the value of the goods supplied for the purpose of GST under Section 15 of the CGST Act read with rule 27 of CGST Rules. 3. The applicant furnishes some facts relevant to the stated activity: a. The applicant states that he is in the business of manufacturing Sheet Metal Pressed Components and caters to various industries, ATM, printers etc, and is having multi-locational facilities in and around Bangalore. b. He states that the earlier Central Excise Valuation Rules has similar provisions and it was held that the cost of amortization of the tool was to be added to the value of the goods removed for the purpose of payment of Excise duty. He has also submitted that he had tweeted to GST and it was replied as includible. This reply from the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax asked to refer to the provisions of section 15 read with rule 27 of the CGST law. However, he stated that the customers are of the view that the amortiza

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mponents were manufactured based on the drawing of the customer. To manufacture these components, the tools were designed and manufactured by the applicant. Such manufactured tools were billed to the customer, even though the tools are retained by the applicant for the manufacture of components. The payment was received by the applicant for the tool. e. He has stated that there are umpteen judgements of the Tribunal and Hon ble Courts, wherein it is held that the moulds, tools, jigs, fixtures supplied free of cost or captively consumed are to be treated as additional money consideration to arrive at the value of excisable goods. In other words, the cost of amortization of the tools, jigs, fixtures, moulds, etc are to the added to arrive at the transaction value on which the Central Excise is paid. He has quoted section 15 of the CGST / SGST Act and rule 27 of the CGST / SGST Rules which reads as under: Section 15 (2) The value of supply shall include:- (a) . . . . . . . (b) Any amount

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent is includible. He states that had the supplier procured it from outside, the cost of the tool would have formed part of the value of supply of the component. As per clause (b) of sub-section 2 of section 15, if the tool is provided free of cost to the supplier, the amortised cost of the tool would have formed part of the taxable supply. (f) The applicant submitted that the components supplied to the recipient are tailor made (or made as per the specifications of the customer) and hence are not available in the open market and so there is no open market value of such supply.. In such case, recourse is to be taken to the sub-rule (b) of Rule 27 of the CGST / SGST Rules, according to which: Value of taxable supply = consideration in money + Amount equivalent to consideration not in money. He added that his customers paid the invoice value including excise duty on the amortised cost of the value of the tools under the erstwhile Central Excise Law. However, the same customers are not pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t becomes the owner of such tools. 4.2 Later the recipient gives the tool free of cost to the applicant and the applicant uses the same for the manufacture of the components. Section 7(1) of CGST Act 2017 stipulates that Supply shall be made for a consideration. Therefore, consideration is an essential element in supply. However Section 7(1)(c) specifies that the activities described in Schedule I shall be considered as Supply even if there is no consideration involved. Schedule I lists out four such activities which shall amount to Supply even if such an activity is carried out without any consideration. In the instant case the tools are business assets in the hands of the recipient as the applicant has raised invoices towards their manufacture / supply and received the due consideration from the recipient. Therefore entry number 1 of Schedule I is the closest entry to the issue at hand. As the tools are supplied by the recipient to the applicant for the limited purpose of manufacture

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e consider Section 15(2)(b) of CGST Act 2017 to be relevant to the facts of this case and analyze the same. 4.4 Section 15(2)(b) of the CGST Act 2017 reads as follows: any amount that the supplier is liable to pay in relation to such supply but which has been incurred by the recipient of the supply and not included in the price actually paid or payable for the goods or services or both In the instant case the applicant and the recipient enter into an agreement where the applicant is required to supply certain components. These components require specialized tools for their manufacture. The tools could be either manufactured by the applicant himself or they could get it manufactured by someone else or the recipient could supply them free of cost. In case the applicant procures the tools from a third party, then they would incur a cost and the cost could be included in the value of taxable supply to the recipient. There is no scope of any dispute in this situation about the fact that the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s Indian Institute of Management

2018 (11) TMI 662 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 148 (A. A. R. – GST) – Liability of GST – education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force – long duration post graduate diploma/ degree granting programmes offered by the Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru – reverse charge mechanism – supply of online educational journals or periodicals to the Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru – Applicability of entry no. 66 in the presence of specific entry no. 67.

Held that:- The two competing entries of N/N. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 relevant to the issue are Entry no. 66 and 67. Both these entries relate to services falling under the Heading 9992. The Heading 9992 appears at serial number 581 in the Annexure: Scheme of Classification of Services attached to Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. There are six Groups of various Education

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion from GST on long duration post graduate diploma/ degree granting programmes offered by the Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru.

There is no exemption from GST on supply of online educational journals or periodicals to the Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru. – AAR No. KAR ADRG 25/2018 Dated:- 25-10-2018 – SRI. HARISH DHARNIA, AND DR. RAVI PRASAD M.P. MEMBER Represented by : Sri Veeresh S. Kandgol, Chartered Accountant ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 1. M/s Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore (called as the Applicant hereinafter), No.12, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru – 560076, having GSTIN number 29AAAAAI0405N1ZQ, has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 as amended by Notification No. 2/2018 dated 25th January 2018 being education provided as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force in the light of enactment of the Indian Institute of Management Act, 2017? 3. The applicant furnishes some facts relevant to the stated activity: a) The applicant states that they are an educational institution of excellence established in the year 1973 with the objectives of imparting high-quality management education and training, conducting industrial and management research, etc. The applicant was established under the auspices of the Ministry of Human Resources Development (MHRD) Government of India as a premier educational institution and is renowned in India for its management education programs. b) That the applicant was registered as a society with the Registrar of Societies, Mysore State (now Karnataka) vide No. 403/71-72 dated 27-03-1972 and is recognized

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tfolio of programmes which cater to multiple sectors of society. The IIMB nurtures a teaching philosophy which encourages students to apply their learning in solving the real-life challenges around the world. IIMB currently offers 5 long duration programmes which collectively develop entry and middle level management professionals for companies, government and non-governmental organisations. IIMB also offers certificate programmes of short and long durations under Executive Education Programmes for mid and senior level Executives. f) The applicant has provided the details of long duration programmes offered by it and its taxability is given in the table as below: Sl.No. Programmes Offered Period Taxability under GST as per Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dtd 28-06-2017 1 Fellow Programme in Management (FPM) is a full time doctoral programme and is committed to train individual who will excel in their area of research through publication of high quality work of international

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e in Enterprise Management (PGPEM) is a weekend management program, designed for middle and senior level working professionals. Participants learn from World Class faculty, while strengthening their network through collaboration with peers during their on-campus long week-end session 2 years Exempted 3 Post Graduate Programme in Management (EPGP) is an intensive program designed to enhance skills and capabilities essential for responsible position at senior management level. Challenging widespread and globally oriented, the objective of this programme is to produce future leaders who can handle the dynamic corporate environment. 1 year Exempted h) The applicant states that currently certain programmes offered by IIM are exempted as per the Notification No. 12/ 2017 – Central tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017. As per the applicant the relevant Heading 9992 vide Sl. No. 67 under which exemption to programmes offered by IIM. The said entry is reproduced as under: Sl.No. Chapter, Section, H

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

28th June 2017 has not addressed the current change in Constitution in respect of IIMB. i) The applicant has reproduced the provisions of the Indian Institute of Management Act, 2017 in support of awarding of educational qualification which is recognized by the said Act: i. Section 2 : Declaration of certain institutions as institutions of national importance. Whereas the objects of the Institutes mentioned in the Schedule are such as to make them institutions of national importance, it is hereby declared that each such institute is an institution of national importance. ii. Section 3 (h) – Institute means any Institute mentioned in column (5) of the Schedule; iii. Section 4: Incorporation of Institutes (1) On and from the commencement of this Act. Every existing Institute shall be a body corporate by the same name as mentioned in column (5) of the Schedule. iv. Section 7 : Powers and functions of Institute Subject to the provisions of this Act, every institute shall exercise the foll

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

programmes or courses of study at the Institute; (f) to grant degrees, diplomas, and other academic distinctions or titles, and to institute and award fellowships, scholarships, prizes and medals; (g) to confer honorary degrees in such manner as may be specified by the regulations (h) to grant honorary awards and other distinctions; (o) to specify by regulations the institution of fellowships, scholarships, medals and prizes; viii. Section 15: Powers and functions of Academic Council. (1) The Academic Council shall perform the following functions, namely: (a) to specify the criteria and process for admission to courses or programmes of study offered by the institute; (b) to specify the academic content of programmes and courses of study and undertake modifications therein; (c) to specify the academic calendar, guidelines for conduct of examination and recommend grant of degrees, diplomas and other academic distinctions or titles. ix. Section 32: Returns and information to be provided t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

galuru Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore xi. Meaning of the term any law for the time being in force Further the expression any law for the time being in force is of wide connotation. It is submitted that the word law itself is very wide in its scope and would include within its ambit not only statutes (whether taxing statute or otherwise) but an order made by the Government, resolution of Government, Government schemes, notification, rules and regulations, customs, usage, etc., which have the force of law. xii. Meaning of the term Curriculum Curriculum refers to the means and materials with which students will interact for the purpose of achieving identified educational outcomes. xiii. The applicant states that in his case the law means The Indian Institute of Management Act, 2017. Thus, as per the provisions of the Indian Institute of Management Act, 2017 the long duration programmes discussed above are approved curriculum-based programmes offered by IIMB. xiv. Therefore, in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng or house-keeping performed in such educational institution. (iv) Services relating to admission to, or conduct of examination by, such institution; Provided that nothing contained in sub-items (i), (ii) and (iii) of item (b) shall apply to an educational institution other than an institution providing services by way of pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent. Provided further that nothing contained in sub-item (v) of item (b) shall apply to an institution providing services by way of, – (i) Pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equipment; or (ii) Education as a part of an approved vocational education course. (v) Supply of online educational journals or periodicals: Nil Nil j. The applicant prays to provide the Advance ruling as mentioned below: (a) To exempt the output liability on GST for the courses offered by IIMB other than those specifically mentioned in Sl. No. 67 of Notification No. 12/2017 – Central Tax (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

irector referred to the following two Resolutions that had been circulated to the Board Members on 16th March 2018, which was approved by 11 members. Resolution-1: With the coming into effect of the Indian Institutes of Management Act, 2017 and also on the approval of the Faculty body Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, now reconstituted as the Academic Council, the Board of Governors of Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, hereby approve the modifications made to the Ordinances. Resolution -2: With the coming into effect of the Indian Institutes of Management Act, 2017 and also on the recommendation of the Academic Council of Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, have resolved for the conversion of the post-graduate diploma in management into a Master s Degree titled as Master of Business Administration to be awarded by the Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, to such eligible persons as may be duly recommended by the Academic Council of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ention of the applicant is that the courses offered by the applicant and not covered under entry no. 67 of the said notification are covered under entry no. 66 of the said notification and are also exempt. For this the entry no. 66 needs to be looked: Entry No. 66 reads as under Services provided – (a) by an educational institution to its students, faculty and staff; (aa) by an educational institution by way of conduct of entrance examination against consideration in the form of entrance fee; (b) To an educational institution, by way of, (i) Transportation of students, faculty and staff; (ii) Catering, including any mid-day meals scheme sponsored by the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory; (iii) Security or cleaning or house-keeping performed in such educational institution. (iv) Services relating to admission to, or conduct of examination by, such institution; (v) Supply of online educational journals or periodicals: Provided that nothing contained in sub-items (i)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services to specialized education services. 4.3 Serial No. 66 of the said Notification No. 12/2017 is a general entry in relation to exemption of services provided by an educational institution and /or to an educational institution. Educational institution means an institution providing services by way of (i) pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent; (ii) education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by any law for the time being in force; (iii) education as a part of an approved vocational education course. Therefore all educational services provided by an institute, which leads to a qualification/ degree, recognized by the law, for the time being in force, are exempt from payment of GST. The applicants contention is that since the coming into effect of the Indian Institute of Management Act, 2017 the qualifications/degrees conferred by them are recognized by law, all the educational services provided by them in rela

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ost Graduate Programmes in management for the Post Graduate Diploma in Management, to which admissions are made on the basis of Common Admission Test (CAT) conducted by the Indian Institute of Management; (b) fellow programme in Management; (c) five year integrated programme in Management and application of Serial number 66 for the rest of the educational programmes. In conclusion we are of the opinion that when Notification number 12/2017 provides for a specific entry for the Indian Institutes of Management at serial no. 67, the provisions of serial number 66 shall not apply to them. 4.5 Similarly, the second question also relates to the applicability of entry no. 66 in the presence of specific entry no. 67. Therefore the same view holds good for the second question also. Consequently the answer for both the questions posed by the applicant is negative . 5. In view of the foregoing, we rule as follows R U L I N G a) In respect of question (a), Whether the long duration post graduate d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Assistant commissioner of Central Tax, Sankrail division

2018 (11) TMI 663 – APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 159 (App. A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of goods – PP Leno Bags – whether classified under CTH 39232990 or under CTH 63053300 – Benefit of Duty Drawback – Doctrine of equitable estoppels – Held that:- Polypropylene Leno Bags are manufactured by the Respondent by weaving polypropylene strips (tapes). Polypropylene is a variety of plastic and it is a fact that the Respondent declared the Polypropylene Leno Bags voluntarily under Tariff Heading 3923 29 90 and enjoyed the duty drawback. No cogent reason could be offered by the Respondent as to why and how the Tariff Heading is now sought to be changed from 3923 29 90 to 6305 33 00.

Since the Respondent declared that Polypropylene Leno Bags manufactured by weaving polypropylene strips (tapes) under Tariff Heading 3923 29 90 for claiming duty drawback, and no explanation could be offered as to why the Tariff Heading should be changed now

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Ltd. 2. M/s. Mega Flex Plastics Ltd., holding GSTIN No. 19AADCM7598R1Z8, a manufacturer of Polypropylene Leno Bags (PP Leno Bags) having its factory at Polypark, Plot-PPD3, Village-Sandhipur, P.O.-Joynagar, Horwah-711302, in West Bengal (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent ), sought an Advance Ruling on the classification of PP Leno Bags under the GST Tariff which is aligned to the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the Tariff Act ). 3. The Advance Ruling Authority after considering Section Notes 1(g) and 1(h) of Section XI of the Tariff Act and specifications issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards ruled that TP Leno Bags', if specifically made from woven Polypropylene fabrics using strips or the like of width not exceeding 5 mm and without any impregnation, coating, covering, or lamination with plastics, are to be classified under Tariff Sub-Heading 6305 33 00. 4. The Appellant has filed an Appeal against the above Advance Ruling re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ence issued by the DGFT, Kolkata on 23.06.2017 (valid for 18 months) classifying the said product under Chapter 39, the assessee without citing any reason to the department or seeking any amendment to DGFT, cleared the product in the domestic market under Tariff Heading 6305 33 00 instead of 3923 29 90. The suo motu change of Tariff Heading is clearly illegal and in violation of the Advance Licence Scheme. Now as the rate of tax has changed for the two Chapter Sub-Headings, the Respondent applied for Advance Ruling while the Chapter Sub-Heading of Advance Licence issued by DGFT is still in force. 5. During the course of the hearing the Appellant reiterated the points as stated in Grounds in Appeal. The Appellant stressed on the point that in spite of Advance Licence issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), Kolkata, (Licence No. 0210207709 dated 23.06.2017, valid for 18 months) classifying the Articles made of polypropylene Leno bags/ sacks containing 100 MT polypropyl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, then it will be excluded from the purview of Chapter 39 of the GST Tariff. (iii) In terms of Note 1(g) to Section XI of the Tariff Act states that the Section of Textiles and Textile Articles covering Chapters 50 to 63 does not include, monofilament of which any cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1 mm or strip or the like (for example, artificial straw) of an apparent width exceeding 5 mm, of plastics (Chapter 39), or plaits or fabrics or other basket-ware or wickerwork of such monofilament or strip (Chapter 46). (iv) Note I(h) to Section XI of the Tariff Act states that the Section of Textile and Textile Articles covering Chapters 50 to 63 does not include. Woven, knitted or crocheted fabrics, felt or nonwovens. impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, or articles thereof, of Chapter 39 (v) IS 16187:2014 issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards specifies that, PP Leno Woven sacks for packaging and storage of fruits and vegetables. The Standard IS 16187:2014 classifies

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t is stated that the reports are not to be reproduced without written approval, and that the report dated 27.03.2018 cannot be used for litigation, hence the above references are not considered as supporting evidence. 8. The matter is examined and arguments of Appellant and submissions made by the Respondent are considered. 9. Polypropylene Leno Bags are manufactured by the Respondent by weaving polypropylene strips (tapes). Polypropylene is a variety of plastic and it is a fact that the Respondent declared the Polypropylene Leno Bags voluntarily under Tariff Heading 3923 29 90 and enjoyed the duty drawback. No cogent reason could be offered by the Respondent as to why and how the Tariff Heading is now sought to be changed from 3923 29 90 to 6305 33 00. 10. Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court while dealing with the classification of woven sacks made of HDPE tapes and fabrics in the matter of Raj Pack Well Ltd. vs Union of India [1993 (41) ECC 285; 1993; ECR 351 MP; [1990 (50) ELT 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ub-heading 5406.90. Similarly the HDPE sacks fall into Heading 39.23, sub-heading 3923.90… 11. The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling failed to take note of the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court which is squarely applicable in the instant case. Further, since the Respondent declared that Polypropylene Leno Bags manufactured by weaving polypropylene strips (tapes) under Tariff Heading 3923 29 90 for claiming duty drawback, and no explanation could be offered as to why the Tariff Heading should be changed now to 6305 33 00, it is not permissible under the doctrine of equitable estoppels that the Respondent is allowed to take such a divergent stand now. The Apex Court has consistently struck down such self-serving attitude as held in The Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation and Anr. vs. Diamond and Gem Development Corporation Ltd. and Am., AIR 2013 SC 1241 = 2013 (2) TMI 870 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. 12. In view of the abo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =