GST – Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Rate of tax collection at source (TDS) – Notification – Issued.

GST – States – G.O. Ms. No. 125 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – COMMERCIAL TAXES AND REGISTRATION (B1) DEPARTMENT G.O. Ms. No. 125 Dated: 20.09.2018 Purattasi – 4 Thiruvalluvar Aandu, 2049 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 52 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 19 of 2017), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies that every electronic commerce operator, not being an agent, shall collect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST – Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Services exempt from state tax – Insertion of Explanation against serial number 41 – Notification – Issued.

GST – States – G.O. Ms. No. 124 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – COMMERCIAL TAXES AND REGISTRATION (B1) DEPARTMENT G.O. Ms. No. 124 Dated: 20.09.2018 Purattasi – 4 Thiruvalluvar Aandu, 2049 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 19 of 2017), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, on the recommendations of the Council, and on being satisfied that it is necessary so to do for the purpose of clarifying the scop

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to insert explanation in an entry in Notification No. 12/2017 – State Tax (Rate) by exercising powers conferred under section 11(3) of MGST Act, 2017.

GST – States – 23/2018-State Tax (Rate) – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – FINANCE DEPARTMENT Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, dated the 20th September 2018 NOTIFICATION Notification No. 23/2018-State Tax (Rate) MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. No. GST. 1018/C. R. 95/ Taxation-1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 11 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Government of Maharashtra, on the recommendations of the Council, and on being satisfied that it is necessary so to do for the purpose of clarifying the scope and applicability of the Notification No. MGST-1017/C. R. 103(11)/Taxation-1 [Notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate)], dated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

THE ANDHRA PRADESH GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 (ACT No. 16 OF 2017) – DATE ON WHICH TCS PROVISION OF SECTION 51 WILL COME INTO FORCE.

GST – States – G.O.Ms.No. 476 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – REVENUE DEPARTMENT (COMMERCIAL TAXES-II) [G.O.Ms.No. 476, Revenue (Commercial Taxes-II) 20th September, 2018.] NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by sub – section (3) of Section 1 of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No.16 of 2017) and in supersession of the notification in GO.Ms.No.458, Revenue (CT-II) Department Dated : 16th October, 2017, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rate of TCS to be collected by every Electronic Commerce Operator U/s 52(1) of RGST Act, 2017.

GST – States – F.12(56)FD/Tax/2017-Pt-II-117 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN FINANCE DEPARTMENT (TAX DIVISION) NOTIFICATION Jaipur, dated: September 20, 2018 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 52 of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No. 9 of 2017), the State Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies that every electronic commerce operator, not being an agent, shall collect an amount calculated at a rate of h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s INDUS PROJECTS LIMITED Versus UNION OF INDIA

2018 (9) TMI 1331 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. J217 (Guj.) – Prayer for payment of GST in installments due to financial difficulty – Held that:- NOTICE, returnable on 17.10.2018. On the condition that before the returnable date the petitioner deposits 20% of the outstanding amount and further continues to deposit 5% thereof between 1st and 5th of every month thereafter until any other order is passed, there shall be stay against coercive recoveries of the dues. Direct service is permitted. – R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14638 of 2018 Dated:- 20-9-2018 – MR AKIL KURESHI AND MR B.N. KARIA, JJ. For The Petitioner : MR ZUBIN F BHARDA (159) ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Petitioner has to pay GST du

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

INDUSIND MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LTD Versus UNION OF INDIA

2018 (9) TMI 1330 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – TMI – CENVAT credit – main grievance of the petitioners is that the credit of the duties for the period prior to 01.07.2017 though reflected in the declaration filed by the petitioner no.1 in Tran1 form is not shown in the electronic credit ledger account – Held that:- NOTICE, returnable on 11.10.2018. Direct service is permitted. – R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14428 of 2018 Dated:- 20-9-2018 – MR AKIL KURESHI AND B N KARIA, JJ. For The Petitioner :

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to insert explanation in an entry in notification No. 12/2017 – Union Territory Tax (Rate) by exercising powers conferred under section 8(3) of UTGST Act, 2017.

Goods and Services Tax – 23/2018 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 23/2018-Union Territory Tax (Rate) New Delhi, the 20th September, 2018 G.S.R. 908 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 8 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (14 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, and on being satisfied that it is necessary so to do for the purpose of clarifying the scope and applicability of the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.12/2017- Union Territory Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to insert explanation in an entry in notification No. 9/2017 – Integrated Tax (Rate) by exercising powers conferred under section 6(3) of IGST Act, 2017.

Goods and Services Tax – 24/2018 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 24/2018-Integrated Tax (Rate) New Delhi, the 20th September, 2018 G.S.R. 907 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 6 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (13 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, and on being satisfied that it is necessary so to do for the purpose of clarifying the scope and applicability of the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 9/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate), dated the 28thJune, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Sect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to insert explanation in an entry in notification No. 12/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) by exercising powers conferred under section 11(3) of CGST Act, 2017

Goods and Services Tax – 23/2018 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 23/2018- Central Tax (Rate) New Delhi, the 20th September, 2018 G.S.R. 906 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 11 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, and on being satisfied that it is necessary so to do for the purpose of clarifying the scope and applicability of the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to notify the rate of tax collection at source (TCS) to be collected by every electronic commerce operator for inter-State taxable supplies

Goods and Services Tax – 02/2018 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 02/2018 – Integrated Tax New Delhi, the 20th September, 2018 G.S.R. 901 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (13 of 2017), read with sub-section (1) of section 52 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to notify the rate of tax collection at source (TCS) to be collected by every electronic commerce operator for intra-State taxable supplies

Goods and Services Tax – 52/2018 – Dated:- 20-9-2018 – Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 52/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 20th September, 2018 G.S.R. 900 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 52 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies that every electronic commerce ope

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC- limit of payment within 180 days

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Archna Gupta – Dated:- 19-9-2018 Last Replied Date:- 29-11-2018 – Dear Sir/ Madam Please refer section 16(2) proviso 2. My query is as below: Last date of availing credit against an invoice raised in financial year is by the end of September of following year or filing of Annual return whichever is earlier. But regarding clause of 180 days this limit will be applicable? Suppose an invoice is raised in February 2018 but it is not paid till August 2018 (180

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Anti-profiteering – Failure to pass on the benefit of Input tax credit – Construction service – assessee directed to reduce the price to be realized from the buyers of the flats in commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him – Amount di

Goods and Services Tax – Anti-profiteering – Failure to pass on the benefit of Input tax credit – Construction service – assessee directed to reduce the price to be realized from the buyers of the fla

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gst for services -reg

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Ramakrishnan Seshadri – Dated:- 19-9-2018 Last Replied Date:- 19-9-2018 – Dear Sir,This has reference to your for the Issue ID: 114148, we request you to confirm whether we have to charge CGST & SGST or IGST .Please confirm.Thanks & Regards,S.Ramakrishnan – Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan – The Reply = Sir,You have to pay IGST only. – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = I concur with the views of Sh.Ranganathan, sir. – Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVIN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Whether the activity of supply and installation of ‘car parking system’ would qualify as immovable property and thereby ‘works contract’ as defined in Section 2(119) of the CGST Act? – Held Yes – Once made operational the ‘car parking system’ ob

Goods and Services Tax – Whether the activity of supply and installation of ‘car parking system’ would qualify as immovable property and thereby ‘works contract’ as defined in Section 2(119) of the CG

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of goods – marine paints – these consumable items are consumed and lost and cannot be reused and are also not worth recovery, reuse or recycle for use on ship – Marine Paint should not be considered as a part of Ship.

Goods and Services Tax – Classification of goods – marine paints – these consumable items are consumed and lost and cannot be reused and are also not worth recovery, reuse or recycle for use on ship –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax Versus Mangalam Cement Limited

2019 (2) TMI 81 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI – CENVAT Credit – input services – Outward Goods Transportation Service (from factory to customers, from railway siding to godown and from godown to customers) – October, 2011 to March, 2012 – place of removal – Held that:- In view of the amended definition of “input service” w.e.f. 01.03.2008 as also in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 117 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], judgment of the Tribunal cannot be sustained in law and the demand is liable to be revived. However, the present matter deserves to be remanded to the Tribunal to consider the question of penalty.

The matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for consideration of the question of penalty to decide the same after hearing both the parties in accordance with law – Petition allowed by way of remand. – D.B. Central Excise Appeal No. 79/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq And Mr. Justice Goverdhan Bardhar For the A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ether the assessee had availed the Cenvat Credit correctly or not? The respondent-assessee is manufacturer of cement classifiable under Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Upon perusal of the assessee s record, it was noticed that for the period from October, 2011 to March, 2012, the respondentassessee availed CENVAT Credit of service tax paid by it towards (a) Goods Transport Agency Services (for short GTA Services ), from factory to customers, from railway siding to godown and from godown to customers; (b) Auction Services and (c) Rent-a- Cab Services amounting to ₹ 53,66,338/-. It appeared that these services were not covered under the definition of input service under the provisions of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (for short the Rules of 2004 ). Therefore, a show cause notice dated 02.11.2012 was issued to the respondentassessee proposing recovery of the CENVAT Credit wrongly availed along with interest under Rule 14 of the Rules of 2004 read with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vide impugned judgment dated 10.10.2017 allowed the appeal and set aside the demand order dated 28.09.2015. Hence, this appeal. Mr. Siddharth Ranka, learned counsel for the appellantrevenue has submitted that the Tribunal has failed to take into consideration that the words, clearance of final products from the place of removal appearing in the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Rules of 2004 prior to 01.03.2008 were amended by Notification No. 10/2008-CE(NT), dated 01.03.2008 by substituting the same with the words, clearance of final products upto the place of removal . Thus, if any ambiguity, which was there in respect of (a) GTA Services; (b) Auction Services and (c) Rent-a-Cab Services upto the place of removal, the same has already been removed by the Government and therefore, the aforesaid services taken upto the place of removal can only be covered under the definition of input service . The Tribunal has failed to notice this change in the definition while decid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erred SLP against the said decision of this Court. Therefore, hearing of the present matter may be deferred till the final decision of the Supreme Court, as according to learned counsel for the respondent, the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Service Tax Vs. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra) has not noticed many important aspects, the matter therefore is required to be reconsidered. So far as the question of penalty is concerned, learned counsel argued that since the Tribunal has decided the issue against the Revenue not only in this matter but also in the matter arising out of the previous assessment year wherein the main demand was set aside, the question of penalty would therefore not arise for consideration. Learned counsel argued that as per the law that was prevalent at the time when the Tribunal passed the impugned judgment, the respondent-assessee was not required to satisfy the demand and acted throughout under that impression, therefore, there was no q

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED

M/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI – 2018 (11) TMI 398 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI – Detention of goods with vehicles – Vires of Rule 140 of the CGST/SCST Rules – collection of security in the form of simple bond for the value of goods and bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of applicable tax, interst and penalty payable as a mandatory condtiion for the release of the goods de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Petitioner : BY ADVS. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) RAJAGOPAL M For The Respondent : N NAGARESH ASGI JUDGMENT The petitioner, a dealer, faced detention proceedings under Section 129 of the Goods and Services Tax Act. After failing to secure interim release of the goods, it has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs : i) declare Rule 140 of the CGST/SCST Rules, to the extent to which it directs collection of security in the form of simple bond for the value of goods and bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of applicable tax, interst and penalty payable as a mandatory condtiion for the release of the goods detained under section 129(3) of the Act as violative of Article 301 of the Constitution ; ii) issue a writ of cer

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CHAITHANYA GRANITES AND MARBLES Versus TTHE ASST STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO 5, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESE

CHAITHANYA GRANITES AND MARBLES Versus TTHE ASST STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO 5, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI – 2018 (11) TMI 331 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2019] 61 G S.T.R. 38 (Ker) – Detention of goods with vehicle – delay in transporting the consignment after filing E-way bill due to flood – Held that:- The petitioner has every document to transport the goods safely, save the expiry of the time prescribed in the e-way bill. It is preposterous to contend that the petitioner delayed the transport deliberately-for no purpose. Granted, I cannot find fault with the authorities in detaining the goods. But once the petitioner has explained the circumstances through Exts.P8 and P8(a), they ought to have taken a leni

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aught in an unprecedented flood. To reach Edapally, Ernakulam, the transporter had no motorable road because most roads, by then, were inundated-even breached. The transport thus took more than usual time to reach Edapally. By then, the e-way bill had expired. 3. In that background, the respondent authorities intercepted the vehicle at Kasaragod and detained the goods under Section 129 of the GST Act. Faced with the Ext.P7 order of detention, the petitioner submitted the Exts.P8 and P8(a) replies. Later, after failing in its effort to have the interim custody of the goods, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 4. In response to the submissions made by the petitioner's counsel, the Government Pleader has submitted that the petitioner had ample time to have the consignment transported to Edappally, on time. According to her, the vehicle was ready by 13.08.2018. And from Surathkal in Karnataka, it would not have taken the transporters so many days to reach Kerala-that is, beyon

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y 16.08.2018 the flood situation in Kerala worsened. Perhaps, the transporter must have played safe and waited for the roads to clear. And that did not immediately happen. 8. I reckon that the petitioner has every document to transport the goods safely, save the expiry of the time prescribed in the e-way bill. It is preposterous to contend that the petitioner delayed the transport deliberately-for no purpose. Granted, I cannot find fault with the authorities in detaining the goods. But once the petitioner has explained the circumstances through Exts.P8 and P8(a), they ought to have taken a lenient view-rather a practical view, at that. Under these circumstances, I dispose of the writ petition, holding that the respondents will release the goods after securing personal bond from the petitioner-that is, without insisting on the bank guarantee. This arrangement, I clarify, will not affect the adjudication under Section 129 of the Act. – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements – Orders – Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

INDUSIND MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LTD. & ANOTHER & ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 (10) TMI 996 – DELHI HIGH COURT – TMI – Transitional credit/input tax credit – filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 – technical/system errors – Held that:- The present petitioner is one of the 213 entities which were allowed the facility and benefit of transitional credit – It is urged that the petitioner should first ensure that the credits which it otherwise is entitled to – both transitional and input credit as on 01.07.2017, are duly claimed and reflected in the place of its registration i.e. Mumbai in order to ensure that thereafter, the other centres where it is registered, can claim it.

List on 16.10.2018. – W.P.(C) 8691/2018, CM APPL. 38569/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND MR. A. K. CHAWLA JJ. Petitioners Through: M

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t is stated that the transitional credit (input tax credit) otherwise available to it is set to lapse in September, 2018. The counsel for the GST Commissioner appearing on advance notice submits that the meeting of the IT Grievance Redressal Committee (ITGRC) on 21.08.2018 has sought to redress this problem. Learned counsel has relied upon the minutes of the meeting which records the issue as follows: 3.2 EVP, GSTN further elaborated the cases under the Category B, where no technical issues were found on the basis of logs in GST system, as below: xxx xxx xxx (d) In 2 cases sent by Nodal Officers, taxpayer had attempted downward revision of distributed credit in Table 8 of TRAN-1. The system was designed to allow only upward revision and not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tails as per Annexures indicated in column No.4 and 6 of Table-1 respectively, subject to Law Committee recommendations regarding consequential benefits related to filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 and suggest ways to handle such situations, in a time bound manner as referred to it in 1st IT-GRC Meeting. Simultaneously, the IT-GRC decided not to allow remaining 127 cases mentioned at Table-2 in absence of evidence of technical/system errors in these cases as explained at para 3.2 above and details as per Annexures indicated in column No.4 and 6 of Table-2 respectively. It is pointed out that the present petitioner is one of the 213 entities which were allowed the facility and benefit of transitional credit. Learned counsel has drawn our attention at

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Udaipur Versus Mangalam Cement Limited

2018 (10) TMI 829 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI – CENVAT credit – input services or not – Goods Transport Agency Services in respect of which the assessee had availed the Cenvat credit of service tax during the period from July, 2014 to March, 2015 for outward transportation of cement – place of removal – Held that:- In view of the amended definition of “input service” w.e.f. 01.03.2008 as also in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 117 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], judgment of the Tribunal cannot be sustained in law and the demand is liable to be revived – It was held by the Supreme Court that Cenvat Credit on goods transport agency service availed for transport of goods from place of removal to buyer’s premises was not admissible to the respondent.

The matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for consideration of the question of penalty to decide the same after hearing both the parties in accordance with law – appeal allowed by way of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are eligible input services within the meaning of input service and whether upon determination of the phrase i.e. place of removal defined under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the assessee had availed the Cenvat Credit on the GTA service correctly or not? The respondent-assessee is manufacturer of cement classifiable under Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Upon perusal of the assessee s record, it was noticed that for the period from July, 2014 to March, 2015, the respondent-assessee availed CENVAT Credit of service tax paid by it towards Goods Transport Agency Services (for short GTA Services ), from factory to customers, from railway siding to godown and from godown to customers, amounting to ₹ 1,24,75,315/-. It appeared that these services were not covered under the definition of input service under the provisions of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (for short the Rules of 2004 ). Therefore, a show cause notice dated 28.07.2015 was issued to the responde

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y Notification No. 10/2008-CE(NT), dated 01.03.2008 by substituting the same with the words, clearance of final products upto the place of removal . Thus, if any ambiguity, which was there in respect of GTA Services upto the place of removal, the same has already been removed by the Government and therefore, the aforesaid services taken upto the place of removal can only be covered under the definition of input service . The Tribunal has failed to notice this change in the definition while deciding the appeal of the assessee, while judgment has been given in the context of earlier definition of input service . Reference to definition of place of removal in Section 4(3)(c) of the Act of 1944 was also given. Since the present matter was covered by the aforesaid notification, the Tribunal was wholly unjustified in allowing the appeal filed by the assessee. Learned counsel argued that since the question raised in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

decided the issue against the Revenue not only in this matter but also in the matter arising out of previous assessment year wherein the main demand was set aside, the question of penalty would therefore not arise for consideration. Learned counsel argued that as per the law that was prevalent at the time when the Tribunal passed the impugned judgment, the respondent-assessee was not required to satisfy the demand and acted throughout that impression, therefore, there was no question of any penalty to be paid on that. Mr. Siddharth Ranka, learned counsel for the appellant rejoined and submitted that the penalty is consequential as the issue raised in this matter is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court. In case the judgment of the Tribunal is set aside and demand is revived, the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority is also liable to be restored. Learned counsel submitted that the submission of the respondent that the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Toshniwal Brothers (SR) Private Limited,

2018 (10) TMI 597 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 129 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of supply – Intermediary Services or not – pure and mere promotion and marketing services – determination of place of supply of services – Composite supply – zero rated supply – export of services or not – POPOS Rules.

Whether pure and mere promotion and marketing services will be “intermediary services” for the purposes of section 12 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for determining the place of supply of such services?

If after sale support services are also provided under a composite contract, would it then be composite supply? What will be the principal supply for such contracts?

Whether the above contracts would qualify as exports if the client is overseas entity, in terms of clause (6) of section 2 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and will be a zero-rated supply as provided in section 16 of IGST Act, 2017?

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

travelling expenses. It is also stated that for spare parts, the commission would be paid for values equal or superior to € 250 and repairs are not subject to commission.

In sub-clause 6 of Clause IV, it is seen that the consideration is payable for the services which include pre-sales, marketing, sales, installation and warranty period services and the commission payable is for the complete bundle of services.

Intermediary services – Held that:- The agreement copy provided by the applicant shows clearly that the price is negotiated by the applicant for the machinery or equipments and intimated to the overseas supplier. It is also seen that the Principal who is the overseas supplier reserves the right to conclude or reject or change the contract, but he shall inform the decisive reasons to the applicant – Even the agreement entered by the applicant with the Principal, call the applicant an agent and since he is facilitating the supply of goods between the overseas supplier

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is related to the supply of goods, as no consideration flows to the applicant without a supply being effected by the Principal and hence it is tightly bound to supply of goods to the Principal.

Export of services or not? – Held that:- The issue has to be decided on the basis of the place of supply applicable to each of the transaction. This Authority is not competent to decide on this issue of determination of place of supply and hence does not answer this question.

Ruling:- The contract of services supplied are not pure and mere promotion and marketing services and the services provided is of the nature of facilitating the supply of goods, and hence would amount to “intermediary services” for the reasons enumerated in the aforesaid paragraphs for the purposes of determination of place of supply of such services.

The after-sale services provided are not in the nature of a composite contract and they are independent from the services provided in paragraph 1 above and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ee of ₹ 5,000-00 each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act. 2. The Applicant is a Private Limited Company and is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017. The applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the following questions: a) Whether pure and mere promotion and marketing services will be intermediary services for the purposes of section 12 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for determining the place of supply of such services? b) If after sale support services are also provided under a composite contract, would it then be composite supply? What will be the principal supply for such contracts? c) Whether the above contracts would qualify as exports if the client is overseas entity, in terms of clause (6) of section 2 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and will be a zero-rated supplt as provided in section 16 of IGST Act, 2017? 3. The applicant furnishes some facts relevant to the stated activity: 3. The applicant states that he is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e goods in India. The orders for the products would be placed directly by the prospective customers on the overseas entity. The applicant is not engaged in trading of such goods, either on his own account or on the account of the overseas client. The promotion and marketing of the products included the following activities: i. Applicant would advertise the details of the goods to the prospective customers; ii. Demonstration of the products to the various prospective customers located in India; iii. Communicate and correspond about all the relevant information to the prospective customers in connection with the goods; iv. Communication to the overseas clients about comments and queries of the prospective customers; and v. Review the credit rating of the prospective customers of the overseas entity on regular basis; b. After sale support services On the basis of the order issued by the prospective customer to the overseas entity, the overseas entity supplies the products to their custome

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

placement and expected delivery dates and long term project and prospect lists; ii. Results of regular observation of marketing conditions, information in the public domain relating to the activities of competitors; and iii. Results of participation in trade fairs. 5. The assessee has submitted that intermediary means a person who arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or services or both, between two or more persons, but does not include a person who supplies such goods or services or both on his own account. In this regard, the following are to be considered: a. Services provided by the applicant to overseas entity (service recipients) is on principal-to-principal basis; b. Applicant is providing services to service recipients and not on behalf of the service recipients to any other person, say, the prospective customers in India; c. Service recipients would be dealing with Indian customers directly and the applicant is not authorised to enter into any contract or arrangement o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AAR/ST/08/2016, Application No. AAR/44/ST/15/2014) = 2016 (3) TMI 355 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS wherein the Authority had clearly demarcated the meaning of intermediary services and ruled that pure marketing and promotion services would not be intermediary services. 6. The applicant submits that in the aforesaid Advance Ruling, it is stated as under: The definition of intermediary as envisaged under Rule 2 (f) of POPS does not include a person who provides the main service on his own account. In the present case, applicant is providing main service i.e. business support services to WWD US and on his own account. Therefore, applicant is not an intermediary and the service provided by him is not intermediary service. Further, during arguments, applicant drew our attention to one of the illustration given under paragraph 5.9.6 of the Education Guide, 2012 issued by CBEC. Relevant portion is extracted as under: Similarly, persons such as call centres, who provide services to their cl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pplicant submitted that clause (30) of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017, provides the meaning of composite supply which reads as under: Composite supply means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply. In this case where after-sale support services are also provided along with the promotion and marketing services under a composite contract, it will be in the nature of composite supply because of the following reasons: (i) Two taxable supplies of services is being made under a single service agreement; (ii) There is a single price for both the services; (iii) The different elements of the services are not available separately; (iv) The different elements are integral to one overall supply – if one or more is removed, the nature of supply wou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tep in the complete process; b. After-sale support services can be given only once the product is sold; c. Customer will place order to the service recipients on the basis of promotion and marketing services provided by the applicant – it is only after the products are sold that after-sale services arises; d. The supply of the product by the overseas entity to the customer in India embeds within itself, the provision of after-sale support; e. Marketing determines the very sale of the product and as a complete offering, post-sales support is ancillary and incidental to the sale; f. The essential characteristic of the services provided by the applicant are marketing, sales promotion and brand building; co-ordination and providing all other support once the product is sold are by-products of the sale of the product; g. In terms of service agreement, promotion and marketing services is the predominant component while installation and warranty services are ancillary to such promotion and ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on is payable for the supply of goods, the person to whom the goods are delivered or made available, or to whom possession or use of the goods is given or made available; and (c) Where no consideration is payable for the supply of services, the person to whom the service is rendered, And any reference to a person to whom a supply is made shall be construed as a reference to the recipient of the supply and shall include an agent acting as such on behalf of the recipient in relation to the goods or services or both supplied. In the present case, the consideration is payable for the supply of such services and the overseas entity is liable to pay that consideration for both promotion and marketing services and after-sale support services. So the recipient of both the services will be the overseas entity, which is located outside India. 10. The applicant submits that the place of supply shall be determined as provided in section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017 because the location of the supplier

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The payment of such service would be received by the supplier of services in convertible foreign exchange; and (e) The supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8 of IGST Act, 2017. Thus the supply of said services is export of services and consequently will become a zero-rated supply as provided in section 16 of IGST Act, 2017. 12. The applicant has made additional submissions and the same are as under 12.1 The activities of the applicant are limited to functioning as an agent of the overseas principals and the applicant does not and is not engaged in the business of buying and selling of the products. In this regard, the following are important to note: (a) Majority of the customers are research institutes or R&D centres. Under the Customs Law, they are eligible for exemptions / concessions with respect to custom duties on import of goods. Accordingly, they would always directly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nstallation and warranty support) are normally undertaken as a bundle of services. The principals, i.e. overseas clients do not have any presence in India and the applicant is the sole representative in the Indian territory for the contracted products. 13.1 On the question as to why in certain cases, only marketing services are undertaken and the post-sale support services are not provided, the applicant submitted that the equipment that are manufactured by the applicant s principals and marketed by him in India are specialized equipment. Most of the equipment would need installation support. The applicant confirms in all such cases, he is the one providing the same and nevertheless, there could be certain equipment: Which donot need any installation: they are typically in the nature of plug and play; Which are installed more appropriately termed as configured remotely through computer or online networks or which requires specialized knowledge, in which cases, the same are undertaken b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e could be treated as naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business Majority of service providers in a particular area of business provide similar bundle of services The nature of the various services in a bundle of services will also help in determining whether the services are bundled in the ordinary course of business. If the nature of services in such that one of the services is the main service and the other services combined with such service are in the nature of incidental or ancillary services which help in better enjoyment of a main service Other illustrative indicators, not determinative but indicative of bundling of services in ordinary course of business are – o There is a single price or the customer pays the same amount, no matter how much of the package they actually receive or use; o The elements are normally advertised as a package; o The different elements are not available separately; o The different elements are integral to one overall supply – if one or more

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is regard, the same being specialized equipment, the spares also would have to be procured from the suppliers of equipment itself. It is in this context, that the agreement with the principals contains clauses with respect to discount that would be offered for purchase of spares from them. The applicant reiterates that the import of spares is not in connection with the marketing activities. 16. FINDINGS & DISCUSSION: 16.1 The applicant has provided a copy of the agency contract and the following are noted from the contract: (a) In clause II relating to the Duties of the Agent, in paragraph 1, the applicant is referred to as Agent – shall be act as intermediary on behalf of principal in negotiating business transactions with prospective customers in his territory, but the applicant shall not be entitled to conclude contracts on behalf of the principal. It is also seen that the applicant acting as an Agent shall take care of the interests of the principal and regularly visit the cust

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that the commission is calculated on the basis of the amount invoiced for the business transaction, free of VAT and rebates are deductible. Additional costs such as freight, cartage, packing insurance, custom duties, and all other charges and dues, costs for installation, expenses resulting from putting into operation and similar services which are essentially work and labour shall be deducted, even if they are not invoiced separately, shall also be deducted. It is also stated in the contract, where the agent orders goods from the principal at his own expense, the commission due can be deducted directly from the value of goods. Further, it is also stated that any expenses and spendings of the Agent resulting from his activities (regardless of whether they arise generally or in connection with a particular business transaction) shall be regarded as covered by commission that the Agent is entitled to, and such expenses excludes travelling expenses. It is also stated that for spare parts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ction 2 of the IGST Act, 2017 defines an intermediary as under: (13) intermediary means a broker, an agent or any other person, by whatever name called, who arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or services or both, or securities, between two or more persons, but does not include a person who supplies such goods or services or both or securities on his own account. The agreement copy provided by the applicant shows clearly that the price is negotiated by the applicant for the machinery or equipments and intimated to the overseas supplier. It is also seen that the Principal who is the overseas supplier reserves the right to conclude or reject or change the contract, but he shall inform the decisive reasons to the applicant. Also the commission payable to the applicant is tied to the amount of sales that the applicant solicits and is typically an agency transaction. Even the agreement entered by the applicant with the Principal, call the applicant an agent and since he is facilitat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e applicant to the principal and hence cannot be called as a naturally bundled services. Hence this does not amount to a composite supply and the same are treated as two supplies independent of each other and the valuation of each has to be computed as per Section 15 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. Both these independent supplies are only linked to the supply of goods from the ultimate supplier to the consumer and till that happens the transaction of after-sales supplies do not come into existence at all. But the supply of services in the form of intermediary services is related to the supply of goods, as no consideration flows to the applicant without a supply being effected by the Principal and hence it is tightly bound to supply of goods to the Principal. 16.5 The question relating to the whether the above contracts would amount to export of services has to be decided on the basis of the place of supply applicable to each of the transaction. This Authority is not competen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Compass Group (India) Support Services Private Limited

2018 (10) TMI 596 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – TMI – Application for withdrawal of Advance Ruling application – Classification of supply – Supply of cooked food and beverages to the employees of the customers within designated area (generally the cafeteria / canteen) of the client’s premises – Over the counter supply of food and beverages to the employees of clients / customers.

Held that:- The application filed by the Applicant for advance ruling is dismissed as withdrawn. – AAR No. KAR ADRG 22/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – HARISH DHARNIA AND DR. RAVI PRASAD. M.P. MEMBER ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERV

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

00/-) bearing CIN number SBIN18042900080695 dated 12.04.2018. 2. The Applicant is engaged in supply of cooked food & beverages and undertakes the following two, separate nature of transactions for its customers. a) Transaction 1 : Supply of cooked food and beverages to the employees of the customers within designated area (generally the cafeteria / canteen) of the client s premises. b) Transaction 2 : Over the counter supply of food and beverages to the employees of clients / customers, which include products which are required to have Maximum Retail Price (MRP) mentioned on the packages under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. 3. In view of the above, the Applicant has sought for Advance Ruling on the following four questions : i. Whether,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under Transaction 2 is classifiable as supply provided by eating joint / mess / canteen etc., and be exigible to GST @ 5% in the light of the Circular No.28/02/2018-GST dated 08.11.2018 and Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018. iv. Whether, over the counter supply of food & beverages (including MRP Products) by the Applicant on a stand alone basis in establishments other than educational institutions under Transaction 2 is classifiable as supply provided by eating joint/mess / canteen etc., and be exigible to GST @ 5% in the light of the Circular No.28/02/2018-GST dated 08.11.2018 and Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018. 4. The Applicant vide their letter dated 10.08.2018 requested to permit them to withdraw the advance ruling application, filed by t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =