Goods and Services Tax

‘God-Sent Tax’ unites India, funds security measures: Himanta on Cong’s ‘Gabbar Singh Tax’ jab
GST
Dated:- 9-5-2025
PTI
Guwahati, May 9 (PTI) Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Friday said that the GST regime, brought by the BJP-led Central government, funds the country’s security and resilience, and called it ‘God-Sent Tax’.
Sarma also dismissed Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's description of GST as ‘Gabbar Singh Tax’.
The chief minister also lauded the Indian armed forces for crushing all attempts by Pakistan to strike at multiple targets in the country.
“Rafale jets and S-400 systems don’t just appear — they are built on the strength of our taxpayers,” Sarma posted on X, referring to the French fighter jets and th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Excess Stock Discovery Under GST: Tax Assessment via Sections 73/74, Not Punitive Section 130
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that when excess stock is discovered during a survey under GST Act section 67, proceedings must be initiated under sections 73/74, not section 130. The statutory framework mandates that if a registered dealer fails to account for goods, the Proper Officer shall determine tax liability through sections 73/74. The court emphasized that GST Act is a comprehensive code, and section 130 cannot be invoked when specific provisions exist for addressing undeclared stock. The petitioner's challenge to proceedings was consequently allowed, establishing a clear legal principle that excess stock discovery triggers assessment proceedings rather than punitive actions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Development Rights Transfer Taxable Under GST: No Exemption for Pre-Completion Consideration and Upheld Recovery Mechanism
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismisses petitioner's challenge to GST notification regarding tax recovery and development agreement. The court held that transfer of development rights is amenable to GST, and the petitioner cannot claim exemption since consideration was received before completion certificate. The court found no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularities. The state's contention that construction services are liable for GST under reverse charge mechanism was upheld. The writ application was dismissed, confirming the tax liability for the financial year 2018-19 and extending the recovery time limit until 31.03.2024.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pre-Deposit Compliance Required: Petitioner Must Deposit Remaining Amount Within 30 Days Under Section 107 of CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
HC ruled that the petitioner must deposit the remaining pre-deposit amount within 30 days under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. Upon compliance, the appellate authority shall review the interim reply and supporting documents, and adjudicate the appeal on merits regarding availment of ITC. The petitioner had already deposited Rs. 2.5 crores, satisfying a substantial portion of the mandatory pre-deposit requirement. The petition was disposed of with directions for further procedural steps.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Credit Dispute Resolved: Procedural Delays Cannot Deny Legitimate Input Tax Credit Under GST Section 16(5)
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the writ petition challenging input tax credit rejection, remanding the matter to the tax authority. The court relied on a prior Division Bench judgment interpreting Section 16(5) of the GST Act, which held that taxpayers can avail tax credits despite procedural delays. The assessment order dated 30.04.2024 was set aside, directing the respondent to conduct a fresh assessment consistent with the legal interpretation of the non-obstante clause in the statutory provision.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Legal Representatives Must Be Notified Before Tax Determination Against Deceased Taxpayer Under Section 93 Liability Rules
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that a tax determination cannot be made against a deceased person. Section 93 addresses liability of legal representatives only for ongoing or discontinued businesses, but does not authorize determination against a deceased individual. Issuance of show cause notice (SCN) must be made to legal representatives, and determination must occur after seeking their response. The present case's determination, which was made against the deceased without notifying legal representatives, was deemed invalid and the petition was consequently allowed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Registration Process Streamlined: Standardized Verification, 7-Day Approval, Balanced Approach to Preventing Fraud
Circulars
GST – States
The GoI's GST Policy Wing issued comprehensive instructions for processing GST registration applications to standardize verification procedures. Key directives include: (1) Officers must strictly adhere to prescribed document lists in FORM GST REG-01, (2) Avoid seeking additional documents beyond the specified list, (3) Complete applications must be approved within 7 working days, (4) Risky applications require physical verification within 30 days, and (5) Officers must obtain senior management approval before requesting documents beyond the standard requirements. The guidelines aim to balance preventing fraudulent registrations while facilitating genuine business registrations through a streamlined, transparent process.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Authorities Instructed to Withdraw Appeals When Full Tax Paid Under Section 73, Preserving Taxpayer Relief Benefits
Circulars
GST – States
In cases where tax has been fully paid under Section 73 of CGST Act, and departmental appeals are solely related to interest or penalty calculations, the tax authority may withdraw such appeals. The instruction clarifies that taxpayers remain eligible for Section 128A benefits even if the department has initiated appellate proceedings, provided all other statutory conditions are met. The primary objective is to reduce litigation and prevent denial of relief based on technical grounds, ensuring taxpayers can avail waiver provisions for interest and penalty pertaining to Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST fraud: ED raids in Jharkhand, West Bengal
GST
Dated:- 8-5-2025
PTI
New Delhi, May 8 (PTI) The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday conducted searches in Jharkhand and West Bengal as part of a money laundering investigation linked to generation of “fraudulent” GST invoices, official sources said.
At least nine locations in Ranchi, Jamshedpur and Kolkata are being raided.
The ED suspects that the accused Shiv Kumar Deora, Sumit Gupta and Amit Gupta allegedly generated fake invoice

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic Filing Deemed Valid: Procedural Flexibility Upheld, Certified Copy Delay Does Not Invalidate Submission Under CGST Rule 108(3)
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the appeal, finding the filing procedurally valid despite delay in certified copy submission. The court determined that online filing with electronic documents constitutes complete submission, and physical certification is not mandatory. Relying on precedent from Chegg India Private Limited, the HC held that technological advancements in filing systems should be interpreted liberally. The subsequent amendment to Rule 108(3) of CGST Rules, 2017 supports retrospective application, thereby validating the appellant's original submission. The court emphasized that technical procedural requirements should not impede substantive hearing of appeals on merits.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Challenge Dismissed: Statutory Notice Upheld, Procedural Fairness Confirmed Under Section 107 of CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the petition challenging tax proceedings, finding no violation of natural justice. The petitioner received hearing notice but failed to appear, and the court clarified that statutory provisions do not mandate exactly three hearings. The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act to the Appellate Authority, effectively upholding the department's procedural actions and rejecting claims of improper notice or hearing.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Levy on Leasehold Rights Transfer: Interim Order Suspends Adjudication, Maintains Status Quo Under Section 54
Case-Laws
GST
HC determined the GST levy on assignment of leasehold rights for an industrial plot and constructed buildings through third-party transfer. The court stayed the adjudication order issued against the petitioner, following a precedent in a similar case involving another corporate entity. The interim order effectively suspends the impugned order dated 28th February 2025, maintaining the status quo pending further judicial review of the GST assessment and procedural compliance.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Notice Nullified: Procedural Flaws Invalidate Show Cause Notice, Demanding Fair Hearing and Proper Service
Case-Laws
GST
HC set aside the tax notice (N/N. 56/2023) due to procedural irregularities in service of Show Cause Notice (SCN). The court found fundamental violations of natural justice, as the SCN was undated and not properly received by the Petitioner. Following precedential rulings in similar tax dispute cases, the court remanded the matter back to the tax authorities, directing them to provide a fair opportunity for the Petitioner to file a reply and receive a personal hearing. The decision mandates a de novo review of the case, ensuring the Petitioner can present their submissions on merits before any final determination.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Compensation Cess Calculation for Motor Vehicles Clarified: Ground Clearance Measurement in Laden Condition Determines 20% Tax Rate
Case-Laws
GST
HC ruled that Notification No. 3/2023-CC (Rate) dated 26th July, 2023 is prospective, not retrospective. Ground clearance for motor vehicles' Compensation Cess calculation must be measured in laden condition for the period September 2017 to July 2022. Petitioners are liable to pay Compensation Cess at 20% rate during this period, invalidating the 22% levy. The Board's clarification, based on GST Council recommendation, was deemed binding, resulting in the petition being allowed with modified Cess calculation.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Strikes Down GST Rule 86A Order, Restores Electronic Credit Ledger Access for Taxpayer Without Proper Procedural Justification
Case-Laws
GST
The HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order blocking the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under Rule 86A of CGST Rules. The court found the order legally unsustainable due to absence of pre-decisional hearing and lack of independent, cogent reasons for blocking the ECL. The respondents' reliance on borrowed satisfaction from enforcement authorities was deemed impermissible. The order's failure to provide substantive reasons for blocking the ECL, coupled with procedural irregularities, necessitated its quashing, thereby restoring the petitioner's access to the electronic credit ledger.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amnesty Scheme Under Section 128(A) Provides Relief for Tax Arrears, Ensures Fair Reconsideration of Undisputed Dues
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter back to the 3rd respondent for reconsideration. The court recognized the applicability of the Amnesty Scheme under Section 128(A) of CGST Act for tax years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. The decision emphasized that undisputed tax arrears cannot be demanded arbitrarily when express legal provisions exist under Section 75(12) of GST Acts. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to avail the benefits of the Amnesty Scheme, with directions to reconsider the matter in accordance with established legal principles.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Strikes Down Rule 86A Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger, Mandates Immediate Unblocking and Fair Hearing Process
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition challenging Rule 86A blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL), finding the order invalid due to lack of pre-decisional hearing and absence of independent, cogent reasons. The court held that reliance on borrowed satisfaction from enforcement reports without providing specific grounds constitutes an arbitrary action. Respondents were directed to immediately unblock the petitioner's ECL, enabling the petitioner to file returns, thus upholding principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in tax administration.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Corporate Merger Voids Show Cause Notice: Authority Must Reissue Proceedings Against Correct Amalgamated Legal Entity
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that the respondent authority's issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) to a non-existent company post-amalgamation was procedurally flawed. Despite initial claims of unawareness, the respondent's counsel acknowledged knowledge of the amalgamation. The court set aside the impugned order and granted liberty to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings against the resultant entity in compliance with legal protocols, effectively nullifying the previous SCN and providing an opportunity for procedural rectification.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Credits Restored: Section 16 Amendments Allow Retrospective Claims for Delayed Returns Filed Between June 2018-March 2019
Case-Laws
GST
HC ruled that pursuant to clause (5) of Section 16 inserted by Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 and the circular dated 15.10.2024, the respondents' orders are set aside. The court directed respondents to permit petitioner's input tax credits for delayed returns filed during June 2018 to March 2019, effectively allowing retrospective tax credit claims despite initial administrative rejection. The judicial intervention ensures compliance with recent statutory amendments and provides relief to the taxpayer by mandating administrative reconsideration of previously denied input tax credit claims.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appellate Rights Upheld: Statutory Deposit Prerequisite for GST Tribunal Appeal Under Section 112(9)
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the appeal with a procedural directive regarding statutory stay under Section 112(9) of the Act of 2017. The court determined that upon the appointment of the President or State President of the Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, the petitioner may file an appeal after statutory deposit. The authority is mandated to adjudicate the appeal strictly in accordance with law, with the statutory stay remaining operative until appeal resolution. The court's order effectively preserves the petitioner's appellate rights while maintaining procedural compliance with indirect tax regulations.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC Refund Allowed: Section 54(3)(ii) Enables Full Credit Recovery for Identical Input and Output Supplies
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that Section 54(3)(ii) of CGST Act permits refund of Input Tax Credit (ITC) where input and output supplies are identical, rejecting restrictive interpretations in Circular No. 135/05/2020-GST. The court found the respondent's orders erroneously relied on inapplicable circular provisions and improperly rejected refund claims. Consequently, the HC quashed the impugned orders, directing the respondent to refund the accumulated ITC with applicable interest within a specified timeframe, thereby affirming taxpayer's statutory entitlement to ITC refund under the inverted duty structure provisions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Zero-Rated Supplies Beyond Customs Frontiers Validated Under IGST Act Section 16, Ensuring Tax Neutrality and Refund Processing
Case-Laws
GST
HC determined that supplies by petitioner outside customs frontiers qualify as zero-rated under Section 16 of IGST Act, rendering the transaction GST-exempt. The court found the tax treatment revenue neutral, particularly for the period before 01.04.2021, and declined revenue's challenge. The third-party refund application must be processed within four weeks, including applicable interest, effectively disposing of the appeal without substantial monetary implications for either party.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Notice Invalidated: Improper Service Violates Natural Justice, Requires Fresh Adjudication Under Procedural Guidelines
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that the SCN was improperly served by uploading it to the Additional notices tab, violating principles of natural justice. Following precedent, the SCN was set aside. The Adjudicating Authority must reissue the SCN and pass a fresh adjudication order, which remains subject to potential Supreme Court review of the underlying notification. The demand order dated 27th December 2023 was consequently nullified due to procedural irregularities in SCN service, effectively rendering the original tax demand invalid.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Taxpayers Win: Rule 86A Limits on Input Tax Credit Ledger Automatically Expire After One Year
Case-Laws
GST
HC ruled that blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) ledger beyond one year under Rule 86A of CGST Rules, 2017, must be lifted. The statutory interpretation of Rule 86A(3) mandates automatic removal of credit restrictions after the specified time period. The court's decision explicitly notes that lifting the ITC block is independent of any concurrent administrative or legal proceedings against the taxpayer. The restriction is therefore automatically terminated after the one-year period, providing relief to the petitioner while preserving the authority's right to pursue separate investigative actions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Audit Compliance Mandate: GST Authorities Must Swiftly Provide Records to C&AG for Comprehensive Financial Scrutiny Under Article 149
Circulars
GST
The CBIC issued Instruction No. 05/2025-GST addressing timely production of records for audit, referencing C&AG Audit Report 7 of 2024. Invoking Article 149 of the Constitution, the instruction mandates field formations to expeditiously provide records and information to C&AG audit teams. Tax authorities must sensitize officers to promptly submit required documentation, including requesting taxpayers to furnish necessary documents when records are unavailable. The directive aims to facilitate comprehensive statutory audit processes by ensuring complete and timely access to relevant financial and tax-related records across government tax formations.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =