M/s. Ramkay Agencies Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai (Now Commissioner of GST & C.E. Chennai South Commissionerate)

M/s. Ramkay Agencies Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai (Now Commissioner of GST & C.E. Chennai South Commissionerate)
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1068 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 27-6-2018
Application No. ST/MISC[CT]/41106/2017, Appeal No. ST/00219/2011 – Final Order No. 41881/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri T.R. Ramesh, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench,
The issue in dispute concerns income received by appellants from various banks and financial institutions as commission, allegedly for providing service in relation to promoting and marketing va

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur, 2012 (25) S.T.R. 489 (Tri. – Del.) and Addis Marketing Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, 2017 (50) S.T.R. 56 (Tri. – Mumbai) in support of his contention.
3. On the other hand, Ld. AR supports the impugned order. He points out that the appellants have paid up the tax liability along with interest only after being pointed out by audit.
4. Heard both sides. We have gone through the facts.
5. Without doubt, the issue of taxability on the impugned services was mired in litigation and was set to rest only by the decision of the larger Bench of the Tribunal in Pagariya Auto Center Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad, 2014 (33) S.T.R. 506 (Tri. – LB.). Especially when there was confus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

om the discussions above the matter was being interpreted by judicial forums in different ways as may be seen from the decisions quoted by the Appellants. The Higher Courts have been taking the view that in such situations the extended period of time cannot be invoked for raising demand. Even in the case of Bridgestone Financial Services the Tribunal has given the benefit for such reason. So we are of the view that the demand in this case can be sustained only to the extent covered in the normal period of limitation. In such a situation penalties are not imposable either.”
6. Following the ratio, we hold that the demand in this case is restricted to the normal period of limitation from the date of issue of Show Cause Notice, with interest

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Fichtner Consulting Engineers (I) Pvt Ltd.

In Re: Fichtner Consulting Engineers (I) Pvt Ltd.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 692 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 612 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU – AAR
Dated:- 27-6-2018
TN/02/AAR/2018
GST
MS. MANASA GANGOTRI KATA, AND SHRI S. VIJAYAKUMAR, MEMBER
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the Central Goods and Service Tax Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act.
1. M/s. Fichtner Consulting Engineers (India) Private Limited, Chennai (hereinafter called the Applicant or the company) has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on which one is applicable from the following options to charge Tax in tra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Coal Handling Plant for the west PIT of PakriBarwadih Coal Block in North Karanpura Coalfields in Hazaribagh district of Jharkhand state, as per the requirements of NTPC/Tenova's Enquiry Specifications”
The said Client is an EPC sub-contractor for the coal handling plant in the Mine. As per the enquiry specification given by the client, the successful bidder (Applicant) shall be responsible for the basic and detailed engineering for the mechanical, structural and auxiliary systems of the coal handling plant meeting the requirements of the Main EPC Contractor and meeting the technical guidance of the end user (owner). The order is being executed from their design office at Chennai and the drawings are delivered to their client to their Chennai office. This fulfils their scope of supply, their design and drawings are specifically made for the Coal Handling Plant of the Mine referred in the job description. They deal only with their client and do not have any direct interaction

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Chennai office, in Tamil Nadu.
3. The Authorised Representative of the Applicant was heard in the matter. They submitted that they are providing engineering consultancy services to a recipient in Chennai in relation to an Immovable property, a coal mine located in North Karanpura Coalfields, Jharkhand for coal handling activities at the site. They state that as it is service in relation to Immovable property, place of supply under Section 12(3) will be Jharkhand and hence it is an inter-state supply.
4. The Advance Ruling sought is whether CGST & SGST or IGST is payable on the said supply. i.e., whether the transaction is an inter-state supply or intra-state supply. In this connection Section 97 of the CGST Act and Tamil Nadu GST Act (TNGST) has given the scope of Advance Ruling Authority, i.e, the question on which the Advance Ruling can be sought. For ease of reference, the section is reproduced as under:
97, (1) An Applicant desirous of obtaining an advance ruling under this Chap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Anabond Ltd.

In Re : Anabond Ltd.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 691 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, TAMIL NADU – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 614 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 61 G S.T.R. 58 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, TAMIL NADU – AAR
Dated:- 27-6-2018
ORDER NO. 1/ AAR/ 2018
GST
MS. MANASA GANGOTRI, MEMBER AND MR. THIRU S. VIJAYAKUMAR, MEMBER
RULING
1. M/s. Anabond Ltd., Chennai (hereinafter called the applicant or the company) has preferred an application for Advance Rulingon what is the appropriate classification of 'Polysulphide sealants' manufactured by them, under GST.
2. The Applicant is engaged in the manufacturing of engineering adhesives and sealants, paints & other chemical formulations which are used in various industries such as automobile, aerospace, energy, construction, marine, railway etc. Applicant manufactures, among other products, polysulphide sealants and market it under the trade name 'Anabond Tuffseald '.Polysulphide sealants are commonly used for sealing expansion

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sealants. There are five competing headings in which the said product can be covered. They are: Heading 3214; Heading 2830; Heading 3911; Heading 4002; Heading 3506.
3. The applicant has further stated that
* Customs Tariff Heading (hereinafter referred to as CTH) 3214 covers various types of mastics viz., “glaziers' putty, grafting putty, resin cements, caulking compounds and other mastics; painters' fillings; non-refractory surfacing preparations for facades, indoor walls, floors, ceilings or the like. Sealants are also known in the trade by their generic name “mastics”. The product in question is a mastic based on rubber which after the addition of hardener is used as mastics. HSN Explanatory Notes provides that “mastics based on rubber” are covered under CTH 3214.Further, in view of Note 3 to Section VI (under which the heading 3214 falls) the fact that the product in question has two components and these two components have to be mixed before use to prepare the sealant is no b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

duct, Viz., the polysulphide is an organic compound. Though there are some exceptions for organic compounds to be covered under Chapter 28 (for instance, organic or inorganic compounds of precious metals of rare-earth metals, or radio-active elements or of isotopes), the polysulphide rubber compound is not covered by such exceptions. From the HSN Explanatory Notes, it is clear that the type of Polysulphides covered under the heading 2830 are mixtures of inorganic polysulphides of the same metal. The polysulphide in question is an organic compound and is a synthetic rubber. Though there are some exceptions for organic compounds to be covered under Chapter 28, the Polysulphide rubber compound is not covered by such exceptions. Therefore, classification of the product in question under Chapter 28 itself could be ruled out.
* Polysulphide polymers are of two types. The one containing Carbon-Sulphur-Carbon linkage is covered under CTH 3911 while the other containing Sulphur-Sulphur linkag

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is not polysulphide rubber alone but also contains the hardener and is presented together as a set. While the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI) provide means for classification of products presented as sets under Rule 3(b) in terms of GRI I, the application of the Rules could be resorted to only when the Section or Chapter Notes are not of help in classifying the product. Therefore, it would be necessary to look at the relevant Section and Chapter Notes before resorting to the GRIs. In the present case, as discussed above, classification of the product can be done based on the Section, Chapter Notes and Headings and therefore classification under CTH 4002 can be ruled out.
* As the product has bonding property, it is relevant to analyse the appropriateness or otherwise of classification of the product under Heading 3506 which deals with adhesives and glues. Heading 3506 covers, “prepared glues and other prepared adhesives, not elsewhere specified or included; products suitable fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Polysulphide Sealant; Technical data sheet; and photographs of the product (in both open and closed state). The details and documents furnished were examined.
5. The product in question, 'Anabond Tuffseald, Polysuphide Sealant'contains two components, viz., polysulphide polymer (resin/rubber) and hardener (acts as the curing agent). Liquid polysulfide polymers form the basic ingredient of the sealant formulation and Manganese dioxide is the curing agent. Both resin and hardener are packed separately within the same container.
Properties of the uncured material are as follows':
Resin
Chemical type
Polysulphide
Appearance
Smooth paste
Colour
Off-white
Hardener
Chemical type
Manganese dioxidebase
Appearance
Smooth paste
Colour
Brown
Mixed adhesive
Mixing ratio
92:08
Colour
Grey
The resin here is a polysuphide where each sulphur atom is bound on both sides by carbon atoms.The synthesis of polysulphide rubber is nNa2S2 +nCl-R-Cl->2nNaCl+- [R-S-S]. After opening the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

First Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act, 1975, including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to their interpretation.
CTH 3214 10 00 covers “glaziers' putty, grafting putty, resin cements, caulking ' compounds and other mastics; painters' fillings”.
As per Explanatory Notes to HSN for CTH 3214, “77k products of this heading are preparations of widely differing composition which are essentially characterised by the uses to which they are put. These preparations are usually put up in a more or less pasty form and in general they harden or cure after application….
The products of this leading are usually applied with a caulking gun, a spatula, a trowel, a plasterer's float or similar tools…..
These preparations are mainly used to stop, seal or caulk cracks and in certain cases to bond or firmly join components together. They are distinguished from other glues and other adliesives by the fa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

presented together; and,
iii. identifiable, whether by their nature or by the relative proportions in which they are present, as being complementary one to another.”
As per Harmonised System of Nomenclature, the general explanation of the above Note 3 is as follows:
“Note 3:
This Note deals with the classification of goods put up in sets consisting of two or more separate constituents, some of which fall in section VI. The Note is, however, limited to sets of which the constituents are intended to be mixed together to obtain a product of Section VI or VII. Such sets are to be classified in the leading appropriate to that product provided that the constituents meet conditions (a) to (c) of the Note”
Applying the above, to the case at hand, it is evident that the base and the curing agent are presented in a single pack and are intended to be used together and complimentary to one another. Thereby, the conditions of the section Note 3 is satisfied. When the conditions are sat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es products having the character of mastics, fillings, etc., of heading 3214. Therefore the product under consideration is not classifiable under this heading.
c. Chapter 3911 covers polysulphides. As per explanatory notes to HSN, Polysulphides are polymers characterised by the presence of monosulphide linkages in the polymer chain…In polysulphides each sulphur atom is bound on both sides by carbon atoms, as opposed to the thioplasts of Chapter 40, which contain Sulphur-sulphur linkages. In the case at hand, Sulphur-Sulphur linkages are present and therefore they are thioplasts. Hence, the product is not classifiable under this heading.
d. Chapter 4002 covers “synthetic rubber and factice derived from oils, in primary forms or in plates, sheets or strip; mixtures of any product of heading 4001 with any product of this heading, in primary forms or in plates, sheets or strip”. The product in question contains polysulphide rubber/resin which is a synthetic rubber. Therefore, the pol

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Harbanslal Malhotra & Sons (Eng.) Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST & C. Excise, Kolkata North

M/s. Harbanslal Malhotra & Sons (Eng.) Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST & C. Excise, Kolkata North
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 411 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 27-6-2018
Appeal No. E/75379/18 – FO/A/76365/2018.
Central Excise
Shri P. K. Choudhary, Member (Judicial)
Shri Harsh Shukla, C. A. for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. Mukhopadhyay, Suptd. (AR) for the Revenue (s)
ORDER
Per Shri P. K. Choudhary:
This appeal has been filed by the Appellant against the impugned Orderin-Appeal No. 03-04/Kol-III/2017 dated 26.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of CGST & CX (Appeal-I), Kolkata.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Safety Razor Blade classifiabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dit was denied on various Input Services. It is further submitted that the Tribunal in various decisions, allowed the credit on the input services.
4. The Learned A.R. reiterates the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals).
5. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
6. We find that the denial of credit on Input Services namely Cooking and providing Food, Cleaning and washing for worker's Canteen and other services used to provide food in the Canteen. The appellant submitted that they are required to maintain the Canteen under Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948. The present issue is covered by the following decisions:
i) Hindustan Coca Beverages Private Limited Vs. CCE – Hyderabad 2017 (49) STR 88 (Tri- Hyd)
ii) Easun MR Tap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ve Vs. C.C.E Chennai – 2016 (STR) 611 (Tri-Chennai).
9. It is contended that the said input credit is a necessary activity for ensuring continuous production in the factory. However, the denial of Cenvat Credit on renovation work undertaken in the recreation room for separate Union room is justified.
10. In my considered view, the renovation of Union room is not covered within the inclusive clause of definition. It cannot be said that the said service was used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product. Accordingly, the impugned Order is modified to the extent of denial of credit on renovation work undertaken in recreation room for separate union room along with interest is upheld and the denial of credit on other issues an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Ultratech Cement Limited

In Re: M/s. Ultratech Cement Limited
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1761 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 455 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 27-6-2018
ARA-34/2017-18/B-56
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question :
Whether the amount paid to dealer towards “rate difference” post supply can be considered for the purpose of arriving at the 'transaction value' in terms of Section 15 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act (“CGST Act”),
At

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d allied products (hereinafter referred to as “goods”) which are taxable under GST law.
2. The applicant has obtained registration and holding valid registration certificate issued under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”).
3. The applicant is manufacturing goods at its manufacturing units located at, Taluka: Korpana, District Chandrapur, Hotgi- District Solapur, Mouda District. Nagpur, Ratanagari, Post-JNPT-Nava Seva- Navi Mumbai and Pune in the State of Maharashtra. Besides this there are plants situated in other States also.
4. The goods manufactured at the aforesaid units arc supplied by the applicant to various authorised dealer/stockists located in state where the above registration certificate is obtained and also to authorised dealer/stockists situated in different states. Apart from the same, the goods received from other States are also supplied to customers/dealers in the State.
5. The applicant enters into an agreement with the authorised dealers/stock

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tions, the authorised dealers/stockists of the applicants have lo sell the goods purchased from the applicant, at a price lower than their purchase price i.e. the price at which the goods are sold by the applicant to continue in business for the reason that the market for cement is very dynamic and the prices keep changing – not only on daily basis but on real time basis. Hence, it sometimes happens that the authorised dealers/stockists of the applicants have to sell the goods purchased from the applicant, at a price lower than their original purchase price to continue in business i.e. the price at which the goods are originally billed by the applicant. For eg. the dealer has to sell a 50 kg bag of cement to ultimate customer at Rs. 295/- based on then prevailing market conditions even though the said dealer purchased the said bag of cement from the applicant at Rs. 300/-. The dealer is aware that there will be compensation in form of “rate difference” as per past practice. However, th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lls goods to the trade a percentage deduction from the regular list or catalogue price of goods.”
13. Therefore, the trade discount is the difference between the regular list or catalogue price and the actual price at which the goods are sold by the trader. At this stage, we refer and rely on the CBEC's excise manual of supplementary instruction, 2005 in Chapter 3, Part – III of Para 2.5(iv) has clarified as follows with regard to deduction of trade discount.
(iv) discount of any type or description given on any normal price payable for any transaction will not form part of the transaction value for the goods, e.g. quantity discount for goods purchased or cash discount for the prompt payment etc. will therefore not form part of the transaction value. However it is important to establish that the discount has actually been passed on the buyer of the goods. The differential discount extended as per commercial consideration on different transactions to unrelated buyers is also perm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rs/stockists is reduced effectively to that extent. At this stage, we are enclosing the invoices issued by the applicant on the authorised dealers/stockists for supply of cement at full value and subsequent credit notes issued to the authorised dealers/stockists for reduction of sale price on account of rate difference as (Annexure-21 & (Annexure-3) collectively.
16. It is submitted that the transaction of compensating the authorised dealers/stockists on account of 'rate difference' is generally followed in the entire Cement Industry.
17. Section 15(1) of the CGST Act states that the value of supply for purpose of GST would be the “transaction value”, which is the price actually paid or actually payable for such supply between unrelated parties, and where the price is sole consideration for supply.
18. Further, Section 15(3)(b) of the CGST Act states that, the discount provided after the supply has been effected shall be excluded from the value of supply subject to fulfilmen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services or both, may issue to the recipient a credit note containing such particulars as may be prescribed.”
20. Even though the sale price of the goods sold by the applicant to the authorised dealers/stockists gets reduced subsequently due to rate difference, the applicant ends up paying GST on the total value mentioned in the original invoice issued to the authorised dealers/stockists as compared to the realization received from the customer/dealer.
21. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the amount paid to the authorised dealers/stockists towards rate difference, without taking the adjustment of same in the output tax liability of the applicant, is becoming cost to the applicant, in other words, once the benefit of rate difference is passed on to the dealers/stockists, the effective value of original supply gets reduced and this results in charging of higher tax than what is mandated by law. Due to absence of clarity in law, the applicant seeks the applicability of Section 34{1) o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cope of the term 'applicant', as defined under sub-Section (c) of Section 95 of the CGST Act shall include both, the person registered under the CGST Act and also the person who is not registered as on date of applying for the advance ruling, but is desirous of seeking registration under the CGST Act, in the state where advance ruling is sought.
A.3 Further, Section 22 of the CGST Act, specifies the person liable for registration and reads as under:-
“22. (1) Every supplier shall be liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory. other than special category States, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both. if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees:
… Emphasis Supplied
A.4 The above referred Section can be vivisected into following essentials: –
a. A supplier shall be liable to be registered under CGST Act in the State or Union Territory, from where he makes taxable supply of goods or services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

larifies that the advance ruling can only be sought on the issues, as arc specified under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, which reads as under-
“97. (1) An applicant desirous of obtaining an advance ruling under this Chapter may wake an application in such form and manner and accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed, stating the question on which the advance ruling is sought.
(2) The question on which the advance ruling is sought under this Act, shall be in respect of,-
(a) classification of any goods or services or both;
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both;
(d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid;
(e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered;
(g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e deemed to be the Authority for advance ruling in respect of that State or Union territory.”
Emphasis Supplied
A.9 Hence, an Advance Ruling Authority appointed by the concerned State or Union Authority Government under concerned State or Union Territory Goods and Service Tax Act, shall be the deemed to be the Advance Ruling Authority for the purpose of CGST Act. The Section 96 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, reads as under:-
“SECTION 96
(1) The Government shall, by notification, constitute an Authority to be known as the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling:
Provided that the Government may, on the recommendation of tlie Council, notify any Authority located in another State to act as the Authority for the State.
(2) The Authority shall consist of-
(i) one member from amongst the officers of Central tax; and
(ii) one member from amongst the officers of State tax, to be appointed by the Central Government and the State Government respectively.
(3) The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

EQUIRING ADVANCE RULING
B. The question on which Advance Ruling is sought by the Applicant is as under:-
* Whether the amount paid to authorized dealers towards “rate difference” after effecting the supply of goods by the applicant to aforesaid dealers can be considered for the purpose of arriving at the 'transaction value' in terms of Section 15 of the CGST Act.
* Whether the amount paid to authorized dealers towards “rate difference” after effecting the supply of goods would be allowed under Section 15(1) read with Section 34(1) of the CGST Act or under Section 15(3) read with Section 34(1) ibid.
APPLICANTS INTERPRETATION
C. Applicants understanding
C1 The applicants understanding is that Section 15(3) of the CGST Act has been enacted to allow deduction from the taxable value, of any discount or incentive or any other relief that may be given by the Supplier to the recipient, in respect of the goods or services supplied. On the other hand, 34(1) of the CGST Act provid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etermined at time of removal of goods from the factory of the assessee. In the case of the applicant, the consideration received from the authorised dealers/stockists after giving the effect of rate difference shall be treated as price “actually payable” by the authorised dealers/stockists for the supply of taxable goods in terms of Section 15(1) of the CGST Act. The value received by the applicant after giving the treatment of rate difference would be considered as price for arriving at the “transaction value” for the purpose of payment of GST in terms of Section 15(1) of the CGST Act.
C.4 In such situation, the applicant submit that the Section 15(1) read with Section 34(1) of the CGST Act, it can assess the duty liability by reducing the amount equal to rate difference mentioned in the credit note given to the authorised dealers/stockists towards rate difference.
C.5 The interpretation that the operation of Section 34(1) is limited only to the amounts which qualify as “discount” u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ribed.
In this regards, the relevant portion of the Section 34 of CGST Act is reproduced below,
“34. Credit and debit notes. – (1) Where a tax invoice has been issued for supply of any goods or services or both and the taxable value or tax charged in that tax invoice is found to exceed the taxable value or tax payable in respect of such supply, or where the goods supplied are returned by the recipient, or where goods or services or both supplied are found to be deficient, the registered person, who has supplied such goods or services or both, may issue to the recipient a credit note containing such particulars as may be prescribed.
(2) Any registered person who issues a credit note in relation to a supply of goods or services or both shall declare the details of such credit note in the return of the month during which such credit note has been issued but not later than September following the end of the financial year in which such supply was made, or the date of furnishing of the r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

side of Jurisdictional Officer.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 15.05.2018, Sh. Nirav Karia, Advocate, appeared and stated that they were making submissions in respect of details as asked for during preliminary hearing. However, he requested that since his senior was not available today, an adjournment is respect of final hearing be granted to them. Jurisdictional Officer Sh. Shivkumar Salunkhe, Dy. Commissioner CGST & Central Excise Division, Chandra pur appeared and made written submissions and stated that they do not want any further hearing. It is communicated to Sh. Nirav Karia, that adjournment would be considered subject to availability of new dates as found convenient in schedule of ARA and to this he agreed to.
The final hearing in the matter was held on 06.06.2018. Shri Nirav Karia, Advocate, appeared made written and oral submissions as per ARA application. He was requested to give documentary evidence in respect of Para 24 of his agreements w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pply of cement and allied products which are taxable under the GST law. The goods manufactured at the applicant's various units are supplied by them to various authorized dealers/stockists located in the State of Maharashtra and also to authorized dealers/stockists situated in various other states.
Further factual position as stated by the applicant in his application is as under:-
“5. The applicant enters into an agreement with the authorised dealers/stockists for supply of goods on a principal-to-principal basis. Tlie agreement entered with the authorised dealers/stockists provides that the goods shall be supplied to the latter at the prices fixed by the applicant. Copies of agreement entered into between the applicant and authorised dealers/stockists are enclosed as (Annexure-1) collectively.
6. Further, the agreement also provides that the applicant shall provide various discounts to the authorised dealers/stockists at the rates as may be decided by the applicant alone, from

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

their original purchase price to continue in business i.e. the price at which the goods are originally billed by the applicant. For eg. the dealer has to sell a 50 kg bag of cement to ultimate customer at Rs. 295/- based on then prevailing market conditions even though the said dealer purchased the said bag of cement from the applicant at Rs. 300/-. The dealer is aware that there will be compensation inform of “rate difference” as per past practice. However, the dealers/stockists are not aware of the exact amount of compensation to be received from the applicant.
10. Based on the trade practice and past history, the dealer is aware that there will be compensation in form of rate difference in case of significant correction of prices.
11. In order to provide relief to the authorised dealers/stockists in such scenario, the applicant pays a certain amount to the authorised dealers/stockists as 'rate difference' (Commonly known as 'Trade Discount' also). The aforesaid pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nding which arc reproduced in their submissions part have opined and claimed that the answer to both the questions that has been raised in their application are in the affirmative and the transactions as per facts stated in the application are allowable under Section 15 and Section 34 of the GST Act.
In view of the above facts of the case and to examine the claims made by the applicant we find that Section 15 of the CGST Act reads as under:-
Section 15:- (1) The value of a supply of goods or services or both shall be the transaction value, which is the price actually paid or payable for the said supply of goods or services or both where the supplier and the recipient of the supply are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the supply.
(2) The value of supply shall include-
(a) any taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges levied under any law for the time being in force other than this Act, the State Goods and Services Tax Act, the Union Territory Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

subsidy.
(3) The value of the supply shall not include any discount which is given-
(a) before or at the time of the supply if such discount has been duly recorded in the invoice issued in respect of such supply; and
(b) after the supply has been effected, if-
(i) such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices; and
(ii) input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis of document issued by the supplier has been reversed by the recipient of the supply.
(4) Where the value of the supply of goods or services or both cannot be determined under sub-section (I), the same shall be determined in such manner as may be prescribed.
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (4), the value of such supplies as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council shall be determined in such manner as may be prescribed.
Expl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on 15(3) of the CGST Act are of specific relevance in the present case before us.
We find that Section 15 of the CGST Act states that the value of supply of goods or services or both shall be the transaction value, which is the price actually paid or payable for the said supply of goods or services or both where the supplier and the recipient of supply are not related and price is the sole consideration for the supply.
We further find that Section 15(3) of the CGST Act states that the value of supply shall not include any discount which is given in ways as under:-
(a) Any discount which is given before or at the time of supply if such discount has been duly recorded in the invoice issued in respect of such supply.
(b) After the supply has been effected if
(i) such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices and
(ii) input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Motani entered into at Mumbai on dated 20 June, 2012;
(iii) Ultra tech Cement Ltd and Mr. Raju K Shah entered into at Mumbai on dated 20 June, 2012;
In respect of all the three agreements which are representative samples, we find that para 21, 22, 23 and 24 which are exactly the same in all the three agreements and gives sale procedure and discount as under:-
“Para 21:- In respect of the sales made by the authorized stockiest it will maintain proper records and shall submit copies thereof from time to time as may be required by the Company, Vie Company through itself or its representatives shall have the right to inspect the premises and records maintained by the Authorized Stockist and ask for any clarification in respect of the same from the Authorized Stockist. The Authorized Stockist shall also furnish to the Company any information, statistical or general, concerning demand, supply and prices of product in general.
Para 22:-The Company shall sell and supply the Authorized Sto

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ates that the company will further decide and pay discount at such rate after the quantity is already sold to the stockists. That the discounts are decided after the goods are already sold to the stockists, was confirmed by their representatives as well, at the time of the Personal Hearing.
In view of this we find that the discount/rate difference being given by the applicant will have to be examined for eligibility or otherwise, as per the terms and conditions given in Section 15 (3) (b) of the CGST Act referred above.
We find that the discount that is given after the goods have been sold has to be established in terms of the agreement entered into at or before such supply i.e. the discount that is to be given afterwards has to be mentioned in the terms of the agreement or the criteria for arriving at the quantum or percentage of discount has to be given in the terms of the agreement which is entered into at or before such supply.
The wordings of Section 15 (3) (b) (i) very clearly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o even 100% as per discretion of the supplier and certainly such abnormal discounts without any criteria or basis can in no way be considered as fair and at arm's length business transactions and no taxation statute can be construed to be having open ended discount with legislative intent.
In view of the detailed discussions above now when we have a relook at para 24 of the Applicant's agreement with authorized stockists which states that the company will pay discount at such rate as may be decided by the company from time to time on the quantity sold to the authorized stockists in a particular month, we find that there is no basis or criteria or parameter (which may even be of personal relations nature between the parties to the agreement) mentioned in the agreement on the basis of which the quantum of discount to be given on the goods which have already been supplied is mentioned.
Further the Applicant during the course of proceedings stated that they are further submitting

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

igible for the said Incentive Schemes the Dealer shall be credited with the entitled discount/incentive, online.
2.4 UltraTech shall issue credit notes for discounts and the same shall be linked with the respective Tax invoices of UltraTech.
2.5 The Dealer agrees to reverse the corresponding input tax credit in his books in the same month during which the Discount is given by UltraTech to the Dealer by way of aforesaid credit note.
2.6 The Dealer shall effectuate the reversal of credit in the monthly GST returns and shall fully comply with the provisions of the GST Act.
2.7 The Dealer accepts and agrees to indemnify and compensate UltraTech for the losses incurred by UltraTech in the event UltraTech is not able to take input tax reversal of credit notes within 60 days of issuance of credit note due to non-reversal by the dealer. The Dealer agrees to indemnify and make good the loss to UltraTech including any interest, penalty and all other legal costs and expenses.
3. The Parties

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively are clearly complying with the requirements of the CGST Act and the criteria or conditions for availing discount as per Section 15(3)(b)(i) and (ii) of the CGST Act and the criteria or conditions for availing discount as per Section 15(3)(b)(i) are specifically mentioned as per agreement before hand.
However we find that in respect of special discount and rate difference as mentioned at Sr. No. 6 and 7 of the above referred GST Annexure for Mumbai region, there is no pre fixed criteria, basis or rationale for arriving at the quantum of these discounts neither as per basis mentioned in GST Annexure for Mumbai region nor as per amendments incorporated in agreements with authorized stockists as referred above.
Thus we find that the amount paid to the Dealer towards “rate difference” and “special discount” as mentioned above, post supply are not complying with the requirements of section 15(3)(b)(i) of the CGST Act and therefore cannot be considered and allo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appointment of Authorities to exercise the powers u/s 105.GST Act 2017

Appointment of Authorities to exercise the powers u/s 105.GST Act 2017
05/2018-State Tax Dated:- 27-6-2018 Kerala SGST
GST – States
Kerala SGST
Kerala SGST
GOVERNMENT OC KERALA
KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT
Notification No. 05/2018-State Tax
No. CT/22046/2017-C1
Thiruvananthapuram, 27 June, 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (20 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

K. REGHUNATHAN, PROPRIETOR, K.R. INN Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES COMPLEX, PUTHOLE, THRISSUR AND STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY

K. REGHUNATHAN, PROPRIETOR, K.R. INN Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES COMPLEX, PUTHOLE, THRISSUR AND STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (7) TMI 1518 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 27-6-2018
W.P (C) No.17900 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Tomson T. Emmanuel
For The Respondent : Sri. V. K. Shamsudheen, Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, running a bar attached to a hotel, is a registered dealer under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.
2. Despite the petitioner's fil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

some other case. The judgment, the petitioner claims, was rendered on identical facts.
4. Yet again, the first respondent passed Ext.P12 reiterating the earlier findings. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. He wants the Court to quash the first respondent's Ext.P12 order, issued for 2013-14.
5. The petitioner's counsel has submitted that the first respondent has ignored the binding judgment from this Court and rendered the Ext.P12 in a mechanical manner. He has also brought to my notice the judgment, dt.11.04.2018, in WP(C) No. 1286 of 2018, to contend that this Court, earlier, under similar circumstances, directed the authority to reconsider the issue.
6. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

could redress. And that forum is available under Section 34 of the Act.
8. As a result, I conclude that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy. So this writ petition must fail. It does. It is dismissed.
9. The petitioner, in fact, bona fide pursued his remedy here, and this Court now holds that the petitioner's remedy lies elsewhere- before the appellate authority. Fairness demands, under these circumstances, that the petitioner be given time to approach the appellate forum. In the meanwhile, the respondent should not take steps that may render the petitioner's statutory remedy illusory.
So I hold that respondent should defer coercive steps for six weeks from today, and the petitioner, in the meanwhile, approach the appell

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s KLJ Developers Pvt. Limited Versus CE, C&CGST, Delhi-III

M/s KLJ Developers Pvt. Limited Versus CE, C&CGST, Delhi-III
Service Tax
2018 (7) TMI 1444 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 27-6-2018
S.T. Appeal No. 53710 of 2015 – ST/A/52349/2018-CU[DB]
Service Tax
Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) And Mr. Ajay Sharma, Member (Judicial)
Sh. Devesh Parekh, C. A. for the appellant
Sh. A. K. Singh, AR for the Respondent
ORDER
Per: V. Padmanabhan:
The present appeal is directed against the Order-in-Original No. 27/ST/SVS/DL-III/2015 dated 31.07.2015 passed by the Pr. Commissioner, Service Tax, Delhi-II.
2. The appellant is engaged in construction of complex and are registered for providing service tax under various services in connection with construct

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

3. With the above background, we heard Sh. Devesh Parekh, ld. C.A. for the appellant as well as Shri A. K. Singh, ld. AR for the Revenue.
4. Ld. C.A. submitted that 'Car Parking Charges' would not be liable for service tax under the category of 'Construction of Complex Service'. He submitted that the appellant was already discharging service tax on the amount recovered from the customers towards covered car parking charges. The dispute is only with reference to open car parking. He referred to the definition of 'preferential location or external or internal development of complex service' under Section 65(105)(zzzzu). He submitted that the said service has excluded services in relation to parking place, alongwith the services under (zzzh).

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s recovered by the appellant form the buyers of apartment towards 'Car Parking Charges'. Such charges are admittedly towards provision of open car parking place within the residential complex. After perusal of the definition of residential complex, we note that provision of parking place within the residential complex is very much included within the definition of residential complex and the same will be liable to payment of service tax under the said category. Consequently, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The adjudicating authority is directed to recomputed the demand with the above mentioned discussion.
7. In the result, appeal is rejected.
(Dictated and pronounced in the open Court).
Case laws, Decisions, Ju

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Hotel Leela Venture Ltd. Versus Commissioner (Audit), Central Excise & CGST, Jodhpur

M/s Hotel Leela Venture Ltd. Versus Commissioner (Audit), Central Excise & CGST, Jodhpur
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 970 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 27-6-2018
Excise Appeal No. E/51358/2018 [SM] – A/52443/2018-SM[BR]
Central Excise
MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present for the Appellant: Mr. Narendra Pati, Advocate
Present for the Respondent: Mr. H. Saini, D.R.
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
Present is an Appeal against the Order of Commissioner (Audit) dated 16.02.2018.
2. The appellant herein is engaged in providing the taxable services of accommodation in hotel for lodging purposes. The Department, during an audit for the period 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2015 and subsequently for April, 2015 to March, 2016 observed that the appellant has availed a total of cenvat credit on annual maintenance of lifts installed in the building. It is the case of the Department that the said service do not fall in the category of the input service. Re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervice as such fall in the exclusion clause of the input definition. It is submitted that the said allegation is not at all sustainable. The decision of Mumbai Tribunal in the case Redhat India Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Pune, 2016 (44) STR 45 (Tri.-Mumbai) has been impressed upon to submit that the maintenance of lift in the appellants premises is very much the part of the inclusive definition of the input services. The impugned Order is accordingly, prayed to be set aside and the Appeal is prayed to be allowed.
5. While rebutting these arguments, Ld. DR has impressed upon para 8 of the impugned order where the Commissioner (Audit) has explained the definition of Work Contract and has mentioned that the repair or renovation of a building or civil structure is included in the construction service. While justifying the said Order it is submitted by the Ld. DR that the decision of Tribunal Hyderabad has rightly been relied upon by Commissioner (Audit) and the decision has be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d the said imported goods are his inputs or capital goods; or
(ii) any service used by a provider of output service for providing an output service; or
(iii) any service used by a manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products upto the place of removal,
and includes services used in relation to modernisation, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage upto the place of removal, procurement of inputs, accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, security, business exhibition, legal services, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation upto the place of removal, but excludes:
(A) service portion in the execution of a works con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

epair of the premises of provider of output services. It is an apparent and admitted fact that the appellant is providing output services of accommodation/ lodging from the said premises. The use of word repair and maintenance in the Works Contract, to my opinion, is not applicable to the given circumstances as the definition of Works Contract has to be read as a whole and the perusal thereof makes it clear that when the repair, maintenance, etc. is the part of a contract where construction is also an activity then that renovation will be covered under the definition of Work Contract else it will be very much inclusive part of the definition of input. It is observed that the India Cements Ltd. vs CCE, Guntur has wrongly been relied in the impugned order. The issue therein was the cleaning and maintenance of garage which was held to be exclusive of the definition of input service. More precisely applicable is the case of Red Hat India Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner, Pune 2016 (44)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

availment of ITC of IGST paid under protest by the supplier.

availment of ITC of IGST paid under protest by the supplier.
Query (Issue) Started By: – Narendra Soni Dated:- 26-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 12 Replies
GST
Dear experts,
Please suggest can we avail ITC of IGST paid under protest by the supplier ????. Under protest is also mentioned on invoices of supplier.
Please confirm at the earliest.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
In my view input tax credit of the tax paid under protest is not eligible.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, any disputed ITC can be availed but you should not utilize it, unless final order is issued.
Our experts may correct me if mistaken,
Thanks
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
In our view it is al

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ill we can avail ITC???, Kindly re confirm.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
In my view no.
Reply By Narendra Soni:
The Reply:
Dear experts,
Thanks for valuable advises.
Now two types of opinions are received, one is saying that ITC is eligible, another is ITC not eligible.on GST paid under protest.
We are unable to juge which option we should select.
Hence, Kindly provide expert opinion based on rule,act or citation.
Thanks
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
In this regards, my point of view is that, if we apply the ratio of Para 2.1 of Circular No.33/2018 dated 23.02.2018, You may avail the credit but as it is disputed credit, you shall not utilize the same for payment of tax.
Our experts may correct me if mistaken
T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

It had been represented by CEI that there is generally a dispute between the industry and the Central Excise field formations regarding eligibility of certain raw materials as 'input' for claiming Modvat. The industry in order to preserve its right or justify the contention regarding eligibility of Modvat, avails the Modvat credit on such items in RG 23A Part II and keeps it in abeyance without utilisation. Show cause notices are, therefore, issued by Central Excise authorities every 6 months for the same inputs resulting in repeated litigation and consequential hardship to the assessees. CEI had, therefore, desired that some practical way out should therefore, be devised to save this avoidable inconvenience.
The matter has been examined

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CHANGES IN BUYERS DETAILS

CHANGES IN BUYERS DETAILS
Query (Issue) Started By: – SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR Dated:- 26-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 27-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
We have cleared Goods to merchant exporter (Concessional Rate i.e. 0.10%) under intimation to department under Notification No.40/2017.
Now, while shipping the Goods, Exporter informed us he has to export the material under different merchant exporter and asking us to raise fresh the Tax invoice on that exporter so h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. NSL Mining Resources India Private Limited

In Re: M/s. NSL Mining Resources India Private Limited
GST
2018 (11) TMI 606 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 26-6-2018
Order/AAR/AP/04(GST)/2018 in Application No. AAR/10(GST)/2018
GST
SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Dasari Nageswara Rao & K. Sivaram
Present for the Jurisdiction Officer: Remarks Receivied through mail
Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act' 2017, an appeal against this order lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section 99 of APGST Act'2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
1. M/s. NSL MINING RESOURCES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, GSTIN 37AADCN0483C1ZQ (hereinafter also referred as an applicant), having are engaged in procuring low grade Iron Ore from third party miners, upgrading the quality of Iron ore by beneficiation process and sells the upgraded iron ore

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

risdictional officer, i.e Assistant Commissioner State tax, Kurnool III Circle, Kurnool Division, stated that there is no proceedings were either pending before any authority or passed by any authority. Hence, based on the remarks obtained from jurisdictional officer, this authority conducted a personal hearing on 21st May 2018. The applicant firm represented through their authorized representative, they attended for the personal hearing and made submissions on the issues raised by them and requested the members of the authority for one more opportunity for personal hearing. Accordingly, the authority conducted 2nd personal hearing on 25th June 2018, and made submissions on the issues.
5. The applicant firm, in their written submissions submitted that…
The applicant firm is engaged in procuring low grade iron ore from third party miners, upgrading the quality of iron ore by beneficiation process and sells the upgraded iron ore. Beneficiation is the process that improves the economi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AD paid is carried forward as Central Tax” in the transition form GST TRAN-I. Transition credit of VAT paid is carried forward as “State Tax” in the transition form GST TRAN-I.
c) Further, they contended that the term “tax” has not been defined in CGST Act. However, input tax credit is defined under section 2(63) of CGST Act,2017 as…
“Input Tax Credit” means the credit of input tax.
“Input Tax”, defined under Section 2(62) of CGST Act,2017 as ..
“Input Tax”, in relation to a registered person, means the central tax, state tax, Integrated tax or Union territory tax charged on any supply of Goods or Services or both made to him.
Since, the transitional credit is carried forward as Central tax and State tax, the same will be covered under input tax credit.
d) They contended that without prejudice to the above 97 (2) (d) of CGST Act,2017 allows for question relating to admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid. Since the transitional credit is a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and enabling provision for transition of credits.
b. the heading of Section 140 reads as transition provision for “input tax Credit” – indicating clearly that the credits under section 140 qualify as “input tax credit “.
c. the definition of “input tax” under section 2(62) should be read in context. Section 2 starts with a preamble “unless the context otherwise required…..”.Therefore, the definition has to be read only in the context of transactions in GST and not for the purpose of interpreting the term “input tax credit” under the transition provisions.
d. The transition credits are carried forward in electronic credit ledger for utilization – this is similar to section 16 relating credit of input tax paid in GST
e. Interpretation that “input tax credit” does not include transition credits would lead to an anomaly since none of the provisions of the GST law relating to “input tax credit” including payment of tax, assessment, penalty etc can apply to such credits.
Further,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Fast Track Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Commissionerate

M/s. Fast Track Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Commissionerate
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1067 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 26-6-2018
Appeal No. ST/00397/2010 – Final Order No. 41885/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri J. Shankaraman, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench,
Brief facts are that the appellants were issued Show Cause Notice demanding service tax under the category of franchise services for the period 16.06.2005 to 31.03.2007. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand of Rs. 5,77,336/- along with interest and also imposed penalty under Section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) waived the penalties imposed, invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Aggrieved by the confirmation of dem

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

attracted all the four conditions stated in the definition of 'franchise'. Since the appellant was free to cater to other customers also and thus, did not fulfil the fourth condition in the definition of 'franchise', the appellant was under bona fide belief that their services did not attract service tax. That with effect from 01.03.2006 the appellant has been paying service tax under Business Auxiliary Services which has so far not been disputed by the Department. He, therefore, contended that the issue being interpretational and the appellant having no intention to evade service tax, failure to make the payment, being only because of interpretational issue, the demand for the extended period cannot sustain. He argued that the Department has not produced any iota of evidence to establish that the appellant is guilty of suppression of facts.
3. The learned AR, Shri R. Subramaniyan, supported the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that non-payment of service tax would not hav

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the vehicle owner not to cater to other customers. Thus, the driver/owner can cater to the requirements of other customers also even though they have entered into an agreement with the appellant. With effect from 16.06.2005, the amended definition is as under:
“Franchise” means an agreement by which –
(i) The franchisee is granted representational right,
(ii) To sell or manufacture goods or to provide service or undertake any process identified with franchisor,
(iii) Whether or not a trade mark, service mark, trade name or logo or any such symbol, as the case may be, is involved.
6. Thus, the fourth limb of the earlier definition has been given go-by after 16.06.2005 and hence, the argument of the learned Counsel that the issue is an interpretational one is not without force. It is also stated that with effect from 01.03.2006, the appellant has been discharging service tax on the very same services under Business Auxiliary Services and the Department has accepted the same

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Krishna Constructions Versus C.C.E, Chennai I Commissionerate ‘The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Commissionerate’

M/s. Krishna Constructions Versus C.C.E, Chennai I Commissionerate ‘The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Commissionerate’
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1066 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 26-6-2018
Application No. ST/Misc[CT]/41109/2017, Appeal No. ST/383/2011 – Final Order No. 41904/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri S. Venkatachalam, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri A. Cletus, ADC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench,
The appellants are engaged in construction services and registered with the Service Tax Department on 08.09.2008. Based on enquiry conducted, Show Cause Notice dated 24.06.2009 was issued to the appellants proposing to demand service tax on Maintenance and Repair Services, Commercial or Industrial Construction Service and Construction of Residential Complex Service. After due process of law, the demands were confirmed along

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ivided share of land in favour of the appellant in consideration of discharge of the mortgage and also agreeing to hand over a particular number of flats to the land owner. Accordingly, it was agreed to convey 56½% sq. ft. of undivided share of land in favour of the appellant. A comprehensive general power of attorney in favour of the appellant was executed, so as to facilitate registration of sale deeds in respect of 56½% of undivided share of land. The agreement also stipulated that the developer/appellant will be entitled to dispose of 56½% of the super built up area of the ownership flats to prospective buyers. The agreement would show that the land owner conveyed 56½% of undivided share in the land to the appellants and the balance was retained by the land owner. The appellant, accordingly, entered into agreement to sell the Undivided Share (UDS) with the prospective buyers, using the power of attorney given in favour of the appellants. After constructi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sue of completion certificate subject to levy of service tax. In the present case, the period involved is prior to 01.07.2010 and, therefore, even if appellant received advance payments, the demand cannot sustain being prior to 01.07.2010. He argued that since the land always belonged to the appellant, and the appellants, having not appointed any other contractor for construction activity, the construction service is for own use. He relied upon the decisions in the case of Vijay Shanthi Builders Limited Vs. CST -2018 (9) G.S.T.L. 257 (Tri.- Chennai), Krishna Homes Vs. C.C.E. – 2014 (34) S.T.R. 881 (Tri.-Delhi) and M/s. Creations Vs. CST Chennai (Final Order No. 41649-41651/2018 dt. 09.05.2018). It is also submitted by him that part of the demand is prior to 01.06.2007 and, therefore, not subject to levy of service tax as decided by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of C.C.E. & Cus. Vs. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. – 2015 (39) S.T.R. 913 (S.C.).
3. The learned AR, Shri A. Cletus, supported

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n and Toubro Ltd. (supra), and requires to be set aside, which we hereby do.
8. The issue that remains for analysation is the demand in respect of Construction of Residential Complex Services. The appellant has constructed two complexes, namely, Nelson Square and Krishna Sarathy.
9. The Department has relied heavily upon the agreement entered with prospective buyer to allege that the undivided share of land (UDS) has been transferred to the prospective buyer and, therefore, since the land does not belong to the appellant, the construction is not for oneself but for the prospective buyer and would attract levy of service tax. We have perused the agreement entered by the appellant, as power of attorney holder of M/s. Nelson Type Foundry Pvt. Ltd, with the prospective purchasers of flat. On perusal, we are able to see that these agreements are only agreements to sell. The Department has raised the demand on the wrong notion that these are agreements of sale and that the appellant has tr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in the land was handed over to the appellants and, in turn, it was agreed to hand over certain portions of constructed area (flats) to land owner. The flats which are handed over to the land owners were for their own use as a consideration for the undivided share of land. Though the appellants may have received payments prior to completion of the flats from prospective buyers, these amounts do not attract service tax prior to 01.07.2010 for the reason that the explanation to Section 65(105)(zzzh) was added only on 01.07.2010. The land remained in the ownership of the appellants till completion of construction of flat. Thereafter, sale deed was executed to the buyer, whereby right/title/interest in undivided share of land as well as the flat is transferred to the buyer. The Tribunal had occasion to analyse a similar issue in the case of M/s. Creations vide Final Order No. 41649-41651/2018 (supra). So also in the case of Vijay Shanthi Builders Ltd. Vs. C.S.T. Chennai (supra), the said is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modification to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018.

Modification to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018.
Trade Notice No. 07/2018-19 Dated:- 26-6-2018 Madhya Pradesh SGST
GST – States
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, GOODS & SERVICES TAX HQRS.
GST BHAWAN, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR (M.P.) 482001
C.No. IV(16)02/Trade Notice/HQ/MP/Tech/2018-19/
Trade Notice No. 07/2018-19
Dated 26.06.2018
Sub: Modification to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion of the provisions of the CGST Act across all the field formations, the Board, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, hereby issues the following modifications to the said Circular:-
(i) In para 2 (e) of the said Circular, the expression “three working days” may be replaced by the expression “three days”;
(ii) The statement after paragraph 3 in FORM GST MOV-05 should read as:
“In view of the above, the goods and conveyance(s) are hereby released on (DD/MM/YYYY) at AM/PM.”
4. Further; it is stated that as per rule 138C (2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, where the physical verification of goods being transported on any conveyance has been done durin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a tax authority by the transporter/registered person to another tax authority as and when required.
4.2 Further, it is clarified that only such goods and/or conveyances should be detained/confiscated in respect of which there is a violation of the provisions of the GST Acts or the rules made thereunder.
Illustration: Where a conveyance carrying twenty-five consignments is intercepted and the person-in-charge of such conveyance produces valid e-way bills and/or other relevant documents in respect of twenty consignments, but is unable to produce the same with respect to the remaining five consignments, detention/confiscation can be made only with respect to the five consignments and the conveyance in respect of which the violation of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Navin Housing & Properties (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Commissionerate, Chennai

M/s. Navin Housing & Properties (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai South Commissionerate, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (8) TMI 1515 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 26-6-2018
Application No. ST/Misc/41495/2017 Appeal No. ST/175/2011 – Final Order No. 41875/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The MA filed by department for change of cause title is allowed.
2. The appellants are engaged in construction of residential complex and was registered with the Service Tax Department. On specific in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s which includes the cost of entire construction. Hence this appeal.
3. After hearing both sides, we find that the period involved in the case is from June 2005 to April 2006. That the issue being a works contract whether subject to service tax prior to 1.6.2007 has been settled by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner Vs. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. – 2015 (39) STR 390 (SC). We also note that the coordinate Bench in the case of CCL Products (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guntur – 2017 (48) STR 50 (Tri. – Hyd.), in a similar matter had set aside the demand relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on identical set of facts.
4. Following the same, we hold that the demand is unsustaina

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGST Refund not disbursed due to PFMS error

IGST Refund not disbursed due to PFMS error
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 62/2018 Dated:- 25-6-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (AIRPORT & ADMN)
AIR CARGO COMPLEX, NSCBI AIRPORT, KOLKATA: 700 052.
F. NO. S41(Misc) – 64/2017CCX/Pt
Date.25.06.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 62/2018
Subject : IGST Refund not disbursed due to PFMS error.
It has come to notice that after generation of IGST Refund Scroll through ICES in some cases the IGST Refund could not be disbursed due to IFSC not being accepted by PFMS/not registered at PFMS.
2. A list of such Shipping Bills where IGST Refund has been verified but could not be granted due to PFMS error is enclosed with this Public Notice as annexure “B”.
3. IEC holders can check the PFMS verification status after registering themselves on ICEGATE (www.icegate.gov.in) Post registration, the PFMS status can be checked in IEC wise PFMS invalidated A/Cs report. The error codes and the rectification for errors

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

008
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
291003869 19AAACD9683M1ZW
14-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0018
288001338 19AACCA3933D1ZZ
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
16-Dec-17
588007811 19AAACH0628J1ZN
14-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0008
9
1673456
20-Dec-17
10
1673456
11
1918664

12
1918664
13
2007406
20-Dec-17
01-Jan-18
01-Jan-18
05-Jan-18
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0008
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0006
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0008
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0006
288051815 19AACCA7094H1ZF
14-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0008
14
2007409
05-Jan-18
288051815 19AACCA7094H1ZF
14-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0008
15
2075528
09-Jan-18
16
2075528
09-Jan-18
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0008
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0006
17
2128897
11-Jan-18
202013162 19ADRPD3183H1ZA
15-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0018
18
2174415
12-Jan-18
288009941 19AGRPK9845Q2Z0
06-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0008
1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

721 06-Mar-18
3296250 06-Mar-18
3467364 14-Mar-18
16-Mar-18
3532838
3533258 16-Mar-18
3593087 19-Mar-18
3779442 27-Mar-18
27-Mar-18
3779442
3843461 29-Mar-18
4314474 19-Apr-18
4314474 19-Apr-18
4626240 03-May-18
12-May-18
4814603
4817380 12-May-18
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0008
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0006
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
296000434 19ALTPS0977L2ZY
288001338 19AACCA3933D1ZZ
288001338 19AACCA3933D1ZZ
203011554 19AFFPM3459M1ZV
288001338 19AACCA3933D1ZZ
288001338 19AACCA3933D1ZZ
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0008
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0006
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
08-May-18 Ready
TBE0019
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
289003482 19AAAFU8863B1ZO
13-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
203010892 19AAAFU9190M1ZF
13-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
203010892 19AAAFU9190M1ZF
13-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0009,TBE0015,TBE0021
214023249 19AAHCP7882K1ZK
30-May-18 Ready
TBE0016
288014952 19ALCPS1796C1ZW
31-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2196000426 20AABCK5855D1ZY
20-Jun-18 Ready
TBE0008
23-Nov-17 Ready
TBE0016
59
7687901
29-Jul-17
296004901 19AADFR7604Q1ZK
12-Oct-17 Ready
TBE0008
60
7756730
02-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0019
61
7756730
02-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0006
62
7756730
02-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0007
Document 3
63
7882109
08-Aug-17
213023920 19AADC13704R1Z4
05-Jan-18 Ready
TBE0009,TBE0021
64
65
66
67
7898687
7898687 09-Aug-17
7898687 09-Aug-17
7941518 10-Aug-17
09-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0019
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0006
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0007
299007201 19AAACU4021G1ZM
18-Dec-17 Ready
TBE0008
68
8079112 18-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0019
69
8079112
18-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0006
70
8079112
18-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

17 Ready
TBE0008
84
8269350 28-Aug-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0019
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
9058992
9058992
8269350
8269350
8605285
8666299 14-Sep-17
8666299 14-Sep-17
8791733 21-Sep-17
8791754 21-Sep-17
8810065 21-Sep-17
8855814 23-Sep-17
04-Oct-17
04-Oct-17
28-Aug-17
28-Aug-17
12-Sep-17
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0006
215018371 19ACSFS8238E1ZH
213012685 19AADCM9719Q1ZJ
31-Mar-18 Ready
TBE0007
16-Apr-18 Ready
TBE0017
298003813 19AAGFA1003M1ZP
25-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0008
298003813 19AAGFA1003M1ZP
25-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0006
200012860 19ACQPJ1769B1ZF
213012685 19AADCM9719Q1ZJ
293012768 19AAHPA6189P1ZO
291003869 19AAACD9683M1ZW
14-Jan-18 Ready
TBE0009,TBE0015,TBE0021
16-Apr-18 Ready
TBE0017
10-May-18 Ready
TBE0008
25-Jan-18 Ready
TBE0018
298003813 19AAGFA1003M1ZP
25-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0008
298003813 19AAGFA1003M1ZP
25-Feb-18 Ready
TBE0006
Document 4Traceback (most recent call last):
Fil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sanjay Sarkar Versus The Goods and Services Tax Council & Ors.

Sanjay Sarkar Versus The Goods and Services Tax Council & Ors.
GST
2018 (11) TMI 797 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 135 (Cal)
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 25-6-2018
W.P. No.8190(W) of 2018
GST
Debangsu Basak, J.
Mr. Anil Dugar, Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhratosh Majumdar, Ld. Addl. A.G., Mr. Md. T. M. Siddique, Mr. Avra Majumdar, For the State.
Mr. Kausik Chanda, Ld. A.S.G., Mr. Manabendranath Bandyopadhyay, for Union of India.
ORDER

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. IL & FS Education and Technology Services Ltd.

In Re: M/s. IL & FS Education and Technology Services Ltd.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 683 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 175 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 25-6-2018
GST-ARA-48/2017-18/B-55
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by IL&FS Education and Technology Services Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question:-
The present Advance Ruling Application is for determining applicability of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 read with Entry No. 72 of Notification N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

0 is registered in Mumbai, Maharashtra and falls within the jurisdiction of Mumbai Nodal Division-5, Maharashtra. The Applicant is the social infrastructure arm of IL&FS group and is engaged in the key areas of education, Skill development, healthcare and cluster development for long term and sustainable impact.
2. Inter alia, the Applicant is working with various State or Union Territory Governments to promote computer training among the students and teachers of the government and government aided higher secondary schools under the Information and Communication Technology ('ICT') @ School Project (hereinafter referred to as “ICT Project”).
Overview Of ICT Project
3. Information and Computer Technology (ICT) is universally acknowledged as an important tool for improving the quality of education. Realizing the importance of ICT and the vital role that it plays in educational sector, the Government of India framed nationwide policy viz. National Policy on Education, 1986 (as modifie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Government aided schools into smart schools, where each school should have a computer lab and students are provided with premier computer training. In addition to computer training, ICT in Schools also provide for encouragement of usage of digital medium to impart education in other subjects and to create capability in terms of teaching staff enabling the schools to fully implement ICT in Schools.
Mode of Implementation
6. As discussed above, this new policy framed by the Central Government endeavors to provide guidelines to assist the States in optimizing the use of ICT in school education Within a national policy framework. As per the guidelines in the new policy, the Central Government provides that for effective implementation of Projects, the State or Union Territory Governments may consider entry of private partners in various aspects of the ICT Project by adopting the Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) model to avoid out of date/ obsolete equipment in schools. Thus, the n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s, optimum utilization and cost-effective implementation of ICT Projects. Thus, the State and Union Territory Governments have to implement Projects in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Central Government in this regard.
9. As the State or Union Territory Government is required to implement ICT Projects in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Central Government, almost all states have been following the PPP model by sourcing out the ICT Project work to the private parties under the BOOT model (as suggested by the Central Government).
10. Thus, as a matter of fact, throughout the nation, the States are adopting the BOOT model to implement ICT Project in schools. In fact, the Applicant is also implementing such ICT Projects on BOOT model basis in various states viz. Odisha, Maharashtra, West Bengal, etc.
ICT Project in the State of Maharashtra
11. The present application concerns one such ICT project being implemented by the Applicant in the State of Maharashtra.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t”).
Activities to be undertaken by the Applicant
14. In terms of the agreement, DE(S&HS) would arrange the necessary minimum constructed rooms/ space in each school for setting up computer labs and the Applicant would carry out the necessary work viz. flooring, furniture and fixtures, etc. for preparing each site to be used as an ICT lab.
15. Further, as per the specifications laid down in the Annexure-I and Annexure-IA to the agreement and the decision of the technical committee, the Applicant would procure the requisite number of IT equipment i.e. Computers, Printers, Scanners, etc. The equipment so procured would be installed and commissioned by the Applicant in the ICT lab prepared in schools. All these activities i.e. site preparation, installation and commission are to be completed by the Applicant in the time prescribed in the agreement i.e. Within 120 days from the date of handing over of the sites by DE(S&HS).
16. Once the labs are ready, the Applicant Shall operate the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re applications.
18. Moreover, it is also the responsibility of the Applicant to maintain and upkeep the ICT labs in proper working conditions for the entire contract period at its own cost. For this, the Applicant would have to provide requisite manpower to carry out the necessary repairs as and when required within the time limit prescribed in the agreement. Besides, the Applicant would also appoint a help desk which will serve as a single point of contact for all ICT related incidents and service requests. Further, the Applicant shall also provide 1 District coordinator for each district and 1 Project manager for a region for project management & monitoring which would coordinate with the Government of Maharashtra.
19. In terms of the agreement, all the above-mentioned activities are to be carried out for a total consideration of Rs. 284,61,00,000/- (Rupees Two hundred and eighty-four crores sixty-one lakhs only) which would be payable in installments (throughout the period of con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es or both;
f. Whether applicant is required to be registered;
g. Whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or Services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.
22. The Applicant submits that the issue on which advance ruling is sought in the instant matter relates to the applicability of Sl. No. 72 of Notification No. 12/ 2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 under CGST Act to the services provided by the Applicant. The questions relating to applicability of a notification issued under the CGST Act, 2017 are eligible to be posed for advance ruling before the Advance Ruling Authority in terms of Section 97(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017. Hence, present advance ruling application is maintainable before the Hon'ble Authority of Advance Ruling,
ISSUE(S) REQUIRING ADVANCE RULING:
23. The Applicant submits the following question for Advance Ruling and their interpretation on the questi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cified otherwise, subject to the relevant conditions as specified in the corresponding entry in column (5).
26. For quick reference, Entry No. 72 of the Notification No. 12/2017 is reproduced herein below:
Sl.No.
Chapter, Section, Heading, Group or Service Code (Tariff)
Description of Services
Rate (per cent)
Condition
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
72
Heading 9992
Services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory administration under any training programme for which total expenditure is borne by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory administration.
Nil
Nil
27. The corresponding exemption is provided under Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 dated 29.06.2017 issued under Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis of the exemption entry
28. On a careful perusal of the above extracted entry, it is clear that NIL rate under the said entry would be leviable to all the services which are provided:
a. under any traini

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

activities carried out by the Applicant would qualify as 'supply of services under the training program' or not?
32. In order to answer this question, it is pertinent to understand true nature, scope and extent of the activities undertaken by the Applicant in the implementation of ICE Projects under the ICT in Schools scheme.
All the activities undertaken under ICT Projects are naturally bundled
33. It has been explained in the facts of the instant matter (Para 6-9 of Annexure I to the application) that the national level policy framed by the Central Government for implementation of ICT Projects provides that the State Government(s) should preferably follow BOOT model.
34. This suggestion of the Central Government is in fact being followed by the State Governments. Multiple state governments, as mentioned in facts also, are awarding the contracts for implementing ICT Projects on BOOT model only. In all such cases, the private parties are implementing ICT Projects under BOOT Model,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nments as recipient of supply, the Applicant is of the understanding that all the activities performed by the private parties under the BOOT model are naturally bundled.
The basic infrastructure is being developed to provide computer training to the students or teachers
38. With the background in mind, as discussed above, the Applicant would like to highlight the fact that the basic idea of the Government of Maharashtra behind sourcing out the ICT project to the Applicant is that the Applicant should provide computer training to specific number of schools in Maharashtra for five years. Further, to be able to impart such computer training, the Applicant is also made responsible for creating the infrastructure in such schools as required, which will be used by the Applicant for first five years and thereafter, by the respective schools.
39. It is pertinent to note that the infrastructure built by the Applicant is used by the teachers appointed by the Applicant to provide computer tra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he agreement clearly provides that the supply of computer hardware, software, faculty and provision of education services under BOOT model are in pursuit to improve the quality of education in secondary and higher secondary schools of Maharashtra.
44. On a careful perusal of the new policy issued by the Central Government and the preamble of the agreement, it is abundantly clear that the prime object behind this scheme is to promote computer literacy among students and teachers. Thus, the main thrust under this scheme is to impart computer training and to achieve this, the Government is making provisions for ICT lab and other IT infrastructure.
BOOT Model achieves the object of imparting computer training and therefore. is preferred over outright purchase of assets
45. It may be argued that in order to achieve the object of providing computer training, the Government may purchase the assets and employ the teachers from the external service provider or engage the available school te

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

OT model, the experts in the IT fields are engaged and thus, the schools will get benefit of the expertise of the private IT vendors.
e. It takes a considerable time for the computer learning processes to stabilize and the BOOT model leverages the expertise of IT vendors for the time period enough for smooth transition.
47. Thus, for the above referred merits of the BOOT Model, the Government has encouraged the State Governments to opt it for implementing ICT Projects.
48. It is to be noted that prior to introduction of the new policy, the Government of India had amended its old policy in 2011 by issuing revised guidelines of in Schools (hereinafter referred to as revised guidelines). A copy of the revised guidelines is enclosed as Annexure-E. Under its revised guidelines also, the Government has stressed upon the fact that the 'Outright Purchase Basis' or 'Direct Procurement of Hardware' by the State Governments would be the last resort. Moreover, the State Government(s) opting t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he focus under the BOOT model and the present agreement of the Applicant with the State of Maharashtra is on the provision of quality computer training for 5 years and not creation / supply of infrastructure.
The Applicant is not providing operation or maintenance services
51. It is to be noted that in terms of the agreement, during the period of contract (i.e. 5 years), the operation and maintenance of the entire IT infrastructure, equipment is to be carried out by the Applicant on its own Cost. It is to be noted that during this period, the ownership of the equipment and infrastructure remains with the Applicant. This can be inferred from the following terms of the contract:
a. during the period of contract, the equipment, infrastructure, etc. are to be repaired by the Applicant at its own costs.
b. it is the responsibility of the Applicant to obtain necessary insurance6 for the equipment, infrastructure, etc. Thus, for the entire contract period, the risk remains with the Appl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

NNAI wherein, the Hon'ble Tribunal has held that the maintenance or repair services undertaken by CMS cannot be taxed under 'Management, Maintenance or Repair service' in as much as the same are undertaken in respect of the self-owned goods and would amount to self-service. This view of the Tribunal is upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CCE, Pondicherry vs. CMS (I) operations and Maintenance co. Pvt. Ltd. =  2017 (11) TMI 442 – SUPREME COURT.
55. Thus, in view of the above discussion it is clear that the entire infrastructure is owned by the Applicant and the repair and maintenance activities undertaken by the Applicant are in regard to the self-owned equipment. Therefore, there is no supply of maintenance or operation services by the Applicant.
56. In fact, the repair and maintenance of the equipment and infrastructure is performed by the Applicant so that it may continue to provide computer training during the contract period in a smooth manner without any obstruction.
Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing service. As discussed above, the basic idea of the ICT project implementation is provision of computer training to specific schools in the state of Maharashtra and not procurement of equipment / mere creation of infrastructure.
60. In view of the above discussion, it is abundantly clear that the Applicant is responsible for provision of computer training for five years using the newly built infrastructure. Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 requires that the services must be provided under a training programme. It is important to analyse if the services of provision of computer training by the Applicant can be considered to have been provided under a training programme.
61. It is pertinent to note that the term 'training' used in the above referred Entry No. 72 has not been defined in the Notification No. 12/2017. Further, this term is also not defined in the CGST/SGST Act as well as CGST/SGST Rules. Therefore, it is necessary to refer to the dictionary meaning of the term

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. a course of diet and exercise for developing physical strength, endurance or dexterity;
(v) Oxford Dictionary of English, third edition
Training means the action of teaching a person or animal a particular skill or type of behaviour
62. On a careful perusal of the above referred dictionary meaning. it can be understood that in common parlance, training is generally used to refer to practical instruction or learning process. It also means practical guidance given for developing skills or the action of teaching or giving instruction in a particular subject to enhance skills.
63. It is to be noted that under the erstwhile service tax regime, the services in the nature of commercial training and coaching provided by commercial training and coaching institutes were taxable and the term 'commercial training and coaching' was also not defined under the Finance Act (both under the positive and negative regime). Further, the courts had, at various occasions, interpreted the term 'train

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

'ble Mumbai Tribunal in the case of CCE, Pune – III vs. Mitcon Consultancy and Engg. Services Ltd. = 2017 (6) TMI 379 – CESTAT MUMBAI. Wherein, the Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal has held that the term education includes training.
66. In the instant case, the Applicant is engaged in imparting computer skills to the students as well as teachers. As far as students are concerned, they are taught computer as a subject wherein, various skills viz. operation of computers, using MS-Office, internet, etc. are given to them. Besides that, even teachers and headmaster/ headmistress are given skills in regard to computer-aided learning.
67. It is to be noted that the activities of the Applicant are restricted to providing skills to teachers as well as students in a particular subject i.e. computer. Thus, these activities, being narrow in scope, would qualify as training services.
68. Further, in the decision of Great Lake Institute of Management Ltd. (Great Lake Institute of Management Ltd. vs. CST,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Thus, it is abundantly clear that the services provided by the Applicant viz. computer related training to the students as well as teachers under ICT Project would squarely fall within the ambit of term 'training' used in Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 irrespective of the tenure, syllabus, content, etc. of the Project.
71. In view of the above discussion, it can be inferred that the first pre-requisite of the Entry No. 72 of the Notification No. 12/2017 is fulfilled.
The services are provided to Government of State of Maharashtra
72. The second pre-requisite of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 is that the services are to be provided to the Central or State or Union Territory administration. In the instant case, the agreement pertaining to implementation of ICT Project is entered into between the Applicant and DE(S&HS).
73. School Education Department of the State of Maharashtra is working as an Administrative Department with several Directorates under its control

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reement has been entered into by the Director of Education on behalf of the State of Maharashtra.
75. It is also apparent from the definition clause of the agreement which provides that director means the Director of Education (Secondary and Higher Secondary), Maharashtra State that is acting on behalf of the Government of Maharashtra as the implementing officer in respect of ICT Project in the State of Maharashtra. Therefore, it is clear that the DE(S&HS) is an implementing authority acting on behalf of the State of Maharashtra for implementation of ICT Project. Thus, the Applicant is providing services to the Government of State of Maharashtra.
76. In view of the above, it is abundantly clear that the Applicant is engaged in providing computer training services to the Government of Maharashtra. Therefore, the second pre-requisite of the Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 is also fulfilled.
The entire expenditure is borne by the Central Government and the State Government of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017?
Applicant's Understanding:
The Applicant is providing computer training services to the Government of Maharashtra and the whole expenditure in regard to such training programme, is borne by the Central Government as well as the Government of Maharashtra, Thus, the services provided by the Applicant would fall within the scope of Entry No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 and thus, leviable to CGST and SGST at Nil rate.
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
No submissions have been made by the department.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on dt. 18.04.2018, with respect to admission or rejection of the application when Sh. Kapil Sharma, Advocate along with Ms. Jyoti Pal, Advocate and Sh. Vinesh Khanna, AVP, Sh. Amitabh Jain, CEO and Sh. Srinivas, SVP appeared and requested for admission of application as per their contentions made in ARA. The jurisdictional officer, Sh. Rishikesh Wagh, Asstt. Commissioner o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

econdary schools in ten identified regions in the State of Maharashtra,
5.3 We therefore take up the issue of interpretation of afore-mentioned Entry No. 72 of the said Notification to the subject activity of the applicant for discussion and are reproducing the said Entry No which is as under:-
Sl.No.
Chapter, Section, Heading, Group or Service Code (Tariff)
Description of Services
Rate (per cent)
Conditions
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
72.
Heading 9992
Services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory administration under any training programme for which total expenditure is borne by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory administration.
Nil
Nil
5.4 We observe that as per Entry No 72 pertaining to Heading 9992, Services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory administration under any training programme for which total expenditure is borne by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ernment/government aided higher secondary schools under the ICT Project. The applicant in their submissions have stated that they are engaged in single supply of computer training services to the state of Maharashtra” in the form of installation, commissioning, site maintenance, operation, etc. to implement ICT Projects in the government secondary and higher secondary schools in the state of Maharashtra. They have also submitted that the ICT project is sourced from them by the DE(S&HS) for providing computer training to specific number of schools in Maharashtra for five years and further, to be able to impart such computer training, the Applicant is also made responsible for creating the infrastructure in such schools as required, which will be used by the Applicant for first five years and thereafter, by the respective schools.
We find that the applicant has referred to the provisions of Entry No 72 of Notification No. 12/2017 mentioned above. A plain reading of the said provisions m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the contracts clearly envisage a situation of supply of both goods and services and not services only. For the contract to fall under “Services provided to…” there should be only services rendered and no supply of goods which is not so in this case.
To summarise, the applicant has entered into a contract with Maharashtra State, for a period of 5 years, for implementation of the ICT @ school project in Government and Government aided higher secondary schools across the State of Maharashtra. In the preamble of the contract it is mentioned that “In its pursuit to improve the quality of education in Secondary and Higher Secondary schools of Maharashtra, the supply of computer hardware, software and connected accessories, Faculty and provision of IT Education Services in Government Secondary and Higher Secondary schools in the State of Maharashtra on Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) Model is envisaged under the ICT @school scheme under Public Private partnership'.
As seen in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

posite supply of Goods i.e. hardware and network equipments, printers, scanners, power equipments, and also imparting training on use of such equipments as per the syllabus prescribed (The said tender was for the supply of computer hardware, software and connected accessories along with the site preparation (i.e. vinyl flooring, furniture and fixtures, electrical fittings, power backup facilities, LAN, etc.), maintenance of equipment and provision of computer training services for 5 years in the various schools). Thus, it will be incorrect to dub the entire project as a training programme. It is rather a composite supply of goods and services, not naturally but artificially bundled having distinctly separate components with distinct value attributable to each of the components.
B. SERVICES SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO CENTRAL GOVERNMENT STATE GOVERNMENT UNION TERRITORY ADMINISTRATION UNDER ANY TRAINING PROGRAMME
From the foregoing discussions we find that the applicant is not just providin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ills to the students as well as teachers Also we see that the contract is for the supply of computer hardware, software and connected accessories along with the site preparation (i.e. vinyl flooring, furniture and fixtures, electrical fittings, power backup facilities, LAN, etc.), maintenance of equipment and provision of computer training services for 5 years in 1590 Govt, and Govt. aided high schools of Maharashtra under ICT @ school project for a certain contract value. Thus, the contract is clearly for supply of goods and services including training.
It is a composite supply having distinctly identifiable components with distinct value attributable to each of the components. There is no doubt that the applicant has provided computer training service as part of the contract, but the said service is not the pre-dominant/ principal supply. In fact as seen above the contracted supply has many distinct supply components out of which training is a small component. It is also seen from t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reading of the terms of the contract that payment for the work done is to be made by DE(S&HS) which is a department of the State Government. Thus the source of funding the expenditure is the State Government. Thus there is no dispute in respect of fulfillment of this condition but as per discussions above, the other two conditions of Notification are not satisfied.
5.7 Thus we find that when the language of a taxing statute is clear, if the conditions of supply falls within the four corners of statute allowing exemption, it is to be exempted. If not, tax is to be levied. In the present case all the conditions of Entry No 72 of the Notification No. 12/2017 have not been fulfilled and therefore there is no question the applicant being eligible for exemption on the basis of the said Entry.
06. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows :
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018
15/2018 Dated:- 25-6-2018 Nagaland SGST
GST – States
Government of India,
Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue
Office of the Chief Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax & Customs
Crescens Building, MG Road, Shillong.793001 Tel.Nos.91-0364-250013112502052.
Fax nos. 91-0364-2224747/2502047, Email: ccshillo@excise.nic.in
Trade Notice No. 15/2018
Dated. Shillong the 25th June, 2018
Subject: reg.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs-GST Policy Wing has issued a Circular No. 49/23/2018-G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ercise of the powers conferred under section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, hereby issues the following modifications to the said Circular.-
(i) In para 2 (e) of the said Circular, the expression “three working days” may be replaced by the expression “three days”;
(ii) The statement after paragraph 3 in FORM GST MOV-05 should read as:
“In view of the above, the goods and conveyance(s) are hereby released on (DD/MM/YYYY) at _ AM/PM.”
3.0 Further, it is stated that as per rule 138C (2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, where the physical verification of goods being transported on any conveyance has been done during transit at one place within a State or Union territory or in any other State or Union

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hen required.
3.2 Further, it is clarified that only such goods and/or conveyances should be detained/confiscated in respect of which there is a violation of the provisions of the GST Acts or the rules made thereunder.
Illustration: Where a conveyance carrying twenty-five consignments is intercepted and the person-in-charge of such conveyance produces valid e-way bills and/or other relevant documents in respect of twenty consignments, but is unable to produce the same with respect to the remaining five consignments, detention/confiscation can be made only with respect to the five consignments and the conveyance in respect of which the violation of the Act or the rules made thereunder has been established by the proper officer.
This Trade

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.

The Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
F.A-3-20-2018-1-V-(54) Dated:- 25-6-2018 Madhya Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Madhya Pradesh SGST
Madhya Pradesh SGST
Commercial Tax Department
Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal
No. F.A-3-20-2018-1-V-(54).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the State Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :-
AMENDMENTS
Save as otherwise provided, they shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017,-
(i) in rule 37, in sub-rule (1), after the proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely :-
“Provided further that the value of supplies on account of any amount added in accordance with the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 15 shall be deemed t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing as assigned to it in sub-rule (4).”
(iv) with effect from 01st July, 2017, in rule 95, in sub-rule (3), for clause (a), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
“(a) the inward supplies of goods or services or both were received from a registered person against a tax invoice;”;
(v) in rule 97, in sub-rule (1), after the proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely :-
“Provided further that an amount equivalent to fifty per cent. of the amount of cess determined under sub-section (5) of section 54 read with section 11 of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 (15 of 2017), shall be deposited in the Fund.”;
(vi) in rule 133, for sub-rule (3), the following shall be substituted, namely :-
“(3) Where the Authority determines that a registered person has not passed on the benefit of the reduction in the rate of tax on the supply of goods or services or the benefit of input tax credit to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e in respect of which the Authority passes an order.”;
(vii) in rule 138, in sub-rule (14), after clause (n), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:-
“(o) where empty cylinders for packing of liquefied petroleum gas are being moved for reasons other than supply.”;
(viii) in FORM GSTR-4, in the Instructions, for Sl. No. 10, the following shall be substituted, namely:-
“10. For the tax periods July, 2017 to September, 2017, October, 2017 to December, 2017, January, 2018 to March, 2018 and April, 2018 to June, 2018, serial 4A of Table 4 shall not be furnished.”;
(ix) with effect from 01st July, 2017, in FORM GST PCT-01, in PART B,
(a) against Sl. No. 4, after entry (10), the following shall be inserted, namely:-
“(11) Sales Tax practitioner under existing law for a period of not less than five years
(12) tax return preparer under existing law for a period of not less than five years”;
(b) after the “Consent”, the following shall be inserted, namely:-
“Declaration
I her

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

On account of deemed exports
(Amount in Rs)
Sl.No.
Details of invoices of outward supplies in case refund is claimed by supplier/Details of invoices of inward supplies in case refund is claimed by recipient
Tax paid
GSTIN of the supplier
No.
Date
Taxable Value
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State Tax/Union Territory Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
;”
(xi) in FORM GST RFD-01A, in Annexure-1,
(a) for Statement 1A, the following Statement shall be substituted, namely:-
“Statement 1A
[see rule 89(2)(h)]
Refund Type: ITC accumulated due to inverted tax structure [clause (ii) of first proviso to section 54(3)]
Sl.No.
Details of invoices of inward supplies received
Tax paid on inward supplies
Details of invoices of outward supplies issued
Tax paid on outward supplies
GSTIN of the supplier
No.
Date
Taxable value
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State Tax/Union territory Tax
No.
Date
Taxable value
Integrated tax
Central Tax
State Tax/Union territory Tax
1
2
3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
26/2018-State Tax Dated:- 25-6-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya,
Mumbai 400 032, dated the 25th June 2018
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 26/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. GST-1018/C.R. 54/ Taxation-1.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Government of Maharashtra hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) Save as otherwise provided, they shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from the 13th day of June, 2018.
2. In the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017,-
(i) in rule 37

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

expressions –
(a) Net ITC shall mean input tax credit availed on inputs during the relevant period other than the input tax credit availed for which refund is claimed under sub-rules (4A) or (4B) or both; and
(b) Adjusted Total turnover shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in sub-rule (4).”
(iv) with effect from 01st July, 2017, in rule 95, in sub-rule (3), for clause (a), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
“(a) the inward supplies of goods or services or both were received from a registered person against a tax invoice;”;
(v) in rule 97, in sub-rule (1), after the proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely :-
“Provided further that an amount equivalent to fifty per cent. of the amount of cess determined under sub-section (5) of section 54 read with section 11 of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 (15 of 2017), shall be deposited in the Fund.”;
(vi) in rule 133, for sub-rule (3), the following shall be substituted, nam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7 in case Maharashtra is the concerned State, where the eligible person does not claim return of the amount or is not identifiable ;
(d) imposition of penalty as specified under the Act; and
(e) cancellation of registration under the Act.
Explanation: For the purpose of this sub-rule, the expression, “concerned State” means the State in respect of which the Authority passes an order.”;
(vii) in rule 138, in sub-rule (14), after clause (n), the following clause shall be inserted, namely :-
“(o) where empty cylinders for packing of liquefied petroleum gas are being moved for reasons other than supply.”;
(viii) in FORM GSTR-4, in the Instructions, for Sl. No. 10, the following shall be substituted, namely :-
“10. For the tax periods July, 2017 to September, 2017, October, 2017 to December, 2017, January, 2018 to March, 2018 and April, 2018 to June, 2018, serial 4A of Table 4 shall not be furnished.”;
(ix) with effect from 01st July, 2017, in FORM GST PCT-01, in PART B,
(a) agai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Taxable value
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State Tax/Union territory Tax
No.
Date
Taxable value
Integrated tax
Central Tax
State Tax/Union territory Tax
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
;”
(b) for Statement 5B, the following Statement shall be substituted, namely :-
“Statement 5B
[see rule 89(2)(g)]
Refund Type: On account of deemed exports
(Amount in Rs)
Sl.No.
Details of invoices of outward supplies in case refund is claimed by supplier/Details of invoices of inward supplies in case refund is claimed by recipient
Tax paid
GSTIN of the supplier
No.
Date
Taxable Value
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State Tax/Union Territory Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
;”
(xi) in FORM GST RFD-01A, in Annexure-1,
(a) for Statement 1A, the following Statement shall be substituted, namely:-
“Statement 1A
[see rule 89(2)(h)]
Refund Type: ITC accumulated due to inverted tax structure [clause (ii) of first proviso to section 54(3)]
Sl.No.
Details of invoices

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 09/2018-19-GST dated 30.04.2018

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 09/2018-19-GST dated 30.04.2018
15/2018-19-GST Dated:- 25-6-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/1214
Dated: 25th June, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 15/2018-19-GST)
Subject: reg.
Circular No. 09/2018-19-GST dated 30.04.2018 was issued to clarify the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances.
2. In order to clarify certain issues regar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

where the physical verification of goods being transported on any conveyance has been done during transit at one place within a State or Union territory or in any other State or Union territory, no further physical verification of the said conveyance shall be carried out again in the State or Union territory, unless a specific information relating to evasion of tax is made available subsequently. Since the requisite FORMS are not available on the common portal currently, any action initiated by the State tax officers is not being intimated to the central tax officers and vice-versa, doubts have been raised as to the procedure to be followed in such situations.
3.1 In this regard, it is clarified that the hard copies of the notices/orders

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

West Bengal Goods and Services Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

West Bengal Goods and Services Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
NO.28/2018-STATE TAX Dated:- 25-6-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
West Bengal SGST
West Bengal SGST
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
REVENUE
NOTIFICATION NO.28/2018-STATE TAX
[NO.836-F.T.]
DATED 25-6-2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (West Ben. Act XXVIII of 2017), the Governor is pleased hereby to make the following rules further to amend the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
(1) These rules may be called the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, they shall be deemed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ained a unique common enrolment number, he shall not be eligible to use any of the Goods and Services Tax Identification Numbers for the purposes of the said Chapter XVI.";
(ii) in rule 138C, after sub-rule (1), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
"Provided that where the circumstances so warrant, the Commissioner, or any other officer authorised by him, may, on sufficient cause being shown, extend the time for recording of the final report in Part B of FORM EWB-03, for a further period not exceeding three days.
Explanation.- The period of twenty four hours or, as the case may be, three days shall be counted from the midnight of the date on which the vehicle was intercepted.";
(iii) in rule 142, in sub-r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Business promotion and development expensess

GST on Business promotion and development expensess
Query (Issue) Started By: – Satyajit Das Dated:- 23-6-2018 Last Reply Date:- 26-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
I am a distributor of Bathroom fittings. this month I organised a dealers meet. I incurred some expenses on purchases of gift items, booked conference hall and lunch, etc.
Can I avail Input Credit on these bills
Reply By YAGAY and SUN:
The Reply:
Input Tax Credit on food expenses may not be eligible u/s 17(5).
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir,
I agree with the reply given by our experts and in addition, I would say that ITC taken on gift is required to be reversed.
Thanks
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Input tax credit on con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =