Eligibility for ITC for goods at transporter warehouse

Eligibility for ITC for goods at transporter warehouse
Query (Issue) Started By: – Shrenik Bhura Dated:- 9-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Sequence of events:
A. Goods are billed to us my manufacturer based in state A.
B. Handed over to GST registered transporter to transport to us in state B.
C. Payment is made by us before receipt of goods in almost all cases.
D. Transporter fills part B for e-waybill generation and dispatches goods from state A to state B which are more than 1000 km apart.
E. Transporter bills us for transportation on a monthly basis and we make the payment and also pay a 5% GST as RCM with our monthly 3B.
F. Goods are kept in most cases at transporters

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the validity of the e-waybill?
3. If the answer to 1. is G, then what is the maximum period that we can stretch to avail the ITC?
Reply By MUKUND THAKKAR:
The Reply:
G. Goods are shifted to our warehouses or shop on a periodic basis in the next 2-3 months and at times even 5-6 months based on demand. All our warehouses are in state B itself and have been listed in additional places of business.
Goods kept at the transporter warehouse :- if such transporter place if you had listed in additional place & additional place meet all condition as per GST rules then you are eligable to take ITC after receiving the goods at transporter place ( your additional place).
E-way Bill Validity as per my point of view will be not effected.if Bill to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SERVICES PROVIDED TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTES

SERVICES PROVIDED TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTES
Query (Issue) Started By: – Pankaj Aggarwal Dated:- 9-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
Whether taxi services for transportation of faculty or staff provided to educational institute i.e. university is exempted from GST or not?
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
In terms of Sl.No.66 (b) of Notification No. 12/2017 -CT (Rates) dated 28th June, 2017, Services provided to educational institute is exempted but this exemption shall apply to an educational institution other than an institution providing services by way of pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent.
In your case, educatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Scrap Vehicle Disposal Classified as 'Supply' for Business; Subject to GST Under Current Regulations.

Scrap Vehicle Disposal Classified as 'Supply' for Business; Subject to GST Under Current Regulations.
Case-Laws
GST
Scope of Supply – disposal of the scrap vehicles – supply of such motor veh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input Tax Credit Eligibility for Cash Carry Vans Disputed, Referred to Appellate Authority for Resolution.

Input Tax Credit Eligibility for Cash Carry Vans Disputed, Referred to Appellate Authority for Resolution.
Case-Laws
GST
Input tax credit on motor vehicle – cash carry vans – used for cash management business – As the Members of the Advance Ruling Authority differ in respect of this question as raised by the applicant, appropriate reference is made to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for hearing and decision on this question – AAR
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, mar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Teaching Class XI-XII Science and Exam Coaching Subject to 18% GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST.

Teaching Class XI-XII Science and Exam Coaching Subject to 18% GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – providing the service of teaching to the students of Class Xlth and Xllth sc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reinstatement charges for road excavation tied to electric supply maintenance are taxable under GST, per AAR ruling.

Reinstatement charges for road excavation tied to electric supply maintenance are taxable under GST, per AAR ruling.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – reinstatement charges paid to Municipal Author

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Caesarstone Classified Under HSN Code 6810, Not Chapter 25 or Heading 2506, in Import Case Decision.

Caesarstone Classified Under HSN Code 6810, Not Chapter 25 or Heading 2506, in Import Case Decision.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of Caesarstone – an article made from artificial stone – same

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Unit XII Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Excise & Service Tax – GST

Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Unit XII Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Excise & Service Tax – GST
Central Excise
2018 (5) TMI 1805 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 9-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31214/2017 – A/30583/2018
Central Excise
Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri N Ram Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri P. S. Reddy, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: M.V. Ravindran
This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. HYD-EXCUS- MD-AP2-074-17-18 dated 25.09.2017.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. The issue involved in this case is regarding the rejection of refund claim filed by the appellant in respect of the claim of refund of the d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Dynamic Commodities Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. of CGST, C. Excise, Kolkata North

M/s Dynamic Commodities Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. of CGST, C. Excise, Kolkata North
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 727 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 9-5-2018
S.T. Appeal No.75423/18 – FO/76543/2018
Service Tax
SHRI P. K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Shri Sushil Kr. Goyal, C.A. for the Appellant (s)
Shri A. Roy, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
Per Shri P. K. Choudhary :
This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against the Order-in- Appeal No.189/ST-I/KOL/2017 dated 17.08.2017 passed by Commr. of CGST & Central Excise (Appeals-I), Kolkata.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant is a provider of “Forwarding Contract Service” and Maintenance or Repair Service”. A show-cause

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s submission that the complete facts and figures were duly disclosed in the ST-3 Returns and proper records as required were being maintained by the appellant and therefore, there cannot be any allegation of suppression against the appellant and the extended period of limitation of five years is not invokable. The ld.C.A.for the appellant also submits that the demand is barred by limitation.
4. The ld.A.R. for the Revenue, reiterated the findings of the lower authorities.
5. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
6. On perusal of records, I find that Rule 4 (7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, states that “the Cenvat Credit in respect of input service shall be allowed, on or after the day that which payment is made of the valu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tax has been paid subject to realization of that cheque.”
The above Rule specifies that the date of payment in case of service tax shall be the date of presentation of cheque subject to realization of cheque. I also find from the records that none of the cheque issued by the appellant were dishonoured. I also observed that the issue is covered by the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of India Cement Limited Vs. Commr. of Central Excise, Hyderabad : 2002 (150) ELT 1344. In this regard, the relevant Para is reproduced below:
“8. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. In the instant case, the penalties have been imposed on the appellants on the ground that there is a gap of few days bet

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s S.A.I.L. Versus Commr. of CGST, C. Excise, Ranchi

M/s S.A.I.L. Versus Commr. of CGST, C. Excise, Ranchi
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 714 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 9-5-2018
Ex. Appeal No.75352/18 – FO/76542/2018
Central Excise
SHRI P. K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Shri S. P. Majumdar, Adv. for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. Mukhopadhyay, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
Per Shri P. K. Choudhary:
This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against the Order-in- Appeal No.157/RAN/2017 dated 31.10.2017 passed by Commr. of CGST & Central Excise (Appeals-I), Ranchi.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant, M/s Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), Bokaro Steel Plant, is engaged in the manufacture of various articles of iro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds.
4. I find that Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, prescribes that “if the capital goods are cleared as waste and scrap, the manufacturer shall pay an amount equal to the duty leviable on the transaction value”. I also find from the record that the appellant all along stated that waste and scrap generated from the capital goods were brought into the factory much before 01.04.1994, when where was no provisions for availing credit on the capital goods. It is the case of the appellant that since there is no provision for availing credit on the capital goods, no Excise duty was required to be paid. I find that the Adjudicating Authority has also dropped the demand attributable to rejected machinery/machinery spares/equipments, which w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M & I Materials India Private Limited

In Re : M & I Materials India Private Limited
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1493 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 423 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 9-5-2018
No. GST-ARA-23/2017-18/B-31
GST
B.V. Borhade (Member) and Pankaj Kumar (Member)
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M&I MATERIALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the applicability of GST on:
What is the correct Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) code and the applicable GST rate for our products MIDEL eN 1204 (rapeseed oil based dielectric transformer fluid) and MIDEL eN 1275 (soya oi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Ltd. based in UK (hereinafter referred to as 'M&I UK').
2. The company commenced its operations in the month of April 2014 and is, inter alia. engaged in the following activities:
2.1 Import of 'Midel Dielectric Fluids' from M&l UK and subsequent sale in India
2.2 Establishing local warehousing and distribution capability.
2.3 Marketing and business development activity with a focus on assisting in the development of the Midel Dielectric Fluids business in India
2.4 Provide local first line support for any technical queries.
3.  The details of the products for which the Advance Ruling is being sought is as follows:
3.1 MIDEL eN 1204
3.1.1 It is a vegetable oil based dielectric transformer fluid It is a chemically modified rapeseed oil based natural ester
3.1.2 It is used as electric insulator in transformers Its function is to provide electrical insulation, suppress corona and arcing, and to serve as a coolant.
3.1.3 We have classified MIDEL eN 1204 as pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

It is used as electric insulator in transformers. Its function is to provide electrical insulation, suppress corona and arcing, and to serve as a coolant.
3.2.3 We have classified MIDEL eN 1215 as per HSN code under the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 under the entry 15180039.
3.2.4 The applicable Indian Standards (IS) of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 is IS 16659:2017.
4. The rate of GST applicable on supply of various goods is notified vide Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017, as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as “the Notification”).
4.1 Under the Notification, the HSN code 1518 appears under “Schedule I – 2.5%” as well as “Schedule 2 – 6%”. The relevant extract is reproduced hereunder for ease of reference:
4.2
S. No.
Chapter / Heading / Sub-heading / Tariff item
Description of goods
Schedule I – 2.5%
90.
1518
Vegetable fats and oils and their fractions, boil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

classification for both of our above mentioned products
Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law and/or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the aforesaid question(s) (i.e. applicant's view point and submissions on issues on which the advance ruling is sought)
We submit that both our products viz. MIDEL eN 1204 and MIDEL eN 1215, are chemically modified vegetable oil based transformer fluids which should be classified under Entry at S. No. 90 of Schedule – 1 [applicable rate of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) – 2,5%]. To support our view, we would like to put forth our contentions, without prejudice to each other, as follows:
1. Specific entry should prevail over general entry
1.1 Chemically modified vegetable oils are more specifically covered under Entry at S No 90 of Schedule – I of the Notification. Hence, both our products viz, MIDEL eN 1204 and MIDEL eN 1215 should be classified under the said entry.
1.2 Further, explanations (iii) and (iv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description. However, when two or more headings each refer to part only of the materials or substances contained in mixed or composite goods or to part only of the items in a set put up for retail sale, those headings are to be regarded as equally specific in relation to those goods, even If one of them gives a more complete or precise description of the goods
(emphasis supplied)
1.4 The entry at S. No 27 of Schedule II – 6% is a general entry mainly referring to animal fats and oils while vegetable fats and oils are mentioned only cursorily. Further, it should be noted under the said entry only those vegetable fats or oils can be covered which are not specified elsewhere.
1.5 It is a well established principle of taxation jurisprudence for resolving classification disputes that a specific entry shall prevail over a general entry. In this regard, we would like to bring to your attention the judgement of the Hon&#39

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e general Entry 18 which relates to rayon and synthetic fibres and yarn i.e. manmade fibres.”
1.7 Given the above, we submit that a combined reading of relevant entries along with the general rules of interpretation [supra] and the decisions of the Apex Court on the matter, it is evidently clear that both our products should fall under Schedule I – 2.5% as it provides a more specific description applicable to both our products
2. Intention of the legislature
2 .1 It is pertinent to note that whereas under the Customs law, animal or vegetable fats and oils are part of the same entry i.e. 1518.00 (supra), under the GST regime a conscious decision has been made by the GST Council to split the said entry between vegetable fats and oils and animal fats and oil by including vegetable fats and oil under Schedule I of the Notification which provides for lower GST rate of 2.5%.
2.2 The Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Dattatraya Govind Mahajan versus State of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e above, if it is assumed that either or both of our products cannot be classified under entry at S. No. 90 of Schedule I – 2.5%, we would like to submit that, entry at S. No. 88 of Schedule I – 2.5% also provides an appropriate description of our products, and that in no case the said products can be classified under the general entry at S. No. 27 of Schedule II – 6%.
3.2 In this regard, we would like to reproduce the entry at S. No 88 of Schedule 1 – 2 5% for ease of reference:
S. No.
Chapter / Heading / Subheading / Tariff item
Description of goods
Schedule I – 2.5%
88.
1516
Vegetable fats and oils and their fractions, partly or wholly hydrogenated, inter-esterified, re-esterified or elaidnised, whether or not refined, but not further prepared. ”
3.3 Both our products being vegetable oil based esterified transformer fluids, we submit that they should fall within the ambit of the said entry and classified accordingly.
4. Beneficial rate under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rdingly, we submit that, both our products should fall within the ambit of entry at S. No 90 of Schedule I – 2.5%.
Prayer
1. In light of the above, we pray that both our products viz. MIDEL eN 1204 and MIDEL eN 1215 be classified under Entry at S. No. 90 of Schedule – I i.e. at the applicable rate of CGST of 2.5%.
2. We crave leave to add, to alter, amend and/or modify all or any of the foregoing submissions
3. We pray that a hearing be granted to us before any decision is taken in this matter and also crave leave to produce documents / records / case law at the hearing granted to us.”
Additional submission dt.16.03.2018
We, M/s. SKP Business Consulting LLP, in our capacity as authorised representatives of M/s. M&I Materials India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the Company” or “us” or “we”) refer to the preliminary hearing held for admission / rejection of our advance ruling application on 7 March 2018 We thank you for admitting our application and granting us anoth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ost of the customers of our products include government and non-government entities operating in the essential sector of electricity generation, transmission and distribution.
1.3 Similarly, the Tamil Nadu government vide Notification-III. G O Ms. No. 77, No II(1)/CTR/12(R-I7)/2011 dated 11 July 2011 had reduced the tax payable by any dealer to 5% on the sale of any goods except petrol, diesel and cement to certain entities engaged in generation, transmission and distribution of electrical energy.
1.4 Given the above, it is evident that our products being supplied to an essential sector, the incidence of tax was kept at a minimum i.e. 5%, to avoid any undue tax burden on the ultimate customers of essential sector of electricity.
1.5 At this juncture we would like to reproduce the relevant extract from the minutes of the 3rd and the 4th GST Council meetings held on 18-19 October 2016 and 3-4 November 2016 respectively, wherein the principles for fixation of GST rates were debated upo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing combined tax rate of Central Excise and VAT between 15% and less than 21 %):
iv. 26 % (to cover those goods presently attracting combined tax rates of Central Excise and VAT equal to or more than 21 %)”
[emphasis supplied]
– 4th GST Council meeting
“10. Initiating the discussion, the Secretary to the Council briefly recapitulated the discussion on this issue in the 3rd GST Council Meeting on 18-19 October, 2016. He recapitulated the proposal to have a four rate GST structure and the rates could be 6%, 12%, 18% and 26%. He explained that a slab of 6% was needed for such goods where VA T was being charged at 5% and Central Excise duty on the same goods was Nil. He stated that if such goods put in the 12% rate band, it would adversely affect the poorer sections of the society.”
[emphasis supplied]
1.6 Applying the principles emanating from the discussions and observations made by the GST Council it is incontrovertible that our products should be classified under the GST rate bra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cted to beneficial rates of tax under the erstwhile law.
1.10 We submit that the above discussion supplies further credence to our earlier submissions that our products viz. MIDEL eN 1204 and MIDEL eN 1215 being products consumed by entities operating in the essential sector of electricity generation, transmission and distribution, and being subjected to beneficial rate of tax under the erstwhile indirect tax regime, should be classified under Entry at S. No. 90 of Schedule -I of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017, as amended from time to time, i.e chargeable to GST at the rate of 5%.
2. Non-classification as 'mixtures'
2.1 The quantity of additives in our products viz. MIDEL eN 1204 and MIDEL eN 1215 is minimal i.e. 0.3% of the total weight of the product. Therefore, the said products cannot be considered as 'mixtures' covered under Entry at S. No. 27 of Schedule II – 6%.
2.2 In order to corroborate our explanation, a copy of test rep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fluid. The dealer is in his application admit that use of the product is transformer fluid, which means it is inedible and hence covered by Schedule II. Chapter heading 1518 and rate of tax applicable is 6%.
(ii) MIDEL eN 1204- In this sheet product use is mentioned as dielectric fluid. It is blend of natural triglyceride esters (vegetable oil). It clearly shows that the product is intended to be used as only dielectric fluid. The dealer is in his application admit that use of the product is transformer fluid, which means it is inedible and hence covered by Schedule II. Chapter heading 1518 and rate of tax applicable is 6%.
2) The above submission is made in the light of Notification No. 1/2017-State Tax(Rate) No. MGST-1017/C.R. 104/Taxation 1 dated 29/06/2017.
Hon. Forum is humbly requested to admit the application for Advance Ruling and decide the issue as per above mentioned notification. ”
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for hearing on dt.07.03.2018 when Sh. Jigar Doshi, Sh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under Schedule II and not under Schedule I as claimed by the applicant.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case. We have been called upon to decide the classification of the products MIDEL eN 1204 (rapeseed oil based dielectric transformer fluid) and MIDEL eN 1215 (soya oil based dielectric transformer fluid). Before we ascertain the applicability of the schedule entries, at the cost of repetition, let us have a look at the information about the products as provided by the applicant-
MIDL eN1204
It is a vegetable oil based dielectric transformer fluid. it is chemically modified rapeseed oil based natural ester.
It is used as electric insulator in transformers. Its function is to provide electrical insulation, suppress corona and arcing, and to serve as a coolant.
The applicable Indian Standards (IS) of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 is IS 16659:2017.
MIDEL eN 1215
It is a vegetable oil based dielectric tr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nal officer had pointed to a document called 'Safety Data Sheet', the relevant parameters from which can be seen below :
Particulars
MIDEL eN 1204 (rapeseed oil based dielectric transformer fluid)
MIDEL eN 1215 (soya based dielectric transformer fluid).
1. Identification of the Substance/Mixture and of the Company/Undertaking
1.1 Product Identifier Material Name: MIDEI. eN 1204.
1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Product Use: Dielectric fluid
Uses advised against: None. 1.3 Details of the supplier of the substance or mixture
Company: M&I Materials Ltd. Hibernia Way, Trafford Park, Manchester, M32 0ZD, UK.
1.1 Product Identifier Material Name: MIDEL eN 1215.
1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Product Use: Dielectric fluid
Uses advised against: None 1.3 Details of the supplier of the substance or mixture
Company: M&I Materials Ltd., Hibernia Way, Trafford Park, Manchester. M3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

56-68-3 Description: Blend of natural triglyceride esters (vegetable oil)
Composition:
Constituent CAS Number Contents Blend of natural triglyceride esters 68956-68-3 >98.5% Performance enhancing additives Proprietary<1.5% All constituents are listed on the TSCA inventory. Additives used in this product are a trade secret, but do not lead to classification of the substance as hazardous. 3 Substance CAS No.: 68956-68-3 Description: Blend of natural triglyceride esters (vegetable oil) Composition: Constituent CAS Number Contents Blend of natural triglyceride esters 68956-68-3 >98.5% Performance enhancing additives Proprietary<1.5% All constituents are listed on the TSCA inventory. Additives used in this product are a trade secret, but do not lead to classification of the substance as hazardous. 4. First Aid Measures 4,1 Description of first aid measures Inhalation: None envisaged due to the low vapour pressure of the substance Skin: Wash with soap and water. Obtain medical a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

handling Avoid eye and prolonged skin contact
7.2 Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities No special precautions required
7.3 Specific end use(s)
Exposure to air should be minimised. Opened containers should be properly resealed
7.1 Precautions for safe handling Avoid eye and prolonged skin contact
7.2 Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities No special precautions required
7.3 Specific end use(s)
Exposure to air should be minimised. Opened containers should be properly resealed
8. Exposure Controls/ Personal Protection
8 1 Control parameters No relevant control parameters.
8 2 Exposure controls
Eye washes should be available for emergency use
Respiratory protection: None required.
Skin protection: Wear coveralls Hand protection: Wash hands after use. For prolonged or repeated skin contact gloves are recommended
Eye protection If splashes are likely to occur wear safety glasses.
8.1 Control parameters No relevant control paramete

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ising
Aspiration hazard: Not considered an aspiration hazard Carcinogenicity/mutagenicity: Not considered a mutagenic hazard or carcinogen. This product is not considered to be a carcinogen by IARC, ACGIH, NTP or OSHA.
11.1 Information on toxicological effects Likely routes of exposure: Skin and eyes are the most likely routes for exposure Accidental ingestion may occur. Inhalation is not expected to be a relevant route of exposure. Product is vegetable oil based and as such non-toxic.
Acute oral toxicity: Considered to be low toxicity, vegetable oil.
Acute dermal toxicity: Considered to be low toxicity. Acute inhalation toxicity: Low volatility makes inhalation unlikely
Skin corrosion/irritation: Considered to be not irritating Eye corrosion/irritation Considered to be not irritating. Respiratory or skin sensitisation: Considered to be not sensitising
Aspiration hazard: Not considered an aspiration hazard Carcinogenicity/mutagenicity: Not considered a mutagenic hazard or carcino

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

inct identity as being a “transformer fluid”. They are also given distinct names to establish their identity.
* We only learn that the impugned products are vegetable oil based.
* Neither the exact ingredients nor the exact additives, and the composition of each of these are available before us.
* The information shows that the products are a blend of natural triglyceride esters. They also contain additives.
* The applicant has argued that the quantity of additives in their products is minimal i.e. 0.3% of the total weight of the product. Therefore, the said products cannot be considered as 'mixtures'.
Having seen thus, we look at the contention with regard to the applicability of the schedule entries thus –
* If it is assumed that either or our products cannot be classified under entry at S. No. 90 of Schedule I – 2.5%, we would like to submit that, entry at S. No. 88 of Schedule I – 2.5% also provides an appropriate description of our products, and that in no case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ble mixtures or preparations of animal or vegetable fats or oils or of fractions of different fats or oils of this chapter, not elsewhere specified of included
12% [6 + 6]
A look at the description as found in the entries and the product information, as reproduced above, we are constrained to observe thus –
1. The products are not vegetable fats and vegetable oils per se.
2. The products do not remain mere vegetable fat or mere vegetable oil. The impugned products are a distinct product which is known in the market as a dielectric transformer fluid.
3. The applicant has argued that the products cannot be considered as 'mixtures'. However, we find a reference to the products being a 'substance' or 'mixture' in the Safety Data Sheet of these products as can be seen thus –
1.3 Details of the supplier of the substance or mixture
4.  No information about the manufacturing process has been given. Neither any information has been shared as to the ingredient

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, BLOWN, POLYMERISED BY HEAT IN VACUUM OR IN INERT GAS OR OTHERWISE CHEMICALLY MODIFIED, EXCLUDING THOSE OF HEADING 1516 ; INEDIBLE MIXTURES OR PREPARATIONS OF ANIMAI. OR VEGETABLE FATS OR OILS OR OF FRACTIONS OF DIFFERENT FATS OR OILS OF THIS CHAPTER, NOT ELSEWHERE SPECIFIED OR INCLUDED
1518 00

Animal or vegetable fats and oils and their fractions, boiled, oxidized, dehydrated, sulphurised, blown, polymerized by heat in vacuum or in inert gas or otherwise chemically modified, excluding those of heading 1516; inedible mixtures or preparations of animal or vegetable fats or oils or of fractions of different fats or oils of this Chapter, not elsewhere specified or included :
 

Lin seed oil:
1518 00 11

Edible grade
151800 19

Other
 

Castor oil, dehydrated:
1518 0021

Edible grade
1518 00 29

Other
 

Other Vegetable oil and its fats:
1518 00 31

Edible grade
1518 00 39

Other
151800 40

Other
From the Tariff Heading 1518 as reproduced

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

otes (HSN) in respect of the part 1 (as reproduced above) of Heading 1518 says-
“This part covers animal or vegetable fats and oils and their fractions which have been subjected to processes which modify their chemical structure thereby improving their viscosity, drying power (i.e., the property of absorbing oxygen when exposed to the air and forming elastic films) or modifying their other properties, provided they retain their original fundamental structure and are not more specifically covered elsewhere, e.g.:
Thus, the Notes make it clear that the animal or vegetable fats and oils and their fractions should retain their original fundamental structure.
e. The part 1 (as reproduced above) of Heading 1518 speaks of certain processes which have been subjected to vegetable and animal oils. But the HSN Notes say that despite undergoing these processes, the vegetable or animal oils should retain their original fundamental structure. In the present case, we have a final product which is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

products as dielectric transformer fluid. The products are described as a “fluid”. Is a fluid same as an oil? A fluid is different from even a liquid, let alone oil. The products are not being sold as a modified vegetable oil but as products which result from the adaptation of the natural triglyceride esters to obtain a dielectric transformer fluid. In view thereof, we are convinced that the impugned products would not be covered by the part 1 (as reproduced above) of Hearting 1518. The same reasoning would apply to non-applicability of entry 88 of Schedule I.
f. We now come to part 2 (as reproduced above) of Heading 1518. This part covers inedible mixtures or preparations of animal or vegetable fats or oils or of fractions of different fats or oils of the Chapter 15. The present products, as discussed above, are a preparation from natural triglyceride esters. They are based or derived from “rapeseed oil based” or “soya based”. In addition, the products are inedible. And even though t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

affect our decision. We find that there is Chapter 38 of the Customs Tariff which covers residual products of the chemical or allied industries. However as the exact composition of the product is not revealed to us by the applicant and therefore on the basis of the facts at hand, we find them insufficient to arrive at any decision as to the classification of the product under Chapter 38 and accordingly, taking into consideration only the details revealed to us, we find that the product is classifiable under Chapter 15 of the Customs Tariff Heading/GST Tariff.
6. We are not in doubts that entry 88 and 90 of Schedule I of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central / State Tax (Rate) would not cover the impugned products. We are also convinced that the impugned products are not covered by any entry of the Schedule in the Notification No. 2/2017- Central / State Tax (Rate) for goods exempted from GST. It is only the question of entry 90 or any other entry of the Notification No. 1/2017- Central

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Arjan Dass Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Kolkata-II

M/s. Arjan Dass Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Kolkata-II
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 161 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 9-5-2018
Appeal No. E/76850/2017 – FO/76049/2018
Central Excise
Shri P.K. Choudhary, Member (Judicial)
Shri N.K. Choudhary, Advocate for the for the Appellant/Applicant (s)
Shri H.S. Abedin, AC(AR) Respondent (s)
ORDER
Per Shri P.K.Choudhary
1. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of M.S. Ingots falling under chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On 08.11.2006, the officers of the department carried out stock verification at the factory premise of the appellant and found that there was a shortage of 31.705 MT of finished goods of non-alloy steel ingots. The officers recorded the statements of one Shri Subal Bera, authorised signatory and Shri Sandip Agarwal, Director who had accepted the shortage. But could not expl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of pipings/risings formed on the edges of the ingots. Such layers of pipings/risings were removed later after the finished goods had been weighed, and it was due to the removal of such extra layers of piping/ risings that there was an apparent difference between the weight recorded in the register and the weight of the actual stock. He further submitted that Shri Sandip Agarwal was not involved in the day to day functioning of the factory and therefore, his statement should not be relied upon. He also stated that the appellant had submitted a certificate from the Chartered Engineer according to which they were eligible for taking credit of Rs. 4,24,573.62. He further submitted that all payments made during the investigation were made under protest. There was no intention to evade payment of duty by suppressing facts. He relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Mundra Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd. v. CCE & Cus reported as 2015 (39) STR 726 (Guj.).

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court has referred to the 'user test' outlined in the case of CCE, Coimbatore v. Jawahar Mills Ltd. reported as 2001 (132) ELT 3 (SC), which lays down the ratio in determining whether particular goods could be categorised as capital goods or not.
7. Regarding the shortage of finished goods detected during the stock verification, I do not find any force in the submission of the ld. Advocate, as it was not substantiated by any evidence. The demand of duty is required to be upheld. I find that in order to impose penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, it is necessary to prove that there was fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts with intent to evade payment of duty on the part of the appellant. There is no material available on record of clandestine removal of goods of the shortage quantity.
8. Accordingly, I uphold the demand of Central Excise Duty of Rs. 82,906/- as per Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, which has already been paid by the Appella

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Specification of Proper Officer under various provisions of DGST Act, 2017.

Specification of Proper Officer under various provisions of DGST Act, 2017.
F.IV/Misc/HR/GST/27/2015-16/Part file/5239 -5245 Dated:- 9-5-2018 Delhi SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITALTERRITORY OF DELHI
DEPARTMENT OF TRADEAND TAXES
(HUMAN RESOURCE BRANCH)
VYAPAR BHAWAN, I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.
ORDER
F.NO. F.IV/Misc/HR/GST/27/2015-16/Part file/5239 -5245
Dated: 09.05.2018
Specification of Proper Officer under various provisions of DGST Act, 2017.
In exercise

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Modern Traders Versus State Of UP And 2 Others

M/s Modern Traders Versus State Of UP And 2 Others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1030 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 184 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-5-2018
Writ Tax No. 763 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Nishant Mishra
For the Respondent : C.S.C.
ORDER
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jagdish Mishra, learned standing counsel.
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner by which the petitioner has sought the following relief :
“A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned seizure order and consequential order under Section 129(3) (Annexure 1 and 2) passed y respondent no.3 on the same i.e. 5.5.2018.
B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.3 and his agents, to release the Vehicle No. UP13AT-1153, without insisting for deposit of any amount of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

accompanied with E-way bill. The respondent no.3 has proceeded for inspection/physical verification of the goods and for the same he has issued verification report in part-A and part-B on 5.5.2018 itself wherein no time has been mentioned. When the proprietor of the petitioner's firm has received the information about interception of the vehicle, he has immediately generated E-way bill on 5.5.2018 at 11.55 a.m. and tried to contact the respondent no.3, however, he was informed that the respondent no.3 will be available after 2 p.m. and thereafter at 2.30 p.m. the aforesaid E-way bill was furnished.
The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner has furnished the E-way bill before the respondent no.3 prior to the seizure proceedings and seizure order, but the respondent no.3 has passed the seizure order. Again without mentioning the time of passing the seizure order a consequential notice under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act (hereinafter ref

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a seizure order and consequential penalty order has been passed. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that once E-way bill was generated after interception of the goods, but before seizure order is passed, then the goods cannot be seized as is held by this Court in the case of Axpress Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the circular dated 13.4.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax and Custom distinguish between interception and detention and hence in the instant case since the petitioner has furnished the E-way bill prior to detention and seizure of goods, no seizure order can legally be passed nor penalty can be asked.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents enclosed along with the writ petition.
We find substance in the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that while issuing the interception memo the respondent no.3 has mentioned the time being 1.30 a.m. on 5.5.2018 and direc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Qube Cinema Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Versus GST & CCE, Chennai North

M/s. Qube Cinema Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Versus GST & CCE, Chennai North
Service Tax
2018 (5) TMI 887 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 9-5-2018
ST/42268 – 42270/2017 – Final Order No. 41457-41459/2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi, Member ( Judicial ) And Hon'ble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member ( Technical )
Shri G. Mani, Advocate, for the appellant
Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The issue involved in all these appeals being the same, they are heard together and disposed by this common order.
2. The appellants namely M/s. Qube Cinema Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as M/s. Real Image Media Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) are aggrieved by the confirmation of service tax under the heading 'Supply of Tangible Goods'. The appellants are engaged in supply, installation and operation of digital camera equipment having Qube digital technology to various theatre owners on 'right to use' basis through an agree

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

same. Hence the appellants are now before the Tribunal.
3. On behalf of the appellants, the Ld. Counsel, Shri G. Mani appeared and argued the matter. He submitted that for the very same activity in the appellant's own case, the Tribunal vide Final Order No. 43368 – 43369/2017 dated 14.12.2017, has set aside the demand to hold that the activity is not subject to levy of service tax under the category of 'Supply of tangible goods' service. The activity subjected to levy of service tax in the said final order is prior to the periods involved in these appeals. That before July, 2012 the department had demanded the service tax under supply of tangible goods service. After July, 2012 the definition of service was newly introduced in Section 65 B (44). Section 65 B (51) provided that taxable service means any service on which service tax is liable under Section 66 N. The department has sought to levy service tax alleging that the activity falls under sub-clause (f) of Section 66 E – declare

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

served in the above stated final order as under:-
“8.1 The issue that comes up for appellate decision is whether the activities of supply of equipment would fall within the ambit of supply of tangible goods or not. In the present case, the appellants contend that the transaction would not fall within the supply of tangible goods for the reason that the appellant has transferred possession as well as effective control of the equipment.
8.2 The definition of supply of tangible goods is as follows:-
“Taxable services means any service provided or to be provided to any person, by any other person in relation to supply of tangible goods including machinery, equipment and appliances for use, without transferring right of possession and the effective control of such machinery, equipment and appliances‟
From the above definition, when there is supply of use of equipment without transferring right of possession and effective control of the equipment, the same would fall within the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods, but it is the right to use property in goods; (ii) Article 366(29A)(d) read with the latter part of the clause (29A) which uses the words, “and such transfer, delivery or supply”, would show that the tax is not on the delivery of the goods used, but on the transfer of the right to use goods regardless of when or whether the goods are delivered for use subject to the condition that the goods should be in existence for use; (iii) in the transaction for the transfer of the right to use goods, delivery of goods is not a condition precedent, but the delivery of goods may be one of the elements of the transaction; (iv) the effective or general control does not mean always physical control and, even if the manner, method, modalities and the time of the use of goods is decided by the lessee or the customer, it would be under the effective or general control over the goods; and (v) the approvals, concessions, licences and permits in relation to goods would also be available to the user o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

being a deemed sale under clause 29 A of the article 366 of the Constitution. The sub-clause (f) of Section 66 E (declared services) refers to transfer of goods by way of hiring, leasing, licensing or in any such manner without transfer of right to use such goods. Whereas, in the present case the supply of goods involves transfer of right of possession and effective control on such goods and therefore would fall under the category of deemed sale. For better appreciation the relevant provisions of Section 65 (B) (44) after July 2012 is reproduced as under:-
“(44) “service” means any activity carried out by a person for another for consideration, and includes a declared service, but shall not include-
(a) an activity which constitutes merely,-
(i) a transfer of title in goods or immovable property, by way of sale, gift or in any other manner; or
(ii) such transfer, delivery or supply of any goods which is deemed to be a sale within the meaning of clause (29A) of Article 366 of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Implication of GST & Income tax on purchase of a second hand machine

Implication of GST & Income tax on purchase of a second hand machine
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kishore Padav Dated:- 8-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
Our Company had sold an equipment to a customer (A) in May 2017 @ ₹ 20 lakhs (incl. CST). The customer (A) has paid us only ₹ 7 lakhs till date.He has expressed his inability to pay the balance ₹ 13 Lakhs and has asked the company to take back his machine or help him sell his machine. Now we have found a customer (B) who has agreed to purchase the machine @Rs.13 Lakhs from him. Since the company has to recover ₹ 13 lakhs from csutomer (A), it is insisting on getting the payment to be made directly to them by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax liability in case of change in constitution

Tax liability in case of change in constitution
Query (Issue) Started By: – JAY SHAH Dated:- 8-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Hello
We have a partnership firm and registered as composition dealer under GST regime. now i want to convert the same to proprietorship by retiring one partner and other one continue in same business under same banner. is there any tax liability arise on closing stock? in proprietorship also i want to continue under composition dealer.
Reply By kollengode venkitaraman:
The Reply:
WHEN THE BUSINESS OF THE PARTNERSHIP IS TAKEN OVER BY ONE PATNER AS A PROPRIETORSHIP, IT WILL BE EXEMPT "TAKING OVER A BUSINESS AS A WHOLE" IS EXEMPTED UNDER GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o proprietorship. So tax liabilty of firm can be paid and ITC in proprietorship can be availed. But we are composition dealer. If we pay GST on closing stock in partnership firm for transfer of stock to proprietorship then we are going to pay two time GST. One at the time of transfer to proprietorship and again we have to pay gst in proprietorship on final sale.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Querist,
There is no doubt that afresh registration is required as rightly advised by Dr.Govindarajan, Sir.. When you apply for a new registration, you are to decide whether to opt for composition dealer or not. New registration, afresh option is required. It is natural that a composition dealer cannot avail ITC
Actually, no-provision o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CASE LAWS RELATING TO E-WAY BILL

CASE LAWS RELATING TO E-WAY BILL
By: – DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 8-5-2018

Implementation of e-way bill
The implementation of e-way bill has caused more delay because of the improvements to be done in the portal system. The Central Government has announced that the e-way bill system would be applicable for the inter-State transactions with effect from 01.02.2018 and the States would implement the e-way bill system for intra-State transactions by 1st June, 2018. Because of the glitches in the system, the Central Government postponed the implementation date and finally it has been implemented with effect from 01.04.2018. The States are advised to implement the same before 1st June, 2018.
E-way bill operations are now available for the following States-
* E-way bill operations are compulsory for intra-state movement of goods for Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh from 15th April 2018;
* E-way bill operatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bill had not been downloaded. It has come on record that before seizure there was some problem in downloading the E-way Bill. The High Court directed to release the vehicles and goods subject to deposit of bank guarantee, equal to the value of the tax on goods.
In 'Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Union of India and Another' – 2018 (2) TMI 766 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT, the petitioner says that the Electronic Way Bills Rules have yet to come into force. Therefore, without access to the online profile, the petitioner cannot generate E-way bills. Without such E-way bills, the petitioner will not be allowed to move the goods anywhere and that will paralyze its business. Lack of access would mean that the petitioner is unable to file return or pay tax or undertake any other compliance required by the statute. The High Court held that the special sessions of Parliament or special or extraordinary meetings of Council would mean nothing to the assessees unless they obtain easy ac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion of India. The High Court directed the first respondent to complete the adjudication provided for under section 129 after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within a week from the date of receipt of the order.
Seizure before effective date
In 'Modern Traders V. State of UP' – 2018 (4) TMI 1076 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (decided on 03.04.2018) the goods were transported from Bhulandshahr to Delhi. There was no e-way bill during the movement of goods, while the vehicle was crossing Ghaziabad. The vehicle was intercepted and detained at Ghaziabad by the Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad on 24.03.2018. The vehicle was seized on the ground that there was no e-way bill. A show cause notice dated 28.03.2018 was issued under section 129(3) of the Act, The petitioner was directed to appear on 04.04.2018 and explain as to why the tax @ 18% and equivalent amount of penalty may not be imposed. The petitioner, therefore, approached the High Court invoking writ jurisdiction.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing the e-way bill with respect to inter-State transaction is mandatory with effect from 01.04.2018, whereas in the present case the transaction is much before the aforesaid date. The High Court directed respondent No. 3 to release the goods and vehicle.
In 'M/s Bhumika Enterprises V. State of U.P. And 3 Others' – 2018 (4) TMI 530 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, from perusal of the record the High Court have noticed that the vehicle has been detained and the goods/vehicle was seized by the respondent no.4 on 27.3.2018 whereas the time has been granted for submission of reply and appearance of the person concerned before the respondent no.4 on the later date. There is no dispute with regard to quality and quantity of the goods and further that the invoice issued clearly indicates of charge of C.G.S.T. and S.G.S.T by the petitioner. The High Court further noticed that there is no dispute with regard to registration of the seller (the petitioner) and the purchaser as also that the goods were bei

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN number of some dealer situates at Allahabad but no details of the said dealer has been given in the impugned seizure order nor the details of the mobile number holder.
Since the tax invoice indicating the tax charged and the same admittedly found during the course of inspection/detention and E-way bill-02 has been downloaded much before the seizure order, the High Court saw no justification in the impugned seizure order and therefore, the High Court have no option but to allow the present writ petition and to set aside the seizure order dated 27.3.2018 as well as the show cause notice issued under Section 129(3) of the Act for imposition of penalty.
Justification for seizure
In 'Surendra Steel Supply Company Versus State of U.P. And Another' – 2018 (5) TMI 526 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, (decided on 11.04.2018) the vehicle carrying the goods was intercepted at Kanpur on 01.04.2018 at about 9-30 a.m. by respondent no. 2 and interception/detention memo was issued on the ground that sin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and seizure.
* Even though E-Way Bill No.01 was generated and produced by the petitioner but there was no requirement for the same as the Central Government has suspended the requirement of E-Way Bill No.01 on 01.02.2018.
The Revenue has not been able to justify the impugned order in the facts and circumstances of the case. The High Court required respondent no.2-Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Mobile SquadXI, Kanpur, U.P. to appear before the Court day after tomorrow (13.04.2018) to explain as to under which authority of law he intercepted the vehicle and passed the seizure order despite E-Way Bill No.01 was generated and produced.
Non mentioning of vehicle number
In 'VSL Alloys (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And Another' – 2018 (5) TMI 455 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, (decided on 13.04.2018) the detention was made on the ground that Part-B of e-way bill was incomplete. The contention of the petitioner before the authority below was that there was no intention on the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Transportation of Employees

Transportation of Employees
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kusalava InternationalLimited Dated:- 8-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 34 Replies
GST
we are mfg co and provide transportation facility to employee from home to factory and factory to home for that we have purchased bus and given to one person(Unregistered Person) to run bus.For that we are paying every month bill to him.(including Diesel,Driver Salaries and his commission)
1.What is the rate of GST to be charged on Bill if he is registered?Please refer SAC Code.
2.Can we claim ITC on that bill?
Reply By Praveen Nair:
The Reply:
* SAC – 9964 @18%.
* As per section 17(5) of the CGST Act input tax credit shall not be available in respect of motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies;
* Further supply of such vehicles or conveyances.
* Transportation of passengers.
* Imparting training on driving, flying, navi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

p and dropping the employees from a fixed pick up point to factory and then dropping at the same fixed point. This service cannot be classified in the nature of personal consumption either as the activity is related to business only. Further this transportation service cannot be classified under rent-a-cab service. As such, I feel, GST input tax credit is available in this case. would invite experts counter opinion on this.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
For ready reference please allow me to reproduce relevant portion of Section 17(5) of CGST, Act, 2017.
“(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and sub-section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(I)for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or…..”
For better

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Moreover, in GST motor vehicles has been mentioned, therefore, it can be said that all motor vehicles as defined under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, are covered under “Rent-a-cab” service.
Based on above, I am of the view that ITC is not available in the instant case.
Our experts may correct me if mistaken.
Thanks
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Sh.Alkesh Jani Ji, Top most reply. Crystal clear interpretation.
Reply By JSW CEMENTLIMITED:
The Reply:
Sh Alkesh Janiji, appreciate your analysis. But, still I am of the same view that credit of service provided by using the company's bus is available to a manufacturer on the following ground.
In the absence of definition of cab in GST Act, you have to refer the definition given other existing law in force viz; motor vehicle Act only and not repealed law (i.e.section 65(20) of Finance Act which was in in force till 30.06.2012). During Service tax regime, credit on transportation of employees were not available and department has

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mportant, the meaning given in the Cambridge dictionary is “cab means the separate front part of a large vehicle, such as a truck, bus, or train, in which the driver sits”. Now rent-a-cab means renting of the space which controls the motor vehicle. The bus falls as motor vehicle having capacity of carrying more than 12 passengers and falls with the ambit of “Rent-a-cab” service.
Repeating that an employee cannot be termed as “passenger”. If I accept your contention that bus is not a cab then too it is covered under Section 17(5)(a)(i)(B) of CGST Act, 2017, ITC with regards to motor vehicle except for transportation of passenger, is not available.
Let me thank Sh. Kasturiji,Sir for expressing their views.
Our experts may correct me if mistaken.
Thanks
Reply By JSW CEMENTLIMITED:
The Reply:
Sir,
Here the queriest is not asking for eligibility of ITC on Bus, but his query is with regard to services availed for transportation of employees. ITC on buses purchased for the purpose of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, In this case also, I am of the view that ITC on the expenses incurred to run a bus, is not available. As this is the facility extended to the employee by the employer, this service is not obligatory for an employer to provide to its employee under any law for the time being in force. However, as there are various decision in the erstwhile law allowing the Credit as input service but that depends upon the facts and circumstances of the case. Further, it is onus on the assessee to prove the nexus.
Request for comments.
Thanks
Reply By JSW CEMENTLIMITED:
The Reply:
Sir
Presently, most of the companies are located in remote areas away from the city, and almost all the companies are providing pick and drop facilities to its staff and sub-staffs for the reason that they reach office and plant in time so that production is not hampered. This facility may be seen as a facility given to employee for the benefit of business only. Unless there is busine

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent's intention is not to allow ITC . It is also the intention of legislature. The definition of cab would not help. In my view , the case is not worth fighting. However, there is a slim chance on the ground of challenging the definition of 'passenger' in this context.
Reply By JSW CEMENTLIMITED:
The Reply:
Kasturi sir
I respect your interpretation and experience also. Still I am not convinced as to why we are comparing employees with passenger, employer employee relationship and all. The service is not falling under rent a cab service where eligibility is restricted except it is performed under as an obligation under some law, it can not be said to be a welfare facility, it is used for furtherance of business, it helps people to reach workplace in time attend to their duty timely,. Directly or indirectly it has a bearing on the manufacturing business, still all the experts are negative towards eligibility.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, I agree that by way of d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

essee), in most of the cases the amount is very small compared to the annual turnover, and small entrepreneurs cannot afford the litigation and cost for the same. The grounds of notice, orders and appeal and person representing the case is important and than too the decisions may not be expected or favorable. The case law, as on now, have not attained its finality, I may agree with the contention in future.
Please offer your comments and correct me if mistaken.
Thanks,
Reply By Anubhav Bansal:
The Reply:
Deal All,
I went through entire discussion in this thread which mainly is on eligibility of ITC in this case of services.
Now, I seek experts opinion on what will be the GST treatment of this service in hands of the Company when they are giving this service to employees i.e. will it be consider as "supply" in terms of the provision of CGST act and will company have to discharge GST liability in case:-
1. When the company is recovering partial amount towards this servic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TLIMITED:
The Reply:
What is specified in Section 25 as referred to in entry no.2 of schedule I
Reply By Anubhav Bansal:
The Reply:
Dear JSW ji,
Extract of Section 25 for ready purusal:
"ACTIVITIES TO BE TREATED AS SUPPLY EVEN IF MADE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION 1. Permanent transfer or disposal of business assets where input tax credit has been availed on such assets. 2. Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of business: Provided that gifts not exceeding fifty thousand rupees in value in a financial year by an employer to an employee shall not be treated as supply of goods or services or both."
Further, as per the explanation to section 15, for the purposes of CGST Act:-
(a) persons shall be deemed to be "related persons" if –
(i) ………..;
(ii) ……..;
(iii) such persons are employer and employee;
Conjoint reading of this 2 provisions of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n common parlance, gift is made without consideration, is voluntary in nature and is made occasionally. It cannot be demanded as a matter of right by the employee and the employee cannot move a court of law for obtaining a gift. Another issue is the taxation of perquisites. It is pertinent to point out here that the services by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment is outside the scope of GST (neither supply of goods or supply of services). It follows therefrom that supply by the employer to the employee in terms of contractual agreement entered into between the employer and the employee, will not be subjected to GST. Further, the input tax credit (ITC) scheme under GST does not allow ITC of membership of a club, health and fitness centre [section 17 (5) (b) (ii)]. It follows, therefore, that if such services are provided free of charge to all the employees by the employer then the same will not be subjected to GST, provided appropriate GST was p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

general entry.
Further, it is advisable to the person, rather than hiring a person for providing such transportation services, the manufacturing company should employ someone to run such buses at its own cost. This will somehow save the commission cost being paid by the manufacturing company to the person.
Reply By HIREGANGE& ASSOCIATES:
The Reply:
My views are as below:
a): 17 (5) (a) not applicable as it blocks credit on "supply of motor vehicles" when supplied "as such" but not on the services provided by using such motor vehicle. Accordingly, no need of considering definition of passenger/employee etc.
b) Restriction in 17 (5) (iii) is on the rent a cab not renting of motor vehicle. Erstwhile Cenvat Credit Rules excluded from the definition of input services "services provided by way of renting of a motor vehicle". If the intention of law makers under GST was to disallow credit on buses, they could have used similar language. (i.e. motor vehicle

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that ITC is not admissibie .
Reply By Mahadev R:
The Reply:
I wish to agree with Mr.Venkat Raman, Credit restriction should be in relation to motor cab or maxi cab which would cover upto 12 persons. In other cases, credit should be allowed and it would be allowed as gradually credits would become more seamless in future.
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Get it clarified from the Law Makers as there are certain words on which no definition is provided in the GST Law.
Reply By Anubhav Bansal:
The Reply:
Dear Venkat Ramanji,
Thanks for sharing the extract of those advertisement. After reading it, I am of the opinion that your conclusion basically is relied upon following extracts of the advertisment "it follows therefrom that supply by the employer to the employee in terms of contractual agreement entered into between the employer and the employee, will not be subjected to GST. "
If this be the case then even the partial recovery form the employee can be said to be a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
Based on above, it is clear that law has very specifically conveyed that ITC is available ONLY for taxable supply i.e. (i) further supply of such vehicles, (ii) for transportation of passengers or goods and (iii) imparting training. In my point of view drop and pick up of employee does not fall within this “namely” services. Moreover, supplies to employer to employee has specifically mentioned in Section and schedules, wherever, benefit is to be granted. So only those supplies including gifts, where specifically mentioned is available to employer. So, I am of the view that ITC is not available.
Thanks
Reply By Anil Sood:
The Reply:
Friends let us have a look at the Apportionment & bl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rd supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply;
(ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre;
(iii) rent-a-cab, life insurance and health insurance except where
(A) the Government notifies the services which are obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees under any law for the time being in force; or
(B) such inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as part of a taxable composite or mixed supply; and
(ii) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession;
Now, if we look at the definition, the credit of motor vehicle is inadmissible except in the case of buses owned by the Employer becau

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Newspapers Supplied on Trains Exempt from GST Under Notification No. 2/2017, S. No. 120.

Newspapers Supplied on Trains Exempt from GST Under Notification No. 2/2017, S. No. 120.
Case-Laws
GST
Supply of newspaper on board the trains – The supply of newspaper is separately invoiced

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Train Food & Water: Charge Based on Goods' Value Only, Exclude Service Charges, No Service Element Involved.

GST on Train Food & Water: Charge Based on Goods' Value Only, Exclude Service Charges, No Service Element Involved.
Case-Laws
GST
Rate of GST – supply of food on board the trains – it is not possible to classify the whole contract as supply of services – The supply of goods i.e. food, bottled water etc. shall be charged to GST on value of goods (excluding the service charges) at applicable rates as pure supply of goods, as the same have no element of service. – AAR
TMI Updates – Hig

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Trophies Not Universally Classified Under HSN Code 83062920; Must Follow Customs Tariff Headings Provisions.

Trophies Not Universally Classified Under HSN Code 83062920; Must Follow Customs Tariff Headings Provisions.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification – TROPHY – even though the word TROPHY is specificall

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AAR advises using interpretative rules to determine correct HSN code for billing mixed materials with one primary component.

AAR advises using interpretative rules to determine correct HSN code for billing mixed materials with one primary component.
Case-Laws
GST
Before AAR, the following question was raised: I would like to know if there is a combination of different materials and about 75% (value terms) is getting used of any one Raw Material, under which HSN should we make bill? – AAR advised the applicant to understand the interpretative Rules and determine the classification accordingly.
TMI Updates

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RATE DIFFERENCE CREDIT NOTE ISSUED BY OUR SUPPLIER AGAINST PURCHASE

RATE DIFFERENCE CREDIT NOTE ISSUED BY OUR SUPPLIER AGAINST PURCHASE
Query (Issue) Started By: – nandankumar roy Dated:- 8-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
DEAR SIR,
SUPPLIER OR CREDITORS ISSUED CREDIT NOTE AGAINST RATE DIFFERENCE THAT IS SHOWING IN GSTR2 CAN WE WE TAKE THIS AMOUNT IN OUR GSTR1 BY TREAT AS DEBIT NOTE OR WHETHER CREDITORS REFLECTED ITC AMOUNT ONLY TO BE REVERSE IN 3B RETURN TILL HAVE TO WAIT SUBMISSION OF GSTR2 IN FUTUR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“Sulekh Sarita” Classified as Workbook Under Heading 48.20, Lacks Features for Heading 49.03 Classification.

“Sulekh Sarita” Classified as Workbook Under Heading 48.20, Lacks Features for Heading 49.03 Classification.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of books – Work Books or Exercise Book – Sulekh Sarita – presence of printed text does not affect their classification under heading 48.20 as exercise books – Further, since, none of the books contain any pages with children’s picture, drawing or colouring matter, classification of any of them under heading 49.03 is not possible – AAR
TMI Update

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =