Customs – Accounts – Change of Focal Point Bank (FPB) of State Bank of India (SBI) from Vizag to Guntur for Custom duty collection and Payment of duty drawback under EDI system in respect of Kakinada Custom House under the jurisdiction of Custom

Customs – Accounts – Change of Focal Point Bank (FPB) of State Bank of India (SBI) from Vizag to Guntur for Custom duty collection and Payment of duty drawback under EDI system in respect of Kakinada Custom House under the jurisdiction of Customs Commissionerate (Preventive), Vijayawada and transfer to revenue account from Pay & Accounts Officer, CGST & Customs, Visakhapatnam to Pay & Accounts Officer, CGST & Customs, Guntur
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 26/2018-Customs Dated:- 23-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTNIVE)
55-17-3, C-14, 2nd Floor, Road No.2, Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada – 520007
Phone: 0866-2551261 Fax: 0866-2551156
C. No. VIII/48/309/2018-Cus.Tech.
Date: 23.05.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 26/2018-Customs
Subject : Customs – Accounts – Change of Focal Point Bank (FPB) of State Bank of India (SBI) from Vizag to Guntur for Custom duty collection and Payment of duty drawback under EDI system in respect of Kakinada Custom Hous

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Visakhapatnam, Gangavaram Port, Visakhapatnam International Airport, Visakhapatnam Special Economic Zone and the areas under the greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation of Visakhapatnam), East Godavari, West Godavari, Krishna, Guntur, Prakasam, S. P. S. R. Nellore, Chittoor, Ananthapur, Dr. Y.S.R. Cuddapah, Kurnool in the State of Andhra Pradesh.
2. The Office of the Principal Chief Controller of Accounts, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, New Delhi vide Office Memorandum Coord / 2 (1) / Guntur (25) / 2018 – 19 /64 dated 04.05.2018 communicated the approval for change of Focal Point Bank of State Bank of India from Vizag to Guntur for Customs duty collection and payment of duty drawback under EDI System in respect of Kakinada Custom House under the Commissionerate of Customs (Preventive), Vijayawada. The information in detail is furnished below:
3. Consequent on re-organization of Commissionerates during the year 2014, Customs Preventive Commissionerate, Vijayawada was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

BK payment at Kakinada Custom House (Location Code : INKAKI) under the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive),Vijayawada are as follows:
Bank branch Name & BSR code
Focal Point Branch with BSR Code
Location for which branch is authorized
Mode of DBK payment
State Bank of India, Main Branch, Kakinada (BSR Code : 0000850) Jurisdictional Commissionerate
State Bank of India, Treasury Branch, Guntur (BSR Code : 0006307) Jurisdictional PAO
Kakinada Custom House (Location Code INKAKI) Specified Officer to issue cheque for DBK
EDI enabled Customs Collection & DBK payment Reason for revised banking arrangement
Commissionerate of Customs (Preventive), Vijayawada
Pay and Accounts Officer, CGST & Customs, Guntur
Shri T. Venkateswara Rao, Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, Kakinada
Change of Focal Point Bank and mapping of Kakinda Custom House from PAO, Vizag to PAO, Guntur
5. As approved by the Principal Chief Controller of Accounts, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Custo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ICES Advisory 21/2018 (IGST Refund) Interim Procedure for processing IGST Refund payments after corrections in the Bank Accounts details of Beneficiaries

ICES Advisory 21/2018 (IGST Refund) Interim Procedure for processing IGST Refund payments after corrections in the Bank Accounts details of Beneficiaries
36/2018 Dated:- 23-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CHENNAI VIII (GENERAL)
CUSTOM HOUSE, NO.60 RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI – 600 001.
Telephone: 25254444 – FAX:25224622
www.chennaicustoms.gov.in
F.No.S.Misc.09/2018 – Sys Unit
Dated: 23/05/2018
PUBLIC NOTICE. 36/2018
Sub: ICES Advisory 21/2018 (IGST Refund) Interim Procedure for processing IGST Refund payments after corrections in the Bank Accounts details of Beneficiaries
************
Kind attention of Exporters/ Customs Brokers is invited to the IGST refund in ICES.
2. It has been noticed th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re it fails only for one or more exporters after having been accepted by PFMS, i.e. 'Failed-after-Success' cases, following interim procedure may be followed:
a. The report on such cases shall be shared by the ePAO (O/o the Pr…CCA, CBIC) with ICEGATE and the Central DDO appointed by CBIC on a daily basis in the following format
Transaction ID:
Name of the Beneficiary:
Bank Account No:
IFSC Code:
Name of the Bank: Reason of Failure:
b. The Central DDO will forward the details to the respective Commissionerate. The details will be sent to the concerned System Manager on his ICEGATE email id. The System Manager shall then ask the sanctioning authority (AC/DC of Refunds) -to obtain the correct Bank Account details of the benefi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bove subject. It may be ensured that the verified account details are emailed to the above id by the System Manager through the official ICEGATE sysmgr email id. No other communication shall be entertained by the Central DDO. It is also reiterated that this procedure is only an interim procedure for the 'Failed-after-Success' cases and not a replacement for submitting valid bank account details in ICES in the CLK role. The correct account details shall have to be updated in ICES before sending the above document to Central DDO.
3. If any difficulty is faced in this regard may be brought to the notice of Dy Commissioner (EDI) for necessary action.
Yours faithfully,
(Dr. ANIL'K NIGAM)
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CHENNAI VIII – GE

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE Versus COMMR. OF CGST & C. EX.

CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE Versus COMMR. OF CGST & C. EX.
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 834 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 198 (All.) , [2019] 71 G S.T.R. 451 (All)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
Writ Tax No. 822 of 2018
Service Tax
Krishna Murari and Ashok Kumar, JJ.
Shri Rishi Raj Kapoor, Counsel, for the Petitioner.
Shri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Counsel, for the Respondent.
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the appellate authority as respondent No. 4 to the writ petition and also carry out necessary amendment in the prayer clause of the writ petition during the course of the day.
2. The petitioner M/s. Central Industrial Security Force, FGUTPP Unit, Unchahar, Raebareli, has approached this Court challenging the order dated 12-2-2018 passed by the respondent No. 1 rejecting the rectification application made under Section 74 of the Finance Act as well as order dated 6-1-2017 rejecting the appe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vice Tax on accommodation charges incurred on the personnel for the same period. Proceedings were contested by the petitioner by giving a reply. The assessing authority vide order dated 17-3-2016 confirmed the demand of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 8,43,581/- plus Education Cess @ 2% amounting to Rs. 16,872/- plus Higher Education Cess @ 1% amounting to Rs. 8,436/- total amounting to Rs. 8,68,889/-. An equal amount was levelled as penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act and a sum of Rs. 20,000/- was imposed as late fee under Section 70 of the Act read with Rules 7C of the Rules of 1994.
6. Petitioner preferred an appeal before the respondent No. 1 vide order dated 6-1-2017. The appeal has been dismissed by respondent No. 1 being barred by limitation.
7. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that delay had occasioned on account of time spent in obtaining sanction for filing of an appeal. It is also submitted that the authorities not being well conversant with the l

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

10. Admittedly the appeal was filed beyond time, however, in the facts and circumstances we are of the considered opinion that the delay was not occasioned because of any fault on the part of the petitioner but was due to circumstances which was beyond his control. However since the Act does not empowers the appellate authority to condone the delay 30 days beyond the prescribed limitation, no illegality is found to have been committed by the appellate authority however in the interest of justice we feel that the petitioner is entitled to be afforded an opportunity of hearing on merits.
11. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we set aside the order dated 6-1-2017 passed by the appellate authority as well as order dated 16-2-2018 passed on the rectification application and remit the matter back to the appellate authority, respondent No. 4 with a direction to consider and adjudicate upon the appeal filed by the petitioner on merits, without raising any objection

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Nutan Warehousing Company Private Limited

In Re: Nutan Warehousing Company Private Limited
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1073 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 139 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 23-5-2018
GST-ARA-30/2017-18/B-38
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by NUTAN WAREHOUSING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following issues.
1. Whether Exemption provided in serial no. 54 to Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is applicable to the activity carried by the company?
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LAW AND/OR FACTS AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN RESPECT OF AFORESAID QUESTION(S)(i.e.) APPLICANT'S VIEW POINT AND SUBMISSIONS ON ISSUES ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT) AND AS PER SUBMISSION DT. 10.04.2018
Brief Facts submitted by applicant on 10.04.2018
1. M/s. Nutan Warehousing Company Pvt Ltd (hereinafter referred to as applicant) is a company formed for following main objective
a) To carry on the business of warehousing, cold storage and refrigeration in all its branches and activities and sphere.
b) To carry on the business of storage of fertilizers, insecticides, quality seed, agricultural and horticultural equipment, tool and machinery.
c) To carry on the business of quality seeds and develop quality seeds, acquire suitable lands and carry on agriculture.
d) To produce material and fertilisers and insecticides and acquire agency in the above lines and act as commission agents.
e) To act as clearing and godowns for proper and safe storing of valuable agricultural and hor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

red in bulk, either from public tea auctions or directly from manufacturers of tea is an agricultural produce as defined in clause 2(d) of the Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.6.2017. Further, storage & warehousing of tea post procurement, blending and packing undertaken by M/s Unilever is exempted under E. No. 54(e) of the Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.6.2017.
5. Based on this understanding, applicant had neither taken GST registration nor discharged the GST liability. After, insistence from Applicant's client, M/S Unilever, applicant had taken registration and regularly discharging GST liability.
6. As the applicant had a serious reservation regarding taxability of renting of warehouse as the warehouse is used for warehousing of tea, an agricultural produce. Under this background, the applicant had requested for advance ruling on
“Whether the supply of warehouse services used for packing & storage of tea, under above mentioned facts & circumstances wa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ea is exported to overseas countries. Applicant claims that the storage and warehousing of tea is exempted vide Serial No 54(e) of Notification No. 12/2017- Central tax (rate). The said entry is reproduced as under
54
Heading 9986
Services relating to cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fibre, fuel, raw material or other similar products or agricultural produce by way of
(a) agricultural operations directly related to production of any agricultural produce including cultivation, harvesting, threshing, plant protection or testing;
(b) supply or farm labour;
(c) processes carried out at an agricultural farm including tending, pruning, cutting, harvesting, drying, cleaning, trimming, sun drying, fumigating, curing, sorting, grading, cooling or bulk packaging and such like operations which do not alter the essential characteristics of agricultural produce but make it only marketable for the primary market;
(d) renti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e for primary market;
11. Before, going into interpretation, it is essential to mention the process involved in making green leaves marketable in form of tea-
Tea leaves are plucked from the tea plants and the green leaves plucked from the tree are not fit for the human consumption and it cannot be sold in the open market for human consumption. The raw tea leaves are withered by exposure in the shadow of the sun or by heating in trays until pliable. Thereafter the leaves are rolled by hand or machine in order to break the leaf cells and liberate the juices and enzymes. Finally, the leaves are completely dried either by further exposure to the sun, over fires, or in a current of hot air then the tea leaves are fermented in baskets, glasses and in clothes. Thereafter the leaves were then subjected to grading with sieves of various sizes. The said leaves are finally roasted with charcoal for obtaining suitable flavour and colour. Thereafter the said tea is packed in the bulk packs.
12

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aves consists of only above processes and not beyond them. All the three ingredients are fulfilled in the present case.
a) The produce must emerge from cultivation of plants or rearing of all life forms of animals-Green leaves are plucked from the tea plant. Hence the first condition is undoubtedly fulfilled.
b) Either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer on the said produce.
14. Tea leaves are plucked from the tea plants and the green leaves plucked from the tree are not fit for the human consumption and it cannot be sold in the open market for human consumption. The raw tea leaves are withered by exposure in the shadow of the sun or by heating in trays until pliable. Thereafter the leaves are rolled by hand or machine in order to break the leaf cells and liberate the juices and enzymes. Finally, the leaves are completely dried either by further exposure to the sun, over fires, or in a current of hot air then the te

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it for marketing when by a minimal process they are made fit for human consumption. Processes were necessary for the purpose of saving the tea-leaves from perishing, making them fit for transporting and marketing them. The process applied was minimal. Withering, crushing and roasting the tea-leaves will be surely necessary for preserving them. The process of fermentation or final roasting with charcoal for obtaining suitable flavour or colour and also the process of grading them with seives were all within the region of minimal it no point of time it crossed that limit and robbed the tea-leaves, the agricultural produce, of their character of being and continuing as such substantially. These processes are normally done by the cultivator or the producer, hence the second ingredient is also satisfied.
17. The process undertaken does not alter its essential characteristics.
The tea leaf remained what it always was. It was tea leaf when selected and plucked and it continued to be tea lea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

after drying and processing remained agricultural produce.. Similar view had been expressed by the Hon'ble Uttaranchal High Court in case of Dehradun Tea Company Ltd. vs State Of Uttaranchal And ors. [2006 148 STC 56 Uttra) (Annexure-2).
19. C(ii) The processes undertaken makes it marketable for primary market. The process undertaken is seen from the submission on record. it is not repeated herein it is the not direct activity link with cultivation.
20. Circular cannot override the Notification.
Notifications are issued using the subordinate legislative power and are tabled in parliament. Circulars are issued for clarifying the issue, which had been dealt in the Act/rule/notification in a legal language. Circulars are issued by authority expressing their view point. It cannot override the Notification. Any circular contrary to the law (including notification) is non est in the eye of the law. It is neither binding on the department nor on the Assessee. The applicant intend to re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s well.
Therefore, tea was an agricultural produce during entire service tax regime.
In light of the above, he pray for passing the appropriate order.
Addition submission by Applicant dated on 11.05.2018.
Please refer to our application reference No. 30 dated 23.2.2018 in respect of which, hearing was held before you on 24.4.2018 and our earlier letter dated 3.5.2018 on the above subject. During the hearing, we were directed to submit documents/data from M/s Unilever Export, Pune within ten days from the date of hearing. Accordingly, M/s Unilever Export had been requested to submit the same.
We are pursuing the matter with the M/s Unilever Export. However, we are yet to receive the complete reply as M/s Unilever Export are in a process of shifting their activity from our premises to Dubai. It is therefore requested to grant us some more time to submit the same. Accordingly, the detail process was submitted on record is considered while passing of order. Hence it is not repeated a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e) and corresponding Notification issued under IGST and UGST Act and therefore the exemption from GST is not available to their loading, packing, warehousing etc. and that any issued in the past to the contrary of Service Tax or Vat/SaIes Tax is no more relevant.
Applicant have obtained online Service Tax Registration No. AAACN7084LST001 on 29.06.2005 for providing Taxable Service under the category of Storage and Warehousing Services. They are providing services in the nature of Warehousing and storage viz. storing Tea Bags (manufactured)in various format such as Service Sachet, Sqeezables, Herbals, Infusion, Flavoured Tea, Packet Tea and blended tea and receiving consideration on account of Warehousing charges, Service Charges, Lease Rent, other charges and Transport charges from M/s. Unilever India Exports Ltd. 100% EOU. Further applicant vide their letter date 13.10.2017, 15.12.2017 02.02.2018 informed this office that they are providing warehousing services 100% EOU viz. Unilever

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n to the activities carried out by the applicant, the definition of agriculture produce, clearance of tea stored in EOU and category of the service recipient is to be discussed as under.
The definition of Agriculture Produce as per Section 65B (5), for the purpose of clause (102) of 65, w.e.f. 01.07.2012 in Service Tax is as under
*Agriculture produce means any produce of agricultural on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes marketable for primary market
The Definition of agricultural produce for the purpose of Sr.54 of Notfn No. 12/2017 in GST is as under-
” agricultural produce” means any produce out of cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fibre, fuel, raw material or other similar products, on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. 99(2001)/SEEPZ/EOU/80/2001-05/5 valid upto 31/03/2022, it means the possession / control of the premises is with 100% EOU. In this case, the status of applicant is Service Provider and received consideration for providing services as mentioned in Answer to Question No. 14.
The Tea stored in 100% EOU is manufactured packed in bags in the factory and exported, and the exemption is applicable only to the agriculture produce which are marketed in primary market therefore the exemption claimed by the applicant is not applicable As per the balance sheet,the service wise income received from M/S. Unilever India for the period 2013-2014 to 2015-2016 is as under –
Category of service provided
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
Warehousing charges
2979264
3507604
55000
Service charges
19440003
19059D984
23037450
Lease Rent
8947365
7572675
8883305
Other charges
340920
167280
559320
Transport charges
11310000
3069800
6288000
 Zero copies of extract of Note 14 of Balance

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e applicant's interpretation of law is based on the legal provisions which were valid up to 30.06.2012. The changes made by the Govt. in the definition of Agriculture Produce after 01.07.2012 and nature and category of service recipient is not considered while filling application under Advance Ruling.
The definition of “Agricultural produce” as defined under Section 65B (5), for the purpose of clause (102) of Section 65, w.e.f. 01 .07.2()12 in Finance Act, 1994 is as under:
” agricultural produce” means any produce out of cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fibre, fuel, raw material or other similar products, on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes it marketable for primary market;”
Further Board vide Circular No. 16/16/2017-GST issued under F.No.354/173/2017-TRU dated 15.1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the deptt. started investigation on 10th January 2018 by issue of letter for submission of documents. However, the applicant have filed application for advance ruling on 25th January 2018 which is much later than the action initiated by deptt. for investigation. It is also noticed that the Registered office of the applicant as per Service Tax Registration is at Krishi Bhavan, 1379, Bhavani Peth, Pune- 411042 falling under the jurisdiction of Swargate Division. However, the applicant has willfully shown the address of Registered office at the time of GST Registration as Krishi Bhavan, 1379, Bhavani Peth Pune 411002 by quoting wrong PIN code falling under Shivajinagar Division to mislead the deptt.
Thus the applicant, by mentioning the wrong Pin Code as 411002 instead of 411042 for the same address in GST Registration, the applicant has tried to mislead the deptt. for hiding the evasion made in past period from 01/07/2012 to 30.06.2017 with intention to make the loss to the Govt. exche

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion Certificate bearing No. No. AAACN7084LST001 on for storage and warehousing services and the same is valid till date.
It is therefore requested to consider the legal provision of the Service Tax/ GST/ Foreign Trade Policy while taking the decision on the application as evasion of tax made by the applicant involves revenue of more than Rupees One Crore.
Additional submission by Jurisdictional Officer dated 21.05.2018
The applicant requires advance ruling on two issues viz.-
a) Whether exemption provided in Sr.No.54 (e) to Notfn No. 12/2017-CentraI Tax (Rate) is applicable to the activity carried out by the company?
b) Applicability of Exemption for the activity of providing Services in the nature of warehousing for loading, unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of agriculture produce?
Issue No. 1 – In this issue, the assessee is asking whether exemption provided in Sr.No.54 to the Notfn No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate) is applicable to the activities carried by the company.
In thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

factory and sale in the open market as well as in overseas countries, the service provided by the applicant to Business activity is not treated as service provided to agricultural produce hence there is not exemption from payment of service tax/GST.
ii) High Court Decision in the case of Brook Bond Lipton India Ltd. Vs State of Karnataka 109 STC 265 in which it was stated that packing led to value addition for the purpose of excise and sales tax and that it was a possible view that packaged blended tea produced in the Industrial unit of the appellant is a manufactured product in which packing material are inputs.
The contents of the exemption in Sr.No.54 of Notfn No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 are as under
Sr. 54 -Services relating to cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the reading of horses, for foods, fibre, fuel, raw material or other similar products or agricultural produce falling under Chapter 9986 by way of-
(a) to (d)
(e) Loading, unloading

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g, refining, oxidation, packing etc on green leaf and is the processed output of the same.
This Circular is also in consonance with the above referred judgments.
In view of the above, Applicant's Question whether exemption provided in Sr.No.54 (e) to Notfn. No. 12/2017-CentraI Tax (Rate) is applicable to the activity carried out by the company can be answered in the Nagative.
5. ISSUE No.2- The Second issue on which applicant sought Advance Ruling is “Applicability of Exemption for the activity of providing Services in the nature of warehousing for loading, unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of agriculture produce”
The propriety of the asking Advance Rulling in respect of this Question is not understood since from the facts described by the applicant in his application, it appears that he is only storing tea manufactured by M/s. Unilever India Export Ltd, which is branded and packed and ready for distribution for tertiary market which is mainly 100% export market. There

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. D.S. Bist and others dated 11.09.1979
Issue-Assessee, agriculturist and having owned Tea Garden grown tea leaves on his own land, after carrying out some kind of process or treatment, tea is sold therefore the sale of tea effected by him was exempted from sales tax under the proviso to the Act. The Sales Tax authorities rejected the assesee 's contention.
Decision-While giving decision High Court held that sales of tea leaves were not exigible to sale tax. The commodity which was sold was not different from the commodity therefore the proviso to Sr.2 (i) of the Act is attracted.
The decision given in the above case is relating to exemption from payment of sale Tax allowed to Agriculturist of Tea, whereas in applicant's case, the applicant is providing Services to the manufacturing Tea unit registered as 100% EOU, hence the same decision is not applicable as the tea is manufactured goods classified under CSH 0902 under Head “Tea whether or not f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

packed tea manufactured by M/s. Unilever India Export Ltd. which comes to applicant's warehouse in packed form ready for tertial market.
c) The decision of Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of C. Ex. Bolpur Vs. Ratan Melting and Wire Industries
Issue-Departmental Clarification vis-a-vis court Decision Binding nature of Circulars Contrary to Statutory Provisions having no Existence in law
Decision-wherein it has been held that a circular which is contrary to the statutory provision has really no existence in law. It is for the court to declare what the particular provisions of Statute Says and it is not for the Executive. Since CBECs Circular is in consonance with the provision of CGST/SGST Act, the ratio of Ratan Melting and Wire Industries is not applicable in the facts of applicant's case.
On going through the letter dated 11.05.2018 submitted by the applicant to Advance Ruling Authority along with the letter of M/s. Unilever Export dated 9.7.2014 mentioning the d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ontentions made in ARA. During hearing Jurisdictional Officer, Sh. Sachin Ghagare, Asstt. Commr. Division-II (Swargate) Pune-II, CGST Commissionarate, Pune also appeared and made written submissions and contended that investigations against the applicant is already going on and therefore their application is required to be rejected. Further he was requested to produce documentary evidences in respect of initiation of investigation at the earliest. The applicant was also requested to submit their contentions and written submissions in this regard.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 24.04.2018, Sh. Suresh Singh C.A along with Sh. Chanshayam L Navalakha, Director and Sh. Bhushan Patil, C.A. appeared and written submissions and orally contended as per their written submissions. They were orally to give details of exact nature of product that was being stored, including photographs of the product, sample of bags in which it was stored along with markings or detail

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g unloading, packing, storage of agricultural produce. The Applicant is seeking the advance ruling in relation to whether exemption as per Serial No.54 of Notification No.12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) is applicable to the activity carried out by the company or not? The Notification 12/2017 is reproduced herein below.
54
Heading 9986
Services relating to cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fibre, fuel, raw material or other similar products or agricultural produce by way of
(a) agricultural operations directly related to production of any agricultural produce including cultivation, harvesting, threshing, plant protection or testing;
(b) supply of farm labour;
(c) processes carried out at an agricultural farm including tending, pruning, cutting, harvesting, drying, cleaning, trimming, sun dryings fumigating, curing, sorting, grading, cooling or bulk packaging and such like operations which do not alter the essential c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

less the context otherwise requires, the Definition of agricultural produce for the purpose of Sr.54 of Notification No. 12/2017 under the GST law is as under-
(g) “Agricultural produce” means any produce out of cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fiber, fuel, raw material or other similar products, on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes it marketable for primary market;
In view of the above, we are required to ascertain if the goods being stored by M/s. Unilever India Export Ltd., in the warehouse of applicant would fall in the definition of 'Agricultural produce' as given above. To ascertain the exact nature of goods being stored in warehouse. we find that a letter received by the applicant from M/s. Unilever dated 09.07.2014 gives the details about the exact nature

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.
Assembly of Raw material as per Bled Order
Cross checking of assembled Tea
5.
Tipping of Tea over Magnetic Grid
Inspection while tipping
6.
Conveying under closed condition
 
7.
Vibratory sieving
Perforated Mesh : 3 mm
8.
Conveying thru bucket elevator to feed hopper 
 
9.
Transferring teas to Blend Drum & Blending
Under covered condition
10.
Conveying and drawing Blended Tea into Mobile Storage Hopper
Closed Hopper, Blended tea checked for sensorial and other Lab clearance
11.
Placing Mobile Hopper on machine chute having Mesh and Magnetic Grid
5000 Gauss Strength.
12.
Filling tea into Tea bags on Constanta Machine  
 
13.
Auto filling of Tea bags into Inner carton               
Online Quality checks for Tea bag Quality
14.
On line Lid closing of Inner carton
 
15.
On line Laser Coding on Inner carton
 
16.
On line over wrapping of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

processing of raw tea leaves into tea results in emergence of a new product having distinct name i.e. Tea, which has distinct name, character and use i.e. Lipton Pure and Simple 100s Tea bags. As such the impugned activity is a 'manufacture' as defined in clause (72) of section 2 of the GST Act. The final product considering various processes undertaken by M/s. Unilever cannot be considered as Agricultural Produce. Both the applicant as well as Jurisdiction Officer have cited several judgments in support of their contentions which we have already referred in their submissions portion but we find that the decision cited by the applicant are not applicable to the facts of the case and hence not discussed. However, the decision of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkatta in the matter of Narendra Tea Co. (P) Ltd Vs. Assesse dated 20/07/2017 is a direct authority on the issue. In this case on reference by Division Bench, Special Bench was constituted and following question was refe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion u/s. 10B of the Act as prayed for. Further the judgments cited by the jurisdictional office namely Union of India Vs. Belgachit Tea Co. and Brook Bond Lipton India Ltd cited supra support the view that 'Tea' is a manufactured product and not agricultural produce.
Thus, we find that the goods being stored in the applicant's godown are not agricultural produce as per definition given in Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017 and the same is reiterated by Board Circular No. 16/16/2017-GST issued under F No. 354/173/2017-TRU dated 15.11.2017,
05.  In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows :
ORDER
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-30/2017-18/B-38
Mumbai, dt. 23.05.2018
For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus –
Question 1. Whether Exemption provided in s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. A.W. Faber-Castell (India) Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: M/s. A.W. Faber-Castell (India) Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (8) TMI 975 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 121 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 23-5-2018
GST-ARA-31/2017-18-B-39
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/S. A W. Faber-Castell (India) Pvt. Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question :
Whether the product of the applicant i.e. “Modelling dough' will be covered under Chapter 34 or Chapter 95 under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alia engaged in the manufacture of various products taxable under GST law.
2. The present application is filed in respect of one of its products – “Modelling Dough” which is a specially manufactured semi-solid, clay-like structure to be used as a toy tor kids to make various shapes, things, caricatures of animals etc. It is made up of 'maida' i.e. 'refined wheat flour' or 'white flour', Modelling dough is usually supplied in packs containing multiple such dough in various colours to attract kid.
3. The applicant submits that there appears to be an anomaly in the Customs Tariff as well as in the GST Tariff Schedules in so far as 'modelling dough' is concerned. The term 'Modelling pastes, including those put up for children's amusement' finds a mention in Chapter Heading No. 34.07 as Tariff Item No. 34.07 00 10. “Modelling paste' of Chapter Heading No. 34 07 is specified under Sl. No. 63 of- Schedule-III to Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 06.2017 as amended by Notif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al nor any allied industrial product. Therefore, to classify the product in the concerned Section of Customs Tariff and applying the rate of tax applicable to Chemicals cannot be construed to be the intention behind the Tariff.
5. Furthermore, it has been recently brought to the applicant's notice that competitors of the applicant (who are branded players in the stationery items and children's goods sector) are clearing identically placed products under the category of 'Toys' by classifying the same under Chapter 95 (Heading No.95 03) of the Customs Tariff (under the GST regime) and charging CGST @ 6%. Thus, effective rate of GST on the said product is 12%.
6. The present ambiguity regarding product-in-question is because of the aforementioned factors and the mismatch usage and composition of the applicant product in relation to Chapter Heading No. 34.07 of the Customs Tariff The applicant's product may fall under Chapter 34.07 which covers 'modelling pastes'. However, the same produ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

option but to supply our product currently by charging CGST @ 9% in order to avoid any possible litigation with the department, whereas some of our competitors have already started charging CGST @ 6%, to take benefit of lower GST rates, which is affecting fair competition, not allowing a level playing field, resulting in loss of market share and financial loss to us. This can also cause confusion amongst consumers, as there are different GST rates being applied in the market for essentially the same product, under different classification / codes for different brands, in different distribution channels.
9. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the ambiguity regarding the applicable taxation rate on the product in question is affecting our business significantly and hitting our industry badly Under such circumstances, we reiterate our request to expedite the matter at hand and Issue a clarification regarding the same and also grant us with a personal meeting to represent our case in detai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s under:-
“22. (1) Every supplier shall be liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory, other than special category States, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees:”
(Emphasis Supplied)
A.4 The above referred section -can be vivisected into following essentials: –
a. A supplier shall be liable to be registered under CGST Act in the State or Union Territory, from where he makes taxable supply of goods or services or both;
b. If the aggregate turnover in the financial year exceeds rupees twenty lakh.
A.5 The Applicant submits that as on date, it is registered in Maharashtra and also making taxable supplies of goods from the same to its customers located in State of Maharashtra, Further, the turnover of the Applicant exceeds rupees twenty lakhs in the financial year. Given this, it is submitted that Applicant clearly satisfies to be 'applicant' in terms of s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n respect of,
(a) classification of any goods or services or both;
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both;
(d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid;
(e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered;
(g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.”
Emphasis Supplied
A.8 In view of the above, it is submitted that advance ruling may be sought by the Applicant on the questions concerning classification of goods or services or both, on the question involving determination if anything done by the applicant with respect to a good or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

17, reads as under:
“96. (1) The Government shall, by notification, constitute an Authority to be known as the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling :
Provided that the Government may, on the recommendation of the Council, notify any Authority located in another State to act as the Authority for the State.
(2) The Authority shall consist of-
(i) one member from amongst the officers of central tax; and
(ii) one member from amongst the officers of State tax,
to be appointed by the Central Government and the State Government, respectively.
(3) The qualifications, the method of appointment of the members and the terms and conditions of their services shall be such as may be prescribed.”
Emphasis Supplied
A.11 The Applicant submits that in terms of the above referred section 96 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the Government of Maharashtra has issued a Notification No. MGST-1017/CR 193/Taxation dated 24.10.2017, which constitutes this authority as Maharasht

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

'MODELLING DOUGH' AS MANUFACTURED AND SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT ARE CLASSIFIABLE UNDER CHAPTER 95 OF THE CUSTOMS TARIFF AND COVERED BY SL. NO. 228 OF SCHEDULE-II TO NOTIFICATION NO. 1/2017-CENTRAL TAX (RATE) DATED 30.06.2017
C.1 In terms of Section 9(1) of CGST Act subject to Section 9(2), there shall be levied a tax called the Central Goods and Service Tax on all intra-State supplies of goods or services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption, on the value determined under section 15 and at such rates, not exceeding twenty per cent, as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person.
C.2 The Central Government has issued Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 in exercise of the powers under Section 9(1), This Notification in Schedule I to VI specifies goods which will be levied to tax at the rate of 2.5%  9%, 14%

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or similar forms; other preparations for use in dentistry, with a basis of plaster (of calcined gypsum or calcium sulphate):
 
 
 
3407 00 10

Modelling pastes , including those put up for children 's amusement
 
 
 
3407 00 90

Other
 
 
 
Chapter Heading No. 95.03
Tariff Item
 
Description of goods
Unit
Rate
 
 
 
 
Standard
Preferential Areas
1
 
2
3
4
5
9503
 
TRICYCLES, SCOOTERS, PEDAL CARS AND SIMILAR WHEELED TOYS; DOLL'S CARRIAGES; DOLLS; OTHER TOYS; REDUCED-SIZE (“SCALE”) MODELS AND SIMILAR RECREATIONAL MODELS, WORKING OR NOT ; PUZZLES OF ALL KINDS
 
 
 
9503 00

Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars and similar wheeled toys; dolls' carriages; dolls; other toys; reduced-size (“scale”) models and similar recreational models, working or not; puzzles of all kinds:
 
 
 
9503 00 10

Of wood
 
 
 
9503 00 20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

foresaid Notifications contains the following explanation:
(i)………………….
(ii)…………………..
(iii) “Tariff Item”, “sub-heading”, “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, heading, sub-heading and Chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the said Customs tariff Act, 1975, including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.
C.6 A perusal of the aforesaid provisions read with explanation to the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) shows that in order to determine the rate of CGST leviable on the product in question, it is paramount to determine the classification or the product in question under Customs Tariff Act. 1975.
C.7 The Custom Tariff is generally based on the tariff classification adopted by World Cust

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and kaolin and are slightly greasy to the touch.
Other are mixtures of cellulose pulp and kaolin with binders.
These pastes are usually coloured and are presented in bulk or in cakes, sticks, plates. etc,
Assorted modelling pastes, including those put up in sets for the amusement of children, are also covered by this heading.”
 ………….emphasis supplied
C.9 From a perusal of the above, it is observed that the goods of Chapter Heading No 34.07 are preparations or plastics or plastic preparation generally used by artists or goldsmiths. Even those modelling pastes which are used by children for amusement purposes are classifiable under this Heading only. However, Chapter Heading No. 34.07 only covers goods made of plastics and not of other materials Therefore, it can be said that the modelling pastes that are used by children for amusement purposes and made specifically from plastics shall only be covered by Chapter Heading No 34.07,
C.10 However, it is clear that the mo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

only but the said definition is applicable throughout the nomenclature. Therefore, if any goods covered under Heading No. 3407 generally be preparations of plastics or plastics preparation shown content the ingredients from materials of Heading No.3901 to 3914. In the present case, the product in question is made entirely out of maida i.e. preparations of wheat flour and none of the contents/materials as covered under Heading No. 3901 to 3914 are present. Thus, the question of product in question Falling under Heading 3407 is clearly ruled out.
C.12 It is pertinent to note that the applicant's product i.e. Modelling Dough is a clay-like semi-solid product which is primarily made of 'maida' or refined wheat flour. Although it is made for the use of children as a growth stimulating, creativity toy and may be termed to be for the amusement of children; it is specifically made from edible substances including maida so as to make it safe for children and not have any harmful effects even i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s Tariff which provides for 'Products of the Chemical or Allied Industries'. Section VI covers chemicals or allied industry products only and not children educational products. Therefore, it shall be wrong to classily the applicant's product which is an educational toy made of maida under Section VI of the Customs Tariff along with other products of Chemicals or other allied industries.
C.15 The principle of ejusdem generis specifies that like items should be treated likely i.e. goods of the same kind should be clubbed and treated similarly. Extending the same principle to 'modelling dough', it is submitted, that modelling dough should not be treated in law as to be of the same kind as other plastic preparations and chemicals. Rather, it is submitted, that the applicant's product i.e. modelling dough should be classified along with similar educational toys for kids and clubbed with the same for the purpose of taxation under GST.
C. 16 Chapter Heading No. 9503 covers toys of various k

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under the Chapter Heading No. 95.03 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 attracting CGST on supply ot- such goods @ 6% by virtue of Sl. No. 228 of Schedule-II to Notification No. 1/2017-CentraI Tax (Rate) dated 30.06.2017 as amended by Notification No. 41/20 17- Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017.”
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The relevant portion of the submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
“2. It is submitted at the outset that the applicant ought to have furnished all the relevant information and details in his application necessary to decide the classification issue. For determination of classification number of factors are required to be examined like raw materials/inputs used and their proportion; desired characteristics of the final product and in turn function, essential characteristics of different raw materials used /the purpose of using each input, manufacturing process, intended as well as alternate use of the product, manufacturing proces

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8(2) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 of at least may be kept in abeyance till all essential information/material is produced before the Authority and made available to the Respondent.
4. With reference to said application of the applicant following further submissions are made as preliminary submissions and detailed response would be submitted at later stage after getting above discussed information from the applicant:-
a) It may be true that the product “moulding/modelling dough is manufactured by the applicant using wheat flour. But wheat flour used appears to be a base material. To enable any material to be used as 'moulding/nodelling dough', that too which shall be reusable, it must have elasticity. pliability and non perishable nature. These three characteristics appear to be essential for any material for using it as 'moulding/modelling dough'. Wheat flour/Maida does not contain any of these characteristics. As such mere use or wheat flour in product, even If predom

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ium. By itself, “alum” often refers to potassium alum, with the formula KAl(SO4) 2*12H 2O. Other alums are named after the monovalent ion, such as sodium alum and ammonium alum.
The name “alum” is also used, more generally, for salts with the same formula and structure, except that aluminium is replaced by another trivalent metal ion like chromium(III), and/or sulfur is replaced by other chalcogen like selenium. The most common of these analogs is chrome alum KCr(SO 4) 2*12H 2O. In some industries, the name “alum” (or “papermaker's alum”) is used to refer to aluminium sulfate Al 2(SO 4) 3*nH 2O. Most industrial flocculation done with “alum” actually uses aluminium sulfate. In medicine, “alum” may also refer to aluminium hydroxide gel used as a vaccine adjuvant ****
c) From above it appears that while manufacturing 'moulding /modelling dough' on commercial basis, certain chemical must be being used to give essential characteristics like elasticity, pliability and non perishable n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nce the applicant has not provided vital details essential to determine classification, as discussed above at paragraph 2 above the application filed may be rejected or it shall not be admitted till the applicant furnishes full facts.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on dt.28.03.2018 with respect to admission or rejection of the application when Sh. Nirav Karia, Advocate appeared and orally contended for admission of application as per their contentions made in the Advance Ruling application and additional written submissions made. Sh. S. S. Bhide, Superintendent GST/CX, Mumbai East Commissionerate, Mumbai Zone, Jurisdictional Officer appeared and made written submissions and orally stated that the applicant has not given detailed contents of the product and should not be therefore admitted till full details of product are given.
The application was admitted and a final hearing was held on dt.17.04.2018 when Sh. Nirav Karia, Advocate alongwith Sh. R. Nambira

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cks containing multiple such dough in various colours to attract kids.
During hearing, the applicant was asked to submit the ingredients of the product which have been informed as being thus –
CONTENTS
% CONSUMPTION
HYDONTOIN DMDM (PRESERVATIVE)    
**%
POLYSORBATE 80             
**%
MD-002- POTTASIUM DIHYDROGEN ORTHO PHOSPATE 
**%
MD-003(SODIUM CHLORIDE)
**%
MD-004- MAIDA
47.57%
MD-006-CALCIUM CHLORIDE DIHYDRATE
**%
MD-008- BUTYL STEARATE
**%
PETROLIUM JELLY -OP – 304
**%
CR-010-LIQUID PARAFFIN OIL    
**%
PC-005-SODWM BENZOATE
**%
PG-002-ALUMlNIUM SULPHATE
**%
HEATED DM WATER
34.58%
POLYBUTENE-950
**%
FLUORO ROYAL BLUE- IXT
**%
VANILLA SP FLAVOUR
**%
DRM-105 (2 PHYNOXY ETHANLO) – LOCAL
**%
TOTAL
100.00%
The Table above reveals that the ingredients consist of maida, water and chemicals. The percentages of various chemicals used by the app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in packings for retail sale or in plates, horseshoe shapes, sticks or similar forms; other preparations for use in dentistry, with a basis of plaster (of calcined gypsum or calcium sulphate):
3407 00 10

Modelling pastes, including those put up for kg. 10% children 's amusement
3407 00 90

Other
Heading 9503
9503
 
TRICYCLES, SCOOTERS, PEDAL CARS AND SIMILAR WHEELED TOYS; DOLL'S CARRIAGES; DOLLS; OTHER TOYS; REDUCED-SIZE (“SCALE”) MODELS AND SIMILAR RECREATIONAL MODELS, WORKING OR NOT ; PUZZLES OF ALL KINDS
9503 00

Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars and similar wheeled toys; dolls' carriages; dolls; other toys; reduced-size (“scale”) models and similar recreational models, working or not; puzzles of all kinds:
9503 00 10

Of wood
9503 00 20

Of metal
9503 00 30

Of plastics
9503 00 90

Other
As can be seen, the CTH 34.07 covers modelling pastes and includes modelling pastes for children's amusement. While Heading 9503 is about toys. A toy is an object

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of 'Toys' by classifying the same under Chapter 95 (Heading No 95.03) of the Customs Tariff (under the GST regime) and charging CGST @6%.
* The applicant's product may pall under Chapter 34.07 which covers 'madelling pastes'. However, the same product is actually used as a 'toy' for kids and maybe more aptly covered under Chapter 95 of the Customs Tariff which covers Toys, games and sports requisites; parts and accessories thereof.
* The prevailing ambiguity has led to two separate Tariff Item Nos. being used for the product in question with contradictory usages thereby levying two different rates of CGST applicable on them. While some cautious sellers are charging CGST @ 9% on the product in question whereas some registered persons are using the ambiguity to charge CGST @ 6% only. The above ambiguity results in unfair market practices being adopted by certain registered persons in an attempt to reduce effective price of product and increase their market share and profits. Further

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o many other chemicals as given in table above are also added to it . Neither can “maida” alone be used for preparing the various shapes as various chemicals are needed to be added to “maida” for it to be used and reused as modelling dough for making the various shapes. These chemicals are needed to give the needful firmness, elasticity, plasticity and non perishability to the shapes. The dough needs to be mouldable and flexible to make the various shapes. There needs to be some safeguard against cracking, crumbling. [I GOT THIS FROM A PATENT RELATED ARTICLE – A MODELING DOUGH COMPRISING A POLAR POLYMERIC RESIN, WATER, A GELLANT, AND A FILLER PROVIDES A DOUGH RESISTANT TO FLAKING, CRACKING, AND CRUMBLING. SO NOT COPIED IT ENTIRELY]. In view thereof, the use of chemicals in the modelling dough is significant. And therefore, the product can very well fall in the Section VI for “Products of the Chemical or Allied Industries”.
Then we come to the Harmonized Commodity Description and Codin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Nomenclature the expression “plastics” means those materials of headings 39.01 to 39.14 which are or have been capable, either at the moment of polymerization or at some subsequent stage, of being formed under external influence (usually heat and pressure, if necessary with a solvent or plasticiser) by moulding, casting, extruding, rolling or other process into shapes which are retained on the removal of the external influence.
It is essential here to mark the difference in the words used. Chapter 39 says “plastics'  while Chapter 34 says ” plastic”. “Plastics” is not the same as “plastic”. The meaning of “plastic”  is not given by the HSN and nor the Customs Tariff Act of India. Hence, we refer to the meaning of “plastic” as normally understood thus –
We find that the word Plastic is a noun as well as an Adjective..
AS NOUN…..
noun: plastic; plural noun plastics
1. a synthetic material made from a wide range of organic polymers such as polyethylene, PVC, nylon, etc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

:
rigid
* offering scope for creativity.
“the writer is drawn to words as a plastic medium”
* relating to moulding or modelling in three dimensions. or to produce three-dimensional effects.
* “the plastic arts”
In view of the above meanings of the word PIASTIC and PLASTICS we find that in the HSN Explanatory notes of the CTH 3407 under the heading “Modelling pastes” it is stated that these are “Plastic Preparations” generally used by Artists or goldsmiths for making models and also by children for amusement purposes. Here in these explanatory notes it is apparent that the word “Plastic” used in phrase “Plastic preparations” is used as an Adjective which denotes the Plastic property of modelling pastes i.e. their malleability, mouIdability, shapability, pliability, flexibility etc as per synonyms of this property mentioned under its meaning above when used as an adjective.
From the extracts reproduced and detailed discussions above it is clear that the meaning of 'plastic” is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“, The Notes Chapter 39 say that the expression 'Plastics' means those materials of headings 39.01 10 39.14 which are or have been capable, either at the moment of polymerization or at some subsequent stage of being formed under external influence (usually heat and pressure, If necessary with a solvent or plasticiser) by moulding, casting, extruding_rolling or other process into shapes which are retained on the removal of the external Influence. Whereas Notes to Heading 3407 Say that modelling pastes are plastic preparations generally used by artists or goldsmiths for making models and also by children for amusement purposes.
Thus we find that the applicant in their contentions have taken “Plastics” and “Plastic” as one and the same and are therefore not able to be certain of the correct classification of their product which would be under CTH 3407 as per detailed discussions above once we are able to differentiate between the word “Plastic” and “Plastics”.
The impugned product is a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r amusement of children, the Heading 3407 would be the correct classification. The description against CTH 3407 being applicable to the impugned product, we refrain from engaging ourselves in any exercise of what constitutes a “toy” and whether the impugned product is a toy”.
We find that the CTH 3407 is covered by the Schedule III of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central/State Tax (Rate) [as amended from time to time] thus –
63
3407
Modelling pastes, including those put up for children's amusement: Preparations known as “dental wax” or as “dental impression compounds”, put up in sets, in packings for retail sale or in plates, horseshoe shapes, sticks or similar forms; other preparations for use in dentistry, with a basis of plaster (of calcined gypsum or calcium sulphate)
06. In View of the deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as under :
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
No

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Varanasi Versus M/s R.P.L. Projects Ltd.

Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Varanasi Versus M/s R.P.L. Projects Ltd.
Service Tax
2018 (7) TMI 1786 – CESTAT ALLAHABAD – 2019 (25) G. S. T. L. 113 (Tri. – All.)
CESTAT ALLAHABAD – AT
Dated:- 23-5-2018
ST/Stay/70051/2018 IN APPEAL No.ST/70066/2018-CU[DB] – ST/A/71120/2018-CU[DB]
Service Tax
Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical)
Shri Mohammad Altaf, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for Appellant
Shri Prashant Shukla, Advocate for Respondent
ORDER
Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar
Heard learned A.R. on Stay Application. Revenue has sought stay of operation of order passed by learned Commissioner through which proceedings for demand of Service Tax were dropped. Since, the order is non executable, the stay application is rejected. Since the matter is covered by earlier decision of this Tribunal, appeal is taken up for final disposal with the consent of both the sides.
2. The present Appeal is filed by Revenue against O

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s NCL and M/s IGL and that the terms and conditions of the contract were for providing GTA Services to NCL and IGL and on the said service value NCL and IGL were paying Service Tax under reverse charge mechanism. They further submitted that the activity was shifting of coal from one place to another within the mining area of NCL and the service included transportation of coal in contractor‟s tipping trucks from the coal stockyard to Coal Handling Plant situated within the main premises of NCL and therefore, they contended that service provided by them was rightly covered under GTA Service and did not qualify the requirement of definition of „Cargo Handling Service‟. The Learned Commissioner held that none of the activities provided by the respondent to either NCL or to IGL fall under the definition of 'Cargo Handling Service' and therefore no service tax liability can be fasten on respondent under that category and also that the said service recipients were discharg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service provider is providing certain ancillary services such as loading/unloading, packing/unpacking, transshipment and temporary storage in the course of transport of goods by road then value of such ancillary services should be counted towards GTA Services. He has further submitted that learned Original Authority has relied on said CBEC Circular as one of the grounds for his decision. He has also submitted that the issue is covered by the decision of this Tribunal in the case of M/s Rungta Projects Ltd. Vs CCE reported at 2017-TIOL-3782-CESTAT.
6. On carefully considering the submissions from both the sides and after going through the joint “statement of facts and grounds of appeal” filed by revenue, we find that revenue could not satisfactorily establish that the transactions in the present appeal are not covered by the said clarification dated 05.10.2015 issued by CBEC. Further, revenue did not contradict the finding of the original authority that same service has been subjected

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Wavier of late fee on GSTR-3B for certain class of registered persons.

Wavier of late fee on GSTR-3B for certain class of registered persons.
38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(58) Dated:- 23-5-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Goa SGST
Goa SGST
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Finance
Revenue & Control Division
_
Notification
No. 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(58)
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 128 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Goa Act 4 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), the Government of Goa, on the recommendations of the Counc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. HDFC BANK LIMITED Versus Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL CIRCLE-I, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM AND THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

M/s. HDFC BANK LIMITED Versus Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL CIRCLE-I, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM AND THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (6) TMI 1289 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W.P.(C). No.13691 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri Joseph Jerard Samson Rodrigues
For The Respondent : Sri. V.K.Shamsudeen (SR.GP) And Sr. Government Pleader:Sri.V.K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (the Act). It is stated by the petitioner that in the return filed by them under the Act for the month of September 2015, the value of goods stock transferred was shown incorrectly by mistake. It is also stated by the petitioner that the said mistake has come to their notice only on receipt of the audit report under subsection (1) of Section 4

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds thus:
“(2) Where any dealer detects any omission or mistake in the annual return submitted by him with reference to the audited figures, he shall file revised annual return rectifying the mistake or omission along with the audit certificate. Where, as a result of such revision, the tax liability increases, the revised return shall be accompanied by proof of payment of such tax, interest due thereon under sub-section (5) of section 31, and penal interest, calculated at twice the rate specified under sub – section (5) of section 31:
Provided that this sub-section shall not apply to a dealer against whom any penal action is initiated in respect of such omission or mistake under any of the provisions of this Act.”
Petitioner has not placed on record the audit report for the relevant year. The petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition as W.P.(C).No.6389/2018, the judges papers of which was called for and perused. The audit report of the petitioner for the relevant year was Ext.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ut of time.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner alternatively contended that in the light of the additional provisos added to the existing proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 42 of the Act in terms of Finance Act, 2018, the petitioner is entitled to prefer Ext.P1 application. The provisos added to the existing proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 42 of the Act reads thus:
“Provided further that those dealers who have filed audited statement of accounts and certificates under sub-section (1) will be allowed to revise the returns for the period up to June, 2017, in respect of defects of a technical or clerical in nature, having no effect on the sales turnover already conceded or the tax paid. Such dealers may apply for revision of their returns before the assessing authority on or before 30th June, 2018:
Provided also that this facility shall not be available to dealers against whom assessment proceedings have already been initiated based on such defects:
Provided also

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Waiver Of Late Fee Payable For Failure To Furnish Return In Form Gstr-3b By Due Date

Waiver Of Late Fee Payable For Failure To Furnish Return In Form Gstr-3b By Due Date
22/2018-STATE TAX Dated:- 23-5-2018 Jharkhand SGST
GST – States
Jharkhand SGST
Jharkhand SGST
GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION NO.22/2018-STATE TAX
[S.O. NO.40 (F.NO.VAKAR/GST/03/2018],
DATED 23-5-2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the State Government, on the recommendations

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notification to extend the time limit to conclude the inspection proceedings under RGST Rules, 2017.

Notification to extend the time limit to conclude the inspection proceedings under RGST Rules, 2017.
F. 17 (131) ACCT/GST/2017/ 3564-3566 Dated:- 23-5-2018 Rajasthan SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
Order
Jaipur, Dated May 23, 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 168 of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No. 9 of 2017), in order to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the RGST Act across all

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notified regarding waiver of late fee for failure to furnish return in Form GSTR-3B

Notified regarding waiver of late fee for failure to furnish return in Form GSTR-3B
F.1-11 (91)-TAX/GST/2018/4194-263 Dated:- 23-5-2018 Tripura SGST
GST – States
Tripura SGST
Tripura SGST
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
(Taxes & Excise)
No.F.1-11 (91)-TAX/GST/2018/4194-263
Dated, Agartala the 23rd May, 2018
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Tripura Act No.9 of 2017). the State Gove

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M. MAHESH PROPRIETOR, M/s. UNIVERSAL PLYWOOD Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER), STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT), PERUMBAVOOR, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM AND

M. MAHESH PROPRIETOR, M/s. UNIVERSAL PLYWOOD Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER), STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT), PERUMBAVOOR, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, MUVATTUPUZHA
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (5) TMI 1612 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W.P.(C).No.16625 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. N. Muraleedharan Nair And Smt. K. Hymavathy
For The Respondent : Sri. V. K. Shamsudeen (SR. GP) And MR. Sri. V. K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a registered dealer under the Central Sales Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pleader.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as also orders passed in similar cases, the writ petition is disposed of directing the appellate authority to pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6 applications preferred by the petitioner for condonation of delay in filing Exts.P3 and P4 appeals, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that if the delay in filing the appeals is condoned, Exts.P7 and P8 applications preferred by the petitioner for stay shall also be considered by the appellate authority within the aforesaid time. Needless also to say that until orders are passed as directed above in the applications for condoning the delay in filing the appeals or applications for stay

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

VENUS HOME APPLIANCES PVT. LTD Versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER KVAT CIRCLE-IV, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM

VENUS HOME APPLIANCES PVT. LTD Versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER KVAT CIRCLE-IV, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (5) TMI 1611 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W.P. (C). Nos.16651, 16698 And 16763 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Joseph Jerard Samson Rodrigues
For The Respondent : Sri. V.K. Shamsudeen (SR.GP) BY SR. Government Pleader:Sri.V.K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
The issue arising for consideration in these writ petitions is common and as such, they are disposed of by this common judgment.
2. One and the same petitioner has instituted all the writ petitions. The petitioner is a registered deal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ided for under Section 6A of the Act. The assessment orders are straight away under challenge in the writ petitions on the ground mainly that the same are vitiated for non-compliance of the principles of natural justice.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in possession of the documents evidencing despatch of goods covered by the Form-F declarations and had the assessing authority called upon the petitioner to produce the same, they would have certainly produced the same before the assessing authority.
5. In so far as the assessing authority has no case that the petitioner has not produced the Form-F declarations

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. GOLDEN TIMBERS Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II, STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, 1ST CIRCLE, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM

M/s. GOLDEN TIMBERS Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II, STATE GOODS & SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, 1ST CIRCLE, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (5) TMI 1610 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W. P. (C).No.16681 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri.N.Muraleedharan Nair And Smt.K.Hymavathy
For The Respondent : V.K.Shamsudeen (SR. GP) AND Sri.V.K.Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act as also the Central Sales Tax Act. Exts.P1 and P2 are the assessment orders of the petitioner under the said statutes for the year 2014-'15. Aggrieved by Exts.P1 a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. BISMI TIMBER INDUSTRIES Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II., STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM

M/s. BISMI TIMBER INDUSTRIES Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II., STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (5) TMI 1609 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W.P.(C).No.16709 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : SRI .N. Muraleedharan Nair And Smt.K. Hymavathy
For The Respondent : V.K. Shamsudeen (SR.GP) And Sri.V.K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order under the Central Sales Tax Act (the Act), the petitioner preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent. There was a delay of 68 days in filing the appeal. Ext.P3 is the application preferr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SUNIL JOSE Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (NOW STATE TAX OFFICER), TATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, SALES TAX COMPLEX, THRIPUNITHURA, COCHIN

SUNIL JOSE Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (NOW STATE TAX OFFICER), TATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, SALES TAX COMPLEX, THRIPUNITHURA, COCHIN
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (5) TMI 1608 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W. P. (C).No.16735 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Tomson T.Emmanuel
For The Respondent : V. K. Shamsudeen (SR.GP) And Sri.V.K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the petitioner preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent. Ext.P3 is the application for stay preferred by the petitioner in the appeal. It

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

KUNHALAN KOZHIKKODAN, PROPRIETOR, WOOD WIN INDUSTRIES, PUTHUPARAMBA Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO. 4, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, MALAPPURAM

KUNHALAN KOZHIKKODAN, PROPRIETOR, WOOD WIN INDUSTRIES, PUTHUPARAMBA Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO. 4, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, MALAPPURAM AND MALABAR FURNITURE, ALAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1555 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W. P. (C). No. 16777 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. K. I. Mayankutty Mather And Sri. R. Jaikrishna
For The Respondent : V. K. Shamsudeen (SR. GP)
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the first respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kera

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AJITH A.R. Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER [INT.] SQUAD NO-II, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GST DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM

AJITH A.R. Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER [INT.] SQUAD NO-II, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GST DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1554 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-5-2018
W. P. (C). No. 16378 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri.M.R. Sarin
For The Respondent : Sri. V.K.Shamsudeen, Senior Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detain

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Ashok Ispat Udyog, M/s. Vijay Chand Bothra Versus Comm. of C. Ex., CGST, Raipur

M/s. Ashok Ispat Udyog, M/s. Vijay Chand Bothra Versus Comm. of C. Ex., CGST, Raipur
Central Excise
2018 (5) TMI 1412 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 23-5-2018
Exicse Appeal No. E/50874/2018-Ex [SM], Excise Appeal No. E/50812/2018-Ex [SM] – Final Order No. 51980-51981/2018
Central Excise
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Member ( Judicial )
For the Appellant : Ms. Priyanka Goel, ( Advocate )
For the Respondent : Mr. S.Nunthuk and P. Juneja A.R.
ORDER
Per : Ajay Sharma
These are case of clandestine removal of M.S. Ingots. Since the issue involved in both the appeals are same therefore, I decide both the appeals by a common order.
2. The question involved in these appeals is whether the principal Commissioner in its impugned order in original dated 11.01.2018 is justified in confirming the demand of Central Excise duty of Rs. 2,56,803./- alongwith interest and penalty, in respect of clandestine removal of 80.695 the MT of M.S Ingots recovered from the app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Pansari, Prop. of M/s. Monu Steel. At the time of adjudication before the Principal Commissioner M/s. Monu Steel (Sh. S.K. Pansari) did not appear for cross examination despite various opportunities given. The Show Cause Notice itself mention that the demand of Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 3,29,78,297/- is inclusive of the duty of Rs. 2,56,803/- involved in 80.695 MT of MS ingots. Therefore, it is clear that duty amount on 80.695 MT of M.S. ingots is also included in the total duty amount of Rs. 3,29,78,297/-. In the impugned order although the demand of Central Excise duty of 3,29,78,297/- was dropped by the ld. Principal Commissioner, but still he confirmed the demand of Central Excise duty of Rs. 2,56,803/- in respect of 80.695 MT of MS ingots. In the said impugned order it has been mentioned that the evidence cited by the Department in the Show Cause Notice pertain to a comparative shorter period and is also insignificant i.e. for 80.695 MT out of total 10,825 MT. In the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s also made only on the basis of the entries made in the records of M/s. Monu Steel and held as under:
xxx xxx xxx
4. I find that the entire case of the Revenue is based upon the records recovered from M/s Monu Steels. Even in those records, the appellant's name has not been spelt correctly and it is based upon the statement of the representative of M/s Monu Steels that the Revenue entertained a view that “S. Iron” refers to the appellant's clearances. When the Director of the appellant contaced by Revenue, he very clearly, in his statement recorded by the officers, deposed that he does not even know M/s Monu Steels. Further, the Revenue has not made any enquiries from the buyer M/s Sapna Steels and has solely relied upon the entries made in the record of M/s Monu Steels.
5. The law i.e. as to whether the third party records can be adopted as an evidence for arriving at the findings of clandestine removal, in the absence of any corroborative evidence, is well established. Refere

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Applies to Liquidated Damages Under Heading 9997 at 18%; Time of Supply Set by Agreement Terms.

GST Applies to Liquidated Damages Under Heading 9997 at 18%; Time of Supply Set by Agreement Terms.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – liquidated damages – to be classified within the Heading 9997 –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

refund of accumulated ITC in case of export.

refund of accumulated ITC in case of export.
Query (Issue) Started By: – bk r Dated:- 22-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 23-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
The client is engaged in manufacturing of goods and clear the goods in domestic market and as well as export . the party get the advance authorisation licence and get the goods imported without BCD,SAD, CVD, Cess etc before the GST regime. The Export was made in the month of July 2017 under advance authorisation sc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Regarding ITC on stock held

Regarding ITC on stock held
Query (Issue) Started By: – m Bhagat Dated:- 22-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 24-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
R/S
One dealer taken Reg. on Composition from 18/08/2017 and he withdraw ,composition from 01.04.2018 onwords. can he get inputs held in stock before 01.04.2018. if yes than which return fillied either ITC1/2/3 and what is last date for it.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Frequently Asked Questions on Composition Levy
Q 6. A person availing composition scheme during a financial year crosses the turnover of ₹ 75 lakhs/50 lakhs during the course of the year i.e. say he crosses the turnover of ₹ 75 lakhs/50 lakhs in December? Will he be allowed to pay tax und

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ADVANCE RULING AUTHORITIES

ADVANCE RULING AUTHORITIES
By: – DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 22-5-2018

Chapter XVII of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('Act' for short) deals with the provisions relating to advance ruling.
Section 96 of the Act prescribes the Authority for advance rulings. This section provides that subject to the provisions of the Chapter XVII, for the purposes of this Act, the Authority for advance ruling constituted under the provisions of a State Goods and Services Tax Act or Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act shall be deemed to be the Authority for advance ruling in respect of that State or Union territory.
Rule 103 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 provides that the Government shall appoint officers not below the rank of Joint Commissioner as member of the Authority for Advance Ruling.
Section 96 of the State GST Acts provides for the constitution of Authority for Advance Ruling. For example section 96 of Tam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vernment
Name and designation of Member of Central Government
Office address of the Authority
Telephone No./ email id of the
office of the Authority
Andhra Pradesh
Sri J.V.M. Sarma, Joint Commissioner
Sri Amnaresh Kumar, Joint Commissioner
O/o the Chief Commissioner of State Tax, 5-59, R.K. Spring Valley Apartments, Block-B, Edupugallu (V), Kankipadu (M), Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh- 521 144
0866-2821175,
arcapgst2017@gmail.com
Arunachal Pradesh
Shri Airudh S. Singh,Commissioner
Shri Suven Das Gupta, Joint Commissioner
Office of the Commissioner, Kar Bhavan, Sector-C Itanagar, District Papum – Pare, Arunachal Pradesh
1. 0360-2211771, Fax no.2291993, 9712574717. tax-com-arn@nic.in; anirudhssingh@gmail.com 2. 0360-2350641; 9163083333 cgstitanagar@gmail.com, suvendasgupta@gmail.com
Assam
Shri Ramen Kumar Barman, Joint Commissioner
Shri J.K. Simte, Additional Commissioner
Office of the Commissioner of Taxes, Kar-Bhawan, G.S. Road, Dispur, Guwahati-78100

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goa@nic.in
Gujarat
Shri R.B.Mankodi, Joint Commissioner (Legal)
Shri Gyan Chand Jain, Joint Commissioner
Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ashram Road, Ahemdabad 380009 (Gujarat)
9825209689, rajanmankodi@ yahoo.co.in, 8424910678-kabra_rameshl@ yahoo.co.in
Haryana
Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, Addl. Excise & Taxation
Mrs.Sangeeta Karmakar, Joint Commissioner,
Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Haryana, Vanijiya Bhawan, Sector- 5, Panchkula
0172-2590931; 0172-2561335 vjsing2k@haryanatax.gov.in commr
cexpchkl@nic.in
Himachal Pradesh
Shri D.T. Negi, Joint Excise & Taxation
Shri Ravindra Kumar, Joint Commissioner
01772620426, 01722704039 jetc.tax@mailptax.gov.in; ravindra.kumar76@nic.in
Jammu & Kashmir
Mr. P. K. Bhat, (KAS), Additional Commissioner, Tax Planning ,
Shri Aman Garg, Joint Commissioner
Jammu: Excise and Taxation Complex, Rail Head, Jammu. Kashmir: Excise and Taxation Complex, Ram Bagh, Srinagar
0191-2477303; aarjkgst@gmail.com 0194-2310875/ 2310135; aarjkgst@gmail.com
Jharkhand
Sh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Advance Ruling Authority (GST)8th floor, New Building, GST Bhavan, Mazgoan
Mumbai-10
022-23760746, advancerulinggst@mahavat.gov.in
Mizoram
Shri H.K. Lalhawngliana, Joint Commissioner
Commissioner of State Tax, New Secretariat Complex, Aizal,
Mizoram – 796001
0389-2336273 / 9436155443; mahawnga@gmail.com
Odisha
Shri Ananda Satapathy, Additional Commissioner
Shri Nilanjan Pan, Joint Commissioner
O/o the Chief Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Central Revenue Building, GST Bhawan, Rajaswa Vishar, Near Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha -751007
943711721 ; 9830288794, asatpathy1960@gmail.com, & nilanjan_pan@yahoo.com
Rajasthan
Shri Sudhir Sharma, Joint
Commissioner
Shri Nitin Wapa, Joint Commissioner
Shri Sudhir Sharma, Joint Commissioner, Room No.313, II Floor, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Ciorcle, Jaipur; Shri Nitin Wapa, Joint Commissioner, Room No.229, NCR Building, State Circle, C-Scheme-
Jaipur.
Shri Sudhir Sharma 09414718908; 0141-2388835; ac-jaipur-spl7@rajasthan-gov.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-Bhokta Bhawan, Pandit Nehru Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, Tripura (West), Pin-799006
AAR State0381-2325534,
0381-2325554 (FAX)aartripura@gmail.comAAR Central9874418877l.beimopha@gov.in
Uttar Pradesh
Shri Sanjay Kumar Patahak, Joint Commissioner (Law) Commercial Tax, U.P. Lucknow
Shri Dinesh Kumar, Joint Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Lucknow
Zone.
Commissioner Commercial Tax, U.P., 4, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti
Nagar, Lucknow.
7235001019 sanjay.111972@gov.in
9836952854
dineshcustom11@yahoo.com
Uttarakhand
Shri Vipin Chandra,, Addl.Commissioner,
Shri Amit Gupta, Joint Commissioner
1.State Tax Headquarter, Pulia No- 06, Ring Road, Nathanpur, Dehradun-248010. 2.Office of Commissioner, GST, E-Block, Nehru Colony, Dehradun-
248010
9837065275,fax-0135-2669935 8469378472.
Fax-0135-2668732 1. vipin1965dc@gmail.com 2.guptaamit.irs@gmail.com
West Bengal
Shri Parthasarathi Dey, Senior Joint Commissioner
Sri Vishwanath, Joint Commissioner
14, Beliaghata Road, Kolkata-
7000

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Dura Line India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Customs Goa

Dura Line India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Customs Goa
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 767 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 22-5-2018
Appeal No. E/85637/18 – A/86806/2018
Central Excise
Mr. Sanjiv Srivastava, Member (Technical)
Ms. Anjali Hirawat, Advocate for appellant
Shri A.B. Kulgod, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: Sanjiv Srivastava
The issue in the appeal is in respect of admissibility of CENVAT credit availed in respect of services provided by the over-seas commission agent including the services of sales promotion by the appellant.
2. The matter was represented by Ms Anajali Hirawat, Advocate on behalf of the appellant and Shri A.B. Kulgod, Authorised Representative on behalf of Revenue.
3. Heard both sides and perused the records.
4. Relying on following decisions, learned Counsel argued that in respect of the same services provided by the overseas commission agents, CENVAT Credit have continuously been allowed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(b) Essar Steel India Ltd. v. CCE & ST – 2016 (335) ELT 660 (Tri. – Ahmd)
(c) CCE ST v. Shivalik Rasayan Ltd. – 2016 -TIOL-3412- CESTAT-Del
(d) Beloorbayir Biotech Ltd. v. CCE – 2018 (5) TMI 24 – CESTAT Bangalore
(e) CCE v Shree Rathi Steel (Dakshin) Ltd – 2018 (5) TMI CESTAT New Delhi.
4.2 Lastly, on limitation, she submitted that since there was contradicting views on the issue, larger period of limitation should not be invoked in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court as follows:-
(a) Blue Star Ltd. v. Union of India – 2015 (322) ELT 820 (SC)
(b) Continental Foundation Jt. Venture v. CCE – 2007 (216) ELT 177 (SC).
5. On the contrary learned A.R. reiterated the finding of the Commissioner.
6. I have considered the matter along with the sample agreement with the commission agents. From the agreement produced by the appellant which has been made between M/s. MAZER-the foreign commission agents and the appellant clearly placed the responsibility to undertake activ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

otherwise agreed by both the parties.
(e) MASER will be responsible for (i) developing marketing plans to generate salesof products; (ii) identifying the key decision makers and contacts for the purchase of Products; (iii) aggressively promoting the sale of products and other business objectives of DURALINE; (iv) providing guidance to DURALINE concerning the customs and practices of public agencies and private business and liaison between DURALINE and such agencies and businesses; (v) occasionally providing translation, interpretation, administrative support and other similar services as requested, (vi) Jointly preparing tenders and compliance statements and other submission and compliances. As an independent contractor, MASER shall be responsible for the manner in which and the time during which the above-described services are performed; however, in so doing MASER agrees to use its best efforts to promote the sale of the said products.
(f) MASER represents and warrants to DURALI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er form of communication received from any Governmental agency in regard to the activities contemplated herein under. MASER shall b liable for any representations that DURALINE has not specifically authorized in writing.
(i) MASER shall perform its business activities in compliance with all the State laws, rules and regulations concerning marketing and sale of DURALINE products while performing its duties pursuant to this agreement and shall not violate such laws, rules or regulations.
“6. Sales Target:
a. MASER shall endeavor to secure maximum sale for DURALINE in the said TERRITORY.
b. MASER will submit sector-wise regular market potential of the said TERRITORY on a quarterly basis as per the attached BBC format.
7. Payment:
On specific orders/requirement of MASER, DURALINE shall supply its products agreed by both parties. The payment for each shall be made by MASER as per the terms and conditions laid down in the relative Purchase Order for the procurement of the products.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ote or sell any other similar product of any other company, which is directly competitive in nature to DURALINE, subject to the provisions in clause 4 c.
11. Confidentiality:
Except as expressly agreed to in writing by DURALINE, MASER shall not at any time or in any manner, directly or indirectly, use of disclose to any party and trade secrets of DURALINE. During the term hereof and, for a period of 1 year thereafter MASER will treat as proprietary the information belonging to DURALINE disclosed to MASER under this Agreement. MASER agrees that within 72 hours following effective date of termination or non-renewal hereof MASER will return to DURALINE all information and materials in its possession concerning the trade secrets, customer information and lists, proprietary information and research of DURALINE.
12. Termination: Non-Renewal:
a) All obligations arising out of the commitments made during the tenure of the Agreement shall be fulfilled by both parties even after the termina

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

terminate this Agreement on sixty (60) days prior written notice to MASER.
I. If either party in its own judgment feels that the agreement with other party is either detrimental to or not beneficial to its business in Thailand or any other market.
II. If MASER fails to meet any of its annual revenue goals for the year; or
III. If MASER liquidates or discontinues its business or terminates the majority of its sales force in the Territory; or
IV. If DURALINE discontinues manufacturing/marketing of the Said Products. Under this provision MASER will be given as option of a last time buy.
V. If MASER starts its own manufacturing of the said products.
13. Jurisdiction:
In the event of any dispute or difference or any other incidental matter relating to this agreement the courts of competent jurisdiction in India only to the exclusion of all other courts shall have jurisdiction and would be competent to adjudicate all the matters arising out of, related to and/or connected with this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. Versus GST, CCE, Coimbatore

M/s. Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. Versus GST, CCE, Coimbatore
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 602 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 22-5-2018
E/42586 – 42587/2017 – 41557-41558/2018
Central Excise
P. DINESHA, Member (Judicial)
Shri A. R. Sreenivasan, Manager, for the appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyam, AC (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
The appellant is a holder of Central Excise Registration No. AAACL5244NXM003 for the manufacture of CNC Lathes, Machining Centre and their parts classified under Chapter Sub-heading Nos. 8457, 8458 and 8466 respectively of the schedule to the CETA, 1985. It is the case of the Revenue that during the course of audit of books of accounts of the appellants, the officers of the audit wherein noticed that in addition to its main activity of manufacture of dutiable goods, the appellant was also doing trading activity from its factory premises and it was found to be selling raw materials like furan resins, furring sheets, sepa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ii) An amount of Rs. 7,49,449/- being the amount equivalent to the specified percentage of the value of clearances of exempted goods during the period from 2011-12 to 2014-15 should not be demanded from them under Rule 14 of CCR read with Section 11A(4)/11A(5) of CEA.
iii) the interest as applicable for the delayed payment of the amount mentioned in Sl.No. (ii) above should not be demanded from them under the provisions of Rule 14 of the CCR read with Rule 6 (3A) (e) of CCR and Section 11AA of CEA.
iv) A penalty under Rule 15(2) of CCR read with Section 11AC of CEA, should not be imposed on them for the said contravention.
2. The appellant filed its detailed reply vide its letter dated 16.04.2016 and it was in the case of the assessee, in nutshell, that they did not have a Trader licence or registration to involve in trading of goods and that they were involved in manufacturing activity alone. Further, they were clearing some inputs as spare parts to their customers and some of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uirements of law. It is no doubt true that the appellant did some trading activity but the same was to an extent of a mere 1%, that too which is supplied to its job workers for processing the products. During the course of hearing, he also relied on the orders of this Court in the case of Sister concern of the appellant, in the case of Lakshmi Ring Travellers (Cbe) Ltd. in Final Order No. 42443/2017 dated 27.10.2017, wherein on identical facts this Court has held as under:-
“5. It is brought out from the facts that the appellant has reversed the credit when the inputs are removed as such from the factory. The department has taken the view that such removal amounts to trading and has directed the appellant to expunge the credit to the extent of the value of inputs removed by them. In fact, such removal of inputs from one factory to the sister unit under the excise law by reversing the credit cannot be considered as a trading activity requiring the appellant to reverse the CENVAT credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =