Goods and Services Tax

GST Proceedings Quashed: Procedural Lapses and Failure to Communicate Order Invalidate Administrative Action
Case-Laws
GST
HC quashed GST proceedings initiated against petitioner due to procedural irregularities in order issuance. The court found a violation of natural justice principles as the respondents failed to upload the GST DRC-07 order on the portal or communicate it to the petitioner on the date of its passing. The absence of proper communication and upload of the order rendered the proceedings invalid. The court held that it is the respondents' duty to ensure timely and proper communication of administrative orders, which was not fulfilled in this instance. Consequently, the petition was allowed, effectively nullifying the GST assessment proceedings.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Jurisdictional Defect Invalidates Tax Notice: Procedural Fairness Mandates Fresh Examination of ITC Reversal
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that the impugned notice and order were quashed due to lack of jurisdictional propriety. The respondent-Authority failed to provide adequate intimation regarding ITC reversal, and the petitioner demonstrated genuine unawareness of procedural requirements. The Court remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority to conduct a de novo examination of ITC reversal for 2017-18, directing a fresh order within twelve weeks. While the Appellate Authority had dismissed the appeal on delay grounds, the HC recognized procedural constraints and procedural fairness, effectively setting aside the original order and providing an opportunity for proper administrative review.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Manual CGST Rule 97A Refund Applications Valid Despite Electronic Filing Requirement
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that manual refund applications under CGST Rules are maintainable. The court invalidated the tax authority's rejection of a 100% EOU's input tax credit refund application solely on grounds of manual filing. Relying on Rule 97A's non-obstante clause, the court determined that manual applications are valid, and electronic filing is not the exclusive method. The impugned order dated 10.08.2022 was set aside, effectively allowing the petitioner's refund application and establishing that procedural rejection without substantive examination is impermissible.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Proceedings Require Separate Annual Orders, Court Mandates Individual Determinations for Each Financial Year from 2017 to 2024
Case-Laws
GST
HC directs second respondent to issue separate orders for each financial year in tax proceedings. The court mandates individual determinations for FY 2017-2018 through 2023-2024, finding composite orders legally improper. Petitioner is granted one month to file reply for FY 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. The court references precedent establishing requirement of distinct orders under tax regulations. Writ petition disposed of with directive for second respondent to pass appropriate separate orders in compliance with legal principles, ensuring procedural fairness and individual assessment for each financial year.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Logistics Services Classified as Rental Without Ownership Transfer Under GST Notification 11/2017 at 18% Rate
Case-Laws
GST
AAR determined that the applicant's Vehicle Leasing and Logistics Management Services do not involve transfer of vehicle ownership. The services encompass comprehensive logistics support including vehicle management, maintenance, replacement, loading/unloading, and transportation. The services are classified under HSN/SAC 997319 as residual entry for leasing or rental services of goods without operator, attracting a GST rate of 18%. The classification is based on the integrated nature of services beyond mere vehicle leasing, with tax applicability determined under Notification No. 11/2017 CT (Rate).
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Labor Contract for Housing Project Fails GST Exemption Test, Triggering 18% Tax Rate Under Notification 12/2017
Case-Laws
GST
The AAR determined that the taxpayer's labor contract service for constructing 380 flats does not qualify as a pure labor service under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. Despite being a sub-contract with a builder, the agreement involves supplying machines and materials beyond labor, rendering it ineligible for GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017. Consequently, the service falls under HSN code 9954(xii), attracting a standard GST rate of 18% as a residuary construction service category, based on a comprehensive analysis of the contractual terms and applicable tax notifications.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic Credit Ledger Restrictions: Rule 86B Limits Taxpayer's Credit Utilization for High Monthly Turnover Partnerships
Case-Laws
GST
AAR held that Rule 86B restrictions apply to the taxpayer, preventing use of electronic credit ledger beyond 99% of total tax liability. The cumulative income tax paid by the partnership firm and its partners cannot be aggregated to satisfy the exemption threshold. Since no individual partner paid more than Rs. 1 lakh in income tax during the last two financial years, the exemption under Rule 86B is not applicable. The taxpayer must discharge tax liability using electronic credit ledger up to 99% of the total tax liability for monthly turnover exceeding Rs. 50 lakh.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Free Drug Samples and Logistics Services Disqualified from Input Tax Credit Under CGST Act Section 17(5)(h)
Case-Laws
GST
AAR ruled that the applicant is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) in three key scenarios: (1) IGST paid on importing sample drugs supplied free to hospitals/clinics, (2) IGST paid by logistics service provider under Delivered Duty Paid model, and (3) CGST paid for Customs House Agent and logistics services. The ruling hinged on Section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act, which prohibits ITC for goods disposed as free samples or gifts. The sample drugs were imported for clinical trials without commercial consideration, thus categorized as free samples, rendering ITC impermissible across all associated tax payments and services.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Liability Challenge Rejected: Petitioner Must First Exhaust Administrative Appeal Mechanism Under Section 107
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition, declining to adjudicate the GST liability dispute. The court found significant discrepancies in the petitioner's self-declared turnover values across different documents and inconsistent financial reporting. Citing SC precedent, the court held that the petitioner must first exhaust the alternative statutory remedy by filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of the GST Act. The petition was disposed of without examining the substantive merits, directing the petitioner to pursue the prescribed administrative appellate mechanism.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Interest Penalty Invalidated: Electronic Cash Ledger Deposit Halts Levy Under Rule 88 B(1) of CGST Rules
Case-Laws
GST
HC quashed the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 regarding interest levy for delayed GSTR 3B return filing. The court held that interest liability ceases upon tax deposit in the electronic cash ledger, relying on precedent in a similar case. Rule 88 B(1) of C.G. & S.T. Rules, 2017 was deemed clarificatory in nature, rendering retrospective/prospective effect arguments moot. The court left open the possibility of respondent taking action for other potential penalties or non-payments. The petition was disposed of, with interest levy specifically quashed while maintaining other potential enforcement mechanisms.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Judicial Review Mandates Enhanced Communication Protocols for Efficient Legal Proceedings and Transparent Administrative Processes
Case-Laws
GST
HC adjudicated a procedural matter concerning natural justice principles, specifically addressing communication deficiencies in legal proceedings. The court mandated the Registry to implement communication protocols for efficient case processing within the CGST Department. Key directives included: deputizing two officers from CGST and CX Delhi Zone for immediate instructions, publishing email addresses of Commissionerates in cause lists, and requiring specific Commissionerate names in writ petitions. The court emphasized improved communication mechanisms to enhance legal service delivery and transparency. Petition was disposed of with procedural recommendations for future case management.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Dispute Resolved: Consolidated Show Cause Notice Upheld, Petitioner Granted Right to Challenge Order Under Section 74
Case-Laws
GST
HC adjudicated a tax dispute involving procedural irregularities in service of show cause notice (SCN). The court found that a consolidated SCN was issued across multiple financial years under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, addressing short payment and input tax credit issues. Despite no prior hearing notice to the Petitioner, the court held that the Petitioner retains the right to submit arguments and challenge the impugned order. The petition was disposed of, allowing the Petitioner procedural opportunities to present their case in subsequent proceedings.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Procedural Fairness Prevails: Rectification Order Quashed for Denying Petitioner's Right to Be Heard and Fundamental Hearing Principles
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that the rectification application was improperly processed due to violation of principles of natural justice by denying the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court set aside the original order dated 28th February, 2025 and directed that the rectification application be reconsidered after providing a proper hearing to the petitioner in accordance with established legal principles. The petition was consequently disposed of with instructions for procedural compliance.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Legal Challenge Succeeds: Notice Invalidated Due to Procedural Flaws and Violation of Natural Justice Principles
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition challenging the SCN issued beyond prescribed limitation period. The court found procedural irregularities in the notice, specifically the lack of opportunity for hearing, which violated principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority. The Petitioner was granted permission to file a reply by 15th July, 2025, with a mandatory personal hearing to be provided thereafter. The challenge to the extension of limitation through Notification 56/2023 remains pending before the Supreme Court, which influenced the HC's decision to provide procedural fairness.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Liability Payment Approved in Instalments, Authorities Directed to Review Petitioner's Financial Constraints Within 3 Weeks
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petitioner's application for GST liability payment in instalments under Section 80 of CGST Act, directing respondent authorities to consider the representation within three weeks. The court recognized the petitioner's financial constraints and mandated a reasoned decision on the instalment request, subject to interest payment under Section 50. The outstanding tax liability of Rs. 4,74,00,293.26 shall be evaluated for potential phased payment, with the petitioner required to submit a certified order copy to authorities within one week of the judgment.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Notification 56/2023 Struck Down: Limitation Period Extension Invalidated, Demand Order Nullified Under Section 168A CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
HC invalidated Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax, which extended limitation periods under Section 168A of CGST Act for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The court found the notification legally unsustainable, effectively setting aside the time limitation extension and consequently nullifying the subsequent demand order of Rs. 1,20,01,973 raised against the petitioner. The ruling emphasizes judicial scrutiny of administrative tax notifications and their compliance with statutory provisions, ultimately protecting the registered assessee's procedural rights by quashing the impugned notification.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Credit Dispute: Appellate Path Opened with Nuanced Pre-Deposit Guidelines for Challenging Ineligible Input Tax Claims
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that the demand for ineligible input tax credit used for discharging outward tax liability involves potential duplication of demands. The court relegated the petitioner to the Appellate Authority, permitting appeal filing by 15th July, 2025, with pre-deposit mandated only for specific demand paragraphs. The court directed that any existing deposits by the petitioner shall be adjusted against the required pre-deposit, effectively providing procedural relief while maintaining tax compliance requirements.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Show Cause Notice Upheld: Procedural Technicality Cannot Override Substantive Legal Communication Under Section 73
Case-Laws
GST
HC rejected the petition challenging a GST show cause notice, holding that an inadvertent misdescription in document title does not invalidate its substantive content. The court found the document clearly identifiable as a valid Section 73 notice through portal description, watermarks, and accompanying context. The ex-parte order was deemed sustainable, emphasizing that procedural errors do not negate the fundamental legal communication. The petitioner's attempt to challenge the notice based on title discrepancy was considered frivolous. Consequently, the court upheld the departmental proceedings and disposed of the petition, affirming the tax authority's right to issue notices despite minor formal inconsistencies.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Credit Challenge Dismissed: Systematic Fraud Allegations Expose Fictitious Input Tax Credit Claims Under Scrutiny
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax credit demand, finding systematic fraudulent ITC availing by the petitioner. The key supplier M/s Fortune Graphics Limited was untraceable, with its director admitting no actual goods supply occurred. While declining immediate judicial intervention, the HC permitted the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107, mandating pre-deposit by 15th July, 2025. The court noted the need for detailed factual scrutiny regarding specific entity's ITC claims, which exceeded writ jurisdiction's scope. The petition was disposed of, allowing potential appellate challenge subject to prescribed legal procedures.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Legal Challenge Succeeds: Show Cause Notice Invalidated for Violating Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness Principles
Case-Laws
GST
HC quashed the summary of show cause notice and order for procedural violations under AGST Act, 2017. The court found that issuing a summary notice without providing an opportunity of hearing constituted a breach of natural justice principles. Following precedent in a similar case, the HC set aside the impugned orders and granted authorities liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73, if deemed appropriate. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness and the requirement of proper legal process in tax determination proceedings.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HC Quashes SCN 09/2023 Due to Notice Service Flaws, Grants Petitioner Fresh Opportunity to Respond
Case-Laws
GST
HC remanded the matter concerning SCN No. 09/2023 due to procedural irregularities in notice service. The court noted that prior to 16th January 2024, show cause notices were uploaded in 'Additional Notices Tab', potentially preventing proper access. Considering the petitioner did not receive adequate opportunity to be heard, the HC directed the adjudicating authority to provide fresh notice. The petitioner was granted time until 15th July 2025 to file reply, with a mandatory personal hearing to be scheduled after submission. The original impugned order was set aside, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bank Account Attachment Order Lifted After Procedural Review of Tax Dispute Under CGST Act Section 107
Case-Laws
GST
HC adjudicated a tax dispute involving procedural challenges to bank account attachment under CGST Act. The court determined that subsequent appellate proceedings and Supreme Court's prior intervention rendered the original bank account freezing order unsustainable. Given the petitioner's utilization of statutory appellate remedies under Section 107 and the progression of underlying show cause notice proceedings, the court ruled to automatically lift the bank account attachment order dated 28th May, 2024. The petition was consequently disposed of, effectively restoring the petitioner's financial operational capacity.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods Detention Case: Conditional Release Granted with 25% Deposit, Bank Guarantee, and Personal Bond for Remaining Demand
Case-Laws
GST
HC granted relief in goods detention case, directing respondents to release detained conveyance and goods upon petitioner depositing 25% of goods value (Rs. 2,56,965) and furnishing bank guarantee for 75% (Rs. 7,70,895), along with executing a personal bond for remaining demand. The court's decision was based on petitioner's specific submissions and aligned with precedential judicial interpretation, effectively resolving the dispute by imposing conditional release mechanisms that balance statutory compliance and procedural fairness.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Ruling Clarifies Silver Transactions: Barter as Supply, Job Work Exemptions, and HSN Code Guidelines
Case-Laws
GST
The AAR ruled on multiple GST-related queries concerning silver transactions. Key holdings include: barter exchanges constitute 'supply' under GST law, even without monetary transactions. Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) does not apply to job work by unregistered individuals. HSN codes were specified for various silver materials: Silver Scrap (7112), Melted Silver Rods (7106). E-way bill requirements were clarified, exempting inter-state and intra-state (Tamilnadu) movements of silver goods under Chapter 71. Procedural queries regarding packaging, insurance values, and payment methods were deemed outside the scope of GST ruling, and thus not addressed. The ruling primarily focused on clarifying GST applicability and documentation requirements for silver-related transactions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC Claim Blocked: Advance Ruling Denied Due to Ongoing Investigation Under Section 98(2) First Proviso
Case-Laws
GST
AAR rejected the advance ruling application concerning Input Tax Credit (ITC) entitlement for commercial property leasing. The ruling determined that prior investigative proceedings precluding the advance ruling application triggered Section 98(2) first proviso. Specifically, summons issued before the ruling application and taxpayer's submission of ITC details demonstrated existing proceedings on the identical issue. The investigation's commencement, even without a show cause notice, constitutes legal proceedings that prevent subsequent advance ruling. Consequently, the application was formally rejected to safeguard potential adjudication processes and prevent procedural complications in tax assessment.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =