11th Meeting of National Traders’ Welfare Board Convened in New Delhi

11th Meeting of National Traders’ Welfare Board Convened in New DelhiGSTDated:- 25-9-2026Board Reviews Measures for Trader Welfare, Ease of Doing Business, Digital Empowerment and Export Promotion

The 11th Meeting of the National Traders’ Welfare Bo…

11th Meeting of National Traders’ Welfare Board Convened in New Delhi
GST
Dated:- 25-9-2026

Board Reviews Measures for Trader Welfare, Ease of Doing Business, Digital Empowerment and Export Promotion

The 11th Meeting of the National Traders' Welfare Board (NTWB) was convened at Vanijya Bhawan, New Delhi, in hybrid mode. The Board reviewed a range of measures concerning trader welfare, Ease of Doing Business, digital empowerment, access to finance, Centre-State coordination and export promotion. The deliberations also covered issues relating to GST, MSMEs, trader grievance redressal, digital platforms and strengthening institutional support for traders, retailers, manufacturers, exporters and service providers.

During th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

district level, Women Entrepreneurship Facilitation Desks under NITI Aayog, POSH cells for grievance redressal and strengthening of cyber fraud redressal mechanisms.

Special emphasis was laid on enhancing export participation by traders and MSMEs, increasing awareness regarding export opportunities, strengthening institutional support mechanisms and promoting India's emergence as a globally competitive trading nation. The Board also discussed the need for thematic committees and focused working groups to examine sector-specific issues and provide structured recommendations for policy intervention.

The meeting was chaired by Chairman, NTWB, Shri Sunil J. Singhi. He apprised the Board of major initiatives undertaken towards achieving i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in Dehradun and Indore, and Tiranga Yatra activities in Chandigarh and Indore.

The Chairman also apprised Members of developments relating to Next Generation GST 2.0 reforms, ONDC integration and expansion of DigiDukaan. DigiDukaan, a B2B procurement and Kirana digitisation initiative by ONDC, is enabling kirana stores to digitise procurement through a single ordering interface, with over 19,000 retailers currently live across Hyderabad and Jaipur.

At the outset of the meeting, Director, DPIIT, Shri Yuvraj Ravindra Patil, welcomed the Board Members and Ex-Officio Members from line Ministries and Departments and outlined the mandate of the NTWB. He emphasised the importance of promoting the Board's initiatives and ensuring wider dissem

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Wrong-head GST payments require appropriation rather than duplicate payment and refund when aggregate liability was timely discharged.

Wrong-head GST payments require appropriation rather than duplicate payment and refund when aggregate liability was timely discharged.NotesGSTWrong-head GST remittances, where a taxpayer timely pays the full aggregate liability but selects an incorrect…

Wrong-head GST payments require appropriation rather than duplicate payment and refund when aggregate liability was timely discharged.
Notes
GST
Wrong-head GST remittances, where a taxpayer timely pays the full aggregate liability but selects an incorrect tax head, are distinct from a later correction of a supply's inter-State or intra-State character. Sections 19 of the IGST Act and 77 of the CGST Act, with Rule 89(1A), address classification errors and the related refund framework, not a pure allocation error. An identifiable wrong-head payment may be appropriated against the correct CGST and SGST liabilities rather than requiring duplicate payment followed by refund. Where funds remain in the electronic cash ledger, Section 49(10) and Rule 87(13) permit inter-head transfer through FORM GST PMT-09; refund may be procedurally necessary if transfer is unavailable.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST appeal limitation: statutory condonation remains capped, while exceptional writ review may restore an unheard appeal.

GST appeal limitation: statutory condonation remains capped, while exceptional writ review may restore an unheard appeal.NotesGSTSection 107 of the CGST Act confines GST appeals to a three-month filing period, with condonation by the Appellate Authorit…

GST appeal limitation: statutory condonation remains capped, while exceptional writ review may restore an unheard appeal.
Notes
GST
Section 107 of the CGST Act confines GST appeals to a three-month filing period, with condonation by the Appellate Authority limited to one further month upon sufficient cause. Section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot enlarge that statutory ceiling. Limitation runs from communication; portal availability and postal service under Section 169 may require factual scrutiny, while Rule 108 governs electronic or permitted manual filing where an order is unavailable on the portal. Statutory pre-deposit triggers a deemed stay of recovery for the balance demand. Article 226 may exceptionally restore an unheard appeal where defective communication, prompt action after knowledge and material procedural unfairness justify relief, but is not a routine cure for delay or inaction.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Draft Warehousing Operations Regulations, 2026 – uploading on the CBIC website for inviting comments/views/suggestions from stakeholders

Draft Warehousing Operations Regulations, 2026 – uploading on the CBIC website for inviting comments/views/suggestions from stakeholders GSTDated:- 25-9-2026F. No. 473/12/2026-LC

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

(Central Board of Indi…

Draft Warehousing Operations Regulations, 2026 – uploading on the CBIC website for inviting comments/views/suggestions from stakeholders
GST
Dated:- 25-9-2026

F. No. 473/12/2026-LC

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

(Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs)

Kartavya Bhawan-1, New Delhi,

Dated the 21.09.2026

To,

The CBIC Webmaster

Email: webmaster.cbec@icegate.gov.in

Madam/Sir,

Subject: reg.

Kindly refer to the draft Warehousing Operations Regulations, 2026 attached herewith, which have been approved for placing in the public domain for stakeholder consultation.

2. In view of the above, it is requested to upload the attached draft regulations on the CBIC website for inviting comments/ views /suggestions from stakeholders. The comments/ views/ suggestions may be furnished within 15 days from the date of issuance of this letter in the following format:

FORMAT FOR SENDING SUGGESTIONS/COMMENTS/VIEWS

Sr. No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the powers conferred by section 157 read with sections 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 64, 67, 68, 69 and 72 and sub-section (2) of section 73A of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and in partial supersession of the Warehouse (Custody and Handling of Goods) Regulations, 2016 and the Warehoused Goods (Removal) Regulations, 2016, in so far as they apply to warehouses governed by these regulations, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs hereby makes the following regulations, namely :-

1. Short title and commencement .-

(1) These regulations may be called the Warehousing Operations Regulations, 2026.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. Definitions .-

(1) In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires,-

(a) “Act” means the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962);

(b) “bond officer” means the officer of customs in charge of a wareh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing device, whether mechanical or electronic, used for securing goods during transport, including an electronic seal where so specified by the Board;

(j) “warehouse” means a public warehouse licensed under section 57 or a private warehouse licensed under section 58 of the Act, to which these regulations apply;

(k) “Warehouse Licensing Regulations, 2026” means the regulations made by the Board for licensing of warehouses under the Act; and

(1) “section” means a section of the Act.

(2) Words and expressions used in these regulations and not defined herein shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the Act.

3. Application .-

These regulations shall apply to warehouses licensed under section 57 or section 58 of the Act, other than a warehouse in which permission to carry on any manufacturing process or other operations has been granted under section 65 of the Act.

4. Conditions for transport of goods .-

(1) Goods transported-

(a) from a customs stat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

may, having regard to the manner of transport, waive the requirement of transit-risk insurance in respect of liquid bulk cargo transported through pipelines.

5. Receipt and accountal of goods at a warehouse .-

(1) Before the removal of goods from a customs station for deposit in a warehouse,-

(a) the importer shall make a request through the electronic portal to the licensee to receive and store the goods;

(b) the licensee shall record acceptance or rejection of the request on the electronic portal; and

(c) upon acceptance of the request and electronic communication of an order made under sub-section (1) of section 60 of the Act, the goods may be transported to the warehouse.

(2) Upon receipt of goods at a warehouse, whether from a customs station or another warehouse, the licensee shall-

(a) verify the one-time-lock affixed to the container or means of transport, where required under regulation 4;

(b) where the one-time-lock is found broken, tampered with or o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l.

(3) Upon confirmation of receipt under clause (f) of sub-regulation (2), the confirmation shall be made available electronically on the electronic portal-

(a) in the case of goods received from a customs station, to the proper officer who made the order under sub-section (1) of section 60 of the Act, the bond officer, the importer or owner of the goods and the licensee; and

(b) in the case of goods received from another warehouse, to the owner of the goods and the licensees and bond officers of the source and receiving warehouses.

6. Removal of warehoused goods from one warehouse to another .-

(1) Where the owner proposes to remove warehoused goods from one warehouse to another under section 67 of the Act,-

(a) the owner shall make a request through the electronic portal to the licensee of the receiving warehouse to receive and store the goods; and

(b) the licensee of the receiving warehouse shall record acceptance or rejection of the request on the electronic p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

records to reflect the quantity so removed and the balance remaining in the warehouse.

(5) Upon receipt of the goods at the receiving warehouse, the licensee shall comply with the requirements specified in sub-regulations (2) and (3) of regulation 5 in respect of goods received from another warehouse.

7. Removal of warehoused goods for home consumption .-

Upon electronic communication of an order made under section 68 of the Act, the licensee shall permit removal only of the quantity specified in the bill of entry for home consumption and the order for clearance, and shall update the electronic records to reflect the quantity removed and the balance remaining in the warehouse.

8. Removal of warehoused goods for export .-

(1) A licensee shall not remove or cause to be removed any warehoused goods for export except upon electronic communication through the electronic portal of an order made by the proper officer under section 69 of the Act.

(2) Upon such communication,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Act.

10. Furnishing of returns .-

(1) The licensee shall, on or before the tenth day of each month, furnish through the electronic portal a return for the preceding month containing the particulars specified in Form WH-1.

(2) The licensee shall, on or before the tenth day of each month, furnish through the electronic portal the particulars specified in Form WH-2 in respect of goods whose warehousing period under section 61 of the Act is due to expire during the following month.

11. Maintenance of electronic records and documents .-

(1) The licensee shall maintain in the digital warehouse management system complete, accurate and up-to-date electronic records of all transactions relating to the receipt, handling, storage, transfer, operations and removal of warehoused goods, including the balance of such goods and the documents supporting each transaction.

(2) The electronic records and documents shall be securely stored, regularly backed up in a system independent of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wner of the goods or the licensee concerned to furnish the relevant information or documents.

(2) Where any discrepancy in the receipt or arrival of the goods is recorded on the electronic portal and made available electronically to the bond officer, the bond officer may require the owner of the goods or the licensee concerned to furnish the relevant information or documents.

(3) Where, upon examination of the information or documents furnished or otherwise available, the proper officer has reason to believe that any of the circumstances specified in section 72 of the Act exist, the proper officer may proceed in accordance with that section and other applicable provisions of the Act.

13. Electronic furnishing and acknowledgement .-

(1) Every request, declaration, intimation, confirmation, return or other information required to be furnished under these regulations shall be furnished electronically through the electronic portal in such form and manner as may be provided ther

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e order.

Encl: Forms WH-1 and WH-2

( ……………. )

Under Secretary

FORM WH-1 Monthly Return of a Bonded Warehouse (To be furnished electronically through the electronic portal)

A. General Information

Name of Licensee Address of Licensee Warehouse Code Warehouse Address Return Month Return Year

B. Transaction Details

SI. No. Section Fields to be furnished
1 Receipt of Warehoused Goods from Customs Station Into Bond BE No .; Into Bond BE Date; Port Code of Import; Bond No .; Bond Date; Date of Order under Section 60(1); Registration No. of Means of Transport; OTL No.
2 Receipt of Warehoused Goods from Another Warehouse Into Bond BE No .; Into Bond BE Date; Port Code of Import; Bond No .; Bond Date; Date of Order under Section 60(1); Warehouse Code of Supplier Warehouse; Date and Unique Reference No. of Acknowledgement of Declaration under Regulation 6; Registration No. of Means of Transport; OTL No.
3 Sub-Form for BE (Goods Details) Into Bond BE No .; Into

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8 Details of Relinquishments During the Month Into Bond BE No .; Into Bond BE Date; Description of Goods; Available Quantity; Quantity Relinquished; Upload Acceptance Letter from Commissioner.
9 Removal of Warehoused Goods for Home Consumption Into Bond BE No .; Into Bond BE Date; Date of Order under Section 68(c); Description of Goods Removed; Unit Code; Quantity of Removal; Assessable Value of Goods Removed (INR); Duty Involved on Goods Removed (INR); Interest (INR); Balance Quantity Available in Warehouse Against Into-Bond BE; Remarks, if Any.
10 Removal of Warehoused Goods for Export Into Bond BE No .; Into Bond BE Date; Date of Order under Section 69(1)(c); SB No .; SB Date; Description of Goods Removed; Unit Code; Quantity of Removal; Assessable Value of Goods Removed (INR); Duty Involved on Goods Removed (INR); Interest (INR); Balance Quantity Available in Warehouse Against Into-Bond BE; Remarks, if Any; Date and Time of Removal; Registration No. of Means of Transport; Contai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Approval of Proper Officer; Any Other Removal During the Month.

Verification

I declare that the information furnished in this return is true, correct and complete.

Name of authorised signatory Designation Place Date Authentication
Digital Signature Certificate (DSC)

FORM WH-2

Details of Bills of Entry in Respect of Which the Warehousing Period Is Expiring in the Following Month

(To be furnished electronically through the electronic portal)

A. General Information

Name of Licensee Address of Licensee Warehouse Code Warehouse Address Return Month Return Year

B. Bill of Entry Details

SI. No. Section Fields to be furnished
1 Main Form-BE Details Into Bond BE No .; Into Bond BE Date; Port Code of Import; Bond No .; Bond Date; Date of Order under Section 60(1); Remarks, if Any.
2 Sub-Form for BE (Line Items) Into Bond BE No .; Into Bond BE Date; Line-Item No. of the Warehousing BE; Description of Goods; Unit Code; Quantity (Weight/Volume/Numbers etc.); Ass

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Expansion of show cause notice at appellate stage requires a chance to respond before refund rejection is reconsidered.

Expansion of show cause notice at appellate stage requires a chance to respond before refund rejection is reconsidered.Case-LawsGSTExpansion of a show cause notice at the appellate stage cannot support rejection of accumulated input tax credit refunds …

Expansion of show cause notice at appellate stage requires a chance to respond before refund rejection is reconsidered.
Case-Laws
GST
Expansion of a show cause notice at the appellate stage cannot support rejection of accumulated input tax credit refunds without allowing the taxpayer to answer the added grounds. The High Court treated the notice as the foundation of proceedings and found that reliance on grounds introduced only in appeal deprived petitioners of an effective opportunity to reply. Without examining the merits of those grounds or the refund claim, the High Court set aside the adjudication and appellate orders and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, requiring a comprehensive reply opportunity and personal hearing.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Opportunity of hearing in GST first appeals requires restoration where dismissal for default followed inadequate hearing intimation.

Opportunity of hearing in GST first appeals requires restoration where dismissal for default followed inadequate hearing intimation.Case-LawsGSTDismissal of a duly constituted GST first appeal for non-prosecution, despite pre-deposit and alleged inadeq…

Opportunity of hearing in GST first appeals requires restoration where dismissal for default followed inadequate hearing intimation.
Case-Laws
GST
Dismissal of a duly constituted GST first appeal for non-prosecution, despite pre-deposit and alleged inadequate notice of hearing, should not leave the appellant remediless or compel a second appeal. Statutory procedure permits the Appellate Tribunal to dismiss an appeal for default and set aside that dismissal. High Court set aside the dismissal where there was no apparent reason for the appellant to abandon its appeal after making the pre-deposit, and remanded the matter to the Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication after due opportunity of hearing.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Net ITC treatment protects zero-rated supply refunds from unrelated earlier-period compensation cess reversals under the statutory formula.

Net ITC treatment protects zero-rated supply refunds from unrelated earlier-period compensation cess reversals under the statutory formula.Case-LawsGSTNet ITC for refunds of unutilised compensation cess on zero-rated supplies comprises credit actually …

Net ITC treatment protects zero-rated supply refunds from unrelated earlier-period compensation cess reversals under the statutory formula.
Case-Laws
GST
Net ITC for refunds of unutilised compensation cess on zero-rated supplies comprises credit actually availed and attributable to the relevant refund period. A reversal recorded in that period reduces Net ITC only where the reversed credit was availed during the same period. Residual credit from earlier periods, not included in the claimed Net ITC for the refund period, cannot reduce the eligible refund. Departmental clarification must operate consistently with the statutory refund formula and cannot require deduction of every reversal irrespective of when the underlying credit arose. The refund sanction was therefore upheld and the Revenue challenge rejected.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Net ITC under the statutory refund formula excludes prior-period reversals, preserving refund of unutilised cess credit.

Net ITC under the statutory refund formula excludes prior-period reversals, preserving refund of unutilised cess credit.Case-LawsGSTRule 89(4) confines Net ITC for refund of unutilised cess credit on zero-rated supplies to credit actually availed durin…

Net ITC under the statutory refund formula excludes prior-period reversals, preserving refund of unutilised cess credit.
Case-Laws
GST
Rule 89(4) confines Net ITC for refund of unutilised cess credit on zero-rated supplies to credit actually availed during the relevant refund period. An ITC reversal recorded in GSTR-3B reduces Net ITC only where the reversed credit was availed in that same period; reversals relating to earlier tax periods do not affect the refund computation. Paragraph 43(c) of the departmental circular cannot require deduction of all reversals made during the refund period irrespective of the underlying credit period, as a circular cannot override or expand the statutory refund formula. The accumulated cess-credit refund was consequently sustained.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Net ITC computation excludes reversals of earlier-period credit unrelated to the refund period under the statutory formula.

Net ITC computation excludes reversals of earlier-period credit unrelated to the refund period under the statutory formula.Case-LawsGSTNet ITC for refund of unutilised Compensation Cess credit on zero-rated supplies is confined to input tax credit actu…

Net ITC computation excludes reversals of earlier-period credit unrelated to the refund period under the statutory formula.
Case-Laws
GST
Net ITC for refund of unutilised Compensation Cess credit on zero-rated supplies is confined to input tax credit actually availed and attributable to the relevant refund period. A reversal recorded in that period need not reduce Net ITC where records establish that it relates to residual unutilised credit from earlier tax periods and was not included in the credit supporting the refund claim. Paragraph 43(c) of the departmental circular must operate consistently with the statutory refund formula and cannot require deduction of every reversal reported during the period, thereby curtailing a statutory refund entitlement.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory appellate-admission discretion permits refusal where the penalty falls within the prescribed monetary threshold for discretionary admission.

Statutory appellate-admission discretion permits refusal where the penalty falls within the prescribed monetary threshold for discretionary admission.Case-LawsGSTStatutory discretion governing appellate admission applies where a penalty does not exceed…

Statutory appellate-admission discretion permits refusal where the penalty falls within the prescribed monetary threshold for discretionary admission.
Case-Laws
GST
Statutory discretion governing appellate admission applies where a penalty does not exceed the prescribed monetary threshold. In an appeal by a managing director against a penalty order issued under section 107, the penalty fell within the threshold for discretion under section 112(2). The Tribunal exercised that discretion to refuse admission, so the appeal was not admitted.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Procedural defect non-compliance can lead to appeal rejection after repeated opportunities to cure filing defects remain unused.

Procedural defect non-compliance can lead to appeal rejection after repeated opportunities to cure filing defects remain unused.Case-LawsGSTRule 24(4) of the GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025 permits rejection of an appeal where filing defects remain unrec…

Procedural defect non-compliance can lead to appeal rejection after repeated opportunities to cure filing defects remain unused.
Case-Laws
GST
Rule 24(4) of the GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025 permits rejection of an appeal where filing defects remain unrectified despite adequate opportunities. The appellant received six hearing opportunities, including three before the Bench and three before the Registrar, but neither appeared nor sought adjournment. No additional material was uploaded to cure the notified defects. Persistent non-attendance and failure to rectify defects support treating the appeal as not being actively pursued and considering rejection under the procedural rule.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Agricultural warehousing exemption does not cover separately rented godowns; rent remains taxable, with reverse charge for unregistered lessors.

Agricultural warehousing exemption does not cover separately rented godowns; rent remains taxable, with reverse charge for unregistered lessors.Case-LawsGSTStorage and warehousing of agricultural produce is exempt, but that exemption does not extend to…

Agricultural warehousing exemption does not cover separately rented godowns; rent remains taxable, with reverse charge for unregistered lessors.
Case-Laws
GST
Storage and warehousing of agricultural produce is exempt, but that exemption does not extend to separately hired godowns used exclusively for the exempt outward service. Renting such godowns constitutes an independent supply of rental or leasing of non-residential property and attracts GST at 18%. Where the lessor is registered, tax is payable under forward charge. Where an unregistered person rents a godown to a registered recipient, the amended reverse-charge entry applies, making the recipient liable to pay GST at 18% from 10.10.2024.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST taxability of domestic aircraft supplies confirms taxable ex-works transfers require registration in the supplying State.

GST taxability of domestic aircraft supplies confirms taxable ex-works transfers require registration in the supplying State.Case-LawsGSTDomestic ex-works supply of aircraft manufactured in Gujarat to the Ministry of Defence constitutes a taxable suppl…

GST taxability of domestic aircraft supplies confirms taxable ex-works transfers require registration in the supplying State.
Case-Laws
GST
Domestic ex-works supply of aircraft manufactured in Gujarat to the Ministry of Defence constitutes a taxable supply of goods where title passes for consideration in the course or furtherance of business. The aircraft are not covered by the GST exemption examined, and GST is payable at the applicable rate. Where the outward supply is made from Gujarat and the registration threshold is exceeded, the supplier must obtain GST registration in Gujarat under the applicable registration provisions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Advance-ruling admission bar requires threshold rejection where the same supply-characterisation question is already pending or decided.

Advance-ruling admission bar requires threshold rejection where the same supply-characterisation question is already pending or decided.Case-LawsGSTThe statutory bar on admission of an advance-ruling application applies where the same question concerni…

Advance-ruling admission bar requires threshold rejection where the same supply-characterisation question is already pending or decided.
Case-Laws
GST
The statutory bar on admission of an advance-ruling application applies where the same question concerning the applicant is already pending or has been decided in proceedings. A transporter's supply-characterisation question-whether making vehicles available to another goods transport agency is exempt or taxable-formed the basis of a pending input-tax-credit reversal proceeding and had been decided for an earlier tax period. Both grounds precluded examination of classification, exemption, or taxability on the merits, and the application was rejected as not maintainable.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mineral extraction rights granted by government make royalty licensing-service consideration, with permit holders bearing reverse-charge GST.

Mineral extraction rights granted by government make royalty licensing-service consideration, with permit holders bearing reverse-charge GST.Case-LawsGSTRoyalty payable for a State Government grant of mineral extraction rights under a Short-Term Permit…

Mineral extraction rights granted by government make royalty licensing-service consideration, with permit holders bearing reverse-charge GST.
Case-Laws
GST
Royalty payable for a State Government grant of mineral extraction rights under a Short-Term Permit is contractual consideration for licensing services involving the right to use minerals, rather than a tax. The permit holder, as recipient of a Government-to-business supply, must discharge GST under reverse charge at 18%. The shorter duration and restricted area of a Short-Term Permit do not change the nature of the supply where the grantor, extraction rights and royalty basis correspond to those for quarry and mining leases. Short-Term Permit holders therefore receive the same reverse-charge GST treatment as quarry and mining lease holders.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling scope.

Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling scope.Case-LawsGSTSpecified composite works contract services supplied to the Government or a local auth…

Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling scope.
Case-Laws
GST
Specified composite works contract services supplied to the Government or a local authority for pipelines, conduits or plants for water supply, water treatment, or sewerage treatment or disposal attracted GST at 12% (6% CGST and 6% SGST) on 1 June 2022 under the concessional entry then in force. Omission of that entry from 18 July 2022 did not alter the rate on the queried date. A contractual entitlement to recover additional tax caused by a GST-rate increase falls outside advance-ruling jurisdiction because it is not among the exhaustively listed matters on which a ruling may be sought; the reimbursement question was therefore not answered.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council to take a view on GST on UPI MDR: Sources

GST Council to take a view on GST on UPI MDR: SourcesGSTDated:- 24-9-2026PTINew Delhi, Sep 24 (PTI) The GST Council, chaired by the Union Finance Minister, will take a view on GST levy on merchant fees for UPI transactions above Rs 2,000, government so…

GST Council to take a view on GST on UPI MDR: Sources
GST
Dated:- 24-9-2026
PTI
New Delhi, Sep 24 (PTI) The GST Council, chaired by the Union Finance Minister, will take a view on GST levy on merchant fees for UPI transactions above Rs 2,000, government sources said on Thursday.

Effective October 15, UPI payments to merchants (P2M) above Rs 2,000 will attract a 0.4 per cent merchant discount rate (MDR) with an overall cap of Rs 300.

Sources said services attract GST, decided by the Goods and Services Tax Council, chaired by the Finance Minister and comprising state counterparts.

“We are hopeful that the GST Council will take a view on the 18 per cent GST on merchant fee on UPI transactions in the larger interest of cons

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST registration cancellation for return default requires a hearing, while full compliance can prevent or conditionally reverse cancellation.

GST registration cancellation for return default requires a hearing, while full compliance can prevent or conditionally reverse cancellation.NotesGSTGST registration may be cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns under Section 29, but cancellati…

GST registration cancellation for return default requires a hearing, while full compliance can prevent or conditionally reverse cancellation.
Notes
GST
GST registration may be cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns under Section 29, but cancellation does not extinguish pre-cancellation tax liabilities. Rule 22 requires notice and an opportunity to respond; where pending returns are filed and tax, interest and late fee are fully paid before cancellation, the officer must drop proceedings. Post-cancellation revocation under Rule 23 requires compliance with prescribed filing, payment and limitation conditions, while appellate authorities cannot exceed statutory condonation limits. Defective notices, absence of reasons, denial of meaningful hearing, or unexplained retrospective cancellation may invalidate the process. Conditional restoration may be available in appropriate non-fraud cases upon full regularisation of returns, tax, interest, late fee and penalty.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Expired e-way bill alone cannot justify detention where transaction documents are accurate and vehicle breakdown is unrebutted.

Expired e-way bill alone cannot justify detention where transaction documents are accurate and vehicle breakdown is unrebutted.Case-LawsGSTSection 129(3) detention and penalty provisions should not be applied solely because an e-way bill has expired wh…

Expired e-way bill alone cannot justify detention where transaction documents are accurate and vehicle breakdown is unrebutted.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 129(3) detention and penalty provisions should not be applied solely because an e-way bill has expired where invoices and transport documents are accurate. An unrebutted vehicle breakdown, coupled with no independent enquiry, does not support an adverse inference that goods were moved to evade tax. In these circumstances, expiry alone does not establish intent to evade tax, and detention, consequential tax and penalty cannot be sustained; deposited amounts are refundable in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Proper-officer assignments to appointed Central Tax Officers remain valid, while GST demand disputes generally require statutory appellate review.

Proper-officer assignments to appointed Central Tax Officers remain valid, while GST demand disputes generally require statutory appellate review.Case-LawsGSTProper-officer functions under the CGST Act may be assigned by circular to Central Tax Officer…

Proper-officer assignments to appointed Central Tax Officers remain valid, while GST demand disputes generally require statutory appellate review.
Case-Laws
GST
Proper-officer functions under the CGST Act may be assigned by circular to Central Tax Officers already appointed under a statutory notification, including demand-related functions allocated by monetary limits. Such assignment does not constitute delegation requiring a separate notification. Challenges to the circulars and to the officer's competence on that basis were rejected. A writ challenge to a GST demand order should ordinarily not proceed where an effective statutory appeal is available, unless a recognised exception applies. Where the authority considered the defence, examined documents and granted a personal hearing, reassessment of disputed material lies with the appellate authority. The demand challenge was therefore directed to the statutory appeal, with limitation protection for filing within 30 days.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Unutilised ITC refunds for SEZ units cannot be denied by limiting applications to supplying vendors alone.

Unutilised ITC refunds for SEZ units cannot be denied by limiting applications to supplying vendors alone.Case-LawsGSTGST refund provisions for unutilised input tax credit do not restrict refund applications to suppliers making supplies to SEZ units. T…

Unutilised ITC refunds for SEZ units cannot be denied by limiting applications to supplying vendors alone.
Case-Laws
GST
GST refund provisions for unutilised input tax credit do not restrict refund applications to suppliers making supplies to SEZ units. The relevant refund rule identifies suppliers as one category of applicants but does not exclude an SEZ unit from claiming its own refund. Reading such a restriction into the statutory scheme would impermissibly add a limiting condition. SEZ units are therefore entitled to have eligible refund claims processed under the GST refund framework, and orders rejecting the claim on that restrictive basis were set aside.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Interest on loans and advances remains GST-exempt, but State-specific turnover claims require cogent documentary proof.

Interest on loans and advances remains GST-exempt, but State-specific turnover claims require cogent documentary proof.Case-LawsGSTEntry 27 exempts services of extending deposits, loans or advances where consideration is represented by interest or disc…

Interest on loans and advances remains GST-exempt, but State-specific turnover claims require cogent documentary proof.
Case-Laws
GST
Entry 27 exempts services of extending deposits, loans or advances where consideration is represented by interest or discount, except interest in credit-card services; qualifying interest recovery is therefore exempt from GST. A taxpayer claiming that turnover reported in one State actually comprised exempt interest attributable to another State must prove that assertion through cogent documentary evidence. Form GSTR-09C and a Chartered Accountant's certificate without disclosed findings or identifiable documentary support do not discharge that burden. Failure to provide supporting evidence permits an adverse inference, leaving the disputed turnover unestablished as exempt interest and resulting in rejection of the claim.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST exemption for written-off housing loan recoveries may be raised at appellate stage, subject to reliable documentary proof.

GST exemption for written-off housing loan recoveries may be raised at appellate stage, subject to reliable documentary proof.Case-LawsGSTGST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 may apply to recovery of amounts under written-off housing loan accou…

GST exemption for written-off housing loan recoveries may be raised at appellate stage, subject to reliable documentary proof.
Case-Laws
GST
GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 may apply to recovery of amounts under written-off housing loan accounts. As a statutory notification has force of law, its applicability constitutes a pure question of law capable of being raised at the appellate stage. Entry 27 covers services by way of extending loans, while entitlement to exemption for a particular recovery depends on cogent proof that it arose from a written-off housing loan in the relevant financial year. Certified banker's books are admissible as prima facie evidence, but supporting loan write-off records are required. A cross-objection is unnecessary where the respondent has received complete relief and may operate as a reply. Factual applicability remains for determination after consideration of the records.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory show cause notice under Section 74 is indispensable; GST DRC forms cannot validate suppression-based tax demands.

Statutory show cause notice under Section 74 is indispensable; GST DRC forms cannot validate suppression-based tax demands.Case-LawsGSTSection 74 tax determinations based on suppression of facts require service of a statutory show cause notice and cons…

Statutory show cause notice under Section 74 is indispensable; GST DRC forms cannot validate suppression-based tax demands.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 74 tax determinations based on suppression of facts require service of a statutory show cause notice and consideration of the taxpayer's representation. The notice must specify the demand, foundational facts and necessary particulars so the taxpayer can respond effectively. GST DRC forms or other communications cannot substitute for the statutory notice. Determining a demand without serving such notice denies the taxpayer knowledge of the allegations and an effective opportunity of representation, vitiating the proceedings; the first appellate order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST route deviation alone cannot justify detention or penalties where goods travel with valid documents and no evasion evidence.

GST route deviation alone cannot justify detention or penalties where goods travel with valid documents and no evasion evidence.Case-LawsGSTGST law does not require a transporter to declare or follow a particular route. Transporting goods by a longer r…

GST route deviation alone cannot justify detention or penalties where goods travel with valid documents and no evasion evidence.
Case-Laws
GST
GST law does not require a transporter to declare or follow a particular route. Transporting goods by a longer route for logistical safety reasons, while carrying valid documents, does not establish mala fide intent to evade tax without material showing an intended diversion or other tax evasion. Route-based obligations under earlier VAT regimes do not apply under the GST Acts or Rules. Accordingly, detention of goods and penalty under section 129 were unsustainable solely because a longer route was used; the detention-penalty orders were quashed and refund of the penalty paid under protest was directed in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =