INPUT Credit

INPUT Credit
Query (Issue) Started By: – Arjun Gopalakrishna Dated:- 18-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 8 Replies
GST
INPUT CREDIT OF GST COLLECTED BY GOVERNMENT BODY ON FINES AND PENALTIES LEVIES FOR DELAY IN SUBMISSION OF FORMS.
IS THERE ANY RESTRICTION FOR CLAIMING GST INPUT IN THIS CASE
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
In my view ITC on penalty paid due to late submission of forms is not allowed. In my view such penalty is legal requirement and does not qualify to the criteria of "in the business or furtherance of business."
Reply By Arjun Gopalakrishna:
The Reply:
Sir we appreciate you view on this query. SEBI has levied penalty for delay in submission of quarterly forms

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2) (d) of CGST Act, 2017, interest, or late fees or penalty for delayed payment of any consideration for supply, is mentioned. Only payment of penalty cannot constitute supply.
Merely, non-mentioning in Section 16, 17 and 18 of Act, does not gives you liberty of all Taxes as credit, other factors are required to be considered before arriving at any conclusion.
Our experts may correct me if mistaken.
Thanks
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
I endorse the views of Shri Arjun.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
If penalty is imposed upon an assessee for an offence (committed by assessee )by way of Adjudication Order, no ITC on that amount of penalty is admissible. In other words, such penalty is not to be treated in busines

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E-waybills

E-waybills
Query (Issue) Started By: – Jayadevan K M Nair Dated:- 18-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
Our client is a timber merchant dealing in timber logs and they raise invoice to the customers mentioning the product HSN code of timber logs which is 4403. But the client B before transporting the timber, does sawing of timber B logs into chipped/sliced timber in near by saw mill.B For sawing services the Sawmill issues sawing bill with service HSN code 9988. After sawing of Timber log, the product is changed to chipped/sliced Timber and its HSN Code is 4407.
HenceB the final item transported would be split timber which comes under HSN 4407.
* The sawing centre raises only a se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d in some cases E-way bill is taken by Timber merchant by giving B reference of their sale bill. Is the process is correct?
* If B a customer cut timber log from his on land or purchased from an unregistered dealerB and bring for sawing , then which are the documents to be attached while transporting the chipped/sliced timber. Shall E-way bill is to be taken. How fill the part A particulars in E-way bill. As he is having only GSTINB of the service provider.
Please clarify as we are not able to give proper guidance to our client.
with regards
Jayadevan
Muralidhar & Associates
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Consignment value and HSN needs to be determined for goods only not for services as only the goods are in movement and e-way

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Capital Goods ITC claim

Capital Goods ITC claim
Query (Issue) Started By: – narendra patel Dated:- 18-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 11-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 12 Replies
GST
Suppose a capital good (purely for business purpose) is purchased for 80,000. on 1.4.2018.
So CGST part will be 7200. We avail 1/5 part (1440) for current year and put reversal entry of 5760.
Now, in next year we claim next 1/5 part (1440).
My question:
1. Do we claim next year ITC on 1.4.2019 or 31.3.2020 (ie exactly 1 year after purchase or at the end of next FY) 2. Under which section of GST, do we claim ITC of next year.
3. Under which section of GST, do we enter reversal enter of current year.
Please advise.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Restrict

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

credit each year. Hence I asked this question.
Please advise.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Querist,
You can take full ITC on capital goods in one year. Reversal (you are talking) is required on account of usage of tax paid inputs/capital goods in the business or furtherance of business in respect of exempted as well as taxable supply of goods or services.
Are you engaged in exempted as well as taxable supply ?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dr.Govindarajan Ji,
Sir, What I want to say is as under :-
During pre-GST era, Cenvat Credit on capital goods was allowed as 50% in first financial year and balance (50% ) in next financial year. In GST regime, ITC on capital goods can be taken in full in one year. (year of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iews it seems I can take FULL ITC in the same year in which I buy machinery (Capital Goods).
Thank you very much.
If my conclusion from above discussion is wrong, please advise.
Reply By Shashank Mutha:
The Reply:
Respected kasturi Sethi & Govindrajan ji
I think that if we charge depreciation on capital goods at the end of financial year than we can't avail ITC .
I refer Sec 17 (5) of CGST Act about BLOCK CREDIT
If I am wrong than kindly guide us
Thank you
(waiting for reply)
Reply By Shashank Mutha:
The Reply:
#DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Reply By Shashank Mutha:
The Reply:
#KASTURI SETHI
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
In case of capital goods used for taxable goods then full credit can be taken in one year. And in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notified Extension Of Time Limit For Filing Form Gstr 3b.

Notified Extension Of Time Limit For Filing Form Gstr 3b.
(1-F/2018) Dated:- 18-5-2018 Karnataka SGST
GST – States
Karnataka SGST
Karnataka SGST
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
FINANCE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION (1-F/2018)
[NO.KGST.CR.01/17-18], Bengaluru
dated: 18.05.2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Karnataka Act 27 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April_2018.

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April_2018.
8/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Nagaland SGST
GST – States
Nagaland SGST
Nagaland SGST
GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
NAGALAND: DIMAPUR
Dated Dimapur, the 18th May, 2018
NOTIFICATION- 8/2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Nagaland Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (4 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Nagaland Goods and Servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Officer authorized for enrolling or rejecting application for Goods and Services Tax Practitioner under the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Officer authorized for enrolling or rejecting application for Goods and Services Tax Practitioner under the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
1357/GST-2 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Order
Subject: Officer authorized for enrolling or rejecting application for Goods and Services Tax Practitioner under the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
In pursuance of clause (91) of section 2 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and subject to sub-section (2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Shree Raipur Cement Plant (A unit of Shree Cement Limited) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, The Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Union of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of R

Shree Raipur Cement Plant (A unit of Shree Cement Limited) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, The Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Union of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), The Under Secretary (ST-II), Ministry of Finance
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1494 – CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 387 (Chhattisgarh)
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 18-5-2018
Writ Petition (T) No. 83 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ramit Mehta, Mr. Saurabh Maheshwari and Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Advocates
For the Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh: – Mr. Anand Dadariya, Deputy Government Advocate
For the Respondents : Union of India: – Mr. Vaibhav P. Shukla, Advocate, appears on behalf of Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General of India
ORDER
1. The short question involved in this writ petition is, whether the petitioner is entitled to be issued

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etitioner was also having registration certificate under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and with the introduction of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, the CGST Act, 2017), the petitioner has also been registered under the CGST Act, 2017 with effect from 1-7-2017. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent Department had been issuing C-Forms to the petitioner Company till 30-6-2017 for the goods covered under Section 2(d) of the CST Act, 1956 and as specified in the certificate of registration of the dealer for use in terms of Section 8 of the CST Act, 1956, but with effect from 1-7-2017, from coming into force of the CGST Act, 2017, C-Form is not being issued and / or withheld by showing error message that “ED9: Invoice date should be less than 1st July, 2017”.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition stating inter alia that its registration certificate is with regard to High Speed Diesel covered under the definition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ax Act, 2005. After the roll-out of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the petitioner / dealer has been migrated to the GST regime by virtue of the provisions contained in Section 139 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 as such, the petitioner's previous registration under the CST Act, 1956 is no more valid and, therefore, the petitioner has rightly been denied the privilege of C-Form, as under the provisions of the CST Act, 1956, C-Form has to be issued only to the registered dealer under the said Act. Therefore, the petitioner's registration under the CST Act, 1956 stood cancelled upon the petitioner's registration under the CGST Act, 2017 and thus, the petitioner is not entitled for the privilege of C-Form under the CST Act, 1956 read with the Rules of 1957. It has further been stated that the petitioner has not availed the facility of C-Form so far as High Speed Diesel is concerned, till 30-6-2017, therefore, the petitioner Company

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e levied with effect from such date as may be notified on the recommendations of the Council. The GST Council till this date, admittedly and undisputedly, has not notified high speed diesel bringing it under the purview of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for issuance of C-Form under the CST Act, 1956 and its migration to the registration under the CGST Act, 2017 will be confined excluding the goods (high speed diesel), as there is no provision even under the CGST Act, 2017 that his registration under the CGST Act, 2017 would automatically cancel his registration under the CST Act, 1956 particularly, the goods which are included in Section 2(d) of the CST Act, 1956 and those have been excluded from the purview of the CGST Act, 2017 by Section 9(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, as by issuance of C-Form the petitioner would be entitled for concessional rate of tax. Therefore, the writ petition be allowed and the respondent State be directed to issue C-Form to the petiti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed the privilege of C-Form for high speed diesel prior to 1-7-2017 and as such, high speed diesel is used by the petitioner for the purpose of operation of drill machine at mines, lifting and loading of limestone in dumper, use of diesel as fuel in dumper and other equipments for extraction of limestone from mines and its transportation, use of diesel in plant and machinery such as kiln and other machineries used in manufacture of clinker and cement etc.. Therefore, the petitioner is otherwise also not entitled for issuance of C-Form as he does not fulfill the criteria under Section 8(3)(b) of the CST Act, 1956 and as such, issuance of C-Form to the petitioner is not permissible and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. He would finally submit that after coming into force of the CGST Act, 2017, the petitioner has not filed any return under the CST Act, 1956, as such, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed.
7. In rejoinder submission, Mr. Mehta would submit that the CST Act,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ection 7(1) of the CST Act, 1956. Replying to the submission of not filing return under the CST Act, 1956 after coming into force of the CGST Act, 2017, he would submit that C-Form has not been issued to the petitioner, despite request, therefore, he could not file return and the petitioner's representation has not been replied / answered.
8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered their rival submissions made herein-above and went through the record with utmost circumspection.
9. In order to judge the correctness of the plea raised at the Bar, it would be appropriate to notice the broad features of the CST Act, 1956 before entering into the merits of the matter.
10. The CST Act, 1956 has been enacted to formulate principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce or outside a State or in the course of import into or export from India, to provide for the levy, collection and distribution of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ch goods inside the appropriate State under the Sales Tax Law of that State.
12. Under Section 7(1) of the CST Act, 1956, every dealer, who is liable to pay tax under the CST Act, 1956, should make an application for registration under the Act, to such authority in the appropriate State, as the Central Government may specify. The certificate of registration so issued is liable to be cancelled under sub-section (4) (b) of Section 7, if the dealer fails to pay any tax or penalty payable under the CST Act, 1956.
13. Sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the CST Act, 1956 carves out an exception. If the sale is to a registered dealer and if the sale is of the goods described in sub-section (3), the dealer need not pay tax at the rate prescribed by the local Sales Tax Law of the State in terms of sub-section (2). It is enough if such a person pays only 2%. Under sub-section (4) of Section 8, the dealer is obliged to furnish to the prescribed authority, a declaration duly filled and signed by th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

15. In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the CST Act, 1956, the Central Government has framed Rules known as the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957. Rule 12 of the said Rules provides as under:-
“12. (1) The declaration and the certificate referred to in sub-section (4) of Section 8 shall be in Forms 'C' and 'D' respectively:
Provided that Form 'C' in force before the commencement of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) (Amendment) Rules, 1974, or before the commencement of the Central Sales Tax (Registration & Turnover) (Amendment) Rules, 1976, may also be used up to the 31st December, 1979 with suitable modifications:
Provided further that a single declaration may cover all transactions of sale which take place in one financial year between the same two dealers:
Provided also that where, in the case of any transaction of sale, the delivery of goods is spread over to different quarters in a financial year

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he case may be, may furnish one such indemnity bond to cover all the forms of declarations so lost.
(3) Where a declaration form furnished by the dealer purchasing the goods or the certificate furnished by the Government has been lost, the dealer selling the goods, may demand from the dealer who purchased the goods or, as the case may be, from the Government, which purchased the goods, a duplicate of such form or certificate, and the same shall be furnished with the following declaration recorded in red ink and signed by the dealer or authorised officer or the Government, as the case may be, on all the three portions of such form or certificate,-
“I hereby declare that this is the duplicate of the declaration form/certificate No…………………..signed on……………and issued to………………………………who is a registered dealer of……………..(State) and whose registration certificate number is………………”
*** *** ***
*** *** ***
*** *** *

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

m the department prescribed under the State's taxation law. The C Form is a declaration to be issued only by the Sales Tax Authorities of the States concerned. By issuing declaration in C Form the purchasing dealer would be benefited as he is entitled to purchase goods by paying only concessional rate of tax of 4% as prescribed by the State concerned of the purchasing dealer otherwise the purchasing dealer has to pay tax at a higher rate besides additional taxes on such sales effected within the State where the selling dealer is situated.”
18. Thus, the declaration (C Forms) are required by the registered dealer to purchase goods from other States at concessional tax rate under the CST Act, 1956. C Form is prescribed under Rule 12(1) of the Rules of 1957 as a declaration form for the purpose as specified under Section 8(4) of the CST Act, 1956 and if the registered dealer fails to procure C Form from the respondents / State and thereafter, do not provide C Form to the supplier/se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

speed diesel;
(iii) motor spirit (commonly known as petrol);
(iv) natural gas;
(v) aviation turbine fuel; and
(vi) alcoholic liquor for human consumption”
21. Thus, the amended definition of goods under the CST Act, 1956 includes high speed diesel and by virtue of the said amendment, the definition of “goods” given under the CST Act stands amended whereby high speed diesel was kept under the meaning of goods amongst other five items.
22. The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was promulgated and brought into force with effect from 1-7-2017, which is an Act to make a provision for levy and collection of tax on intra-State supply of goods or services or both by the Central Government and the matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Likewise, the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, 'the Chhattisgarh GST Act, 2017') was promulgated and brought into force with effect from 1-7-2017 which is also an Act to make a provision for levy

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eto.
23. At this juncture, it would be appropriate to notice the repeal and saving provision of the CGST Act, 2017 i.e. Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017, which provides as under: –
“174. Repeal and saving.-(1) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, on and from the date of commencement of this Act, the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) (except as respects goods included in entry 84 of the Union List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution), the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 (16 of 1955), the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (58 of 1957), the Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 (40 of 1978), and the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) (hereafter referred to as the repealed Acts) are hereby repealed.
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx
xxx xxx xxx”
24. The aforesaid provision of the CGST Act, 2017 contains a provision pertaining to repeal and saving. It is pertinent to not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1936 (30 of 1936), (hereinafter referred to as the repealed Acts) are hereby repealed.”
26. The aforesaid provision of the State Act clearly provides that the Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 shall apply only in respect of goods included in Entry 54 of the State List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. Entry 54 of the State List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India as amended by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, states as under: –
“54. Taxes on the sale of petroleum, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas, aviation turbine fuel and alcoholic liquor for human consumption, but not including sale in the course of inter- State trade of commerce or sale in the course of international trade or commerce of such goods.”
27. Thus, from the aforesaid analysis, it is quite vivid that the Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 has not been repealed qua the items specified under the amended Entry 54 of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council.”
30. Sub-section (2) of Section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the Chhattisgarh GST Act, 2017 clearly provide that GST on crude oil, high speed diesel, aviation turbine, motor spirit (petrol) shall be levied with effect from the date as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the GST Council. Therefore, the CGST Act, 2017 has kept the aforesaid six goods away from the ambit of the CGST Act, 2017 and no notification has been issued by the Central Government on the recommendation of the GST Council imposing GST on high speed diesel at a prescribed rate.
31. Thus, the net effect of the aforesaid discussion is that after the promulgation of the CGST Act, 2017 and the State Act, the items mentioned in the amended Entry 54 of the State List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution are governed by the CST Act, 1956, as no notification has been issued even under Section 9(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 by the C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the petitioner is entitled to be issued 'C' Forms in respect of the natural gas purchased by it in the course of interstate sales and used by it for the generation of electricity. …”
33. The Division Bench speaking through Avneesh Jhingan, J, held at the end of para 17 as under: –
“It is pertinent to note that till date, the Government has not issued a notification under either the CGST Act or the HGST Act. Hence inter-state sale of natural gas continues to be governed by the CST Act.”
34. Their Lordships finally directed the State authorities to issue 'C' Forms by holding as under: –
“28. In these circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. It is held that the respondents are liable to issue 'C' Forms in respect of the natural gas purchased by the petitioner from the Oil Companies in Gujarat and used in the generation or distribution of electricity at its power plants in Haryana. …”
35. I respectfully agree and follow the principle of law laid d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecommendation of the GST Council would be necessary to be notified by the Central Government, neither the GST Council has recommended levy of GST on high speed diesel nor it has been notified by the Central Government particularly when prior to introduction of GST with effect from 1-7-2017, the competent legislature has already amended the definition of “goods” under Section 2(d) of the CST Act, 1956 and purposefully amended the definition of “goods” mentioning the same items which are barred under Section 9(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 whereby high speed diesel is included.
37. Next submission of the learned State counsel is that after introduction and promulgation of GST, the registration certificate of the petitioner issued under the provisions of the CST Act, 1956 and the rules made thereunder would automatically stand cancelled after his migration to the GST regime, has no legs to stand. The registration certificate issued under the CST Act, 1956 can be cancelled only after the initi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oods” as defined under the amended definition of Section 2(d) of the CST Act, 1956 including high speed diesel.
38. Further submission of the learned State counsel that since the petitioner did not avail the facility / privilege of 'C' Form with respect to high speed diesel prior to 1-7-2017, now, he cannot be allowed to use 'C' Form qua high speed diesel, deserves to be rejected, as if the petitioner is lawfully entitled and eligible for issuance of 'C' Form, he cannot be declined such facility, merely on the count that he did not avail such facility prior to 1-7-2017 as the CGST Act, 2017 or the CST Act, 1956 do not bar to avail such facility on the said ground. Non-furnishing of return by the petitioner raised by the State is equally fallacious. Even otherwise, there is no bar in the CGST Act, 2017 that the petitioner Company after migrating from the CST regime to the GST regime cannot hold registration certificate under the CST Act, 1956 confining it to the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore the Central Government has not notified high speed diesel to be within the ambit and sweep of the CGST Act, 2017. Thus, the petitioner's registration certificate under the CST Act, 1956 is still valid for the goods defined in Section 2(d) of the CST Act, 1956, including high speed diesel, and the petitioner is entitled for issuance of C-Form for inter-State purchase / sale of high speed diesel against the said C-Form. Accordingly, the respondents shall be liable and are directed to issue C-Form to the petitioner in respect of high speed diesel to be purchased by the petitioner and used in the course of manufacture of cement and for that, it is further directed to rectify and remove the error on their official website and entertain the petitioner's application submitted on-line on the official website seeking issuance of C Form to the petitioner for said goods.
40. The writ petition is allowed to the extent outlined herein-above leaving the p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Structural Waterproofing Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Frontier Strips Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Central Excise, Alwar

M/s. Structural Waterproofing Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Frontier Strips Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Central Excise, Alwar
Central Excise
2018 (5) TMI 1409 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 18-5-2018
Excise Appeal No. 50675 of 2018, Excise Appeal No. 50692 of 2018 – Final Order No. 51951-51952 /2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Mr. Justice ( Dr. ) Satish Chandra, President And Hon'ble Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member ( Technical )
Shri G G Gupta, Advocate and Shri Mohit Gohlyan, CA for the Appellants
Shri M R Sharma, AR for the Respondent
ORDER
Per: Justice ( Dr. ) Satish Chandra
The present appeals are filed by the appellant against the Order-in- Appeal No. 34 (AK) CE/JPR/2017 dated 29.01.2018 and 496-544(SM)CE/JPR/2017 dated 01.12.2017. In both the appeals, the issue is identical and hence, are disposed of by a common order.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants have their factories situated in the State of Rajasthan and were operating

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e on record, it appears that identical issue has came up before the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Shree Cement Ltd. & other vs. CCE, Alwar [ Final Order Nos. 50189- 50191/2018 dated 18.1.2018] as also in M/s. UltraTech Cement Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur I [Final Order No. 51129/2018 dated 28.3.2018] wherein it was observed that :
4. After hearing both sides and on perusal of record, it appears that identical issue has come up before the Tribunal in the case of Shree Cement Ltd. vs. CCE, Alwar (Final Order No. 50189 – 50191/2018 dt. 18.01.2018) where it was observed that:
“7. We have heard both sides at length and perused the appeal record. As out lined above, the appellants are covered by the Investment Promotion Schemes of the Rajasthan Government. In terms of the various schemes of the Rajasthan Government, the appellants are required to discharge their VAT liability by making payment of the same. Out of such VAT credited to the Government, a certain portion is disbursed back to them in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

owever, we note that the Tribunal in the case of Welspun Corporation Ltd. (Supra) has distinguished the decision of the Apex Court in the light of Gujarat VAT Act, 2003. In the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case, the assesse had opted for remission of tax scheme under which a portion of the VAT paid was remitted back to the assessee. The Tribunal held that such subsidy amounts are not required to the included in the transaction value.
9. In the present case we know that for the initial period the assessees are required to remit the VAT recovered by them at the time of sale of the goods manufactured. A part of such VAT is given back to them in the form of subsidy in Challan 37 B. Such Challans are as good as cash but can be used only for payment of VAT in the subsequent period. In terms of the scheme of the Government of Rajasthan payment of VAT using such Challan are considered legal payments of tax. In view of the above, Revenue is not correct in taking the view that VAT liability discha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of due date of filing of GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018

Extension of due date of filing of GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018
09/2018–C.T./GST Dated:- 18-5-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
West Bengal SGST
West Bengal SGST
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
NOTIFICATION BY THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
Notification No. 09/2018-C.T./GST
Dated: 18.05.2018
Notification No. 23/2018 – State Tax
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the West Bengal Good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Daman and Diu – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 318(E), dated the 31st March, 2018

Daman and Diu – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 318(E), dated the 31st March, 2018
9/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 9/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 465(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Dadra and Nagar Haveli – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 317(E) dated the 31st March, 2018

Dadra and Nagar Haveli – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 317(E) dated the 31st March, 2018
8/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 8/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 464(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Chandigarh – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 316(E) dated the 31st March, 2018

Chandigarh – E-way bill comes into effect w.e.f. 25-5-2018 – Central Government, rescinds the notification number G.S.R. 316(E) dated the 31st March, 2018
7/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Union Territory GST (UTGST)
GST
UTGST
UTGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION No. 7/2018-Union Territory Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 463(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018
23/2018 Dated:- 18-5-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Notification No. 23/2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018
G.S.R. 462 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rectification in GST3B

Rectification in GST3B
Query (Issue) Started By: – Amlan Mohanty Dated:- 17-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Sir,
I am a civil contractor.I work with Police Housing corporation. I receive bill almost in every month and 12 % GST for construction work is allocated for GST purpose and which is given ro me. I file my GST return every month till March 18 GSTR 3B has also been filed, but by mistakenly during filing i filed it B2C instead of B2B by putting the GSTIN NO OF POLICE HOUSING corporation . Now the corporation is telling me as i had filed in B2C so the GST AMMOUNT is not visible in their GST NO and they will not be able to get input tax credit for the GST I filed. For this re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Issue related to taxability. of 'tenancy rights' under GST.

Issue related to taxability. of 'tenancy rights' under GST.
12-28/2017-18-EXN-GST-(528)-15710-727 Dated:- 17-5-2018 Himachal Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Circular No. 12-28/2017-18-EXN-GST-(528)-15710-727
Government of Himachal Pradesh,
Excise and Taxation Department
To
1. The Additional Excise and Taxation Commissioner, South Zone. Shimla-9, H.P.
2. The Jt. Commissioner of State Taxes and Excise Central zone, North zone, Flying squad NZ/ SZ/ CZ.
3. The Director (Directorate Treasuries, Accounts and Lotteries) Block No-23 SDA Complex, Kasumpati, Shimla- 171009.
4. The Dy. Commissioner of State Taxes and Excise, Shimla, Solan, BBN Baddi, Sirimour, Bilaspur, Hamirpur, Mandi, Kullu, Chamba, Kangra, Revenue Distt Nurpur and Una,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of tenancy rights against tenancy premium which is also known as “pagadi system” the tenant acquires, tenancy rights in the property against payment of tenancy premium (Pagdi). The landlord be owner of the property but the possession of the same lies with the tenant. The tenant pays periodic rent to the landlord as long as he occupies the property. The tenant also usually has the option to sell the tenancy right of the said property and in such a case has to share a percentage of the proceed with owner of land. as laid down in their tenancy agreement. Alternatively, the landlord pays to tenant the prevailing tenancy premium to get the property vacated.
3. As per section 9(1) of the HPGST Act there shall be levied state tax on the intra-St

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is levied on such transfers of tenancy rights and such transaction thus should not be subjected to GST. is not relevant. Merely because a transaction or a supply involves execution of documents which may require registration and payment of registration fee and stamp duty would not preclude them from the scope of supply of goods and services and from payment of GST. The transfer of tenancy rights cannot be treated as sale of land or building declared as neither a supply of goods nor of services in para 5 of Schedule III to HPGST Act. 2017. Thus a consideration for the said activity shall attract levy of GST.
5. To sum up, the activity of transfer of 'tenancy rights' is squarely covered under the scope of supply and taxable per-se. Trans

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Swastik Township Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, Kolkata North

M/s Swastik Township Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, Kolkata North
Service Tax
2018 (8) TMI 485 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
S.T. Appeal No.75355/2018 – FO/76431/2018
Service Tax
SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER And SHRI BIJAY KUMAR, TECHNICAL MEMBER
Shri Saurabh Bhutra, Adv. for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. S. Chattopadhyay, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
Per Shri Bijay Kumar :
The present appeal has been filed the Appellant against the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.219/ST-I/KOL/2017 dt.-26.09.2017 passed by Commissioner of CGST & Ex. (Appeals), Kolkata, vide which the ld.Commissioner (Appeals) has modified the order passed by the adjudicating authority to the extent that he set aside the demand of Rs. 46,814/- under Rule 14 and penalty under Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. He has also ordered the appellant to pay interest for intervening period under Section 75 of the Act and imposed penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 77

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and for such wrong availment of Cenvat Credit, the appellants were made liable to penal action under Rule 15 thereof. It is alleged that the aforesaid liability arose on the appellant on account of not including the additional sale price of the flat sold by the appellant pertaining to (i) Association formation deposit, (ii) Common meter security deposit, (iii) Deposit for common maintenance for six months, (iv) Deposit for electricity charges for common areas of six months. The appellant-assessee discharged the service tax liability on the total sale price, but did not discharge the service tax liability on the amount received on account of different head as mentioned above. It was felt by the Department that the services provided under the aforesaid head is to be categorized under “Builders Special Service” and such deposit is to be added in the gross amount in the service tax. The Department relied upon the audited balance sheet.
3. The ld.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

zu) of the Act. He is of the view that the Revenue has proceeded against the baseless allegations because the amount collected by them from the residence of the flat owners, has been taken towards the services mentioned above and has been subsequently returned to them after making adjustment towards various fees. The ld.Advocate also submitted that the impugned order classifying the services under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) under Manpower Recruitment Services is not sustainable on the ground that the appellant has availed various services from vendors as plumbing services, pipe laying and fittings, tap box fitting etc. and the payment has been late against the plumbing bill. In providing of services discharging service tax on this service, the appellant is not in receipt of manpower recruitment services. The ld.Advocate also stated that the impugned demand is barred by limitation as the extended period of limitation is not invokable in this case. As there is no malafide intention,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lt of any conscious and deliberate wrong doing and in the order passed under Section 11A(2) there is a legally tenable finding to that effect then the provision of Section 11AC would also get attracted. The converse of this, equally true, is that in the absence of such an allegation in the notice the period for which the escaped duty may be reclaimed would be confined to one year and in the absence of such a finding in the order passed under Section 11A(2) there would be no application of the penalty provision in Section 11AC of the Act.”
He has also relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Saboo Coating Ltd. Vs. CCEx, Chandigarh : 2016 (36) STR 447 (Tri.- Del.), wherein the Tribunal has held as under :
“4. As regards limitation, I find that there is no dispute by the lower authorities that the credit was availed and duly reflected in the returns. If there is no column in the returns to show the nature of the input services, the assessee cannot be blamed for not provi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

classify under the Builders Special Services classifiable under Chapter Heading 65(105)(zzzu) of the Finance Act,1994. On going through the various documents enclosed in the appeal memorandum, as such, agreement of sale, bank statement, bills provided by the various vendors, we find that the appellant has returned excess amount to the flat owners after collection of various fees, as such, Association formation deposit, Common meter deposit, common maintenance deposit, common electricity charges etc. The same has been rendered after collection of actual amount spent for payment of this deposit/fees/base area on behalf of 120 flat owners.
7. In view of the above, we are of the view that this payments are only actual charges paid to the various statutory bodies and for electricity maintenance in common area and the same is therefore, not liable to service tax and if so, abatement is available to them under the Service Tax Law.
8. Further, we find that the adjudicating authority has pass

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rain Cements Limited Unit-II Versus CCT, Tirupathi GST

Rain Cements Limited Unit-II Versus CCT, Tirupathi GST
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 1407 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31224/2017 – IO/27/2018
Central Excise
Mr. P.V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Y. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri Das Thavanam, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
[Order per: P.VENKATA SUBBA RAO]
1. Heard both sides and perused the records. This is a case of credit of the service tax paid on the food provided to the workers outsourced by the appellant. The definition of input service specifically excludes outdoor catering provided to the employees. The appellant argues that they have outsourced manpower to work in the factory

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rvice provider for the subsidised food although it is not evident from the records. In turn, the man power service provider bills the appellant for the food subsidy including the service tax thereon. The issue in dispute is the credit of the service tax element on this food subsidy. It is the case of the Revenue that this food subsidy amounts to outdoor catering services for employees and the credit of the service tax thereon is inadmissible in view of the specific exclusion in the Rules. The appellant argued that although it is called food subsidy, in fact, it is manpower outsourcing service and it is also a component of the charges paid to the manpower supplier. The department, on the other hand, argues that the bill is raised specificall

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. [2017(49) S.T.R 88 (Tri.-Hyd), Tribunal had specifically allowed credit of input service on outdoor catering services provided to the employees, considering this is a statutory requirement. Ld. DR points out that there have been conflicting orders regarding the availability of credit on outdoor catering service and hence in the case of Wipro Limited [2018(9)G.S.T.L. 285 (Tri.-Bang.)], the matter was referred to Hon'ble President for constituting Larger Bench to resolve the conflict between the decisions of different Benches. Hence, this case should also be referred to Larger Bench.
3. I have gone through the records of the case and I find one of the elements to be decided is whether or no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Western Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Thane Rural

Western Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Thane Rural
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 235 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/85245/2018 – Order No. A/86433/2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member ( Judicial )
Shri Rajesh Ostwal, Advocate, for appellant
Shri M. R. Melvin, Superintendent (AR), for respondent
ORDER
The present appeal is filed by the appellant only for waiver of penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
2. The facts of the case are that the appellant has availed cenvat credit in respect of common input service. Apart from the sale of their manufactured goods, they are also doing the trading activity of boughtout items. The case of the department is that the appellant was supposed to reverse the cenvat credit under Rule (3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 attributed to the trading activity being an exempted service. The demand of cenvat credit was confirmed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he case of wrong availment of credit. As per Rule 6(3A), the appellant is required to pay the proportionate cenvat credit attributed to the exempted service along with interest @ 24%. Since this interest rate is very exorbitant, it is in the form of penalty. Therefore, the legislators very consciously did not make the provision for penalty in such cases. He submits that Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 meant for penalty was not invoked and also not invokable. Therefore, penalty under Section 11AC cannot be imposed. He placed reliance on the following judgments:-
(i) CCE vs. Sangrur Agro Ltd. – 2010 (254) ELT 25 (P&H);
(ii) Eastern Medikit Ltd. vs. CCE – 2009 (242) ELT 51 (Tri.-Del.);
(iii) Sandoz Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE – 2018 (4) TMI-CESTAT Mumbai;
(iv) Man Structural Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE&ST – 2015 (11) TMI 664-CESTAT New Delhi.
He further submits that the appellant has recorded the trading activity and availment of cenvat credit in their books. Therefore, the case was als

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oods or the provider of output service shall intimate in writing to the Superintendent of Central Excise giving the following particulars, namely :-
(i) name, address and registration number of the manufacturer of goods or provider of output service;
(ii) date from which the option under this clause is exercised or proposed to be exercised;
(iii) description of inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted goods removed or for provision of exempted services and description of such exempted goods removed and such exempted services provided;
(iv) description of inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of non-exempted goods removed or for the provision of non-exempted services and description of such non-exempted goods removed and non-exempted services provided;
(v) CENVAT credit of inputs and input services lying in balance as on the date of exercising the option under this condition;
(

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mmon credit, denoted as C and calculated as,-
C = T – (A + B);
Explanation. – Where the entire credit has been attributed under sub-clauses (i) and (ii), namely ineligible credit or eligible credit, there shall be left no common credit for further attribution.
(iv) the amount of common credit attributable towards exempted goods removed or for provision of exempted services shall be called ineligible common credit, denoted as D and calculated as follows and shall be paid, –
D = (E/F) x C;
where E is the sum total of –
(a) value of exempted services provided; and
(b) value of exempted goods removed, during the preceding financial year; where F is the sum total of –
(a) value of non-exempted services provided,
(b) value of exempted services provided,
(c) value of non-exempted goods removed, and
(d) value of exempted goods removed, during the preceding financial year :
Provided that where no final products were manufactured or no output service was provi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(c) the manufacturer or the provider of output service shall determine the amount of CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods removed and provision of exempted services for the whole of financial year, out of the total credit denoted as T (Annual) taken during the whole of financial year in the following manner, namely :-
(i) the CENVAT credit attributable to inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted goods removed or for provision of exempted services on the basis of inputs and input services actually so used during the financial year, shall be called Annual ineligible credit and denoted as A(Annual);
(ii) the CENVAT credit attributable to inputs and input services used exclusively in or in relation to the manufacture of non-exempted goods removed or for the provision of non-exempted services on the basis of inputs and input services actually so used shall be called Annual eligible credit and denoted as B(Annual);
(iii) com

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ble common credit and the aggregate amount of ineligible credit and ineligible common credit for the period of whole year, namely, [{A(Annual) + D(Annual)} – {(A+D) aggregated for the whole year)}], where the former of the two amounts is greater than the later;
(e) where the amount under clause (d) is not paid by the 30th June of the succeeding financial year, the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service, shall, in addition to the amount of credit so paid under clause (d), be liable to pay on such amount an interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum, from the 30th June of the succeeding financial year till the date of payment of such amount;
(f) the manufacturer or the provider of output service, shall at the end of the financial year, take credit of amount equal to difference between the total of the amount of the aggregate of ineligible credit and ineligible common credit paid during the whole year and the total of the amount of annual ineligible credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h the date of payment of the amount;
(iv) interest payable and paid, if any, determined as per the provisions of clause (e); and
(v) credit determined and taken as per the provisions of clause (f), if any, with the date of taking the credit”.
5.1 As per above Rule 6(3A), it can be seen that the only requirement is to pay the proportionate cenvat credit along with interest @ 24%. There is no provision for imposition of penalty. The penalty provisions under the Cenvat Credit Rules are provided under Rule 14 which reads as under:-
“Recovery of CENVAT credit wrongly taken or erroneously refunded. – Where the CENVAT credit has been taken and utilized wrongly or has been erroneously refunded, the same along with interest shall be recovered from the manufacturer or the provider of the output service and the provisions of sections 11A and 11AA of the Excise Act or sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries.”
5.2 From the above

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Naveep Sharma and others Versus The Union of India and others

Naveep Sharma and others Versus The Union of India and others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1650 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMI
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 17-5-2018
CWP No. 12490 of 2018 (O&M)
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ. AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
For The Petitioners : Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate
ORDER
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ.(ORAL)
The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226 /227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a wr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CCT, Visakhapatnam GST Versus Sri Sitarama Lakshmi Jute Mills Pvt. Ltd

CCT, Visakhapatnam GST Versus Sri Sitarama Lakshmi Jute Mills Pvt. Ltd
Customs
2018 (5) TMI 1246 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – 2019 (370) E.L.T. 939 (Tri. – Hyd.)
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31339/2017 – FINAL ORDER No. A/30566/2018
Customs
Hon'ble Mr. P. V. Subba Rao, Member ( Technical )
Shri P.S. Reddy, Asst. Commissioner/AR for the Appellant
None for the Respondent
ORDER
[ Order Per : P. Venkata Subba Rao ]
1. When this matter was called, nobody appeared on behalf of the respondents. The Ld. Departmental Representative explained the case as follows.
2. The assessee imported jute yarn from Bangladesh which was exempted from Basic Customs Duty and CVD. However, they paid Special Additional Duty (SAD) @ 4% as applicable and applied for refund of SAD under Notification No. 102/97-Cus. Their application for refund was rejected by the lower authority on the following grounds:
a) Para 2 (a) of the notification 102/97-Cus requires the importer t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the notification is concerned, where goods are sold on a commercial invoice, no such endorsement is required and merely not mentioning the SAD on the invoice would suffice as laid down by the Principal Bench of the Tribunal in the case of RKG International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of C.Ex. &Cus. Noida [2013 (290)ELT 253 (Tri-Del)] and remanded it back to the Assistant Commissioner to decide the refund. The appeal of the Commissioner (Appeals) was not contested by the Department on grounds of monetary limits and therefore, has become final. Based on the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), the Assistant Commissioner sanctioned the refund. The Department appealed against this to the Commissioner (Appeals) who rejected it vide OIA No. 7/2016 [VSP]CE [D] dated 28.9.2017. This is an appeal against this OIA of the Commissioner (Appeals).
4. Condition No. 3 of the notification 102/97 says that the application for refund must be filed with the jurisdictional officer. In this case, the goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sioner, Vizianagaram. He could have returned the application directing it to be filed before the jurisdictional officer. Instead, he considered it on merits and passed an order rejecting it. The department appealed to Commissioner (Appeals) and it does not emerge from the OIA that the department raised this issue of jurisdiction before the Commissioner (Appeals) either. When the Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter back to the to the lower authority for sanction of refund, this order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was also not contested by the Department. The Deputy Commissioner sanctioned the refund and the department appealed against it before the Commissioner (Appeals) citing the issue of jurisdiction. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the department's appeal and hence this appeal.
6. Special Additional Duty (SAD) @ 4% was introduced to provide a level playing field to the domestic manufacturers who suffer VAT (which is not leviable on the imports). If the imported goods are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Voith Turbo Private Limited Versus CCT, Secunderabad GST

Voith Turbo Private Limited Versus CCT, Secunderabad GST
Central Excise
2018 (5) TMI 1205 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 17-5-2018
Appeal No. E/31289/2017 – Final Order No. A/30567/2018
Central Excise
Hon'ble Mr. P.V. Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri V.S. Sridhar & Shri P. Venkata Prasad, CAs for the Appellant
Shri B. Guna Ranjan, Superintendent /AR for the Respondent
ORDER
[ Order Per : P. Venkata Subba Rao ]
1. Appellant assessee are manufacturers of hydraulic/fluid couplings and they availed credit of duty paid on inputs/tax paid on input services under CENVAT Credit Rules (CCR), 2004. Their final goods are cleared both on payment of duty and without payment of duty to M/s NTPC Limited under an exemption notification. During audit by Central Excise authorities, it was found that the appellant had not reversed the CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3) on the exempted goods. It was pointed out and the appellant reversed an amount of Rs. 24,1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

edit under Rule 6(3) is not required in view of Rule 6(6)(vii), they have already reversed the same and also paid interest well before the show cause notice dated 29.09.2015 was issued. As per Section 11A(2) as they have reversed the credit and paid the interest, no show cause notice should have been issued against them. Hence, the SCN is not valid.
ii) Rule 6(6) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 reads as follows:
“(6) The provisions of sub rules (1), (2), (3), and (4) shall not be applicable in case the excisable goods removed without payment of duty are either –
(i) …………………; or
(ii) ………………..; or
(iii) ………………..; or
(iv) ……………….;or
(v) ………………..; or
(vi) ………………..; or
(vii) ………………..; or
(viii) All goods which are exempt from the duties of customs leviable under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) and the additional duty leviable under sub-section (1) of S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

defined in CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and hence the definition of Customs Act should be relied upon. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jacsons Thevara vs. CCCE [1992(61)ELT 343 (S.C.)] held that exemption shall be read to include partial exemption.
4. The extended period of limitation is not invokable as the appellant have not wilfully contravened any Rule with intent to avoid payment of duty and had, in fact, provided all relevant information in their returns for the relevant period. Hence, wilful suppression of facts and violation of any Act or Rules with the intent to avoid payment of duty cannot be invoked.
5. The appellants are under bonafide belief that they are eligible to the impugned credit in terms of Rule 6(6)(vii) and hence extended period of limitation cannot be invoked. Interest and penalty are not payable or imposable as CENVAT Credit itself is not liable to be reversed.
6. During the hearing, Ld. Consultant appeared on behalf of the appellant and strongly reiterate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ms” under rule 6(6)(vii) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – does it include only goods which are fully exempted or it also includes the goods which are partially exempted from the customs duty? Consequently, is the appellant required to reverse the credit as per Rule 6(3) of CENVAT credit Rules?
(ii) Has appellant resorted to fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts or violated any provisions of the Act of the Rules with an intention to avoid payment of duty resulting in extended period of limitation?
(iii) Is the appellant liable to pay interest and penalty?
9. I proceed to decide these issues. The words “goods which are exempted” are not defined in CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. However, the words “exempted goods” and “exempted services” are defined in the Rules. Both these expressions would mean that they are exempted on the whole of the duty or tax or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The expression “exempted goods” is used at several places in CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and in Rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

context of the scheme of CENVAT credit. The CENVAT Credit scheme has been designed to set off the duty paid on the inputs against the duty to be paid on the final products or services. Wherever no duty is payable on the final products, either because they are exempted or are chargeable nil rate of duty, no CENVAT credit is admissible. This principle has been well established and the rates of duty on the inputs and final products are immaterial. Even if the rate of duty of final products is merely 1% the credit of duty paid on inputs is available. However, if the final products are exempted or chargeable to nil rate of duty, no credit is admissible. This has been made clear in Rule 6(1) of CENVAT credit Rules 2004. Provisions have been made under sub rules 2, 3 & 4 of Rule 6, to ensure that where some inputs are used for exempted goods while others are used for goods on which duty has been paid, credit is available only to the extent the imports are used in dutiable goods. The harmonio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

I, therefore, find that the appellant is not exempted from reversing the credit as per Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules. The second question is whether the assessee has resorted to fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts or violation of any condition of the Act or Rules, with an intent to avoid payment of duty. I find from the records presented during hearing that the assessee in fact had filed returns in ER-I in which under the head “duty payable for clearance”, they have declared that they have availed the benefit of notification No. 12/2012. Under the head details of CENVAT credit taken and utilised, they have shown the credit utilised for payment of amount in terms of Rule 6 of CENVAT credit Rules as zero. Thus, it is evident that the assessee had declared both the fact that they have availed the exemption notification and also that they have not reversed any CENVAT credit, in their ER-I returns filed with the department. I do not find that they have suppressed any facts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Works Contract Services: Composite Supply Includes Freight and Transportation, Subject to 18% GST Rate.

Works Contract Services: Composite Supply Includes Freight and Transportation, Subject to 18% GST Rate.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – composite contracts – The applicant supplies works contract service, of which freight and transportation is merely a component and not a separate and independent identity, and GST is to be paid at 18% on the entire value of the composite supply, including supply of materials, freight and transportation, erection, commissioning etc. – AAR
TMI Updates – H

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Solar Plant Setup Deemed 'Works Contract'; Single GST Rate Applies: 5% Goods, 18% Services Not Allowed.

Solar Plant Setup Deemed 'Works Contract'; Single GST Rate Applies: 5% Goods, 18% Services Not Allowed.
Case-Laws
GST
Works Contract – transaction of setting up and operation of a solar photo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE : GE DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.

IN RE : GE DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 257 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 45 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – UTTAR PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 16-5-2018
Order No. 4
GST
Shri Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Member (State Tax) and Dinesh Kumar, Member (Central Tax)
ORDER
M/s. GE Diesel Locomotive Private Limited, Locomotive Shed Roza, Post Roza RS, Shahjanpur, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN : 09AAGCG1589HIZA.
2.  The applicant is engaged in the business of import and manufacture of rail locomotive engines for supply to Indian Railways. The applicant had made a bid for a tender floated by the Indian Railways for supply of locomotive engines and their comprehensive maintenance. In pursuance to the bid, the applicant has been awarded a contract by President of India represented by Director, Mechanical Engineering (Works), Ministry of Railway

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

i.  There is no fixed value ascribed for goods in the contract considering these goods would be supplied depending upon condition of the locomotive at the time of maintenance.
(d)  In case services are considered as principal supply, what tax rate should be applicable?
(e)  In case of the said contract, what is the relevant place of supply and type of tax which needs to be discharged (i.e. CGST & SGST or IGST)?
4.  The applicant was granted a personal hearing on 20-4-2018. Shri Ankush Goel, Tax Head, M/s. GE Diesel Locomotive Private Ltd., and Rjeev Dewan, Consultant, M/s. GE Diesel Locomotive Private Ltd. appeared on behalf of the applicant. In the written submission, the applicant has submitted that they are engaged for supplying 1000 locomotives as well as ensuring comprehensive annual maintenance for first 500 locomotives for an agreed period at its two locomotive maintenance sheds. The first locomotive maintenance shed is being setup in the State of Uttar Pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d transported with insurance, the supply of goods, packing materials, transport and insurance is a composite supply and supply of goods is a principal supply.
And as per Section 2(74) of the CGST Act, 2017/SGST Act, 2017 has defined the term 'mixed supply' to mean –
“two or more individual supplies of goods or services, or any combination thereof, made in conjunction with each other by a taxable person for a single price where such supply does not constitute a composite supply”
Illustration – A supply of a package consisting of canned foods, sweets, chocolates, cakes, dry fruits, aerated drinks and fruit juices when supplied for a single price is a mixed supply. Each of these items can be supplied separately and is not dependent on any other. It shall not be a mixed supply if these items are supplied separately.
Further, Section 2(90) of the CGST Act, 2017 /SGST Act, 2017 has defined the term 'principal supply' to mean –
“the supply of goods or services which const

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

itions for a supply to qualify as composite supply can be highlighted as under :
a.  Two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both;
b.  The taxable supplies should be naturally bundled;
c.  The taxable supplies should be supplied in conjunction with each other; and
d.  One taxable supply should be a principal supply.
In such case, the supply which is the principal supply is treated as the main supply and the entire transaction should be eligible to GST as per the principal supply.
8.  Section 10(1)(a) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the IGST Act”) provides for determination of the place of supply of goods. In case of supply involving movement of goods, the place of supply would be the place where the goods are handed over to the recipient. The relevant extract has been given below :
“10. (1)(a) where the supply involves movement of goods, whether by the supplier or the recipient or by any other person, the place of supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ated in India, the provisions of Section 12 of the of IGST Act, 2017 determine the place of supply of services. Sub-section (10) of Sec. 12 ibid enjoins that place of supply if service on-board a train shall be the first scheduled points of departure of the convenience. If the location of the supplier and place of are not in the same State or Union territory, it shall be treated as inter-State supply of Services and IGST shall be levied, otherwise CGST & SGST shall be levied.
If the supply of services is not made on-board a train, the location of a registered service recipient shall be the place of supply of service as per Section 12(2) ibid.
11.  The jurisdictional Commissioner, CGST i.e. the Commissioner, CGST & CX, Lucknow has also submitted views on the above said Advance Ruling application which are as under –
The activity of the party is a supply of service and principal supply of service inasmuch as the supply of goods is merely incidental to the maintenance contract. Si

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pply of service and goods is made in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course as per maintenance contracts, this maintenance service to the extent of presence of all the necessary ingredients cited in the legal provisions quoted supra, is naturally bundled with the incidental supply of goods., it is case of composite supply of service,
(b)  In case the said contract is considered as composite supply, what is the principal supply between goods or services ?
Ans. – The said contract merits to be considered to be a composite supply of service, and principal supply is service inasmuch as the supply of goods is merely incidential to the maintenance contract in the given facts and circumstances.
(c)  In case goods are considered as principal supply, how the taxability should be determined considering the following :
i.  The contract would entail supply of various goods falling under different tax brackets.
ii.  These goods would be supplied on a need basi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Essel Propack Ltd Versus CGST & CX, Thane

Essel Propack Ltd Versus CGST & CX, Thane
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 78 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 16-5-2018
Appeal No. E/85320/2018 – A/86920/2018
Central Excise
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial)
Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate for appellant
Shri S.J. Sahu, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: S.K. Mohanty
Denial of CENVAT Credit of service tax paid on the taxable services namely, pest control, telephone, repair and maintenance of air conditioner and export related services is the subject matter of the present dispute. The authorities below have denied CENVAT Credit to the appellant on the ground that the disputed services, by nature of their use/participation for the intended pur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

regard to telephone services, the contentions of the appellant were that such services were availed by the appellant for effective communication and negotiation between company employees with the suppliers/ customers, and thus, such service has been used/utilised in relation to the manufacturing activity of the appellant.
3.3 As regards the repair and maintenance of air conditioners, the appellant contended that the air conditioners were installed in the factory for ensuring smooth functioning of the machines installed therein. Thus, the same should be considered as input service. In support of said contentions, the appellant has relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. Hollister Medical Indi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or consumption of its employees. Since the disputed services were used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product and having nexus with the ultimate final product manufactured by the appellant, CENVAT Credit on the disputed services cannot be denied by the department. I find that in identical situation, this Tribunal in the above referred decisions has allowed CENVAT benefit on the pest control services and telephone charges for the employees, holding that the same merits consideration as input service.
5. In view of the above, I do not find any merits in the impugned order. Accordingly, after setting aside the same, I allow the appeal in favour of the appellant.
(Order dictated in Court)
Case laws, Decisions, Judgemen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =