Seeks to waive the late fee paid for specified classes of taxpayers for FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTR-4 and FORM GSTR-6.

Seeks to waive the late fee paid for specified classes of taxpayers for FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTR-4 and FORM GSTR-6.
41/2018-State Tax Dated:- 12-9-2018 Mizoram SGST
GST – States
Mizoram SGST
Mizoram SGST
No.J.21011/2(II)/2018-TAX/Pt
GOVERNMENT OF MIZORAM
TAXATION DEPARTMENT
….
N O T I F I C A T I O N
No.41/2018-State Tax
Dated Aizawl the 12th Sept., 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Mizoram Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Government of Mizoram, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby waives the late fee paid under section 47 of the said Act, by the following classes of taxpayers:-
(i) the registered persons whose return in FORM GSTR-3B of the Mizoram Goods an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Sterlite Technologies Limited

In Re: Sterlite Technologies Limited
GST
2018 (9) TMI 975 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 518 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 12-9-2018
GST-ARA-41/2018-19/B-112
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Sterlite Technologies Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :-
1.1. Whether the Applicant is required to separately discharge GST on the excess length of OF although the cost of such excess length is already included in the price charged to independent customers?
1.2 Whether the Ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

G ON THE QUESTION(S) ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS REQUIRED
1. This Application is being preferred by Sterlite Technologies Limited, Maharashtra (“Company”/”Applicant”), a company incorporated in India under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at E-1, E-2,E-3, MIDC Waluj, Aurangabad-431136, Maharashtra, India.
2. The Applicant is engaged in providing goods and services which qualify as 'supply' as per provisions of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) and is duly registered thereunder bearing GSTIN 27AAECS8719B1ZC.
3. The Company is engaged in manufacturing of products which inter alia includes preform, Optic Fibre (“OF”) and Optic Fibre Cable (“OFC”). The process flow for manufacturing OFC involves manufacture of preform which is used for manufacture of OF and such Of is then used for manufacture of OFC. Diagrammatic presentation of the OFC manufacturing process is as under:
Step I
Step II
Step III
Step IV
Silica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

actured and winded up in exact length, any damage to the loose ends would render entire length OF in the spool unusable owing to shortfall in maintaining standard length.
6. To overcome these practical challenges whilst ensuring that of manufactured by STL retains its minimum required length, each lot of OF is manufactured and supplied with marginally surplus length (e.g. 1-2 meter surplus length in a spool that ought to contain Of in multiples of 2.1 kilometre in length). The practice to manufacture and supply of in excess length is a standard practice across industry and all the supplies being made (both to STL's unit in Rakholi and Dadra as well as third party customers).
7. Usable length of OF (in multiples of 2.1 km/4.2 km) which is mentioned on the invoice (which the customer has placed an order and agreed to pay) is considered as 'usable quantity' whereas the actually supplied quantity (which is marginally surplus than the standard length-not usable) is known as &

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssessable value may be invoked.
10. Further, since supply of OF to its own units in Dadra and Nagar Haveli is treated as supply between distinct persons, the assessable value is determined under Rule 28(a) of the CGST Rules based on 'Open Market Value' which is independent of cost incurred for manufacture of excess length. In other words, as long as the open market value is available and is not disputed, cost of manufacturing excess length is immaterial to arrive at the assessable value.
11. However, for the identical reason of absence of any price being earmarked for excess length of OF and in view of the provision of Entry No. 2 of Schedule 1 of the CGST Act which provides to treat a transaction between distinct persons as a 'supply' even in absence of any consideration, there is possibility that the 'open market value' arrived at for delivered quantity, which inter alia includes cost of excess length, would be disputed
12.Given the above background, presen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

estigation being undertaken by them on the same issue as raised by the applicant in their Advance Ruling Application. However the full facts and details of the investigation are not being reproduced here for the sake of confidentiality of investigation proceedings. However only relevant paras with respect to initiation of proceedings is reproduced below:-
“At the outset it is to submit that the issues for determination raised by the taxpayer has been placed before Authority of Advance Ruling, only after initiation of investigation by the preventive officers of GST Commissionerate, Aurangabad on the basis of searches conducted on 02.04.2018 and 03.04.2018 and consequent follow-up actions conducted by the department including statements of the key persons recorded under Section 70 of the CGST Act, 2017.
In this connection, your attention is invited towards proviso to Section 98 of the CGST Act, 2017, (similar provision has been given in proviso to Section 98 of the Maharashtra GST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rest of Rs. 24,73,379/- and submitted the detailed work-sheet of entries against which they availed irregular ITC.
It is also pertinent to mention here that the taxpayer at nowhere in the invoices issued have mentioned that the cost of excess length is already included in prices charged to customers. The prices charged to the customers are as per purchase orders placed by customers and only towards the invoiced quantity and not for excess lengths.
This is issued with the approval of the Joint Commissioner (Preventive), GST & Central Excise, Aurangabad. Joint Commissioner (Preventive) GST & Central Excise, Aurangabad has submitted report vide letter dated 24.07.2018
Please refer to this office letter of even number dated 12.07.2018 on the above subject.
At the outset it is to submit that the issues for determination as raised by the taxpayer has been placed before Authority of Advance Ruling, only after initiation of investigation by the preventive officers of GST Commissionerate,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

declare before Authority of Advance Ruling, in para 17 of form GST ARA-01 that whether question raised in the application is already pending or decided in any proceedings in applicant's case under any provisions of the Act. The fact that the case has been booked against the taxpayer on the said issue in the month of April 2018 i.e. well before making this application, which is under investigation, needs to be co-related with the declaration submitted by the taxpayer in form GST ARA-01. The admissibility of the application may be dealt with accordingly and any mis-declaration made by the taxpayer may be taken up as per provisions of the Act.
It is also pertinent to mention here that the taxpayer at nowhere in the invoices issued have mentioned that the cost of excess length is already included in prices charged to customers. The prices charged to the customers are as per purchase orders placed by customers and only towards the invoiced quantity and not for excess lengths.
It is i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at the Assistant Commissioner (Preventive), CGST Commissionerate, Aurangabad may be made a party to the subject issue and comments / views may be taken before deciding the issue.
This is issued with the approval of the Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Aurangabad.
Further, Dy. Commissioner of State Tax, Large Tax Unit, (AUR-VAT-E-003) Aurangabad Division, Arangabad has submitted following report.
M/s. Sterlite Technologies Ltd (GSTIN 27AAEC58719BIZC) has applied in form GST ARA 01 for Advance Ruling under section 98 (CGST ACT 2017) before Hon. Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra, Mumbai on 19th June 2018. The hearing is scheduled for acceptance or rejection of said application, on 17/07/2018. Being the Jurisdictional officer (DGST-AUR-VAT-E003.Aurangabad) I am directed to attend for primary hearing and represent the case with Legal submission.
In this regard the Taxpayer, M/S Sterlite Technologies Ltd (GSTIN 27AAEC58719BlZC) was communicated and asked to attend to this offi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

information about the investigation action taken during 02/04/2018 to 03/04/2018 by Central GST office. Hence, it is clear that M/s. Sterlite Technologies Ltd. (GSTIN k7AAEC58719BIZC) has applied in Form GST ARA 01 before Hon. Authority for Advance Ruling only after initiation of investigation by the Preventive officers of CGST office, Aurangabad on basis bf searches conducted on 02/04/2018 and 03/04/2018.
Hon. Sir, in this connection, your attention is invited towards proviso to Section 98 of the CGST ACT 2017 (similar provision has been given in proviso to section of the Maharashtra GST Act 2017) wherein specially provided that:
“The Authority for Advance Ruling shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already pending or decided in any proceedings in the case of an applicant under any of the provisions of this Act”.
In view of provisions given in the CGST Act 2017, and Maharashtra GST Act 2017, the application submitted by M/S. Sterlite Tech

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sue with respect to admission or rejection of application.
As requested opportunity to present their side of the case was granted to CGST Commissionerate, Aurangabad wherein Sh. Sandeep Vaichal Supt. Appeared on 28.08.2018 and made written submissions and stated that the department is investigating the matter on the same issue for which advance ruling application is made by the applicant.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case and the written submissions made by both, the applicant and the departmental authority. We find that
1. The Company is registered person under GST Act and engaged in manufacturing of products which inter alia includes preform, Optic Fibre (“OF”) and Optic Fibre Cable (“OFC”). The optical fibre (OF) as manufactured by the Applicant is supplied to its units located in Rakholi and Dadra as well as to third party customers on payment of appropriate GST. Such OF is then further used for manufacture of OFC.
2. The applicant submitted that sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ejection of the application have been held on various dates and details of the same are already produced above.
5. During the course of hearing, we find that jurisdictional officers have raised the objection with regard to admission of this advance ruling application and requested that it is to be rejected as the same issue is pending before the investigation authority on the same questions as raised in the application put forth before ARA Authority. In connection to the same the officers have invited our attention towards proviso to Section 98 of the CGST Act, 2017, (similar provision has been given in proviso to Section 98 of the Maharashtra GST Act, 2017), wherein it is specifically provided that “the Authority for Advance Ruling shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already pending or decided in any proceedings in the case of an applicant under any of the provisions of this Act” and further stating that in view of the express provisions gi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

proceedings. However in their oral and written submissions their only contentions is  that no proceedings for denial of admission of the ARA application can be stated to be initiated against them until Show Cause Notice in this respect has been issued to them.
8. However the contentions of the applicant are not sustainable in view of there being no difference with regard to the fact that searches were conducted against the applicant on 02.04.2018 and 03.04.2018 on the same issue as raised in the application and consequent follow up actions against them have also been conducted by the department as part of the investigations including recording of statements of key persons under Section 70 of the GST Act, 2017.
9. The contention of the applicant that no proceedings can be stated to have been initiated against them until Show Cause Notice is issued to them is not tenable in view of the very clear position that Show Cause Notice is a form of charge memo/charge sheet filed which is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s authorised representative, by order, either admit or reject the application:
Provided that the Authority shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already pending or decided in any proceedings in the case of an applicant under any of the provisions of this Act:
Provided further that no application shall be rejected under this sub-section unless an opportunity of hearing has been given to the applicant:
Provided also that where the application is rejected, the reasons for such rejection shall be specified in the order.
12. Thus the application filed by the applicant is not maintainable as per the provisions of Section 98 of the CGST Act, as proceedings are already initiated against them before the filing of their present application.
13. The various case laws referred to by the applicant in their submissions are in different context and are therefore not relevant in the present proceeding before this authority. The provision in the law is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rajwinder Singh Versus The Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Commissionerate, Jalandhar

Rajwinder Singh Versus The Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Commissionerate, Jalandhar
GST
2018 (9) TMI 971 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMI
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 12-9-2018
CWP No. 8002 of 2018 (O&M)
GST
MR. RAJESH BINDAL AND MR AMIT RAWAL, JJ.
For The Respondent : Mr. Tajender Joshi, Advocate for Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate
ORDER
RAJESH BINDAL J.
The petitioner approached this Court seeking quashing of impugned letter/notice dated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Magarpatta Retail Private Limited

In Re: Magarpatta Retail Private Limited
GST
2018 (9) TMI 855 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 12-9-2018
GST-ARA-56/2018-19/B-114
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Magarpatta Retail Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :
The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC) – regarding

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC) – regarding
62/36/2018 Dated:- 12-9-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
CIRCULAR No.62/36/2018-GST
F. No. 354/124/2018-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
New Delhi, 12th September, 2018
To
The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners/ Principal Commissioners/ Commissioner of Central Tax (All) /
The Principal Director Generals/ Director

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

How to claim refund on CESS for cars with retrofitment for Physically challenged persons

How to claim refund on CESS for cars with retrofitment for Physically challenged persons
Query (Issue) Started By: – Lindon Johnson Dated:- 11-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 12-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
For the cars purchased by physically challenged persons with retrofitment, CESS is NIL, but however during the purchase, dealer is requesting to pay the CESS and claim refund. Can you give the procedure to claim refund of CESS. The exemption is based on the belw

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TRADE DISCOUNT

TRADE DISCOUNT
Query (Issue) Started By: – Mahesh Dhanaboina Dated:- 11-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 12-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Dear Professionals,
We are giving discount to our customers on attainment of Target Sales with us on Aggregate Basis.We are issuing credit notes charging GST towards such discount. But, Our customers are telling as per their Auditor's advice that gst will not applicable on such discount as it is not related to a single invoic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Ninth Amendment to CGST Rules 2017 Allows GST TRAN-1 Filing Extension to March 31, 2019, for Technical Issues.

Ninth Amendment to CGST Rules 2017 Allows GST TRAN-1 Filing Extension to March 31, 2019, for Technical Issues.
Notifications
GST
Seeks to make amendments (Ninth Amendment, 2018) to the CGST Rules, 2017 – Commissioner empowered to extent the Filing of GST TRAN-1 not beyond 31st March, 2019, in respect of registered persons who could not submit the said declaration by the due date on account of technical difficulties on the common portal and in respect of whom the Council has made a recom

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-3B filing deadline extended for new GSTIN holders under notification No. 31/2018-Central Tax. More time to comply.

GSTR-3B filing deadline extended for new GSTIN holders under notification No. 31/2018-Central Tax. More time to comply.
Notifications
GST
Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension for New GST Migrants to File FORM GSTR-3B per Notification 31/2018; Amendments to Previous GST Filing Deadlines.

Extension for New GST Migrants to File FORM GSTR-3B per Notification 31/2018; Amendments to Previous GST Filing Deadlines.
Notifications
GST
Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Due Date Extended for FORM GSTR-3B Filing for Recently Migrated Taxpayers per Notification No. 31/2018-Central Tax.

Due Date Extended for FORM GSTR-3B Filing for Recently Migrated Taxpayers per Notification No. 31/2018-Central Tax.
Notifications
GST
Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR – 3B

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-3B filing deadline extended for newly migrated taxpayers with GSTIN per Notification No. 31/2018-Central Tax.

GSTR-3B filing deadline extended for newly migrated taxpayers with GSTIN per Notification No. 31/2018-Central Tax.
Notifications
GST
Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR – 3B

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Deadline Extended for Filing FORM GSTR-1 for Taxpayers with Turnover Over Rs. 1.5 Crores.

Deadline Extended for Filing FORM GSTR-1 for Taxpayers with Turnover Over Rs. 1.5 Crores.
Notifications
GST
Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR – 1 for taxpayers having aggre

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-1 Filing Deadline Extended for Taxpayers with Turnover Up to Rs. 1.5 Crores.

GSTR-1 Filing Deadline Extended for Taxpayers with Turnover Up to Rs. 1.5 Crores.
Notifications
GST
Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR – 1 for taxpayers having aggregate tur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

No GST Exception for Works Contracts in Solar Infrastructure Projects, Including Services by Solar Park Developers.

No GST Exception for Works Contracts in Solar Infrastructure Projects, Including Services by Solar Park Developers.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of Services – no provision has been made for carving out an exception in case of supply of service in the nature of a Works Contract for creating infrastructure which is to be exclusively used for Solar Power or in a Solar Park for or by a Solar Project Park Developer.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Exemption Rules for Municipal Work Orders: Goods Supply Must Not Exceed 25% for ITC Eligibility Post-Jan 2018.

GST Exemption Rules for Municipal Work Orders: Goods Supply Must Not Exceed 25% for ITC Eligibility Post-Jan 2018.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – operation and maintenance work order given by such Municipal Corporation – Admissibility of ITC (input Credit tax) of purchases against such work order – Post 25.01.2018, their services would be exempt only subject to the fulfilment of condition that the value of supply of goods does not exceed 25% of value of composite supply.
TMI Updates –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RECENT CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY GST POLICY WING

RECENT CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY GST POLICY WING
By: – DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 11-9-2018

Though more than one year has lapsed after the introduction of GST, many confusions arised among the stakeholders. Now and then the Central Government made amendments in the Act as well as Rules. As on date 61 circulars have been issued by the GST Policy Wing clarifying various issues in GST. On 04.09.2018 the GST policy wing issued 5 circulars clarifying the various aspects as detailed below-
* Circular No. 57/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018 – Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the CGST Act;
* Circular No. 58/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018 – Recovery of arrears of wrongly availed CENVAT credit under the existing law and inadmissible transitional credit;
* Circular No. 59/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018 – Clarification on refund related issues.
* Circular No. 60/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018 – Processing of refund appli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Board issued clarifications vide Circular No. 57/2018 about the scope of principal-agent relationship.
It is clarified as follows-
* All the activities between the principal and the agent and vice versa do not fall within the scope of the said entry.
* The supply of services between the principal and the agent and vice versa is outside the ambit of the said entry, and would therefore require “consideration” to consider it as supply and thus, be liable to GST.
* The key ingredient for determining relationship under GST would be whether the invoice for the further supply of goods on behalf of the principal is being issued by the agent or not.
* Where the invoice for further supply is being issued by the agent in his name then, any provision of goods from the principal to the agent would fall within the fold of the said entry in Schedule I.
* Where the goods being procured by the agent on behalf of the principal are invoiced in the name of the agent then further provision of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tration under sub-section (vii) of section 24 of the CGST Act.
Recovery of arrears of wrongly availed CENVAT credit
Various representations have been received seeking clarification on the process of
recovery of arrears of wrongly availed CENVAT credit under the existing law and CENVAT credit wrongly carried forward as transitional credit in the GST regime. In this regard the Board issued clarifications vide Circular No. 58/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018.
The Board has already clarified that the recovery of arrears arising under the existing law shall be made as central tax liability to be paid through the utilization of the amount available in the electronic credit ledger or electronic cash ledger of the registered person, and the same shall be recorded in Part II of the Electronic Liability Register (FORM GST PMT-01).
Since the liability register is not available in the GST portal the Board clarifies that the tax payers taxpayers may reverse the wrongly availed CENVAT credit under t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be eligible for refund of integrated tax paid on export of goods or services as per section 96(10) of the Act as amended with effect from 04.09.2018.
* No refund under sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) of section 54 shall be paid to an applicant, if the amount is less than ₹ 1000/-.
* The refund claim shall be accompanied by a print-out of FORM GSTR-2A of the claimant for the relevant period for which the refund is claimed.
* The proper officer shall not insist on the submission of an invoice (either original or duplicate) the details of which are present in FORM GSTR-2A of the relevant period submitted by the claimant.
* The claimant shall also submit the details of the invoices on the basis of which input tax credit had been availed during the relevant period for which the refund is being claimed, in the format enclosed as Annexure-A manually along with the application for refund claim in FORM GST RFD-01A and the Application Reference Number (ARN).
* The claimant sha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ection of claim the proper officer shall order for the re-credit the rejected amount to the electronic credit ledger of the claimant using GST RFD – 01B and proceed further for the recovery of the said amount by issuing a show cause notice and after getting reply and giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard may confirm the demand.
* A sanction order shall be issued for the refund amount for the disbursal of the sanctioned amount to the claimant.
The tax authority may refuse to disburse the sanctioned amount on the contention that the amount is sanctioned incorrectly. The Board clarified that the remedy for correction of an incorrect or erroneous sanction order lies in filing an appeal against such order and not in withholding of the disbursement of the sanctioned amount. If any discrepancy is noticed by the disbursing authority, the same should be brought to the notice of the counterpart refund sanctioning authority, the concerned counterpart reviewing authority and the nodal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n Stores Department (CSD for short), under the Ministry of Defence, as a person who shall be entitled to claim a refund of-
* 50% of the applicable central tax, integrated tax and Union territory tax paid by the CSD on all inward supplies of goods received by the CSD for the purposes of subsequent supply of such goods to the Unit Run Canteens of the CSD or to the authorized customers of the CSD.
* 50% of the applicable State tax paid by the CSD on the inward supply of goods received by it and supplied subsequently.
Vide circular No. 60/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018 the Board clarifies the procedure involved in refund to CSD. The above said refund process involves two steps-
* Filing application for refund;
* Processing and sanction of the refund claim.
The complete process of refund is as below-
* The CSD are required to apply for refund on a quarterly basis.
* The CSD will apply for refund with the jurisdictional Central tax/State tax authority to whom the CSD has been assi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

memo covering all aspects, manually in GST RFD – 03.
* The proper officer is to verify with the portal as to the filing of GSTR – 3B.
* The proper officer is to scrutiny the details in Form GST RFD – 10A, GSTR 2A and 3B.
* The Form GSTR – 2A will be an evidence of the accountal of the supply made by the corresponding suppliers to the CSD in relation to which the refund has been claimed by the CSD.
* The proper officer should ensure that the amount of refund sanctioned is 50 % of the Central tax, State tax, Union territory tax and integrated tax paid on the supplies received by CSD.
* The proper officer shall issue the refund sanction/rejection order manually in FORM GST RFD-06 along with the payment advice manually in FORM GST RFD-05 for each tax head separately.
* The amount of sanctioned refund in respect of central tax/integrated tax along with the bank account details of the CSD shall be manually submitted in the PFMS system by the jurisdictional Division's DDO and a si

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ient taxpayer stores his goods in the godown of the transporter, then the transporter's godown has to be declared as an additional place of business by the recipient taxpayer.
* Where the transporter's godown has been declared as the additional place of business by the recipient taxpayer, the transportation under the e-way bill shall be deemed to be concluded once the goods have reached the transporter's godown (recipient taxpayer' additional place of business). Hence, e-way bill validity in such cases will not be required to be extended.
* Whenever the goods are transported from the transporters' godown, which has been declared as the additional place of business of the recipient taxpayer, to any other premises of the recipient taxpayer then, the relevant provisions of the e-way bill rules shall apply. Hence
* The transporter to maintain accounts and records as specified in section 35 of the CGST Act read with rule 58 of the CGST Rules shall continue as a warehouse keeper.
* A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Sword of Damocles Hanging Over Head – 30th September, 2018

The Sword of Damocles Hanging Over Head – 30th September, 2018
By: – Anuj Bansal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 11-9-2018

Apart from regular compliances and deadline in GST, do you know that one more deadline is there i.e. 30th Sept., 18? May be said date is going unnoticed by many professional, but it has a big relevance from ITC point of view. Even the GSTR 9 Notified by the govt. vide notification 39/18 CGST requires us to report the details of ITC for previous Financial Year i.e. 2017-18 considered till 30th Sept., 18 and same is for the reason that after 30th Sept., 18 credit pertaining to previous FY 2017-18 will lapse and lapse means a financial loss. Now the question is; have we determined the expected lapse of credit on 30th Sept., 18? What are recourse to save yourself from such Financial Loss?
Considering the above, in this article, an attempt has been made to analyse the issues and actions required to mitigate the loss on account of lapsing of credit.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e considered in GSTR 3B for the month of Sept., 18. In case it is found that there is certain defect in considering the credit like invoice / debit note is not traceable, the vendor shall be approached for duplicate copy of invoice / debit note otherwise it is going to be loss of credit after Sept, 18.
2. Credit note pertaining to FY 2017-18 shall be issued upto 30th Sept., 18 otherwise, tax amount in the Credit note cannot be reduced from the output liability.
As per Section 34(2) of the CGST Act, any registered person have to declare the value of the credit note in the return in the month in which credit note is issued. However, no such Credit Note can be issued for the previous Financial Year after filing of return for the month of Sept.
Accordingly, in case the supply has been made in FY 2017-18, the credit note is required to be issued in regard to same till 30th Sept., 18 otherwise the reduction in output liability on account of credit note will not be allowed.
3. Correction

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ission or incorrect particulars in such return, can rectify such omission or incorrect particulars in the return. However, no such rectification can be made after the due date for furnishing of return for the month of Sept.
Therefore, every dealer has to reconcile his return i.e. GSTR 3B with his books of account and in case any omission or error is discovered, same has to be rectified immediately i.e. before filing return for the Month of Sept., 18.
4. Credit relating to exempted supplies is required to be reversed as per Rule 42 of CGST Rule and final calculation shall be done by Sept., 18
As per Section 17 of CGST Act, credit relating to exempted supplies is required to be reversed in Books of Account as well as in GST Returns. The reversal of credit is done as per Rule 42(1) of the CGST rules which states that common ITC relating to exempted and taxable supplies shall be reversed in the ratio of exempted turnover to total turnover. Such calculation is done on monthly basis and r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat tax on all the invoices relating to financial year 2017-18 must be paid and credit is to be considered in the return for the month of Sept,18.
6. Section 16(4) v/s. Section 16(2) of CGST Act are tangled with each other
As per Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, credit relating to Invoice and Debit Note for a Financial Year can be considered latest by filing return for the month of Sept., 18. However, Section 16(2) prescribes some qualifying conditions for availing credit. The conditions mentioned in Section 16(2) of the CGST Act are that (i) a person must be in possession of an Invoice, (ii) He has received the goods or services, (iii) tax charged by supplier has been paid to the govt. and (iv) return has been furnished. Further, proviso to above section states that payment should have been made to the vendor within 180 days otherwise credit is required to be reversed and the same can be reclaimed after making of payment to the vendor. Certain situations are being given hereunder as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s received from the vendor in Mar,18. The vendor has also reported details in his GSTR 1 for Mar,18. But vendor has paid tax in Oct,18. In which month credit in this case can be claimed?
As per Sec 16(2)(c), credit shall be available in Oct, 18 i.e. at the time when payment of tax is made by vendor. However, as per Section 16(4) the credit cannot be considered in the return after Sep,18 because invoice pertains to Mar,18. There are contradictory provisions in this regard. Credit should be considered in the return for Sept, 18, if not considered at the time of issuance of invoice i.e. in Mar,18.
3.
Invoice was received from vendor in 2017-18 reversal of credit on account of 180 days done and reclaim on payment after 180 days.
Invoice was received from the vendor in Feb,18. Payment was not made to vendor within 180 days therefore credit reversed. Payment is made in Oct, 18. Therefore, credit has to be reclaimed in Oct,18.
As per Proviso to Sec 16(2) , credit shall be available in Oc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reimbursement of Traveling and visit

Reimbursement of Traveling and visit
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ashok Puri Dated:- 11-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 12-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
A manufacturer supplies equipment to a buyer. Due to incorrect installation by buyer equipment malfunctions. Buyer contacts seller to come urgently to resolve issue and agrees to bear traveling and visit expenses. The supplier travels by air and taxi to reach destination urgently and return. Buyer reimburses traveling expenses incurred to seller. Seller does claim ITC on traveling expenses incurred. Is GST applicable on reimbursement received for traveling and visit.
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
In my view it is applicable.
Reply By Ashok Pu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Boldrocchi India Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: M/s. Boldrocchi India Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2019 (2) TMI 1003 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HARYANA – 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 135 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HARYANA – AAR
Dated:- 11-9-2018
AAR No. HAR/HAAR/R/2018-19/12 (In Application No. 12/2018-19
GST
SANGEETA KARMAKAR AND VIJAY KUMAR SINGH, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sh. Abhishek, Manager (Fin. & Accts.) alongwith Sh. Rijul Kalra, Asst. Manager (Proposals).
1. M/s. Boldrocchi India Pvt. Ltd., 18th 19th Floor, Tower-4, Office No.1801, 1802 1907, DLF Corporate Green, Sector-74A, Gurgaon, Haryana [hereinafter referred to as the “applicant”], has submitted that their customer is setting up a waste to energy plant in Andhra Pradesh and for which they require WTE PLANT BOILER'S FLUE GAS CLEANING SYSTEM. The customer has also requested to supply these goods under Chapter 84 charging tax @5% according to the said entry as under:-
* Following renewable energy devices & parts for their m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rs flue gas cleaning system (FGCS) 600 TPD to waste to energy project would be under HSN Code 84 and rate of tax would be 5%
4. The applicant further submits that:
1. The HSN Code No. 84 05 10 90 clearly mentions “waste to energy plants/devices” which implies the applicability of 5% GST.
2. The Ministry of Finance and Ministry of New and Renewable Energy has specifically exempted such equipments and machinery from indirect taxes in the past also. Further the conditions of law in GST remains the same and govt intends to promote the use of Renewable Energy by categorizing Waste to Energy Plants and their devices at 5% IGST. This fact can be verified from the Notification No. 33/2005 Central excise and F. no. 460/44/2005-Cus V dated 03.09.2005 (attached herewith) issued by Ministry of Finance and also by certificate No. 10/05/2005- UICA- Part file dated 06.10.2010 issued by Ministry of New and Renewable Energy to M/s. Timarpur Okhla Waste Management Private Limited.
3. The purchase or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ST), Gurugram (South) had attended the proceedings as concerned officer. The applicant had reiterated the submissions made in their application. Since, the ruling sought was covered under section 97 (2), clause (a) and (b), the application was admitted and after hearing the applicant and concerned officer in detail, the decision on merit was reserved which is being released today.
DISCUSSIONS AND FINDINGS OF THE AUTHORITY
7. We have carefully gone through the facts and records of the case. In the instant case, the applicant seeks advance ruling in the matter of classification and rate of GST applicable on the parts being supplied for setting up waste to energy plant.
8. The functioning of the waste to energy plant has been explained by the applicant in the following manner, which includes collection/storage of Municipal Solid Waste at site and involves following processes.
(i) Mechanical Sorting.
(iii) Burning of sorted municipal solid waste in boiler for combustion and steam gene

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hrough acid gas (HCL, SO2) of the outlet loop. Flue gas flowing out from the reactor then goes into the bag filter for removal of micro particles including hazardous substances.
(iv) Turbine
(v) Air cooled condenser.
10. The applicant seeks the HSN classification code for the above explained “waste to energy plant boiler's flue gas cleaning system”, as explained in para 7(iii) above. As per the functioning/working of the impugned product, it is a pollution control device which merits classification in chapter heading 8421, which is also reproduced below.
8421
 
CENTRIFUGES, INCLUDING CENTRIFUGAL DRYERS; FILTERING OR PURIFYING MACHINERY AND APPARATUS, FOR LIQUIDS OR GASES
 
 
 
 

Centrifuges, including centrifugal dryers:
 
 
 
84211100

Cream separators
u
7.50%

84211200

Clothes-dryers
u
7.50%

842119

Other :
 
 
 
84211910

Bowl centrifuges
u
7.50%

84211920

Basket c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ke air filters for internal combustion engines
u
7.50%

842139

Other :
 
 
 
84213910

Air separators to be employed in the processing, smelting or refining of minerals, ores or metals; air strippers
u
7.50%

84213920

Air purifiers or cleaners
u
7.50%

84213990

Other
u
7.50%

 

Parts :
 
 
 
84219100

Of centrifuges, including centrifugal dryers
u
7.50%

84219900

Other
u
10%

Thus, the impugned product is classifiable under heading 8421 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, being filtering or purifying machinery and apparatus for gases.
11. As regards rate of GST on this product “waste to energy plant boiler's flue gas cleaning system” falling under chapter heading 8421, it is observed that in modern day power plants, even those running on municipal waste, such as waste to energy plants/devices, pollution control equipment/machinery is an integral part of such power

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Awla Infra

In Re: M/s. Awla Infra
GST
2019 (2) TMI 1002 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HARYANA – 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 149 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HARYANA – AAR
Dated:- 11-9-2018
AAR No. HAR/HAAR/R/2018-19/13 In Application No. : 13/2018-19
GST
SANGEETA KARMAKAR AND VIJAY KUMAR SINGH, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Dr. Subash C. Batra, GM (Warehousing Operations) .
Factual Background As Per Applicant
1. A Scheme known as “SCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION OF GODOWNS FOR FCI – STORAGE REQUIREMENTS, THROUGH PRIVATE ENTERPRENEURS – 2008” (in short known as PEG-2008 Scheme) was framed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) at the behest of Government of India. The details of the scheme are available on the official web-site of the FCI.
2. The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. (HAFED) was notified as nodal agency for construction of godowns in the State of Haryana under the said PEG-2008 Scheme of the Central Government/ FCI.
3.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al Agency (HAFED) and the FCI. This is a tripartite arrangement where one agreement has been executed between the private investor and the nodal agency and the other agreement has been executed between the nodal agency and the FCI. Copy of the agreement between the Private Investor and the HAFED is placed on record at Annexure-3.
6. Under the said PEG-2008 Scheme, there are two types of PEGs –
(i) On Lease only basis and
(ii) On Lease and Services basis.
In case of Lease only basis, godowns have been built by the Private Investor and have been leased out to the Nodal Agency which manages storage, preservation and warehousing of the stocks of the FCI stored therein.
In case of Lease and Services basis, godowns have been built by the Private Investor and have been leased out to the Nodal Agency and the storage, preservation and warehousing of the stocks of the FCI stored therein is managed by the Private Investor under the supervision of the Nodal Agency.
The present case falls und

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

clause is understood to be as under:-
9.1 – For godowns hired on lease & services basis: Storage charges for godowns constructed for lease & services by Private Investors and supervised by the Nodal Agency shall be reimbursed to the Nodal Agency at the monthly rates/qtl. as approved by SLC/HLC for lease & services. FCI shall also pay to the Nodal Agency, 15% of the monthly rates/qtl. as approved by SLC/HLC as supervision charges on submission of separate bills. There shall be annual increase of 33% of percentage increase in WPI in rent (Rate approved by HLC/SLC) for such godowns provided on lease with services by Private Investors to the Nodal Agency. Private Investors will be responsible for the payment of service tax as applicable on storage charges of food grains and claim the same from FCI through the Nodal Agency.
10. Private investors were made to quote the rates of monthly rentals exclusive of the taxes, as a result of which ibid provisions were made in the agreements between

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed under GST. Copy of this letter dated 07.09.2017 of the FCI is placed on record as Annexure-4.
Question(s) on which advance ruling is required
'Whether GST is exempt or is applicable on the Private Entrepreneurs Godowns built under the PEG-2008 scheme of the FCI and leased out to the Nodal Agency (UPSWC) on 'Lease and services basis' for the storage of FCl's food grain stocks (Wheat)'.
Applicant's interpretation of law and/or facts, in respect of the aforesaid question(s)
12. Under the Service Tax regime, District Office, FCI, Hisar released the amount of service tax of Rs. 3.43 crores to the applicant through the nodal agency – HAFED continuously for a period of more than three years on their raising the invoices and it was only after receiving the amount from the FCI/ HAFED, they had deposited the service tax with the treasury. FCI, District Office, Hisar, however, subsequently in the fourth year, recovered/withheld the entire amount of Rs. 3.43 crores from their subsequent ren

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

poses to Hafed, thus the amount received on account of Rent/lease is taxable being supply of taxable services falling under section 7 of HGST Act, 2017.
13.2 It is further pointed out that as per Notification No.46/ST-2 dated 30th June 2017 Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act (Rate), Sr.No.24 and Notification No. 47/ST-2 dated 30the June 2017 Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act (Rate) Sr.No.54, the GST Rate on loading, unloading, packing, shortage or warehousing of agriculture produce is Nil but renting of immovable properties i.e. Godowns given for commercial use is not covered in the above said notifications and is thus not exempt from the levy of GST. The intention of the exemption given to the agriculture services under heading 9986 at Sr. No. 24 of the notification no. 46/ ST-2 of 2017 is the exemption to the support services for agriculture which means services relating to cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals etc. i.e. where such services are extended for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ely cover the case of the present applicant as in the said explanation only the term Market Produce is defined and in the end of the said definition “any produce out of cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fiber, fuel, raw material or other similar products, on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes it marketable for primary market” only are covered. Further it has been submitted that the contract between Hafed and the present applicant reveals that the lessee shall provide insecticides, fumigation, spraying equipments etc. which are not applied when the agriculture produce is sold in the primary market.
13.6 In view of facts and submissions made above, it is obvious that the amount of rent paid by Hafed to the owner of godowns is taxable in the hands of owner of godowns, whether to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

her side it is the FCI and we as private investor are only intermediary and as intermediary we cannot be put to any harassment or made to suffer for the reason that there is any ambiguity in the rules or the activity involved is open to different interpretation.
16. After detailed discussions the application was admitted being covered by clauses (a) & (b) of section 97 (2) of the CGST/HGST Act 2017. As regard merits, the decision was reserved which is being released today.
Discussion and finding of the authority
17. As per the documents placed on record it is understood that under the scheme for construction of godowns for FCl-storage requirement through private entrepreneurs2008 (known as PEG-2008 scheme), the Haryana State Co-operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. (Hafed) was notified as Nodal Agency for construction of godowns in the State of Haryana.
18. The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. (HAFED) was notified as nodal agency for construct

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

have been leased out to the Nodal Agency which manages storage, preservation and warehousing of the stocks of the FCI stored therein.
21.2 In case of Lease and Services basis, godowns have been built by the Private Investor and have been leased out to the Nodal Agency and the storage, preservation and warehousing of the stocks of the FCI stored therein is managed by the Private Investor under the supervision of the Nodal Agency.
21.3 The applicant's case, as per its agreement with the Nodal Agency, falls under the PEG scheme of 'Lease and services basis' type.
22. The applicant has brought in our notice a letter no. SF-19/GST/2018-19/Fin/GST-63, dated 31.07.2018 wherein the Food Corporation of India has clarified the applicability of GST on services provided by private investors to Nodal Agencies under PEG schemes as under:-
1. Agreements of Nodal Agencies with private investors in case of PEG godowns on 'Lease Only Basis'.
The agreement between Nodal Agencies with Private Inves

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ions for the purpose of understanding the nature of the services provided by the applicant are as per Sr. No. 24 (e) of notification no. 11 /2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017 and Sr. No. 54 (e) of notification no. 12/ 2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017 read with the corresponding State Tax notification No. 46/ST-2 & 47/ST-2 both dated 30.06.2017. The SAC 9972 is also relevant to determine the true classification of the services provided by the applicant.
25. The scope of entry 24 (e) and 54 (e) in respective notification no. 11 and 12 of Central Tax (Rate) are limited to services in relation to agriculture produce and cultivation of plants. The term agriculture produce has further been defined in clear terms by way of explanation (vii) appended to the said notification no. 11 and definition (d) appended to the said notification no. 12 as under:-
“Any produce out of cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

12, and since both these services are capable of being provided independent of each other, these cannot be understood to be naturally bundled and supplied conjointly in the ordinary course of business. Therefore, the applicant has/is providing 'Mixed Supply' as per section 2 (74) of the CGST/HGST Act, 2017 and attract tax rate of that particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax in terms of section 8 (b) of the Act ibid.
Advance ruling under section 98 of the CGST/HGST Act 2017
In the backdrop of above discussions and findings the advance ruling on the questions is pronounced as under: –
'Whether GST is exempt or is applicable on the Private Entrepreneurs Godowns built under the PEG-2008 scheme of the FCI and leased out to the Nodal Agency (UPSWC) on 'Lease and services basis' for the storage of FCl's food grain stocks (Wheat)'.
Ruling
In view of the above discussions and findings it is ruled that the services, i.e., leasing of immovable property and support services i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commr., CGST & Central Ex., Johpur Versus J.K. Lakshmi Cement Ltd.

Commr., CGST & Central Ex., Johpur Versus J.K. Lakshmi Cement Ltd.
Central Excise
2018 (10) TMI 754 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 11-9-2018
Excise Appeal No. E/51550/2018-CU [DB] with E/CO/50671/2018 – A/53041/2018-EX[DB]
Central Excise
MR. C.L. MAHAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) And MS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present for the Appellant: Mr. K.K. Anand (Adv.)
Present for the Respondent: Mr. V.B. Jain, (DR).
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
Present is Departmental appeal directed against order of Commissioner (Appeals) bearing no 247 dated 08.03.2018 vide which assessee is held eligible for cenvat credit of service tax paid to the service agent on sale commissions. the relevant facts for the adjudication of appeal are that assessee, M/s. J.K Lakshmi Cement Ltd. are engaged in manufacture of cement and are availing cenvat credit of central excise duty paid on inputs and capital goods. The department alleged is that the assessee has wrongly ava

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ification i.e. April 2015 to November 2015. It is impressed upon that the explanation in Rule 2(1)(C) CCR, 2004 shall be effective only from the date of publication in the official gadget i.e. It shall only be prospective application. The final order therefore has erred in applying this application with retrospective effect. It is also submitted that the sale commission can have not nexus with the manufacturing activity as such cannot be defined as the input services. Seen from that angle also, the commissioner appeals is alleged to have has committed mistake while allowing the cenvat credit Ld. DR has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmadabad Vs. Cadila Healthcare Ltd. 2013 TIOL 12 (Ahmd. HC).
3. While rebutting these arguments it is submitted that the assessee is actually covered under Circular No. 943/4/2011-CX dated 29.04.2011 which entitles the assessee to avail cenvat credit upon the sales commission. The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ction 2k of CCR, 2004 reads as follows: Input means
[(k) “input” means –
(i) all goods used in the factory by the manufacturer of the final product; or
(ii) any goods including accessories, cleared along with the final product, the value of which is included in the value of the final product and goods used for providing free warranty for final products; or
(iii) all goods used for generation of electricity or steam [or pumping of water] for captive use; or
(iv) all goods used for providing any [output service, or];
[(v) all capital goods which have a value upto ten thousand rupees per piece.]
but excludes……………………….
Explanation. – For the purpose of this clause, “free warranty” means a warranty provided by the manufacturer, the value of which is included in the price of the final product and is not charged separately from the customer;]
[(l) “input service” means any service, –
(i) used by a provider of [output service] for providing an output servic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on of the case CCE Ludhiana Vs. Ambika Overseas 2012 (25) STR 348 (P & H).
5. As per circular dated 29.04.2011 also the cenvat credit of service tax paid on amount of commission paid to the commission agent is available to the assessee. Though the Commissioner (Appeals) vide order under challenge, has extended a retrospective benefit of notification no. 2/2016 dated 03.02.2016 but we are of the opinion that the said notification is nothing but the clarification of the said circular Tribunal Ahmadabad in Essar Steel India Ltd. (supra) has clarified that the explanation inserted in Rule 2 (1) (C) of the notification dated 03.02.2016 is declaratory in nature hence is effective retrospectively. It was clarified that the explanation so inserted is generally to explain the meaning of words contained in the circular and which was inserted to clarify a doubtful point of law. We also draw our support from the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Brijmohan Das Lakshman Das Vs. Commiss

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

WS Industries India Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam – GST

WS Industries India Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam – GST
Service Tax
2018 (10) TMI 544 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 11-9-2018
Appeal Nos. ST/30348 & 30349/2018 – A/31162-31163/2018
Service Tax
Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri D.V. Subba Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri B. Guna Ranjan, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: M.V. Ravindran]
1. These two appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal No.VIZ-EXCUS- 002-APP-101-102-17-18, Dt.22.12.2017.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. The issue involved in both these appeals, though being the question of refund to an SEZ unit of service tax paid by various service providers, they are being disposed of separately in this order on the factual matrix.
4. The appellant herein is an SEZ unit; took service tax registration as non-assessee category for claiming exemption from payment of service tax (by way of refund) on various taxable services rec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at the list of services which were approved by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, by Letter No. 2(6)/APSEZ/2010-1 dated 29.04.2010, indicates at Sl.No.18 the services rendered by Rent-a-Cab operator. Since the said services are approved for authorized operations, I find that impugned Order-in-Appeal No.VIZ-EXCUS-002-APP-101-102-17-18 dated 22.12.2017 to the extent contested in this appeal is set aside and the refund applications are allowed as eligible for refund of Rs. 39,583/- (including cesses).
6. In respect of Appeal No.ST/30348/2018, the refund claims have been rejected on the ground that the said refund claims were filed beyond the period of one year from the date of payment to service provider. The adjudicating authority in the case in hand has, wherever an application is made, for condonation of delay has condoned the same and rejected the refund claim of Rs. 13,17,625/- as being hit by limitation. The first appellate authority has also upheld the said Order-in-Original.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndonable period was condoned.
9. On careful consideration of the submissions made, I find that the adjudicating authority has condoned the delay of three months in few refund applications which were filed by the appellant herein but has not condoned the delay in respect of other applications. The said order of the adjudicating authority not condoning delay in few applications, in my view needs reconsideration as the procedure mentioned in the Notification No.40/2012- ST dated 20.06.2012 for sanctioning of the refund claims based on this exemption notification, specifically at clause 3(a) indicates that refund claims should be filed within one year from the end of the month in which actual payment of service tax was made by such developer or unit (SEZ) to the registered service provider but considering the situation prevalent at ground level, such clause 3(a) specifically grants powers to the Asst. Commissioner or the Dy. Commissioner of the Central Excise as the case may be condoning

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Measures to be taken by various State Government Authorities for ensuring compliance to GST by taxpayers/contractors/suppliers, etc.

Measures to be taken by various State Government Authorities for ensuring compliance to GST by taxpayers/contractors/suppliers, etc.
38/5/2018-Fin (R&C)/1493 Dated:- 11-9-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Office Memorandum
38/5/2018-Fin (R&C)/1493
Sub.:- Measures to be taken by various State Government Authorities for ensuring compliance to GST by taxpayers/contractors/suppliers, etc.
The Goods & Services Tax (GST) regime has been implemented in India w.e.f. 01-07-2017 and by now, after more than a year, the GST common Portal has stabilized and taxpayers are filing their returns online on the portal https://www.gst.gov.in. It has been noticed that there are sizeable number of registered taxpayers from the works contract sector who are non-compliant on GST common portal and have failed to make timely payments of GST collected by them, while filing returns.
2. The provisions of section 51 of GST Law (Central Goods & Services Act, 2017 and the Goa Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) rela

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mpliance which in turn will lead to increase in the tax collection:
The Concerned Authorities shall immediately take the following steps.
i) Eligibility for participating in any Tender for procurement of goods or services.
The Concerned Authorities shall obtain a copy of Application Reference Number(ARN) generated on GST common Portal www.gst.gov.in by the Taxpayer after filing his latest return which was due as per GST Law. The Concerned Authorities shall carry out necessary changes in their Rules/Byelaws/Manuals/Tender documents, etc. as may be required for making the submission of documentary proof mandatory towards GST compliance upto date for being eligible to participate in any tender/quotation, etc.
ii) Eligibility for receiving any work order/supply order
The Concerned Authorities shall obtain before issuing any work order/supply order, a copy of Application Reference Number(ARN) generated on GST common portal www.gst.gov.in by the Taxpayer after filing his latest return

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods/services
The Concerned Authorities shall incorporate a condition in any such permission/consent/NOC issued for holding/organizing Exhibitions/Exhibition-cum-Sale/any event within the State of Goa for supply of goods/services, that the organizer of such event shall obtain CST registration as a Taxpayer and shall also ensure that all persons to whom stalls are allotted at such events are registered under GST either as Regular Taxpayer or as a Composition Taxpayer/Casual Taxable Person/Non-resident Taxable Person and that a board showing GSTIN, Legal Name, Trade name is displayed in a conspicuous place at such event by each of the stall owner. The organizer of such event shall submit to the local Ward Office of Commercial Tax Department, a list of all stall holders with their respective GSTIN at least one (01) day prior to the start of such event.
v) Verification of compliance status on GST common Portal before taking any actions at points (i) to (iv) above.
The Concerned Author

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Purewal Stone Crusher,

In Re: Purewal Stone Crusher,
GST
2018 (10) TMI 346 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 641 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – AAR
Dated:- 11-9-2018
AAR No. 08/2018-19 In Application No. 06/2018-19
GST
VIPIN CHANDRA AND AMIT GUPTA, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Shri Ashwarya Sharma (Advocate)
Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: None
Note : Under Section 100(1) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under Section- 99 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act and the rules made thereunder filed M/s. Purewal Stone Crusher, Ramnagar (Nainital) Uttarakhand, primarily engaged in the business of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vernment Departments (tabled in sl.no. a above) falls within the category of Exempted Government Services as mentioned under s.no. 4, 5, 6, 9, 23 & 47 of the Exemption Notification and accordingly no GST is require to be paid on such charges under s.no.5 of the RCM notification.
(c). GST applicability on penalty paid by the applicant on unaccounted stock of River Bed Material (RBM) on the orders of the District Magistrate to the Govt. department under s.no. 5 of Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) notification.
(d). Vehicles (Pokland, JCB, Dumper & Tipper)purchased and used by the applicant in its day to day business activities for movement of goods from one place to another would fall within the definition of Motor Vehicle under the provisions or GST law.
(e). Availability of GST Paid by the applicant at the time of purchase or repairs including spares w.r.t. Vehicles (Pokland, JCB, Dumper Tipper)used by it for movement of goods in its palace of business as Input Tax Credit.
2. Adva

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of any goods or services or both;
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both;
(d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid;
(e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered;
(g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.
4. Accordingly opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the applicant on 28.08.2018. Shri Ashwarya Sharma (Advocate) appeared for personal hearing on 28.08.2018 and submitted documents describing therein exact nature of work beine undertaken. Nobody appeared from the side of Revenue for the hearing.
5. In the present application, applicant has requested for advance ruling on different i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n here that the Authority has earlier dealt with the same issue in the case of Forest Department wherein the advance ruling was sough: by them on the question whether GST is leviable on the “Marg Sudharan Shulk” and “Abhivahan Shulk”. The findings of the Authority in the said case is reproduce as under:
GST on “Marg Sudharan Shulk” : From the documents submitted by the applicant we find that the said “marg sudharan shulk” is charged and collected by applicant from non government, private and commercial vehicles engaged in mining work in lieu of use of forest road. Stated purpose of said “marg sudharan shulk” is for maintenance of forest road. Under GST, “the services by way of access to a roac or a bridge on payment of toll charges” are included in the list of exempted services. Further, A toll road, also known as a turnpike or tollway, is a public or private road for which a fee (or toll) is assessed for passage. It is a form of road pricing typically implemented to help recoup the c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mpanied with a transit pass issued by forest authorities in this regard. Authority further observe that charges for carrying forest, produce through road or water are different and determined according to quality and quantity. Therefore said “Abhivahan Shulk” cannot be termed as toll tax and rather is a form of consideration received by the applicant in lieu of services provided to the person for carrying forest produce. Under GST regime under Section 2(102) services means anything other than goods and all services but for list of exempted services as provided under Chapter 99 of GST Tariff, 2017 are liable for GST. Since the services provided by the ' applicant do not find mention in the list of exempted services, therefore the applicant, is liable to pay GST @ 18% on the said “Abhivahan Shulk” under Service Code 9997 and to be treated as “other services”.
Since the facts of the present case are similar to facts earlier dealt by the authority in the case of Forest Department, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

inside or outside the precincts of a port or an airport;
(iii) transport of goods or passengers
Central Government. State Government Union territory or local authority
Any business entity located in the taxable territory.
B. From the documents submitted by the applicant we find that the 'Fee for Ambient Air Monitoring' has to be paid to the Uttarakhand Environment Protection Control Board, Haldwani as a pollution expenses. We also find that the function of the Uttarakhand Environment Protection Control Board, Haldwani is to safeguard the environment as well as general public from the negative impact of working of stone crushers and other pollution generating plants, for which a prescribed amount of fee is levied by the State Board. We also find from the official website of Uttarakhand Environment Protection and Pollution Control Board (herein after referred 'to as UEPPCB) that it is a statutory Organization constituted under the section 4 of Water (Prevention and Cont

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sp; **
(c) a Municipal Committee, a Zilla Parishad, a District Board, and any other authority legally entitled to, or entrusted by the Central Government or any State Government with the control or management of a municipal or local fund
 (d) to (g)
**           **           **
On going through the legal position (supra) we find that UEPPCB is not State Government however cow-red under the definition of local authority in terms of Section 2(69)(c ) of the Act.
It is established that UEPPCB is a local authority, now second question arises whether the services rendered by them are liable to GST or not. In. this context we find that the services rendered by UEPPCB is covered under Article 243 W of the Constitution and the same is extracted below:
(a) Urban planning including town planning.
(b) Regulation of land-use and construction of buildings.
(c) Planning for economic and social deve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

endered by local authority by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a municipality under Article 243 W of the Constitution is also covered under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28':1 June' 2017 and the relevant portion of the same is reproduced as under:
Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28th June 2017
Sl.No
Chapter heading (Tariff)
Description of Services
Rate per cent)
Condition
4.
Chapter 99
Services by Central Government, State Government Union territory, local authority or governmental authority by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a municipality under Article 243 W of the Constitution
Nil
Nil
In view of the above we find that functions, under article 243W of the Constitution, entrusted to municipality specifically mention “protection of the environment and promotion of ecological aspects”. Thus we observe that providing protection to the environment and promotion of ecological asp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ly basis. Therefore we observe that the said “Khanij sampada sulk” is a form of consideration received by the State Department in lieu of services provided to the applicant for carrying over produce. As per Section 2(102) of the Act 'service' is defined as under:
(102) “services” means anything other than goods, money and securities but includes activities relating to the use of money or its conversion by cash or by any other mode, from one form, currency or denomination, to another form, currency or de nomination for which a separate consideration is charged;”
We further find that services which are exempted from GST are notified vide Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28* June' 2017. On going through the said notification we find that in totality 81 services are exempted services which includes 12 services' provided, by government or local authority and we observe that service in question provided by the State Government does not find place in said 12

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cent)
Condition
47
Heading 9983 or Heading 9991
Services provided by the Central Government Slate Government, Union territory or local authority by way of –
(a) registration required under any law for the time being in force;
(b) testing, calibration, safety check or certification relating to protection or safety of workers, consumers or public at large, including fire license, required under any law for the time being in force.
Nil
Nil
Thus we observe that the sa d registration fee is covered Under exempted service (supra) under “Services provided by the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or local authority by way of- (a) registration required under any law for the time being in force. Accordingly the services of registration rendered by State Transport. Office is a exempted service and no GST is payable on the same.
5.2 GST applicability on penalty paid by the applicant on unaccounted stock of River Bed Material (RBM) on the orders of the District Magist

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

person, for not doing a particular act in the given circumstance.
(ii) Obligation to tolerate an act or a situation: It means to accept the occurrences or existence of an act or a particular thing, which is imposed by a condition or circumstances, in a contract, agreement or any other document which is legally enforceable by law.
(iii) Obligation to do. an act It means to perform or to do something, necessarily, prescribed in an agreement, contract/or any other document which is required under am law for the time being in force.
Further, to satisfy the definition of service (defined in section 2(102) of Act ibid), the activity should be carried out by a person for another for consideration. Here it must be emphasized that the service is 'agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act', not 'to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act'.
We find that a service has been state

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are liable to GST under this supply of service as the provision of cancellation charges is already informed to the customer and, therefore, it is an agreement to the obligation to tolerate an act or situation. Further penal provisions for non-performance of service or for deficiency in service also imply consideration in lieu of tolerating an act or situation.
In view of the above we observe that the penalty is to be treated as supply of service in terms of Schedule II of the Act and is liable for GST @ 18% under Service Code '-99^ and to be treated as “other services”. However the applicant is required to discharge GST liability under reverse charge in terms of serial No. 5 of the Notification no. 13/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 06.2017 as discussed in point A above.
5.3 Availability of GST paid by the applicant at the time of purchase or repairs including spares w.r.t Vehicles (Pokland. JCB. Dumper & Tipper)used by it for movement of goods in its palace of business as Inpu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

internal source and includes a chassis to which a body has not been attached and a trailer: but does not include a vehicle running upon fixed rails or a vehicle of a special type adapted for use only in a factory or in any other enclosed premises or a vehicle having less than four wheels fitted with engine capacity of not exceeding 4[twenty-five cubic centimetres]; 1 [twenty five cubic centimetres];”
In view of the above we observe that as per Section 17(5) (a) of the-Act, Input Tax Credit shall not be available on “motor vehicle”, unless it is used for specified purposes, viz transport, training etc, listed therein. One very important thing in the said section is the definition of the term “Motor Vehicle” under. GST It generally take it to mean that all types of vehicles, as nowadays everything is run by motor. But as per Section 2(76) of the Act the expression 'motor-vehicle' shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (28) of Section 2 of the Motor Vehicle Act,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ippers, dumpers by a mining company be allowed as input credit?
Answer: The provision of Sec. 17(5) (a) of the CGST Act, 2017 restricts credit on motor vehicle for specified purposes listed therein. Further, in terms of the provision of Section 2(76) of the CGST Act, 201 7 the expression 'motor vehicle' shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in Clause (28) of Section 2 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, which does not include the mining equipment viz., tippers, dumpers. Thus, as per present provisions, the GST charged or purchase of earth moving machinery including tippers, dumpers used for transportation of goods by a mining company will be allowed as input credit.
ORDER
(i) “Abhivahan Shulk” is different from toll tax and is covered under Service Code 9997, and to be treated as “other services” and is liable for GST. The applicant is liable to pay GST a 18% as on date on the same under reverse charge in terms of Serial No. 5 of the Notification no. 13/2017 – Central T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =