Goods and Services Tax

Quashing tax order for violation of natural justice; fresh opportunity granted.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court quashed the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax u/s 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, citing violation of principles of natural justice. The Court relied on its coordinate Bench judgment in Mahaveer Trading Company, where it held that the self-imposed bar of alternative remedy cannot be applied in such cases, as the appeal authority

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Orders Reinstatement of GST Registration After Petitioner Resolves Non-Compliance Issue, Ensuring Business Continuity.
Case-Laws
GST
The petitioner sought restoration of its GST registration under the trade name 'Shri Salasar Balaji Steel'. The court directed the respondent authorities to confirm the petitioner's compliance with the Show Cause Notice and take necessary steps to restore its GST status without delay. As per Rule 86B of CGST/DGST Rules, a registered taxpayer cannot u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST penalty proceedings initiated by State nullifies Centre's jurisdiction on same matter.
Case-Laws
GST
Penalty proceedings under CGST Act cannot be initiated after State GST Authorities have initiated proceedings on the same subject matter. Once proceedings are initiated u/ss 73 or 74, penalty proceedings u/s 122 are deemed concluded. The impugned show cause notice purporting u/s 122 of CGST Act, after initiation of proceedings by State GST Authorities, is illegal, arbitrary, without

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Advance Ruling Application Dismissed Due to Non-compliance with GST Act Section 97(2) Clauses; Lacked Relevant Notifications.
Case-Laws
GST
The Advance Ruling Authority rejected the application made by the applicant for pronouncement of ruling as the questions raised were not covered under any of the clauses of sub-section (2) of section 97 of the GST Act. The applicant had selected clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 97 but failed to refer to any relevant notification during the h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Ride-hailing app not liable for GST on driver services despite e-commerce tag.
Case-Laws
GST
E-commerce operator definition under GST Act examined. Applicant found to be owner of digital platform facilitating supply of services, qualifying as e-commerce operator. However, driver services supplied directly to customers, not 'through' applicant's platform as required u/s 9(5). Thus, applicant not liable to collect and pay GST on driver services, despite being an e-commerce operator. Condi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Baby carriers classified as textile articles, not vehicle parts. Duty based on value: <=Rs. 1000 @ 5%, >Rs. 1000 @ 12%.
Case-Laws
GST
Baby carriers with hip seats, made of textile fabric, are classified under HSN code 6307 90 as “other made up articles” of textiles, rather than as parts or accessories of motor vehicles. This classification is based on the interpretation that such baby carriers are not integral parts of motor vehicles, similar to car covers which were held classifi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Event Catering with Venue Rental Set at 5% if Room Tariff Below Rs. 7,500; Input Tax Credit Restrictions Apply.
Case-Laws
GST
The case involves the classification of a composite supply of outdoor catering services along with renting of premises. It is held that where the applicant provides renting of premises along with the supply of food at any event, such a composite supply would attract GST at 5% with the restriction of input tax credit, subject to the condition that the room

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Interest charges on loans by HDFC Bank are exempted services for computing 80% GST threshold limit.
Case-Laws
GST
Interest charges by HDFC Bank Ltd on loans are an inward supply of exempted services for the applicant. As per Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances, where consideration is interest or discount (excluding credit card services), are exempt from GST. Since HDFC Bank is a registered person under GST, the supply of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Advisory: GSTN e-Services App to Replace e-Invoice QR Code Verifier App Shortly
GST
Dated:- 3-10-2024

GSTN is pleased to inform the launch of the new GSTN e-Services app, which replaces the old e-Invoice QR Code Verifier App. This app offers the following features:
Verify e-Invoices: Scan the QR code to verify the B2B e-Invoices QR code and check the live status of the Invoice Reference Number (IRN).
GSTIN Search: Search for GSTIN details using the GSTIN or PAN.
Return Filing

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gross and Net GST revenue collections for the month of Sep, 2024
GST
Dated:- 3-10-2024

The gross and net GST revenue collections for the month of September, 2024.
=============
Document 1Traceback (most recent call last):
File “C:\inetpub\vhosts\taxmanagementindia.com\httpdocs\python_image_text_project\google\direct_extract_text.py”, line 19, in
from google_doc_api import process_single_document
File “C:\inetpub\vhosts\taxmanagementindia.com\httpdocs\python_image_text_project\

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Delayed appeal dismissed for lack of justifiable cause; Courts bound by statutory limitation periods.
Case-Laws
GST
Appeal filed beyond limitation period without sufficient cause for condonation of delay. Extraordinary jurisdiction cannot be invoked to interfere with orders passed after proper show cause notice. Apex Court precedent establishes no power to condone delay after expiry of statutory limitation period for appeals. Petition dismissed due to lack of merits and jurisdictional c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST refund claim for March 2018 allowed due to Covid extension.
Case-Laws
GST
Refund application for unutilized Input Tax Credit for March 2018 was filed on 27.05.2020, beyond the two-year limitation period ending on 20.04.2020. However, due to exclusion of period from 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 from limitation, petitioner is entitled to benefit. Competent authority directed to reconsider refund claim by applying mind and passing appropriate order following Circular dated 05.07.2022. Peti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notice to Deceased Sole Proprietor Under GST Act Invalid; Must Address Legal Representative, Court Rules.
Case-Laws
GST
The court held that the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to a deceased sole proprietor is non-est in law. A sole proprietorship concern's identity is not distinct from the sole proprietor. Since the sole proprietor, Mr. Surender Kumar Gupta of M/s S.K. Gupta & Co., has expired, the SCN was issued to a non-existent pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Quashing summary GST order for lack of details violates natural justice.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court quashed the summary order issued under the GST Act without a detailed order, finding it a violation of principles of natural justice. The court observed that the summary order merely mentioned the order number, tax period, financial year, issues involved, description of goods, and demand details, but lacked a detailed order supporting it. Consequently, the court set aside the summary or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST registration wrongly cancelled for delay in tax payment despite lack of valid grounds.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court held that the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration with retrospective effect was improper. The show cause notice (SCN) cited non-payment of tax, interest or penalty within three months as the reason, which is not a valid ground u/s 29 of the CGST Act for cancellation. The impugned order failed to reflect any reason for cancellation and indicated no amount

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Confirms GST Exemption for Cotton Seed Oil Cake as Cattle Feed, Dismissing Purchaser Status Objections.
Case-Laws
GST
The petitioner was exempt from paying GST on the supply of cotton seed oil cake under Entry No. 102 of Notification No. 2/2017, as it qualifies as cattle feed. The pre-GST VAT regime also exempted cotton seed oil cake as cattle feed. The respondent Authority's objections, based on the Audit Party's findings that the petitioner could not prove the purchasers' s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Annuity tax dispute: When does GST liability arise for road maintenance? Court favors tax payment timeline in CBIC circular.
Case-Laws
GST
GST levy on annuity received by petitioner – dispute on timing of liability. Authorities viewed liability arising from concession period commencement date, considering annuity for road maintenance. Petitioner disagreed. CBIC circular clarified tax payable on invoice issuance or annuity receipt, whichever earlier. HC set aside orders, directing author

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Penalty Overturned Due to Authorities' Oversight on Transport Issues and Expired E-Way Bill; Appeal Sent Back for Reassessment.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court held that the issues raised by the petitioner regarding the reasons for transporting goods in a different vehicle and the expiry of the e-way bill should have been considered by the competent authorities before imposing a penalty u/s 129 of the CGST/SGST Acts. If there was no attempt to evade tax and the discrepancies were beyond th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Remands Case for Fresh Review, Clarifies Jurisdiction Despite Appeal Dismissed Due to Time Limitation.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The appeal was dismissed on the ground of time limitation. However, the Court held that if an appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay as barred by limitation, it is not considered an appeal in the eyes of law, and there would be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Upholds Rejection of ITC Claim, Emphasizes Proof of Goods Movement; Fraudulent Vehicles Found.
Case-Laws
GST
The High Court upheld the validity of the impugned order u/s 107(11) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Act, 2017. The petitioner's contention that the adjudicating authority erred by not taking action against the supplier and ignoring tax invoices and tax payments was rejected. The court held that the purchasing dealer must prove the actual physical movement of goods unle

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reversal of ITC and opting for lower GST rate resolves tax liability dispute for real estate project.
Case-Laws
GST
The Respondent opted for GST at 5% without ITC as per Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) and reversed all available ITC pertaining to the financial years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 from April 2019 onwards. The Respondent also reversed ITC availed due to delay in payments to suppliers beyond 180 days and excess ITC availed wrongly, resulting in negative credit during

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Cinema Hall Profiteered Rs. 4.65L by Not Passing GST Rate Cut; Ordered to Refund with Interest.
Case-Laws
GST
The respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on cinema tickets, realizing an additional Rs. 4,65,549 from recipients. As per Rule 133, the respondent is directed to reduce ticket prices commensurate with the tax cut, deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 4,65,549 plus 18% interest equally in central and state consumer welfare funds

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Govt restricts anti-profiteering scrutiny by CCI or Appellate Tribunal on GST benefits from Apr 2025.
Notifications
GST
The Central Government, based on recommendations from the Goods and Services Tax Council, will cease accepting requests from the Competition Commission of India or Appellate Tribunal regarding Input Tax Credit and Pricing Impact from April 1, 2025. This notification, issued u/s 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, prohibits the Authority from examining

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Govt empowers tax tribunal to assess pricing impact of ITC, tax cuts on goods/services supplied by registered entities.
Notifications
GST
Central Government empowers Principal Bench of Appellate Tribunal to assess impact of input tax credits and tax rate reductions on pricing of goods and services supplied by registered persons. This power is conferred u/s 171(2) read with Section 109(1) and second proviso to Section 109(5) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on recommendations

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exporter accidentally omitted IGST on exports, HC ordered tax authorities to refund IGST within 12 weeks.
Case-Laws
GST
The petitioner exported goods but inadvertently failed to include the IGST amount paid in Form GSTR-1 for the relevant month. The High Court directed the respondent authorities to manually process and refund the IGST paid by the petitioner on the exported goods within twelve weeks from the date of receiving the order. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
TMI U

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =