In Re: M/s. Kolte Patil Developers Ltd.
GST
2018 (12) TMI 1355 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 666 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 70 G S.T.R. 23 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 24-9-2018
GST-ARA-40/2018-19/B-118
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :-
What is the legal procedure for cancellation of flat which is booked in pre-GST Regime and cancelled in post-GST Regime. Also, GST liability in cases where some small amount is retained, for
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ue to certain reasons, the flats are cancelled by the customer on or after 1st July 2017 (i.e. after implementation of GST) which are booked by the customer in the pre-GST regime.
In pre-GST regime, Developer was entitled to avail service tax credit in case of cancellation flat as per Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1944. Hence, the customer who cancelled flat was not required to bear indirect tax cost as the cenvat credit for the same was available to the Developer.
In view of the above, the issue for determination before the Authority for Advance Ruling ('AAR') is – whether GST input tax credit of Service Tax and State VAT paid while booking of flat is available to the Developer, if cancelled in GST regime? What will be the methodology to avail Input Tax Credit on the said taxes paid?
STATEMENT CONTAINING THE APPLICANT'S INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND/OR FACTS, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN RESPECT OF THE QUESTION(S) ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS REQUIRED
1. ISSUE FOR DETERMINATION –
The
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
count of issue of the credit note only if the recipient of the credit note has reduced his input tax credit corresponding to such reduction of tax liability.
We submit that, the situation like revision of price upward or downward is addressed via sub clause (a) and sub clause (b) of Section 142 (2) of the CGST Act wherein credit note can be raised if the revision of price is downward. However, said section does not appear to exclude cancellation of contract cases.
Hence, can cancellation of flat be equated with revision of contract price is the question of law. Given this, we submit that, there could be two scenarios:
Cancellation of flat can be equated with the downward revision of price
Cancellation of flat cannot be equated with the downward revision of price
Cancellation of flat can be equated with the downward revision of price
In said scenario, as discussed aforesaid as per section 142(2)(b) of the CGST Act, credit note can be raised for cancellation of flat by the build
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
in pre-GST regime. Given this, indirect tax burden on flat booked in pre-GST regime was ranges from 4.50% – 5.50%.
Additionally, the Proviso to section 142 (2) specifically provides that 'Provided that the registered person shall be allowed to reduce his tax liability on account of issue of the credit note only if the recipient of the credit note has reduced his input tax credit corresponding to such reduction of tax liability.'. Thus, this proviso specifically appears to link and then restrict the amount of re-credit to the extent of amount paid by recipient (as the credit note is permissible only if the recipient of the credit note has reduced his input tax credit corresponding to such reduction of tax liability). Thus, it can be construed as the credit note can be issued to the extent of earlier taxes paid (which effectively could be 5.50%) than 12% (i.e. the GST rate applicable on under-construction flats in GST regime).
Additionally, we would like to submit that, the disclosing
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ch service is not provided then the taxpayer allowed to avail credit of such excess service tax paid.
Also, we would like to bring your kind attention towards Sub Section 5 of Section 140 of CGST Act, reproduced below:
“Every claim filed by a person after the appointed day for refund of tax paid under the existing law in respect of services not provided shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of existing law and any amount eventually accruing to him shall be paid in cash, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the provisions of existing law other than the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.”
Given the aforesaid, the amount already paid in pre- GST regime towards Service tax or Excise, could be refunded in cash, as it is specifically not carried forward in GST regime.
Further, we would like to bring your kind attention to the fact that, in accordance with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 'Any person c
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ordable homes for citizens.
Also, as per Section 173 of the CGST Act, the taxpayer has to reduce the prices and pass on GST benefit of increased input tax credit and reduced tax rate. However, double taxation of in aforesaid cases may not be intention of the law.
Additionally, even section 142 (6) (a) provides, inter-alia, cash refund in specified scenarios, in respect of admissible credit.
Thus, developers and property buyers are seeking clarity on the aforesaid as to whether the Service
Tax/VAT paid earlier can be claimed as credit or allowed as refund to property buyers.
Prayer
In view of the submissions made above, it is most humbly prayed that Hon'ble authorities may kindly pass a ruling to clarify the legal procedure for availment of Service Tax and VAT paid on cancellation of flat which is booked in pre-GST Regime and cancelled in post-GST Regime.
ADDITIONAL SUBMISSION TO BE CONSIDERED AND CLARIFIED WITH RESPECT TO SUBMISSION CANCELLATION OF FLAT DATED -24.07.2018
1.1 W
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
e raised with GST.
A.1 Cancellation is covered under downward revision as there is no restriction in the law
I. With respect to cancellation of flat this could be construed as the Builder/Developer is required to reduce GST to the extent of Service Tax or VAT paid at the time of booking of fiat. Also, it is to be noted that in case of citizen, who were not registered under indirect tax, the question of availment of cenvat credit not arises. Further, cenvat credit with respect to construction service in Service Tax was not available as per Finance Act, 1994 hence, in case of registered business entity also, the same was not available.
ll. Further we would like to bring your kind attention to the fact that Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1944 states-Where an assessee has issued an invoice, or received any payment, against a service to be provided which is not so provided by him either wholly or partially for any reason or where the amount of invoice is renegotiated due to deficient
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
subject matter with reference to which and context in which they have been used in the statute.
VI. Further, as per the 'cardinal Rule of interpretation', 'Whenever you have to constitute a statute or a document you do not constitute it according to the mere ordinary general meaning of the words, but according to the mere ordinary meaning of the word as applied to the subject matter which regards to which they are used.”
VII. Therefore, in determining the meaning of any word or phrase in a statute the first question to be asked is- “What is the natural or ordinary meaning of the word or phrase in its context in the statute?
VIII. The meaning should lead to some result which is reasonably be supposed to have been the intention of the legislature'.
IX. In the case of ICICI Bank v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (2005 (6) SCC 404, P. 414) = 2005 (8) TMI 666 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA it was held that 'In the construction of Statutes means the Statute as a whole, the previou
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
e CGST Act is allowed to avail the credit of taxes paid in the pre-GST regime in case of downward revision of contract price. Hence, question under consideration is whether cancellation of contract can be considered as a downward revision of price or not.
III. In this regard, reference can be given to the principle of interpretation of statute wherein beneficent construction involves giving the widest meaning possible to the statutes. When there are two or more possible ways of interpreting a section or a word, the meaning which gives relief and protects the benefits which are purported to be given by the legislation, should be chosen.
IV. A beneficial statute has to be construed in its correct perspective so as to fructify the legislative intent. Given this, in case of legislations which have may two different interpretations, the legislation which favours the class of persons for which it is purported should be preferred.
V. The rule of beneficial construction requires that eve
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
that it may not take away with one hand what the policy gives with the other.
B. Cancellation of flat cannot equated with the downward revision of price and builder is eligible for refund as per Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1944
B.1 when the transaction itself is cancelled the Government has no right over the taxes from the citizen
I. In this regard, we would like to refer Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1944 states that, in accordance with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 'Any person claiming refund of any duty of excise may make an application for refund of such duty to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise before the expiry of one year from the relevant date in such form as may be prescribed and the application shall be accompanied by such documentary or other evidence'
II. The expression 'relevant date' has been defined in clause (f) of Explanation (B) to Section 11B of the CE Act as “the date of payment of duty”
III. We would like to bring your kind attention
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
not levied at all.
VIII. We would like to bring your kind attention to the fact that, what is paid erroneously which was not required to be paid at all by the law and doesn't become of the nature of service tax.
IX. Given this, if assessee has paid service tax which was not payable at all, then time limit does not apply to amount paid which is not service tax (as no service is provided).
X. In this regard, reference can be had to the case of Madhvi Procon Pvt.Limited [2015 (38) S.T.R.74 (Tri. – Ahmd.) = 2015 (2) TMI 144 – CESTAT AHMEDABAD wherein it was held that, 'The issue involved in the present proceedings is as to whether amount of Rs. 19, 11,331/- paid by the Respondent should be considered as payment of duty' or an amount paid as 'deposit. From the facts available on records Service Tax was paid on the amount of advances received by the Respondent but ultimately no service could be provided as the said works contract got terminated. In the case of Addition Advertising v. U
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ice tax for acquisition of residential unit as held by the Hon'ble High Court in K.V.R. Constructions (2009 (8) TMI 150 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT). As it is not an amount of service tax, therefore, provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act are not applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore, the time limit prescribed under 11B is not applicable. Hence impugned order deserves no merit and same is set aside. Appeal is allowed with consequential relief. Stay petition also disposed of in the above terms.
XII. Karnataka high could in the case of KVR Construction (2012 (26) S.T.R. 195 (Kar.) =2012 (7) TMI 22 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT held that,
'Where the claim of the respondent/assessee is on the ground that they have paid the amount by mistake and therefore they are entitled for the refund of the said amount. If we consider this payment as service tax and duty payable, automatically, Section 11B would be applicable. When once there was no compulsion or duty cast to pay this se
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
t payable then refund of same is allowable and Section 11B of Central Excise Act is not applicable as for period of time limitation.
XV. Also, we would like to bring your kind attention towards Sub Section 5 of Section 140 of CGST Act, reproduced below:
“Every claim filed by a person after the appointed day for refund of tax paid under the existing law in respect of services not provided shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of existing law and any amount eventually accruing to notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the provisions of existing law other than the provisions of sub- section (2) of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.”
XVI. Given the aforesaid, the amount already paid in pre-GST regime towards Service tax or Excise, could be refunded in cash, as it is specifically not carried forward in GST regime.
XVII. Further, citizen of India who will cancel flats for any reason may not have to bear the impact. Also, anyways, the deve
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
94) and thus, the new provision which essentially is to cover the scenarios provided for under earlier law, cannot curtail the rights of the taxpayers.
III. Thus, we submit that, the substantial benefit should not be denied to the applicant that because of new law which assesse was eligible under pre-GST regime
B.3 Time limit should apply from date of cancellation as that is the trigger point (and not payment of tax) – Law cannot enforce impossible condition to claim within one year if the contract is cancelled after 1 year (say in July 2018)
I. Without prejudice to aforesaid submission even we consider that the time limit of one year is applicable in the given case it should be considered from the date of cancellation of flat.
ll. As per the Principles of Interpretation it is well settled law that there are two exceptions to non-compliance of mandatory requirement viz:
a. When the performance of the requirement is impossible in such cases the performance is excused
b. If
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
was held that for the purpose of computing the time limit under Section 11B, the date of issue of credit notes is relevant and then only the provisional price gets finalized
V. It may be noted that had the earlier regime continued, the taxpayer was having right to utilise the excess tax paid (arising due to cancellation of booked flats) against any other Service Tax liability. Now, as the cancellation is taking place in GST regime, typically, cancellation is the trigger point which should either enable the taxpayer (i.e. developer) to claim credit or the customer claim the refund.
VI. Also, it is to be noted that erstwhile in the Pre-GST regime as per rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1944 the builder/ developer is allowed to avail credit of such excess service tax paid against the invoice issued for which service is not provided then the taxpayer.
VII Thus, practically the period of one year should be reckoned from the date of cancellation of flat and not from the date of payment
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
Patil Road, Pune-411001, have filed an application No. 40. Dtd. 19.06.2018 for Advance Ruling before the Authority for the Advance Ruling.
2. M/s. Kolte Patil Developers Ltd., Pune, in the pre-GST regime, had obtained registration under Service Tax (No. AAACK7310GST001) w.e.f. 20.03.2007 for services rendered,
3. M/s. Kolte Patil Developers Ltd., Pune (hereinafter referred to as “Appellant”), is engaged in the activity of Construction of Residential and Commercial Complex. When the flats were booked by the Customer, the applicable Service Tax and MVAT was deposited. Given this, Indirect Tax burden borne by the Individual Customer on the flat booked in Pre-GST regime ranges from 4.50% -5.50%. However, due to certain reasons, the flats are cancelled by the Customer on or after 1st July 2017 (i.e. after implementation of GST) which are booked by the Customer in the Pre-GST regime.
4. In terms of Section 142 (2) of the CGST Act, credit note can be raised:
5. a….
6. where, in pur
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
r, said section does not appear to exclude cancellation of contract cases.
9. Hence, can cancellation of flat be equated with revision of contract price is the question of law. Given this, we submit that, there could be two scenarios:
10. Cancellation of flat can be equated with the downward revision of price
11. In said scenario, as discussed aforesaid as per section 142(2)(b) of the CGST Act, credit note can be raised for cancellation of flat by the builder and same is treated as 'Outward Supply'. Further, as per proviso to said section tax liability on account of issue of credit note can be reduced only if the recipient of credit note has reduced his input tax credit.
12. As regards to said legal pronouncement tax liability is to be reduced to the extent of input tax credit reduced/reversed by the recipient. With respect to cancellation of flat this could be construed as the Builder/Developer is required to reduce GST to the extent Of Service Tax or VAT paid at the time of b
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
paid while booking of Flat is available to the Developer, if cancelled in GST regime? What will be the methodology to avail Input Tax Credit on the said taxes paid?
b) What is the legal procedure for cancellation of flat which is booked in Pre-GST Regime and cancelled in Post-GST Regime. Also, GST liability in cases where some small amount is retained, for cancellation.
COMMENTS ON 5(a):-
6. As regards to the Point 5(a), attention is drawn to the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as quoted below.
“Effect of Refund or Receipt of Credit Note on CENVAT Credit: According to third proviso to substituted Rule 4(7) [substituted Vide Notification No. 13/2011- Central Excise (N.T.) dated 31.03.2011 with effect from 01.04.2011], if any payment or part thereof made towards an input service is refunded or a credit note is received by the service provider after availing the CENVAT Credit on such input service, then he shall be required to pay an amount equal to the CENVAT Credit availed in respect
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
renegotiated due to deficient provision of service, or any terms contained in a contract], the assessee may take the credit of such excess service tax paid by him, if the assessee.-
(a) has refunded the payment or part thereof, so received for the service provided to the person from whom it was received; or] (b) has issued a credit note for the value of the service not so provided to the person to whom such an invoice had been issued.
8. There is no provision like the earlier provision of 'Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1944' in GST because the very essence of GST is matching of input tax credit both at Supplier's and Receiver's end and therefore, situation like excess credit paid on the same transaction or excess credit paid by the Supplier to be adjusted against his future tax liability will not arise in GST, because in GST there is choice for correction and matching of the data by the Supplier and Receiver. so, if the excess service tax is paid, the option of refund to the App
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
on of GST, as such this service (cancellation of flat) will be governed by the provisions of GST Act. When the contract (providing of house to customer) itself is cancelled and refund to the said customer is paid by the developer (and also GST on cancellation charges is being paid), there is no question of upward revision or downward revision of contract price. Hence, cancellation of flat cannot be equated with revision of contract price.
11. In GST, Cancellation of service may lead to cancellation of invoice and hence, no input tax credit can be availed on such invoice. Only the remedy available to customer /developer for claiming excess service tax paid by them for cancellation of flat booked in Pre-GST Regime and cancelled during Post-GST Regime is to file an application for refund of excess service tax paid by them in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 140 of the CGST Act.
12. There is no question of burden of double taxes as discussed by the A
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
s, submitted to the Advance Ruling Authority on 19.06.2018, has mentioned that the case under consideration is covered under clause (d) of Section 97(2) of CGST Act called as 'admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid'. In their submissions, they dwelled on following issues to justify that their case can be admitted before the Advance Ruling Authority:-
Cancellation of contract can be equated with the revision in contract.
Express and implied intention of repealed statute shall be used for interpretation of the provisions of the new statute. CanceIIation is covered under downward revision as there is no restriction in the law.
New law cannot be interpreted to restrict the rights of Old Statute.
New law cannot create a situation to deny the benefits available under earlier law.
3. Though this office's reply dt.13.7.2018 is sufficient to decide the admissibility of the case and the issues raised therein, even then, the comments on the issues
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
on Point 2 – Express and implied intention of repealed statute shall be used for interpretation of the provisions of the new statute.
TO understand the issue raised by the taxpayer, let's understand the provisions as mentioned in Section 173 and 174 of “THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”. The same are reproduced below:-
“173. Save as otherwise provided in this Act, Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 shall be omitted.
174. (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, on and from the date of commencement of this Act, the Central Excise Act, 1944 (except as respects goods included in entry 84 of the Union List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution), the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955, the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, the Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978, and the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereafter referred to as th
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
s regards the interpretation of Section 174(2)(b), the GST Law has not affected the previous operation of the Amended Act i.e. the Finance Act, 1994, on the issue raised by the taxpayer. Rule 6(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 still holds good, if any case or issue pertaining to it is to be decided or adjudicated in said terms of the Finance Act, 1994.
As regards the interpretation of Section 174(2)(c), the GST Law has not affected any right, privilege, obligation, or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under the amended Act (the Finance Act, 1994,) or repealed Acts (Central Excise Act, 1944 and other Acts mentioned in said Section 174(1) of the CGST Act), on the issue raised by the taxpayer in as much as it was open to the said taxpayer to take credit of the excess service tax paid by them, either by filing revised Service Tax Return within stipulated time on the services not offered to the clients or by filing refund claim of the excess service tax paid by them as per the provision
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
nerate, at the GST Portal even though Principal unit of the assessee falls in the jurisdiction of the said Range. On verbal enquiry with the said assessee, they submitted the amended registration certificate issued to them by the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax authorities, which is enclosed herewith for information. However, in GST Portal on searching taxpayer details for the GSTIN No. 27AAACK7310G1ZT, it is observed that the said assessee is registered under Centre jurisdiction of Range-ill, Division-IV, MUMBAI-EAST COMMISSIONERATE (document showing taxpayer details for the said GSTIN is enclosed). Hence, it is requested to the Advance Ruling Authority (GST), Mumbai that further enquires/correspondence/proceedings in the matter be conducted with the officers of the said jurisdiction.
5. In view of above, the Advance Ruling Authority (GST), Mumbai may like to decide whether case should be admitted on merits or not.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on d
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ared and made written submissions.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case. At different places in the application and the submission thereafter, we find that the following issues have been raised for our consideration thus –
i. Clarification about the legal procedure for availment of Service Tax and VAT paid on cancellation of flat which is booked in pre-GST Regime and cancelled in post-GST Regime.
ii. Whether cancellation of flat can be equated with the downward revision of price where the credit note can be raised with GST as per Section 142 (2) of the CGST Act.
iii. Whether cancellation of flat can be equated with the downward revision of price and hence service Tax/VAT paid earlier can be claimed as credit or allowed as refund to property buyer as per Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1944 along with applicability of time of limitation for refund as specified under section 11B of Central Excise Act.
iv. Whether GST input tax credit of Service Tax and St
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
king has been cancelled in the GST regime. This cancellation has two aspects. One where the cancellation comes with retention of some amount for cancellation. The other, though not expressly stated, is cancellation without retention of any amount for cancellation. It has been submitted before us that the cancellation with retention of some amount is being considered as a service by the applicant and GST is being discharged in respect of the same. For the reason being so, the applicant has decided not to contest, in the present proceedings, the issue about cancellation with retention of some amount. We therefore move to the issue of cancellation of booking without any consideration for effecting the cancellation. It is a admitted fact that the transaction of booking has taken place in the pre-GST regime. That being so, it would be but obvious an inference that no transaction has taken place in the GST regime. There is no 'supply' under the GST Act. However, we find the following provisi
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
ed person shall be eligible for refund of the tax paid under the existing law where such goods are returned by a person, other than a registered person, to the said place of business within a period of six months from the appointed day and such goods are identifiable to the satisfaction of the proper officer :
Provided that if the said goods are returned by a registered person, the return of such goods shall be deemed to be a supply.
(3) Every claim for refund filed by any person before, on or after the appointed day, for refund of any amount of CENVAT credit, duty, tax, interest or any other amount paid under the existing law, shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of existing law and any amount eventually accruing to him shall be paid in Cash, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the provisions of existing law other than the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944:
Provided that where any claim for refund of
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
filed by a person after the appointed day for refund of tax paid under the existing law in respect of services not provided shall be disposed of in accordance with the provision of existing law and any amount eventually accruing to him shall be paid in cash, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the provisions of existing law other than the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
With the facts as attending and the above provisions, we observe thus –
a) The amounts received towards construction of a flat was considered a taxable event, a sale, under the provisions of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 [MVAT Act]. The M VAT Act applied to tangible and intangible goods and not to services. The sale of a flat after its construction was complete was not taxable under the MVAT Act, being a transaction for sale of immovable property.
b) Similarly, Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 [Service Tax Act] providing for tax
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
noted is that mere return of goods within the specified time is not enough. The return has to survive the test of identification to the satisfaction of the proper officer.
e) The return of such goods is deemed to be a supply under the GST Act if the return of such goods is by a registered person. No information on this aspect is available to us.
f) In respect of services not provided, claim is to be filed by a person after the appointed day for refund of tax paid under the existing law. Such a claim shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the existing law which would be the Service Tax Act in the instant case.
g) We know no more than the fact that a transaction of booking of flat in the pre-GST regime has been cancelled in the GST regime. Having said so, we invite attention to the questions that can be posed in an application for an Advance Ruling under the provisions of the GST Act. Sub-section (2) of section 97 about “Application for advance ruling” say
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
iii. the determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both.
iv. the admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid.
Input tax credit is defined u/s 2(63) of the GST Act as being “input tax credit” means the credit of input tax; Input tax is defined u/ s 2(62) of the GST Act thus –
(62) “Input tax” in relation to a registered person, means the central tax, State tax, integrated tax or Union territory tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both made to him and includes-
(a) the integrated goods and services tax charged on import of goods;
(b) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9;
(c) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 5 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act;
(d) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9 of the respective State Goods and Services Tax Act; or
(e) the tax payable under
= = = = = = = =
Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source
= = = = = = = =
