M/s. Balaji Construction Company Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Commissioner State Gst, GSTN, (Goods And Service Tax Network, Joint Commissioner Of Sales Tax Department

M/s. Balaji Construction Company Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Commissioner State Gst, GSTN, (Goods And Service Tax Network, Joint Commissioner Of Sales Tax Department
GST
2018 (9) TMI 119 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 29-8-2018
S. B. Civil Writ No. 12825/2018
GST
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat
ORDER
It is stated that the petitioner had applied well in time for registration under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Kaya Designer Launge Versus CGST C.E & C. C-Bhopal

Kaya Designer Launge Versus CGST C.E & C. C-Bhopal
Service Tax
2018 (8) TMI 1688 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – 2019 (25) G. S. T. L. 98 (Tri. – Del.)
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 29-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/50256/2018-SMC – Final Order No. 52874/2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member ( Technical )
None for the appellant
Sh. K. Poddar, DR for the respondent
ORDER
Per : V. Padmanabhan
1. When the appeal was called, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri K. Poddar, Ld. DR is present on behalf of the Revenue. The appeal was adjourned at the request of appellant repeatedly at least six times. Even today none is present on behalf of the appellant. Since the appeal cannot be kept pending endlessly, I have no option but to take up the issue for decision on merit, even in the absence of the representative of the appellant.
2. Heard Ld. DR for the Revenue.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the stitching of cloths and occasion

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t of the total refund claimed as above, an amount of Rs. 1,63,305/- which was paid on 23/07/2014 and for which the refund claim was filed on 06/08/2015, will be barred by limitation of time as prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The rest of the refund claim was also rejected on merit. Aggrieved by the rejection of refund in the impugned order, the present appeal has been filed.
5. Heard Shri K. Poddar, Ld. DR. He submitted that the issue regarding the applicability of Section 11B for the Refund of Service Tax, has been decided by the Larger Bench in the case of Veer Overseas Ltd V/s Commissioner 2018-TIOL-1432-CESTAT-CHD-LB. The Larger Bench has taken the view that any refund of Service Tax will be covered within the time limits strictly specified by Section 11B and the same will also be applicable to any Service Tax which is paid in the mistaken notion that Service Tax was payable, even though there was no requirement to pay such tax. On merits also, Ld. DR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f the clarification as above by the CBEC, it is evident that no Service Tax can be charged on stitching/ tailoring charges under the category of Fashion Designing. Consequently, no Service Tax is payable on the stitching charges. The cost of raw materials used by the appellant and recovered from their customers also cannot be included for payment of Service Tax. Under the category of “Fashion Designing”. However, amounts recovered by the appellant towards the activity of designing such as design of Jodhpuri, blazer etc, which was carried out by the appellant at the request of the customers will squarely be covered within the category of fashion designing and Service Tax is liable to be paid for amounts recovered towards this.
8. The next I turn to the issue of limitation. The lower Authorities have given detailed findings that the Service Tax amounting to Rs. 1,63,305/- paid on 23/07/2014 and for which refund has been claimed on 06/08/2015, is hit by time limit under Section 11B. The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

long term lease of immovable property

long term lease of immovable property
Query (Issue) Started By: – vasanth kumar Dated:- 28-8-2018 Last Reply Date:- 29-8-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
whether gst is applicable on long term lease of immovable property where contract for lease was entered pre-gst amount received under pre-gst and term of lease continued under gst also
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
It is applicable.
Reply By vasanth kumar:
The Reply:
how to substantiate that it is applicable under gst, relevant provisions which supports under gst as well as service tax law?
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
The time of supply of service is completion of service or date of invoice . Even though the contract was ente

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

leviable on the said services under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994;
Reply By Pavan Mahulkar:
The Reply:
Typographical error
Please read Section 142 instead of Section 140
Reply By vasanth kumar:
The Reply:
Dear sir
in this situation how do we bifurcate as to how much value liable under service tax law and how much value attract gst as under long term lease lump sum payment was made under service tax law nothing was receivable under gst law
Reply By Pavan Mahulkar:
The Reply:
There's specific provision regarding Import under section 21 of IGST Act which could be helpful for understanding the provisions under section 142 of CGST Act
21. Import of services made on or after the appointed day shall be liable to tax under the pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Lions Club of Poona Kothrud

In Re: Lions Club of Poona Kothrud
GST
2018 (12) TMI 590 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 625 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 28-8-2018
GST-ARA-33/2018-19/B-100
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
RULING
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by LIONS CLUB OF POONA KOTHRUD, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following ISSUE.
Since the amount collected by individual Lions clubs and Lions District is for convenience of Lion members and pooled together only for paying Meeting expenses & communication expenses and the same is deposited in single b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ices.
2) These services are executed through various districts comprising of many Clubs.
3) In order to facilitate the meetings and administration fees are collected from members.
4) These amounts are then used for administration and meetings.
5) In some cases the amount so collected is likely to exceed Rs. 20 lacs, being the threshold for registration under GST Act, 2017.
Clarification as regards to “Nature of are three administrative layers:
1. Clubs in Lions
2.District of Lions:-Comprises Of many Clubs, normally 100 & above where district policies for the clubs are formulated.
3.Cabinet of District:- Comprises Of various member from Lion fraternity, who are head of various committee that conduct social activities.
Receipts of Lions Club cab be broadly divided into following categories-
1) Club receiving Fees from its members. These can be purely said to be collected to defray its expenditure on meetings and communication. No facilities/ benefits are provided su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2(84) of the CGST Act 2017. As per said definition, there is no deeming fiction to treat association and members as different persons. Hence the key condition to tax a transaction u/s that supplier and recipient must be different, is not satisfied. Hence the transaction of providing services by an association to its members should not be taxed u/s 7(1)(a). Earlier in Service Tax regime Court in several cases held that in absence of deeming fiction, treating club/association & its members as distinct person, service tax shall not be payable. Thereafter to nullify the above decision w. e. f. clause (a) to Explanation 3 to Sec. 65B provided that an unincorporated association or body of persons, as the case may be and a member thereof shall be treated as distinct persons. Such deeming fiction is not provided under the current GST regime.
WRITTEN SUBMISSION MADE BY applicant at the time of hearing on 08/08/2018
ISSUE UNDER CONSIDERATION:-
Lion Clubs are autonomous units those collect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the recent Malin, rune, landslide, helping over 50,000 people see again or taking over the education of abandoned families, Lions have created a huge impact on Indian society. The Lions Clubs International Foundation has provided US$ 901 million in grants globally of which India is the recipient of USS 84 million for 1535 projects. Through programs like Sight-First, Lions Quest and Opening Eyes, the Foundation provides essential grant funding to Lions Clubs so they can carry out ambitious projects.
Currently the three major projects running in India are Measles & Rubella, Diabetes and Sight First. India is the home to the most diverse of cultures, but each one of them has one thing in common- acceptability. Naturally, Lions India has been successful in building symbiotic growth systems among Lions across the country. As a result, strenuous activities such as raising awareness, organising camps, fundraising etc. have become simpler.
* Membership is open to all people of the community

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the administration and working of the Association and implementation of policies are established and are implemented on the concept of mutuality. Each member is equally represented with individual identity and status thereby, establishing the fact of complete transparency i.e. the identity between the contributors and the participators of the Association and Foundation.
Facts and Background –
1. The International Association of Lions Clubs also known as Lions Clubs International (LCI) is a non-profit making organization registered in Ilions, United States of America (USA) and has many members all over the globe.
2. Lions Club International Foundation (LCIF), charitable grant making arm of LCI is also a non-profit making charity organization registered in the State of Ilinois USA.
3. LCI pursues its charitable objective through LCIF in multifarious ways by building / running hospitals, clinics, schools, playgrounds, etc. other health care, charitable activities.
4. LCI and all i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of mutuality:-
The three conditions stipulated by the Judicial Committee in the case of English and Scottish Joint Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd. v. Commr. Of Agrl. I.T. (1948) 16 ITR 270 (PC) = 1948 (4) TMI 2 – PRIVY COUNCIL; existence of which establishes the doctrine of mutuality. They are as follows (page 559):
“(1) the identity of the contributors to the fund and the recipients from the fund,
(2) the treatment of the company, though incorporated, as a mere entity for the convenience of the members and policyholders, in other words as an instrument obedient to their mandate, and
(3) the impossibility that contributors should derive profits from contributions made by themselves to a fund which could only be expended or returned to themselves.”
In the case of CIT vs. Bankimpur Club Ltd. 226 ITR 97 = 1997 (5) TMI 392 – SUPREME COURT also the Hon'ble Court discussed the principles of mutuality and at page 103 held as follows:
It should be noticed that in the case of a “mut

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d should willy-nilly distribute the surplus amongst themselves : it is enough if they have a right of disposal over the surplus, and in exercise of that right they may agree that on winding up the surplus will be transferred to a similar association or used for some charitable objects.”
SUPPLY:-
As per Sec. 9 of the Central Goods & Services Tax (“CGST”) Act, 2017, levy of tax is on an event called 'supply', Scope of supply is stated u/s 7. Relevant portion of said provision is reproduced below for ready reference:
'Sec. 7. (1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply” includes
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business;
(c) the activities specified in Schedule I, made or agreed to be made without a consideration'
To tax the transaction between an association or club and its members,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

benefits to its members;'
From the above definition it is Clear that for getting satisfied under the term “business”, there must be facilities or benefits to its members.'
In case of Lions Clubs, as we have discussed above, the members of the club come together only for social cause and there is neither furtherance of any business benefits or facilities to the members.
From the above it can be interpreted that, to satisfy the definition of “Business”, there must be some benefit / facility to its members.
In our case there is no benefit facility to the members of the lions club.
Further it can be seen whether the supply of services between club and its members is for a consideration.
CONSIDERATION:-
It is worthwhile to refer to the definition of “supplier” as provided u/s 2(105) & “recipient” as provided u/s 2(93).
Both the definitions are reproduced below:
Sec. 2(105) “supplier” in relation to any goods or services or both, shall mean the person supplying the said goods or se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ransaction, the recipient is the “person” who pays the consideration to the “supplier”. Hence two different persons have been envisaged in the law to tax a transaction as a supply made for a consideration.
Now the question remains that whether the club and its members can be treated as different persons?
Recent Circular:-
“GST is levied on intra-State and inter-State supply of goods and services. According to section 7 of CGST Act, 2017, the expression “supply” includes all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business, and includes activities specified in Schedule II to the CGST Act, 2017, definition of “business” in section 2(17) of CGST Act states that “business” includes provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) oi the facilities or benefit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on the supply of goods by any association or body of persons to a member thereof for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration.”
Following observations may be noted in reference to the above circular:
a. Above circular has not considered the definition of “supplier” as well as “recipient” before taxing a transaction u/s 7(1)(a). There must be two different persons to tax a transaction under said provision. Merely because an association of person has been included as person u/s 2(84) does not imply that members of such association are different persons.
b. Circular has invoked the concept of deemed sale as provided under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution. It must be noted that clause (e) of said Article only enables to tax supply of goods by an association to its members as deemed sale. It does not enable to tax supply of service as a deemed service. Even para 7 of Schedule II only covers supply of goods by any unincorporated association. It does not cover supply o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nct person. Hence only thing to be checked is whether an association and its members are related person.
Explanation u/s 15 of CGST Act, 2017 defines related person. Said explanation is also reproduced below for ready reference:
Explanation.- For the purposes of this Act,
(a) persons shall be deemed to be “related persons” if
(i) such persons are officers or directors of one another's businesses;
(ii) such persons are legally recognised partners in business;
(iii) such persons are employer and employee;
(iv) any person directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds twenty-five per cent. or more of the outstanding voting stock or shares of both of them;
(v) one of them directly or indirectly controls the other;
(vi) both of them are directly or indirectly controlled by a third person;
(vii) together they directly or indirectly control a third person; or
(viii) they are members of the same family;
(b) the term “person” also includes legal persons;
(c) persons who are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Charitable activities.
In the context of GST, definition of persons is provided u/s 2(84) of the CGST Act, 2017. As per said definition, there is no deeming fiction to treat association and members as different persons. Hence the key condition to tax a transaction u/s. 7(1)(a), that supplier and recipient must be different, is not satisfied. Hence the transaction of providing services by an association to its members should not be taxed u/s 7(1) (a).
Earlier in Service Tax regime Court in several cases held that in absence of deeming fiction, treating club/association & its members as distinct person, service tax shall not be payable. Thereafter to nullify the above decision w. e. f. 01.06.2012 clause (a) to Explanation 3 to Sec. 65B provided that an unincorporated association or body of persons, as the cast may be and a member thereof shall be treated as distinct persons. Such deeming fiction is not provided under the current GST regime.
Further, the said transaction between the c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ns Districts is for convenience of Lions members & pooled together only for paying Meeting expenses & communication expenses & the same is deposited in a Single bank account. As there is no furtherance of business in this activity and neither any services are rendered nor any goods are being traded. Whether registration is required?”
Legal position upto from 01-07-12 to 30-06-17: There seems to be a fact that the club and members are not distinct persons, levy of service tax on such clubs/ associations may not be warranted. Principally, there should be existence of two sides/entities for having transaction as against consideration. in u members club, were is no question of two sides – Members and club, both are same entity. With effect from 1-7-2012, the word “service” has also been defined under Section 65B (44) of the Finance Act, 1994. Explanation 3a) to said Section states that for the purposes of this Chapter, an unincorporated association or a body of persons, as the case may b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under-,
“all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business.”
Therefore, there is no force in the submission of the Applicant that there is no furtherance of business in the activity and neither any services are rendered nor any goods are being traded. Consequentially, a prayer that there is no registration is required, has no leverage and legal backing.
Para No. 16 Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law and or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the aforesaid questions.
As the activity is more appropriately covered, as explained above, under “scope of supply”, Applicant's plea is not acceptable as the same is not supported by the statutory provision.
Also the term “person” is defined in section 2(84) of the CGST Act, 2017 to include an association of persons or a body of individual

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Club. Hence no comments are offered.
Para No.2 and Para No. 3: The documents show the Club Constitution, i.e. club's vision, mission, procedure for membership, their mode various activities etc. Hence no comments are offered.
Para No. 4: The said set of document was perused by this office. The Applicant has relied upon the Circular No. 35/9/2018-GST dated 05-03-2018, The circular is applicable to “Joint Venture- taxable services provided by the members of the Joint Venture (JV) to the JV and vice versa and inter se between the members of the JV”. The relevant portion of the circular is reproduced below:        
“GST is levied on intra-State and inter-State supply of goods and services. According to section 7 of CGST Act, 2017, the expression “supply” includes all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y of persons (AOP) to a member thereof for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration shall be treated as supply of services.”
Therefore, the above said circular is irrelevant and inapplicable in the present situation. Hence the instructions in the said circular claimed to be applicable to them by applicant, is incorrect.
Para No. 5 – It is also submitted that the Applicant have nowhere expressly submitted and committed that they are not engaged in the activities which may amount to '(facilities” or “benefits” to its members. This is very much essential to decide whether the Applicant falls in/out of purview of the definition under “business”, as envisaged under section 2(17) of CGST Act, 2017. On the contrary, the written submission States that the Seminars and Institutes for Leadership Development and other forums only for Lion members and non lions are not allowed to take part. Thus, funds received from members are utilized for mutual benefit of members” / last para of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

made written submissions. The applicant has filed revised application on 18.07.2018.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 08.08.2018, Sh. Abhay Shatri, C.A. Vice District Governor of the club, duly authorized appeared and stated that they are not providing any facilities to their members and made written submissions. Jurisdictional Officer, Sh. P.C. Gotkhinde, Asstt. Commr, Cental Tax, (DIV -IV) Pune-II CGST COMMM'RATE, Pune appeared and made written submissions.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case. The issue before us is the requirement of registration and the applicability of the GST Act quo the receipt of fees from members by the Lions Club of Poona, Kothrud the applicant. We reproduce herein the purpose and activities as seen in their Constitution and by laws as below:
Article II- Purposes:
The purpose of this club shall be:
a) To create and foster a spirit of understanding among the peoples of the world.
b) To promote the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from interest must also be returned to public use.
Section 2. ADMINISTRATIVE FUNDS.- Administrative funds are supported through contributions from members through dues, fines and other individual contributions.
As per the Standard District constitution of the clubs, the fallowing purposes are,
Article II – Purposes,
The purposes of this district shall be:
a) To provide an administrative structure with which to advance the Purposes of Lions Clubs International in this district.
b) To create and foster a spirit of understanding among the people of the world.
c) To promote the principles of good government and good citizenship.
d) To take an active interest in the civic, cultural, social and moral welfare of the community.
e) To unite the members in the bonds of friendship, good fellowship and mutual understanding.
f) To provide a forum for the open discussion of all matters of public interest; provided, however, that partisan politics and sectarian religion shall not be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

roster of each club as of the first days of September and March, respectively. Any club which is chartered or recognized in a current fiscal year shall collect and pay said convention tax for said fiscal year on a pro-rata basis from the first day of the second month following the date of its organization, as the case may be. This tax shall be collected from the clubs by, and be remitted to, the cabinet secretary or cabinet treasurer (or secretary-treasurer), who shall deposit the monies so collected in a special account in a bank or other depository chosen by the district governor. The fund so collected shall be used exclusively for defraying expenses of district conventions and shall be expended only by district checks drawn and signed by the cabinet treasurer and countersigned by the district governor.
Section 2. REMAINING FUNDS. In any fiscal year, any balance remaining in the convention fund after payment of all convention administrative expenses in that year shall remain in sai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eriod July 1 to December 31; and (value in national currency __) per club member on March tenth of each year, to cover the semi-annual period January 1 to June 30, with billings of the same to be based upon the roster of each club as of the first days of July and January, respectively. Said tax shall be paid to the cabinet secretary or cabinet treasurer (or secretary-treasurer), by each club in the district, except newly chartered and reorganized clubs, which shall collect and pay said tax on a pro-rata basis from the first day of the second month following the date of their organization or reorganization, as the case may be. Said tax shall be disbursed only for administrative expenses of the district and only upon approval by the district governor's cabinet. Disbursement therefrom shall be by checks drawn and signed by the cabinet treasurer and countersigned by the district governor.
Section 2. REMAINING FUNDS. In any fiscal year, any balance remaining in the district administrative

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l check-up camps, Blood donation camps,
9. Motivating leos for activity for the public.
10. Distribution of Jaipur foots to the handicapped
We have been informed of the activities carried on by the applicant. These have been reproduced hereinabove. These purpose of receipt of subscription fees and the utilization thereof has to be interpreted in terms of the provisions of the GST Act. Does the applicant club engage in any form of supply of goods or services to its members? Whether the collection of 'fees' from the members is for any supply by the Club to the members? We have seen the earlier submission where the applicant has extensively argued against the applicability of the provisions of the GST Act. A look at the above along with the earlier submission makes us observe that the question put forth for our consideration would have to be answered in the negative.
We proceed to record our reasons.
We restrict our discussion herein below to the activities of the applicant in rel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8]
(i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities;
We see that clause (e) speaks about subscription. But this subscription is for the facilities or benefits that would be provided. The definition requires that the club, association, society, or any such body has to provide facilities or benefits to its members. And these facilities or benefits are to be provided for a subscription or any other consideration. In the facts of the instant case, the amounts collected as 'fees' from the members are not for the purposes of making any 'supply'. All are aware that the definition of 'supply' under the provisions of the GST Act is an inclusive one. However, it is one for 'supply' and the 'supply' is of goods or services. The definition of 'supplier' under section 2 (105) of the GST Act would help clear what we intend to put across –
“Supplier” in relation to any goods or services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ot supply any facilities or benefits in terms of goods or services to its members. At the cost of repetition, we reproduce herein the clauses relating to the use of funds-
i) Meeting Expenses
ii) Printing of Circulars
iii) Stationery
iv) Postage
v) Greetings
vi) Fees payable to International office
vii) Fees payable to Multiple office.
As can be seen, the club is not formed to provide any supply of goods or services to its members qua the fees received from them. There being no supply qua the fees received, there arises no occasion for us to visit the definition of 'Supply' under the GST Act. The applicant club as per the facts put up before us does not render any 'Supply' for the purposes of the CST Act. Having observed so, we refrain from any further discussion.
We find that the Departmental officer holds a different opinion. We would want to deal with one aspect discussed by the official about seminars for Leadership Development as organized for the members. Such acti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

3DPLM Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST, Central Excise & ST, Raigarh

3DPLM Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST, Central Excise & ST, Raigarh
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1461 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/86473/2018 – A/87226/2018
Service Tax
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial)
Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate for appellant
Shri O.M. Shivdikar, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: S.K. Mohanty
In this case, the appellant is a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), registered under STPI Scheme. The entire output services are exported by the appellant to its clients located abroad. The taxable service namely, Information Technology Service provided by the appellant is categorized as a taxable service, as per the definition provided under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant avails CENVAT Credit in respect of various input services used / utilized for providing such output service. Since the appellant exports its entire output service, there was no scope

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aintained adequate records to demonstrate that the credit particulars were relatable to the export of service during the period April to June 2011. Thus, he contended that for mere procedure lapses of non-reflecting the credit particulars for the period from April to June 2011, substantive right for the refund claim cannot be whittled down.
3. On the other hand, learned D.R. appearing for Revenue reiterates the findings recorded in the impugned order. He further submits that since the appellant had not produced any documents to demonstrate that input services, in dispute, were utilized for the services exported during the period April to June 2011, rejection of refund benefit by the authorities below is proper and justified.
4. Heard both sides and perused the records.
5. On perusal of the impugned order, I find that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the adjudication order on the ground that the input credit has not been reflected in the relevant ST-3 Returns filed for t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

od April to June 2011. Thus, I am of the view that the matter should be remanded to the original authority for verification of the accounting records maintained by the appellant, to satisfy himself that the credit was availed during the relevant period and services were utilized for providing the exported output service during such period. The original authority while adjudicating the matter afresh, should not insist the appellant for establishing the nexus between the input services and the output service, provided by it inasmuch as, the appellant is a 100% EOU and no services were provided to the domestic clients. Thus, it cannot be said that the appellant had not used the input service for export of the output service.
6. Therefore, after setting aside the impugned order, I remand the matter to the original authority for passing of fresh adjudication order in line with the above observations. Needless to say, that opportunity of personal hearing should be granted to the appellant b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Giordano Fashions India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, TK (Chennai North)

M/s. Giordano Fashions India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, TK (Chennai North)
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 1079 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
Appeal No. : E/40789/2018 – Final Order No. 42419/2018
Central Excise
Shri P Dinesha, Member (Judicial)
Shri. C. Seethapathy, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri. R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
This is an assessee's appeal wherein the assessee has challenged the interest and penalty for the period 01.03.2011 to 31.12.2012.
2. The Revenue issued a Show Cause Notice to the appellant on 26.02.2016 alleging inter alia that the appellant had taken CENVAT Credit on certain goods purchased which were not used in the manufacture of their final products; the CENVAT Credit taken was therefore not legally correct and proper. On being pointed out by the audit party, the appellant debited Rs. 1,62,811/- in their December, 2012 ER-1 return; the appellant had pai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng not met with success in its first appeal before the first appellate authority, the appellant is in appeal before this forum.
4. During the course of hearing, Shri. C. Seethapathy, Ld. Advocate appeared for the assessee and Shri. R. Subramaniyan, Ld. Department Representative (DR) appeared for the Revenue.
5.1 The contentions of the Ld. Advocate are broadly summarized as under :
(i) The appellant has been filing its monthly ER-1 returns regularly, which are duly audited;
(ii) The appellant voluntarily reversed the alleged irregular CENVAT Credit on being pointed out as early as December 2012;
(iii) The Show Cause Notice does not allege any suppression or fraud or misstatement, is clearly time barred;
(iv) That though the CENVAT Credit was available in excess, had remained unutilized.
5.2 He relies on the following judgments :
* Commissioner of Customs Vs. Magus Metals P. Ltd. [2017 (355) E.L.T. 323 (S.C.)]
* Commissioner of C.Ex., Cus. & S.Tax Vs. Suvidha Engineers India

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e is no allegation of suppression or fraud or misstatement. In fact, the only strongest allegation against the appellant is that the fact of availing ineligible credit came to the knowledge of the Department only after the verification conducted by the internal audit wing of the Department on 03.01.2013 and 04.01.2013, which had been duly reciprocated in good faith by the appellant by accepting and filing its December 2012 ER-1 return which remains undisputed.
8.1 It is also an undisputed fact that the appellant had reversed the unutilized CENVAT Credit since it is nowhere disputed, either in the Show Cause Notice or in the Order-in-Original or in the impugned Order as to the availability of excess CENVAT Credit.
8.2 From the above, I find strength in the contention of the Ld. Advocate that the Notification of extended period of limitation was bad for which I find it useful to rely on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Magus Metals P. Ltd.(supra) wherein the Hon'bl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

difficult to understand as to how the Revenue could have the benefit of anything but the ‚normal‛ period of limitation to issue the show cause notices dated 18-3-2003. The order of the learned Tribunal insofar as the six appeals are concerned, holding show cause notices issued therein to be time barred and interfering with the adjudication orders dated 29-3-2004 and 23-9-2004, therefore, must have the approval of this Court.”
9.1 I find from the documents furnished along with the appeal memo that the appellant, in its response to Show Cause Notice, had categorically submitted that the ineligible CENVAT Credit was never utilized, rather the same was available as balance in its CENVAT Credit Account and that as of February 2016, the excess balance amount to the tune of Rs. 42,80,511/- was lying in its CENVAT Credit.
9.2 On a perusal of both Order-in-Original as well as the impugned Order, I find that the above categorical statement has neither been controverted nor examined

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gail Gas Limited Versus Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.

Gail Gas Limited Versus Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.
GST
2018 (11) TMI 1074 – DELHI HIGH COURT – TMI
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 28-8-2018
W.P.(C) 4891/2018, CM Nos.18839/2018 & 26282/2018
GST
MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND MR. A. K. CHAWLA JJ.
Petitioner Through: Mr. N.L. Ganapathi, Adv.
Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel, Indirect Taxes, Deptt. of Revenue.
O R D E R
The petitioner's grievance is two-fold: first that very senior officers of the petitioner such as the Chief Operating Officer and the Deputy General Manager, have been summoned to answer the queries of the Director General of Goods and Services Tax (GST) Intelligence. Secondly, that the scope of investigation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ocuments (Annexures 'E' and 'F'). However, it is also stated that if GAIL Gas Ltd. deputes concerned officers who have knowledge about the transactions and can reply to the queries, that would suffice the requirements of the respondent – Directorate General of GST Intelligence.
In view of the statement made, the GAIL Gas Ltd. shall intimate in advance – within two weeks, the officer/officers concerned who are familiar with the records in connection with the inquiry pertaining to the contracts with M/s Avinash EM Projects Pvt. Ltd. as according to its previous replies, no transactions had been entered into with the other concerns. Upon receipt of information with respect to such officers, the Directorate General of GST Intelligence shall fi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Safal Food Products Versus Commissioner of GST, Customs & Central Excise

M/s Safal Food Products Versus Commissioner of GST, Customs & Central Excise
Central Excise
2018 (10) TMI 457 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
Appeal No. E/51421/2018 – A/52944/2018-EX[DB]
Central Excise
Mr Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical)
Shri H.G. Daramadhikari, Adv for the appellant
Shri S.K. Bansal.DR for the respondent
ORDER
Per: Bijay Kumar
1. The present appeal is filed against this impugned order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) wherein order passed by the ld. Adjudicating Authority has been upheld.
2. The appellant is engaged in manufacture of Pickle/species etc, for which they are having the automatic machine where the pre-form is fed at the first station of automatic mechanized plant and plastic jars come out and at the next station the pre-required quantity of the product is dispensed therein and thereafter the final product emerging is packed. Prior to having the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nd spices manufactured by them were then packed in different quantity in various sizes of plastic bottles already manufactured by them. The Plastic Bottles were found to be manufactured on automatic machines from pre-from purchased by them, then the Plastic caps were put on them. The manufacturing process of plastic bottles is carried out on such automatic machines installed separately with in their factory premises. Later on these plastic bottles were taken to the manufacturing plant of pickles and species and these bottles were packed with different quantity of Pickles/species as per their sizes i.e 100 gm. 200 gm. 300 gm. 500 gm. 1 kg., 5 kg., on automatic machines. Subsequently, these bottles were labeled with the company's label containing name, address, logo and other details and then after packing in cartoons were stored in their store rooms for sale. They were also stored for further sale to their customers. It was, further, observed that the notice have not taken Central Excis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etability of itself. We have also perused various case laws wherein it is clearly held that it intermediate product do not have the marketability then the same case be subjected to excise duty.
6. As per the case records there does not appear to be a deliberate intention by appellant to suppress any material facts from the Department. They were under the bona fide belief that they do not come under the purview of Central Excise as their turnover is less than the exemption limit as specified under the Notification 8/2003. During the relevant period to July 2009 to March 2010, the value of the manufacture of the packaging material is to the extent to Rs. 45,29,406/- and the period of between July 2010 to February 2011 Rs. 1,35,45,533/- totally 1,80,73,959/- which is much below the in threshold limit of SSI exemption as above. These submissions have been made by the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant in a categorical term. Therefore, we accept the same. And hence, on account of the m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Vindhya Telelinks Ltd.

In Re: Vindhya Telelinks Ltd.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1646 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 649 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – AAR
Dated:- 28-8-2018
AAR No. 06/2018-19 In Application No. 01/2018-19
GST
SHRI VIPIN CHANDRA AND SHRI AMIT GUPTA MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Shri Sanjay Gupta, Vice President
Present for the Jurisdictional Office : None
Note : Under Section 100(1) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section- 99 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
RULING
1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST Act and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Ground Floor, Wing-B, Commercial Plaza, Hotel Radisson, NH 8, Mahipalpur, New Delhi seeking

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ore, in terms of said Section 97(2)(d) of CGST/ SGST Act, 2017, the present application is hereby admitted.
4. Accordingly opportunity of personal hearing was earlier granted on 14.06.2018 and the applicant attended the hearing. That time the authority had Shri Anil Singh, Joint Commissioner, SGST and Shri Amit Gupta, Joint Commissioner, CGST were members. Since Shri Anil Singh, has been promoted and transferred, therefore fresh PH has been given to the applicant on 01.08.2018 and 13.08.2018 and the applicant had sought adjournments vide letters dated 28.07.2018 & 08.08.2018. Another personal hearing was fixed on 28.08.2018 and Shri Sanjay Gupta, Vice President of the applicant attended the hearing on the designated date.
5. In the present application, applicant has requested for advance ruling on admissibility of cenvat credit of goods and services used for erection of infrastructure which is discussed as under :
6.1 Admissibility of ITC of goods & services used for erection of inf

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s since the infrastructure provided by the applicant is different from “Telecommunication Tower” .
6.3 To give decision on the issues, we have to go through the background of telecommunication services how it works.
The mobile telecommunications industry provides cellular telephone services through the use of active and passive infrastructure, to use industry terminologies. The active infrastructure, as the name implies, comprises the core elements of cellular telephony in the form of a network of contiguous radio cells providing coverage through operating on a dedicated set of radio channels of defined frequencies. Elements of the active infrastructure are the base transceiver station (BTS), the base station controller (BSC), the mobile switching centre (MSC) and microwave and GSM antennae. The antenna enable both the transmission and receipt of radio signals, enabling the cellular telephony to proceed uninterrupted as the subscriber is mobile.
In contrast, the passive infrastructu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onopole tower is a single steel or concrete tube tower. It requires one foundation and typically don't exceed 50 metres. The antennas are mounted on the exterior of the tower.
(c) Guyed Tower/Mast – (Guyed towers used to be the cheapest tower to construct, but require the greatest amount of land. For taller heights (100 metres and greater) it is much cheaper to build a guyed tower. Most radio and television towers are guyed towers. A guyed tower is a straight tower (also referred to as mast) connected by guy wires attached to the ground in all directions, which anchor and support the tower.
6.5 As per applicant, they are engaged in leasing of 'Telecommunication Fibre'. In hilly areas, the telecommunication fibres are kept to be elevated unlike in plain areas where the fibres are put underground. It is only because of this reason the fibres cannot be put underground in the hilly area, they are placed on the poles. The infrastructure so erected by them to elevate the fibre

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re placed on pole to joint the incoming end of the fibre to outgoing end of the fibre. Loop brackets are placed on the pole to hold extra fibre so that fibre can be reconnected in case there is any cut or damage in the pulling the fibre down whenever so needed.
d. Stay wires are used in some poles for protecting them from bending.
6.7 The details of items used in the infrastructure are as under:
a. The poles used in the infrastructure are hollow and does not contain any fibre inside.
b. GI Support erected is also hollow, from which fibres arc passed.
c. The height of pole is 7m while in exceptional cases it is 9m.
d. The pole along with muff installation can be removed using civil work without any damage to the entire infrastructure. After removal of the said infrastructure, it can be used easily at another location without any damage to the fibre connected to the structure or the structure as a whole.
6.8 To appreciate the law position in this regard, first we have to go t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
(b) the following supply of goods or services or both:-
(i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery except where an inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply;
(ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre;
(iii) rent-a-cab, life insurance and health insurance except where
(A) the Government notifies the services which are obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees under any law for the time being in force; or
(B) such inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as part of a taxable com

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ices or both used for personal consumption;
(h) goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples; and
(i) any tax paid in accordance with the provisions of sections 74, 129 and 130.
17(6) The Government may prescribe the manner in which the credit referred to in sub-sections (1) and (2) may be attributed.
Explanation. For the purposes of this Chapter and Chapter VI, the expression “plant and machinery” means apparatus, equipment, and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support that are used for making outward supply of goods or services or both and includes such foundation and structural supports but excludes-
(i) land, building or any other civil structures;
(ii) telecommunication towers; and
(iii) pipelines laid outside the factory premises.
6.9 The explanation (supra) put restrictions on availment of cenvat credit in respect of apparatus, equipment, and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tennas that transmit and receive radio-frequency (RF) signals from mobile phones and devices. Wires run from the tower antennas to base station equipment, typically located at ground level in sealed telecom equipment cabinets.
d. A cell site or cell tower is a cellular-enabled mobile device site where antennae and electronic communications equipment are placed.
e. The telecommunication towers during the course of providing output service of telecommunication affixed to the earth becomes immovable property as it cannot be moved to another place for use in the same position.
6.11 On analyzing the work being undertaken by the applicant as discussed above, we observe that:
a. The poles erected by the applicant are used for stringing of fibres
b. Height of the poles varies from 7m to 9m.
c. The poles do not contain antennas electronic communications equipment.
d. There is no cell site where antennae and electronic communications equipment are placed.
e. The infrastructure was a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ers, the petitioner enters into agreements with private owners. Armed with such agreements, the petitioner would apply to the local authorities for permission to erect such a structure. As pointed out by the petitioner in the petition, such structure consists of the following :
“a. A pre-fabricated shelter made of insulating PUF material made of fibers.
b. Electronic Panel.
c. Base Transceiver Station(BTS) and other radio transmission and reception equipment.
d. A diesel generator set.
e. Six poles of 6 to 9 meters length each made of hollow steel galvanized pipes.”
6. To understand the purpose of such BTS's, we may refer to the booklet circulated by the Department of Telecommunications Ministry of Communications & IT, Government of India and titled as “Mobile Communication Radio Waves & Safety, in which it is stated as under :
“Cellular Phone tower & waves Mobile phone base stations are radio transmitter with antennas mounted on either transmission towers or roof tops on

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

obile phone, the phone transmits radio waves to the antenna of a nearby base station. The base station then transmits the call using the mobile telecommunications network to the phone of the person you are calling.
In town and cities where there are many phone users, more base stations are needed than in rural areas. The antenna of the base stations are mounted on mast, buildings or towers. The intensity of the radio waves emitted from base stations in places where the public have access are generally found to be hundreds of times below the health and safety guidelines.
The intensity of electro-magnetic wave (power density) weakens very quickly as it moves away from the antenna. It is reduced to ¼ when the distance from the antenna double and to 1/9 when the distance is three times.”
6.13 The hon'ble Supreme Court of India in civil appeal nos.5360 -5363 of 2013 in the case of Ahmadabad Municipal Corporation versus GTL Infrastructure Ltd. & ors. = 2016 (12) TMI 1092 – SUPREM

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n Towers are in the nature of immovable property and are consists of
a. A pre-fabricated shelter made of insulating PUF material made of fibres.
b. Electronic Panel.
c. Base Transceiver Station (BTS) and other radio transmission and reception equipment.
d. A diesel generator set.
e. Six poles of 6 to 9 meters length each made of hollow steel galvanized pipes.
6.15 We observed that each of these goods had independent functions and hence, they cannot be treated and classified as single unit. It also observed that all goods are not eligible for credit and only those relatable to output services would be eligible for credit. Since the towers merely enabled the antennae to function, they did not enter the composition of the antenna themselves and could not be construed as components or parts thereof. We further observed that only telecom equipments like BTS transmitters which are used in providing telecom services alone would be liable to input credit. The towers and PFB are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f CGST/SGST Act, 2017 which is read as under:
“goods” means every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply;
6.19 As discussed supra we observe that if the goods are movable from one place to another in the same position or liable to be dismantled and re-erected at the later place, if it is liable to be shifted and was dismantled or re-erected at a later place, it will be movable property. But if erected permanently with out being shifted from place to place, then it would be treated as permanently attached to the earth and the same will be treated as immovable property.
6.20 Thus we observe that “telecommunication tower” does not come within the purview of goods in as much as the same being a immovable property and the ITC on “telecommunication tower” is not admissible as per explanation to S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Eapro Global Limited

In Re: M/s. Eapro Global Limited
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1526 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 677 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – AAR
Dated:- 28-8-2018
AAR No. 07/2018-19 In Application No. 05/2018-19
GST
SHRI VIPIN CHANDRA AND SHRI AMIT GUPTA MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Shri Mohit Chaudhary Accountant
Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: None  
Note : Under Section. 100(1) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section-99 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
RULING
1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Eapro Global Ltd, Khasra No. 103 & 104, Salempur Rajputana I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

subsection (2) of Section 97 of the CGST/ SGST Act, 2017 advance ruling can be sought by an applicant in respect of :
(a) Classification of any goods or services or both
(b) Applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of his Act,
(c) Determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both,
(d) Admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid
(e) Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both
(f) Whether the applicant is required to be registered
(g) Whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both within the meaning of that term
4. In the present case applicant has sought advance ruling on applicability of GST rate on supply of goods and their classification thereof. Thus, in terms of said Section 97(2)(a) & (e) of CGST/SGST Act, 2017, the present application is hereby admitted.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

documents submitted by the applicant we find that applicant is registered in Uttarakhand with GSTIN bearing no. O5AADCE1852G1ZZ. Before proceeding, we have to first know about the “Solar Power Generating System”. We find that there are four main components to a solar power generating system as under:
(i) Solar panels: The main part of a solar power generating system is the solar panel. Solar panels contain solar cells. Solar cells, sometimes called photovoltaic cells, convert the energy the sun into electricity.
(ii) Inverters : The electricity produced in a solar panel is DC. Electricity we get from the grid supply is AC. So it is required to install an inverter to convert DC of solar system to AC of same level as grid supply. In off grid system the inverter is directly connected across the battery terminals so that DC coming from the batteries is first converted to AC then fed to the equipment. In grid tie system the solar panel is directly connected to inverter and this inverter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

enerating System” as a whole and can be called as 'composite supply or mix supply' & what will be the rate of GST on such supply. To appreciate the law position in this regard we reproduce the relevant portion of the Act as under:
(i) Section 2(30) of the Act ibid “composite supply” means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply;
(ii) Section 2(74) of the Act ibid “mixed supply” means two or more individual supplies of goods or services, or any combination thereof, made in conjunction with each other by a taxable person for a single price where such supply does not constitute a composite supply.
(iii) Section 2(90) of the Act ibid “principal supply” means the supply of goods or services which constitutes the predominant element of a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lamp
(g) Ocean waves/tidal waves energy devices/plants
(vi) We find that “Solar Power Generating System” has not been defined in GST law. We also find that in erstwhile Central Excise regime, though exemption to said “Solar Power Generating System' was granted vide serial ho. 332 of Notification No. 12/12-CE dated 17.03.2012 but the same has also not been defined in the said regime. The relevant portion Notification No. 12/12-CE dated 17.03.2012 is reproduce as under:
Sl. No.
Chapter or heading or sub-heading or tariff item of the First Schedule
Description of excisable goods
Rate
1
2
3
4
332
Any Chapter
Non-conventional energy devices or systems specified in List 8
Nil
List-8: 1) Flat plate solar Collector (2) Black continuously plated solar selective coating sheets (in cut length or in coil) and fins and tubes (3) Concentrating and pipe type solar collector (4) Solar cooker (6) Solar air heating system (7) Solar low pressure steam system (8) Solar stills and desalinati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y conclusion we have seek help from various judicial pronouncement in this regard and a few of them related to the case in hand are reproduce as under:
*Rajasthan Electronics & Instruments Ltd. Vs CCE [2005 (180) ELT 0481 (Tri. – Del.)]  = 2004 (7) TMI 259 – CESTAT, NEW DELHI
3. The contention of the appellant is that the Dusk Dawn System is an electronic system for street lights comprising of electronic controller and Solar Photovoltaic Module. The street lights are automatically switched off based on the ambient light level which is sensed by the sensors installed therein. The Dusk Dawn System comprises of the SPV module and the penal housing. The contention is that whole system works on the solar energy and it is an energy saving device used for automatic switching off the street lights making proper use of grid power and increasing the life of the lamps by operating the street light from sunset to sunrise. The contention of the appellant is that the Commissioner of Central E

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ting authority is not sustainable. The impugned order is set aside and the appeals are allowed.
*Bhel vs CCE [2008 (223) ELT 0609 (Tri. – Bang.)] = 2007 (10) TMI 165 – CESTAT, BANGALORE
1. The point at issue is whether the 'Solar Inverter Charger for solar lantern' is entitled for the benefit of exemption Notification 5/99-C.E., dated 28-2-99. The contention of the revenue is inverter charger should be classified under Heading No. 80.03 of the C.E. Tariff Act as a component of solar power generating system or solar lantern. The exemption Notification No 5/99 C.E., dated 28-2-99 as amended exempts “nor conventional energy systems” specified in list 4 of the Notification from payment of duty. Since the exemption notification exempts total system and not parts the system, the lower authority held that the inverter charger for solar lantern is not entitled for the benefit of the said notification.
3.  We heard both sides. Learned Advocates contended that solar power generat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r voltaic module
(ii) Solar power generating system
(iii) Solar lantern.
In the present case, the appellants have claimed exemption in respect of “inverter charger card” as solar power generating system. The appellants actually manufactured SPV lantern. The above lantern required electricity for its It is possible to convert solar energy to electricity with the help of inverter charger manufactured by the appellants. The Dy. General Manager has certified that the inverter merger constitutes solar power generating system as it performs the function of generating the required high frequency AC power from in-light with, the help of SPV module and supplying it to the compact fluorescent lamp of a solar lantern. In view of the above, expert opinion, we hold that e impugned item can be considered as solar power generating system and is entitled for the benefit of the exemption Notification. Therefore, we allow the appeal with consequential relief.
(vii) On going through the afore state

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

power generating system (11) Solar photovoltaic module and panel for water pumping and other applications (12) Solar crop drier and system (13) Wind operated electricity generator, its components and parts thereof (14) Water pumping wind mill, wind aero-generator and battery charger (15) Bio-gas plant and bio-gas engine (16) Agricultural, forestry, agro-industrial, industrial, municipal and urban waste conversion device producing energy (17) Equipment for utilising ocean waves energy (18) Solar lantern (19) Ocean thermal energy conversion system (20) Solar photovoltaic cell (21) Parts consumed within the factory of production of such parts for the manufacture of goods specified at S.Nos. 1 to 20 above.
Notifications 5/99-CE dated 28.02.99
Sl. No.
Chapter or heading or sub-heading or tariff item of the First Schedule
Description of excisable goods
Rate
1
2
3
4
265
Any Chapter
Non-conventional energy devices or systems specified in List 4
Nil
List-4: (1) Flat plate solar co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sion systems (20) Parts consumed within the factory of production of such parts for the manufacture of goods specified at S.Nos. 1 to 19 above (21) Solar photovoltaic cells.
(viii) On going through the Notifications 12/12-CE, 06/2002-CE & 5/99-CE (supra), we find that there is no change in the description of goods viz “Non-conventional energy devices or systems specified in List” in the said notifications and Solar power generating systems in the list appended to said notifications however their entry against serial no. & list nos. appended to said notifications keeps on changing during the relevant period except that there is no material change in the said notifications. Thus we observe that said notifications are similar in character & have the same soul to extend the benefit under Central Excise Law to “solar power generating system” and are identical to the Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 in as much as the same benefit continued in GST regime also by w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re all the goods should be taxable @ 5% as “Solar Power Generating System”. This fact also confirm by the hon'ble tribunal (supra). Further in GST Tariff the same has been classified as under:
Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff Item
Description of Goods
Unit
GST Rates
 
 
 
Central CGST
State/UT/SGST/UTGST
Inter-State IGST
Compensation Cess
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
[84, 85 or 94]
Following renewable energy devices & parts for their manufacture
(a) Bio-gas plant
(b) Solar power based devices
(c) Solar power generating system
(d) Wind mills, wind Operated Electricity Generator (WOEG)
(e) Waste to energy plants / devices
(f) Solar lantern / solar lamp
(g) Ocean waves/tidal waves energy devices/plants
(h) Photo voltaic cells, whether or not assembled in modules or made up into panels
u
2.5%
2.5%
5%
Nil
(ix) As regard to the HSN code of “Solar Power Generating System”, we observed that “Solar Power Generating System” is a composite supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ply' as discussed above.
9. In view of the above discussion we pass the order as under:
ORDER
(i) Supply of solar inverter, controller, battery and panels would covered under “Solar Power Generating System” as a whole in terms of serial no. 234 of Schedule-I of the Notification No. 01/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 when supplied for said purpose and the applicable rate of GST on such supply will be 5% as on today [2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST] and such supply will be treated as “composite supply”.
(ii) Supply of solar inverter & solar panels together will fall under the definition of “Solar Power Generating System” (if the same are used for said specified purpose) in terms of serial no. 234 of Schedule-I of the Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and the applicable rate of GST on such supply will be 5% as on today [2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST] and such supply will be treated as “composite supply”.
(iii) The aforesaid findings are applicable for both manufa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Vedhas Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Navi Mumbai

Vedhas Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Navi Mumbai
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1383 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/87105/2018 – A/87227/2018
Service Tax
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial)
Shri Bharat Raichandani, Advocate for appellant
Shri Dilip Shinde, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: S.K. Mohanty
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 27.02.2018 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), CGST and Central Excise, Audit-Thane. Rejection of refund claim of service tax paid on residential complex service, is the subject matter of the present dispute.
2. The appellant contended that the advance payment received from M/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the show-cause notice and the appellant was never given any opportunity before adjudication of the matter to find out the contains of the said report. He further submits that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) also rejected the appeal of the appellant in a mechanical way, without considering even after the submissions made before him that the original authority had not provided copy of the report and thus, violated the principles of natural justice.
3. On the other hand, learned D.R appearing for Revenue reiterates the finding recorded in the impugned order.
4. Heard both sides and perused the records.
5. I find that consequent upon filing of the refund application, the department issued show-cause notice for necessary clarification on c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iew, ends of justice will be met, if the matter is remanded to the original authority for readjudication of refund issue.
6. Accordingly, after setting aside the impugned order, the matter is remanded to the original authority with a direction to supply a copy of the report / statement of the divisional authorities to the appellant and thereafter, to decide the issue based on the documents to be submitted by the appellant in support of its claim that refund benefit should be available to them. Needless to say, that opportunity of personal hearing should be granted to the appellant before deciding the issue afresh. Further, the appellant is also directed to co-operate with the original authority for arriving at a proper conclusion regarding

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

3D PLM Software Solutions Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, CE & ST Raigadh

3D PLM Software Solutions Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, CE & ST Raigadh
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1382 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/86469 & 86481/2018 – A/87224-87225/2018
Service Tax
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial)
Shri Prasad Paranjape, Advocate with Ms. Shraddha Seth, C.A. for appellant
Shri O.M. Shivdikar, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: S.K. Mohanty
These appeals are directed against the impugned order dated 19.01.2018 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Tax, Central Excise & Service Tax, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the business of providing 'Information Technology Service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s. Learned Commissioner (Appeals) has also considered certain input services for the purpose of refund benefit. However, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has denied the service tax refund in respect of catering service and rent-a-cab service, on the ground that such service has been used by the appellant for personal consumption of its employees and thus, such service has no nexus with the output service provided by the appellant.
3. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is not pressing for denial of refund benefit in respect of rent-a-cab service. However, he contended that catering service was availed and utilized by the appellant as per the H.R. Policy adopted by the appellant Company and such service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vice tax paid in respect of rent-a-cab service, I am of the view that the impugned order denying such refund benefit cannot be faulted with. Accordingly, the impugned order sustains, so far as it denied the refund benefit on rent-a-cab service.
6.1 With regard to catering service, the fact is not on dispute that the appellant had availed the services of the caterer for providing the catering facility to its employees, working within its business premises. Since providing catering facilities to the employees within the business premises is as per the Human Resource Policy, adopted by the appellant, the service tax paid on such service, in my opinion, should be considered as input service for the purpose of availment of refund benefit. Furth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Navabharat Ventures Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam – GST

Navabharat Ventures Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam – GST
Central Excise
2018 (9) TMI 739 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
Appeal Nos: E/31186/2017 & E/30055/2018 – A/31068-31069/2018
Central Excise
Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri G. Prahlad, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri Bhanu Kiran, Asst. Commissioner/AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
[Order per: P.V. Subba Rao.]
1. These two appeals involve a similar issue and are being disposed of together by a common order.
2. The appellant is a manufacturer of sugar and they stored sugar in godowns outside the factory premises, after paying duty on the same because the place in the factory was not sufficient. Thereafter the appellant had sold the sugar from these godowns. The godowns in question were hired by the appellant and service tax on renting of immovable property was paid on these godowns and appellant had taken credit of the same. Show Cause Notices were issued

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e of final products and clearance of final products “up to the place of removal”. It is to be decided whether the godowns in question are to be treated as places after the point of removal or they are the places of removal. According to the show cause notice the godowns are not part of the place of removal and the removal had already taken place as the duty has been paid before the goods were stored in these godowns. The original authority held that the use of input service must be integrally connected with the manufacture of final product and there must be nexus with the process of the manufacture. He held that in this case, the renting of immovable property services are utilized beyond the factory gate after removal of goods and does not qualify for entitlement of credit. He therefore confirmed the demand along with interest and also imposed a penalty under Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Sec.11AC of the Act. This position of the original authority was upheld by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r factory and stored it in the depots from where the sugar was subsequently sold to the customers. Therefore, the godowns of their factory consequently fall under the definition of place of removal and hence, they are entitled to the credit of CENVAT credit on the service tax paid from renting of immovable property on these godowns. He relied on the following orders:
1) DSCL Sugar Vs CCE, Lucknow [ 2014-34-STR-58-Tri.-Delhi] in which it was held that the godowns of the appellant at Agra and Farrukhabad where the sugar was stored after payment of duty must be considered as place of removal.
2) Mark Exhaust Systems Ltd [2017-47-STR-167-Tri.-Delhi] in which it was held that motor vehicles manufactured and sold to buyer through the depots situated outside factory premises and the depots were treated as the place of removal.
3) Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd [2017-3-GSTL-199-Tri.-Chennai] in which CENVAT credit was allowed on the godowns hired to store duty paid sugar outside the factory premi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Royal Line Resources Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam, GST

Royal Line Resources Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam, GST
Central Excise
2018 (9) TMI 246 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
Application No. E/COD/30355/2018 and Appeal No. E/30618/2018 – Final Order No. A/31067/2018
Central Excise
HON'BLE MR. P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri N.V. Ramana Rao, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri V.R. Pavan Kumar, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent
ORDER
[ Order Per : P. V. Subba Rao ]
1. The application is filed seeking condonation of a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal. As the delay is marginal, I condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeal on merits.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records. The appellant herein is a merchant exporter registered as dealer with the Central Excise, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate. They have filed form ARE1 seeking to export excisable goods viz., Mill scale under claim of rebate of duty from the premises of their supplier M/s Jai Balaji Mine

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

prescribed under notification 19-2004-CE (NT), Dt. 06.09.2004. The revenue felt that the rebate was wrongly sanctioned as the condition in Para 3(b)(i) of notification requires the refund claim to be filed with the Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise or Dy. Commissioner of Central Excise, having jurisdiction over the factory of the manufacture or warehouse or, as the case may be, the Maritime Commissioner. In this case, the goods were not cleared from the factory but from the warehouse in Raipur. The refund claim was filed with the Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam, who neither has jurisdiction over the factory or the warehouse. He was also not designated as Maritime Commissioner by the Visakhapatnam Commissionerate. The Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise, Division-II has been designated as Maritime Commissioner for the purpose of processing and granting rebate claims and not the Asst. Commissioner of Central Excise, Division-III who sanctioned the rebate. An appe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on procedural grounds.
5. The learned counsel for the appellant argued that in terms of Para 3(b)(i) of the notification, the officer having jurisdiction over the factory or manufacturer or warehouse can sanction the rebate. The term 'warehouse' under Rule 2(h) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 includes any place registered under Rule 9. The appellant is registered under Rule 9 as a dealer and therefore, the premises of the appellant should be considered as a warehouse and the Asst. Commissioner, Central Excise, Division-III, Visakhapatnam has jurisdiction over the appellant and hence is entitled to sanction the rebate. Therefore, the rebate was correctly sanctioned and the Order-in-Appeal needs to be set aside. As an alternative argument, he submitted that in terms of second proviso to Sec.35A, if the Commissioner (Appeals) is of the opinion that any duty has been erroneously refunded, no order requiring the appellant to pay the erroneously refunded duty shall be passed unless, the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Navabharat Ventures Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam –GST Vice-Versa

Navabharat Ventures Ltd Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam –GST Vice-Versa
Central Excise
2018 (9) TMI 245 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 28-8-2018
E/30717/2016, E/31203/2017 , E/31237/2017, E/31283/2017, E/30619/2018 – Final Order No. A/31070-31074/2018
Central Excise
HON'BLE MR. P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri G. Prahlad, Advocate for the Assessee
Smt B.V. Siva Naga Kumari, Commissioner/AR for the Revenue
ORDER
[ Order Per : P. V. Subba Rao ]
1. All these appeals are filed by the Assessee except Appeal No.E/31203/2017 which is filed by the Revenue.
2. These appeals involve a single issue and hence are being disposed of by a common order. The appellant/assessee is a manufacturer of sugar. They also manufacture certain other commodities as follows:
a. Dutiable Products – Sugar, Molasses, Denatured Spirit, Fuel Oil, etc., and
b. Exempted Final Products – Organic manure, Rectified Spirit, Bagasse, Bio earth and power.
3.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

imposed penalty as proposed. The appellant's appeals to the first appellate authority have been rejected and hence, these appeals are filed. As far as the appeal filed by the department is concerned, it is alleged in the appeal that the first appellate authority has wrongly demanded a duty @ 6% of value of exempted goods under Rule 6(3)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 which is beyond the scope of the show cause notice. The show cause notice had only demanded duty proportionate to the value of the exempted goods. Therefore, the appeal of the revenue is that the Order-in-Appeal No. VIZ-EXCUS-002-APP-043-17- 18, Dt. 21.08.2017 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) may be modified to this extent. The appellant/assessee readily agrees with the prayer of the revenue on this ground.
4. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that they have a sugar division which manufactures sugar and produces bagasse and molasses also. They also have a power division which uses bagasse to produce power, part o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal that they failed to maintain separate accounts for availment of credit on input services in respect of dutiable and exempted final products. It has also been alleged that they failed to comply with the provisions of Rule 6 knowingly and availed credit on input services which went into both dutiable and exempted goods. The appellant/assessee contended these assertions on the following grounds:
a. They are maintaining separate books of accounts for each division and have been maintaining records of inputs availed in respect of each unit.
b. The provisions to Rule 6 do not apply to the waste that is generated during the manufacture such as bagasse.
c. The rectified spirit manufactured by them from molasses is an intermediary product for the final product denatured spirit although in some cases, they cleared the rectified spirit as such.
d. The bio-earth or organic manure manufactured by them is also an excisable product and is being cleared on pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed spirit, he concedes that they are liable to reverse credit of input services to the extent the rectified spirit has been cleared as such without payment of duty but not to the extent it has been denatured and cleared on payment of duty. As far as the electricity is concerned, he submits that they have already reversed the input service credit to the extent the electricity has been sold to outsiders. To the extent the electricity has been consumed within the factory, it becomes an intermediary product and not an exempted product and hence, no input service needs to be reversed. He relied on the judgment in the case of DSCL Sugar Ltd [2015-(322)-ELT-(769)-(SC)] and argued that the bagasse is only an agricultural waste or residue produced during the manufacture of sugar and is not a product by itself, let alone being an intermediary product. Therefore, the question of reversing credit of input services which have gone into production of bagasse does not arise. Similarly, Hon'ble High c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uiring reversal of CENVAT credit. There are also other products with respect to which the appellant claims that they have already reversed the CENVAT credit such as on electricity. There are products such as organic manure which the appellant claims to have cleared on payment of duty. Therefore, the proper course of action is to remand the matter back to the original authority to examine the claims of the appellant in respect to each product and re-determine the amount of duty, if any, to be recovered from them after following principles of natural justice. Without passing any comments on the merits of the case, I remand the matter back to the original authority to re-determine the quantum of input service credit, if any, required to be reversed by the appellant/assessee taking into account their claims and the other judicial pronouncements which they have relied upon.
7. The appeals filed by the assessee as well as the department are allowed by way of remand to the original authority

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Ujjain Versus Mars Stationery Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Ujjain Versus Mars Stationery Pvt. Ltd.
Central Excise
2018 (9) TMI 26 – MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT – TMI
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 28-8-2018
C. E. A. No. 57 of 2017
Central Excise
P. K. Jaiswal And S. K. Awasthi, JJ.
Shri Prasanna Prasad, learned Counsel for the appellant
Shri Alok Barthwal, learned Counsel for the respondent
ORDER
Heard.
2. This appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been filed by the Revenue against the final order dated 18.1.2017 (Annexure – A) passed by the Appellate Tribunal, whereby the learned Tribunal came to the conclusion that Board's circular No.6/92 dated 29.5.1992 does not debar clubbing of turnover and it is also observed that there is no allegation that the SSI units were dummy units and allowed the appeal.
3. Learned Counsel for the respondent has submitted that in this appeal the issue is regarding interpretation of Board's circular No.6/92 date

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndent / assessee has been confirmed along with interest and penalty of incidental amount.
2.Shri Alok Barthwal, learned counsel for the respondent / assessee has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the appeal; and submitted that appeal shall lie against an order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi not being an order relating among other things, to the determination of any question having relation to the rate of duty or excise or to the value of the goods for the purpose of assessment.
3.He submitted that looking to the controversy, an order passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal shall lie to the Apex Court under Section 35-L of the Central Excise Act, 1944. He further submitted that in identical facts and circumstances of the case, similar question was raised before the Gujarat High Court in the case of Commissioner v. Kich Industries reported in 2014 (305) ELT 107 (Gujarat); and other decisions (1) Commissioner of Cen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

35-L and not under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to the High Court.
4.On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the present case, so also the law laid down in the cases of Commissioner v. Kich Industries (supra), Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-II v. Vadapalani Press & others (supra), Commissioner of Central Excise, Panchkula v. Special Machine (supra), Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa v. Primella Sanitary Products (P) Limited (supra) Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiyana v. A.S.T. Paper Mills Limited (supra), Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax, Ahmedabad-III v. Pravinbhai Narshibhai Patel Partner (supra) and Navin Chemicals Manufacturing and Trading Company Limited v. Collector of Customs (supra), we permit the appellant / department to withdraw this appeal and direct the department to assail the order by filing an appeal under Section 35-L of the Central Excise Act, 1944 before the Apex Court. However, on filing true cop

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Application for Refund of ITC on Export of Goods & Services without payment of ITC

Application for Refund of ITC on Export of Goods & Services without payment of ITC
Query (Issue) Started By: – viraf deboo Dated:- 27-8-2018 Last Reply Date:- 29-8-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 11 Replies
GST
We are manufacturer exporter registered under GST. We are exporting our goods to various countries. We want to know that, whether Application for Refund of ITC on Export of Goods & Services without payment of ITC under LUT as per Section 54(3) (i) and Rule 89(4) of CGST Act 2017 is compulsory / mandatory??
We have blocked / carry forward proportionate ITC in Electronic Credit Ledger as per formula given in Rule 89(4) of CGST Rules & to be applied for ITC refund in GST RFD-01A form on common portal. Kindly advice w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion (3) of section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (13 of 2017), refund of input tax credit shall be granted as per the following formula –
Refund Amount = (Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods + Turnover of zero-rated supply of services) x Net ITC ÷Adjusted Total Turnover
Sir kindly advice that, whether it is compulsory / mandatory that we have to block / carry forward ITC in Electronic Credit Ledger as per above formula against zero rated goods & the same ITC will be applied for refund in GST RFD-01A FORM on common portal ??
Reply By Ramaswamy S:
The Reply:
This is similar to rule 5 of erstwhile Cenvat Credit Rules.
The refund of tax paid on inputs for exports without payment of IGST under LUT or bond

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s of Sri Ramasamy.
Reply By Gorantla Bhaskar Rao:
The Reply:
Nicely elucidated by Shri Ramaswamy sir
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Yes, indeed.
Reply By Yash Jain:
The Reply:
Sir,
When we apply for refund U/s 54(3), the refund amount is automatically reversed in electronic credit ledger , which again depends on balance available as on date(I.e the balance on date when refund is filed)and not the date on which export is done/gaye 3b is filed.
Sir, now from your question I interpretate that you will export zero rated and claim ITC refund, by keeping in ecl the amount of refund (as per formula). In this case I would request you to please evaluate the option of paying igst (by input tax reversal) and claim refund, as this is lea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RECENT ADVANCE RULINGS IN GST (PART-5)

RECENT ADVANCE RULINGS IN GST (PART-5)
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 27-8-2018

Advance rulings are important in any tax law as it provides a forum for clarification and possible interpretation of statutory provisions. Moreover, it conveys the legislative intention from the revenue's view point. Provisions of advance ruling are contained in section 95 to 106 of CGST Act, 2017 and State / UT GST enactment. Rules 103 to 107 of also provide for forms, manner, certification etc.
The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) have been set up in all the states and we have now over 100 advance rulings on different issues already pronounced by various State Authorities. The appellate mechanism for filing appeals against AAR rulings is also in place and we have about ten such appellate orders already pronounced. One major issue presently being faced is about multiple authorities (equal to number of States), each pronouncing a ruling of its own even if

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uch supply of works contract involved only a minor fraction of earth work and therefore, such composite supply of works contract service for maintaining railway tracks would be taxable at the rate of 18% GST. Further, such service could be classifiable under Heading No. 995429 under GST. [In Re Sreepati Ranjan Gope & Sons (2018) 5 TMI 370 (AAR-West Bengal); ]
Advance Ruling on liquidated damages
In the instant case, based on agreement entered into by applicant, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd. with BHEL for purpose of erection, testing and commissioning of main plant package, there were no such clauses in agreement as would tantamount to reducing contract price or contract value of supplies of goods or services or both as made by Contractor on account of delay in delivery of manufactured goods. In fact, levy of liquidated damages had been specifically identified as an independent levy. The contract price variation clause in impugned agreement did not provide for variat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

licability of GST on freight bills.
Applicant argued that it is not a goods transport agency (GTA) for applicability of Notification No. 9/2017 – IT (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, which, granted exemption on transportation services provided by an entity other than GTA. As applicant is not a GTA, supply of transportation services is exempt from GST vide the exemption notification.
It has been ruled that the applicant supplies works contract service, of which freight and transportation is merely a component of overall services and not a separate and independent activity and GST is to be paid @ 18% on the entire value of the composite supply, including supply of materials, freight and transportation, erection, commissioning etc.
It was also held that reference to a notification under the IGST Act should be contract specific, where an inter-state supply is taking place. In this application general nature of a supply is being dealt with rather than the place of any particular supply. Moreover,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Puducherry

M/s. Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Puducherry
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 1196 – CESTAT CHENNAI – 2019 (369) E.L.T. 841 (Tri. – Chennai)
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 27-8-2018
Appeal Nos. E/40803 and 40804/2017 – Final Order Nos. 42352-42353/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri Raghaan Ramabhadran, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, ADC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The issue involved in both these appeals being same, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of mosquito repellent coil and are registered with the Central Excise Department. They are availing CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods and input services used in the manufacture of the finished goods and also on the input services distributed by their Head Office as Input Serv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

units availing area based exemption were distributed to the appellant unit at Puducherry which according to department is not eligible as it is contravention of the provisions of Rule 2(l) r/w third proviso to Rule 3(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The second issue is that the credit of service tax availed on membership fee for membership in Bombay Gymkhana Club Ltd. is not an input service as defined under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and therefore not eligible. Show cause notice dated 8.12.2011 was issued raising both these allegations. Later, show cause notice dated 18.10.2012 was raised alleging violation of credit distributed on ISD invoices as narrated above. After due process of law, the adjudicating authority confirmed the demand along with interest and also imposed penalties. Hence the appellants are now before this Tribunal.
3. On behalf of the appellant, ld. counsel Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran appeared and argued the matter. He submitted that the units located in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he credit has been distributed by the head office as per Rule 7 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The said Rule does not provide for any pro-rata distribution prior to 1.4.2012. During the disputed period, which is from December 2006 to March 2011, Rule 7 did not provide for pro-rata distribution of credit and whatever credit availed by the units availing area based exemption and distributed to other units is correct and proper. He drew support from the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. ECOF Industries P. Ltd. – 2011 (277) ELT 317 (Kar.) to argue that Rule 7 does not provide any pro-rata distribution prior to 1.4.2012.
3.1 With regard to the issue of credit availed on membership fee for Bombay Gymkhana club, ld. counsel submitted that the same is availed for the activities of business of the company and therefore eligible.
4. The ld. AR Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy supported the findings in the impugned order. He adverted to pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. 39/2001-Central Excise, dated the 31st July 2001 [GSR 565(E) dated the 31st July 2001];
(iv) No.56/2002-Central Excise, dated the 14th November, 2002 [GSR 764(E) dated the 14th November, 2002];
(v) No.57/2002-Central Excise, dated the 14th November, 2002 [GSR 765(E) dated the 14th November, 2002];
(vi) No.56/2003-Central Excise, dated the 25th June, 2003 [GSR 513(E) dated the 25th June, 2003];
(vii) No.71/2003-Central Excise, dated the 9th September, 2003 [GSR 717 (E) dated the 9th September, 2003];
shall, respectively, be utilized only for payment of duty on final products, in respect of which exemption under the said respective notifications is availed of”
The above proviso clearly shows that the units who avail credit of duty or service tax if availing the area based exemptions shall utilize the credit only for payment of duty on final products in respect of which exemption under the respective notifications has been availed. It is an undisputed fact that various services we

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

there was no restriction as to how much credit can be distributed to each unit. During the relevant period, Rule 7 did not lay down any manner of distribution based on pro-rata basis. The said proviso under Rule 7, during the disputed period read as under:-
RULE 7. Manner of distribution of credit by input service distributor. – The input service distributor shall distribute the CENVAT credit in respect of the service tax paid on the input service to its manufacturing units or units providing output service, subject to the following conditions, namely:-
(a) the credit distributed against a document referred to in rule 9 does not exceed the amount of service tax paid thereon; or
(b) credit of service tax attributable to service use in a unit exclusively engaged in manufacture of exempted goods or providing of exempted services shall not be distributed.”
6.1 Only with effect from 1.4.2012, Rule 7 has been amended to include that the distribution of credit shall be on pro-rata basis.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Khedut Hat,

In Re: M/s. Khedut Hat,
GST
2018 (10) TMI 302 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 75 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT – AAR
Dated:- 27-8-2018
GUJ/GAAR/RULING/2018/17 (IN APPLICATION NO. Advance Ruling/SGST&CGST/2017-18/AR/32)
GST
R.B. MANKODI AND G.C. JAIN, MEMBER
Present for the applicant : Shri Brijen Mehta, CA
The applicant, M/s. Khedut Hat has submitted that it is in the business of carrying out blasting work at various sites by means of use of explosives and other materials for which it has obtained licence from Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organization.
1.1. The applicant submitted that explosives procured by the applicant for blasting activity are stored only in licenced premises as stated in licence, termed as 'magazine'; that prior to carrying out blasting activity, client inform the applicant number of holes to be charged at the site; that prior to initiating blasting activity, applicant wit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

carry out only blasting at the site only; that client is not qualified person to possess explosives and thus it is clear that applicant has not transferred title to goods used in blasting activity to its client and therefore the applicant has the view that blasting activity carried out by it shall be treated as 'supply of service'.
1.4 On the basis of above facts and submissions, the applicant has sought ruling on following question-
(i) Whether the blasting activity carried out by the applicant is to be considered as a 'supply of goods' or 'supply of service' ?
2. We have heard Shri Brijen Mehta, Chartered Accountant, for the appellant on 18.01.2018. We have considered the submissions made by the applicant in their application for advance ruling and submissions made at the time of personal hearing. We have also considered the comments on the application offered by the department vide letter F.No. IV/16-64/Tech/2017-18 dated 18.01.2018.
3. In order to decide

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the contract executed by the respondent – contractor cannot have our approval. We, therefore, set aside the order of the High Court and allow this appeal.”
3. Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as the 'CGST Act, 2017) and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as the 'GGST Act, 2017') provides for scope of supply and the definition of supply is an inclusive definition. Therefore, Schedule II is not the exhaustive condition for the scope of supply as defined under Section 7.
4. In the present case applicant uses explosives in the blasting activity at their client's site. Thus it would be evident that blasting activity is carried out by the applicant for their client for which the applicant uses explosives. The applicant carries out blasting work with the aid of explosives. Thus, there is deemed supply of explosives in this case in view of the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Pest C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendment in Notification No. 3043/CSTUK/GST-Vidhi Section/2018-19/CT-34, dated 10 August, 2018

Amendment in Notification No. 3043/CSTUK/GST-Vidhi Section/2018-19/CT-34, dated 10 August, 2018
4207/CSTUK/GST-Vidhi Section/2018-19/CT-35 Dated:- 27-8-2018 Uttarakhand SGST
GST – States
Uttarakhand SGST
Uttarakhand SGST
Commissioner, State Tax, Uttarakhand
State Tax Department
NOTIFICATION
August 27, 2018
No. 4207/CSTUK/GST-Vidhi Section/2018-19/CT-35In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (06 of 2017) read with s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited

In Re: Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1645 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 700 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 27-8-2018
AAR No. 11/2018
GST
SHRI RAJIV AGRAWAL AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR CHOUBEY, MEMBER
Present on behalf of applicant: Shree Abhay singi, C.A. and Shree Anirudh Tiwari, Accounts Officer
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and MP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and MPSGT Act respectively) by M/S Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Limited (hereinafter also referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax.
2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

whether clause(vi)(a) of Sr. No. 3 of table of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017 is applicable on the works contract undertaken by it. And determination of liability to pay Tax.
5. DEPARTMENT'S VIEW POINT- The concerned officer submitted that the nature of works contract undertaken by the applicant doesn't come under the category for which the notified rate of tax is 12%(6%CGST and 6% SGST) but it will attract 18%(9% CGST and 9% SGST).
6. RECORD OF PERSONAL HEARING –
Shree Abhay singi, C.A. and Shree Anirudh Tiwari, Accounts Officer Appeared for personal hearing on 06.07.18 and they reiterated the submission already made in the application and attached additional submission which goes as follow –
6.1. The Company Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Company Ltd. (MPPKVVCL) is wholly owned subsidiary of M.P. Power Management Co. Ltd.
6.2 The holding Company M.P. Power Management Co. Ltd. is wholly owned by the Government of Madhya Pradesh.
6.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d – 13/10/2017.
4) Notification No. – 46/2017 – Central Tax (Rate), Dated – 14/11/2017.
5) Notification No. – 01/2018 Central Tax (Rate), Dated – 25/01/2018.
6.7 Vide notification no. 24/2017 – Central Tax (Rate), Dated – 21/09/2017,
Government of India by inserting entry no. (vi) notified concessional GST rate of 6% for the construction services provided to Central Government, State Government, Union Territory, a local authority or a governmental authority by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of-
a) a civil structure or any other original works meant predominantly for use other than for commerce, industry, or any other business or profession;
b) a structure meant predominantly for use as (i) an educational, (ii) a clinical, or (iii) an art or cultural establishment; or
c) a residential complex predominantly meant for self-use or the use of their employees or other persons specif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

provisions referred above issued under the Notification No. 24/2017-Central Tax (Rate), Dated – 21/09/2017 and  Notification No. – 31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate), Dated – 13/10/2017 is applicable on the Company.
7. DISCUSSIONS AND FINDINGS:
7.1. First of all we must look in the contention that the Applicant is a government entity or not. As per Notification No. 31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate), Dated 13/10/2017 issued under CGST Act, 2017 and corresponding notification under MPGST Act, 2017. Government Entity is defined as under –
“Government Entity” means an authority or a board or any other body including a society, trust, corporation, i) set up by an Act of Parliament or State Legislature; or ii) established by any Government, with 90per cent. or more participation by way of equity or control, to carry out a function entrusted by' the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or a local authority.”
7.2. The Company Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Company Ltd. (MP

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s important to discuss the nature of work undertaken by the applicant. The Applicant is entrusted for various ambitious projects of Central and State Government relating to strengthening of power distribution network and Rural Electrification for public welfare such as Deendayal Upadhyay Gram Jyoti Yojna for Rural Electrification (DDUGJY), Integrated Power Development Scheme (IPDS), Saubhagya Yojna, ADB funded project, Scheme for Strengthening of Transmission and Distribution systems (SSTD) projects, feeder separation project (FSP) etc., the work has been carried out with the help of Contractor and work include both supply of material and erection of the same.
7.7. The projects are undertaken for construction of electricity distribution lines, sub-stations and other infrastructure which arc meant predominately for sell of electricity in urban and/or rural area.
7.8. As per the Memorandum of Association of the Company, Main objects to be pursued by the Company on its incorporation is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ining to construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration, which are carried out in respect of projects under DDUGY, IPDS, ADB, SSTD, Saubhagya Yojna, FSP and all other schemes of governments as the same is undertaken for the business purpose.
Further, as per Section 2 of CGST Act '2017 and MPGST Act, 2017 defines “works contract” as a contract for building, construction, fabrication, completion, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair, maintenance, renovation, alteration or commissioning of any immovable property wherein transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) is involved in the execution of such contract;
The composite supply of works contract as defined at Section 2 of CGST Act '2017 and MPGST Act, 2017 is treated as supply of service in terms of serial no.6, Schedule II of CGST Act '2017 and MPGST Act, 2017.
In the instant case, th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: M/s. JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES P. LTD.,

IN RE: M/s. JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES P. LTD.,
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1644 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 690 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 60 G S.T.R. 31 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 27-8-2018
Order No. 12/2018
GST
SHRI RAJIV AGRAWAL AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR CHOUBEY MEMBER
Present on behalf of applicant: Shree Nikhilesh Mlshra , DGM and Shree Vishal Shreevastav Tax, Consultant
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and MP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and MPSGT Act respectively) by M/S. JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES P. Ltd., (hereinafter also referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax.
2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are ide

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Area Maintenance charges from tenants;
iii. Food Court – Operates a food court in the Mall, which is an air-conditioned area with self-serve (dine-in) and take away arrangements;
iv. SAM Retail – Operates a franchise apparel retail store within the Mall.
3.2 The Applicant is charging GST on outward supply of Goods & Services as under:
i. Sale of Movie tickets – @28% (on tickets exceeding Rs. 100/-) or @18% (on tickets below Rs. 100/-);
ii. Renting of Shops – @18%
iii. Common Area Maintenance Charges – @18%
iv. Sale of Food & Drinks – @5% (Without claiming ITC on food items and beverages purchased)
3.3 Further, the Applicant is claiming ITC of GST paid on following inward supplies of goods & services:
i. Movie Distributor Share Bill – Movie Distributor is raising a bill against revenue share of sale of movie tickets of every movie;
ii. Projector Rental Bills – The Applicant has taken a projector on rent for screening of movies;
iii. Advertising Bill – Relating to advert

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rticle for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent '
The Applicant is not providing residential or lodging accommodation services therefore rate of GST on food & drinks served by the Applicant is covered under the clause mentioned above. Therefore the Applicant is charging GST @5% on supply of food, drinks and & snacks from Food Court and Snack bar of Multiplex.
ii. As per Section 16(1) of the CGST Act, “Every registered pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course of furtherance of business.
Explanation: For the purpose of clause (c) and (d), the expression “construction includes re-construction renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalization, to the said immovable property;”
The inward supply of goods and services as mentioned in the questions 2 and 3, is for the purpose of maintenance & renovation of building and it is not capitalized in the books of accounts. These expenses are revenue in nature and hence full ITC can be claimed.
4 QUESTIONS RAISED BEFORE THE AUTHORITY:
The following questions have been posed before the Authority, with reference to the activity undertaken by the Applicant:
4.1 Whether GST @5% can be charged on food, soft drinks, and snacks sold in the Snack Bar & Food Court in terms of Notification no.46/2017;
4.2 Whether ITC of GST paid on Movie Distri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t in terms of Notification no.46/2017?
It has been opined by the CGST department that in terms of relevant entry in the notification no.46/2017, the supply of food, drinks & snacks etc. Served by the Applicant at their own Mall, without providing lodging and accommodation services, shall attract GST @5% and no Input Tax Credit shall be available to the Applicant.
5.2 Whether ITC of GST paid on Movie Distributor Revenue Share Bill, Projector Rental Bill, Advertisement Bill, Security Agency Bill and Housekeeping Bill can be claimed in full?
It has been opined that in view of the facts and circumstances about the output services being provided by the Applicant through their four Divisions, Viz. Multiplex Division, Renting Division, Maintenance Division and Food Court, it appears that ITC on aforementioned Input Services would be admissible to the Applicant because the said input supply of services appear attributable towards their outward supply of services for furtherance of their bus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in respect of the following, namely:
(a)…………
(b)…………
(c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service;
(d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.
Explanation.For the purposes of clauses (c) and (d), the expression “construction” includes re-construction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalisation, to the said immovable property;
Thus, it is clear from clause (d) above, that no ITC shall be admissible to the Applicant in respect of goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction/maintenance of an immovable property. In the instant case, the applicant h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pplicant is not availing such ITC for providing output works contract service, therefore it appears that the applicant is not entitled to avail ITC and any ITC so availed needs to be reversed by the Applicant.
6 RECORD OF PERSONAL HEARING:
Shri Shree Nikhilesh Mlshra, DGM and Shree Vishal Shreevastav, Tax Consultant, appeared on behalf of the applicant and reiterated the submissions already made in the application. Subsequent to PH, the Applicant also submitted additional write-up on 09.07.2018 giving further details in furtherance of their extant application. The same are briefed as under:
A. Process description of Restaurant services: The Applicant submitted that they mainly selling popcorn, cold drinks, sandwiches, tea & coffee etc. in the Snack Bar for which they have the facility of electric fryers, grillers, warmers, dispensing machine etc. These items are served in disposable plates/glasses etc.
B. For movie show exhibition they have an agreement with V N Exhibitors who char

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

these questions one by one to arrive at conclusion.
7.3 The first question reads, “Whether GST @5% can be charged on food, soft drinks, and snacks sold in the Snack Bar & Food Court in terms of Notification no.46/2017- Central Tax (Rate)?'. On a careful consideration of the legal position under the GST law, we find that the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 further amended by Notification No.46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) vide entry at Serial Number 7 and corresponding notifications issued under MPGST ACT ,2017, squarely covers the services provided by the Applicant at item no.(i) which reads:
'Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

utdoor Catering. The term 'Outdoor Catering' was defined under Section 65(76)(a) of the erstwhile Finance Act 1994 as “Outdoor caterer means a caterer engaged in providing service in connection with catering at place other than his own but including a place provided by way of tenancy or otherwise by the person receiving such service”. On considering the common parlance meaning of 'Outdoor Catering' and its above definition for Service Tax, we come to the conclusion that the supply of food, soft drinks and snacks sold in the Food Court or Snack Bar of the Applicant cannot by any stretch of imagination, be treated as a part of outdoor catering. In view of the facts and circumstances, we are of the view that the services provided by the Applicant in Snack Bar would be classifiable under SAC 9963 and chargeable to GST @ 5% (CGST @2.5% + SGST @2.5%), provided they fulfill the conditions laid down under Notification 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and corresponding notifications i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

roviding exempted supplies shall be subject to reversal in terms of Section 17(1) of the GST Act, 2017. To illustrate, Security Services and Housekeeping in particular shall be utilized for Snacks Bar and Food Court also and hence ITC on such services would be available partially in terms of provisions of Section 17(1) of the GST Act, 2017.
7.5 Now moving on to the third question posed before the Authority, we observe that the question is; 'Whether ITC on GST paid on goods purchased for the purpose of maintenance such as Vitrified Tiles, Marble, Granite ACP Sheets, Steel Plates, TMT TOR, Bricks, Cement, Paint, Chemicals, Sanitary items like wash basin, urinal pots, and toilet accessories can be claimed in full?'.
The Applicant has been purchasing the materials under question for the purpose of utilising the same in maintenance/renovation of the Mall building. Broadly speaking, the extant law i.e. the GST Act 2017 prohibits such ITC in terms of clause (d) of Section 17(5) whic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Explanation to the sub-section (5) has defined the term 'Construction' to encompass all the activities '…….to the extent of capitalization to the said immovable property.' Going by the said definition it has been argued that ITC of materials used for maintenance can be claimed in full if the cost of maintenance is not capitalized. We find that capitalization of expenditure depends on the nature of expenditure and the period of benefit from such expenditure. However, the Application falls pretty short in elucidating the nature of expenditure i.e. capital or revenue. Thus we are constrained to reach any definitive conclusion on this argument. Mere statement that expenditure is not capitalized cannot come to the rescue of Applicant. Be that as it may, the eligibility of ITC does not depend on the treatment given to the expenditure. If the expenditure is revenue in nature but subsequently capitalized in the books of account it would not make Applicant eligible to ITC on s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of Section 16 and sub-section (1) of Section 18, Input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:
(a)…………….
(b)…………….
(c) works contract service when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service,
Thus we do not find anything for us to discuss and deliberate on this issue. It is admittedly clear that Works Contract Service which the Applicant intends to engage is for the civil work etc. for repair/renovation/maintenance of Mall building. Such service is fully consumed at the end of Applicant and it is not an input service for further provision of output service as Works Contract. That being the case, we have no hitch in concluding that ITC in respect of Works Contract Service utilised by the Applicant for repair/renovation/maintenance of Mall building shall not be available to them.
7.7 Having regard to the discussi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Asia Cables Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai

M/s. Asia Cables Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai
Central Excise
2018 (9) TMI 1570 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 27-8-2018
Appeal No. E/75/2011 – Final Order No. 42317/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri Akhil Suresh, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The appellants are engaged in manufacture of PVC insulated cables and are registered with the Central Excise Department. It was alleged that the appellants have collected separately, in addition to the price of the goods sold, Inspection Charges, Service charges and Freight Charges from their buyers through debit notes. According to the department, these amounts have to be included in the assessable value for discharging the excise duty. As the appellant did not include these amounts in the transaction value and did not pay duty on su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeals) has excluded the railway freight. These are service charges which are not relatable to 'sale' effected by the appellant to the contractors on whose behalf the railway transport is arranged. Once the appellants have dispatched the goods from their end, that is the place of removal, which is the factory, contract terms are completed. In other words, the title to the goods is passed on to the contractor and the subsequent transport of goods is only at the instance of the contractor as it can be seen from one of the contracts that the consignee has been indicated as OS, S&T Stores, Projects, Boiguda, South Central Railway, Secunderabad. The appellants have rendered such services only as per the instructions of the contractor. Therefore, the said amount cannot be included in the assessable value.
3. The ld. AR Shri S. Govindarajan supported the findings in the impugned order. With respect to service charges, he submitted that the appellant has raised debit notes for collection of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o transport arrangement through rail. These charges have been paid to M/s. ARR Cargo Movers towards making arrangements for the transport of goods through railway. It can be seen that these are in connection with the loading / cargo handling of the goods for transportation by railway. The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the freight charges are not includible in the assessable value since the said charges are collected after the place of removal which is the factory gate. On the very basis, it can be definitely held that the service charges collected for cargo handling on the instruction of the contractor cannot be included in the assessable value.
6. From the above discussion, we hold that the demand raised alleging that the service charges as well as pre-delivery inspection charges are includible in the assessable value cannot sustain and requires to be set aside, which we hereby do. The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any.
(O

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Divya Singla and others Versus Union of India and others

Divya Singla and others Versus Union of India and others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 431 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 530 (P&H.)
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 27-8-2018
CWP No. 12390 of 2017 (O&M)
GST
MR. RAJESH BINDAL AND MR. AMIT RAWAL, JJ.
For The Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate
For The Respondent : Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate
ORDER
RAJESH BINDAL J.
The petitioners approached this Court seeking quashing of notice dated 15.05

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =