GTA services under forward charge mechanism

GTA services under forward charge mechanism
Query (Issue) Started By: – SUSHIL GOYAL Dated:- 11-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 22-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
GST @ 6% on GTA services is allowed to be paid on forward charge basis provided that the goods transport
agency opting to pay central tax @ 6% under this entry shall, thenceforth, be liable to pay central tax @ 6% on all the services of GTA supplied by it.
I have a query – Is a person registered under two States can opt for paying GST on GTA Services on reverse charge basis, if it has opted for payment of tax on forward charge basis in one State?
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
In my opinion if GTA pays 6% gst from one state then

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

12%..No other condition is appearing in this notification.
Reply By SUSHIL GOYAL:
The Reply:
But relevant notification refers to Goods Transport Agency, which is defined as a person engaged in such rendering service. A person has been defined in CGST Act, 2017 as a Company, Firm, etc. No is no mention of Registered Person in the said provisions. A registered person is defined in CGST Act, 2017 as a person registered is a State. Therefore, in my view also a person being a Company or a firm can not opt for paying tax on reverse charge basis in a State, if it opts for paying tax on forward charge basis is another state. However, this view is subject to discussion and therefore further views are invited on this issue.
Reply By rajkumar shuk

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council's 26th Meeting: Boosting Tax Compliance with Data Analytics to Enhance Revenue and Transparency.

GST Council's 26th Meeting: Boosting Tax Compliance with Data Analytics to Enhance Revenue and Transparency.
News
GST
Recommendationsregarding Data Analytics made during the 26th meeting of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council Proposes E-way Bill Changes: Shorter Validity, Higher Threshold, Stricter Penalties, FASTag Integration for Better Compliance.

GST Council Proposes E-way Bill Changes: Shorter Validity, Higher Threshold, Stricter Penalties, FASTag Integration for Better Compliance.
News
GST
Recommendations regarding E-way Bill made d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council Simplifies Return Filing, Extends Current System, Defers E-Wallet Scheme, and Forms Group to Tackle GST Issues.

GST Council Simplifies Return Filing, Extends Current System, Defers E-Wallet Scheme, and Forms Group to Tackle GST Issues.
News
GST
Recommendations made during the 26th meeting of the GST Co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Council Extends Exporter Tax Exemptions for Six More Months in 26th Meeting Decision.

GST Council Extends Exporter Tax Exemptions for Six More Months in 26th Meeting Decision.
News
GST
26th Meeting of the GST Council meets & decides Extension of tax exemptions for exporters fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Recommendationsregarding Data Analytics made during the 26th meeting of the GST Council

Recommendationsregarding Data Analytics made during the 26th meeting of the GST Council
GST
Dated:- 10-3-2018

In the 26th meeting held here today , the GST Council has been apprised of the fact that CBEC and GSTN have started detailed data analytics across a number of data sets available with them. The outcome of preliminary data analysis has revealed interesting insights:
* It has emerged that there is variance between the amount of IGST & Compensation Cess paid by importers at

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Recommendations regarding E-way Bill made during meeting of the GST Council

Recommendations regarding E-way Bill made during meeting of the GST Council
GST
Dated:- 10-3-2018

E-way Rules
In the 26th meeting held here today , the GST Council has recommended the introduction of e-way bill for inter-State movement of goods across the country from 01st April 2018. For intra-State movement of goods, e-way bill system will be introduced w.e.f. a date to be announced in a phased manner but not later than 01st June, 2018.
Major improvements over the last set of rules, as approved by the Council now, are as follows:
* E-way bill is required to be generated only where the value of the consignment exceeds ₹ 50000/-. For smaller value consignments, no e-way bill is required.
* The provisions of sub-ru

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ill, railways will not deliver the goods to the recipient. But railways are required to carry invoice or delivery challan etc.
* Time period for the recipient to communicate his acceptance or rejection of the consignment would be the validity period of the concerned e-way bill or 72 hours,whichever is earlier.
* In case of movement of goods on account of job-work, the registered job worker can also generate e-way bill.
* Consignor can authorize the transporter, courier agency and e-commerce operator to fill PART-A of e-way bill on his behalf.
* Movement of goods from the place of consignor to the place of transporter up to a distance of 50 Km [increased from 10 km] does not require filling of PART-B of e-way bill.They have to gener

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Recommendations made during the 26th meeting of the GST Council held in New Delhi Today

Recommendations made during the 26th meeting of the GST Council held in New Delhi Today
GST
Dated:- 10-3-2018

I. Return filing System
The present system of filing of GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 is extended for another three months i.e., April to June, 2018 till the new return system is finalized. A new model was discussed extensively and Group of Ministers on IT has been tasked to finalize the same.
II. Reverse charge mechanism
The liability to pay tax on reverse charge basishas been de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

26th Meeting of the GST Council meets & decides Extension of tax exemptions for exporters for six months

26th Meeting of the GST Council meets & decides Extension of tax exemptions for exporters for six months
GST
Dated:- 10-3-2018

Sending a strong positive signal to the exporting community, the GST Council in its 26thmeeting held here today decided to extend the available tax exemptions on imported goods for a further 6 months beyond 31.03.2018. Thus, exporters presently availing various export promotion schemes can now continue to avail such exemptions on their imports upto 01.10.2018, by which time an e-Wallet scheme is expected to be in place to continue the benefits in future.
In a related development which would benefit the exporters, the Council reviewed the progress in grant of refunds to exports of both IGST and Input

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on their procured goods was introduced. Also, domestic procurement made under Advance Authorization, EPCG and EOU schemes were recognized as 'deemed exports' with flexibility foreither the suppliers or the exporters being able to claim a refund of GST / IGST paid thereon. All these avenues were made available upto 31.03.2018.
The permanent solution agreed to by the Council was to introduce an e-Wallet scheme w.e.f. 01.04.2018. The e-Wallet scheme is basically the creation of electronic e-Wallets, which would be credited with notional or virtual currency by the DGFT. This notional / virtual currency would be used by the exporters to make the payment of GST / IGST on the goods imported / procured by them so their funds are not block

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PRESUMPTION AS TO DOCUMENTS IN GST LAW

PRESUMPTION AS TO DOCUMENTS IN GST LAW
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 10-3-2018

Meaning of Document
The term 'document' has been defined in section 2(41) of the CGST Act, 2017 to include:
* Written or printed
* Record of any sort and
* Electronic record as defined in the Information Technology Act, 2000
Meaning of Presumption
The term 'presumption' has not been defined under the GST Act. The dictionary meaning of this term is
* A conclusion made as to the existence or non existence of a fact
* That must be drawn from other evidence
* That is admitted and proven to be true.
Thus, presumption can be understood as an inference of a fact drawn from another known fact.
In certain c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

natures and attestation on such documents made by such person.
(b) Admit the documents as evidence whether it is duly stamped or not, if such document is otherwise admissible
It may be noted that this provision is rule of evidence and rebuttable presumption which can be proved by the accused that it is not genuine and should not be accepted as evidence.
Admissibility of Micro Films, Facsimile Copies of Documents and Computer Printouts as Documents and as Evidence
The term micro films has not been defined under the CGST Act. As per the free dictionary, it means a film on which printed materials are photographed at greatly reduced size for ease of storage.
The phrase 'Facsimile Copies of Documents' has not been defined under the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

document and included in a printed material produced by a computer produced by a computer subject to prescribed conditions or
(d) Any information stored electronically on a device or a media, including any hard copies made of such information
Certificate to be considered as evidence for proceedings under GST
In any proceeding where it is desired to give a statement in evidence as provided in section 145(2) of the CGST Act, a certificate doing any of the following things shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.
(a) Identifying the document containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced
(b) Giving particulars of any device involved in prod

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Carry forward of KKC, EC etc., into GST – implications of recent Delhi High court decision

Carry forward of KKC, EC etc., into GST – implications of recent Delhi High court decision
By: – Venkataprasad Pasupuleti
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 10-3-2018

Education Cess was being levied on Central Excise and Service Tax from 10.09.2014. Education Cess paid on the purchase was available as a credit against payment of education cess on payment on the output removal. The credit of cess was not able to use for the payment of duty. Later when the rate of excise duty was increased from 12% to 12.5%, cess was rescinded. Thereby the accumulated credit was not able to be used. Similar was in case of Krishi Kalyan Cess credit in case of service tax. Now whether this accumulated credit of cess can be carried forward into the GST under the transition provision is the issue, there were contradicting views on this some in favor and some against. Few of them have carried forward the credit, however recently, there were news articles published in the newspapers that co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ly for the input services received after 01.06.2015). However, the unanswered question remains what to do with the unutilized credit of EC/SHEC lying as on 01.03.2015/01.06.2015 whether it lapses or can be sought as a refund or used for the payment of tax/duty?
A writ petition has been filed inter alia seeking direction that the credit accumulated as on 01st June 2015 on account of EC and SHEC should be allowed to be utilised for payment of service tax.
Contentions:
The petitioners claim a vested right to avail benefit of the unutilized amount of EC or SHE credit, which was available and had not been set off as on 1st March 2015 and 1st June 2015 for payment of tax on excisable goods and taxable services respectively. The contention was that EC and SHE were subsumed in the Central Excise Duty, the general rate of which was increased from 12% to 12.5%, and service tax, which was increased from 12.36% to 14%. Reliance is placed upon the Budget Speech of the Finance Minister and the me

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

arlier and this amounts to seeking the additional benefit and concession beyond those granted. Hence, Article 14 was not offended. Further, the Hon'ble High Court held that there is no provision in the law which states that EC and SHEC are subsumed into Service Tax and Excise Duty to allow the cross-utilisation of credit. Thereby decision concluded that the credit of EC and SHEC cannot be used for the payment of excise duty.
Implications on the Credit carried forwarded into GST:
The decision of the Hon'ble High court restricted to the subject of cross-utilisation of EC and SHEC against the payment of Central Excise or Service Tax. This judgment nowhere discusses the eligibility of CENVAT Credit of EC and SHEC and the same lapsing. Therefore it is of no dispute that the credit was eligible and did not lapse.
Section 140 of CGST Act, 2017 entitles a registered person to carry forward the closing balance of CENVAT Credit in the last return filed under the existing law. 'CENVAT Credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

credit Rules, 2004.
The Hon'ble Delhi High Court has only discussed the second part i.e, cross-utilisation of EC and SHEC but has not discussed the first part i.e, CENVATABILITY of 'Cess' which is essential to determine whether such credits can be carried forward to GST or not. As 'Cess' passed the first criteria, the credit of the same can be carried forward to GST.
As the issue decided by the Delhi High Court is related to cross-utilization of EC, SHEC which does not have any impact on CENVATABILITY of the cesses, the said decision does not have any impact on the credit carried forwarded into GST.
Further, while giving the above judgment High Court has observed that there is no specific provision in existing laws stating that EC and SHEC are subsumed in Service Tax and Excise Duty. While introducing GST, Central Government has amended the Constitution of India by subsuming the Service tax and Excise Duty into GST and an article has been included requiring the GST Council to su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST ON GOLD LOAN INTEREST

GST ON GOLD LOAN INTEREST
Query (Issue) Started By: – raja raja Dated:- 9-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 13-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Experts ,
Pl clarify GST applicability on gold loan interest
Thanks in advance
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
Vide Sl. No.27 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended rate of gst on "Services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consider

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST paid on export of goods.

Refund of IGST paid on export of goods.
Query (Issue) Started By: – Narendra Soni Dated:- 9-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Dear Expert, kindly suggest the meaning of below para of Rule 96, what is restriction for availing IGST paid refund from Customs ???
""The persons claiming refund of integrated tax paid on exports of goods or services should not have received supplies on which the supplier has availed the benefit of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, notification No. 48/2017-Central Tax dated the 18th October, 2017 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R 1305 (E) dated the 18th October, 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R 1299 (E) dated the 13th October, 2017.]
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, In simple words it can be said that the exporter shall not avail the benefits as per the Notifications cited by you otherwise the refund of IGST shall not be granted. The double benefit cannot be availed.
At this juncture, I request the experts, that there is marginal benefits against, IGST. So my point of view is that refund should be granted after deducting the benefits availed, or else the taxes have been deemed to be exported out of India and is violation of International treaty. Please correct me if mistaken.
Reply By CS SANJAY MALHOTRA:
The Reply:
Refund of IGST paid on export of goods is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of that only one refund claim can be seeked which can be either under Rule 96 or Rule 89 subject to the availment / non availment of benefit by supplier of goods against supplies to Exporter of goods.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Dear Sanjay Sir,
Please comment on the second para of my first reply. I am very keen to know your views.
Reply By CS SANJAY MALHOTRA:
The Reply:
Dear Alkesh,
First of all, the concept of refund claim is different alongwith the tax administration for processing of same, hence your view not acceptable from legal and administration perspective. Furthermore, no treaty is violated as no tax incidence is recovered from customers.
Act allows Exporter to claim back tax suffered on Exports either by way of input

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of CGST And Central Excise Versus M/s Rama Sales And Services

Commissioner of CGST And Central Excise Versus M/s Rama Sales And Services
Service Tax
2018 (3) TMI 556 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 286 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-3-2018
Central Excise Appeal No. 28 of 2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru And Hon'ble Harsh Kumar, JJ.
For the Appellant : Piyush Agrawal
ORDER
Heard Sri Piyush Agrawal learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Subham Agrawal assisted by Ms.Sanyukta Singh learned counsel for the respondent assessee.
This is department's appeal under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act,1944 against the judgment and order dated 3.7.2017 passed by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad. The questions of law sought to be answered are as under:
“(a) Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT has erred in not confirming the demand of service tax along with interest and imposition of penalties for the period in question when the “Bus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;ble CESTAT erred in treating it as double taxation when services are distinct? Service tax is paid on full value of SIM card by BSNL under the “Telecommunication Service” and not under “Business Auxiliary Service”. In the instant case, service tax has been demanded from the respondent under the category of “Business Auxiliary Service” on the communication received from BSNL, which is entirely different from “Telecommunication Service”?
(e) Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT has erred in not taking into account of its own case passed vide final order no.ST/A/684-687/2012CU(DB) dated 6.11.2012 in respect of M/s. Martand Food & Dehydrates Pvt. Ltd. Unnao, wherein at para 18 it was observed that “BSNL is paying service tax for value of telecommunication service being provided by them to the customer. Revenue is demanding tax on the service provided by distributor to BSNL which is in the nature of marketing of the services of BSNL to its customers and tax is demanded under the head of “Busin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ready discharged the burden of Service Tax on the gross amount of SIM cards and demand of service tax on the same amount from the appellants will only lead to double taxation which is not permissible under the law. Hence the demand of service tax as ordered vide impugned order in original is not sustainable. Further when the demand is not sustainable, penalties imposed are also not maintainable.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material on record, we are of the view that in view of the law settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Martend Food & Dehydrates Pvt. Ltd. decided on 6.11.2012, it has been held that the activities of purchase and sale of SIM cards belonging to BSNL where BSNL has discharged the service tax on the full value of the SIM cards does not amount to providing business auxiliary service. Therefore the questions are answered against the department and in favour of the assessee.
This appeal is dismissed at the stage of ad

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Simple Rajendra Shukla

In Re : Simple Rajendra Shukla
GST
2018 (5) TMI 648 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 463 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 9-3-2018
GST-ARA-06/2017/B-05
GST
Shri B.V. Borhade, Joint Commissioner of State Tax and Shri Pankaj Kumar, Joint Commissioner of Central Tax
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 )
NO.GST-ARA-06/2017/B-05                   Mumbai, dt. 09 /03/2018
The applicant Simmple Rajendra Shukla has filed the application under section 97 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and requested to decide the question “whether the services related to providing the coaching for entrance examination will come in the ambit of Goods and Service Tax.
02. Fact of the case:-
The applicant runs Simmple Shukla Tutorials and is thus engaged in provid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ices. The rendering of educational services falls under the chapter heading of 9992.
04.    The legal position, Analysis and Discussion
The charging section 9(1) of MGST and CGST ACT, 2017 provides for levy and collection of state tax and central tax on goods and services on all intra-State supplies of goods or services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption, on the value determined under section 15 and at such rates, not exceeding twenty per cent. , as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person. Accordingly the State and central government have issued the notification for levy of tax. The provisions for implementing the CGST ACT and MGST ACT, 2017 are similar.
Now we sequentially discuss the provisions that are applicable in the present case-.-
The taxability of education services is as per notification no. 11/2017 C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t.)
Condition
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
30
Heading  9992
Education services.
9

On perusal of scheme of taxation related to supply of services, we find that the education service is taxable at the rate of 9 percent under CGST ACT and SGST at 9 percent as provided.
However, we also find that Government has issued another notification No. 12/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) by virtue of which Government has granted exemption in respect of education services when rendered by or in relation to certain institutions which is as under
4.2    The Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate).
G.S.R. 691(E) .- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby exempts the intra-State supply of services of description as specified in column (3) of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t or Union territory;
(iii) security or cleaning or house-keeping services performed in such educational institution;
(iv) services relating to admission to, or conduct of examination by, such institution;
(v) supply of online educational journals or periodicals:
Provided that nothing contained in sub-items (i), (ii) and (iii) of item (b) shall apply to an educational institution other than an institution providing services (by way of pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent.)
Provided further that nothing contained in sub-item (v) of item (b) shall apply to an institution providing services by way of,- 
(i) pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent; or 
(ii) education as a part of an approved vocational education course.
Nil
Nil
From the above notification it can be seen that the exemption is granted in respect of services provided to and by an educational institution.
4.3 Further we

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r her claimed institution “Simmple Shukla's Tutorials” is in no way covered in the definition of Educational institution as given in the above notification.
The private institute does not have any specific curriculum and does not conduct any examination or award any qualification recognized by any law which would be covered in the above notification, The activity of applicant is not covered by the specific definition provided for interpretation of exemption notification. We find that the education service provided in the case is taxable at the rate of 9 percent under CGST ACT and 9 percent SGST Act
In view of the deliberations as above, we pass an order as follows.
ORDER
(Under section 98 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-06/2017/B-09               Mumbai,      dt. 09/03/2018
As per discussions held above, the question is answered as below.
Q.1 “Whether the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Ceat Limited

In Re : Ceat Limited
GST
2018 (5) TMI 699 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 467 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 72 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 9-3-2018
GST-ARA-07/2017/B-10
GST
Shri. B. V. Borhade, Joint Commissioner of state tax and Shri. Pankaj Kumar, Joint Commissioner of Central tax 
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-07/2017/B- 06    Mumbai, dt. 09/03/18
The applicant, M/S Ceat Ltd. has filed the application under section 97 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and requested to decide the question What is the classification and rate of Central Goods and Service Tax leviable on the product “E-rickshaw tyres.
02. Fact of the case:-
1. M/s Ceat Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'Applicant') having its corporate head office at, Ceat Limited, RPG House, 463, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Wo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by the applicant that there is an anomaly in the Customs Tariff as well as in the GST Tariff Schedules in so far as 'e-rickshaw tyres' are concerned. The term 'e-rickshaw tyres' fails to find a mention in both, the Customs Tariff and the GST Rate Schedules. Furthermore, it is observed that Chapter Heading No. 4011 of the Customs Tariff is covered by two separate entries in two distinct Schedules i.e. SI. No. 190 of Schedule-I attracting CGST and Sl. No. 46 of Schedule-IV attracting CGST@14% as per Notification No. 1/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 30.06.2017.
5. Sl. No. 190 of Schedule-I and Sl. No. 46 of Schedule-IV of the Notification No. 1/2017Central Tax (Rate) dated 30.06.2017 reads as under:
   Sch.
    SI.     NO.
Chapter Heading/     Sub-Heading
           Description of goods
 Rate of    Tax  (CGST)
    I.
 19

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n 'New pneumatic tyres, of rubber [other than of a kind used on/in bicycles, cycle-rickshaws and three wheeled powered cycle rickshaws; and Rear Tractor tyres; and of a kind used on aircraft]' attracting CGST @ 14%. Chapter Heading No. 4011 covers 'New pneumatic tyres, of rubber' and the term 'e-rickshaw tyre' is not specifically covered in the entire Tariff. Furthermore, even HSN Explanatory Notes to Chapter Heading No. 4011 are silent in so far as 'e-rickshaw tyres' are covered.
7. The prevailing ambiguity is caused by the omission of the term 'e-rickshaw' and further, by specific mention of the term 'three-wheeled powered cycle rickshaws ' in Sl. No. 190 of Schedule-I of Notification No. 1/201 7-CentraI Tax (Rate). It shall be noted that 'Three-wheeled powered cycle rickshaw' was a vehicle that comprised of three wheels and was used to carry passengers or light goods over a short distance. It was a modification of the three wheele

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fforts put in by the driver.
9. The principle of ejusdem generis specifies that like items should be treated likely i.e. goods of the same kind should be clubbed and treated similarly. Extending the same principle to e-rickshaws, it is submitted, that e-rickshaws should be treated as similar to three-wheeled powered cycle rickshaws in law and clubbed with the same for the purpose of taxation under GST.
10. The lack of mention of 'tyres used in e-rickshaws' along with three-wheeled powered cycle rickshaws in Sl. No. 190 of Schedule-I to Notification No. 1-Central Tax (Rate) gives rise to the ambiguity that whether the product in question shall be perceived to be covered under Schedule I or Schedule IV of Notification No. 1-Central Tax (Rate). This further gives rise to the ambiguity regarding applicability of GST @ 5% or 28% on the product in question which is an effective tax differential of 23%.
03. The legal submission of applicant:-
A.1  That the sub-section (c) of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tes, from where he makes a taxable supply of Goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees:”      
…(Emphasis Supplied)
A.4  The above referred section can be vivisected into following essentials: –
        a. A supplier shall be liable to be registered under CGST Act in the State or Union Territory, from where he makes taxable supply of goods or services or both;
        b. If the aggregate turnover in the financial year exceeds rupees twenty lakh.
A.5  The Applicant submits that as on date, it is registered in Maharashtra and also making taxable supplies of goods from the same to its customers located in State of Maharashtra. Further, the turnover of the Applicant exceeds rupees twenty lakhs in the financial year. Given this, it is submitted that Applicant clearly satisfies to be 'applicant' in terms of sub

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

this Act, shall be in respect of,­­-
(a) classification of any goods or services or both;
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both;
(d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid;
(e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered;
(g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.”
…Emphasis Supplied
A.8  In view of the above, it is submitted that advance ruling may be sought by the Applicant on the questions concerning classification of goods or services or both, on the question involving determination if any thing done by the applicant with respect to a goods or services or both amounts to or res

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Ruling Authority for the purpose of CGST Act. The Section 96 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, reads as under:-
“SECTION 96
(1) The Government shall, by notification, constitute an Authority to be known as the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling:
Provided that the Government may, on the recommendation of the Council, notify any Authority located in another State to act as the Authority for the State.
(2) The Authority shall consist of-
(i) one member from amongst the officers of central tax; and
(ii) one member from amongst the officers of State tax, to be appointed by the Central Government and the State Government respectively.
(3) The qualifications, the method of appointment of the members and the terms and conditions of their services shall be such as may be prescribed.
…Emphasis Supplied
A.11  The Applicant submits that in terms of the above referred section 96 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the Government of Mahara

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

anufactured to be used in modern day electric rickshaws. The dealer has been clearing goods under chapter heading-4011. While going through chapter heading 4011 in the customs act (which is quoted above) it mentions new pneumatic tyres of rubber.
The word rickshaw's origins lie in the Japanese language, and it literally translates to “a human powered vehicle”. The rickshaw is one of the oldest modes of transport, and was first introduced in the late 19th century. It is used all across the world, but more common in the Asian countries, especially in India and Bangladesh. The various types of rickshaws have also evolved over time with the earliest ones being the pulled-rickshaws. Other variations of the mode of transport include the powered cycle-rickshaw, the auto-rickshaw and the relatively newer iteration of the e-rickshaws. Historically, India's urban as well as rural areas have depended on the various rickshaw types for their travel requirements. The most recent modificatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

 
4011, 4013
Pneumatic tyres or inner tubes, of rubber, of a kind used on/
in bicycles, cycle-rickshaws and three wheeled powered
cycle rickshaws
2.5
2.5
5
 
4011
Rear Tractor tyres and rear tractor tyre tubes
9
9
18
 
4011 70 00
Tyre for tractors
9
9
18
 
4011
New pneumatic tyres, rubber {other than of a kind used on/in bicycles, cycle-rickshaws and three wheeled powered cycle rickshaws: rear tractors tyres: and of a kind used on aircraft}
14
14
28
 
The dealer's contention to consider three wheeled powered cycle rickshaws as three wheeled electric rickshaws based on the principle of Ejusdem generis cannot be accepted because three wheeled powered cycle rickshaws are different than electric rickshaws. Cycled rickshaws were first driven manually. To carry more loads and reduce burden on the person who rides it manually power was added to it. This means three wheeled power cycled rickshaws is up gradation of cycled rickshaws.
Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ic Motor Vehicles (E-Rickshaw) were not even conceptualized. This exemption has been taken verbatim in GST in 2.5% percent slab.
Three Wheeled Electric Motor Vehicle (known as E-Rickshaw in market) is a Motor Vehicle in Motor Vehicle Act also. It has to be registered with State Transport Authorities as a Motor Vehicle. Tyres and Tubes used in these Vehicles are Automobile Tyres and Tubes of size 300-12, 300-14, 90-90/12 and 3.75-12, which are duly prescribed as Automobile Tyres in Bureau of Indian Standards for Two and Three Wheeled Motor Vehicles IS 15627:2005. By no means the Tyres and Tubes cleared by them are Tyres and Tubes of Three Wheeled Powered Cycle Rickshaw. The SSI exemption notification no. 8/2003-Central Excise dated 1st March. 2003deiines the powered cycle rickshaw is defined as under:
“Powered cycle or powered cycle rickshaw means a mechanically propelled cycle or as the case may be mechanically propelled cycle rickshaw. Which may also be pedalled if  any necessi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e history findings of term 'powered cycle rickshaw'.
The term 'powered cycle rickshaw' in the explanation to the notification number 102/76 dated 16-3-1976 as follows:
“Explanation.- The expression term 'powered Cycle' or 'Powered Cycle Rickshaw' means a mechanically propelled cycle or as the case may be mechanically propelled cycle rickshaw, which may also be paddled, if any necessity arises for so doing”.
Further, the meaning of Powered Cycle Rickshaw was clearly explained in the case of Delhi Kinetic Engineering Ltd. vs Collector of Central Excise and upheld by Supreme Court bench on 21.03.1996 and reported in 1997 (94) ELT A157(SC) = 1996 (3) TMI 555 – SUPREME COURT . Therefore, It is settled that Powered Cycle Rickshaw referred to in the Explanation would not cover an Auto Rickshaw and would only cover an ordinary Cycle Rickshaw to which a motor or petrol engine has been fitted.
The next question is, why Three Wheeled Electric Vehicle (E-Ricksha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ind that the charging section 9(1) of MGST and CGST ACT, 2017 provides for levy and collection of state tax and central tax on goods and services on all intra-State supplies of goods or services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption, on the value determined under section 15 and at such rates, not exceeding twenty per cent., as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person. Accordingly the State and central government have issued the notification for levy of tax. The provisions for implementing the CGST ACT and MGST ACT, 2017 are similar.
5.1 The relevant entries in the respective Schedules of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017, for the purpose of the impugned product in question, read as under:
SI. No.
Chapter Heading/ Sub-Heading
 
Description of Goods
Rate of Tax (GST)
Prescribed Sch. for rate of tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

b) The SSI exemption notification no. 8/2003-Central Excise dated 1st March, 2003 defines the powered cycle rickshaw as under:
“Powered cycle or powered cycle rickshaw means a mechanically propelled cycle or as the case may be mechanically propelled cycle rickshaw, which may also be pedalled if any necessity arises for so doing”
c) It clearly shows that the Tyres cleared by these manufacturers attract a peak rate of 14% percent instead of 2.5% percent, as these Tyres and Tubes are meant for Electric Motor Vehicles (known as E-Rickshaw).The sizes of these tyres and tubes mentioned are also used widely in scooters and motorcycles. It is necessary to verify what duty these companies were paying in pre-GST.
d) In Chapter head 4011 and 4013, Pneumatic Tyres or Inner Tubes, of Rubber, of a kind used on/in Bicycles, Cycle Rickshaws and Three Wheeled Powered Cycle Rickshaws attract a GST Rate of 2.5%, In Chapter head 4011, New Pneumatic Tyres of Rubber {Other than of a kind used on/in Bic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) = 1996 (3) TMI 555 – SUPREME COURT. Therefore, It is settled that Powered Cycle Rickshaw referred to in the Explanation would not cover an Auto Rickshaw and would only cover an ordinary Cycle Rickshaw to which a motor or petrol engine has been fitted.
5.3 We have carefully considered the notification issued for rate of tax, in order to determine the rate of MGST/CGST. The scheme of tax revealed that the GST is levied on supplies of goods, the description of which is specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Schedules.
The description is provided as 'Pneumatic tyres or inner tubes, of rubber, of a kind used on / in bicycles, cycle -rickshaws and three wheeled powered cycle rickshaws.”
* On analysis of the schedule entry- 190, it is seen that the tyres of cycle or cycle rickshaw whether powered or not are covered only. It is clear that the rickshaw must be pedal driven. The term “Cycle rickshaw” connotes a pedal driven, human powered, single track vehicle, havi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

od in their commercial sense and not as per the scientific or technical meaning. How the product is identified by the class or section of people dealing with or using the product is also a test when the statute itself does not contain any definition and commercial parlance would assume importance when the goods are marketable.
* In the present case, the product introduced by the appellant is with electric battery whereas the simple meaning of “cycle” is a pedal driven, human powered, single track vehicle, having two wheels attached to a frame, one behind the other. He also urged that the word “cycle” has to be understood in the light of the word “cycle rickshaw”, The word “bicycle and cycle rickshaw, provided in entry-190 of schedule-I takes the colour from each other. For the purpose of charging sales tax we have to consider the plain meaning of “cycle” in common parlance.
* With this understanding, let us turn to the maxim “noscitur a sociis”, which means the meaning of a doubtfu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

word is to be found in the company of the words “cycle rickshaws”, “bicycle”. The cycle rickshaws are commonly understood as rickshaws propelled by cycling. The cycle rickshaw cannot be termed as auto-rickshaw or e-rickshaw.
* The Cycle rickshaw is cycle rickshaw as understood in common parlance. The word cycle-rickshaw will take colour from the word bicycle and the things are belonging to same genus. Considered from this angle, one has to reach to the conclusion that the e-rickshaw is not within the sweep of the word “bicycles” or “cycle Rickshaw” and also does not appear to be in consonance with the legislative intent.
* The applicant has relied upon the various case laws. We have carefully gone through the case laws. The case laws cited by applicant are more or less related to advancement of technology. The courts have observed that there is no change in the class of goods. The textile remains as textile. The change in method of manufacturing does not change the product. In pre

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

015] 80 VST 502(Karn) = 2015 (3) TMI 1048 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT , more particularly the observations made at para 37 of the said decision, which reads as under (pages 526 & 527 in 80 VST) :
“37. The 'entry' to be interpreted here is in a taxing statute ; full effect should be given to all the words used therein, If a particular article would fall within a description, by the force of words used, it is impermissible to ignore that description and denote the article under another entry, by a process of reasoning. The meanings given to articles in a fiscal statute must be as people in trade and commerce, con-versant with the subject, generally treat and is understand by them in the usual course. If an expression is capable of a wider meaning as well as narrower meaning, the question whether the wider or the narrower meaning should be given depends on the context and the background of the case. But once an article is classified and put under a distinct entry, the basis of the cla

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

three wheeled powered cycle rickshaws; and Rear Tractor tyres; and of a kind used on aircraft] of particular entry. Once the articles are in circulation and come to be described, then, there is no difficulty for statutory classification under a particular entry. Hence we are of opinion that there is no force in contention of applicant.
In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as under:-
                                                                                               &n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nbsp;                                                                                                                 
Q.1 What is the classification and rate of Central Goods and Service Tax leviable on product “E-rickshaw tyres”?
A.l The product is classified and covered by Tariff Heading 4011 and the rate of tax shall be at the rate of 14 percent under MGST ACT, 2017
and 14 percent under  CGST ACT, 2017.
Case laws, Decisi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on Export – processing of refund claims with error code SB005 – facility to trade on all Saturdays

Refund of IGST on Export – processing of refund claims with error code SB005 – facility to trade on all Saturdays
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 12/ 2018 Dated:- 9-3-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CUSTOM HOUSE: PORT AREA: VISAKHAPATNAM – 530 035
F. No. P3/06/2017 – A.M.
Date: 09.03.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 12/ 2018
Sub:- Refund of IGST on Export – processing of refund claims with error code SB005 – facility to trade on all Saturdays – reg.
*****
Atte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on Export – Invoice mis-match Cases -Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface

Refund of IGST on Export – Invoice mis-match Cases -Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 01/2018 Dated:- 9-3-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PATNA
CR Building, 5th Floor, Birchand Patel Path, Patna – 800001
C. No. VIII (48)05-13/575/CUS/TECH/Public Notice/17/1763-81
Date:09.03.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 01/2018
Subject: reg.
Attention of all Exporters, Importers, Customs Brokers, Trade and all concerned is invited to CBEC Circular No. 05/2018 -Customs dated 23.02.2018 vedi which alternative mechanism of refund of IGST on export- invoice mis-match cases has been prescribed by the board.
2.0. Numerous representations have been received from exporters / trade associations seeking resolution of various problems which have hindered the sanction of refund of IGST paid on exports. CBEC has issued Circular No 42/2017 dated 07-11-2017 which highlighted the common errors that hindered the sanction and di

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

exporters asking them to correct their records through amendment process of GSTR 1 i.e through Table 9 of GSTR 1 of the following month.
(iii) The aggregate IGST paid amount claimed in GSTR 1 or Table 6A should not be greater than the IGST paid amount indicated in Table 3.1(b) of GSTR 3B of the corresponding month. This check is put in the GSTN system to ensure that the refund claimed is not more than the IGST paid by the exporter. Analysis of GSTN return data indicates that this condition has failed in a large number of cases, consequently, the information filed by exporters is not forwarded to Customs by GSTN. In these cases also, e-mails have been sent to exporters asking them to correct their records through amendment process of GSTR 1 i.e. through Table 9 of GSTR 1 of the following month.
(iv) The analysis of data further indicates that only about 32% records of GSTR 1 / Table 6A have been transmitted from GSTN to Customs. In other words, a majority of refund claims are held u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vii) However, there are many instances where refunds are held up on Customs EDI system due to certain errors which have been clearly brought out in the Circular No 42/2017-Customs. The major errors that are committed by the exporters are (a) incorrect Shipping bill numbers in GSTR 1 (b) GSTIN declared in the shipping bill does not match with the GSTIN used to file the corresponding GST Returns (c) the most common error hampering refund is due to mismatch of invoice number, taxable value and IGST paid in the Shipping Bill vis-a-vis the same details mentioned in GSTR 1 / Table 6A which is the most common error hampering refund. Another reason attributable to carriers is the non-filing or incorrect filing of electronic Export General Manifest (EGM).
(viii) Exporters are advised to track the refund status and errors pertaining to their shipping bills on the ICEGATE website. The registration process demo, advisory and the needed IT configurations are hosted on the ICEGATE website under th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oned at (c) in para (vii) is most prevalent. The error mentioned at (c) in para (vii) is about invoice mis-match. This error is because of the fact that exporters are using two sets of invoices, one invoice for GST and another invoice for Customs which is resulting in mismatch of invoice numbers, including mis-match in taxable value and IGST paid in those invoices. It is once again reiterated that exporters may be advised take due care to ensure that the details of invoice such as invoice number, taxable value and IGST paid mentioned in GSTR 1 and shipping bill match with each other and the invoice issued is compliant with the GST Invoice Rules, 2017.
4.0. Recognizing that invoice mis-match has been the major reason why the refunds have been held, it has been decided to provide an alternative mechanism to give exporters an opportunity to rectify such errors committed in the initial stages. This envisages an officer interface on the Customs EDI System through which a Customs officer ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stoms(P) Division, Forbesgani (for exports made through LCS Bhimnagar & LCS Galgalia) and Asstt. Commissioner of customs, customs(P) Division, Muzaffarpur (for exports made through LCS Forbesgani, LCS Sonbarsa,  Bhithamore, LCS Pipraun, LCS Jainagar, LCS Haukaha & Kunauli). A scanned copy of concordance table may also be sent to dedicated email address (mentioned below) of concerned Deputy/ Assistant. Commissioner of customs under whose jurisdiction export took place.
Name of LCS
E-mail address
LCS Raxaul
Lcs.raxaul-rev@nic.in
LCS Jogbani
Lcs-cusjbn@gov.in
LCS Bhimnagar & LCS Galgalia
Lcs-cusfbg@gov.in
LCS Bairgania, LCS Sonbarsa,  Bhithamore, LCS Pipraun
LCS Jainagar, LCS Haukaha & Kunauli
Lcs-cusmzp@gov.in
b. Customs EDI system shall display list of all the invoices pertaining to such SBs vis-a-vis the invoice data received from GSTN.
5.0 This procedure is available only for Shipping Bills filed till 31st December 2017. It is the responsibility of the exporter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Registration of casual taxable person

Registration of casual taxable person
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ravikumar Doddi Dated:- 8-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Sir,
Applicant holding GST registration in Telangana he want to do exhibition sales in Bangalore for a period 3 days, in such a situation is he liable to take a separate casual taxable person registration in Bangalore for a period of 3 days in a state of Karnataka or on Telangana GST can he do business in Bangalore exhibition. if he takes casual taxable person registration in Karantaka he has to comply with all returns formalities, GSTR 3B, GST1 and to claim for refund. over a period of one year he will participate in exhibition sales more than 10-15 times in 5 states. so is he liable to take 5 registration in 5 states, So it will become more burden to him in return compliance in each state rather than doing business, kindly give your reply with supporting sections and rules
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

state or union territory.
There is no threshold limit for registration.
Refer Section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017 – Compulsory registration in certain cases.
Registration / Returns
* Registration should be done in Form Reg-01, used for normal registration. Returns are to be filed like GSTR 1, 2 & 3.
* Casual Taxable Person is not required to file Annual Return as required by the normal registered taxpayer.
Refund:
In case the amount of advance tax deposited by Casual Taxable Person at the time of applying for registration exceeds the amount of his actual tax liability, then he shall be given refund of such excess amount of tax paid. But in order to claim such refund, he must file all the returns in respect of the time period for which registration is granted.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, Some important point for casual tax payer is given below, however, the views expressed by the experts may also be considered.
“Casual taxable person” means a person who occasionally u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rence number by the Common Portal for making the mandatory advance deposit of tax for an amount equivalent to the estimated tax liability of such person for the period for which the registration is sought.
* The registration certificate shall be issued electronically only after the said deposit appears in his electronic cash ledger.
* The casual taxable person can make taxable supplies only after the issuance of the certificate of registration.
* The certificate of registration shall be valid for the period specified in the application for registration or ninety days from the effective date of registration, whichever is earlier.
* In case the casual taxable person intends to extend the period of registration indicated in his application of registration, an application in FORM GST REG-11 shall be submitted before the end of the validity of registration granted to him.
* The validity period of ninety days can be extended by a further period not exceeding ninety days. The extens

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SUBMISSION OF ITC04

SUBMISSION OF ITC04
Query (Issue) Started By: – SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR Dated:- 8-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Is there any date declare to submission of ITC 04 for Oct-17 to Dec-17.
Reply By Praveen Nair:
The Reply:
Hi Suryakant
ITC-04 is a quarterly form.
It must be furnished on or before 25th day of the month succeeding the quarter.
For example, for Oct-Dec quarter, the due date is 25th Jan.
Reply By PAWAN KUMAR:
The Reply:

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Returnable Goods sent to Customers

Returnable Goods sent to Customers
Query (Issue) Started By: – SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR Dated:- 8-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
While sending Goods (Returnable) to customers on delivery challon is it necessary to mention GST liablity in challon as per precentage.
Reply By Praveen Nair:
The Reply:
Hi Suryakant
Kindly find Rule 55 of CGST Act, 2017, addressing your query:
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
No sir, not required.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TIME OF SUPPLY (GOODS & SERVICES), GST LAW

TIME OF SUPPLY (GOODS & SERVICES), GST LAW
By: – Praveen Nair
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 8-3-2018

Meaning: Time of Supply of (Goods):
Time of Supply of Goods means the Point of Time when the liability to pay tax arises, on the Taxable goods, on the Proper value of such Goods either on the part of Supplier or Recipient, as the case may be.
Liability to pay Tax, on a Transaction or Supply of Goods, where the Tax is payable under Forward charge would arise on the following dates, whichever is earlier;
* Date of Invoice of the Supplier of Goods or
* Date of Payment received by the Supplier of Goods from the recipient.
Ex: Date of Tax Invoice is 06.03.2018 and payment was received from the Recipient of goods in advance on 01.02.2018 then the liability to pay Tax, on the Goods, in the said transaction has arisen in the month of February, 2018 and Tax will be payable by the Supplier of Goods.
Note: Under GST Law, Liability to pay Tax on receipt of Advance pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under Reverse Charge would rise upon the Recipient of Goods on 01.02.2018 and accordingly, the Tax would be payable on Due Date, on which, the Recipient is required to file Monthly or Quarterly return for February 2018.
Alternatively, if the goods is received by the Recipient on 06.03.2018 and payment for the supply is not made then the Liability to pay Tax, under Reverse Charge, would arise on 31.03.2018 and accordingly, the Tax would be payable on Due Date, on which, the Recipient is required to file Monthly or Quarterly return for March 2018.
Ref: Section 12(3) of the CGST Act, 2017,which is also applicable to SGST Act, UTGST Act & IGST Act, 2017.
Meaning: Time of Supply of (Services):
Time of Supply of Services is the Point of Time when the liability to pay Tax, under GST Law, arises in case of Supply of Services arises, either on the part of the Supplier of Services or Recipient of Services as the case may be.
Liability to pay Tax, under the GST Law, on transaction related t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing the Date of Invoice, 01.01.2018, is the Time of Supply. Liability of payment of Tax has arisen and therefore Tax is payable under Forward charge on the date of filing of Monthly or Quarterly return, for the month of January, 2018.
* If Invoice is not raised, then it is the date of provision or completion of the services, by the Supplier of Services or the Date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier, would be the Time of Supply of such services. If the date of completion is 01.02.2018 and if the payment is received by the Supplier of Services by 06.03.2018, then the Time of Supply is 01.02.2018. Liability of payment of Tax has arisen and therefore Tax is payable under Forward charge on the date of filing of Monthly or Quarterly return, for the month of February, 2018.
* If none of the above information's are available for the Supply of services then date of booking the bill in accounts will be the Time of Supply of Services.
Ref: Section 13(2) of the CGST Act, 2017,whi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1. Advance Payment:
As per the provisions of Section 31(3)(d), read with Section 12(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017 as applicable to SGST, UTGST & IGST Act, 2017, receipt of Advance payment, attracts Tax, at appropriate rate, the hands of the Supplier (Forward Charge) or Recipient (Reverse Charge) of Goods or Services or both.
Notification No. 66/2017-Central Tax dtd. 15.11.2017 for the time being has kept the GST applicability on Advance at Abeyance on Supply of Goods & Services upto 31.03.2018 and accordingly, when Advance Payment is received by the Supplier of Services (where tax is payable under Forward charge) or such Advance Payment is made by the Recipient of Services (where tax is payable under Reverse Charge), Advance payment would Not attract Tax under GST Law, in respect of Supply of Goods or Services.
2. Supply by Unregistered Person to a Registered Person:
As per the provision of Section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 and similar provisions under SGST, UTGST & IGST Act, 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

REFUND OF IGST TO FOREIGN TOURIST 

REFUND OF IGST TO FOREIGN TOURIST 
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 8-3-2018

Section 15 of IGST Act, 2017 deals with refund of IGST paid on supply of goods to tourists leaving India (International Tourist) under Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST).
Section 15 of the IGST Act provides for refund to be allowed to 'tourist' on supply of goods being taken along by him at the time of leaving India. The refund to be allowed to him is subject to such condition and in the manner as may be prescribed (yet to be prescribed).
Who is a foreign tourist
The term 'tourist' has been defined in explanation to section 15 of the IGST Act to mean:
* a person not normally resident in India.
* who enters India for a stay of not more than six months.
* for legitimate non immigrant purpose.
Thus, for being a tourist for the purpose of IGST, the person should be not normally resident in India and maximum stay should not exceed a period of six months

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ist can not be considered to be consumed in India and it will be eligible for treatment given to export of goods. Thus, goods taken along by the tourist needs to be free from any taxes in India. Refunding IGST to such tourist is a method by which such goods are made free from taxes in India.
Charging of IGST
Section 10 of the IGST Act provides the rule for place of supply of goods. According to these rules, in case goods supplied with in the same state is a intra state transaction and is chargeable to CGST and SGST. Since, sec 15 of the IGST Act prevails in the case of tourist. The Supplier needs to take the proof of passport and visa of such tourist and then arrange to charge IGST on goods supplied to such tourist. Thus, the passport and copy of visa is an evidence with the supplier in India as the basis for charging IGST on such transactions.
Are Indians on work permit visiting India are tourists
Such Indians coming to India for a short duration can not be considered tourists for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

treated as intra-State supply, namely:
(i) supply of goods to or by a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit;
(ii) goods imported into the territory of India till they cross the customs frontiers of India; or
(iii) supplies made to a tourist referred to in section 15.
That as per the above provision, a supply where place of supply and location of supplier is within the same state, however if the receipt is a foreign tourist the same will be treated as inter state supply.
For a example Mr John of USA ( Fulfills condition of foreign tourist) visits a showroom in Jaipur and purchased some jewellery and goods are handed over to Mr. John on the Showroom itself. In this case the place of Supply is in Rajasthan and location of Supplier is also in Rajasthan, therefore as per normal rule it is a intra state supply. However since Mr. John is a foreign tourist by virtue of the proviso, it becomes an inter state supply. (Similarly like a sale to SEZ Unit)
While Fill

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd. Versus GST, Bhopal

M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd. Versus GST, Bhopal
Central Excise
2018 (3) TMI 1124 – CESTAT, NEW DELHI – 2018 (363) E.L.T. 1085 (Tri. – Del.)
CESTAT, NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 8-3-2018
Appeal No. E/50179/2018-SM – Final Order No. 50876/2018
Central Excise
Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial)
Shri B.L. Narasimhan, Advocate – for the appellant
Shri G.R. Singh, D.R. – for the respondent
Per Ashok Jindal:
The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order for denial of Cenvat credit on CVD paid by the appellant on imported coal.
2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of aluminium ingots and aluminium billets. They were availing Cenvat credit of duty paid on inputs and capital good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

per Cenvat Credit Rules 3(1) proviso, the appellant is not entitled to avail Cenvat credit. In these set of facts, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant for the period June 2012 to December 2012 on 5.12.2016 by invoking extended period of limitation to deny Cenvat credit to the appellant. The matter was adjudicated, Cenvat credit was denied. Against the said order, the appellant is before me.
3. The ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 17.3.2012 applicable to domestically manufactured goods and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. dated 17.3.2012 for imported coal. In both the cases, assessee is required to pay duty @ 1%. In case of imported coal, appellant is required to pay CV

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is entitled to avail Cenvat credit. The demand has been raised due to misunderstanding of the Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. He also agitated that it is an issue of applying wrongly provisions of the notification. In that circumstances, the extended period is not invocable.
4. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions.
5. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both the sides, I find that the sole reason to deny Cenvat credit to the appellant is that the authorities below has taken into consideration Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 17.3.2012. The authorities below have not considering the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. dated 17.3.2012. If same is taken into consideration and duty paid under the said notification, t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Abhay Solvents Private Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Lgsto-510 Koppal And Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes

M/s. Abhay Solvents Private Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Lgsto-510 Koppal And Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (3) TMI 1369 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – 2019 (29) G. S. T. L. 405 (Kar.) , [2020] 74 G S.T.R. 438 (Karn)
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 8-3-2018
Writ Petition Nos. 3636 & 4607-4624/2018 & W.P.Nos.4625-4626/2018 (T-RES)
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MRS. S. SUJATHA J.
Petitioner: [By Sri K.P. Kumar, Senior Counsel for Ms. Veena j. Kamath, Adv. For Kamath & Kamath, Advs.]
Respondents: [By Sri T.K. Vedamurthy, Aga.)
ORDER
These petitions are filed challenging the correctness and legality of the order of the respondent dated 28.12.2017 as per Annexures-A1 to A18, inter alia, seeking for a direction to the respondent to furnish to the petitioner all the details, documents and information as sought for by the petitioner vide its letter dated 27.12.2017 as per Annexure-H and grant an opportunity of being heard

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

25/2015 seeking for a direction to the concerned Authority to refund the input tax credit in respect of the tax period, March 2014 to July 2015. This Court following the decision of the Division Bench in M.K. AGRO TECH's case supra,allowed the writ petitions and a direction was issued to Respondent No.1 to process the application filed by the petitioner for refund of input tax paid in excess, refund the same, if not otherwise found disentitled. It was observed that in case the tax is refunded as ordered, the respondents are at liberty to obtain indemnity bond from the petitioner to the extent of amount refunded. Further refund shall be subject to result of special leave petitions pending in SLP [Civil] Nos.576-596/2014. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the respondent refunded the excess input tax credit in respect of tax period April 2015 to January 2017 after the indemnity bond executed by the petitioner. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its order dated 22.09.2017, in 'THE STATE O

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

btain the same from the CCT directly. It is based on the CCT's circular, which was issued pursuant to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M.K. AGRO TECH supra, demand notices were issued and orders were passed under section 10[5] read with section 69[1] of the KVAT Act, directing the petitioner to make payment of refund amount with interest from the date of the refund till the date of passing of the order. Being aggrieved by the same, petitioner is before this Court.
4. In the writ petition proceedings, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed IA-2/2018 for impleading the CCT as Respondent No.2 to the proceedings. IA-3/2018 is filed seeking amendment of the writ petition under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to amend the writ petition. The additional relief sought by the petitioner is to quash the Circular No.09 of the CCT dated 9.10.2017 as per Annexure-J, by issuing a writ of ce

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Authorities to demand/recover the refund amount with interest as sought for. Attention was drawn to Section 69[1] of the KVAT Act to contend that rectification of mistake apparent from the record is amenable to Section 69[1] of the KVAT Act with a view to rectify the same by the prescribed Authority, Appellate Authority or revising Authority. Application of the principles of law enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a subsequent Judgment cannot be construed as any mistake apparent on the record. The Authorities have refunded the amount based on the law holding the field on the date of passing of the refund order, if any subsequent order is passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court modifying or annulling the said order of this Court, on the basis of which, refund order was issued, the same would not be a ground to withdraw the refund order and to demand/seek recovery of the refund of the amount paid.
[iii] Notices under Section 42 of the KVAT Act were issued for the tax period March 2010

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

xplanation dated 27.12.2017 filed, the orders impugned herein were passed on the ground that the issue involved relates to implementation of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court involving State revenue and hence granting further time would be unreasonable.
[iv] The request made by the petitioner to furnish the circular of the CCT dated 9.10.2017 was rejected by issuing endorsement dated 19.12.2017, informing that the same relates to the internal matters of administration of the Department. Therefore, in case of necessity of the said circular, petitioner can contact the CCT, Bengaluru. It was mandatory on the part of the respondent to provide the circular of CCT, the basis on which the impugned orders were passed before passing of the orders. It is settled law that any information/ documents/circulars relied upon by the Authorities must be made known to the Assessees while demand is made based on such material. The impugned orders passed are in violation of the principles of natural

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of 'DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS v. SIMPLEX CONCRETE PILES [INDIA] LIMITED' reported in [(2013) 11 SCC 373.
7. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the revenue placed the submissions as under:
[i] Section 174[3][i] of the KGST Act contemplates that in consequence of, or to give effect to, any finding, direction or order made under any provision of the relevant repealed Acts or any Judgment, or order made by the Supreme Court, High Court or any other court whether before or after the commencement of KGST Act, any order, assessment or reassessment or any action may be made notwithstanding the repeal of the KVAT Act. The proceedings relates to the tax period April 2015 to January 2017, much prior to the KGST Act coming into force. Proceedings were pending under the KVAT Act relating to these tax periods. Hence, claim of refund with interest by the respondent is saved under Section 173 of the KGST Act. Even otherwise, the s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ers, issued the Circular dated 9.10.2017, bringing to the notice of the departmental authorities, the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M.K. AGRO TECH supra. It is no doubt true that the penalty and interest are directed to be levied, but no such penalty is levied in the case on hand. It is only interest has been levied which is in conformity with Section 36[1] of the KVAT Act. The argument of the learned Senior Counsel, in as much as, not providing adequate opportunity to the petitioner would not be relevant since the respondent has acted upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M.K. AGRO TECH supra, which is binding on the authority as well as the Assesse.
[iii] The Assessee placing reliance on the Judgment of M.K. AGRO TECH supra, sought for refund of input tax credit, strangely now canvassing arguments that the said Judgment is not applicable to the facts of the present case.
[iv] Issuance of notice under Section 42 of the KVAT Act was only for t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

force or existing at the time of such repeal; or
(b) affect the previous operation of the repealed Acts and orders or anything duly done or suffered thereunder; or
(c) affect any right, privilege, obligation, or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under the repealed Acts or orders under such repealed Acts:
Provided that any tax exemption granted as an incentive against investment through a notification shall not continue as privilege if the said notification is rescinded on or after the appointed day; or
(d) affect any tax, surcharge, penalty, fine, interest as are due or may become due or any forfeiture or punishment incurred or inflicted in respect of any offence or violation committed against the provisions of the repealed Acts; or
(e) affect any investigation, inquiry, verification (including scrutiny and audit), assessment proceedings, adjudication and any other legal proceedings or recovery of arrears or remedy in respect of any such tax, surcharge, penalty, fine, i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

necessary or expedient,-
(a) for making omissions from, additions to and adaptations and modifications of the rules, notifications and orders issued under the repealed Acts;
(b) for specifying the authority, officer or person who shall be competent to exercise such functions exercisable under any of the repealed Acts or any rules, notifications or orders issued thereunder as may be mentioned in the said notification.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 173, nothing contained in any of the repealed Acts limiting the time within which any action may be taken or any order, assessment or re-assessment may be made shall apply to an assessment or re- assessment made on the assessee or any person,-
(i) in consequence of, or to give effect to, any finding, direction or order made under any provision of the relevant repealed Acts or any judgement, or order made by the Supreme Court, High Court or any other court whether before or after the commencement of this Act;
(ii)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng contained in Section 173, despite any limitation contained in any of the repealed Acts or, assessment or re-assessment may be made on the assessee or any person in consequence of, or to give effect to, any finding or direction or order made under any provision of the relevant repealed Acts or any Judgment or order made by the Hon'ble Apex Court or High court or any other court whether before or after commencement of KGST Act.
12. Section 38 of the KVAT Act deals with the assessment of tax. In terms of the returns filed under Section 35 of the KVAT Act, there is a deemed assessment under Section 38(1) of the KVAT Act. Thus on the returns filed by the assessee under Section 35 of the Act, refund was claimed on the ground that the input tax deductable by the dealer exceeds the output tax payable by him mainly relying on the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in M.K. AGROTECH's case supra. Refund claimed or the adjustments sought by the dealer not being responded, petitioner approac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s and subject to the result of pending Special Leave Petitions. The orders passed in the connected writ petitions are also placed on record for the perusal of this Court.
4. In the result, by following the decision of the Division Bench and the orders subsequently passed in the writ petition pursuant to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench, these writ petitions are allowed. A direction is issued to respondent No.1 to process the application filed by petitioner for refund of input tax paid in excess, as per Annexure 'B' and refund the same, if not otherwise found disentitled. In case the tax is refunded, as ordered, respondents are at liberty to obtain indemnity bond from the petitioner to the extent of amount refunded.
It is also ordered that refund shall be made within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and from the date the petitioner furnishes indemnity bond, whichever is later.
It is made clear that refund shall be subject to result of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court. It was further ordered that respondents are at liberty to obtain indemnity bonds from the petitioner to the extent of amount refunded. The refund orders are passed after obtaining the indemnity bonds from the petitioner to the extent of the amount refunded. Though the subject matter of W.P.Nos.110509-525/2015 was relating to the tax period from March 2014 to July 2015, refund orders are issued for 22 months based on the said order of this court subject to the indemnity bonds executed by the petitioner. Hence repeal of the KVAT Act on 1.7.2017 would not affect the proceedings initiated by the Authorities in view of Section 174(1)(f) and (3) of KGST Act.
15. It is true that ordinarily no rectification is allowable based on the subsequent judgment passed by the High Court or the Apex Court, but in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case when the petitioner has approached this court seeking refund of the amount referring to the Judgment of the Division Bench in M.K. AGROT

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

owing cause, in writing, against such amendment. As could be observed from the records that no enhancement of an assessment or otherwise increasing of the liability of the dealer has been made by the Prescribed authority in rectifying the refund orders passed under Section 10(5) of the Act. Indisputably the impugned orders are passed under Section 10(5) r/w Section 69(1) of KVAT Act. Admittedly, assessee had no objections at the time of passing of the refund orders under Section 10(5) of the Act. However, now it is argued that the power under Section 10(5) r/w Section 69(1) of the Act cannot be exercised/invoked by the prescribed authority to withdraw the refund/ demand/initiate proceedings for recovery of refunded amount. Section 10(5) provides for refund or adjustment of the excess amount whereunder input tax deductable by the dealer exceeds the output tax. An order of recovery/demand of refunded amount has to be passed pursuant to the disposal of the appeal before the Hon'ble Apex C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has observed, on the ratio of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, penalty and interest shall be levied as per the levies as existed at that point of time for the relevant years of assessment or re-assessment. It can be held that circular issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes is only incorporating the executive instructions intended in the department in order to maintain uniformity in collecting taxes, interest and penalty, finalising the assessments or initiating any proceedings in furtherance of achieving the benefit of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court.
19. It is trite law that penalty is not automatic, while imposing penalty, it is mandatory to provide an opportunity of hearing to the dealer but in the batch of present cases, no such penalty is levied by the prescribed authority.
20. As regards levy of interest, it is apt to refer to the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of J.K.SYNTHETICS LTD. -VS- COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER repor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ble smooth and effective collection of the tax from the dealers liable to pay tax under the statute. Section 11B provides for levy of interest on failure of the dealer to pay tax due under the Act and within the time allowed. Should this provision be strictly construed or should it receive a broad and liberal construction, is a question which we will have to consider in determining the sweep of the said provision.
It is well-known that when a statute levies a tax it does so by inserting a charging section by which a liability is created or fixed and then proceeds to provide the machinery to make the liability effective. It, therefore, provides the machinery for the assessment of the liability already fixed by the charging section, and then provides the mode for the recovery and collection of tax, including penal provisions meant to deal with defaulters. Provision is also made for charging interest on delayed payments, etc. Ordinarily the charging section which fixes the liability is s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e to provide for charging interest, the Court must give that meaning to it as is conveyed by the language used and the purpose to be achieved. Therefore, any provision made in a statute for charging or levying interest on delayed payment of tax must be construed as a substantive law and not adjectival law.”
21. In the light of the said judgment, it can be held that interest is levied in order to compensate any loss occasioned to the revenue due to delay. The dealer was liable to pay the tax in terms of Section 10 of the KVAT Act. In view of the said judgments of this court in M/s M.K. AGROTECH's case supra applying the principles enunciated therein, net tax was computed and refund was claimed before this court, on the submissions made by the revenue that the matter is subjudiced before the Hon'ble Apex Court, refund order was directed to be made subject to the result of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court. Had no refund was made, the tax amount would have been utilized by the reven

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able to be paid as discussed above, demand of tax is not hit by the principles of natural justice.
22. The commissioner's circular dated 9.10.2017 is attacked by the dealer mainly on the count that no penalty and interest can be levied without providing an opportunity of hearing. As aforesaid, proceedings initiated to demand/recover the tax refunded based on the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court as well as this court in W.P.Nos.110509-525/2015 coupled with the indemnity bond filed by the dealer may not be held to be unjustifiable as levying of interest is compensatory in nature but the same requires an opportunity to the petitioner to put-forth his reasons or explanation in as much as quantification is concerned in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Reasonable opportunity is quintessential as much as levying penalty. Hence Commissioner issuing circular instructions though for the smooth functioning or administration of the department, no instructions to levy penalty or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =