Court ruling: Late filing not reason enough to deny transition of credit extension u/s 140(5) of CGST Act.

Court ruling: Late filing not reason enough to deny transition of credit extension u/s 140(5) of CGST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was rejected for not filing within the time limit. The section allows credit for duties/taxes on inputs received post the appointed day if recorded within 30 days, extendable by Commissioner for another 30 da

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court ruled that multiple show cause notices can be issued to an individual and their business. Proper jurisdiction must be considered.

High Court ruled that multiple show cause notices can be issued to an individual and their business. Proper jurisdiction must be considered.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction in a case involving the issuance of two show cause notices to an individual for different entities. The petitioner argued that once a notice was issued to them individually, a separate notice could not be issued for their proprietorship concern by a different Commissionerate. The Cour

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The court decided to accept the late appeals in GST case due to valid reasons provided by the petitioner.

The court decided to accept the late appeals in GST case due to valid reasons provided by the petitioner.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court addressed a challenge to appellate orders rejecting appeals as time-barred u/s 107 of GST enactments. The petitioner's appeals were filed 21 to 24 days beyond the limitation period but explained the delay due to rectification petitions. The petitioner paid 10% of the disputed tax and had funds appropriated from their bank account. The Court directed the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Penalty proceedings under GST Act initiated after premises search deemed unjustified by High Court. Orders quashed.

Penalty proceedings under GST Act initiated after premises search deemed unjustified by High Court. Orders quashed.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that penalty proceedings post a search are not warranted. Quashed impugned orders of March 21, 2018 and August 31, 2018, finding them unjustified. Petition allowed based on lack of justification for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court rules in favor of petitioner in recovery case. Directed to supply demanded documents within 3 days. Petition allowed to reply within 10 days.

Court rules in favor of petitioner in recovery case. Directed to supply demanded documents within 3 days. Petition allowed to reply within 10 days.
Case-Laws
GST
In a case before the High Court, the petitioner sought recovery of CGST, SGST, and KFC amounts following a search and seizure at their business premises. The petitioner claimed they were not provided with the demanded documents, hindering their ability to respond to the show cause notice. The Court noted the lack of a reply fro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Rules on Composite vs. Mixed Supply in Power Plant Ash Transport Case, Extends Hearing to July 2024.

High Court Rules on Composite vs. Mixed Supply in Power Plant Ash Transport Case, Extends Hearing to July 2024.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court examined whether a supply was a composite supply u/s 8(a) of the CGST Act/JGST Act or a mixed supply u/s 8(b). The supply involved transportation of Power Plant Ash within 50 km, taxed under various headings. The Court found a prima facie case of abuse of process of law and lack of jurisdiction. It held that the extended period of limitation u/s 74

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court ruled audit notice under Central GST Act valid if not same subject as State GST proceedings. No restriction in statute. Petition dismissed.

High Court ruled audit notice under Central GST Act valid if not same subject as State GST proceedings. No restriction in statute. Petition dismissed.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court considered the validity of a notice issued u/s 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding GST Audit. The writ petition challenged the Central GST authorities' power to initiate proceedings when the subject matter was already under consideration by State GST authorities. The Court held that th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court rules in favor of company, allowing payment of GST dues in installments. Bank account attachment lifted. Justice served

Court rules in favor of company, allowing payment of GST dues in installments. Bank account attachment lifted. Justice served
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court addressed the issue of bank account attachment for GST recovery, noting the company's concerns over operational disruptions. The Court cited Section 80 of the GST Act allowing for installment payments. It directed the petitioner to pay tax arrears in six monthly installments starting from April 15, 2024. The Court set aside the procee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Overturns GST Registration Cancellation Due to Lack of Personal Hearing, Citing Violation of Section 29(2) GST Act.

High Court Overturns GST Registration Cancellation Due to Lack of Personal Hearing, Citing Violation of Section 29(2) GST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court set aside the order canceling the petitioner's GST registration as it was issued without providing an opportunity for a personal hearing, violating Section 29(2) of the GST Act, 2017. Previous court decisions highlighted the importance of following principles of natural justice. The court directed the respondents to review the petiti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Violation of natural justice found as petitioner not given fair hearing. Order quashed, matter remanded for review.

Violation of natural justice found as petitioner not given fair hearing. Order quashed, matter remanded for review.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a personal hearing despite the offer in the first notice. The petitioner's claim of sending replies was not proven, leading to responsibility. The absence of a personal hearing in the second notice deprived the petitioner of a fair opportunity. The court quashed the order and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council Waives Penalties for 2017-2020; Sets Appeal Limits, Adjusts Rates, and Streamlines Processes.

GST Council Waives Penalties for 2017-2020; Sets Appeal Limits, Adjusts Rates, and Streamlines Processes.
News
GST
The GST Council in its 53rd meeting held on 22-06-2024 made significant recommendations. Key highlights include waiving interest and penalties u/s 73 of the CGST Act for FY 2017-2020 if full tax is paid by 31.03.2025. The input tax credit time limit u/s 16(4) for FY 2017-2021 is deemed to be 30.11.2021. Monetary limits for appeals are set: Rs. 20 lakh for GSTAT, Rs. 1 crore

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Recommendations of 53rd GST Council Meeting held on 22-06-2024

Recommendations of 53rd GST Council Meeting held on 22-06-2024
GST
Dated:- 23-6-2024

Recommendations of 53rd GST Council Meeting held on 22-06-2024
GST Council recommends waiving interest and penalties for demand notices issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act (i.e. the cases not involving fraud, suppression or wilful misstatement, etc.) for the fiscal years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20, if the full tax demanded is paid upto 31.03.2025.
GST Council recommends the time limit to avail input tax credit w.r.t. any invoice or debit note under Section 16(4) of CGST Act, through any GSTR 3B return filed upto 30.11.2021 for FY 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, may be deemed to be 30.11.2021
Council has recommends monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakh for GST Appellate Tribunal, Rs. 1 crore for High Court and Rs. 2 crore for Supreme Court, for filing of appeals by the Department, to reduce litigation
GST Council recommends reduction of the quantum of pre-deposit required to be pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

including fire water sprinklers.
GST Council recommends exemption of certain services provided by Indian Railways to common man and also intra railway supplies
GST Council recommends certain exemptions related to accommodation services, providing relief to students and working professionals
GST Council recommends to roll-out the biometric-based Aadhaar authentication of registration applicants on pan-India basis in a phased manner
The 53rd GST Council met under the Chairpersonship of Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman in New Delhi today. The meeting was also attended by Union Minister of State for Finance Shri Pankaj Chaudhary, Chief Ministers of Goa and Meghalaya; Deputy Chief Ministers of Bihar, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha; besides Finance Ministers of States & UTs (with legislature) and senior officers of the Ministry of Finance & States/ UTs.
The GST Council inter alia made the following recommendations relating to changes in GST ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of genuine interpretational issues.
6. To clarify that all types of sprinklers including fire water sprinklers will attract 12% GST and to regularise the past practice on 'as is where is' basis in view of genuine interpretational issues.
7. To extend IGST exemption on imports of specified items for defence forces for a further period of five years till 30th June, 2029.
8. To extend IGST exemption on imports of research equipment/buoys imported under the Research Moored Array for African-Asian-Australian Monsoon Analysis and Prediction (RAMA) programme subject to specified conditions.
9. To exempt Compensation Cess on the imports in SEZ by SEZ Unit/developers for authorised operations w.e.f. 01.07.2017.
Other Miscellaneous Changes
10. To exempt Compensation cess on supply of aerated beverages and energy drinks to authorised customers by Unit Run Canteens under Ministry of Defence.
11. To provide Adhoc IGST exemption on imports of technical documentation for AK-203 rifle k

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

63 to exempt accommodation services having value of supply of accommodation up to Rs. 20,000/- per month per person subject to the condition that the accommodation service is supplied for a minimum continuous period of 90 days. To extend similar benefit for past cases.
Other changes relating to Services
4. Co-insurance premium apportioned by lead insurer to the co-insurer for the supply of insurance service by lead and co-insurer to the insured in coinsurance agreements, may be declared as no supply under Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017 and past cases may be regularized on 'as is where is' basis.
5. Transaction of ceding commission/re-insurance commission between insurer and re-insurer may be declared as no supply under Schedule III of CGST Act, 2017 and past cases may be regularized on 'as is where is' basis.
6. GST liability on reinsurance services of specified insurance schemes covered by Sr. Nos. 35 & 36 of notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 may be regul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e BHIM-UPI transactions and is decided in the proportion and manner by NPCI in consultation with the participating banks is not taxable.
B. Measures for facilitation of trade:
1. Insertion of Section 128A in CGST Act, to provide for conditional waiver of interest or penalty or both, relating to demands raised under Section 73, for FY 2017-18 to FY 2019-20 : Considering the difficulties faced by the taxpayers, during the initial years of implementation of GST, the GST Council recommended, waiving interest and penalties for demand notices issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act for the fiscal years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20, in cases where the taxpayer pays the full amount of tax demanded in the notice upto 31.03.2025. The waiver does not cover demand of erroneous refunds. To implement this, the GST Council has recommended insertion of Section 128A in CGST Act, 2017.
2. Reduction of Government Litigation by Fixing monetary limits for filing appeals under GST: The Council recommende

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rores SGST to 10 % with a maximum of Rs. 20 crores CGST and Rs. 20 crores SGST.
4. Applicability of Goods and Services Tax on Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) Taxation of ENA under GST: The GST Council, in its 52nd meeting, had recommended to amend GST Law to explicitly exclude rectified spirit/Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) from the scope of GST when supplied for manufacturing alcoholic liquors for human consumption. The GST Council now recommended amendment in sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 for not levying GST on Extra Neutral Alcohol used for manufacture of alcoholic liquor for human consumption.
5. Reduction in rate of TCS to be collected by the ECOs for supplies being made through them: Electronic Commerce Operators (ECOs) are required to collect Tax Collected at Source (TCS) on net taxable supplies under Section 52(1) of the CGST Act. The GST Council has recommended to reduce the TCS rate from present 1% (0.5% CGST + 0.5% SGST/ UTGST, or 1% IGST) to 0.5 % (0.25% CG

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, may be deemed to be 30.11.2021. For the same, requisite amendment in section 16(4) of CGST Act, retrospectively, w.e.f. 01.07.2017, has been recommended by the Council.
b) with respect to cases where returns have been filed after revocation:
The GST Council recommended retrospective amendment in Section 16(4) of CGST Act, to be made effective from July 1st, 2017, to conditionally relax the provisions of section 16(4) of CGST Act in cases where returns for the period from the date of cancellation of registration/ effective date of cancellation of registration till the date of revocation of cancellation of the registration, are filed by the registered person within thirty days of the order of revocation.
8. Change in due date for filing of return in FORM GSTR-4 for composition taxpayers from 30th April to 30th June: The GST Council recommended an amendment in clause (ii) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 62 of CGST Rules, 2017 and FORM GSTR-4 to extend the due da

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecover duties not levied or short-levied as a result of general practice under GST Acts: The GST Council recommended inserting a new Section 11A in CGST Act to give powers to the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, to allow regularization of non-levy or short levy of GST, where tax was being short paid or not paid due to common trade practices.
11. Refund of additional Integrated Tax (IGST) paid on account of upward revision in price of the goods subsequent to export: The GST Council recommended to prescribe a mechanism for claiming refund of additional IGST paid on account of upward revision in price of the goods subsequent to their export. This will facilitate a large number of taxpayers, who are required to pay additional IGST on account of upward revision in price of the goods subsequent to export, in claiming refund of such additional IGST.
12. Clarification regarding valuation of supply of import of services by a related person where recipient is eligible to ful

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

restricted in respect of ducts and manhole used in network of optical fiber cables (OFCs), under clause (c) or under clause (d) of sub-section (5) of section 17 of CGST Act.
14. Clarification on the place of supply applicable for custodial services provided by banks: The Council recommended to clarify that place of supply of Custodial services supplied by Indian Banks to Foreign Portfolio Investors is determinable as per Section 13(2) of the IGST Act, 2017.
15. Clarification on valuation of corporate guarantee provided between related persons after insertion of Rule 28(2) of CGST Rules, 2017: GST Council recommended amendment of rule 28(2) of CGST Rules retrospectively with effect from 26.10.2023 and issuance of a circular to clarify various issues regarding valuation of services of providing corporate guarantees between related parties. It is inter alia being clarified that valuation under rule 28(2) of CGST Rules would not be applicable in case of export of such services and also w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount of premium in Life Insurance services, which is not included in the taxable value as per Rule 32(4) of CGST Rules.
* Clarification on taxability of wreck and salvage values in motor insurance claims
* Clarification in respect of Warranty/ Extended Warranty provided by Manufacturers to the end customers
* Clarification regarding availability of input tax credit on repair expenses incurred by the insurance companies in case of reimbursement mode of settlement of motor vehicle insurance claims.
* Clarification on taxability of loans granted between related person or between group companies.
* Clarification on time of supply on Annuity Payments under HAM Projects.
* Clarification regarding time of supply in respect of allotment of Spectrum to Telecom companies in cases where payment of licence fee and Spectrum usage charges is to be made in instalments.
* Clarification relating to place of supply of goods supplied to unregistered persons, where delivery address is dif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

urn in FORM GSTR-3B for the said tax period. This will facilitate taxpayer to add any particulars of supply of the current tax period missed out in reporting in FORM GSTR-1 of the said tax period or to amend any particulars already declared in FORM GSTR-1 of the current tax period (including those declared in IFF, for the first and second months of a quarter, if any, for quarterly taxpayers), to ensure that correct liability is auto-populated in FORM GSTR-3B.
20. The Council recommended that filing of annual return in FORM GSTR-9/ 9A for the FY 2023-24 may be exempted for taxpayers having aggregate annual turnover upto two crore rupees.
21. Amendment was recommended to be made in section 122(1B) of CGST Act retrospectively w.e.f. 01.10.2023, so as to clarify that the said penal provision is applicable only for those e-commerce operators, who are required to collect tax under section 52 of CGST Act, and not for other e-commerce operators.
22. The Council recommended amendment in rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d orders, in cases where charges of fraud, suppression, willful misstatement etc., are not involved, and in cases where those charges are involved. In order to simplify the implementation of those provisions, the GST Council recommended to provide for a common time limit for issuance of demand notices and orders in respect of demands for FY 2024-25 onwards, in cases involving charges of fraud or willful misstatement and not involving the charges of fraud or willful misstatement etc. Also, the time limit for the taxpayers to avail the benefit of reduced penalty, by paying the tax demanded along with interest, has been recommended to be increased from 30 days to 60 days.
25. The Council recommended amendment in section 171 and section 109 of CGST Act, 2017 to provide a sunset clause for anti-profiteering under GST and to provide for handling of anti-profiteering cases by Principal bench of GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT). Council has also recommended the sun-set date of 01.04.2025 for re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court: Classic Malabar Parota = Chapter 1905 or 2106? Similarity to products in Chapter 19 = exclusion not justified. Stay granted for two months.

High Court: Classic Malabar Parota = Chapter 1905 or 2106? Similarity to products in Chapter 19 = exclusion not justified. Stay granted for two months.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court addressed the issue of classification and tax rate for Classic Malabar Parota and Whole Wheat Malabar Parota under Chapter Heading 1905 or 2106. The court found that if the products are similar to those in Chapter 19, they should not be excluded from Rate Notifications. Notice was issued to the first responde

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petition granted! Court orders restoration of GST registration for petitioner-Firm after clearing all dues.

Petition granted! Court orders restoration of GST registration for petitioner-Firm after clearing all dues.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court addressed the issue of cancellation of Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) of a petitioner-Firm. The respondents argued that any revenue loss due to delays would be unacceptable, but if all payments are made, they would consider restoring the GSTIN, especially in cases of genuine crisis like cancer. The Court decided to quash the previ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court finds excessive tax demand compared to initial notice. Order dated 06.11.2023 canceled.

Court finds excessive tax demand compared to initial notice. Order dated 06.11.2023 canceled.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court quashed an impugned order due to an excess tax demand compared to the amount in the show cause notice under Sub-Section (7) of Section 75 of Uttarakhand Goods and Services Act, 2017. The State acknowledged the order did not align with the Act as the demand exceeded the notice amount. The court allowed the petition, leading to the order's annulment on 06.11.2023.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reminder notices were sent, but no reply. Petitioner given chances to provide evidence, yet failed to do so. Writ petition dismissed.

Reminder notices were sent, but no reply. Petitioner given chances to provide evidence, yet failed to do so. Writ petition dismissed.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the disallowance of input tax credit. The petitioner failed to respond to reminder notices and missed deadlines for submitting replies and evidence. Despite multiple opportunities, the petitioner did not provide any documentary evidence to support their claim for input tax credit. The cour

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Key points from court decision: Petition for anticipatory bail granted. Specific guidelines in place. Bail is rule, jail is exception.

Key points from court decision: Petition for anticipatory bail granted. Specific guidelines in place. Bail is rule, jail is exception.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the Petitioners accused of using false documents and abetment. Citing legal precedents like u/s BHADRESH BIPINBHAI SHETH V. STATE OF GUJARAT, the Court emphasized understanding the nature of accusations and the accused's role before arrest. Referring to u/s GURBAKSH SINGH SIBBIA V. STATE OF PUNJAB

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court considered petitioner's claim of unfair GST registration cancellation. No relief granted due to availability of alternative remedies.

High Court considered petitioner's claim of unfair GST registration cancellation. No relief granted due to availability of alternative remedies.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration, considering alternative remedy u/s 30 of GST Act. The petitioner alleged violation of natural justice and infringement of Constitutional rights u/s 19 and 21. Citing WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION case, the court noted exceptions for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner's GST registration cancelled, claiming violation of natural justice. No alternative remedy pursued. Dismissed writ petition.

Petitioner's GST registration cancelled, claiming violation of natural justice. No alternative remedy pursued. Dismissed writ petition.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. Petitioner argued violation of natural justice and constitutional rights. Referring to WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION case, the court noted exceptions to the availability of alternative remedy. Show cause notice contained necessary details,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Finds Breach of Natural Justice; Remands Tax Case for Reconsideration with 10% Payment Condition.

High Court Finds Breach of Natural Justice; Remands Tax Case for Reconsideration with 10% Payment Condition.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The tax proposal was upheld due to the petitioner's failure to submit written objections or attend a hearing. The court acknowledged the petitioner's claim of being unaware of the proceedings. To rectify this, the court set aside the orders

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Advance Ruling Authority decided not to admit an application due to a pending issue on GST payment.

The Advance Ruling Authority decided not to admit an application due to a pending issue on GST payment.
Case-Laws
GST
The Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) considered an application regarding the levy of GST under reverse charge mechanism on royalty payments. The AAR cited u/s 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which prohibits admitting applications where the question raised is already pending or decided in the applicant's proceedings under the Act. In this case, the AAR foun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The court ruled in favor of the petitioner on refund of tax credit for Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets under GST.

The court ruled in favor of the petitioner on refund of tax credit for Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets under GST.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court considered denial of refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit due to inverted duty structure for Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets under GST. The Court found that the revenue authority failed to adequately prove the classification of the product under a specific tariff heading. It emphasized that the burden of proof lies with the taxing autho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Allows Business to Resume After Setting Aside Revocation Due to Late Appeal Under CGST Act Section 107.

Court Allows Business to Resume After Setting Aside Revocation Due to Late Appeal Under CGST Act Section 107.
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act due to late filing. Petitioner's registration was cancelled for not furnishing returns u/s 39. Respondents claimed non-compliance, but no tax evasion. HC noted suspending license harms revenue. Petitioner filed returns promptly post show cause. Orders rejecting revocation set aside. Petition disposed off, allowing petitio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Adjudication order set aside due to discrepancy in ITC claims. Circular applies for 2017-18. Matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Adjudication order set aside due to discrepancy in ITC claims. Circular applies for 2017-18. Matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court considered the validity of an adjudication order regarding discrepancies in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The Court noted the discrepancy and referenced Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST applicable to the financial year 2017-18. The Court found the Circular relevant to the case and set aside the adjudi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court quashes assessment order due to disparity in GST returns. Petitioner agrees to pay 10% of disputed tax demand for remand.

Court quashes assessment order due to disparity in GST returns. Petitioner agrees to pay 10% of disputed tax demand for remand.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court considered a challenge to an assessment order based on disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 3B return and the supplier's GSTR 1 return. The petitioner's explanation for the disparity was noted, attributing it to the supplier's error in reporting turnover. The court found the petitioner negligent for not uploading the reply and no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =