Ease of doing Business (EODB)- CT Department – GST Act 2017- GST Help Desk cum facilitation centres at Division/Circle level w.e.f.01.07.2017 -assist taxpayers for e-filing of returns and explain the procedures.

Ease of doing Business (EODB)- CT Department – GST Act 2017- GST Help Desk cum facilitation centres at Division/Circle level w.e.f.01.07.2017 -assist taxpayers for e-filing of returns and explain the procedures.
CCW/CS (2)/58/2017 Dated:- 26-10-2018 Andhra Pradesh SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
CIRCULAR
CCT's Ref. No.CCW/CS (2)/58/2017, Dt.26.10.2018
Sub: Ease of doing Business (EODB)- CT Department – GST Act 2017- GST Help Desk cum facilitation centres at Division/Circle level w.e.f.01.07.2017 -assist taxpayers for e-filing of returns and explain the procedures -Orders issued- Reg.
****
After implementation of GST w.e.f 01.07.2017 in the state, department has initiated action for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

epartment already established the Facilitation centres cum helpdesks at division and circle level offices based on the location of offices and assist the taxpayers and general public for the procedures to be followed under the GST regime, filing of returns and help in solving the technical glitches facing.
Hence, Joint Commissioners (ST), are requested to encourage the more taxpayers to utilise the services of these facilitation centres cum help desks for e- filing of returns and assisting users in preparing and filing returns under the AP GST act 2018 with immediate effect.
The facilitation centres should maintain the record with details of services provide to the taxpayers with details like GSTN No, enterprise name, email ID and contact

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

FDC Limited Versus CCGST, Mumbai West

FDC Limited Versus CCGST, Mumbai West
Service Tax
2018 (10) TMI 1561 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 26-10-2018
APPEAL NO: ST/87537/2018 – A/87764/2018
Service Tax
Shri Ajay Sharma, Member (Judicial)
Appellants: Shri Mehul Jivani, Advocate
Respondent: Shri O.M Shivadikar, AC (AR)
ORDER
The instant appeal has been filed from the order-in-appeal no. NA/GST A-III/MUM/392/17-18 dated 16.03.2018 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-III), CGST and CX, Mumbai.
2. Refund claim of service tax of Rs. 3,51,117/- was filed by the appellant on the ground that they have not provided any service to M/s Generic Partners, Australia but only provided documents to them, in respect of the products manufactured and supply to them, in order to enable them to apply and obtained marketing authorization from distribution and for providing the documents, the appellant has received the amount as per the Manufacture and Supply Agreement dated 05.02.2018 between M/s Gen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Revenue and perused the record. The appellant has challenged the impugned order on various grounds viz. that the issue of the violation of principle of natural justice has not been gone into by the Commissioner while deciding the appeal; that since no service was provided by the appellant, the amount paid by the appellant is not service tax and therefore, the time limit as prescribed under Section 11B is not applicable for refund of the amount which is not service tax at all; that unjust enrichment is not applicable in the facts of the present case since the agreement between M/s Generic Partners, Australia and the appellant clearly stipulates that the consideration is exclusive of VAT and exclusive of other taxes if applicable; that even if the activity is treated as a provision of service, the same will fall under the definition of export of service and therefore, no service tax is payable. Learned Authorised Representative, on the other hand reiterated the findings recorded in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ty of defending the case. A consistent view taken by this Tribunal is that there has to be issuance of show cause notice, since it is mandatory and if the same has not been issued, then it is contrary to law and such proceedings have to be quashed. The lacunae of non issue of show cause notice is not curable and such proceedings are not sustainable. Even if a party has waived the show cause notice, it will not absolve the department's statutory liability to issue show cause notice under the relevant provision. Mere presence of the appellant before the Adjudicating Authority during the course of hearing does not authorise the department to encroach upon the right of the appellant to have a fair the opportunity of placing his defence before the adjudicating authority. The presence of the appellant before the Adjudicating Authority, without issuance of show cause notice, cannot lead to the conclusion that the appellant had a fair opportunity to defend the case. Otherwise also principle of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Filing a FINAL Return till 31st December 2018 in FORM GSTR-10 by taxpayers whose Registration Certificate has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018.

Filing a FINAL Return till 31st December 2018 in FORM GSTR-10 by taxpayers whose Registration Certificate has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018.
58/2018–State Tax Dated:- 26-10-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk
Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, dated the 26th October 2018
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 58/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final return in FORM GSTR-10 till 31st December, 2018

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final return in FORM GSTR-10 till 31st December, 2018
58/2018-State Tax Dated:- 26-10-2018 Gujarat SGST
GST – States
Gujarat SGST
Gujarat SGST
NOTIFICATION
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar
Dated the 26th October, 2018
Notification No. 58/2018-State Tax
No. (GHN-108)/GST-2018/S.148(10)TH:- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Gu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. KHUSHIYA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

M/s. KHUSHIYA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1454 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – [2019] 61 G S.T.R. 141 (Guj)
GUJARAT HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 26-10-2018
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14566 of 2018 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14567 of 2018
GST
MR AKIL KURESHI AND MR UMESH TRIVEDI, JJ.
For The Petitioner : MR SIRAJ R GORI (2298) AND MR VARIS V ISANI (3858)
For The Respondent : MR PRANAV TRIVEDI, AGP
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1. These petitions are filed for challenging provisional orders of attachment passed by the respondent authorities attaching the petitioner's factory premises, stock and bank accounts. The facts behind such action of the respondents are that the petitioner-a Private Limited Company is engaged in manufacture and trading in caster oil and related products. The premises of the petitioner and other entities in the same business were raided. During the period between 27.06.2018

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

me reasonable conditions, attachment should be suspended.
3. On the other hand, learned AGP explained the modes operandi allegedly employed by the petitioner for defrauding the Government revenue. He submitted that there is reliable material on record to establish such allegation. Pending assessment, the competent authority passed the order of provisional attachment to protect the interest of the Revenue.
4. In facts of the case, we have to balance the interest of both sides. At the prima facie stage, the department contends strongly that the petitioner has indulged into revenue defalcation. Possible tax and penalty liabilities are substantial. At the same time, it is not disputed that the petitioner is also involved in legitimate business activities. By freezing the petitioner's bank accounts and attaching the properties, the petitioner is temporarily rendered penalized. The petitioner cannot operate the business, cannot move the stock and cannot make payments. On reasonable ter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ollection.
6. Under the circumstances, we would permit the petitioner to carry on the legitimate business by suspending provisional attachments subject to fulfillment of following conditions:
(i) The petitioner creates an undertaking to maintain a stock of the goods of a minimum of Rs. 5 crores. Such undertaking shall be filed before the department as well as before this Court by 15.11.2018;
(ii) The petitioner give unconditional bank guarantee to the department to the tune of Rs. 5 crores. For this limited purpose of enabling the petitioner to create stock and give bank guarantee, it would be open for the petitioner to receive payments from its dealers. The director of the petitioner will file undertaking before this Court latest by 30.10.2018 that such payments will not be utilized for any purpose other than creating the stock as directed above and for raising bank guarantee.
7. Upon fulfilling such conditions, the attachment orders would automatically stand suspended along wit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final return in FORM GSTR-10 till 31st December, 2018

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final return in FORM GSTR-10 till 31st December, 2018
S.O. 266 Dated:- 26-10-2018 Bihar SGST
GST – States
Bihar SGST
Bihar SGST
Commercial Tax Department
Notification
The 26th October 2018
S.O. 266, Dated 26th October 2018- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notificat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Circular to clarify the procedure in respect of return of time expired drugs or medicines – Reg.

Circular to clarify the procedure in respect of return of time expired drugs or medicines – Reg.
72/46/2018 Dated:- 26-10-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 72/46/2018-GST
F. No. CBEC/20/16/04/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 26th October, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All)
The Principal Directors General/Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Circular to clarify the procedure in respect of return of time expired drugs or medicines – Reg.
Various representations have been received seeking clarification on the procedure to be followed in respect of return of time expired drugs or medicines under the GST laws. The issues raised in the said representations have been examined and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the law across the fie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be treated as fresh supply:
a) In case the person returning the time expired goods is a registered person (other than a composition taxpayer), he may, at his option, return the said goods by treating it is as a fresh supply and thereby issuing an invoice for the same (hereinafter referred to as the, “return supply”). The value of the said goods as shown in the invoice on the basis of which the goods were supplied earlier may be taken as the value of such return supply. The wholesaler or manufacturer, as the case may be, who is the recipient of such return supply, shall be eligible to avail Input Tax Credit (hereinafter referred to as “ITC”) of the tax levied on the said return supply subject to the fulfilment of the conditions specified in Section 16 of the CGST Act.
b) In case the person returning the time expired goods is a composition taxpayer, he may return the said goods by issuing a bill of supply and pay tax at the rate applicable to a composition taxpayer. In this scenario t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the basis of fresh invoice issued by wholesaler is ₹ 15/-. So, when the time expired goods are destroyed by the manufacturer he would be required to reverse ITC of ₹ 15/- and not of ₹ 10/-.
(B) Return of time expired goods by issuing Credit Note:
a) As per sub-section (1) of Section 34 of the CGST Act the supplier can issue a credit note where the goods are returned back by the recipient. Thus, the manufacturer or the wholesaler who has supplied the goods to the wholesaler or retailer, as the case may be, has the option to issue a credit note in relation to the time expired goods returned by the wholesaler or retailer, as the case may be. In such a scenario, the retailer or wholesaler may return the time expired goods by issuing a delivery challan. It may be noted that there is no time limit for the issuance of a credit note in the law except with regard to the adjustment of the tax liability in case of the credit notes issued prior to the month of September foll

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed the credit note) as tax liability cannot be adjusted in this case.
d) Further, where the time expired goods, which have been returned by the retailer/wholesaler, are destroyed by the manufacturer, he/she is required to reverse the ITC attributable to the manufacture of such goods, in terms of the provisions of clause (h) of sub-section (5) of section 17 of the CGST Act. This has been illustrated in table below:
Date of Supply of goods from manufacturer/ wholesaler to wholesaler/ retailer
Date of return of time expired goods from retailer / wholesaler to wholesaler / manufacturer
Treatment in terms of tax liability & credit note
Case 1
1st July, 2017
20th September, 2018
Credit note will be issued by the supplier (manufacturer / wholesaler) and the same to be uploaded by him on the common portal. Subsequently, tax liability can be adjusted by such supplier provided the recipient (wholesaler / retailer) has either not availed the ITC or if availed has reversed the ITC.
Ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications of issues under GST related to casual taxable person and recovery of excess Input Tax Credit distributed by an Input Service distributor – Reg.

Clarifications of issues under GST related to casual taxable person and recovery of excess Input Tax Credit distributed by an Input Service distributor – Reg.
71/45/2018 Dated:- 26-10-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 71/45/2018-GST
F. No. 349/94/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 26th October, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All)/
The Principal Directors General/ Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Clarifications of issues under GST related to casual taxable person and recovery of excess Input Ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ty” only and not the gross tax liability.
2. It is accordingly clarified that the amount of advance tax which a casual taxable person is required to deposit while obtaining registration should be calculated after considering the due eligible ITC which might be available to such taxable person.
2.
As per section 27 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), period of operation by causal taxable person is ninety days with provision for extension of same by the proper officer for a further period not exceeding ninety days. Various representations have been received for further extension of the said period beyond the period of 180 days, as mandated in law.
1. It is clarified that in case of lo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input Service Distributor (ISD) in contravention of the provisions contained in section 20 of the CGST Act.
1. According to Section 21 of the CGST Act where the ISD distributes the credit in contravention of the provisions contained in section 20 of the CGST Act resulting in excess distribution of credit to one or more recipients of credit, the excess credit so distributed shall be recovered from such recipients along with interest and penalty if any.
2. The recipient unit(s) who have received excess credit from ISD may deposit the said excess amount voluntarily along with interest if any by using FORM GST DRC-03.
3. If the said recipient unit(s) does not come forward voluntarily, necessary proceedings may be initiated against the said u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification on certain issues related to refund – Reg.

Clarification on certain issues related to refund – Reg.
70/44/2018 Dated:- 26-10-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Superseded Vide Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18-11-2019
Circular No. 70/44/2018 -GST
F. No. CBEC/20/16/04/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 26th October, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners / Commissioners of Central Tax (All)/
The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All)
The Principal CCA, CBIC
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Clarification on certain issues related to refund – Reg.
The Board is in receipt of representations seeking clarification on certain issues relating to refund. In order to clarify these issues and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by sectio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rvices Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “CGST Rules”) is required to be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger of the applicant by using FORM GST RFD-01B and the taxpayer is expected to file a fresh application for refund.
2.2 The issue has been re-examined and it has been observed that presently the common portal does not allow a taxpayer to file a fresh application for refund once a deficiency memo has been issued against an earlier refund application for the same period. Therefore, it is clarified that till the time such facility is developed, taxpayers would be required to submit the rectified refund application under the earlier Application Reference Number (ARN) only. Thus, it is reiterated that when a deficiency memo in FORM GST RFD-03 is issued to taxpayers, re-credit in the electronic credit ledger (using FORM GST RFD-01B) is not required to be carried out and the rectified refund application would be accepted by the jurisdictional tax authorities with the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, had accorded approval to the proposal of suitably amending the said sub-rule along with sub-rule (4B) of rule 89 of the CGST Rules prospectively in order to enable such exporters to avail the said facility notification No. 54/2018 – Central Tax dated the 9th October, 2018 has been issued to carry out the changes recommended by the GST Council. Alongside the amendment carried out in the said sub-rule through the notification No. 39/2018- Central Tax dated 4th September, 2018 has been rescinded vide notification No. 53/2018 – Central Tax dated the 9th October, 2018.
3.2 For removal of doubts, it is clarified that the net effect of these changes would be that any exporter who himself/herself imported any inputs/capital goods in terms of notification Nos. 78/2017-Customs and 79/2017-Customs both dated 13th October, 2017 shall be eligible to claim refund of the IGST paid on exports till the date of the issuance of the notification No. 54/2018 – Central Tax dated the 9th October, 2018 ref

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Processing of Applications for Cancellation of Registration submitted in FORM GST REG-16 – Reg.

Processing of Applications for Cancellation of Registration submitted in FORM GST REG-16 – Reg.
69/43/2018 Dated:- 26-10-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 69/43/2018-GST
F. No. CBEC/20/16/04/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 26th October, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All)
The Principal Directors General/Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Processing of Applications for Cancellation of Registration submitted in FORM GST REG-16 – Reg.
The Board is in receipt of representations seeking clarifications on various issues in relation to processing of the applications for cancellation of registration filed by taxpayers in FORM GST REG-16. In order to clarify these issues and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law across

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r cancellation of registration shall submit the application in FORM GST REG-16 on the common portal within a period of 30 days of the „occurrence of the event warranting the cancellation‟. It might be difficult in some cases to exactly identify or pinpoint the day on which such an event occurs. For instance, a business may be transferred/disposed over a period of time in a piece meal fashion. In such cases, the 30-day deadline may be liberally interpreted and the taxpayers‟ application for cancellation of registration may not be rejected because of the possible violation of the deadline.
4. While initiating the application for cancellation of registration in FORM GST REG-16, the Common portal captures the following information which has to be mandatorily filled in by the applicant:
a) Address for future correspondence with mobile number and email address;
b) Reason for cancellation;
c) Date from which cancellation is sought;
d) Details of the value and the in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s incomplete, i.e. where all the relevant particulars, as detailed in para 4 above, have not been entered;
b) In case of transfer, merger or amalgamation of business, the new entity in which the applicant proposes to amalgamate or merge has not got registered with the tax authority before submission of the application for cancellation.
In all cases other than those listed at (a) and (b) above, the application for cancellation of registration should be immediately accepted by the proper officer and the order for cancellation should be issued in FORM GST REG-19 with the effective date of cancellation being the same as the date from which the applicant has sought cancellation in FORM GST REG-16. In any case the effective date cannot be a date earlier to the date of application for the same.
6. In situations referred to in (a) or (b) in para 5 above, the proper officer shall inform the applicant in writing about the nature of the discrepancy and give a time period of seven working days

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed person (other than an Input Service Distributor or a non-resident taxable person or a person paying tax under the provisions of section 10 or section 51 or section 52) whose registration has been cancelled, to file a final return in FORM GSTR-10, within three months of the effective date of cancellation or the date of order of cancellation, whichever is later. The purpose of the final return is to ensure that the taxpayer discharges any liability that he/she may have incurred under sub-section (5) of the section 29 of the CGST Act. It may be noted that the last date for furnishing of FORM GSTR-10 by those taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before 30.09.2018 has been extended till 31.12.2018 vide notification No. 58/2018 – Central Tax dated the 26th October, 2018.
8. Further, sub-section (5) of section 29 of the CGST Act, read with rule 20 of the CGST Rules states that the taxpayer seeking cancellation of registration shall have to pay, by way of debiting either t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

said date except for discharging liabilities under GST Act upto the date of filing of final return in FORM GSTR-10. Therefore, the requirement to reverse the balance in the electronic credit ledger is automatically met. In case it is later determined that the output tax liability of the taxpayer, as determined under sub-section (5) of section 29 of the CGST Act, was greater than the amount of input tax credit available, then the difference shall be paid by him/her in cash. It is reiterated that, as stated in sub-section (3) of section 29 of the CGST Act, the cancellation of registration does not, in any way, affect the liability of the taxpayer to pay any dues under the GST law, irrespective of whether such dues have been determined before or after the date of cancellation.
9. In case the final return in FORM GSTR-10 is not filed within the stipulated date, then notice in FORM GSTR-3A has to be issued to the taxpayer. If the taxpayer still fails to file the final return within 15 day

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

any taxable supplies during the intervening period (i.e. from the date of registration to the date of application for cancellation of registration) and has furnished an undertaking to this effect.
11.1[It is pertinent to mention here that section 29 of the CGST Act has been amended by the CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018 to provide for “Suspension” of registration. The intent of the said amendment is to ensure that a taxpayer is freed from the routine compliances, including filing returns, under GST Act during the pendency of the proceedings related to cancellation. Accordingly, the field formations may not issue notices for non- filing of return for taxpayers who have already filed an application for cancellation of registration under section 29 of the CGST Act. Further, the requirement of filing a final return, as under section 45 of the CGST Act, remains unchanged.]
12. It may be noted that the information in table in FORM GST REG-19 shall be taken from the liability ledger and the dif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Time limit for making the declaration in FORM GST ITC-04 for the period period from July, 2017 to September, 2018 extended till the 31st day of December, 2018.

Time limit for making the declaration in FORM GST ITC-04 for the period period from July, 2017 to September, 2018 extended till the 31st day of December, 2018.
59/2018 Dated:- 26-10-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
Superseded vide Notification No. 78/2018-Central Tax dated 31-12-2018
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)
NOTIFICATION No. 59/2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 26th October, 2018
G.S.R. 1071(E).- In pursuance of section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) and sub-rule (3) of rule 45 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), and in supercession of the notification of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final return in FORM GSTR-10 till 31st December, 2018

Seeks to provide taxpayers whose registration has been cancelled on or before the 30th September, 2018 time to furnish final return in FORM GSTR-10 till 31st December, 2018
58/2018 Dated:- 26-10-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)
NOTIFICATION No. 58/2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 26th October, 2018
G.S.R.1070(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Central Goo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of SB005 Mechanism for IGST Export Refunds with Revised Procedures; Streamlined Compensation Cess Disbursal for Exporters.

Extension of SB005 Mechanism for IGST Export Refunds with Revised Procedures; Streamlined Compensation Cess Disbursal for Exporters.
Circulars
Customs
IGST Export Refunds – extension in SB0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CLUBBING OF SERVICES FOR CHECKING GST EXEMPTION LIMIT

CLUBBING OF SERVICES FOR CHECKING GST EXEMPTION LIMIT
Query (Issue) Started By: – rajesh singal Dated:- 25-10-2018 Last Reply Date:- 26-10-2018 Service Tax
Got 10 Replies
Service Tax
Hello Sir,
We are providing two types of one services i.e. one is providing tankers to Indian Oil Corporation for transportation of petrol/diesel. These tankers are provided for supply of product to our own petrol pumps. Although it is a taxable service under GTA but service tax is being deposited by IOC. So we do not do anything in this regard. Total amount of service provided is app. 28.00 lacs.
Secondly we have one Maruti Service Station and annual receipts are around 6.50 Lacs. Which is very well below the exemption limit.
Now query is wheth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n into account.
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
Not required.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
In my view, the GTA turnover would not be considered to include it with the taxable service of service station.
Reply By rajesh singal:
The Reply:
Sir,
but Assessing officer is doing so, what should be done in this regard.
Rajesh Kumar Singal
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
You may receive a letter from the Department. You will not receive Show Cause Notice on the issue asked by you .Some other issues may be involved. It is your phobia on the issue. It is time to be silent and fearless. Notification is very much clear. All other experts are also of the same view. Nowadays Govt. is very strict regarding issuance o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

request for clarification on generation of invoice-gst

request for clarification on generation of invoice-gst
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ramakrishnan Seshadri Dated:- 25-10-2018 Last Reply Date:- 26-10-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
Dear Sirs,
Good Morning.
We need a clarification on generation of invoices. We are supplier of OEM Car company and supplying parts through generation of invoices like original for buyer and duplicate for transporter to them. Now the customer says you can supply the parts with duplicate for transporter copy and no need of original for buyer copy. Whether this is correct or not under gst. Any amendment has came that one invoice is ok .Please clarify.
Thanks & Regards,
S.Ramakrishnan
Reply By SHIVKUMAR SHARMA:
The Reply:
Tax Inv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGINAL FOR RECIPIENT;
(b) the duplicate copy being marked as DUPLICATE FOR TRANSPORTER; and
(c) the triplicate copy being marked as TRIPLICATE FOR SUPPLIER.
(2) The invoice shall be prepared in duplicate, in the case of the supply of services, in the following manner, namely,-
(a) the original copy being marked as ORIGINAL FOR RECIPIENT; and
(b) the duplicate copy being marked as DUPLICATE FOR SUPPLIER.
(3) The serial number of invoices issued during a tax period shall be furnished electronically through the common portal in FORM GSTR-1.
There is not change in section/rule of invoice. Original for recipient and dup. for transporter are meant for recipient only. But difference people are handling invoice in different way as their conv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Denial of carry forwarding of CESS credit into GST – Course of action

Denial of carry forwarding of CESS credit into GST – Course of action
By: – Venkataprasad Pasupuleti
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 25-10-2018

On introduction of GST, the credit of taxes under the existing law, predominantly Central Excise, Service Tax and Value Added Tax, was allowed to be carry forwarded vide the transitional provision either as Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) or State Goods and Service Tax (SGST) as the case may be accordingly taxpayers did carry forwarded the credit by filing transactional credit by filing Form Tran-1. The common observation of the department during the transitional credit verification is that the closing credit balance of the Education Cess, Secondary and higher Education Cess, Krishi Kalyan cess (herein after referred as 'Cess credit' for brevity) is not eligible for the transfer into GST. However, Section 140(1) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that register person shall be entitled to take, in his electronic credit ledger

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

C: As the amendment is retrospective in nature, the amount of Cess credit carry forwarded into GST becomes the transfer of irregular credit and requires to be paid back to the Government. The same may be paid back by way of reversal of CGST credit through Table 4(B)(2) of the GSTR – 3B and intimate the department in writing with a dated acknowledgement. In case there is no sufficient credit this gets reflected into to electronic output register and needs to be paid in cash.
Interest liability: The consequential interest liability would vary in different scenarios which are discussed below:
* When CESS credit carry forwarded into GST but not utilized: As far as interest on input tax credit, the reference shall be made to the section 50(3) of CGST Act, 2017 which specifies that interest is required to be paid by a taxable person at 24% if he claims any undue or excess claim of input tax credit under Section 42(10) and Section 43(10). As these sub-section deals with the concept of ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ies then the same shall be reversed along with interest from the date of utilization to actual date of reversal.
Is there any waiver of the interest liability as the ineligibility was due to retrospective amendment?
It Is very important to note that the 'Cess credit' was eligible upto the enactment however it is becoming ineligible from the past date on the date of enactment, so non-payment of the output liability (to the extent of utilization) will be on the date of enactment, which has to be made good by making the payment and hence the question of interest arises. In general, whenever retrospective amendment was made, it was the practice of the Government to give a saving clause in terms of either waiver of the interest liability or specify the cutoff date from which the interest liability would attract. Unfortunately, no such saving clause is found in the present retrospective amendment made in the section 140, ibid.
Judicially, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Star India

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Concept and Applicability of TDS and TCS provisions w.e.f. October 1, 2018

Concept and Applicability of TDS and TCS provisions w.e.f. October 1, 2018
By: – Bimal jain
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 25-10-2018

After getting deferred till September 30, 2018, the Central Government vide Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 and Notification No. 51/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018, has appointed the 1st day of October 2018, as the date on which the provisions of Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 (i.e. Tax deduction at source) and Section 52 (i.e. Tax collection at source) shall come into force.
For easy digests, we are summarizing hereunder the gist of provisions pertaining to TDS and TCS in GST:
Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 66 of the CGST Rules, 2017
Particulars
Applicable Section/ Sub-section/ Notification
Provisions
Who is required to deduct TDS (deductor)?
Section 51(1) r.w. Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018
F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te of TDS
Section 51(1)
TDS is to be deducted at the rate of 1% [i.e. 2% for CGST+SGST/UTGST or IGST] from the payment made or credited to the deductee
Value of supply
Explanation to Section 51(1)
For the purpose of TDS specified above, the value of supply shall be taken as the amount excluding CGST, CGST/UTGST, IGST and cess indicated in the invoice
Compulsory registration for TDS deductor
Section 24(vi)
TDS deductors, whether or not separately registered, are required to compulsorily register in GST irrespective of threshold limits.
Form for TDS deductor registration
Rule 12(1)
Form GST REG-07 – Registration started from September 18, 2017(The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council, at its 21st meeting in Hyderabad) TDS applicants who do not have a PAN, can register on basis of TAN
Payment of TDS by deductor
Section 51(2)
The amount of TDS shall be paid to the Government by the deductor within 10 days after the end of the month in which such deduction is made.
TDS Certif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

per day from the day after the expiry of five days period until the failure is rectified, subject to a maximum amount of INR 5,000/- [i.e. INR 2,000/- per day subject to maximum of INR 10,000/- for CGST + SGST/UTGST]
Recovery & Refund
Determination of amount in default
Section 51(7)
In accordance with Section 73 (determination of tax in non-fraud cases) or Section 74 (determination of tax in fraud cases) of the CGST Act, 2017
Refund of excess deduction
Section 51(8)
Refund to deductee arising on account of excess or erroneous deduction shall be dealt in accordance with Section 54.
No refund shall be granted if the amount deducted has been credited to electronic cash ledger of deductee.
Collection of tax at Source (TCS) under Section 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 67 of the CGST Rules, 2017
Particulars
Applicable Section/Sub-section/ Notification
Provisions
Who is required to collect TCS?
Section 52(1)
Every electronic commerce operator (“operator”), not being

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll be done by the operator by paying the supplier, the price of the product/ services, less the amount of TDS.
Rate of TCS
Section 52(1)
TCS is to be deducted at the rate not exceeding 1% of the net value of taxable supplies of the goods/services supplied through the portal of the operator
Meaning of 'electronic commerce operator'
Section 2(45)
“Electronic commerce operator” means any person who owns, operates or manages digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce
Meaning of 'electronic commerce'
Section 2(44)
“Electronic commerce” means the supply of goods or services or both, including digital products over digital or electronic network
Meaning of 'Net value of taxable supplies'
Explanation to Section 52(1)
“Net value of taxable supplies” shall mean the aggregate value of taxable supplies of goods or services or both, other than services notified under sub-section (5) of section 9, made during any month by all registered persons through the operator

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

operator within 10 days after the end of the month in which such collection is made.
TCS statement
Section 52(4), 52(5) & 52(6) r.w. Rule 67(1) & 80(2)
The operator is required to furnish a monthly statement in Form GSTR-8 by the 10th of the following month.
The operator is also required to file an Annual statement in Form GSTR-9B by the 31st of December following the end of every financial year.
The operator can rectify errors in the statements filed, if any, latest by the return to be filed for the month of September, following the end of every financial year or the actual date of furnishing relevant annual statement, whichever is earlier.
ITC to supplier
Section 52(7)
The tax collected by the operator shall be credited to the cash ledger of the supplier who has supplied the goods/services through the operator. The supplier can claim credit of the tax collected and reflected in the return by the Operator in his [supplier's] electronic cash ledger.
Matching of details of sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Liaison Office Activities Not Considered Supply Under CGST/SGST When Compliant with RBI Conditions.

Liaison Office Activities Not Considered Supply Under CGST/SGST When Compliant with RBI Conditions.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – Supply of services or not – activity of Liaison office – they are in fact working as employees of the foreign office – The liaison activities being undertaken by the applicant when strictly in line with condition specified by RBI permission letter do not amount to supply under CGST and SGST Act.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, ne

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Ship Parts and Equipment Not Eligible for 5% Reduced IGST Tax Rate: Classification Ruling Explained.

Ship Parts and Equipment Not Eligible for 5% Reduced IGST Tax Rate: Classification Ruling Explained.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of Supply – Whether the parts/spares/equipments which are use

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Company Canteen Services for Employees Considered 'Supply' Under GST; Subject to Taxation.

Company Canteen Services for Employees Considered 'Supply' Under GST; Subject to Taxation.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – providing canteen services exclusively for their employees – The supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Rate for “Ada” (Maida/Rice Flour) Set at 5% Under HSN 1902, Sl No. 97 for Vermicelli.

GST Rate for “Ada” (Maida/Rice Flour) Set at 5% Under HSN 1902, Sl No. 97 for Vermicelli.
Case-Laws
GST
Rate of GST – Classification – Ada – made from 'maida or rice flour' or 'maida and rice

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Officers cannot blame technical issues like computer failures for canceling provisional registrations; they must follow proper procedures.

Officers cannot blame technical issues like computer failures for canceling provisional registrations; they must follow proper procedures.
Case-Laws
GST
Restoration of cancelled provisional r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN to DG Systems

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN to DG Systems
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 34/2018 Dated:- 25-10-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
NEW CUSTOM HOUSE, KANDLA-370 210
Phone No. 02860-271468/469, FAX NO. 02836-271467
F. No. S/20-72/PN/IGST Ref/AG/2017-18
Dated: 25.10.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 34/2018
Subject:- Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from GSTN to DG Systems- M/ reg.
Attention of the Exporter, General Trade and all other stake holders is invited to the Public Notice No. 01/2018 dated 16.1.2018, Public Notice No. 9/2018 dated 27.2.2018, Public Notice No. 13/2018 dated 15.3.2018, Public Notice No. 16

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on said subject. The matter was examined in the Board and it has been observed that under CGST Act, 2017 Cost Accountants have also been recognized for various certification/ representations like in Section 35, Section 66, Section 116 and Section 48 read with Rule 24 of Return rules.
4. Accordingly, it has been decided that Cost Accountants are also authorized to provide the requisite certificates as envisaged under Circular 12/2018-Customs dated 29.05.2018.
5. Hence, It is requested that above changes in facility to obtain certificates from Cost Accountant also, may be utilized by one and all and co- operate with the Department in processing the refund claims immediately.
(Sanjay Kumar Agarwal)
Commissioner
Circular, Trade Notice,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Steel & Metal Tubes (I) Ltd. Versus Commissioner Central GST, Noida

M/s Steel & Metal Tubes (I) Ltd. Versus Commissioner Central GST, Noida
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 236 – CESTAT ALLAHABAD – TMI
CESTAT ALLAHABAD – AT
Dated:- 25-10-2018
APPEAL No. E/70555/2018-EX[SM] – FINAL ORDER NO 72578/2018
Central Excise
Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial)
Shri Rajesh Chhibber (Advocate) for Appellant
Shri Pawan Kumar Singh (Supdt.) AR for Respondent
ORDER
Per: Archana Wadhwa
After hearing both the sides I find that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Steel Pipes and Tubes and was procuring HR Coils from various sources including SAIL, Rourkela. The said HR Coils was being received through Rail and Railways were charging service tax for transportation of the same, which were shown in the Railway Receipt (RR), on the basis of which the appellant was claiming the credit.
2. However, w.e.f. 27.08.2014, the Cenvat Credit Rules were amended and Clause (a) was introduced after Clause (f) of sub Rule (1) of Rule 9 of Cenvat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dit and the credit availed by the consignee i.e., appellant is not proper. The appellant brought to the notice of the Adjudicating Authority a circular issued by the Board being Circular No. 1048/36/2016-CX dated 20.09.2016 wherein it was clarified that if the consignor is not availing the Cenvat Credit, the same can be availed by the consignee. The said circular was not followed by the Adjudicating Authority on the ground that the same stands issued in September, 2016 whereas the period involved in the appeal is from July, 2014 to March, 2015. It was also observed that since the STTG certificate was not issued by the Railways in the name of the appellant, the same would not form eligible document for the purpose of availment of credit. Hence demand to the tune of Rs. 10.58 lakhs approximately were confirmed along with confirmation of interest and imposition of penalty of identical amount.
The said order was upheld by Commissioner (Appeals). Hence the present appeal.
4. The facts are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or ready reference:-
“(v) In case if the Service Tax has been paid by the consignor but CENVAT credit is to be availed by the consignee, who is eligible for such credit as per the rules, the consignor shall make a written request to Railways for issue of consignee-wise STTG certificate duly indicting the RR details pertaining to the consignee in the format prescribed above. The competent Railway Authority shall issue the STTG certificate accordingly, even though it will require issuance of more than one STTG certificates to the customer (consignor) for a particular month. The consignor shall transfer the consignee-wise 'STTG certificate' in original to the consignee concerned. The consignee may avail the CENVAT credit on the strength of this certificate.
(vi) Where a consolidated STTG Certificate has been issued in terms of clause (iii), no STTG Certificate consignee-wise in terms of clause (v) shall be issued and vice-versa.”
As is clear from reading of the above paragraphs the c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Assistant commissioner of Central Tax, Sankrail division (MEGA FLEX PLASTICS LTD.)

In Re: Assistant commissioner of Central Tax, Sankrail division (MEGA FLEX PLASTICS LTD.)
GST
2018 (11) TMI 663 – APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 159 (App. A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 63 G S.T.R. 80 (AAR)
APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL – AAAR
Dated:- 25-10-2018
Case No. 06/WBAAAR/Appeal/2018
GST
RANDHIR KUMAR AND RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA MEMBER
Present for the Appellant: Mr. Nishant Kumar, Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Sankrail Division, Howrah CGST & CX Commissionerate
Present for the Respondent: Mr. Vinay Kumar Shraff, Advocate
This Appeal has been filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Sankrail Division, Howrah CGST & CX Commissionerate (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant”) on 08.08.2018 against Advance Ruling No. 09/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 06.07.2018 = 2018 (7) TMI 391 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, WEST BENGAL, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

peal against the above Advance Ruling requesting to set aside/ modify the impugned Advance Ruling passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling or pass any such further or other orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case on the following grounds:
i) The Respondent had themselves declared that they manufacture woven sacks of plastic materials of Chapter 39. The learned Advance Ruling Authority referred to Note 1(h) to Section XI of the Tariff Act which covers “textile and textile articles from Chapter 50 to 63 and does not include woven, knitted or crocheted fabrics of Chapter 39”, and hence the learned Advance Ruling Authority has erred in interpreting the true essence of this Chapter note;
ii) When every word in the above Chapter note is separated by comma then each word should be given equal weightage and from that perspective the word 'woven' should have been considered as an exclusion word in its own right. Hence the Advance Ruling is n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ne Leno bags/ sacks containing 100 MT polypropylene granules” under ITCHS 39232990, the assessee decided to change the Tariff Heading for the same product, PP Leno Bags, to 6305 33 00 without citing any reasons for the same. The Appellant also submitted that the rule of estoppel by election is applicable in the matter as the Respondent themselves declared the item in question under Tariff Sub-Heading 3923 29 90 and enjoyed the duty draw back as per Duty Drawback Schedule of DGFT. The Appellant further submitted that the same product cannot be cleared for export and in DTA under two different Tariff Headings.
6. During the course of the hearing, the Respondent submitted the following:
(i) Manufacturing process includes manufacturing of polypropylene strips (tapes) which is woven to produce man-made textile material which is commercially known as Leno Fabric;
(ii) In terms of Chapter Note 2(p) of Chapter 39 of the GST Tariff (Plastics and articles thereof) if textiles or textiles prod

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uits and vegetables. The Standard IS 16187:2014 classifies such Sacks under the category of Textiles.
(vi) The respondent has been granted capital subsidy by the government of India under The Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) for making the textile industry globally competitive and to reduce the capital cost for the textile industry-
(vii) The polypropylene leno bags for packing of agricultural produce is internationally classified under HSN code 63053300.
7. The Respondent submitted copies of the reports of test conducted by the Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology, Haldia, dated 15.03.2018, the Indian Institute of Packaging, Kolkata, dated 27.03.2018 and Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Panipat, dated 12.03.2018 on his samples of PP Woven Leno Bags. These test reports arc based on samples provided by the Respondent. It is also seen that in the reports of Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology and the Indian Institute of Packaging i.e. Test Rep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

[1993 (41) ECC 285; 1993; ECR 351 MP; [1990 (50) ELT 201 MP] = 1989 (9) TMI 120 – HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE, has rendered the following judgment: –
“……the process of the manufacture of the HDPE tapes, the earlier judgments of the CEGAT approved by the Supreme Court and accepted by the Department, all clearly go to show that the HDPE bags are the bags woven by the plastic strips and they, therefore, are goods of plastic and the material used for weaving those bags being the strips of plastic made from plastic granules, the strips of plastic used for weaving the aforesaid HDPE woven sacks has to be classified as an Item under entry 39.20 of Chapter 39 and not under entry 54.06 of Chapter 54. Accordingly the entries of the finished goods have also to be made under the proper Chapter of the Tariff Act treating them as the finished goods made of plastic strips.
In the result we hold that HDPE strips or tapes fall under the Heading 39.20, sub-heading 3920.32 of the Central

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =