Manoj Kumar And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Manoj Kumar And Another Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (4) TMI 347 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (11) G. S. T. L. 32 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 7-2-2018
Writ Tax No. – 134 of 2018
GST
Ms. Bharati Sapru And Mr. Neeraj Tiwari, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Nitin Kesarwani,Murari Mohan Rai
For The Respondent : C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.
ORDER
The petitioner states that he is a registered dealer who is carrying goods from Orissa to Punjab and has duly paid IGST o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Issue related to classification and GST rate on lottery tickets

Issue related to classification and GST rate on lottery tickets
01/2017-18-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5138
CIRCULAR
(No. 01/2017-18-GST)
Dated: 7th February, 2018
Subject: – regarding.
Supply of lottery has been treated as supply of goods under the Goa Goods and Services Tax (Goa GST) Act, 2017.
2. Accordingly, based on the recommendation of the GST Council, the GST rate for supply of lottery has been notified under relevant GST rate notification relating to Goa GST/ IGST/ CGST. However, entries in the respective notifications mention classification for lottery as – .
3. In this connection, referen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

System based reconciliation of information furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 with FORM GSTR-3B.

System based reconciliation of information furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 with FORM GSTR-3B.
02/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5139
Dated: 07th February, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 02/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: System based reconciliation of information furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 with FORM GSTR-3B – regarding.
Sections 37, 38 and section 39 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with rules 59, 60 and 61 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') require every registered person to furnish details of outward supplies made in a month in FORM GSTR-1, details of inward supplies received in a month in FORM GSTR-2 and a return in FORM GSTR-3 by the 10th, 15th and 20th of the next month respectively. Keeping in view that taxpayer

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rocess of reconciliation between the information furnished in FORM GSTR 3B with that furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 would be carried out in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (6) of rule 61 of the Rules.
4. The detailed procedure for reconciliation of information furnished in FORM GSTR-3 and FORM GSTR-3B is detailed in succeeding paras.
Furnishing of information in FORM GSTR- 1 & FORM GSTR-2:
5. It may be noted that after the registered person has filed his return in FORM GSTR-3B and the statement of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1, the inward supplies shall be auto drafted for all registered persons (corresponding recipients of supply) and made available to them in FORM GSTR-2A as per sub-rule (3) of rule 59 of the Rules. FORM GSTR-2A is the exact replica of FORM GSTR-2 containing only those details that are auto-populated from the details furnished in FORM GSTR-1 by the corresponding suppliers. Based on the details communicated in FORM GSTR-2A, the registered per

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RM GSTR-2, as the case may be. For example, while preparing and furnishing the details in FORM GSTR-1, if the outward supplies have been under reported or excess reported in FORM GSTR-3B, the same may be correctly reported in the FORM GSTR-1. Similarly, if the details of inward supplies or the eligible ITC have been reported less or more than what they should have been, the same maybe reported correctly in the FORM GSTR-2. This will get reflected in the revised output tax liability or eligible ITC, as the case may be of the registered person. The details furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 will be auto-populated and reflected in the return in FORM GSTR-3 for that particular month.
Action on the system-based reconciliation:
7. After the registered person has furnished the statement of inward supplies in FORM GSTR-2 by the extended date, the common portal shall auto-draft Part-A of the return in FORM GSTR-3 for the said month based on the information furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

than what has been paid as per FORM GSTR-3B, the common portal would show another instance of Table 12 for making additional payment of taxes, in accordance with the mandate of clause (b) of sub-rule (6) of rule 61. As the tax payable in column (2) of Table 12 of FORM GSTR-3 is more than what was shown in FORM GSTR-3B, the additional amount of tax payable can be paid by debiting the electronic cash or credit ledger as per the provisions contained in section 49 of the Act along with applicable interest on delayed payment of tax starting from 26th day of August, 2017 till the date of debit in the electronic cash or credit ledger. If the eligible ITC claimed by the person in FORM GSTR-2 is less than the ITC claimed and utilised by the registered person in FORM GSTR-3B, the same would be added to his output tax liability and shall have to be paid by him along with interest by debiting the electronic cash or credit ledger as per the provisions contained in section 49 of the Act before submi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reduction in output tax liability:
10. Where the output tax liability of the registered person as per the details furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 is less than the output tax liability as per the details furnished in the FORM GSTR-3B and the same is not offset by a corresponding reduction in the input tax credit to which he is entitled, the excess shall be carried forward to the next month's return to be offset against the output liability of the next month by the taxpayer when he signs and submits the return in FORM GSTR-3. However, simultaneously, if there is a decrease in the eligible input tax credit, the same will be adjusted against the above mentioned reduction in output tax liability and the balance, if any, of the reduction in output tax liability shall be carried forward to the next month's return to be offset against the output liability of the next month.
Submission of GSTR-3B without payment of taxes:
11. Where, for some reasons, the registered person h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bmit the return in FORM GSTR-3 along with the payment of the due taxes as per the provisions of section 49 of the Act. However, since the payment was not made on or before the due date, the registered person shall be liable for payment of interest on delayed payment of tax starting from 26th day of August, 2017 till the date of debit in the electronic cash and / or credit ledger. No late fee, however, would be levied for late filing of return in terms of section 47 of the Act, in accordance with the recommendation of the GST Council, as notified vide Notification No. 38/1/2017Fin(R&C)(14)/2406 dated 21/09/2017 published in the Extraordinary Official Gazette Series 1 No. 25 dated 21/09/2017.
Processing of information furnished:
13. After submission of the information in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2, the process of matching as per section 41, 42 and 43 of the Act read with rules 69 to 76 of the Rules shall be carried out as if these details were submitted in the regular course. Any amen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB]

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB]
06/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5143
Dated: 7th February, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 06/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB]- Regarding.
Briefly stated, references have been received related to applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB].
2. In this context, LAB manufactu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7% of the total quantity of SKO received from refinery is retained and balance quantity ranging from 83%- 85% is returned back to refinery. The retained SKO is towards extraction of Normal Paraffin, which is used in the manufacturing of LAB. In this transaction consideration is paid by LAB manufactures only on the quantity of retained SKO (n-paraffin).
4. In this context, the GST Council recommended for issuance of a clarification that in this transaction GST will be payable by the refinery on the value of net quantity of superior kerosene oil (SKO) retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB).
5. Accordingly, it is here by clarified that, in aforesaid case, GST will be payable by the refinery only on the net quantity of sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Procedure regarding procurement of supplies of goods from DTA by Export Oriented Unit (EOU)/Electronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit/ Software Technology Park (STP) Unit/Bio-Technology Parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export benefits under s

Procedure regarding procurement of supplies of goods from DTA by Export Oriented Unit (EOU)/Electronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit/ Software Technology Park (STP) Unit/Bio-Technology Parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export benefits under section 147 of Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
08/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5145
Dated: 7th February, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 08/2017-2018-GST)
Subject – Procedure regarding procurement of supplies of goods from DTA by Export Oriented Unit (EOU)/Electronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit/ Software Technology Park (STP) Unit/Bio-Technology Parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export benefits under section 147 of Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – reg.
In accordance with the decisions taken by the GST Council to resolve certain difficulties being faced by exporters post GST, it has been decided th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ation No. 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(26)/3640 dated 02nd November, 2017, the following procedure and safeguards are prescribed-
(i) The recipient EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit shall give prior intimation in a prescribed proforma in “Form-A” (appended herewith) bearing a running serial number containing the goods to be procured, as pre-approved by the Development Commissioner and the details of the supplier before such deemed export supplies are made. The said intimation shall be given to-
(a) the registered supplier;
(b) the jurisdictional GST officer in charge of such registered supplier; and
(c) its jurisdictional GST officer.
(ii) The registered supplier thereafter will supply goods under tax invoice to the recipient EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit.
(iii) On receipt of such supplies, the EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit shall endorse the tax invoice and send a copy of the endorsed tax invoice to-
(a) the registered supplier;
(b) the jurisdictional GST officer in charge of such registered

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

B containing transactions for the month, shall be provided to the jurisdictional GST officer, each month (by the 10th of month) in a CD or Pen drive, as convenient to the said unit.
3. The above procedure and safeguards are in addition to the terms and conditions to be adhered to by a EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit in of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015- 20 and the duty exemption notification being availed by such unit.
4. Difficulty, if any, in implementation of the above instructions may please be brought to the notice of the undersigned.
(Dipak M. Bandekar)
Commissioner of State Tax
Note: Similar circular is issued under Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by GST Policy Wing, Central Board of Excise and Customs, Dept. of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, GOI vide Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST dated 06th November, 2017.
Form – A
(Intimation for procurement of supplies from the registered person by Export Oriented Unit (EOU)/E1ectronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit/ Software Te

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(Name of supplier, address and Goods & Services Tax Identification Number(GSTIN)). Such supplies on receipt would be used in manufacturing of goods or rendering services by us. We would also abide by procedure set out in Circular no……………. dated -.
Signatures of the owner of
EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP unit
or his Authorised person
To:
1. The GST officer having Jurisdiction over the EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP unit.
2. The GST officer having Jurisdiction over the registered person intending to supply the goods.
3. The registered person intending to supply goods to EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP unit.
For the month of…………………
FORM- B
Form to be maintained by EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP unit for the receipt, use and removal of goods received under deemed export benefit under section 147 of CGST Act,2017 read with Notification No. 48/2017-Central Tax dated 18.10.2017.
(as per Circular………..dated………&hel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications regarding applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of certain services.

Clarifications regarding applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of certain services.
09/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5146
Dated: 7th February, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 09/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: Clarifications regarding applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of certain services.
Clarification with regard to certain issues are as under: 
Sl.No.
Issue
Comment
1.
Is GST applicable on warehousing of agricultural produce such as tea (i.e. black tea, white tea etc.), processed coffee beans or powder, pulses (de-husked or split), jaggery, processed spices, processed dry fruits, processed cashew nuts etc.?
1. As per GST notification No. 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(11/2017-Rate), dated 30.06.2017, at Sl.No. 24 and notification No. 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(12/2017-Rate) Sl.No. 54, published in Extraordinary Official Gazette

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of agricultural produce. Same is the case with coffee obtained after processing of coffee beans.
5. Similarly, processing of sugarcane into jaggery changes its essential characteristics. Thus, jaggery is also not an agricultural produce.
6. Pulses commonly known as dal are obtained after dehusking or splitting or both. The process of dehusking or splitting is usually not carried out by farmers or at farm level but by the pulse millers. Therefore pulses (dehusked or split) are also not agricultural produce. However whole pulse grains such as whole gram, rajma etc. are covered in the definition of agricultural produce.
7. In view of the above, it is hereby clarified that processed products such as tea (i.e. black tea, white tea etc.), processed coffee beans or powder, pulses (dehusked or split), jaggery, processed spices, processed dry fruits, processed cashew nuts etc. fall outside the definition of agricultural produce given in notificatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vailable for discharging GST on inter-state supply of such aircraft engines, parts & accessories by way of inter-state stock transfers between distinct persons as specified in section 25 of the Goa GST Act, notwithstanding that credit of input tax charged on consumption of such goods is not allowed for supply of service of transport of passengers by air in economy class at GST rate of 5%.
3.
3. Is GST leviable on General Insurance policies provided by a State Government to employees of the State government/ Police personnel, employees of Electricity Department or students of colleges/ private schools etc.
(a) where premium is paid by State Government and
(b) where premium is paid by employees, students etc.?
It is hereby clarified that services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory under any insurance scheme for which total premium is paid by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory are exempt from GST under Sl. No. 40 of notificati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification on refund of unutilized input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exporters of fabrics.

Clarification on refund of unutilized input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exporters of fabrics.
11/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5148
Dated: 7th February, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 11/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: Clarification on refund of unutilized input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exporters of fabrics – regarding.
Doubts have been raised regarding the restrictions of refund of unutilized input tax credit of GST paid on inputs to manufacturer exporters of fabrics [falling under chapters 50 to 55 and 60 and headings 5608, 5801, 5806] under GST.
2.1 The matter has been

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the recommendations of the GST Council, Notification No. 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(5/2017-Rate) dated 30th June, published in the Extraordinary Official Gazette No. 3 , Series I No. 13 dated 30th June, 2017 [as amended from time to time] has been issued under clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 54 of the Goa GST Act, 2017 restricting refund of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of certain specified goods, including input tax credit of GST paid on inputs.
2.3 However, the aforesaid notification having been issued under clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 54 of the Goa GST Act, 2017, restriction on refund of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs will not be applicable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Issue related to classification and GST rate on Terracotta idols.

Issue related to classification and GST rate on Terracotta idols.
13/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5150
Dated: 7th February, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 13/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: Issue related to classification and GST rate on Terracotta idols-regarding
The GST rate on Idols made of clay is Nil. (Sl.No. 135A of Schedule notification 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(2/2017

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications regarding GST on College Hostel Mess Fees

Clarifications regarding GST on College Hostel Mess Fees
18/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001
Ph: 0832-2229430
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5155
Dated: 7th February , 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 18/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: reg.
The educational institutions have mess facility for providing food to their students and staff. Such facility is either run by the institution/ students themselves or is outsourced to a third person. Supply of food or drink provided by a mess or canteen is taxable at 5% without Input Tax Credit [Serial No. 7(i) of Notification No. 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(11/2017-Rate) dated 30.06.2017, published in the Extraordinary

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol.

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol.
19/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji -Goa-403001
Dated: 7th February, 2018
CIRCULAR
(No. 19/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: Clarification regarding applicability of GST on Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol – Regarding.
The principal raw materials for manufacture of Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol and Poly Iso Butylene goods are Liquefied Petroleum Gas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of net quantity of polybutylene feedstock and liquefied petroleum gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl Para Cresol.
4. Accordingly, it is hereby clarified that, in the aforesaid cases, GST will be payable by the refinery only on the net quantity of Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained by the manufacturer for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol. Though, the refinery would be liable to pay GST on such returned quantity of Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas, when the same is supplied by it to any other person.
5. This clarification is issued in the context of the Goods and Service Tax (GST) law only and past issues, if an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Filing of Returns under GST

Filing of Returns under GST
20/2017-2018-GST Dated:- 7-2-2018 Goa SGST
GST – States
=============
Document 1
Government of Goa
Department of Commercial Taxes
Vikrikar Bhavan,
Panaji – Goa – 403001

email: comm-ctax.goa@nic.in
Dated: 7th February, 2018
Ph: 0832-2229430
CCT/26-4/2017-2018/5/57
CIRCULAR
(No. 20/2017-2018-GST)
Subject: Filing of Returns under GST- regarding
Various representations have been received seeking clarifications on
various aspects of return filing such as return filing dates, applicability and
quantum of late fee, amendment of errors in submitting / filing of FORM GSTR-
3B and other related queries. In order to consolidate the information in various
notifications and circulars regarding return filing and to ensure uniformity in
implementation across field formations, the Commissioner, in exercise of its
powers conferred under section 168 (1) of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017 hereby clarifies the following issue

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ublished in Official Gazette.
Series II No. 40 dated 04th January, 2018. (superseding Notification No.
38/1/2017-Fin(R&C) (31) dated 23rd November, 2017, published in
Extraordinary Official Gazette, Series 1 No. 34 dated 23rd November, 2017
and CCT/26-2/2017-18/22 dated 15th November, 2017, published in
Extraordinary Official Gazette No. 2, Series II No. 32 dated 15th
November, 2017) have been issued to notify the due dates for filing of
outward supply statement in FORM GSTR-1 for various months / quarters
(as depicted in the calendar above) by registered persons having aggregate
turnover in the previous financial year or current financial year of upto 1.5
Crores rupees and above 1.5 Crores rupees respectively. Since, the option
of quarterly filing was not available earlier, many taxpayers have already
filed their FORM GSTR-1 for the month of July, such taxpayers shall not
file these details again and shall only file details for the month of August
and September, 2017. Fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Section 2(6) of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017 (hereinafter referred as ” Goa GST Act”) for the previous financial
year or the current financial year (in case of new registrants). Based on this
self-assessed turnover, the registered person with turnover up to Rs. 1.5
Crore will be required to file FORM GSTR-1 on quarterly basis instead of
on monthly basis. It is also clarified that the registered person may opt to
file FORM GSTR-1 on monthly basis if he so wishes even though his
aggregate turnover is up to Rs. 1.5 Crore. Once he falls in this bracket or if
he chooses to file return on monthly basis, the registered person will not
have the option to change the return filing periodicity for the entire financial
year. In cases, where the registered person wrongly reports his aggregate
turnover and opts to file FORM GSTR-1 on quarterly basis, he may be
liable for punitive action under the Goa GST Act, 2017.
2.Applicability and quantum of late fee:
2.1 The late fee f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of errors:
COMMISSIONER
GOVT. O
L-GOA
3.1 Various representations have been received wherein registered persons have
requested for clarification on the procedure for rectification of errors made
3
TAXES
*
while filing their FORM GSTR-3B. In this regard, Circular No. 2/2017-
2018-GST dated 7th February, 2018 was issued which clarified that errors
committed while filing FORM GSTR – 3B may be rectified while filing
FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 of the same month. Further, in the
said circular, it was clarified that the system will automatically reconcile the
data submitted in FORM GSTR-3B with FORM GSTR-1 and FORM
GSTR-2, and the variations if any will either be offset against output tax
liability or added to the output tax liability of the subsequent months of the
registered person.
3.2 Since, the GST Council has decided that the time period of filing of FORM
GSTR-2 and FORM GSTR -3 for the month of July 2017 to March 2018
would be worked out by a Committee of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he output tax liability or input
tax credit, there can be no negative entries in the FORM GSTR-3B. The
amount remaining for adjustment, if any, may be adjusted in the return(s)
in FORM GSTR3B of subsequent month(s) and, in cases where such
adjustment is not feasible, refund may be claimed. Where adjustments have
been made in FORM GSTR-3B of multiple months, corresponding
adjustments in FORM GSTR-1 should also preferably be made in the
corresponding months.
TAXES
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL
GOVT. OF GOA, PANAJI-GOA
4
5. Where the taxpayer has committed an error in submitting (before offsetting
and filing) the information in FORM GSTR-3B, a provision for editing the
same has been provided. The facility to edit the information can be used
only before offsetting the liability and editing will not be permitted after
offsetting the liability. Hence, every care should be taken to ensure the
accuracy of the figures before proceeding to offset the liabilities.
6.
It is further

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

I
Liability was
under
reported
Change in
FORM
GSTR-1
Stage 1
Confirmed submission
Return liabilities / Input tax credit
availed were confirmed and
submitted and therefore no change
can be done to the liability. No
action was taken after this step.
Use “Edit” facility to add under
reported liability
Company A has four units in
Haryana, while filing their return
for the month of July, they
inadvertently, missed on details of
a last minute order. Since, they had
already submitted and confirmed
their output supply details, they
were not sure of how to proceed.
What can they do?
The company may use the edit
return” facility to add such liability
in their submitted return and then
proceed for filing of their return
|
Stage of Return Filing (GSTR – 3B)
Stage 2
Cash ledger updated
Cash was added to the electronic cash ledger as per
the return liability. No action was taken after this
step.
Use “Edit” facility to add such liability and
additional cash, if re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

quent month(s) after payment of
interest.
Company A has four units in Haryana,
while filing their return for the month of
July, they inadvertently, missed on details
of a last minute order. The Company had
filed their returns in order to not pay late
fee and other penalties. What can they do?
In this case, they may report this
additional liability in the return of next
month and pay tax with interest.
If such liability was not reported in FORM GSTR-1 of the month/quarter, then such liability may be declared in the subsequent
month's/quarter's FORM GSTR-1 in which payment was made.
COMISSIONER
OF
COMMERCIAL
TAXES
GOVT. OF GOA
RENENGOA
6
Common
Error II

Liability was
over reported
Stage 1
Confirmed submission
Return liabilities / Input tax credit availed
were confirmed and submitted and therefore
no change can be done to the liability. No
action was taken after this step.
Stage of Return Filing (GSTR – 3B)
Stage 2
Cash ledger updated
Cash was added to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he company
had already deposited cash in their cash
ledger before realizing this error. What can
company B do?
In this case, Company B has the option to
use the “edit” facility to reduce such
liability. Once, this is done, they can
partially debit their cash ledger to offset
their tax liability. Further, remaining
balance can either be claimed as refund or
used to offset future liabilities.
Stage 3
Offset Liability
Stage 4
Return Filed
All liabilities were offset Return was filed.
by debiting the cash and
credit ledger. No action
was taken after this step.
Liability may be adjusted in return of subsequent
month(s) or refund may be claimed where adjustment
is not feasible.
Company B had reported an inter-State sale but
realized that the same sale was counted twice and
hence was not to be reported or taxed. But the return
form was already filed and no change could be done
to reduce the liabilities. What can company B do?
In this case, they may reduce this liabi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g balance, if any may
be either claimed as refund or used to offset
future liabilities.
Company C is registered in the State of
Haryana. While entering their outward
supplies in FORM GSTR-3B, the company
| realized that they had inadvertently, shown
inter-State supply as intra-state supply and
submitted the return. Further, they also had
updated their Central Tax and State tax cash
Company C is registered in the State of
Haryana. While entering their outward
supplies in FORM GSTR3B, the company
realized that they had inadvertently, shown
inter-State supply as intra-State supply and
submitted the return. What can they do?
In this case, the company will have to rectify | ledgers. What can they do?
wrongly reported liability using the edit
facility. Here, the company will reduce their
Central Tax / State tax supplies and liability
and add integrated tax liability and proceed
to file their return.
In this case, the company will have to rectify
wrongly reported liabil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

filed their return in order to avoid late fee and
penalty? What can they do? Since, the return
has already been filed, then the company will
have to report the inter-state supply in their next
month's liability and adjust their wrongly paid
intra-State liability in the subsequent months
returns or claim refund of the same.
Such taxpayers will have to file for amendments by filling Table 9 of the subsequent month's / quarter's FORM GSTR-1.
TAXES
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL
GOVT. OF GOA AVAJAGO
00
8
Common
Error
IV
Input Tax
credit was
under
reported
Change in
Stage 1
Confirmed submission
Stage of Return Filing (GSTR-3B)
Return liabilities / Input tax credit availed were
confirmed and submitted and therefore no
change can be done to the liability. No action
was taken after this step.
Use 'Edit” facility to add un-availed input tax
credit. Input tax Credit will be added to the
credit ledger and may be used for offsetting this
month or subsequent month's lia

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

this month
or for subsequent months.
No Action
GSTR – 3B for the month of July,
inadvertently, misreported Input tax
credit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- as Rs.
10,00,000/-. They had filed their return
and paid Rs. 90,00,000/- in cash. What
can they do?
Since, the return has already been filed,
Company D may add such Input tax
credit in their return for subsequent
month(s).
FORM
GSTR-1
CONERS SIGNER
GOVT. OF
ان من
COMMERCIAL
-GO
TAXES
9
Common
Error – V
Input tax
credit was
over
reported
Change in
FORM
GSTR-1
Stage 1
Confirmed submission
Return liabilities / Input tax credit availed
were confirmed and submitted and
therefore no change can be done to the
liability. No action was taken after this
step.
Stage of Return Filing (GSTR – 3B)
Stage 2
Cash ledger updated
Cash was added to the electronic cash ledger as
per the return liability. No action was taken
after this step.
Use “Edit” facility to rectify the over Additional cash, if requir

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

osit additional Rs. 10,00,000/- in
the cash ledger by creating challan in FORM
GST PMT-06.
No Action
Stage 3
Offset Liability
All liabilities were offset
by debiting the cash and
credit ledger. No action
was taken after this step.
Stage 4
Return Filed
Return was filed.
Pay (through cash) / Reverse such over
reported input tax credit with interest in return
of subsequent month (s).
While filing their FORM GSTR 3B for the
months of July, 2017, Company E
inadvertently, reported their eligible input tax
credit, as Rs. 20,00,000/- instead of Rs.
10,00,000/-. Company E also utilized their
additional input tax credit and filed their
returns. What can they do?
Since, the company had utilized ineligible
credit to offset such liabilities, the company
will have to pay (through cash) / Reverse such
over reported utilized input tax credit with
interest.
10
GOUT OF COP
Common Error
– VI
Input Tax
Credit of the
wrong tax was
taken
Change in
FORM GSTR-1
Stage 1
C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for
the months of July, 2017, Company E
inadvertently, reported their Central
Tax credit of Rs. 20,00,000/- as
Integrated tax. What can they do?
They can use “edit” facility to correct
central tax credit under the right head.
For offsetting any integrated tax
liability, additional cash may be
deposited in the cash ledger by creating
challan in FORM GST PMT-06.
No Action
|
Stage 3
Stage 4
Return Filed
Offset Liability
All liabilities were offset by Return
debiting the cash and credit filed.
ledger. No action was taken after
this step.
was
Pay(through cash) / Reverse any wrongly reported
input tax credit in return of subsequent month(s).
For under reported input tax credit, the same may
be availed in return of subsequent month(s).
While filing their FORM GSTR 3B for the months
of July, 2017, Company E inadvertently, reported
their Central Tax credit of Rs. 20,00,000/- as
Integrated tax credit. In order to avoid late fee and
penalties, they paid Rs. 20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications regarding GST on College Hostel Mess Fees.

Clarifications regarding GST on College Hostel Mess Fees.
Trade Notice No. 18/2017-18 Dated:- 7-2-2018 Madhya Pradesh SGST
GST – States
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, GOODS & SERVICES TAX HQRS.
GST BHAWAN, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR (M.P.) 482001
C.No. IV(16)01/Trade Notice/HQ/Tech/2017-18
Trade Notice No. 18/2017-18
Dated 07.02.2018
Clarifications regarding GST on College Hostel Mess Fees – Reg.
Kind attention is invited to Circular No.28/02/2018-GST dated 08.01.2018 issued under F.No.35

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

USA Company – US Citizen- Living India more than 3 years

USA Company – US Citizen- Living India more than 3 years
Query (Issue) Started By: – Prime Edge Dated:- 6-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 14-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 10 Replies
GST
Hello,
I am USA Citizen. I have Tax return filing Firm in USA. Its LLC sole proprietorship. Its single member only company. I am the member. I run that company from India for USA Clients and Money goes to that company and later that money comes to member of that company. That means money will come back to me. I file the tax return in India and Report the income. Do I have to file GST as LUT? As far as I feel that since money is going to Company, I don't have to deal with GST.
Please assist on this query.
Thanks.
Reply By Rajagopalan R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ports of goods or services or both and inter-State supplies of persons having the same Permanent Account Number, to be computed on all India basis but excludes Central tax, State tax, Union Territory tax, Integrated tax and Cess.
The value of following supplies shall be taken into account while computing the limit of ₹ 20 Lakh/ ₹ 10 Lakh.
(a)
Value of all taxable supplies excluding the value of inward supplies
(b)
Value of exempted supplies
(c)
Value of export goods or services or both
(d)
Value of inter-State supplies of persons having same Permanent Account Number to be computed on all India basis
Thus in view of the above legal position and in view of your turnover in the preceding year as well as this year, you can

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tributed to member of Partnership LLC company. Do I still fall into GST registration and filing GST Return?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Company is treated as a person. One irrespective of members in a. Company. If you talk of partnership firm, it is one.
Reply By Prime Edge:
The Reply:
i think I didn't explain my company structure.
Prime Edge LLC(USA Based)
Member 1 : Janak Shah
Member 2: Akshay Shah
Both members are based on India. Prime Edge LLC is providing service tax return filing to USA based Customers. Both members are paying the taxes to India for the profit which coming from LLC.
Based on my understanding both members are not required to file GST even revenue goes more than ₹ 20 lakh. Please confirm it.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of GST paid against supply to SEZ units

Refund of GST paid against supply to SEZ units
Query (Issue) Started By: – MohanLal tiwari Dated:- 6-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
We have supplied goods during July'17 to SEZ unit on payment of applicable IGST, our SEZ customer had initially paid the IGST charged in bill but later on recovered asking to claim refund.
Kindly advise procedure with rulings & forms if any for claiming refund of IGST paid on supplies to SEZ units.
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
sir,
According to second proviso to rule 89 (1) of CGST rules, 2017 "in respect of supplies to a Special Economic Zone unit or a Special Economic Zone developer, the application for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TRA:
The Reply:
GST RFD-01 is to be filed online as duty will be debited at common portal by doing so and ARN shall be generated. Application with supporting documents is to be filed manually with jurisdictional GST officer.
Reply By Gorantla Bhaskar Rao:
The Reply:
Dear sir,
I agree with the above experts. However, as of now due to non-availability of the refund module on the common portal, manual filing and processing of refund claims in respect of zero-rated supplies was prescribed vide CBEC circular 17/17/2017-GST Dt.15.11.2017. Accordingly, the application for refund of integrated tax (IGST) paid on zero-rated supply of goods to SEZ developer/SEZ unit is required to be filed in Form GST RFD-01A (as notified in the CGST Rules vide N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

RCM & FCM METHOD FOR TRANSPORTER

RCM & FCM METHOD FOR TRANSPORTER
Query (Issue) Started By: – MANAV KEDIA Dated:- 6-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
CAN A TRANSPORTER REGISTERED IN DIFFERENT STATES OPT FOR FCM IN ONE STATE AND RCM IN ANOTHER STATE and WHAT WILL BE THE PROCEDURE TO TAKE INPUT TAX CREDIT ?
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
The service provider is exempted from taking registration if the service provided by him is covered under reverse charge notif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST ON SUPPLY OF USED MOTOR VEHICLE BY TRANSPORTER

GST ON SUPPLY OF USED MOTOR VEHICLE BY TRANSPORTER
Query (Issue) Started By: – MANAV KEDIA Dated:- 6-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 26-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
WHAT WILL BE GST RATE ON SUPPLY OF USED MOTOR VEHICLE BY TRANSPORTER AND ALSO RELEVANT NOTIFICATION ?
Reply By CS SANJAY MALHOTRA:
The Reply:
IGST Notification No 09/2018 w.e.f. 25/01/18
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Great relief is given by the Govt by reducing the tax rate.
Reply By CS SA

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds (Amendment) Rules, 2018

Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds (Amendment) Rules, 2018
F. No. 31013/16/2017-ST-I-DoR – G.S.R. 145(E) Dated:- 6-2-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 6th February, 2018
G.S.R. 145(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 53 read with section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), sections 17 and 18 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (13 of 2017) and section 21 of the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (14 of 2017), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds Rules, 2017, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Union of India and Anr.

Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Union of India and Anr.
GST
2018 (2) TMI 766 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – 2018 (10) G. S. T. L. 18 (Bom.) , [2018] 2 GSTL 37 (Bom)
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-2-2018
Writ Petition (L) No. 2230 of 2018
GST
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
Mr. Vinayak Patkar with Mr. Ishaan Patkar and Mr. G.Y. Patwardhan i/b Ms. Roshni Naik for the petitioner.
Mr. Sonpal with Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for respondent no.2. Mr. Jitendra Mishra for respondent no.1.
P.C.:
The petitioner has brought before this Court his grievance and it is little peculiar.
2. The petitioner says that it is a company engaged in manufacturing of robotic and automation equipment. The 1st respondent is the Union of India through the Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax, Pune and the 2nd respondent is the State of Maharashtra through the Commissioner of State Goods and Services Tax.  
3. The purpose of filing this petition is bec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tioner from securing the final registration number. In the absence thereof, the petitioner is exposed to interest liability and may have to face even penal consequences. Importantly, the petitioner as well as its customers are unable to avail input tax credit mechanism.
5. The writ petition was filed in this Court and after its filing, notice was issued. On the earlier occasion, only the learned AGP representing the State Goods and Services Tax Commissioner appeared before us. After notice, Mr. Mishra is instructed to appear for respondent no.1.
6. The petitioner says that after filing of this petition, on 25th January 2018, it has been allowed access to the online profile. However, even this access is not complete. The petitioner was granted the final registration number and the profile was made operational, but the petitioner could not file the necessary return, and particularly the Return GSTR-3B, and the payment of tax is not possible without this return. This return is not being

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r would be projected and raised before the Council or not, Mr. Mishra could not give us a definite answer. All that Mr. Mishra says is that he may be granted two weeks' time to take instructions and file affidavit.
10. We do not think that these are satisfactory state of affairs. A tax like Goods and Services Tax was highly publicised and termed as popular. We had yet not seen a celebration of New Tax regime, but that has followed with great hue and cry. These celebrations mean nothing. The special sessions of Parliament or special or extraordinary meetings of Council would mean nothing to the assessees unless they obtain easy access to the website and portals. The regime is not tax friendly. We hope and trust that those in charge of implementation and administration of this law will at least now wake up and put in place the requisite mechanism.
This is necessary to preserve the image, prestige and reputation of this country, particularly when we are inviting and welcoming foreig

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Versus Shri Dheeraj Lulla

Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Versus Shri Dheeraj Lulla
Central Excise
2018 (2) TMI 921 – MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT – TMI
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-2-2018
CEA No. 41 of 2017
Central Excise
P. K. Jaiswal And Virender Singh, JJ.
Shri Prasanna Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant
ORDER
This appeal under Section 35-G (2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been filed by the Revenue against order dated 11.01.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, by which the learned Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee filed against order dated 26.07.2012 passed in Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Indore, whereby the assessee was denied benefit of CENVAT credit on input and input services.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has made a statement at Bar that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered by the order dated 31.01.2018 passed in Central

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

actures of Cement & Clinker falling under Sub-Heading No.25.23 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986). They are availing CENVAT Credit facility on inputs capital goods and input services under Rules 2 and 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. On the basis of departmental audit carried out in September, 2005, it was alleged that several input services for which CENVAT Credit has been allowed, would not be eligible for the same and show cause notice was issued. The Original Authority dismissed CENVAT Credit on various input services to the extent of Rs. 28,24,034/-. Vide order dated 30.03.2007 (Annexure-C) First Appellate Authority – Commissioner (Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Indore allowed the CENVAT Credit to the tune of Rs. 27,57,759/- and upheld the demand to the tune of Rs. 1,16,280/-.
3. The Revenue aggrieved by the aforesaid order, challenged the same by filing appeal before the learned Appellate Tribunal. Credit has been taken as distributed by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y covered by a decision of the Tribunal in the case of Cadile Health Care v. CCE, Ahmedabad reported in 2010 (17) STR 134 (Tribunal Ahmedabad) and held that denial of credit for these services is not legally sustainable and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.
4. Shri Prasanna Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that one appeal against order passed by the Delhi High Court on 08.03.2017 in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-I etc. v. M/s. Space Telelink Limited & another has been filed before the Apex Court and the aforesaid matter is pending, and therefore, till the matter is decided, it cannot be said that the issue has been finally decided by the Courts of law.
5. It is not in dispute that the claims of CENVAT Credit was held to be admissible and penalty imposed was set aside by the Gujarat High Court as well as other High Courts. Gujarat High Court took note of the revenue's contention with regard to the justification of Rule 8 (3A). It wa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the fact, which has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the Revenue, that the matter has been decided and appeal has been dismissed by the Delhi High Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I v. Space Telelink Limited reported in 2017 (355) ELT 189 (Delhi) by giving following reasons in paragraphs No.6, 7 and 8, which read, as under: –
“6. This Court also notices that the Indsur Global Ltd. (supra) decision had cited and relied upon the decision in Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India 1999 (106) ELT 3 (SC) as well as upon the decision in Collector v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. 1999 (112) ELT 353 (SC). In Dai Ichi (supra), the Court held as follows: –
“17. It is clear from these Rules, as we read them, that a manufacturer obtains credit for the excise duty paid on raw material to be used by him in the production of an excisable product immediately it makes the requisite declaration and obtains an acknowledgment thereof. It is entitled to use the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

le.
18. It is, therefore, that in the case of Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India [1999(106) ELT 3] this Court said that a credit under the MODVAT scheme was as good as tax paid.”
7. The revenue has argued that the Supreme Court has entertained a Special Leave Petition against the judgment of Gujarat and Madras High Courts and furthermore, granted a stay of proceedings and that in these circumstances, the law declared in those judgments are no longer applicable. This submission is fallacious because in Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. v. Church of South India Trust Association (1992) 3 SCC 1, the Supreme Court had observed as follows: –
“While considering the effect of an interim order staying the operation of the order under challenge, a distinction has to be made between quashing of an order and stay of operation of an order Quashing of an order results in the restoration of the position as it stood on the date of the passing of the order which has been quashed. The stay of opera

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at the passing of the interim order dated February 21, 1991 by the Delhi High Court staying the operation of the order of the Appellate Authority dated January 7, 1991 does not have the effect of reviving the appeal which had been dismissed by the Appellate Authority by its order dated January 7, 1991 and it cannot be said that after February 21, 1991, the said appeal stood revived and was pending before the Appellate Authority.”
8. It is apparent therefore, that an order keeping in abeyance the judgment of a lower Court or authority does not deface the underlying basis of the judgment itself, i.e., its reasoning.”
7. In view of the aforesaid, we are of the view that the law on the issue is well settled by various High Courts. No case to interfere with order dated 02.06.2016 passed by the learned Tribunal, as prayed for, is made out, nor any substantial question of law is arising in this appeal.
8. Central Excise Appeal No.32/2016 filed by the Revenue has no merit, and is acco

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Reliance Industries Ltd. Versus Stae of U.P.

M/s Reliance Industries Ltd. Versus Stae of U.P.
GST
2018 (3) TMI 678 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (10) G. S. T. L. 133 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-2-2018
Misc. Bench No. -31799 of 2017
GST
Mr. Rajan Roy And Rajesh Singh Chauhan, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Aditya Pandey,Bipin Kumar Pandey,Vaibhav Pandey
For The Respondent : C. S. C., A. S. G.
ORDER
Heard.
The petitioners have approached this Court against the order of the seizure dated 05.12.2017 passed by the proper Officer under Section 129 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 read with Section 7 of the same Act.
As regards the contention of the petitioners on merits as to his liability to tax etc. these are issues which would be considered either in the pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

REJI KURIAN Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER GOODS & SERVICE TAXES, MATTANCHERRY, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GOODS & SERVICE TAXES, (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAXES) AND THE COMMISSIOENR OF GOODS & SERVICE TAXES (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAXES), THIRUVANANTHAPURA

REJI KURIAN Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER GOODS & SERVICE TAXES, MATTANCHERRY, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GOODS & SERVICE TAXES, (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAXES) AND THE COMMISSIOENR OF GOODS & SERVICE TAXES (FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAXES), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (6) TMI 1129 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 260 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-2-2018
W.P. (C). No. 2384 of 2018
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Aji V. Dev, Sri. M.G. Shaji And Smt.O.A. Nuriya
For The Respondents : Sri. V. K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner along with others was carrying on business in partnership in the name 'Vibgyor Digital Colour Lab'. The firm of the petitio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the firm is no longer doing business since 31.07.2011. It is the case of the petitioner that there was no communication thereafter to the firm from the Department. While so, it is stated that the petitioner has received notice under the Revenue Recovery Act for realization of amounts payable under the Act, and the enquiries made by the petitioner thereafter revealed that proceedings have been initiated by the first respondent against the firm after Ext.P3 notice under Section 25(1) of the Act, for assessing the escaped turnover of the petitioner for the year 2011-12 and an assessment order has been passed pursuant to the said proceedings, on 20/03/2017. Ext.P6 is the order passed by the first respondent in this connection and the said order

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

heir business address and the firm has responded to the said notice. It is submitted that in so far as the firm has received Ext.P3 notice earlier sent, they cannot be heard to contend that they have not received the notice issued prior to Ext.P6 order. It was also pointed out by the learned Government Pleader that the registration of the firm of the petitioner is yet to be cancelled and on that ground also, they cannot contend that they have not received the notice sent in the business address of the firm .
5. True, in so far as one of the partners of the firm is doing business with others in the very same premises, they must have received Ext.P3 notice. But, that does not mean that they should always get the notices sent in that address.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Versus Endo Labs Ltd.

Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Versus Endo Labs Ltd.
Central Excise
2018 (2) TMI 1755 – MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT – TMI
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-2-2018
CEA No.40 of 2017
Central Excise
P. K. Jaiswal And Virender Singh JJ.
For the Appellant : Shri Prasanna Prasad, learned counsel
ORDER
This appeal under Section 35-G (2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been filed by the Revenue against order dated 11.01.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, by which the learned Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee filed against order dated 26.07.2012 passed in Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Indore, whereby the assessee was denied benefit of CENVAT credit on input and input services.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has made a statement at Bar that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered by the order dated 31.01.2018 passed in Central Exc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

res of Cement & Clinker falling under Sub-Heading No.25.23 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986). They are availing CENVAT Credit facility on inputs capital goods and input services under Rules 2 and 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. On the basis of departmental audit carried out in September, 2005, it was alleged that several input services for which CENVAT Credit has been allowed, would not be eligible for the same and show cause notice was issued. The Original Authority dismissed CENVAT Credit on various input services to the extent of Rs. 28,24,034/-. Vide order dated 30.03.2007 (Annexure-C) First Appellate Authority – Commissioner (Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Indore allowed the CENVAT Credit to the tune of Rs. 27,57,759/- and upheld the demand to the tune of Rs. 1,16,280/-.
3. The Revenue aggrieved by the aforesaid order, challenged the same by filing appeal before the learned Appellate Tribunal. Credit has been taken as distributed by the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y covered by a decision of the Tribunal in the case of Cadile Health Care v. CCE, Ahmedabad reported in 2010 (17) STR 134 (Tribunal Ahmedabad) and held that denial of credit for these services is not legally sustainable and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.
4. Shri Prasanna Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that one appeal against order passed by the Delhi High Court on 08.03.2017 in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-I etc. v. M/s. Space Telelink Limited & another has been filed before the Apex Court and the aforesaid matter is pending, and therefore, till the matter is decided, it cannot be said that the issue has been finally decided by the Courts of law.
5. It is not in dispute that the claims of CENVAT Credit was held to be admissible and penalty imposed was set aside by the Gujarat High Court as well as other High Courts. Gujarat High Court took note of the revenue's contention with regard to the justification of Rule 8 (3A). It was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o the fact, which has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the Revenue, that the matter has been decided and appeal has been dismissed by the Delhi High Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I v. Space Telelink Limited reported in 2017 (355) ELT 189 (Delhi) by giving following reasons in paragraphs No.6, 7 and 8, which read, as under: –
“6. This Court also notices that the Indsur Global Ltd. (supra) decision had cited and relied upon the decision in Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India 1999 (106) ELT 3 (SC) as well as upon the decision in Collector v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. 1999 (112) ELT 353 (SC) . In Dai Ichi (supra), the Court held as follows: –
” 17. It is clear from these Rules, as we read them, that a manufacturer obtains credit for the excise duty paid on raw material to be used by him in the production of an excisable product immediately it makes the requisite declaration and obtains an acknowledgment thereof. It is entitled to use the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ble.
18. It is, therefore, that in the case of Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India [1999(106) ELT 3] this Court said that a credit under the MODVAT scheme was as good as tax paid.”
7. The revenue has argued that the Supreme Court has entertained a Special Leave Petition against the judgment of Gujarat and Madras High Courts and furthermore, granted a stay of proceedings and that in these circumstances, the law declared in those judgments are no longer applicable. This submission is fallacious because in Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. v. Church of South India Trust Association (1992) 3 SCC 1 , the Supreme Court had observed as follows: –
“While considering the effect of an interim order staying the operation of the order under challenge, a distinction has to be made between quashing of an order and stay of operation of an order Quashing of an order results in the restoration of the position as it stood on the date of the passing of the order which has been quashed. The stay of operat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the passing of the interim order dated February 21, 1991 by the Delhi High Court staying the operation of the order of the Appellate Authority dated January 7, 1991 does not have the effect of reviving the appeal which had been dismissed by the Appellate Authority by its order dated January 7, 1991 and it cannot be said that after February 21, 1991, the said appeal stood revived and was pending before the Appellate Authority.
” 8. It is apparent therefore, that an order keeping in abeyance the judgment of a lower Court or authority does not deface the underlying basis of the judgment itself, i.e., its reasoning.”
7. In view of the aforesaid, we are of the view that the law on the issue is well settled by various High Courts. No case to interfere with order dated 02.06.2016 passed by the learned Tribunal, as prayed for, is made out, nor any substantial question of law is arising in this appeal.
8. Central Excise Appeal No.32/2016 filed by the Revenue has no merit, and is accordi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Procedure for validation of Bank Accounts and rectification of EGM errors for credit of IGST Refund through PFMS Portal

Procedure for validation of Bank Accounts and rectification of EGM errors for credit of IGST Refund through PFMS Portal
08/2018 Dated:- 6-2-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (AIRPORT & ADMN)
AIR CARGO COMPLEX, NSC131 AIRPORT, KOLKATA: 700 052.
F. NO. S41 (Misc) – 64/2017CCX/Pt
Date: 06.02.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 08/2018
Sub: Procedure for validation of Bank Accounts and rectification of EGM errors for credit of IGST Refund through PFMS Portal.
Attention of the exporters. Custom House Brokers, all Carriers and all Members of Trade invited regarding Refund of IGST paid on export of goods under Rule 96 of CGST Rules, 2017 and validation of Bank accounts in the PFMS for quick dis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ata for validating their Bank Accounts in the Customs EDI System.
4. The Exporters/their Authorized Representatives are advised to submit the following documents to Drawback: Section (Airport) for updating their Bank Accounts details in the Customs EDI system.
(i) The Bank Account No. and the name of the Bank declared for credit of Drawback.
(ii) The Bank Account and name of the Bank declared in the GSTN Registration Form as uploaded in GSTN Portal.
(iii) Authorization letter issued to the Agent/Broker for Updating the Bank account in the Customs EDI system.
(iv) Request letter along with valid IEC No. and cancelled cheque of the Bank Account declared in the GSTN and the Bank Account no. desired by the Exporter to be updated in the Cus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

0.10% MERCHANT EXPORT OR THIRD PARTY EXPORT TO BE TREAT AS DEEMED EXPORT IN GSTR1 AND PROCEDURE FOR REBATE CLAIM ON LINE IN GST REGIME AS EXPORTED WITH DUTY PAYMENT

0.10% MERCHANT EXPORT OR THIRD PARTY EXPORT TO BE TREAT AS DEEMED EXPORT IN GSTR1 AND PROCEDURE FOR REBATE CLAIM ON LINE IN GST REGIME AS EXPORTED WITH DUTY PAYMENT
Query (Issue) Started By: – nandankumar roy Dated:- 5-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
DEAR SIR,
PL HELP REGARDING TO CLEAR 0.10% DUTY MERCHANT EXPORT OR THIRD PARTY EXPORT TO BE TREAT AS DEEMED EXPORT IN GSTR1 AND PROCEDURE FOR REBATE CLAIM ON LINE IN GST REGIME WITHIN GST SITE AS EXPORTED WITH DUTY PAYMENT
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
It is not deemed export. Anchor
Deemed exports : The Government may notify certain supplies of goods as deemed exports, where goods supplied do not leave India, and payment fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST ON INTEREST ON DELAYED PAYMENT

GST ON INTEREST ON DELAYED PAYMENT
Query (Issue) Started By: – ROHIT GOEL Dated:- 5-2-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-2-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
We have purchased Cigarettes for which payment has been made beyond due date of payment and therefore interest on delayed payment has been charged by company. Company has issued debit note where HSN code of cigarette is mentioned and description mentioned as Interest on delayed payment….
Whether it is correct treatment by company and how to treat it in our GST return??
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Yes. The Company is correct in this aspect. As per Section 15 of CGST Act, 2017 interest on delayed payment is part of taxable value/transaction value(on which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =