Goods and Services Tax

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – GST levy on annuity received by petitioner – dispute on timing of liability. Authorities viewed liability arising from concession period commencement date, considering annuity for road maintenance. Petitioner disagreed. CBIC circular clarified tax payable on invoice issuance or annuity receipt, whichever earlier. HC set aside orders, directing authorities to collect tax per CBIC circular. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court held that the issues raised by the petitioner regarding the reasons for transporting goods in a different vehicle and the expiry of the e-way bill should have been considered by the competent authorities before imposing a penalty u/s 129 of the CGST/SGST Acts. If there was no attempt to evade tax and the discrepancies were beyond the petitioner's control, this should have been considered by the original and Appellate Authorities. Although the petitioner may be justified in challenging the Appellate Authority's order due to the non-constitution of the Tribunal u/s 112, the High Court may not entertain the challenge in a writ petition under Article 226 since adjudication involves disputed questions of fact. The appeal filed by the petitioner is restored to the Appellate Authority, who shall pass fresh orders after affording a further opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The order is quashed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The appeal was dismissed on the ground of time limitation. However, the Court held that if an appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay as barred by limitation, it is not considered an appeal in the eyes of law, and there would be no merger of the original order into the order of the Appellate Authority. Therefore, the High Court can exercise its jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The mere dismissal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority on the ground of limitation does not preclude the High Court from exercising its jurisdiction. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court upheld the validity of the impugned order u/s 107(11) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Act, 2017. The petitioner's contention that the adjudicating authority erred by not taking action against the supplier and ignoring tax invoices and tax payments was rejected. The court held that the purchasing dealer must prove the actual physical movement of goods unless purchased from respective dealers. Failure to establish this aspect justifies rejection of Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims by the assessing officer, as per the Supreme Court's judgment in The State of Karnataka v. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited. Although the petitioner produced documents showing the supplier's existence and business continuity, the vehicles transporting the goods were not traced and appeared fraudulent. Section 16(2)(c)(d) was applicable, and the burden of proving ITC eligibility lies on the purchaser u/s 155. The revenue can recover tax from the purchaser if the supplier failed to pay. The appellate authority rightly confirmed the order rejecting the petitioner's ITC claim. The High Court found no malice, arbitrariness, or illegality in the order and dismissed the writ petition. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The Respondent opted for GST at 5% without ITC as per Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) and reversed all available ITC pertaining to the financial years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 from April 2019 onwards. The Respondent also reversed ITC availed due to delay in payments to suppliers beyond 180 days and excess ITC availed wrongly, resulting in negative credit during the post-GST period. The Respondent did not retain any ITC related to the 'Ireo Waterfront' project and reversed all ineligible ITC. Post-GST, no additional ITC benefit accrued to the Respondent for the 'Ireo Waterfront' project. Consequently, the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 are not attracted, and the proceedings were dropped. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on cinema tickets, realizing an additional Rs. 4,65,549 from recipients. As per Rule 133, the respondent is directed to reduce ticket prices commensurate with the tax cut, deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 4,65,549 plus 18% interest equally in central and state consumer welfare funds within 3 months. The respondent violated Section 171(1) by denying rate cut benefit, but penalty u/s 171(3A) cannot be imposed retrospectively. The jurisdictional GST commissioners are directed to monitor compliance and report to the commission within 4 months. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notifications – GST – Highlights – The Central Government, based on recommendations from the Goods and Services Tax Council, will cease accepting requests from the Competition Commission of India or Appellate Tribunal regarding Input Tax Credit and Pricing Impact from April 1, 2025. This notification, issued u/s 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, prohibits the Authority from examining whether input tax credits availed or tax rate reductions have resulted in commensurate price reductions for goods or services supplied by registered persons. The notification takes effect upon publication in the Official Gazette. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notifications – GST – Highlights – Central Government empowers Principal Bench of Appellate Tribunal to assess impact of input tax credits and tax rate reductions on pricing of goods and services supplied by registered persons. This power is conferred u/s 171(2) read with Section 109(1) and second proviso to Section 109(5) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, on recommendations of GST Council. Notification comes into force from 1st October 2024. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The petitioner exported goods but inadvertently failed to include the IGST amount paid in Form GSTR-1 for the relevant month. The High Court directed the respondent authorities to manually process and refund the IGST paid by the petitioner on the exported goods within twelve weeks from the date of receiving the order. The petition was disposed of accordingly. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court held that the appellate authority erred in enhancing the tax liability payable by the appellant/assessee in an appeal filed by the assessee without following the mandatory procedure u/s 107(11) of the Act. The assessing officer had quantified the tax liability at Rs.2,58,536.80, but imposed penalty on Rs.41,83,804.72. The appellate authority was required to consider the correctness of the tax liability fixed by the assessing officer and the penalty levied, but instead enhanced the tax liability without adhering to the statutory procedure. Consequently, the orders of both the appellate authority and assessing officer were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after following due process. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – GST registration of petitioner cancelled by respondent for alleged violation of Rule 86B of CGST Rules, 2017 without providing details, particulars or conducting necessary enquiry. Impugned order deserves to be quashed and direction issued to reinstate/restore GST registration, reserving liberty for respondent to take necessary action in accordance with law. Dismissal of petitioner's appeal by Appellate Authority as barred by limitation does not preclude HC from entertaining petition under Article 226, as appeal dismissed summarily without merging with Appellate Authority order. Petition allowed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Order of cancellation of registration passed without providing opportunity of hearing or assigning reasons, appeals dismissed on limitation ground. Coordinate Bench held procedural aspects should be scrutinized diligently, unnecessary to give chance for complaint. Appellate Authority dismissed appeals, revisional power u/s 108 cannot be exercised. Impugned orders quashed, matter remanded to Assessing Officer at show-cause notice stage. Registration to remain suspended till disposal of show-cause notice. Petition partly allowed by way of remand. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court directed respondents to expeditiously establish the GST Appellate Tribunal in Kerala as per Section 112 of the CGST Act 2017. While noting steps were underway, it ordered completion of the entire selection process within four months. The Court declined to rectify Section 169 by replacing “or” with “and” to mandate service through minimum three modes, stating individual grievances must be raised through separate litigation. The writ petition was disposed of. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Show Cause Notice u/s 74 of CGST Act lacks jurisdiction as it fails to establish fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts by petitioner in availing Input Tax Credit. Proceedings dropped earlier u/s 73 cannot be reopened u/s 74 without fulfilling prerequisites. High Court maintains consistent view that writ petition against jurisdictionally deficient Show Cause Notice is maintainable. Impugned Show Cause Notice quashed for want of basic ingredients required to initiate action u/s 74, rendering entire exercise without jurisdiction. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petition maintainable – violation of Section 75(4) of UPGST Act – denial of opportunity of personal hearing – violation of principles of natural justice. Opportunity of personal hearing must be provided before assessment/adjudication order against assessee. Neither adjudicating authority issued notice for personal hearing nor granted opportunity to petitioner. Before adverse order in adjudication, personal hearing must be offered to noticee. If waived, authority may proceed ex-parte. Inordinate delay of five years in passing impugned order violates natural justice. Impugned order passed in gross violation of natural justice – unsustainable, petition allowed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court held that Section 129(5) of the State Act, which stipulates that upon payment of the entire amount pursuant to a notice u/s 129(3), all proceedings related to that notice shall be deemed concluded, applies only when the entire amount stated in the show cause notice is paid. However, it does not preclude the right to file an appeal against the order passed u/s 129(3) within the stipulated time. The Court opined that the petitioners' right to file appeals against the orders dated 19.10.2023 and 12.09.2023 cannot be taken away merely because they paid the demanded amount. The Court held that due to the respondent authorities' fault, the petitioners were unable to file appeals against those orders, and the petition was disposed of accordingly. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Remand order issued in case concerning refund of accumulated input tax credit (ITC) for zero-rated supply due to mismatch in ITC as per GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B. Adjudicating authority faulted for not examining reconciliation statement and passing refund order without sufficient discussion. Appellate authority also failed to address reconciliation issue as required u/s 107(11) of CGST Act. Matter remanded to appellate authority for fresh consideration by setting aside impugned order. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The court held that the parameters for entertaining the writ petition were not satisfied, and the petitioners had an adequate, alternative, and efficacious remedy available u/s 107 of the Assam GST Act, 2017. The court was not inclined to entertain the writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 12.08.2024, as an alternative remedy was available. However, the petitioners were at liberty to file an appeal u/s 107 of the AGST Act, 2017. Regarding the pre-deposit of 10% of the tax amount required u/s 107(6)(b) for filing an appeal, the court directed the Appellate Authority to permit the filing and entertaining of the appeal(s) without any pre-deposit, subject to the frozen accounts mentioned in the Show Cause Notice dated 09.04.2024 having deposits equivalent or more than the required amount. The petition was disposed of accordingly. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The court held that the respondent authority cannot adjudicate a demand for reversal of input tax credit (ITC) on non-business transactions and exempt supplies, when the same issue is already subject to separate proceedings initiated by the Director General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). As the period covered under the impugned order overlaps with the show cause notice issued by the DGGI, both proceedings cannot continue simultaneously. Consequently, the impugned demand for reversal of ITC was set aside, and the petition was allowed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's refund applications filed u/s 54 of the Central/Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act within one month. If the respondents intend to reject the applications, they must provide reasons and afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard before passing an order. The petition was disposed of based on the respondents' statement to comply with the court's directions. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods and Services Tax – GST Dated:- 30-9-2024 – News – Please refer to the advisory issued on 24th September, 2024 regarding the archival of return data from the Common Portal after seven years. This data was archived in line with data archival policy. Data archival process was implemented on a monthly basis. Consequently, the return data for July, 2017 and August, 2017 was archived on 01st August and on 01st September respectively. However, in view of the requests received from the trade du

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods and Services Tax – GST Dated:- 30-9-2024 – News – Advisory for Biometric-Based Aadhaar Authentication and Document Verification for GST Registration Applicants of Odisha Dated:- 30-9-2024 – Dear Taxpayers, This is to inform taxpayers about recent developments concerning the application process for GST registration. It is advised to keep the following key points in mind during the registration process. 1. Rule 8 of the CGST Rules, 2017 has been amended to provide that an applicant can be identified on the common portal, based on data analysis and risk parameters for Biometric-based Aadhaar Authentication and taking a photograph of the applicant along with the verification of the original copy of the documents uploaded with the appli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e/he can proceed with the application as per the existing process. 5. However, if the applicant receives the link as mentioned in point 3(b), she/he will be required to book the appointment to visit the designated GSK, using the link provided in the e-mail. 6. The feature of booking an appointment to visit a designated GSK is now available for the applicants of Odisha. 7. After booking the appointment, the applicant gets the confirmation of appointment through e-mail (the appointment confirmation e-mail), she/he will be able to visit the designated GSK as per the chosen schedule. 8. At the time of the visit of GSK, the applicant is required to carry the following details/documents (a) a copy (hard/soft) of the appointment confirmation e-mai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notifications – GST – Highlights – This notification brings into force various provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024. On the date of publication, sections 118, 142, 148, and 150 come into effect. Sections 114 to 117, 119 to 141, 143 to 147, 149, and 151 to 157 come into force on November 1, 2024. The notification is issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs under the Ministry of Finance, exercising powers conferred by the Finance Act. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Bail granted – creation of fake firms, availing and utilizing ITC – offences u/ss 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(5) of CGST Act, 2017 – allegations based on witness statements, no documentary evidence adduced – petitioner languishing in jail since 25.06.2024 – trial unlikely to conclude soon – no apprehension of tampering evidence or flight risk – bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of like amount and conditions. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The petitioner's application for GST refund, filed on 08.09.2020, was within the two-year limitation period prescribed u/s 54 of the CGST Act, 2017. The respondents initially treated this application as timely but later rejected a subsequent application dated 28.03.2020 as time-barred, despite it being a continuation of the original timely filed application. The respondents failed to justify their contradictory stance and provide cogent reasons for rejecting the claim. Their evasive objections and failure to address the original timely filed application led the Court to draw an adverse inference. Consequently, the deficiency memo issued by the Assistant Commissioner rejecting the refund claim was quashed, and the petition was allowed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =