Is RCM payable under GST on arbitrary fees paid

Is RCM payable under GST on arbitrary fees paid
Query (Issue) Started By: – RAJAGOPAL OBBAI Dated:- 23-1-2019 Last Reply Date:- 26-1-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Is GST applicable under RCM if fees is paid to a retired judge appeared arbitrary case
Reply By Mahadev R:
The Reply:
Services provided by an individual advocate including a senior advocate or firm of advocates by way of legal services to business entity would be liable. Please refer notification no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Used Cars

GST on Used Cars
By: – Akshay Hiregange
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 23-1-2019

Introduction:
Since one and half year from date of implementation of GST, there are several confusions regarding rate of tax applicable on sale of motor vehicles. In this article I would like to throw some light on changes on GST implications on sale of old/used vehicles.
In this article we would aim to cover:
* General Classification
* GST Rate changes (including abatement)
* Exemption from URD purchases
* Valuation
* Illustrations
* FAQs
* Upcoming/related GST updates
General Classification of Motor Vehicle:
HSN
Description
Specimen
8702
Motor vehicles for the transport of ten or more persons, including the driver
Passenger Bus, Tempo travellers
8703
Motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons (other than those of heading 8702
Diesel and Petrol Cars, Electric cars, Ambulance, Three wheeled motor vehicles
8704
Moto

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r 87, which have varied rates.
This would provide relief to the persons dealing in the buying and selling of motor vehicles. Although, it would also help reduce the impact for a registered person who is selling the motor vehicle being a fixed asset.
Conditions for claiming such rates & exemptions:
* Where depreciation claimed under Income tax, margin shall be calculated as consideration received (-) depreciated value of goods as on date of supply. Here, it is important to note, that although Income Tax required depreciation to be calculated on the asset block, the rate is required to be applied for the specific motor vehicle, upto the date the supply.
* The credits under GST or erstwhile laws have not been claimed. (GST, VAT, ED, ST)
Changes of GST Cess rate over a period of time
In case of motor vehicles even the rate of GST compensation cess has undergone many changes from initial compensation cess notification no. 01/2017- Compensation cess (Rate) vide notification no. 05/20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bove. [Added as per notification no.5/2017 Compensation cess (rate)]
NIL
15%
NIL
All other rates in notification 01/2017 remain same – GENERAL
4
Petrol, Liquefied petroleum gases (LPG) or compressed natural gas (CNG) driven motor vehicles of engine capacity not exceeding 1200cc and of length not exceeding 4000 mm.
1%
1%
NIL
Petrol Vehicles with said parameters
5
Diesel driven motor vehicles of engine capacity not exceeding 1500 cc and of length not exceeding 4000 mm.
3%
3%
NIL
Diesel Vehicles with said parameters
Serial no. 52 in 01/2017 is substituted for below (only 8703):
6
For other than above vehicles engine capacity not exceeding 1500cc
15%
17%
NIL
Generally, Petrol vehicles between 1200 – 1500 cc
7
Vehicles exceeding 1500cc known as SUVs.
Explanation of SUVs – Includes a motor vehicle of length exceeding 4000mm and having ground clearance of 170 mm. and above.
15%
22%
NIL
If declared as SUV, also need to check ground clearance
8
For other than ab

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

conditions, a registered person who is dealing in second hand sale of motor vehicle (which is falling under chapter 87) could claim the abatement of 35% of value of taxable supplies and pay GST on only 65% of value of supply of such motor vehicle.
Note: This notification would become redundant (for other than leasing entity), due to notification 8/2018 Central Tax (Rate) & 1/2018 Compensation Cess (Rate).
Exemption notification for purchase of old and used cars:
In terms of Notification no. 10/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) & 4/2017 Compensation cess (Rate) dated 01/07/2017, exempts intra state purchase of second-hand goods from an unregistered person (sec 9(4) of CGST Act) by a registered person, dealing in buying and selling of second-hand goods as per section 32(5) of CGST Act 2017.
Comments:
* As per the above notification the exemption benefit can be availed by the dealer (who are into buying and selling of second-hand goods) when motor vehicle is purchased from the unregistered

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

through Illustrations:
Mr. Pradeep (car dealer) is into the buying and selling of old and used cars situated in Karnataka. He purchased a petrol car which is having engine capacity 1498cc and 3998mm on 02/07/2017 for a price of ₹ 4, 00,000 from an unregistered person who is also located in the same state. After minor changes/additions to the car, Pradeep sold the car for ₹ 6, 00,000.
Sale value
6,00,000
Purchase value
4,00,000
Margin
2,00,000
Scenario 1: Sale of old and used car on or before 12/10/2017:
In terms of Rule 32(5) of CGST Rules 2017, GST is to be paid on the Margin i.e. ₹ 2,00,000 + GST at the rate of 45% (i.e. 28% +17%) which amounts to ₹ 90,000 (Rs. 2,00,000*45%).
Scenario 2: Sale of old and used car after 13/10/2017:
In this scenario the assessee has an option to avail the benefit of notification no.37/2017 CT(R) & 38/2017 IT(R) provides an abatement of 35% of taxes, computation is as follows:
Sl. no.
Particulars
Amount
*
Taxable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

can avail the benefit of 08/2018 CT(R) and 1/2018 CC(R) the computation as per below.
The above notification renders Rule 32(5) and notification no.37/2017 (condition 2) redundant in such scenario.
SI.No.
Particulars
Amount
A
Margin
2,00,000
B
CGST (A*9%)
18,000
C
SGST (A*9%)
18,000
D
Cess
NIL
Total tax liability
36,000
The liability has significantly reduced from ₹ 90,000 to ₹ 36,000 from the time when GST was implemented to January 2018.
FAQ's related to supply of old and used cars:
* Whether GST liability on margin can be discharged inclusive basis i.e. margin inclusive of GST?
No, in terms of Rule 32(5) of CGST Rules, GST needs to be charged on margin (i.e. sale price – purchase price).
Whether services provided by the second-hand car dealer could be considered as intermediary service?
* In terms of Section 2(13) of IGST Act, “Intermediary” means a broker, an agent or any other person, by whatever name called, who arranges or facilitates the s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y the supplier.”
* Accordingly, TCS collected should be included in the taxable value.
* Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of SN Automobiles Private Limited vs. UOI & CBIC has stayed the imposition of GST on TCS collected.
* It is important to note Circulars issued by the department are not binding the assessee, but are binding on the department.
Whether dealers can avail the ITC on old and used cars purchased from the registered tax payers?
* Generally, car dealers work based on margin earned on sale, therefore, they would opt for concessional tax rates and valuation as provided under notification no. 08/2018 CT(R) and similar notifications.
* If the dealers are not availing any exemption through the notifications, he would require to discharge GST on entire sale value at full tax rate, wherein he can avail the ITC on purchase of old and used car.
Whether a car dealer can avail the concessional rate benefit for demo cars?
The Demo car is used for the purpose of tes

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Telstra Telecommunication Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: Telstra Telecommunication Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2019 (3) TMI 592 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 546 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 23-1-2019
GST-ARA-82/2018-19/B-12
GST
SHRI B. TIMOTHY, AND SHRI B. V. BORHADE, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by TELSTRA TELECOMMUNICATION PVT.LTD., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :-
a) Whether in the facts and circumstances in the case of supply involving leased circuit services where in pan India contract for supply of such services is entered into without any State wise break up for the su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also means a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST Act/MGST Act would be mentioned as being under the “GST Act”.
02. FACTS AND CONTENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT
The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
2. Facts of the Case:
2.1 The Applicant is primarily engaged in providing internet connectivity services. It has been granted a license by the Department of Telecommunications in this regard. As a part of the internet connectivity services, the customers may also mandate the Applicant to provide colocation services and leasing of certain customer premises equipment i.e. routers, modems, etc.
2.2 In order to pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vendor who is providing leased circuit services across the country, such as Tata Teleservices, Bharti Airtel etc. to provide the last mile connectivity service. A flow diagram is attached as Annexure A to explain how the service is rendered to the customer via POP of the Applicant located in a State to the location of customer.
3. Interpretation of Law:
At the outset, the Applicant would like to submit that it has Obtained registration in terms of Section 22 (2) of the CGST Act. Consequently, the Applicant shall qualify as a 'registered person' in terms of the CGST Act and the provisions of the CGST Act shall apply accordingly. The interpretation of applicable law with regard to the internet connectivity services provided by the Applicant is as follows:
3.1 Registration requirement:
3.1.1 The Applicant would like to submit that in terms of Section 22 of the CGST Act, a supplier is liable to be registered in the State from where he makes a taxable supply. In other words,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on 22(1) of CGST Act as mentioned above, a supplier is liable to take registration in the State from where he makes taxable supply of service. While in case of supply of internet connectivity service, it is not feasible to determine from where the supply is made since the data travels from one POP to another pop. This phenomenon is illustrated via a diagram showing the possible flow of data:
3.2.3 Further, POP cannot be considered as fixed establishment. Fixed establishment as defined under Section 2(50) of CGST Act means a place (other than the registered place of business) which is characterized by a sufficient degree of permeances and suitable structure in terms of human and technical resources to supply of services, or to receive and use services for its own needs. An internet POP typically houses servers, routers, network switches, multiplexers and other network interface equipment. It may not require permanent human resources on site and are maintained electronically. Therefore,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

11) of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the IGST Act'). The same is reproduced below:
Section 12(11) of Integrated Tax Act, 2017
(a) in case of services by way of fixed telecommunication line, leased circuits, internet leased circuit, cable or dish antenna, be the location where the telecommunication line, leased circuit or cable connection or dish antenna is installed for receipt of services;
(b) in case of mobile connection for telecommunication and internet services provided on post-paid basis, be the location of billing address of the recipient of services on the record of the supplier of services;
(c) in cases where mobile connection for telecommunication, internet service and direct to home television services are provided on pre-payment basis through a voucher or any other means,
(i) through a selling agent or a re-seller or a distributor of subscriber identity module card or re-charge voucher, be the address of the selling agent

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

charged for supply of services relating to such circuit, the place of supply of such services shall be taken as being in each of the respective States or Union territories in proportion to the value for services separately collected or determined in terms of the contract or agreement entered into in this regard or, in the absence of such contract or agreement, on such other basis as may be prescribed
3.3.2 Section 12 (11) of IGST Act as referred above determines the place of supply in case of Telecommunication services. In order to confirm which provision of the aforementioned Section shall be applicable in the case of the Applicant, it would be necessary to make reference to each of the Clause referred above. Clause (a) of the said section helps to determine the place of supply in case of fixed telecommunication line, leased circuits, internet leased circuit, cable or dish antenha. Clause (b) provides for place of supply in case of mobile connection services for telecommunication and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed as inter-state supply, if it is in the same State then it will be considered as intra-state supply.
Scenario 1: Applicant's location is Mumbai (Maharashtra), address on records of recipient is say Pune (Maharashtra), Central Tax and State Tax of Maharashtra shall be charged on such supply.
Scenario 2: Applicant's location is Mumbai (Maharashtra), address on records of recipient is say Delhi (Delhi), Integrated Tax on such supply shall be charged.
3.3.5 Having made the submissions relating to the place of supply for the outward supplies, it shall also be relevant at this stage to discuss the place of supply provisions for inward supplies. This is in light of the fact that ITC can be availed only in respect of the Central Tax and State Tax charged to the Applicant, where the place of supply is in the State where the Applicant is registered. With regard to the input services and the corresponding input tax credits which are the subject matter of the application, the Applican

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services relating to circuit and there is no agreement or contract to determine the value of services, the place of supply shall be on such other basis as may be prescribed.
3.3.5.3 In cases where Applicant enters into a consolidated contract with the leased circuit provider located across India and it is not feasible for the Applicant to determine the value of service provided in a particular state in such case the place of supply would be determined in terms of Section 12(11) (d) of IGST Act. Further a reference can be made to the case of Suresh Kumar Bansal Versus Union of India (2016 (43) S.T. R. 3 (Del.)) = 2016 (6) TMI 192 – DELHI HIGH COURT wherein was held that if there is no mechanism to ascertain the value of a particular service, service tax cannot not be levied on the same. The principle which can be derived from this case is that if there is no procedure prescribed under a statue, the same would be considered as outside the levy of that particular statute. Hence, in case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rdance with the provisions of Section 22 of CGST Act. It raises invoices to the customer from the State where it has been incorporated i.e. Mumbai (Maharashtra) which would be considered as location of supplier as discussed in above Para. Further on the basis of the address on records of the recipient (customer) which is the place of supply as determined above, the Applicant charges Central Tax and State Tax or Integrated Tax.
3.4.2 The leased circuits to provide the last mile connectivity service are not owned by the Applicant. Applicant provides connectivity service through the bandwidth it has taken on the leased line operated by other internet service operators. Applicant avails leased circuit facility from third party local vendors to connect its POP to the CPF installed at customer's premises. Place of supply in case of leased circuits is the place where leased circuits are installed and in case of a composite contract place of supply would be determined on such other basis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed person. The implication of said provision can be understood with the help of below Scenario (3):
Scenario 3: Applicant is located in Maharashtra and the customer is also located in Maharashtra therefore the applicant will charge CGST and SGST of Maharashtra. While the vendor providing leased circuit service is based in Haryana. In case the vendor determines place of supply in terms of Explanation to Section 12(11)(d), he may charge IGST (i.e. location of registered person which in the current scenario would be Maharashtra). Hence, the ITC of tax charged by vendor can be availed and utilized by Applicant.
Legend:
Last Mile – Service has been subscribed from Airtel/Tata to extend the physical connectivity from Service Provider POP to Customer Premises
Router – Router is a networking device that forwards data packets between computer networks. A router is connected to two or more data lines from different networks and extended to customer LAN for using internet. Cisco & Juniper are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wishes to seek an advance ruling for determination of liability to pay tax on receipt of services. Subsequently, Applicant also wish to seek an advance ruling in relation to admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid.
3. In light of the above, Applicant would like to submit that the question (e) as envisaged under Section 97(2) of CGST Act may also cover the situation where the recipient of may wish to seek an advance ruling in order to determine the tax liability on the goods or services received. Further, in the said question it is not specifically mentioned whether the advance ruling in relation to determination of tax liability on goods or services can be sought only by the applicant being service provider. Hence, giving a restrictive meaning to this question or limiting the scope only to the service provider shall be ultra vires the provisions of law and the same may not be the intent of the legislature drafting the law.
4. In this regard, Applican

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

islation or the intention of the legislature, when the language of the provision is plain. The court cannot rewrite the legislation for the reason that it had no power to legislate. The court cannot add words to a statute or read words into it which are not there. The court cannot, on an assumption that there is a defect or an omission in the words used by the legislature, correct or make up assumed deficiency, when the words are clear and unambiguous. Courts have to decide what the law is and not what it should be. The courts adopt a construction which will carry out the obvious intention of the legislature but cannot set at naught legislative judgment because such course would be subversive of constitutional harmony”
5. Further, in case of B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal (2011) 4 SCC 266 = 2011 (3) TMI 1590 – SUPREME COURT the Supreme Court observed that while interpreting a statute the basic principle of literal rule of interpretation has to be followed. The relevant extract of the de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

duty and obligation of the court to interpret the statute as it is. It is contrary to all rules of construction to read words into a statute which the legislature in its wisdom has deliberately not incorporated.”
7. Applicant wish to also refer to the judgement of the Allahabad High Court in Mayfair Leather Exports (Pvt.) Ltd. vs Union of India 2011 (272) E.L.T. 193 (All.) = 2011 (5) TMI 718 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT wherein it was held that:
“20. The provision of an Act is to be read in the manner as it exists in the statute book and it a well settled principle in law that the court cannot read anything Into a statutory provision which is plain and uniarnbiguous. The language employed in a statute is determinative factor of legislative intent. If the language of the enactment is clear and unambiguous, it would not be proper for the courts to add any words thereto and evolve some legislative intent, not found in the statute. The court cannot add words to a statute, or change its langua

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uthorities is accepted, it would be a case of adding or deleting something from the provision, which is not permissible.
Position under erstwhile regime:
10. Under service tax regime, an application for advance ruling can only made by certain specified applicants as defined under Section 96A(b) of the Finance Act, 1994. Further, the application for advance ruling can be made in relation to following questions:
(a) classification of any service as a taxable service under Chapter V;
(b) the valuation of taxable services for charging service tax;
(c) the principles to be adopted for the purposes of determination of value of the taxable service under the provisions of Chapter V;
(d) applicability of notifications issued under Chapter V;
(e) admissibility of credit of duty or tax in terms of the rules made in this regard;
(f) determination of the liability to pay service tax on a taxable service under the provisions of Chapter V.
11. The questions on which advance ruling can

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e of Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Ltd (2018 TIOL-234-AAR-GST) = 2018 (11) TMI 57 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH, the applicant has sought a ruling to know whether the benefit of concessional rate under a specified Notification would be applicable and determination of liability to pay tax on the work contract service received by it.
(b) Rajasthan Authority for Advance ruling Goods and Services Tax in case of M/s. Chambal Fertilizers & chemicals ltd (2018-TIOL-161-AAR-GST) = 2018 (9) TMI 1257 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN, the appellant has sought ruling on the applicability of GST on Ocean freight charges on import of raw materials or fertilizers. The Authority for Advance ruling in the said case held that the applicant is liable for payment of IGST under reverse charge on Ocean freight charges for receipt of transportation service.
(c) Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling in the case of Reliance infrastructure Limited (2018-TIOL-2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

icant wish to submit that an applicant being the recipient of goods or services can seek an advance ruling under question (e) of Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017 i.e. determination of liability to pay tax on goods or services or both.
15. Therefore, Applicant humbly request the honorable authority of advance ruling to accept our application in light of the above submissions.
Questions for which Advance ruling is sought in the present application:
1. Applicant wishes to seek advance ruling in terms of Section 97(2)(e) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, “Whether the supplier is to charge Integrated Tax on supply of leased circuit facility to the Applicant, where the leased circuit is installed in more than one State or Union territory and the contract or agreement doesn't specifically provide the proportion of service provided in each state?”
2. Applicant also wishes to seek advance ruling in terms of Section 97(2)(d) of CGST Act 2017, “If the answer to the above questio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as prescribed i.e. the same would be the location of recipient of service.
B. In a case where the location of the service provider on pan India basis is Delhi and that of the recipient is Mumbai whether in the facts and circumstances, it would be integrated tax that would be chargeable since no rules have been prescribed pursuant to Sec 12(11)(d) as aforesaid and therefore whether it would be in order for the recipient to take credit of such Intergrade tax       since the said services are used in the course or furtherance of business namely provision of last mile connectivity services to the recipient of services,
C. In respect of proposition (b) section 95(a) of MGST Act 2017, may be referred and is as follows
(a) “advance ruling” means a decision provided by the Authority or the Appellate Authority to an applicant on matters or on questions specified in sub-section (2) of section 97 or sub-section (1) of section 100, in relation to the supply of good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pply of services, except the services specified in sub-sections (3) to (14),-
1. made to a registered person shall be the location of such person;
2. made to any person other than a registered person shall be, –
(i) the location of the recipient where the address on record exists; and
(ii) the location of the supplier of services in other cases.
(3) The place of supply of services,
1. directly in relation to an immovable property, including services provided by architects, interior decorators, surveyors, engineers and other related experts or estate agents, any service provided by: way of grant of rights to use immovable property or for carrying out or co-ordination of construction work; or
2. by way of lodging accommodation by a hotel, inn, guest house, home stay, club or campsite by whatever name called, and including a house boat or any other vessel; or
3. by way of accommodation in any immovable property for organising any marriage or reception or matters related the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

4) The place of supply of restaurant and catering services, personal grooming, fitness, beauty treatment, health service including cosmetic and plastic surgery shall be the location where the services. are actually preferred.
(5) The Place of supply of services in relation to training and performance appraisal to, –
1. a registered person, shall be the location of such person;
2. a person other than a registered person, shall be the location where the services are actually performed.
(6) The place of supply of services provided by way of admission to a cultural, artistic, sporting, scientific, educational, entertainment event or amusement park or any other place and services ancillary thereto, shall be the place where the event is actually held or where the park or such other place is located.
(7) The place of supply of services provided by way of,
1. Organisation of a cultural, artistic, sporting, scientific, educational or entertainment event including supply of services in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed.
(8) The place of supply of services by way of transportation of goods, including by mail or courier to,
1. a registered person, shall be the location of such person;
2. a person other than a registered person, shall be the location at which such goods are handed over for their transportation,
(9) The place of supply of passenger transportation service to –
1. a registered person, shall be the location of such person;
2. a person other than a registered person, shall be the place where the passenger embarks on the conveyance for a continuous journey:
Provided that where the right to passage is given for future use and the point of embarkation is not known at the time of issue of right to passage, the place of supply of such service shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2).
Explanation. For the purposes of this sub-section, the return journey shall be treated as a separate journey, even if the right to passage for onward and return journey

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ices are provided on pre-payment basis through a voucher or any other means, moms
(i) through a selling agent or a re-seller or a distributor of subscriber identity module card or re-charge voucher, be the address of the selling agent or re-seller or distributor as per the record of the supplier at the time of supply; or
(ii) by any person to the final subscriber, be the location where such prepayment is received or such vouchers are sold;
4. in other cases, be the address of the recipient as per the records of the supplier of services and where such address is not available, the place of supply shall be location of the supplier of services:
Provided that where the address of the recipient as per the records of the supplier of services is not available, the place of supply shall be location of the supplier of services:
Provided further that if such pre-paid service is availed or the recharge is made through internet banking or other electronic mode of payment, the location of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er of services,
(13) The place of supply of insurance services shall,
1. to a registered person, be the location of such person;
2. to a person Other than a registered person; be the location of the recipient of services on the records of the supplier of services
(14) The place of supply of advertisement services to the Central Government, a State Government, a statutory body or a local authority meant for the States or 'Union territories identified in the contractor agreement shall be taken as being in each of such States or Union territories and the value of such supplies specific to each State or Union territory shall be in proportion to the amount attributable to services provided by way of dissemination in the respective States or Union territories as may be determined in terms of the contract or agreement entered into in this regard or, in the absence of such contract or agreement, on such other basis as may be prescribed.
13. Place or supply of services where location

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e provided from a remote location by way of electronic means, the place of supply shall be the location where goods are situated at the time of supply of services:
Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied in respect of goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs and are exported after repairs without being put to any other use in India, than that which is required for such repairs;
2. Services supplied to an individual, represented either as the recipient of services or a person acting on behalf of the recipient, which require the physical presence of the recipient or the person acting on his behalf, with the supplier for the supply of services.
(4) The place of supply of services supplied directly in relation to an immovable property, including services supplied in this regard by experts and estate agents, supply of accommodation by a hotel, inn, guest house, club or campsite, by whatever name called, gr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

taken as DEN each of the respective States or Union territories and the value of such supplies specific to each state or Union territory shall be in proportion to the value for services separately collected or determined in terms of the contract or agreement entered into in this regard or, in the absence of such contract or agreement, on such other basis as may be prescribed.
(8) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location of the supplier of services, namely:
1. services supplied by a banking company, or a financial institution, or a non-banking financial company, to account holders;
2. intermediary services;
3. services consisting of hiring of means of transport, including yachts but excluding aircrafts and vessels, up to a period of one month.
Explanation.-„ For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression,
1. “account” means an account bearing interest to the depositor, and includes a non-resident external account and a non-resident ordinary a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rtation services shall be the place where the passenger embarks on the conveyance for a continuous journey
(11) The place of supply of services provided on board a conveyance during the course of a passenger transport operation, including services intended to be wholly or substantially consumed while on board, shall be the first scheduled point of departure of that conveyance for the journey.
(12) The place of supply of online information and database access or retrieval services shall location of the recipient of services.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this sub-section, person receiving such services shall be deemed be located in the taxable territory, if any two of the following non contradictory conditions are satisfied, namely:
1. the location of address presented by the recipient of services through internet is in the taxable Territory.
2. the credit card or debit card or store value card or charge card or smart card or any other card by which the recipient of services se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

R. Pattabiraman 94 (AIR 1985 SC 502 = 1985 (1) TMI 306 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. (observed as under:
The object of an Explanation to a statutory provision is
a) To explain the meaning and intendment of the Act itself;
b) Where there is any obscurity or vagueness in the main enactment to clarify the same make it consistent with the dominant object which it seems to sub serve;
c) to provide an additional support to the dominant object of the Act in order to mak meaningful and purposeful;
d) An Explanation cannot in any way interfere with or change the enactment or any part thereof but where some gap is left which is relevant for the purpose of the explanation in order to suppress the mischief and advance the object of the Act it can help or assist the court in interpreting the true purport and intendment of the enactment; and
e) It cannot however take away a statutory right with which any person under a statute has been clothed or set at naught the working of an Act by becoming

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iose or sterile 65.(State of T .N, V, M.K. Kandaswami, (1975) 36 STC 191 (SC) = 1975 (7) TMI 123 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA followed in Kingsway & co. v. C.T.O., (1990) 76 STC 119 (WBTT) = 1989 (7) TMI 326 – WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL.
3: Section 5 of IGST Act which is charging section needs to be construed strictly –
taxing statute indisputably is to be strictly construed. See 1. Srinivasa Rao v. Govt. Of Andhra Pradesh & Another-2006(13) SCALE 27) = 2006 (11) TMI 620 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. It is, however, also well-settled that the machinery provisions for calculating the tax or the procedure for its calculation are to be construed by ordinary rule of construction. Whereas a liability has been imposed on a dealer by the charging section, it is well-settled that the court would construe the statute in such a manner so as to make the machinery workable:
4. In Case of M/s. Mabini Patram Private Ltd vs Union of India & others on 23 February, 2007 = 2007 (2) TMI 73 – SUPREME COURT

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alue for service cannot be determined in absence of a contract shall be on value of section 15 of CGST Act and on prorate basis as prescribed i.e. the same would be the location of recipient of service.
In respect of proposition (b) if answer to proposition (a) is affirmative then it would just and proper for recipient to take credit of GST since the said services are use in the course of furtherance of business namely provision of last mile connectivity services to the recipient of services.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on 11.12.2018 with respect to admission or rejection of the application when Sh. Harish Bindumadhavan, Advocate along with Sh. Sagar Shah, Manager, and Sh. Aakash Sarda, C.A. appeared and made oral submissions for admission of their ARA application. They were informed that their question would have to be reframed to enable their application to be admitted which they agreed to. They have requested for 15 days time to reframe their questi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t and the departmental authority. We find the relevant provision of Section 95, Section 97 and Section 98 of the GST Act. As per section 95, the term 'advance ruling' means a decision provided by this authority to the applicant on matters or questions specified in subsection 2 of Section 97, in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. For the sake of better understanding Section 97 is reproduced as below:
Section 97:
(1) an applicant desirous of obtaining an advance ruling under this Chapter may make an application in such form and manner and accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed, stating the question on which the advance ruling is sought.
(2) The question on which the advance ruling is sought under this Act, shall be in respect of,
(a) classification of any goods or services or both;
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(c) determination of time and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

acility to the Applicant, where the leased circuit is installed in more than one State or Union territory and the contract or agreement doesn't specifically provide the proportion of service provided in each state?”
2. Applicant also wishes to seek advance ruling in terms of Section 97(2)(d) of CGST Act 2017, “If the answer to the above question is affirmative, can the Applicant avail Input Tax Credit of the tax charged by the supplier of leased circuit facility?”
We find from the statement of facts pertaining to first question “Whether the supplier is to charge Integrated Tax on supply of leased circuit facility to the Applicant, where the leased circuit is installed in more than one State or Union territory and the contract or agreement dosen't specifically provide the proportion of service provided in each state?”
From the perusal of transaction as discussed above in details in their contention, it is clear that applicant is not supplier of services . He is recipient of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. The Kreations Builders & Developers

In Re: M/s. The Kreations Builders & Developers
GST
2019 (3) TMI 148 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 513 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 23-1-2019
GST-ARA-85/2018-19/B-16
GST
SHRI B. TIMOTHY, AND SHRI B. V. BORHADE, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST “Act and “MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. THE KREATIONS BUILDERS & DEVLOPERS, seeking an advance ruling raising the following question:
1) Whether, as per notification no. 01/2018 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 25th January, 2018 can works?
2) Facts in brief –
Mr. Madan Khadgi, proprietor of M/s. The Kreations Builders and Developers is in the busi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

into agreement with M/s. Loomcraft Shade Systems Private Limited for providing works contract services. The entire project is a residential project with each residential unit having an area of with less than 60 sq. meters. The said project gets infrastructure status vide Notification of Government of India, Ministry of Finance. department of Economics Affairs vide F. No. 13/06/2009.INF, dated the 304 March, 2017 .The Loomcraft Shade Systems Private Limited wish to raise the invoice on THE KREATIONS, at GST 18% considering that since residential project is not registered with any central or state authority, concessional rate of 12% cannot be charged
Statement of Fact for Question no. (2):-
As per press Release by Ministry of Finance dated Feb 7, 2018, 7 Para which is reproduced below give understanding that concessional rate of 12% {effective GST rate of 8% after deducting value of land) to service by way of construction of low cost houses up to carpet area of 60sqm in to a housing

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

composite supply of works contract as per sub section 119 of Section 2 of CGST Act. So as per notification no. 01/2018 Central Tax (Rate) SL No. 3{v}(da) a concessional rate of GST of 6% can be charged to a project even if the project is not registered with any central or state authorities and fall within the ambit Of notification F No. 13/6/2009 INF, dated the 30 March, 2017.
Interpretation for question (2) As per Consolidated Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) which is amended vide notification No 1/2018-Central Tax (Rate) Construction service having service Accounting Code (SAC) 9954 is divided into 2 broad categories i.e. Construction Services and Composite supply of works contract as per section 2(119) Of CGST Act. Strictly speaking the service provided by M/s. THE KREATIONS to prospective home buyers fall in the category of Construction series of complex, building etc. for which the rate as per notification is 9%. However, the intention of the government can be read fr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d, this office has contacted the applicant on 14.01.2019 in the issue of reframing of their questions, but response has been received by them till 16.1.2019. Hence we are constrained to decide present application on the basis of available records.
7. OBSERVATION –
It is mandatory as section 97(1) read with Rule 104 of the CGST/MGST Act to pay applicable fee of Rs. 5000/- each under SGST and CGST Act to be deposited as per the provision of Section 49 of the Act. If not the application would be treated as an incomplete application liable for rejection. Details regarding, the payment of fee for the filing an application for advance ruling is also clarified vide Circular No. 25/25/2017-GST by GOI, Ministry of finance, Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise and Customs, GST Policy Wing, New Delhi dated 21st  December, 2017 wherein, in point no. 4 mentioned that the applicant can make the payment of the fee of Rs. 5000/- each under CGST and the respective SGST ACT. In the inst

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Envitech Chemical Specialities Private Limited

In Re: Envitech Chemical Specialities Private Limited
GST
2019 (2) TMI 914 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 23-1-2019
GST-ARA-95/2018-19/B-15
GST
SHRI B. TIMOTHY, AND SHRI B.V. BORHADE, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by ENVITECH CHEMICAL SPECIALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Royal Translines Private Limited

In Re: M/s. Royal Translines Private Limited
GST
2019 (2) TMI 913 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 23-1-2019
GST-ARA-92/2018-19/B-14
GST
SHRI B. TIMOTHY, ADDL. AND SHRI B.V. BORHADE, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by Royal Translines Private Limited, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :
1. Whether the transaction would be classified as GTA service.
2. A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam – GST

M/s Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam – GST
Central Excise
2019 (2) TMI 748 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 23-1-2019
Appeal No. E/30669/2018 – A/30126/2019
Central Excise
Mr. P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Smt Swetha, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri AVLN Chary, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: P. Venkata Subba Rao
This appeal is filed against Order-in-Appeal No. VIZ-EXCUS-002-APP-130-17-18 dated 22.02.2018.
2. The appellants are engaged in manufacturing various iron and steel products and availed CENVAT credit in various inputs and input services used by them. Three show cause notices were issued covering the per

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and imposed penalties as proposed in the show cause notice. Aggrieved, the appellant preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority who upheld the order of the lower authority and rejected the appeal. Hence this appeal.
3. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that on similar issue in respect of the same appellant this bench had vide Final Order No. A/30916/2016 dated 28.09.2016 as reported in [2016 (12) TMI 271- CESTAT, Hyderabad] allowed them credit on authorized service station services, outdoor catering services, mandap keeper services, convention service holding that these services were availed by the appellant in connection with their business and were not meant for personal consumption as alleged by the Department. Fol

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e that all these bills raised were in the name of the appellant (a public sector undertaking) and not in the name of any individual. The actual person who stayed in the accommodation booked or enjoyed the food at the restaurant etc., could be an individual, say, an employee of the appellant firm or somebody else in relation to some business of the appellant. This should not matter as long as the services are in relation to their business. Under these circumstances, it cannot be said they are not related to their business activity. Respectfully following the decisions of this bench in Final Order Nos. A/30916/2016 & A/30582/2017, I hold that the appellant is entitled to the credit of CENVAT on the disputed services. In view of the above, I f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Integral Trading and Logistics Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam – GST

M/s Integral Trading and Logistics Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam – GST
Service Tax
2019 (2) TMI 681 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 23-1-2019
Appeal No. ST/30684/2018 – A/30127/2019
Service Tax
Mr. P. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri T. Satya Murthy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri Mir Anwar Mohiuddin, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: P. Venkata Subba Rao
This appeal is filed against Order-in-Appeal No. VIZ-EXCUST-001-APP-234-235-17-18 dated 22.02.2018.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant provides services to their clients and is also availing CENVAT credit as per the rules. In respect of some services rendered by them, they had charged their clients for their services more than what should they have paid. Thereafter, they had raised credit notes thereby returning the excess amount which they collected from the customers. As they initially charged excess a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ards reimbursable expenditure to various port expenditures and Customs duties, wherein you are acting as pure agent. The other credit notes are issued against excess amount charges, service disallowed, invoices cancelled etc. During discussion, you have informed that you have taken the CENVAT credit on these 'credit notes', as Service Tax had already been paid on full value of invoices against which the credit notes were issued.
A 'credit note' means; A form or letter sent by a seller to a buyer, stating that a certain amount has been credited to the buyer's account. A credit note is issued in various situations to correct a mistake, such as when;
1) An invoice amount is overstated,
2) Correct discount rate is not applied,
3) Goods spoil within guaranty period, or
4) They do not meet the buyer's specifications and are returned.
The Board vide, Notification No. 3/2011-ST, dated 01.03.2011, had amended the Service Tax Rules to the extend as detailed below:
“(3) where an ass

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

der Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules. Corresponding changes have also been in entries at in E2, E4, F2 & F4 of the return. Thereafter, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant seeking to recover the irregularly availed CENVAT credit under Rule 14 of the CCR, 2004 read with Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. It was also proposed to demand and interest under Rule 14 of the CCR, 2004 read with Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. It was also proposed to impose penalties under Rule 15(3) read with Section 78 of the Finance Act under Section 77(2) for filing improper returns. After following due process, the Original Authority confirmed the demands raised with interest and imposed penalties. Aggrieved, the appellant filed an appeal before the First Appellate Authority who upheld the Order-in-Original. Hence this appeal.
4. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the entire mistake committed by them was taking credit under CCR, 2004 instead of taking credit under Rule 6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai

M/s. Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai
Service Tax
2019 (2) TMI 680 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 23-1-2019
Appeal Nos. ST/42069 to 42071/2015 – Final Order Nos. 40147-40149/2019
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Ms. Radhika Chandrasekar, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The issue involved in all these appeals being the same, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. The appellants are engaged in letting out their property situated at various places for commercial purposes. During the course of audit of accounts, it was noticed that they did not pay appropriate service tax on the rent received from the property situated at Delhi and Mumbai for the different periods. Show cause notice was issued proposing to demand service tax along with i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by Finance Act, 2010 seeking to impose service tax on leasing letting, licensing, renting of immovable property with retrospective effect from 1.6.2007. The appellant had made predeposit of 50% of the taxes as per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court i9n the writ petition. Subsequently the writ petitions were dismissed on 20.9.2014. The department has issued three show cause notices for three different periods i.e. from June 2009 to June 2011. The appellant has paid the service tax and the dispute remains only to the variance in the quantification of the demand. The statement given by the appellant showing details of payment has not been reconciled with the demand raised in the notice. The entire amount paid by the appellant has not been taken into consideration. Further, the appellant has paid property tax collected and the said amount has not been deducted for ascertaining the tax liability as well as the rent received in advance from tenants had been included in the total taxabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rty tax benefit as well as the rent received in advance from tenants is given to the appellant. She therefore prayed that the penalties may be waived.
5. The ld. AR Shri B. Balamurugan supported the findings in the impugned order. He argued that the appellant had not furnished documents to show that they had paid property tax. Without furnishing documents before the authorities below, they cannot now contend that they have paid property tax and the same is to be deducted from the total taxable value. It is also argued by him that the appellant had not discharged service tax within prescribed time as under section 80(2) of Act ibid and therefore the penalties levied are correct and proper.
6. Heard both sides.
7. The appellant submits that the authorities have not taken into consideration the property tax paid by the appellant while arriving at the total taxable value. Indeed, if taxes are paid by the appellant, the same has to be considered while arriving at the total taxable value.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TRENTIN JOHN Versus STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM, STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FIN

TRENTIN JOHN Versus STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM, STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI
GST
2019 (2) TMI 460 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-1-2019
WP(C). No. 620 of 2019
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. C. K. SREEJITH
For The Respondent : ADV. SRI. M. A. VINOD, CGC AND GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a business concern, has sought the following reliefs:
“(i) issue a writ of mandamus or direction or order to quash Exts.P5 & P6
(ii) issue writ of mandamus or direction o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HI-LITE BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKKODE, THE STATE TAX OFFICER (WORKS CONTRACT) STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE, THE SALES TAX OFFICER (RECOVERY) OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONE

HI-LITE BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKKODE, THE STATE TAX OFFICER (WORKS CONTRACT) STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE, THE SALES TAX OFFICER (RECOVERY) OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, STATE GSTDEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE AND STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2019 (2) TMI 395 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-1-2019
RP. No. 5 of 2019 IN WP(C). 41721/2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. M. P. SHAMEEM AHAMED
For The Respondents : GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a dealer in KVAT Act 2003, seeks the following

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Act. According to him, 20% must be of the disputed tax, rather than “the existing demand”, which includes interest as well. According to him, it will suffice if the authorities strictly adhere to the proviso to Section 55(4) of the Act.
4. To avoid ambiguity about the quantum to be paid by the petitioner as the pre-deposit before the appellate authority, the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, informed the Court that the amount is Rs. 2,93,81,208/-. According to her, that is 20% of the disputed tax. On this quantification, the petitioner's counsel agrees.
5. I, therefore, modify the judgment dated 20.12.2018 and hold that though the ratio of the judgment dated 06.09.2018 in W.P. (C)No.29440/2018 applies as already indicated,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Sindia Steels Ltd. Versus CCGST, Nashik

M/s. Sindia Steels Ltd. Versus CCGST, Nashik
Central Excise
2019 (2) TMI 380 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 23-1-2019
Appeal No. E/86271/18 – A/85176/2019
Central Excise
Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati, Member (Judicial)
Shri S.M. Vaidya, Consultant for the appellant
Shri M.R. Melvin, Supdt. (AR) for the respondent
ORDER
Availment of cenvat credit on Education Cess & Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Cess against purchase of inputs for manufacture from 100% EOU for manufacturing was held inadmissible by the Commissioner (Appeals) that resulted in confirmation of duty demand along with interest and equivalent penalty against the appellant which is being assailed in this appeal.
2. The brief facts of the case is that appellant manufactures bright bar of stainless steel, and mild steel and mild steel wire. It has registered under the Central Excise Act. It availed cenvat credit on inputs for such manufacturing. During investigation made in Janu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dicating authority that was dismissed in respect of appellant company but allowed in respect of the Director absolving the penalty imposed on him. The present appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging part rejection of its appeal in respect of duty demand interest and penalty on the appellant company
3. In his memo of appeal and during course of hearing of the appeal, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that appellant had been availing credit as audit conducted twice found no irregularity in such availment but it had accepted its mistake in availing cenvat credit on Education Cess & Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Cess during the period between February 2011 and March 2011 and reversed the same immediately after it was brought to its knowledge by the excise official and such credit was only taken in its account but never utilised. In citing Larger Bench decision of this Tribunal in the case of JK Tyres & Inds. reported in 2016 (340) ELT 193 (Tri-LB) he also poi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Commissioner (Appeals) who referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in Ind-Swift Lab reported in 2011 (265) ELT 3 (SC). In citing decision of this Tribunal reported in 2018-TIOL-1034-CESTAT-MUM in the case of JSW Jaigarh Port, learned AR also submitted that after analysing the judgment in Ind-Swift Lab and Bilforge cited supra though penalty was waived off, interest liability was upheld. Referring to the factual aspect of the case that such wrong availment of cenvat credit was noticed after gathering intelligence information, Learned AR submitted that had the same not been noticed, on the strength of intelligence report appellant would have continued to avail the inadmissibility credit for which interference in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is uncalled for.
5. Heard from both sides at length, perused the case records, relied upon decisions, relevant provision of law and also written submissions of the appellant. Going by the show- cause notice and the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

use (vii) it is very much clear that all those duties of excise specified under clause 1, 2,3,4,5, 6 and 6A, against which availment of cenvat credit is permissible, are equally applicable to additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act. So there is no doubt that Education Cess & Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Cess paid against additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act are covered under cenvat credit permitted to be taken under Rule 3(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. Further, in respect of additional duty leviable under sub-section (5) of Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, nothing has been mentioned in Rule 3(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 that Education Cess & Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Cess paid on those duty is also included for availment of credits by the manufacturer.
6. Going by Section 126 and 129 of the Finance Act it is very much clear that Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Cess levied under section 126 is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act.
7. In respect of taking of cenvat credit and its utilisation the learned counsel for the appellant had submitted relied upon the larger bench decision of J.K. Tyre, cited supra in which mear taking of credit is differentiated from its utilisation. Therefore, mere taking of cenvat credit in the book of account would not entail interest and penalty unless the same is drawn from the account of the government by way of refund or utilisation against duty dues. Moreover having regard to the fact that even the intelligence wing officials of the Excise department, who conducted investigation are unaware that higher education cess is not to be attached to sub-rule (5) of Rule 3 of Customs Tariff Rules, and issued show-cause to the appellant, the same itself is sufficient indication that even experts in the field of taxation also misinterpreted the provisions due to inadequate understanding. So the case of the appellant can be considered as a bonafide di

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

V. VIJIN Versus STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURA

V. VIJIN Versus STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI
GST
2019 (2) TMI 328 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-1-2019
WP(C). No. 590 of 2019
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner (s) : ADVS. SRI. P. S. SOMAN SMT. T. RADHAMONY SRI. K. SUNDAR SRI. V. SATHEESH
For the Respondent (s) SRI. SREELAL N. WARRIER, SC AND GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a business concern, has sought the following reliefs:
“(i) To call for the record

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s of Constitution are inconsistent with the provisions of a statute the constitutional provisions only will prevail and hence Section 174 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 to the extent to which they are in conflict with Constitution are bad in law;
(v) to declare that as Section 19 of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 is having supremacy over the rest of the Sections of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, the provisions passed under Section 174 invoking Article 246A of the Constitution of India is subservient to Section 19 of Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 and so any provision in Section 174 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 which are co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s SKYLINE BUILDERS Versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPUTAM, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPUTAM AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (WORKS CONTRACT), KOCHI

M/s SKYLINE BUILDERS Versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPUTAM, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPUTAM AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (WORKS CONTRACT), KOCHI
GST
2019 (2) TMI 327 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-1-2019
WP(C). No. 589 of 2019
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU. J.
For The Petitioner : ADVS. SRI. A. KUMAR SRI. JOB ABRAHAM SMT. G. MINI(1748) SRI. AJAY V. ANAND SRI. P. J. ANILKUMAR AND SRI. P. S. SREEPRASAD
For The Respondent : GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a business concern, has sought the following reliefs:
“(i) Declare that clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of Sub Section 2 of Section 174

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rticle 246A of the Constitution of India and Section 19 of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 and also beyond the scope and scheme of the Kerala State Goods and Services Act 2017 (Act 20 of 2017) and is therefore to be rendered void and unenforceable.
(iii) Declare that the authorities under the Taxes Department of the State of Kerala have no jurisdiction or powers to levy, assess and collect tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (Act 30 of 2004) enacted under Entry 54 of the State list of the 7th Schedule to the Constitution as it stood prior to substitution on 16.09.16 by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 and/or also consequent to the introduction of the Kerala State Goods A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Jeyyam Global Foods (P) Ltd., Versus Union of India, Through its Secretary (Revenue), Ministry of Finance, and Others

M/s. Jeyyam Global Foods (P) Ltd., Versus Union of India, Through its Secretary (Revenue), Ministry of Finance, and Others
GST
2019 (2) TMI 124 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 465 (Mad.) , [2019] 64 G S.T.R. 129 (Mad)
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 23-1-2019
WP(MD)No. 937 of 2019 and WMP(MD)Nos. 764 & 765 of 2019
GST
MR. G.R. SWAMINATHAN J.
For Petitioner: Mr. S. Jaikumar
For Respondents: Mr. P. Dharmaraj for R1 Mr. Vijayakarthikeyan for R2 &R3 Mr. Aayiram K. Selvakumar Additional Government Pleader for R4
ORDER
The petitioner is a manufacturer of dried chick peas, gram flour, pulses and grams. The petitioner's claim is that they purchase chick peas, dry them by heating them to a certain degree and the resultant product is known as “Dried Chick Peas”.
According to the petitioner, this would have to be classified only under Chapter 0713 of HSN. The petitioner had transported the dried chick peas from Salem to Dindigul. The petitioner had not fi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as not open to the Squad Officer to have done so.  
3. Heard the learned counsel on either side. The contesting respondent is only the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent official appeared in person and assisted this Court. He also filed a detailed counter affidavit.
4. According to the fourth respondent, he is statutorily empowered under Section 68 r/w Section 129 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Section 68 of the said Act reads as under :
“Section 68 (1) : The Government may require the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding such amount as may be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed.
(2) The details of documents required to be carried under sub-section (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) Where any conveyance referred to in sub-section (1) is intercepted by the proper officer at any place, he may require the person in charge of the sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods comes forward for payment of such tax and penalty;
(b) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to the fifty per cent. of the value of the goods reduced by the tax amount paid thereon and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to five per cent. of the value of goods or twenty five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods does not come forward for payment of such tax and penalty;
(c) upon furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed: Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods.”
5. The stand of the fourth respondent is that he is entitled to call upon the person in charge of the conveyance to produce the documents in question for verification. In the present case, there is no dispute as to the goods that were actually transporte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for consideration before the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the decision reported in 2018 (11) TMI 1503 (N.V.K. Mohammed Sulthan Rawther and Sons and Willson Vs. Union of India). The Hon'ble Kerala High Court held that in such cases at best the inspecting authority can alert the assessing authority to initiate the proceedings “for assessment of any alleged sale, at which the petitioner will have all his opportunities to put forward his pleas on law and on fact.” The process of detention of the goods cannot be resorted to when the dispute is bona fide, especially, concerning the exigibility of tax and, more particularly, the rate of tax.  
8. I am in full agreement with the aforesaid enunciation of law laid down by the Hon'ble Kerala High Court. Here, a bonafide dispute with regard to the classification has arisen between the transporter of goods and the squad officer. I am of the view that the squad officer can intercept the goods, detain them for the purpose of prepar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e matter cannot rest there. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner would strongly press that this Court will have to direct the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai to issue appropriate directives in this regard. I find force in the said request. This Court therefore suo motu impleads the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai as the fifth respondent in this writ petition and directs Shri.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, the learned Additional Government Pleader to take notice for him also.
11. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai is directed to issue a circular to all the inspecting squad officers in Tamil Nadu not to detain goods or vehicles where there is a bonafide dispute as regards the exigibility of tax or rate of tax.
The circular shall embody the essence of the decision reported in 2018 (11) TMI 1503 (N.V.K. Mohammed Sulthan Rawther and Sons and Willson Vs. Union of India). Such a circular shall be issued within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Industrial Filters & Fabrics P. Ltd. Versus CGST & C.E., Indore

Industrial Filters & Fabrics P. Ltd. Versus CGST & C.E., Indore
Central Excise
2019 (1) TMI 1426 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 23-1-2019
Excise Appeal No. E/52849/2018 [SM] – FINAL ORDER No. 50106/2019
Central Excise
MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present for the Appellant: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate
Present for the Respondent: Ms. Tamana Alam, DR
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
The present appeal has been preferred against the order in appeal No. 188-18-19 dated 28.06.2018. The adjudication is with respect to the Show Cause Notice (SCN) No. 2542 dated 27.09.2017. The appellant herein are engaged in manufacture of filter bags and are also are availing cenvat credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. During the course of audit of records for the year 2015-16, the Department observed that the appellant had taken input credit of Rs. 4,53,909/- wrongly on the invoices which were more than one year old. Resultantly, the said cenvat credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

submitted that Commissioner (Appeals) in the Order under challenge has made a wrong observation that the appellant has failed to produce any evidence to suffice that entry record receipt of inputs made prior the date of Notification and that the said material was received prior to the Notification as the invoices relied upon by the appellant only are the sufficient proof for the fact that material was also received prior the date of said Notification. Order under challenges, is therefore, prayed to be set aside. Appeal is prayed to be allowed.
3. Per contra Ld. AR, Ms. Tamana Alam has justified the order impressing upon para 7.2 thereof. It is submitted that the Commissioner has not disputed the fact that the invoices are issued prior the date of Notification but the relief has been declined for want of the relevant documents/ evidence. Order is therefore sustainable and appeal deserves dismissal.
4. After hearing both the parties and perusing the record, I observe that the SCN has

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g received on the date of invoice itself. All the four invoices are issued prior 01.09.2014 i.e. prior date when for the first time the concept of limitation for availing credit was introduced. The findings of Commissioner(Appeals) are therefore apparently wrong while observing that the evidence about receipt of material is missing on record. The order is definitely liable to be set aside. Finally, I draw my support from the decision of the coordinate bench in the case of C.C.E., Vishakapatnam as relied upon by the appellant. Tribunal has observed and held as follows:
On the second point as to whether the relevant date for effect of the notification placing the time limit is the date of invoice or the date on which credit has been taken, I find that Tribunal in the case of Suryadev Alloys & Power Pvt. Ltd (supra) and Indian Potash Ltd. (supra) and Voss Exotech Automotive Pvt. Ltd. has held that the date of the invoice has to be after 01.09.2014 for limitation of six months to apply. I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. V. Stephen Versus The Commissioner of GST & CE (Chennai-South)

M/s. V. Stephen Versus The Commissioner of GST & CE (Chennai-South)
Service Tax
2019 (1) TMI 1180 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 23-1-2019
Appeal No. ST/42129/2018 – FINAL ORDER No. 40154/2019
Service Tax
Shri P. Dinesha, Member (Judicial)
Shri R. Viswanathan, CA for the Appellant
Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Service tax was sought to be recovered by the Revenue vide the Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 23.03.2017, alleging that the assessee claiming to be covered under Notification No. 17/2011-ST dated 01.03.2011 did not furnish declaration in Form A-1 for claiming the benefit of exemption in terms of the above Notification. Vide Order-in-Original dated 18.01.2018, the ex

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ted at Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and hence the services were consumed within the SEZ. It is the case of the appellant that during the impugned period, he rendered services to M/s. Perlos Telecommunication & Electronics Components India Pvt. Ltd. (in short M/s. Perlos) situated at M/s. Nokia Telecom Special Economic Zone-SEZ, Kancheepuram; that M/s. Perlos had closed its business for which reason the appellant could not obtain Form A1; etc.
4.1 I find the issue of providing service and the service being consumed at SEZ is not in dispute and it is also undisputed that the service recipient viz. M/s. Perlos closed down its business and hence, Form A1 could never be obtained and hence non-furnishing of Form A1 is not deliberate, which was be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. R.S. Granite Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of GST & CE (Chennai-North)

M/s. R.S. Granite Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of GST & CE (Chennai-North)
Service Tax
2019 (1) TMI 1179 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 23-1-2019
Appeal No. ST/42302/2018 – FINAL ORDER NO. 40155/2019
Service Tax
Shri P. Dinesha, Member (Judicial)
Shri P.C. Anand, Consultant, for the Appellant
Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
A Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 31.05.2017 was issued covering the periods October, 2014 to March, 2016 alleging interalia that the commission received by the appellant from the appellant's service recipients located outside India, was liable to service tax as per the amended Rule 2 (f) of the Places of Provisions of Services Rules, 2012 (POPS) w.e.f. 01.10.2014. After considering the explanation filed by the assessee, the adjudicating authority vide Order-in-Original No. 6/2018 dated 05.02.2018 confirmed the proposed demand and consequently appropriated the payments made towards

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d not include a person providing the main service.
* Appellant's main and only service is obtaining orders from the Indian customers and passing on the same to the foreign manufacturer/appellant's Principals
* The words 'supply of goods' inserted post amendment is not in addition to the facilitation of a service since, there is 'or' in between.
* Right from the beginning, facilitating the provision of service by identifying the Indian customers and obtaining orders is the only and main service of the appellants.
* The extract of education guide published by CBEC made it further clear that a commission agent who buys and sells goods is not an intermediary.
* Rule 3 of the POPS makes it clear that the place of provision of service shall be the location of the service recipient whereas Rule 9 ibid prescribes the place of provision of specified services in the nature of intermediary services is that of the location of the service provider, etc.
He also relied on the following ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s a provision of a service (hereinafter called the 'main' service) or a supply of goods, between two or more persons, but does not include a person who provides the main service or supplies the goods on his account'”.
4.2 It is not the case of the Revenue that the appellant arranges or facilitates other services as well, in addition to the above, to its 'Principals' nor is the case of the Revenue that the appellant had suppressed the provision of any other service. The Revenue has also nowhere disputed the above service rendered by the appellant, ie., procuring/obtaining orders for its Principals located outside the taxable territory, for which the commission is paid by its Principals as also the fact of that obtaining orders from the Indian customers is the main and the only service rendered by the appellant. I find the above service is a taxable service but for the fact that it is an export of service and the same stood exempted for all the preceding years. This fact is also vouched

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n 46/2016-Service Tax
(c) Intermediary services:
(d) Service consisting of hiring of means of transport other than, – (i) aircrafts, and (ii) vessels except yachts upto a period of one month.”
4.4 On perusal of the above Rules, I find that Rule 3 is the general Rule whereas, Rule 9 is specific and also covers 'intermediary service'. Therefore, if the service of the appellant herein is held to be that of intermediary services, then Rule 9 will automatically apply. If not, Rule 3 will apply. Rule 2 (f) excludes the services of intermediary if the person whose main service is arranging or facilitating a provision of service, which also stands automatically excluded from the purview of Rule 9 and thus would fall under Rule 3.
5. The facts of the case as analysed elsewhere in this order, make it clear that obtaining/procuring order for its foreign Principals is the main service rendered by the appellant and consequently, rigors Rule 9 vis-à-vis Rule 2 (f) are not applicable. In v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

APPLICABILITY OF GST

APPLICABILITY OF GST
Query (Issue) Started By: – NILESH PITALE Dated:- 22-1-2019 Last Reply Date:- 26-1-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Respected Sir
My Client is Registered in Maharashtra, He Has Imported The Goods In Delhi Wherein he has No Place of Business and Sent to the Goods at Job Worker place in delhi , and Finished Goods Despatched to The Buyers in delhi , Goods Delivered By His Job workers, Can we Charged IGST to Our Delhi Buyers ?
Reply By SHARAD ANADA:
The Reply:
* Please refer Sec 20 (xxii) of IGST Act 2017
20. Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to,
(xxii) job work;
shall, mutatis mutandis, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onal place of business. If you declares the place of business of the job worker as his additional place of business then you have to register your self at Delhi and you have to charge CGST and Delhi SGST
* You can also claim input tax credit on import of goods. Please Refer Sec 19(3) of CGST Act 2017.
Reply By SHARAD ANADA:
The Reply:
* If your job worker is registered U/s. 25 of CGST Act then also you can supply from his place of business and you can charge IGST on such supply.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
IGST is applicable.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
After in agreement with Sh.Sharad Anada Ji, I further express my views as under :- . Person registered in Maharashtra is owner of goods sent for job work at Delhi. So

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Rules Electricity Services Are Naturally Bundled, Treated as Single Service Under Negative List Tax Regime.

Court Rules Electricity Services Are Naturally Bundled, Treated as Single Service Under Negative List Tax Regime.
Case-Laws
GST
Transmission or distribution for electricity – Scope of bundled service – Service tax under negative list era – all the services are naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business of the petitioner and are required to be treated as provision of the single service of transmission and distribution of electricity which gives the bundle its essential characte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electricity transmission services classified as composite supply under GST per section 8(a) of the CGST Act.

Electricity transmission services classified as composite supply under GST per section 8(a) of the CGST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
Transmission or distribution for electricity – scope of composite supply in GST era – the services provided by the petitioner are in the nature of composite supply in view of the provisions of clause (a) of section 8 of the CGST Act, the tax liability thereof has to be determined accordingly.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, aler

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicant Not Intermediary: Service Supply Analyzed Under GST, Fails Facilitation Test from Education Guide.

Applicant Not Intermediary: Service Supply Analyzed Under GST, Fails Facilitation Test from Education Guide.
Case-Laws
GST
Nature of supply of service – Support services or Intermediary servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AM's Advertising Policy Services and Sales Promotions Classified as Market Research Services Under Group 99837.

AM's Advertising Policy Services and Sales Promotions Classified as Market Research Services Under Group 99837.
Case-Laws
GST
Nature and classification of supply of service – adoption and implementation of AM’s advertising policy, conducting sales promotion through exhibition trade, liaising with customer etc. – the services the applicant proposes to provide would fall under Group 99837 as Market Research Services.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XIX)

GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XIX)
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 22-1-2019

Goods and Services Tax (GST), introduced from July 1, 2017 is more than a year and half old now but has resulted in operational and implementation disruptions affecting all stakeholders. GST law, as drafted and legislated, is not free from the interpretational hassles. GST Council is however, making regular changes to fix the anomalies and hardships faced by taxpayers. 32 meetings of GST Council have been held till 15th January, 2019.
Taxpayers have already challenged various provisions of GST laws and rules framed thereunder with over 300 writs being filed in different courts. High courts and Supreme court have taken a liberal stand so far in view of the fact that law is new and is yet evolving. However, CBIC may move to Supreme court where the verdict is against the Government. In recent past, CBIC had issued directions to be officers to defend the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and the goods were being transported from Himanchal Pradesh and the E- Way Bill prescribed under the provision of CGST Rules was downloaded in which the vehicle number being HP12C-2297 as well as other details were duly mentioned.
Petitioner submitted that on account of activities of Transport Union, the transportation of goods with a vehicle provided by the transport union of Himanchal Pradesh is permitted to transport the goods from Himanchal Pradesh to Chandigarh and thereafter from Chandigarh to its onward journey another vehicle is required to be booked. Hence Part B was later filled by hand. The petition was filed against seizure order due to filing of part B of e-way bill by hand.
The contention of the petitioner is that since the movement of goods from Baddi to Gorakhpur and also from Derabassi to Gorakhpur, was on two different vehicles via Chandigarh, hence while uploading the details, the petitioner though tried to mention the numbers and details of both set of vehicles bu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ails of second vehicle had been mentioned in E-way bill by hand not justified.
* In B.R. Agriculture Industries v. State of U.P. (2018) 8 TMI 210 (Allahabad), the goods of the petitioner have been seized from the business place in pursuance of a seizure order passed under Section 67. Since respondents wanted time to file counter affidavit, it was held that where the amount equal to value of tax and penalty be deposited as security by way other than by cash or bank guarantee or indemnity bond, to the satisfaction of the seizing authority goods under seizure shall be released forthwith.
* In Ramesh Chand Kannu Mal v. State of UP (2018) 5 TMI 761; the petitioner is a firm dealing with all kinds of Iron Scrap etc. and is registered under the provision of GST Act, 2017.
The respondent passed a seizure order by which he has seized the goods as well as vehicle on the ground that the goods were being transported from outside the state of U.P. without the Transit Declaration Form, which is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

outside State of U.P. without Transit Declaration Form (TDF), in view of fact that on date of incident i.e. 24-3-2018, neither there was any E-way bill system nor any notification by Central Government under rule 138, requiring carrying of a TDF Form or any other such document in course of inter-State supply/movement of goods, impugned order passed by Department was to be set aside.
The court observed that on the relevant date i.e. 24.03.2018, there was no requirement of carrying TDF Form-1 in the case of an inter-State supply of goods. In fact on the relevant date there was no prescription of the documents to be carried in this regard under Rule 138 of the CGST Act, 2017, accordingly, the seizure and penalty imposed upon the petitioners based on the notification dated 21.7.2017 issued under Rule 138 of the UPGST Act 2017, which was not applicable, is clearly illegal.
The goods and vehicles were ordered to be released forthwith and Authorities directed to return the amount paid in pu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hey were supplying such goods in packets which are branded as well as unbranded. The packings of more than 25 kgs were branded goods, the rest were unbranded.
The officers visited the factory and under threat, collected cheques for ₹ 19.74 lakh but petitioner instructed the bank not to clear the cheques and hence cheques were returned by bank unpaid. The department subsequently issued show cause notice for recovery of ₹ 36.88 lakhs and provisionally attached bank account. Again, the adjudicating authority issued fresh notice under the purported exercise of powers under Section 74(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act calling upon the petitioners to show cause why a sum of ₹ 1.29 crores towards CGST and SGST not be recovered from the period between July, 2017 and 20-2-2018. The petitioners have challenged this second show cause notice, on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.
The court held that practice of collecting post-dated cheques under coercion during rai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Kerala HC stays collection of GST on Income Tax TCS amount

Kerala HC stays collection of GST on Income Tax TCS amount
By: – SHARAD ANADA
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 22-1-2019

PSN Automobiles Private Limited Vs. UOI & CBIC (Kerala High Court at Ernakulam) – 2019 (1) TMI 1022 – KERALA HIGH COURT
Petitioner, has submitted that the amount of 1% the dealer collects from the purchaser of a car worth more than ten lakhs, under Section 206C(1F) of the Income Tax Act, cannot be treated as an integral part of the value of the goods and services supplied by the petitioner. According to him, the petitioner, as the dealer of the motor vehicle, acts only as an agent for the State to collect the income tax under Section 206C(1F). And that amount will eventually goes to the vehicle purch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

yable for the said supply of goods or services or both where the supplier and the recipient of the supply.
2. Section 15(2) mandates that the value of supply shall include any taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges levied under any other law in force.
3. As has been rightly contended by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Customs Department, Section 15(2)(a) is expansive. Yet Sri Gopinathan, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the amount of 1% the dealer collects from the purchaser of a car worth more than ten lakhs, under Section 206C(1F) of the Income Tax Act, cannot be treated as an integral part of the value of the goods and services supplied by the petitioner. According to him, the petitioner, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =