M/s Kalpataru Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai

M/s Kalpataru Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1460 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/86913/2018 – A/87125/2018
Service Tax
SHRI RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Mehul Jivani, C.A. for Appellant
Shri M.P. Dixit, AC (AR) for Respondent
ORDER
Per: Raju
This appeal has been filed by M/s Kalpataru Ltd. against denial of CENVAT Credit of certain services received by them in relation to general insurance, repair and maintenance of motor vehicles and those utilized for staff welfare.
2. Learned C.A. for the appellant argued that they are not contesting the demand confirmed in respect of services used for staff welfare. He pointed out that two show-cause notices were issued, one for the period 2010 to 2014 and another for 2014-15. Both the notices were adjudicated by same original adjudicating authority but different first appellate authority. He pointed out that in respect of impugned show-cau

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d/intimated that, abiding to the show-cause notice they have admitted their liability and paid total liability of Rs. 11,05,801/- along with interest of Rs. 8,83,714/- vide Challan No. 05214 dated 05.11.2015 and 05218, 05216, 05213 all dated 05.11.2015. As the assessee has admitted the liability and paid the same along with interest. I am not discussing the admissibility/inadmissibility of individual services covered by the show-cause notice.”
2.1 He further pointed out that Commissioner (Appeals) has also not given any findings in respect of individual services in respect of which credit was taken and observed as follows: –
8. I have considered the submissions made by appellants which are available on records and findings and reasoning's and stand taken by the Adjudicating Authority. In this case appellant stated that they were eligible to avail/take CENVAT credit on the various employees and business related insurances charges as per the definition of the input service given in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

para 25 onwards in respect of these very services.
4. I have gone through the rival submissions. I find that the Order-in-Original confirms the demand without given any specific finding on the admissibility/inadmissibility of individual services covered by the impugned show-cause notice by observing that the assessee had admitted the liability and paid the same along with interest. The assessee had indeed paid liability and informed the Joint/Additional Commissioner on 17.11.2015 about the payment made, however, on 29.2.2015 in its reply to the showcause notice contested all the issues before original adjudicating authority. In these circumstances, the observation of the original adjudicating authority to the effect that the appellants are not contesting the demand is incorrect. In so far as findings given in para 25 onwards are concerned, the same relate to a different show-cause notice and different period.
5. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited.

In Re: M/s. Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1044 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GOA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 359 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 64 G S.T.R. 258 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GOA – AAR
Dated:- 21-8-2018
ARN No. GOA/GAAR/1 of 2017-18/2018-19/1929
GST
ASHOK V. RANE AND S.K. SINHA, MEMBER
Person Present for Hearing : Shri Ragavendra Singh Butola, Chief Financial Officer alongwith Shri Rajesh Sukla, Head of Indirect Tax of Tata Motors
PROCEEDING
(Under Section 98 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax, Act 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Goa Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax, Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the SGST Act and CGST Act) by Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited, seeking an Advance Ruling in respect of the following question:
“Whether the activity of building and mounting of the body on the chassis by the Applicant will result in supply of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

esult in supply of goods under HSN 8707 or supply of services under HSN 9988? To examine the issue, the applicant had referred provision of section 2(68) and Schedule Il of the of the CGST and SGST Act.
As per section 2(68) of the CGST and SGST Act, the term job work means;
 “any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person and the expression 'job worker' shall be construed accordingly.”
As per para 3 of the Schedule II of the CGST Act, which specifies certain activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services – 'Any treatment or process which is applied to another person's goods is a supply of service.
Hence as per the application the chassis is sent to the applicant for building body. The question arises for consideration is
1. Is the chassis complete without a body? -If the answer is affirmative then anything added more by anyone is the sale of goods.
2. If answer is negative, -It is a semi-finished goods then

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In this connection, it is relevant to refer explanation provided under section 143 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 which is read as under:
“For purpose of job work, input includes intermediate goods arising from any treatment or process carried out on the inputs by the principal or job worker.”
As per the ratio of the judgement held in case of Prestige Engineering (India) Ltd vs CCE on Meerut [1994 (73) ELT 497 (SC)] = 1994 (9) TMI 66 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, addition or application of items by job worker would not detract from the nature and character of his work.
GST law does not distinguish between raw material, finished goods and semi-finished goods. It talks about input and Capital goods. Even, semi-finished goods or intermediates are goods and in turn 'Input' by the principal or the job worker.
So, the argument of the applicant that they use their own material, hence, they should not be treated as job worker is not tenable under the provision of law.
Moreover, it is clarified t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. KTV Oil Mills Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Madurai and Chennai

M/s. KTV Oil Mills Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Madurai and Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1665 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/251/2010, ST/269/2010, ST/595/2010 – Final Order Nos. 42298-42300/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri Hari Radhakrishnan, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
All these appeals relate to the same appellants, they are heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of edible palm oil. Appellants were refining crude edible palm oil and selling the same under their own brand name 'ROOBINI'. They also refined crude edible palm oil belonging to others, affixed their brand name 'ROOBINI' on the packages and collected brand royalty commission of Rs. 100/- per MT from such c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

same. Hence appeal Nos.. ST/251/2010 and ST/269/2010. The appellant had paid up the amount of Rs. 1,74,782/- along with interest of Rs. 19,545/- totaling to Rs. 2,03,355/-. They preferred refund claim for the said amount, which was rejected by the original authority vide order dated 31.10.2008. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence Appeal No. ST/595/2010.
3. Today, when the matter came up for hearing ld. counsel Shri Hari Radhakrishnan submitted that they are not contesting the demand of Rs. 1,02,139/- under Intellectual Property Right relating to appeal No. ST/251/2010. However, the appellant is praying for relief from penalties on the ground that the dispute is one of interpretation.
3.1 In respect of Appeal No. ST/269/2010, the appellants are not pressing the demand of service tax under Intellectual Property Right for the normal period of limitation. However, it is contended that the extended period of limitation was invoked in this case; that penalties als

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed with. However, we find merit in the contention put forward by the appellant regarding penalty. As the issue was interpretational, the penalties imposed in this regard vide Order-in-Original No. 5/2008 dated 15.9.2008 is set aside. So ordered.
6.1 In respect of Appeal No. ST/269/2010, the service tax demand on Intellectual Property Right has also been conceded for the normal period. The said demand has already been confirmed and the extended period has been set aside by Commissioner (Appeals) vide Order-in-Appeal No. 113 & 114/2010 dated 31.3.2010, against which the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed on monetary grounds by the Tribunal. We find that it is not the case that the appellant had informed the department about these transactions in ER-I returns. This being so, the extended period, in our view, can very well be invoked and hence the entire demand of service tax of Rs. 1,74,782/- with interest thereon is not being interfered with. However, taking into consideration

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018
CT/LEG/GST-NT/12/17/750 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Nagaland SGST
GST – States
Nagaland SGST
Nagaland SGST
GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
NAGALAND: DIMAPUR
Dated Dimapur, the 21st August, 2018
NOTIFICATION- 13/2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Nagaland Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (4 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Naga

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Coffee Day Global Limited,

In Re: M/s. Coffee Day Global Limited,
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1042 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 121 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 64 G S.T.R. 139 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – AAR
Dated:- 21-8-2018
AAR No. KAR ADRG 21/ 2018
GST
SRI. HARISH DHARNIA, AND DR. RAVI PRASAD. M.P. MEMBER
Represented by: Sri S Vishnumurthy, Chartered Accountant
ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017
M/s Coffee Day Global Limited, 23/2, 6th Floor, Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore – 560 001, having GSTIN number 29AABCA5291P1Z3, have filed an application, on 18.01.2018, for advance ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017, KGST Act, 2017 & IGST Act, 2017 read with rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01. They also enclosed copy of challan for Rs. 5,000/- bearing CIN number SBIN18012900060425

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ut tax credit and it would not apply in the circumstances if the supplier wants to avail input tax credit. If the restaurateur avail input tax credit, the transaction would get classified under Sl.No.35 of Notification No.11/2017 and chargeable to tax at 18% (CGST – 9% and SGST – 9%). Hence the restaurateur has the option of paying output tax @ 5% without availing input tax credit or paying output tax @ 18% by availing input tax credit. Therefore the applicant filed this instant application seeking advance ruling on the following issue:
“Whether the applicant is entitled to pay GST @ 18% (CGST-9% and SGST-9%) and claim input tax credit?”
PERSONAL HEARING: / PROCEEDINGS HELD ON 30.01.2018.
4. The Applicant submitted power of attorney, issued by Sri. Jayraj C Hubli, Director, M/s Coffee Day Global Ltd., authorizing Sri. S Vishnumurthy, Chartered Accountant to represent the applicant before the Authority for Advance Ruling in connection with the instant application for Advance Ruling.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the case of State of Kerala Vs Builders Association of India [(1997)104 STC 134 (SC)] = 1996 (11) TMI 355 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA].
5.3 Holding the notification under reference as mandatory would render it being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India (which guarantees equality before law) and violative of Section 16(1) of CGST Act'2017, which provides for input tax credit.
5.4 Restaurants inside Five Star hotels will be eligible for input tax credit. This would mean that persons consuming it there would end up paying lower than what they pay in stand alone restaurants, which have to treat the tax paid on inputs & input services as cost of supplies being made.
5.5 Reduction is made by invoking the powers in Section 9, which does not confer any power to reduce the rate of tax.
FINDINGS & DISCUSSION:
6. We have considered the submissions made by the Applicant in their application for advance ruling as well as the submissions made by Sri. S Vishnumurthy, Chartered Acc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ccommodation services provided by Hotels, Inn, Guest House, Club and the like 
74
 
996312
Camp site services 
75
 
996313
Recreational and vacation camp services 
76
Group 99632
 
Other accommodation services  
77
 
996321
Room or unit accommodation services for students in student residences
78
 
996322
Room or unit accommodation services provided by Hostels, Camps, Paying Guest and the like 
79
 
996329
Other room or unit accommodation services nowhere else classified 
80
Group 99633
 
Food, edible preparations, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages serving services  
81
 
996331
Services provided by restaurants, cafes and similar eating facilities including takeaway services, room services and door delivery of food 
82
 
996332
Services provided by Hotels, Inn, Guest House, Club and the like including room services, takeaway services and door deli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

umn (3) of the Table in the notification, falling under Chapter, Section or Heading of scheme of classification of services as specified in column (2).
8.2 The restaurant services provided by the applicant are squarely covered under serial number 7 of the aforesaid Notification.
8.3 The entries at serial number 7 of the aforesaid Notification were amended through Notification No 46/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 14th November, 2017 levying a central tax of 2.5% on restaurant services as provided by the applicant under the condition that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service have not been taken. The entry is reproduced below for ease of reference:
(ii) against serial number 7,-
(a) for item (i) in column (3) and the entries relating thereto in columns (3), (4) and (5), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
(3)
(4)
(5)
“(i) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)].”;
We also find that in the same Notification the following explanation is provided:
Explanation.- For the removal of doubt, it is hereby clarified that, supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent shall attract central tax @ 2.5% without any

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al well -being services; and other miscellaneous services including services nowhere else classified).  
9

The various services covered under the scope of Heading 9997 as per the Annexure to Notification 11/2017 are reproduced below for reference.
700
Heading 9997  
 
Other services  
701
Group 99971  
 
Washing, cleaning and dyeing services  
702
 
999711 
Coin-operated laundry services 
703
 
999712 
Dry-cleaning services (including fur product cleaning services) 
704
 
999713 
Other textile cleaning services 
705
 
999714 
Pressing services 
706
 
999715 
Dyeing and colouring services 
707
 
999719 
Other washing, cleaning and dyeing services nowhere else classified 
708
Group 99972  
 
Beauty and physical well-being services  
709
 
999721 
Hairdressing and barbers se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

als by persons 
722
 
999799 
Other services nowhere else classified 
A reading of the above classification of services makes it clear that the applicant contends that his services shall fall under serial number 722 under the category of other services not elsewhere classified.
9. The question put forth by the applicant is “Whether the applicant is entitled to pay GST @ 18% (CGST @ 9% and SGST @ 9%) and claim input tax credit?”. The rate of tax is notified in Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017. The scheme of the Notification is such that the rate of tax is described in direct conjunction with the classification of the service represented by the Chapter, Section or Heading under which the relevant service falls. Further the explanation given under serial number 4 of the notification reads “Reference to “Chapter”, “Section” or “Heading”, wherever they occur, unless the context otherwise requires, shall mean respectively as “Chapter,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r services which are not specifically described under any other entry in the Annexure. The services provided by the applicant are classifiable under Heading 9963 and such services covered under heading 9963 are squarely covered under serial number 7 of the Notification. As the services provided by the applicant are covered under a specific heading and the Notification carves out a specific rate of tax for that heading, the same shall be applicable to the applicant. Serial number 35 would qualify for invocation only in respect of services that do not find classification elsewhere. Therefore the applicant is covered by serial number 7 and not 35.
9.2 In this regard the applicant has argued that the words 'provided that' (refer para 7.3 above) give them an option to not to avail concessional rate of 5% and avail input tax credit. In this context we find the explanation given in Notification 46/2017 (para 7.3 above) relevant. The explanation clearly stipulates that '…..shall attract cen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Priyanka Agencies Versus Union of India, The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi, The General Manager, The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination), The Principal Financial Advisor & Chief Accounts Officer, The Principal Chief Commissioner

M/s. Priyanka Agencies Versus Union of India, The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi, The General Manager, The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination), The Principal Financial Advisor & Chief Accounts Officer, The Principal Chief Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, The State of Tamil Nadu And The Commissioner of State Goods and Service Tax, Ezhilagam
GST
2018 (9) TMI 544 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Writ Petition No. 21272 of 2018 And WMP. Nos. 24940 & 24941 of 2018
GST
Mr. K. Ravichandrabaabu J.
For the Petitioner : Mr.Velayutham Pichaiya
For the Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar Standing Counsel for R1 to R5 Ms.Aparna Nandakumar, Standing Counsel for R6 Mrs. G.Dhana Madhi,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

apter Heading No. 995421 referred to in the Top Sheet pertains to the General Construction Services and therefore, the petitioner will not fall under such services. By contending so, the petitioner made a representation dated 14.06.2018 before the fifth respondent seeking clarification, more particularly, with regard to the relevant Chapter Heading applicable to the case of the petitioner. It is stated that the said representation is not considered so far.
4. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner raised very many grounds touching upon the merits of such clarification, as sought for by the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 to 5 submitted that in view of the letter of acceptance d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as raised an issue with regard to the Chapter Heading in consonance with the work executed by him, certainly, it is for the authorities concerned to clarify the same as, at this stage, this Court, is not inclined to go into such issue and express any view.
Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the contentions raised by this Court, this writ petition is disposed of, by giving liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the Senior Divisional Engineer, Chennai Division (West), within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the said official viz., the Senior Divisional Engineer, Chennai Division (West), shall consider the same and pass appropr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

MSR Iron and Steel Industries India Private Limited, Balu Iron and Steels Company, M/s. Ramesh Iron and Steel Company India Private Limited Versus The Joint Commissioner of Sales taxes Coimbatore Division Coimbatore, The Commissioner of GST and

MSR Iron and Steel Industries India Private Limited, Balu Iron and Steels Company, M/s. Ramesh Iron and Steel Company India Private Limited Versus The Joint Commissioner of Sales taxes Coimbatore Division Coimbatore, The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise GST Bhavan, Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) ast Wing, Goods and Service Tax Council (GST Council), The Union of India And The Government of Tamil Nadu
GST
2018 (9) TMI 543 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
W. P. Nos. 21321 to 21323 of 2018
GST
Mr. K. Ravichandrabaabu J.
For the Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Krishnan (in WP. Nos.21321 to 21323 of 2018)
For the Respondents : Mrs.G.Dhana Madhri Government Advocate (Tax) For R1 & R6 Mr.S.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion in FORM GST TRAN-1, so as to enable the petitioners to submit the FORM GST-TRAN 1 in Column No.7(a) or electronically or manually by correcting the error of filing in Column 7(d) and accept the same as being in compliance with the provisions of Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 / Section 140 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017 / Rule 117 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017.
3. Heard both sides.
4. The main grievance in all these writ petitions is that the respective writ petitioner is not in a position to take excise duty credit in the stock of goods on the appointment of GST (as on 30.06.2017) in view of certain

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of Indirect Taxes and consequently, a Nodal Officer is also appointed by the State Government, it is for the petitioners/Assessees, to submit their applications in accordance with the said circular before the concerned Nodal Officer.
5. Accordingly, all these writ petitions are disposed of, without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, only with the following directions:
(a) The respective writ petitioner shall submit their application in accordance with the circular dated 03.04.2018 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to the respective Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer.
(b) On receipt of such application, the Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notifies the dates for furnishing the return in form GSTR 3B for the months form July,2018 to March, 2019.

Notifies the dates for furnishing the return in form GSTR 3B for the months form July,2018 to March, 2019.
CCW/GST/74/2015 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Andhra Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Commercial Taxes Department
Proceedings of the Chief Commissioner of State Tax
Present: Sri. J. SyamalaRao, I.A.S.
Office of
The Chief Commissioner of State Tax,
Andhra Pradesh,
Eedupugallu, Krishna District.
CCTs Ref. in CCW/GST/74/2015 Dt. 21.08.2018
In exercise of the powers

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Chandra Kishor Singh Govt. Contractor And General Order Supplier Versus The Director, Construction And Design Services UP Jal Nigam And 4 Others

M/s Chandra Kishor Singh Govt. Contractor And General Order Supplier Versus The Director, Construction And Design Services UP Jal Nigam And 4 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 233 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
WRIT TAX No. 1159 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal And Hon'ble Saral Srivastava, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Shailesh Kumar Shukla,Sheo Kinkar Singh
For the Respondent : Pranjal Mehrotra
ORDER
The petitioner is a co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendment in the Notification No. F.17(131) ACCT/GST/2017/3765, dated 10th August, 2018.

Amendment in the Notification No. F.17(131) ACCT/GST/2017/3765, dated 10th August, 2018.
F17 (131) ACCT/GST/2017/3791 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Rajasthan SGST
GST – States
Rajasthan SGST
Rajasthan SGST
Government of Rajasthan
Commercial Taxes Department
NOTIFICATION
Jaipur, Dated: 21 August, 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No. 9 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Rajasthan Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Ankit Ispat Private Limited Versus The GST Council Represented by its Finance Secretary, The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, The Governmen

M/s. Ankit Ispat Private Limited Versus The GST Council Represented by its Finance Secretary, The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, The Government of Puducherry
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1736 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
W. P. No. 21337 of 2018
GST
K. Ravichandrabaabu, J.
For the Petitioner  : Mr.S.Muthuvenkataraman
For the Respondents : Mrs.R.Hemalatha, Mr.V.Sundareswaran, Mr.J.Kumaran
ORDER
Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 3 & 4. Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. Mr.J.Kumaran, le

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tioner is that even though they are entitled to claim transitional credit as per Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017 r/w Section 140 of the TNGST Act, 2017, such input tax credit fails to appear in the electronic credit, despite the fact that the petitioner duly complied with the requirements for transition of credit on input tax, the un-utilized amount in the return relating to the period ending with the day immediately preceding the date on which GST Act, 2017 came into force. It is contended that the petitioner had duly filled declaration electronically in Form GST TRAN-I on 05.09.2017. Therefore, it is stated that the petitioner vide their communication sent by E-mail dated 26.01.2018, informing the respondents that due credit which ought

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

petitioner/Assessee, to submit their application ventilating their grievance in accordance with the said circular, before the concerned Nodal Officer.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, only with the following directions:
(a) The petitioner shall submit their application in accordance with the circular dated 03.04.2018 to the respective Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
(b) On receipt of such application, the Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer is directed to forward the application to the respective Nodal Officer within a period of one week.
(c) The N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July,2018.

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July,2018.
CT/GST-14/2017/141-13/2018-GST Dated:- 21-8-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
Assam SGST
Assam SGST
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
ORDERS BY THE GOVERNOR
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX ASSAM KAR BE-LAWAN
NOTIFICATION No. 13/2018-GST
The 21st August, 2018
No. CT/GST-14/2017/141.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Assam Act No. XXVIII of 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: National Plastic Industries Limited

In Re: National Plastic Industries Limited
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1650 – APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 287 (App. A. A. R. – GST)
APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING MAHARASHTRA – AAAR
Dated:- 21-8-2018
MAH/AAAR/SS-RJ/06/2018-19
GST
SHRI RAJIV JOTA AND SMT. SUNGITA SHARMA MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act.
The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Ac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the vertically extruded yarn immediately falls on a water bed to form a non-woven carpet pile. Also, referred to as PVC web, non-woven carpet pile is taken up in a horizontal direction on a roller and wound up in rolls. Pile height of the carpet can be varied by changing the process parameters, usually in the range of 8 mm to 16 mm.
b) Under Stage 2, the web formed in Stage 1 is impregnated with a lamination of clear coat of liquid PVC and is further made to fall over the liquid PVC layer on a conveyer belt. Then it passes through the heated conveyor oven to solidity the liquid PVC backing to the web.
c) The resultant product is a product of running length. It is then cut into size as given specified by the customer. A sample of the product to be classified is attached as annexure 10 for ready reference.
C) On 03.01.2018, The appellant filed the Advance ruling application under section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017 before the advance ruling authority (hereafter referred as the 'Auth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ons which levy CGST and SGST respectively on all intra-State supplies of goods or services or both, at such rates as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council.
In exercise of powers conferred under Section 9(1) of the CGST as well as SGST Act, Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (hereinafter referred to as “Notification No. 1/2017-CGST”) and Notification no. 1/2017-State Tax (Rate) respectively which specifies the rate of CGST and SGST respectively to be levied on different products along with their corresponding Chapter/Heading/Sub-Heading/Tariff item. Thus, the rate of GST will depend on the schedule of the notification under which the goods are being classified.
Further, Notification No. 1/2017-CGST specifically provide that:
“Explanation – For the purposes of this Schedule, –
(iii) “Tariff item”, “sub-heading” “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter as specified in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es”. Therefore the impugned advance ruling passed by the authority needs to be set aside.
a) The authority has classified the impugned goods under chapter heading 3918 on the grounds that the impugned product is made up of PVC which is plastic and thus covered under chapter heading 3918.
b) The Entry no. 104A of Schedule III of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 amended by notification No. 41/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 issued under CGST Act, covers the chapter heading 3918, the same being reproduced below:
“104A
3918
Floor coverings of plastics, whether or not self-adhesive, in rolls or in form of tiles; wall or ceiling coverings of plastics”
 
 
Tariff Item
Description of goods
Unit
(1)
(2)
(3)
3918
Floor coverings of plastics, whether or not self-adhesive, in rolls or in form of tiles; wall or ceiling coverings of plastics”, as defined in note 9 to this chapter
Kg
3918 10
Of polymers of Vinyl Chloride:
Kg
3918 1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

materials of Section Xl.
Further, as per clause no.(p) of the Note 2 to chapter 39, the goods of section XI (textiles or textile articles) i.e. Chapter 50 to 63 will not be covered under this chapter. The relevant extract of the same is reproduced as follow: –
This Chapter does not cover:
(a)…………….
(b)…………….
…………….
…………….
(p) goods of Section Xl (textiles and textile articles);
(q)……………
Thus, on combined reading of note 1 and 2 of the chapter 39, the term plastic for the purpose of chapter 39 will not cover any material which is classified as textile material under section XI of the Tariff. Therefore, the classification can be finalized only after deciding the nature of the material of which the impugned product is made up of.
c) The term 'textile' or 'textile material l is not defined in the GST Act. Therefore, reference can be taken from various Textile Dictionaries and Encyclopaedia to ascertain the mea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rapery and wall covering, and they have variety of industrial functions as tire reinforcement, tenting, filter media, conveyor belts, insulation, etc. Textile materials are produced from fibres (finite lengths) and filaments (continuous lengths) by a variety of processes to form woven, knitted and nonwoven (felt-like) fabrics. In the case of woven and knitted fabrics, the fibres and filaments are formed into intermediate continuous length structures known as yarns, which are then either interlaced by weaving or interloped by knitting into planar flexible sheet like structures known as fabrics. Nonwoven fabrics are formed directly from fibres and filaments by chemically or physically bonding or interlocking fibres that have been arranged in a planar configuration (see Nonwoven textile fabrics, Tire cords).
Textile fibres may be classified into two main categories and into a number of subcategories, as indicated in Table-1. The generic names of man-made fibres are defined and controlle

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

based on segmented polyurethane
vinyon based on polyvinyl chloride
based on inorganic substances
glass
metallic
ceramic”
(ii) Further, “Textile Terms and Definitions, Tenth Edition” published by the Textile Institute has also defined the term 'textile'. The Textile Institute is an international organisation governed by a Council representing members throughout the world. It is legally constituted by a Royal Charter, granted in Britain in 1925. The main central functions are the provision of an operational framework and the maintenance of quality, particularly in regard to professional qualifications and the spread of information to members and others.
The term 'textile' as per this publication is defined as follows:
“A textile was originally a woven fabric, but the terms textile and the plural textiles are now also applied to fibres, filaments and yarns, natural and manufactured and most products for which these are a principal raw material.
Note: This defini

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

product under dispute is a nonwoven product.
d) Now it is important to understand the meaning of the term 'fibre' to conclude that the mat produced is of textile material or not. Again, the term 'fibre' is not defined under the GST Act and thus reference is made to the Textile Dictionaries and Encyclopaedia to understand its meaning.
i) the extract of “Encyclopaedia” of Textile Fibres and nonwoven fabrics” reproduced above, it is evident that textile fibres may be classified into two main categories i.e. naturally occurring fibres and manmade fibres as indicated in Table-1 of the extract. It can be seen that manmade fibres includes fibres which are based on polyvinyl chloride i.e. PVC.
ii) Further, the “Textile Terms and Definitions Tenth Edition” published by the textile institute has an entire flow chart of classification of textile fibres given. From the flow chart, it is evident that textile fibres can be classified mainly into natural or manmade fibres. Further, manm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mposed of organic polymers produced by manufacturing processes, either by:
(1) Polymerisation of organic monomers or chemical modification of the resulting polymers(see the General Explanatory Note to the Chapter 39) (synthetic fibres); or by
(2) Dissolution or chemical treatment of natural organic polymers, or chemical modification of natural organic polymers (artificial fibres).
(1) SYNTHETIC FIBRES
The basic material for the manufacture of these fibres are generally derived from coal or oil distillation products or from natural gas. The substances produced by polymerisation are either melted or dissolved in a suitable solvent and then extruded through spinnerets(jets) into air or into a suitable coagulating bath where they solidify in cooling or evaporation of the solvent, or they may be precipitated from their solution in the form of filaments.
The main synthetic fibres are:
(1) Acrylic: .
(2) Modacrylic: ..
(3) Polypropylene: ..
(4) Nylon or other polyamides: .
(5) Polye

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er, it is also important to mention that the authority in the order have also agreed that the impugned goods are of man-made textiles. The relevant extract of the same is reproduced as follows:-
Having seen thus, there arises no occasion for us to discuss the Heading 5705 which is claimed as being applicable. The case laws being buttressed in respect of the applicability of the Heading 5705 also need no discussion as to their applicability or otherwise. However, we would like to observe herein that we are not at all disagreeable to the point that there are man-made textiles but the same are not required to be referred to here in view of the impugned product being clearly classifiable under Chapter 39 as per discussions held herein above.
Thus, once it has been accepted that the impugned goods are made up of manmade textile, it will get covered under section Xl of the tariff and thus will be excluded from the scope of chapter 39. Therefore, in view of the above, it is evident that t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

process by polymerisation of organic monomers, such as polyamides, polyesters, polyurethanes or polyvinyl derivatives. Similarly, synthetic textile material will also be textile materials of organic polymers produced by manufacturing process by polymerisation of organic monomers, such as polyamides, polyesters, polyurethanes or polyvinyl derivatives. In similar fashion artificial fibre would be staple fibres and filaments of organic polymers produced by manufacturing process by chemical transformation of natural organic polymers (for example, cellulose, casein, proteins or algae), such as viscose, rayon, cellulose acetate, cupro or alginates. Likewise artificial textile material will mean textile material of organic polymers produced by manufacturing process by chemical transformation of natural organic chemicals (for example cellulose, casein, proteins or algae), such as viscose, rayon, cellulose acetate, cupro or alginates. Non-cellulosic synthetic waste is classifiable under Tariff

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Customs Tariff, the heading of which reads as “other carpets and other textile floor coverings, whether or not made up” is the relevant entry in this case. The relevant entry no 146 of Schedule Il under notification 1/2017 is reproduced below:
146.
5705
Other carpets and other textile floor coverings, whether or not made up; such as Mats and mattings including Bath Mats where cotton predominates by weight, of Hand loom, Cotton Rugs of handloom
 
The relevant extract of customs tariff is as follows:
Tariff Item
Description of goods
Unit
(1)
(2)
(3)
5705
Other carpets and other textile floor coverings whether or not made up:
m2
5705 00
Other carpets and other textile floor coverings whether or not made up: 
m2
 
……Carpets
 
5705 00 11
…….. Of Silk
m2
5705 00 19
……Other
m2
 
……Durries:
 
5705 00 21
……Durries Cotton
m2
5705 00 22
…….Durries of man-made fibres
m2
5705 00 23  
…..

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e pile use surface is bonded either to a substrate or directly to an adhesive which forms the substrate. The bonding may be achieved by adhesion or heat or a combination of both or by ultrasonic welding. The pile can be bonded either to a single backing surface or between two backing surfaces, in the latter case for separation into two carpets.
(2). ……………
(3). ……………
(4) .. …………..
In the present case, as discussed in facts of the case, the pile of PVC fibres is bonded to the liquid PVC layer on a conveyer belt which forms the substrate of the product. The PVC fibres are bonded to each other by way of adding liquid PVC coating which functions as an adhesive in this case. Thus, it can be seen that the present product clearly falls under the explanation given in the HSN explanatory notes and therefore will be covered under chapter heading 5705.
Further, the Chapter note to chapter heading 57 reads as follows:
“For the purposes of this Chapter, the term

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tic raw material). The product has been classified under chapter heading 57033090 which covers CARPETS AND OTHER TEXTILE FLOOR COVERINGS, TUFTED, WHETHER OR NOT MADE UP.
As per HSN explanatory notes of chapter heading 5703, this heading covers the following:
This heading covers tufted carpets and other tufted textile floor coverings produced on tufted machines which, by means of a system of needles and hooks insert textile yarn into a pre-existing backing (usually a woven fabric or a nonwoven) thus producing loops, or, if the needles and hooks are combined with a cutting device, tufts. The yarn forming the pile are then normally fixed by a coating of rubber or plastic. Usually before the coating is allowed to dry it is either covered by a secondary backing of loosely woven textile material, e.g., jute, or by foamed rubber.
Chapter 5703 covers textile floor coverings but made with tufting technology. It is submitted that artificial turf imported by the sister concern is also made u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The product was classified as floor covering under heading 5703 by the tribunal. The relevant extract is as follows:
5. As per Explanatory Notes of HSN, Chapter 95 also includes equipment for indoor or outdoor games, appliances and apparatus for sports, gymnastic or athletic. The appellant except claiming the impugned product to be “Astra turf” for sports has not adduced any material on record to show that the impugned goods are meant for any sports. We observe that the Adjudicating Authority has given the following findings in the Adjudication Order:
“l have seen the sample. A perusal of samples, however, indicate that goods are nothing but tufted carpet/floor coverings covered under Custom Tariff Heading 57.03 as described in HSN explanatory notes i.e. these have textile yarn/strip inserted into a pre-existing backing, thus producing loops. The yarn/strips forming the pile are fixed with some coating of rubber/plastic or other adhesive and are covered by a secondary baking of lo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ding but the same has not been submitted. No explanation as to what is the difference between the two types of goods priced at US $ 2.37 and 2.85 per sq. yard respectively has been submitted. No correspondence with the supplier indicating as to what they were looking for and what they have ordered has been submitted. No explanation regarding the end use of the goods has been submitted. The goods are stated to be for Tennis, hockey and other games. No purchase order, trade enquiry from intended customers has been submitted. It is difficult to comprehend that goods if intended to be used for a specific technical use such as surface for a particular sport would be ordered for random quantities, at random prices without reference to any specifications.”
6. We find that no material has been brought on record to controvert the above findings. Neither the Appellants have furnished the catalogue of the foreign supplier to indicate that the impugned goods is to be used for any sport nor any t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at the goods imported by them were same which are impugned in the present matter. We also observe that Commissioner (Appeals) has, in the impugned order, given his findings that as per the composition sheet produced by the Appellants, the fibre used is 100% UV Olefin; primary and secondary backing is of woven polypropylene. Commissioner (Appeals) has referred to “The World Book Multimedia Encyclopaedia”, according to which Olefin floor coverings are widely used because they are strong and they resist moisture. The Appellants have not produced any material in support of their claim that the imported goods did not have a thread of textile exposed to the surface. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order as far as classification of the product is concerned. We also agree with the Revenue at there was a mis-declaration in claiming classification under Heading 95.06 inasmuch as there was no material with the Appellant to declare the same heading. However, w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Xl to state that the impugned product is impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastic or articles thereof, of Chapter 39 and thus will not fall under chapter 5705. The same is reproduced below:
(h) woven, knitted or crocheted fabrics, felt or nonwovens, impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastic or articles thereof, of Chapter 39;
It is submitted that the authority has mis-understood the manufacturing process of the appellant. The extruded PVC fibres require on the conveyor belt are treated with liquid PVC which acts as bonding material to bond the fibres amongst themselves as well as the substrate. The function of liquid PVC is only as an adhesive. Such use of adhesive will not make the product to be treated as impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastic. The appellant relies on the judgment in the case of F.G.P. LTD. 2002 (139) E.L.T. 581 (Tri. – Del.) = 2001 (4) TMI 637 – CEGAT, NEW DELHI wherein, in a similar manufacturing process to that in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wound into rolls or cut into slabs and packed in polythene lined hessian bags for transfer to Bonded Store Room. This product is known as Resin Bonded Glass Wool Mats”
10. The Revenue has not disputed the process of manufacture and has contended that admittedly the glass wool has been bonded and as such has been treated with plastic/resin material meaning thereby it contains the plastic material. The Revenue has also emphasised that the aim and objective of the wordings of serial No. 10 of the Notification No. 52/86 is very clear that once glass fabrics is treated either by impregnation or by coating or by covering or by lamination; it would not be eligible for exemption. The appellants, on the other hand, have contended that the Department has not appreciated the distinction between the 'bonding' end the term 'impregnation  According to Fair Child's Dictionary of Textiles, Bonding is a “process of adhering fibres or layers of fabrics together by a bonding agent”

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. We find that the Collector (Appeals) considered all the material on record including the opinions rendered by (i) The Bombay Textile Research Association, (ii) The Silk & Art Silk Mills' Research Association, and (iii) Wool Research Association according to whom the impugned product is not impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastic or varnish but bonded with adhesive by spraying technique. The Collector (Appeals) after referring to the process of 'bonding' and 'impregnation' in Paras 7 and 8 of the impugned order gave his findings that “the distinction between the bonded fabrics and impregnated fabrics is that in case of impregnated fabrics the interstices are completely filled whereas this is not the case with bonded fabrics To find out the true character of fabric, it is necessary that the fabric has to be subjected to certain test as highlighted by the Bombay Textile Research Association in their report dated 20-12-1992 in which they stated that the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

egnation, coating, covering or lamination with plastic or varnish and benefit of Sr. No. 10 of Notification No. 52/84-C. E. was extended. This order was confirmed by the Tribunal vide Final Order No. E/962/97-D, dated 5-11-1997. Accordingly, we are of the view that the Revenue has not succeeded in proving that the impugned product is impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics or varnishes and therefore, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal filed by the Revenue is thus, rejected.
It is evident from the above judgment that the process of bonding using an adhesive does an that the product has been impregnated, coated, covered or laminated. Therefore, the contention of the authority to exclude the impugned product from chapter heading 5705 by way of note 1(h) is completely erroneous.
4) Without prejudice to the above if the product equally merits classification under 2 different chapter headings, as per the interpretative rules, the chapter occu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

apter headings, then the product will be classified under the heading which occurs last in the numerical order among those headings. The rules read as follows:
3. When by application of rule 2(b) or for any other reason, goods are, prima facie, classifiable under two or more headings, classification shall be affected as follows:
(a) The heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description. However, when two or more headings each refer to part only of the materials or substances contained in mixed or composite goods or to part only of the items in a set put up for retail sale, those headings are to be regarded as equally specific in relation to those goods, even if one of them gives a more complete or precise description of the goods.
(b) Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different materials or made up of different components, and goods put up in sets for retail sale, which cannot be classified by reference t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r which was attended by Sh. S.S. Gupta, Chartered Accountant, Karan Awatani, C.A on behalf of the Appellant and Sh. Clint D'silva, Assistant Commissioner and Smt. Anagha Jakhadi, Range-IV, Division-VI, CGST Mumbai East as jurisdictional officers.
7). The Appellant reiterated their written submission and vehemently argued that their product is different from PVC Flooring, mentioned under HSN 3918, and thus the order of AAR classifying the same under 3918 should be set aside. They pleaded that their arguments were not covered in the findings of the AAR so they have come before the Appellate authority with same grounds and arguments. They further submitted that they had no dispute about classification of PVC flooring under HSN 3918 but their product being different from PVC flooring should not be classified under HSN 3918. They argued that coir mat attracts GST @ 12%, similar sports material attracts GST @ 12% so their product should also attract GST @12% as the use is same. They exp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the use of these words. Since, there is no cotton in the goods in question, same does not merit classification under entry no. 146.
DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS
9. We have heard both the parties and also seen the sample(s) of their product produced by the Appellant. The issue before us is to decide whether the goods in   questionare classifiable under Tariff Item 3918 as held by AAR, or 5705 as claimed by the Appellant.
10. In the facts of the case of their appeal, the appellants have introduced themselves as a company engaged in the manufacture of floor mats/ (floor coverings) made of (PVC textiles) PVC, known as PVC Carpet Mats or Floor coverings or textile floor coverings of PVC. They also advertise their product on their website as 'Mats' having sleek carpet like finish. On perusal of the sample produced before us by the Appellant, we observe that it is in the form of a plastic web on exposed surface and with a sheet-like backing of plastic. The manufacturing proces

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5702:
Carpets and other textile floor coverings, woven, not tufted or flocked, whether or not made up, including “Kelem”, 'Schumacks”, “Karamanie” and similar hand-woven rugs;
5703:
Carpets and other textile floor coverings, tufted, whether or not made up;
5704:
Carpets and other textile floor coverings, of felt, not tufted or flocked, whether or not made up; and finally,
5705:
Other carpets and other textile floor coverings, whether or not made up; such as Mats and mattings including Bath Mats, where cotton predominates by weight, of Handloom, Cotton Rugs of handloom
Thus it can be seen that the appellant would have us classify the product under the entry 'other carpets and other textile floorings', i.e. other than those falling under headings 5701 to 5704; whereas the AAR has preferred the classification as 'floor coverings of plastics'.
12. In the absence of any definition for the terms in the tariff, let us look at the meaning of 'floor coverings&#

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

introduction of machine-made products, however, it has been used almost exclusively for a floor covering. Both in Great Britain and in the United States the word rug is often used for a partial floor covering as distinguished from carpet, which frequently is tacked down to the floor and usually covers it wall-to-wall. In reference to handmade carpets, however, the names rug and carpet are used interchangeably.
(ii) Wikipedia defines the terms as below2.
Flooring is the genera/ term for a permanent covering of a floor, or for the work of installing such a floor covering. Floor covering is a term to generically describe any finish material applied over a floor structure to provide a walking surface. Both terms are used interchangeably but floor covering refers more to loose-laid materials.
Materials almost always classified as flooring include carpet, laminate, tile and vinyl.
Carpeting
Carpet is a soft floor covering made of bound carpet fibers or stapled fibers. Carpeting refers

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

used to cover the floor of a room, such as a carpet or tiles'
In view of the above definitions, it is clear that floor coverings is a wide term and includes carpets, mats, rugs used to cover a floor area. Therefore, it will have to be the material or form of the floor covering which will decide the correct classification.
13. With this in mind, let us examine the claim of Appellant for classification of the said goods under HSN 5705.
13.1 At the outset we must place on record that to avoid classification disputes under the GST regime, the Customs Tariff has been adopted for descriptive classification of goods under GST. Further, in case of any doubt, and for the exact classification of any goods, reference needs inevitably to be made to the Section and Chapter Notes provided therein, as has been done in this case by both the appellants and the Maharashtra AAR.
13.2 In this context it is seen that Chapter 57 of the HSN falls under Section Xl of the Customs Tariff. Section Note

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e term “carpets and other textile floor coverings” means floor coverings in which textile materials serve as the exposed surface of the article……
(emphasis supplied)
They have also, additionally, clarified during the personal hearing that they are not claiming their goods to be carpets. Rather, their claim is that their product falls in the category of 'other textile floor coverings .
13.4 We shall therefore need to turn our attention to understanding what constitutes textiles and textile materials. The definition of 'Textile' cited by the appellant is as follows:
“A textile was originally a woven fabric, but the terms textile and the plura/ textiles are now also applied to fibres, filaments and yarns, natural and manufactured and most products for which these are a principal raw material”
We also find that the definition of 'Textile' and 'Textile material' as available in The Fairchild Books Dictionary of Textiles is as under:
Textile-
Derived f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n which T-shaped monofilaments result in the intermediate process. It is not the case of the appellants that that they manufactured the non-woven product (PVC web) by use of monofilament yarns. There are no identifiable fibres, filaments or yarns in the exposed surface of their product and the web like structure made from 100% PVC therefore does not qualify for the textile materials as specified in Note 1 to Chapter 57.
14. As regards the Bill of Entry produced by the appellant during hearing for goods imported by their sister concern under CTH 5703, it is observed that neither CTH 5703 is claimed by the appellant nor the detail facts of the goods mentioned in the BE like test report etc. are presented before us to arrive at a conclusion that the goods imported under the said BE are similar to that of the goods in question, excepting the difference of process as claimed by the appellant. Therefore, the said Bill of Entry is of no help to the appellant. The Explanatory notes cited by t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as compelled them to approach AAR for classification. The only change noticed and which was discussed during hearing also, is the higher rate of GST under HSN 3918 than under HSN 5705. But the rate of duty/tax cannot be a criterion for deciding the classification of any product. The classification has to be decided as the terms of headings, subheadings and tariff items and the relevant section/ chapter notes/sub notes in terms of the interpretative rules to the Customs Tariff.
16. As regards the entry no. 146 of Schedule II of the CGST rate notification 01/2017, the appellant has claimed that the semi colon has divided the entry in two parts and they are covered under the first part i.e. 'Other carpets and other textile floor coverings.' They have cited two judgments of Tribunal in their support that use of semi colon between two entries makes the sentences separate and they have to be read disjunctively. We have observed in above paras that the goods in question are neither c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

claim that their goods are not impregnated, coated, covered or laminated to escape the exclusion clause provided under Section XI vide Note 1(h). But this claim is against their manufacturing process which states that “under stage 2, the web formed in Stage 1 is impregnated with a lamination of clear coat of liquid PVC”.
19. As regards the argument of the appellant that if product equally merits classification under 2 different chapter headings, as per interpretative rules, the chapter occurring later will apply, we observe that there is no such case of merit classification of the said goods under 2 different chapter headings equally. Instead, the said goods are specifically classifiable under 3918 as PVC floor coverings, and invoking Rule 3 is not necessary when classification can be decided under Rule 1 itself.
20. In view of the above discussion, we hold that the PVC Mats manufactured by the appellant, a sample of which was produced before us, are specifically covered under HSN 39

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

EXTENSION FOR GSTR-3B On or Before 24th August 2018

EXTENSION FOR GSTR-3B On or Before 24th August 2018
35/2018 – State Tax Dated:- 21-8-2018 Gujarat SGST
GST – States
Gujarat SGST
Gujarat SGST
NOTIFICATION
By the Commissioner of State Tax,
Gujarat State, Ahmedabad
Dated 21st August, 2018
Notification No. 35/2018 – State Tax
No. GSL/S.168/B.15 – In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Guj.25 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Gujarat Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018
I-L / 2018 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Karnataka SGST
GST – States
Karnataka SGST
Karnataka SGST
Office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka)
Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar, Bengaluru,
NOTIFICATION (I-L / 2018)
No. KGST.CR.01/ 17-18, Dated: 21.08.2018.
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Karnataka Act 27 of 2017) read

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of due date of filing GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018 till 24.08.2018.

Extension of due date of filing GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018 till 24.08.2018.
18/2018-C.T./GST-35/2018-State Tax Dated:- 21-8-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
West Bengal SGST
West Bengal SGST
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
NOTIFICATION BY THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
Notification No. 18/2018-C.T./GST Dated: 21.08.2018
Notification No. 35/2018-State Tax
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Due dates for filing FORM GSTR-3B for the months from July, 2018 to March, 2019

Due dates for filing FORM GSTR-3B for the months from July, 2018 to March, 2019
34/2018 – State Tax S.O. No. 60 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Jharkhand SGST
GST – States
Jharkhand SGST
Jharkhand SGST
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
Notification
21st August, 2018
Notification No. 34/2018 – State Tax
S.O. No. 60 Dated. 21st August, 2018 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said rules), the Commissioner, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby specifies that the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Prescribe the due dates for furnishing the details of outward supply of goods or services or both for GSTR1 from July 2018 to March 2019

Prescribe the due dates for furnishing the details of outward supply of goods or services or both for GSTR1 from July 2018 to March 2019
33/2018 – State Tax – S.O. No. 59 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Jharkhand SGST
GST – States
Jharkhand SGST
Jharkhand SGST
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
Notification
21st August, 2018
Notification No. 33/2018 – State Tax
S.O. No. 59 Dated. 21st August, 2018 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act), the Jharkhand Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies the registered persons having aggregate turnover of up to 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018
35/2018 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
[Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs]
Notification No. 35/2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 21st August, 2018
G.S.R. 792 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to exempt BCD & IGST on goods imported for donation for relief & rehabilitation of the people of Kerala affected by the floods upto 31.12.2018

Seeks to exempt BCD & IGST on goods imported for donation for relief & rehabilitation of the people of Kerala affected by the floods upto 31.12.2018
59/2018 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Customs -Tariff
Customs
Miscellaneous Exemption Notifications
Cus
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
Notification No. 59/2018 – Customs
New Delhi dated the 21st August, 2018
G.S.R. 789 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts all goods falling under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) when imported into India and i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, the relief agencies of the Central Government, the Government of Kerala including the relief agencies duly approved by the Central Government or the Government of Kerala for the purpose; and
(iii) that the importer produces before the Deputy Commissioner or the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, within six months from the date of importation of the said goods or within such extended period as the said officer may allow, a certificate from the District Magistrate of the affected area in the State of Kerala that the said goods have been donated for use for the aforesaid purpose.
2. This notification shall remain in force upto and inclusive of the 31st December, 2018.
[F.No. 354/311/2018-TRU]
(Gunjan Kumar Verma)
Und

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit

Input tax credit
Query (Issue) Started By: – DK AGGARWAL Dated:- 20-8-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-8-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 12 Replies
GST
Dear Sir
GST-Input Tax Credit
1Please clarify if the ITC is available on replacement or repair of Tube lights, electric wire, in the office. In the purchase invoice of supplier GST number is appearing of buyer and in GSTR- 2A the ITC is shown.
2Similarly, in repair of godown, expenses are incurred for replacement of roof sheet etc and the ITC is appearing in GSTR- 2A. Please note its not a new construction .
3-Similarly, is ITC available on replacement of CAR tyres, battery or service bill. ITC is available in GSTR- 2A as we have given our GST number to the supplier ?
Kindly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ell.
Reply By DK AGGARWAL:
The Reply:
OK
Thanks Sir
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Input tax credit is allowed on query 1 & 2. Third one is covered under ineligible list.
Reply By Pavan Mahulkar:
The Reply:
It may not be available for 2 also…
Please read section 17
(c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service;
(d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.
Explanation.For

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d sub-section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
So it is clearly mentioned in the section that "ITC shall not be available in respect of" which indicates that neither on the purchases of the same nor on the parts there of
Reply By Ramaswamy S:
The Reply:
1 ITC on replacement or repair of Tube lights, electric wire, in the offi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Warehouse Services for Tea Not GST Exempt; Processed Tea Not Considered Agricultural Produce.

Warehouse Services for Tea Not GST Exempt; Processed Tea Not Considered Agricultural Produce.
Case-Laws
GST
Warehouse services – claim of benefit of exemption – agricultural produce or not – Whether the supply of warehouse services used for packing & storage of tea, was/is exempted from GST – Held No. – the activity of M/s. Unilever of processing of raw tea leaves into tea results in emergence of a new product having distinct name i.e. Tea, which has distinct name, character and use – I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Reviews If FSSAI-Mandated Name on Goods Counts as Brand Name for GST Exemption Under Exemption Notification.

Court Reviews If FSSAI-Mandated Name on Goods Counts as Brand Name for GST Exemption Under Exemption Notification.
Case-Laws
GST
Branding of goods – Whether mention of name of the Appellant on the goods, as required by FSSAI regulations and Legal Metrology Rules, amounts to brand name or not? – Claim of exemption from GST – The use or words ‘VALUE’, ‘CHOICE’ or ‘ SUPERIOR’ on the proposed packing, without altering the surrounding environment to take advantage of brand ‘MOR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Uninterruptible Power Supply and Battery Not Classified as Mixed or Composite Supply Under GST Regulations.

Uninterruptible Power Supply and Battery Not Classified as Mixed or Composite Supply Under GST Regulations.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of the supply – supply of UPS along with the battery – Mixed supply or not – naturally bundled goods – The storage battery has multiple uses and can be put to different uses and when supplied separately with static converter (UPS) it cannot be considered as a composite supply or a naturally bundled supply.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, mar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commission Directs Respondent to Proactively Disclose Information for Enhanced Transparency Under RTI Act Sections 25(4) and 4.

Commission Directs Respondent to Proactively Disclose Information for Enhanced Transparency Under RTI Act Sections 25(4) and 4.
Case-Laws
GST
RTI – GSTN Network – Keeping in view the supervisory powers of the Commission u/s 25(4) of the RTI Act, 2005, the Commission advises the Respondent to suo motu disclose the information sought by the Complainant in compliance with Section-4 of the RTI Act, 2005 to ensure transparency, objectivity and accountability in the functioning of the Public

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =