Extension of date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-6

Extension of date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-6
08/2018-State Tax Dated:- 12-2-2018 Mizoram SGST
GST – States
Mizoram SGST
Mizoram SGST
No.J.21011/1/2017-TAX/Vol III/Pt(v)
GOVERNMENT OF MIZORAM
TAXATION DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION No. 8 of 2018 – State Tax
Dated Aizawl the 12th Feb., 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of section 39 read with section 168 of the Mizoram Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (6 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the sai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HSN Code for Debries

HSN Code for Debries
Query (Issue) Started By: – Nandini Annamaneni Dated:- 10-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Expert,
Please suggest me the HSN code for Debris Movement from office premises.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
In pre-GST regime, it was covered under 'Dredging Service'. To ascertain the correct HSN pl. elaborate your query.
Reply By Nandini Annamaneni:
The Reply:
Hi Sir,
Construction is going on in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Branch Transfer to Outside India

Branch Transfer to Outside India
Query (Issue) Started By: – Nandini Annamaneni Dated:- 10-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Sending consumable material to one of the branch office outside India. Please advise me about GST applicability.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Elaborate your query. It is not a complete query.
Reply By Nandini Annamaneni:
The Reply:
HI Sir,
We having office branch outside India. we are sending Employee ID cards from India to Outside India branch location. should I pay IGST on this transaction. Can i get Customs Duty Exemption for this.
Thanks
Nandini
Reply By Praveen Nair:
The Reply:
Dear Nandini
Your question lacks clarity;
– Whether the ID

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Export to SEZ

Export to SEZ
Query (Issue) Started By: – Vivek anandhan Dated:- 10-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 14-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear Experts
We are going to supply goods to a unit located at SEZ without payment of GST. Already we filed LUT for supply of goods without payment of GST.
Now I want to know , what are the document need to file as proof of Export to the department under GST after supply of goods.
Kindly clarify
Regards
Vivekanandhan
Sunbeam Generators Pvt Ltd.,
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, The registered person may supply goods to SEZ unit or Developer without payment of IGST, under Bond/LUT. The invoice shall carry an endorsement “SUPPLY TO SEZ UNIT OR SEZ DEVELOPER FOR AUTHORIS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC on GST paid on Life Insurance Premium?

ITC on GST paid on Life Insurance Premium?
Query (Issue) Started By: – gvenugopal g Dated:- 10-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 21-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Sirs,
GST @1.80% on premium paid for life insurance policy of proprietor (Proprietary Concern) , can ITC be availed?
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, you cannot claim ITC in this regards, it is specifically mentioned at Section 17(5)(b)(iii) rent-a-cab, life insurance and health insurance, assuming t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seizure order under UP GST Act deemed under IGST Act per Section 129 of Central GST Act.

Seizure order under UP GST Act deemed under IGST Act per Section 129 of Central GST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
Seizure order – Section 129(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – in the matter of seizure under the provisions of IGST Act the provisions of Central G.S.T. Act such as Section 129 would apply mutatis mutandis – the impugned order is to be treated to have been passed under IGST Act read with Section 129 of the Central G.S.T. Act rather than the one passed under U.P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

THE WEST BENGAL AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING REGULATIONS, 2018

THE WEST BENGAL AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING REGULATIONS, 2018
By: – DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 10-2-2018

Introduction
The Governor of West Bengal is empowered to make regulations for Advance Rulings under section 165 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('Act' for short). By virtue of the above said power the Governor of West Bengal made 'The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling Regulations, 2018' ('Regulations' for short) vide Notification No. 60-F.T, dated 10.01.2018.
Effective date of regulations
The Regulations shall be deemed to have come into effect from 01.07.2017.
Definitions
Section 95(a) of the Act defines the expression 'advance ruling' as a decision provided by the Authority or the Appellate Authority to an applicant on matters or on questions in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant.
Section 95(b) of the Act defines the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r services or both;
* whether applicant is required to be registered;
* whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.
Procedure for filing application for Advance Ruling
The following is the procedure for filing application for Advance Ruling-
* The application for Advance Ruling shall be filed in Form GST ARA – 01 through the Common Portal;
* The application may be filed manually in accordance with Rule 107A which provides that notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter, in respect of any process or procedure prescribed herein, any reference to electronic filing of an application, intimation, reply, declaration, statement or electronic issuance of a notice, order or certificate on the common portal shall, in respect of that process or procedure, include manual filing of the said application, intimation, reply, declaration

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hall be legible and prepared in similar manner as far as possible;
* An application shall be deemed to have been filed on the date on which hard copy of the application transmitted electronically through the common portal is received in the office of the Authority;
* A copy of each of the application, the statement of relevant facts havinga bearing on the question(s) shall also be sent as an attachment in .doc or .docx format to the designated email of the Authority.
Procedure on receipt of application
The following is the procedure to be adopted by the Authorized officer and the Authority is as follows-
* The Authorized Officer on receipt of the application shall initial the application and the stamp of the Authority thereon together with the date and time of the receipt of the application;
* The Authorized officer shall acknowledge the receipt;
* He shall enter the particulars of the application in the register of daily filing, maintained for that purpose;
* The applica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

comment with relevant documents;
* On receipt of the relevant records/comments from the concerned officer or after the expiry of two weeks or such further time as may be extended by the Authority, the application shall be placed before the Authority for passing advance ruling;
* In a case if the Authority considers that prima facie the application is liable for rejection, a notice shall be sent to the applicant for showing cause as to why the application shall not be rejected on the grounds indicated in the said notice;
* No application shall be rejected without giving an opportunity of being heard in person or through an authorized representative;
* On the date fixed for hearing or such other date to which the case is adjourned, the Authority may pass an order either allowing or rejecting the application;
* A copy of the advance ruling passed by the Authority shall be sent to both the applicant and the concerned officer;
* Where an application is admitted, the Authority s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t/petitioner to the authorized officer;
* No person other the applicant or the authorized representative shall be heard in person save by special leave of the Authority;
* The ruling, reserved, shall be pronounced in the open room under intimation to both the applicant and the concerned officer within a period not exceeding 90 days from the date of filing the application;
* The language of the Authority shall be English;
* A copy of the order shall be served on the applicant and the concerned officer;
* If one of the members is on leave or cannot participate for the time being in the functioning of the authority for any compelling reasons, such period of absence shall be excluded while computing the limitation;
* A ruling pronounced shall bear signature of both the members unless they differ on any question;
* If they differ on any question, either separate drafts of the ruling be prepared by each of them clearly stating the grounds for difference of opinion or one of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Authority;
* receive all applications filed before the Authority;
* scrutinize the applications and petitions and point out omissions and defects in the application and require the applicant to make good the omissions or remove the defects within the time granted by him and, in case of non compliance, place such applications before the Authority for appropriate orders;
* place all the applications before the Authority for appropriate orders;
* forward a copy of the application along with its enclosures to the concerned or jurisdictional officer to transmit records of the case, if any, and to offer his comments on the application;
* issue notices or other processes, as may be ordered by the Authority;
* verify service of notices or other processes on the applicant and obtain necessary orders of the Authority in case of defective service;
* requisition records from the custody of any person upon orders of the Authority;
* return original records to the person from whose c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicability of IGST on Sale of Warehoused Goods

Applicability of IGST on Sale of Warehoused Goods
By: – CASanjay Kumawat
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 10-2-2018

Introduction
The facility of warehousing of imported goods in Customs Bonded Warehouses, without payment of Customs duty otherwise leviable on import, is permitted under the Customs Act, 1962. Apart from specific provisions in the said Act (specially under Chapter IX), certain Regulations have been also framed and provisions of Warehoused Goods (Removal) Regulations, 1963 and Manufacture and Other Operations in Warehoused Regulations, 1966 could be referred to in this regard. Basically, goods after landing are permitted to be removed to a warehouse without payment of duty and duty is collected at the time of clearance from the warehouse.
Accordingly, Chapter IX of the Customs Act provides for deposit of goods into a customs bonded warehouse licensed under section 57 or 58 or 58A without payment of duty and the procedures to be followed with respect t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er payment of all duties etc., the Customs officer cancels and returns the bond executed as discharged in full.
Clearance of imported goods
The importer of any warehoused goods can clear the goods for home consumption by filing an ex-bond Bill of Entry and after payment of duties etc. in terms of section 68 of the Customs Act.
Transfer of Bonded Goods or Transfer of ownership
Section 59 (3) of the Customs Act, 1962 provides for the transfer of bonded goods to another person. The sale of the warehoused goods to holders of duty exemption or duty concession license for the goods is permitted under the law (Board's instructions issued from F. No. 473/43/94 dtd. 22.9.1994 refers in this regard).
Accordingly, Sub-section (3) of section 59 provides that the importer is at liberty to transfer the ownership of such goods to another person while the goods remain deposited in the warehouse.
Supply under GST
The CBEC vide Circular No.46/2017-Customs, dated 24.11.2017 provides for the levy o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d at the ex-bond stage.
Thus, in respect of goods stored in a customs bonded warehouse, there is a possibility that certain cases may involve an additional taxable event, if a transfer of ownership of warehoused goods takes place between the importer and another person, before clearance of the goods, whether for home consumption or for export.
In other words, when goods remain deposited in a customs bonded warehouse and are transferred by the importer to another person, the transaction will be subject to payment of IGST at the value determined as per section 20 of the IGST Act read with section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the rules made thereunder and the tax liability shall be reckoned as per section 5 of the IGST Act, 2017.
Section 5(1) of IGST ACT, 2017: Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), there shall be levied a tax called the integrated goods and services tax on all inter-State supplies of goods or services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lustrative charts A, B and C are attached to the circular to facilitate better understanding] .
Rate of Duty/ Value for Assessment
The value of imported goods, for purposes of charging customs duty, is determined as per section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 at the time of import i.e. at the time of filing of the into-bond Bill of Entry.
Any costs incurred after the import of goods, such as, port charges / port demurrage charges or costs for customs clearing or transporting the goods from the port to the customs bonded warehouse or costs of storage at the customs bonded warehouse, cannot be added to the value of the goods, for the purpose of levy of duties of customs at the stage of ex-bonding.
Further, clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Customs Act provides that the rate of duty or tariff valuation for an ex-bond Bill of Entry shall be the date on which it is filed. There is no provision to vary the assessable value of the goods at the ex-bond stage unless they are su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of ₹ 36 and filing of return for the same should be done by 20th August 2017.
The credit of IGST paid can be availed as per Section 16(2)(b) of CGST Act.
“B” files an Ex-bond Bill of entry on 25th of September 2017 and pays ₹ 23.20 (the deferred duty, in addition to duty of ₹ 36 paid earlier as indicated in Point-C).
The credit of IGST paid can be availed.
Total duty paid: 23.20+36= ₹ 59.2
In this case, when 'A' sells the goods to 'B', 'A' becomes the supplier of the goods as per IGST Act and is therefore liable to pay IGST under section 5 of IGST Act, as explained in Point -C. 'B' in turn becomes the importer and is therefore liable to pay the duties deferred as in Point-B, on ex-bonding, as explained in Point-D above.
Illustration 2: Goods imported, bonded and cleared for home consumption and subsequent sale thereof:
* Goods imported by “A” on 2nd July 2017. Importer wants to deposit the goods in a bonded warehouse to defer duty.
Importer files an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

= ₹ 13.2 (12% of ₹ 110)
* Duty Deferred (ii+iii) = 23.20
'A' can take credit of IGST paid at the time of clearance for home consumption.
'A' sells the goods to 'B' for ₹ 300 on 25th September 2017 and charges GST. Value of goods= ₹ 300 GST (say 12 %) = ₹ 36. Credit of which can be availed.
Total duty paid: 23.20+36= ₹ 59.2
Recovery of Duty on Bonded Goods
Customs Officers may demand from the owner of bonded goods the full amount of duty chargeable on such goods, along with all penalties, rent, interest and other charges payable in the following cases:
* Where any warehoused goods are removed in contravention of the Customs Act, 1962;
* Where such goods have not been removed from a warehouse at the expiry of the period permitted under section 61;
* Where any warehoused goods have been taken under section 64 as samples without payment of duty; and
* Where any bonded goods have not been cleared for home consumption or exportation or a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST RATE FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR

GST RATE FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR
Query (Issue) Started By: – JAJU BANSAL Dated:- 9-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
My client is a government contractor. He is involved in contracts with NBCC/NPCC.
Advise me about the rate to be charged from such unit.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, in terms of Section 2(84) (k) even government is a person, so any supply of goods or services will attract the rates declared by the Government

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Eligibility of input GST in cases where building is constructed for leasing purpose

Eligibility of input GST in cases where building is constructed for leasing purpose
Query (Issue) Started By: – Amit Gopal Dated:- 9-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Section 17(5) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 provides that input tax credit in respect of the following shall not be available-
(c) works contract services when supplied for construction of immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN TAXATION OF ALCO-BEVERAGES

CONFLICTING INTERESTS IN TAXATION OF ALCO-BEVERAGES
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 9-2-2018

Till GST was introduced in India in July, 2017, taxation of alco-beverages was in absolute domain of State taxation- be it value added tax or sale tax, duly on manufacture in the form of state excise duty, municipal taxes such as octroi, entry tax etc.
In GST regime, taxation of alco-beverages has been specifically carved out of GST so much so that GST shall not be levied on alco-beverages – manufacturing as well as marketing or distribution thereof. However, certain inputs, input services and value additions in relation to such products shall be liable to levy of GST which puts this industry into a di

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the regulation of this industry calls for Government's control, regulation, supervision requiring more than one permission, licence, permit or fee. The industry players are required to pay amounts for all such permission or licences or permits. Such payments become mandatory for the furtherance of business of alco-beverages these are not in the nature of tax (goods and service tax) and as such, levy of such fees can not be objected to permit fee or licence fee payment to Government or Local Authority is an essential payment to pursue business without which business operations can not continue. These payments enable continuity of business and therefore are support services for business or commerce.
These payments would attract levy of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Proper officer under sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017–reg.

Proper officer under sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017–reg.
31/05/2018 Dated:- 9-2-2018 CGST – Circulars
GST
Circular No. 31/05/2018 – GST
F. No. 349/75/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs
GST Policy Wing
***
New Delhi, 9th February 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax / Commissioners of Central Tax (Audit)/ Principal Director General of Goods and Services Tax Investigation/ Director General of Systems
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Proper officer under sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017-reg.
The Board, vide Circular No. 1/1/2017-GST dated 26th June, 2017, assigned proper officers for provisions relating to registration and composition levy under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Designation of the Officer
Functions under Section of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or the rules made thereunder
(1)
(2)
(3)
4.
Superintendent of Central Tax
viii(a). Sub-sections (1), (2), (3), (5), (6), (7), (9) and (10) of Section 74
3. Further, in light of sub-section (2) of section 5 of the CGST Act, whereby an officer of central tax may exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed under the CGST Act on any other officer of central tax who is subordinate to him, the following entry is hereby removed from the Table on page number 2 of Circular No. 3/3/2017-GST dated 5th July, 2017:-
Sl. No.
Designation of the Officer
Functions under Section of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or the rules made thereunder
(1)
(2)
(3)
3.
Deputy or Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax
vi. Sub-sections (1), (2), (3), (5), (6), (7), (9) and (10) of Section 74
4. In other words, all officers up to the rank of Additional/Joint Commission

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct (read with sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act), up to the monetary limits as mentioned in columns (3), (4) and (5) respectively of the Table below:-
Table
Sl. No.
Officer of Central Tax
Monetary limit of the amount of central tax (including cess) not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit of central tax wrongly availed or utilized for issuance of show cause notices and passing of orders under sections 73 and 74 of CGST Act
Monetary limit of the amount of integrated tax (including cess) not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit of integrated tax wrongly availed or utilized for issuance of show cause notices and passing of orders under sections 73 and 74 of CGST Act made applicable to matters in relation to integrated tax vide section 20 of the IGST Act
Monetary limit of the amount of central tax and integrated tax (including cess) not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit of central tax and integrated tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax officer of the executive Commissionerate in whose jurisdiction the noticee is registered when such cases pertain to jurisdiction of one executive Commissionerate of Central Tax only.
2[7.1 In respect of show cause notices issued by officers of DGGI, there may be cases where,
(i) a show cause notice is issued to multiple noticees, either having the same or different PANs; or
(ii) multiple show cause notices are issued on the same issue to multiple noticees having the same PAN,
and the principal place of business of such noticees fall under the jurisdiction of multiple Central Tax Commissionerates. For the purpose of adjudication of such show cause notices, Additional/Joint Commissioners of Central Tax of specified Commissionerates have been empowered with All India jurisdiction through amendment in the Notification No. 02/2027 dated 19th June, 2017 vide Notification No. 02/2022-Central Tax dated 11th March, 2022, as further amended vide Notification No. 27/2024-Central Tax da

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mn 3 of the said table corresponding to the said Central Tax Zone/Commissionerate. Such show cause notice(s) may, accordingly, be made answerable by the officers of DGGI to the concerned Additional/ Joint Commissioners of Central Tax.
TABLE
Sl. No.
Central Tax Zone/ Commissionerates in whose jurisdiction the location of the principal place of business of the noticee having highest amount of demand of tax involved falls
Central Tax Commissionerate whose Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner shall adjudicate Show Cause Notices issued by officers of Directorate General of GST Intelligence
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Ahmedabad Zone
Ahmedabad South
2.
Vadodara Zone
Surat
3.
Bhopal Zone
Bhopal
4.
Nagpur Zone
Nagpur-II
5.
Chandigarh Zone
Chandigarh
6.
Panchkula Zone
Faridabad
7.
Chennai Zone
Chennai South
8.
Bengaluru Zone
Bengaluru East
9.
Thiruvananthapuram Zone
Thiruvananthapuram
10.
Delhi North and Delhi East Commissionerates of Delhi Zone
Delhi North
11.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

notice(s) is issued subsequently on the same issue to some other noticee(s) having PAN(s) different from the PANs of the noticees included in the earlier show cause notice, the said later show cause notices is to be adjudicated,
(i) by the jurisdictional adjudicating authority of the noticee, if there is only one noticee (GSTIN) involved in the said later show cause notice; or
(ii) by the common adjudicating authority in accordance with the criteria mentioned in para 7.1 above as applicable independently based on the highest amount of tax demand in the said later show cause notice, if there are multiple noticees (GSTINs) involved in the said later show cause notice having principal place of business under the jurisdiction of multiple Central Tax Commissionerates.]
7.2 In respect of a show cause notice issued by the Central Tax officers of Audit Commissionerate, where the principal place of business of noticees fall under the jurisdiction of multiple Central Tax Commissionerates, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s).
9. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this circular.
10. Difficulty, if any, in implementation of the above instructions may please be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.
(Upender Gupta)
Commissioner (GST)
 
 
**************
NOTES:-
1.
Substituted vide Circular No.169/01/2022-GST dated 12-03-2022 before it was read as,
“6. The central tax officers of Audit Commissionerates and Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (hereinafter referred to as “DGGSTI”) shall exercise the powers only to issue show cause notices. A show cause notice issued by them shall be adjudicated by the competent central tax officer of the Executive Commissionerate in whose jurisdiction the noticee is registered. In case there are more than one noticees mentioned in the show cause notice having their principal places of business falling in multiple Commissionerates, the show cause no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the principal place of business of noticees fall under the jurisdiction of multiple Central Tax Commissionerates or where multiple show cause notices are issued on the same issue to different noticees, including the persons having the same PAN but different GSTINs, having principal place of business falling under jurisdiction of multiple Central Tax Commissionerates. For the purpose of adjudication of such show cause notices, Additional/Joint Commissioners of Central Tax of specified Commissionerates have been empowered with All India jurisdiction vide Notification No. 02/2022-Central Tax dated 11th March, 2022. Such show cause notices may be adjudicated, irrespective of the amount involved in the show cause notice(s), by one of the Additional/Joint Commissioners of Central Tax empowered with All India jurisdiction vide Notification No. 02/2022-Central Tax dated 11th March, 2022. Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of the Central Tax Commissionerates specified in the said notificati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissionerate whose Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner shall adjudicate show cause notices issued by officers of DGGI
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Ahmedabad
Ahmedabad South
2.
Vadodara
3.
Bhopal
Bhopal
4.
Nagpur
5.
Chandigarh
Chandigarh
6.
Panchkula
7.
Chennai
Chennai South
8.
Bengaluru
9.
Thiruvananthapuram
10.
Delhi
Delhi North
11.
Jaipur
12.
Guwahati
Guwahati
13.
Hyderabad
Rangareddy
14.
Visakhapatnam (Amaravathi)
15.
Bhubaneshwar
16.
Kolkata
Kolkata North
17.
Ranchi
18.
Lucknow
Lucknow
19.
Meerut
20.
Mumbai
Thane”
21.
Pune
3. 
Substituted vide Circular No. 239/33/2024-GST dated 04-12-2024 before it was read as, 
“7.3 In respect of show cause notices issued by the officers of DGGI prior to issuance of Notification No. 02/2022-Central Tax dated 11th March, 2022, involving cases mentioned in para 7.1 above and where no adjudication order has been issued till date, the same may be made answerable to the Additional/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mohit Minerals Pvt Ltd Versus Union of India

Mohit Minerals Pvt Ltd Versus Union of India
GST
2018 (2) TMI 770 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – 2018 (10) G. S. T. L. 424 (Guj.)
GUJARAT HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-2-2018
Special Civil Application No. 726 of 2018
GST
Akil Kureshi And B. N. Karia, JJ.
Mr JK Mittal for Mr Hardik P Modh, Advocates for the Petitioner
ORDER
( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi )
The petitioner has challenged vires of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax [Rate] dated 28th June 2017 and Entry 10 of the Notification No. 10/2017-Integrated Tax [Rate] also dated 28th June 2017. The petitioner is an importer of non-cooking coal and on such imports, the petitioner pays Custom duty, the value of which includes Ocean Freight. On the same valuat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Powermech Diesels Versus The State Tax Officer Kerala GST, Ernakulam And The Assistant State Tax Officer, Ernakulam

Powermech Diesels Versus The State Tax Officer Kerala GST, Ernakulam And The Assistant State Tax Officer, Ernakulam
GST
2018 (2) TMI 983 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 64 (Ker.) , [2018] 2 GSTL 114 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-2-2018
W. P. (C). No. 4613 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. R. Muralidharan (AROOR)
For The Respondents : Sri. V. K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CGST, CE & CC, Bhopal Versus M/s Manokamma Electrification Co.

CGST, CE & CC, Bhopal Versus M/s Manokamma Electrification Co.
Service Tax
2018 (3) TMI 1247 – CESTAT, NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT, NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 9-2-2018
Service Tax Appeal No. 57713 of 2013 – Final Order No. 50626/2018
Service Tax
Shri S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial) And Shri B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical)  
Shri A.K. Singh, Authorized Representative (DR) – for the appellant.  
Shri Sandeep Mukherjee, Advocate – for the Respondent.  
Per. B. Ravichandran :-  
The Revenue is aggrieved by the order dated 27/02/2013 of Commissioner (Appeals), Bhopal. By the impugned order, the Commissioner dropped the demand against the respondent for the period upto 15/06/2005. He also held that the proc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to include immovable property also. Considering the facts of the case, intimation by the respondent and various correspondence thereafter the impugned order held that no allegation of suppression, willful mis-statement cannot be sustained against the respondent. Accordingly, the impugned order allowed the appeal filed by the respondent.  
2. We have heard both the sides and perused the appeal record. The grievance of the Revenue is that there is a case for suppression of material facts on the part of the respondent and impugned order should not have dropped the proceedings on limitation. It was submitted that the respondent did not provide all the details and later took the plea of bonafide understanding of the legal provision. The R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ote that the enquiry against the respondent started on 29/09/2004 by summon proceedings. The respondent obtained registration for service tax on 02/11/2004. The enquiry and verification continued for many years thereafter. Show cause notice was issued demanding service tax under management, maintenance or repair service. The impugned order held that seeing the accounts maintained and the nature of contracts and the correspondent with the Revenue by the respondent, there is no scope for invoking extended period. We also note that many of the buildings and properties maintained by the respondent are Government buildings. Section 98 of the Finance Act, 2012 brought in a special provision for exemption in cases where management, maintenance or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RSHPREMIUM GLOBAL TRADING LLP Versus STATE OF KERALA AND INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR SQUAD NO. IB (ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER)

RSHPREMIUM GLOBAL TRADING LLP Versus STATE OF KERALA AND INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR SQUAD NO. IB (ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER)
GST
2018 (2) TMI 1798 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 115 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-2-2018
W. P. (C). No. 4280 of 2018
GST
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
For the Petitioner(S):- Represented by Mr. Biju M Nair By Advs. Sri. Jolly John, Smt. Liza Meghan Cyriac.
For the Respondent(S):- Senior Government Pleader. Sri.V.K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the second respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act.
2. It is seen that an identical matter has been disposed of by a Divisi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Labour contractor

Labour contractor
Query (Issue) Started By: – Vidhya Lingam Dated:- 8-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Respected sir, i have an GST no. Today i here no GST for labour contractor i am as a labour contractor in sugar mill
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Your service falls under Manpower Supply. What is your turnover ?
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Gst is applicable on manpower supply service if the turnover is more than t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ITC ELEGIBILITY ON FOOD BILLS OF DIFFERENT TYPES.

ITC ELEGIBILITY ON FOOD BILLS OF DIFFERENT TYPES.
Query (Issue) Started By: – SAFETAB LIFESCIENCE Dated:- 8-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
Our company is in Pondicherry. Our staff submitting Food Bills consumed by them during their official visits to local and other states.
1. Local bills with CGST+SGST.
2. Other state bills with IGST
3. Other state bills with CGST+SGST
All the above 3 categories are eligible for ITC. ???? Our staff trip is purely official.
Further, we are providing Food to our Employees for which we are not collecting any amount from our Employees. The caterer is giving local bills with CGST+SGST. Shall we take ITC credit of this.
Reply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

MULTIPLE REGISTRATION OF PROPRIETORY CONCERN

MULTIPLE REGISTRATION OF PROPRIETORY CONCERN
Query (Issue) Started By: – SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR Dated:- 8-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 10 Replies
GST
We have proprietory concern which is registered under GST Act and obtained GST Number.
We have started new proprietory concern under same proprietor now we have to register the same.
How we will get register the new firm whether we have to amend the existing registration under amendment of core field on GST server or apply as fresh registration.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, please elaborate the nature of business of first concern and nature of second concern.
Reply By SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR:
The Reply:
First Proprietory concern is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at GST in India is State-centric. Hence, a person making supplies from different States needs to take separate registration in each State. Further, the person may take more than one registration within a State if the person has multiple business verticals. A person who has obtained or is required to obtain more than one registration, whether in one State or Union territory or more than one State or Union territory shall, in respect of each such registration, be treated as distinct persons for the purposes of GST. Hence, a supply between these entities constitutes supply under GST.
Reply By SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR:
The Reply:
Both concern in same state under one proprietor.
Reply By SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR:
The Reply:
CAN WE KEEP ONLY ONE REGI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Shreyas Stocks Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

M/s. Shreyas Stocks Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
Service Tax
2018 (2) TMI 1184 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 8-2-2018
ST/MISC/41607/2017 & ST/355/2010 – Final Order No. 40412/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi, Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Ms. Radhika Chandrasekar, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyam, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The facts of the case in brief are that the appellants are registered with Service Tax department for rendering taxable service under the category of “Stock Broking Service.” During the course of audit, it was noticed that in addition to brokerage charges appellants had collected transaction charges from their customers on the value of purchase and sale of the securities from April 2004 to June 2007 amounting to Rs. 81,37,357/-. Hence, a SCN dated 27.11.2007 was issued to the appellants interalia proposing to demand servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

value of a taxable service, as the case may be, includes,
(a) the aggregate of commission or brokerage charged by a broker on the sale or purchase of securities including the commission or brokerage paid by the stock-broker to any sub-broker;”
Ld. Counsel submits that the transaction charges were not charged by them but were charged by the stock exchange and that they were only collecting the amount from their clients and paying it on their behalf to the stock exchange. She also submits that wherever they had collected the amounts more than the transaction charges, they had discharged service tax liability on such excess amounts, a fact which is not disputed by the department. She further submits that the matter is no longer res integra and has been decided in favour of the appellants in a number of Tribunal decisions. Ld. Counsel relies upon the following Tribunal decisions in support of her arguments:-
a. First Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CST, Bangalore 2007 (7) STR 690 (Tri.-Ban

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ts and remitting the same to the concerned stock exchange cannot be a reason for considering such amounts as received by them for “services rendered by them”. We find that this is the very ratio that has been laid down in the Tribunal decisions relied upon by the Ld. Counsel.
5.2 In the case of First Securities Pvt. Ltd. (supra) the Tribunal has held that handling charges collected from investors and the amounts collected towards transaction charges cannot be equated to brokerage or commission for purchase of securities. The relevant portion of the said decision is reproduced as under:-
“6. In the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the lower authority is right in including the handling charges and transactions charges as part of the taxable value as additional brokerage for Service Tax purpose. The learned Advocate who appeared for the appellants took us through the impugned order and stated that the Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified in stating that the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s by the appellants also cannot be equated to brokerage or commission. It is seen that the transaction charges collected have been paid to the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. In Kohlers Dictionary for Accountants, 6th Edition, the term brokerage is defined as follows :-
“brokerage A commission, paid or accruing to a broker, arising from effecting a deal between seller and buyer, and borne by either party in accordance with custom, regulation or special agreement. It may be fixed, as in stock market transactions, by trade or government bodies, and may take any of various forms, such as a percentage or modification of selling price; a (finders) fee; an underwriting or other discount (4); a concession or other advantage (whether or not transaction -related).”
The handling charges are the expenses incurred for handling shares on delivery. The appellants have clarified that prior to 2001, there used to be physical delivery of scrips and certificates and the appellants were chargin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to different authorities and claimed that the same is not taxable. But Revenue taxed the same on the ground that such receipt by stock broker was liable to tax. Revenue failed to bring out whether the turnover charges and other charges in dispute in these appeals received by appellant were commission or brokerage. The character of receipts was claimed by appellants as recoveries from investors to make payment thereof to respective authorities in accordance with statutory provisions of Indian Stamp Act and SEBI guidelines and were not received towards consideration in the nature of commission or brokerage of sale or purchase of securities. While burden of proof was on Revenue to establish that such receipts were in the nature of commission or brokerage or had the characteristic of such nature that was failed to be discharged. The character of commission or brokerage is remuneration for the service of stock broking provided by a stock broker to investors. Therefore, aforesaid charges re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Inox Air Products Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam- GST

M/s Inox Air Products Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapatnam- GST
Central Excise
2018 (2) TMI 1744 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 8-2-2018
Appeal No. E/31202/2017 – Final Order No. A/30405/2018
Central Excise
Mr. M. V. Ravindran., J.
Shri A. Sarveswar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri M. Chandra Bose, Additional Joint Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent.
Order  
Per: M. V. Ravindran.
This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. VIZEXCUS- 001-APP-080-17-18 dated 31.07.2017.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. The issue involved in this case is regarding reversal of an amount equivalent to 6% of the value of goods cleared under Notif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Don't charge GST from affordable housing buyers: Govt to

Don't charge GST from affordable housing buyers: Govt to
GST
Dated:- 7-2-2018

New Delhi, Feb 7 (PTI) The government today asked builders not to charge any GST from home buyers as the effective GST rate on almost all affordable housing project is 8 per cent which can be adjusted against the input credit.
It said builders can levy GST on buyers of affordable housing projects only if they reduce the apartment prices after factoring in the credit claimed on inputs.
In its last meeting on January 18, the GST Council had extended the concessional rate of 12 per cent GST for construction of houses under the Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS) to promote affordable housing, which has been given infrastructure status in 2017-18 Budge

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not recover any GST payable on the flats from the buyers".
It further said that GST can recovered from buyers only if builders recalibrate the cost of the flat after factoring in the full ITC available in the GST regime and reduces the ex-GST price of flats.
The concessional rate of 12 per cent GST was already applicable on houses constructed under three components of the Housing for All (Urban) Mission/ Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) (i) ln-situ redevelopment of existing slums using land as a resource component; (ii) Affordable Housing in partnership and (iii) Beneficiary led individual house construction/enhancement.
In the meeting last month, the Council extended this tax benefit to CLSS for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RBI Announces Relief for MSMEs: Flexible Repayment and Loan Restructuring for GST-Registered Enterprises to Ease Financial Strain.

RBI Announces Relief for MSMEs: Flexible Repayment and Loan Restructuring for GST-Registered Enterprises to Ease Financial Strain.
Circulars
RBI
Relief for MSME Borrowers registered under Goo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council recommends relief in GST on Circus, Dance and Theatrical Performances

GST Council recommends relief in GST on Circus, Dance and Theatrical Performances
GST
Dated:- 7-2-2018

GST Council recommends relief in GST on Circus, Dance and Theatrical Performances
Threshold Exemption under GST for admission to such cultural and sports events in the country increased from ₹ 250 to ₹ 500 per person.
In its Meeting held on 18th January, 2018, the GST Council has recommended that for the purpose of GST exemption, the threshold price limit of Admissio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council recommends granting relief from GST on services provided by the Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) to their Members

GST Council recommends granting relief from GST on services provided by the Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) to their Members
GST
Dated:- 7-2-2018

GST Council recommends granting relief from GST on services provided by the Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) to their Members
Threshold Exemption Limit under GST for monthly contributions made by members for services provided by RWAs raised from ₹ 5,000 to ₹ 7,500 per month per person
In its 25th Meeting held on 18th January, 2018, the GST Council had recommended several measures granting relief from GST on a number of goods and services. One of the important reliefs granted by the Council is to enhance the limit of contribution made by members of a Resident We

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of services and goods is also Rs. 20 lakhs or more.
Under GST, the tax burden on RWAs will be lower for the reason that they would now be entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of taxes paid by them on capital goods (generators, water pumps, lawn furniture etc.), goods (taps, pipes, other sanitary/hardware fillings etc.) and input services such as repair and maintenance services. ITC of Central Excise and VAT paid on goods and capital goods was not available in the pre-GST period and these were a cost to the RWA.
The Notifications giving effect to the above recommendations of the GST Council have been issued and have come into force on 25th January, 2018. Accordingly, from 25 January 2018, the services provided by Resident Welfare

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =