GST rate – latest on scrap of computers, monitors, keyboards,mouse& multimeter

GST rate – latest on scrap of computers, monitors, keyboards,mouse& multimeter
Query (Issue) Started By: – BSNL STR Dated:- 19-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 20-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Sir/Madam,
What is the present rate of GST on scrap sale of computers, monitors, keyboards,mouse& multimeter ?
Regards,
CHANDRASHEKAR G
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, Please clarify that computer, monitor, keyboard, mouse are booked as Capital goods in your books of Account, so that our experts may get the clarity to reply.
Reply By BSNL STR:
The Reply:
Sir,
yes, these items are equipments booked as capital goods.
Regards,
CHANDRASHEKAR G.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, In this regards, my point o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

manufacturer or provider of output services shall pay an amount equal to the Cenvat Credit taken on the said capital goods reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method as specified below for each quarter or a year or part thereof from the date of taking the Cenvat Credit, namely.
(i) for computers and computer peripherals :
For each quarter in the first year @ 10%
For each quarter in the second year @ 8%
For each quarter in the third year @ 5%
For each quarter in the fourth and fifth year @ 1%
(ii) for capital goods, other than computers and computer peripherals @ 2.5% for each quarter :
Provided that if the amount so calculated is less than the amount equal to the duty leviable on transaction value, the amoun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Special provision for exemption from service tax in certain cases relating to services provided or agreed to be provided by Goods and Services Tax Network, retrospectively.

Special provision for exemption from service tax in certain cases relating to services provided or agreed to be provided by Goods and Services Tax Network, retrospectively.
Section 106
F. Acts / Amendment Acts
SERVICE TAX
Finance Act, 2018
Special provision for exemption from service tax in certain cases relating to services provided or agreed to be provided by Goods and Services Tax Network, retrospectively.
106. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 66B of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), as it stood prior to its omission vide section 173 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Chapter), no service tax shall be levied or collected in resp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Credit Notes and accounting implications of Discounts & Incentives for GST

Credit Notes and accounting implications of Discounts & Incentives for GST
By: – Raginee Goyal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 19-3-2018

I. THE CONCEPT:
A. WHAT IS A CREDIT / DEBIT NOTE
A Credit or a debit note serves the purpose of accounting adjustment to settle the correct amount of value and tax for any invoice already issued in the same or earlier period. GSTR 1 is to capture information of all debit / credit note(s) issued by a registered person.
While furnishing details of a debit note/credit note, the details of the original debit note/credit note is required to be mentioned in the GSTR -1 which needs to be precise and correct to avoid any mismatch.
B. BASIC PURPOSE OF CN/ DN
* Credit/ Debit Note can be issued by a taxable person who had earlier issued a tax invoice for supply of any goods and/or services.
* Credit/ Debit note has to be issued where tax invoice has charged excess value and/or excess tax charged than required.
C. PARTICULARS TO BE C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

person can issue a credit note not later than September following the end of the financial year in which such supply was made, or the date of furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier.
[Refer Section 34 (2) of CGST Act, 2017]
Thus, for FY 2017-18, no credit note can be issued post September 30, 2018 or filing of annual return (due date of filing of annual return is December 31, 2018).
E. VARIOUS TRANSACTIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT OF CREDIT NOTES/ DEBIT NOTES
* SALES RETURNS (ALIAS RETURN OF GOODS SUPPLIED)
* DISCOUNTS (PRE SUPPLY / POST SUPPLY)
* CHANGE IN PRICE/ VALUE OF SUPPLY
* CANCELLATION / TERMINATION OF SUPPLY POST BILLING
* INCIDENTAL EXPENSES RELATING TO SUPPLY
* INCENTIVES/ COMMISSION/ BACK-ENDS
RETURN OF GOODS SUPPLIED :
There may be two broad scenarios is case of return of goods supplied in view of the transition to GST:
(a) Goods Supplied in Pre-GST period – returned in post GST period
(b) Goods supplied in Post GST period retu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017, no refund of tax so paid shall be given to the supplier under the old law.
[Refer Section 142 (1) of CGST Act]
(ii) Where the supplies were made before 01.01.2017:
When such goods are returned on or after 01.07.2017, no refund or reversal of tax so paid is allowed.
* DISCOUNTS
Credit Notes were popularly used for accounting of discounts in the pre-GST regime since discounts are inherent part of any commercial transaction. Discounts go on to reduce the amount recoverable from the customer. However, it is noteworthy that all discount shall not result in reversal of corresponding GST applied on them. Discounts can be classified in two broad categories -Pre supply discounts and Post Supply Discounts.
Pre Supply Discounts get captured in Invoice itself and tax is accordingly charged. Post Supply Discounts need to be treated as per provisions of law. The following situations may arise for accounting and tax treatment relating to rice revision and discounts:
(i) Post Suppl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t any post-sale discount given post 01.07.2017 for any sales prior to 01.07.2017.
[Refer Proviso to Section 142(2) (b) of CGST Act, 2017]
(ii) Pre-Supply Discounts relating to post GST supplies (i.e. supplies made after 01.07.2017)
Pre Supply discounts like trade discount etc. are discounts which are given before or at the time of supply as part of the normal trade and commerce. Such discounts are pre-agreed/ contracted/ known and are recorded in the invoice itself and are allowed to be excluded while determining the taxable value and GST shall be levied on value of invoice after discount. No credit is required in such cases.
[Refer Section 15(3) of CGST Act, 2017]
(iii) Post-Supply Discounts relating to post GST supplies (i.e. supplies made after 01.07.2017)
Post Supply discounts are discounts which are given after the supply of goods is made. Any discount given post supply can be excluded while determining the taxable value for calculating GST liability subject to the fol

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alue only when two conditions are fulfilled simultaneously, viz.
i) Supplier and recipient are not related, and
ii) Price is the sole consideration.
Therefore, if no conditions are fulfilled or if only one of the two conditions are fulfilled, then the amount paid or payable shall not be considered as transaction value and recourse to Section 15(4) will be taken. In some industry segments like electronic goods, consumer durables, mobile handsets, computers, laptops, parts and peripherals, cement, etc., it is common practice that the manufacturer/ distributor supplies to the dealers/ resellers at a determined price, whereas, these dealers/ resellers supply to the consumers at a lower price offering store discounts/ bulk discounts for penetration. The discount so offered or price reduced for supply to the consumers is compensated by the manufacturer/ distributor at a pre agreed rate or at an agreed value later.
The questions that arise in the above situation is that whether credit n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that all post sale discounts shall be excluded from the value of supply because, the Department will view it not with an angle of reversing ITC but to add the value of such discounts and incentives to the value of outward supplies. The logic behind this is that the company had agreed/ directed the dealer to supply the goods at lower prices, else the dealer will not supply at lower prices. The dealer would supply the goods at higher prices with a reasonable profits. Here, the dealer is aware that he would be substantially compensated by the company by way of credit notes and it is only for this reason, that he sells it off at such discounted prices. Hence, it is a pre contracted discount which may or may not be quantified before the supply is made to the dealer. As such, price is not the sole consideration, and therefore 15(4) will be invoked. Once it is established that 'price is not the sole consideration', it is not even necessary to examine whether the supplier and recipient are re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nder which they are paid. No general view can be taken that a discount given is commission or incentive received.
The best practice shall be to examine the agreement and accordingly first decide, whether commission or incentive is to be paid to the dealer, in such case, an invoice should be issued by the dealer/ reseller claiming the same for supply of services in the nature of an agent for selling goods of the manufacturer/ distributor. The invoice shall be subject to GST, irrespective of the fact, whether the incentive is under a pre determined contract or agreement or not, or it is linked to specific invoices or not. The manufacturer/ distributor shall claim ITC of the said GST charged in the commission/ incentive invoice.
Whereas, if discount is extended to the dealer/ reseller by the manufacturer/ distributor, the same shall be treated as a price revision/ discount relating to the inward supply received by the dealer/ reseller, invoice cannot be issued by the recipient. A debit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nts are specifically linked to specified invoices, and (c) the recipient has reversed its credit.
If the terms of discount was not agreed before making the supply or if the discount offered is not linked to specific invoice, the supplier cannot reduce the GST output liability which was charged in the original invoice. However, if both the above conditions are fulfilled and the supplier reduces the GST against original invoice, such reduction in output liability of supplier shall be subject to the fact that the recipient also reverses the ITC availed against the original invoice. If the supplier himself does not reduce the output liability in the credit note, there is no provision or law in GSTwhich mandates him to do so and the recipient also cannot be forced to reverse ITC, which was duly paid to the Government by the supplier. The consumer stands benefitted by such price reduction and the GST on the discount received by the dealer is also received by the Government. Reversal of ITC

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Operational Definition of Claimed vs Availed

Operational Definition of Claimed vs Availed
Query (Issue) Started By: – LAKSHMINARAYANAN TR Dated:- 19-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 19-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Section 50 (3) the act says any undue or excess credit claimed will be taxed to an extent of 24%.
However I would like to understand whether Claimed alone is exposed to interest or simple availed and not utilized will also be exposed to Interest of 24%
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
Section 50 (3) of CGST Act, 2017 stipulates that " a taxable person who makes an undue or excess claim of input tax credit under sub-section (10) of section 42 or undue or excess reduction in output tax liability under sub-section (10) of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

een received physically in the factory.
(iii) Inputs are not in the list of (ineligible inputs/input services under Section 17(5) of CGST Act & other Sections, if relevant.
(iv) Payment has been made against the invoice.
(v) If under RCM, cash payment has been made.
and so on.
After crossing the stage of 'claim' you will avail ITC in your books of accounts and other statutory records i.e. in various returns and declarations.
Thus the words, "availed" and "Claimed" both are prior to utilization.
If you claim ITC in your books of accounts or other statutory records, you are prone to interest and penalty both.
For example : You file TRANS-1 wrongly. Thus you are claiming ITC wrongly . In this question avail

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Now Applies to Works Contracts Previously Under VAT; Clarification to Be Provided by Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.

GST Now Applies to Works Contracts Previously Under VAT; Clarification to Be Provided by Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – Works Contract, on which VAT was imposed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Rules Tax on Goods for Export Sales Not Permissible Under TNGST Act Section 2(n) Explanation 3(a.

Court Rules Tax on Goods for Export Sales Not Permissible Under TNGST Act Section 2(n) Explanation 3(a.
Case-Laws
VAT and Sales Tax
Levy of tax on purchase of goods – since the export sale is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Rules UPS Systems Differ from Inverters Under TNGST Act; Tax Classification Adjusted for Unique Features.

Court Rules UPS Systems Differ from Inverters Under TNGST Act; Tax Classification Adjusted for Unique Features.
Case-Laws
VAT and Sales Tax
Rate of tax – Un-interrupted Power Supply Systems (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Shri Dutt India Private Limited Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer And Others

Shri Dutt India Private Limited Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer And Others
GST
2018 (4) TMI 1142 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 120 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-3-2018
WP (C). No. 9355 of 2018
GST
P. B. Suresh Kumar, J.
FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR
FOR THE RESPONDENT : BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDEEN  BY SREELAL N. WARRIER, SC, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOMS
JUDGMENT
Goods owned by the petitioner as referred to in the writ petition have been detained by the first respondent in exercise of the powers under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. It is stated that the petitioner had to pay the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : CMS Info System Limited

In Re : CMS Info System Limited
GST
2018 (5) TMI 649 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 486 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 73 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 19-3-2018
GST-ARA-08/2017/B-11
GST
Shri B.V. Borhade, Joint Commissioner of State Tax and Shri Pankaj Kumar, Joint Commissioner of Central Tax
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. CMS Info Systems Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the applicability of GST on:
1.   Whether supply of such motor vehicles as scrap after its usage can be treated as 'supply' in the course or further

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PER THE APPLICANT
The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
“Statement of relevant facts having a bearing on the question(s) raised.
The applicant is having cash management network pan India. During the course of providing cash management services, the applicant is engaged in following activities:
* Providing ATMs and installing the same at various locations across India
* Managing cash circulation through transporting cash from currency chests to bank branches
* Cash pick up and delivery from and to dedicated banks
Such transportation of cash is done through security vans popularly known as cash carry vans. The applicant purchases raw motor vehicles and with the requisite fabrications, gets it converted to cash carry vans. The applicant also pays GST on fabrication. For this purpose, the applicant purchases motor vehicles and pays GST (Goods and Services tax). Credit of such GST is not availed by the Applicant presently. While purchasing cash carry vans un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t is supplying motor vehicles as scrap after using the same. Therefore, the issue raised is whether such transaction can be considered to be 'supply' in the eyes of GST Law. In this regard, it would be worth analysing Section 7 of Central GST Act, 2017 which reads as under:
“Section 7. Scope of supply
(1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply” includes
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business;
(d) the activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.”
On analysing the above definition, it may be observed that only when the transaction is in the course or furtherance of business, the transaction would be treated as supply.
For reaching to a conclusion whether the transaction is supply or not, it is important is to understand

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

profession or vocation;
(h) services provided by a race club by way of totalisator or a licence to book maker in such club ; and
(i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities;”
Clause (c) of the above definition may cause certain doubts that even if a stray transaction of selling scrap is covered under the definition of 'business'. However, it is very important to note that Clause (c) refers that such activity or transaction should be in the nature of any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, wager or any other similar activity. Therefore, it is very important that to call some transaction/activity as business, it has to be in the nature of any 'trade', 'commerce' etc.
The terms trade or commerce are not defined in GST law and therefore, recourse may be taken to dictionaries. Trade:
Cambridge dictionary: “the activity o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

selling old gold jewellery is not the business of the said individual). and hence does not qualify to be a supply per se. Accordingly the sale of gold jewellery by an individual to a jeweller will nor attract The provisions of section 9(4) and jeweller will not be liable to pay tax under reverse charge mechanism on such purchases. However, if an unregistered supplier of gold ornaments sells it to registered supplier, the tax under RCM will apply ”
From the above clarification given by the Finance Ministry, it clearly appears that the intention of Government is not to treat all the transactions as 'supply' unless the same are carried in the normal course of business activities which are carried with an intention to engage supplier into the activities of buy and sell of relevant commodities/services.
Another important point which needs to be noted is certain activities are deemed to be 'supply' when specified in Schedule I. Clause I of Schedule I reads as under:
&nbs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

used for cash management business and supplied post usage as scrap?
In any case, if the stray transaction of sell of cash carry van is considered to be supply then the bar of taking input tax credit under Section 17 (5) would not be applicable.
The relevant extract of Section 17 (5) reads as under:
“Section 17 (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
[Emphasis supplied]
The exception provided in clause (a) above stipulates that if the motor vehicles are used for making further taxable supply of such vehicles, input tax credit is availa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“purposive interpretation. It is well settled law that while interpreting a statute the basic principle of literal rule of interpretation has to be followed. In light of the above submission, Applicant rely on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of B. Premanand v. Mohan Koikal, 2011 (3) TMI 1590 – SUPREME COURT = (2011) 4 SCC 266 , which is binding upon the Advance Ruling Authority also. The relevant portion of the said decision is as follows:
“9. It may be mentioned in this connection that the first and foremost principle of interpretation of a statute in every system of interpretation is the literal rule of interpretation. The other rules of interpretation e.g. the mischief rule, purposive interpretation etc. can only be resorted to when the plain words of a statute are ambiguous or lead to no intelligible results or if read literally would nullify the very object of the statute. Where the words of a statute are absolutely clear and unambiguous, recourse cannot be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
(b)
[Emphasis supplied]
2)   The term “goods”, “money” and “motor vehicle” have been defined as per Section 2 of the said act, as follows:
   “Sec. 2 – In this act   unless the context otherwise requires.
(52) “goods” means every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply; 
(75) “money” means the Indian legal tender or any foreign currency, cheque, promissory note, bill of exchange, letter of credit, draft, pay order, traveller cheque, money order, postal or electronic remittance or any other instrument recognised by the Reserve Bank of India when used as a consideration to settle an obligation or exchang

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017 is chargeable to Goods and Services Tax;
d. The Applicant on perusal of the provision of Law stated above wishes to claim Input Tax Credit paid on purchase of such vehicles based on following interpretation
–   As per provisions of Section 16 of the CGST Act – Every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed and in the manner specified in section 49, be entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business. As the applicant is going to use the said vehicle in furtherance of the business of transporting valuables (cash and bullion), we feel Input Tax Credit shall be available relying provisions of Section 17(5)(a)(ii)  (supra);
–   The applicant feels the valuables (cash and bullion) as transported is goods and not money in the given context. The applicant is given a consignment by the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ischarge of the debts and full payment for commodities; being accepted equally without reference to the character or credit of the person who offers it. and without the intention of the person Who receives it to consume it or apply it to any other use than In turn to tender it to others in discharge of debts or payment for commodities.: (per DARLING, J. Moss v Nancock, 68 LJQB  660  1899-22 B 111)- Reference – Advanced Law Lexicon, P Ramnatha Aiyar's – 4th Edition.
Therefore, the purpose of excluding money from these definitions is not to charge GST on mere supply of money.
4)   Without prejudice to above submissions, we would like to further submit the following;
a.   Reference is made to Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ('CGST Rules') in relation to E-way bills. E-way bills Rules have been introduced in the GST regime vide Notification No. 27/2017 – Central Tax dated 30.08.2017, to monitor movement of goods from one location to anoth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

truments as may be notified by the Reserve Bank;
Accordingly, with reference to the above definition of the term currency, it may be noted that currency includes, inter alia, currency notes, cheques, draft.
b.   It is pertinent to note that the words used in the CGST rules are -'goods being transported”. Thus, e-way bill is not required to be generated when currency is transported. It may be appreciated that in spite of specific exclusion of money from the definition of goods, currency is considered as goods in the Annexure, Further, even in the case of applicant, currency is being 'transported' in a secured vehicle by the applicant.
c.   Accordingly, 'currency' should be treated as goods, And as the Applicant is transporting currency in the secured vans, which is treated as goods as per the said CGST Rules/ Notification, therefore applicant shall be eligible for input tax credit of CGST, MGST, IGST and Compensation Cess with respect to cash c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sing of 'goods'. Here, It would be worthwhile to take note of decision delivered by Hon'ble Supreme Court under the erstwhile Central Sales Tax ('CST') Act, 1956. In case of Printers (Mysore) Ltd. vs. Asstd. Commissioner Tax Officer 1994 SCC (2) 434 = 1994 (2) TMI 261 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (copy attached for your reference as Annexure the issue on hand was 'newspaper' was excluded from the definition or 'goods' under CST Act, 1956. Consequently, department expressed the view that 'C' form would not be available for buying newsprint for printing newspapers. In other words, the purchasers were required to pay higher rate of tax and benefit of concessional rate of CST was not available to them. Having regard to the intention of exclusion of 'newspaper' from the definition of goods, Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the definition of 'goods' was amended to adhere to Constitution of India i.e. not to levy CST on sale of ne

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y a vehicle except living persons. but does not include luggage or personal effects carried in a motor car or in trailer attached to a motor car or the personal luggage of passengers travelling in the vehicle.
On analysing the above definition, it can be observed that under Motor Vehicles Act, goods includes money and consequently, all cash carry vans of the applicant are considered as 'goods carriage'
Therefore, though there is express definition given in Central GST Act, 2017 for goods, the term 'goods' shall include 'money' for the purpose of Section 17 (5) (a) of Central GST Act. Consequently, the applicant Shall be eligible for input tax credit of CGST, MGST, IGST and Compensation Cess with respect to cash carry vans.
7)   Cash carry vans are also used for transportation of gold i.e. goods and therefore, Input tax Credit thereof shall be available to the applicant.
In the present case, the Applicant provides various cash management services in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

llery from one branch of the bank to safe vault where such gold is stored safely. Therefore, one needs to analyse Section 17 (5) of Central GST Act, 2017 in this factual matrix. The said Section is reproduced hereunder:
“Section 17 Apportionment of credit and blocked credits
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
[Emphasis supplied]
Therefore, as per the above provision, input tax credit is available in respect of motor vehicles and other conveyances when they are used for transportation of 'goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

xure 'C' ,
There is no dispute to the fact that gold and silver are nothing but goods. In common parlance, gold is not considered as money; but a commodity which is capable of being bought and sold. Accordingly, gold and silver are movable properties squarely falling within the definition of 'goods'
Therefore, these cash carry vans are also used for transportation of gold and other valuable goods. Consequently, as per Section 17 (5) of Central GST Act, 2017, the input tax credit of CGST, MGST, IGST and Compensation Cess shall be available to the applicant.
In view of the above, we request you to pass a suitable Advance Ruling stating Input Tax Credit shall be eligible in respect of GST/Cess paid on purchase of cash carry vans to the Applicant
03.   CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
” (3) The Point wise comments are as follows:-
(i) AS per Section 7(1)(a) the activity of supply of vehicl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of CGST Act, activities or transactions which shall be treated neither as a supply of goods nor a supply of services.
Schedule-III of the Act gives: –
(i) Services by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment.
(ii) Services by any court or Tribunal established under any law for the time being in force.
(iii). (a) the functions performed by the Members of Parliament, Members of State Legislature, Members of Panchayats, Members of Municipalities and Members of other local authorities;
(b) the duties performed by any person who holds any post in pursuance of the provisions of the Constitution in that capacity; or
(c) the duties performed by any person as a Chairperson or a Member or a Director in a body established by the Central Government or a State Government or local authority and who is not deemed as an employee before the commencement of this clause.
(iv) Services of funeral, burial, crematorium or mortuary including transportation of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es that;
“Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
Since the applicant is engaged in cash management services and the same does not fall within exceptional cases as mentioned above including clause (ii) of Section 17(5) (a) because as per definition of goods in Section 2(52) of CGST Act, 2017 “goods” means 'every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing Crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed befo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sion was tendered during hearing and a request was made to make a further submission. The same has been tendered. None was present on behalf of the concerned officer from the Central Tax Office. However, a written submission has been furnished.
05.   OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case. Lt has been informed thus –
* The applicant is having cash management network pan India. Such transportation of cash is done through security vans popularly known as cash carry vans.
* The applicant purchases raw motor vehicles and with the requisite fabrications, gets it converted to cash carry vans. For this purpose, the applicant purchases motor vehicles and pays GST and also pays GST on fabrication.
* While purchasing cash carry vans under pre-GST era, the applicant had paid Central Excise Duty as well as Value Added tax. When these vans cannot be used further, the applicant sells these motor vehicles as scrap.
* In certain cases, instead of purchasing motor v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, continuity or regularity of such transaction;
(d) supply or acquisition of goods including capital goods and services in connection with commencement or closure of business;
(e) provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members;
(f) admission, for a consideration, of persons to any premises;
(g) services supplied by a person as the holder of an office which has been accepted by him in the course or furtherance of his trade, profession or vocation;
(h) services provided by a race club by way of totalisator or a licence to book maker in such club ; and
(i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities;
 7. (l) For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply” includes-
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchang

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ash management network. As and when the vehicles become scrap, they have to be disposed off and the proceeds therefrom to be identified as income for the business which is reflected in the Profit & Loss Account of the business. Buying new assets and discarding the old and unusable assets is an activity in the course of carrying on of the business. Hence, we conclude that supply of such motor vehicles as scrap after its usage is an activity of 'supply' in the course or furtherance of business and such transaction would attract GST. However, we see that the applicant has referred to the following to make a claim that the impugned transaction would not be a 'supply' under the GST Act
SCHEDULE I [see section 7] – ACTIVITIES TO BE TREATED AS SUPPLY EVEN IF MADE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION
1. Permanent transfer or disposal of business assets where input tax credit has been availed on such assets.
SCHEDULE II [See section 71 – ACTIVITIES TO BE TREATED AS SUPPLY OF GOODS OR SUPPLY

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r the reason that they lack the crucial element of 'consideration'. As regards Schedule IL the same classifies the supplies into supplies of goods or services. Schedule Il begins with the premise that the activities are 'supply'. For the facts before us, we find that there is a supply of cash vans, which are ' goods', for a consideration and the transaction is in the natural course of business. The transaction and the provisions are obvious. In view thereof, we do not find merit in the argument of the applicant.
Having seen that the transaction amounts to a 'supply' under the GST Act, we move on to the next aspect which the applicant desires to know and which is the rate of GST and Compensation Cess. Chapter 87 of the Customs Tariff covers motor vehicles. The applicant has not informed the Customs/ Excise Tariff Heading, Neither has any copy Of the invoice effecting the supply been tendered. The applicant has submitted a sample agreement copy which it e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able to CST at various rates –
a.   Schedules I to III and V to VI do not cover the impugned goods.
b.   Entries in Schedule IV would cover the impugned goods.
3.   Notification No.1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) (as amended from time to time) enlisting the goods taxable to Compensation Cess under the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 at various rates –
a.   This Notification enlists goods from the Chapter 87.
In absence of the requisite details before us, we have to ask the applicant to go through the Notification No.1/2017-CentraI/State Tax (Rate) and Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate), as amended from time to time. We would now turn to the next question.
Question 2
If the answer to Question 1 is in affirmative, whether Input tax Credit is available to CMS Info Systems Ltd. ('CMS' or 'the applicant') on purchase of motor vehicles i.e. cash carry vans which are purchased, used for cash

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the input tax credit on the said tax component shall not be allowed.
Section 17 – Apportionment of credit and blocked credits.
(1) Where the goods or services or both are used by the registered person partly for the purpose of any business and partly for other purposes, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the purposes of his business.
(2) Where the goods or services or both are used by the registered person partly for effecting taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies under this Act or under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act and partly for effecting exempt supplies under the said Acts, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies
 (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uch goods determined under section 15.
As can be seen from the above, except in certain situations as enumerated, ITC is not available in respect of motor vehicles. Hence, I see the exceptions.
As can be seen, the impugned activity of providing cash management services not being for transportation of passengers OR for imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances, it would not be covered by the exceptions in (B) and (C) of sub-section 5(a)(i). Sub-section 5(a)(i)(A) is about making “further supply of such vehicles or conveyances”. The words “further supply” herein are m the nature of “resale”. It should be noted that it is not mentioned as being just “supply of such vehicles or conveyances”. The word “further” before the word “supply” has to be given its proper weightage. Here, the legislature intends to cover motor vehicles which are purchased for the purpose of being sold. In this category, we have the chain of the distributors/ dealers of motor veh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion which speaks about exception if the motor vehicles are used for transportation of goods. The word 'goods' has been defined thus –
“Definitions. 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(52) “goods” means every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply; 
(75) “money” means the Indian legal tender or any foreign currency, cheque, promissory note, bill of exchange, letter of credit, draft, pay order, traveller cheque, money order, postal or electronic remittance or any other instrument recognised by the Reserve Bank of India when used as a consideration to settle an obligation or exchange with Indian legal tender of another denomination but shall not include any currency that is held for its numismatic value;
I find that the applicant has also mentioned that bes

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oney'.
The applicant has cited the case law in Printers (Mysore) Ltd. And Another V. Assistant Commercial Tax Officer And Others. (Civil Appeal No. 1550 of 1985). Indian Newspapers Society V. State of Karnataka. (Writ Petition No. 278 of 1991). (And Other Appeals) [93 STC 95]. We could look at the facts and the decision in this case thus –
“The publishers of newspapers require various goods, here inafier referred to as “the raw material”, for producing, i. e., for printing and publishing their newspapers. The publishers are registered as dealers under the Act. They purchase their raw material from other registered dealers. Most of these purchases are inter-State purchases; m the hands of the selling dealers they are inter-Stale sales exgible to tax.
Section 8, read as a whole, says, inter alia: where a dealer purchases goods (being non-declared goods) required by him for use in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale and issues form “C” to the selling dealer, the selling

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er alia, in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale. Of declared goods, the selling dealer has to pay tax at the rate applicable to sale of such goods within the appropriate State.). It necessarily means that the selling dealer will collect (pass on) tax from the purchasing dealer only at the said concessional rate. The idea behind this provision is self-evident. It is to ensure that the price of the product manufactured by such purchasing dealers does not go up to the detriment of the consumers of those goods. The Parliament does not want to tax both the raw material and the finished goods at the full rate. Where the finished goods are meant for sale, the raw material utilised or consumed for the manufacture of said finished goods is taxed at the concessional rate, for the reason that the State derives revenue again by taxing the sale of the finished goods. However, it is not necessary that the finished goods are actually subjected to tax on their sale-for they may be exempted

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on is this: before the amendment of the definition of the expression “goods” by the 1958 Amendment Act, the publishers of the newspapers [who held the certificate of registration contemplated by section 8(3)(b)] were issuing forms “C” [declarations contemplated by section 8(4)(a)] and on that basis the selling dealer was collecting from them Central sales tax at the concessional rate of 4 per cent (in the case of non-declared goods). They were like any other manufacturers in this respect. But after newspapers were excluded from the purview of the “goods” by the 1958 (Amendment) Act, the Central sales tax authorities took the stand that by virtue of the said amended definition, the printers/publishers of newspapers were not entitled to the benefit of section 8(3)(b) read with section 8(1)(b) and are, therefore, not entitled to issue forms “C”. Their reasoning was this: since the expression “goods” does not take in newspapers, it cannot be said that publishers of newspapers are purchasin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ution and hold on that basis that the expression “goods” occurring in the latter half of clause (b) of section 8(3) does not exclude newspapers from its purview
[clause (b) of sub-section (3) :
“The goods referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) are goods of the class or classes specified in the certificate of registration of the registered dealer purchasing the goods as being intended for resale by him or subject to any rules made by the Central Government in this behalf, for use by him in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale or in mining or in the generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power.”……
Now coming back to the amendment of the definition of “goods” in section 2(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the said amendment, brought in with a view to bring the said definition in accord with the amendments brought in by the Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act (referred to hereinbefore) was actuated by the very same concern, viz., to exempt the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

efined in section 2(d). In other words, the “goods” referred in the first half of clause (b) in section 8(3) refers to what may generally be referred to as raw material (in cases where they were purchased by a dealer for use in the manufacture of goods for sale) while the said word “goods” occurring for the fourth time (i.e., in the latter half) cannot obviously refer to raw material. It refers to manufactured “goods”, i.e., goods manufactured by such purchasing dealer-in this case, newspapers. If we attach the defined meaning to “goods” in the second half of section 8(3)(b), it would place the newspapers in a more unfavourable position than they were prior to the amendment of the definition in section 2(d). It should also be remembered that section 2 which defines certain expressions occurring in the Act opens with the words “in this Act, unless the context otherwise requires”. This shows that wherever the word “goods” occurs in the enactment, it is not mandatory that one should mecha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods which they required for printing and publishing newspapers. Their position could not be worse after the amendment which would be the case if we accept the contention of the Revenue. If the contention of the Revenue is accepted, the newspapers would now become liable to pay tax at 10 per cent on non-declared goods as prescribed in section 8(2). This would be the necessary consequence of the acceptance of Revenue's submission inasmuch as the newspapers would be deprived of the benefit of section 8(3)(b) read with section 8(1)(b). We do not think that such was the intention behind the amendment of definition of the expression “goods” by the 1958 (Amendment) Act. Even apart from the opening words in section 2 referred to above, it is well-settled that where the context does not permit or where it would lead to absurd or unintended result, the definition of an expression need not be mechanically applied.”
 It can be seen from the above case law that the Hon. Court went into

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that effect such a qualification is always implied.
18. There is no dispute with the proposition that the meaning of a word or expression defined may have to be departed from on account of the subject or context in which the word had been used and that will be giving effect to the opening sentence in definition section, namely, “unless the context otherwise requires”. In view of this qualification, the court has not only to look at the words but also to look at the context, the collocation and the object of such words relating to such matter and interpret the meaning intended to be conveyed by the use of the words in a particular section. But where there is no obscurity in the language of the section, there is no scope for the application of the rule ex visceribus actus. This rule is never allowed to alter the meaning of what is of itself clear and explicit. The authorities relied upon by the High Court are, therefore, not applicable.”
Thus, the Hon. Courts have laid down that the co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ifying the Schedule for goods exempted specifying the goods “Rupee notes when sold to the Reserve Bank of India”. Notes become legal tender after they are issued by the Reserve bank of India. Till that time they are mere printed papers and not 'money' or 'currency' and hence, they are held exigible to GST, though at a NIL rate. In the present case, the ITC would be available when the motor vehicles are used for transportation of goods. Here, the ITC is of the tax paid in respect of the purchase of the motor vehicles and not Of the goods being transported. To restrict the ITC here to the case when only 'goods' as understood in GST are being transported in the motor vehicles would not be in the context of the provision. The applicant has rightly invited attention to the definition of 'goods' as appearing in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which says thus –
(13)   “goods” includes livestock, and anything (other than equipment ordinarily used with th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eration of the above, the impugned activity of providing cash management services involves use of the motor vehicles for transportation of 'goods'. The motor vehicles would be covered by the exception in sub-section 5(a)(ii) of section 17. Thus, the applicant would be entitled to the ITC on the purchase of the cash carry vans i.e motor vehicles used for transportation of goods, subject to the provisions of the Rules made in this regard.
As per Sh. Pankaj Kumar, Member
This question pertains to the eligibility to avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the purchase of cash carry vans which are used for the cash management business. I have seen above that the disposal of the cash carry vans as scrap vehicles is a 'supply' in the course of furtherance of business and is amenable to GST. In view thereof, the applicant queries as to whether ITC would be available on the purchase of cash carry vans which are later disposed off as scrap, For answering this, I would have to refer to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including  zero-rated supplies.
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
 (6) In case of supply of capital goods or plant and machinery. on which input tax credit has been taken, the registered person shall pay an amount equal to the input lax credit taken on the said capital goods or plan,' and machinery reduced by such percentage points as may be prescribed or the tax on the transac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The word “further” before the word “supply” has to be given its proper due. Here, the legislature intends to cover motor vehicles which are purchased for the purpose of being sold. In this category, we have the chain of the distributors/ dealers of motor vehicles who purchase from the manufacturers for the downward sale to the final customer. The use of the word “further” is indicative of a further supply and not such a supply as in the present case which is the disposal as a scrap and which happens after the motor vehicle has been used till its full working life. In view thereof, the impugned activity of providing cash management services not being for making a further supply of the motor vehicles would not be covered by the exception in (A) of sub-section 5(a)(i). I find that the applicant has argued that as per well-settled principle of law at first one has to apply “literal interpretation” and only in cases of absurd results, one has to apply “purposive interpretation”. However, th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ank of India when used as a consideration to settle an obligation or exchange with Indian legal tender of another denomination but shall not include any currency that is held for its numismatic value;
I find that the applicant has also mentioned that besides i cash', the cash carry vans are also used for transport of bullion. Bullion not being excluded from the definition of ' goods' , there arises no issue. However, the applicant has raised the question in terms of 'cash carry vans' and hence, “cash” would be the goods which would be transported. “Cash” here is the Indian legal tender which is 'money' and I find that 'money' has been excluded from the definition of 'goods' for the purposes of the GST Act. However, it is found that the applicant has specifically mentioned in his application that they are engaged in “cash management service” which they have specifically mentioned as under :
*   Providing ATMs and installing the sam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as under :-
(52) “goods” means every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply; 
Thus from the above definition of 'goods', it very clear that 'money' is specifically excluded from the definition of 'goods' and therefore in no way input tax credit in respect of motor vehicles and other conveyances as envisaged in Section 17(5) (a) would be available in respect of transportation of money in motor vehicles as under GST law as money is specifically excluded from the definition of 'goods' and therefore 'money' is not to be treated as 'goods' because of specific exclusion.
The intent of the legislature in excluding 'money' from the definition of 'goods' can also  be visualized from a situation wherein if a person 'X' eng

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
We see that legislative intent to allow input tax credit in respect of vehicles is very restrictive and requires to be interpreted accordingly and credit in respect of motor vehicles shall not be available except to the four persons/entities as enumerated above when there is specific exclusion of 'money' from being considered as goods in GST Act and provisions. The judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Printers (Mysore) Ltd Vs Asst. Commercial Tax Officer (cited supra) as referred by the applicant is in respect of very different statute i.e. the Central Sales Tax Act,1956 wherein the issue was whether purchase and use o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e was no intent to not to treat newspapers as 'goods' but the only intent was to put them out of Sales Tax liability and Hon'ble Supreme Court has rightly interpreted as per intent and context of the Central Sales Tax statute.
However when we see definition of 'goods' as given in the GST Act, we see that the definition of 'goods' is as under –
(52) “goods” means every kind of movable property other than money and securities but includes actionable claim. growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply;
We see that it specifically gives the exception that under the GST Act, 'money' will not be considered as ' goods' for the provisions of GST and therefore, in respect of GST Act wherever the word 'goods' comes it will specifically mean that money would not be covered in the same. The intent of legislature is further confirmed from the e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a) (ii) of the GST Act which is reproduced as under –
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
And therefore, transportation of money is not covered in section 17(5)(a) (ii) of the GST Act and the applicant is not eligible for availing input tax credit in respect of motor vehicles used in transport of money.
06.   In view of the detailed deliberations held hereinabove, it is ordered thus –
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Victory Production & Entertainment P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Mumbai.

Victory Production & Entertainment P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Mumbai.
Service Tax
2018 (5) TMI 1221 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 19-3-2018
Appeal No. ST/85617, 85618, 85620, 85621/18 – A/86158-86161/2018
Service Tax
Mr. M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial)
Shri Prashant Kandagal, Office Boy for appellant
Shri V.R. Reddy, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
Per: M. V. Ravindran
These four appeals are directed against order-in-appeal No. IM/CGST A-III/MUM/166 to 169/17-18 dated 10.10.2017.
2. An application for adjournment of the matter is received from the appellant.
3. On consideration of the application and perusal of records, I find that the appeals can be disposed of at this stage as t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West Versus Ugam Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai West Versus Ugam Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Service Tax
2018 (6) TMI 250 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 19-3-2018
ST/85398, 85407, 85411, 85413/18 – A/86201-86204/2018
Service Tax
Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial)
Shri Dilip Shinde, Asst. Commr (AR) for appellant
Shri Mihir Deshmukh, Advocate, Shri Abhijeet Singh, Advocate for respondent
ORDER
Per: M.V. Ravindran
All these stay petitions are filed by Revenue for staying operations of the impugned order on the ground that refund has been sanctioned by first appellate authority.
2. After hearing both sides, I find that the stay petitions filed by Revenue are devoid of merits accordingly, the stay petitions are disposed of.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Solutions to global organizations. The respondent's global expertise provides clients with specialist knowledge in Multi-country Project Management, International Data Collection and Healthcare Data Solutions using multiple market research platforms and proprietary technologies. Respondent offer a comprehensive range of services that include:-
1. Market Research Operations and Technology related services offering:
(i) language skills across more than 25 international languages,
(ii) expertise across all modes of market research date collection-telephone, internet, mobile and to-face, our strong domain expertise and experience, and track record of proven result.
Respondent provides various kinds of services with the services of single

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to its clients mainly located outside India i.e. United States of America, United Kingdom and other countries.
6. Adjudicating authority has allowed the refund claims of the respondent partially and partially rejected the same against which an appeal was preferred before the first appellate authority. First appellate authority by following the law settled by Tribunal as also by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Hindustan Coca Cola – 2009 (242) ELT 168 (Bom), set aside the impugned order.
7. In the grounds of appeal, Revenue is only stating that post April 2014, the definition of 'input service' has undergone a change which has deleted the services in relation to the business activity and is not to be considered as in or in relatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Anderson Business Solutions P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Bhiwandi, Thane

Anderson Business Solutions P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Bhiwandi, Thane
Service Tax
2018 (6) TMI 329 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 19-3-2018
ST/85527, 85528, 85530, 85543, 85544/18 – FINAL ORDER NO. A/86195-86199/2018
Service Tax
Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial)
Shri Rajiv Luthia, C.A. for appellant
Shri Atul Sharma, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent
ORDER
Per: M.V. Ravindran
These five appeals are directed against order-in-appeal No. PK/75-79/Appeal Thane/TH/2017-18 dated 01.11.2017.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. On perusal of records, it transpires that the issue is regarding rejection of refund of claim of CENVAT Credit availed where service tax paid on the follo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ceived and utilized by the appellant during the course of rendering output services which are exported. In my view, export of insurance service and the amount involved therein as credit of service tax paid by the service provider of the services would fall under the category of “services” which are used for providing output services by the appellant and exported. To that extent, I rely upon the decision of Robert Bosch Engineering & Business Solutions Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Cus. & ST – 2017 (12) TMI 836 – (Tri.).
6. As regards the service tax credit on the insurance services, maintenance and repair services, I find that the said services in respect of individuals are not allowed accordingly to that extent, impugned orders

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Kanj Products Private Limited

M/s Kanj Products Private Limited
GST
2018 (6) TMI 429 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – AAR
Dated:- 19-3-2018
Ruling No. 03/2017-18 In Application No. 04
GST
MR. VIPIN CHANDRA (MEMBER) AND AMIT GUPTA (MEMBER)
For The Applicant : Shri C M Dang
RULING
1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s Kanj Products Private Limited, Plot No. 71 & 72, Sector 8A, IIE, SIDCUL, Haridwar seeking an advance ruling on applicability of notification dated 5.10.2017 issued by DIPP, Ministry of Commerce and Industry read with CBEC Circular No. 1060/9/2017-Cx. Dated 27th November 2017 in r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te authority to an applicant on matters or on questions specified in sub section (2) of section 97 or sub section (1) of section 100 in relation to the supply of goods or services- or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant.
3. As per the said subsection (2) of Section 97 of the CGST Act advance ruling can be sought by an applicant in respect of :-
(a) Classification of any-goods or services or both.
(b) Applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act,
(c) Determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both,
(d) Admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid
(e) Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or bo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Union of India Versus Kundan Care Products Ltd.

Union of India Versus Kundan Care Products Ltd.
GST
2018 (6) TMI 1477 – SC Order – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. J94 (SC)
SUPREME COURT – SC
Dated:- 19-3-2018
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 3004 of 2018 with I. A. Nos. 28261 & 28265 of 2018
GST
Mr. Ranjan Gogoi and Mrs. R. Banumathi, JJ.
ORDER
Heard the Learned Counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material.
Delay condoned.
Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is al

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & C. Ex., Kolkata South

M/s Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & C. Ex., Kolkata South
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 157 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 19-3-2018
Ex. Appeal No.75315/18 – FO/A/76034/2018
Central Excise
SHRI P. K. CHOUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Shri H. P. Kanade, Adv. for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. S. Chattopadhyay, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Respondent (s)
ORDER
Per Shri P. K. Choudhary:
This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against the Order-in- Appeal No.93/Kol.V/2017 dated 30.10.2017 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of CGST (Appeals I), C.Ex., Kolkata South.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of soaps and OSAA, glycerine and DFA classifiable under chapters 15, 34 and 38 of the first schedule to CETA. They entered into an agreement with M/s I.M.C. Ltd. with regard to Oil Pipeline Supply Management Services termed as 'Pipeline utilisation charges' to oil tanks. There is a c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

records.
4. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that in this case the appellant availed the cenvat credit of service tax paid for services which were in the nature of penalty and cannot be treated as input service as defined under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant drew the attention of the Bench to the agreement dated 10 March 2002 between the appellant and M/s IMC Ltd. in respect of transfer of liquid cargo from M/s IMC Ltd.,s terminal. It is seen that there is a clause for pipeline utilisation charges. For the proper appreciation of the case, the relevant portion of the said agreement is reproduced:
“6. The Minimum Guaranteed quantity will be 20000 MT of oil pumped through pipelines (both from Company's terminal/N.S.Dock i.e ex-ship to Party's Factory annum. For any shortfall below 20000 MT per annum “Party” shall pay to “Company” @ Rs. 55/- per MT for such shortfall. After an initial period of 5 years, the amount paya

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

agreement, it is clear that the said charges are related to the service provided by the service provider. The appellant contended that “inward transportation of inputs” has been specifically covered under the inclusive definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. It is noticed that the service rendered by M/s IMC Ltd. is in respect of manufacturing of excisable goods. Therefore, the denial of credit is not justified.
6. The Tribunal in the case of CCE, Mumbai v. GKW Ltd. [2014 (308) ELT 759 (Tri.-Mum)] observed that excise authorities having jurisdiction over recipient of inputs cannot reopen classification adopted by the officer having jurisdiction over input supplier. The relevant portion of the said decision is reproduced:
“5. I have carefully considered the submissions advanced by the Revenue.
5.1 It is true that in the case of Technoweld Industries (supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court had held that the process of drawing wires from wire rods not amount to manufactur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Principal Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, GST, Raipur Versus M/s. Balajee Structural (I) Pvt. Ltd,

The Principal Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, GST, Raipur Versus M/s. Balajee Structural (I) Pvt. Ltd,
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 1457 – CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT – TMI
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-3-2018
TAXC No. 14 of 2018
Central Excise
SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA AND SHRI RAM PRASANNA SHARMA JJ.
For the Appellant:- Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent:- None
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
Heard.
1. Mr. Manish Sharma, learned counsel for the Revenue, would raise a ground on the strength of the order passed by the Coordinate Benches of this Court in Union of India Vs M/s Harshad Thermic Industries Pvt. Ltd (TAXC No.48 of 2012) decided on 22.11.2012 and Commissioner, Central Excise Customs &

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h Sharma, learned counsel for the Revenue, that if an order is non-speaking or unreasoned it hinders judicial review by the Higher Courts, therefore, it is required to be set aside so that a detailed order is passed by the Tribunal or any other Subordinate Adjudicatory Body enabling the Superior Court to examine the correctness of the reasoning assigned by the authority while rendering the judgment. However, the present matte is bit different in the sense that the issue as to whether the structural steel items are capital goods or input has already been settled by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in bunch of tax appeals. The lead case being (TAXC No. 59 of 2011) M/s Vandana Global Limited Siltara Industrial Growth Centre Vs Commissioner,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al (supra). Admittedly, the legal issues on which the case would be decided on merits, even after remit, would be the same as has been decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Vandana Global (supra). Therefore, there is no point in remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for decision afresh as the case would involve the same structural steel items which were subject matter of decision making by the Division Bench in the matter of Vandana Global (supra) and other connected matters decided by a common order.
5. In view of the above, even though the impugned order is a non speaking order, the core issue having already been settled by this Court in the matter of Vandana Global (supra), we do not consider the present to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on Export – EGM Error related cases

Refund of IGST on Export – EGM Error related cases
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 14/2018 Dated:- 19-3-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CUSTOM HOUSE: PORT AREA: VISAKHAPATNAM – 530 035
F. No. P3/06/2017 – A.M. (Pt.1)
Date: 19.03.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 14/2018
Sub:- reg.
*****
Attention of Importers, Exporters, Customs Brokers and Members of Trade is invited to this office Public Notices No. 49/2017, dated 08.11.2017, No. 09/2018, dated 26.02.2018, No. 12/2018, dated 09.03.2018 and No. 13/2018, dated 14.03.2018.
2. IGST Refund Module for exports is operational in ICES from 10/10/2017. The module has an inbuilt procedure to automatically grant refund after validating the Shipping Bill data available with Customs against the GST Returns data available with GSTN. The procedure also returns error/response codes in case there is any discrepancy. A number of representations were received by Board from the stakeholders seeking resolution of variou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll be deemed to be an application for refund of integrated tax paid on the goods exported out of India, once both the Export General Manifest (EGM) and valid return in Form GSTR-3 or Form GSTR-3B, as the case may be, has been filed. In other words, filing of EGM, apart from filing of Shipping Bill and GSTR-3B is a mandatory requirement for processing refund claim. The Shipping Lines / Agents have been filing EGM electronically for exports originating from gateway ports. However, for cargo originating from ICDs, the Shipping Lines / Agents were filing EGM in manual mode. Absence of electronic EGMs and their integration with local EGMs has been the major obstacle in processing of refund claims in the case of exports from ICDs.
4. In order to overcome this issue, the Shipping Lines have been mandated to include the Shipping Bills originating from ICDs while filing the electronic EGMs at the gateway ports. In cases where the EGMs have not been incorporated the Shipping Bills pertaining to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed at gateway port by the Shipping Lines / Agents; and (c) rectification of errors in local and gateway EGM, wherever necessary.
6. The jurisdictional officers at the gateway port shall strictly monitor the EGM pendency and error reports available in ICES, The officers at the gateway port shall resolve the EGM errors in an expeditious manner by asking the Shipping Lines / Agents to file requisite amendments and approving those amendments on ICES. In cases, where there are errors either in the Shipping Bill or in the local EGM (i.e. truck or train summary), the remedial action shall be taken by the jurisdictional officer in 1CD.
7. It has been observed that mis-match of information provided in local and gateway EGM mainly occurs because of (i) incorrect gateway port code in local EGM (error M); (ii) change in container for LCL cargo or mistakes committed while entering container number (error C); (iii) incorrect count of containers (error N); (iv) mistakes in entering the nature of ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notified Telangana Goods and Services Tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2018.

Notified Telangana Goods and Services Tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2018.
G.O.Ms.No.79 Dated:- 18-3-2018 Telangana SGST
GST – States
Telangana SGST
Telangana SGST
GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
G.O.Ms.No.79,
DATED 18-3-2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No.23 of 2017), the State Government hereby makes the following Rules further to amend the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
(1) These Rules may be called the Telangana Goods and Services Tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, they shall come into force with effect from 23rd March, 2018.
2. In the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

worker, indicating there in the quantity and description of goods where the goods are sent by one job worker to another or are returned to the principal.";
(ii) in Rule 124 –
(a) in sub-rule (4), in the first proviso, after the words "Provided that", the letter "a" shall be inserted;
(b) in sub-rule (5), in the first proviso, after the words "Provided that", the letter "a" shall be inserted;
(iii) for Rule 125, the following rule shall be substituted, namely:-
"125. Secretary to the Authority.- An officer not below the rank of Additional Commissioner (working in the Directorate General of Safeguards) shall be the Secretary to the Authority.";
(iv) in Rule 127, in clause (iv), a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rded in writing, refer the matter to the Director General of Safeguards to cause further investigation or inquiry in accordance with the provisions of the Act and these rules.";
(vii) for Rule 134, the following Rule shall be substituted, namely:-
"134. Decision to be taken by the majority.- (1) A minimum of three members of the Authority shall constitute quorum at its meetings.
(2) If the Members of the Authority differ in their opinion on any point, the point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the members present and voting, and in the event of equality of votes, the Chairman shall have the second or casting vote.";
(viii) after Rule 137, in the Explanation, in clause (c), after sub-clause (b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rate difference Debit Note to Labour Service provider

Rate difference Debit Note to Labour Service provider
Query (Issue) Started By: – Nihal Shaikh Dated:- 17-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 19-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 20 Replies
GST
Dear Sir,
Our business type is Steel trading & we doing transactions of purchase and sale of steel only (no other service).
We had taken Labour service from a Labour Service provider and he charged us extra rate in his GST bill
Now we want to raise a debit note of a rate difference on him, In this debit note should we charge him GST? OR without GST?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
A labour contractor has provided/supplied Manpower Service to you and he has charged for that. Should he not charge GST from you ? You are service receiver. Why the question of raising a debit note on account of rate difference ?
Reply By Nihal Shaikh:
The Reply:
Sir,
This is not actually Manpower Service this service is Testing of material and he mentioned in his bill as "Labour Charges".

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

estricted to the actual tax liability of service supplier.
Reply By Nihal Shaikh:
The Reply:
Sir,
If He Corrects bill as Testing Charges with charging us GST & we want to raise Debit note on Him for extra charges then what should we do..? Charge him GST in Debit note or wthout GST?
Reply By SHIVKUMAR SHARMA:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
As per GST Rule debit note/Credit note will be issued only by Goods/Service Supplier.
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
According to Section 34 (3) of CGST Act, 2017 " Where a tax invoice has been issued for supply of any goods or services or both and the taxable value or tax charged in that tax invoice is found to exceed the taxable value or tax payable in respect of such supply, or where the goods supplied are returned by the recipient, or where goods or services or both supplied are found to be deficient, the registered person, who has supplied such goods or services or both, may issue to the recipient a credit note containing s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

recipient is un-registered;
(h) serial number and date of the corresponding tax invoice or, as the case may be, bill of supply;
(i) value of taxable supply of goods or services, rate of tax and the amount of the tax credited or, as the case may be, debited to the recipient; and
(j) signature or digital signature of the supplier or his authorised representative."
From the above it is clear that the registered person, who has supplied such goods or services or both, may issue to the recipient a credit note containing such particulars as indicated in rule 53 (1) of CGST Rules, 2017. The recipient cannot issue a credit/debit note under CGST Act.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Well explained by Sh.Ranganathan Sir. I agree with him entirely.
Reply By Nihal Shaikh:
The Reply:
Thank You very much all of you Sir.
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
I explained the legal position regarding Credit/Debit note in my reply dated 17.03.2017. From the practical p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecking GST rates applied to products & for it, ITC could be easily claimed even if excess GST rate applied on a product then market prevailing rate. Its a mistake by the department {but they cant also introspect every transaction, they are humans} but unless un until with autofill of rates is given in common portal, In portal based on HSN auto populate of rates should come which is missing due to which many people are taking negative advantage of it.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
We talk of legal aspects. Practically the department may or may not be able to detect/examine such lapse it does not mean we should shut our eyes. No assessee would like to take risk of interest and penalty. We cannot forget that every assessee is subject to audit. More over Range Officers and Preventive Officers are to monitor and supervise. For law abiding persons it is wise to take credit as per ITC Rules. Any party who charges in excess and deposit with Govt. can claim refund. In that situation, wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Second hand good purchased from ex employer (Bank)

Second hand good purchased from ex employer (Bank)
Query (Issue) Started By: – vivin vijay Dated:- 17-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 20-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 8 Replies
GST
Dear expert, I am currently working in bank, wherein I have purchased furnitures under the furniture allowance of the bank, the purchsses were made in 2015 and 2016, wherein I had paid VAT, (GST was not implemented at that time), these furnitures were purchased in the name of bank, now since I am leaving the organization , I have to purchase it back from the bank at depreciated cost, my bank while has depreciated the value, but has charged me GST on the depreciated value , my question is is GST applicable? Does it not come under the section 32(5)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ar expert, on what will you consider GST if applicable, on the depreciated value which includes VAT as well ? Currently, the value including GST , makes the price of the second hand good which was purchased two years become more expensive then it's purchase price , as the the GST ranges between as high as 28 percent on the LCD and 18 percent on the furniture. Also one more question since in this transaction the bank is a seller of furniture hence by the nature it becomes a dealer even though the principal activity is not to sell furniture.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Bank cannot be termed as a dealer by any stretch of imagination. By selling second hand goods Bank does not become a dealer at all.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ual to the Cenvat Credit taken on the said capital goods reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method as specified below for each quarter or a year or part thereof from the date of taking the Cenvat Credit, namely.
(i) for computers and computer peripherals :
For each quarter in the first year @ 10%
For each quarter in the second year @ 8%
For each quarter in the third year @ 5%
For each quarter in the fourth and fifth year @ 1%
(ii) for capital goods, other than computers and computer peripherals @ 2.5% for each quarter :
Provided that if the amount so calculated is less than the amount equal to the duty leviable on transaction value, the amount to be paid shall be equal to the duty leviable on transaction val

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Collection of 1% tax on agri items as cess by gari market commitee t

Collection of 1% tax on agri items as cess by gari market commitee t
Query (Issue) Started By: – Padmanabham Jaladi Dated:- 17-3-2018 Last Reply Date:- 17-3-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
In andhrapradesh agri market committee collecting 1% as agri cess on the goods like ,Tamarind,jaggery
It is right to collect even state compensation act comes i to force
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
In my view, State has power to impose agriculture cess.
Discussion

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods and Services Tax Rate and Policy

Goods and Services Tax Rate and Policy
GST
Dated:- 16-3-2018

Based on the various representations received from the trade and industry, the GST Council has recommended a number of measures pertaining to change in Goods and Services tax rate and policy including the GST rates on eateries and small traders. Some of these decisions which have been implemented by the issuance of the requisite notifications and circulars are detailed below:
Rationalization of GST Policy measures:
* Increase in the aggregate annual turnover threshold for eligibility under the composition scheme from ₹ 75 lakh to Rs. one crore for 27 States (including Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand).
* Increase in the aggregate annual turnover threshold f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1% under Composition scheme for manufacturers and traders. The turnover of taxable goods to be considered for eligibility for the Composition scheme for traders.
* Supply of exempted services by Composition taxpayer will be allowed and the same will not be taken into account while computing the aggregate turnover.
* Amount of late fee payable for delayed filing of return in Form GSTR-3B by a taxpayer whose tax liability for the month was 'Nil' reduced to ₹ 20/- per day (Rs.10/- per day each under CGST & SGST Acts) subject to maximum ₹ 5000/-under each Act from October, 2017.
* The amount of late fee payable for delayed filing of return in Form GSTR-3B by other taxpayers reduced to ₹ 50/- per day (Rs. 25/- per day eac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vely.
Subsequent to notification of these rates a number of representations were received from the trade and industry regarding GST rates on goods and services. Based on these representations the GST Council reviewed the rates on goods and services in its subsequent meetings including GST rates on eateries which has been reduced from 18% with ITC to 5% without ITC, including a restaurant located in the premises of a hotel having unit of accommodation with declared tariff below ₹ 7500/-.
The changes in the GST rate structure and policy have been recommended by the GST Council keeping in view the representations received from trade and industry and the interests of consumers and the same are expected to benefit the overall economy and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Taxes collected by Service Providers

Taxes collected by Service Providers
GST
Dated:- 16-3-2018

The Government is aware of instances where taxes are collected by many service providers, hoteliers, traders etc. from the customers but are not deposited in the Government's account. Based on specific intelligence collected, detailed investigations are carried out and the due tax amount is either recovered or quasi-judicial proceedings are initiated. The details of such losses are as below:
Financial Year
No. of cases
Amount detected (Rs. Crores)
2015-16
1097
1501.49
2016-17
1086
1311.34
2017-18 (till Feb 2018)
743
766.67
Total
2926
3579.5
In order to encourage compliant behavior under GST, the Government has undertaken a massive awarene

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Export Refunds

GST Export Refunds
GST
Dated:- 16-3-2018

It has been noticed that at regular intervals, unverified estimates of pending GST refunds on account of exports are published in the print media or put forward by various trade bodies. These figures are highly speculative and mostly inaccurate. It is a fact that while a number of exporters have not been able to get the export refunds so far others have been granted refunds. In order to overcome the causes of the delay in sanctioning of refunds, Government has taken various steps, which includes amendments in the rules, changes in the business procedures of common portal and customs automated system to address the systemic issues. Many of the errors plaguing the claims for refunds are o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund of IGST on Export – EGM Error related cases

Refund of IGST on Export – EGM Error related cases
06/2018 Dated:- 16-3-2018 Circular
Customs
Circular No. 06/2018-Customs
F. No.450/119/2017-Cus-IV (Pt.)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise And Customs
Room No. 227B, North Block, New Delhi.
Dated the 16th March, 2018
To
All Principal Chief commissioner/Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive)
All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Tax
All Principal Commissioners/Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive)
Subject: reg.
IGST Refund module for exports is operational in ICES from 10.10.2017. The module has an inbuilt procedure to automatically grant refund after validating the Shipping Bill data available with Customs against the GST Returns data available with GSTN. The procedure also returns error/response codes in case there is any discrepancy. A number of representations have been received from the stakeholders

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(EGM) and valid return in Form GSTR-3 or Form GSTR – 3B, as the case may be, has been filed. In other words, filing of EGM, apart from filing of shipping bill and GSTR 3B is a mandatory requirement for processing refund claim. The Shipping lines/agents have been filing EGM electronically for exports originating from gateway ports. However, for cargo originating from ICDs, the Shipping lines/agents were filing EGM in manual mode. Absence of electronic EGMs and their integration with local EGMs has been the major obstacle in processing of refund claims in the case of exports from ICDs.
3. In Order to overcome this issue, the Shipping lines have been mandated to include the shipping bills originating from ICDs while filing the electronic EGMs at the gateway ports. In cases where the EGMs have not incorporated the shipping bills pertaining to ICDs, the Shipping lines/agents have been asked to file supplementary EGMs. While the Shipping lines have been largely cooperative in filling regula

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the gateway port should strictly monitor the EGM pendency and error reports available in ICES. The officers at the gateway port have to resolve the EGM errors in an expeditious manner by asking the Shipping lines/agents to file requisite amendments and approving those amendments on ICES. In cases, where there are errors either in the shipping bill or in the local EGM (i.e. truck or train summary), the remedial action has to be taken by jurisdictional officer in ICD.
6. It has been observed that mis-match of information provided in local and gateway EGM mainly occurs because of (i) incorrect gateway port code in local EGM (error M), (ii) change in container for LCL cargo or mistakes committed while entering container number (error C), (iii) incorrect count of containers (error N), (iv) mistakes in entering the nature of cargo – LCL or FCL (error T), (v) the let export order is given in ICES after sailing date of the vessel (error L), ICES has provision to correct all aforementioned err

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =