Invoice not included in GSTR-1 by supplier

Invoice not included in GSTR-1 by supplier
Query (Issue) Started By: – Sadanand shelar Dated:- 7-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
If supplier has not included invoice in his GSTR-1 what action receipient has to take?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Supplier may add missing next month.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Buyer can also upload his purchase invoice (sale invoice for supplier ) which is auto populate in GSTR 1A of the supplier who shall accept it. Otherwise, the supplier can show the missing invoice in subsequent month 's GSTR 1. Thanks.
Reply By subramanian vijayakumar:
The Reply:
The receipient can on verifying the GSTR 2A ANY OMISSION FOIND CAN BE A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Resorts charging 18% GST as against 5% in their restaurants

Resorts charging 18% GST as against 5% in their restaurants
Query (Issue) Started By: – vivin vijay Dated:- 7-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 8-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
As per the recent ruleing restaurant we're to charge 5 percent as against 18 percent but we're not allowed to claim input credit. However, for resort they were given an option that if room rate is more than 7500 then they can charge 18 percent and cliam input credit . This is the background, now I went to a resort recently where my room rate was 5000 but I was charged GST at 18 percent the reason given by the resort was even if one room has a charge over 7500 they can charge at 18 percent for every room .
My question is
can a re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Therefore the rate of gst should be uniform for the entire resort. Since rent for one room is less than ₹ 7500/- they cannot charge lesser rate.
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Yes , I agree with your view Sir.
Reply By vivin vijay:
The Reply:
Rajgopalan Sir, all rooms are charged bellow 6000 except for one room they have kept at 7500 to get the benfit of input tax credit . It's not the other way around .
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Querist,. You must make a representation to GST Council. This practice should be brought to the Notice of the GST Council. Evidence should be there.
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
The various input services provided to the resrot like maintenance, cleanin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

which amount to be claimed as refund for accumulated ITC in case of export under LUT

which amount to be claimed as refund for accumulated ITC in case of export under LUT
Query (Issue) Started By: – BalKrishan Rakheja Dated:- 6-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 12-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
One party is engaged in manufacturing and clearing the goods on payment of duty in DTA and under LUT for export. The party claimed refund of accumulated ITC for the tax period of July 2017 amounting to ₹ 1.62 Crores on 05.01.2018 after making debit entry of the amount claimed as refund. The party also made some more debit entry in the same month for refund claimed for the month of August and September also. Now the detail of the amount remained in the electronic credit ledger is as under:
1. Balance as on 31.01.2018 in the credit ledger after debiting the duty for the month of Decmber 2017 and debit entry made for three refunds is = ₹ 50 lacs only
2. Balance for the month of July after taking credit and debiting the duty (Tax period for wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ax credit availed on inputs and input services during the relevant period other than the input tax credit availed for which refund is claimed under sub-rules (4A) or (4B) or both;
(C) "Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods" means the value of zero-rated supply of goods made during the relevant period without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking, other than the turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under sub-rules (4A) or (4B) or both;
(D) "Turnover of zero-rated supply of services" means the value of zero-rated supply of services made without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking, calculated in the following manner, namely:-
Zero-rated supply of services is the aggregate of the payments received during the relevant period for zero-rated supply of services and zero-rated supply of services where supply has been completed for which payment had been received in advance in any period prior to the relevant period red

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f say when the accumulated ITC for the period (Tax period) for which refund claimed is less than the refund claimed then how he can claim for refund of that amount which was not accumulated as ITC. for example accumulated ITC for the relevant period is ₹ 100000/- and he filed refund as per formula (maximum refund amount) for ₹ 1.5 Lacs. My question is which amount is elgible to him claimed as refund of accumulated I
Reply By Harshal Fifadra:
The Reply:
The refund application is allowed to be filed for lower of following:
1. Refund as per the formula
2. ITC claimed in GSTR-3B
3. Balance amount in ITC ledger
Reply By BalKrishan Rakheja:
The Reply:
Thanks Harshal ji for your valuable opinion.
Please clarify for which period the credit ledger's balance is to be claimed as refund .
(1) Credit ledger balance of July 17 (Rs. 20 lacs) for which the refund pertains as the export was done in July 17 and ITC was also availed in July 2017 or
(2) credit ledger balance (Rs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Functions of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) from Competition Commission of India (CCI) and the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC)

Functions of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) from Competition Commission of India (CCI) and the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC)
GST
Dated:- 6-4-2018

The National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Chapter XV of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (CGST Rules for short) to determine whether the reduction in tax rates or benefit of input tax credit is being passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. As per rule 137 of the CGST Rules, the Authority shall cease to exist after the expiry of two years from the date on which the Chairman enters upon his office unless the Council

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Revenue Targets

GST Revenue Targets
GST
Dated:- 6-4-2018

The month-wise figures of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST), State Goods and Services Tax (SGST), Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) and Cess collected by the Government since July 1, 2017 is as under:
(Amount in Rs. Crores)
Month
Collection
August, 2017
93,590
September, 2017
93,029
October, 2017
95,132
November, 2017
85,931
December, 2017
83,716
January, 2018
88,929
February, 2018
88,047
March, 2018
89,264
No targets for collection of GST have been fixed. In the absence of any past precedent, it shall be difficult to compare the GST revenue collection with the corresponding months of the previous years due to a number of factors like overlap of taxpayers

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5% Uniform rate of GST to apply in all railway catering services in trains or on stations

5% Uniform rate of GST to apply in all railway catering services in trains or on stations
GST
Dated:- 6-4-2018

With a view to remove any doubt or uncertainty in the matter and bring uniformity in the rate of GST applicable to supply of food and drinks made available in trains, platforms or stations, it has been clarified with the approval of the competent authority that the GST rate on supply of food and drinks by the Indian Railways or Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

selling out the old machinery

selling out the old machinery
Query (Issue) Started By: – Aditya badraika Dated:- 6-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
first thing can any 1 tell me how to check the current value of machinery in balance sheet
and second thing what is the procedure to sell the machinery
we have to make a sell billl for the machinery or first we have to make the agreement regarding for selling the machinery & how to make sale bill including gst
Reply B

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification on issues related to furnishing of Bond/Letter of Undertaking for exports – Reg.

Clarification on issues related to furnishing of Bond/Letter of Undertaking for exports – Reg.
40/14/2018 Dated:- 6-4-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 40/14/2018-GST
F. No. 349/82/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
(GST Policy Wing)
***
New Delhi, April 6, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Director Generals / Director Generals (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Clarification on issues related to furnishing of Bond/Letter of Undertaking for exports – Reg.
Various communications have been received from the field formations and e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(ARN), is generated online.
d) Documents for LUT: No document needs to be physically submitted to the jurisdictional office for acceptance of LUT.
e) Acceptance of LUT/bond: An LUT shall be deemed to have been accepted as soon as an acknowledgement for the same, bearing the Application Reference Number (ARN), is generated online. If it is discovered that an exporter whose LUT has been so accepted, was ineligible to furnish an LUT in place of bond as per Notification No. 37/2017-Central Tax, then the exporter's LUT will be liable for rejection. In case of rejection, the LUT shall be deemed to have been rejected ab initio.”
3. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular.
4. Difficu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Lal Steels (P) Ltd. Versus The asst. Commissioner, State GST Department, Palakkad

M/s Lal Steels (P) Ltd. Versus The asst. Commissioner, State GST Department, Palakkad
GST
2018 (4) TMI 1143 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 77 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-4-2018
W. P. (C). No. 12059 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. Harisankar V. Menon Smt.Meera V. Menon Smt.K.Krishna
For The Respondents : Smt. Thushara James
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the second respondent under Section 129

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

K.C. Pappu & Sons Versus State of Kerala, The Assistant Sales Tax Officer, State Good & Services Tax

K.C. Pappu & Sons Versus State of Kerala, The Assistant Sales Tax Officer, State Good & Services Tax
GST
2018 (4) TMI 1216 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 76 (Ker)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-4-2018
WP (C). No. 12152 of 2018
GST
P. B. Suresh Kumar, J.
For the Petitioner : Sri. Babu Paul
For the Respondent : Smt. Thushara James
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the second respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Saluja Transport Co Versus. CGST C.E And C. C-Bhopal

Saluja Transport Co Versus. CGST C.E And C. C-Bhopal
Service Tax
2018 (4) TMI 1243 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 6-4-2018
Appeal No. ST/52969-52974/2014(DB) – 51276-51281/2018
Service Tax
Mr. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra, President And Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member(Technical)
Shri Kumar Vikram, Ld. Advocate for the appellant
Shri G.R. Singh, DR for the Respondent
Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra:
1. The present appeal is filed against the Order – in – Original No. 6 – 11/201 2 dated 15/10/2012.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is providing services of shifting and transportation of the coal for M/s Western Coalfields Ltd from pitheads to railway sidings.
3. Such activiti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

act is not under dispute that the appellant provided the service of transportation of coal within the mining area to M/s. SECL and that such service receiver had deposited the service tax under the taxable category of goods transport agency service. Further, the show cause notice in this case was issued, seeking confirmation of Service Tax demand under cargo handling service, whereas both the authorities below have changed the classification of service and confirmed the Service Tax demand under different head of service i.e. mining service. It is evident that the authorities below have travelled beyond the scope of the show cause notice, which is not sustainable as per the settled principles of law enunciated by the judicial forum, which ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. KOTHAMANGALAM AGGREGATES Versus KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDYUTHI BHAVAN

M/s. KOTHAMANGALAM AGGREGATES Versus KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDYUTHI BHAVAN
GST
2018 (5) TMI 365 – KERLA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERLA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-4-2018
W. P. (C) Nos. 1112, 2221, 2450 & 4034 of 2018
GST
MR. SHAJI P.CHALY J.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.), SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA And SRI.BALU TOM
MR. ABHIJITH SURANA., R1 & R2 BY SRI.RAJU JOSEPH SENIOR ADVOCATE, BY SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW, SC, BY SRI.P.A.AHAMED, SC, R3 BY ADVS. SRI.BOBY MATHEW And SMT.K.MEERA
JUDGMENT
The captioned writ petitions are materially connected in respect of a tender invited by the 1st respondent, Kerala State Electricity Board for supply of 8M and 9M Pre Stressed Concrete Poles (PSC Poles) to the Electrical Circles under Southern and Central Region, for a period of two years, as per Ext.P1 notification dated 28.09.2017. The legal as well as factual contentions raised in the writ petitions are almost typical in nature. For the disposal of the writ petitions, I am relyi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ocessing, for the reason that, for the manufacture of pre stress concrete poles, the rawmaterials required are cement, steel, coarse aggregates and fine aggregates. When the petitioner sells the PSC Poles to the Board, then GST is imposed, which is known as output GST. When the raw-materials are purchased, there is input credit of GST. However, the GST incurred by the petitioner at the time of purchase of the raw-materials shall be adjusted towards GST payable at the time of sale of Poles and net amount shall be paid to the Government. So also, the input tax credit varies from time to time based on the cost of raw-materials. It was highlighting the said aspect, Ext.P2 letter was issued. However, without hearing the petitioner, the Board issued Ext.P4 corrigendum dated 19.10.2017, informing that, no change in the clauses of tender documents is necessary.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that, as evident from Ext.P4 corrigendum, there is no change either in the general conditions of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

there is violation of the general conditions of contract and special conditions of contract. It is also the case of the petitioner that, the 3rd respondent has submitted documents which were not called for in the tender notice, and therefore, there is a clear violation.
5. Petitioner has produced Ext.P7 attachment given by the 3rd respondent, stating that he has quoted the price after giving the effect of GST credit, which according to the petitioner, is impermissible in accordance with the Instructions to the Bidders as well as the general conditions of contract and special conditions of contract. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent has violated the basic conditions of the documents by which the 3rd respondent is not technically qualified to participate in the commercial bid. It is thus seeking the following reliefs, the writ petition is filed:
“i) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction directing or compelling the respondents 1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

stated that, the writ petition is not maintainable, since as per the special conditions of contract, petitioner has agreed to approach the civil courts at Thiruvananthapuram in the event of disputes arising pertaining to the contract. Therefore, according to the said respondents, the writ petition is not maintainable under law. The averments contained in various paragraphs with respect to Clause No.B.20 'Taxes', of Ext.P3 special conditions of contract and the violation of the general conditions of contract and the issue with respect to the qualification of the 3rd respondent are all denied by the said respondents. According to the respondents, Clause B.20 is formulated in order to specify fair, logical and transparent conditions to suit their requirements while procuring materials. It is also clearly stipulated that the benefit of the input credit will be passed on to KSEBL as per Sec.171 of CGST Act, and in the very next sentence, it has been stated that, 'any reduction i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

conditions, evident from Ext. R1(a). From Ext. R1(a), it is evident that, in respect of 8m poles except for the Electrical Circle, Kattakkada, 3rd respondent is the lowest one. As far as 9m poles are concerned, except for Electrical Circles, Kollam, Kattakkada and Kottarakkara, the rate quoted by the 3rd respondent is the lowest. There is a marked difference of Rs. 9,63,35,681/-. If the tender is finalized, as per the above stated price bids, the respondents who are an agency or instrumentality of the State, will be benefited to the tune of Rs. 7.23 Crores. According to the respondents, the said amount is arrived at based on the difference in rates quoted by the 3rd respondent and the 2nd lowest, and where 3rd respondent is the L1 after taking into consideration the difference in amount wherever 3rd respondent is the L2, evident from Ext. R1(b). Therefore, according to the respondents, petitioners have not made out any case in order to secure the reliefs sought for in the writ petition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and Shri. K. Jaju Babu, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.2450 of 2018 and the other Advocates appearing for the petitioners in the other writ petitions, Sri. Raju Joseph, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and also the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent. Perused the documents on record and the pleadings put forth by the respective parties.
11. The paramount contention advanced by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners is that, as per the Bid specification, Part-I, Pre-qualification bid, Part-B, it was directed to send only the hard copies of agreement in Kerala Government stamp paper as per Appendix IV of General Conditions of Contract along with the Bid form (Part-III, Annexure-II) in Kerala Government stamp paper. But it is noticed that the 3rd respondent has submitted many other documents as hard copies, which discusses about price. It is also the contention that, mention of price details at any place other than the de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e 14 of Section-A (Bid specifications Part-II, Instruction to Bidders), the indication of price anywhere else other than in price bid (BOQ) will render the tender invalid and will be liable to be rejected. Therefore, according to the learned Senior Counsel, Ext.P7 enclosure produced along with the bid is violative of clause 14. It is also the case of the learned Senior Counsel that, as per clause 15 of Section-A, conditional offers are liable to be rejected, and therefore, the bid submitted by the 3rd respondent ought to have been rejected by the Board. Other arguments are also advanced in tune with the pleadings made in the writ petition.
13. Yet another contention advanced is that, the 3rd respondent does not have sufficient water tanks for water dipped curing of poles as per the specification of KSEB Ltd., except one small tank they have constructed recently to satisfy the pre-qualification condition. That apart, it is contended that, the 3rd respondent is not having sufficient 9M

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ention for the petitioners that the 3rd respondent has violated the special conditions of contract and the only contention is that, they have added Ext.P7 along with the bid document, which is in no way causing any manner of prejudice to the petitioners or violating the terms and conditions contained in the special conditions of contract and the general conditions of contract.
16. It is also submitted that, so far as respondents 1 and 2 are concerned, when a price is quoted by the tenderer, it is the price in commensurate with the tender conditions, and therefore, even if Ext.P7 is submitted by the 3rd respondent, the same can be ignored by the Board. So also, it is contended that, the price difference is more than Rs. 7 crores from the second lowest bidder, as per the calculations specified and quoted above. Learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent also advanced contentions in tune with the contentions advanced by respondents 1 and 2.
17. I have evaluated the submissions mad

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

implication with respect to the terms and conditions of the contract, and respondents 1 and 2 are entitled to overlook the same and consider the bid submitted by the respective parties.
18. Clause 14 of Section-A stipulated that: “The indication of price anywhere else other than in the price bid (BOQ) will render the bid invalid and will be liable to be rejected”. Therefore, the said stipulations are also specific and clear to the effect that, what is prohibited is indication of price anywhere else other than in the price bid. Therefore, merely Ext.P7 communication is issued by the 3rd respondent, “that the effect of GST credit to be availed has been taken in account in the quoted price” will not in any manner interferes with clauses 14 and 15 of Section-A. Clause 21 stipulates that: “No deviations will be accepted”. There is no case for the petitioners that there is any deviation on the part of the 3rd respondent from the Instructions to Bidders, special conditions of contract or ge

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ally agrees to bear will be admitted at the rates applicable at the time of delivery, on the basis of an undertaking on Kerala Government stamp paper worth Rs. 500/- from the supplier in the following format:
“P.O. No………………………..dated …………….(Name & address of firm) hereby agrees that if any dispute on payment of taxes from concerned tax authorities occurs in future, the firm shall indemnify the KSEB Limited from such liabilities and supplier will be liable for the additions, loss or cost on account of such discrepancies/dispute”. The benefit of input tax credit will be passed on to KSEB Limited as per Section 171 of CGST Act. Any reduction in rates of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of input tax credit shall be passed in to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. KSEB Limited is a registered dealer under the Goods and Service Tax Act. GST identification Number (GSTIN) of KSEB Limited in 32AAECK2277NBZ1.”
21. So far

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

values of Whole Sale Price Index Number for Manufacture of Basic Metals (published by IEEMA) and Consumer Price Index Number (published by the Department of Economics and Statistics) during the month under consideration, from its values on the due date of tender.
Price variation will be given for the poles supplied as per the monthly delivery schedule (monthly supply less than or equal to monthly target/allocation) at the rates applicable for the actual month of supply.
Price variation for the monthly supply in excess of the monthly target to meet the quarterly target will be applicable at the rate of actual month of supply or scheduled month of supply (within the quarter), whichever is lower.
Price variation will be given for the excess poles supplied in a quarter (poles supplied in excess of quarterly target) at the rates applicable for the actual month of supply, only if the supply is made as per the written allocation given by the respective consignees of the Electrical Ci

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onsidered opinion, the General Conditions of Contract will have to be taken into account and read along with the special conditions of contract. First of all, there is no price variation clause put forth by the 3rd respondent. As I pointed out earlier, in Ext.P7, the 3rd respondent has specified an aspect with respect to the GST billing. From Section-A Instructions to Bidders, it is evident that if any communication from a contractor is not acceptable to the Board, it can be ignored by the Board. Even though a case is projected by the petitioners that the tender offered by the 3rd respondent is subject to conditions of verification of the documents, it cannot be said that the tender made by the 3rd respondent is conditional in nature. It is also clear that no manner of prejudice is caused to the petitioners on that account, especially due to the fact that such a course of action adopted by the 3rd respondent is not egregiously violative of the tender conditions.
23. When this writ pet

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. ALUKKA GOLD PALACE Versus STATE TAX OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF GST, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NETWORK PVT. LTD GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL

M/s. ALUKKA GOLD PALACE Versus STATE TAX OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF GST, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NETWORK PVT. LTD GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL
GST
2018 (5) TMI 525 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 484 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-4-2018
WP (C). No. 35333 of 2017
GST
P. B. Suresh Kumar, J.
FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
FOR THE RESPONDENT : SMT.THUSHARA JAMES
JUDGMENT
On account of a mistake committed by the petitioner during 2009 in providing the PAN number of another firm for the purpose of obtaining registration under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act ('the Act'), the request of the petitioner for registration under the GST statutes were delayed and were gr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Shri Shalesh Kumar Singh

In Re : Shri Shalesh Kumar Singh
GST
2018 (5) TMI 529 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – DELHI – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 373 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – DELHI – AAR
Dated:- 6-4-2018
Advance Ruling No. 04/DAAR/2018
GST
Pankaj Jain Member (Centre) and Vinay Kumar Member (State)
Present for the Applicant : Shri Prafull Gupta, C.A.
Present for the Revenue (Centre) : Shri Raj Kumar, Assistant Commissioner, Karol Bagh Division, CGST North, New Delhi
Present for the Revenue (State) : Shri Shamsher Singh, Assistant Commissioner, DGST (W-44)
Statement of Facts as per the Applicant:
The applicant is interested in trading of 'Dried Tobacco Leaves' which would be purchased from registered dealer who in return purchases such Tobacco Leaves from Agriculturist / Farmers. Such registered dealer after purchasing it from Agriculturist / Farmers will sell the same to Applicant as it is without any further change in its form.
2.   Applicant aft

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

which cleaning and removal of unwanted particles (Bhusa, Dust etc.) has been done would be classified under Tobacco Leaves' or not, if the form and nature of same has still not undergone any change. Whether 'Dried Tobacco Leaves' on which cleaning and removal of unwanted particles has been done would be classified under Tariff Item/Heading 2401 as 'Tobacco Leaves' or 'All goods not specified elsewhere' as mentioned in Notification No. 01/2017  Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 
4.   Determination of the liability to pay tax on goods or services or both:
Whether GST on such 'Dried Tobacco Leaves' on which cleaning and removal of unwanted particles (Bhusa, Dust etc.) has been done without any addition of foreign particles, would be levied @ 5% or 28% under Chapter No. 24 Tariff Item 2401 under Notification No. 01/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Views of The Applicant:
5.   Product to be traded by the ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tobacco' and 'manufactured tobacco'. Tobacco leaves being agricultural produce in raw form appears to be in state of unmanufactured tobacco, but they cannot be classified other than tobacco leaves.
9.   Since, ingredients Of tobacco patti and its extract represent the same substance for all purposes, the application of latter to former does not lead to any mixture or compound of two. It was submitted that the issue has now been finally decided by the CESTAT in the case of Yogesh Associates V/s Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-II wherein it was held that raw leaf of tobacco treated with tobacco solution quimam and other flavours including saffron water – raw tobacco leaf not undergone any irreversible change and remains raw leaf tobacco unmanufactured – mixture too concentrated for comfortable consumption by human beings and fails to meet test of marketability of product as 'chewing tobacco' – classification under Sub-heading 2401.10 of Central Excise

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7-CX. 3, dated 23.06.1987 upholds the view.
RELEVANT PROVISIONS:
11.   S. No. 28 of FAQs on GST Rate-II dated 03.08.2017 and S. No. 42 of CBEC Circular F.No. 332/2/2017-TRU dated December 2017:
S. No.
Question
Answer
28./42.
Tobacco leaves falling under heading 2401 attracts 5% GST on reverse charge basis in respect of supply by an agriculturist. What is the meaning of tobacco leaves?
For GST rate of 5%, tobacco leaves means leaves of tobacco as such or broken tobacco leaves or tobacco leaves stems.
12.   Notification No. 1/2017-central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017:
Schedule 1-2.5%
S. No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff Item
Description of Goods
(1)
(2)
(3)
109.
2401
Tobacco leaves
 
Schedule IV-14%
S. No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff Item
Description of Goods
(1)
(2)
(3)
13.
2401
Unmanufactured tobacco; tobacco refuse (other than tobacco leaves)
13.   Chapter 24 of HSN: Tobacco and manufactured tobacco subs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

which undergoes spontaneous ageing after packing.
Tobacco so treated is packed in bundles, bales (of various shapes), in hogsheads or in crates. When so packed, the leaves are either aligned (Orient) or tied in hands (several leaves tied together with a band or with another tobacco leaf), or simply left as loose leaves. They are always tightly compressed in order to ensure preservation.
In some cases, in addition to (or instead of) fermentation, flavouring or moistening substances are added (casing) in order to improve the aroma or keeping qualities.
14   HSN Notes for heading 24.01:
24.01- Unmanufactured tobacco; tobacco refuse.
2401.10 – Tobacco, not stemmed/stripped
2401.20 – Tobacco, partly or wholly stemmed/stripped
2403.30 – Tobacco refuse
This heading covers:
(1)   Unmanufactured tobacco in the form of whole plants or leaves in the natural state or as cured or fermented leaves, whole or stemmed/ stripped, trimmed or untrimmed, broken or cut (includin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

substitutes in any proportion, for example, manufactured tobacco for use in pipes or for making cigarettes.
(2)   Chewing tobacco, usually highly fermented and liquored.
(3)   Snuff, more or less flavoured.
(4)   Tobacco compressed or liquored for making snuff.
(5)   Manufactured tobacco substitutes, for example, smoking mixtures not containing tobacco. However, products such as cannabis are excluded (heading 12.11).
(6)   “Homogenised” or reconstituted” tobacco made by agglomerating finely divided tobacco from tobacco leaves, tobacco refuse or dust, whether or not on a backing (e.g., sheet of cellulose from tobacco stems), generally put up in the form of rectangular sheets or strip. It can be either used in the sheet form (as a wrapper) of shredded/chopped (as a filler).
(7)   Tobacco extracts and essences. These are liquids extracted from moist leaves by pressure or prepared by boiling waste tobacco in water. They are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the same will be covered in S. No. 109 of Schedule-I of Notification No. 1/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, being 'tobacco leaves' or the same will be covered under S. No. 13 of Schedule-IV of the said Notification which covers 'Unmanufactured Tobacco and Tobacco Refuse (other than tobacco leaves)'.
19.   To understand the goods proposed to be supplied, and applicable rate of GST, the process of harvesting, curing, fermentation etc. of tobacco leaves and meaning of various terms used in the HSN, relevant Notification and Circular issued by CBEC have been discussed as under:
20.   Harvesting of tobacco: Harvesting is the process of collecting tobacco leaves from the field at the time when leaf maturity has reached its desired stage. Harvesting can be done by either manual or mechanical means. Tobacco can be harvested in several ways. If the entire plant is harvested at once by cutting off the stalk at the ground with a sickle it is called

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

isture is removed by opening vents in the roof and/or opening side walls that are specially constructed for this purpose. For the most part, air-cured tobacco is dried with natural heat; however, humid weather conditions may require a limited amount of artificial heat. Tobacco that has been air-cured is typically brown in colour.
(ii) Fire-curing: A method of curing, which involves removing all of the natural sap and moisture from tobacco leaves. As its name suggests, this particular method of curing involves exposing tobacco to the heat and smoke of open fires; doing so allows the leaves to absorb the aromatic substances in the smoke, which will in turn affect the tobacco's taste. The type and age of the wood, as well as the duration of the tobacco's exposure to the smoke, all affect the tobacco's taste, Which is why these factors vary depending on the end-product that is desired.
(iii)   Flue-curing: A method of curing, which involves removing of the natural s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

There are primarily two types of fermentation, natural fermentation and forced fermentation, with the duration of the process ranging from two days to two months or more. Natural fermentation, sometimes known' as aging, is a chemical reaction caused by moisture and warm temperatures; it occurs when tobacco is packaged in bales or hogsheads. Natural fermentation generally gives tobacco a more uniform colour and a milder taste. Forced fermentation involves placing tobacco in huge stacks so that the chemical reaction caused by the moisture and warm temperatures is intensified by the pressure the tobacco is under. Forced fermentation generally gives tobacco a more uniform colour, as well as a smoother aroma and taste.
24.   Aging: Curing and subsequent aging allow for the slow oxidation and degradation of carotenoids in the tobacco leaf. This produces various compounds in the tobacco leaves that give cured tobacco its sweet hay, tea, rose oil, or fruity aromatic flavour tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s broken into small pieces during the processing or manufacturing stages. The scrap results from handling tobacco during processing or during manufacturing, whereas, broken leaf results from handling that occurs prior to processing.
28.   Stalk: The primary stem of an entire tobacco plant.
29.   Stem: A side shoot that extends from the tobacco plant's primary stalk and divides each leaf from its base to its tip. In larger tobacco leaves, the stem must be removed prior to processing. Also known as the midrib.
30.   Stemming: The process of removing stems from tobacco leaves. Also know as stripping.
31.   The applicant has claimed that 'Dried Tobacco Leaves' proposed to be supplied by them are covered under HSN code 2401. It is observed that the heading 2401 of HSN covers Tobacco Leaves and Unmanufactured Tobacco. However, heading 2403 covers 'Manufactured Tobacco'. Hence, to determine the correct classification under HSN, i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7-TRU dated December 2017 that the said rate of 5% is applicable only on the following three categories of goods.
(i)   Leaves of Tobacco as such;
(ii)   Broken Tobacco Leaves;
(iii)   Tobacco Leaves Stems;
33.   To ascertain whether the 'Dried Tobacco Leaves' after the process of curing are covered in any of the abovementioned three categories of goods, the process of harvesting, curing and meaning of various relevant terms as discussed above have been considered.
34.   It appears that the term 'Leaves of Tobacco as such' would mean leaves obtained by the removal of individual leaves from the stalk by cropping, pulling or priming. However, if any process e.g. curing has been done on the said tobacco leaves, the said leaves would not be covered in this category.
35.   The term 'Broken Leaves' covers only such leaves which are broken during handling before any process like curing is done. However ,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

red as 'unmanufactured tobacco (other than tobacco leaves)'.
38.   Regarding Circular No. 81/5/87 – CX-3 dated 23.06.1987 issued by the Ministry of Finance, .the same is regarding classification of unmanufactured tobacco merely broken by beating and then sieved and packed for consumption as chewing tobacco (Zarda) and it was clarified that the same should be classifiable as unmanufactured tobacco under heading 2401. Hence, the same is not applicable in the present case.
39.   Regarding CESTAT Order in the case of Yogesh Associates V/s Commissioner Central Excise, Surat-II dated 06.09.2005 reported in 2006 (195) E.L.T. 196 (TRI- Mumbai), it was held that application of a solution of quiman (which is tobacco flavoured water) and other flavours including saffron water which admittedly serve no other purpose than to prepare a blend of unmanufactured tobacco for purposes of use in further manufacture of Gutkas/pan Masala, classification under sub-heading 2401.10 of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M/s Sonka Publications (India) Private Limited

In Re : M/s Sonka Publications (India) Private Limited
GST
2018 (5) TMI 594 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – DELHI – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 414 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – DELHI – AAR
Dated:- 6-4-2018
Advance Ruling No. 05/DAAR/2018
GST
Pankaj Jain Member (Centre) and Vinay Kumar Member (State)
Present for the Applicant: Shri Vineet Bhatia, Advocate
Present for the Revenue (Centre): Shri Neeraj Aneja, Superintendent, Division Janakpuri, GST West, New Delhi
Present for the Revenue (State): None
Statement of Facts as per the Applicant:
The applicant is a Publishing House and engaged in the business of publishing and selling of books for students of various classes.
2. The applicant has got registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and is holding GSTIN No. 07AAACS2232H1ZQ.
3. That besides many of its other publications, the applicant is also publishing books by the name of 'Sulekh Sarita Part-A' (सुले&#23

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on Question No. 1:
6. The books 'Sulekh Sarita Part-A' (सुलेख सरिता भाग – अ), 'Sulekh Sarita Part-B (सुलेख सरिता भाग – ब)' and 'Sulekh Sarita Part-1-5 (सुलेख सरिता भाग – 1 से 5)' are classifiable as 'Printed books' falling under 'HSN 4901'.
7. That whereas 'exercise books'/ 'writing books' simply contains sheets of lined paper, commonly known as 'note books' for practising and are used by students for taking down notes or for practising written contents and/or solving problems. Thus 'exercise books' generally do not contain any instructions and are merely compilation of plain papers with lines printed on them. The printing of lines on the plain paper is merely for enabling the students to write in a straight manner. Merely printi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

This book teaches 'MATRAS' with the concept of “उच्चारण के आधार पर मात्राओं का ज्ञान” with comparison of words and picture presentation. The concept helps the child to learn Hindi 'MATRAS' in the easy way, thus making the Hindi subject easier for the child.
c. The printed matter given in these books are also aimed at-
(i) Teaching the students about various prominent idioms i.e. (मुहावरों का ज्ञान करवाना)
(ii) Teaching the students about the art of word formation i.e (शब्द निर्माण सिखाना)
(iii) Improving the vocabulary of the students i.e. (हिन्द&#

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

#2350;े क्या सिखाती है; मुझे सदा याद रखना है आदि का मूल उदेश्य बच्चों को वो संस्कार प्रदान करना है जो जीवन मे उनके काम आएं और वे एक अच्छा इंसान बनने मे उनकी मदद करे।” have been provided in the book with the objective to inculcate ethos and values in the minds of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ain any content as such.
14. The basic edition of i.e. 'Sulekh Sarita Part-A (सुलेख सरिता भाग – अ)', 'Sulekh Sarita Part-B (सुलेख सरिता भाग – ब)' also qualify to be a 'picture book' falling under HSN 4903. These books, alternatively, even otherwise would be exempt from tax falling either under HSN 4901 or 4903. The primary level books of 'Sulekh Sarita Part 1-5' definitely qualify to be 'printed books' falling under HSN 4901.
15. Regarding, the relevance and importance of these books it is mentioned as these books are the first books which a child holds while beginning his process of learning. In the formative years the endeavour is to make learning a fun exercise for a child and therefore, the basic pre-nursery/ nursery and primary books are designed in such a manner that a child gets attracted towards them. For this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

books (including educational workbooks sometimes called writing books), with or without narrative texts have been classified to be 'printed books' falling under HSN 4901.
18. It is a settled law that the principle of ejusdem generis can be applied while interpreting entries in a taxing statute and the words or expressions in a entry derives its meaning, colour and characteristics from the preceding and succeeding words. A particular section of the statute shall not be divorced from the rest of the Act. The Ejusdem Generis rule applies to resolve the problem of giving meaning to groups of words where one of the words is ambiguous or inherently unclear. Even otherwise when the principle of ejusdem generis is applied to these HSN codes then the meaning of 'exercise books' and 'printed books' becomes clear. It can be noticed that the word 'exercise books' (In HSN 4820) is preceded by the word “registers, account books, note books, order books, receipt books, letter pads, diaries and simil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from where he makes a taxable supply, if his aggregate turn over in a financial year exceeds the taxable quantum of Rs. 20.00 lacs.
20. Section 23 of the CGST Act deals with person who is not liable for registration. As per Section 23 (1) any person engaged exclusively in the business of supplying goods or services or both that are not liable to tax or are wholly exempt from tax then the person is not liable itself to register. Section 23 of the GST Act is reproduced here under for ready reference and the same reads as under:
Section 23(1): The following persons shall not be liable to registration, namely:-
(a) Any person engaged exclusively in the business of supplying goods or services or both that are not liable to tax or wholly exempt from tax under this Act or under the integrated Goods and Services Tax Act.
(b) An agriculturist, to the extent of supply of produce out of cultivation of land.
21. Section 24 of the CGST Act deals with compulsory registration in certain cases

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Every person supplying online information and database access or retrieval services from a place outside India to a person in India, other than a registered person;
(xii) Such other person or class of persons as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council.
22. The issue for decision is that in case person engaged exclusively in supply of goods that are not liable to tax or wholly exempt from tax (say for example 'printed books' or fresh vegetables or fruits) but is also availing the services of Goods Transport Agency or an Advocate and thus liable to pay tax under reverse charge then whether such a person is liable for registration or not?
23. From a plain reading of Section 24 it can be noticed that the opening word of Section 24 states “Notwithstanding anything contained in the sub-section (1) of section 22”. Thus, it can be noticed that section 24 specifically overrides the provision of section 22 (1), which prescribe the threshold taxable quantum. How

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eading of section 22, section 23 and section 24, it appears that section 24 does not override section 23, which is an independent code in itself and thus a person dealing exclusively in supply of goods or services or both that are not liable to tax or wholly exempt from tax would not be required to take a registration under the GST Acts.
Prayer of the Applicant:
27. That the product supplied by the applicant i.e. 'Sulekh Sarita Part-A', 'Sulekh Sarita Part-B' and 'Sulekh Sarita Part 1-5' be classified as 'printed books' falling under HSN 4901 or as 'picture books' falling under 'HSN 4903' and consequently covered by entry No. 119 or 121 of Notification No. 2/2017 – Central Tax (Rate).
28. That the applicant is not liable for registration, if it is engaged in supply of goods or services that are not liable to tax or wholly exempt from tax under the GST Acts.
Comments of Jurisdictional Officer (Centre):
29. With respect to Question No. 1:
CBEC vide Circular No. 1057/6/2017-CX dated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e members of the trade requesting clarification regarding classification of printed workbooks, exercise books, children's drawing book etc. The issue raised in these representations is whether the aforesaid goods are classifiable under Chapter 48 or Chapter 49 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff Act (CETA), 1985. Issue was also litigated before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The Hon'ble High Court directed Board to examine the matter and pass appropriate order at its earliest convenience.
(ii) The issue has been examined. Exercise Books have been explained in HSN under explanatory note (2) to Heading 48.20 as, “These may simply contain sheets of lined paper but may also include printed examples of handwriting for copying in manuscript”. Such exercise Books are specifically classified under heading 4820 of the erstwhile CETA, 1985. These are nothing but stationary items having blank pages with lines for writing and may also include printed texts for copying manually. In common par

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s for completion in manuscript)…” Thus, printed work books containing questions followed by spaces for writing or other exercises would fall within the scope of Chapter 49. The said goods are different from Exercise Books falling under Chapter 48 which are stationary items with blank pages with lines for writing and some time may also include printed texts for copying manually, as explained in the preceding para. Further, since printing in case of printed workbooks is not merely incidental to the primary use of the of the goods, such goods are classifiable under Chapter 49, in terms of Chapter note 12 to Chapter 48 of erstwhile CETA, 1985.
(iv) Similarly, HSN Chapter note (6) to Chapter 49 read with HSN explanatory note under heading 49.03 covers children's workbooks consisting essentially of pictures with complementary texts, for writing or other exercises, and children's drawing or colouring books, provided the pictures form the principal interest and are not subsidiary to the tex

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e main issue for decision in this case is whether the books 'Sulekh Sarita Part-A', 'Sulekh Sarita Part-B' and 'Sulekh Sarita Part 1-5' are classifiable as 'Printed Books' falling under HSN 4901 or as children's 'Drawing Books' under HSN 4903 or as 'Exercise Books' under HSN 4820.
36. The HSN notes for Heading 4820 reads as under:
48.20- Registers, account books, note books, order books, receipt books, letter pads, memorandum pads, diaries and similar articles, exercise books, blotting-pads, binders (loose-leaf or other), folders, file covers, manifold business forms, interleaved carbon sets and other articles of stationery, of paper or paperboard; albums for samples or for collection and book covers, of paper or paperboard.
4820.20 – Exercise books
(2) Exercise Books. These may simply contain sheets of lined paper but may also include printed examples of handwriting for copying in manuscript.
Educational workbooks, sometimes called writing books, with or without narrative texts,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y works of all kinds, text-books (including educational workbooks sometimes called writing books), with or without narrative texts, which contain questions or exercises (usually with spaces for completion in manuscript); technical publications; books for reference such as dictionaries, encyclopaedias and directories (e.g., telephone directories, including “yellow pages”): catalogues for museums and public libraries (but not trade catalogues); liturgical books such as prayer books and hymn books (other than music hymn books of heading 49.04); children's books (other than children's picture, drawing or colouring books of heading 49.03). Such books may be bound (in paper or with soft or stiff covers) in one or more volumes, or may be in the form of printed sheets comprising the whole or a part of the complete work and designed for binding.
Heading 4901 also covers:
Bound picture books (other than children's picture books of heading 49.03).
The heading 49.01 further excludes:
(a) ….

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the sense of stories is conveyed by a series of episodal pictures, accompanied by captions or summary narratives related to the individual pictures. It also includes children's workbooks consisting essentially of pictures with complementary texts, for writing or other exercises.
This heading also includes children's drawing or colouring books. These consist mainly of bound pages (sometimes in the form of detachable postcards) containing simple pictures for copying, or outlines of pictures, with or without printed instructions, for completion by drawing or colouring; sometimes coloured illustrations for guidance are incorporated. They also include similar books with “invisible” outlines or colour which can be made visible by rubbing with a pencil or applying water with a paint brush, and also books in which the small amounts of water colour required for colouring are contained in the books (e.g., in the form of a palette).
39. The issue of classification of text books and printed wor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ues, prayer books etc. The heading 49.01 specifically covers educational workbooks or writing books.
(ii) Heading 49.03: This heading generally covers children's picture, drawing or colouring books wherein pictures form the principal interest in the books.
(iii) Heading 48.20: This heading generally covers stationery books. However, exercise books are specifically covered in this heading. Such exercise books may contain simple sheets with printed lines or may even have printed examples of handwriting for copying by the students.
42. In the case of certain goods of heading 49.01 e.g workbooks, there may be space for writing in addition to the printed text but printing is of primary use and space for writing is incidental. On the contrary, in case of certain goods of heading 48.20 e.g. diaries, exercise books, there may be considerable amount of printed matter but the printing is incidental to their primary use of writing by hand.
43. It is observed that the main feature which differ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

their classification under heading 48.20 as exercise books. Further, since, none of the books contain any pages with children's picture, drawing or colouring matter, classification of any of them under heading 49.03 is not possible. Hence, the goods are to be correctly classified under HSN 4820.
46. Regarding, Sections 22, 23 and 24 of CGST Act, 2017 dealing with registration, it is observed that the section 24 deals with compulsorily registration in certain cases. The section 24 requires that if a person is required to pay tax under reverse charge, then he is compulsorily required to get registered. The contention of the applicant that the persons who are engaged exclusively in supply of goods and services that are exempt or not liable to tax shall not be required to take registration is not correct because without registration payment of tax under reverse mechanism would not be possible. The Sections 22, 23 and 24 have to be read together and from the combined reading of the same i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notification of last dates for filing of GSTR-3B returns for the periods April 2018, May 2018, June 2018

Notification of last dates for filing of GSTR-3B returns for the periods April 2018, May 2018, June 2018
1/2018-STATE TAX Dated:- 6-4-2018 Kerala SGST
GST – States
Kerala SGST
Kerala SGST
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
GOODS AND SERVICE TAXES DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION No. 1/2018-STATE TAX
No. CT/22046/2017-C1.
Thiruvananthapuram, 6th April 2018.
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (20 of 2017) (hereinafter in this notification referred to as the Act) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Rule, 2017 the Commissioner of State Tax, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby specifies that the return in Form GSTR-3B for the month as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of date for submitting the statement in FORM GST TRAN-2 under rule 117 (4) (b) (iii) of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017.

Extension of date for submitting the statement in FORM GST TRAN-2 under rule 117 (4) (b) (iii) of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017.
2/2018-STATE TAX Dated:- 6-4-2018 Kerala SGST
GST – States
Kerala SGST
Kerala SGST
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
GOODS AND SERVICE TAXES DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION No. 2/2018-STATE TAX
No. CT/22046/2017-C1.
Thiruvananthapuram, 6th April 2018.
Sub:- Extension of date for submitting the statement in FORM GST TRAN-2 under rule 117 (4) (b) (i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Treatmemt of Rent/ hire of machinery

Treatmemt of Rent/ hire of machinery
Query (Issue) Started By: – BIBHUTIBHUSAN PATTANAIK Dated:- 5-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Sir
sub-
A reg. dealer having machine want to let out his machine to a Reg dealer, how can i give effect in both parties
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Sec 7(a) of CGST Act, 2017 states as, " all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Validity of Letter of Undertaking (LUT)

Validity of Letter of Undertaking (LUT)
Query (Issue) Started By: – Venukumar HJ Dated:- 5-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 6 Replies
GST
Dear All,
Please clarify me.
We are having letter of undertaking valid up to 30th June 2018. I read some where 2017-18 LUT is valid up to 31st March, 2018. for the year 2018-19, we have to apply for new LUT in April 2018 itself, still our old LUT valid till 30th June 2018.
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
If online facility in Common Portal System is operative, prefer apply afresh. Second choice is manual. Since LUT filed manually is valid till 30.6.18, no need to file afresh manually.
Manual filing is viable/required only in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t further clarified that no documents are required to be physically submitted to the jurisdictional office for acceptance of LUT. The Circular also stated that if an exporter's LUT has been accepted and later if it was discovered that the exporter was ineligible to furnish a LUT in place of a bond, then the LUT will be liable for rejection and such LUT shall be deemed to have been rejected from the very beginning.
The Circular was issued upon receiving various queries from the field formations and exporters regarding a technical glitch that the LUTs submitted via online in FORM GST RFD-11 on the common portal were not visible to the jurisdictional officers of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) and of a few states.
Repl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Directs First Respondent to Act Promptly on Advance Ruling u/s 97(1) of Kerala GST Act.

Court Directs First Respondent to Act Promptly on Advance Ruling u/s 97(1) of Kerala GST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
Inaction on the part of the first respondent in taking a decision – advance ruling

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Form C Usage Unaffected by GST: No Restriction to Six Items Under CST Act Section 8 & Rule 12.

Form C Usage Unaffected by GST: No Restriction to Six Items Under CST Act Section 8 & Rule 12.
Case-Laws
VAT and Sales Tax
The provisions of Section 8 of the CST Act, Rule 12 of CST (R&T) Rules and declaration Form C have not undergone any amendment after the implementation of the GST laws. There cannot be any occasion to restrict the usage of ‘C’ Form only for the purposes of re-sale of the six items mentioned in the amended definition of ‘goods’ in Section 2 (d) of the CST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Prompt Compusolutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Asst. Tax Officer, Squad No. VII, State Gst Department, Palakkad

Prompt Compusolutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Asst. Tax Officer, Squad No. VII, State Gst Department, Palakkad
GST
2018 (4) TMI 531 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-4-2018
W. P. (C) No. 11900 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri. K. M. Cherian And Sri. P. M. Girijavallabhan
For The Respondent : Sri. C. Unnikrishnan
JUDGMENT
Goods belonging to the petitioner have been detained by the competent authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, invoking the powers under section 129 of the said statutes. Ext.P5 is the detention order issued in this regard. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5 detention order.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In re: Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd.

In re: Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd.
GST
2018 (5) TMI 458 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 526 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 5-4-2018
GST-ARA-18/2017-18/B-25
GST
B.V. BORHADE AND PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 Of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by KANSAI NEROLAC PAINTS LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question :
Whether accumulated credit by way of Krishi Cess (KKC) as appeared in the Service tax return of Input Service Distributor (ISD) ON June 30, 2017 which is carried forward in the electronic credit ledger maintained by the company under CGST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e company's Head Office. Under chapter V of Finance Act 1994, the Company has a centralized registration for Head Office, factories and depots at its Head Office (HO) in Mumbai, Apart from centralized registration, the Company also has a separate registration as Input Service Distributor (ISD) for its HO to distribute the eligible CENVAT credit to its factories and Head Office according to Rule 2(m) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 (herein after referred as CCR), read with Rule 7 and Rule 7A of CCR.
Rule 9(10) of the CCR requires the input service distributor to file the half yearly return in the statement giving the detail of the credit received and distributed during the said half yearly period by the end of the following months.
As an input service distributor, the company received CENVAT credit at head office. Those CENVAT credit also included Krishi Kalyan Cess (KKC) as well but the company could not distribute KKC to its factories as because, KKC credit could be utilized only with K

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pre GST regime, that is prior to July 1, 2017, company was engaged in manufacture and sale of goods across the states and in the state of Maharashtra Company was engaged in works contract service as well. Accordingly under chapter V of Finance Act 1994, company took centralized registration for its Head Office located (HO) in the state of Maharashtra. Apart from centralized registration, company also obtained registration as Input Service Distributor (ISD) for its HO to distribute eligible credit to its respective manufacturing units according to Rule 2(m) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 (herein after referred as CCR), read with Rule 7 and Rule 7A of CCR.
1.3 CBEC had vide Circular No. 97 dated 23.8.2007 clarified that input service distributor is an office or premises of the manufacturer or taxable service provider which receives bills/invoices etc., of input services. The input service distributor can distribute the eligible credit to any unit of the manufacturer or any premises/office

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onic credit register maintained under CGST ACT 2017.
Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law and/or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the aforesaid question(s) (i.e. applicant's view point and submissions on issues on which the advance ruling is sought),
1.1 KKC is levied as per sec 161 of the Finance Act 2016
1.2 Sec 161(5) of the Finance Act specified that for levy and collection of KKC, Chapter V of Finance Act 1994 (Service Tax) will be applicable.
1.3 Entry 92C of Union List I of Indian Constitution empowers legislature to levy service tax as provided under Chapter V of Finance Act 1994.
1.4 122nd amendment of Constitution deletes Entry 92C of Union List I, in view of implementation Of Goods and Service Tax.
1.5 It implies KKC is also subsumed in Goods and Service Tax along with service tax. In other words CGST liability under CGST Act 2017 contains liability on account of KKC as well.
1.6 Rule 3(1a) of CCR includes KKC as cenvat credit.
1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s.
As an input service distributor, company received cenvat credit at its head office. Those cenvat credit includes Krishi Kalyan Cess (KKC) as well but the company could not distribute KKC to its manufacturing units as because KKC credit could be utilised only with KKC liability and recipient entity being manufacturing entity did not have any KKC liability to set off KKC credit, resulting in accumulation of KKC credit.
In Post GST regime neither there is any specific restriction in law regarding admissibility of KKC nor there any specific provision in law regarding admissibility of KKC as input tax credit.
In view of the aforesaid facts, our question regarding admissibility of input tax credit is duly covered under clause (d) of section (2) of section 97 of CGST,/MGST Act 2017 and thus the said question is duly covered under the provision of Advance Ruling as provided under CGST/MGST Act 2017.
Submission of NIL date
2. Legislative provisions.
2.1 Sec 161 of Finance Act 2016 read

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es specified in sub-section (2), as it may consider necessary.
(5) The provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 and the rules made thereunder, including those to refunds and exemptions from tax, interest and imposition or penalty shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the levy and collection of the Krishi Kalyan Cess on taxable services, as they apply in relation to the levy and collection of tax on such taxable services under the said Chapter or the rules made thereunder, as the case may be.” (Emphasis supplied)
2.2 Deletion of entry 92C vide constitution 122nd amendment
“17. In the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution.
(a) an List I Union List, (i) for entry 84, the following entry shall be substituted namely:
“84. Duties of excise on the following goods manufactured or produced in India namely:-
(a) petroleum crude:
(b) high speed diesel:
(c) motor spirit (commonly known as petrol)
(d) natural gas
(e) aviation turbine fuel; and
(f) tobacco and tobacco

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rs conferred by section 37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) and section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, namely : –
1.  (1) These rules may be called the CENVAT Credit (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2016.
      (2) They shall come into force on 1st of June, 2016.
2. In the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, in rule 3,
(a) after sub-rule (1), the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely :-
“(1a) A provider of output service shall be allowed to take CENVAT credit of the Krishi Kalyan Cess on taxable services leviable under section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016);”;
(b) in sub-rule (4), after the ninth proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely,-
“Provided also that the Cenvat credit of any duty specified in sub-rule (1) shall not be utilised for payment of Krishi Kalyan Cess leviable under section 161 of the Fin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2) Sec 161(5) of the Finance Act specified that for levy and collection of KKC, Chapter V of Finance Act 1994 (Service Tax) will be applicable.
4.2 Entry 92C of Union List I of Indian constitution empowers legislature to levy service lax as provided under Chapter V or Finance Act 1994.
4.3 122nd amendment of Constitution deletes Entry 92C of Union List l, in view of implementation and Service Tax.
4.4 It implies is also subsumed in Goods and Service Tax along with service tax. In other words CGST liability as accrued under CGST Act, 2017 contains liability on account or KKC as well..
4.5 Rule 3(1a) of CCR includes KKC as cenvat credit.
4.6 CCR provides KKC liability could be set off with KKC credit only CGST liability subsumed KKC liability in of 122nd amendment of constitution. Therefore migrated KKC credit will be admissible to setoff with CGST liability.
4.6 Sec 140(1) allows a registered person to carry forward the CENVAT credit in return to electronic credit ledger provide

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alue of taxable service.
What about carry forward of credit of Krishi Kalyan Cess, to GST Regime?
Section 140 (1) of the GST law permits carry forward of Credit of GST regime.
Transitional provisions have been prescribed in the GST law which provids tax treatment for transitional matters like spill over transactions, transitional credits etc. It allows existing taxpayers to transfer the input tax credit available as closing balance in the existing tax returns to the GST returns. Therefore, assesses were able to transfer the closing balance of credit in respect of Central Excise duty, Service Tax, Local VAT etc. As the opening credit balance in the GST returns.
As specified in the proviso to Section 140(1) of the Act, the taxable person is allowed to carry forward the credit to the extent admissible as INPUT TAX CREDIT under GST.
Definition of Input tax as given in section 2(62) does not include any cess.
So apparently Krishi Kalyan Cess, will not be allowed to be carried forword.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ulated credit as carried forward in the Service Tax return on 30th June, 2017, we would refer to the relevant transitional provision as available in the CST Act-
140. (1) A registered person, other than a person opting to pay tax under section 10, shall be entitled to take, in his electronic credit ledger, the amount of CENVAT credit carried forward in the return relating to the period ending with the day immediately preceding the appointed day, furnished by him under the existing law in such manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that the registered person shall not be allowed to take credit in the following circumstances, namely:
(i) where the said amount of credit is not admissible as input tax credit under this Act; or
(ii) where he has not furnished all the returns required under the existing law for the period of six months immediately preceding the appointed date; or
(iii) where the said amount of credit relates to goods manufactured and cleared under such exemption noti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al Importance) Act. 1957 (58 of 1957);
(v) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001);
(vi) the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004);
(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of2007):
(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty of excise specified under clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) (vi) and (via);
(viia) the additional duty leviable under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act,
Provided that a provider of taxable service shall not be eligible to take credit of such additional duty;
(viii) the additional duty of excise leviable under section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003);
(ix) the service tax leviable under section 66 of the Finance Act'

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Thus, CENVAT credit was available in respect of KKC. However, we need to see the following amendments, too, as were brought by the aforesaid Notification No. 28/ 2016 – Central Excise (N.T.), the 26th May, 2016 –
i. in sub-rule (4), after the ninth proviso, the following proviso was inserted –
“Provided also that the Cenvat credit of any duty specified in sub-rule 1 shall not be utilised for payment of Krishi Kalyan Cess leviable under section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016);”;
ii. in sub-rule (7), after clause (c), the following clause was inserted –
“(d) Cenvat credit in respect or Krishi Kalyan Cess on taxable services leviable under section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016) shall be utilised only towards payment of Krishi Kalyan Cess on taxable services leviable under section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016)”;
It can be seen that by express provision, it was made clear that KKC would be utilised towards payment of KKC only, Further, it was express

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR. for short), credit of EC and SHE was admissible and could be utilised for payment of EC and SHE respectively. In other words. CENVAT credit on EC and SHE on inputs, capital goods and input services could be utilised and availed of for payment of EC and SHE on manufactured goods and output services. Input EC and SHE credit had the effect of preventing cascading effect on EC and SHE payable down the line. It is an accepted and admitted case that benefit of EC and SHE on inputs, etc. could not have been utilised for payment of excise duty service tax on the output, i.e, manufactured goods or taxable services Thus, cross utilization of EC and SHE towards excise duty or service tax was impermissible and not permitted.
4. EC and SHE were abolished and were not payable on excisable goods with effect from 1st March, 2015 vide Notification Nos. 14/2015-CE and 15/2015-CE both dated 1st March, 2015. EC and SHE were also abolished and ceased to be payable on taxable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

xcise duty or service tax. They were specific cesses for the objective and purpose specified……………………………………………………………………………………………………… As noticed above, in the present case, credit of EC and SHE could be only allowed against EC and SHE and could not be cross-utilized against the excise duty or service tax. In fact, what the petitioners seek is an amendment of the scheme to allow them to take cross utilization of the unutilized EC and SHE upon the two cesses being Withdrawn against excise duty and service tax, though this was not the position even earlier,”
The Hon. Court dismissed the Writ Petition. In the present case, KKC is to be utilized for payment of KKC only. Therefore, KKC cannot be treated as excise duty or service tax. in view thereof, the CENVAT credit as referred to in sub-section (1) of section 140 would not include the credit in respect of KKC. We can also see the position in respect of the Swachh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vernment may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
(2) There shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, a cess to be called the Swachh Bharat Cess, as service tax on all or any of the taxable services at the rate of two per cent. on the value of such services for the purposes of financing and promoting Swachh Bharat initiatives or for any other purpose relating thereto.
The Swachh Bharat Cess leviable under sub-section (2) shall be in addition to any cess or service lax lev table on such taxable services under Chapter of the Finance Act, 1994, or under any other law for the time being in force.
(4) The proceeds of the Swachh Bharat Cess levied under sub-section (2) shall first be credited to the Consolidated Fund of India and the Central Government may, after due appropriation made by Parliament by law in this behalf utilise such sums of money of the Swachh Bharat Cess for such purposes specified in sub-section (2), as it may consid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e in addition to any cess or service tax leviable on such taxable services under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, or under any other law for the time being in force.
 
(4) The proceeds of the Krishi Kalyan Cess levied under sub-section(2) shall first be credited to the Consolidated Fund of India and the Central Government may, after due appropriation made by Parliament by law in this behalf utilise such sums of money of the Krishi Kalyan Cess for such purposes specified in sub-section (2), as it may consider necessary.
(5) The provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 and the rules made thereunder, including those relating to refunds and exemptions from tax, interest and imposition of penalty shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the levy and collection Of the Krishi Kalyan Cess on taxable services, as they apply in relation to the levy and collection of tax on such taxable services under the said Chapter or the rules made thereunder, as the case be.
As can b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Ramesh Chand Kannu Mal Versus State Of Up And 2 Others

M/s Ramesh Chand Kannu Mal Versus State Of Up And 2 Others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 761 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 168 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-4-2018
WRIT TAX No. – 583 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari and Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,JJ.
For the Petitioner :- Nishant Mishra
JUDGEMENT
(Per: Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, J.)
1. Heard Sri Nishant Mishra assisted by Sri Vipin Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, writ petition is finally disposed of without calling the counter affidavit.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief;
A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned seizure order dated 28.03.2018 and consequential notice dated 28.03.2018. (Annexure-1 & 2) passed by respondent no.3
B. Issue a writ, order

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lue of the goods to the tune of Rs. 3,51,450/- on which Integrated Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred as 'the IGST') @ 18% has been charged to the tune of Rs. 63,262/-. Since the petitioner's firm is situated in District Faridabad, State of Haryana, it generated e-way bill prescribed under Central Goods and Service Tax, Rules (hereinafter referred as the 'CGST') after uploading of the relevant details of the aforesaid transactions. The said e-way bill has been downloaded from the official portal on 24.03.2018. The said e-way bill indicates the time and the date of generation as 24.03.2018 at 8.38 P.M. giving all requisite details therein. The said goods were booked for transportation from Faridabad to Haridwar  through a transporter namely DEV Transporter, Muzaffar Nagar against goods receipt (GR) no. 241 dated 24.03.2018. The aforesaid goods are loaded at Faridabad and transported through truck no. U.P.-12AT-1460.
6. Learned counsel for the petitione

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er dated 28.03.2018 by which he has seized the goods as well as vehicle on the ground that the goods were being transported from outside the state of U.P. without the Transit Declaration Form, which is in violation of provision of UPGST Act. The respondent no.3, in pursuance to the seizure order, has issued a show cause notice dated 28.03.2018 under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act directing the petitioner to appear before him on 04.04.2018 and to explain as to why tax @ 18% amounting to Rs. 63,262/- and equivalent amount of penalty may not be imposed.
9. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no requirement for generation or downloading of the Transit Declaration Form-I for the goods crossing/passing through the State of U.P. He has further submitted that since the TDF-I is not required under the law, the seizure of goods and the vehicle on the ground of non availability of TDF-I is wholly illegal and without jurisdiction.
10. It is further submitted that in e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n Form TDF-02
 
11. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a process for initiation of a new indirect taxation regime was put into motion by the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act 2016 dated 8.9.2016 by which Articles 246-A, 269-A, 279-A and other provisions of the Constitution were amended. As per the amended Article 269-A, which pertains to levy and collection of Goods and Services Tax in the course of inter-state trade or commerce such tax shall be levied and collected by the Government of India and such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as may be provided by Parliament by law on the recommendations of the Goods and Service Tax council. Import within the territory of India was included within the meaning of the term “Inter-State Trade or Commerce” and in respect of it tax, as aforesaid, would be levied and collected by the Government of India.
12. In pursuance to the aforesaid 101st Amendment of the Constitution three enac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act are authorized to be the proper officers for the purposes of the said Act, subject to such exceptions and conditions as the Government shall, on the recommendations of the Council by notification, specify. Similarly for enforcement of CGST Act 2017 by virtue of section 6 thereof State Authorities under UPGST Act 2017 are also empowered to enforce CGST Act 2017.
15. It is also not in dispute that by virtue of section 20(xv) of the ''IGST Act, 2017' the provisions of ''CGST Act, 2017' apply in respect of matters covered by the IGST Act, 2017 on the subject of inspection, search, seizure and arrest. Chapter XIV of the CGST Act, 2017 deals with inspection, search, seizure and arrest. While section 67 of CGST Act, 2017 deals with the power of inspection, search and seizure, section 68 deals with inspection of goods in movement and it is this provision with which we are primarily

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ay be specified, are such, as may be prescribed. Now this prescription has been made under Rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017 which reads as under:
“138. E-way rule.-Till such time as an E-way bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government may, by notification, specify the documents that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage.”
17. As would be evident from a reading of the aforesaid rule, it refers to an E-way bill System which is to be developed by the GST Council and it provides for an interim arrangement by the Government till an E-way Bill System is so developed and approved. The words “Government” used therein is defined in Section 2(53) of CGST Act, 2017 to mean the “Central Government”. It is not in dispute that on the date of interception of the vehicle in question E-way Bill System had not been developed, therefore, the documents which were required to be ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

way Bill system was to come into force from 1.2.2018, but, the notification dated 29th December 2017 was rescinded by a subsequent notification dated 2.2.2018. Thereafter the notification dated 7th March 2018 has been issued regarding E-way Bill System.
18. Thus, E-way bill system has been prescribed only recently by a notification of the Government of India dated 7th March, 2018 whereby Rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017 has been amended and other Rules have been incorporated in this regard. These amendments are to come into force from a date to be specified by the Central Government which is specified w.e.f. 01.04.2018.
19. Be that as it may, the fact of the matter is that on the date of incident i.e. 24.03.2018 neither there was any E-way Bill System nor any notification by the Central Government under Rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017 requiring the carrying of a TDF Form or any other such document in the course of inter-State supply/movement of goods, as such, the very basis for pas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

' the Central Government'. Moreover, with respect to Goods and Service Tax in relation to inter-State Trade the Parliament alone has the authority to legislate as would be evident from the 101st Amendment to the Constitution.
21. In this view of the matter, we are of the considered view that on the relevant date i.e. 24.03.2018, there was no requirement of carrying TDF Form-1 in the case of an inter-State supply of goods. In fact on the relevant date there was no prescription of the documents to be carried in this regard under Rule 138 of the CGST Act, 2017, accordingly, the seizure and penalty imposed upon the petitioners based on the notification dated 21.7.2017 issued under Rule 138 of the UPGST Act 2017, which was not applicable, is clearly illegal.
22. Cross-empowerment under section 4 of IGST Act, 2017 and section 6 of CGST Act, 2017 merely means that State Authorities empowered under the UPGST Act, 2017 can also enforce the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 or IGST Act, 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed by the State Government under Rule 138 of the Rules made under the UPGST Act 2017, was required to be carried, which is not the requirement in law. For this very reason, the judgment dated 29.1.2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Tax No.95 of 2018 does not apply to the instant case, as the challenge therein was to the very power of the State Authorities under UPGST Act, 2017 to seize goods involved in inter-state supply. Here the question is whether petitioner was required to carry TDF Form I or not, which we have answered in the negative.
24. As regards the provisions of Section 129 UPGST Act, 2017 under which the impugned action has been taken, the same is not applicable to an inter-State trade or commerce. By virtue of Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017, it is section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 that would apply, but this is not the ground on which we are invalidating the impugned action, as, if it is traceable to the aforesaid provision of CGST Act, 2017 which is pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ld take me through the provisions of the IGST Act, CGST Act and SGST Act and in particular, the provisions of Section 4 and Section 20 of the IGST Act and Section 6 of the CGST Act read with Rule 138 of the CGST Rules as amended by notification No.27/2017 – Central Tax for the purposes of pointing out that, although the power to prescribe the documents that are to accompany the transportation of goods in the course of interstate trade is conferred on the Central Government, the Central Government has, till date, not notified the documents that have to be carried by a transporter of the goods in the course of interstate movement. Under the said circumstances, and finding that neither the State Legislature nor the State Government would have the power to make laws/rules to govern interstate movement of goods in the course of trade, and for the purposes of levy of tax, I am of the view that detention in Ext.P.5, for the sole reason that the transportation was not accompanied by the prescr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

early inapplicable for the reasons already mentioned earlier. There was no intent to evade tax.
27. The contention of Sri Nishant Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners was that the transaction was one of inter-State supply of goods, therefore, it was covered by the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and as per section 20 (xv) thereof, in matters of inspection, search, seizure and arrest, provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were applicable. As per section 68 of the CGST Act, 2017, inter alia, Government may require, the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding such amount as may be specified, to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed. This prescription is contained in Rule 138 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, but, no notification had been issued by the Central Government under the said rule specifying the documents that a person in charge of a conveyance carr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t jurisdiction.
29. According to the counsel for the petitioner, the Commissioner of State Tax has no power to issue the circular in exercise of power under Section 168 of the Act. The Commissioner, therefore, cannot issue circular and directions which are not in consonance with the Act and Rule or the notifications. He has further submitted that the Commissioner is not expected to perform the legislature function and issue the instruction or the circular on something contrary to the provision which are available in the Act or Rule.
30. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, has submitted that the Commissioner by way of circular dated 06.02.2018 usurped the rule making power of the legislature. It is further submitted that the circular issued by the Commissioner cannot revive the notification. In the present case the Notification no. 1014 dated 21.07.2017 which was already amended by another notification No. 1359 dated 20.09.2017 has no legal value. The counsel for the petiti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

requiring of downloading of TDF-I. He has also submitted that the order of seizure and issuance of the notice under Sections 129(1) and 129(3) respectively are issued with full authority of law by the respondent no.3 and are in accordance with law.
33. We find no substance in the submission of learned counsel for the State.
34. We noticed that the notification dated 21.07.2017 has already been amended by the notification No. 1359 dated 20.09.2017 and on account of aforesaid amendment, the UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules, 2017 was introduced and made effective with effect from 01.02.2018 vide notification No.138 dated 30.01.2018, therefore, in our opinion, the initial notification no.1014 by which e-way bill-01, e-way bill-02, e-way bill-03 and TDF (Transit Declaration Form)  was introduced stands rescinded.
35. We are in agreement with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that with effect from 01.02.2018 there was no requirement to download the Transit Declaration

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. CERA SANITARYWARE LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA

M/s. CERA SANITARYWARE LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1390 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – TMI
GUJARAT HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-4-2018
R/Special Civil Application No. 5212 of 2018
GST
MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. B.N. KARIA, JJ.
For The PETITIONER : Mr ANAND NAINAWATI(5970)
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
At the cross over to GST regime, the petitioner as a trader had un-utilized input tax credit. Section 140 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 permits availing of such tax credit; subject to conditions that may be prescribed. Rule 117 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017 lays down procedure and conditions, subject to which such credit would be available. Sub-rule [1] ther

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =