Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of Goods and Services

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of Goods and Services
035 Dated:- 11-6-2001 Circular
FEMA
Superseded vide A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 20 dated 16-01-2026 w.e.f. 01-10-2026

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of Goods and Services

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT

CENTRAL OFFICE

MUMBAI – 400 001

A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 35

June 11, 2001

To

All Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange

Dear Sirs

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of Goods and Services

Attention of authorised dealers is invited to paragraph C.10 of the Annexure to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.12 dated September 9, 2000, in terms of which authorised dealers have been

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed to realise and repatriate the full export value of goods or software to India within twelve months from the date of export. However, as regards follow up of outstanding export proceeds, authorised dealers should send a statement in Form XOS containing the details of all export bills outstanding beyond six months from the date of shipment irrespective of the location of the exporter/unit. In case of units located in Special Economic Zones (SEZs), authorised dealers should indicate “SEZ” in the remarks column of XOSstatement.

3. Authorised dealers may being the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents concerned.

4. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under Section 10(4) and Section 11(1) of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Export of goods and services against repayment of State credit granted by erstwhile Soviet Union

Export of goods and services against repayment of State credit granted by erstwhile Soviet Union
033 Dated:- 10-5-2001 Circular
FEMA
Export of goods and services against repayment of State credit granted by erstwhile Soviet Union
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT
CENTRAL OFFICE
MUMBAI 400 001
A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No.33
May 10, 2001
To
All Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange
Dear Sirs
Export of goods and services against repayment of State credit granted by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of goods and services -Forwarder’s Cargo Receipt

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of goods and services -Forwarder’s Cargo Receipt
027 Dated:- 2-3-2001 Circular
FEMA
Superseded vide A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 20 dated 16-01-2026 w.e.f. 01-10-2026

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of goods and services -Forwarder's Cargo Receipt

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT

CENTRAL OFFICE

MUMBAI 400 001

A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No.27

March 2, 2001

To

All Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange

Dear Sirs,

Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Export of goods and services -Forwarder's Cargo Receipt

Attention of authorised dealers is invited to paragraph B.5 of the annexure to A.P. (DIR Series)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Export of Goods and Services

Export of Goods and Services
036/2001 Dated:- 27-2-2001 Foreign Exchange Management
FEMA
Foreign Exchange Management Act
FEMA
Export of Goods and Services
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
(EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT)
CENTRAL OFFICE
MUMBAI 400 001
Notification No. FEMA 36 /2001-RB. Dated February 27, 2001
Published in the Official Gazette of Government of India – Extraordinary – Part-II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i) dated 21.03.2001 – G.S.R. No.199(E)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (3) of Section, 7, sub-section (2) of Section 47 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and in partial modification of its Notification No. FEMA 23/2000-RB dated 3rd May 2000, Reserve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ted, namely:-
'(ia) goods listed at items (1), (2) and (3) of clause (i) to be re-exported by units in Special Economic Zones, under intimation to the Development Commissioner of Special Economic Zones / concerned Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Customs,'
(c) after clause (j), the following clauses shall be inserted, namely:-
'(k) goods sent outside India for testing subject to re-import into India;
(l) defective goods sent outside India for repair and re-import provided the foods are accompanied by a certificate from an authorised dealer in India that the export is for repair and re-import and that the export does not involve any transaction in foreign exchange.
(m) exports permitted by the Reserve Bank, on applicatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

egulation (I) as so numbered, the following sub-regulation shall be inserted, namely:-
'(2) (a) Where the export of goods or software has been made by a unit situated in a Special Economic Zone, then notwithstanding anything contained in sub-regulation (I), the amount representing the full export value of goods or software shall be realised and repatriated to India within twelve months from the date of export.
Provided that the Reserve Bank may for a sufficient and reasonable cause shown, extend the said period of twelve months.
(b) The Reserve Bank may for reasonable and sufficient cause direct that the unit shall cease to be governed by sub-regulation (2);
Provided that no such direction shall be given unless the unit has been given a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 – Export of Goods and Services

Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 – Export of Goods and Services
012 Dated:- 9-9-2000 Circular
FEMA
Superseded vide A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 20 dated 16-01-2026 w.e.f. 01-10-2026

Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 – Export of Goods and Services

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT

CENTRAL OFFICE

MUMBAI-400 001

A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.12

September 9, 2000

To

All Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange

Dear Sirs,

Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 – Export of Goods and Services

Attention of authorised dealers is invited to the Notification No. FEMA 23/ 2000-RB dated 3^rd May, 2000, issued by Reserve Bank in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1), sub-section (3) of Section 7 and sub-section (2) of Section 47 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999), under which the “Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2000” have been made. Syno

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

serve Bank.

4. In terms of Regulation 4 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Guarantees) Regulations, 2000, notified vide Reserve Bank Notification No FEMA 8/2000-RB dated 3^rd May 2000, authorised dealers have been permitted to issue guarantees on behalf of exporter clients on account of exports out of India.

5. Export of goods and services against repayment of state credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union will continue to be governed by the extant directions issued by Reserve Bank, as amended from time to time. Further, Reserve Bank will continue to consider as hitherto, counter trade proposals from Indian exporters with Romania involving adjustment of value of exports from India against value of imports made into India in terms of a voluntarily entered arrangement between the concerned parties.

6. It is further clarified that the Directions contained in the Annexureshould be read with the Regulations notified by the Reserve Bank vide its Notification No. FEMA 23/2000 -RB d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

'. These Regulations have been notified vide Notification No. FEMA 23 /2000-RB dated 3^rd May, 2000.

(ii) Any reference to Reserve Bank should be made to the office of Exchange Control Department within whose jurisdiction the applicant person, firm or company resides or functions unless otherwise indicated. If for any particular reason, a firm or company desires to deal with a different office of the Exchange Control Department, it may approach the office within whose jurisdiction it functions for necessary approval.

A.2 Exemptions from Declarations

(i) The requirement of declaration of export of goods and software in the prescribed form will not apply to the cases indicated in Regulation No. 4 ibid. The requirement of declaration also shall not apply to goods sent for testing abroad, subject to re-import.

(ii) Gift of goods exceeding rupees one lakh in value require approval of the Reserve Bank.

(iii) Export of goods not involving any foreign exchange transaction di

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a.

(c) Payment out of funds held in the FCNR / NRE account maintained by the buyer.

(d) Through International Credit Cards. When payment, in respect of goods sold to overseas buyers during their visits is received in this manner the GR/SDF (duplicate) should be released by the authorised dealers only on receipt of funds in their Nostro account or on production of a certificate by the exporter from the Credit Card servicing bank in India to the effect that it has received the equivalent amount in foreign exchange, if the authorised dealer concerned is not the Credit Card servicing bank.

A.5 Guarantees against Exports

Prior approval of Reserve Bank should be obtained by authorised dealers for issue of guarantees in respect of caution-listed exporters.

A.6 (i) Foreign Currency Accounts

Reserve Bank may consider applications in form EFC from exporters having good track record for opening foreign currency accounts with banks subject to certain terms and conditions. Applica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai 400 001, through their authorised dealer.

A.7 Counter-trade Arrangement

(i) Counter trade proposals involving adjustment of value of goods imported into India against value of goods exported from India in terms of an arrangement voluntarily entered into between the Indian party and the overseas party through an Escrow Account opened in India in U.S. dollar will be considered by the Reserve Bank. All imports and exports under the arrangement should be at international prices in conformity with the Exim Policy and Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. No interest will be payable on balances standing to the credit of the Escrow Account but the funds temporarily rendered surplus may be held in a short-term deposit up to a total period of three months in a year (i.e. in a block of 12 months) and the banks may pay interest at the applicable rate. No fund based / or non-fund based facilities would

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ign Currency Account by a person resident in India) Regulations, 2000 notified under Notification No. FEMA 10/ 2000-RB dated 3^rd May, 2000 for opening temporary foreign currency account abroad. Exporters may deposit the foreign exchange obtained, by sale of goods, at the internationalexhibition/trade fair and operate the account during their stay outside India provided that the balance in the account is repatriated to India within a period of one month from the date of closure of the exhibition/trade fair and full details are submitted to the concerned authorised dealer.

(ii) Firms/Companies and other organisations participating in Trade Fair/ Exhibition abroad should obtain approval on GR Form from the concerned office of Reserve Bank for export of exhibits and other items for display-cum-sale in the trade fair/exhibition. On closure of the fair/exhibition, they should re-import the exhibits or repatriate the value of goods sold within one month of the closure of the fair/ exhibit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rom the date of export and the balance amount within a maximum period of two years from the date of export are not treated as deferred payment exports, provided the exporter does not require/avail of any funded or non-funded facility/ies for such exports from authorised dealers.

A.11 Export on Elongated Credit Terms

Exporters intending to export goods on elongated credit terms may submit their proposals giving full particulars through their banks to the concerned Regional Office of Reserve Bank for consideration.

A.12 Forfaiting

Export-Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) and authorised dealers have been permitted to undertake forfaiting, for financing of export receivables. It would be in order for authorised dealers to allow remittance of commitment fee/ service charges, etc. payable by the exporter as approved by the Exim Bank/ the concerned authorised dealer. Such remittance may be permitted in advance in one lumpsum or at monthly intervals as approved by the concerned agen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d. After examination of the goods and certifying the quantity passed for shipment on the duplicate copy, Customs will return it to the exporter for submission to the authorised dealer for negotiation or collection of export bills.

(b) Within twenty one days from the date of export, exporter should lodge the duplicate copy together with relative shipping documents and an extra copy of the invoice with the authorised dealer named in the GR form. After the documents have been negotiated/sent for collection, the authorised dealer should report the transaction to Reserve Bank in statement ENC under cover of appropriate R-Supplementary Return. The duplicate copy of the form together with a copy of invoice will be retained by the authorised dealer till full export proceeds have been realised and thereafter submitted to Reserve Bank duly certified under cover of appropriate R-Supplementary Return.

NOTE: (i) In the case of exports made under deferred credit arrangement or to joint venture

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ended for being submitted to the authorised dealer within 21 days from the date of export. The authorised dealer should accept the Exchange Control (EC) copy of the shipping bill and form SDF appended thereto, submitted by the exporter for collection/ negotiation of Shipping documents. The manner of disposal of EC copy of shipping Bill (and form SDF appended thereto) is same as that for GR forms.

(d) In cases where ECGC initially settles the claims of exporters in respect of exports insured with them and subsequently receives the export proceeds from the buyer/buyer's country through the efforts made by them, the share of exporters in the amount so received is disbursed through the bank which had handled the shipping documents. In such cases, ECGC will issue a certificate to the bank which had handled the relevant shipping documents after full proceeds have been received. The certificate will indicate the number of declaration form, name of the exporter, name of the authorised d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ealer for countersignature. Authorised dealer will countersign the forms in accordance with directions in paragraph B.2 and return the original copy to the exporter, who should submit the form to the post office with the parcel. The duplicate copy of the PP form will be retained by the authorised dealer to whom the exporter should submit relevant documents together with an extra copy of invoice for negotiation/collection, within the prescribed period of twenty one days.

B.2 Counter signature on PP forms

PP forms will be presented by the exporter to an authorised dealer for countersignature. Authorised dealers should countersign the PP forms after ensuring that the parcel is being addressed to their branch or correspondent bank in the country of import. The concerned overseas branch or correspondent should be instructed to deliver the parcel to consignee against payment or acceptance of relative bill. Authorised dealers may, however, countersign PP forms covering parcels addressed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, the exporters should bill their overseas clients periodically, i.e. at least once a month or on reaching the 'milestone' as provided in the contract entered into with the overseas client and the last invoice/bill should be raised not later than 15 days form the date of completion of the contract. It would be in order for the exporters to submit a combined SOFTEX form for all the invoices raised on a particular overseas client, including advance remittances received in a month.

(ii) In respect of contracts involving only 'one shot operation', the invoice/bill should be raised within 15 days from the date of transmission.

(iii) The exporter should submit SOFTEX form to the concerned official of Government of India at STPI/EPZ for valuation/certification not later than 30 days from the date of invoice/the date of last invoice raised in a month, as indicated above.

(iv) The invoices raised on overseas clients as at (i) to (iii) above will be subject to valuation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dealer to the effect that he has filed the short-shipment notice with the Customs and that he will furnish it as soon as it is obtained. Authorised dealer should send the short shipment notice along with the GR duplicate to Reserve Bank.

(ii) Where a shipment has been entirely shut out and there is delay in making arrangements to re-ship, exporter will give notice in duplicate to Customs in the manner and in form prescribed for the purpose, attaching thereto the unused duplicate copy of GR form and the shipping bill. Customs will verify that the shipment was actually shut out, certify copy of the notice as correct and forward it to Reserve Bank together with unused duplicate copy of the GR form. In this case, the original GR form received earlier from Customs will be cancelled. If the shipment is made subsequently, a fresh set of GR form should be completed.

B.5 Consolidation of Air Cargo

Where air cargo is shipped under consolidation, the airline company's Master Airway B

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gards exports by rail, Customs staff have been posted at certain designated railway stations for attending to Customs formalities. They will collect the GR/SDF forms in respect of goods loaded at these stations so that the goods may move straight on to the foreign country without further formalities at the border. The list of designated railway stations is obtainable from the Railways. In respect of goods loaded at stations other than the designated stations, exporters must arrange to present GR/SDF forms to the Customs Officer at the Border Land Customs Station where Customs formalities are completed.

c. In terms of an agreement on Border Trade between India and Myanmar, exchange of certain specified locally produced commodities, by people living along the India-Myanmar border on both sides under barter trade arrangement as also trade in freely convertible currency, has been permitted as per guidelines issued by Reserve Bank to authorised dealers from time to time. Authorised deale

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aid' basis may be accepted where the sale contract is on f.o.b., f.a.s. etc. basis provided the amount of freight has been included in the invoice and the bill. Conversely, in the case of c.i.f., c.&f. etc. contracts whose freight is sought to be paid at destination, it should be ensured that the deduction made is only to the extent of freight declared on GR/SDF form or the actual amount of freight indicated on the Bill of Lading/Airway Bill, whichever is less. Likewise, where the marine insurance is taken by the exporters on buyer's account, authorised dealer should verify that the actual amount paid is received from the buyer through invoice and the bill.

iii. The documents submitted do not reveal any material inter se discrepancies in regard to description of goods exported, export value or country of destination.

NOTE: A. The export realisable value may be more than what was originally declared to/accepted by Customs on the GR/SDF form in certain circumstances such as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

le exporters declare to Customs the full export value based on the contract price, invoices submitted along with shipping documents for negotiation / collection may reflect a different value arrived at after taking into account the results of analysis of samples or late shipment penalty, as the case may be.

As such variations stem from the terms of contract, authorised dealers may accept them on production of documentary evidence after verifying the arithmetical accuracy of the calculations and on conforming the terms of underlying contracts.

C.3 Trade Discount

Bills in respect of exports by sea or air which fall short of the value declared on GR/SDF forms on account of trade discount may be accepted for negotiation or collection only if the discount has been declared by exporter on relative GR/SDF form at the time of shipment and accepted by Customs.

C.4 Advance Payments against Exports

Exporters may receive advance payments (with or without interest) from their oversea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ar line of export trade, subject to a maximum of 10 per cent of the full export value;

and

(b) an undertaking is obtained from exporter on the duplicate of GR/SDF/PP that he will surrender/account for the balance proceeds of the shipment within the period prescribed for realisation.

NOTE : In cases where exporter has not been able to arrange for repatriation of the undrawn balance in spite of best efforts authorised dealers, on being satisfied with the bona fides of the case, may submit duplicate copies of GR/PP/SDF forms to Reserve Bank duly certified for the amount actually realised. Authorised dealers should however, ensure that the exporter has realised at least the value for which the bill was initially drawn (excluding undrawn balances) or 90% of the value declared on GR/PP/SDF form, whichever is more and a period of one year has elapsed from the date of shipment.

C.6 Consignment Exports

i. When goods have been exported on consignment basis, authorised dealer, whil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ge/cable charges, stamp duty etc.

NOTES: A. In case of goods exported on consignment basis, freight and marine insurance must be arranged in India.

B. Reserve Bank, on an application made to it may, permit individual exporters to hire warehouses abroad subject to such terms and conditions as it may stipulate.

C. Reserve Bank will permit, on application, exporters with satisfactory track record a longer period up to twelve months for realisation of export proceeds for exports on consignment basis made to CIS countries and East European countries financed in any permitted currency.

C.7 Despatch of Shipping Documents

i. While Authorised dealers should normally despatch shipping documents to their overseas branches/ correspondents expeditiously, they may despatch shipping documents direct to the consignees or their agents resident in the country of final destination of goods in cases where advance payment or an irrevocable letter of credit has been received for the full valu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ce, in terms of paragraph C.4 may be directly sent by the exporter to the consignee.

C.8 Handing Over Negotiable Copy of Bill of Lading to Master of Vessel/Trade Representative

Authorised dealers may deliver one negotiable copy of the Bill of Lading to the Master of the carrying vessel or trade representative, in respect of exports to certain landlocked countries if the shipment is covered by an irrevocable letter of credit and the documents conform strictly to the terms of the Letter of Credit which, inter alia, provides for such delivery.

C.9 Export Bills Register

i. Authorised dealers should maintain Export Bills Register, in physical or electronic form. Details of GR/SDF/PP form number, due date of payment, the fortnightly period of R Supplementary Return with which ENC statement covering the transaction was sent to Reserve Bank and the period of R Supplementary Return with which the duplicate copy of GR/SDF/PP form is submitted to Reserve Bank should be available.

i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed by Note under paragraph C.5. Authorised dealers should follow up export outstandings with exporters systematically and vigorously so that action against defaulting exporters does not get delayed. Any laxity in the follow up of realisation of export proceeds by authorised dealers will be viewed seriously by Reserve Bank leading to the invocation of the penal provision under FEMA 1999.

ii. Authorised dealers should furnish to Reserve Bank, on half-yearly basis, a consolidated statement in Form XOS giving details of all export bills outstanding beyond six months from the date of export as at the end of June and December every year. The statement should be submitted in triplicate within fifteen days from the close of the relative half-year.

C.11 Reduction in Invoice Value on account of

Prepayment of Usance Bills

Occasionally, exporters may approach authorised dealers for reduction in invoice value on account of cash discount to overseas buyers for prepayment of the usance bi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

any.

In the case of exporters who have been in the export business for more than three years, reduction in invoice value may be allowed, without any percentage ceiling, subject to the above conditions as also subject to their track record being satisfactory i.e. the export outstandings do not exceed 5% of the average annual export realisation during preceding three calendar years. For the purpose of reckoning the percentage of outstanding export bills to average export realisations during the preceding three calendar years, outstandings in respect of exports made to countries facing externalisation problems may be ignored provided the payments have been made by the buyers in the local currency.

C.13 Export Claims

Authorised dealers may remit export claims on application, provided the relative export proceeds have already been realised and repatriated to India and the exporter is not on the caution list of Reserve Bank. In all such cases of remittances, the exporter should be a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gional Office of Reserve Bank in form ETX through his authorised dealer with appropriate documentary evidence. Extension will not ordinarily be granted unless Reserve Bank is satisfied that the exporter is in no way directly or indirectly responsible for the delay in realisation of proceeds and that by grant of a short extension the exporter will be able to realise proceeds.

C.16 Shipments Lost in Transit

When shipments from India for which payment has not already been received either by negotiation of bills under letters of credit or otherwise are lost in transit, authorised dealer must ensure that insurance claim is made as soon as the loss is known. The duplicate copy of GR/SDF/PP form should be forwarded to Reserve Bank with following particulars:

a. Amount for which shipment was insured.

b. Name and address of insurance company

c. Place where claim is payable.

In cases where claim is payable abroad, authorised dealer must arrange to collect the full amount of cla

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lso continue to hold the duplicate copies of GR/SDF/PP forms in their custody and initiate follow-up measures in the normal manner.

C.18 Write off of unrealised Export Bills

(i) An exporter who has not been able to realise the outstanding export dues despite best efforts, may approach the authorised dealer, who had handled the relevant shipping documents, with appropriate supporting documentary evidence with a request for write off of the unrealised portion. Authorised dealers may accede to such requests subject to the under noted conditions:

a. The relevant amount has remained outstanding for one year or more;

b. The aggregate amount of write off allowed by the authorised dealer during a calendar year does not exceed 10% of the total export proceeds realised by the concerned exporter through the concerned authorised dealer during the previous calendar year;

c. Satisfactory documentary evidence is furnished in support of the exporter having made all efforts to realise th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en after winning the Court case against the overseas buyer could not execute the Court decree due to reasons beyond his control.;

vii. Bills were drawn for the difference between the letter of credit value and actual export value or between the provisional and the actual freight charges but the amount has remained unrealised consequent on dishonour of the bills by the overseas buyer and there are no prospects of realisation.

e. The case is not the subject matter of any pending civil or criminal suit.

f. The exporter has not come to the adverse notice of the Enforcement Directorate or the Central Bureau of Investigation or any such other law enforcement agency.

g. The exporter has surrendered proportionate export incentives, if any,

availed of in respect of the relative shipments.

(ii) Where there is no further amount to be realised against the GR/SDF/PP form covered by the write off, authorised dealer should submit the duplicate thereof to Reserve Bank along with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntersign PP forms completed by them unless the GR/SDF/PP forms bear approval of Reserve Bank.

 

PART D – Remittances connected with Export

D.1 Agency Commission on Exports

(i) Authorised dealers may allow payment of commission, either by remittance or by deduction from invoice value, on application submitted by the exporter. The remittance on agency commission may be allowed subject to the following conditions:

a. Amount of commission has been declared on GR/SDF/PP/SOFTEX form and accepted by Customs authorities or Department of Electronics, Government of India /EPZ authorities as the case may be. In cases where the commission has not been declared on GR/SDF/PP/SOFTEX form, remittance thereof may be allowed after satisfying about the reasons adduced by the exporter for not declaring commission on Export Declaration Form, provided a valid agreement/written understanding between the exporter and /or beneficiary for payment of commission subsists.

b. The relative sh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Payment of Service Tax by cheque in authorized Banks-Consequences of delay in encashment beyond due date

Payment of Service Tax by cheque in authorized Banks-Consequences of delay in encashment beyond due date
V/DGST/ 30-Misc-46/2000 Dated:- 23-8-2000 Order-Instruction
Service Tax
DIRECTORATE OF SERVICE TAX, Mumbai
F.NO. V/DGST/ 30-Misc-46/2000, Dated 23rd August, 2000.
Payment of Service Tax by cheque in authorized Banks-Consequences of delay in encashment beyond due date
The Rule 7 of the Central Government Account (Receipts and Payments) Rules ,1983 interalia provides that Government dues including taxes can be credited by the taxpayers directly into any branch of an authorised Bank. As per Rule 79 of the Treasury Rules of the Central Government, such payments / credits can be mad by cheques also. Accordingly, a large number of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

date. Hitherto, in such cases also, the department has been levying interest and penalty. This practice has developed presumably because the Rule 79(1) (a) of the Treasury Rules interalia states that “, until the cheque is cleared, the Government cannot admit that payment has been received; ”
4. A number of representations have been received in this Directorate stating that recovery of interest and imposition of penalty in the cases where cheques have been deposited before due date and the amount is credited to the Government account in due course, but after the due date, is
5. The matter has been examined.
6. It is observed that the identical issue had arisen in case of payment of Inland Air Travel Tax (IATT) by Sahara Airlines Ltd. The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on the date when the cheque was handed over to the Government's bankers. Accordingly, the Government set aside the imposition of penalty / interest etc. in the said case.
7. The ratio of above cited decision of the Government would apply mutatis – mutandis to the payment of service tax also. Therefore, it is clarified that in the cases where the service tax amount has been deposited by an assessee in the authorized Bank, by cheque, before the due date and such cheque is not dishonored later, the Department need not initiate proceedings for recovery of interest /penalty etc. However, if the cheque is not honored in due course or the clearance is abnormally delayed for any lapse on the part of the assessees, the Department would be free to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service Tax — Payment by cheque — Delay in encashment beyond due date — No interest/penalty charged

Service Tax — Payment by cheque — Delay in encashment beyond due date — No interest/penalty charged
V/DGST/30-Misc-46/2000 Dated:- 23-8-2000 Order-Instruction
Service Tax
Service Tax Payment by cheque Delay in encashment beyond due date No interest/penalty charged
F. No. V/DGST/30-Misc-46/2000, dated 23-8-2000 of the Mumbai Directorate of Service Tax
The Rule 7 of the Central Government Account (Receipts and Payments) Rules, 1983 inter alia provides that Government dues including taxes can be credited by the taxpayers directly into any branch of an authorised Bank. As per Rule 79 of the Treasury Rules of the Central Government, such payments/credits can be made by cheques also. Accordingly, a large number of tax payers i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, in such cases also, the department has been levying interest and penalty. This practice has developed presumably because the Rule 79(1)(a) of the Treasury Rules inter alia states that “, until the cheque is cleared, the Government cannot admit that payment has been received; ”
4. A number of representations have been received in this Directorate stating that recovery of interest and imposition of penalty in the cases where cheques have been deposited before due date and the amount is credited to the Government account in due course, but after the due date, is not fair since the assessee has no control over the time taken by the Bankers of the Government in clearing the cheque.
5. The matter has been examined.
6. It is observed that the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

authorized Bank. And if the cheque is not dishonored later, the payment shall be deemed to have been made on the date when the cheque was handed over to the Government's bankers. Accordingly, the Government set aside the imposition of penalty / interest etc. in the said case.
7. The ratio of above cited decision of the Government would apply mutatis – mutandis to the payment of service tax also. Therefore, it is clarified that in the cases where the service tax amount has been deposited by an assessee in the authorized Bank, by cheque, before the due date and such cheque is not dishonored later, the Department need not initiate proceedings for recovery of interest/penalty etc. However, if the cheque is not honored in due course or the clea

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Export of goods and services against repayment of State Credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union

Export of goods and services against repayment of State Credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union
004 Dated:- 15-7-2000 Circular
FEMA
Export of goods and services against repayment of State Credits granted by erstwhile Soviet Union
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT
CENTRAL OFFICE
MUMBAI 400 001
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.4
July 15, 2000.
To
All Authorised Dealers in Foreign Exchange
Dear Sirs,
Export of goods and services against repayment of State Credits gran

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service tax — Clearing & Forwarding Agents — Certain clarification

Service tax — Clearing & Forwarding Agents — Certain clarification
V/DGST……./2/99/10683 Dated:- 6-6-2000 Order-Instruction
Service Tax
Service tax Clearing & Forwarding Agents Certain clarification
F.No. V/DGST/21(9)/C&F/2/ 99/10683, dated 6-6-2000 of the Mumbai Directorate of Service Tax
The office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax Cell, Chennai-II Commissionerate, has sought for a clarification, on the applica- bility of Service Tax, for the services rendered by a company/assessee which are as follows :-
“The company/assessee owns storage tanks made of mild steel in different parts of India. These tanks are used for storing liquids/ chemicals for which customers pay rents based on the tanks capacity.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service tax — Clearing & Forwarding Agents — Certain clarification

Service tax — Clearing & Forwarding Agents — Certain clarification
V/DGST/21(9)/C&F/2/ 99/10683 Dated:- 6-6-2000 Order-Instruction
Service Tax
Service tax Clearing & Forwarding Agents Certain clarification
F.No. V/DGST/21(9)/C&F/2/ 99/10683, dated 6-6-2000 of the Mumbai Directorate of Service Tax
The office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax Cell, Chennai-II Commissionerate, has sought for a clarification, on the applica- bility of Service Tax, for the services rendered by a company/assessee which are as follows :-
“The company/assessee owns storage tanks made of mild steel in different parts of India. These tanks are used for storing liquids/ chemicals for which customers pay rents based on the tanks capac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Foreign Exchange Management (Export of goods and services) Regulations, 2000

Foreign Exchange Management (Export of goods and services) Regulations, 2000
023/2000 Dated:- 3-5-2000 Foreign Exchange Management
FEMA
Foreign Exchange Management Act
FEMA
Foreign Exchange Management (Export of goods and services) Regulations, 2000
Notification No. FEMA 23 /2000-RB dated 3rd May 2000
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
(EXCHANGE CONTROL DEPARTMENT)
CENTRAL OFFICE
MUMBAI 400 001
Published in the Official Gazette of Government of India – Extraordinary – Part-II, Section 3,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service Tax — Union Budget for the Financial Year 2000-2001 — Changes in respect of Service Tax

Service Tax — Union Budget for the Financial Year 2000-2001 — Changes in respect of Service Tax
V/DGST/30-Misc-06/2000/8975 Dated:- 3-3-2000 Order-Instruction
Service Tax
Service Tax Union Budget for the Financial Year 2000-2001 Changes in respect of Service Tax
F.No. V/DGST/30-Misc-06/2000/8975, dated 3-3-2000 of the Directorate of Service Tax
Please refer to the provisions made in the Finance Bill 2000 and the explanatory notes issued by the Ministry alongwith the d.o. letter F.No. 334/1/2000-TRU, dated 29-2-2000 of Joint Secretary (TRU), on the above subject.
2. The Hon'ble Finance Minister, while presenting the budget, indicated that no substantive changes are being made in respect of the administration of Service Tax, and the Government has decided to constitute an Experts Committee to go into the entire gamut of issues pertaining to this tax. Nevertheless, a few changes have been brought about which would require necessary action by all Commissionerates.
3.1. N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and 16-7-1997, respectively. At the relevant time, the field formations would have got such service providers registered with them. However, in the meantime, the definitions of Tour Operators and Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operators were amended by virtue of provisions made in the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998.
3.2.2 The definition of term “Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator” is contained in Section 65(38) of the Finance Act, 1994. Prior to the amendment, scope of said term was limited to a person who was holding a licence under the Rent-a-Cab Scheme, 1989, framed by the Central Government under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, as a Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator. Under the said scheme, a licence is granted only in the case where a person has a minimum of 50 cabs. However, in the revised definition, the requirement of operators being registered under the Rent-a-Cab Scheme has been dispensed with. Consequently, any person who is engaged in the business of renting of cabs would be required to pay Service Tax, irres

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

garding number of registrations issued, w.e.f. 1-4-2000, to the Tour Operators and Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operators may be forwarded to this Directorate by 15-5-2000 indicating separately the number of new assessees who have been registered as a consequence of the revised definitions.
3.3.1 Clauses 112 & 113 of the Finance Bill, 2000 relate to retrospective amendments in the Finance Act, 1994 with reference to the services rendered by the Goods Transport Operators and the Clearing & Forwarding Agents. The intention of these amendments is to validate the Rule 2 (1) (d) (xii) & (xvii) of the Service Tax Rules,1994 which shifted the burden of levy on the service receivers in the case of services rendered by GTOs and C&F Agents. As you are aware, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgement in the case of M/s. Laghu Udyog Bharati & Others v. Union of India – 1999 (89) E.L.T. 247 held the above rules to be ultra vires the provisions of Finance Act, 1994. Accordingly, these rules were struck down.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P., of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Uttar Pradesh, as an eligible project or scheme

Deleted……

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified for Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P. of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Uttar Pradesh, as an eligible project or scheme

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified for Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P. of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Uttar Pradesh, as an eligible project or scheme
S. O. 318(E) Dated:- 11-5-1999 Income Tax
Income Tax
Section 035AC
IT
Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified for Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P. of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Uttar Pradesh, as an eligible project or scheme
NOTIFICATION NO. S. O. 318(E)
DATED 11-5-1999
Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance No. S.O. 822(E), dated 6th November, 19922, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d properly, made a further recommendation under sub-rule (5) of rule 11M of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, for specifying the said project or scheme for a further period of three years:
Now, therefore, the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), hereby specifies the project or scheme of Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U.P. of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), P.O. Box No. 10, 21 East Canal Road, Dehradun-248 001, Uttar Pradesh, at the estimated cost of rupees twenty lakhs only as an eligible project or scheme for a further period of three assessment years commencing from

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Service Tax — Interest in case of delayed payment of Service Tax to the Government — Clarification

Service Tax — Interest in case of delayed payment of Service Tax to the Government — Clarification
3/DGST/98 Dated:- 16-11-1998 Order-Instruction
Service Tax
Service Tax — Interest in case of delayed payment of Service Tax to the Government — Clarification
Service Tax, Circular No. 3/DGST/98, dated 16-11-1998
Trade Notice No. 50/CE/98(Service Tax), dated 27-11-1998 of the Chandigarh Commissionerate
Attention of the Trade and all other concerned is invited to the practice bein

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U. P. by Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Dehra Dun as an eligible project or scheme

Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U. P. by Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Dehra Dun as an eligible project or scheme
S.O.977(E) Dated:- 14-12-1995 Income Tax
Income Tax
Section 035AC
IT
Exemption u/s 35AC – Central Government had specified Total literacy amongst nomadic Gujjars living in Western U. P. by Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendras (RLEK), Dehra Dun as an eligible project or scheme
NOTIFICATION NO. S.O.977(E)
DATED 14-12-1995
Whereas by Notification, vide S.O. No. 822(E), dated 6th November, 1992, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 196

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Central Excise – Tungsten Halogen Bulbs – Applicability of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 – Clarification regarding

Central Excise – Tungsten Halogen Bulbs – Applicability of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 – Clarification regarding
4/94-CX.4 Dated:- 17-1-1994 Circular
Central Excise
Central Excise – Tungsten Halogen Bulbs – Applicability of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 – Clarification regarding
Circular No. 4/94-CX.4
Dated 17-1-1994
[From F. No. 167/2/92-CX.4]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi
Subject : Central Excise – Tungsten Halogen Bulbs – Applicability of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 – Clarification regarding.
Representations have been received relating to application of Notification No. 67/83-C.E., dated 1-3-1983 (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n examined. Under Notification No. 67/83-C.E. Explanation II reads as follows :
For the purposes of determining under this Notification, the classification and nomenclature of bulbs or lamps, or as the case may be, the wattage, length or diameter of bulbs or lamps, the definition as well as the procedure for testing including allowances for tolerances as prescribed in the Indian Standard Specifications shall be adopted.
The relevant Tariff of Indian Standard Specifications dealing with lamps are IS : 1885 (Par XVI / Section 3)-1969.
Under the category of incandescent lamps, three relevant sub heads are as follows :
2.1.7     
Vacuum Lamp – Incandescent lamp in which the luminous element operates in an eva

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Somany Pilkingstons Limited Versus Income-Tax Officer

Somany Pilkingstons Limited Versus Income-Tax Officer
Income Tax
1989 (9) TMI 156 – ITAT DELHI-A – [1989] 31 ITD 287
ITAT DELHI-A – AT
Dated:- 4-9-1989
Misc. Application No. 39 (Delhi) of 1989, Misc. Application No. 20 (Delhi) of 1981, IT Appeal No. 361(Chd.) of 1978-79, IT Appeal No. 362 of 1978-79, IT Appeal No. 363 (Chd.) of 1978-79, IT Appeal No. 364 (Chd.) of 1978-79
Income Tax
Member(s)  : CH. G. KRISHNAMURTHY., F. C. RUSTAGI.
ORDER                 
Per Krishnamurthy, PresidentThis is a misc. application filed by the assessee on 14-10-1988 bringing to the notice of the Tribunal that the allowance of an earlier misc. application filed by the I.T.O. Co. Cir., Rohtak on 28-1-1981, in his favour was out of time and was barred by limitation, was therefore wrong and should be cancelled.
2. The assessee claimed, inter alia, relief u/s 80J of the Income-tax Act, stating that i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erent occasions and finally it was disposed of by its order dated 6-4-1985 whereby the Tribunal held that the mistake pointed out by the Department did exist in the order of the Tribunal and, therefore, it should be rectified. The operative portion of the order of the Tribunal was relevant and, we therefore, reproduce it below :
“At the time of hearing of this application, the learned counsel for the assessee Sh. C.S. Agarwal did not oppose this petition and concede the point because as on today the decision of the Supreme Court on Sec. 80J and the effect of retrospective amendment were all decided against the assessee. The order of the Tribunal, therefore, stands modified to this extent, namely, that the relief u/s 80J will now have to be worked out excluding the loans taken by the assessee. The ITO will work out the capital accordingly. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order passed by the Tribunal in I.T.A. Nos. 361 to 364 of 1978-79 dated 27-8-1980.”
3. In thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r passed by the Tribunal was barred by limitation, by the same rule, logic, the present misc. application also must be deemed to have been filed out of time. The earlier misc. application was filed by the Department on 25-1-1981 though it was disposed of on 6-4-1985. The order of the Tribunal was dated 27th August, 1980. Reckoning the period of limitation of four years from the date of the order of the Tribunal namely 27th August, 1980, the order passed by the Tribunal on 6-4-1985 was clearly out of time, though the application for rectification was filed by the department on 27-1-1981 which was well within time. When an application was filed well within time, the time taken by the authority to rectify the mistake will not render the petition as time barred, even if the order was passed after the period of four years, because the crucial date is not the date of passing the order by the authority empowered to rectify the mistake but the date of filing of the petition, as otherwise the d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d High Court in Vithaldas v. ITO [1969] 71 ITR 204. In this case, it was held by the Allahabad High Court that it was the duty of the ITO u/s 35 of the Old Act (to make the rectification) and if he had failed to do so, the High Court had power to issue a writ directing the ITO to make a rectification even though the period of four years fixed u/s 35 had expired. By relying upon this principle, the learned Advocate for the assessee very seriously contended that the time limit fixed to make a rectification could thus be lifted by the authority concerned if the application had been filed in time and since his application was filed in time, the Tribunal could pass an order now on his application holding that its earlier order of 6-4-1985 was barred by limitation even though the application for rectification for that order was filed by the Department. The period of four years from the date of the order of the Tribunal. We fail to see how the decision of the Allahabad High Court helped the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. 9678. The assessee applied for rectification of his assessment and wrote several letters to the Income-tax authorities right from December, 1959. But the Department did not act on those applications. It filed a writ in the High Court in 1967 for a writ to compel the I.T.O. to rectify the assessment. It was pleaded on behalf of the Revenue that as the period of four years prescribed for rectification by Sec. 35(1) had expired in 1960, no writ to enforce rectification could be issued. It was in that context that the High Court observed that it was the duty of the I.T.O. u/s 35 to make the rectification and as he had failed to do so, the High Court had power to issue a writ and directing the I.T.O. to make a rectification even though the period of four years fixed u/s 35 had expired. The High Court in this case, after reviewing the relevant Law on the subject, including the Halsbury's Laws of England came to the conclusion that the period prescribed u/s 35 could only be said to be the p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bservations of the Chief Justice, Chagla in All India Groundnut Syndicate v. CIT [1954] 25 ITR 90 (Bom.). We are, therefore, of the opinion that the language of sec. 254(2) and sec. 35 being on pari materia the law as made applicable to sec. 35 would also apply to Sec. 255(4) and, therefore, if an application has been made at any time within four years from the date of the order, with a view to rectify any mistake apparent from the record, the Tribunal may amend any order passed by it and in doing so, all that it has to see is whether the application was made in time. The limit of time provided in sec. 254(2) applies only to the commencement of the proceedings namely, filing of the application, bringing the mistake to the notice of the Tribunal and not to the orders to be passed by the Tribunal. Once the mistake has been brought to the notice of the Tribunal in time, that mistake can be rectified at any time even after the lapse of the period of four years otherwise it will lead to mis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssed by the C.I.T. holding that he had no power to make such an order acting u/s 154 of the I.T. Act because Section 154 would apply only to the orders passed by the I.T.O. and the C.I.T. could have cancelled the order only if the earlier order had been passed by a Commissioner u/s 263 or sec. 264 and not otherwise. There were some other issues involved in this case which were decided by the High Court against the revenue but we are not concerned with any one of them in this matter. This decision, does not turn upon an issue even closer to the issue before us.
6. The learned counsel for the assessee also placed reliance upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Kapurchand Shrimal v. CIT [1981] 131 ITR 451. The Supreme Court laid down in this case the ruling that it is well known that an appellate authority has the jurisdiction as well as the duty to correct all errors in the proceedings under appeal and to issue, if necessary, appropriate directions to the authority against

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d by the authority concerned, within the time specified under sub-section (7) of sec. 154, it may be disposed of by that authority even after the expiry of the statutory time limit on merits and in accordance with law. This circular helps the cause of both the assessee as well as that of the Department. It applies with equal force to both the parties before us. We cannot say that the force of the Circular is applicable only to the applications filed on behalf of the assessee but not to the applications filed on behalf of the department. Before the law every one is equal, it cannot be slanted in favour of the assessee at the cost of the revenue or vice versa. The Law of Limitation vests a right in a party and if the limitation expires, a vested right accrues to the other party and that right cannot be easily tampered with by mere technicalities. Therefore, none of the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the assessee advance the cause of the assessee. To the petition filed by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Powers exercised by IACs u/s 144A-Coordination amongst assessing officers.

Powers exercised by IACs u/s 144A-Coordination amongst assessing officers.
1585/CBDT Dated:- 29-10-1984 Order-Instruction
Income Tax
INSTRUCTION NO. 1585/CBDT
Dated: October 29, 1984
The Public Accounts Committee in their 26th Report has adversely commented upon the lack of proper coordination between different assessing officers and has further stated that this is a serious weakness in the set up of the direct taxes administration.
2. Sec.144 A provides for giving directions to the ITO by the Assistant Commissioners on (a) his own motion or (b) on a reference to his by the ITO or (c) on an application by the assessee. In these situations the IAC can call for and examine the records of any proceedings in which an assessment is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Direct reference to Supreme court u/s 257 in case of divergence of opinion amongst High court.

Direct reference to Supreme court u/s 257 in case of divergence of opinion amongst High court.
1408/CBDT Dated:- 21-7-1981 Order-Instruction
Income Tax
INSTRUCTION NO. 1408/CBDT
Dated: July 21, 1981
Attention is invited to the Boards instruction No.1020 (F.No.277/15/75- ITJ) dated 5th November, 1976 whereby the Commissioners were directed that while scrutinising the orders of the appellate Tribunal for filing reference application u/s.256(1) they should instruct the Departmental Representatives to request the Tribunal to make a direct reference to the supreme court u/s.257 if there are conflicting decisions of two or more High Courts on any particular question of law. Further even in a reference sought by the assessee the Depa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng u/s.34(1)(a) o the 1922 Act the ITO cannot bring to charge an item of income falling under clause b in such reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the period of four years under clause(a). According to the court a notice of reassessment cannot be issued after the period of 4 years in respect of items of income falling under clause(b) and the ITO cannot assume jurisdiction indirectly by issuing a notice purporting to be under clause(a). As against this view, Andhra Pradesh High court in the case of Pulavarthi Visvanadham and recently in the case of subakaran Gangabhishan dissented from Madras and Bombay view and held that once the assessment was reopened validly no distinction could be made between items falling under clause(a) and tho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pierce, Leslie And Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax,

Pierce, Leslie And Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax,
Income Tax
1958 (9) TMI 99 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – AIR 1960 Mad 137, (1960) IIMLJ 1
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-9-1958

Income Tax

Rajagopalan And B Ayyar, JJ.
JUDGMENT
Rajagopalan,
(1) Both the assessee and the Department were aggrieved, each with a part of the order of the Appellate Tribunal. On applications presented by them the Tribunal made a consolidated reference under S. 66(1) of the Income-tax Act and submitted three questions for the determination of this court.
(2) The questions arose out of the assessment proceedings for the assessment years 1949-50 and 1950-51.
(3) The second of the question, which is easiest answered, ran:
“Whether the dividends of ₹ 36,820 and ₹ 32,603 received in the previous years for assessment years 1949-50 and 1950-51 from Plantation Companies whose main business was agriculture can be said to include any agricultural income exempt under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

antation company itself wound up its operations the assessee was paid compensation, the quantum of which was decided by agreement. In 1945-1946 the assessee company held such managing agencies for sixteen Plantation Companies. Tallier Estate Ltd. was one of such Plantation Companies, and the agreement between that company and the assessee was in 1937 (Annexure A). In 1945 Tallier Estate sold its plantation, which was in India, and, the company subsequently went into liquidation. On 24-7-1945 Tallier Estates passed a special resolution which ran:
“That the Liquidator be authorised to pay the Secretaries and Agents, Pierce Leslie and Co., Ltd., London, 4500 by way of compensation for loss of office.”
In accordance with that resolution the assessee received ₹ 60,000, in the year of account which ended on 30-6-1946. That was treated as a trading receipt by the department for the purpose of assessment to income-tax, excess profits tax and business profits tax. When the assessee app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

income or whether it is to be regarded as his capital receipt. Income, said Lord Wright in Kamakshya Narain Singh v. Commr. of Income-tax, B. and O., 1943-11 ITR 513: (AIR 1943 PC 153), is a word of the broadest connotation and difficult and perhaps impossible to define in any precise general formula. Lord Macmillan said in Van Dan Berghs Ltd. v. Clark, (1935) 19 Tax Cas 390, that though in general the distinction between an income and a capital receipt was well recognised and easily applied, cases did arise where the item lay on the border line and the problem had to be solved on the particular facts of each case. No infallible criterion or test can be or has been laid down and the decided cases are only helpful in that they indicate the kind of consideration which may relevantly be borne in mind in approaching the problem.” The learned Chief Justice observed further at p. 915 (of ITR): (at p. 495 of AIR):
“The assessee before us is a company carrying on a business and it received t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e assessee, that is, that the amount was paid to the assessee as compensation for the loss of an item of its apparent capital assets.
(7b) The relevant facts in as set out in the headnote were as follows:
“The assessee (South India Pictures Ltd.) which carried on the business of distribution of films entered into three agreements for advancing monies to certain motion picture producers towards the production of three films and acquiring the rights of distribution thereof. The agreements, inter alia, provided that the assessee would advance certain sums of money in instalments for the production of the firms, the assessee acquiring the sole right to distribute the films for a period of five years from the date of release of each film. The assessee was to pay itself from the money realised by the distribution of the films its commission and the amount advanced to the producers and to pay the balance to the producers. The assessee had a charge by way of security on the negative and po

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d by the assessee as a result of or in connection with such termination of agreements would certainly be regarded as having been so paid or received in the ordinary course of its business and therefore a trading disbursement or trading receipt… In fact in the accounting year the assessee had distribution rights in respect of eleven films including these three. These three agreements would have come to an end on the expiration of the period of five years from the respective dates of release of the films and had only a part of the period to run, a fact which may also be relevantly borne in mind. The cancellation of these agreements must have left the assessee free, if it so chose, to secure other films which could be distributed in the place of these films and which might have brought in better box office collections. In the language of Lord Hanworth M. R. in Short Bros. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue, (1927) 12 Tax Cas 955, the sum paid to the assessee was not truly compensati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dically or at all affect or alter the structure of the assessee's business. Indeed the assessee's business of distribution of films proceeded apace notwithstanding the cancellation of these three agreements.”
(9) After pointing out that what the South India Pictures Ltd. entered into were composite agreements, and that even under the financing part of the agreements the South India Pictures Ltd. did not acquire any capital assets, the learned Chief Justice proceeded to observe at pp. 918-9 (of ITR): (at p. 497 of AIR):
“Assuming that to start with the films constituted capital assets the entire capital outlay had been recovered and the security had been extinguished and that part of the agreements which constituted financing agreements had been fully worked out and had come to an end and the three films ceased to be capital assets and the assessee was holding the films only under that part of the agreements which constituted the distributing agency agreements which only were

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TC 390, or Barr Crombie's case 1947-15 ITR (Sup). 56.”
(10) In the case of the assessee, taking up managing agency along with secretaryship to the Plantation company and other trading rights was part of the assessee's normal trading activities. The assessee dealt with among other things, the export of tea produced in India, and obtaining managing agencies and other rights from the Plantation companies certainly facilitated that trade in tea. The managing agencies the assessee obtained were liable to termination, in which event the assessee received the compensation it was entitled to by agreement. We should point out that the agreement (Annexure A) was not a contract for securing simpliciter the managing agency, for Tallier estates.
It was a composite agreement securing other rights as well to the assessee, which helped it in its trading activities in tea. The assessee was in a position to obtain such contracts with Plantation companies because of its large experience in han

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y received in the ordinary course of the business of the assessee and that therefore it was a trading receipt.
(11) Mr. Rama Rao Sahib, learned counsel for the department, referred us also to Anglo French Exploration Co. Ltd. v. Clayson, 1956-30 ITR 309, Lord Evershed M. R. said at page 316:
“If the matter were res integra, I think that there is much to be said for the simple view that a sum of money received in consideration for the giving up or destruction of an agreement under which you look to earn an annual sum if capital and not income; for in such case the sum received might be described fairly as the capitalised equivalent at the present time of income prospects.”
(12) After pointing out that the real question for determination was whether it was a profit or gain arising from the trade of the recipient within the terms of Sch. D. the learned Master of the Rolls proceeded.
“And the matter is not in any case res integra. The line of cases to which we have had our attention

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the business of Anglo-French, and the cancellation of this one contract in no sense affected the 'profit making apparatus' of the company which retained its offices and staff, in Johannesburg exactly as before.”
The case of the assessee before us was certainly analogous to that the Court of Appeal had to consider in 1956-30 ITR (Sup.) 309.
(13) In our opinion, in the circumstances in which the assessee company carried on its trading operations the amount of ₹ 60,000 constituted a trading receipt received in the usual course of its business activities.
(14) We answer the first question in the affirmative and against the assessee.
(15) The third question ran:
“Whether the credit balances in the capital profits accounts, profit and loss account and business profits tax post war refund suspense account form part of the 'reserve' of the assessee within the meaning of rule 2(1) of Sch. II of the Business Profits Tax Act ?”
The relevant chargeable accounting peri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on of those principles that we have to answer the second question which we have set out above.
(17) The sums in question apparently represented the undistributed profits and were shown in the balance sheet partly as capital and partly as revenue receipts. During the arguments before us the learned counsel for the assessee limited the claim for abatement to the following amounts: .27857 (capital profits account) and .219 (profit and loss account) for the chargeable accounting periods 1 and 2 we have mentioned above; .9812-0-5 (capital profits account) and .30-7-4 (profit and loss account) for the chargeable accounting periods 3 and 4. In addition the assessee claimed abatement with reference to the chargeable accounting periods 2, 3 and 4 of another sum of .19236, which amount was shown in the balance sheets under the head excess profits tax post war Refund suspense account.
(18) Did these amounts constitute reserves within the meaning of rule 2(1) for the relevant chargeable accounti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reserve. The Supreme Court stated in “the profits lying unutilised and not specially set apart for any purpose on the crucial date did not constitute reserves within the meaning of Sch. II, rule 2(1)”
on this basis of what was pointed out by this court at page 245 (of ITR): (at p. 327 of AIR) in 1957-32 ITR 237: (AIR 1958 Mad 326), what the Tribunal will have to decide in this case is whether, with reference to each of the sums we have mentioned above, any one possessed of the requisite authority indicated on or before the crucial dates, with reference to each of the chargeable accounting periods, the manner of disposal or the destination of the funds of the company which constituted its profits. Was any portion of the profits specifically set apart for any purpose on or before the crucial date and was it so set apart by one having the requisite authority? It was on an erroneous view of the law that the Tribunal upheld the claim of the assessee, and as we said there was no occasion at

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HART (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) Versus SANGSTER

HART (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) Versus SANGSTER
Income Tax
1957 (3) TMI 59 – THE COURT OF APPEAL – [1958] 34 ITR 303 (CA)
THE COURT OF APPEAL – DSC
Dated:- 19-3-1957

Income Tax

LORD GODDARD C.J., JENKINS and L. SELLERS JJ.
JUDGMENT
APPEAL from Vaisey J. [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1105; [1956] 3 All E.R. 52; 31 I.T.R. 624
This was an appeal by the taxpayer, John Young Sangster, from the decision of Vaisey J., who reversed the decision of the Commissioners for the Special Purposes of the Income Tax Acts, who had substantially reduced assessments made upon the taxpayer to income tax, Schedule D, for the years 1951-1952, 1952-1953, in respect of interest on a deposit account which he kept with the Colmore Row, Birmingham, branch of Barclays Bank.
The case stated by the Commissioners for the Special Purposes of the Income Tax Acts, so far as relevant, provided:
1. At a meeting of the commissioners held on January 28, 1955, John Young Sangster (hereinafter called "the tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stating this case the commissioners followed the same course and made references to the earlier enactments as if they applied to the 1952-1953 assessment in the same manner as they applied to the 1951-1952 assessment.
(2) The assessments under appeal were made upon the basis that the income in question had to be computed in accordance with the Finance Act, 1951, s. 21, which deals with cases where a person acquires a new source or an addition to any source of income chargeable under Case III of Schedule D. The provisions apply in relation to new sources or additions to sources of income acquired before April 6, 1951, only where income first arose therefrom on or after that date.
(3) Cases where a person has acquired a new source or an addition to any source of such income and income first arose therefrom before that date are governed by the Finance Act, 1926, s. 30.
(4) If the matter were governed by the Finance Act, 1951, s. 21, then subparagraph (a) of and the proviso to paragrap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d December 20 in each year.
5. The commissioners found the following facts:-
No special argument was concluded between the taxpayer and the bank.
Interest on deposit accounts was calculated on the principal on a day-to-day basis and was credited on half-yearly rest dates, June 20 and December 20 in each year. When it was so credited, the interest became principal and then (and not before) began itself to earn interest. It was not the practice to allow accruing interest to be withdrawn between the half-yearly rest dates, save that if an account was closed at any time interest was calculated up to the date of closure, credited and withdrawn as principal. The rate of interest varied from time to time.
In 1951 the bank required 14 days' notice of withdrawals from deposit account; a depositor who wished to make a withdrawal without this notice could do so, but would lose 14 days' interest on the sum withdrawn. The taxpayer withdrew ? 253,000 on March 30, 1951, without giving the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

6, 1951; that section 21 of the Finance Act, 1951, was accordingly not applicable to such income, and that income tax for the years to which the appeal related should be computed in accordance with section 30 of the Finance Act, 1926.
7. It was contended on behalf of the Crown:-
(1) That the taxpayer acquired a new source, or an addition to a source, of income chargeable under Case III of Schedule D on March 17, 1951.
(2) That income first arose therefrom after April 6, 1951; that is to say, on June 20, 1951 when the interest was placed at the credit and disposal of the taxpayer.
(3) That income tax for the years to which the appeal related was properly computed by reference to the provisions of section 21 of the Finance Act, 1951.
The commissioners were referred, inter alia, to the following authorities: Cull v. Cowcher [1934] 18 T.C. 449; Simpson v. Executors of Bonner Maurcie [1929] 14 T.C. 580; 45 T.L.R. 581; St. Lucia Usines and Estates Co. v. St. Lucia (Colonial Treasurers)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alternative contention, but we indicated the opinion we had formed that if a new source, or an addition to a source, of income was acquired on March 17, 1951, income first arose therefrom on June 20, 1951.
On April 26, 1955, we determined the appeal by adjusting the assessments to the following figures, which had been agreed between the parties to be correct upon the basis of our decision in principle: the 1951-1952 assessment we reduced to ? 53; the 1952-1953 assessment we reduced to ? 7,032."
The inspector of taxes appealed to the court. On July 3, 1956, the appeal was allowed by Vaisey J. who held that the source or origin of the interest on the ? 2,000,000 was the deposit of the money coupled with the contract between the taxpayer and the bank; that it was not to be found in an existing contract but that a new contractual relationship resulted from and was brought into existence by the tender of that sum by the taxpayer and its acceptance by the bank on the date in question

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

III of Schedule D. The source of the income is the contractual right of the depositor to be paid interest. When a customer opens a deposit account a contract is made with the bank under which, so long as the account continues in existence, interest will be paid on whatever balance there is to the credit of that account. In other words, there is one contract which continues to run throughout the existence of the deposit account.
Contrary to the contention of the Crown, a new contrast is not entered into on every occasion on which the depositor pays a sum into that account. It is conceded that if the lodgment of the sum in question did constitute a new source, or an addition to a source, then the income therefrom first arose after April 5, 1951, and that for tax purposes it is to be computed in accordance with the provisions of section 21 of the Finance Act, 1951.
The relationship between banker and customer is that of debtor and creditor: per Atkin L.J. in Joachimson v. Swiss Bank Co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ely trivial amounts, but each deposit would have to be segregated for three years and the interest on it would have to be dealt with as income from a new and separate source. That would cause very great practical difficulties.
Roy Borneman Q.C. and Sir Reginald Hills for the Crown. There is a new contract every time a sum is accepted on deposit. Even if it be held that there is a single continuing contract throughout the existence of a deposit account, that of itself produces no income. It is the operation of that contract on the particular sums of money deposited that produces the income, where there is a contractual right to receive interest, and accordingly new deposits of money in a deposit account are new sources or additions to sources of income within Case III of Schedule D.
Heyworth Talbot Q.C. replied.
LORD GODDARD C.J. This is an appeal from a judgment of Vaisey J., who reversed the decision of the special commissioners, who adjusted certain assessments for the years 1951-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e half-yearly rest dates, save that if an account was closed at any time, interest was calculated up to the date of closure, credited and withdrawn as principal. The rate of interest allowed varied from time to time."
It happened that in 1951 a very large sum of money amounting to ?2,000,000 was paid into the deposit account, which even then had a substantial sum of money in it, and it is in respect of interest earned by this very largely increased amount of money paid in that this appeal arises.
The point which the court has to decide is one which is exceedingly simple in statement. It is, what was the source of the income? The special commissioners held that the contract was the source of the income. Vaisey J. took a different view, and I think held that the source of income was the deposit of the money coupled with the contract I say at once that I cannot agree that where a deposit account is kept between a customer and a banker there is a new contract every time money is pai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

imson v. Swiss Bank Corporation [1921] 3 K.B. 110; 37 T.L.R. 534. It is that of debtor and creditor; the banker borrows the money from the customer under terms to repay it. As a general rule he does not pay interest on a current account, although bankers do at times agree to allow interest on a current account if a certain credit balance is maintained. We need not consider current amounts in this case at all. We are only concerned with deposit accounts under which money is paid in at 14 days' notice; that is to say, that the customer cannot withdraw the money without giving 14 days' notice, though he may be allowed to do so if he gives up interest. Interest at the current rate is allowed by the banker, and the current rate generally is regulated by the Bank rate.
Sangster had been assessed under Case III of Schedule D in respect of this interest which he had been receiving, and I think that it is necessary in considering this matter to refer to section 21 of the Finance Act, 1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =