Goods and Services Tax

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The judgment addresses the jurisdiction and competence of the Appellate Authority u/s 107(4) of the Act of 2017 to condone delays in filing appeals against decisions or orders passed by an adjudicating authority beyond the prescribed time limit. The Court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Bengal Chemists and Druggists Association v. Kalyan Chowdhury, which interpreted a similar provision in the Companies Act, 2013. It held that the Appellate Authority cannot entertain an appeal u/s 107 if it is filed beyond four months from the date of communication of the decision or order. While the High Court has extraordinary jurisdiction to condone delays in exceptional circumstances to prevent gross injustice, the reasons provided by the petitioner were found insufficient to warrant such exercise. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed as lacking merit. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Refund claim rejected solely on non-compliance of time limit u/s 34(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Appellant authority noted facts, grounds, submissions but dismissed appeal without addressing misinterpretation of Section 34(2) raised by appellants. High Court quashed orders of authorities, remanded matter to consider refund application u/s 54 based on documents, undisputed TPL certificate, and pass order in accordance with law. Petition disposed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging refund rejection order, observing that respondent authority had passed reasoned order after considering petitioner's reply and deficiencies in refund application. Court held that petitioner ought to have availed statutory appeal remedy instead of directly approaching Court. Under Article 226, High Court's jurisdiction in certiorari is supervisory, limited to correcting errors of jurisdiction or natural justice violations, not re-appreciating evidence. Appellate forum offers wider canvas than writ jurisdiction. Petition dismissed, with liberty to pursue statutory appeal. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Violation of principles of natural justice by the respondents. Impugned order passed without giving opportunity to petitioner to reply to show cause notice. Non-receipt of documents hindered petitioner's reply. Respondents lost original documents admittedly taken from petitioner, prejudicing petitioner's rights – a serious matter requiring action. Commissioner directed to explain why disciplinary action should not be taken against him and concerned officers for losing documents. Order forwarded to CBIC, Principal Secretary, and Chief Commissioner for information and necessary action. Respondents to show cause for making false statement about not having records contradicted by Commissioner's affidavit stating documents received but lost. Matter adjourned. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The impugned circular dated 13.04.2018 does not lead to double taxation. Section 129 aims to recover tax on goods in transit where statutory compliance for removal was not met. The tax collected at detention stage is the tax payable in returns. If excess tax is paid in GSTR-3B after detention and payment u/s 129, the supplier can claim refund. The petitioner's apprehension of double taxation is misplaced, and the writ petitions are dismissed by the High Court. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that considering similar circumstances where the petitioner was granted an opportunity upon payment of 25% of the differential tax, it directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the differential tax between the tax remitted in GSTR 3B and the assessed tax within two weeks. If such tax is paid, the assessing officer shall redo the assessment after hearing the petitioner. The impugned order was set aside, and the assessing officer was directed to consider the impact of the amendment and pass fresh orders on merits in accordance with the law. The petition was disposed of. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The summary highlights a challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the petitioner's reply, violating the principles of natural justice. The court held that the respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which stated a clerical error in GSTR 3B and correct filing of GSTR 1, supported by necessary bills. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner pays 15% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – GST registration cancellation due to default in payment caused by financial crisis. Court set aside cancellation order, directing restoration of registration to enable business operations, filing returns, and remitting statutory dues as per law. Petition disposed, allowing petitioner to continue business and facilitate tax collection by the state. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The summary addresses the key issues of levy of GST on export of goods to the petitioner's Maldives office, zero-rate supplies, fixed establishment, location of recipient and supplier of services. The court held that the petitioner and respondent had fixed establishments in Addu City, Maldives, and the petitioner was re-registered there, not constituting a separate legal entity. The scope of judicial review was discussed, and the court found that the immovable property and place of supply were in Maldives, outside India. Section 13(4) of the IGST Act governs such cases where the supply, location of recipient and supplier are outside India, precluding GST levy u/ss 9 of CGST Act or 5 of IGST Act. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were directed to reimburse the GST, interest and penalty paid by the petitioner within 90 days. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Interim protection granted by High Court against coercive action based on assessment order pending challenge to notification No. 56/2023 issued u/s 73(9) of CGST Act, 2017. Court prima facie observed notification may be ultra vires Section 168A. Examination required regarding applicability of force majeure based on GST Council meeting minutes. Respondents directed to file affidavits by 19.08.2024. No coercive action permitted till next date based on impugned assessment order dated 05.05.2024. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petition dismissed by High Court regarding reversal of input tax credit. Court found it was not a case where authorities proceeded on assumption that input tax credit was wrongly availed by buyer despite existence of seller/supplier. Factual dispute raised, not jurisdictional issue or violation of natural justice principles. Petitioner granted liberty to pursue alternative remedy. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Validity of input tax credit (ITC) u/s 16 of the UP GST Act hinges on compliance with specified conditions to avoid double taxation. The burden lies on the dealer to prove fulfillment of conditions for claiming ITC. Merely producing tax invoices, e-way bills, and banking channel payments is insufficient. Proof of actual physical movement of goods, genuineness of transportation, payment of freight charges, acknowledgment of delivery, toll receipts, and filing of GSTR 2A is necessary. The Supreme Court has held that the primary burden is on the dealer to furnish details like selling dealer, vehicle number, freight payment, delivery acknowledgment, tax invoices, and payment particulars to establish actual goods movement. Submitting only invoices, e-way bills, or payment details is inadequate. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the orders denying ITC for non-compliance with statutory conditions. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The impugned order was passed ex parte without providing notice to the petitioner for the subsequent hearing date, violating principles of natural justice. Relying on a coordinate bench judgment in M/s Shubham Steel Traders Vs. State of U.P. and Another, where it was held that by not passing the order on the scheduled date and not communicating the next date, the assessing authority forced an ex-parte order, the court quashed the impugned order dated March 1, 2024, and directed the authority to grant an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of fraudulent claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) and furnishing fake GST certificate for opening a bank account. The first allegation pertained to claiming ITC of Rs. 3,65,23,076/- without the corresponding tax being deposited by the supplying firms. The court held that prosecution u/s 132 of the CGST Act for fraudulently obtaining refund requires prior sanction from the Commissioner. Regarding the second allegation of using a fake GST certificate to open a bank account with transactions of Rs. 196 crores, the court observed a lack of evidence on whether the petitioner cheated anyone. As the case is triable by a Magistrate and based on documentary evidence, keeping the petitioner in custody would serve no purpose. The petitioner was granted regular bail upon furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds of Rs. 10,00,000/- with conditions imposed by the trial court. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – GST registration cancellation does not affect taxpayer's liability or recovery of dues. Petitioner's registration cancelled retrospectively, challenged effective date. Court held cancellation valid from date petitioner stopped business operations, subject to furnishing correspondence address and KYC documents within two weeks to satisfaction of proper officer. Petition disposed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The impugned orders u/s 16(2)(c) of the CGST/DGST Act, 2017 demanding excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to non-reconciliation of information are set aside as they lack reasoning and violate principles of natural justice by not dealing with explanations submitted. The Court noticed a pattern of unreasoned orders being passed near the limitation period's expiry, merely reproducing show cause notice details without addressing taxpayer explanations. The respondent conceded the retrospective GST registration cancellation of M/s Feron Life Sciences was restored, a relevant factor for considering the petitioner's demand. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the Proper Officer for fresh consideration, examining the petitioner's reply and affording a personal hearing opportunity. The petition is disposed of by way of remand. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Cancellation of a petitioner's Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration. The Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not provide specific details of the allegations, violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner had applied for revocation of the cancellation order, stating that business activities were halted due to COVID-19 but would resume gradually. The petitioner provided property tax receipts and explained ownership of the principal place of business. The cancellation order was passed by the Proper Officer based on directions from another authority, which was impermissible. The Proper Officer was required to independently assess the reasons for cancellation. The High Court set aside the SCN, cancellation order, and appellate order, directing the respondents to restore the petitioner's GST registration forthwith. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court dismissed the appeal against the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration in Form GST REG-19 with effect from 01.05.2023, on the ground of time limitation. The Court upheld the order of the appellate authority rejecting the appeal in limine, in view of the statutory limitation prescribed under the Act. The issue was covered on merits by a previous decision of the Court, where it was held that if any Input Tax Credit has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilized until it is scrutinized and approved by a competent officer of the Department. The petition was allowed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petition challenging cancellation of GST registration dismissed on grounds of limitation. Petitioner directed to approach competent authority for restoration of GST number within seven days, subject to completion of requisite formalities, filing returns, and depositing taxes, penalty, and interest. Order based on similar previous decisions, without examining maintainability of writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy. Clarification provided that the order should not be construed as an opinion on maintainability of writ petitions in such cases. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – This legal matter concerns the attachment of two bank accounts belonging to the petitioner, a private limited company, due to personal liability imposed on its directors. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to consider and resolve the petitioner's representation dated 20-9-2023 within one month. The respondent must provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and consider the provisions of the Finance Act while disposing of the representation. No costs were awarded. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The petitioner challenged the seizure order and show cause notice (SCN) on grounds that the address provided in the invoice was not the registered place of business at the time of detention. The court examined whether there existed mens rea (guilty mind) for tax evasion. It held that the revenue failed to establish mens rea, rendering the detention process, SCN, and penalty imposition without legal basis. Consequently, the seizure, SCN, and penalty were quashed. The revenue was directed to refund the penalty paid under protest by the petitioner within eight weeks. The petition was disposed of. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Bail granted in case involving creation of fake firms and passing of fake input tax credit. Considering nature of offense, punishment, available material, lack of evidence regarding device used for creating fake firms, and co-accused with more serious role already granted bail, applicant deemed eligible for bail upon furnishing personal bond and sureties to court's satisfaction, subject to imposed conditions. Application for bail allowed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Sections 16(2)(c) and 16(2)(d) of the Assam and Central Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017, were challenged regarding the validity of punishing a purchasing dealer for the selling dealer's failure to deposit collected tax. The High Court held that the controversy is covered by the Delhi High Court's decision in On Quest Merchandising India Pvt. Ltd. case, where it was ruled that default assessment orders against purchasing dealers invoking Section 9(2)(g) of the DVAT Act for the selling dealer's default were set aside. Consequently, the impugned show cause notices and consequential orders were set aside in the present case. However, the Department can act against non-bona fide purchase transactions in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The petitioners sought transfer of unutilized input tax credit available in their ledgers as on 02.06.2014 to the AP GST regime. The court held that Section 56 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 deals with refund of excess tax collected, but is inapplicable to unutilized input tax credit, which is not excess tax paid. Consequently, the impugned demand orders in Form GST DRC-07 issued by the respondent were set aside, and the petition was allowed. The court clarified that the petitioners' only option was not to seek a refund, as Section 56 did not cover unutilized input tax credit. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petition challenged impugned order passed by respondent for assessment year 2018-19, contending violation of principles of natural justice due to non-issuance of notices. Court held petitioner may have merits as dispute pertained to difference in turnover reported in GSTR-7 and GSTR-3B. Partial relief granted by setting aside impugned order and remitting case to respondent for fresh order on merits. Impugned order quashed, treated as addendum to show cause notices. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days and deposit 20% of disputed tax from electronic cash register. Petition disposed off by way of remand. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =