General Equipments And Techonology Suppliers Versus Asst. State Tax Officer, Thiruvananthapuram

General Equipments And Techonology Suppliers Versus Asst. State Tax Officer, Thiruvananthapuram
GST
2018 (4) TMI 348 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 75 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-4-2018
W. P. (C). No. 11146 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. S. Anil Kumar (Trivandrum)
For The Respondent : Sri. V. K. Shamsudheen
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Bhumika Enterprises Versus State of U.P. And 3 Others

M/s Bhumika Enterprises Versus State of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (4) TMI 530 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 137 (All.) , [2018] 1 GSTL 123 (All). [2018] 53 G S.T.R. 356 (All)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-4-2018
Writ Tax No. 564 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Murari Mohan Rai,Nitin Kesarwani
For the Respondent : C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.
ORDER
Heard Sri Nitin Kesarwani and Sri M.M. Rai, learned counsels for the petitioner, Sri Vinay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned special counsel for the State.
By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the seizure order dated 27.3.2018 passed under Section 129(1) of the U.P. G.S.T. Act, 2017 as well as the show cause notice issued under Section 129(3) of the said Act dated 27.3.2018 respectively.
The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a registered dealer and ha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no opportunity of being heard has been afforded to the petitioner before passing the seizure order dated 27.3.2018 under Section 129(1) of the Act by which the respondent no.4/seizing authority has seized the goods on the ground that the tax invoice was kept in a sealed envelope, the goods was being transported without E-way bill-02, the GSTIN number written on the tax invoice belongs to another dealer situates at Allahabad and not the consignee situated at Bindiki, Fatehpur as also the mobile number.
The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that while issuing the show cause notice dated 27.3.2018 the Mobile Squad Authority had indicated for submission of the defence reply before him on 2.4.2018 and to explain as to why tax being not realized as also the penalty be imposed. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that that due to technical fault of the State Web-site E-way bill-02 could n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f tax as the tax amounting to the tune of Rs. 1,08,000/- as C.G.S.T. and S.G.S.T. was charged by the petitioner himself and the same was duly mentioned in the tax invoice separately.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has submitted that there was no occasion to mention the G.S.Tin number of different dealer in the invoice, though he has accepted that the same has been correctly mentioned in the E-way bill. The learned counsel for the State has further submitted that admittedly at the time of inspection/detention of the vehicle there was no E-way bill available with the driver of the vehicle.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
From perusal of the record we have noticed that the vehicle has been detained and the goods/vehicle was seized by the respondent no.4 on 27.3.2018 whereas the time has been granted for submission of reply and appearance of the person concerned before the respondent no.4 on the later date. There is no dispute with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

/s Ram Narsh Ramakant, Bindki, Fatehpur and the same was available with the seizing authority and we see no reason as to why the seizing authority has not made any effort to make inquiry from the said dealer/consignee whose TIN number was mentioned in the tax invoice. We see that the seizing authority though has mentioned the GSTIN number of some dealer situates at Allahabad but no details of the said dealer has been given in the impugned seizure order nor the details of the mobile number holder.
Since the tax invoice indicating the tax charged and the same admittedly found during the course of inspection/detention and E-way bill-02 has been downloaded much before the seizure order, we see no justification in the impugned seizure order and therefore, we have no option but to allow the present writ petition and to set aside the seizure order dated 27.3.2018 as well as the show cause notice issued under Section 129(3) of the Act for imposition of penalty.
In view of the aforesaid facts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Navyug Airconditioning Versus State Of U.P. And 02 Others

M/s Navyug Airconditioning Versus State Of U.P. And 02 Others
GST
2018 (4) TMI 886 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 559 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-4-2018
Writ Tax No. 551 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Nishant Mishra
For the Respondent : C.S.C.
ORDER
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner assisted by Sri Vipin Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate and Sri C.B. Tripathi, Special Counsel for the State of U.P.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the seizure of his goods vide impugned order dated 25.03.2018 passed under Section 129(1) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the U.P.G.S.T.).

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

S.T. makes applicable the provisions of Central G.S.T. in respect to matters relating to inspection, search and seizure under the said Act.
Rule 138 of the Rules framed under the Central G.S.T. provides that till such time E-Way bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government by notification may specify the documents which are to be carried with the consignment of goods. In exercise of the said power a notification has been issued which provides for the carrying of E-Way bill with the goods in transit but the same is applicable has been enforced w.e.f. 1st February, 2018 and not before.
Simultaneously, U.P.G.S.T. also contains similar provisions and in exercise of the power under Rule 138 of the Rules framed under the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Modern Traders Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others

M/s Modern Traders Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others
GST
2018 (4) TMI 1076 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 7 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-4-2018
Writ Tax No. 576 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Nishant Mishra,Vipin Kumar Kushwaha
For the Respondent : C.S.C.
ORDER
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra assisted by Sri Vipin Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel representing the State- respondents.
The petitioner being a proprietorship firm is engaged in trading of iron and steel as well as their products and is registered under the provisions of the UPGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The Assessing Authority has allotted GSTIN no. to the petitioner. The petitioner has sold 10.110 MT of Iron Scrap vide Invoice dated 24.03.2018 for the value of Rs. 1,67,017/- to M/s R.K. Enterprises of Delhi in which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ire seizure proceedings are not only illegal but clearly is abuse of process of law as well as misuse of power. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the respondent no.3 was insisting for seizure on the ground of non-production of e-way bill, the petitioner has downloaded the e-way bill-02 on 24.3.2018 itself just after 15 minutes from the time of detention of the vehicle and has produced the same before the respondent no.3.
The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that without considering the e-way bill-02 which has been furnished immediately within 20 minutes from the time of the detention of the vehicle/goods, the respondent no.3 has illegally passed the seizure order after a gap of four days i.e. on 28.3.2018 by which he has seized the goods as well as vehicle in question. The seizure order indicates that the goods/vehicle has been solely seized on the ground that goods were being transported without e-way bill-02 which has been prescribed under the UPGST Rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uld not invalidate the same.
The provisions of UPGST are applicable to transactions within the State of U.P. whereas IGST covers the interstate transactions.
Section 20 of the IGST makes applicable the provisions of Central GST in respect to matters relating to inspection, search and seizure under the said Act.
Rule 138 of the Rules framed under the Central GST provides that till such time e-way bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government by notification may specify the documents which are to be carried with the consignment of goods. In exercise of the said power a notification has been issued which provides for the carrying of e-way bill with the goods in transit but the same is applicable has been enforced w.e.f. 1st February, 2018 and not before.
Simultaneously, UPGST also contains similar provisions and in exercise of the power under Rule 138 of the Rules framed under the UPGST by a notification dated 21.07.2017 has made e-way bill mandatory but that ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sri Raghavendra Traders Versus The Government Of Karnataka

Sri Raghavendra Traders Versus The Government Of Karnataka
GST
2018 (4) TMI 1291 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 46 (Kar), 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 439 (Kar.)
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-4-2018
W. P. Nos. 13839/2018 & 13941/2018 (T-RES)
GST
MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA  J.
Petitioner [By Sri A. Srikanth., Adv.]  
Respondents: [By Sri Vikram Huilgol., HCGP)  
O R D E R
Petitioner has challenged the order passed by second respondent at Annexures-F and F1 both dated 22.03.2018, one under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('CGST Act' for short) and another under the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('KGST Act' for short) respectively, interalia seeking for a direction to release the vehicle bearing registration No.TN-77D-8555 along with the goods which are detained by the Authorities.
2. It is the contention of the petitioner that a consignment regarding the transaction of the invoice No.481 dated 07.08.2018 issued throug

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

same, the petitioner is before this Court.
3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that despite the full tax amount pertaining to the tax invoice submitted before the second respondent has been deposited, no vehicle/conveyance and goods are released till date. Learned counsel would fairly submit that the petitioner shall pursue the alternative an d efficacious remedy available under the Act which would be time consuming, since the livelihood of the petitioner has been adversely affected owing to the seizure of the vehicle/conveyance in question, a fervent plea is made to release the vehicle/conveyance along with the goods with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal as provided under the Act.
4. Learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondents justifying the impugned order would contend that no documents were placed before the Authorities at the time of the intercept ion of the vehicle/conveyance by the driver/person in-charge of the goods vehicle. Tax invoic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the main dispute is relating to the valuation of the goods carried in the goods vehicle. It is an admitted fact that no documents were carried by the driver/person in-charge of the goods vehicle at the time of interception of the goods vehicle on 08.03.2018. The ownership of the goods as well as quantum of penalty levied are also in dispute. These are all the factual disputes to be adjudicated before the Appellate Authority. Hence, this Court deems it appropriate to relegate the petitioner to the Appellate Authority without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. However in the circumstances, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the second respondent to release the vehicle/conveyance along with the goods forthwith subject to the petitioner furnishing the bank guarantee of Rs. 9,23,650/- along with the deposit of Rs. 1,08, 026/- in addition to the amount already deposited.
7. The Authorities shall release the vehicle as well as the goods forthwith subject to the paymen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extends the time limit for furnishing the return by an Input Service Distributor in FORM GSTR-6

Extends the time limit for furnishing the return by an Input Service Distributor in FORM GSTR-6
19/2018-State Tax Dated:- 3-4-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE
GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010,
dated the 3rd April 2018.
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 19/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. JC(HQ)-1/GST/2018/Noti/Returns/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

To prescribe the due dates for furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover of more than 1.5 crores.

To prescribe the due dates for furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover of more than 1.5 crores.
18/2018-State Tax Dated:- 3-4-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, MAHARASHTRA STATE
GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010,
dated the 3rd April 2018.
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 18/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. JC(HQ)-1/GST/2018/Noti/Returns/ADM-8.-In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 37 read with section 168 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017) (hereinafter in this notification referred to as the ” said Act “), the Co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Versus The Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai North Commissionerate

Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. Versus The Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai North Commissionerate
Service Tax
2018 (5) TMI 404 – CESTAT CHENNAI – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. J25 (Tri. – Chennai)
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 3-4-2018
Application Nos. ST/Misc/CT/40128-40160/2018, ST/EH/40161-40193/2018 and Appeal Nos. ST/41645-41677/2015 – Final Order No. 41015-41047 / 2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S. Member (Judicial) And Hon'ble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri V. Vikram, Advocate For the Appellant
Ms. P. Hemavathi, Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The MAs filed by Revenue for change cause title are allowed. As we take up the appeals themselves for hearing and disposal, the other MAs filed by Revenue for grant of early hearing get disposed of.
2. The facts of the case are that that the appellant, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as TASMAC) is a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

shop raised by the current year growth rate @ 10% and the highest bidder is granted permission for sale of eatables and to collect the empty liquor bottles on payment of security deposit which is equal to the consideration payable for 2 months. The licence fee collected on monthly basis is accounted under 'Income from Operations' in their Profit & Loss Account. It appeared to the department that the contractors can conduct their business only after issue of a licence by TASMAC, on payment of licence fee; that without the support of TASMAC in the form of giving permission to sell eatables and to collect empty bottles, contractors would have no business; therefore upto 30-06-2012, the services rendered by TASMAC is a taxable service under 'Support Service of Business or Commerce' under Section 65 (104c) read with Section 65 (105) (zzzq) of the Finance Act, 1994; that after 1.7.2012, the services are continued to be taxable since they are not covered under the negative list or ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

um
3. On 08-03-2018, when the matter came up for hearing, the appellants were represented by Shri V.Vikram, Advocate made oral and written submissions which can be broadly summarized as under :
i) TASMAC is not rendering any service directly or indirectly to consumers. TASMAC is a seller of a liquor and not service provider.
ii) TASMAC is an institution created by Statute and acting on behalf of the State Government of Tamil Nadu
iii) The buyers of the Liquor from TASMAC shop and consume (sit and drink) the same at the adjacent place which is called a 'Bar'; the rules governing the Bar are also governed by Statute which prescribes the location, timings, holidays of the Bar too.
iv) TASMAC is solely responsible for retailing liquor to pubic; while doing so it has responsibility to make sure liquor is consumed safely in bar's adjacent to it. Merely because these bars are run by third- parties selected by TASMAC through tender as opposed to being run by TASMAC itself cann

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed with rights such as mining rights i.e. those rights which are all handed exclusively by the State.
viii) The decision to float tender to selected third parties / contractors to run bars adjacent to TASMAC shops was pursuant to decision taken by the TASMAC Board of Directors comprising of senior government officers. In the conduct of the tender process and the grant of permission to run the bars and assigning of the work of collection of empty bottles, TASMAC was only acting as agent of the State exercising its sovereign rights. The definition of 'Business Support Service' will clearly fall outside the ambit of appellant's activities and since services which are provided by a Government in terms of their sovereign right to business activities, and which are not substitutable in any manner by any private entity, are not support services. Examples of exercise of such sovereign functions would be grant of mining or licensing rights or audit of Government entities by CAG etc. Reference

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed out any fraud or exercised any wilful misconduct. So also, the contention of department that appellant has not obtained registration is incorrect since they had registered under GTA service and had been filing ST-3 returns.
4. (i) On the other hand, the department represented by Ld. Commissioner (A.R) Ms. P. Hemavathi vehemently opposed the appeal.
(ii) Ld. A.R took us through the definition of 'Business Support Service' introduced w.e.f. 1.5.2006.
(iii) She submitted that the services provided by TASMAC are clearly such that are provided only in relation to business or commerce.
(iv) The definition is an inclusive definition. Only few examples of similar activities which can be included under that service category have been included in the definition.
(v) TASMAC have permitted the contractors to sell eatables and collect empty liquor bottles in the bars by way of tender. The fees so collected are in the nature of income for TASMAC and definitely cannot be considered as a s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services outsourced by business entities for use in business or commerce are very much taxable as 'Business Support Service' and that the definition only gives indicative list of such outsourced services. The activity of TASMAC in permitting the contractor to sell eatables in the bar and to collect empty bottles and sell them provides support to the business of such contractors. Hence they cannot escape tax liability under the said category.
5. Heard both sides and have gone through the facts.
6.1 The period of dispute encompasses October 2008 to March 2013. The impugned order has held that the activities of TASMAC would fall within the ambit of 'Support Service of Business or Commerce' defined under Section 65B (44) for the remaining period.
6.2 The core issue that therefore comes up for decision is whether this assertion of the adjudicating authority is correct or otherwise.
6.3 For the period upto 30.06.2012, the definition of 'Support Service of Business or Commerc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct, 1994 which reads as under :
“Taxable Service” means any service provided or to be provided to any person, by any other person, in relation to support services of business or commerce, in any manner”
An analysis of the definition in Section 65 (104c) indicates that while it is indeed an inclusive definition, the type of services sought to be taxed are those of the genre and outsources services normally prevalent in business and commerce like evaluation of prospective customers, telemarketing, processing of purchase orders and fulfilment services, information and tracking of delivery schedules etc. In our view, the intention of the legislature to bring within the ambit of 'Business Support Services' only outsourced activities relating to management, logistics and customer relations etc. is vindicated by the Explanation to the said definition which exemplifies 'infrastructural support services' as providing office along with office utilities, lounge, reception with competen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s that 'when two or more words which are susceptible of analogous meaning are coupled together, they are understood to be used in their cognate sense. They take as it were their colour from each other, that is, the more general is restricted to a sense analogous to a less general.'
In 'Principles of Statutory Interpretation' by Justice G.P. Singh, the said maxim is further explained as follows :
“Associated words take their meaning from one another under the doctrine of noscitur a sociis, the philosophy of which is that the meaning of the doubtful word may be ascertained by reference to the meaning of words associated with it; such doctrine is broader than the maxim ejusdem generis.” In fact the latter maxim 'is only an illustration or specific application of the broader maxim noscitur a sociis'. It must be borne in mind that noscitur a sociis, is merely a rule of construction and it cannot prevail in cases where it is clear that the wider words have been deliberatel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

immediate connection with the type of activities exemplified in the inclusive definition of 'Support Services of Business or Commerce'.
6.7 We are therefore not able to find favour with the proposition that the income generated by the appellant by way of collecting fees from tenders for contracting the impugned activities to successful contractors can, by any stretch of imagination are to be considered as taxable income and become liable to service tax under BSS. We have thus no hesitation in setting aside that part of the impugned order which has confirmed the tax liability on the appellant for the period upto 30.06.2012 under 'Business Support Service' defined under Section 65 (104c) read with Section 65 (105) (zzzq) of the Finance Act, 1994.
6.8 However, the position changes after the introduction of the Negative List regime w.e.f. 1.7.2012, from which date the activities which were liable to service tax under Finance Act, 1994 were given a much wider and broad banded sco

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ipalities and Members of other local authorities who receive any consideration in performing the functions of that office as such member; or
(B) the duties performed by any person who holds any post in pursuance of the provisions of the Constitution in that capacity;' or
(C) the duties performed by any person as a Chairperson or a Member of a Director in a body established by the Central Government of State Governments or local authority and who is not deemed as an employee before the commencement of this section.
Explanation 2 – for the purposes of this clause, transaction in money shall not include any activity relating to the use of money or its conversion by cash or by any other mode, from one form, currency or denomination, to another form, currency or denomination for which a separate consideration is charged.
…. … ….”
6.9 Then, w.e.f. 1-7-2012, all services except those excluded by Section 65B (44), in particular, transfer of title in goods, deemed sale, transacti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

een prepared and audited only in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956 and in terms with the accounting standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956. Even the Supplementary Audit conducted by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India of TASMAC has been carried out in terms of Section 619 (3) (b) of the Companies Act, 1956 only. The activities of TASMAC for most of the period under dispute cannot therefore be said to be activities assigned and performed by sovereign / public authority under the authority of law.
6.12 We find that this aspect has been also clarified by the CBEC in Master Circular No.96/7/2007-ST dt. 23.08.2007, which is further reiterated by Circular No.89/7/2006 dt. 18.12.2006 where it is inter alia clarified as follows :
“However, if a sovereign / public authority provides a service, which is not in the nature of statutory activity and the same is undertaken for a consideration (not a statutory fee), then in such cases, serv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

urt in the case of Karnataka Government Insurance Department Vs Asst.CCE Bangalore – 2012 (26) STR 521 (Kar.), which ratio was echoed by the Hon'ble Kerala High Court as reported in 2012 (28) STR 337 (Kar.) and also by the High Court of Allahabad in the case of Greater Noida Industrial Developmental Authority Vs CCE & CE reported in 2015-TIOL- 1008-HC-ALL-ST.
6.15. Along with the introduction of Negative List of services, CBEC thought it proper to issue an Education Guide, giving the official Guidelines for new system of Levy of Service Tax on the basis of negative List w.e.f. 1.7.2012, wherein the issue whether entities like statutory body, corporation or an authority constituted under an Act passed by Parliament or State Legislature is 'Government' or Local authority' was addressed in para 2.4.7 which reads as follows :
“2.4.10 Would various entities like a statutory body, corporation or an authority constituted under an Act passed by the Parliament or any of the State

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

also do not all in the definition of 'local authority.
Thus regulatory bodies and other autonomous entitled which attain their entity under an act would not comprise either government or local authority.”
6.16 At the same time, we take note that in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 17-C, 17-D, 21 and 22-D read with Section 54 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, in Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (in Shops and Bars) Rules, 2003 was amended by insertion of Rule 9A w.e.f. 29.03.2013 as follows :
“9A. Grant of privilege to run the bar:- The privilege of running bars may be granted to private parties by tender. The Board of the Corporation may decide the upset price and other terms and conditions of tender, from time to time, with the prior approval of the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise. The Corporation, as agency shall collect the tender amount from the successful tenders and remit the same to the Government on or before the 25th of the following month and the Co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t has agreed that appellant is liable to pay service tax only on the 1% of the payments made by contractors. He has placed copy of OIA No.262/2017 dt. 30.11.2017 before us. The Commissioner (Appeals) vide the said order has held that TASMAC is liable to pay service tax only on the 1% commission retained by them for the period April 2013 to March 2014 and April 2014 to March 2015. The ld. Counsel prays that the same benefit may be extended to the intervening period of 1.7.2012 to 28.3.2013. We are afraid that this contention is not acceptable as it is not based on any legal footing, but only principles of equity. There is no equity in fiscal law. Therefore, we hold that TASMAC is liable to pay service tax of the licence fees received for the period 1.7.2012 to 28.3.2013. So ordered.
6.19 Coming to the matter of penalty, we find that the entire dispute is one of interpretation and even from the record, we find that there are at least two circulars before introduction of negative list re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CCE & GST, Delhi Versus M/s. Providence Equity Advisors India Ltd.

CCE & GST, Delhi Versus M/s. Providence Equity Advisors India Ltd.
Service Tax
2018 (4) TMI 1583 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 3-4-2018
Service Tax Appeal No. 50301/2018 (SM) – Final Order No. 51135/2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial)
Shri K. Podar, DR-For the Appellant.
Shri Gagan Kumar, Advocate-For the Respondent.
JUDGMENT
Per Archana Wadhwa:
Being aggrieved with the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeal.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the party had filed instant refund claims seeking refund of CENVAT Credit for Banking & Financial Services, which have been exported out of India under Notification No.27/2012

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iled the present appeals both dated 20.03.2017.
3. The Commissioner (Appeals) examined the meaning of 'all other services' as mentioned in the definition of 'total turnover' under Rule 5 (1) E of CCR, 2004 and observed that the definition of 'all other services' has not been provided in CCR, 2004. As per the 'Law of purposive interpretation' the Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the text proceeding the phrase 'all other services' is 'export turnover' . Hence, 'all other services' would mean 'value of all services other than the exported service'. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that in CCE vs. Aam Services India Pvt. Ltd. [2016 (42) STR 760 (Tribunal- Mumbai)], the Hon'ble Tribunal held that when entire turnover is exported and no o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ia Pvt. Ltd. – 2016 (42) STR 760 (Tribunal-Mumbai) relied upon by the Commissioner (Appeals).
6. I find that apart from the said decision, the Appellate Authority has also referred to the Hon'ble High Court's decision in the case of CST Vs. Quintiles Technologies Ltd. – 2015 (40) STR 237 (Guj.), wherein various decisions of the Tribunal on the said decision including the decision in the case of Aam Services India Pvt. Ltd (supra) were considered. Accordingly, the Commissioner (Appeals) has held in favour of the assessee. I find that inasmuch as the issue stands decided by the various decisions referred to in the impugned order, which have not been distinguished by the Revenue in their memo of appeal and the applicability of the same has no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. B.L. Kashyap & Sons Ltd., Versus Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Admn) DGSTO-5,

M/s. B.L. Kashyap & Sons Ltd., Versus Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Admn) DGSTO-5,
VAT and Sales Tax
2018 (9) TMI 296 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – TMI
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-4-2018
W.P.Nos.11916-11920 & 12854-12857/2018 (T-RES)
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MRS. S. SUJATHA J.
Petitioner [By Sri V. Raghuraman, Adv.]  
RESPONDENTS [By Sri T.K. Vedamurthy, AGA.)  
O R D E R
Petitioner has called in question the legality and correctness of the orders dated 8.9.2017 passed by the Respondent No.1 enclosed as Annexures-A1, A2 and A3 to the writ petitions as well as endorsement dated 8.2.2018 issued by the Respondent No.1 enclosed as Annexure-B to the writ petitions and the consequential endorsement dated 14.02.2018 issued by the Respondent No.2 enclosed as Annexures-C1, C2, C3 and C4 to the writ petitions.
2. Petitioner is engaged in execution of civil works contract of construction of buildings and other works contract for private parties and G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t was passed by the Respondent No.2 for the period April 2011 to March 2012 on 26.06.2013 and reassessment order under Section 39[1] of the Act was passed by the Respondent No.2 for the period April 2012 to March 2013 on 29.07.2013. The amount demanded pursuant to these reassessment orders was remitted by the petitioner with interest. The Respondent No.2 again resorted to assessment and issued three separate notices under section 39[2] of the Act for the tax periods April 2010 to March 2013 alleging that the claim of labour and like charges at 30% on the total contract receipts which includes taxes collected and again allowing deduction towards taxes collected to arrive at taxable works contract receipts resulted in excess allowance of labour charges on the taxes collected which resulted in short payment of tax.
3. The petitioner submitted his reply to the said proposition notices issued under Section 39[2] of the Act. Considering the objections filed by the petitioner, Respondent No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y same tax periods April 2010 to March 2013 on the very same ground that deduction of 30% as labour and like charges claimed by the petitioner has resulted in excess deduction and short payment of taxes. The petitioner replied to the said notice issued under Section 63-A[1] of the Act. After considering the reply, the Respondent No.1 proceeded to pass the orders revising the order of the Respondent No.2 dated 16.08.2014 passed under Section 39[2] of the Act for the tax periods April 2010 to March 2013. Pursuant to the orders passed by the Respondent No.1, petitioner has filed rectification application under Section 69 of the Act which came to be rejected. These orders of the Respondent No.1 passed under Section 63-A[1] of the Act as well as endorsements issued by the Respondent No.1 rejecting the rectification application are impugned herein.  
4. The main ground of challenge in these writ petitions is regarding the jurisdiction of the Respondent No.1 to pass an order under Secti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

[39] STC 177.
[b] 'V. JAGANMOHAN RAO v. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX AND EXCESS PROFITS TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH' reported in 1970 [75] ITR 373.
[c] 'M/s. KUNDAN LAL SRIKISHAN, MATHURA [U.P.] v. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P. AND ANOTHER' reported in 1987 [1] SCC 684.
7. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents supporting the impugned orders, would submit that the Respondent No.1 is empowered to revise the order passed by the Assessing Authority dropping the proceedings under Section 39[2] of the Act. Dropping of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Respondent No.2 being erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, it cannot be held that the Respondent No.1 had no jurisdiction to invoke Section 63-A[1] of the Act, to revise such orders.
8. Learned Additional Government Advocate would submit that the Respondent No.2 failed to act upon the notices issued under Section 39[2][e] of the Act, which constrained the Respondent No.1 to proceed wit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e the order made on reassessment. The initial order for reassessment cannot be said to survive, even partially, although the justification for reassessment arises because of turnover escaping assessment in a limited field or only with respect to a part of the matter covered by the initial assessment order.”
12. Similarly, in the case of JAGANMOHAN RAO supra, the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:
“Section 34 in terms states that once the Income-tax Officer decides to reopen the assessment he could do so within the period prescribed by serving on the person liable to pay tax a notice containing all or any of the requirements which may be included in a notice under section 22[2] and may proceed to assess or reassess such income, profits or gains. It is, therefore, manifest that once assessment is reopened by issuing a notice under sub-section [2] of section 22 the previous under assessment is set aside and the whole assessment proceedings start afresh. When once valid proceeding

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from the date of the original assessment order but from the date of the earlier rectification order. In Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes v. H.R. Sri Ramulu this Court has clearly laid down that when once a notice is issued for purposes of making reassessment the assessment proceedings become re-opened and the initial order of assessment ceases to be operative. The Court has further held that the effect of the re-opening of the assessment is to vacate or set aside the initial order of assessment and to substitute in its place the order made on reassessment and that the result of re-opening of the assessment is that a fresh order for reassessment would have to be made in respect of all matters including those matters in respect of which there is no allegation of the turnover escaping assessment. The same principle should apply even to a case like the present one where an application for rectification is filed after the completion of the reassessment proceedings”.
14. In the ligh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eady issued by the Respondent No.2 under Section 39[2][e] of the Act.  
16. In the circumstances, it can be held that the proceedings initiated by the Respondent No.1 under Section 63-A[1] of the Act is without jurisdiction and nullity in the eye of law. Hence, for the aforesaid reasons, the orders impugned cannot be sustained and deserves to be quashed.
17. Accordingly, the impugned orders are quashed with liberty to the Respondent No.2 to proceed with the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 39[2][e] of the Act in accordance with law.
18. Writ petitions stand disposed of in terms of the above. The Respondent No.2 shall conclude the reassessment proceedings in an expedite manner. Petitioner shall appear before the Respondent No.2 on 24.04.2018 without expecting any further notice. The Respondent No.2 shall hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.  
All rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be adjudicated before

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E-Way Bill in case of Exports

E-Way Bill in case of Exports
Query (Issue) Started By: – ROHIT GOEL Dated:- 2-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
How to generate e-way bill if goods are to be transported to the place of Clearing House agent for the purpose of exports..
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
As per Section 20 of IGST Act, 2017, e-way bill provisions prescribed by CGST Act, 2017 are not made applicable to IGST Act, 2017. Therefore e-way bil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Smooth roll out of e-Way Bill system from 01stApril, 2018

Smooth roll out of e-Way Bill system from 01stApril, 2018
GST
Dated:- 2-4-2018

As per decision of the GST Council, e-Way Bill system became mandatory from 01stApril, 2018 for all inter-State movement of goods. The implementation of the nationwide e-Way Bill mechanism under GST regime is being done by GSTN in association with the National Informatics Centre (NIC)and is being run on portal namely https://ewaybillgst.gov.in.
On day-1, total of 2.59 lakh e-Way Bills were generated on the e-way bill portal. Till 2:00 pm today, 2,04,563 e-way bills have been generated. A total of 11,18,292 taxpayers have registered on e-Way Bill Portal till date. Further 20,057 transporters have enrolled themselves on the e-Way Bill Portal.
To ass

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ate multiple Sub-Users and allocate roles to them. This way large transporters can declare their various offices as sub-users.
There isa provision for cancellation of e-way Bill within 24 hours by the person who has generated the e-way Bill. The recipient can also reject the e-way Bill within validity period of e-way bill or 72 hours of generation of the e-way bill by the consignor whichever is earlier.

State-wise breakup of e-Way Bills generated
Number of e-Way Bills Generated
01-04-2018
02-04-2018 (till 2PM)
State Name
No. of EWBs
No. of EWBs
JAMMU AND KASMIR
384
268
HIMACHAL PRADESH
2838
1716
PUNJAB
9342
2028
CHANDIGARH
1319
1000
UTTARAKHAND
6622
3016
HARYANA
21131
14985
DELHI
15376
11731
RAJASTHAN
2093

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Final Monthly collection figures of GST

Final Monthly collection figures of GST
GST
Dated:- 2-4-2018

The revenue collection figures under GST including CGST, SGST, IGST and cess for the period July 2017 – February 2018 paid in the period July 2017 – March 2018 is as follows:
(Figures in Rs. Crores)
Month
GST Collection
August
93,590
September
93,029
October
95,132
November
85,931
December
83,716
January
88,929
February
88,047
March
89,264
Total
7,17,638
Besides the above ₹ 27,811 crores were c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Total 17,616 crore of Refunds issued under GST; 90% of IGST eligible claims have been approved

Total 17,616 crore of Refunds issued under GST; 90% of IGST eligible claims have been approved
GST
Dated:- 2-4-2018

In line with commitment of government to liquidate all pending GST refunds, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has successfully concluded refund fortnight cum special drive from 15th March, 2018 to 31stMarch, 2018.
During the period, all field formations of CBIC worked hardto provide refund relief to the exporters. Special refund cells manned by experienced staff were put in place throughout the country. The exporter awareness campaigns using both print media and social media were carried out so that the benefit can be extended to maximum exporters. All field formations were tasked to go extr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oms of the period till 31stJanuary, 2018 are of ₹ 10,720 crore, out of which ₹ 9,604 crore have been sanctioned which is about 89.6% of those eligible claims transmitted by GSTN.
As regards to ITC refunds, ₹ 1,136 crore has been sanctioned during the special drive making the total figure of ITC sanctioned equal to ₹ 5,510 crore by end of this fiscal. As per the latest available data:
a. 1,61,325 refund applications have been filed in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal, in which an amount of ₹ 17,471crore has been claimed. Of these, 60,183 refund applications are in relation to zero rated supplies, in which an amount of ₹ 14,649 crore has been claimed. Taxpayers are required to submit a copy of these

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sale of old car

Sale of old car
Query (Issue) Started By: – Subir Bose Dated:- 2-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear sir,
My partnership firm wants to sell a car purchased in the year 2009 to a unregistered person and also wants to buy a new car. So is gst applicable on sale and itc applucale on puchase of new car?
Subir Bose
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
GST is payable on sale of old car. ITC is not admissible on purchase of a new car. Re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LUT 2018-19

LUT 2018-19
Query (Issue) Started By: – VSV & Co VSV & Co Dated:- 2-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Dear Sir,
My client has not applied for LUT online before 31st March,2018 , now he wants to export the goods tomorrow i.e. 3rd April 2018, what he suppost to do right now ?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Either LUT/Bond or payment of IGST and get refund. No other option.
Reply By MistralSolutionsPrivateLimited:
The Reply:
LUT online filing can be done anytime before export.
Reply By Amit Kumar:
The Reply:
Well, there are two types of taxes in India; they are Direct Tax and Indirect Tax. Income Tax is a direct tax, which is directly paid by the taxpayer to the governmen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Applicability on Employee Reimbursement

GST Applicability on Employee Reimbursement
Query (Issue) Started By: – AnilKumar Vyas Dated:- 2-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 4-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
Please suggest, Is GST Applicable on following transactions:
* Payment to Employee for Vehicle running and maintenance charges at fix rate (example INR 8/- per KM) (Not part of Employee agreement and Salary offered)
Example:
We are paying INR 8/- per KM to X. during the month vehicle run 3,750 KM, Total amount paid INR 30,000/-
Is company liable to pay GST on these reimbursement under RCM for supply from unregistered dealer?
* Payment to Employee for Vehicle petrol expenses at fix (Example 4,000/- per month) (It is part of salary

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e reimbursement under RCM for supply from unregistered dealer?
Thanks for your valuable suggestion ……………………
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Query-wise reply is as under:-
1. No doubt these fixed expenses are not part of salary or employee agreement but these are provided on account of performing duty or we say when employees are performing duties in the employment. Therefore we can say that these fixed amounts are provided in the course or in relation to employment and hence are out of the purview of GST/definition of supply.
2. Not taxable, it being in the course or in relation to employment.
3. It is taxable on the following grounds:-
(i) it being in the course of business or in furtherance of business.
(ii) It

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt no 1 if the arrangement is not part of employee agreement and salary offered, can it still be said to be in the course of employment.
2. Regarding point no3 .. there may be problem in claiming ITC if only cash memo is there, since gstn of reciepient company is not there.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Sh.Shukla Ji,
Sir, Regarding query No.3, I agree with you.
Regarding query no. 2 Yes. This is my view.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
1. There is employer employee relationship so GST is not applicable. However, the same is not forming part of employment agreement and hence it may become taxable in the hands of the employee. But since his/her turnover would be below the threshold limit (based on the amount reimbursed the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Smooth Roll-out of E-way Bill System from, 1st April, 2018

Smooth Roll-out of E-way Bill System from, 1st April, 2018
GST
Dated:- 2-4-2018

As per decision of the GST Council, e-Way Bill system became mandatory from 01st April, 2018 for all inter-State movement of goods. The implementation of the nationwide e-Way Bill mechanism under GST regime is being done by GSTN in association with the National Informatics Centre (NIC) and is being run on portal namely https://ewaybillgst.gov.in.
Heralding a paradigm shift in movement of goods from one State to another, trial run for e-way bills under the current GST regime was started on 16th January 2018 for the entire country.
A total of 10,96,905 taxpayers have registered on e-Way Bill Portal till date. Further 19,796 transporters, who are no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Are we maintaining documents and records as required under GST Laws? – A Big Question

Are we maintaining documents and records as required under GST Laws? – A Big Question
By: – Anuj Bansal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 2-4-2018

By this time every tax professional is aware that GST is mainly following various kinds of compliances like filing of returns, e-way bills, etc. The department is silent and accepting all the returns, etc., without raising much issues. The intention is to provide a breathing or settling time to industry. However, till date no attention is given to the documents or records maintained or to be maintained in order to support the details / data furnished in our returns, etc. For example, if the ITC relating to gifts, loss of goods, etc., is reversed, whether we are recording such gifts / loss in our stock register, as required under Rule 56(2) of the CGST Rules. Similarly, whether we are maintaining electronic back-up of all our documents / records, as required under Rule 57 of the CGST Rules. In other words, the department

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hly production accounts showing quantitative details of raw materials or services used in the manufacture and quantitative details of the goods so manufactured including the waste and by products thereof;
Inward and outward supply of goods or services or both;
Stock of goods – Accounts of stock in respect of goods received and supplied, and such accounts shall contain the following particulars:
* Opening balance,
* Receipt,
* Supply,
* Goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free sample
* Balance of stock
above stock shall be maintained for each of the items like raw materials, finished goods, scrap, wastage, etc.
Account of the goods or services imported or exported or of supplies attracting payment of tax on reverse charge along with the relevant documents, including invoices, bills of supply, delivery challans, credit notes, debit notes, receipt vouchers, payment vouchers and refund vouchers.
Every registered person shall keep a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

plicable) of goods or services received for the execution of works contract;
* description, value and quantity (wherever applicable) of goods or services utilized in the execution of works contract;
* the details of payment received in respect of each works contract; and
* the names and addresses of suppliers from whom he received goods or services.
Every agent shall maintain accounts depicting the,-
* Particulars of authorization received by him from each principal to receive or supply goods or services on behalf of such principal separately;
* Particulars including description, value and quantity (wherever applicable) of goods or services received on behalf of every principal;
* Particulars including description, value and quantity (wherever applicable) of goods or services supplied on behalf of every principal;
* Details of accounts furnished to every principal; and
* Tax paid on receipts or on supply of goods or services effected on behalf of every principal.
Ev

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e cover of any valid documents, the officer shall determine the amount of tax payable, as if such goods have been supplied by the registered person.
In any documents or books of accounts belonging to the registered person are found at any premises other than those mentioned in the certificate of registration, they shall be presumed to be maintained by the said registered person.
Every registered person shall produce the books of accounts which he is required to maintain under any law for the time being in force.
Documents shall be maintained at:
Documents shall be kept and maintained at the registered place of business, as specified in Registration certificate. However, incase, where there are more than one place of business in the certificate of registration, the accounts relating to each such place of business shall be maintained.
Moreover, the documents may be kept and maintained in electronic form and the record so maintained electronically shall be authenticated by means of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of date for submitting the statement in FORM GST TRAN-2.

Extension of date for submitting the statement in FORM GST TRAN-2.
07/2018 Dated:- 2-4-2018 Telangana SGST
GST – States
Telangana SGST
Telangana SGST
GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
TGST Notification No. 7/2018
CCT's Ref No. A(1)/42/2018,
Dt. 02-04-2018
Sub:- Extension of date for submitting the statement in FORM GST TRAN-2
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iii) of clause (b) of sub-rule (4) of Rule 117 of the Telangana Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extends the time limit for furnishing the return by an Input Service Distributor in FORM GSTR-6

Extends the time limit for furnishing the return by an Input Service Distributor in FORM GSTR-6
06/2018 Dated:- 2-4-2018 Telangana SGST
GST – States
Telangana SGST
Telangana SGST
GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
TGST Notification No. 06/2018
CCT's Ref No. A(1)/115/2017,
Dt. 02-04-2018
Sub:- Extension of Time limit for filing FORM GSTR-6.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of Section 39 read with Section 168 of the Telangana Goods and Se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for filing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1.

Extension of time limit for filing the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1.
05/2018 Dated:- 2-4-2018 Telangana SGST
GST – States
Telangana SGST
Telangana SGST
GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
TGST Notification No. 05/2018
CCT's Ref No. A(1)/116/2017,
Dt. 02-04-2018
Sub:- Extension of time limit for filing FORM GSTR-1 – Regarding.
*****
In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 37 read with section 168 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (23 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the Act), the Commissioner of State Tax, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby extends the time limit for furnishing the details of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Diamond Cements Versus CGST C.E & C. C-Bhopal

Diamond Cements Versus CGST C.E & C. C-Bhopal
Central Excise
2018 (4) TMI 223 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 2-4-2018
Appeal No. E/50163/2018-EX (DB) – Final Order No. 51139/2018
Central Excise
 Justice Dr. Satish Chandra, President And  Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical)
Shri Dhruv Tiwari, Advocate for the appellant
Shri M.R. Sharma, DR for the respondent
Per : V. Padmanabhan
1. The present appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 257/2017-18 dated 29/09/2017.
2. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of cement and such cement is mainly cleared on payment of duty on the basis of MRP valuation under Section 4A as also under Section 4 Valuation. The dispute covers the period September, 2011 to August, 2016 in respect of cement which was captively consumed within the factory. The Central Excise duty on the cement captively consumed was paid by the appellant on the basis of the cost of production of such cement an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

period after 01/12/2013, the date of such amendment, the duty paid by the appellant on the basis of the above determination was in order.
5. With reference to the period prior to 01/12/2013 he submitted that the duty should be determined on the same basis as has been held by the Tribunal in the case of Ultra Tech Cement V/s CCE, Indore, Final Order No. 57753-57755/2017 dated 08/11/2017.
6. The Ld DR argued that for the period before and after the amendment to Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, the demand made is fully justified. He specifically pointed out that determination of value at the rate of 110 per cent of cost of production in terms of Rule 8 cannot be made applicable since the cement in the present case was not used for production or manufacture of other goods within the factory.
7. After hearing both sides and perusal of record we find that Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules has been amended w.e.f. 1/12/2013. After such amendment the Rule provides for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

07 (209) ELT 185 (Tri. LB). We note the finding of original authority recorded as below:
10. The assessee in their letter dated 28.05.2011 addressed to the Additional Commissioner as also in a letter dated 07.07.2011 addressed to the Assistant Commissioner (Audit) Indore clarified that as per the Boards Circular No.634/34/2002-CX dated 01.07.2000 and Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, they have transferred the goods to their sister concern correctly as per 110% of the cost of production on the basis of CAS-4 Certificate. They have also referred to the case laws in their support. The main point involved in this case is that the party is not transferring on payment of duty the final product from factory to their sister concern and not for sale therefrom. The reason for price difference in case of parts of the final product as explained by the party is that in case of transfer of components, they are not including selling expenses, marketing expenses, distribution expenses etc. which are t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tification No. 14/2013-CE (NT) dated 22.11.2013. The scope of the new Rule vis-`-vis the old rule was explained in the Board Circular dated 25.11.2013. It was clarified that the new provision was introduced which clearly state their application irrespective of whether the whole or a part of clearances of manufactured goods are covered by the circumstances given in the said rule. The Board further stated that these amendments in the rules addressed the issues clarified already vide Board Circular dated 01.07.2002. In other words, it is apparent that the provisions for application of 110% / 115% of cost of production to be adopted for valuation as all along been the same. The Honble Supreme Court in CCE, Mumbai vs. Fiat India Pvt. Ltd. – 2012 (283) ELT 161 (SC) held that a bare reading of Valuation Rules does not give any indication that the adjudicating authority while determining the value for duty of excisable goods had to follow the rules sequentially. The rules only provides for arr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. National Plastic Industries Ltd.

In Re: M/s. National Plastic Industries Ltd.
GST
2018 (5) TMI 528 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 445 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 60 G S.T.R. 451 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 2-4-2018
GST-ARA-17/2017-18/B-23
GST
B.V. BORHADE AND PANKAJ KUMAR (MEMBER)
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by NATIONAL PLASTIC INDUSTRIES LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question :
To seek the classification of the PVC floor mat and the applicable rate of GST on the same.
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MG

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s follows:
a) Under Stage 1, PVC monofilament yarn with decitex ranging from 1200 to 2800 and filament diameter range 0.38 to 0.75 mm is extruded through a perforated dis plate using T-die extrusion. Extrusion is done through 3 to 4 parallel rows along the entire width of T-die and the vertically extruded yarn immediately falls on a water bed to form a non-woven carpet pile.
Also, referred to as PVC web, non-woven carpet pile is taken up in a horizontal direction on a roller and wound up in rolls. Pile height of the carpet can be varied by changing the process parameters, usually in the range of 8 mm to 16 mm.
b) Under Stage 2, the web formed in Stage I is impregnated with a lamination of clear coat of liquid PVC and is further made to fall over the liquid PVC layer on a conveyer belt. Then it passes through the heated conveyor oven to solidity the liquid PVC backing to the web.
3) The resultant product is a product of running length. It is then cut into size as given specified by

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hedule II of the respective notifications issued under both the Acts cover the chapter heading 5705, the same being reproduced below.
146
5705 
Other carpets and other textile floor coverings, whether or not made up; such as Mats and mattings including Bath Mats, where cotton predominates by weight, of handloom Cotton Rugs of handloom
4) Notification No. 1/2017 – CGST specifically provide that-
“Explanation- For the purposes of this Schedule,-
(iii) “Tariff item”, “sub-heading” “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.”
Thus, for the purpose of GST, Classification of goods under any tariff ite

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nbsp;

Durries :
 
57050021

Durries cotton
m2
57050022

Durries of man-made fibres
m2
57050023

Durries of wool
m2
57050024

Cotton Durries of handloom (including Chindi Durries, Cotton Chenille Durries, Rag Rug Durrie, Printed Durries, Druggets)
m2
57050029

Other
m2
 

Of jute :
 
57050031

Of blended jute
m2
57050032

Of coir jute
m2
57050039

Other
m2
 

Carpets, carpeting, rugs, mats and mattings:
 
57050041

knitted
m2
57050042

Mats and mattings including Bath Mats, where cotton predominates by weight, of Handloom, Cotton Rugs of Handloom
m2
57050049

Other
m2
57050090

Other
m2
6) Also, the relevant extract of HSN explanatory notes for chapter 5705 is reproduced below:
57.05-Other carpets and other textile floor coverings, whether or not made up.
Thus heading covers carpets and textile floor coverings, other than those covered by a more specific heading of this Chapter.
The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the purposes of this Chapter, the term 'carpets and other textile floor coverings” means floor coverings in which textile materials serve as the exposed surface of the article when in use and Includes articles having the characteristics of textile floor covering but intended for use for other purposes.”
It can be seen from the chapter note that Chapter 57 covers those carpets and floor coverings in which textile material serves as the exposed surface of the article.
8) The term 'textile' or 'textile material' is not defined in the GST Act. Therefore, reference can be taken from various Textile Dictionaries and Encyclopedia to ascertain the meaning of this term.
a) “Encyclopedia of Textiles, Fibres and Nonwoven Fabrics” edited by Martin Grayson and published by Wiley-Interscience Publication has defined the term 'textile material' (Relevant extract attached as annexure B). This encyclopedia is another in the series of carefully selected reprints from the world-renowned Kirk-Othmer E

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s. In the case of woven and knitted fabrics the fibres and filaments are formed Into Intermediate continuous length structures known as yarns, which are then either interlaced by weaving or interloped by knitting Into planar flexible sheet like structures known as fabrics. Nonwoven fabrics are formed directly from fibres and filaments by chemically or physically bonding or Interlocking fibres that have been arranged a planar configuration (see Nonwoven textile fabrics, Tire cords).
Textile fibres may be classified into two main categories and into a number of sub-categories, as indicated in Table-1. The generic names of man-made fibres are defined and controlled by the Federal Trade commission (1) With the exemption of glass and asbestos fibres and the specialty metallic and ceramic fibres, textile fibres are formed from organic polymers. Cellulose (gv) and proteins (gv) are the only important natural polymers in naturally occurring fibres (see Biopolymers).
Table 1. Classification

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Textile Institute is an international organisation governed by a Council representing members throughout the world. It is legally constituted by a Royal Charter, granted in Britain in 1925. The main central functions are the provision of an operational framework and the maintenance of quality, particularly in regard to professional qualifications and the spread of information to members and others. The term 'textile' as per this publication is defined as follows:
“A textile was originally a woven fabric, but the terms textile and the plural textiles are now also applied to fibres, filaments and yarns, naturals and manufactured and most products for which these are a principal raw materials.
Note: This definition embraces, for example, fibre based products in the following categories threads, cords, ropes and braids; woven knitted and nonwoven fabrics, lace, nets and embroidery, hosiery, knitwear and made up apparel; household textile, soft furnishing and upholstery; carpets and ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ile Dictionaries and Encyclopedia to understand its meaning.
a) From the extract of “Encyclopedia of Textile Fibres and nonwoven fabrics” reproduced above, it is evident that textile fibres may be classified into two main categories i.e. naturally occurring fibres and manmade fibres as indicated in Table-1 of the extract. It can be seen that manmade fibres includes fibres which are based on polyvinyl chloride i.e. PVC.
b) Further, the “Textile Terms and Definitions Tenth Edition” published by the textile institute has an entire flow chart of classification of textile fibres given, copy of which is attached as annexure D. From the flow chart, it is evident that textile fibres can be classified mainly into natural or manmade fibres. Further, manmade fibres include fibres made from synthetic polymer which further includes polyvinyl derivatives. Further, polyvinyl derivatives include chloro-fibre which are manufactured from PVC. Therefore, textile fibres includes fibres of PVC.
c) Furth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ution or chemical treatment of natural organic polymers, or chemical modification of natural organic polymers (artificial fibres).
 (1) SYNTHETIC FIBRES
The basic material for the manufacture of these fibres are generally derived from coal or oil distillation products or from natural gas. The substances produced by polymerisation are either melted or dissolved in a suitable solvent and then extruded through spinnerets (jets) into air or Into a suitable coagulating bath where they solidify in cooling or evaporation of the solvent, or they may be precipitated from their solution in the from filaments.
The main synthetic fibres are:
(1) Acrylic:
(2) Modacrylic:
(3) Polypropylene:
(4) Nylon or other polyamidesa:
(5) Polyesters
(6) Polyethylene:
(7) Polyurethane:
Other synthetic fibres include: chlorofibre, fluorofibre, polycarbamaide, trivinyl and vinylal.
In the present Case, PVC is produced by polymerization of vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) which is an organic monomer a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nd therefore will be covered under Chapter Heading 5705.
As per Notification NO. 1/2017-CT (Rate) the Chapter Heading 5705 is covered under the Schedule-II where the goods are taxable @ 6% CGST and 6% SGST or 12% IGST.”
Submission dt. 19.02.2018
In addition to the submissions made in the application for advance ruling, the applicant would like to submit the following countering the submissions made from departmental authority:
1) Use of semi-colon between two entries makes the two sentences separate and they have to be read disjunctively.
The departmental authorities have construed that entry number 146 in notification no. 1/2017-CT(Rates) applies only to product where cotton predominates by weight. Since the product for which classification is under dispute is not made up of cotton, it will not be classified under entry number 146.
The description of entry number 146 In notification no 1/2017-CT(Rate) is reproduced below:
Other carpets and other textile floor coverings, whether

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t apply.
2) Even if it is assumed that the semi-colon does not separate the entry and it is to be read conjunctively. still the impugned product will be classified under serial no 146 of the notification.
It is submitted that the entry intends to cover carpets and other textile floor coverings. The entry uses the term 'such as' and mentions specific products. It is submitted that it is a settled principle of interpretation that the items mentioned after the term 'such as' are only illustrative in nature and are not exhaustive.
a) Goodyear India Limited v. Collector of Customs, Bombay, 1997 (95) E.L.T. 450 (SC). = 1997 (9) TMI 100 – Supreme Court of India
b) T.T.K, PHARMA LTD. 1993 (63) E.L.T. 446 (Tribunal) = 1992 (8) TMI 183 – CEGAT, NEW DELHI
It is submitted that the mats and mattings with predomination of cotton is only an example. Also, there is one more product mentioned i.e. cotton rugs of handloom. Thus, cotton rugs is a separate item and the predomination of cotton does no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lowing cases:
a) OSWAL AGRO MILLS LTD. 1993 (66) E.L.T. 37 (S.C.) = 1993 (4) TMI 73 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
b) Trimurti Weldmesh (P) Ltd. 1993 (64) ELT 419 (Tri-Del)= 1992 (11) TMI 171 – CEGAT, NEW DELHI approved by the Supreme Court in the Trimurti Weldmesh (P) Ltd. 1996 (82) E.L.T. A168 (S.C.) = 1995 (12) TMI 397 – SUPREME COURT
4) There is no res-judicata in taxation.
It has been contended in para 6 of the departmental submission made during the hearing that in the pre-GST period the applicant was classifying the product under chapter heading 39249090 and thus now why is the applicant classifying the product under Chapter heading 5705.
It is submitted that the applicant was under the impression that the product would be classifiable under chapter heading 3924. However, it was lately realised that the main ingredient in the product is PVC fibre which is a textile material. Detailed submission on the same has been made in the advance ruling application. Thus, the applicant now w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rule of equity cannot prevail against law. If an excise duty is not paid due to incorrect interpretation, still the Central Excise authorities are empowered to recover the duty due and payable by an assessee by virtue of Section 11A. If an assessee has wrongly classified his goods, then it cannot be taken by an authority in respect of any assessment period will not be binding for subsequent periods.
In view of above discussion, we find no merit in the. Appeal is dismissed.
The above case has been upheld by the Supreme Court in the case of Micron Tips Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector- 1999 (106) ELT. A189 (S.C.) = 1998 (11) TMI 690 – SUPREME COURT
 The applicant also relies on the case of PERFECT REFRACTORIES 2005 (185) E.L.T. 163 (Tri. – Del.) = 2005 (2) TMI 597 – CESTAT, NEW DELHI wherein the mere wrong classification of the goods in question by the respondents at one stage, did not operate as estoppel/res judicata against them for claiming the classification under the correct tariff

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

turf by sister concern M/s. Rayzon Global LLP. The corresponding packing list and purchase invoice is attached as annexure 2 The bill of entry clearly mentions the item as artificial turf (made of plastic raw material). The product has been classified under chapter heading 57033090 which covers CARPETS AND OTHER TEXITLE FLOOR COVERINGS, TUFTED, WHETHER OR NOT MADE UP.
It is submitted that artificial turfs also made up of PVC fibres but is sewed on the backing fabric with the help of-specialized multi-needle sewing machines. This process is called tufting. Therefore, the product is classifiable under chapter heading 5703.
However, in the case of product under dispute in the present case, there is no tufting carried out. In the present case, the PVC fibres are extruded and the pile is then bonded on to the backing material with the help of adhesives, Thus, the product is classifiable under chapter heading 5705.”
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reprod

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

product intended to be supplied to the respondent to examine the facts and issue. No such samples have been provided to the respondent. The applicant also required to provide
iii) What is the weight of cotton/or cotton fabric material.
iv) Whether the above weight of cotton will be constant or change product to product or time to time ?
v) The applicant has claimed in Para 2 of Annexure-I of their application that the prime raw material is PVC for their products. However. the applicant has no where mentioned the quantity in terms of weight of PVC and cotton which is crucial to decide the classification.
vi) The applicant has mentioned their manufacturing process, however, it is not clear as to how the said process mentioned at Para 2 (a) and (b) of Annexure-1 is relevant to decide the classification.
2. It is observed from the applicant's submission that the product is manufactured using predominantly polyvinyl chloride in the manufacturing process. The stages of manufacture giv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

specified by the customer.
However, it is not coming out from the above reasoning as to what is their product/product-range and how the same merits classification under chapter heading 5704.
3. As per the GST Tariff, the products which are classifiable under 5705 have been clearly mentioned as “other carpets and other textile floor covering, whether or not made up [such us mats, & mattings including bath Mats, where cotton predominates by weight, of handlooms, cotton rugs handlooms]”.  From the Annexure-1 submitted by the applicant, it is observed that they have clearly mentioned that the prime raw material being used for PVC carpet mats PVC (Poly vinyl Chloride). However, the requirements of chapter 5705, are such that cotton should predominate by weight. In these circumstances, it is not clear as to how the product of Applicant can be classified under CH 5705.
4. The classification under Chapter Heading 3924 and Chapter heading 5705 are mutually exclusive as Chapter heading 3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

failed to provide complete information as to whether their product qualifies as tableware, kitchenware, Other household articles and hygienic or toilet articles of plastic. If their product qualify under CH. 5705 as to why they were earlier classifying the same under CH 39249090 which is mainly for household or hygienic articles of plastics.
7. Since the applicant has not made a full disclosure of relevant facts, as discussed above, it appears that the application deserves to be rejected under the provisions of Section 98 of the CGST, Act, 2017
8. The above submissions are made only as preliminary submissions about the admissibility of the application and detailed submissions would be filed at a later Mage.
PRAYERS
Since the applicant has not provided the vital information as discussed above, necessary to decide the issue, it is prayed that the application may be rejected at this stage only.
Additional Written Submissions or NIL date as received on dt. 05.03.2018
In addition to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able under CH 5703. However, they have further stated that in the subject case, to the product under dispute, tufting is not carried out, the PVC fibers are extruded and the pile is then bonded on to the backing material with the help of adhesives, hence the product is classifiable under CH 5705, so it is not understood why the applicant has submitted the said sample, which has no bearing with the instant case.
2]. Further, they were again emphasizing that their product namely PVC carpet should be classifiable under chapter 5705. However, chapter 5705 clearly states that “other carpets and other textile floor covering, whether or not made up; such as mats, & mattings including bath Mats, where cotton predominates by weight, of handlooms, cotton rugs handlooms”, which they themselves agreed that as already mentioned in point No. 2 of ANNEXURE-1 of their application, the prime raw material being used for their product is polyvinyl chloride. However, it is again mentioned by 'he applican

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

njunctively. Which is not applying in the said case, so the above referred case laws are irrelevant in this case.
4] Further, they have also relied on certain following case laws for the word 'such as that this word is only illustrative in nature and is not exhaustive.
i] Goodyear India Limited v. Collector of Customs, Bombay, 1997 (95) ELT, 450 (S.C) = 1997 (9) TMI 100 – Supreme Court of India
ii] T.T.K. Pharma Ltd. 1993 (63) ELT 446 (Tribunal) = 1992 (8) TMI 183 – CEGAT, NEW DELHI
iii] Jalal Plastic industries 1981 (8) ELT 653(Guj) = 1980 (12) TMI 51 – HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
iv] M/s. Varroc Engineering Pvt. Ltd. 2015 (10) TMI 54-CESTAT Mumbai
It is observed that the applicant's intention is that the mats and mattings with predomination of cotton is only an example. Also, there is one more product mentioned i.e. cotton rugs of handloom. Thus, cotton rug is a separate item and the predomination of cotton does not apply to such article. Therefore, it can be interpreted

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oducts of the appellant with that of the above said case laws. Further, it has also to be seen as to how the case law pronounced for Central Excise regime may be applicable under GST regime. The applicant has failed to provide any reasons as to how the said case law will be applicable under GST regime.
7] Further, from the enquiries made with the trade, it is learnt that the PVC carpet is classified under Custom CHSH 3918 which reads as under “Floor coverings of plastics, whether or not self-adhesive, in rolls or in the forms of tiles; wall or ceiling coverings of plastics”
The explanatory notes provided under each HSN is as following: –
3918: The said HSN covers “Floor coverings” of “polymers of vinyl chloride in rolls or forms of tiles.
In the present case, primary raw material used in the manufacturing the goods in consideration is “PVC”, hence a view can be formed that the goods are specifically classified in the said entry.
It appears that Chapter heading 5705 covers carpets

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

S
We have gone through the facts of the case. The product before us is claimed to be a floor mat. Though at the cost of repetition, for immediate reference we go through the manufacturing process once again –
a) Under Stage 1, PVC monofilament yarn with decitex ranging from 1200 to 2800 and filament diameter range 0.38 to 0.75 mm is extruded through a perforated dis plate using T-die extrusion. Extrusion is done through 3 to 4 parallel rows along the entire width of T-die and the vertically extruded yarn immediately falls on a water bed to form a non-woven carpet pile. Also, referred to as PVC web, non-woven carpet pile is taken up in a horizontal direction on a roller and wound up in rolls. Pile height of the carpet can be varied by changing the process parameters, usually in the range of 8 mm to 16 mm.
b) Under Stage 2, the web formed in Stage 1 is impregnated with a lamination of clear coat of liquid PVC and is further made to fall over the liquid PVC layer on a conveyer belt, Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t of polymerisation or at some subsequent stage, of being formed under external influence (usually heat and pressure, if necessary with a solvent or plasticiser) by moulding, easting, extruding, rolling or other process into Shapes which are retained on the removal of the external influence.
Throughout the Nomenclature any reference to “plastics” also includes vulcanised flbre. The expression, however. does not apply to materials regarded as textile materials of Section XI.
The applicant has laid claim to the Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 5705 as being applicable to the impugned product. Chapter 57 falls in Section Xl of the scheme of the Customs Tariff, Section Xl is about “TEXTILES AND TEXTILE ARTICLES” and Chapter 57 is about “Carpets and other textile floor coverings”. With the understanding that the impugned product is composed only of PVC monofilament yarn and liquid PVC, we look at the HSN Notes to Section XI which say thus
Notes,
1.- This Section does not cover :
(h) Woven,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PVC only and there should be no doubt whatsoever that the same would fall in Chapter 39 which covers PVC, a polymer and articles thereof.
Having seen thus, there arises no occasion for us to discuss the Heading 5705 which is claimed as being applicable. The case laws being buttressed in respect of the applicability of the Heading 5705 also need no discussion as to their applicability or otherwise. However, we would like to observe herein that we are not at all disagreeable to the point that there are man-made textiles but the same are not required to be referred to here in view of the impugned product being clearly classifiable under Chapter 39 as per discussions held hereinabove.
Now as can be seen that the applicant's query is in respect of the classification of the PVC floor mat and the applicable rate of GST on the same, we would now move on to decide the rate on the impugned product. There is no specific entry in the Schedule for goods exempted from GST as found in the Notifica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eading 39.26, the HSN General Notes say that it is a residual heading which covers articles, not elsewhere specified or included, of plastics or of other materials of headings 39.01 to 39.14. However, we find that Heading 39.18 covers the following products as under –
3918
 
FLOOR COVERINGS OF PLASTICS, WHETHER OR NOT SELF-ADHESIVE, IN ROLLS OR IN THE FORM OF TILES; WALL OR CEILING COVERINGS OF PLASTICS, AS DEFINED IN NOTE 9 TO THIS CHAPTER
3918 10

Of polymers of vinyl chloride:
3918 10 10

Wall or ceiling coverings combined with kg. 10% – knitted or woven fabrics, nonwovens or felts
3918 10 90

Other
3918 90

Of other plastics :
3918 90 10

Floor coverings of linoxyn
3918 90 20

Wall or ceiling coverings combined with kg. 10% – knitted or woven fabrics, non wovens or felts
3918 90 90

Other
Note 9. For the purposes of heading 3918, the expression “wall or ceiling coverings of plastics” applie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Agra Steels Versus Union Of India And 5 Others

M/s Agra Steels Versus Union Of India And 5 Others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1281 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 247 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 2-4-2018
WRIT TAX No. – 555 of 2018
GST
Mr. Krishna Murari And Mr. Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Vishwjit
For The Respondent : C.S.C., A.S.G.I., Gaurav Mahajan
ORDER
List and connect along with Writ Tax No.-422 of 2018.
Heard Shri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner. Respondents no. 1 and 2 are represented by Assistant Solicitor General of India. Shri Gaurav Mahajan appears for the respondent nos.3 and 4 and learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 5 and 6.
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council, respon

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =