CG Power & Industrial Solutions Ltd. Versus CGST, C.C. & C.E., Ujjain

CG Power & Industrial Solutions Ltd. Versus CGST, C.C. & C.E., Ujjain
Central Excise
2019 (1) TMI 969 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 6-12-2018
Excise Appeal Nos. E/53165/2018 [SM] – A/53405/2018-SM[BR]
Central Excise
MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present for the Appellant: Mr. Nitin Mehta, Advocate
Present for the Respondent: Mr. P. R. Gupta, DR
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
Present is an Appeal directed against the Order of Commissioner(Appeals) bearing No. 183-18-19 dated 28.06.2018. Facts relevant for impugned adjudication are that the appellant are engaged in the manufacture of signalling relay and were discharging their duty liability. However the appellant filed a refund claim for Rs. 3,79,313/- in terms of Notification No. 108/95-Ex dated 13.10.1995 for the exemption from Central Excise duty paid on clearance of goods to a specified project authority approved by the Government of India i.e. Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd. funded by As

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

refund application, an exemption certificate was duly filed. The details thereof fulfil all the requirements as have been wrongly held to be missing by the Commissioner(Appeals). Order accordingly prayed to be set aside, Appeal is prayed to be allowed.
4. Ld. DR while justifying the impugned Order has placed emphasis upon the Notification No. 108/95 dated 28.08.1995 and also upon the various case laws of the Hon'ble Apex Court as is relied upon by the Commissioner(Appeals) to the effect that the exemption Notification has to be strictly construed. It is submitted that lack of information as is required under (ii)(c)(i) of the aforesaid Notification the Commissioner(Appeals) has been justified while rejecting the refund claim for the noticed deficiency. Appeal is accordingly prayed to be allowed.
5. After hearing both the parties and perusing the record, it is observed as follows: Alongwith the Application praying for refund following documents were furnished by the appellant:
(i) Co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er this exemption certificate provides all the details as are required to be furnished by the appellant to seek the benefit of exemption Notification No. 108/95 dated 20.08.1995 same, the relevant portion thereof has been referred by Commissioner (Appeals) in para 7.1 of the Order under challenge. Same is not reproduced here for the sake of brevity. However, from the said para itself the following conditions as are required to be fulfilled by the appellant for seeking benefit of the said exemption and the respective details from the exemption certificate as provided by the appellant are as follows:
S. No.
Condition in Para 1(c) (i) of Notification No. 108/95-CE
Compliance in Project Authority Certificate [PAC] dated 17.03.2015, issued by Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd.
1.
Goods are supplied to a Project financed by ADB or any international organisation
Goods were supplied to the Project of doubling of Raipur-Titagarh rail line in East Coastal Railway, which is financed by the Asian Deve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Aurobindo Pharma Ltd Unit XII Versus CCT, Medchal – GST

Aurobindo Pharma Ltd Unit XII Versus CCT, Medchal – GST
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 1289 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 6-12-2018
Application No. E/ROM/30684/2018 in Appeal No. E/31214/2017 – M/30559/2018
Central Excise
Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Ms. Sandhya, Chartered Accountant (Rep.) for the Appellant.
Shri B. Guna Ranjan, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: M.V. Ravindran
1. This application is filed by the revenu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

FIROZ KHAN. M. Versus THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), THE VILLAGE OFFICER., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES PALAKKAD, THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICE OF THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT CO

FIROZ KHAN. M. Versus THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), THE VILLAGE OFFICER., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES PALAKKAD, THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICE OF THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE) COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD, STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GST DEPARTMENT CHITTUR, PALAKKAD, THE TAHSILDAR, CHITTUR PALAKKAD DISTRICT AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (12) TMI 1014 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-12-2018
WP(C). No. 37677 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADVS. SRI. G. HARIHARAN SMT. K. S. SMITHA SRI. PRAVEEN. H. AND SRI. V. R. SANJEEV K

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it of through the Ext.P5 judgment. Later, the appellate authority passed the Ext.P6 conditional stay. But the petitioner did not comply with that condition. As a result, the stay never came in to operation.
3. Thus, on the Department's request, the revenue administration of the District initiated recovery proceedings as seen from the Ext.P7. Assailing the Ext.P7 notice from the Tahsildar, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.
4. The petitioner's contention is that the petitioner has inherited no property from his father. Therefore, he cannot be subjected to the recovery proceedings.
5. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader submits that the petitioner is liable to answer the Department's claim under Section

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ead, he was asked to answer the claim against his deceased father. The statutory mandate under Section 27 is unmistakable. A legal heir or representative is liable to answer the claim raised against the deceased only to the extent he has succeeded to the deceased person's estate. At any rate, that is a disputed question of fact.
9. The records reveal that the petitioner seems to have approached the District Collector and submitted the Ext.P9 representation. Now the petitioner's counsel also informs the Court that the District Collector has already heard the petitioner. But he is yet to pass orders.
10. Then it will suffice if the District Collector, the 7th respondent, passes orders expeditiously on the petitioner's Ext.P9 app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Caparo Engineering India Ltd Versus CGST, C.C. & C.E., Ujjain

Caparo Engineering India Ltd Versus CGST, C.C. & C.E., Ujjain
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 922 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – 2019 (369) E.L.T. 1461 (Tri. – Del.)
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 6-12-2018
Excise Appeal Nos. E/53148/2018 [SM], E/53149/2018 [SM] – FINAL ORDER NO. 53399-53400/2018
Central Excise
MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present for the Appellant: Mr. Manish Saharan, Advocate
Present for the Respondent: Ms. Tamana Alam & Mr. K. Poddar, DRs
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
Present order disposes of two Appeals for the issue being common. The appellant herein initially pays an adjudication proposing the demand of Central Excise duty of Rs. 74,89,162/- which was confirmed vide the Order-in-Original dated 22.09.2009 alongwith the interest and the penalties. However when the matter was appealed before this Tribunal, vide stay Order dated 28.04.2011, appellant was directed to deposit the entire demand of the aforesaid duty. In a writ petition No. 5314/2011 c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

24.04.2017 to 11.04.2018 was not granted on the sanctioned refund amount of Rs. 40 lakhs. Being aggrieved the appellant is before this Tribunal.
2. I have heard Mr. Manish Saharan, Ld. Advocate for the appellant and Ms. Tamana Alam, Ld DR for the Department.
3. Ld. Counsel for appellant has paid reliance upon Circular No. 802/35/2004 dated 08.12.2004 impressing upon that it is mandate upon the Department that in case the refund is not sanctioned within three months the Department is liable to sanction the same alongwith the interest. The statutory provision i.e. Section 11B of the Customs Act is also emphasised. It is submitted that grounds of rejecting the contention praying for interest alongwith the amount of refund has been rejected on unreasonable grounds as that of the want of the copy of the Final Order of this Tribunal. It is submitted that irrespective the appellant himself provided the copy as demanded on 04.01.2018 that the same was available with the Department. Otherwise

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

thin the stipulated time limit of three months as prescribed by law. Explanation in custom refund application (from Regulation 1995) is being impressed upon wherein it has been clarified that for the purpose of payment of interest under Section 27A of the Act the application shall be deemed to have been received on the date on which a complete application as acknowledged by the proper officer has been made. Finally justifying the Order of Commissioner(Appeals) bearing No. 1492 dated 16.07.2018 Appeal in hand is prayed to be dismissed.
5. After hearing both the parties, the only question to be adjudicated herein is as to whether the date of refund application as required in Section 11B of the Customs Act has to be the date of application on which it has been filed or it has to be the date on which the deficiencies in the application got corrected. For the purpose, Section 11BB is relevant to be looked into, it reads as follows:
“11BB. Interest on delayed refunds – if any duty ordered

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has to be construed strictly and one has to look merely at what is said in the relevant provision. There is nothing to be read in or nothing to be implied and there is no room for any intentment as it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case Ajmera Housing Corporation and other Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 2010 (8) SCC 739. If at this stage, the plea of Department is looked into still the deficiency of application does not entitle the Department to get an extension of the period of 3 months as has been statutorily provided. Further, there is a Notification as impressed upon by the appellant. Perusal thereof shows that it is a clarificatory decision specifically with respect to the refund of pre- deposit requiring such pre-deposits to be made within three months from the date of the Tribunal Orders. As mentioned in para 4 of the Circular, the word used therein is that such pre-deposit must be returned within three months rather from the date of the Order passed by the appellate Tri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SHAJAN ABRAHAM Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE), NEW DELHI, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE (GST WING) FINANCE (REV-1), NEW DELHI, GST COUNCIL, THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICES TA

SHAJAN ABRAHAM Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE), NEW DELHI, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE (GST WING) FINANCE (REV-1), NEW DELHI, GST COUNCIL, THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, EAST WING, NEW DELHI, THE COMMISSIONER GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, VELI RANGE, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND PRINCIPAL NODAL OFFICER (TECH) /DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ions to enable him to take credit of the available input tax.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader, besides perusing the record.
3. The Ext.P2 is the circular issued by the Government of India for “setting up an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal.” Paragraph 5 of the circular outlines the procedure the Nodal Officers is to follow. It reads:
5. Nodal officers and identification of issues 5.1 GSTN, Central and State government would appoint nodal officers in requisite number to address the problem a taxpayer faces due to glitches, if any, in the Common Portal. This would be publicized adequately.
5.2 Taxpaye

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. GSTN shall forward the same to the IT Grievance Redressal Committee with suggested solutions for resolution of the problem.”
(italics supplied)
4. Not only the petitioner but also many other people faced this technical glitch and approached this Court. Both the learned counsel submit that this Court on earlier occasions permitted the petitioners to apply to the additional sixth respondent for the issue resolution.
5. So, in this case also, the petitioner may apply to the ninth respondent, the Nodal Officer. The petitioner applying, the Nodal Officer will look into the issue and facilitate the petitioner's uploading FORM GST TRAN-1, without reference to the time-frame. Ordered so.
6. I may also observe that if the petitioner applies

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

KUN MOTOR CO. PVT. LTD. AND VISHNU MOHAN Versus THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO. III, KERALA STATE GST DEPARTMENT AND STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KUN MOTOR CO. PVT. LTD. AND VISHNU MOHAN Versus THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO. III, KERALA STATE GST DEPARTMENT AND STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (12) TMI 531 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2019] 60 G S.T.R. 144 (Ker), 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 3 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-12-2018
WA. No. 1803 of 2018
GST
MR K. VINOD CHANDRAN AND MR ASHOK MENON, JJ.
For The Appellant : ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON, KRISHNA. K AND MEERA V. MENON
For The Respondent : SRI C E UNNIKRISHNAN SPL GP
JUDGMENT
Vinod Chandran, J
The issue arises as to whether the omission to upload e-way bill with respect to the transport of a car purchased in Puthuchery, by a person normally residing in Thiruvananthapuram, attracts Section 129 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (KSG&ST Act for brevity). The impugned judgment found that there should be an adjudication carried on and refused release of the vehicle.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

name of the 2nd appellant was also taken from Puthuchery Motor Vehicles Department as also an insurance cover obtained. The 2nd appellant then, could have driven the vehicle to Thiruvananthapuram where he normally resides. However, the purchase being made of a fancy car at a fancy price he felt that he should not subject the car to a long journey from Puthuchery to Thiruvananthapuram. He hence entrusted the same to the dealer itself for transportation. Here, we have to notice that the dealer has a transportation and logistic wing which is also registered under the GST enactment. The goods were transported in a specially equipped carriage by road. The invoice of purchase of car showed collection of IGST, obviously deeming the sale to be an inter-state one. An invoice is issued for the transporting charges, which too shows collection of IGST, being the tax for service of transportation of the vehicle. The vehicle in which the car was carried was detained at Amaravila, within the State of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed under Sub-rule (14) of Rule 138 read with the Annexure. It was also argued that the 2nd appellant if had driven the vehicle from Puthuchery to Thiruvananthapuram there would have been no such detention or demand for tax. The demand raised as per the notice issued and the order passed was the applicable tax and penalty at 100% of the tax applicable, being the IGST which the dealer had already collected as evidenced from the invoice produced at Ext.P1.
6. The learned Single Judge rightly found Section 129 to be the mechanism for detention,seizure and release of goods and conveyance, in transit, with interim release controlled by sub-section (4) of Section 67, by virtue of Section 129(2). Release of goods detained can be effected under sub-clause (a) of Section 129, when the owner comes forth, on payment of applicable tax and penalty coming to 100% of tax and when any other person so offers, on payment of applicable tax and penalty equal to 50% of tax under sub-clause(b). Sub-clause (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

129, there has to be necessarily payment of tax and penalty or furnished; bank guarantee for the said amounts and a bond for the value of the goods. The Division Bench had set aside the order of the learned Single Judge which directed interim release, on payment of 50% of the demanded tax in that case. (Asst.Sales Tax Officer v. Indus Motors Ltd. (2018) 5 SGSTR 402 (Ker))was also relied on in which another Division Bench (ourselves) had found that even if the transaction is not taxable, Rules 55 and 138 of the KG&ST Rules prescribed documents to accompany the goods as provided thereunder and any failure; would result in detention under Section 129 and consequent demand of applicable tax and penalty. The learned Single Judge noticed Exts.P1 and Ext.P3, the tax invoice of sale of vehicle and tax invoice for transportation, both of which indicated the supply at Thiruvananthapuram. The second proviso to sub-rule (3) of Rule 138 was noticed to find that even an unregistered person transpor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ced. The learned Single Judge refused to venture into such adjudication for it being premature. Considering the fact that the appellant wanted only release of the goods as an interim measure, the learned Single Judge confined his consideration to that.
8. Considering the issue of an interim release, the learned Single Judge held that if the 2nd appellant had driven the car by himself to Puthuchery then, the tax regime would not have hampered the transport. But however, the 2nd appellant having entrusted the vehicle to a transporter, the consequence of his driving the car from Puthuchery to Kerala remains in the conjectural realm, it was observed. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 138 was noticed to find that the registered person as a consignee or as a consignor has to generate e-way bill and upload it in the common portal. The decision in Indus Towers (supra) was relied on to find that if there is contravention of the provisions under the Act and Rules definitely Section 129 operates, as a result

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y] and the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in C.E Appeal 14/2014 dated 07.07.2017. The learned Counsel also takes us through the provisions being Rule 55A and Rule 138 to contend that there is no requirement to upload the e-way bill if it falls under Annexure of Rule 138. 2016 (4) SCC 82 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes , Thiruvananthapuram v. KTC Automobiles is relied on to assert that the sale took place at Puthuchery and the purchaser took possession of the goods by virtue of the temporary registration taken and insurance cover obtained in his name.
10. The learned Special Government Pleader would however, contend that there can be no sale said to have been carried out or a transfer of property in goods, in Puthuchery merely for reason of a temporary registration issued. It is pointed out that the vehicle had run only 17kms as seen from the Odometer, the copy of which is produced as Annexure R2(a). It is contended that temporary registration is a necessary requirement in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Puthucherry merely by reason of the temporary registration obtained for the car, which is an essential requirement for delivery to the purchaser. The parties to the transaction too understood it to be an inter-State sale, hence the IG&S tax collected in the invoice. A trade certificate as can be seen from Rule 41 of the CMV Rules cannot be the document on which delivery made to a purchaser of a vehicle intended for use in the roads. Rule 42 requires the holder of a trade certificate, being a dealer, to deliver a motor vehicle to a purchaser with registration whether temporary or permanent.
11. The temporary registration taken out for the car has in fact been taken out by the dealer without which the purchaser cannot take the vehicle out on to the public road. It is also argued that for the purpose of temporary registration the vehicle is never taken out of the dealership. There can also be no dispute, it is argued, that the transport was of a brand new car purchased by the 2nd appella

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ect for the transaction, pursuant to which transport is carried out; the compliance of the statutory prescriptions is sacrosanct, in default of which there could be automatic imposition of penalty. The bonafides or otherwise of a transport, is not at all a question which can be considered by an adjudicating authority especially since it is a civil liability cast on the persons carrying out conveyance. The detention is not related to an attempt at evasion alone, is the compelling argument. The learned Special Government Pleader would urge this Court to leave the adjudication to the adjudicating authority especially since there is a mixed bundle of facts and law involved to be considered. The adjudicating authority at the first instance has to look into it and this Court need not preempt such consideration. The decision relied on by the appellant in KTC Automobiles (supra) has absolutely no application and if at all it can be applied, it has to be in favour of the State, concludes the le

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Special Government Pleader(Taxes)the G&ST regime being destination based and the purchaser being from an outside State, it was understood by the seller that it was an inter-State sales. The State of Kerala stood to benefit by that understanding. There is no dispute that the tax payable on an inter-State sale was paid by the purchaser and the same reflected in the invoice issued by the seller. We however raise a caveat here, that the nature of the transaction whether it is inter-State or intra-State supply is to be decided from the provisions in the statute and not by the intention or understanding of the parties to the transaction.
13. In understanding inter-State and intra-State sale, one has to look at the IG&ST Act, specifically Chapter IV, which speaks of 'Determination of Nature of Supply'; the word “supply” being defined under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CG&ST Act). The levy under Section 9 of that Act is on every supply of goods and servic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ivery to the recipient.”
14. To determine the place of supply of goods, what is relevant is that the movement of goods should be occasioned by the transaction of supply, as evident from the words “where the supply involves movement of goods”. It is in such circumstances that the location of supply would be the location of the goods, at the time at which the movement of goods terminates for delivery to the recipient. What is discernible is that, we repeat, the transaction of supply itself, should occasion the movement of the goods. Then the location of the supply would be fixed as the place where the goods are delivered, so as to apply Section 7 or Section 8.
15. A transaction which terminates with the supply within a State is an intra-State supply. However, when a dealer or manufacturer within the State of Kerala purchases goods for the purpose of further sale or manufacture within the State of Kerala, from an outside State dealer and transports it to their manufacturing unit or dea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Union Territory of Puthuchery and purchased a car from a dealership there. It is the specific submission of the purchaser that the said car was not available within the State of Kerala for purchase, there being no dealership for the manufacturer within the State of Kerala. There is also no question of any tax evasion as of now, by a purchase made from outside the State, since there is a uniform rate prescribed all over the country. The shift in so far as the GST regime being destination based taxation, is only the shift from the earlier regimes, which was source of goods or origin based. Hence earlier, when goods were sold from one State to another, the levy was under the CST Act, which benefit goes to the State from which the sale originates. In the destination based regime, there is a shift in so far as when there is an inter-State sale, the tax benefit accrues to the State in which supply is made, where the goods eventually are used.
17. When, a resident of Trivandrum purchases

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8, read with Section 10 of the IG&ST Act is not the concern of the taxing authorities or even the motor vehicle authorities, the latter of whom is only concerned with the permanent registration being made within the State in which the vehicle is proposed to be used. The requirement also is that, necessarily the vehicle would have to be permanently registered in the State in which the purchaser has his residence or place of business and normally intends to keep it for use as provided in Section 42 of the M.V. Act.
18. Madhu M.B. was a case in which the goods were detained for reason of no nexus between the documents accompanied and the actual goods under transport. The Division Bench found that under Rule 140(2), there is a provision for release of goods on a provisional basis, but only on execution of a bond in Form GST INS 04 and furnishing of security in the form of a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of applicable tax and penalty payable. The Division Bench after considering

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ansport. The perceived doubt as to whether the transaction was an intra-state or inter-state sale actually brings forth a Catch-22 situation; for if it was the former there is no ground for detention within the State of Kerala and if it was the latter then the applicable tax is satisfied, which document is accompanying the transport also.
19. Rule 41 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules details the purposes for which motor vehicle with trade certificate may be used. Sub-clause (d) of Rule 41 speaks of “for proceeding to or returning from the premises of the dealer or of the purchaser or of any other dealer for the purpose of delivery.” Rule 42 however, mandates that the delivery of a vehicle to a purchaser can be only after registering the vehicle temporarily or permanently. The application for registration has to be made under Rule 47 in Form No.20 to the registering authority within a period of 7 days from the date of taking delivery of such vehicle, excluding the period of journey a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it ran for 17 kilometers; obviously after the registration. The transfer of property of goods was occasioned on the temporary registration being made, but, however, the seller-dealer understood it as an inter-state sale since the purchase was intended for use in a State other than the State from which the sale was effected. The purchaser had also paid IGST, a portion of which would be accrued to the State in which eventually the car would be used.
21. In this context, we have to see KTC Automobiles (supra) wherein the Department, under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, proceeded under Section 45A on the premise that the dealer had shown 263 numbers of car having sold from its Mahe Branch when the cars had never been delivered at Mahe by the manufacturer. The allegation was that the cars were merely registered by the motor vehicles department of Mahe and the cars never physically reached there. Mahe being a Union Territory, at that point, levied lesser tax on the sale of motor vehicles

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

levant particulars of the vehicle such as engine number and chassis number and hence, registration of a motor vehicle is a post-sale event.
20. But this legal proposition does not take the appellant far. It must be carefully seen as to when the properties, particularly possession of a motor vehicle passes or can pass legally to the purchaser, authorising him to apply for registration. Only after obtaining valid registration under the Motor Vehicles Act, the purchaser gets entitled to use the vehicle in public places. Under the scheme of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 the dealer cannot permit the purchaser to use the motor vehicle and thus enjoy its possession unless and until a temporary or permanent registration is obtained by him. Only thereafter, the vehicle can safely be said to be no more under possession of the dealer. Clearly, mere mentioning of engine number and chassis number of a motor vehicle in the invoice of sale does not entitle

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssession and present the vehicle for registration only when it reaches the office of the registering authority. With the handing over of the possession of a specific motor vehicle just prior to registration, the dealer completes the agreement of sale rendering it a perfected sale. The purchaser as an “owner” under the Motor Vehicles Act is thereafter obliged to obtain certificate of registration which alone entitles him to enjoy the possession of the vehicle in practical terms by enjoying the right to use the vehicle at public places, after meeting the other statutory obligations of insurance, etc. Hence, technically though the registration of a motor vehicle is a post-sale event, the event of sale is closely linked in time with the event of registration. Neither the manufacturer nor can the dealer of a motor vehicle permit the intended purchaser having an agreement of sale to use the motor vehicle even for taking it to the registration office in view of the statutory provisions alread

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not having registered the pre-owned cars in its name and merely facilitates the sale from the prior owner. This Court found that the “sale or the ownership transfer of a motor vehicle is governed by the Sale of Goods Act and not the Motor Vehicles Act”. We referrred to this only to emphasize that whatever be the position, in the subject transaction there is transfer of property in goods and completed sale within Puthuchery as per the Sale of Goods Act and the Motor Vehicles Act. The fact that temporary registration was obtained at Puthuchery, and insurance cover taken in the name of the registered owner establishes that the sale had been completed at Puthuchery itself.
23. The fact remains that the 2nd appellant could have very well driven the vehicle from Puthuchery to Kerala without any problem. If the vehicle was driven by the petitioner, there was absolutely no reason to upload an e-way bill. However, as noticed at the beginning, the purchaser having taken delivery of a fancy car

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the brand new car taken delivery of by the 2nd appellant at Puthuchery and transported to Thiruvananthapuram can be termed to be a used car and hence a used personal effect. How “used” is generally understood, is evident from the various definitions as available in the dictionaries as extracted here-under:-
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary:
Used: that has belonged to or been used by somebody else before SECOND-HAND: used cars
New Webster's Dictionary:
Utilized in or employed for some accomplishment or function; having undergone use; secondhand
Collins COBUILD English Dictionary:
A used car has already had one or more owners Would you buy a used car from this man.. His only big purchase has been a used Ford.
We see from the various definitions as extracted from the dictionaries herein above that “used” means something which is second hand. A car on purchase from the authorised dealer of the manufacturer, with a registration taken is owned by the registere

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s, televisions, radios, etc. Term when used in will, includes only such tangible property as attended the person, or such tangible property as is worn or carried about the person. In re Sorensen's Estate, 46 Cal.App.2d 35, 115 P.2s 241, 243. Term “personal effects” when employed in a will enjoys no settled technical meaning and, when used in its primary sense, without any qualifying words, ordinarily embraces such tangible property as is worn or carried about the person, or tangible property having some intimate relation to the person of the testator or testatrix; where it is required by the context within which the term appears, it may enjoy a broader meaning. In re Stengel's Estate, Mo.App., 557 S.W.2d 255, 260″
26. Rana Hemant Singhji was in the context of the specific words employed in the definition that was considered; which was as follows:
(4A) “Capital asset” means property of any kind held by an assessee, whether or not connected with his business, profession or vo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has no application here. The reference to Customs Tariff Act is also irrelevant since the taxing statute herein does not, by specific words or intendment adopt that definition available in the other enactment. Even going by the normal connotations, a car is the personal effect of the person, who carries the registration in his name, who also carries with it the liability to compensate any third party injury caused by the use of such car on the roads. In the case of a car the like of which has been purchased by the 2nd appellant, it is also a priced possession, to be driven around and more to be flaunted as a status symbol.
27. We also are in agreement with the proposition as seen from the English decisions placed before us. Elliott v. Grey was concerned with a situation where a motor car, without an insurance policy, being parked outside the registered owner's house after it had broken down. The vehicle was not in a movable condition, since the owner had jacked up the wheels and r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nufacturers of motor cars, who marketed and sold the cars manufactured through its authorised distributors. An individual purchased a car with warranty, which was for the new vehicle and for the first owner/user. The purchaser took delivery of the car and then sold it to a motor dealer, who advertised the car in a newspaper under the heading 'New Cars', which was challenged by the manufacturer. It was held that a car ceased to be new, when it was sold in retail by the authorised dealer and is registered with the local authority and had been driven away by a purchaser. Here also even accepting the fact that there need be no production of the vehicle for a temporary registration, it has to be noticed that the car had been driven for 17kms. The brand new car would have an odometer showing zero and necessarily it was driven only after the supply to the purchaser. The purchaser came to the possession of the vehicle on its retail sale and had taken out a registration albeit temporary

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the supply, whether it be an inter-state or intra-State, would not depend on whether the purchaser carries it as a head-load through the borders or transports it through his own conveyance or through a transporter. The incidence of tax is on the supply and not on the nature of transport. There is no distinction in so far as the IG&ST Act is concerned, of a supply by road or on a carriage. We hence are of the opinion that the supply of the new vehicle by its authorised dealer terminated on it being purchased by the 2nd appellant in Puthuchery and the subsequent movement of the goods was not occasioned by reason of the transaction of supply. The goods having come into the possession of the purchaser, and the vehicle having been used, however negligible the distance run, we are also of the opinion that it is his “used personal effect” and there can be alleged no taxable transaction in so far as the movement of goods from Puthuchery to Trivandrum in Kerala, especially since the car had

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Director General of Anti-profiteering, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, Versus M/s. J.P. and Sons,

Director General of Anti-profiteering, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, Versus M/s. J.P. and Sons,
GST
2018 (12) TMI 472 – NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY – 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 473 (N. A. P. A.)
NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY – NAPA
Dated:- 6-12-2018
Case No. 16/2018
GST
SH. B.N. SHARMA, CHAIRMAN SH. JC CHAUHAN, TECHNICAL MEMBER, MS. R BHAGYADEVI, TECHNICAL MEMBER
Present:-
Sh. Akshat Aggarwal, Assistant Commissioner and Sh. Bhupender Goyal, Assistant Director (Costs) for the Applicant,
Sh. Ankit Khandelwal, Proprietor and Sh. Anand Kumar Garg for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. This report dated 31.072018, has been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Standing Committee vide the minutes of it's meeting dated 13.042018 had requested the DGAP to initiate investigation under Rule 129 (1) of the CG

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rice Charged of Inclusive of GST (Rs.)
1.
JJGST1707093 12.10.2017
Baby Shampoo 100 ml.
57.24
28%
73.27
Baby Powder 200 Gms.
80.82
28%
103.45
2.
JJGST1709322 16.11.2017
Baby Shampoo 100 ml.
62.10
18%
73.28
 
 
Baby Powder 200 Gms.
87.67
18%
103.45
2. The DGAP had called upon the Respondent to submit his reply on the allegations levelled above and also to suo moto determine the quantum of benefit which he had not passed on during the period between 15-11,2017 to 31.032018 on the above products. The Respondent was also requested to provide a copy of the audited Balance Sheet, GST Returns, Tran-1 Returns and the details of the outward taxable supplies etc.
3. The Respondent had submitted replies to the notice issued by the DGAP on 24.05-201B vide his letters dated 08.06.2018 and 22.06.2018, The DGAP has informed that the Central Government on the recommendations of the GST Council had reduced the GST rate on the above products from 28% to 18% w.e.f. 15,11.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

had also stated that the invoices dated 1210.2017 and 16.11.2017 were issued prior to the updation of software by J & J and hence he could not charge the reduced prices.
4. The DGAP has also intimated that during the investigation it had been observed that the Respondent was required to sell the above products at the base prices which were prevalent before 15.11.2017 and he should have charged GST @ 18% on such base prices to pass on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax from 28% to 18% w.e.f. 15.11.2017. He has further intimated that since the Respondent was a supplier registered under the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 vide GSTI No. 07AWPPK4876R1ZC, he was legally bound to pass on the benefit of reduction in the rate of GST to his customers immediately w.e.f. 15.11.2017.
5. The DGAP has also submitted that by increasing the base prices of the above products and having maintained the pre-GST rate reduction MRPs, the benefit of GST rate reduction was not passed on to the customers by the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ve been.
8. The DGAP has further stated that after analysing the entire outward supplies made by the Respondent, it had been observed that during the period w.e.f. 15.11.2017 to 31 03.2018, the Respondent had sold 223 products comprising of 32 HSN codes out of which 134 products comprising of 14 HSN codes were affected by the reduction in the rate of GST from 28% to w.e.f. 15.11.2017, the details of which have been mentioned in Annexure-8 by the DGAP. The DGAP has further observed that out of the above 134 products impacted by reduction in the rate of GST, Il products were not supplied during the period between 01.11.2017 to 14, 11.2017. He has also informed that out of the above 11 products, the prices for calculating the profiteered amount in the case of 9 products had been taken from the price list submitted by the Respondent whereas 2 products had been launched in December, 2017. The DGAP has further informed that in the case of rest 123 products, it was observed that the base pri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

submitted that as per the above agreement, he was appointed as Retail Distribution Stockist (RDS) by J & J and he was bound by the terms of this agreement to use the software 'Wave' which included the Manual, any associated software components, any media, any printed materials other than the Manual, and any online or electronic documentation. He has also claimed that the contract also required him not to use the above software in case he did not agree to the terms of the above agreement. The Respondent has also maintained that the contract stated that the ownership of the licensed software at all times would be with J & J. He has further alleged that through this agreement, he had been given a very limited right of using the software solely for the business of the above company and take prior consent of the concerned officer in case he wanted to use this software for any other business. He has also claimed that the title and full ownership rights of the above software were with J & J a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he had produced the list of MRPs and the Tax Invoices Which he had issued to his customers after 15.11.2017 to prove that he had charged the same base prices which were fixed by the above company and had also charged tax at the rate of 18%,
12. The Respondent has also filed further submissions on 06.09.2018 in which he has stated that he had deposited the due tax which he had charged from the customers at the rate of 18% and had not misused the Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed off as had been calculated by the DGAP. He has further added that he was only an intermediatory between the Company and the customers and was ready to pay the difference of tax if any but no penalty should be imposed since the circumstances were beyond his control and he had no intention to retain the profit on revised rates, He has further submitted that the calculation of the profiteered amount should be done on the stock which was lying on 14.11.2017 only. instead of the total sales made from 15.11.2017 to 31.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

butor, from the Distributor to the Retailer and from the Retailer to the consumer upto 14.11.2017, and from 17.11.2017 onwards as per the table given below:-
JB Powder 200 Gms, Monsoon
Particular
J&J to Distributor
Distributor to Retailer
Retailer to consumers
Upto 14 November 2017
17th November onwards
Upto 14 November 2017
17th November onwards
Upto 14 November 2017
17th November onwards
Base Price
74.76
79.74
80.82
86.21
93.75
100.00
Tax
20.93
14.35
22.63
15.52
26.25
18.00
Invoice Price
95.69
94.09
103.45
101.72
120.00
118.00
 
JB NMT Shampoo (TBP) 100 ml.
Particular
J&J to Distributor
Distributor to Retailer
Retailer to consumers
Upto 14 November 2017
17th November onwards
Upto 14 November 2017
17th November onwards
Upto 14 November 2017
17th November onwards
Base Price
52.95
54.06
57.25
58.45
66.41
67.80
Tax
14.83
9.73
16.03
10.52
18.59
12.20
Invoice Price
67.78
63.79
73.28
68.97
85.00
80.00
16. We have careful

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t before 15, 11.2017, Therefore, there is no doubt that the Respondent had increased the base prices of the above products w.e.f. 15.11.2017 by the amount shown above, whereas he was required not to increase them and after charging GST @ 18%, he was legally bound to charge the reduced prices so as to pass on the benefit of reduced tax rate to his customers and hence he has indulged in profiteering.
17. It is also revealed from the perusal of Annexure-8 submitted by the DGAP that between the period w.e.f. 15.11.2017 to 31.03.2018, the Respondent had sold 223 products manufactured by J & J out of which rate of tax was reduced in respect of 134 products from 28% to 18% w.e.f 15.11.2017. It is further revealed that out of the above 134 products, 11 products were not supplied during the period between 01.11.2017 to 14.11.2017 and hence for calculating the profiteered amount in respect of 9 products, the prices had been taken from the price list submitted by the Respondent whereas 2 product

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s vehemently argued that he had no control on the fixing of the base prices as well as the MRPs as both of them were fixed by J & J through the software which he was bound to follow as per the terms of the agreement executed by him with the above Company, However, it is apparent from the record that the Respondent is duly registered under the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 and he was hence bound to follow the Notification dated 14.11.2017 mentioned above vide which the rate of GST was reduced from 28% to 18% on 130 products which he was selling, He cannot escape the legal obligation which was imposed upon him by the above Notification by shifting his accountability on this ground, The Respondent has himself admitted during the course of the hearing that he was aware that he was required to pass on the benefit of the reduced rate of tax to his customers and therefore also he cannot deny his legal liability. The Respondent has also not produced any evidence to show that he had made any corresponden

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cannot be construed to have resulted in passing on of the benefit when the base prices had been deliberately increased. Hence, this contention of the Respondent is not tenable and cannot be accepted.
20. The Respondent has also submitted that the amount of profiteering should be calculated on the basis of the stock which was lying with him as on 14.11.2017 instead of the sales made between 15.11.2017 to 31.03.2018 and therefore, the total amount of profiteering would be Rs. 47,333.03/-, However, this argument of the Respondent is fallacious as he had made illegal profit on all the supplies which he had made w.e.f. 15.11.2017 to 31.03,2018 as he had charged increased prices on all the 130 products although he was bound not to do so as per the Notification dated 14.11.2017. Hence the amount of profiteering calculated by the DGAP is correct.
21. The Respondent has also claimed that he had deposited the due tax and had not misused the ITC and he was willing to pay the balance tax if any

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the CGST Rules, 2017 by making commensurate reduction in their prices keeping in view the reduction in the rate of tax so that the benefit is passed on to the recipients, The Respondent is also directed to deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 5,01,646/- along with the interest to be calculated @ 18% from the date when the above amount was collected by him from his customers till the above amount is deposited. Since the recipients in this case are not identifiable the DGAP is directed to get the amount of profiteering of Rs. 5,01,646/- along with interest deposited from the Respondent in the Consumer Welfare Fund of the Central and the concerned State Govt. as per the provisions of Rule 133 (3) (c) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The above amount shall be deposited within a period of 3 months by the Respondent from the date of receipt of this order failing which the same shall be recovered by the DGAP as per the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and shall be deposited as has been directed vide

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Arch Pharmalabs Ltd, Benzo Petro International Ltd, Manoj Tejraj Jain Versus CCT, Medchal – GST

Arch Pharmalabs Ltd, Benzo Petro International Ltd, Manoj Tejraj Jain Versus CCT, Medchal – GST
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 429 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 6-12-2018
E/30708/2018, E/30709/2018, E/30710/2018 – A/31497-31499/2018
Central Excise
Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri Prasannan S. Namboodiri, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri V.R. Pavan Kumar, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: M.V. Ravindran
1. These three appeals are directed against Orders-in-Appeal No. HYDEXCUS- MD-AP2-268-270-17-18 dated 28.02.2018.
2. Relevant facts that arise, in brief are the main appellant Arch Pharma is a manufacturer of fine chemicals, availing CENVAT credit of duty paid on inputs, utilizing the same for discharge of duty liability on finished goods cleared. During the course of investigation of manufacturing unit M/s Benzo, officers of DCGEI noticed that Benzo manufacturing unit had put up a dealer and had passed on i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e adjudicating authority that they have received the material, manufactured the finished goods and removed the same on payment of duty which could not have been possible if the materials were not received. On limitation, was the case that they have informed the department about the receipt of the material, recorded the same and made payments to the dealer who had supplied the material. The adjudicating authority after following due process of law, confirmed the demands raised along with interest, imposed penalties on the individual and the dealer. Appeals preferred before the first appellate authority resulted in upholding of the Order-in-Original. Hence, these appeals.
3. Learned counsel appearing for all the three appellant after giving overall picture of the issue involved draws my attention to the facts of the case and more specifically the documents. It is his submission that the entire case of the revenue is dependent on the statements given by the individuals of the appellants

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the main appellant) wherein they have admitted that they have not received the material.
5. On careful consideration of the submission made by both sides, on merits, I find that the dealer had issued invoices on 1st May, 2013 and the said invoices are seen by me. In the said invoices the dealer has specifically mentioned the transporter as Padmashri Road Lines and vehicle registration number is also mentioned along with LR/ Consignment note No.70262 dated 01.05.2013. The said invoices are annexed at Page 95 & 96 of appeal memoranda. I perused the consignment note (truck copy) of the said LR annexed at Page 110 of the appeal memoranda. The said annexure does indicate the consignment note as number being 70262 dated 01.05.2013 and also indicates truck numbers which has been mentioned on the documents. It is seen further from the documents available on record that the appellant had shown the receipt of this material in the stock records maintained by them as inputs and the said materi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alleged that this consignment note is a fake. In the absence of anything to discredit consignment note of Padmashri Road Lines which carried the material from Vadodara to Hyderabad, it is difficult to accept the revenue's view point that the main appellant had availed CENVAT credit only on documents.
7. I find that my this view is fortified by the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Dhakad Metal Corporation [2015 (330) ELT 561]. This view is also further fortified by the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of GS Alloy Castings Ltd [2016 (331) ELT 310] wherein similar issue cropped up. I find that the Tribunal in the case of Chaudhary Steel Traders [2015 (329) ELT 934] on a similar issue has held that in the absence of any investigation made at the end of transporter, as to the transportation of the goods being incorrect, demands are not sustainable.
8. In view of the facts and circumstances in the case in hand, I find that the ratio of the above decisions would cover the issue i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Accura Valves Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCGST & CE, Nashik

M/s. Accura Valves Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCGST & CE, Nashik
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 428 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 6-12-2018
Appeal No. E/86191/2018 – A/88054/2018
Central Excise
Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati, Member (Judicial)
Shri Govind P. Pingle, Consultant for the appellant
Shri D.S. Chavan, Supdt. (AR) for the respondent
ORDER
Imposition of duty demand of 6% against availment of common input and input services without maintenance of separate account for dutiable and exempted final products against appellant's voluntary reversal of proportionate credit under Rule 6(3) along with penalty invoking extended jurisdiction is assailed in this appeal.
2. The narrow compass in which the dispute has come up to this Tribunal stage is that appellant company was found to have been availing cenvat credit of duty paid on inputs/ capital goods and service tax paid on input services. Though it is manufacturing exempted goods i.e. part of bicycle valve,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at on being pointed out by the department, proportionate credit was reversed under Rule 6(3A) and the sole reason for rejection of the appeal is that appellant had not exercised the option in writing to the departmental Superintendent giving particulars which was required under Rule 6(3)(ii) read with 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Concerning the appellant's contention against allegation of suppression of fact, the adjudicating authority has avoided to comment on the same. He further argued that, as reveals from para 5 of the order-in-original, the appellant had not availed cenvat credit of duty paid on common inputs and the issue is therefore strictly restricted to availment of credit on common input services. In referring to the decision of the Tribunal reported in 2016 (43) STR 411 (T-Hyd.) and 2017 (347) ELT 112 (T-Bang.), Ld. Counsel for the appellant argued that condition in Rule 6(3A) to intimate to the department is only a procedural requirement and failure to intimate the d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stified leviability of duty @ 6% as contemplated in the Cenvat Credit Rules.
5. Heard from both sides, perused the case records and gone through the judicial decisions cited by the appellant. Admittedly reversal of proportionate credit was made much before issue of show-cause notice. Show-cause notice doe not reveal as to how the matter has gone to the knowledge of the department or brought to the notice of the parties but order-in-original at para 2 indicates that during the course of audit, it was noticed that assessee had availed cenvat credit on common inputs and input services which are used in the manufacture of dutiable as well as exempted final products. However, a finding is given in the order-in-original at para 5, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:-
In this regard the assessee's submission that they have not availed cenvat credit on inputs of exempted goods i.e. Bicycle valve appears to be correct as seen from the sample bill of entries wherein it is seen that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rvices which was noticed only during audit, for which extended period of limitation as envisaged in proviso to Section 11A(1) prior to 08.04.2001 and Section 11A(4) with effect from 08.04.2001 is justifiably invocable and the demand of `16,65,169/- along with interest and penalty are appropriately imposed. It is found from the Order-in-Appeal that a vague statement at para 17 is made that appellant had availed cenvat credit on raw materials viz. Brass rods, brass stems and rubber components but no such basis is found from its order despite the fact that the appellants' contention regarding non-availment of credit on inputs/ raw materials required for manufacture and clearance of final products are noted in para 6 of his order.
7. Now coming to the statutory audit procedure, the purpose of audit, as available in the Manual published by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India in respect of EA audit and CERA audit under Chapter 17 is that the idea behind such conduct of verificat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

recoveries of dues by the Central Excise Department. Therefore, it cannot be said that only because audit party had found non-maintenance of separate records appellant is to be tasked for suppression etc.
8. In exercise of option as contemplated in Rule 6(3A), the assessee has to choose either of those options and in view of the judicial precedent set in the above two referred case laws, non-intimation of such exercise of option can only be treated as mere procedural lapse. Further, nowhere in the said procedure it has been mentioned that in the event of such intimation not being given, tax liability at the higher rate would be applicable to the assessee for which the order passed by the Commissioner confirming 6% liability against proportionate availment of 1.33% credit is not sustainable and hence the Order.
9. The Appeal is allowed and the impugned order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) vide Order-in-Appeal No. NSK/EXCUS/000/APPL/138/17-18 is hereby set aside.
(Pronounced in Cour

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Alfred Berg & Co., (I) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise-II, Appeals II, Chennai

Alfred Berg & Co., (I) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise-II, Appeals II, Chennai
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 427 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 6-12-2018
Appeal No. E/41565/2018 – FINAL ORDER No. 43003/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Sh. M.N. Bharathi, Advocate For the Appellant
Shri L. Nanda Kumar, AC (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
The appellants are engaged in manufacturing medicines. The allegation of the department is that they removed one input namely Ephedrine HCL on which MODVAT Credit to the tune of Rs. 6,72,397/- was taken, in the guise of Ephedrine Tablets IP on payment of duty by raising invoices though they had not manufactured the same. Show cause notice dt.10/6/2003 was issued demanding duty alongwith interest on the inputs cleared as such and also proposing to appropriate the amount of Rs. 2,87,986/- paid by them on 14/2/2000. After due process of law, the original authority

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rs. 24,490/- and therefore the confirmation of demand cannot sustain. It is argued by him that Ephedrine Powder was the input and the appellant had cleared them as tablets by paying duty. Though the duty was paid on the items which were removed, the department has not taken into consideration this aspect. During the relevant period, Ephedrine was not a controlled substance coming within the purview of NDPS Act, 1986. It was later brought within the purview of the Act. The appellant having paid duty, the demand raised again cannot sustain. On penalty, he argued that since the appellant has furnished all invoices showing the payment of duty at the time of removal and much before the issuance of show cause notice, he pleaded that the penalties may be set aside. That these would show that appellant is not guilty of suppression of facts with intention to evade payment of duty.
3. The Ld.AR, Sh.L.Nanda Kumar appeared and argued the matter. He submitted that the appellants had cleared the i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wrong availment of MODVAT Credit was taken up for adjudication.
6. The Show cause notice is highly vague and does not give the exact allegation. It is presumed to be alleged that appellant removed inputs as such without reversing the credit and has contravened provisions of 57F. But then it is also stated that inputs are removed as tablets. When the inputs are Ephedrine Powder, then the removal in the form of tablets will not be removal as such requiring reversal of credit. If they are removed as Ephedrine tablets after manufacture then these attract Central Excise duty. The appellants contend that they have paid the excise duty after raising invoices. For the total quantity alleged to have been removed appellants have paid central excise duty of Rs. 6,96,887/- (Rs.4,08,901/- + Rs. 2,87,986/-). From the facts narrated in the show cause notice, it is not clear whether the allegation is inputs were removed as such or whether Ephedrine tablets manufactured were removed without payment o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SUNIL SINGLA

SUNIL SINGLA
Query (Issue) Started By: – Sunil Singla Dated:- 5-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 11-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
SIR
ONE OF OUR CLIENT IS GTA HAS SHIFTED HIM/ITSELF FROM RCM TO FCM
NOW HIS QUERY IS THAT HE IS CHARGING FREIGHT FROM TWO TYPES OF CUSTOMERS: ONE IS INDUSTRIALIST OTHER IS FURTHER GTA. HIS QUERY IS THAT WHETHER HE HAS TO CHARGE GST FROM GTA OR NOT . WHETHER GTA TO GTA SERVICES ARE EXEMPTED SERVIES OR NOT.
REGARDS ALL
SUNIL SINGLA
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
What type of service is rendered between these two GTAs.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
No exemption from GTA to GTA is available. Your client is providing service of GTA under Forward Charge Mechan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

URI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dr.Govindarajan Sir, Thanks a lot for your support. A support from a learned person matters a lot to me. Really it is moral boosting for me, especially, in view of the time taken and pondered over again and again on a unique question.
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
Sethi sir,
Actually I learnt a lot. You were in the department and you must have vast experience. Being an officer in BSNL my expertisation is only on service tax matters.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
An extract of GST Council Meeting held on 5.8.17, option has to be given for providing GTA service under Forward Charge Mechanism
S.No.8 Transport Agency Service (GTA)
Allowed option of 12% GST with full ITC under forward charge.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

REGARDING ANNUAL RETURN FILING

REGARDING ANNUAL RETURN FILING
Query (Issue) Started By: – Seena James Dated:- 5-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Respected Sir,
Good day!
A registered tax payer with around 7 lakhs income from house boat service of FY 2017-18 were not shown while filing the GST returns. As the returns filed cannot be revised what shall we do while filing the annual return for the FY 2017-18.
I would be grateful for your prompt reply.
Thank you

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input Tax Credit on Import Return

Input Tax Credit on Import Return
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kaustubh Karandikar Dated:- 5-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 17-1-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
XYZ imported goods and input tax credit taken on it for IGST charged in the Bill of Entry. These goods were rejected being wrong supply and re-exported to the supplier.
1) Can they claim input tax credit of IGST paid?
2) While re-exporting to the supplier, can they export without payment of GST under LUT even if they had taken input tax credit of the IGST?
Reply By YAGAY andSUN:
The Reply:
Except certain circumstances, there is no tax on export. in our view, XYZ can claim input tax credit of IGST paid and they can export under LUT without payment of IG

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pre Primary Education

Pre Primary Education
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ravikumar Doddi Dated:- 5-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Dear sir,
Applicant is a proprietor running a Pre primary educational institution ( Kinder garden school) neither it is a trust or society is liable for GST or exempted, HSN Code, rate of tax, if any exemption Notification Number and date, please clarify
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
HSN 999210 Fully exempted as per Bo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st December 2018)

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st December 2018)
GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (GST)
CONCEPT & STATUS
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS (CBIC)
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
AS ON 1st DECEMBER, 2018
The uniform system of taxation, which, with a few exceptions of no great consequence, takes place in all the different parts of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, leaves the interior commerce of the country, the inland and coasting trade, almost entirely free. The inland trade is almost perfectly free, and the greater part of goods may be carried from one end of the kingdom to the other, without requiring any permit or let-pass, without being subject to question, visit, or examination from the revenue officers. ……This freedom of interior commerce, the effect of uniformity of the system of taxation, is perhaps one of the principal causes of the prosperity of Great Britain; every great country being n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nbsp;
2.    CONSTITUTIONAL SCHEME OF INDIRECT TAXATION IN INDIA BEFORE GST :
2.1      Article 265 of the Constitution of India provides that no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. As per Article 246 of the Constitution, Parliament has exclusive powers to make laws in respect of matters given in Union List (List I of the Seventh Schedule) and State Government has the exclusive jurisdiction to legislate on the matters containing in State List (List II of the Seventh Schedule). In respect of the matters contained in Concurrent List (List III of the Seventh Schedule), both the Central Government and State Governments have concurrent powers to legislate. 
2.2      Before advent of GST, the most important sources of indirect tax revenue for the Union were customs duty (entry 83 of Union List), central excise duty (entry 84 of Union List), and service tax (entry 97 of Union List). Although entry 92C was i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

entry 52 of the State List) and electricity tax ((entry 53 of the State List). CST was also an important source of revenue though the same was levied by the Union.
3.    HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF INDIRECT TAXATION IN POSTINDEPENDENCE INDIA TILL GST:
3.1      In post-Independence period, central excise duty was levied on a few commodities which were in the nature of raw materials and intermediate inputs, and consumer goods were outside the net by and large. The first set of reform was suggested by the Taxation Enquiry Commission (1953-54) under the chairmanship of Dr. John Matthai. The Commission recommended that sales tax should be used specifically by the States as a source of revenue with Union governments' intervention allowed generally only in case of inter-State sales. It also recommended levy of a tax on inter-State sales subject to a ceiling of 1%, which the States would administer and also retain the revenue. 
3.2    &

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

addition but in the beginning it was limited to select inputs and manufactured goods only with one-to-one correlation between input and manufactured goods for eligibility to take input tax credit. The comprehensive coverage of MODVAT was achieved by 1996-97. 
3.4      The next wave of reform in indirect tax sphere came with the New Economic Policy of 1991. The Tax Reforms Committee under the chairmanship of Prof. Raja J Chelliah was appointed in 1991. This Committee recommended broadening of the tax base by taxing services and pruning exemptions, consolidation and lowering of rates, extension of MODVAT on all inputs including capital goods. It suggested that reform of tax structure must have to be accompanied by a reform of tax administration, if complete benefits were to be derived from the tax reforms. Many of the recommendations of the Chelliah Committee were implemented. In 1999-2000, tax rates were merged in three rates, with additional rates on a few lux

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

     Before state level VAT was introduced by States in the first half of the first decade of this century, sales tax was levied in States since independence. Sales tax was plagued by some serious flaws. It was levied by States in an uncoordinated manner the consequences of which were different rates of sales tax on different commodities in different States. Rates of sales tax were more than ten in some States and these varied for the same commodity in different States. Inter-state sales were subjected to levy of Central Sales Tax. As this tax was appropriated by the exporting State credit was not allowed by the dealer in the importing State. This resulted into exportation of tax from richer to poorer states and also cascading of taxes. Interestingly, States had power of taxation over services from the very beginning. States levied tax on advertisements, luxuries, entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling. 
3.7      A report, titled “Refo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e first preliminary discussion on transition from sales tax regime to VAT regime took place in a meeting of Chief Ministers convened by the Union Finance Minister in 1995. A standing Committee of State Finance Ministers was constituted, as a result of meeting of the Union Finance Ministers and Chief Ministers in November, 1999, to deliberate on the design of VAT which was later made the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers (EC). Haryana was the first State to implement VAT, in 2003. In 2005, VAT was implemented in most of the states. Uttar Pradesh was the last State to implement VAT, from 1st January, 2008.
4.    INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON GST / VAT:
4.1      VAT and GST are used inter-changeably as the latter denotes comprehensiveness of VAT by coverage of goods and services. France was the first country to implement VAT, in 1954. Presently, more than 160 countries have implemented GST / VAT in some form or the other. The most popular

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dministered by the Central government (Germany, Switzerland, Austria), or dual GST structure wherein both Centre and States administer tax independently (Canada) or with some co-ordination between the national and sub-national entities (Brazil, Russia). While a centralized structure reduces fiscal autonomy for the States, a decentralized structure enhances compliance burden for the taxpayers. Canada is a federal country with unique model of taxation in which certain provinces have joined federal GST and others have not. Provinces which administer their taxes separately are called 'non- participating provinces', whereas provinces which have teamed up with the Federal Government for tax administration are called 'participating provinces'. 
4.3      The rate of GST varies across countries. While Malaysia has a lower rate of 6% (Malaysia though scrapped GST in 2018 due to popular uproar against it),  Hungary has one of the highest rate of 27%. Australia levie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

w the stage of production. Similarly, in the State-level VAT, CENVAT load on the goods has not yet been removed and the cascading effect of that part of tax burden has remained unrelieved. Moreover, there are several taxes in the States, such as, Luxury Tax, Entertainment Tax, etc. which have still not been subsumed in the VAT. Further, there has also not been any integration of VAT on goods with tax on services at the State level with removal of cascading effect of service tax.  
5.3      CST was another source of distortion in terms of its cascading nature. It was also against one of the basic principles of consumption taxes that tax should accrue to the jurisdiction where consumption takes place. Despite remarkable harmonization in VAT regimes under the auspices of the EC, the national market was fragmented with too many obstacles in free movement of goods necessitated by procedural requirement under VAT and CST. 
5.4      In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

towed upon both Union and States in the Constitution itself. As a natural corollary of this, any unification of the taxation system required a dual GST, levied and collected both by the Union and the States. 
6.    GST : A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE:
6.1      The Kelkar Task Force on Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) recommended in 2005 introduction of a comprehensive tax on all goods and service replacing Central level VAT and State level VATs. It recommended replacing all indirect taxes except the customs duty with value added tax on all goods and services with complete set off in all stages of making of a product. 
6.2      An announcement was made by the then Union Finance Minister in Budget  (2007-08) to the effect that GST would be introduced with effect from April 1, 2010 and that the EC, on his request, would work with the Central Government to prepare a road map for introduction of GST in In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

discussions in the EC and the written observations, certain modifications were considered necessary and were discussed with the Co-conveners and the representatives of the Department of Revenue of Union Finance Ministry. With the modifications duly made, a final version of the views of EC on the model and road map for the GST was prepared (April 30, 2008). These views of EC were then sent to the Government of India, and the comments of Government of India were received on December 12, 2008. These comments were duly considered by the EC (December 16, 2008), and it was decided that a Committee of Principal Secretaries/Secretaries of Finance/Taxation and Commissioners of Trade Taxes of the States would be set up to consider these comments, and submit their views. These views were submitted and were accepted in principle by the EC (January 21, 2009). Based on discussions within the EC and between the EC and the Central Government, the EC released its First Discussion Paper (FDP) on GST in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d to the State of origin where production or sale happened and not to the State where consumption happened. Many manufacturing States expressed concerns over the loss of revenue on account of shift from origin based taxation to destination based taxation. 
7.2.1      An argument put forward on behalf of producing states in support of origin based taxation is that they need to collect at least some tax from inter-State sales in order to recover the cost of infrastructure and public services provided by the State Governments to the industries producing the goods which are consumed in other states. This line of reasoning is based on the assumption that in the absence of a tax on inter-State sales, the location of export industries within their jurisdiction would not contribute to the tax revenues of the exporting state. This view was missing the fact that any value addition in a jurisdiction necessarily means extra income in the hands of the residents of tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bsp;   A Committee headed by the Chief Economic Adviser Dr. Arvind Subramanian on possible tax rates under GST suggested RNR (Revenue Neutral Rate). The term RNR refers to that single rate, which preserves revenue at desired (current) levels. This would differ from the standard rate, which is the rate that would apply to a majority of goods and services. In practice, there will be a structure of rates, but for the sake of analytical clarity and precision it is appropriate to think of the RNR as a single rate. It is a given single rate that gets converted into a whole rate structure, depending on policy choices about exemptions, what commodities to charge at a lower rate and what to charge at a very high rate. 
7.3.2      The Committee recommended RNR of 15-15.5% (to be levied by the Centre and States combined). The lower rates (to be applied to certain goods consumed by the poor) should be 12%.  Further, the sin or demerit rates (to be appl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the Parliament and the State Legislatures. The Constitution (One Hundred Twenty Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 departed from the previous GST amendment bill and proposed that the Goods and Services Tax Council may decide about the modalities to resolve disputes arising out of its recommendations. 
7.5      Alcohol and Petroleum products: Alcoholic liquor for human consumption and petroleum products are major contributor to revenue of States. As States were uncertain about impact of GST on their finances and moreover loss of autonomy in collection of tax revenue, States unanimously argued for exclusion of these products from the ambit of GST. In the 115th Amendment Bill alcoholic liquor for human consumption and five petroleum products namely crude petroleum, high speed diesel, motor spirit or petrol, aviation turbine fuel and natural gas were kept out of GST. But in the 122nd Amendment Bill, only alcoholic liquor for human consumption was kept outside GST and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he complete supply chain from production to distribution, and both goods and services. The scheme of the Constitution did not provide for any concurrent taxing powers to the Union as well as the States and for the purpose of introducing goods and services tax amendment of the Constitution conferring simultaneous power on Parliament as well as the State Legislatures to make laws for levying goods and services tax on every transaction of supply of goods or services was necessary. 
8.2      The Constitution (115th Amendment) Bill, 2011, in relation to the introduction of GST, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 11th March, 2011. The Bill was referred to the Standing Committee on Finance on 29th March, 2011. The Standing Committee submitted its report on the Bill in August, 2013. However, the Bill, which was pending in the Lok Sabha, lapsed with the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha. 
8.3      The Constitution (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.
* Article 268A of the Constitution has been omitted. The said article empowered the Government of India to levy taxes on services. As tax on services has been brought under GST, such a provision was no longer required.
* Article 269A has been inserted which provides for goods and services tax on supplies in the course of inter-State trade or commerce which shall be levied and collected by the Government of India and such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as may be provided by Parliament by law on the recommendations of the Goods and Services Tax Council. It also provides that Parliament may, by law, formulate the principles for determining the place of supply, and when a supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of interState trade or commerce.
* Article 270 has been amended to provide for distribution of goods and services tax collected by the Union between the Union and the States.
* Article 271 has been amended

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST.
* Parliament shall, by law, on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council, provide for compensation to the States for loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of the goods and services tax for five years.
* In case of petroleum and petroleum products, it has been provided that these goods shall not be subject to the levy of Goods and Services Tax till a date notified on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council.
9.    GOODS & SERVICE TAX COUNCIL:
9.1      As provided for in Article 279A of the Constitution, the Goods and Services Tax Council (the Council) was notified with effect from 12th September, 2016. The Council is comprised of the Union Finance Minister (who will be the Chairman of the Council), the Minister of State (Revenue) and the State Finance/Taxation Ministers as members. It shall make recommendations to the Union and the States on the following issues:
* the taxes, cesses and surch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onferred by this article, the Goods and Services Tax Council shall be guided by the need for a harmonized structure of goods and services tax and for the development of a harmonized national market for goods and services. 
9.3      One half of the total number of Members of the Goods and Services Tax Council shall constitute the quorum at its meetings. The Goods and Services Tax Council shall determine the procedure in the performance of its functions. Every decision of the Goods and Services Tax Council shall be taken at a meeting, by a majority of not less than three-fourths of the weighted votes of the members present and voting, in accordance with the following principles, namely: – 
(a)      the vote of the Central Government shall have a weightage of one-third of the total votes cast, and 
(b)      the votes of all the State Governments taken together shall have a weightage of two-thirds of the total vo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntral or State governments may be continued by respective government by way of reimbursement through budgetary route. The schemes, in the present form, would not continue in GST. Further, 50% exemption of the CGST portion will be provided to CSD (Defense Canteens).
(iv)     Recommending GST laws, namely CGST Law, UTGST Law, IGST Law, SGST Law and GST Compensation Law paving the way for implementation of GST.
(v)      In order to ensure single interface, all administrative control over 90% of taxpayers having turnover below Rs. 1.5 crore would vest with State tax administration and over 10% with the Central tax administration. Further all administrative control over taxpayers having turnover above Rs. 1.5 crore shall be divided equally in the ratio of 50% each for the Central and State tax administration. 
(vi)     Powers under the IGST Act shall also be cross-empowered on the same basis as under CGST and SGST Acts with few excep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 and under sub-section (4) of section 5 of the IGST Act, 2017 has been suspended till 30.09.2019.
(xii)    There shall be no requirement on payment of tax on advance received for supply of goods by all taxpayers.
(xiii)   Supply from GTA to unregistered persons has been exempted from tax.
(xiv)   TDS/TCS provisions to be implemented from 01.10.2018. Further, to provide some more time to TDS deductor to familiarize themselves with the new system, last date for furnishing return in FORM GSTR-7 for the months of October, November & December has been extended upto 31st January, 2019. Further, exemption from TDS for been made for supply made by PSU to PSU.
(xv)    E-Wallet Scheme shall be introduced for exporters from 01.04.2019 and till then relief for exporters shall be given in form of broadly existing practice. 
(xvi)   All taxpayers are required to file return FORM GSTR-3B & pay tax on mont

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;Late fee for delayed filing of return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of July, 2017 to September, 2017 has been waived. The amount of late fee already paid but subsequently waived off shall be re-credited to the Electronic Cash Ledger of registered person under “Tax” head instead of “Fee” head. 
(xxi)   From October 2017 onwards, the amount of late fee for late filing of GSTR-3B payable by a registered person is as follows:
* whose tax liability for that month was 'NIL' will be Rs. 20/- per day instead of Rs. 200/- per day;
* whose tax liability for that month was not 'NIL' will be Rs. 50/- per day instead of Rs. 200/- per day.
(xxii)      Facility has been introduced for manual filing of refund application. (xxii) Supply of services to Nepal and Bhutan shall be exempted from GST even if payment has not been received in foreign convertible currency – such suppliers shall be eligible for input tax credit.
(xxiii)     Centrali

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e.
9.5 In its 28th meeting held in New Delhi on 21.07.2018, the GST Council recommended certain amendments in the CGST Act, IGST Act, UTGST Act and the GST (Compensation to States) Act. These amendments have been passed by Parliament and have been enacted, after receiving the assent of the Hon'ble President of India on 29.08.2018, as the Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Act, 2018, respectively. The major amendments brought about by these Acts are as below: 
(i)    Upper limit of turnover for opting for composition scheme to be raised from Rs. 1 Cr to Rs. 1.5 Cr. Present limit of turnover can now be raised on the recommendations of the Council.
(ii)   Composition dealers to be allowed to supply services (other than restaurant services), for up t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;Registration to remain temporarily suspended while cancellation of registration is under process, so that the taxpayer is relieved of continued compliance under the law.
(viii)   The following transactions to be treated as no supply (no tax payable) under Schedule III: 
(a)      Supply of goods from a place in the non-taxable territory to another place in the non-taxable territory without such goods entering into India;
(b)      Supply of warehoused goods to any person before clearance for home consumption; and
(c)   Supply of goods in case of high sea sales.
(ix) Scope of input tax credit is being widened, and it would now be made  available in respect of the following:
(a)      Most of the activities or transactions specified in Schedule III;
(b)      Motor vehicles for transportation of persons having seating capacity of more than thirteen (including driver), ve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nbsp;  Place of supply in case of job work of any treatment or process done on goods temporarily imported into India and then exported without putting them to any other use in India, to be outside India.
(xv)    Recovery can be made from distinct persons, even if present in different State/Union territories.
(xvi)   The order of cross-utilisation of input tax credit is being rationalized.
(xvii)      The amount of IGST not apportioned to the Centre or the States/UTs may, for the time being, on the recommendations of the Council, be apportioned at the rate of fifty per cent. to the Central Government and fifty per cent. to the State Governments or the Union territories, as the case may be, on ad hoc basis and this amount shall be adjusted against the amount finally apportioned.
(xviii)     Fifty per cent of such amount, as may be recommended by the Council, which remains unutilised in the Compensation Fund, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ated changes in law.  These changes have been carried out in the law vide the Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018. The main features of the new return filing format are as follows:
(i)    All taxpayers excluding small taxpayers and a few exceptions like ISD etc. shall file one monthly return. 
(ii)   The return is simple with two main tables. One for reporting outward supplies and one for availing input tax credit based on invoices uploaded by the supplier.
(iii)      Invoices can be uploaded continuously by the supplier and can be continuously viewed and locked by the buyer for availing input tax credit. This process would ensure that very large part of the return is automatically filled based on the invoices uploaded by the buyer and the supplier. Simply put, the process would be “UPLOAD – LOCK – PAY” for most tax payers.
(iv)     Taxpayers would have facility to create his profile based on nat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n called amendment return. Payment would be allowed to be made through the amendment return as it will help save interest liability for the taxpayers.
In order to ensure that the above changes in the Centre and the State GST laws are brought into force simultaneously, these amendments will be made effective from a date to be notified in the future.
10. THE DESIGN OF INDIAN GST:
10.1    Concurrent dual model of GST: India has adopted dual GST model because of its unique federal nature. Under this model, tax is levied concurrently by the Centre as well as the States on a common base, i.e. supply of goods or services or both. GST to be levied by the Centre would be called Central GST (Central tax / CGST) and that to be levied by the States would be called State GST (State Tax / SGST). State GST (State Tax / SGST) would be called UTGST (Union territory tax) in Union Territories without legislature. CGST & SGST / UTGST shall be levied on all taxable intra-State supplies.&n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pective governments to transfer the funds. The major advantages of IGST Model are:
(i)    Maintenance of uninterrupted ITC chain on inter-State transactions.
(ii)   No upfront payment of tax or substantial blockage of funds for the interState supplier or recipient.
(iii)      No refund claim in exporting State, as ITC is used up while paying the tax.
(iv)     Self-monitoring model.
(v)      Model takes 'Business to Business' as well as 'Business to Consumer' transactions into account. 
10.3    Tax Rates: Owing to unique Indian socio-economic milieu, four rates namely 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% have been adopted. Besides, some goods and services are exempt also. Rate for precious metals is an exception to 'four-tax slabrule' and the same has been fixed at 3%. In addition, unworked diamonds, precious stones, etc. attracts a rate of 0.25%. A cess over the peak rate of 28% on certain specifi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s' tax revenues from: (i) State Value Added Tax (VAT), (ii) central sales tax, (iii) entry tax, octroi, local body tax, (iv) taxes on luxuries, (v) taxes on advertisements, etc.  However, any revenue among these taxes arising related to supply of alcohol for human consumption, and five specified petroleum products, will not be accounted as part of the base year revenue. A GST Compensation Cess is levied on the supply of certain goods and services, as recommended by the GST Council to finance the compensation cess. 
10.5    E-Way Bill System: The introduction of e-way (electronic way) bill is a monumental shift from the earlier “Departmental Policing Model” to a “SelfDeclaration Model”. It envisages one e-way bill for movement of the goods throughout the country, thereby ensuring a hassle free movement for transporters throughout the country. The e-way bill system has been introduced nation-wide for all inter-State movement of goods with effect from 1st April,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Authority shall cease to exist after the expiry of two years from the date on which the Chairman enters upon his office unless the Council recommends otherwise.
10.6.2    The Authority may determine whether any reduction in the rate of tax or the benefit of input tax credit has been passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. It can order reduction in prices, imposition of penalty, cancellation of registration and any other decision as may deem fit, after inquiry into the case. 
10.7    Concept of Supply: GST would be applicable on supply of goods or services as against the present concept of tax on manufacture of goods or on sale of goods or on provision of services. It includes all sorts of activities like manufacture, sale, barter, exchange, transfer etc. It also includes supplies made without consideration when such supplies are made in certain specified situations. 
10.8    Threshold Exemption: A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ry amendments in the GST Acts. The amendment shall be effective from a date to be notified in the future.
10.10     Zero rated Supplies: Export of goods and services are zero rated. Supplies to SEZs developers and SEZ units are also zero-rated. The benefit of zero rating can be taken either with payment of integrated tax, or without payment of integrated tax under bond or Letter of Undertaking. 
10.11     Cross-utilization of ITC: IGST credit can be used for payment of all taxes. CGST credit can be used only for paying CGST or IGST. SGST credit can be used only for paying SGST or IGST. 
The credit would be permitted to be utilized in the following manner:
(a)      ITC of CGST allowed for payment of CGST & IGST in that order;
(b)      ITC of SGST allowed for payment of SGST & IGST in that order;
(c)   ITC of UTGST allowed for payment of UTGST & IGST in that order;
(d)   &

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

    Tax Deduction at Source: Obligation on certain persons including government departments, local authorities and government agencies, who are recipients of supply, to deduct tax at the rate of 1% from the payment made or credited to the supplier where total value of supply, under a contract, exceeds two lakh and fifty thousand rupees. The provision for TDS has been operationalized wef 01st October 2018. Exemption from the provisions of TDS has been given to certain authorities under the Ministry of Defence.  
10.15     Refunds: Refund of tax to be sought by taxpayer or by any other person who has borne the incidence of tax within two years from the relevant date. Refund of unutilized ITC also available in zero rated supplies and inverted tax structure.
10.16   Tax Collection at Source: Obligation on electronic commerce operators to collect 'tax at source', at such rate not exceeding two per cent of net value of taxable supplies

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es including detaining and sale of goods, movable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person.
10.19     Appellate Tribunal: Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal would be constituted by the Central Government for hearing appeals against the orders passed by the Appellate Authority or the Revisional Authority. States would adopt the provisions relating to Tribunal in respective SGST Act.
10.20     Advance Ruling Authority: Advance Ruling Authority would be constituted by States in order to enable the taxpayer to seek a binding clarity on taxation matters from the department. Centre would adopt such authority under CGST Act.
10.21     Transitional Provisions: Elaborate transitional provisions have been provided for smooth transition of existing taxpayers to GST regime.
10.22   Subsuming of taxes, duties etc.: Among the taxes and duties levied and collected by the Union, Central Excise duty, Duties of E

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t J&K) and Union territories with legislature have passed their respective SGST Acts. The economic integration of India was completed on 8th July, 2017 when the State of J&K also passed the SGST Act and the Central Government also subsequently extended the CGST Act to J&K. 
11.2.      In its 28th meeting held in New Delhi on 21.07.2018, the GST Council recommended certain amendments in the CGST Act, IGST Act, UTGST Act and the GST (Compensation to States) Act. These amendments have been passed by Parliament and have been enacted, after receiving the assent of the Hon'ble  President of India on 29.08.2018, as the Central Goods and Services Tax  (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Act, 2018, respectively. In order to ensure that the above changes in the Centre and the Sta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rious forms, etc.
12.      ROLE OF CBIC:
12.1 CBIC is playing an active role in the drafting of GST law and procedures, particularly the CGST and IGST law, which will be exclusive domain of the Centre. This apart, the CBIC has prepared itself for meeting the implementation challenges, which are quite formidable. The number of taxpayers has gone up significantly. The existing IT infrastructure of CBIC has been suitably scaled up to handle such large volumes of data. Based on the legal provisions and procedure for GST, the content of work-flow software such as ACES (Automated Central Excise & Service Tax) would require re-engineering. The name of IT project of CBIC under GST is 'SAKSHAM' involving a total project value of Rs. 2,256 Cr.
12.2 Augmentation of human resources would be necessary to handle large taxpayers' base in GST scattered across the length and breadth of the country. Capacity building, particularly in the field of Accountancy and Information Techn

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

et up the Feedback and Action Room which monitored the GST implementation challenges faced by the taxpayer and act as an active interface between the taxpayer and the Government.
13.      GOODS & SERVICES TAX NETWORK:
13.1 Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has been set up by the  Government as a private company under erstwhile Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. GSTN would provide three front end services to the taxpayers namely registration, payment and return. Besides providing these services to the taxpayers, GSTN would be developing back-end IT modules for 27 States who have opted for the same. Infosys has been appointed as Managed Service Provider (MSP). GSTN has selected 73 IT, ITeS and financial technology companies and 1 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CCT, Karnataka), to be called GST Suvidha Providers (GSPs). GSPs would develop applications to be used by taxpayers for interacting with the GSTN. The diagram below shows the work distribution

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s per GST law, can access the data. Data can be accessed by audit authorities as per law. No other entity can have any access to data available with GSTN.
14.      GST: A GAME CHANGER FOR INDIAN  ECONOMY:
14.1 GST will have a multiplier effect on the economy with benefits accruing to various sectors as discussed below.
14.2 Benefits to the exporters: The subsuming of major Central and State taxes in GST, complete and comprehensive setoff of input goods and services and phasing out of Central Sales Tax (CST) would reduce the cost of locally manufactured goods and services. This will increase the competitiveness of Indian goods and services in the international market and give boost to Indian exports. The uniformity in tax rates and procedures across the country will also go a long way in reducing the compliance cost.
14.3 Benefits to small traders and entrepreneurs: GST has increased the threshold for GST registration for small businesses. Those units havin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n an average dealer in industry, trade and agriculture.
14.5 Benefits for common consumers: With the introduction of GST, the cascading effects of CENVAT, State VAT and service tax will be more comprehensively removed with a continuous chain of set-off from the producer's point to the retailer's point than what was possible under the prevailing CENVAT and VAT regime.  Certain major Central and State taxes will also be subsumed in GST and CST will be phased out. Other things remaining the same, the burden of tax on goods would, in general, fall under GST and that would benefit the consumers.
14.6 Promote “Make in India”: GST will help to create a unified common national market for India, giving a boost to foreign investment and “Make in India” campaign. It will prevent cascading of taxes and make products cheaper, thus boosting aggregate demand. It will result in harmonization of laws, procedures and rates of tax. It will boost export and manufacturing activity, generate more emp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

exemptions along with reduction in multiplicity of taxes that are at present governing our indirect tax system will lead to simplification and uniformity. Reduction in compliance costs as multiple record-keeping for a variety of taxes will not be needed, therefore, lesser investment of resources and manpower in maintaining records. It will result in simplified and automated procedures for various processes such as registration, returns, refunds, tax payments. All interaction shall be through the common GSTN portal, therefore, less public interface between the taxpayer and the tax administration. It will improve environment of compliance as all returns to be filed online, input credits to be verified online, encouraging more paper trail of transactions. Common procedures for registration of taxpayers, refund of taxes, uniform formats of tax return, common tax base, common system of classification of goods and services will lend greater certainty to taxation system.    
1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

14.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for February, 2018
73,86,339
15.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for March, 2018
74,44,829
16.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for April, 2018
74,05,472
17.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for May, 2018
74,89,674  
18.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for June, 2018
75,22,043
19.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for July, 2018
75,15,731
20.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for August, 2018
74,84,227  
21.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for September, 2018
73,53,188
22.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for October, 2018
69,60,318
23.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for July, 2017
59,41,377
24.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for August, 2017
24,63,078
25.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for September, 2017
66,32,774
26.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for October, 2017
25,30,098
27.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for November, 2017
25,59,048
28.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for December, 2017
66,59,016  
29.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for January, 2018
25,38,847

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8
12,94,450
15.2    Revenue Collection Snapshot:
S. No.
Revenue Collected in the Month of
 Amount  (in Rs. Thousand crore)
1.  
August, 17
95,633
2.  
September, 17
94,064
3.  
October, 17
93,333
4.  
November, 17
83,780
5.  
December, 17
84,314
6.  
January, 18
89,825
7.  
February, 18
85,962
8.  
March, 18
92,167
9.  
April, 18
1,03,459
10.  
May, 18
94,016
11.  
June, 18
95,610
12.  
July, 18
96,483
13.  
August, 18
93,960
14.  
September, 18
94,442
15.  
October, 18
1,00,710
16.  
November, 18
97,637
 
16.      CHALLENGES & FUTURE AHEAD:
16.1    Any new change is accompanied by difficulties and problems at the outset. A change as comprehensive as GST is bound to pose certain challenges not only for the government but also for business community, tax administration and even common

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntra-State supplies last being NCT of Delhi where it was introduced w.e.f. 16th June, 2018. 
16.3    NAPA has initiated investigation into various complaints of anti-profiteering and has passed orders in some cases to protect consumer interest. 
16.4    To expedite sanction of refund, manual filing and processing of refunds has been enabled. Clarificatory Circulars and notifications have been issued to guide field formations of CBIC and States in this regard. The government has put in place an IT grievance redressal mechanism to address the difficulties faced by taxpayers owing to technical glitches on the GST portal.
16.5    The introduction of GST is truly a game changer for Indian economy as it has replaced multi-layered, complex indirect tax structure with a simple, transparent and technology-driven tax regime. It will integrate India into a single, common market by breaking barriers to inter-State trade and commerce. By eli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners
GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

Reference is invited to Press Releases dated 1.11.2018 and 29.11.2018 regarding exam to be conducted on 17.12.2018 for GST Practitioners (GSTPs) covered under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 83 of CGST Rules 2017, i.e. those enrolled as a sales tax practitioners or tax return preparer under the existing law for a period not less than five years, and enrolled under sub-rule (2) of Rule 83 of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Credit eligibility – cases where no payment liability exists

Credit eligibility – cases where no payment liability exists
By: – Shilpi Jain
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

Under GST, any registered person would be eligible to claim ITC of taxes paid on goods or services procured, which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business and to the extent used for effecting taxable supplies, unless specifically restricted u/s 17(5) of the Act.
Apart from the restrictions specified in section 17(5) of the Act, there could be situations where credit would become ineligible, like non-payment within 180 days in certain cases, non-receipt of proper tax invoice, etc. However, it can be said that the provisions are not as stringent as under the earlier laws where receipt of the capital goods in the premises/factory of the manufacturer was required. Further, under GST there could be some situations where, say, in spite of non-receipt of the goods in the premises of the recipient or non-payment of con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

charged on import of goods, in the instant case, even though not paid for by the Indian company, falls under the purview of input tax credit. Further, the goods are used by the Indian company for business purpose and for effecting taxable supplies as required by section 16(1) and 17(2) of the Act. Hence, prima facie ITC is eligible.
Further, section 16(2) of the Act prescribes conditions for availing ITC, which are as follows:
Condition
Applicability in the instant case
The registered person is in possession of a tax invoice or debit note issued by a supplier registered under this Act, or such other taxpaying documents as may be prescribed
As per rule 36 of CGST Rules 2017, BoE is a prescribed document.
The registered person has received the goods or services or both
The Indian company has received the goods.
The tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the Government, either in cash or through utilization of input tax credit admissible in respect of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e to pay tax also to the supplier. However, in case of BoEs, the recipient is not required to pay the taxes to the supplier, but the same has to be paid to the Government directly. Thus, it can be said that this proviso is not applicable.
Therefore, as all the conditions prescribed for availing ITC are satisfied and credit is not restricted under section 17(5) of the Act, it can be said that the credit of the taxes mentioned in the BoE will be eligible to the Indian company irrespective of the fact that no amount has been paid by such company to either the Government or to the supplier, in respect of the BoE.
Case-2: A company has purchased machinery for which the supplier has given 3 years warranty. After 1 year, the machinery was damaged. Since, the machine was in the warranty period, the supplier replaced the machinery free of cost. However, while sending the spare parts for replacement, the supplier has discharged GST liability at its end by treating such replacement as supply in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AN UPDATER ON RECENT CHANGES IN GST

AN UPDATER ON RECENT CHANGES IN GST
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

With general elections in the country slated to be in May, 2019 will have interim budget only before the Lok Sabha elections. According to convention, the Budget speeches immediately preceding a Lok Sabha election do not have a distinct Part B, and only a very limited number of tax related announcements are made. So far as indirect taxes are concerned, there may not be much in the coming Budget as it is the GST Council who makes the final recommendations to be carried out by the Parliament or by way of delegated legislation.
The report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) on performance of GST is likely to be tabled before Parliament in the ensuing winter session thereof, which begins on 11th December, 2018. The CAG is in process of auditing the functioning of GST since its inception on 1st July, 2017. It would include aspects like registration,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has been made.
* For Export supply type, the 'Bill To' Party will be URP or GSTIN of SEZ Unit with state as 'Other Country' and shipping address and PIN code will be of the location (airport/shipping yard/border check post) from where the consignment is moving out from the country.
* For Import supply, the 'Bill From' Party will be URP or GSTIN of SEZ Unit with state as 'Other Country' and dispatching address and PIN code will be of the location (airport/shipping yard/border check post) from where the consignment is entered the country
* Enhancement in 'Bill To – Ship To' transactions: EWB generation is now categorized to four types now Regular and Bill to Ship to, Bill from Dispatch from & combination of both.
* Facility of EWB generation through the Bulk Generation Tool has been enhanced.
GSTN Portal Updates
Provisional Assessment
Following forms have been made available on GST Portal:
* Form GST ASMT 01 for provisional assessment by taxpayers who are not able to deter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

STR-4 filed during the financial year.
* Part III requires details of tax paid as declared in returns filed during the financial year.
* Part IV consists of summary of amendments/corrections relating to entries of previous FY.
* Part V requires other information such as particulars of demand and refunds & details relating to late fees payable and paid.
Extension in due dates of returns
* CBIC has extended the last date for filing FORM GSTR-3B for the month of September, 2018 and October, 2018 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in Srikakulam district in the State of Andhra Pradesh to 30th November, 2018 and has also extended the last date for filing FORM GSTR-3B for the month of October, 2018 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in 11 districts of Tamil Nadu* to 20th December, 2018.
* CBIC has extended the due date for filing FORM GSTR-1 for the month of September, 2018 and October, 2018 for registered persons whose principal pl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Shri Dhananjay Kumar Singh

In Re: Shri Dhananjay Kumar Singh
GST
2019 (2) TMI 64 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH – 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 219 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH – AAR
Dated:- 5-12-2018
STC/AAR/06/2018
GST
SHRI S.K. BUXY AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
[U/s 98 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGGST Act, 2017)]
Sub:- Chhattisgarh GST Act, 2017 – Advance Ruling U/s 98 – Regarding the GST rates applicable in case of supply of services to Solid waste management, Garbage Collection, Disposal, Water Supply, Cleaning of Colony.
Read:-Application dated 08-09-2018 from Shri Dhananjay Kumar Singh, H.N -13, Sanyasi Para, Khamtarai, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492001
PROCEEDINGS
[U/s 98 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGGST Act, 2017)]
No. STC/AAR/06/2018
Raipur, Dated 05/12/2018
 
The applicant M/s. Dhananjay Kumar Singh HN 13, Sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ead tank), cleaning of common area of residential area developed by Chhattisgarh Housing Board and not handed over to the local authority for its maintenance. The applicant is providing all those services to the CGHB that a local authority usually provides to the common resident under their jurisdiction. There are certain localities which are developed by CGHB for which maintenance work is given to contractor till they are handed over to the local authority.
II. The applicant sought Advance Ruling (AAR) on whether the services provided in relation to solid waste management, water supply operations, garbage collection door to door and disposal, cleaning of colony i.e. garden, street and open area, drainage system, sewerage cleaning of water tank (all UG Sump & Over head tank), cleaning of common area of residential area developed by Chhattisgarh Housing Board and not handed over to the local authority by Chhattisgarh Housing Board (CGHB) are exempt, under as per notification no. 12/20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“Government entity”.
III. Further CGHB is also engaged in performing various functions required to be performed by Municipality under article 243W of the Constitution like slum improvement, up gradation and also facilities like solid waste management, Water supply for domestic purpose etc. till the time the developed areas are officially handed over to the local authority for maintenance.
IV. The above view is supported by the recent judgment in case of M/s. Vinod Kumar Panday, Raipur O/A No. BHO-EXUS-002APP-037-17-18 dated 03.05.2017 passed by Hon. Commissioner (Appeals) Raipur where the appellate authority held that the CGHB is covered under the definition of Government Authority for the purpose of Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012.
V. The Definition of Government authority under service tax regime is also produced below as defined in Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 and as amended from time to time.
“Governmental authority” means an authority or a board or a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(CGHB) is exempt under as per notification no. 12/2017 dated 28th June 2017 as updated and amended time to time. However, in case they are not covered under the said exemption notification, the applicant has sought clarification as regards the applicable rate of GST for the above services rendered by them.
4. Personal Hearing:-
In keeping with the established principles of natural justice, personal hearing in the matter was extended to the authorized representative of the applicant and accordingly, Shri Ramandeep Singh Bhatia (CA) appeared before us for hearing on 30.10.2018 and reiterated their contention. They also furnished a written submission dated 30.10.2018, which has been taken on record.
I. The applicant has quoted the judgment of M/s. The Nursery Men Co-operative Society, Lalbagh, Lalbagh Double Gate Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka in case no. KAR ADRG 18/2018, order dated 06-08-2018 = 2018 (9) TMI 1037 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA as pronounced by Authority fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nicipality. Hence exempt under as per notification no. 12/2017 dated 28th June, 2017
5. The legal position, Analysis and Discussion:-
5.1 The provisions for implementing the CGST Act and CGGST Act, 2017 are similar. Now we sequentially discuss the provisions that are applicable in the present case.
Notification No. 12/2017-state Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017, Serial No. 3, Chapter 99 reads as under:-
Sl.No.
Chapter, Section, Heading, Group or Service Code (Tariff)
Description of Services
Rate (per cent)
Condition
3.
Chapter 99
“Pure services (excluding works contract service or other composite supplies involving supply of any goods) provided to the Central Government, State Government or Union territory or local authority or a Government by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution or in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under article 243W of the C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pply of goods is involved herein along with provision of service, the work order issued by Chhattisgarh Housing Board has been verified. The applicant has shown the nature work order to be solely provision of services, and no supply of goods has been mentioned. This gets further clear from the invoices submitted to the Chhattisgarh Housing Board. Thus it is evident from the work order itself that the same is solely for provision of service and no supply of good is involved.
Following two points needs ascertainment in order to determine the applicable tax rate on the impugned services to be provided by the applicant:-
i. Whether the Authority issuing work order to the applicant i.e. Chhattisgarh Housing Board is an established 'Governmental Board' under State or Central Government or not; and
ii. Whether the service supplies to be provided by the applicant falls under public utility services enumerated under 12th schedule, Article 243W of the Indian Constitution or not.
5.4 In thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

minent in the field of Housing, Engineering Architecture of Town Planning to be appointed by the State Government.
(h) Housing Commissioner;
5.5 Thus it gets amply clear that Chhattisgarh Housing Board is a “Government Authority” as per No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10- 43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017 and as amended by Notification No. 31/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-82/2017/CT/V(146), Naya Raipur, Dated 13.10.2017.
“(ix) “Governmental Authority” means an authority or a board or any other body, –
(i) set up by an Act of Parliament or a State Legislature; or (ID established by any Government,;) with 90 percent. or more participation by way of equity or control, to carry out an)' function entrusted or a Municipality/ under article 243 W of the Constitution or to a Panchayat under article 243 G of the Constitution.
Thus Chhattisgarh Housing Board is a Government Authority fully owned by the State Government.
5.6 Now for arriving at a decision as to whether

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

th such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule
APPENDIX-3
Twelfth Schedule [Article 243W of the Constitution (Seventy-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992]
1. Urban planning including town planning.
2. Planning of land- use and construction of buildings.
3. Planning for economic and social development.
4. Roads and bridges.
5. Water supply for domestic, industrial and commercial purposes.
6. Public health, sanitation conservancy and solid waste management.
7. Fire services.
8. Urban forestry, protection of the environment and promotion of ecological aspects.
9. Safeguarding the interests of weaker sections of society, including the handicapped and mentally retarded.
10. Slum improvement and up gradation.
11. Urban poverty alleviation.
12. Provision of urban amenities and facilities such as parks, gardens, playgrounds.
13. Pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t, water supply operation, garbage collection door to door and disposal, cleaning of colony i.e. garden, street and open area, drainage system, sewerage, water tank (All UG Sump & Overhead Tank), cleaning of common area in multistoried building, etc. and all other related work pertaining to operation and maintenance.
The service supply to be provided by the applicant by their very nature appear to fall in the list of services enumerated under serial no. 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 17 of 12th schedule of Article 243W of the Indian Constitution, thus qualifying the admissibility criterion. It has also been categorically stated by the applicant that the said services to be provided to Chhattisgarh Housing Board does not involve any transfer/sale of any goods. Services specified under serial no. 3, chapter 99 of Notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017 provides exemption, as under :-
“Pure services (excluding works contract service or ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

terms of Notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017, Serial No. 3, Chapter 99 :-
(i) Supply of Services of Colony maintenance work to C.G. Housing Board Colony, Sector 29, Naya Raipur with regard to solid waste management, water supply operation, garbage collection door to door and disposal, cleaning of colony i.e. garden, street and open area, drainage system, sewerage, water tank (All UG Sump & Overhead Tank), cleaning of common area in multistoried building, etc. and all other related work pertaining to operation and maintenance will be treated as exempt supply as per notification No 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017, Serial No. 3, Chapter 99.
(ii) The aforesaid exemption is not available in case any transfer of property in goods involved therein or if the said service is provided to persons other than State Government, Central Government or a local Authority or a Governmental

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. SWARNASHILPI Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (TAXES), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OFREVENU

M/s. SWARNASHILPI Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (TAXES), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE, NEW DELHI AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAXES DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR, TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (12) TMI 839 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-12-2018
RP. No. 991 of 2018 In WP(C). 13090/2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. RUBEN GEORGE ROCK
For The Respondent : DR THUSHARA JAMES, GP. SRI. T. V. VINU, CGC.
ORDER
In W.P.(C) No.13090 of 2018, the petitioner challenged the Ext.P6 a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

According to the petitioner's counsel, as the petitioner bona fide pursued its remedy before this Court in W.P.(C) No.13090 of 2018, there occurred some delay, which would be fatal if the petitioner goes before the appellate authority. There ought to be an observation on that delay from this Court. According to him, the judgment in the earlier writ petition, based on which this writ petition was disposed of, contained no reference to the delay.
4. Heard the petitioner's counsel and the learned Government Pleader.
5. I reckon the petitioner's apprehension is genuine. I, therefore, in modification of the judgment dated 23rd October 2018 in W.P.(C) No.13090 of 2018, hold that if the petitioner approaches the appellate authority-t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Satya Prakash Singh @ S.P. Singh Versus The Union of India through GST Council.

Satya Prakash Singh @ S.P. Singh Versus The Union of India through GST Council.
GST
2018 (12) TMI 708 – JHARKHAND HIGH COURT – TMI
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-12-2018
B. A. No. 9077 of 2018
GST
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN J.
For the Petitioner: Mr. N.K.Pasari, Advocate
For the State: A.P.P.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel for opposite party, who opposes the prayer for bail. The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017.
There is an allegation against this petitioner that he illegally availed Input Tax Credit. The petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2018. Learned counsel appe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-II) CGST & Central Excise, Chennai

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-II) CGST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 438 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 5-12-2018
Appeal No. E/40788/2018 – FINAL ORDER No. 42996/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Ms. S. Sridevi, Advocate For the Appellant
Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
The issue involved in this appeal is with regard to the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on various services.
2. The Ld. Advocate, Ms. S. Sridevi appearing for the appellant submitted that the department has denied the credit alleging that it is not established that the services on which credit has been availed on the basis of ISD invoices have been used directly or indirectly in or in relation to manufacture and clearance of final products. She submitted that the details of the services availed and the nexus with the manufacturing activity alongwith the decisions whic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

35 (Tri Hyd);
Virchow Laboratories – 2017 (51) STR 443 (Tri Hyd)
5
Erection commission/installation service
For installation of servers, generators, ups and other equipments
GE India technology Centre-2014-TIOL-1931-CESTAT-BANG Orient Cement Ltd., – 2017 (51) STR 459 (Tri Hyd)
6
Civil works services/Repairs and maintenance
Used for repairs/modernization and maintenance of office building
Zydus Nycomed Healthcare 2013 (3) STR 197 (Tri Mum);
7
Designing and printing services
Printing of tender docs/in house journals etc.,
Ultratech Cements Ltd., vs CCE., Jaipur – 2015 (40) STR 523 (Tri Del)
8
Cleaning services/Housekeeping
For maintaining the office
Xlinx India Tech – 2016 (44) STR 635 (Tri Hyd);
CCE., vs Maruthi Suzuki – 2015 (38) STR 503 (Tri Del)
9
Sponsorship services
Publication of booklet, banner and conductive events in relation to business development etc.,
Xlinx India Tech – 2016 (44) STR 635 (Tri Hyd.)
10
Finance Lease services /
Purchase of computers/p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sponsorship service and finance lease service are eligible for credit. These issues were considered by the Tribunal in Xilinx India Tech. Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs CC., CE. & ST., Hyderabad-IV 2016 (44) S.T.R.635 (tri. – Hyd.). Following the said decision, I hold that the credit availed on the above services are legal and proper. The disallowance being unjustified, is set aside.
6. The Ld.Counsel for the appellant has produced the invoices relating to the services availed on membership fees. It is submitted by her that the appellant company had to take membership in Associated Chamber of Commerce and Industry of India. This is to enable the company to have connections with similar persons in the very same field of commerce and industry. This helps to develop the business and also to get updated with the trends in the industry and is therefore related to the activity of manufacture. It is not for personal membership in a Club. Similarly the appellant has taken membership in spending on con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeals) has remanded to the adjudicating authority to reconsider the issue of various services. In para 8.4 of the Order in Original it is mentioned that works contract services as well as civil works services are disallowed. It is not possible to make out from the SCN or the order as to the services which come under works contract service and civil works services. This aspect needs to be reconsidered. Therefore this issue with respect to credit availed on works contract service / civil works service / repair and maintenance of xerox machine is remanded to the adjudicating authority.
8. So also the appellant contends that the accommodation services are availed for hotel accommodation for the employees who are on official duty. The appellant has to establish with necessary documents that the accommodation was availed for official purposes only. The Counsel for appellant submitted that the appellant would be able to furnish documents to establish that this was availed for official purp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

To charge GST or Not -reference section 13 of IGST Act.

To charge GST or Not -reference section 13 of IGST Act.
Query (Issue) Started By: – Vijay Kumar Dated:- 4-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear Experts
One of my client received an offer for creation/shooting of a animation film from a Canadian person. My client is registered GST Service Provider in India. Film will be shot/created in India but will be intended for the Canadian audience only. Canadian person has no Business connecti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Admisibility of Input Tax Credit on Hotel Stay

Admisibility of Input Tax Credit on Hotel Stay
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kaustubh Karandikar Dated:- 4-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
XYZ (Maharashtra) had arranged a Customer meet in a Hotel in Bangalore towards sales promotion. The Hotel is ready to issue to separate bills viz. one for food and other for stay. The Hotel will be charging IGST in the invoice issued to XYZ in the name of XYZ, Maharashtra. Can XYZ take input tax credit against the bill for hotel stay?
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
Since it is in furtherance of busines ITC is eligible.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
In this regards my point of view is that, the Hotel cannot cha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Guidance on GST for Casual Taxable Persons and Rectifying Excess ITC Distribution by Input Service Distributors.

Guidance on GST for Casual Taxable Persons and Rectifying Excess ITC Distribution by Input Service Distributors.
Circulars
GST – States
Clarifications of issues under GST related to casual ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =