In Re : Udayan Cinema Pvt Ltd

In Re : Udayan Cinema Pvt Ltd
GST
2019 (3) TMI 704 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – WEST BENGAL – 2019 (23) G. S. T. L. 345 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 66 G S.T.R. 63 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – WEST BENGAL – AAR
Dated:- 26-2-2019
Case No. 44 of 2018 Order No. 45/WBAAR/2018-19
GST
Mr Sydney D'Silva, Joint Commissioner, CGST & CX (Member) and  Mr Parthasarathi Dey, Senior Joint Commissioner, SGST (Member)
Applicant's representative heard : Rahul Dhanuka, Advocate
Preamble
A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called 'the GST Act'), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further time as menti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, read with section 20(xviii) of the IGST Act, 2017.
1.3 The Applicant declares that the issues raised in the application are not pending nor decided in any proceedings under any provisions of the GST Act. The officer concerned from the revenue has raised no objection to the admissibility of the Application.
1.4 The Application is, therefore, admitted.
2. Submissions of the Applicant
2.1 The Applicant submits, along with the Application, a written submission, including a description of the activity of a Line Producer and the proposed draft for the contract with CDIVF (hereinafter the Contract). The Contract is for the 'production services'. According to clause 5 of the Contract, CDIVF will facilitate the provisioning of the production services. The Applicant will reimburse CDIVF the cost of procuring these services, based on the bills raised by the service providers, bearing the name of the feature film. CDIVF will hire the local actors in Brazil and will provide insurance coverage

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s the budgeted amount is shared by CDIVF in advance. In case of any deviation from the budgeted amount, CDIVF shall pay the foreign supplier after taking concurrence from the Applicant. Moreover, the invoices raised by the foreign suppliers mention the name of the motion picture.
2.4 Without prejudice to the aforesaid, the Applicant further argues that the service of CDIVF can also be classified as event management service, as described under section 13(5) of the IGST Act, 2017. The shooting of the film in foreign locations, resulting in the emergence of a CD containing the filmed materials, is an 'event' that CDIVF is going to organize and manage.
2.5 At the same time, the Applicant argues that CDIVF will act as pure agent, as defined under rule 33. The Contract specifically provides that the Applicant will reimburse CDIVF at the actual cost of procuring these services, based on the bills the service providers raise in the name of the feature film.
2.6 The Applicant also believes t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng the location of the supplier, the recipient receives the service in Brazil and location of the recipient is, therefore, not within the taxable territory, and no tax is payable on RCM in terms of Sl No. 1 of Notification No. 10/2017 – IGST (Rate) dated 28/06/2017.
3. Submissions of the Revenue
3.1 Concerned officer from the Revenue submits that at the time of signing the Contract the so-called principal suppliers of the services or the services are not clearly identified. The Question of facilitating as an intermediary between the principal suppliers and the recipient, therefore, does not arise. CDIVF is, not, therefore, acting as an intermediary.
4. Observation & Findings of the Authority
4.1. The answer to the question about the liability to pay IGST on the reverse charge on the payments to be made to CDIVF depends upon the location of the recipient of the service. The Applicant, a resident of India, will receive the service in Brazil, where it has no fixed establishments or a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

answered first before determining whether the Applicant is liable to pay IGST on the payments to be made to CDIVF in terms of Sl No. 1 of Notification No. 10/2017 – IGST (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, provided the transaction constitutes an inter-State supply within the meaning of section 7(4) of the IGST Act, 2017.
4.3 SAC 999900 refers to services provided by embassies and representations from other countries, services provided by international organizations such as the United Nations and its specialized agencies or regional bodies, etc., the Organization of American States, the European Union, the African Union, the League of Arab States, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the World Customs Organization, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other international bodies or extraterritorial units (refer to Explanatory Notes on Classification of Services; cbic.gov.in). Service of CDIVF does not fit this description, and, therefore, cannot be classifie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

C 998596), as described in section 13(5) of the IGST Act, refers to “admission to, or organization of a cultural, artistic, sporting, educational or entertainment event, or a celebration, conference, fair, exhibition or similar events, and services ancillary to such admission or organization”. Clearly, any event whatsoever does not fit the bill. It has to be an event of a nature specified above. The emergence of a CD containing footage for a motion picture is not a cultural, artistic, or entertainment or a similar event. It is merely a stage in the process of producing the feature film. Screening of the completed motion picture or, for that matter, of the footage contained in the CD, however, can fit the description of events included in section 13(5) of the IGST Act. CDIVF is not being contracted for organizing such a screening event for the Applicant. CDVIF is not, therefore, supplying services for organizing events included in section 13(5) of the IGST Act or the events described un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has the Tribunal examined whether these commercial services are intermediary in nature. This judgment does not, therefore, throw much light on the question of classifying the service of a Line Producer and, therefore, not applicable in the present case.
4.7 It is evident from the above discussion that the Contract, the Applicant's argument based on the Contract, or the judgment in the case of Yash Raj Film (supra) does not throw sufficient light on the role CDIVF plays as a Line Producer in the production of the film in offshore locations. He is alternately described as an intermediary service provider or an event manager. It is, therefore, pertinent to examine the role of the Line Producer, as understood in common parlance in the film industry.
4.8 A Line Producer is a key member of the production team for a motion picture. Typically, a Line Producer manages the budget of a motion picture. Alternatively, or in addition, they may manage the day to day physical aspects of the film pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

this schedule, the Line Producer can accurately estimate the cost of each day's shooting and produce a provisional budget estimating the total amount of funding required.
4.9 During pre-production, Line Producers, working closely with the director, production manager, first assistant director, art director and other heads of department, prepare the production schedule and budget and set the shoot date. Line Producers oversee all other preproduction activities, including hiring the production team, setting up the production office, location scouting, ensuring compliance with regulations and codes of practice, sourcing equipment and suppliers, selecting the crew, engaging supporting artists and contributors, and monitoring the progress of the art department and other production departments. Line Producers are ultimately responsible for overseeing all activities, and for ensuring that the production is completed on time and within budget. [Source: Media match – USA Media Industry mag

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al part of the activity for the production of the feature film.
4.11 The Applicant himself submits that CDIVF is going to organize and manage the shooting in Brazil that will result in the emergence of a CD containing the audio-visual content, and retains as security all production rights and talent buy-outs for such production in Brazil till receiving the final payment from the recipient. Clearly, CDVIF cannot retain production rights and talent buy-outs, even as security, unless it is engaged in the production and realization of a motion picture, explicitly or implicitly protected by copyright, without a contract for outright sale. It is, therefore, provisioning motion picture production service classifiable under SAC 999612. It is, therefore, not an intermediary service.
4.12 The service being supplied is not, therefore, classifiable as the one specified in subsections (3) to (13) of section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017. The transaction between CDIVF and the Applicant is, therefore, i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds any title to the goods or services or both so procured or supplied as a pure agent of the recipient of supply;
(c) does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and
(d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services in addition to the amount received for supply he provides on his own account.
The Contract does not specify CDIVF as the Applicant's pure agent. It merely refers to bills for some of the services procured will bear the name of the feature film and will be paid on an actual cost basis. The crucial test is whether these services are a charge on the Applicant or CDIVF. If CDIVF is liable to pay the suppliers of these services no matter what the Applicant does, it will be treated as a charge on CDIVF. As CDIVF holds the production rights, even though as security, all procurements of goods and services will be a charge on him unless specifically excluded. That the bills for such services bears the name of the feature film

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Liability on collecting blood samples for cancer testing outside india

GST Liability on collecting blood samples for cancer testing outside india
Query (Issue) Started By: – AKReddy andCO Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 27-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Sir,
Can anyone help me in deciding whether we have to pay GST on collecting blood samples from patients in India and providing the same to a lab in USA. The USA lab will bill me and i will pay to him, am I need to pay GST under RCM in this transaction. Am I need to char

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST ON TOUR PACKAGE

GST ON TOUR PACKAGE
Query (Issue) Started By: – CABIJENDERKUMAR BANSAL Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 26-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Query : Tour Operator, XYZ has provided tour package for 6 days to Mr. A, a resident of the USA at US $. 50,000. The itinerary of the package is a follows:-
Day 1: Flight from Delhi to Jaipur
Day 2 & 3: Sightseeing in Jaipur
Day 4: Flight from Jaipur to Kathmandu Nepal
Day 5 & 6 : Sightseeing in Kathmandu
Combined tour p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of accumulated -ITC of Compensation Cess

Refund of accumulated -ITC of Compensation Cess
Query (Issue) Started By: – Prem Choudhary Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 27-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Dear Expert
Please advice for refund provision if any for following Case:-
The manufacturer are producing Cement and Clinker under HSN-2526 and Sales within in India. Cement is taxable @28% ( SGST-14% & CGST-14%) and no any GST Compensation Cess is leviable. However in production of Cement, Coal is require to running the Kilan(generating the heat) and on procurement of Coal Cess is leviable @ ₹ 400/- per tone.
As per provision of Act, Compensation Cess can be utiliase for payment of out put Cess only. Hence Compensation Cess is going to a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of compensation cess paid on goods exported is admissible. Read Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act, 2017.
This issue has been clarified vide C.B.I. & C. Circular No. 79/53/2018-GST, dated 31-12-2018. (Point No.9 is relevant).
Reply By Prem Choudhary:
The Reply:
Thank you Sethi ji for providing reference of provision and clarity,
We have gone through the Circular No.-45/19/2018-GST Point no-05 and your reply pint no-(i),
Kindly more clarify is require, In our Case Cement sale is within India and having accumulated Compensation Cess ITC. Whether we are eligible to claim refund of accumulated compensation Cess ITC ?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
In view of Board's clarification, you are eligible for refund claim of Compensat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Issue related with IGCR for job work vendor

Issue related with IGCR for job work vendor
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kyle Zhu Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 26-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear Exports,
I wanna discuss a case as bellow :
Raw Material imported by a foreign company A under IGCR Benefit than send to Vendor factory for further manufacturing and return back i.e. JOB WORK.
If the company A colud process this case Under IGCR ?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Querist,
In my

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Related Party Trnasactions

Related Party Trnasactions
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kaustubh Karandikar Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 27-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
XYZ(Proprietor) received Interest free loan from PQR (HUF). Both XYZ and PQR are related. Will it have any GST implications? Loan being given without charging any interest and XYZ and PQR being related, will it not amount to service provided by PQR to XYZ and for related person even without consideration, GST is require

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

What will be GST rates on pending payments for house purchase

What will be GST rates on pending payments for house purchase
Query (Issue) Started By: – Amit Agarwal Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 25-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
I booked a house in June 2016, for amount say ₹ 50L,and paid ₹ 10% of the total value that is 5L to book house. I paid 12% GST charges on booking amount that is 5 Lakhs.
Now as building is completed, builder asked me to pay rest 45 Lakh plus GST and final demand note for ₹

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PROOF OF EXPORT OF SOFTWARE and SERVICES

PROOF OF EXPORT OF SOFTWARE and SERVICES
Query (Issue) Started By: – Durga KARUMURU Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 25-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
What is the proof of Software or Services exported, required under GST.
A Software company providing services to an overseas company does it need GST Registration?
Do professional Accountants providing consultancy services to overseas clients need to provide any proof under GST?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
(1) SOFTEX (software export details) Form/Return is the proof of export. Monitored by Department of Electronics, DGFT and Customs. More details are as under:-
FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT (EXPORT OF GOODS AND SERVICES) REGULATIONS, 2015
[RBI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

about LUT on basis of ARN received from GST

about LUT on basis of ARN received from GST
Query (Issue) Started By: – kamal soni Dated:- 25-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 25-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
I have ARN no from GST registration yet not completed.application accepted and forwarded to state.
I want LUT to export my consignment.can I have on basis of ARN received from GST dept.
Reply By SHARAD ANADA:
The Reply:
GST Regn is must for application of LUT
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Yes. Withou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Continental Milkose India Limited Versus Union Of India And 4 Others

M/s Continental Milkose India Limited Versus Union Of India And 4 Others
GST
2019 (2) TMI 1456 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 25-2-2019
Writ Tax No. – 227 of 2019
GST
Bharati Sapru And Piyush Agrawal JJ.
For the Petitioner : Rishi Raj Kapoor
For the Respondent : A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Shukla
ORDER
Heard Sri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rajesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents no.1 to 3.
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not enter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Coimbatore Lorry Urimaiyalargal Pothunala Trust Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Coimbatore

M/s. Coimbatore Lorry Urimaiyalargal Pothunala Trust Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Coimbatore
Service Tax
2019 (2) TMI 1564 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 25-2-2019
Appeal No. ST/661/2012 – Final Order No. 40372/2019
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Ms. D. Naveena, Advocate for the Appellant
Ms. T. Usha Devi, DC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The appellant was issued a show cause notice dated 9.12.2005 demanding service tax under Business Auxiliary Service for the period from 1.8.2003 to 31.3.2005. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand along with interest and imposed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to furnish evidence with regard to the reimbursable expenses. The second argument was with regard to the penalties imposed. She submitted that the adjudicating authority has imposed higher amount of penalty than that of the service tax demand confirmed. She submitted that the appellant was under bonafide belief that the activity does not fall under BAS. Therefore, the appellant did not discharge the service tax during the relevant period and was contesting the same before various forums. Therefore, she pleaded that the penalties may be set aside.
3. The ld. AR Ms. Usha Devi supported the findings in the impugned order. She submitted that the appellant has not taken the plea of reimbursable expenses before the lower authorities. It is also

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to be remanded to the adjudicating authority who shall consider whether any reimbursable expenses are to be excluded from the taxable value that has been arrived by the adjudicating authority.
6. With regard to the penalties, ld. counsel submitted that the appellants were under bonafide belief that the said activity did not fall under BAS. From the litigations taken up by the appellant, we find that the said contention requires to be considered. For this reason, we find that the penalties imposed are unwarranted and requires to be set aside, which we hereby do.
7. From the foregoing discussions, we hold that the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority for the limited purpose of looking into whether the reimbursable expenses are t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. SAT Vision Network Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Coimbatore

M/s. SAT Vision Network Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Coimbatore
Service Tax
2019 (3) TMI 46 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 25-2-2019
Appeal No. ST/660/2012 – Final Order No. 40373/2019
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri R. Balagopal, Consultant for the Appellant
Ms. T. Usha Devi, DC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The appellant was engaged in cable operator service. On investigation, it was found that when compared to the amount paid by cable operators to the MSO, the service tax paid by cable operators was far below the actual tax payable. It was found that the appellant had not discharged the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gnals, link to the appellant herein. It is therefore pleaded by him that the matter may be remanded to the original authority to give the appellant an opportunity to furnish evidence with respect to the eligibility of CENVAT credit on the input service. The consultant also pleaded to set aside the penalties. He submitted that out of the demand of Rs. 3,04,484/-, they had already paid an amount of Rs. 1,48,461/-.
3. The ld. AR Ms. Usha Devi supported the findings in the impugned order. She submitted that the appellant had not furnished any evidence to show the amount collected by them as well as payment of service tax. The quantification of demand and the penalties imposed are legal and proper.
4. Heard both sides.
5. The appellant has su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that there was rivalry between different cable operators and most of the customers did not pay up the amount for which reason they could not discharge the service tax. Further, if they are eligible for CENVAT credit and the same would be eligible for adjustment towards the demand. The appellant has paid up substantial amounts. For these reasons, we hold that the penalties imposed are unwarranted and requires to be set aside which we hereby.
7. From the above discussions, the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority for the limited purpose of granting the benefit of CENVAT credit on the basis of the documents furnished by the appellant. The penalties are set aside in toto. The appeal is partly allowed, in above terms, with consequen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council Sets 1% Rate for Affordable Housing, 5% for Other Residential Properties Without ITC Benefit.

GST Council Sets 1% Rate for Affordable Housing, 5% for Other Residential Properties Without ITC Benefit.
News
GST
Recommendations of the 33rd GST Council meeting – Real estate sector – GST f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Recommendations of the 33rd GST Council meeting

Recommendations of the 33rd GST Council meeting
GST
Dated:- 24-2-2019

Real estate sector is one of the largest contributors to the national GDP and provides employment opportunity to large numbers of people. “Housing for All by 2022” envisions that every citizen would have a house and the urban areas would be free of slums. There are reports of slowdown in the sector and low off-take of under-construction houses which needs to be addressed. To boost the residential segment of the real estate sector, following recommendations were made by the GST Council in its 33rd meeting held today:
2. GST rate:
i. GST shall be levied at effective GST rate of 5% without ITC on residential properties outside affordable segment;
ii. GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

exempted only for such residential property on which GST is payable.
6. Details of the scheme shall be worked out by an officers committee and shall be approved by the GST Council in a meeting to be called specifically for this purpose.
7. Advantages of the recommendations made:
The new tax rate in principle was approved by the Council taking into consideration the following advantages:-
i. The buyer of house gets a fair price and affordable housing gets very attractive with GST @ 1%.
ii. Interest of the buyer/consumer gets protected; ITC benefits not being passed to them shall become a non-issue.
iii. Cash flow problem for the sector is addressed by exemption of GST on development rights, long term lease (premium), FSI etc.
iv.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

supply without consideration

supply without consideration
Query (Issue) Started By: – Madhavan iyengar Dated:- 24-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 24-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
After cgst amendment act 2018 wherein sec 7 clause (d) is deleted effective from 01/07/2017
query now any supply made with out consideration will it be liable to gst ( other than exceptions like import of services and transactions between related parties and items specified in schedule I without consideration)
Reply By

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC on Electric installation

ITC on Electric installation
Query (Issue) Started By: – Hiren Pathak Dated:- 23-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 2-3-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 11 Replies
GST
Dear All,
A company is setting up its manufacturing plant where in power supply by way of supplying and installation of various electric cable connection from main station outside factory premises to company sub station is required from state government. State government instructed company that company can itself set up this electric installation from thier nominated vendor but ultimate ownership of such electric installation (Assets) will remain with state government.
Now question is whether company can claim ITC of such electric installation which mainly constist of supplying and installing various electric cables?
Whether ownership of such electric installation will remain with state govenment and not with compnay, will it have any impact on ITC eligibility?
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hough the Company may get it done through some other person I.e. sub contractor. Also see .Explanation- (ii) to Section 16(2)(b) inserted vide CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018 effective from 1.2.19
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Dear Experts,
Can we apply Sl.No.25 of Notification No.12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 (as amended time to time) instant case and can we apply the ratio of decision given by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in case of M/s. Torrent Power Ltd Vs. Union of India SCA No. 5343 of 2018. = 2019 (1) TMI 1092 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Can we consider as, the installation is undertaken as per the direction of the state government and title is not transferred by way of Invoice or anyother documents.
This is to enrich my knowledge through your guidence and views.
Thanks,
With Regards,
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Sh.Alkesh Jani Ji,
Neither Notification nor ratio of High Court judgement is applicable to this situation inasmuch as erection and installation activities ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

related services be used for any purpose other than for transmission and distribution of electricity. The principal supply and the related/ancillary services go hand in hand and one cannot be provided independent of the other. The upshot of this discussion is that the services provided by the petitioner are in the nature of composite supply and therefore, in view of the provisions of clause (a) of section 8 of the CGST Act, the tax liability thereof has to be determined by treating such composite same as a supply of the principal supply of transmission and distribution of electricity. Consequently, if the principal supply of transmission and distribution of electricity is exempt from levy of service tax, the tax liability of the related services shall be determined accordingly."
In view of above, can we say that such installation is ancillary service provided?
Thanks,
With due regards
Reply By Hiren Pathak:
The Reply:
Kasturi sir,
Little clarification in facts, My question

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply;
Illustration. – Where goods are packed and transported with insurance, the supply of goods, packing materials, transport and insurance is a composite supply and supply of goods is a principal supply;
(47) ”exempt supply” means supply of any goods or services or both which attracts nil rate of tax or which may be wholly exempt from tax under section 11, or under section 6 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, and includes non-taxable supply.
108) ”taxable supply” means a supply of goods or services or both which is leviable to tax under this Act;
In view of the above, it can be easily arrived at the conclusion that composite supply consists of two or more taxable supplies and not one taxable and one exempt. Thus exempt supply is excluded from the scope of composite supply. So erection and installation is not ancil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and second whether electric installation (Lying of electric cable etc from main power supply station situated outside company premises to company manufacturing plant) can be termed as immovable or movable?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Sh.Hiren Pathak Ji,
No doubt yours is a manufacturing company but here is a question of what nature of service you are supplying/providing. In my view (based on various case laws), it is a works contract service which you are providing to State Govt. and no exemption is available to you. Now is the question of vendor's service. The vendor is working for you. In other words, we can say that that person is your job worker. So the vendor's service is also of the nature of service being provided by you. His service an integral part of the works contract service being provided. In Works Contract Service, ITC is available if utilised in providing the same output taxable service.So you can avail ITC on the strength of invoice to be issued by y

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s an immovable property. (Power station is an immovable property for which you will work.)There is a Board's circular to this effect and case laws.
You can easily trace out case laws in your support.
Reply By CASusheel Gupta:
The Reply:
The primary responsibility of laying of cable was of state government. SG authorised the company to purchase cable and install it on behalf of SG. The ownership shall rest with the SG.
The SG shall be required to bill the company including the cost of cabling (covered by section 15(2)(b)). Cost of cable though incurred by company shall be included in the value of supply of SG.
Applying the ratio of Torrent Power, the supply from SG to company shall be exempt supply. Being exempt, ITC should not be availed by company, though the bill in the name of company entitles it to avail ITC.
IMO in case the ownership does not rest with SG, section 15(2)(b) shall not be applicable since it can be presumed that SG has only installed the meter and cable was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Free of Cost Supply – Valuation Implications

Free of Cost Supply – Valuation Implications
By: – CA Akash Phophalia
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 23-2-2019

In this article the author aims to enlighten its readers about the inclusion or non-inclusion of value of FOC material provided by the buyer/service receiver to the seller/service provider.2017
Statutory provisions related to valuation are principally carved out in the Section 15 of the CGST Act 2017. The relevant portion of the said provisions related to the concept clarified hereunder is mentioned as under:-
“Section 15 Value of taxable supply
(1)
(2) The value of supply shall include –
(a) ………………..
(b) any amount that the supplier is liable to pay in relation to such supply but which has been incurred by the recipient of the supply and not included in the price actually paid or payable for the goods or services or both;
(c) ……
(d) ……
(e) ………&helli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

omponent manufacturer (the two being not related persons or distinct persons) on FOC basis dose not constitute a supply as there is no consideration involved. Further, since the moulds and dies are provided on FOC basis by the OEM to the component manufacturer in the course or furtherance of his business, there is no requirement of reversal of input tax credit availed on such moulds and dies by the OEM.
1.2 It is further clarified that while calculating the value of the supply made by the component manufacturer, the value of moulds and dies provided by the OEM to the component manufacturer of FOC basis shall not be added to the value of such supply because cost of moulds/dies was not to be incurred by the component manufacturer and thus, does not merit inclusion in the value of supply in terms of section 15(2)(b) of the CGST Act 2017.
1.3 However, if the contract between OEM and component manufacturer was for supply of components made by using the moulds/dies belonging to the compone

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er form the third party are ultimately supplied to the receiver for which tax invoice was raised and GST had been charged. Thus the absolute ownership of the tools gets transferred to the OEM. However, the physical possession of the tool remains with the applicant during manufacturing process or till the time they are removed by the receiver form the premised of the supplier.
Having regard to the clarification issued by the department as mentioned above and in the facts we need to ascertain the contractual obligation to provide tools in terms of the contract executed between the supplier and the receiver. Once it is established that the obligation to provide tools on FOC basis is on the receiver then the question of adding the amortized value for tools supplied by the receiver does not arise. Conclusively, in the given facts of the case the supplier is not required to add value of tools while calculating value of its principle supply of manufacturing of the product under Section 15(2)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Composition Scheme after Amendment(Supplying Goods as well as Service

Composition Scheme after Amendment(Supplying Goods as well as Service
Query (Issue) Started By: – Prem Choudhary Dated:- 22-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 25-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 12 Replies
GST
Dear Exper
We have heard that amended in Composition scheme for availing scheme for both supplier -goods or Services or both supplier.
However we have not find condition for availing scheme if supplier has supplier both goods and services.
please advice..
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Notification No. 02/2019-Central Tax New Delhi, the 29th January, 2019. Also see Section 5 of the CGST (Amendment )Act, 2018 (31 of 2018 effective from 1.2.2019
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
According to Section 10 (1) of CGST Act, 2017 "notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act but subject to the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9, a registered person, whose aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year did

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

than those referred to in clause (b) of paragraph 6 of Schedule II), of value not exceeding ten per cent. of turnover in a State or Union territory in the preceding financial year or five lakh rupees, whichever is higher.]"
In view of this provision if a supplier makes supply of both goods and services under composition scheme, he can make supply of service upto 10% of the turnover (of what turnover of goods or turnover of both goods and services-not clear from the wordings employed by the legislature) during previous financial year. As the things stand as of noe the turnover is of both goods and services.
Reply By Prem Choudhary:
The Reply:
Sir
In our case , previous year total turnover is less then 1.5 crores and includes ₹ 10 lacs supply of services.
Pls advice we can opt composition scheme w.e.f 01.04.2019
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
In my view, 10% is of turnover of goods. You can opt for Composition Scheme but practically there is a huge loss to the asse

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

preserved properly. The composition scheme eliminates all the requirement. It reduces the cost of compliance. Further, GSTR-2A reconciliation is also not required to these person. Lot of headache is gone in matching the purchase shown in books vs sales uploaded by the vendor. Going ahead the buyer has to call the vendor and ask him to show the sales in GSTR-1 in B2B with proper GSTIN. The call centre type of work will increase in the business. Also, to claim credit the vendors needs to be withing 180 days. The payment tracking is also important to justify claims. Hence, the composition scheme is lucrative. Otherwise as said by collegue expert composition scheme is not beneficial.
Reply By Prem Choudhary:
The Reply:
Sir
Dealer is going to discontinue supply of Services and only supply of goods in future. We have confusion in condition related to to amendment that the "value not exceeding ten per cent. of turnover in a State or Union territory in the preceding financial year or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

unting to ₹ 5 Lacs in condition is maximum limit of Service value in previous year for opting Composition Scheme.
Reply By Prem Choudhary:
The Reply:
Thank you so much for clarifying amendment of Composition Scheme.
One more Clarity is require for followings:-
Case- if dealers are supplying of goods, running canteen and providing service of courier in previous year.
Query:-
1. What are the rate applicable in case dealer want to opt Composition from 1.4.2019 ? whether Separate rate is applicable for canteen (5%) ? or single rate of entire turnover (1% ).
2 Sec-10(1)''For complying of Condition of up to 10% of total turnover or 5 Lacs'', Canteen supply is also consider as Service or excluding Canteen ?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
For mixed supplies under composition it is 6 % (CGST 3%+SGST 3%)
Reply By SHARAD ANADA:
The Reply:
Logic behind ₹ 5 Lakh is, suppose you have started business in the year 18-19 and do not have any turnover in previo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Input Credit

GST Input Credit
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ethirajan Parthasarathy Dated:- 22-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 23-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
A Business entity spends on interior including false ceiling and the service provider charges GST on works contract. The building is owned by the business entity. Is it eligible to take input credit of GST paid or interior including false ceiling.
Will situation be different if the building is rented premises.
Reply By KA

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Availement of Input Tax Credit on Motor vehicles

Availement of Input Tax Credit on Motor vehicles
Query (Issue) Started By: Dated:- 22-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 23-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Can some one help me on below query ?
Recently through an amendment, Input Tax Credit is allowed on Motor Vehicles if the approved seating capacity is more than 13 persons ( Including Drivers ) , Input Tax Credit is admissible with out any restriction. The same is effective from 01-02-2019.
In the case of following situations ,
If the Date of Rendering of Services falls before 01-02-2019 [ Effective Date of Amendment ], But the Invoices for the same has been received after 01-02-2019 [ Effective Date of Amendment ] –
Can the recepient of the service claim th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5) above (a) are same even after amendment w.e.f. 1.2.19.
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
Section 17 (5) prescribes that "notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and sub-section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely :-
[(a) motor vehicles for transportation of persons having approved seating capacity of not more than thirteen persons (including the driver), except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such motor vehicles; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving such motor vehicles
Therefore motor vehicles for transportation of persons havi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ry and not others.
According to Section 13 (2) CGST Act, 2017 "the time of supply of services shall be the earliest of the following dates, namely :-
(a) the date of issue of invoice by the supplier, if the invoice is issued within the period prescribed under [* * *] section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or
(b) the date of provision of service, if the invoice is not issued within the period prescribed under [* * *] section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or
(c) the date on which the recipient shows the receipt of services in his books of account, in a case where the provisions of clause (a) or clause (b) do not apply :
Therefore if the invoice is issued

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods manufactured under excise regime now written off

Goods manufactured under excise regime now written off
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kaustubh Karandikar Dated:- 22-2-2019 Last Reply Date:- 24-2-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
XYZ(Manufacturer) had transferred the unutilized CENVAT credit laying in balance as on July'17 to Electronic credit ledger under GST through TRAN – 1. They are holding certain manufactured stocks of excise regime which they now want to write off. Are they required to proportionately reverse

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST ON SKIN CARE PRODUCTS

GST ON SKIN CARE PRODUCTS
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 22-2-2019

In general parlance, there are many products which are used as cosmetics or soaps which may have medicinal relevance or considered as 'Ayurvedic' in nature. 'Ayurvedic' is one discipline of medicine just like allopathy or homeopathy.
The issue of classification came up before the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) of West Bengal in the matter of Akansha Hair & Skin Care Herbal Unit Pvt. Ltd. 2018 (4) TMI 811 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL ; . However, this ruling has since been modified by Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal.
In the instant case, there was a manufacture of skin care preparations and issue was of classification of 33 such products. It was claimed that its skin care preparations are Ayurvedic Medicaments. They are meant for therapeutic or prophylactic uses, put up in packaging for retail sale and entirely correspond to the des

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

classification. The remaining products mentioned in the list submitted by them are not offered primarily as medicaments and, therefore, not to be included under Heading 3004. This ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103(2) until and unless declared void under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.
It was also observed that medicaments are not defined under GST law or Customs Tariff applicable for goods classification in GST law. Further, for classification of skin care products as medicament, it is not sufficient that such a product manufactured as per authoritative text book, merely helps in controlling skin disease. Its curative or preventive value must be substantial, and product must be manufactured primarily to control or cure a skin-related disease. Further, it must he established that consumers use it primarily for treatment, mitigation, cure or prevention of specific skin disease or skin disorder. Since most of skin care preparations have both uses i.e. medicinal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

& Skin Care Herbal Unit Pvt. Ltd. 2018 (4) TMI 811 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL] gave the ruling that:
"Preparations for the care of the skin namely, Rupam (Pimple Pack) and Pailab (Anti-Crack Cream), in the list submitted by the Applicant are classifiable as Medicament under Heading 3004 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Preparations listed as Swarnajyoti, Sunayana and Tarumitra-60 have not yet come into existence, and, therefore, no rulings are pronounced on their classification. The remaining products mentioned in the list submitted by them are not offered primarily as medicaments and, therefore, not to be included under Heading 3004."
It was held that to determine whether or not a product or a formulation is to be labelled as a 'medicament', it is necessary to consider its efficacy in treating or remedying an 'injury', an 'ailment' or an 'illness'.
The four products in question were Komal Parash and Romancho (Lavender, Va

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Anil Kumar And Sons Versus Union of India And 4 Others

M/s Anil Kumar And Sons Versus Union of India And 4 Others
GST
2019 (2) TMI 1341 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 22-2-2019
Writ Tax No. – 221 of 2019
GST
Bharati Sapru And Piyush Agrawal JJ.
For the Petitioner : Vishwjit
For the Respondent : A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Shukla
ORDER
Heard Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri O.P. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the respondents no.1, 2 & 3, and Shri R.C. Shukla, learned Counsel for the respondent no.4.
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the Commissioner to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because hi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Navi Mumbai

M/s Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Navi Mumbai
Service Tax
2019 (2) TMI 1424 – CESTAT MUMBAI – 2019 (24) G. S. T. L. 362 (Tri. – Mumbai)
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 22-2-2019
APPEAL NO. ST/86812/2018 – A/85361/2019
Service Tax
DR. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri K.A. Photographer, Associate Vice President for Appellant
Shri Dilip Shinde, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for Respondent
ORDER
Rejection of refund claim made by the appellant on the ground that it failed to qualify the test of unjust enrichment is the subject matter of this appeal in this second round of litigation.
2. Factual backdrop of the case is that appellant M/s Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. claimed refund recalculated as Rs. 19,66,794/- for the period from April 2008 to September 2008 on commission received for export of services from a Singapore based company M/s Komatsu Asia Pvt. Ltd. against sale and services of its trucks in India. Appellant's

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rders. At the same time, the procedural aspect of filling the declaration and granting the refund to the appellant needs to be done. Accordingly I direct the appellant to file the declaration as required under Notification No. 12/2005 read with Export of Services Rules, 2005 before the Adjudicating Authority and the Adjudicating Authority on receipt of such declaration, will process refund claims.”
20. In view of the foregoing discussions, I set aside the impugned order on merit with the direction to the refund sanctioning authority to sanction the refund/rebate subject to observance of the procedure and the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The appeal of the appellant is allowed in above terms with consequential relief, if any.”
3. Appellant complied with the orders, appeared before the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax, Division-I, Mumbai-VII and participated in the personal hearing, who vide his order dated 28.10.2016, made some adverse observation on the m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

through CENVAT credit except for the month of June, 2008. The payment under reverse charge was always required to be made through CASH only. Therefore the claim of the claimant that they made the Service Tax under reverse charge does not hold ground.
(iii) xxxxxxx
(iv) From the above bills, it can be seen that the claimant has received Rs. 9,37,714/- (inclusive of Service Tax) by way of foreign exchange remittance equivalent to USD 22,186/- from the foreign client and it was credited to their account. This is evident form FIRC no. 3129007336 for an amount of USD 22,176/-. It is therefore conclusively proved that the claimant has received the payment inclusive of Service Tax from the foreign customer. The claimant claims that they merely worked back from the said commission amount of Service Tax liability to be discharged by them under reverse charge and paid the said Service Tax amount from the actual service commission received by them. I find that once the invoice or bill has bee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ice Tax and doctrine of unjust enrichment is applicable in this case.
(9) xxxxxxxxxx
10. The claimant has submitted the certificate of Chartered Accountant and foreign customer to prove that they have not recovered any amount of Service Tax from their customer. It is already proved that the amount received by the claimant from their foreign customer is inclusive of Service Tax, therefore the Certificate issued by C.A. has no relevance. The CA certificate is neither corroborative by any documentary evidence nor does it explain the method adopted for arriving at the conclusion that the Service Tax has not been recovered from the clients which puts the said certificate on a weak footing in view of the facts and documents discussed in the foregoing paras. Further the CA certificate alone cannot prove that the incidence of duty/tax has not been passed to the customers. For this proposition, I rely on the decision of Hon'ble Tribunal in case of CCE, Chennai-II Vs. M/s Caterpillar India P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

have already held in para 8 (iv) (ii) above that the payment made by the claimant is not under reverse charge and the same was made by them as a service provider and the amount has been collected from the client and paid to the government treasury, therefore the case law cited by them is not relevant in the instant refund claim.
12. To sum up, I hold that the “Business Auxiliary Services” provided by the claimant qualify as export of service. They have fulfilled the procedural aspect for claiming the rebate under Notification No. 11/2005-ST dated 19.04.2005. However, the claimant has failed the test of doctrine of unjust enrichment in the instant refund claim, as the incidence of duty has already been passed to the clients/third party.”
4. Being aggrieved by the above rejection order, appellant preferred on appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and as the same yielded no fruitful result, it has approach this Tribunal seeking relief in this second round of litigation.
5. In the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g of the Adjudicating Authority that appellant had failed in the test of unjust enrichment, despite the fact that judicial decision regarding acceptance of Chartered Accountant certificate by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Joshi Technologies International Vs. Union of India – [2016 (339) ELT 21 (GUJ)] and Tribunal decisions reported in [2014 (34) STR 890 (Tri.-Mumbai)] in the case of Vodafone Cellular Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III, [2018 (12) GSTL 316 (Tri.-Del.)] in the case of Western Union Financial Services Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi and [2015 (40) STR 699 (Tri.-Mumbai)] in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-I Vs. Vodafone (India) Ltd. were all in favour of appellant, for which he prayed to set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals).
6. In response to such submissions, Shri Dilip Shinde, learned Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the respondent-department has supported the reasoning and rationality of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

appellant had submitted declaration in compliance to Notification No. 11/2005 read with Export of Service Rules, 2005 to the Adjudicating Authority and also made an alternative prayer in the grounds of appeal. In the first round of litigation, which was not made before the Commissioner (Appeals) at the first instance who passed order in favour of the appellant, the test of unjust enrichment was asked to be decided by the Refund Sanctioning Authority. This being so, rejection of refund is solely confined to the dispute concerning applicability of doctrine of unjust enrichment to the appellant, since claim of refund was allowed to it and the same attained finality being unchallenged by the respondent department. Therefore, determination of such an issue is well within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal for which hearing had been rightly preceded.
8. The test of unjust enrichment, in its limited applicability, is confined to the consideration as to who had borne the incidence of tax? If

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tution of India. It is not understood as to why the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Authority have ignored this documentary evidence and only placed their reliance on bifurcation of tax component in the invoice raised by the appellant, which appellant claims to have been prepared for the purpose of calculation of Service Tax liability only and on the basis of foreign exchange remittance as well as invoice copies, Commissioner (Appeals) had drawn a presumption that incidence of duty had passed on knowing, fully well that presumption/suspicion, however strong, cannot take the place of proof. Despite the fact that Adjudicating Authority vide his order dated 28.10.2016 (page no. 12 of the appeal memo) under para 8 (iii) had given his observation that it was for the appellant to change/amend their CIF system to make it complacent as per their requirement and they have not done so. Further, when the service receiver denied to have born the incidence of tax, it is not understood as to wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

M/s. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai
Central Excise
2019 (2) TMI 1484 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 22-2-2019
Appeal No. E/504/2012 – Final Order No. 40371/2019
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri M.N. Bharathi, for the Appellant
Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The facts of the case are that the appellants are inter alia manufacturers of cars. Pursuant to audit, it emerged that appellant had availed CENVAT credit on certain inputs like angles, channels and other items used for support of capital goods, in particular, hollow profiles and panels for use in paint shop. Department took the view that there cannot availment of CENVAT credit in respect of such items. Accordingly, proceedings were initiated against the appellant which culminated in an order dated 7.9.2012, (impugned order), w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f the paint shop.
2.5 The adjudicating authority has relied upon the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Vandana Global Ltd. – 2010 (253) ELT 440 (Tri.LB) to conclude that input credit cannot be allowed in fabrication of items which are eventually embedded to earth. However, the said decision been overruled by the Hon'ble High Court of Chattisgarh as reported in 2018 (16) GSTL 462 (Chat.)
2.6 The ld. counsel submits that the issue has already been addressed and decided in favour of the appellant in a number of other judgments / decisions of High Court / Tribunal.
3. On the other hand, ld. AR Shri B. Balamurugan supported the findings in the impugned order. He further submits that the decision of the Vandana Global Ltd. by Hon'ble High Court of Chattisgarh has been appealed against by the department. Hence the matter is not settled.
4. Heard both sides.
5. We find ourselves in agreement with the ld. counsel that the matter in dispute is no longer res integra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ase and held as follows :
“We do not find that amendment made in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 which come into force on 7-7-2009 was clarificatory amendment as there is nothing to suggest in the Amending Act that amendment made in Explanation 2 was clarificatory in nature. Wherever the Legislature wants to clarify the provision, it clearly mentions intention in the notification itself and seeks to clarify existing provision. Even, if the new provision is added then it will be new amendment and cannot be treated to be clarification on particular thing or goods and/or input and as such, the amendment could operate only prospectively.”
6. That view has been quoted with approval by the Madras High Court in M/s. Thiruarooran Sugars v. Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CMA 3814/2014 and connections) decided on 10-7-2017 [2017 (355) E.L.T. 373 (Mad.)] to conclude that the said amendment cannot be treated as clarificatory. M/s. Thiruarooran Sugars also considered the issue

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =