Extend time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1

Extend time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1
01-D/2018 Dated:- 11-4-2018 Karnataka SGST
GST – States
Karnataka SGST
Karnataka SGST
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
Office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Karnataka), Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar,
Bengaluru,
NOTIFICATION (01-D/2018)
No. KGST.CR.01/17-18, Dated: 11.04.2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 37 read with section 168 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Karnataka Act 27 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the Act), on the recommendations of the Council, the time limit for furnishing the details of outward supplies in FORM

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extend the time limit for furnishing the return by an Input Service Distributor in FORM GSTR-6

Extend the time limit for furnishing the return by an Input Service Distributor in FORM GSTR-6
01-E/2018 Dated:- 11-4-2018 Karnataka SGST
GST – States
Karnataka SGST
Karnataka SGST
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
Office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Karnataka), Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar,
Bengaluru,
NOTIFICATION (1-E/2018)
No. KGST.CR.01/17-18, Dated: 11.04.2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of section 39 read with section 168 o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notifies the registered persons having aggregate turnover of up to 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year furnish the details of outward supply of goods or services or both in FORM GSTR-1

Notifies the registered persons having aggregate turnover of up to 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year furnish the details of outward supply of goods or services or both in FORM GSTR-1
38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(56) Dated:- 11-4-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Goa SGST
Goa SGST
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Finance
Revenue & Control Division

Notification
38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(56)
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Goa Act 4 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the Act), the Government of Goa, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies the registered persons having aggregate turnover of up to 1.5 cro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Seventeenth Amendment) Rules, 2017.

The Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Seventeenth Amendment) Rules, 2017.
G.O.Ms.No.161 Dated:- 11-4-2018 Andhra Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Andhra Pradesh SGST
Andhra Pradesh SGST
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
(COMMERCIAL TAXES-II)
[G.O.Ms.No.161, Revenue (Commercial Taxes-II), 11th April, 2018.]
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 164 of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No.16 of 2017), the Government hereby make the following Rules further to Amend the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, issued in G.O.Ms.No.227, Revenue (CT-II) Dept., Dated : 22-06-2017 as subsequently amended namely,-
These Rules may be called the Andhra Pradesh Goo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of goods where the goods are sent by one job worker to another or are returned to the principal:
Provided further that the challan endorsed by the job worker may be further endorsed by another job worker, indicating therein the quantity and description of goods where the goods are sent by one job worker to another or are returned to the principal.”;
(ii) in Rule 127, in clause (iv), after the words “to furnish a performance report to the Council by the tenth”, the word “day” shall be inserted;
(iii) in Rule 129, in sub-rule (6), for the words “as allowed by the Standing Committee”, the words “as may be allowed by the Authority” shall be substituted;
(iv) in Rule 133, after sub-rule (3), the following sub-rule may be added, namely:-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Authority differ in their opinion on any point, the point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the members present and voting, and in the event of equality of votes, the Chairman shall have the second or casting vote.”;
(vi) after Rule 137, in the Explanation, in clause (c), after sub-clause (b), the following sub-clause shall be added, namely : –
“(c) any other person alleging, under sub-rule (1) of Rule 128, that a registered person has not passed on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of input tax credit to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices.”;
(vii) after Rule 138D, the following Explanation shall be deemed to have been added, wi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund against export of goods on payment of IGST

Refund against export of goods on payment of IGST
Query (Issue) Started By: – MohanLal tiwari Dated:- 10-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 12-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
Please advise whether the refund of IGST paid against export of goods can be approved & sanctioned by jurisdictional Dy Commissioner.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, No, the Shipping Bill it self is an application of refund, therefore, the Customs Authority of the port of export can approve & sanctioned. The details filed in Table 6 (exports) will be transmitted to the respective port and the Customs Authority at the port will verify in case of any errors or else the refund will be sanctioned without any human interface.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Affirms GST on One-Time Premium for 60-Year Leases, Declaring It Constitutionally Valid and Lawful.

High Court Affirms GST on One-Time Premium for 60-Year Leases, Declaring It Constitutionally Valid and Lawful.
Case-Laws
GST
Constitutional validity of GST on long term lease premium (60 year

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E way Bill Issuance

E way Bill Issuance
Query (Issue) Started By: – Rakesh Srivastava Dated:- 10-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
I need to issue e way bill against an import shipment received through courier which got stuck at port due to some reasons, the Bill of Entry date is 03-10-2017 where as the shipment got cleared dt. 09-04-2018. While generating eway bill plz tell me which date to metion on the e way as the BOE Date is too old & the system is tak

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Roll-out of e-Way Bill system for Intra-State movement of goods in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh from 15th April, 2018

Roll-out of e-Way Bill system for Intra-State movement of goods in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh from 15th April, 2018
GST
Dated:- 10-4-2018

As per the decision of GST Council, e-Way Bill system for all inter-State movement of goods has been rolled-out from 01stApril, 2018. E-way Bill system for Intra-State movement of goods in the State of Karnataka is also operational from the said date. E-Way Bills are getting generated successfully a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST COMPLIANCES REQUIRING ATTENTION NOW

GST COMPLIANCES REQUIRING ATTENTION NOW
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 10-4-2018

31st March, 2018 marks the end of Financial Year 2017-18, first fiscal year of GST and last year of service tax. This is also the transitional year for migration and as such crucial for taxpayers to migrate balances and tax credits fully but accurately. This calls for due diligence and careful closing of financial books of accounts.
Here are few action points in the new financial year for immediate compliance under GST in April, 2018 for the new Financial Year 2018-19.
Annual Reconciliation of Books and GST returns
For this, assessees are required to reconcile the sale ledger/ GST liability / cash ledger/ credit ledger as per books of accounts and as per GST returns. Further, in case there is any difference, then company is required to take the effect of the same in March, 2018, GSTR 3B and GSTR 1.
New Invoice Series
A registered person may develop the n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ction 16(2) of CGST Act, 2017. If the payment is not made, the credit taken on that invoice must be reversed. And whenever such payment is made credit may be taken then. By this logic, invoices issued before 1st October, 2017 must have been paid by 31st March, 2018. If not, you'll have to reverse the input credit claimed. This requires proper ageing analysis of outstanding debtors and creditors.
* Filing of TRAN 2 for the period July, 2017 to December, 2017 has been extended to be filed by 30th June, 2018. Earlier, it was to be filed by 31st March, 2018.
* In the past, there have been many instances and complaints that assessees were not able to file TRAN-1 which was required to carry forward balances of input credit pertaining to old tax regime (excise, service tax, VAT) due to technical snags. There were many writ petitions filed across the country and various high courts directed the Government to allow further opportunity to the tax payers who could not file TRAN-1. [M/s. Ariha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not be allowed to amend the amount of credit in TRAN-1 during this process vis-à-vis the amount of credit which was recorded by the taxpayer in the TRAN-1, which could not be filed.
* The taxpayers are allowed to complete the process of filing of TRAN 1 stuck due to IT glitches, as discussed above, by 30th April 2018 and the process of completing filing of GSTR 3B which could not be filed for such TRAN 1 shall be completed by 31st May 2018.
It may be noted that this extention is not for all taxpayers who did not file TRAN-1 but only for those who attempted to file but were not successful. This will be verified from GSTN audit trail.
Application / Renewal of LUT
Exporters making zero rates supplies have to furnish an LUT to the jurisdictional commissioner. An LUT is valid for one financial year. Therefore, LUT tendered in FY 2017-18 was valid until 31st March, 2018 only. Exporters who wish to continue to export under LUT need to submit a fresh LUT for FY 2018-19 to have thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e been rejected ab initio.
Thus, LUT will be deemed to be accepted as soon as ARN is generated and no documents need to be submitted in physical form to the tax office.
Use of E-way Bills
1st April has become a land mark date in the GST journey, as it marks the advent of e-way bills in the country under the GST regime, a tool to check tax evasion and bring in operational efficiency so far as taxpayers and logistics management is concerned.
Date of Introduction of e-way bills is 1st April, 2018 for inter-state movement of goods.
Every registered person who causes movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees (including tax)-
* in relation to supply, or
* for the reasons other than supply, or
* due to inward supply from unregistered person,
shall require to furnish an e-way bill. No e-way bill is required if the value of the goods in an individual consignment is less than ₹ 50,000/- even if the total value of all such consignments in a single c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rticulars
To whom applicable
Period
Due date
GSTR-1
(Monthly)
Taxpayers with annual aggregate turnover more than ₹ 1.5 crore
Feb 2018
10.04.2018
GSTR 4
Composition dealers
Jan – Mar 2018
18.04.2018
GST Payment
All taxpayers
March 2018
20.04.2018
FORM 3B
All taxpayers
March 2018
20.04.2018
GSTR 5
Non-resident taxable persons
March 2018
20.04.2018
GSTR 5A
Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval (OIDAR)
March 2018
20.04.2018
GSTR 1
Taxpayers with annual aggregate turnover upto ₹ 1.5 crore
Jan – Mar 2018
30.04.2018
TRAN 1
Taxpayers who failed to file TRAN 1 due to IT glitches
30.04.2018
Now that most of the returns will be filed in next three months, it appears that another major GST reforms / amendments may take place w.e.f. July, 2018, when it completes first year of levy of GST in the country. GST Council has had 26 meetings so far and yet lot of issues have to be ironed out, the most crucial being technical interface.
Account

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal

Setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal
Trade Notice No. 07/2018 Dated:- 10-4-2018 Nagaland SGST
GST – States
Government of India,
Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue
Office of the Chief Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax & Customs
Crescens Building, M.G. Road Shillong-793001, Tel.Nos. 91-0364-2500131/2502052.
Fax Nos. 91-0364-2224747/2502047, Email: cchillo@excise.nic.in
Trade Notice No. 07/2018
Dated, Shillong the 10th April, 2018
Sub: Setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal-reg.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs [CBIC] has issued a Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST dated 3rd April, 2018 for the Trade and as well as all concerned regarding setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal.
It has be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n.
3. Scope
Problems which are proposed to be addressed through this mechanism would essentially be those which relate to Common Portal (GST Portal) and affect a large section of taxpayers. Where the problem relates to individual taxpayer, due to localised issues such as non-availability of internet connectivity or failure of power supply, this mechanism shall not be available.
4. IT-Grievance Redressal Committee
Any issue which needs to be addressed through this mechanism shall be identified by GSTN and the method of resolution approved by the GST Implementation Committee (GIC) which shall act as the IT Grievance Redressal Committee. In GIC meetings convened to address IT issues or IT glitches, the CEO, GSTN and the DG (Systems), CBIC shall participate in these meetings as special invitees.
5. Nodal officers and identification of issues
5.1 GSTN, Central and State government would appoint nodal officers in requisite number to address the problem a taxpayer faces due to glitches,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iat shall obtain inputs of the Law Committee, where necessary, on the proposal of the GSTN and call meeting of GIC to examine the proposal and take decision thereon.
6.2 The committee shall examine and approve the suggested solution with such modifications as may be necessary.
6.3 IT-Grievance Redressal Committee may give directions as necessary to GSTN and field formations of the tax administrations for implementation of the decision.
7. Legal issues
7.1 Where an IT related glitch has been identified as the reason for failure of a taxpayer in filing of a return or form prescribed in the law, the consequential fine and penalty would also be required to be waived. GST Council has delegated the power to the IT Grievance Redressal Committee to recommend waiver of fine or penalty, in case of an emergency, to the Government in tern-ns of section 128 of the CGST Act, 2017 under such mitigating circumstances as are identified by the committee. All such notifications waiving fine or penalt

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ified taxpayers shall be allowed to complete the process of filing TRAN-1.
8.2 The taxpayer shall not be allowed to amend the amount of credit in TRAN-1 during this process vis-a-vis the amount of credit which was recorded by the taxpayer in the TRAN-1, could not be filed. If needed, GSTN may request field formations of Centre and State to collect additional document/ data etc. or verify the same to identify taxpayers who should be allowed this procedure.
8.3 GSTN shall communicate directly with the taxpayers in this regard and submit a final report to GIC about the number of TRAN-1s filed and submitted through this process.
8.4 The taxpayers shall complete the process of filing of TRAN 1 stuck due to IT glitches, as discussed above, by 30th April 2018 and the process of completing filing of GSTR 3B which could not be filed for such TRAN 1 shall be completed by 31st May 2018.
9. The decisions of the Hon'ble High Courts of Allahabad, Bombay etc., where no case specific decision

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Action Construction Equipment Limited

In Re : Action Construction Equipment Limited
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1420 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – HARYANA – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 103 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – HARYANA – AAR
Dated:- 10-4-2018
ADVANCE RULING NO. /HAR/HAAR/R/2017/18/5
GST
Sangeeta Karmakar (Member)  and Vijay Kumar Singh (Member)
Sh Rajan Luthra, CFO and Sh Deepak Bhardwaj Sr. Manager (Indirect Taxation) for the Appellant.
RULING
The applicant has submitted that they are manufacturer of Cranes, Backhoe Loaders, forklifts. Motor Graders, Compactors, Tower Cranes, Tractors, Harvesters, etc. The applicant raised the question of correct classification of one of their product namely Truck Mounted Cranes (TMC). The applicant submitted that they buy readymade trucks, say, Ashok Leyland, TATA, etc., and on these trucks they manufacture cranes which are mounted/fixed on these trucks. These cranes have lifting capacity of 20 tonnes, 25 tonnes, 40 tonnes, etc. These cranes are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n lorries, cranes, lorries, fire fighting vehicles, concrete-mixtures lorries, spraying lorries, mobile workshop, mobile radiological units).
As per the report of the concerned assessing authority, the dealer either purchases trucks or are provided by the customers themselves, Cranes are manufactured by the dealer and are mounted/fixed on the trucks. The final product i.e. truck mounted cranes are used for unloading and loading of heavy material. It is a special purpose vehicle (crane lorry) which is engaged in lifting/loading/unloading of heavy loads. However, the Product “Truck Mounted Crane” has got a specific mention in Entry no. 8426 as “Works Trucks fitted with a crane”.
Records, of personal hearing – 2nd Proviso to Section 98(2) of CGST/HGST Act, 2017
3. Personal hearing in the instant case was conducted on 09.04.18, which was attended by Sh Rajan Luthra , CFO and Sh Deepak Bhardwaj, Sr Manager( Indirect Taxation). He reiterated the submissions made in their application for a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r
u
7.50%

84262000

Tower cranes
u
7.50%

84263000

Portal or pedestal jib cranes
u
7.50%

 

Other machinery, self-propelled :
 
 
 
84264100

On tyres
u
7.50%

84264900

Other
u
7.50%

 

Other machinery :
 
 
 
84269100

Designed for mounting on road vehicles
u
7.50%

842699

Other :
 
 
 
84269910

Ropeway and telphers
u
7.50%

84269990

Other
u
7.50%

8705 SPECIAL PURPOSE MOTOR VEHICLES, OTHER THAN THOSE PRINCIPALLY DESIGNED FOR THE TRANSPORT OF PERSONS OR GOODS (FOR EXAMPLE, BREAKDOWN LORRIES, CRANE LORRIES, FIRE FIGHTING VEHICLES, CONCRETE-MIXERS LORRIES, SPRAYING LORRIES, MOBILE WORKSHOPS, MOBILE RADIOLOGICAL UNITS)
87051000

Crane lorries
u
10%

87052000

Mobile drilling derricks
u
10%

87053000

Fire fighting vehicles
u
10%

87054000

Concrete-mixer lorries
u
10%

87059000

Other
u
10%

5. From

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

426, it is necessary that the truck which is being used to mount the crane must be “works truck” Whereas, works trucks are specifically covered under heading 8709
8709 – WORKS TRUCKS, SELF-PROPELLED, NOT FITTED WITH LIFTING OR HANDLING EQUIPMENT, OF THE TYPE USED IN FACTORIES, WAREHOUSES, DOCK AREAS OR AIRPORTS FOR SHORT DISTANCE TRANSPORT OF GOODS.
Thus, it is evident that when the works truck is not fitted with lifting of handling equipment such as crane, it merits classification under chapter heading 8709. However, when it is fitted with crane, it merits classification under heading 8426. Whereas, in their application, the applicant has submitted that they buy readymade trucks say Ashok Leyland, TATA, etc. Such Trucks and Lorries which are meant for transport of goods are covered under chapter heading 8704. Accordingly, classification of the impugned goods under heading 8426 is ruled out, as because the trucks being purchased/used by the applicant for manufacturing truck mounted c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the following mechanical features : propelling engine, gear-box and controls for gear-changing, and steering and braking facilities. Such assemblies fall to be classified in Heading 87.05 as special purpose motor vehicles, whether the lifting or handling machine is simply mounted on the vehicle or forms an integral mechanical unit with it, unless they are vehicles designed essentially for transport purposes falling in Heading 87.04.”
The Hon'ble Tribunal further observed that the above explanatory note providing exclusion from the Heading 84.26 supports the department's view that the impugned goods cannot be classified under Heading 8426 but under Heading 8705 as a special purpose motor vehicle; that the crane lorry and other such special purpose vehicles are included under Heading 8705 vide the explanatory note thereunder.
8. As regards the dependency on HSN explanatory notes, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of LML ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs 2010(258)E.LT.321(S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Torque Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Up And 2 Others

M/s Torque Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Up And 2 Others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 75 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 119 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 10-4-2018
Writ Tax No. 610 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Vipin Kumar Kushwaha, Nishant Mishra
For the Respondent : C.S.C.
ORDER
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the seizure order passed by the respondent no. 3 dated 30.03.2018 and the notice dated 30.03.2018 issued under Section 191(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017. The petitioner is having its registered office in Chandigarh and branch office at Gorakhpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner company is engaged in manufacturing of medicines and mineral water and its manufacturing unit is situated at Derabas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e stock transfer invoice dated 21.3.2018 and 24.3.2018 and the same were booked after paying the IGST from Derabassi unit situated in Punjab and the goods are brought at transporters office at Chandigarh and thereafter E-Way Bill, prescribed under the CGST Rules, had been downloaded in which the vehicle number as well as other details were duly mentioned for the transportation of the goods from the manufacturing unit up to Chandigarh Transport Nagar. At Chandigarh the goods are loaded in another vehicle being Truck No. HR 46 B-9022 for the transportation from Chandigarh to Gorakhpur.
The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner has also generated E-Way Bill prescribed under the UPGST Rules for all the three transactions, against the aforesaid three invoices, by mentioning all the relevant details with relation to the transactions in question.
The contention of the petitioner is that since the movement of goods from Baddi to Gorakhpur and also from Derabassi to Gorakhpur, w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ound for seizing the goods and vehicle is taken by the respondent no. 3 that the E-Way Bills -01 relating to the petitioner, the vehicle numbers are hand written whereas E-Way Bill -01 was not used in respect of other goods which is allegedly not related to the petitioner.
A show cause notice was also issued under Section 129(3) of the Act by which the respondent no. 3 has directed the petitioner and owner of the other goods to appear and file their explanation by 04.04.2018 and has indicated in the said notice that as to why there is a difference of IGST in two different invoices.
The petitioner appeared and has filed reply, explaining the reasons for both ground namely as to why the vehicle numbers are hand written as well as with regard to objection of other item it is clearly stated that the petitioner is not at all related with the goods nor the same belongs to the petitioner.
The respondent no. 3 has not accepted the reply as such has insisted for bank guarantee for release of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

garh and therefore the goods were firstly unloaded from the vehicles at Chandighar and were loaded in another vehicle at Chandigarh for their onwards journey.
In the said background the E-Way Bill which has been issued initiatlly when the goods/vehicle started its journey from Himanchal Pradesh/Punjab by mentioning the vehicle number in the E-Way Bill but after reloading in another vehicle at Chandigarh since the official portal was not permitting to mention the details of two transport vehicles, the registration number of the second transport vehicle has been mentioned by hand.
We find no irregularity at the hands of the petitioner or the transport company and in such peculiar circumstances the petitioner has no option but to mention the details of the subsequent vehicle by hand. We further noticed that the tax has been charged while issuing the stock transfer invoices at the prescribed rate, however, if there is any short fall of the tax, it would be open to the concern GST Authori

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

refund of unutilized ITC under GST after export under LUT

refund of unutilized ITC under GST after export under LUT
Query (Issue) Started By: – BalKrishan Rakheja Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 4-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 11 Replies
GST
After exporting the goods under LUT and claimed refund for untilized ITC. As per formula refund amount comes to Rs. 50 Lacs but credit ledger balance at the end of the tax period (month in which the export took place) is ₹ 10 lacs only. Which amount I am eligible for refund of ITC, however as on today the credit ledger balance is ₹ 80 Lacs
Reply By YAGAY AND SUN:
The Reply:
As per Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person may claim refund of unutilised input tax credit at the end of any tax period. A tax period is the period for which return is required to be furnished.
Refund of unutilised input tax credit is allowed only in following two cases:
a) Zero rated supplies made without payment of tax
b) Inverted duty structure
Reply By Harshal Fifadr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cannot spread across different financial years.
However, to be honest, I am not be to understand para 11.2. I request our experts to please clarify the issue that how to club and how to file the refund for quarters, as online it is for the month only.
Reply By BalKrishan Rakheja:
The Reply:
Thanks Harshal ji. I also agree with your views.
Reply By BalKrishan Rakheja:
The Reply:
Thanks Alkesh Jani ji for your valuable information. But my querry is still unanswered regarding for which amount I am eligible for refund. Please give your valuable advise.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, you are requested to furnish the figures as per formula, than only proper reply can be given by our experts. However, if we think logically, the refund may be equal to or less than the input tax of value of exported goods. For example, if goods exported valued for ₹ 100/- than refund shall be ₹ 18/- or less.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Querist,
Rs.10 lacs is correct a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d not in next financial year(s) and onward. You should claim refund against export within one year. Cycle of one year has to be monitored to claim the whole due amount.
Reply By BalKrishan Rakheja:
The Reply:
Thanks Sethi ji. I am fully agreed with your views.
Reply By rohit patodi:
The Reply:
what would be my adjusted turnover and net ITC in case of refund of input tax credit availed on inputs in case of exporters. For eg., an exporter has exported goods on LUT worth rs 2500000 in July period and in the same period he has done taxable sale within state worth rs 500000 and tax is ₹ 12500 cgst and sgst. So Total sale would be 3000000 rs. He has total input on purchases amounting to ₹ 150000 cgst and sgst. Thus input left at the end of the tax period at the end of the month is 150000-12500 i.e 137500.
In this case, how can I calculate adjusted turnover and net ITC?
Reply By SUDHANSHU JOSHI:
The Reply:
6 Dated: 12-4-2018
By:- Alkesh Jani
Sir, you are requested to f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Trading with assembling

Trading with assembling
Query (Issue) Started By: – Mira choksi Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 1-3-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
i am trading in Led lights
and also assemble led lights from raw materials purchased (Led,battery,housing etc)
assembling on small scale.
while registering for GST nature of business activity Mfg or trading …….i select what..?
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir/Madam, In my point of the assembling amounts to manufacturi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST for individual house construction

GST for individual house construction
Query (Issue) Started By: – Preeti Preeti Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 13-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
I have to construct residential house in my plot, I am hiering an construction company( architectural plan +materials+construction)
Can anybody clarify about for what and all should I pay the GST for, and should I pay the double times GST to the construction company for materials as they would have already paid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification about Export Refund under GST

Clarification about Export Refund under GST
Query (Issue) Started By: – venkatachalapathy parameshwaran Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
Hi Madam,
This is venkatachalapathy.p from Tirupur in Tamilnadu. I request you to please clarify about the export refund for the following situation:
The Central Government has introduced ROSL (Rebate on State Levy). The condition of the Scheme is When the dealer avail the ROSL they cannot a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund claim against export of goods on payment of IGST

Refund claim against export of goods on payment of IGST
Query (Issue) Started By: – MohanLal tiwari Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 4-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear experts,
We are exporting goods on payment of IGST but since July'17, we have not received any single refund, kindly advise if –
1. In ICEGATE portal, under the head IGST inquiry, all our export bills and shipping details are available.
2. But under Validation by ICEGATE, it is showi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Government and GST Software: A Unified Approach to Facilitate E-way Bill

The Government and GST Software: A Unified Approach to Facilitate E-way Bill
By: – Priya Sharma
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 9-4-2018

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) is the backbone of the new taxation regime. It has been five years since the GSTN got launched. However, the taxpayers have been complaining about the taxation network as the compliance with GST has been extremely painful for the taxpayers and especially the MSMEs. And the recent technological glitch that resulted in the failed implementation of GST e-way bill worsen the situation. Hence, the government has taken some serious measures in order to help the taxpayers, simplify taxation processes, most importantly the e-way billing system.
The ch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ime. Making the process easier demands input of every entity associated with it, whether directly or indirectly. The entire network of accountants, GST Suvidha providers, and GST software providers are required to sync to develop a time-effective return filing process. Just because the network of all these entities is extremely vast, the shortage of time is hindering the revamp to be smooth and result-oriented.
The safety of data
Amidst all the hassle of return filing and ITC claims under GST, the taxpayer couldn't pay attention to the safety processes of the data. To ensure that the data of the taxpayers is free from any kind of breach, the government has kept the entire data-retrieving process encrypted. As per the government, only two

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ernment assures that nothing is left out. This time the NIC (National Informatics Center) played a vital role in the revamp. The bill is not only developed for inter-state movements, but also tested multiple times to assure success. With the re-implementation of the bill, the government assures 75 lakh bills in a day irrespective of the earlier limit of 26 lakh bills.
What is an e-way bill?
However, the re-roll-out of e-way will resume the billing process and thus the government would also easily analyze the tax evasion measure, if any, in the transportation of the goods and services. An e-way bill is an electronic document that is provided to every vehicle carrying either goods or services or both from one place to another. That bill, c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Axpress Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And 3 Others

M/s. Axpress Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And 3 Others
GST
2018 (12) TMI 68 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 794 (All.) , 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 794 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-4-2018
WRIT TAX No. – 602 of 2018
GST
Mr Krishna Murari And Mr Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Aloke Kumar
For The Respondent : A. S. G. I. , C. S. C.
ORDER
Heard Shri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anant Kumar Tiwari for respondent no. 1 and Shri C. B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4.
The goods were being booked and transported from Panvel Raigarh, Maharashtra to M/s. Bosch Ltd. Local Distribution Centre Khasra No. 1482 NH 56 B Jait

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification on levy of GST on the bills raised by the vendor organiser for Organising PRI Training

Clarification on levy of GST on the bills raised by the vendor organiser for Organising PRI Training
5621/CT/POL/3/2017-Policy Dated:- 9-4-2018 Orissa SGST
GST – States
Saswat Mishra (IAS)
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Odisha
Banijyakar Bhawan
Old Secretariat Compound
Cuttack – 753001
No. 5621/CT/POL/3/2017-Policy
To
The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Nuapada Circle, Nuapada
Sub: Clarification on levy of GST on the bills raised by the vendor organiser for Organising PRI Training
Sir,
In inviting a reference to the letter referred to above on the aforementioned subject, the issue raised is clarified below-
1. As understood from the information furnished, Sahavagi Vikas Abhiyan, Nuapada organised PRI trai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ental Authority or a Government Entity by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G is exempted from levy of GST.
4. In the case under consideration, the bills raised by the vendor for conducting the training program in the mutually agreed manner are essentially towards composite supply of goods and services used in the training. Here, the direct recipient of the service (training) is DRDA, Nuapada and indirect recipients are SIRD, Odisha and PR Department, Government of Odisha. The objective of the training being to train the elected representatives of the PRIS on different aspects of Panchayati Raj, the said training service can be held as an activity in relation to a function entrusted t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M/s. Inox India Pvt. Ltd.

In Re : M/s. Inox India Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (7) TMI 75 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 424 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 86 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – AAR
Dated:- 9-4-2018
ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/10 (IN APPLICATION NO. Advance Ruling/SGST&CGST/2017-18/AR/23)
GST
Mr. R. B. Mankodi, Member And Mr. G.C. Jain, Member
For The Applicant : Shri Hardik Modh, Advocate And Shri Ashish S. Agarwal, CA
RULING
The applicant M/s. Inox India Pvt. Ltd. has submitted that the range of products manufactured and supplied by the company inter alia includes Cryo Container, also known as Liquid Nitrogen Containers (subject product), which is essentially a container with double walls made of aluminum and the mechanism of this container is such that the space between two walls is vacuum and super insulated. The applicant submitted that vacuum and super insulation helps maintain temperature around minus 196 degree wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HSN 7613 0019 or HSN 9617 0012 in the GST regime ?”
4. The applicant referred to Chapter Heading 7613, Tariff Entry No. 7613 0019 and the explanatory note to heading 7613 under the HSN Explanatory Notes and submitted that in view of the scope of heading 7613 and the nature of subject product, it appears that the subject product is well covered by heading 7613.
5. The applicant also referred to Tariff Entry No. 9617 00 12 and relevant HSN Explanatory Notes and submitted that in view of the difference in the nature of product and the key features of the scope of Entry No. 9617 00 12, the subject product may not merit classification under HSN 9617 00 12.
6. The Central Goods & Services Tax and Customs Commissionerate, Vadodara – II, inter-alia informed that the description under Heading 7613 is 'Aluminum containers for compressed or liquefied gas; that though the product manufactured by the applicant is made up of Aluminum, it is also used for the purpose of storage / transport of seme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion (iii) and (iv) of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 provides as follows :-
“Explanation. – For the purposes of this notification, –
(i) ……
(ii) ……
(iii) “Tariff item”, “sub-heading” “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.”
9.2 Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of L.M.L. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs [Civil Appeal No. 3764 of 2003, decided on 21.09.2010 reported at 2010 (258) ELT 321 (S.C.)] has held as follows :-
“12. In Collector of Central Excise, Shillong v. Wood Crafts Products Ltd. reported in (1995) 3 SCC 4

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d or liquefied gas
 
7613 00
– Aluminium containers for compressed or liquefied gas :
 
 

Low pressure cylinders :
 
7613 00 11
-Plain
Kg.
 
7613 00 12
-Lacquered
Kg.
 
7613 00 13
-Printed
Kg.
 
7613 00 19
-Other
Kg.
 
 
High Pressure Cylinders :
 
 
7613 00 21
-Plain
Kg.
 
7613 00 22
-Lacquered
Kg.
 
7613 00 23
-Printed
Kg.
 
7613 00 29
-Other
Kg.
 
 
Other
 
 
7613 00 91
-Plain
Kg.
 
7613 00 92
-Lacquered
Kg.
 
7613 00 93
-Printed
Kg.
 
7613 00 99
-Other
Kg.
 
10.2 Chapter Heading 9617 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is as follows :-
HS Code
Description of goods
Unit.
(1)
(2)
(3)
9617
 Vacuum flasks and other vacuum vessels, complete with cases; parts thereof other than glass inners
 
9617 00
– Vacuum flasks and other vaccum vessels, complete with cases; parts there

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct product can be manufactured to suit the; either of transport, storage or portability purposes;
– Based on its design, the subject product finds its utility in following sectors (i) use for transportation of liquid nitrogen, industrial testing and shrink fitting, (ii) dairy organizations, animal husbandries, cattle breeding farms, infertility clinics for semen preservation for artificial insemination / livestock breeding; (iii) pharmaceutical companies for storage of biological samples for medical research / vaccine preservation;
11.2 On the brochure of the subject product, submitted by the applicant, it is inter-alia mentioned as follows :-
– Serves dairy organizations, animal husbandries, cattle breeding farms, infertility clinics for semen preservation for artificial insemination / livestock breeding
– Serves pharmaceutical companies for storage of biological samples for medical research / vaccine preservation
– Utilized for small quantity transportation of Liquid Nitroge

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

9617 covers 'Vacuum flasks and other vacuum vessels, complete with cases'. The Explanatory Notes of Harmonized System of Nomenclature for Chapter Heading 9617 are as follows –
“This heading covers :
(1) Vacuum flasks and other similar vacuum vessels, provided they are complete with the cases. This group includes vacuum jars, jugs, carafes, etc., designed to keep liquids, food or other products at fairly constant temperature, for reasonable periods of time.
These articles consist of a double-walled receptacle (the inner), generally of glass, with a vacuum created between the walls, and a protective outer casing of metal, plastics or other material, sometimes covered with paper, leather, leathercloth, etc. The space between the vacuum container and the outer casing may be packed with insulating material (glass fibre, cork or felt). In the case of vacuum flasks the lid can often be used as a cup.
14.2 As per the technical specifications of 'cryo containers' submitted by the applica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M/s. Alka Industries

In Re : M/s. Alka Industries
GST
2018 (7) TMI 74 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 411 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 85 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – AAR
Dated:- 9-4-2018
ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/9 (IN APPLICATION NO. Advance Ruling/SGST&CGST/2017-18/AR/18)
GST
Mr. R. B. Mankodi, Member And Mr. G. C. Jain, Member
For The Applicant : Shri Nirav Laljibhai Patel
RULING
The applicant M/s. Alka Industries manufactures CI Casting for which it purchases pig iron, scrap, molasses, coal, foundry minerals, sand etc. The applicant melts pig iron and scrap in the cupola furnace fired by coal and add foundry minerals in the same. The melted pig iron is poured into moulding boxes of sand and required shape of cast article is obtained. The applicant manufactures the goods according to the requirement of customers. The cast articles so manufactured are used in various industries. The applicant has submitted tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hing but a product of casting industry. The applicant manufactures brackets and clamps of cast iron, which are used by building construction industry for hanging wash basin, commodes, urinals etc. as support structure.
3. The applicant further submitted that the aforesaid products are used by building construction industry for hanging ceramic articles, but the products themselves are separately classified products under Chapter 7325 or 7326 or 7308 of the Central Excise Tariff. Hence, the applicant submitted that the same requires classification accordingly. The applicant referred to Circular No. 17/2003-CUS dated 11.04.2013. The applicant also relied upon the view taken in their own issue by the Ld. Assistant Sales Tax Commissioner, Ahmedabad in Order No. 1995/D/165 to 175 (11) dated 24.08.1995, wherein the Ld. Authority after considering the products, has held that the aforesaid products are nothing but casting. The Ld. Authority has relied upon various judgements for the aforesaid.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s sanitary ware manufactured out of iron and steel and if parts of such Iron or Steel sanitary ware are manufactured then only the goods can be classified under CETH 7324. The applicant submitted that the goods are certainly not parts of sanitary ware of Iron or Steel mentioned in the CETH, hence the same cannot be classified under CETH 7324. Further, the goods are used by building construction industry for hanging / fixing urinals, commodes, wash basins which are made of ceramic material which are classifiable under Chapter 69 of the Central Excise Tariff. These are urinals, commodes, wash basins themselves are finished products and the products of the applicant are not supplied / used in factories during manufacturing. The applicant relied upon the order of Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of M/s. Consolidated Petrotech Ind Ltd. [1993 (66) ELT 244) and judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court [1997 (96) ELT 223 (SC)]. The applicant submitted that the goods under consideration are cast articles

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds & Services Tax and Central Excise Commissionerate, Ahmedabad North.
8. The issue involved in this case is regarding classification of goods viz. brackets and clamps of cast iron.
9. It is observed that the Explanation (iii) and (iv) of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 provides as follows :-
“Explanation. – For the purposes of this notification, –
(i) ……
(ii) ……
(iii) “Tariff item”, “sub-heading” “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.”
10. The applicant manufactures cast articles, does sand blasting on the CI Casting for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sify Technologies Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

Sify Technologies Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (5) TMI 486 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 9-4-2018
Application No. ST/Misc/CT/41711/2017 & Appeal No. ST/759/2010 – Final Order No. 41084 / 2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S. Member (Judicial) And Hon'ble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate For the Appellant
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The MA filed by Revenue for change of cause title is allowed.
2. The facts of the case are that appellants are providing various taxable services such as internet cafe service, leased circuit service, franchise service etc. Scrutiny of ST-3 returns and records maintained by the appellants indicated that they had not discharged service tax liability in full for the period October 2005 to March 2006. The main allegation was that service tax paid by the tax payer as shown in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7.09.2010 (impugned order), the Commissioner has confirmed the same demand of Rs. 1,86,23,677/- with interest and imposed same penalty of Rs. 2 Crores under Section 78 ibid. Hence this appeal.
3. Today when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of the appellants, Ld. Advocate Shri G. Natarajan submits that in de novo adjudication, appellants had furnished voluminous data, which has been taken cognizance of in the impugned order too. However, without examining the correctness of the data furnished by the appellants, the Commissioner has compared the data furnished before him in de novo proceedings, to those furnished in the first round and observed certain differences, based on which he has discredited the entire information furnished by the appellants. Ld. Counsel also contends that department has not proved that the appellants had received higher taxable value than what was declared in the ST-3 returns. He submits that the demand has resulted only due to misunderstanding of the n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ave emanated only due to the misreading of the ST-3 returns filed by the appellants, there is no justification for imposition of penalty. 4. On the other hand, Ld. A.R Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy draws our attention to para-15 of the impugned order to point out that appellants vide their letter dt. 7.7.2010 had given figures which were different from those furnished vide their letter dt. 29.05.2007 in the first round of adjudication. Further, the adjudicating authority has observed that even comparison of figures furnished in the second round of adjudication reveals that there are still differences.
5. Heard both sides. From the impugned order, it is clear that the adjudicating authority has primarily focused on comparing the figures given by the appellants in the first and second round of adjudication. In the first round of litigation, CESTAT Chennai had clearly indicated that the adjudicating authority came to pass the impugned demand as the proper reconciliation exercise was avoided.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d on 18.10.06. The Commissioner came to pass the impugned demand as the above exercise was avoided. The Commissioner found variations between the figures furnished along with the reply to the Show Cause Notice and those furnished in the ST-3 returns. However, the demand was raised ignoring one class of variations.
5. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the whole issue arose on account of certain errors in reporting which could be reconciled; the appellant was willing to do such reconciliation. He prayed that the impugned order may be set aside and the matter remanded for full scale reconciliation.
6. The learned Jt. CDR broadly agrees with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants. He has no objection to the matter being remanded.
7. On a careful consideration of the case records and the submissions made by both sides we are convinced that the ends of justice require that the impugned order be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adju

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sare Realty Projects Private Limited, Tara Chand Saluja And Sons, Vee Gee auto components pvt. ltd., ankur oil and refrigeration, M/s Alliance Graphic Equipment Private Limited And M/s Batra Art Press Versus Union of India And ORS.

Sare Realty Projects Private Limited, Tara Chand Saluja And Sons, Vee Gee auto components pvt. ltd., ankur oil and refrigeration, M/s Alliance Graphic Equipment Private Limited And M/s Batra Art Press Versus Union of India And ORS.
GST
2018 (5) TMI 366 – DELHI HIGH COURT – TMI
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-4-2018
W.P.(C) 1300/2018, W.P.(C) 2192/2018 & CM APPL. 9058/2018, W.P.(C) 2332/2018, W.P.(C) 2333/2018 & CM APPL. 9801/2018, W.P.(C) 2475/2018 & CM APPL. 10262/2018, W.P.(C) 2740/2018 & CM APPL. 11123/2018 And W.P.(C) 2885/2018 & CM APPL. 11632/2018
GST
MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND MR. A. K. CHAWLA, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Adv, Mr. Gaurav Dudeja with Mr. Farhaan S. Haque, Advs., Mr. Puneet Rai, Adv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Sika India Pvt Ltd

In Re : Sika India Pvt Ltd
GST
2018 (4) TMI 812 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 400 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 61 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL – AAR
Dated:- 9-4-2018
Case Number 03 of 2018
GST
Partha Sarathi Dey Member And Vishwanath Member
Sri Partha Pratim Mukhopadhyay, Assistant Manager ( Accounts )
ORDER
1. The Applicant states that the proper HSN of its manufactured product “SIKA Block Joining Mortar” is 3824 50 90. The Applicant himself, however, has classified the product under HSN 3214 90 10 while filing returns under the Excise Act. Advance Ruling is sought on this issue uunder section 97 (2) (a) & (e) of the CGST / WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”).
2. The Applicant also declares that the question raised in the Application is not pending or decided in any proceeding under any provision of the GST Act. The concerned officer has not conveyed any objection to admiss

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(hereinafter CESTAT), Delhi. The Applicant also produced an order dated 28/07/2017 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) CGST & Customs, Goa, disposing appeal case no GOA-EXCUS-000-APP-059-2017-18. The written submissions also refer to order dated 30/10/2001 passed by the Customs Excise & Gold Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter the CEGAT), Mumbai, in Roofit Industries Ltd [2002 (149) ELT 541] and also order dated 10/04/2017 of Commissioner of Sales Tax, West Bengal, passed in case no. 24X/PRO/VAT/16/303 in the matter of M/s UAL Industries Ltd.
5. In its above order, the CESTAT remands the matter to the departmental authority with direction to carefully examine the claim of the appellant (i.e. M/s Sika India Pvt Ltd) for classification of its products under subhead 3824 keeping in mind the views of the CESTAT in the above order. The views of the CESTAT are that most of the construction chemicals manufactured by the appellant that are in the nature of cement, grout, repair mortar, repair concr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ementitious mortar modified with polymers. It is available in powdered form in 30 kg bags. It needs to be mixed thoroughly with water before applying a thin uniform layer of the paste to cleaned and levelled surface of the masonry units (AAC blocks, fly ash brick etc.) using trowel. The next masonry unit is to be gently pressed and get jointed and so on [Source: the datasheet presented by the Applicant and also the information available in the Applicant's website]. It is, therefore, a bonding compound used for joining masonry units like AAC blocks and fly ash bricks. It is a powder made pasty before use by adding water, and it hardens after application, enabling joining of the masonry units. It is applied with a trowel after cleaning the surface.
10. We will now discuss the classification options. Heading 3214 of the Tariff Act covers “GLAZIERS' PUTTY, GRAFTING PUTTY, RESIN CEMENTS,CAULKING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER MASTICS; PAINTERS' FILLINGS; NON-REFRACTORY SURFACING PREPARATIONS FOR FACA

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ch harden after application. Some of them are solid or in powdered form made pasty at the time of use by heating or by addition of a liquid like water. They are usually applied with a caulking gun, a spatula, a trowel or similar tools.
Products under HSN 3214 10 00 are preparations mainly used to stop , seal, or caulk cracks, and, in certain cases bond or firmly join components together. They are distinguished from glue and other adhesives by the fact that they are applied in thick coatings or layers.
Products under HSN 3214 90 10 includes non-refractory surfacing preparations for facades, indoor walls, floors, ceilings or the like. These preparations are used to make such surfaces waterproof and improve their appearance. They include powdered preparations containing plaster and sand with plasticisers, preparations for setting walls or floor tiles, pasty preparations made by coating mineral fillers with binders with added pigments and water or solvent.
HSN 3214 90 90 is a residuary

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =