Cenvat Credit Migration Restriction for First-Stage Dealers Deemed Unconstitutional; Section 140(3)(iv) Struck Down.

Cenvat Credit Migration Restriction for First-Stage Dealers Deemed Unconstitutional; Section 140(3)(iv) Struck Down.
Case-Laws
GST
Constitutional validity of restriction on migration of Cenvat Credit to GST – Transitional Credit – first stage dealers in excise Regime – prescribed documents (Invoices) older than twelve months – clause (iv) of subsection (3) of section 140 is unconstitutional, and the same is struck down.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, new

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sub-Contractor for Railway Works Eligible for 12% GST Concessional Rate on Composite Supply Services.

Sub-Contractor for Railway Works Eligible for 12% GST Concessional Rate on Composite Supply Services.
Case-Laws
GST
Rate of tax – sub-contractor – even the sub-contractor providing services o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

How to claim receipt of business promotion expenses to be filed as exemption under GST

How to claim receipt of business promotion expenses to be filed as exemption under GST
Query (Issue) Started By: – Usha RaoJ Dated:- 15-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 27-10-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
We have received incentive on sales from our principles. Also, during final calculation, our principals debit from the sales achieved, the amount in proportion to the percentage of incentive received. ( Say, if 10 lakhs is the sales incentive ( over and above normal operating discounts), this amount will be reduced to the extent in the subsequent year. Our Auditors say that this payment credit received to our account is taxable under GST and we are liable to pay now. When we enquired with our principals, they sai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hence if he get or does not get input he is safe, as the Liability to discharge GST on the said “Business Promotion – Revenue (From agents angle) is always on agent and not on principle
Hence either issue and Debit Note for taxes (Against CN As being received from Principle or Its better to Raise Invoice and File GSTR 1)/ GSTR 3B
In GST Even on Free Supplies (FOC Sales) GST is levied and hence the above transaction (Be it any nomenclature) is subject to GST.
Others Comments Highly Appreciable.
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
If any discount and incentives are given in the course of business, there shall be an agreement between them in this regard. If it is so the same should be indicated in the invoice. In such cases GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gst for services -reg

gst for services -reg
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ramakrishnan Seshadri Dated:- 15-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 19-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Dear Sir,
We have done a service for repair work in India relating to a Foreign Customer . He will be paying the amount in Indian rupees and he wants to issue invoice in his name and foreign address. Now our question is whether gst is applicable for service made or what is the procedure to be followed. can be treated as export of service and invoice can be raised against lut or how to proceed.
Experts please guide
Thanks & REgards,
S.Ramakrishnan
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
In my view it is not export of service.
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

territory (India) though the customer is not residing in India. Therefore supply of service by you will not qualify as export of service.
Reply By Yash Jain:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
In GST Place of Service Provisions, if the Supply for the Service is rendered in India, then irrespective of the Location of the Recipient, it will be always be a “Service Rendered in India” – Reason & Logic – GST Being a destination & Consumption based Tax.
For Taxes : Yes GST Will be charged.
For Invoices : Yes you can raise the Invoice in Name of the Foreign Customer (Amendment has been made on 29.08.2018) were in bill to and Ship to Provision is being made applicable to Invoice also.
Regards,
Reply By Yash Jain:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
The Bill to and Shi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Lindstorm Services India Private Limited

In Re: M/s. Lindstorm Services India Private Limited
GST
2018 (12) TMI 1275 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 671 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 15-9-2018
GST-ARA-43/2018-19/B-115
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Lindstrom Services India Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions.
1. What is the classification of the activities transactions carried out by the Applicant Company as mentioned in the statement of facts (Annexure-I). In particular,
* Do these activities / t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

supply” for the purpose of section 2 (90) of CGST Act?
(ii) What will the applicable rate of GST?
(iii) Whether the conclusion (i.e. the transaction is a 'composite supply') will remain the same if in addition to the services covered in question no. 2 above Applicant Company also provides additional service of renting of locker as part of the same consideration?
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST Act/ MGST Act would be mentioned as being under the “GST Act”.
02. FACTS AND CONTENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT
The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r the workwear to its customers on need basis.
3. At present, the Applicant Company has operations in multiple locations in India i.e. Faridabad, Panchkula (Haryana), Mumbai, Pune (Maharashtra), Hyderabad (Telangana), Vishakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh), Chennai (Tamil Nadu), Kolkata (West Bengal), Bangalore (Karnataka), Tinsukia (Assam) and Vadodara (Gujarat).
Towards carrying out the aforesaid activities, the Applicant Company enters into agreements with its customers for leasing / renting of workwear and services ancillary to the renting of workwear such as transportation, weekly cleaning and repairs etc. of the workwear and other optional services such as lockers, modification etc.
5. Broad types of activities carried out by the Applicant are as follows:
Sr.No.
Type of activities carried out by the Applicant
Remuneration structure
1.
Renting of workwear
1. Weekly rental is charged for renting of work wear and ancillary Services.
2. Additional fees is charged
For any addition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f locker, sales of logo(s) and nametag(s) and modification to the workwear etc. as per customer(s) specification. Lindstrom India chargers separate consideration for any additional service provided to the customer.
6. It is noteworthy that renting of workwear are usually long-term i.e. perpetual or for 12 months period and the same may be extended as per the mutual consent of the parties involved. It is also noteworthy that in the event of termination of the agreement between the customer and Lindstrom India, the customer will be liable to purchase all the garments that have been in use and the stock maintained for him.
7. In the below paragraphs we have discussed the business activities of the Applicant Company in detail.
B.1 Renting/leasing of workwear and other ancillary services provided for a single consideration
8. Renting of workwear is the main/ primary business activity undertaken by Lindstrom India. Lindstrom India provides workwear on rent to its customer against weekly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ar. These equipment's are to be returned back to Lindstrom by the customer on termination of the agreement.
b. Lindstrom India is also providing services of weekly servicing of the workwear to its customer. Servicing of workwear includes washing, inspection, finishing and minor repairs of the workwear. Lindstrom India and its customer agree to workwear to a collection point which is in agreement of both the parties at a schedule time on weekly basis. In case after servicing of the workwear they are found to be not of the quality standards of Lindstrom India, Lindstrom India replaces such workwear
Note No. 1: – For the activities mentioned above in para B.1 Lindstrom India charges a single consideration from its customer on weekly basis.
Note No. 2: – In some other agreements Lindstrom India may also provide additional service of renting of locker as part of the service for a single consideration. Renting of lockers has been discussed in detail in point no. 11(a) of para B.2 bel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stomer's logo on the workwear, the Applicant Company charges a fixed amount from the client.
C. Replacement/exchange of the workwear: In case the workwear provided to the customer become unfit for use due to normal wear and tear or customer wants to replace the workwear originally rented to him against a new collection of workwear having new improved design, Lindstrom India on the request of the customer replaces/ exchanges such workwear.
Lindstrom India charges redemption price from its customer for replacement of workwear. Price to be charged for such replacement keeping in mind the age of the workwear provided to the customer.
d. Modification of workwear: Lindstrom India offers services of modifications of workwear to its customer such as adding extra pockets to the garments, shortening of sleeves, addition of extra push buttons on the garments etc. alteration and modifications are done as per the specific requirement of customer. Alteration/ modification are chargeable additi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

quick wear.
* Product is lost while in the customer's possession.
* Product returned to the warehouse has undergone modifications requested by the customer, due to which it cannot be returned to its original form.
* Product returned to the warehouse cannot be rented further because of its condition
f. Changing number of garments: Customer may increase or decrease the number originally rented. The agreed number of workwear can be either be increased by placing additional order with the Applicant Company or decreased by returning the excess garments. In case, the service volume leased from the Applicant Company is reduced by more than 30% from the highest volume of the past 6 months, customer will be required to pay compensation to Lindstrom India in accordance with redemption policy.
g. In the above para we have explained/covered different types of business activities entered by the Applicant Company for your reference and/or understanding of the business of the Applicant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eave to add, alter or amend all or any of the submissions mentioned above and to lead such oral and/ or documentary evidence as may be considered necessary.
Eligibility to file application for Advance ruling
2. In the present case, since the advance ruling is sought by the Applicant Company for the question covered by Section 97 and Section 98 of the CGST Act and MGST Act and also the said question is not pending or deiced elsewhere in the case of Applicant Company, it is submitted that the Applicant Company is eligible to file advance ruling and the instant application is admissible.
Transaction carried out by the Applicant Company in relation to renting of workwear amounts to “transfer of right to use” of goods
3. The expression “transfer of right to use” has been employed in Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India and also under the erstwhile Value Added Tax legislations and under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 (in so far as they are relevant for 'Service Tax' pu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the agreement.
7. Based on above legal provisions, the Applicant Company respectful submits that the services of renting of workwear provided by it amounts to 'transfer of right to use of the workwear to respective customers, which activity / transaction is covered under entry 5 (f) of the schedule II of the CGST Act. This submission of the Applicant Company is based inter alia on following factual aspects:
(a) Ownership of the workwear remains with the Applicant Company throughout the contract but effective control and possession is transferred to respective customers,
(b) The Applicant Company has exclusive right to wash and maintain the workwear and maintaining inventory of workwear because the subject workwear are industrial products prepared based on specifications prescribed by each customer and needs to be washed and serviced industrially,
(c) Each workwear is designed and prepared specifically for a customer based on the desired specifications and size and in case of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t
1.
Goods should be available for delivery
Yes. The workwear is available for delivery to customers
2.
There must be consensus ad idem as to the identity of the goods
Yes. The customer and the Applicant Company are aware of goods (being workwear), which are separately identifiable
3.
The transferee should have a legal right to use goods
Yes. The customers have sole legal right to use the goods
4.
For the period for which the transferee has legal right, it has the to be the exclusion of transferor
Yes. During the period such work wear are supplied by Applicant Company to the customers, such work wear can be exclusively used by the customers and the Applicant Company has no legal right over the workwear.
5.
Owner cannot again transfer the same right to others
Yes. During the term of the agreement the workwear cannot be transferred by Applicant Company to any other person as such workwear are stitched as per fitting of respective employees and therefore cannot be transferr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

own the activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services. Entry 1 (b) and Entry 5 (f) of Schedule II of CGST Act deals with transfer of right in goods without transfer of title and transfer of right to use of goods for any purpose for a consideration respectively. In both cases, the transaction shall qualify as supply of services. Relevant portion has been reproduced below:
“Schedule II- Activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of service
1. Transfer
(b) any transfer of right in goods or of undivided share in goods without the transfer of title thereof, is a supply of service
5. Supply of services
(f) transfer of the right to use any goods for any purpose (whether or not for a specified period) for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration.”
12. Without prejudice to the aforesaid submissions, it is submitted that even if it is assumed for the sake of argument that the transaction undertaken by the Applicant Company falls short of a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y identifiable.
15. Therefore, conferment by Applicant Company of rights to the customers to possess, control, use and in other identified ways enjoy workwear will qualify as 'transfer of right to use' of goods under Entry 5 (f) of Schedule II of CGST Act. Thus, in terms of Entry 5 (f), this transaction will also be considered as supply of service under GST laws. Even if the transaction do not qualify as 'transfer of right to use' of goods it is shall qualify as transfer of right in goods without transfer of title, which is also treated as supply of service under GST laws.
“Composite supply” V. “Mixed Supply” under GST laws
16. The taxable event under GST law is the supply of goods and services. Classification of a supply is essential to charge the applicable rate of GST on a particular supply. On a few occasions, certain transactions require supply of a combination of services or combination of goods or combination of both goods and services that maybe taxed at different GST rates

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ne or more supplies would render the entire supply ineffective. The discussion on service which gives the bundle its essential character and whether services cannot be separated follows.
21. The concept of composite supply as envisaged under GST laws is identical to the concept of bundled services existing under the erstwhile service tax regime. The term naturally bundled stems from the erstwhile service tax regime. As per service tax laws, a bundled service means a bundle of provision of various services wherein an element of provision of one service is combined with an element or elements of provision of any other service or services. In order to understand the concept and the principles to determine bundled services, reliance has been placed on Taxation of Services, an Education Guide 2012, dated 20 June 2012 issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs ('Education Guide'). As per the Education guide, an illustrative list of indicators, not determinative but indicative of bundli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Company workwear are mainly used from industrial purpose and customer (s) expect that ancillary services provided by the Applicant Company are expected to be provided as a package since such workwear are industrial products and are required to be industrially washed, maintained etc. Lindstrom India is having the required machinery and techniques to carry out such industrial washing etc.
b. Majority of service providers in a particular area of business provide similar bundle of services. For example, bundle of catering on board and transport by air is a bundle offered by a majority of airlines. Lindstrom India is the market leader in providing such services and these services are provided by Lindstrom as a package to its customers therefore this condition will automatically get fulfilled,
C. The nature of the various services in a bundle of services will also help in determining whether the services are bundled in the ordinary course of business. If the nature of services is such th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the lawmakers.
Further, in addition to above various judgments under European Union VAT laws have also clarified that a transaction compromising two supplies should be considered as supply of two or more distinct and independent supply or a single supply of service. In the case of Card Protection Plan Ltd. (“CCP”) v/s Commissioner of Customs and Excise Dated 25 February 1999 [case C-349/96] CCP along with services related to its credit card operations was providing services of insurance coverage of damage resulting from loss of credit card. In the above case European court of justice ('IECJ”) held that in order to determine whether the taxable person is supplying the customer with several distinct principle services or with a single service the essential features of the transaction must to ascertain. According to ECJ a supply would be considered as single supply of service where one of the element of the supply is considered as principle service and one or more element is regarded

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ideration for the same. Thus, in case of services provided by the Applicant Company to customers, it appears that the core service is renting of workwear gives the bundle its essential character. Intent of the arrangement between Lindstrom India and customers is renting of workwear for industrial purpose. Supplying the various heads of services that are ancillary to the renting of workwear by Lindstrom India is with the fundamental purpose of supplying the core service of providing workwear to its customers and maintain the same as per terms of the agreement.
f. The main/core services provided by Lindstrom India to customers appears to be of renting and maintaining of industrial workwear to customers. In other words, the aim of customers is to receive agreed number of workwear from Lindstrom India stitched and maintained as per agreed terms to be used by workers of the customers. Therefore, the renting of workwear provided by Lindstrom India appears to be bundle of services, where ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

itional services i.e.. Weekly cleaning, sale of logo/badges, transportation, locker facility, maintenance and repair etc. are services naturally bundled with the principle supply of renting of workwear. The said services can be construed as ancillary services provided in conjunction with the principle service to render the main/ core service. However, the ancillary services are integral to one overall supply i.e. renting of workwear and cannot be separated from the main service. Therefore, the services qualify to be naturally bundled services provided in conjunction of each Other they will be covered under as composite supply under Section 2 (30) of the CGST Act.
Mixed Supply
23. As per section 2(74) Of the CGST “Mixed supply” has been defined as follows:
“Mixed Supply means two or more individual supplies of goods or services, or any combination thereof, made in conjunction with each other by a taxable person for a single price where such supply does not constitute a composite su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pany
25. The concept of taxability of bundled service were also covered in erstwhile regime under Section 66F (3) of the Finance Act 1994 (Service Tax Act). Relevant portion is reproduced below:
The taxability of a bundled service shall be determined in the following manner:
1. if various elements of such service are naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business, it shall be treated as provision of the single service which gives such bundle its essential character;
2. if various elements of such service are not naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business, it shall be treated as provision of the single service which results in highest liability of service tax
26. Furthermore, taxability of composite supply is covered under section 8 of CGST Act. Relevant provision is reproduced below:
“Section 8 of CGST: – composite supply comprising two or more supplies, one of which is a principal supply, shall be treated as a supply of such principal supply and the whole cons

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ax applicable on the above services provided by Applicant Company would be that of goods involved in such services and in the case of the Applicant Company goods involved are clothes or apparel.
28. Further, it must be noted that rate of tax applicable on apparel/clothes is also dependent on the sales value or sales price of the goods in question which is elaborated as follows:
Goods
GST Rate
Articles of apparel and Clothing accessories, knitted or crocheted, of sale value not exceeding INR 1000 per piece  
5%
If exceeding INR 1000 per piece
12%
Articles of apparel and clothing accessories, not knitted or crocheted, of sale value not exceeding INR 1000 per piece
5%
If exceeding INR 1000 per piece
12%
29. Keeping in mind the above section in the present case, since the primary activity of the Lindstrom India is renting of workwear which is predominant element of the services provided by Lindstrom India to its customers and other services provided along with renting of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s follows:
“(b) a mixed supply comprising two or more supplies shall be treated as a supply of that particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax”
31. Therefore, in case the transaction of (a). Renting of workwear along with other ancillary services mentioned in Para B.1 or (b) Renting of workwear along with ancillary services and locker facility to its customer by the Applicant company for a single consideration is considered as mixed supply of services under GST, entire bundle of services shall be deemed to be against supply of service which attracts the highest rate of tax and accordingly the whole consideration shall become chargeable to GST at such highest rate.
PRAYER
In view of the foregoing, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Authority be pleased to hold, adjudge and declare its ruling on the matters covered as follows:
1. That the transfer of the workwear to its customer by the Applicant Company amounts to transfer of right to use goods;
2. That the services pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e has perused the documents provided by M/s. Lindstorm Services India Pvt Ltd as well as the previous records available on this issue. The reply to the questions raised by M/s. Lindstorm Services India Pvt Ltd is as follows:
Question 1 :
1. What is the classification of the activities/transactions carried out by the applicant company as mentioned in the statement of facts (Annexure-I). In particular,
i) DO these activities/ transactions of renting of work wear qualify as “transfer of right to use” of goods by applicant company to its customers in terms of entry 5(f) of Schedule II of CGST Act,
ii) Alternatively do these activities/ transactions qualify as “transfer of right in goods” in terms of Entry 1 (b) of Schedule II of CGST, Act?
Entry 1 (b) of Schedule II of CGST Act, 2017 states that:
Transfer
(b) an transfer of right in goods or of undivided share in goods without the transfer of title thereof, is a supply of service.
Entry 5(f) of Schedule II of CGST Act,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ract, the ownership of the workwear rests with M/s. Lind storm Services India Pvt Ltd. Only the right to use the workwear is passed on their customers with a condition that the workwear should only be used for the purpose for which they were designed in the first place. The customers cannot sublet the workwear or use it for any other needs. Thus, this is not an absolute or un-conditional transfer of rights. Hence, this activity is more aptly categorized under Entry 5(f) of Schedule II of CGST Act, 2017 as this is transfer of the right to use the goods(workwear) for the said purpose (in this case) for a specified period (12 months or perpetuity) for a pre-determined consideration (weekly rent).
Question 2:
ii) What is the nature of the supply based on the facts and circumstances as mentioned in the statement of facts i.e. renting of work wear along with other services such as transportation, weekly washing etc. for a single consideration?
* Does this supply qualify as “composite su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oes not constitute a composite supply.”
Illustration. – A supply of a package consisting of canned foods, sweets, chocolates, cakes, dry fruits, aerated drinks and fruit juices when supplied for a single price is a mixed supply. Each of these items can be supplied separately and is not dependent on any other. It shall not be a mixed supply if these items are supplied separately;
The services provided by M/s. Lindstorm Services India Pvt Ltd. are as listed below:
i. Renting of workwear
ii. Wash, maintenance & repair
iii. Transport of workwear including trolleys and transport of bags
iv. Lockers for storage of workwear
v. Modification of workwear as per specifications
vi. Sale of logo/ badges/ nametags Replacement or reimbursement of old workwear against a redemption charge.
From our records, it has also been observed that M/s. Lindstorm Services India Pvt Ltd provide services of Supply of Manpower (if need be) for the Management of lockers & workwear at the customer's p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing on board can be availed only if the air transport is availed. Without the latter, the former ceases to exist. Besides, due to lack of other options on board, the two services are naturally bundled.
(ii) Stay in a hotel combined with a service of laundering: Without the former the latter ceases to exist. The latter is not a standalone service and adds to enhance the quality of the former. Hence, the two services are naturally bundled.
Applying the same ratio decided to the case of M/s. Lindstorm Services India Pvt Ltd, it is evident that Washing, Maintenance and Repair of workwear is a standalone service and it is independent of the service of renting of workwear. There are many industries which offer only the services of Washing, Maintenance and Repair of clothes. As perused from our records, M/s Lindstorm Services India Pvt Ltd has also provided only “Washing Services in the past to one of their customers (namely Glaxo Smith Kline). Hence, it is evident that this bundling of s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

4. HEARING
The case was taken up for Preliminary hearing on DT. 18.07.2018 when Sh. Ankit Shah, applicant along with Ms. Mausumi Sarkia and Ms. Anjana Varma appeared and requested for admission of application as per contentions in their ARA. Jurisdictional Officer, Ms. Arpita, Asstt. Commissioner of CGST & CE, Belapur- IV, Division appeared and stated that she does not have any objection with respect to admission and made written submissions.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 23.08.2018, Sh. Tarun Jain, Advocate along with Sh. Ankit Shah, applicant Ms. Anjana Varma and Sh. Saurabh Chhadwa appeared and made oral and written submissions. Jurisdictional Officer, Sh. Sadanand Patnaik Asst. Commissioner, Belapur-IV, Division appeared and stated that they have already made written submissions.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We find that the applicant has raised questions as mentioned above on which advance ruling is sought. We now deal with the questions raised, as under:-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

urther states that applicant owns the rented products and shall have the exclusive right to wash and service them. We also find from the terms of the agreement that workwear is designed as per the fittings of every individual and further at the request of customer applicant fixes on the workwear with logos/ badges making the goods identifiable. The agreement also mentions that in the event either applicant or the customer withdraw from the agreement, the workwear remains the Applicant's property. The facts of the present case are similar to the facts in the judgment of Hon. High Court of AP in case of M/s. G.S. Lamba & Sons Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported as 43 VST 323 (AP) = 2011 (1) TMI 1196 – ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT wherein petitioners agreed to provide five dedicated fleet of transit mixers and these dedicated vehicles were to be painted in a particular style and colour. The court held that during the period of contract for any third party, the goods as visible in use would

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s such as transportation, weekly washing etc. for a single consideration?
* Does this supply qualify as “composite supply” as per Section 2(30) of CGST Act?
* Alternatively does this supply constitute a “mixed supply” under Section 2(74) of CGST Act?
This question is about the nature of supply. From the terms of the contract as mentioned in earlier part, we find that the activities carried out by the applicant is renting of workwear, which we have declared as supply of services. Besides renting of workwear and as per the terms of the contract, ancillary activities such as transport of workwear, weekly cleaning, maintenance, repairs and finishing of workwear is carried out by the applicant. It is thus obvious that impugned transaction as envisaged by the contract consists of more than two taxable supplies of services. In view of this the applicant concludes that services provided by them such as renting of workwear and other ancillary services constitute composite supply as defi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to justify their case, the applicant has strongly relied upon the 'Education Guide' issued by CBEC in the year 2012, wherein the concept of 'composite supply' has been explained.
We have already reproduced the same in the para 'Applicant's interpretation of law'. From the perusal of entire transaction as evidenced by the contract we find that the provision of renting of workwear is combined with provision of ancillary services such as transportation, weekly clearing, maintenance, repairs and finishing of the said workwear. Thus applicant satisfies one of the conditions that is essential character of 'Bundled Service' of the composite supply.
Applicant having satisfied one of the essential character of composite supply as mentioned above now examine whether these services are bundled in the ordinary course of business which is one of the essential character of supply. To answer this Question we have to refer to Object of the Agreement' at para 2 of the agreement made between M/s. Nutr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

le separately
* The different elements are integral to one overall supply – if one or more is removed, the nature of supply would be affected.
The above principle can be adopted to the facts of the present case to determine whether impugned supply is a bundled services in the ordinary course of business.
From the perusal of object of agreement we find that services other than renting of workwear are being supplied not in the ordinary course of business but under the compulsion imposed by the applicant on the customer. Further we find that services such as washing, maintenance and transportation etc. are standalone services and are normally available separately. We agree with the jurisdictional officer that all so called ancillary services are independent of the service of renting of workwear and that there are many service providers who offer specific service such as washing, maintenance and repair of cloths. Applicant has also provided 'Washing Services' in the past to one of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed supply if these items are supplied separately;
Thus, in order to identify, if the particular supply is a mixed supply, the first requisite is to rule out that the supply is a composite supply. A supply can be a mixed supply only if it is not a composite supply. As a corollary it can be said that if the transaction consists of supplies not naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business then it would be mixed supply. Further we find that customer pays single price under single invoice for the package of services. We have already ruled out the possibility of the present transaction being a composite supply, and the fall out is that the transaction qualifies as a mixed supply as defined in section 2(74) of the GST Act.
06. In view of the deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as under:
ORDER
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-43/2018-19/B-115
Mumbai, dt. 15.09.2018

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tement of facts (Annexure-I) i.e., renting of workwear along with other services such as transportation, weekly washing etc. for a single consideration? In particular,
* Does this supply qualify as “composite supply” as per section 2 (30) of CGST Act?
* Alternatively, does this supply constitute a “mixed supply” under section 2 (74) of CGST Act?
Answer: – The supply of renting of workwear along with other services such as transportation, weekly washing etc. for a single consideration is a mixed supply under section 2 (74) of CGST Act.
Question 3. In the event the answer to question (2) above is that the transaction undertaken by the Applicant Company qualifies as 'composite supply',
(i) What will be the “principle supply” for the purpose of section 2 (90) of CGST Act?
(ii) What will the applicable rate of GST?
(iii) Whether the conclusion (i.e. the transaction is a 'composite supply) will remain the same if in addition to the services covered in question no. 2 above Applican

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Behr-Hella Thermocontrol India Pvt. Ltd.,

In Re: Behr-Hella Thermocontrol India Pvt. Ltd.,
GST
2018 (11) TMI 887 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 124 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 15-9-2018
GST-ARA-172018-19/B-116
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST”] by Behr-Hella Thermocontrol India Pvt. Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question.
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant is liable to pay Integrated Goods and Services Tax on the testing services provided to its overseas group entities, being a zero-rated sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

adgaon, Pune – 411 033. The Applicant is a 100% subsidiary of Behr-Hella Thermocontrol GmBH, Lippstadt, Germany (hereinafter referred to as “BHTC Germany”). The Applicant is registered under GSTIN No. 271800000581ARQ.
2. In the normal course of business, the Applicant has entered into service agreements with BHTC Germany and its other overseas group entities such as Behr-Hella Thermocontrol, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “BHTC USA”) and Behr-Hella Thermocontrol (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “BHTC Shanghai”), inter alia, for providing testing services. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “A” is the copy of the Service Agreement entered into by the Applicant with BHTC Germany.
3. The testing services provided by the Applicant are in relation to the prototype goods supplied by the overseas group entities to determine whether the products so tested function in accordance with the requisite standards based on certain identified parameters such as temperature, environ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cation to the Hon'ble Authority for Advance Ruling.
The Applicant craves leave to submit such further facts as may be relevant after admission of the application or at the time of hearing.
Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law and/or facts. as the case may be. in respect of the questions(s) on which advance ruling is required
In light of the facts of the case (as explained in Annexure I) and the question in respect of which the Applicant seeks an Advance Ruling, the Applicant's interpretation of facts and law in respect of the aforesaid questions is as follows:
Question: Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant is liable to pay Integrated Goods and Services Tax on the testing services provided to its overseas group entities, being a zero-rated supply?
Applicant's submissions
1.1 With effect from 01 July 2017, indirect tax regime in India has shifted from multiple taxes by multiple authorities at multiple times to a consolidated Go

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ld accrue to the taxing authority which has jurisdiction over the place of consumption which is also termed as place of supply.
1.3 Section 7(5) of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “IGST Act”) provide that supply of service shall be treated as a supply of service in the course of inter-State trade or commerce when the supplier is located in India and the place of supply is outside India,
1.4. As per Section 16 of the IGST Act, “export of service” shall qualify as “Zero rated supply” and can be supplied without payment of IGST.
1.5 Thus, even if a supply is in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, the same can be supplied without payment of IGST if it qualifies as an export of service.
1.6 In terms of Section 2(6) of the IGST Act, a supply of service shall qualify as export of service when:
(a) the supplier of service is located in India;
(b) the recipient of service is located outside India;
(c) the place of supply of service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e for the supply of a service, the person to whom the service is rendered,
and any reference to a person to whom a supply is made shall be construed as a reference to the recipient of the supply and shall include an agent acting as such on behalf of the recipient in relation to the goods or services or both.
*********
(105) “supplier” in relation to any goods or services or both, shall mean the person supplying the said goods or services or both and shall include an agent acting as such on behalf of such supplier in relation to the goods or services or both supplied.
*********
1.8 In the facts and circumstances of the present case, it is not in dispute that the Applicant is the “supplier of services” in terms of Section 2(105) of the CGST Act, and the overseas group entities, being liable to pay the consideration for the services supplied by the Applicant, are the “recipient of services” in terms of section 2(93) of the CGST Act.
1.9 Thus, condition provided under clause (a) and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t is also satisfied.
1.15 Now the only condition that needs to be satisfied for the testing service provided by the Applicant to its overseas group entities to qualify as export and therefore a “zero rated supply” which can be supplied without payment of IGST is whether the “place of supply” is outside India.
1.16 Hence, the “place of supply” is relevant to decide the taxability and the status of taxability of the testing services provided by the Applicant to its overseas group entities.
1.17 The provisions for determining the place of supply of services are contained under Section 13 of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “IGST Act”). The relevant extracts of Section 13 of the IGST Act are reproduced below for ready reference:
Place of supply of services where location of supplier or location of recipient is outside India.
13. (1) The provisions of this section shall apply to determine the place of supply of services where the location

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied in respect of goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs and are exported after repairs without being put to any other use in India, than that which is required for such repairs;
***********
1.18 The terms “location of the recipient of services” and “location of the supplier of services” have been defined under Section 2(14) and Section 2(15) of the IGST Act as under:
 
Definitions
2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, –
********
(14) “location of the recipient of services” means,
(a) where a supply is received at a place of business for which the registration has been obtained, the location of such place of business;
(b) where a supply is received at a place other than the place of business for which registration has been obtained (a fixed establishment elsewhere), the location of such fixed establishment;
(c) where a supply is received

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ence” has been defined under Section 2(113) of the CGST Act as under:
Definitions
2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, –
********
(113) “usual place of residence” means
(a) in case of an individual, the place where he ordinarily resides;
(b) in other cases, the place where the person is incorporated or otherwise legally constituted;
1.20 In view of the above, while the location of the Applicant is in India in terms of Section 2(15)(a) of the IGST Act, the recipient of services (i.e., the overseas group entities) are located outside India in terms of Section of the IGST Act.
1.21 Further, a bare perusal of Section 13 of the IGST Act would reveal that generally, the place of supply of services shall be the location of the recipient of services in terms of Section 13(2) of the IGST Act, except in case of the services specified in sub-sections (3) to (13) of Section 13 of the IGST Act.
1.22 The Applicant understands that sub-sections (4) to (13) of Section 13 of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the testing services.
1.26 The Applicant is required to submit a test report and the contractual obligation of the Applicant towards overseas group entities in terms of the provision of testing services is complete only when the test reports are delivered to them. In other words, the provision of service is complete only when the test report is delivered to the overseas group entities.
1.27 It is submitted that the delivery of the test report by the Applicant to its overseas group entities is the most Important part of the services rendered by the Applicant. In fact, the overseas group entities, as recipient of Services, are expecting the test report and nothing apart from that.
1.28 As stated above, GST is a destination based tax on consumption of goods and services. Further, “Services” are something intangible in nature. Thus, service is something which is not visible but the person receiving the same is deriving some benefit from its performance. Thus, GST is levied where the s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In other words, the ultimate deliverable or the actual provision of service is the provision of the test report.
1.31 Further, there is no compulsion on the Applicant to return the prototype goods to the overseas group entities which further confirms that the overseas group entities are not concerned with the goods. Therefore, the actual consumption of the testing services performed by the Applicant is happening outside India in the form of the test reports.
1.32 The aforesaid position is further substantiated by the second proviso to Section 13(3)(a) of the IGST Act which provides that even though the repairing of goods is done in India, the place of supply shall be outside India if the goods after repairs are exported out of India. The rationale behind such exclusion appears to be that no GST should be levied as the goods will be ultimately used or consumed outside India.
1.33 The above contention is also supported by the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dent in inspection/test analysis of the goods which the clients located abroad intended to import from India. In other words, the clients abroad were desirous of confirming the fact as to whether the goods imported complied with requisite specifications and standards. Thus, client of the respondent located abroad engaged the services of the respondent for inspection and testing the goods. The goods were tested by the respondents in India. The goods were available or their samples were drawn for such testing and analysis in India. However, the report of such tests and analysis was sent abroad. The clients of the respondent were foreign clients, paid the respondent for such services rendered, in foreign convertible currency. It is in that sense that the Tribunal holds that the benefit of the services accrued to the foreign clients outside India. This is termed as 'export of service'. In these circumstances, the Tribunal takes a view that if services were rendered to such foreign clients

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be said to be perverse or vitiated by an error of law apparent on the face of the record. If the emphasis is on consumption of service then, the order passed by the Tribunal does not raise any substantial question of law.
 1.34 The aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court has been followed by it in the case of The Pr. Commissioner of Mumbai Commissionerate v. QIndia Investment Advisory Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2017-TIOL-2171-HC-MUM-ST = 2017 (10) TMI 754 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT.
1.35 Since GST is also a “destination based consumption tax” on goods and services, relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in SGS India Ltd, (supra) and Qlndia Investment Advisory Pvt. Ltd. (supra), it is submitted that the place of supply in case of the testing Service provided by the Applicant to its overseas group companies is also outside India.
1.36 In this regard, it is further submitted that even if the services are provided from India, since the actual consumption of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

incorporated under the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany, having its registered office at Stuttgart, register court HRB 20260, and its principal place of business at Hansastraße 40, 59557 Lippstadt, Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its Managing Directors Mr. Thomas Schulte and Dr. Andreas Teuner (hereinafter called “BHTC”) of ONE PART
AND
Bebr-Hella Thermocontrol India Private Limited, a Company incorporated in India and having its Registered Office at Elpro Compound, City Survey No. 4270, Chinchwadgaon, Pune – 411033, India,, represented by its Director and CEO Mr. Shrivardhan Gadgil (hereinafter called “BHTCIN”) of OTHER PART. Whereas –
a) BHTC, IN was incorporated on February 10, 2006. BHTCIN is in the process of undertaking activities as developer, manufacturer, producer, purchaser, seller, importer, exporter, distributor, dealer, commission agent and market representatives of all kinds of Control Equipment and Units for Air conditioning and Climate Contr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ting is carried in manual mode and also in automated mode
c) BHTCIN is interested in accepting such engagements from BHTC and willing to provide services related to man and machine resources as per requirement of BHTC (hereinafter referred to as “Services”); and
d) BHTC and BHTCIN mutually desire to set forth in this Agreement certain terms and conditions                 applicable to all such engagements;
Now it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. Scope, Duties and Responsibilities of BHTCIN
a. BHTCIN shall recruit and maintain duly qualified, skilled and experienced resources to provide services to BHTC and its group companies as agreed in the beginning of each calendar year with BHTC. These services will be provided from BHTCIN facility or on-site as per requirement of BHTC or its affiliates.
b. BHTCIN will track its resources in the manner agreed with BHTC and will ensure that the time booking is done

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for resources planned and available at BHTCIN with all information and details about the projects. All resources identified and agreed in the business plan will have to be used by BHTC and will be invoiced by BHTCIN.
b. BHTC will provide. 4.rolling plan on services required from BHTCIN in the beginning of each calendar month covering next three months outlook of the project jobs which could be assigned to resources at BHT CIN
c. The technical coordinators at BHTC shall work closely with Dianagers/ supervisors at BHTCIN and will be responsible for the quality of deliverables and the project timelines.
d. BHTC will support BHTCIN for building competencies and enhance efficiency and productivity through sufficient workloads, exposure to now projects/ technologies, training and mentoring. BHTC will plan and send its experts to visit BHTCIN for technical training of resources at its own costs and the same will be invoiced separately from: BHTC to BHTCIN.
e. BHTC will help BHTCIN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h calendar year commencing from January 2014 and shall be notified separately.
BHTC will pay the hourly' rate plus travel expenses (Air ticket, Transportation, Lodging, Meals or allowance), which will be approved in advance by BHTC for each Professional on project assignment on site at BHTC Lippstadt or at any other location. (BHTC will receive corresponding documentation)
Except as expressly agreed with BHTC, BHTCIN shall bear all of its own expenses arising from its performance of its obligations under this Agreement, including (without limitation) expenses for facilities, work spaces, training, utilities and the like.
4. Ownership and Rights
In relation to jobs received by BHTCIN from BHTC, all original and intermediate written material, including programs, documentation, CDs, diskettes, listings and any other material generated by BHTCIN personnel for BHTC shall belong exclusively to BHTC.
5. Confidentiality
a. Except as provided by clause 5(b) herein below, BHTC and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

enalties and obligations arising directly or indirectly from a breach of this provision.
7. Assignment
BHTCIN is not allowed to assign this Agreement or any part of this Agreement to a third Party without prior written consent of BHTC.
8. Change Of ownership
BHTCIN must inform BHTC of any pending change in ownership of the BHTCIN as soon as the change is more likely than not. Upon notice of a pending change in ownership BHTC reserves the right to change the terms and conditions of this agreement without any concurrence of BHTCIN.
9. Term and Termination:
a. This Agreement supersedes the Service Agreement between BHTC and BHTCIN dated January 1, 2012 and amendments thereof and shall come into force on the date of its execution and shall lasts until 315 December 2015 and will be automatically renewed if none of the parties terminates within ninety (90) days in advance.
b. If BHTCIN Commits any act of insolvency or any provision for winding up is admitted against BHTCIN,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

11. Severability Clause
If a provision of this agreement is or becomes illegal, invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, the contract shall be construed as if the same had not been inserted. The Parties hereby agree to make an amendment to the contract containing a legal, valid or enforceable provision.
12. Amendments and Modifications
All amendments or modifications to this Agreement must be in writing, identified as an amendment to this Agreement and signed by an authorized representative of each Party
13. Governing LAW
This Agreement Shall be subject to the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany. For all claims arising out of or in connection with this Agreement as far as statutorily allowed -, the courts competent for Behr-Hella Thermocontrol GmbH domicile shall have jurisdiction.
Additional submissions 06.09.2018
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
1. At the outset, the Applicant expresses their gratitude to this Hon'ble Authority for Advance Ruling for granting a patient

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds are not usually sent back. The copy of the test report us attached as page 27 of the application.
4. On the basis of the said test reports, the overseas group companies then make the suggested alterations to the product design and manufacture products based thereon.
SUBMISSIONS:
A. We refer to and reiterate the Submissions made in para 1.1 to 1.38 of the application. The Said submissions are summarized as follows:
(i) The services of testing of the prototypes provided by the Applicant to its group companies are appropriately classified under Section 13(2) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“IGST Act”);
(ii) The services of testing of prototype and providing the report based on which mass production is undertaken is more in the nature of advisory/ consultancy service, rather than the services prescribed under Section 13(3) of the IGST Act which, inter alia, entail provision of service on the goods made available physically by the recipient of service and which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n'ble High Court and Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal.
C. It is submitted that the Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal have taken a consistent view that service tax being a destination based consumption tax, the place of supply/ place of provision of the said services are outside India and the said services qualify as export of services.
D. Under the service tax regime, as applicable prior to 2012, i.e., prior to the negative list based approach of taxation of services, the conditions prescribed for qualifying as export of services were laid down in the Export of Services Rules, 2005, The relevant extracts Of the Export of Services Rules, 2005 are reproduced below:
“3. Export of taxable service. –
The export of taxable service shall mean, –
******
(2) in relation to taxable services specified in sub-clauses (a), (), (h), (i), (i), (1), (m), (n), (o), (s), (t), (u), (w), (x), (y), (2), (zb), (zc), (zi), (zj), (zn), (zo), (zq), (zr), (zt), (zu), (zu), (zw), (zza), (zz

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndia. It is submitted that the said provisions are substantially similar to the provisions of the Place of Supply Rules as provided under Section 13 of the IGST Act.
F. Further, w.e.f. 01 April 2011, Rule 3(2) of the Export of Services Rules, 2005 was amended and condition for the Technical Testing and Analysis Services for qualifying as export of services was changed from the place of performance of service to the location of the recipient of service.
G. The aforesaid amendment indicates that the intention of the legislature at all times was to treat the said testing and analysis services, the report for which was issued to the overseas service recipient as export of service, based on the location of the recipient of service. The key factor being that service tax was a destination based consumption tax and the services with regard to the said testing were being consumed outside India, The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 published by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012 have been reproduced below:
RULE 4. Place of provision of performance based services. –
The place of provision of following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely:-
(a)  services provided in respect of goods that are required to be made physically available by the recipient of service to the provider of service, or to a person acting on behalf of the provider of service, in order to provide the service:
Provided that when such services are provided from a remote location by way of electronic means the place of provision shall be the location where goods are situated at the time of provision of service:
Provided further that this clause shall not apply in the case of a service provided in respect of goods that are temporarily imported into India for repairs and are exported after the repairs without being put to any use in the taxable territory, other than that which is required for su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dgment on the prevalent issue wherein, the Hon'ble Bombay High Court while interpreting the Export of Services Rules, 2005 has held as follows:
24. In the present case, the Tribunal has found that the assessee like the respondent rendered services, but they were consumed abroad. The clients of the respondents used the services of the respondent in inspection/test analysis of the goods which the clients located abroad intended to import from India. In other words, the clients abroad were desirous of confirming the fact as to whether the goods imported complied with requisite specifications and standards. Thus, client of the respondent located abroad engaged the services of the respondent for inspection and testing the goods. The goods were tested by the respondents in India. The goods were available or their samples were drawn for such testing and analysis in India. However, the report of such tests and analysis was sent abroad. The clients of the respondent were foreign clients, paid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

activities and is not a charge on the business, but on the consumer, then, it is leviable only on services provided within the country. It is this finding and conclusion of the Hon'ble Supreme Court which has been applied by the Tribunal in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
The copy of the said judgment in the case of SGS India Pvt. Ltd. has been attached at page 25 of the first compilation of documents.
K. It is submitted that said judgment in the case of SGS India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has been followed by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case Of QIndia Investment Advisory Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2017-TIOL-2171-HC-MUM-ST = 2017 (10) TMI 754 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT. The copy of the said judgment has been attached at page 31 of the first compilation of documents.
L. The aforesaid two judgments are issued under the Export of Services Rules, 2005. The Hon'ble Tribunal, in Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-l v/ s. Sai Life Sciences Ltd. reported in 2016 (42) STR 882 (Tri.-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of SGS (supra), the ratio of the said judgment cannot be said to be in jeopardy, as no Stay has been granted against the same. In this regard, reliance is placed on the following judgments:
(i) Union of India v/s. Kamlakshi Finance Corporation Ltd. reported in 1991 (55) ELT 433 (SC) = 1991 (9) TMI 72 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA;
(ii) Mycon Construction Ltd. v/s. Union of India reported in 2017 (350) ELT 514 (Bom.) = 2017 (3) TMI 347 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT;
(Ill) Shree Sai Vamika Industries v/ s. Union of India reported in 2017 (347) ELT 93 (Gau.) = 2015 (12) TMI 1778 – GAUHATI HIGH COURT
The copies of the said judgments are attached at pages 31 to 36 of the second compilation of documents.
In view of the aforesaid, it is submitted that the place of supply of the testing services provided by the Applicant is outside India and the testing services qualify as export of service in terms of Section 2(6) of the IGST Act.
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion of the recipient of services:
Provided that where the location of the recipient of services is not available in the ordinary course of business, the place of supply shall be the location of the supplier of services.
(3) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely:
(a) services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or to a person acting on behalf of the supplier of services in order to provide the services:
Provided that when such services are provided from a remote location by way of electronic means, the place of supply shall be the location where goods are situated at the time of supply of services:
Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied in respect of goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs and are exported after repair

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“export of services” means the supply of any service when,
(i) the supplier of service is located in India;
(ii) the recipient of service is located outside India;
(iii) the place of supply of service is outside India;
(iv) the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange; and
(v) the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8;
The applicant satisfies the clauses of sec(2)(6) and as the place of supply of service is outside India, this office is of the view that the applicant is not liable to pay Integrated Goods and Services Tax on the testing services provided to its overseas group entities.
The applicant may carry out export of service under LUT/Bond without payment of IGST or may carry out export with payment of IGST and claim refund later on.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Dy. Commr. S. T. (PUNE-BST-E-001), Pune Division, Pune appeared and stated that they will be making detailed submissions in due course.
The application was admitted and final hearing was held on 29,08.2018, Sh. Mihir Mehta, Advocate along with Sh. Suyog Bhave Advocate and Sh. Sandeep Deshmukh, D G M Finance appeared and made oral and written submissions and requested time for further submissions before 06.09.2018.
The jurisdictional officer, Sh. Ramesh Phadtare, Dy. Commr. S. T. (PUNE-BST-E-001), Pune Division, Pune appeared and made written submissions.
05. OBSERVATIONS
5.1 We have perused the records on file and gone through the facts of the case and the submissions made by the applicant and the department.
5.2 facts of the subject matter are that the Applicant has entered into service agreement for providing testing services in relation to the prototype goods supplied by their overseas clients. The tests are directly carried out on the prototype goods provided by the overseas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of service in the course of Inter-State trade,
5.4 Now we take the opportunity to discuss whether the supply of service by the applicant in this case attracts the provisions of Section 2(6) of the IGST Act, so as to be treated as an export of service so as to qualify as “Zero rated supply” under the provisions of Section 16 of the IGST Act.
5.5 An exporter of services in the case of Inter-State trade must satisfy all the conditions of Section 2(6) of the IGST Act which is reproduced as under:-
Section 2(6) “export of services” means the supply of any service when,-
(i) the supplier of service is located in India;
(ii) the recipient of service is located outside India;
(iii) the place of supply of service is outside India;
(iv) the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange; and
(v) the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explana

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervices specified in sub-sections (3) to (13) of Section 13 of the IGST Act. We agree with the applicant that sub-sections (4) to (13) of the said Section 13 are irrelevant in the present case for the purpose of determination of the “place of supply” of the testing services provided by them to their overseas clients and therefore we restrict ourselves to the provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 13 of the IGST Act, which is as under:-
Section 13 (3) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely:-
(a) services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or to a person acting on behalf of the supplier of services in order to provide the services:
Provided that when such services are provided from a remote location by way of electronic means, the place of supply shall be the location where goods are situated at the ti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. From a reading of the agreement it is very clear that the testing activities that are carried out include Functional tests, Electrical tests, Mechanical tests, Life cycle tests, Endurance tests, Illumination tests, Environmental tests, Software tests, Product robustness tests, etc. The facts and situation in the present case clearly attract the provisions of Section 13 (3)(a) of the IGST Act and therefore it can be inferred that the said services of testing of the protypes, which are physically made available by the service receiver to the service provider, are provided in India and therefore liable to tax.
5.9 The argument of the applicant is that the services provided by the applicant in this case, as per the agreement, are completed only when the test reports are sent to their overseas clients is not tenable for the reason that first of all the service of testing provided by the applicant on the basis of examination and physical verification of prototypes is in respect of verific

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

its further use or otherwise by the service recipient as we can clearly see that even if the findings of test report are not used in any way by the service recipient, it cannot be said that the service of testing is not provided by the applicant to the service recipient as the provision of testing services as per the agreement between them is clearly there whether or not the test report is used by the service recipient. Thus the applicant's argument does not hold any ground and we are of the opinion that in the present case it can safely be inferred from a reading of the provisions of Section 13(3) that the services supply of which has been rendered by the applicant to their overseas client as per the agreement is taxable under IGST Act.
5.10 Further we specifically find that in the SGS case cited by the applicant, the facts are different. In that case the overseas clients of SGS used the services of SGS in inspection/ test analysis of the goods which the clients located abroad inten

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s Nagaur Mukangarh Highways Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: M/s Nagaur Mukangarh Highways Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1146 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 652 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – AAR
Dated:- 15-9-2018
ADVANCE RULING NO. RAJ/AAR/2018-19/17
GST
NITIN WAPA AND SUDHIR SHARMA, MEMBER
Present for the applicant: Ms. Khushboo Kundalia and Mr. Madhav Kalani, Authorised Representative
Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
The issue raised by M/s. Nagaur Mukangarh Highways Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred as the applicant also) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it fails under ambit of the Section 97(2) (a), it is given as under:
(d) Admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid.
Further, the applicant bei

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ate laning of the sections of State highway (hereinafter referred to as Project) on design, build, operate /maintain and transfer (hereinafter referred to as 'DBOT') basis under a contract (hereinafter referred to as 'Project') with Public Works Department (PWD). Government of Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as 'Authority ).
2. Scope of the Contract:
Under the Contract, the applicant has been engaged as a “Concessionaire' wherein the Authority has granted concession to Construct, Operate and Maintain the Project during:-
a. The construction period shall commence from the appointed date and will end on the COD.
b. A period of 10 years from the (hereinafter referred to as 'DBOT').
c. The applicant shall receive 50% of the project cost (i.e. cost of construction) which shall be paid to the applicant in five equal installments during the construction period on the basis of achievement of milestones i.e. achieving specified percentage of physical progress.
d. The applicant shall re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to the applicant, Ms Khushboo Kundalia and Mr. Madhav Kalani appeared as representative of the applicant for personal hearing on 10.08.2018 and submitted documents and notifications related to projects. They reiterated the submissions already made in the Advance Ruling Application and requested that the case may be decided at earliest.
5. issues to be decided :
The applicant has sought advance ruling as to whether they are eligible to:
(a) Claim full ITC pertaining to procurement of goods and services for construction of the project during the Construction Period, as the entire revenue received during the said period is subject to GST; and
(b) Claim ITCs pertaining to procurement of goods and services during the O & M period after reversal of ITC as per Section 17(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 42 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rule, 2017 as Annuity Payment received during the said period is exempt whereas 0 & M payments received are subje

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017-CT (rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended vide notification No. 32/2017-CT(Rate) dated 13.10.2017.
(iii) The contention of the applicant is tenable because the services provided by the applicant are taxable under SAC 9954 and annuity received by them after completion of work.
(iv) The Entry No 23A inserted vide notification No. 32/2017 ibid in Notification 12/2017-CT (rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not applicable to the applicant.
(v) Entry No 27 and 23A of Notification No. 12:12017 ibid exempts to Toll Fee which was being paid on the spot to access road or bridges or paid as annuity.
(vi) The annuity received by the applicant is liable to tax and cannot be included in entry No. 23A.
7. Findings:
7.1 We have gone through the content of advance ruling application made by the applicant, submission made at the time of personal hearing, and comments of officer concerned and find that the applicant M/s Nagaur Mukangarh Highways Pvt. Ltd is providing 'work contract service' as defined unde

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017 as Annuity Payment received during the said period is exempt whereas O & M payments received are subject to GST.
7.3 Before deciding the issue, it would be appropriate to appreciate the legal provision 'in this regard It is a fact that the applicant is providing the services of construction of roads and bridges on design, build, operate and transfer (DBOT) basis which is a composite supply as defined under clause 30 of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017 which reads as under:
“composite (30) supply' means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply;
 
7.4 Further, these supplies are in relation to construction of immovable property like roads and bridges and it can be termed as 'Work Contract' in terms of Section 2(119) of CGST Ac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l installments along with interest starting from 180 days of COD. Thus the applicant is liable to pay applicable GST on the full value of the project during the construction period of 2 years.
7.6 Section 13 of CGST Act, 2017 specifies time and value of supply of services which is as under:-
13. Time of supply of services-
(1) The liability to pay tax on services shall arise at the time of supply, as determined in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(2) The time of supply of services shall be the earliest of the following dates, namely:-
(a) the date of issue of invoice by the supplier, if the invoice is issued within the period prescribed under sub-section (2) of Section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or
(b) the date of provision of service, if the invoice is not issued within the period prescribed under sub-section (2) of section 31 or the date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier; or
(c) the date on which the recipient shows

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o awarded the work of Operation & Maintenance of the said project for the period of 10 years, During this period, the applicant will also receive 50% of the project cost, as annuity, alongwith interest. The applicant contended that the said annuity is exempted under entry No. 23A of the Notification 12/2017-CT (rate) dated 28.06.2017. The contention of the applicant is not tenable as entry No 23A ibid pertains to SAC 9967 which is for support services of transport services whereas the services provided by the applicant is classifiable under SAC 9954 which is liable to tax at the applicable rate of GST. In the given circumstances the applicant has to pay GST on full value of cost of project during the period of construction. The annuity received by the applicant is already GST paid during the construction period for which they are also paid interest by the Government.
7.8 Now we come to the main question of the applicant as to whether they are entitled to claim Input Tax Credit in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the purposes of his business.
(2) Where the goods or services or both are used by the registered person partly for effecting taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies under this Act or under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act and partly for effecting exempt supplies under the said Acts, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies.
(3) The value of exempt supply under sub-section (2) shall be such as may be prescribed, and shall include supplies on which the recipient is liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, transactions in securities, sale of land and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building.
(4) A banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company, engaged in supplying services by way of accepting deposits, extending loans or advances shall have the option to either comply with the provisions of sub-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(ii) for transportation of goods;
 (b) the following supply of goods or services or both:-
(i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery except where an inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply;
(ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre;
(iii) rent-a-cab, life insurance and health insurance except where
(A) the Government notifies the services which are obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees under any law for the time being in force; or
(B) such inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as part of a taxable composite or mixed supply; and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al consumption;
(h) goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples; and
(i) any tax paid in accordance with the provisions of sections 74, 129 and 130.
(6) The Government may prescribe the manner in which the credit referred to in sub-sections (1) and (2) may be attributed.
Explanation. For the purposes of this Chapter and Chapter VI, the expression “plant and machinery” means apparatus, equipment, and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support that are used for making outward supply of goods or services or both and includes such foundation and structural supports but excludes-
(i) land, building or any other civil structures;
(ii) telecommunication towers; and
(iii) pipelines laid outside the factory premises.
7.10 The applicant is providing 'work contract service' for construction of road and the issue is to be clarified whether they are restricted to claim input Tax Credit in terms of clause (c) or (d) of sub-sectio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ods and services after reversing the ITC under Section 17(2) of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 42 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rule, 2017 as Annuity Payment received during the O & M period is exempted and payment received for O&M is subject to GST. As discussed herein above the annuity received by them for the construction of road and bridges is classifiable under SAC 9954 and liable to tax at the applicable rate of GST. The applicant has not spec fled whether they are supplying any other exempted goods and services during the operation and maintenance period. If they are not supplying any exempted goods and services during the O & M period, the provision of section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 are not applicable upon the applicant. The annuity received by the applicant is a payment of the remaining 50% of cost of the project in biannual equal instalments on which the applicant would be paying GST during the construction period. As the annuity so received by the applicant is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: SHUBHLAXMI COLD STORAGE & ICE FACTORY PRIVATE LIMITED

In Re: SHUBHLAXMI COLD STORAGE & ICE FACTORY PRIVATE LIMITED
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1141 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 634 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – AAR
Dated:- 15-9-2018
ARN No. RAJ/AAR/2018-19/18
GST
SHRI NITIN WAPA AND SUDHIR SHARMA, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Mr. Anand Prakash Arora (Director)
Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
The Issue raised by M/s. Shubhlaxmi Cold Storage And Ice Factory Pvt. Ltd, Sukhdham, Pushkar Road, Ramnagar, Ajmer (Raj.) 305004 (hereinafter referred to as 'Applicant' also) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under ambit of the Section 97(2)(b) and (e), it is given as under:
(b) Applicability of a notification issued under provisions

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cultural produce” means any produce out of cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fibre, fuel, raw material or other similar products, on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes it marketable for primary market.”
According to Applicant eggs are produce of live chicken farming and are not further processed. Hence their storage in cold storage is covered by above definition prescribed under these notification and has argued that service of storing fresh eggs should not be chargeable under GST.
2. QUESTION(S) ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT
The Applicant has sought ruling to be pronounced under section 97(2) (b) and (e) of the CGST Act 2017, on the following questions:
Whether charges received by the cold storage for providing service of storing of eggs, which is produce of rear

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

soil for the growing of crops and rearing of animals to provide food, wool and other products.” Thus Eggs fall under the category of Agricultural Products and hence services of loading, unloading, packaging, storage or warehousing of agriculture produce are covered under the above notification.
4. FINDING, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
4.1 We have gone through the content of the Advance Ruling Application filed by applicant, submission made at the time of personal hearing and comments of the jurisdictional officer and find that the applicant has facility of cold storage house and therefore is supplier services of storage and warehousing to variety of agriculture produce.
4.2 The Applicant has sought Advance Ruling on applicability of Entry No. 24 of the Notification No. 11/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 and Entry No. 54 of the Notification No. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017. The applicant has sought advance ruling on matter whether charges received by the cold sto

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

renting or leasing of agro machinery or vacant land with or without a structure incidental to its use;
(e) loading, unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of agricultural produce;
(f) agricultural extension services;
(g) services by any Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee or Board or services provided by a commission agent for sale or purchase of agricultural produce;
(h) services by way of fumigation in a warehouse of agricultural produce”
4.3 For the purpose of above notification 'agriculture produce' has been defined in clause (d) of para 2 of Notification No. 12/2018 ibid, which is as under:
“(d) 'agricultural produce' means any produce out of cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fibre, fuel, raw material or other similar products, on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characterist

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Solairedirect India LLP (Solai Redirect India LLP)

In Re: M/s. Solairedirect India LLP (Solai Redirect India LLP)
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1046 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 314 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – AAR
Dated:- 15-9-2018
RAJ/AAR/2018-19/16
GST
NITIN WAPA, AND SUDHIR SHARMA
Present for the applicant: Mr. Sumit Rahi (C.F.O.) and Ms Sagar Shah (G.S.T.P)
Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST ACT 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
The Issue raised by the applicant is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under ambit of the Section 97(2) (a), it is given as under:
(a) Classification of any goods or services or both;
Further, M/s. Solairedirect India LLP the applicant being a registered person, GSTIN is 08ADEFS5194G1ZR, as per the declaration given by him in Form ARA-01

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

system and access is granted to the Applicant for executing the project on turnkey basis.
1.4 The steps involved in execution of a contract by the Applicant are as below:
1.4.1 Planning for the project
The Applicant submits the Implementation schedule which is approved by the purchaser. The Applicant remains responsible for ensuring compliance with the documentation, related drawings, data sheets, technical specifications, measurements while discharging obligations under the contract.
1.4.2 Procurement of materials
The solar panels and other ancillary materials are then procured by the Applicant and delivered to the power generating system's site, The risk of loss for all equipment and material is transferred to the purchaser on delivery at the project site.
1.4.3 Civil works at the site
Post receiving the access to the project site, applicant Starts with the civil works which involves creating of foundations for erection of the solar panels.
1.4.4 Erection, commissioning and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntracts in question is a working solar power generating system, duly connected with the grid for transmission of electricity and the electricity being generated seamlessly as per the technical specifications (like voltage, etc) of the Applicant's customer.
1.6 Applicant has sought to classify the supply of solar power generating system as a composite supply with solar panels being the principal supply under HSN 8541 basis the nature of the product and after considering relevant chapter notes and section notes. Notification No 1/2017 – Integrated Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 prescribes applicable rate of IGST). Photovoltaic cells supplied by Applicant classifiable under Chapter Heading 8541are covered under Schedule I of the said Notification and accordingly liable to 5% IGST.
1.7 Applicant wishes to understand whether the solar panels could be said to be the principal supply and the supply of solar power generating system along with all components could be said to composite supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

els (5% under the heading 8541) should be applicable on the entire contract value. According to him in the instant case, the individual components (like solar panels, inverters, cables, etc.) are not being sold individually. The intention of the parties is to enter into a contract for set up of a power generating system and not for the purchase of the individual components as such. Also, the individual components would not be of use as such unless they are assembled at the site (which would involve element of service) to work as a unit resulting in set up of the power generating system. This implies that the individual components or the services are supplied in conjunction with each other as these are not being sold as such but as a complete unit.
The Applicant submitted that the contract undertaken is for supply of goods to customer and setting up power generating system wherein the installation/ assembly services are also included for the supply of goods. Accordingly, it can be seen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or the services are supplied in conjunction with each other as these are not being sold as such but as a complete unit.
The Applicant submitted that the contract undertaken is for supply of goods to customer and setting up power generating system wherein the installation/ assembly services are also included for the supply of goods. Accordingly, it can be seen that the goods and services are naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business with the primary intention being to get a complete and operational solar power generating system.
The Applicant in support of his submission has also stated certain overseas GST and VAT jurisdictions like United Kingdom ('UK'), European Union ('EU') and Australia.
3.2 The Applicant submitted that the supply of solar panels is the principal supply in the composite supply of solar power generating system hence the tax rate applicable on the solar panels is 5% under the heading 8541 should be applicable to the entire contract value and has relied

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ew of entry 234 and hence would be liable to 5% IGST.
3.3 The Applicant has further submitted that if the contract is not to be considered as composite supply, it should be considered as two separate supplies of goods and services with goods being taxed at the rate of 5% and services being taxed at the rate of 18%.
The two parts in the contract in question are the supply of solar panels and ancillary equipment like invertors, transformer, wires, cables, etc and the allied services supplied under the contract. He submitted that applicable tax rates on these products should be 5% under heading 8541 as detailed in our submissions in Para 3.
Another element of the contract is the allied services. The services involved in the contract in question should be taxed at 18% in terms of the notification no 8/2017 -Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017.
3.4 The Applicant stated that the EPC Contract cannot be classified as a works contract in relation to immovable property or a mixed supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y Spinning Mills (P) Ltd Vs The Inspector General of Registration =2013 (3) TMI 681 – MADRAS HIGH COURT.
* Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Vs Solid & Correct Engineering Works =2010 (4) TMI 15 – SUPREME COURT.
* Selvel Advertising Private Limited Vs Commercial Tax Officer, Alipore Charge = 1992 (5) TMI 182 – WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL.
* Jaiprakash Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Uttarakhand = 2010 (7) TMI 884 – UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT.
* Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. Vs Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad =1997 (12) TMI 109 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
* Essar Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India etc = 2011 (4) TMI 234 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT.
In the light of the above discussion, the Applicant submitted that that the solar power generating system cannot be said to be “attached to the earth” within the meaning of that expression as defined in section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act. Further it is attached to the land for its effe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

queries and sought clarification on them. He wanted to know that in case the above contract is not considered as composite supply, can it be split into two i.e. one of supply of goods and another of service and taxed accordingly. Secondly he wanted to know which goods would fall under entry no. 234 of the rate notification as solar generating system. They submitted few judicial precedents in support of their argument. Both these additional queries have been addressed in detail under the 5. Findings, Analysis and Conclusion of the order. Further they reiterated the submission already made in Advance Ruling Application pleaded that the case may be decided as per above submissions and requested the issue to be decided at the earliest.
4.2 The jurisdictional officer in his comments has stated that the applicant is executing the project on turnkey basis which involves planning, procurement, civil work, erection, commissioning, installation and project management services. Hence the nature

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cant is required to supply goods and services stated above, except solar panels. Solar panels procured by the customer are made available by the customer to the Applicant for assembly and erection.
As per submissions made in Advance Ruling Application the applicant undertakes Engineering, Procurement and Construction ('EPC') activities for Group companies as well as third parties for setup of solar power generating system where contract for commissioning of solar power generating system involves simultaneous supply of goods and services.
a) Applicant has not submitted copy of any specific EPC contract along with the Advance Ruling Application on which he would like to seek the Ruling. As per submission made by applicant in Advance Ruling Application and based on discussions during PH, the nature of work undertaken by applicant clearly falls under category of “Composite turnkey EPC contract”.
b) In a composite EPC contract the contractor has to, inter alia design, engineer, procure,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

issioning, Performance tests, Defect rectification.
vi. Generation of electricity and connection with the grid i.e. related interconnection facilities and other related infrastructure for evacuation of power (Evacuation Infrastructure).
vii. Apart from installation the contractor has to successfully test run the plant over certain period of time to check and ensure the optimum output (generation of electricity) as agreed upon in contract.
viii. Final acceptance and payment is done only after successful test run as per condition laid down in contract.
d) Under composite EPC turnkey contracts the intention of the owner is not to procure goods of solar power generating system but to procure a completely functional solar power plant as a whole wherein applicant undertakes end to end responsibility of supply of equipments of solar power plant including designing, engineering, supplies, installation to technical specification, testing and commissioning of a functional solar power plan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ith the principal supply being the solar panels and accordingly, the tax rate of solar panels (5% under the heading 8541) should be applicable on the entire contract value.
i) As can be seen, the above entry is under the notification describing the Tax rate on 'Goods'. The entry reads as “renewable energy devices & parts for their manufacture”. If the transaction is only of supply of goods then the applicable Schedules would have to be seen but the intent of parties is always for supply of Solar Power Generating System as a whole which includes supply, installation, testing and commissioning and it is not chattel sold as chattel. It is not a contract of supply of solar power generating system or its parts but an EPC contract where the contractor has to, inter alia design, engineer, procure, transport, deliver, develop, erect, install, test and commission the project. Under composite EPC turnkey contracts the intention of the owner and the contractor is not to procure goods of solar po

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sferred from one place to another without substantial damage hence same should qualify as movable property. Hence in view of above precedence and facts of the case, the given supply should be treated as supply of Solar Power Plant Only.
I) As per the terms and conditions usually laid in EPC Contract the contractor i.e. the applicant has to undertake activities from engineering, design, to procurement of the material and has also to test and commission a functional plant before Final Acceptance. In contracts of such a nature, the liability of the contractor doesn't end with the procuring of materials but it extends till the successful testing and commissioning of the system. The transaction is not of mixed or composite supply but is of a 'work contract' but it is for us to decide whether it is a 'work contract' in terms of GST Act also, so, we come to the crux of the issue, which is as to whether the transaction results into any immovable property. The term 'immovable property' has not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

upervision of erection and commissioning of four sets of Hydraulic Mudguns and Tap Hole Drilling Machines required for blast furnace Nos. 4 and 6 of the Bhilai Steel Plant. For this purpose, it imported several components and also manufactured some of the components at their factory in Marai Malai Nagar, Chennai. These components were transported to the site at Bhilai where the manufacture and commissioning of the aforesaid machines took place. It is undisputed that duty was paid in respect of the components manufactured at its workshop in Chennai, but no duty was paid on manufacture of the aforesaid Mudguns and Drilling Machines which were erected and commissioned on site.
In their reply to the show cause, the respondents explained the processes involved, the manner in which the equipments were assembled and erected as also their specifications in terms of volume and weight. It was explained that the function of the drilling machine is to drill hole in the blast furnace to enable the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tform described as the cast house floor which is in the nature of a concrete platform around the furnace. The cast house floor is at a height of 25 feet above the ground level. On this platform concrete foundation intended for housing drilling machine and mudgun are erected. The concrete foundation itself is 5 feet high and it is grouted to earth by concrete foundation. The first step is to secure the base plate on the said concrete platform by means of foundation bolts. The base plate is 80 mm mild sheet of about 5 feet diameter. It is welded to the columns which are similar to huge pillars. This fabrication activity takes place in the cast house floor at 25 feet above ground level. After welding the columns, the base plate has to be secured to the concrete platform. This is achieved by getting up a trolley way with high beams in an inclined posture so that base plate could be moved to the concrete platform and secured. The same trolley helps in the movement of various components to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it is a physical and engineering impossibility to assemble mudguns or the drill tap hole machines elsewhere in a fully assembled condition and thereafter erect or install the same at a height of 25 feet on the cast floor of the blast furnace. She found that even the Adjudicating Authority conceded the fact that the equipments have to be assembled/erected on the base frame projection of the furnace. She also accepted the submission urged on behalf of the appellant that if the machines are to be removed from the blast furnace, they have to be first dismantled into parts and brought down to the ground only by using cranes and trolley ways considering the size, and also considering the fact that there is no space available for moving the machines in assembled condition due to their volume and weight. She considered the authorities on the subject and came to the conclusion that erection of mudgun and tap hole drilling machine results in erection of immovable property. She noticed the judgm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be dismantled and reassembled or re-erected at another place for such use, such chattel would be immovable. In the present appeal, even according to the finding of the Collector, mudguns and drill tap hole machines have to be dismantled and disassembled from the cast floor before being erected or assembled elsewhere. We have also arrived at the same conclusion independently, in para 10 above.
Accordingly applying the test laid down by the Supreme Court we hold that the erection and installation of mudguns and drill tap hole machines result in immovable property. In the light of the ratio of the above case law, we hold that the mudguns and tap hole drilling machines do not admit of the definition of goods and, therefore, excise duty is not leviable thereon”.
The core question that still survives for consideration is whether the processes undertaken by the appellant at Bhilai for the erection of mudguns and drilling machines resulted in the emergence of goods leviable to excise duty

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

each tank being about 30 feet in height 50 feet in diameter weighing about 40 tons. The tanks were connected with pump house with pipes for pumping petroleum products into the tank and sending them back to the pump house. The question arose in the context of ascertaining the rateable value of the structures under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. The High Court held that the tanks are neither structure nor a building nor land under the Act. While allowing the appeal this Court observed :-
“The tanks, though, are resting on earth on their own weight without being fixed with nuts and bolts, they have permanently been erected without being shifted from place to place. Permanency is the test. The chattel whether is movable to another place of use in the same position or liable to be dismantled and re-erected at the later place? If the answer is yes to the former it must be a movable property and thereby it must be held that it is not attached to the earth. If the answer is yes to th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d erection at the site in the steel plant, they must nevertheless be deemed as individual machines having specialized functions. We are not impressed by this reasoning, because it ignores the evidence brought on record as to the nature of processes employed in the erection of the machine, the manner in which it is installed and rendered functional, and other relevant facts which may lead one to conclude that what emerged as a result was not merely a machine but something which is in the nature of being immovable, and if required to be moved, cannot be moved without first dismantling it, and then re-erecting it at some other place. Some of the other decisions which we shall hereafter notice clarify the position further.
In Quality Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, UP – 1995 (75) E.L.T. 17 (S.C.) = 1994 (12) TMI 75 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA; the facts were that a tube mill and welding head were erected and installed by the appellant, a manufacturer of steel pipes and t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

le or capable of being brought to market. Goods which are attached to the earth and thus become immoveable do not satisfy the test of being goods within the meaning of the Act nor it can be said to be capable of being brought to the market for being bought and sold. Therefore, both the tests, as explained by this Court, were not satisfied in the case of appellant as the tube mill or welding head having been erected and installed in the premises and embedded to earth they ceased to be goods within meaning of Section 3 of the Act.”
In Mittal Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE – 1996 (88) E.L.T. 622 (S.C.) = 1996 (11) TMI 66 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA; this Court was concerned with the exigibility to duty of mono vertical crystallisers which are used in sugar factories to exhaust molasses of sugar. The material on record described the functions and manufacturing process. A mono vertical crystaliser is fixed on a solid RCC slab having a load bearing capacity of about 30 tons per square mete

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat the mono vertical crystalliser has to be assembled, erected and attached to the earth by a foundation at the site of the sugar factory. It is not capable of being sold as it is, without anything more. This Court, therefore, concluded that mono vertical crystallisers are not “goods” within the meaning of the Act and, therefore, not exigible to excise duty. In Triveni Engineering & Indus. Ltd. v. CCE – 2000 (120) E.L.T. 273 = 2000 (8) TMI 86 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA; a question arose regarding excisability of turbo alternator. In the facts of that case, it was held that installation or erection of turbo alternator on a concrete base specially constructed on the land cannot be treated as a common base and, therefore, it follows that installation or erection of turbo alternator on the platform constructed on the land would be immovable property, as such it cannot be an excisable goods falling within the meaning of Heading 85.02. In reaching this conclusion this Court considered the ear

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

facts and circumstances of each case.”
It was also held that the decision of this Court in Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad – 1998 (97) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) = 1997 (12) TMI 109 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. must be viewed in the light of the findings recorded by the CEGAT therein, that the whole purpose behind attaching the machine to a concrete base was to prevent wobbling of the machine and to secure maximum operational efficiency and also safety. In view of those findings it was not possible to hold that the machinery assembled and erected by the appellant at its factory site was immovable property as something attached to earth like a building or a tree.
Keeping in view the principles laid down in the judgments noticed above, and having regard to the facts of this case, we have no doubt in our mind that the mudguns and the drilling machines erected at site by the appellant on a specially made concrete platform at a level of 25 feet above the ground on a ba

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e in hand. It cannot be disputed that such drilling machines and mudguns are not equipments which are usually shifted from one place to another, nor it is practicable to shift them frequently. Counsel for the appellant submitted before us that once they are erected and assembled they continue to operate from where they are positioned till such time as they are worn out or discarded. According to him they really become a component of the plant and machinery because without their aid a blast furnace cannot operate, it is not necessary for us to express any opinion as to whether the mudgun and the drilling machines are really a component of the plant and machinery of the steel plant, but we are satisfied that having regard to the manner in which these machines are erected and installed upon concrete structures, they do not answer the description of “goods” within the meaning of the term in the Excise Act.
Thus, it can be seen that the Hon. Supreme Court while holding the machines as immo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mp sum price for the entire contract. Hence the said EPC contract cannot be split in two separate contracts one of supply of goods and another that of services and taxed accordingly.
n) Explanations covered under point i) and m) of 5. Findings, Analysis and Conclusion satisfactorily addresses additional queries raised by applicant during personal hearing.
6. Based on above facts along with provision of law it is observed: –
1) That the Solar Power Plant is a big project and has a permanent location as it is meant for onward sale of power to the consumer. Contract between an EPC contractor and the counter-party is entered into on the premise that the plant would continue to be situated at the place of construction. Such plant would therefore have an inherent element of permanency.
2) The output of the project i.e. Electricity, would be available to an identifiable segment of consumer. Thus this output supply would involve an element of permanency for which it would not be possible a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

which there is a single lump sum price for the entire contract. Hence for convenience of contractor the said EPC contract cannot be split in two separate contracts one for supply of goods and another for supply of services and taxed accordingly.
6) An Overview of all makes us observe that the impugned transaction for EPC Contract for the Solar Power Plant which includes engineering, design, procurement, supply, development, testing and commissioning is a “works contract” in terms of clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act.
7) Since the impugned transaction for EPC Contract for the Solar Power Plant is a works contract under section 2(119) as supply of services hence question of principal supply does not arise and so GST tax rate of Solar power Generating System under notification No 01/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, at S. No. 234, under HSN Classification 84, 85 and 94 is not applicable.
RULING
As per the statement of facts submitted by the applicant, the scope of work in respec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

New Guidelines on GST Refund Claims for UIN Entities: Streamlined Process to Enhance Efficiency and Transparency.

New Guidelines on GST Refund Claims for UIN Entities: Streamlined Process to Enhance Efficiency and Transparency.
Circulars
GST
Clarification regarding processing of refund claims filed by UI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

New Rules for Inspecting Goods in Transit: Streamlined Process for Detaining, Releasing, and Confiscating under GST Regulations.

New Rules for Inspecting Goods in Transit: Streamlined Process for Detaining, Releasing, and Confiscating under GST Regulations.
Circulars
GST
Modification of the procedure for interception o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC 04 GST return -Service provider as a job worker – to be filed or not to be filed

ITC 04 GST return -Service provider as a job worker – to be filed or not to be filed
Query (Issue) Started By: – venkataraman swaminathan Dated:- 14-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 14-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Sir
We are a job worker doing job work for our customer " X " . Registered with GST and paying GST undder SAC code.
Customer is giving all raw materials / components etc. and doiong machining / assembly and send back the FG to sutomer under DC .For our Labour charges we are paying GST under SAC Code.
for the Raw materials /components given by our Principal/ ie. by our customer , we need to send WIP components to our s/c vendors for further processing like machining / plating / painti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Composition rate of tax to Bakery

Composition rate of tax to Bakery
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ravikumar Doddi Dated:- 14-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 26-7-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear sir,
Dealer is running bakery, he manufacture some of the items like, cakes, pastries, bread and like items and he will also trade biscuits and chocolates, cool drinks getting it from GST dealers , doing across the counter sales and partly service. Kindly clarify what is the rate of tax in composition.
Repl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST late fee waiver scheme launched and GSTR1 filing date extended*

GST late fee waiver scheme launched and GSTR1 filing date extended*
By: – Sandeep Rawat
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 14-9-2018

GST late fee waiver scheme launched and GSTR-1 filing date extended*
It has been observed that the number of taxpayers who have filed FORM GSTR-3B is substantially higher than the number of taxpayers who have furnished FORM GSTR-1.
✔Non-furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 is liable to late fee and penalty as per the provisions of the GST law.
✔In order to encourage taxpayers to furnish FORM GSTR-1, a one-time scheme to waive off late fee payable for delayed furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for the period from July, 2017 to September, 2018 till 31.10.2018 has been launched.
✔In this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, or whose principal place of business is in Kodagu (Karnataka) and Mahe (Puducherry), the due date for furnishing FORM GSTR-1 for the quarter July, 2018 to September, 2018 would continue to remain as 15th November, 2018 as notified vide notification No. 38/2018-Central Tax dated 24th August, 2018.
✔ Further, for those taxpayers who will now be migrating to GST as per the procedure specified in notification No. 31/2018-Central Tax, dated 06.08.2018, the last date for furnishing the details of outward supplies of goods or services or both in FORM GSTR-1 and for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of July, 2017 to November, 2018 has been extended till 31.12.2018.
✔ Notification Nos. 45, 46 and 47/2018 – Central Ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LEVY OF GST ON EXTRA NEUTRAL ALCOHOL (ENA)

LEVY OF GST ON EXTRA NEUTRAL ALCOHOL (ENA)
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 14-9-2018

The year 2018 so far has seen revival of demand of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) by 2-3 percent, which was in negative for last two years. The slow down during 2016-2018 was mainly due to adverse effect of demonetization in November, 2016 followed by highway sale ban by Supreme Court in March, 2017 and then GST w.e.f. 1st July, 2017. The impact of all these reasons has now been stabilized and business is returning to near normal now.
On whether to include a alcoholic beverages and alcohol into GST ambit is still a big question mark. The GST Council, the supreme body to take decisions on GST under the Constitution, is expected to take first steps in this direction but that will happen only when all the states are on board. With opposition (political parties other than the ruling party at centre) still governing few States / Union Territories, consensus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are required to be registered under GST Act and GST is to be levied on the supply of ENA @18% GST in terms of Entry No. 25 of Schedule-III of the Notification No. 1/2017-State Tax (Rate), dated 30.06.2017 and 1/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2018.
The relevant clarification reads as under:
“This is with reference to the issue raised on the captioned subject during the Video Conference held on 30.06.2018. This matter was discussed in the 20th meeting of GST Council on 05.08.17 wherein it was decided to obtain legal opinion of Attorney General of India. Attorney General of India vide reference no AGI 6/2017-Adv.C dt 03.12.18 has given following opinion on the issue:
'ENA typically contains 95% alcohol by volume and as such is not fit for human consumption. Under article 246A (1) read with 366(12A), GST cannot be levied on the supply of “alcoholic liquor for human consumption”. ENA that is used for manufacture of alcoholic liquor is not supply for the purpose of human consumption as it is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

jected to GST whereas output, i.e., alco-beverages being out of GST net, leading to enhanced cost of production without any set off benefit of input taxes in the form of GST.
While it may be technically correct to levy GST on ENA as it is not a potable liquor (meant for human consumption), yet it will bring in more distortions but of course, more revenue too to the exchequer. However, the VAT paid on the purchase of ENA can be used as a set-off on the VAT payable on sale of potable alcohol. But, if ENA is subject to the GST, input tax credit will no longer be available. While ENA is a major input for alco-beverage sector, it is also used in cosmetic, pharmaceutical and perfume formulations. There it would be allowed a set off and will therefore, be a welcome change.
GST or no GST, be it on raw material and inputs or the output supply, alco-beverage sector is facing challenge on costing front which accrues because of GST. The only possible solution lies in two fold strategy -one, to r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reconciliation Statement

Reconciliation Statement
GSTR – 09C
GST
2[FORM GSTR-9C
See rule 80(3)
PART – A – Reconciliation Statement
Pt. I
Basic Details
 
1
Financial Year
 
 
2
GSTIN
 
 
3A
Legal Name
< Auto>
 
3B
Trade Name (if any)
< Auto>
 
4
Are you liable to audit under any Act?
<< Please specify >>
 
 
 
(Amount in Rs.in all tables)
 
Pt. II
Reconciliation of turnover declared in audited Annual Financial Statement with turnover declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
 
5
Reconciliation of Gross Turnover
 
A
Turnover (including exports) as per audited financial statements for the State / UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN the turnover shall be derived from the audited Annual Financial Statement)
 
B
Unbilled revenue at the beginning of Financial Year
(+)
 
C
Unadjusted advances at the end of the Financial Year
(+)
 
D
Deemed Supply under Schedule I
(+)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fter adjustments as above
 < Auto >
Q
Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
 
R
Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P)
AT1
6
Reasons for Un – Reconciled difference in Annual Gross Turnover
A
Reason 1
<> 
B
Reason 2
<> 
C
Reason 3
<> 
7
Reconciliation of Taxable Turnover
A
Annual turnover after adjustments (from 5P above)
 < Auto >
B
Value of Exempted, Nil Rated, Non-GST supplies, No-Supply turnover
 
C
Zero rated supplies without payment of tax
 
D
Supplies on which tax is to be paid by the recipient on reverse charge basis
 
35[D1
Supplies on which tax is to be paid by ecommerce operators as per sub-section (5) of section 9 [Supplier to report]
]
E
Taxable turnover as per adjustments above 36[(A-B-C-D-D1)]
 < Auto >
F
Taxable turnover as per liability declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
 
G
Unreconciled taxable turnover (F-E)
AT 2
8
Reasons for Un – Reconciled

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

 
 
16[K-1
Others
 
 
 
 
]
37[K-2
Supplies on which ecommerce operator is required to pay tax as per sub-section (5) of section 9 [Ecommerce operator to report]
NA
 
 
 
]
L
Interest
 
 
 
 
 
M
Late Fee
 
 
 
 
 
N
Penalty
 
 
 
 
 
O
Others
 
 
 
 
 
P
Total amount to be paid as per tables above
 
 
 
 
 
Q
Total amount 38[payable] as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9)
 
 
 
 
 
R
Un- reconciled payment of amount (PT1)
 
 
 
 
 
10
Reasons for un-reconciled payment of amount
A
Reason 1
<> 
B
Reason 2
<> 
C
Reason 3
<> 
11
Additional amount payable but not paid (due to reasons specified under Tables 6,8 and 10 above)
 
 
 
To be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bsp;
 
Pt. IV
Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC)
12
Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC)
A
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN this should be derived from books of accounts)
 
B
ITC booked in earlier Financial Years claimed in current Financial Year
(+)
 
C
ITC booked in current Financial Year to be claimed in subsequent Financial Years
(-)
 
D
ITC availed as per audited financial statements or books of account
 
E
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9)
 
F
Un-reconciled ITC
ITC 1
13
Reasons for un-reconciled difference in ITC
A
Reason 1
 <>
B
Reason 2
 <>
C
Reason 3
 <>
14
Reconciliation of ITC declared in Annual Return (GSTR9) with ITC availed on expenses as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account
 
Description
Value
Amount of Total ITC
Amount of eligible ITC availed
&nbsp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gible ITC availed
 
 
<> 
S
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9)
 
 
 
T
Un-reconciled ITC (ITC 2)
 
 
 
15
Reasons for un – reconciled difference in ITC
A
Reason 1
<> 
B
Reason 2
<> 
C
Reason 3
<> 
16
Tax payable on un-reconciled difference in ITC (due to reasons specified in 13 and 15 above)
 
Description
 Amount Payable
Central Tax
 
State/UT Tax
 
Integrated Tax
 
Cess
 
Interest
 
Penalty
 
Pt. V
18[Additional Liability due to non-reconciliation]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To be paid through 41[cash or ITC]
Description
Value
Central tax
State tax / UT tax
 Integrated tax
Cess, if applicable
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
 
 
 
 
 
29[6%]
 
 
 
 
 
12%
 
 
 
 
 
18%
 
 
 
&n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;
 
 
 
 
 
Description
Payable
Paid
 
1
2
3
A
Integrated Tax
 
 
B
Central Tax
 
 
C
State Tax/UT Tax
 
]
20[Verification of registered person:
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct and nothing has been concealed there from. I am uploading this self-certified reconciliation statement in FORM GSTR-9C. I am also uploading other statements, as applicable, including financial statement, profit and loss account and balance sheet, etc.]
Signature
Place:
Date:
Name of Authorized Signatory
Designation/status
Instructions: –
1. Terms used:
(a) GSTIN: Goods and Services Tax Identification Number
2. It is mandatory to file all your FORM GSTR-1, FORM GSTR-3B and FORM GSTR -9 for the 3[current financial year] before filing this return. 4[For FY 2017-18,] the details for the period between July 2017 to March 2018 are to be prov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons / entities having presence over multiple States.
5B
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting in the last financial year and was carried forward to the current financial year shall be declared here. 5[For 14[FY 2017-18, 21[2018-19, 25[2019-20, 30[2020-21, 32[2021-22, 44[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O.] In other words, when GST is payable during the financial year on such revenue (which was recognized earlier), the value of such revenue shall be declared here. (For example, if rupees Ten Crores of unbilled revenue existed for the financial year 2016-17, and during the current financial year, GST was paid on rupees Four Crores of such revenue, then value of rupees Four Cro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f credit notes which were issued after 31st of March for any supply accounted in the current financial year but such credit notes were reflected in the annual return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here. 7[For 14[FY 2017-18, 21[2018-19, 25[2019-20, 33[2020-21, 2021-22, 47[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O.]
5F
Trade discounts which are accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but on which GST was leviable (being not permissible) shall be declared here. 7[For 14[FY 2017-18, 21[2018-19, 25[2019-20, 33[2020-21, 2021-22, 48[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O.]
5G
Turnover included in the audited Annual Financial Statement for April 2017 to June 2017 shall b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

all have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O.]
5J
Aggregate value of credit notes which have been accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but were not admissible under Section 34 of the CGST Act shall be declared here. 9[For 14[FY 2017-18, 21[2018-19, 25[2019-20, 33[2020-21, 2021-22, 51[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O.]
5K
Aggregate value of all goods supplied by SEZs to DTA units for which the DTA units have filed bill of entry shall be declared here. 9[For 14[FY 2017-18, 21[2018-19, 25[2019-20, 33[2020-21, 2021-22, 52[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s shall be declared here. 9[For 14[FY 2017-18, 21[2018-19, 25[2019-20, 33[2020-21, 2021-22, 54[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O.]
5N
Any difference between the turnover reported in the Annual Return (GSTR9) and turnover reported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to foreign exchange fluctuations shall be declared here. 9[For 14[FY 2017-18, 21[2018-19, 25[2019-20, 33[2020-21, 2021-22, 55[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this table. If there are any adjustments required to be reported then the same may be reported in Table 5O.]
5O
Any difference between the turnover reported in the Annual Return (GSTR9) and turnover reported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to reasons not listed above shall be declared here.
5Q
Annual turnover as declared in t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e paid by the recipient shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any.
56[7D1
Supplies on which tax is to be paid by e-commerce operators as per sub-section (5) of section 9 shall be declared here by the supplier.]
7E
The taxable turnover is derived as the difference between the annual turnover after adjustments declared in Table 7A above and the sum of all supplies (exempted, non-GST, 57[reverse charge, supplies made sub-under section (5) of section 9 etc.) declared in Table 7B, 7C, and 7D and 7D1 above.]
7F
Taxable turnover as declared in Table 58[(4N – 4G- 4G1)] + (10-11) of the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here.
8
Reasons for non-reconciliation between adjusted annual taxable turnover as derived from Table 7E above and the taxable turnover declared in Table 7F shall be specified here.
 
5. Part III consists of reconciliation of the tax payable as per declaration in the reconciliation statement and t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e 6, 8 and 10 above shall be declared here.
 
6. Part IV consists of reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The instructions to fill Part IV are as under:-
Table No.
Instructions
12A
ITC availed (after reversals) as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. There may be cases where multiple GSTINs (State-wise) registrations exist on the same PAN. This is common for persons / entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their ITC for each individual GSTIN and declare the same here. It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons / entities having presence over multiple States.
12B
Any ITC which was booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement of earlier financial year(s) but availed in the ITC ledger in the financial year for which the reconciliation statement is being filed for shall be declared here. This s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2E) availed in the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be specified here.
14
This table is for reconciliation of ITC declared in the Annual Return (GSTR9) against the expenses booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account. The various sub-heads specified under this table are general expenses in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account on which ITC may or may not be available. Further, this is only an indicative list of heads under which expenses are generally booked. Taxpayers may add or delete any of these heads but all heads of expenses on which GST has been paid / was payable are to be declared here. 12[For 15[FY 2017-18, 22[2018-19, 26[2019-20, 31[2020-21, 34[2021-22, 59[2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25]]]]]], the registered person shall have an option to not fill this Table.]
14R
Total ITC declared in Table 14A to 14Q above shall be auto populated here.
14S
Net ITC availed as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here. Table 7J

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

drop down provided in FORM DRC-03. It may be noted that such liability shall be paid through electronic cash ledger 61[or electronic credit ledger].
24[****]
 
 
*******
Notes
1. Inserted vide Notification No. 49/2018 – Central Tax dated 13-09-2018
2. Substituted vide Notification No. 74/2018 – Central Tax dated 31-12-2018 before it was read as
“1[FORM GSTR-9C
See rule 80(3)
PART – A – Reconciliation Statement
Pt. I
Basic Details
1
Financial Year
 
2
GSTIN
 
3A
Legal Name
<  Auto >
3B
Trade Name
(if any)
< Auto >
4
   Are you liable to audit under any Act?                    << Please specify >>
 
 
(Amount in Rs. in all tables)
Pt. II
Reconciliation of turnover declared in audited Annual Financial Statement with turnover declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
5
Reconciliation of Gross Turnover
A
Turnover (including exports) as per audited fina

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

supply of goods by SEZ units to DTA Units
(-)
 
L
Turnover for the period under composition scheme 
(-)
 
M
Adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder 
(+/-
)
 
N
Adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations
(+/-
)
 
O
Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not listed above 
(+/-
)
 
P
Annual turnover after adjustments as above
< Auto >
Q
Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
 
R
Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P)
AT1
6
Reasons for Un – Reconciled difference in Annual Gross Turnover
A
B
C
Reason 1 
<< Text >>
Reason 2
<< Text >>
Reason 3
<< Text >>
7
Reconciliation of Taxable Turnover
A
Annual turnover after adjustments (from 5P above)
 < Auto  >    
B
Value of Exempted, Nil Rated, Non-GST supplies, No-Supply turnover
 
C
D
E
F
Zero rated supplies without payment of tax
 
Supplies on whi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

p;
 
18%
 
 
 
 
 
18% (RC)
 
 
 
      
 
28%
 
 
 
 
 
28% (RC)
 
 
 
      
 
I
J
K
L
M
N
3%
 
 
 
 
 
0.25%
 
 
 
 
 
0.10%
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
 
 
 
 
 
Late Fee
 
 
 
 
 
Penalty
  
 
 
 
 
O
Others 
 
 
 
 
 
P
 Total amount to be paid as per tables above
 < Auto >
< Auto >
 < Auto >
< Auto >
Q
  Total amount paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9)
 
 
 
 
R
Un-reconciled payment of amount
PT 1
10
Reasons for un-reconciled payment of amount
A
B
Reas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nbsp; 
 
Penalty
      
 
 
      
 
 
Others
(please specify)
      
 
 
      
 
Pt.
Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) 
IV
 
12
Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC)
A
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN this should be derived from books of accounts)
 
B
ITC booked in earlier Financial Years claimed in current
Financial Year
(+)
 
C
ITC booked in current Financial Year to be claimed in subsequent Financial Years
(-)
 
D
ITC availed as per audited financial statements or books of account 
 < Auto >
E
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9)
      
F
Un-reconciled ITC 
ITC 1 
13
Reasons for un-reconciled

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;
 
 
Entertainment charges
 
 
 
Stationery Expenses
(including postage etc.)
 
 
 
Repair and Maintenance
 
 
 
N
Other Miscellaneous expenses
 
 
 
O
P
Capital goods
 
 
      
Any other expense 1
 
 
 
Q
Any other expense 2
 
 
 
R
Total amount of eligible ITC availed
<> 
S
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9)
      
T
Un-reconciled ITC
ITC 2 
15
Reasons for un – reconciled difference in ITC
A
Reason 1 
<< Text >>  
B
C
Reason 2
<< Text >>  
Reason 3
<< Text >>  
16
Tax payable on un-reconciled difference in ITC (due to reasons specified in 13 and 15 above)
 
 
 
Description
 Amount Payable
Central Tax
 
State/UT Tax
 
Integrated Tax
 

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;
 
      
 
Penalty
      
 
 
      
 
 
Any other amount paid for supplies not included in Annual Return (GSTR 9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Erroneous refund to be paid back
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding demands to be settled
 
 
 
 
 
Other (Pl. specify)
      
 
 
      
 
 
Verification:
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from.
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor) 
Place: …………… 
Name of the signatory ………………… 
Membership No………………
Date: …………… 
F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

me PAN. This is common for persons / entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their GSTIN wise turnover and declare the same here. This shall include export turnover (if any). It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons / entities having presence over multiple States.
5B
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting in the last financial year and was carried forward to the current financial year shall be declared here. In other words, when GST is payable during the financial year on such revenue (which was recognized earlier), the value of such revenue shall be declared here. 
(For example, if rupees Ten  Crores of unbilled revenue existed for the financial year 2016-17, and during the current financial year, GST was paid on rupees Four  Crores of such revenue, then v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

led revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting during the current financial year but GST was not payable on such revenue in the same financial year shall be declared here. 
5I
Value of all advances for which GST has not been paid but the same has been recognized as revenue in the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. 
5J
Aggregate value of credit notes which have been accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but were not admissible under Section 34 of the CGST Act shall be declared here. 
5K
Aggregate value of all goods supplied by SEZs to DTA units for which the DTA units have filed bill of entry shall be declared here. 
5L
There may be cases where registered persons might have opted out of the composition scheme during the current financial year. Their turnover as per the audited Annual Financial Statement would include turnover both as composition taxpayer as well as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is turnover may be derived from Sr. No. 5N, 10 and 11 of Annual  Return (GSTR 9). 
6
Reasons for non-reconciliation between the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement and turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be specified here. 
7
The table provides for reconciliation of taxable turnover from the audited annual turnover after adjustments with the taxable turnover declared in annual return (GSTR-9).
7A
Annual turnover as derived in Table 5P above would be auto-populated here. 
7B
Value of exempted, nil rated, non-GST and no-supply turnover shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any. 
7C
Value of zero rated supplies (including supplies to SEZs) on which tax is not paid shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any.
7D
Value of reverse charge supplies on which tax is to be paid by the recipien

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9). Under the head labelled ―RC‖, supplies where tax was paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient (i.e. the person for whom reconciliation statement has been prepared ) shall be declared.  
9P
The total amount to be paid as per liability declared in Table 9A to 9O is auto populated here.
9Q
The amount payable as declared in Table 9 of the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here. It should also contain any differential tax paid on Table 10 or 11 of the Annual Return (GSTR9). 
10
Reasons for non-reconciliation between payable / liability declared in Table 9P above and the amount payable in Table 9Q shall be specified here.  
11
Any amount which is payable due to reasons specified under Table 6, 8 and 10 above shall be declared here.
 
6.   Part IV consists of reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The instructions to fill Part IV are as under:-
Table No.
Instructions

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

current financial year but the same has not been credited to the ITC ledger for the said financial year shall be declared here.
12D
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of accounts as derived from values declared in Table 12A, 12B and 12C above will be auto-populated here.
12E
Net ITC available for utilization as declared in Table 7J of Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here.
13
Reasons for non-reconciliation of ITC as per audited Annual Financial  Statement or books of account (Table 12D) and the net ITC (Table12E)  availed in the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be specified here.
14
This table is for reconciliation of ITC declared in the Annual Return (GSTR9) against the expenses booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account. The various sub-heads specified under this table are general expenses in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account on which ITC may or may not be available. Further, this is o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to be paid for supplies not included in the Annual Return. Any refund which has been erroneously taken and shall be paid back to the Government shall also be declared in this table. Lastly, any other outstanding demands which is recommended to be settled by the auditor shall be declared in this Table. 
8.   Towards, the end of the reconciliation statement taxpayers shall be given an option to pay their taxes as recommended by the auditor. 
PART – B- CERTIFICATION
I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by the person who had conducted the audit:
 * I/we have examined the-
(a)   balance sheet as on ……… 
(b)   the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from …………..to ending on ……., and
(c)   the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ………..to ending on ………, – attached herewith, of M/s ……….

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit were not provided/partially provided to us. 
(B)   In *my/our opinion, proper books of account *have/have not been kept by the registered person so far as appears from*my/ our examination of the books. 
(C)   I/we certify that the balance sheet, the *profit and loss/income and expenditure account and the cash flow Statement are *in agreement/not in agreement with the books of account maintained at the Principal place of business at ……………………and **
……………………additional place of business within the State. 
4.   The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the CGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the CGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No. GSTR-9C. 
5.   In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to explanations given to *me/us, the p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

audit of the books of accounts and the financial statements of M/s.
…………………………………… (Name and address of the assessee with GSTIN) was conducted by M/s. …………………………………………………… (full name and address of auditor along with status), bearing membership number in pursuance of the provisions of the …………………………….Act, and *I/we annex hereto a copy of their audit report dated ……………………………. along with a copy of each of :- 
(a)   balance sheet as on ……… 
(b)   the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from …………..to ending on ……., 
(c)   the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ………..to ending on ………, and
(d)   documents declared by the said Act to be part of, or annexed to, the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account and balance shee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

…………………………………………………………………. 
(b)   ………………………………………………………………………………….. 
(c)   ………………………………………………………………………………….. 
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor) 
Place: …………… 
Name of the signatory ………………… 
Membership No………………
Date: …………… 
Full address ………………………]”
3. Substituted vide Notification No. 56/2019 – Central Tax dated 14-11-2019 before it was read as “FY 2017-18”
4. Inserted vide Notification No. 56/2019 – Central Tax dated 14-11-2019
5. Inserted vide Notification No. 56/2019 – Central Tax dated 14-11-2019
6. Inserted vide Notification No. 56/2019 – Central Tax dated 14-11-2019
7. Inserted vide Notification No. 56/20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, of M/s …………… (Name), ………………………………. (Address), …………………..(GSTIN).
2. Based on our audit I/we report that the said registered person-
*has maintained the books of accounts, records and documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder
*has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder:
1.
2.
3.
3. (a) *I/we report the following observations/ comments / discrepancies / inconsistencies; if
any:
…………………………………….
…………………………………….
3. (b) *I/we further report that, –
(A) *I/we have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit/ information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ions/qualifications, if any:
(a) ……………………………………………………………………………………
(b) ……………………………………………………………………………………
(c) ……………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor)
Place: ……………
Name of the signatory …………………
Membership No………………
Date: ……………
Full address ………………………
II. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by a person other than the person who had conducted the audit of the accounts:
*I/we report that the audit of the books of accounts and the financial statements of M/s. …………………………………… (Name and address of the assessee with GSTIN) was condu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder:
1.
2.
3.
3. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the CGST Act/SGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the CGST Act/SGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No.GSTR-9C.
4. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to examination of books of account including other relevant documents and explanations given to *me/us, the particulars given in the said Form No.9C are true and correct subject to the following observations/qualifications, if any:
(a) …………………………………………………………………………………..
(b) …………………………………………………………………………………..
(c) …………………………………………………………………………………..
………

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ax dated 30-07-2021 w.e.f. 01-08-2021
20. Substituted vide NOTIFICATION No. 30/2021-Central Tax dated 30-07-2021 w.e.f. 01-08-2021 before it was read as
“Verification:
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from.
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor)
Place: ……………
Name of the signatory …………………
Membership No………………
Date: ……………
Full address ………………………
Verification of registered person:
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that I am uploading the reconciliation statement in FORM GSTR-9C prepared and duly signed by the Auditor and nothing has been tampered or altered by me in the statement. I am also uploading other statements, as applicable, including financial statement, profit and loss account and balance sheet etc.”
21. Substituted vide NOTIFICATION No. 30/2021

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

01-08-2021 before it was read as
“13[PART – B- CERTIFICATION
I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by the person who had conducted the audit:
* I/we have examined the-
(a) balance sheet as on ………
(b) the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from …………..to ending on ……., and
(c) the cash flow statement (if available) for the period beginning from ………..to ending on ………, -attached herewith, of M/s …………… (Name), ………………………………. (Address), …………………..(GSTIN).
2. Based on our audit I/we report that the said registered person-
*has maintained the books of accounts, records and documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder *has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications mad

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

…………….and ** ……………………additional place of business within the State.
4. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the CGST Act / SGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the CGST Act / SGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No. GSTR-9C.
5. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to explanations given to *me/us, the particulars given in the said Form No.GSTR-9C are true and fair subject to following observations/qualifications, if any:
(a) ……………………………………………………………………………………
(b) ……………………………………………………………………………………
(c) ……………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Au

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

od beginning from …………..to ending on …….,
(c) the cash flow statement (if available) for the period beginning from ………..to ending on ………, and
(d) documents declared by the said Act to be part of, or annexed to, the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account and balance sheet.
2. I/we report that the said registered person-
*has maintained the books of accounts, records and documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder *has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder:
1.
2.
3.
3. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the CGST Act / SGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the CGST Act / SGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No.GSTR-9C.
4. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and accor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ated 05-07-2022 before it was read as, “2019-20 and 2020-21”
27. Inserted vide NOTIFICATION NO. 38/2023- Central Tax dated 04-08-2023
28. Inserted vide NOTIFICATION NO. 38/2023- Central Tax dated 04-08-2023
29. Inserted vide NOTIFICATION NO. 38/2023- Central Tax dated 04-08-2023
30. Substituted vide NOTIFICATION NO. 38/2023- Central Tax dated 04-08-2023 before it was read as, “2020-21 and 2021-22”
31. Substituted vide NOTIFICATION NO. 38/2023- Central Tax dated 04-08-2023 before it was read as, “2020-21 and 2021-22”
32. Substituted vide Notification No. 12/2024 – Central Tax dated 10-07-2024 w.e.f. 10-07-2024 before it was read as, “2021-22 and 2022-23”
33. Substituted vide Notification No. 12/2024 – Central Tax dated 10-07-2024 w.e.f. 10-07-2024 before it was read as, “2020-21 and 2021-22”
34. Substituted vide Notification No. 12/2024 – Central Tax dated 10-07-2024 w.e.f. 10-07-2024 before it was read as, “2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5 w.e.f. 22-09-2025
43. Inserted vide Notification No. 13/2025-Central Tax dated 17-09-2025 w.e.f. 22-09-2025
44. Substituted vide Notification No. 13/2025-Central Tax dated 17-09-2025 w.e.f. 22-09-2025 before it was read as, “2022-23 and 2023-24”
45. Substituted vide Notification No. 13/2025-Central Tax dated 17-09-2025 w.e.f. 22-09-2025 before it was read as, “2022-23 and 2023-24”
46. Substituted vide Notification No. 13/2025-Central Tax dated 17-09-2025 w.e.f. 22-09-2025 before it was read as, “2022-23 and 2023-24”
47. Substituted vide Notification No. 13/2025-Central Tax dated 17-09-2025 w.e.f. 22-09-2025 before it was read as, “2022-23 and 2023-24”
48. Substituted vide Notification No. 13/2025-Central Tax dated 17-09-2025 w.e.f. 22-09-2025 before it was read as, “2022-23 and 2023-24”
49. Substituted vide Notification No. 13/2025-Central Tax dated 17-09-2025 w.e.f. 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TDS Deduction u/s 51 of CGST Act Effective from October 1, 2018 for Payments to Suppliers.

TDS Deduction u/s 51 of CGST Act Effective from October 1, 2018 for Payments to Suppliers.
Notifications
GST
TDS liability u/s 51 of CGST Act, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 01-10-2018 – Persons

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rochem Separation Systems (India) Pvt Ltd Versus The Commissioner of CGST & CX, Palghar

Rochem Separation Systems (India) Pvt Ltd Versus The Commissioner of CGST & CX, Palghar
Central Excise
2019 (3) TMI 408 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 14-9-2018
APPEAL NO: E/87174/2018 – A/88315/2018
Central Excise
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial)
Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate for appellant
Shri M.R.Melvin, Superintendent (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: S.K. Mohanty
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 27.02.2018 passed by the Commissioner of CGST & CX, Bhiwandi.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of water purification plants, falling under Chapter heading 8421 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant avails Cenvat Credit in respect of central excise duty paid on inputs and capital goods and service tax on the input services. During the disputed period, the appellant had claimed duty exemption in respect of supply of the said final product to specified buye

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

file the refund application under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 instead of taking re-credit on its own.
3. The Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that taking of re-credit is merely a technical correction/adjustment of an erroneous accounting entry passed earlier and not fresh availment of credit. Thus, he submits that the provisions of Section 11 B of the Act shall not be applicable. In this context, Learned Advocate has relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case on ICMC Corporation Ltd. Vs. CESTAT, Chennai reported in 2014 (302) ELT 45 (Mad.) and Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Krishnav Engineering Ltd. Vs. CESTAT reported in 2016 (331) ELT 391 (All.). The Learned Advocate also relied on the decision of Bangalore Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Comm. Of C.E., C. & S.T., Bangalore Vs. Stumpp, Scheule & Somappa P. Ltd., reported in 2015 (319) ELT 146 (Tri. – Bang.).
4. On the other hand, Learned AR appearing for R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt paragraphs in the said judgment are extracted herein below:
“13. We do not subscribe to the view expressed by the Revenue. Admittedly, the assessee originally availed the Cenvat Credit on service Tax for discharging its liability. However, for sound reasons, it reversed the credit. Strictly speaking, in this process, there is only an account entry reversal and factually there is no outflow of funds from assessee to result in filing application under Section 11N of the Central Excise Act, 1944 claiming refund of duty. The contention of the revenue the even in reversal of the entry there is bound to be an unjust enrichment has no substance or based on any legal principle, since, what is availed off by the assessee is only a credit on the duty paid on the services rendered. Further, the assessee is entitled to take no9te of as per Rule 6(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. As there is no dispute of the fact that a sum of Rs. 3,21,308/- available as Cenvat Credit was in respect of inp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e subsequent conduct of the assessee for a follow up action on an amount of Rs. 3,21,308/-, which is only an account entry adjustment, technically speaking cannot be taken exception to either by Tribunal or for that atter by the Revenue. For this, we do not find any need for a finding to be given in the order of the Tribunal in the earlier round of litigation. 16. We do not for a moment deny the fact that a sum of Rs. 3,21,308/- for which suo motu credit was taken by the assessee was forming part of Rs. 5,38,796/- which was earlier reversed by the assessee. On the admitted fact, Rs. 3,21,308/- represented the enumerated input services as given under Rule 6(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, we have no hesitation in accepting the plea of the assessee that on a technical adjustment made, the question of unjust enrichment as a concept does not arise at all for the assessee to go by Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
17. In the circumstances, we set aside the order of the Trib

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GOOD FORTUNE CAPITALS (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF GST & C. EX., SALEM

GOOD FORTUNE CAPITALS (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF GST & C. EX., SALEM
Service Tax
2019 (2) TMI 762 – CESTAT CHENNAI – 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 44 (Tri. – Chennai)
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 14-9-2018
Appeal No. ST/40554/2018-SM – Final Order No. 42431/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (J)
Shri S. Kannapan, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR), for the Respondent.
ORDER
The appellants are engaged in providing 'Stock Broker Service'. A show cause notice was issued to them, inter alia, alleging that they failed to file ST-3 returns within due time, and proposing to demand the late fee, for not filing the returns, within the due time. After adjudication, the original authority, inter alia, confirmed the demand on this allegation against which the appellants filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). Vide order impugned herein, the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand of late fee regarding ST-3 returns filed for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f the appellants.
3. The Learned Authorised Representative Shri B. Balamurugan supported the ported the findings in the impugned order. He adverted to para 10 of the impugned order and submitted that the appellants ought to have approached the department and sorted out the problem. Since the appellants had not produced any evidence to show that they have taken up the problem with the department, the Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the demand for the periods from 7/2012 to 9/2012, 10/2012 to 3/2013 and 4/2013 to 9/2013. He submitted that the demand raised is legal and proper as the appellants have delayed in filing ST-3 returns.
4. Heard both sides.
5. The only issue arising for consideration is whether the demand raised in respect of late fee, for the delayed filing of returns, is correct and proper. The appellants submit that they could not file the returns electronically due to system failure and they had submitted the returns manually. In pages 56, 71 and 86 of the appeal paper

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en the problem to the department, I find that the appellants have produced screen shots of the returns filed to the department, which bears the signature of the officer concerned. The department having acknowledged the manually filed returns, ought to have taken steps to help or assist the appellants to solve the problem. Thus, the appellants cannot be found fault in the present case for the cause of delay in filing the returns.
6. After hearing on 12-6-2018, the Learned Authorised Representative sought time to get clarification from the department as to whether the appellants have filed the returns manually or not. The Learned Authorised Representative has submitted that he has intimated the matter to the department by letter dated 14-6-2018. The case was then posted to 3-8-2018 for getting report from the department. It was adjourned on the request of the department as they sought time. Still no reply has been received from the department. It is presumed that the department has no r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Sri Kannchi Steel Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai Outer Commissionerate

M/s. Sri Kannchi Steel Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai Outer Commissionerate
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 1137 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 14-9-2018
Appeal No. E/361/2012 – Final Order No. 42417/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri S. Venkatachalam, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The appellants were engaged in manufacture of non-alloy steel and hot re-rolled products etc. During the period from 1.9.1997 to 31.3.2000, the said products were brought under compounded levy scheme of payment of excise duty as contained in proviso to section 3A(3) of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. Accordingly, the ACP of the appellant's mill was determined by the Commissioner and communicated to them. The appellant o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has not complied with sub-clause (a) of sub-rule (2) of Rule 96ZP of Central Excise Rules, 1944. He adverted to para 4 and 4.1 of the impugned order and submitted that though the appellant has given intimations vide letters dated 1.10.1998 and 1.10.1999 regarding the shutdown of the rolling mill, the department has denied receiving such letters and therefore rejected the abatement claims. It is submitted by him that as per letter dated 6.5.2003, the department themselves have permitted copies of the said letters on request made by the appellant. That therefore they cannot deny receipt of such letters. Further, on merits, he relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Chamundi Steel Castings (India) Ltd. vide Final Order No. 42364 & 42365/2017 dated 26.9.2017 and argued that the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Chamundi Steel Castings (India) Ltd. has held that the assessee would be eligible for abatement on pro-rata basis during the period of closure o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.10.1999 to the appellant. The only strong inference that can be drawn from this letter is that the intimations regarding the closure of the factory was received by the department. Therefore, the rejection of abatement on the ground that appellant did not give intimations cannot sustain. The Hon'ble High Court in the case of Chamundi Steel Castings (India) Ltd. (supra), had observed that the assessee was eligible for abatement on pro-rata basis and the said decision was followed by the Tribunal in the final order referred supra. Taking the facts of the case into consideration as well as the provision of law and the decision of the Hon'ble High Court followed by us in the above stated final order, we are of the considered view that the rejection of abatement is without basis. The impugned order rejecting the abatement cannot sustain and requires to be set aside which we hereby do. The appeal is therefore allowed with consequential relief if any.
(Pronounced in court on 14.09.2018)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Shriram EPC Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai

M/s. Shriram EPC Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1083 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 14-9-2018
Appeal Nos. ST/410/2011 and ST/41631 to 41633/2014 – Final Order Nos. 42412-42415/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri N. Viswanathan, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in supply, erection and commissioning of sewage treatment plant, PVC pipe line for water supply projects to Water and Sewage Board. They obtained service tax registration for various services. In the course of audit of accounts, it was noticed by the department that appellants have not paid service tax for the following services from 1.4.2008 that is engineering, procurement, erection and commissioning of sewage treatment plant and implem

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

demand along with interest and also imposed penalties. Hence these appeals.
2. On behalf of the appellant Shri N. Viswanathan assisted by Shri R. Ravikumar submitted that the said works of erection and commissioning of sewage treatment plant, water treatment plant would fall under works contract service with effect from 1.6.2007. However, such services are provided in respect of non-commercial activities to the Government / Municipal bodies and therefore would fall under the exclusion clause of clause (b) of Section 65(105)(zzzza) of Finance Act, 1994 and therefore the said services are not subject to levy of service tax. The Commissioner in the said order for the period from 1.4.2008 to 31.3.2009 has confirmed the demand and refused to apply the decision in Lanco Infratech Ltd. – 2014 (34) STR 384 (Tri. Bang.) stating that the said decision was only an interim order. However, later the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Lanco Infratech Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sub-clause (b) of said section would apply. He submitted that the work was awarded by EPC/turnkey projects which involves designing, execution and handing over and therefore cannot be said that such activities merely because they are in the nature of EPC projects would fallout of the exemption provided in clause (b) of works contract service.
2.2 He also relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Jyoti Buildtech (P) Ltd. – 2017 (3) GSTL 116 and argued that in the said case, the Tribunal has granted the exemption and set aside the demand in respect of erection and commissioning for services rendered for water treatment plant, sewage treatment plant and sewage works.
3. The ld. AR Shri A. Cletus supported the findings in the impugned order. He adverted to the definition of works contract in section 65(105)(zzzza) and argued that the explanation clarifies the meaning of works contract. As per sub-clause (b) of the said explanation, only a pipe line or conduit which is not u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ax for the reason that the service of construction of water treatment plant and sewage treatment plant etc. were rendered to Government / Municipal bodies / Board and therefore are not of a commercial nature. It is the case of the department that since the projects were turnkey projects, it would fall under sub-clause (e) of the explanation to the definition of works contract service and that the said section does not exempt constructions which are not intended for commerce or industry. The ld. Counsel has put forward the arguments based on the decision in Lanco Infratech Ltd. (supra) stating that the exemption given to construction activities which are not commerce or industry envisaged in clause (b) has to be read along with clause (e) of the said explanation. The turnkey projects are only in the nature of contract which takes in all the works of design, engineering, procurement etc. In Lanco Infratech Ltd. (supra), the Larger Bench of the Tribunal had analyzed the issue and held tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rly, in Ramky Infrastructure Ltd., the Tribunal had held that such activities of construction of canals / pipelines or conduits undertaken for the Government / Government bodies would not attract levy of service tax being for non-commercial and non-industrial purpose.
5.2 The decision of the Larger Bench of Tribunal in Lanco Infratech Ltd. (supra) was approved by the jurisdictional High Court in the case of Indian Hume Pipes Co. Ltd. – 2015 (40) STR 214 (Mad.) wherein the services rendered by the assessee for laying of long distance pipelines to enable State Water Supply and Drainage Board for supply of water to the public was held to be non-commercial or non-industrial and therefore not taxable.
5.3 The Tribunal in the case of Jyoti Buildtech (P) Ltd. (supra), had occasion to analyze the demand of service tax on erection, commissioning and installation service on water treatment plant, sewage treatment plant etc. The Tribunal in the said decision followed the decision in the case of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

construction of sewage pumping station, water treatment plants, sewage treatment plant and sewage works. The SCN further observes that the appellant assessee had pleaded that the works of laying of pipelines for sewage etc. are not for commerce and trade and as such the same is exempted from service tax in terms of provisions of Explanation (ii)(b) of Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant contested the show cause notice and the same was adjudicated and the proposed demand confirmed observing, that applying the principle of classification as provided under sub-section (2) of Section 65A, sub-clause (ii)(b) of Section 65(105)(zzzza) of Finance Act, 1994, provides the most specific description of services of laying drains or pipes. Accordingly, it was held that services of laying pipelines and conduits is a taxable service as defined under “works contract” vide clause (ii)(a) of Explanation to Section 65(105)(zzzza) of Finance Act, 1994 and the appellant is liabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

period of limitation is not invocable.
4. The ld. AR for Revenue relies on the impugned order.
5. Having considered the rival contentions, we are satisfied that the issue now stands settled by the Larger Bench of this Tribunal in M/s. Lanco Infratech Ltd. (supra) and also confirmed by order of the Hon'ble Madras High Court (supra) in Indian Hume Pipes Ltd. wherein it has been held that such works executed by the appellant in the nature of sewerage works, laying of pipe and for water supply falling under Explanation (ii)(b) fall under the definition of “works contract service” and were also exempted under the classification commercial and industrial construction service prior to 1-6-2007, as explained by the Larger Bench. Further, we find that the issue is wholly interpretational and thus the longer period of limitation is not invocable under the facts and circumstances. Accordingly, we allow the appeal setting aside the impugned order, except the demand for normal period, if any, i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Jamna Pharmaceuticals Versus CGST, CCE, Bhopal

M/s Jamna Pharmaceuticals Versus CGST, CCE, Bhopal
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 667 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 14-9-2018
Excise Appeal No. 50576 of 2018 – A/53109/2018-EX[DB]
Central Excise
Shri C.L. Mahar, Member (Technical) And Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial)
Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate – for the appellant.
Shri H.C. Saini, Authorized Representative (DR) – for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per. C.L. Mahar :-
The brief of the matter are that the appellant is engaged in manufacture of patent and proprietary medicines and SHASTROKTA medicines falling under Central Excise Tariff Heading 30039011 of the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. The appellant have been availing SSI exemption from payment of central excise duty up to the turnover of Rs. 1.50 crore's as per Notification No. 8/2003 dated 01/03/2003. During the course of audit of the appellant on 26/04/2014 it was detected by the departmental audit party that the appellant during the f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

findings of order-in-original. The appellant is before us against the impugned order of learned Commissioner (Appeals).
2. The learned Advocate appearing for the appellants have contended that they were under genuine belief that while calculating the total turnover for availing SSI exemption the value of exempted goods may not be includable in the total turnover. It has been argued that the value of clearances of Ayurvedic patent and proprietary medicines were less then Rs. 400 lakhs in the preceding financial years 2008-2009 and 2009- 2010 and therefore they were under impression that no central excise duty is payable by them. It has further been submitted that the appellant were totally unaware of the fact that the clearance of value of Ayurvedic SHASTROKT medicines are also to be included for determining the total value of clearances of all excisable goods cleared for home consumption. It has also been contended that that there was no intention of the appellant to evade excise dut

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

T. 276 (S.C.)]
3. It has been contested by the appellant that they have furnished the true and correct value of clearances and same has been acknowledged by the department and therefore it cannot be alleged that they have suppressed any information with a purpose of evading central excise duty.
4. We have also heard the learned Departmental Representative who has reiterated the findings given in the order of Commissioner (Appeals).
5. We have heard both the sides and have also perused the record of appeal.
6. It is a matter of fact that while calculating aggregate value of clearances the appellant have not included the value of goods which were excisable but otherwise exempted vide Notification No. 3/2005 dated 24/02/2005 it is also a matter of record that that as per the conditions of Notification No. 8/2003 dated 01/03/2003 the value of exempted goods should have also been included while calculating the aggregate value of turnover in a particular financial year. It is apparent t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on the appellant is legally sustainable however we are also the view that since the appellant have truly declared their value of clearances to the Department vide their letter dated 01/04/2009 as well as 31/03/2010 wherein the value of both the patent and proprietary medicines as well as that of SHASHTROKTA medicines have specifically been mentioned by the appellant. We are therefore of the view that the appellant did not have any intention of evading central excise duty, at the same time we find that the charges of suppression, mis-declaration or fraudulent intention with the purpose of evading central excise duty, as is required for invoking the extended time proviso under Section 11A of Central Excise Act are not available in the in the facts of the matter. We therefore hold that demand is barred by period of limitation and therefore same is legally not sustainable
8. Accordingly we hold that the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order is without any merit and therefore we set aside the sam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited

In Re: M/s. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited
GST
2018 (11) TMI 446 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 135 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 14-9-2018
AAR/AP/13(GST)/2018 in Application AAR/18(GST)/2018
GST
SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sri. A.V.S Krishna Mohan (Authorized Representative)
Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: Received Remarks
Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act'2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section 99 of APGST Act'2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
M/s. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited (here in after called as 'applicant') having GSTIN : 37AAACG7891G1ZA, has filed an application in From GST ARA- 01 , dated: 30th June 2018, for seeking clarification on certain iss

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

offered their remarks through mail dated: 10.07.2018, stating that, there were no pending or passed proceedings on the issues raised by the applicant in his application.
At this juncture, a personal hearing opportunity has been given to the applicant, and served a notice of personal hearing notice on the applicant accordingly, with the scheduled date for personal hearing is 19th July 2018.
Sri. A.V.S Krishna Mohan, authorized representative, had attended and presented their submission before this authority.
Authority Discussion and Findings:
1. We have gone through the application filed by the applicant, supporting documents submitted and the explanation rendered during the personal hearing. The Applicant is a private limited company incorporated in India and is inter alia engaged in the design, manufacture, supply, and erection and commissioning of Air Cooled Condensers [ACC] and cooling towers for renewable energy devices.
2. The applicant received an order for manufacturing and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the applicant to the buyer for use in the waste-to-energy project is covered under Sl. No 234 of Schedule I of Notification 1/2017 dated 28.06.2017- Integrated Tax (Rate), Notification 1/2017 dated 28.06.2017- Central Tax (Rate) and G.O.Ms.No.258 dated 29.06.2017 CAP) as parts for the manufacture of waste to energy plants/devices, attracting IGST at the rate of 5% or CGST and APGST Rate of 2.5% and 2.5% respectively (GST Tariff Notifications) ?
It is seen that question is for supply of goods viz. ACC, without involving any supply of service and accordingly we take up the issue to discuss the same.
4.1 The relevant extract of the Notification 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated : 28.06.201 7 is as under…
S.No
Heading
Description
Rate
234.
84, 85 or 94
Following renewable energy devices & parts for their manufacture
(a) Bio-gas plant
(b) Solar power based devices
(c) Solar power generating system
(d) Wind mills, Wind Operated Electricity Generator (WOEG)
(e) Waste to en

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Srivet Hatcheries

In Re: M/s. Srivet Hatcheries
GST
2018 (11) TMI 445 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – [2018] 59 G S.T.R. 67 (AAR), 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 140 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 14-9-2018
AAR/AP/12(GST)/2018 in Application No. AAR/17(GST)/2018
GST
SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sri. J.V. Rao (Advocate)
Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: Received Remarks
Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act'2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section 99 of APGST Act'2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
M/s. SRIVET HATCHE

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. 102 falling under Chapter Heading No.2309?.
On verification of basic information of the applicant, it is observed that the applicant falls under State jurisdiction, i.e Vuyyuru Circle, of Vijayawada II Division (as per the bifurcation lists of tax payers between the Centre and State in the prescribed manner). Accordingly, the application has been forwarded to the jurisdictional officers and also a copy marked to the Central Tax authorities to offer their remarks as per the Sec. 98(1) of CGST/APGST Act'2017, and requested for the information.
In response to this communication, the concerned jurisdictional officer, offered their remarks, and stated that there are no proceedings pending relating to the applicant, and no proceedings are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

horus and calcium that helps meet animal / poultry requirements for these essential nutrients”.
Observations of the Authority:
We have gone through the labels of the products, viz Bio-fos being supplied by the applicant. The product is being marketed as “Mono calcium phosphate for animal and poultry feed” and “Mono calcium phosphate for animal, poultry and aqua feed”. It is further observed that their labels contain “Biofos” is a feed grade Mono calcium phosphate. We have seen the relevant notification, 2/2017 CGST Rate dt. 28.6.2017, entry 102, 105 which reads as under……..
Sl.No
Chapter heading, tariff
Description of the goods
102
2302, 2304, 2305, 2306, 2308, 2309
Aquatic feed including shrimp feed and prawn feed, poultry feed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =