Refund against export of goods on payment of IGST

Refund against export of goods on payment of IGST
Query (Issue) Started By: – MohanLal tiwari Dated:- 10-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 12-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
Please advise whether the refund of IGST paid against export of goods can be approved & sanctioned by jurisdictional Dy Commissioner.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, No, the Shipping Bill it self is an application of refund, therefore, the Customs Authority of the port of export can approve & sanctioned. The details filed in Table 6 (exports) will be transmitted to the respective port and the Customs Authority at the port will verify in case of any errors or else the refund will be sanctioned without any human interface.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Affirms GST on One-Time Premium for 60-Year Leases, Declaring It Constitutionally Valid and Lawful.

High Court Affirms GST on One-Time Premium for 60-Year Leases, Declaring It Constitutionally Valid and Lawful.
Case-Laws
GST
Constitutional validity of GST on long term lease premium (60 year

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

E way Bill Issuance

E way Bill Issuance
Query (Issue) Started By: – Rakesh Srivastava Dated:- 10-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
I need to issue e way bill against an import shipment received through courier which got stuck at port due to some reasons, the Bill of Entry date is 03-10-2017 where as the shipment got cleared dt. 09-04-2018. While generating eway bill plz tell me which date to metion on the e way as the BOE Date is too old & the system is tak

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Roll-out of e-Way Bill system for Intra-State movement of goods in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh from 15th April, 2018

Roll-out of e-Way Bill system for Intra-State movement of goods in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh from 15th April, 2018
GST
Dated:- 10-4-2018

As per the decision of GST Council, e-Way Bill system for all inter-State movement of goods has been rolled-out from 01stApril, 2018. E-way Bill system for Intra-State movement of goods in the State of Karnataka is also operational from the said date. E-Way Bills are getting generated successfully a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST COMPLIANCES REQUIRING ATTENTION NOW

GST COMPLIANCES REQUIRING ATTENTION NOW
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 10-4-2018

31st March, 2018 marks the end of Financial Year 2017-18, first fiscal year of GST and last year of service tax. This is also the transitional year for migration and as such crucial for taxpayers to migrate balances and tax credits fully but accurately. This calls for due diligence and careful closing of financial books of accounts.
Here are few action points in the new financial year for immediate compliance under GST in April, 2018 for the new Financial Year 2018-19.
Annual Reconciliation of Books and GST returns
For this, assessees are required to reconcile the sale ledger/ GST liability / cash ledger/ credit ledger as per books of accounts and as per GST returns. Further, in case there is any difference, then company is required to take the effect of the same in March, 2018, GSTR 3B and GSTR 1.
New Invoice Series
A registered person may develop the n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ction 16(2) of CGST Act, 2017. If the payment is not made, the credit taken on that invoice must be reversed. And whenever such payment is made credit may be taken then. By this logic, invoices issued before 1st October, 2017 must have been paid by 31st March, 2018. If not, you'll have to reverse the input credit claimed. This requires proper ageing analysis of outstanding debtors and creditors.
* Filing of TRAN 2 for the period July, 2017 to December, 2017 has been extended to be filed by 30th June, 2018. Earlier, it was to be filed by 31st March, 2018.
* In the past, there have been many instances and complaints that assessees were not able to file TRAN-1 which was required to carry forward balances of input credit pertaining to old tax regime (excise, service tax, VAT) due to technical snags. There were many writ petitions filed across the country and various high courts directed the Government to allow further opportunity to the tax payers who could not file TRAN-1. [M/s. Ariha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not be allowed to amend the amount of credit in TRAN-1 during this process vis-à-vis the amount of credit which was recorded by the taxpayer in the TRAN-1, which could not be filed.
* The taxpayers are allowed to complete the process of filing of TRAN 1 stuck due to IT glitches, as discussed above, by 30th April 2018 and the process of completing filing of GSTR 3B which could not be filed for such TRAN 1 shall be completed by 31st May 2018.
It may be noted that this extention is not for all taxpayers who did not file TRAN-1 but only for those who attempted to file but were not successful. This will be verified from GSTN audit trail.
Application / Renewal of LUT
Exporters making zero rates supplies have to furnish an LUT to the jurisdictional commissioner. An LUT is valid for one financial year. Therefore, LUT tendered in FY 2017-18 was valid until 31st March, 2018 only. Exporters who wish to continue to export under LUT need to submit a fresh LUT for FY 2018-19 to have thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e been rejected ab initio.
Thus, LUT will be deemed to be accepted as soon as ARN is generated and no documents need to be submitted in physical form to the tax office.
Use of E-way Bills
1st April has become a land mark date in the GST journey, as it marks the advent of e-way bills in the country under the GST regime, a tool to check tax evasion and bring in operational efficiency so far as taxpayers and logistics management is concerned.
Date of Introduction of e-way bills is 1st April, 2018 for inter-state movement of goods.
Every registered person who causes movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees (including tax)-
* in relation to supply, or
* for the reasons other than supply, or
* due to inward supply from unregistered person,
shall require to furnish an e-way bill. No e-way bill is required if the value of the goods in an individual consignment is less than ₹ 50,000/- even if the total value of all such consignments in a single c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rticulars
To whom applicable
Period
Due date
GSTR-1
(Monthly)
Taxpayers with annual aggregate turnover more than ₹ 1.5 crore
Feb 2018
10.04.2018
GSTR 4
Composition dealers
Jan – Mar 2018
18.04.2018
GST Payment
All taxpayers
March 2018
20.04.2018
FORM 3B
All taxpayers
March 2018
20.04.2018
GSTR 5
Non-resident taxable persons
March 2018
20.04.2018
GSTR 5A
Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval (OIDAR)
March 2018
20.04.2018
GSTR 1
Taxpayers with annual aggregate turnover upto ₹ 1.5 crore
Jan – Mar 2018
30.04.2018
TRAN 1
Taxpayers who failed to file TRAN 1 due to IT glitches
30.04.2018
Now that most of the returns will be filed in next three months, it appears that another major GST reforms / amendments may take place w.e.f. July, 2018, when it completes first year of levy of GST in the country. GST Council has had 26 meetings so far and yet lot of issues have to be ironed out, the most crucial being technical interface.
Account

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Torque Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Up And 2 Others

M/s Torque Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Up And 2 Others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 75 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 119 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 10-4-2018
Writ Tax No. 610 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Vipin Kumar Kushwaha, Nishant Mishra
For the Respondent : C.S.C.
ORDER
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the seizure order passed by the respondent no. 3 dated 30.03.2018 and the notice dated 30.03.2018 issued under Section 191(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017. The petitioner is having its registered office in Chandigarh and branch office at Gorakhpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner company is engaged in manufacturing of medicines and mineral water and its manufacturing unit is situated at Derabas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e stock transfer invoice dated 21.3.2018 and 24.3.2018 and the same were booked after paying the IGST from Derabassi unit situated in Punjab and the goods are brought at transporters office at Chandigarh and thereafter E-Way Bill, prescribed under the CGST Rules, had been downloaded in which the vehicle number as well as other details were duly mentioned for the transportation of the goods from the manufacturing unit up to Chandigarh Transport Nagar. At Chandigarh the goods are loaded in another vehicle being Truck No. HR 46 B-9022 for the transportation from Chandigarh to Gorakhpur.
The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner has also generated E-Way Bill prescribed under the UPGST Rules for all the three transactions, against the aforesaid three invoices, by mentioning all the relevant details with relation to the transactions in question.
The contention of the petitioner is that since the movement of goods from Baddi to Gorakhpur and also from Derabassi to Gorakhpur, w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ound for seizing the goods and vehicle is taken by the respondent no. 3 that the E-Way Bills -01 relating to the petitioner, the vehicle numbers are hand written whereas E-Way Bill -01 was not used in respect of other goods which is allegedly not related to the petitioner.
A show cause notice was also issued under Section 129(3) of the Act by which the respondent no. 3 has directed the petitioner and owner of the other goods to appear and file their explanation by 04.04.2018 and has indicated in the said notice that as to why there is a difference of IGST in two different invoices.
The petitioner appeared and has filed reply, explaining the reasons for both ground namely as to why the vehicle numbers are hand written as well as with regard to objection of other item it is clearly stated that the petitioner is not at all related with the goods nor the same belongs to the petitioner.
The respondent no. 3 has not accepted the reply as such has insisted for bank guarantee for release of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

garh and therefore the goods were firstly unloaded from the vehicles at Chandighar and were loaded in another vehicle at Chandigarh for their onwards journey.
In the said background the E-Way Bill which has been issued initiatlly when the goods/vehicle started its journey from Himanchal Pradesh/Punjab by mentioning the vehicle number in the E-Way Bill but after reloading in another vehicle at Chandigarh since the official portal was not permitting to mention the details of two transport vehicles, the registration number of the second transport vehicle has been mentioned by hand.
We find no irregularity at the hands of the petitioner or the transport company and in such peculiar circumstances the petitioner has no option but to mention the details of the subsequent vehicle by hand. We further noticed that the tax has been charged while issuing the stock transfer invoices at the prescribed rate, however, if there is any short fall of the tax, it would be open to the concern GST Authori

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Action Construction Equipment Limited

In Re : Action Construction Equipment Limited
GST
2018 (7) TMI 1420 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – HARYANA – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 103 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – HARYANA – AAR
Dated:- 10-4-2018
ADVANCE RULING NO. /HAR/HAAR/R/2017/18/5
GST
Sangeeta Karmakar (Member)  and Vijay Kumar Singh (Member)
Sh Rajan Luthra, CFO and Sh Deepak Bhardwaj Sr. Manager (Indirect Taxation) for the Appellant.
RULING
The applicant has submitted that they are manufacturer of Cranes, Backhoe Loaders, forklifts. Motor Graders, Compactors, Tower Cranes, Tractors, Harvesters, etc. The applicant raised the question of correct classification of one of their product namely Truck Mounted Cranes (TMC). The applicant submitted that they buy readymade trucks, say, Ashok Leyland, TATA, etc., and on these trucks they manufacture cranes which are mounted/fixed on these trucks. These cranes have lifting capacity of 20 tonnes, 25 tonnes, 40 tonnes, etc. These cranes are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n lorries, cranes, lorries, fire fighting vehicles, concrete-mixtures lorries, spraying lorries, mobile workshop, mobile radiological units).
As per the report of the concerned assessing authority, the dealer either purchases trucks or are provided by the customers themselves, Cranes are manufactured by the dealer and are mounted/fixed on the trucks. The final product i.e. truck mounted cranes are used for unloading and loading of heavy material. It is a special purpose vehicle (crane lorry) which is engaged in lifting/loading/unloading of heavy loads. However, the Product “Truck Mounted Crane” has got a specific mention in Entry no. 8426 as “Works Trucks fitted with a crane”.
Records, of personal hearing – 2nd Proviso to Section 98(2) of CGST/HGST Act, 2017
3. Personal hearing in the instant case was conducted on 09.04.18, which was attended by Sh Rajan Luthra , CFO and Sh Deepak Bhardwaj, Sr Manager( Indirect Taxation). He reiterated the submissions made in their application for a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r
u
7.50%

84262000

Tower cranes
u
7.50%

84263000

Portal or pedestal jib cranes
u
7.50%

 

Other machinery, self-propelled :
 
 
 
84264100

On tyres
u
7.50%

84264900

Other
u
7.50%

 

Other machinery :
 
 
 
84269100

Designed for mounting on road vehicles
u
7.50%

842699

Other :
 
 
 
84269910

Ropeway and telphers
u
7.50%

84269990

Other
u
7.50%

8705 SPECIAL PURPOSE MOTOR VEHICLES, OTHER THAN THOSE PRINCIPALLY DESIGNED FOR THE TRANSPORT OF PERSONS OR GOODS (FOR EXAMPLE, BREAKDOWN LORRIES, CRANE LORRIES, FIRE FIGHTING VEHICLES, CONCRETE-MIXERS LORRIES, SPRAYING LORRIES, MOBILE WORKSHOPS, MOBILE RADIOLOGICAL UNITS)
87051000

Crane lorries
u
10%

87052000

Mobile drilling derricks
u
10%

87053000

Fire fighting vehicles
u
10%

87054000

Concrete-mixer lorries
u
10%

87059000

Other
u
10%

5. From

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

426, it is necessary that the truck which is being used to mount the crane must be “works truck” Whereas, works trucks are specifically covered under heading 8709
8709 – WORKS TRUCKS, SELF-PROPELLED, NOT FITTED WITH LIFTING OR HANDLING EQUIPMENT, OF THE TYPE USED IN FACTORIES, WAREHOUSES, DOCK AREAS OR AIRPORTS FOR SHORT DISTANCE TRANSPORT OF GOODS.
Thus, it is evident that when the works truck is not fitted with lifting of handling equipment such as crane, it merits classification under chapter heading 8709. However, when it is fitted with crane, it merits classification under heading 8426. Whereas, in their application, the applicant has submitted that they buy readymade trucks say Ashok Leyland, TATA, etc. Such Trucks and Lorries which are meant for transport of goods are covered under chapter heading 8704. Accordingly, classification of the impugned goods under heading 8426 is ruled out, as because the trucks being purchased/used by the applicant for manufacturing truck mounted c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the following mechanical features : propelling engine, gear-box and controls for gear-changing, and steering and braking facilities. Such assemblies fall to be classified in Heading 87.05 as special purpose motor vehicles, whether the lifting or handling machine is simply mounted on the vehicle or forms an integral mechanical unit with it, unless they are vehicles designed essentially for transport purposes falling in Heading 87.04.”
The Hon'ble Tribunal further observed that the above explanatory note providing exclusion from the Heading 84.26 supports the department's view that the impugned goods cannot be classified under Heading 8426 but under Heading 8705 as a special purpose motor vehicle; that the crane lorry and other such special purpose vehicles are included under Heading 8705 vide the explanatory note thereunder.
8. As regards the dependency on HSN explanatory notes, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of LML ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs 2010(258)E.LT.321(S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal

Setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal
Trade Notice No. 07/2018 Dated:- 10-4-2018 Nagaland SGST
GST – States
Government of India,
Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue
Office of the Chief Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax & Customs
Crescens Building, M.G. Road Shillong-793001, Tel.Nos. 91-0364-2500131/2502052.
Fax Nos. 91-0364-2224747/2502047, Email: cchillo@excise.nic.in
Trade Notice No. 07/2018
Dated, Shillong the 10th April, 2018
Sub: Setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal-reg.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs [CBIC] has issued a Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST dated 3rd April, 2018 for the Trade and as well as all concerned regarding setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal.
It has be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n.
3. Scope
Problems which are proposed to be addressed through this mechanism would essentially be those which relate to Common Portal (GST Portal) and affect a large section of taxpayers. Where the problem relates to individual taxpayer, due to localised issues such as non-availability of internet connectivity or failure of power supply, this mechanism shall not be available.
4. IT-Grievance Redressal Committee
Any issue which needs to be addressed through this mechanism shall be identified by GSTN and the method of resolution approved by the GST Implementation Committee (GIC) which shall act as the IT Grievance Redressal Committee. In GIC meetings convened to address IT issues or IT glitches, the CEO, GSTN and the DG (Systems), CBIC shall participate in these meetings as special invitees.
5. Nodal officers and identification of issues
5.1 GSTN, Central and State government would appoint nodal officers in requisite number to address the problem a taxpayer faces due to glitches,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iat shall obtain inputs of the Law Committee, where necessary, on the proposal of the GSTN and call meeting of GIC to examine the proposal and take decision thereon.
6.2 The committee shall examine and approve the suggested solution with such modifications as may be necessary.
6.3 IT-Grievance Redressal Committee may give directions as necessary to GSTN and field formations of the tax administrations for implementation of the decision.
7. Legal issues
7.1 Where an IT related glitch has been identified as the reason for failure of a taxpayer in filing of a return or form prescribed in the law, the consequential fine and penalty would also be required to be waived. GST Council has delegated the power to the IT Grievance Redressal Committee to recommend waiver of fine or penalty, in case of an emergency, to the Government in tern-ns of section 128 of the CGST Act, 2017 under such mitigating circumstances as are identified by the committee. All such notifications waiving fine or penalt

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ified taxpayers shall be allowed to complete the process of filing TRAN-1.
8.2 The taxpayer shall not be allowed to amend the amount of credit in TRAN-1 during this process vis-a-vis the amount of credit which was recorded by the taxpayer in the TRAN-1, could not be filed. If needed, GSTN may request field formations of Centre and State to collect additional document/ data etc. or verify the same to identify taxpayers who should be allowed this procedure.
8.3 GSTN shall communicate directly with the taxpayers in this regard and submit a final report to GIC about the number of TRAN-1s filed and submitted through this process.
8.4 The taxpayers shall complete the process of filing of TRAN 1 stuck due to IT glitches, as discussed above, by 30th April 2018 and the process of completing filing of GSTR 3B which could not be filed for such TRAN 1 shall be completed by 31st May 2018.
9. The decisions of the Hon'ble High Courts of Allahabad, Bombay etc., where no case specific decision

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

refund of unutilized ITC under GST after export under LUT

refund of unutilized ITC under GST after export under LUT
Query (Issue) Started By: – BalKrishan Rakheja Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 4-6-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 11 Replies
GST
After exporting the goods under LUT and claimed refund for untilized ITC. As per formula refund amount comes to Rs. 50 Lacs but credit ledger balance at the end of the tax period (month in which the export took place) is ₹ 10 lacs only. Which amount I am eligible for refund of ITC, however as on today the credit ledger balance is ₹ 80 Lacs
Reply By YAGAY AND SUN:
The Reply:
As per Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person may claim refund of unutilised input tax credit at the end of any tax period. A tax period is the period for which return is required to be furnished.
Refund of unutilised input tax credit is allowed only in following two cases:
a) Zero rated supplies made without payment of tax
b) Inverted duty structure
Reply By Harshal Fifadr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cannot spread across different financial years.
However, to be honest, I am not be to understand para 11.2. I request our experts to please clarify the issue that how to club and how to file the refund for quarters, as online it is for the month only.
Reply By BalKrishan Rakheja:
The Reply:
Thanks Harshal ji. I also agree with your views.
Reply By BalKrishan Rakheja:
The Reply:
Thanks Alkesh Jani ji for your valuable information. But my querry is still unanswered regarding for which amount I am eligible for refund. Please give your valuable advise.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir, you are requested to furnish the figures as per formula, than only proper reply can be given by our experts. However, if we think logically, the refund may be equal to or less than the input tax of value of exported goods. For example, if goods exported valued for ₹ 100/- than refund shall be ₹ 18/- or less.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Querist,
Rs.10 lacs is correct a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d not in next financial year(s) and onward. You should claim refund against export within one year. Cycle of one year has to be monitored to claim the whole due amount.
Reply By BalKrishan Rakheja:
The Reply:
Thanks Sethi ji. I am fully agreed with your views.
Reply By rohit patodi:
The Reply:
what would be my adjusted turnover and net ITC in case of refund of input tax credit availed on inputs in case of exporters. For eg., an exporter has exported goods on LUT worth rs 2500000 in July period and in the same period he has done taxable sale within state worth rs 500000 and tax is ₹ 12500 cgst and sgst. So Total sale would be 3000000 rs. He has total input on purchases amounting to ₹ 150000 cgst and sgst. Thus input left at the end of the tax period at the end of the month is 150000-12500 i.e 137500.
In this case, how can I calculate adjusted turnover and net ITC?
Reply By SUDHANSHU JOSHI:
The Reply:
6 Dated: 12-4-2018
By:- Alkesh Jani
Sir, you are requested to f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Trading with assembling

Trading with assembling
Query (Issue) Started By: – Mira choksi Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 1-3-2019 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
i am trading in Led lights
and also assemble led lights from raw materials purchased (Led,battery,housing etc)
assembling on small scale.
while registering for GST nature of business activity Mfg or trading …….i select what..?
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Sir/Madam, In my point of the assembling amounts to manufacturi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST for individual house construction

GST for individual house construction
Query (Issue) Started By: – Preeti Preeti Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 13-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
I have to construct residential house in my plot, I am hiering an construction company( architectural plan +materials+construction)
Can anybody clarify about for what and all should I pay the GST for, and should I pay the double times GST to the construction company for materials as they would have already paid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification about Export Refund under GST

Clarification about Export Refund under GST
Query (Issue) Started By: – venkatachalapathy parameshwaran Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 1 Reply
GST
Hi Madam,
This is venkatachalapathy.p from Tirupur in Tamilnadu. I request you to please clarify about the export refund for the following situation:
The Central Government has introduced ROSL (Rebate on State Levy). The condition of the Scheme is When the dealer avail the ROSL they cannot a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund claim against export of goods on payment of IGST

Refund claim against export of goods on payment of IGST
Query (Issue) Started By: – MohanLal tiwari Dated:- 9-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 4-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear experts,
We are exporting goods on payment of IGST but since July'17, we have not received any single refund, kindly advise if –
1. In ICEGATE portal, under the head IGST inquiry, all our export bills and shipping details are available.
2. But under Validation by ICEGATE, it is showi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Government and GST Software: A Unified Approach to Facilitate E-way Bill

The Government and GST Software: A Unified Approach to Facilitate E-way Bill
By: – Priya Sharma
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 9-4-2018

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) is the backbone of the new taxation regime. It has been five years since the GSTN got launched. However, the taxpayers have been complaining about the taxation network as the compliance with GST has been extremely painful for the taxpayers and especially the MSMEs. And the recent technological glitch that resulted in the failed implementation of GST e-way bill worsen the situation. Hence, the government has taken some serious measures in order to help the taxpayers, simplify taxation processes, most importantly the e-way billing system.
The ch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ime. Making the process easier demands input of every entity associated with it, whether directly or indirectly. The entire network of accountants, GST Suvidha providers, and GST software providers are required to sync to develop a time-effective return filing process. Just because the network of all these entities is extremely vast, the shortage of time is hindering the revamp to be smooth and result-oriented.
The safety of data
Amidst all the hassle of return filing and ITC claims under GST, the taxpayer couldn't pay attention to the safety processes of the data. To ensure that the data of the taxpayers is free from any kind of breach, the government has kept the entire data-retrieving process encrypted. As per the government, only two

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ernment assures that nothing is left out. This time the NIC (National Informatics Center) played a vital role in the revamp. The bill is not only developed for inter-state movements, but also tested multiple times to assure success. With the re-implementation of the bill, the government assures 75 lakh bills in a day irrespective of the earlier limit of 26 lakh bills.
What is an e-way bill?
However, the re-roll-out of e-way will resume the billing process and thus the government would also easily analyze the tax evasion measure, if any, in the transportation of the goods and services. An e-way bill is an electronic document that is provided to every vehicle carrying either goods or services or both from one place to another. That bill, c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Akansha Hair & Skin Care Herbal Unit Pvt. Ltd.

In Re : Akansha Hair & Skin Care Herbal Unit Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (4) TMI 811 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 214 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 63 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL – AAR
Dated:- 9-4-2018
Case Number 01 of 2018
GST
Vishwanath Membe And Parthasarathi Dey Member
Applicant's representative heard Sri Anjan Dasgupta, Advocate & Sri P K Mukherjee, Authorised Representative
ORDER
1. The Applicant manufactures skin care preparations and wants an Advance Ruling on the Classification of 33 of its products. The Applicant declares that the question raised in this Application is not pending or decided in any proceedings under the CGST / WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter the GST Act). The officer concerned has not objected to the admission of the application. As such, the question raised is admissible for Advance Ruling under section 97 (2) (a) of the GST Act. The Application is, therefore, admitted.
2. Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ack Patch Pack
Beautifies the skin of sun-burn and black patches, ensures dazzling liveliness. Enhances glamour and beauty
Rupam
Pimple Pack
Glossy skin without pimples and rashes
Tanurima
Baby Skin Care
Fair and glossy skin for your baby
Romancho (lavender)
Body Talc
Soothing agent having anti-bacterial, anti-fungal anti-septic activity. Prevents excessive perspiration. Feeling of freshness, increases lustre of skin, gives relief from itching sensation and irritation of prickly heat, very helpful remedy in summer boils and pimples.
Romancho (Vanilla)
Body Talc
Soothing agent having anti-bacterial, anti-fungal anti-septic activity. Prevents excessive perspiration. Feeling of freshness, increases lustre of skin, gives relief from itching sensation and irritation of prickly heat, very helpful remedy in summer boils and pimples.
Romancho (Kewra)
Body Talc
Soothing agent having anti-bacterial, anti-fungal anti-septic activity. Prevents excessive perspiration

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Wash
Properly cleanses, exfoliate and moisturizes the skin. Helps for removing make-ups and sunscreen which, clog pores. Strengthens the natural protection of the skin. Instantly enhances glow and fairness. Improves the skin texture of skin and body
Nabaroop (Lemon)
Face & Body Wash
Properly cleanses, exfoliate and moisturizes the skin. Helps for removing make-ups and sunscreen which, clog pores. Strengthens the natural protection of the skin. Instantly enhances glow and fairness. Improves the skin texture of skin and body
Nabaroop (Neem)
Face & Body Wash
Properly cleanses, exfoliate and moisturizes the skin. Helps for removing make-ups and sunscreen which, clog pores. Strengthens the natural protection of the skin. Instantly enhances glow and fairness. Improves the skin texture of skin and body
Nabaroop (Orange)
Face & Body Wash
Properly cleanses, exfoliate and moisturizes the skin. Helps for removing make-ups and sunscreen which, clog pores. Strengthens the natur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

with hydrating the skin to make it glow, fresh and smooth. Helps to skin and tighten skin pores. Make skin soft and more elastic, reduces skin oilyness.
Twaka Snigdha (Rose)
Skin Toner
helps in the normal firming and toning of skin along with hydrating the skin to make it glow, fresh and smooth. Helps to skin and tighten skin pores. Make skin soft and more elastic, reduces skin oilyness.
Sukhparash
Face & Body Cream
Prevents from pimples, blemishes and skin rashes. Helps to cure minor and sunburn quantity
Namrata
Moisturizer for normal to dry skin
Helps to moisturize, soften and hydrate the skin. Prevents skin from rashes and burning sensation
Pailab
Anti-Crack cream
antibacterial & anti-septic for removal of cracked feet
Aadrita
Moisturizer for Oily skin
helps to moisturize, soften and hydrate the skin. Prevents the skin from rashes and burning sensation
Komal Parash
Baby Body Talc
Soothing agent having anti-bacterial, anti-fungal anti-septic activi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of a Mauritius based company and intended to import revitalising toner, repairing lotion, cleanser, and refining mask of 'Proactive' brand. According to the petitioner, the cleanser and the repairing lotion contain almost 2.5% Benzoyl Peroxide as an ingredient, which has immense potential to cure acne. The fourth product, namely the mask, contains 6% sulphur as an ingredient, which too has therapeutic value. The first product, namely the toner, does not contain any active ingredient for curing the disease but is used for cleansing the skin as an aid to acne treatment. The petitioner sought an Advance Ruling on commodity Classification. After that, the AAR refers to several decisions of the Apex Court that have laid down common parlance as the appropriate test for determining the meaning or connotation of words or expressions describing an article in a Tariff Schedule. According to the AAR, common parlance test is not a rigid formula capable of being applied in all situations. The test

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r. The AAR resolves the contradiction by retaining in 3304 such skin care preparations as having only incidental or subsidiary therapeutic or prophylactic value. Other skin care preparations having substantial therapeutic or prophylactic use should be treated as medicaments under heading 3004. In other words, it is not sufficient that a skin care preparation incidentally or in a small way helps in controlling skin disease. Its curative or preventive value must be substantial, and the product must be manufactured primarily to control or cure a skin-related disease. That is to say, if preparations for the care of skin contain sufficient medical ingredients to offer a cure for skin ailments, they stand excluded from the purview of 3304.
7. While discussing Note 1 to Chapter 30 in Puma Ayurvedic Herbal Pvt Ltd (supra) the Supreme Court observes, “Thus preparations falling in Chapter 33 even if they have therapeutic or prophylactic properties will not fall under Chapter 30 which deals with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lished, it cannot be placed under Chapter 30 as a Medicament.
9. The AAR's observations are primarily based on Puma Ayurvedic Herbal Pvt Ltd [2006 (196) ELT 3 (SC)]. In its written submission the Applicant also refers extensively to the above judgment, which has traversed the history of Supreme Court's observations on the related questions and issues while deciding upon the classification of the petitioner's skin care products. It has direct relevance to the Applicant's case and needs to be discussed in some detail for clarity on the legal position regarding classification of goods in the present context.
10. In Puma Ayurvedic Herbal Pvt Ltd (supra) the Court observes, “In order to determine whether a product is a cosmetic or a medicament a twin test has found favour with the Courts. The test has the approval of this Court also vide Collector Vs. Richardson Hindustan Ltd [1989(42) ELT A100 (SC)/2004 (9) SCC 156]. There is no dispute about this as even the Revenue accepts that the tes

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ommon parlance meaning and understanding is a strong factor in the determination of the classification of products. One need not resort to the scientific or technical meaning of the terms used (emphasis added). So far as the other test is concerned, the learned counsel for the appellant has placed on record material from the Ayurvedic texts or Pharmacopoeia in support of each product which is the subject matter of the present appeal to show that the ingredients of each product are independently mentioned in the Ayurvedic texts.”
11. In Puma Ayurvedic Herbal Pvt Ltd (supra) the Appellant had a license to manufacture Ayurvedic products obtained from the Drug Controller under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. All the items under appeal before the Supreme Court were produced from ingredients found in Ayurveda textbooks. They are manufactured as per the Ayurveda pharmacopoeia and had curative, therapeutic or prophylactic value. They were meant to give relief from body ailments. As such, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dgments, the Apex Court observes that the law is settled on the applicability of the twin test for determination of the classification of a product (emphasis added).
12. In its judgment dated 13/04/2009 in Baidynath Ayurved Bhawan Ltd (CA No. 4048 of 2001), the Apex Court revisited the question of the twin test for determining whether the product is an Ayurvedic Medicament or not. It observes that the twin test noticed in Puma Ayurvedic Herbal (P) Ltd continue to be relevant. The court holds that classification should be based on the popular meaning and understanding attached to such products by those using them and not the scientific and technical meaning of the terms and expressions used (emphasis added). “The approach of the consumer or user towards the product, thus, assumes significance. What is important to be seen is how the consumer looks at a product and what is his perception in respect of such product. The user's understanding is a strong factor in the determination of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

her parameters like classification in the license issued by the competent authority are relevant only in relation to and subject to the twin tests discussed above. It may be mentioned in this connection that different parameters can be used based on the purpose for the classification. The Apex Court has long settled that classification for fixing tariff should be based on how the goods are understood in common parlance in the commercial world.
14. In subhead 3004 the emphasis is on therapeutic or prophylactic uses. Even if a product is manufactured using ingredients and according to the formula prescribed in the authoritative textbooks of Ayurveda, it should not be classified as a medicament under heading 3004 unless it is meant for therapeutic or prophylactic uses. In other words, it is not sufficient that a skin care preparation, manufactured following a formula in an authoritative textbook of Ayurveda, helps in controlling skin disease. Its curative or preventive value must be subs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

xed (other than aqueous distillates and aqueous solutions of essential oils), suitable for use as goods of these headings and put up in packings with labels literature or other indications that they are for use as cosmetics or toilet preparations or put up in a form clearly specialized to such use and includes products whether or not they contain subsidiary pharmaceutical or antiseptic constituents, or are held out as having subsidiary curative or prophylactic value.' On the basis of this Note it was argued that even if a product has some curative or prophylactic value, it will still be cosmetic. We cannot accept this argument. The learned counsel has overlooked the use of the word 'subsidiary' in the said note from which it follows that a subsidiary curative or prophylactic use will not convert a cosmetic into a medicament. We have tried to illustrate this by giving the example of a bald man treating his baldness by use of the Ayurvedic product. The curative use of the product

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not mixed (other than aqueous distillates and aqueous solutions of essential oils), suitable for use as goods of these headings and put up in packings of a kind sold by retail for such use.” Note 5 to Chapter 33 of the Tariff Act does not exist anymore. It, therefore, appears that the phrase 'suitable for use as goods of these headings and put up in packings with labels literature or other indications that they are for use as cosmetics or toilet preparations (emphasis added) or put up in a form clearly specialized to such use and includes products whether or not they contain subsidiary pharmaceutical or antiseptic constituents, or are held out as having subsidiary (emphasis added) curative or prophylactic value' in Note 2 to Chapter 33 and also the Note 5 do not exist for the purpose of the GST Act.
18. Conclusions reached in Puma Ayurvedic Herbal Pvt Ltd (supra) and followed by the AAR in M/s Guthy Renker Marketing Pvt Ltd [2009 (248) ELT 932 (AAR)], based on earlier constructions of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion etc.), it is not to be classified as a medicament under heading 3004 in terms of Note 1(e) to Chapter 30, even if it has therapeutic or prophylactic properties of whatever degree.
19. It is acknowledged that nearly all proper skin care preparations have therapeutic or prophylactic properties, as they help in maintaining or improving the health of the skin. On the other hand, skin care preparations that are used as medicaments may have the effect of enhancing appearance and beauty by restoring skin health. The essential difference, therefore, lies in the user's perception of a particular product. If the user consumes the product primarily for cure from or treatment or mitigation of or for prevention of a specific skin disease or disorder, it should be treated as a medicament classifiable under heading 3004 (unless, of course, it has been specifically included under heading 3304). The effect of enhancing appearance of the skin or beauty is not what the product is offered for or used

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

abel contains indication and method of use for each of the products. They are compared with the indication as per the list provided in the application. The prescriptions and also information available in the English Transcript are taken into account wherever relevant, subject to the limitation that the CD contains only snippets of different episodes of a TV show where the users are uniformly endorsing the Applicant's products as showing good results. It is not clear whether the 'good results' relate to enhancing appearance of the skin or treatment of a disease. We are not to involve ourselves in examining efficacy of the Applicant's products. Our focus will be to ascertain from available materials what the Applicant is offering and consumer is using. A more objective way to examine it is to analyse the information contained in the labels attached to the product when offered in retail set up. The information provided on the labels may be considered as written communication from the manu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cts are either already specified under heading 3304 (like talcum powder, sunscreen, moisturising lotion etc.) and, therefore, cannot be considered for inclusion under heading 3004. The remaining products mentioned in the list submitted by them are not offered primarily as medicaments and, therefore, not to be included under heading 3004.
In view of the foregoing we rule as under
RULING
1. Preparations for the care of the skin namely, Rupam (Pimple Pack) and Pailab (Anti-Crack Cream), in the list submitted by the Applicant of the Application are classifiable as Medicament under heading 3004 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Preparations listed as Swarnajyoti, Sunayana and Tarumitra-60 have not yet come into existence, and, therefore, no rulings are pronounced on their classification. The remaining products mentioned in the list submitted by them are not offered primarily as medicaments and, therefore, not to be included under heading 3004.
This ruling is valid subject to the provisio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Sika India Pvt Ltd

In Re : Sika India Pvt Ltd
GST
2018 (4) TMI 812 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL – 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 400 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 61 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING , WEST BENGAL – AAR
Dated:- 9-4-2018
Case Number 03 of 2018
GST
Partha Sarathi Dey Member And Vishwanath Member
Sri Partha Pratim Mukhopadhyay, Assistant Manager ( Accounts )
ORDER
1. The Applicant states that the proper HSN of its manufactured product “SIKA Block Joining Mortar” is 3824 50 90. The Applicant himself, however, has classified the product under HSN 3214 90 10 while filing returns under the Excise Act. Advance Ruling is sought on this issue uunder section 97 (2) (a) & (e) of the CGST / WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “GST Act”).
2. The Applicant also declares that the question raised in the Application is not pending or decided in any proceeding under any provision of the GST Act. The concerned officer has not conveyed any objection to admiss

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(hereinafter CESTAT), Delhi. The Applicant also produced an order dated 28/07/2017 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) CGST & Customs, Goa, disposing appeal case no GOA-EXCUS-000-APP-059-2017-18. The written submissions also refer to order dated 30/10/2001 passed by the Customs Excise & Gold Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter the CEGAT), Mumbai, in Roofit Industries Ltd [2002 (149) ELT 541] and also order dated 10/04/2017 of Commissioner of Sales Tax, West Bengal, passed in case no. 24X/PRO/VAT/16/303 in the matter of M/s UAL Industries Ltd.
5. In its above order, the CESTAT remands the matter to the departmental authority with direction to carefully examine the claim of the appellant (i.e. M/s Sika India Pvt Ltd) for classification of its products under subhead 3824 keeping in mind the views of the CESTAT in the above order. The views of the CESTAT are that most of the construction chemicals manufactured by the appellant that are in the nature of cement, grout, repair mortar, repair concr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ementitious mortar modified with polymers. It is available in powdered form in 30 kg bags. It needs to be mixed thoroughly with water before applying a thin uniform layer of the paste to cleaned and levelled surface of the masonry units (AAC blocks, fly ash brick etc.) using trowel. The next masonry unit is to be gently pressed and get jointed and so on [Source: the datasheet presented by the Applicant and also the information available in the Applicant's website]. It is, therefore, a bonding compound used for joining masonry units like AAC blocks and fly ash bricks. It is a powder made pasty before use by adding water, and it hardens after application, enabling joining of the masonry units. It is applied with a trowel after cleaning the surface.
10. We will now discuss the classification options. Heading 3214 of the Tariff Act covers “GLAZIERS' PUTTY, GRAFTING PUTTY, RESIN CEMENTS,CAULKING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER MASTICS; PAINTERS' FILLINGS; NON-REFRACTORY SURFACING PREPARATIONS FOR FACA

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ch harden after application. Some of them are solid or in powdered form made pasty at the time of use by heating or by addition of a liquid like water. They are usually applied with a caulking gun, a spatula, a trowel or similar tools.
Products under HSN 3214 10 00 are preparations mainly used to stop , seal, or caulk cracks, and, in certain cases bond or firmly join components together. They are distinguished from glue and other adhesives by the fact that they are applied in thick coatings or layers.
Products under HSN 3214 90 10 includes non-refractory surfacing preparations for facades, indoor walls, floors, ceilings or the like. These preparations are used to make such surfaces waterproof and improve their appearance. They include powdered preparations containing plaster and sand with plasticisers, preparations for setting walls or floor tiles, pasty preparations made by coating mineral fillers with binders with added pigments and water or solvent.
HSN 3214 90 90 is a residuary

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sare Realty Projects Private Limited, Tara Chand Saluja And Sons, Vee Gee auto components pvt. ltd., ankur oil and refrigeration, M/s Alliance Graphic Equipment Private Limited And M/s Batra Art Press Versus Union of India And ORS.

Sare Realty Projects Private Limited, Tara Chand Saluja And Sons, Vee Gee auto components pvt. ltd., ankur oil and refrigeration, M/s Alliance Graphic Equipment Private Limited And M/s Batra Art Press Versus Union of India And ORS.
GST
2018 (5) TMI 366 – DELHI HIGH COURT – TMI
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-4-2018
W.P.(C) 1300/2018, W.P.(C) 2192/2018 & CM APPL. 9058/2018, W.P.(C) 2332/2018, W.P.(C) 2333/2018 & CM APPL. 9801/2018, W.P.(C) 2475/2018 & CM APPL. 10262/2018, W.P.(C) 2740/2018 & CM APPL. 11123/2018 And W.P.(C) 2885/2018 & CM APPL. 11632/2018
GST
MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND MR. A. K. CHAWLA, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Adv, Mr. Gaurav Dudeja with Mr. Farhaan S. Haque, Advs., Mr. Puneet Rai, Adv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sify Technologies Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

Sify Technologies Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (5) TMI 486 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 9-4-2018
Application No. ST/Misc/CT/41711/2017 & Appeal No. ST/759/2010 – Final Order No. 41084 / 2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S. Member (Judicial) And Hon'ble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate For the Appellant
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The MA filed by Revenue for change of cause title is allowed.
2. The facts of the case are that appellants are providing various taxable services such as internet cafe service, leased circuit service, franchise service etc. Scrutiny of ST-3 returns and records maintained by the appellants indicated that they had not discharged service tax liability in full for the period October 2005 to March 2006. The main allegation was that service tax paid by the tax payer as shown in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7.09.2010 (impugned order), the Commissioner has confirmed the same demand of Rs. 1,86,23,677/- with interest and imposed same penalty of Rs. 2 Crores under Section 78 ibid. Hence this appeal.
3. Today when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of the appellants, Ld. Advocate Shri G. Natarajan submits that in de novo adjudication, appellants had furnished voluminous data, which has been taken cognizance of in the impugned order too. However, without examining the correctness of the data furnished by the appellants, the Commissioner has compared the data furnished before him in de novo proceedings, to those furnished in the first round and observed certain differences, based on which he has discredited the entire information furnished by the appellants. Ld. Counsel also contends that department has not proved that the appellants had received higher taxable value than what was declared in the ST-3 returns. He submits that the demand has resulted only due to misunderstanding of the n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ave emanated only due to the misreading of the ST-3 returns filed by the appellants, there is no justification for imposition of penalty. 4. On the other hand, Ld. A.R Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy draws our attention to para-15 of the impugned order to point out that appellants vide their letter dt. 7.7.2010 had given figures which were different from those furnished vide their letter dt. 29.05.2007 in the first round of adjudication. Further, the adjudicating authority has observed that even comparison of figures furnished in the second round of adjudication reveals that there are still differences.
5. Heard both sides. From the impugned order, it is clear that the adjudicating authority has primarily focused on comparing the figures given by the appellants in the first and second round of adjudication. In the first round of litigation, CESTAT Chennai had clearly indicated that the adjudicating authority came to pass the impugned demand as the proper reconciliation exercise was avoided.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d on 18.10.06. The Commissioner came to pass the impugned demand as the above exercise was avoided. The Commissioner found variations between the figures furnished along with the reply to the Show Cause Notice and those furnished in the ST-3 returns. However, the demand was raised ignoring one class of variations.
5. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the whole issue arose on account of certain errors in reporting which could be reconciled; the appellant was willing to do such reconciliation. He prayed that the impugned order may be set aside and the matter remanded for full scale reconciliation.
6. The learned Jt. CDR broadly agrees with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants. He has no objection to the matter being remanded.
7. On a careful consideration of the case records and the submissions made by both sides we are convinced that the ends of justice require that the impugned order be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adju

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M/s. Alka Industries

In Re : M/s. Alka Industries
GST
2018 (7) TMI 74 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 411 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 85 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – AAR
Dated:- 9-4-2018
ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/9 (IN APPLICATION NO. Advance Ruling/SGST&CGST/2017-18/AR/18)
GST
Mr. R. B. Mankodi, Member And Mr. G. C. Jain, Member
For The Applicant : Shri Nirav Laljibhai Patel
RULING
The applicant M/s. Alka Industries manufactures CI Casting for which it purchases pig iron, scrap, molasses, coal, foundry minerals, sand etc. The applicant melts pig iron and scrap in the cupola furnace fired by coal and add foundry minerals in the same. The melted pig iron is poured into moulding boxes of sand and required shape of cast article is obtained. The applicant manufactures the goods according to the requirement of customers. The cast articles so manufactured are used in various industries. The applicant has submitted tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hing but a product of casting industry. The applicant manufactures brackets and clamps of cast iron, which are used by building construction industry for hanging wash basin, commodes, urinals etc. as support structure.
3. The applicant further submitted that the aforesaid products are used by building construction industry for hanging ceramic articles, but the products themselves are separately classified products under Chapter 7325 or 7326 or 7308 of the Central Excise Tariff. Hence, the applicant submitted that the same requires classification accordingly. The applicant referred to Circular No. 17/2003-CUS dated 11.04.2013. The applicant also relied upon the view taken in their own issue by the Ld. Assistant Sales Tax Commissioner, Ahmedabad in Order No. 1995/D/165 to 175 (11) dated 24.08.1995, wherein the Ld. Authority after considering the products, has held that the aforesaid products are nothing but casting. The Ld. Authority has relied upon various judgements for the aforesaid.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s sanitary ware manufactured out of iron and steel and if parts of such Iron or Steel sanitary ware are manufactured then only the goods can be classified under CETH 7324. The applicant submitted that the goods are certainly not parts of sanitary ware of Iron or Steel mentioned in the CETH, hence the same cannot be classified under CETH 7324. Further, the goods are used by building construction industry for hanging / fixing urinals, commodes, wash basins which are made of ceramic material which are classifiable under Chapter 69 of the Central Excise Tariff. These are urinals, commodes, wash basins themselves are finished products and the products of the applicant are not supplied / used in factories during manufacturing. The applicant relied upon the order of Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of M/s. Consolidated Petrotech Ind Ltd. [1993 (66) ELT 244) and judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court [1997 (96) ELT 223 (SC)]. The applicant submitted that the goods under consideration are cast articles

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds & Services Tax and Central Excise Commissionerate, Ahmedabad North.
8. The issue involved in this case is regarding classification of goods viz. brackets and clamps of cast iron.
9. It is observed that the Explanation (iii) and (iv) of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 provides as follows :-
“Explanation. – For the purposes of this notification, –
(i) ……
(ii) ……
(iii) “Tariff item”, “sub-heading” “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.”
10. The applicant manufactures cast articles, does sand blasting on the CI Casting for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M/s. Inox India Pvt. Ltd.

In Re : M/s. Inox India Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (7) TMI 75 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 424 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 86 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT – AAR
Dated:- 9-4-2018
ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/2018/10 (IN APPLICATION NO. Advance Ruling/SGST&CGST/2017-18/AR/23)
GST
Mr. R. B. Mankodi, Member And Mr. G.C. Jain, Member
For The Applicant : Shri Hardik Modh, Advocate And Shri Ashish S. Agarwal, CA
RULING
The applicant M/s. Inox India Pvt. Ltd. has submitted that the range of products manufactured and supplied by the company inter alia includes Cryo Container, also known as Liquid Nitrogen Containers (subject product), which is essentially a container with double walls made of aluminum and the mechanism of this container is such that the space between two walls is vacuum and super insulated. The applicant submitted that vacuum and super insulation helps maintain temperature around minus 196 degree wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HSN 7613 0019 or HSN 9617 0012 in the GST regime ?”
4. The applicant referred to Chapter Heading 7613, Tariff Entry No. 7613 0019 and the explanatory note to heading 7613 under the HSN Explanatory Notes and submitted that in view of the scope of heading 7613 and the nature of subject product, it appears that the subject product is well covered by heading 7613.
5. The applicant also referred to Tariff Entry No. 9617 00 12 and relevant HSN Explanatory Notes and submitted that in view of the difference in the nature of product and the key features of the scope of Entry No. 9617 00 12, the subject product may not merit classification under HSN 9617 00 12.
6. The Central Goods & Services Tax and Customs Commissionerate, Vadodara – II, inter-alia informed that the description under Heading 7613 is 'Aluminum containers for compressed or liquefied gas; that though the product manufactured by the applicant is made up of Aluminum, it is also used for the purpose of storage / transport of seme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion (iii) and (iv) of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 provides as follows :-
“Explanation. – For the purposes of this notification, –
(i) ……
(ii) ……
(iii) “Tariff item”, “sub-heading” “heading” and “Chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.”
9.2 Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of L.M.L. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs [Civil Appeal No. 3764 of 2003, decided on 21.09.2010 reported at 2010 (258) ELT 321 (S.C.)] has held as follows :-
“12. In Collector of Central Excise, Shillong v. Wood Crafts Products Ltd. reported in (1995) 3 SCC 4

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d or liquefied gas
 
7613 00
– Aluminium containers for compressed or liquefied gas :
 
 

Low pressure cylinders :
 
7613 00 11
-Plain
Kg.
 
7613 00 12
-Lacquered
Kg.
 
7613 00 13
-Printed
Kg.
 
7613 00 19
-Other
Kg.
 
 
High Pressure Cylinders :
 
 
7613 00 21
-Plain
Kg.
 
7613 00 22
-Lacquered
Kg.
 
7613 00 23
-Printed
Kg.
 
7613 00 29
-Other
Kg.
 
 
Other
 
 
7613 00 91
-Plain
Kg.
 
7613 00 92
-Lacquered
Kg.
 
7613 00 93
-Printed
Kg.
 
7613 00 99
-Other
Kg.
 
10.2 Chapter Heading 9617 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is as follows :-
HS Code
Description of goods
Unit.
(1)
(2)
(3)
9617
 Vacuum flasks and other vacuum vessels, complete with cases; parts thereof other than glass inners
 
9617 00
– Vacuum flasks and other vaccum vessels, complete with cases; parts there

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct product can be manufactured to suit the; either of transport, storage or portability purposes;
– Based on its design, the subject product finds its utility in following sectors (i) use for transportation of liquid nitrogen, industrial testing and shrink fitting, (ii) dairy organizations, animal husbandries, cattle breeding farms, infertility clinics for semen preservation for artificial insemination / livestock breeding; (iii) pharmaceutical companies for storage of biological samples for medical research / vaccine preservation;
11.2 On the brochure of the subject product, submitted by the applicant, it is inter-alia mentioned as follows :-
– Serves dairy organizations, animal husbandries, cattle breeding farms, infertility clinics for semen preservation for artificial insemination / livestock breeding
– Serves pharmaceutical companies for storage of biological samples for medical research / vaccine preservation
– Utilized for small quantity transportation of Liquid Nitroge

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

9617 covers 'Vacuum flasks and other vacuum vessels, complete with cases'. The Explanatory Notes of Harmonized System of Nomenclature for Chapter Heading 9617 are as follows –
“This heading covers :
(1) Vacuum flasks and other similar vacuum vessels, provided they are complete with the cases. This group includes vacuum jars, jugs, carafes, etc., designed to keep liquids, food or other products at fairly constant temperature, for reasonable periods of time.
These articles consist of a double-walled receptacle (the inner), generally of glass, with a vacuum created between the walls, and a protective outer casing of metal, plastics or other material, sometimes covered with paper, leather, leathercloth, etc. The space between the vacuum container and the outer casing may be packed with insulating material (glass fibre, cork or felt). In the case of vacuum flasks the lid can often be used as a cup.
14.2 As per the technical specifications of 'cryo containers' submitted by the applica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification on levy of GST on the bills raised by the vendor organiser for Organising PRI Training

Clarification on levy of GST on the bills raised by the vendor organiser for Organising PRI Training
5621/CT/POL/3/2017-Policy Dated:- 9-4-2018 Orissa SGST
GST – States
Saswat Mishra (IAS)
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Odisha
Banijyakar Bhawan
Old Secretariat Compound
Cuttack – 753001
No. 5621/CT/POL/3/2017-Policy
To
The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Nuapada Circle, Nuapada
Sub: Clarification on levy of GST on the bills raised by the vendor organiser for Organising PRI Training
Sir,
In inviting a reference to the letter referred to above on the aforementioned subject, the issue raised is clarified below-
1. As understood from the information furnished, Sahavagi Vikas Abhiyan, Nuapada organised PRI trai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ental Authority or a Government Entity by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G is exempted from levy of GST.
4. In the case under consideration, the bills raised by the vendor for conducting the training program in the mutually agreed manner are essentially towards composite supply of goods and services used in the training. Here, the direct recipient of the service (training) is DRDA, Nuapada and indirect recipients are SIRD, Odisha and PR Department, Government of Odisha. The objective of the training being to train the elected representatives of the PRIS on different aspects of Panchayati Raj, the said training service can be held as an activity in relation to a function entrusted t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Axpress Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And 3 Others

M/s. Axpress Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And 3 Others
GST
2018 (12) TMI 68 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 794 (All.) , 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 794 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 9-4-2018
WRIT TAX No. – 602 of 2018
GST
Mr Krishna Murari And Mr Ashok Kumar, JJ.
For The Petitioner : Aloke Kumar
For The Respondent : A. S. G. I. , C. S. C.
ORDER
Heard Shri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anant Kumar Tiwari for respondent no. 1 and Shri C. B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4.
The goods were being booked and transported from Panvel Raigarh, Maharashtra to M/s. Bosch Ltd. Local Distribution Centre Khasra No. 1482 NH 56 B Jait

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Transportation expenses

Transportation expenses
Query (Issue) Started By: – subramanian vijayakumar Dated:- 8-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Whether an exporter who has paid transportation expenses paid to the cargo company can claim it as it and get refunds
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Reply:
Sir,
The government will refund only CGST/IGST paid on transportation charges. The transportation charges will be reimbursed by your customer provided he

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gst on bond money

Gst on bond money
Query (Issue) Started By: – Harini Singh Dated:- 8-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 10-4-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Hi I m working in a firm and digned a bond for 3 years or 1lakh rs. Now Do i have to pay gst also on penalty of 1lakh and can i get it ireimbursed
In this case who has to pay gst me or firm because I m not gegetti any sale or service
Pls clarify
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
In My view yes, you will have to pay GST.
Re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st April 2018)

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st April 2018)
GST
Dated:- 7-4-2018

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS
Updated as on 01st April 2018
INTRODUCTION:
The introduction of Goods and Services Tax on 1st July 2017 was a very significant step in the field of indirect tax reforms in India. By amalgamating a large number of Central and State taxes into a single tax, the aim was to mitigate cascading or double taxation in a major way and pave the way for a common national market. From the consumer point of view, the biggest advantage would be in terms of a reduction in the overall tax burden on goods, which was estimated to be around 25%-30%. Introduction of GST would also make Indian products competitive in the domestic and international markets. Studies show that this would have a positive impact on economic growth. Last but not the least, this tax, because of its transparent and self-policing character, would be easier to administer.
GENESIS:
2. The idea of moving towards t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) Act, 2016, fiscal powers between the Centre and the States were clearly demarcated in the Constitution with almost no overlap between the respective domains. The Centre had powers to levy tax on the manufacture of goods (except alcoholic liquor for human consumption, opium, narcotics etc.) while the States had powers to levy tax on sale of goods. In case of inter-State sales, the Centre had power to levy a tax (Central Sales Tax) but the tax was collected and retained entirely by the originating States. As for services, it was the Centre alone that was empowered to levy service tax. Since the States were not empowered to levy any tax on the sale or purchase of goods in the course of their importation into or exportation from India, the Centre levied and collected this tax as additional duties of customs, which was in addition to the Basic Customs Duty. This additional duty of customs (commonly known as CVD and SAD) counter balanced excise duties, sales tax, State VAT and other taxes

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

territories without legislatures (Union territory tax- UTGST). The Parliament would have exclusive power to levy GST (integrated tax – IGST) on inter-State trade or commerce (including imports) in goods or services. The Central Government will have the power to levy excise duty in addition to the GST on tobacco and tobacco products. The tax on supply of five specified petroleum products namely crude, high speed diesel, petrol, ATF and natural gas would be levied from a later date on the recommendation of GST Council.
5. A Goods and Services Tax Council (GSTC) was constituted comprising the Union Finance Minister, the Minister of State (Revenue) and the State Finance Ministers to recommend on the GST rate, exemption and thresholds, taxes to be subsumed and other features. This mechanism would ensure some degree of harmonization on different aspects of GST between the Centre and the States as well as across States. One half of the total number of members of GSTC would form quorum in me

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ber, 2016. GSTC is being assisted by a Secretariat. Twenty six meetings of the GSTC have been held so far. The following major decisions have been taken by the GSTC:
(i) The threshold exemption limit would be ₹ 20 lakh. For special category States (except J&K) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution, threshold exemption limit has been fixed at ₹ 10 lakh.
(ii) Composition threshold shall be ₹ 1 crore. As decided in the 23rd meeting of the GSTC, this limit shall be raised to ₹ 1.5 crore after necessary amendments in the Act. Composition scheme shall not be available to inter-State suppliers, service providers (except restaurant service) and specified category of manufacturers. For special category States (except J&K and Uttarakhand) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution, threshold exemption limit has been fixed at ₹ 75 lakh.
(iii) Existing tax incentive schemes of Central or State governments may be continued by respective government by wa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s, would be imposed for a period of five years to compensate States for any revenue loss on account of implementation of GST. The list of goods and services in case of which reverse charge would be applicable has also been finalized.
(v) The five laws namely CGST Law, UTGST Law, IGST Law, SGST Law and GST Compensation Law have been recommended.
(vi) In order to ensure single interface, all administrative control over 90% of taxpayers having turnover below ₹ 1.5 crore would vest with State tax administration and over 10% with the Central tax administration. Further all administrative control over taxpayers having turnover above ₹ 1.5 crore shall be divided equally in the ratio of 50% each for the Central and State tax administration.
(vii) Powers under the IGST Act shall also be cross-empowered on the same basis as under CGST and SGST Acts with few exceptions.
(viii) Power to collect GST in territorial waters shall be delegated by Central Government to the States.
(ix

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vance received for supply of goods by all taxpayers.
(xiv) Supplies from GTA to unregistered persons has been exempted from tax.
(xv) Registration and operationalization of TDS/TCS provisions has been postponed till 30.06.2018.
(xvi) The e-way bill system shall be introduced nation-wide for all inter-State supplies with effect from 01.04.2018. As regards intra-State supplies, option has been given to States to choose any date on or before 01.06.2018.
(xvii) www.ewaybillgst.gov.in, managed by NIC, shall be the Common Goods and Services Tax Electronic Portal for generation of e-way bill.
(xviii) E-Wallet Scheme shall be introduced for exporters from 01.10.2018 and till then relief for exporters shall be given in form of broadly existing practice.
(xix) All taxpayers are required to file return FORM GSTR-3B & pay tax on monthly basis.
(xx) Taxpayers with turnover upto ₹ 1.5 Cr are required to file information in FORM GSTR-1 on a quarterly basis. Other taxpayers would have to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be exempted from GST even if payment has not been received in foreign convertible currency – such suppliers shall be eligible for input tax credit.
(xxvii) Centralized UIN shall be issued to every Foreign Diplomatic Mission / UN Organization by the Central Government.
(xxviii) www.gst.gov.in, managed by GSTN, shall be the Common Goods and Services Tax Electronic Portal.
(xxix) Rate of interest on delayed payments and delayed refund has been recommended.
(xxx) Rules for National Anti-Profiteering Authority have been recommended. The National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been constituted having Chairman and four technical Members. Further Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering and State level Screening Committee have also been set up.
SALIENT FEATURES OF GST:
8. The salient features of GST are as under:
(i) GST would be applicable on “supply” of goods or services as against the present concept of tax on manufacture of goods or on sale of goods or on provision of services.
(

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST.
(vii) CGST, SGST /UTGST & IGST would be levied at rates to be mutually agreed upon by the Centre and the States under the aegis of the GSTC.
(viii) GST would replace the following taxes currently levied and collected by the Centre:
a) Central Excise Duty;
b) Duties of Excise (Medicinal and Toilet Preparations);
c) Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance);
d) Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Products);
e) Additional Duties of Customs (commonly known as CVD);
f) Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD);
g) Service Tax;
h) Cesses and surcharges insofar as they relate to supply of goods or services.
(ix) State taxes that would be subsumed within the GST are:
a) State VAT;
b) Central Sales Tax;
c) Purchase Tax;
d) Luxury Tax;
e) Entry Tax (All forms);
f) Entertainment Tax (except those levied by the local bodies);
g) Taxes on advertisements;
h) Taxes on lotteries, betting and gambling;
i) State cesses and surcharges insofar as they

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

category States (except J&K and Uttarakhand) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution). As decided in the 23rd meeting of the GSTC, this limit shall be raised to ₹ 1.5 crore after necessary amendments in the Act. The threshold exemption and compounding scheme would be optional.
(xiv) The list of exempted goods and services would be kept to a minimum and it would be harmonized for the Centre and the States as well as across States as far as possible.
(xv) All Exports and supplies to SEZs and SEZ units would be zero-rated.
(xvi) Credit of CGST paid on inputs may be used only for paying CGST on the output and the credit of SGST/UTGST paid on inputs may be used only for paying SGST/UTGST. In other words, the two streams of input tax credit (ITC) cannot be cross utilized, except in specified circumstances of inter-State supplies for payment of IGST. The credit would be permitted to be utilized in the following manner:
a) ITC of CGST allowed for payment of CGST & IGST in tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the course or furtherance of business.
(xix) Electronic filing of returns by different class of persons at different cut-off dates.
(xx) Various modes of payment of tax available to the taxpayer including internet banking, debit/ credit card and National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) / Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS).
(xxi) Obligation on certain persons including government departments, local authorities and government agencies, who are recipients of supply, to deduct tax at the rate of 1% from the payment made or credited to the supplier where total value of supply, under a contract, exceeds two lakh and fifty thousand rupees. The provision for TDS has not been operationalized yet.
(xxii) Refund of tax to be sought by taxpayer or by any other person who has borne the incidence of tax within two years from the relevant date.
(xxiii) Obligation on electronic commerce operators to collect 'tax at source', at such rate not exceeding two per cent. (2%) of net value of taxable sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person.
(xxix) Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal would be constituted by the Central Government for hearing appeals against the orders passed by the Appellate Authority or the Revisional Authority. States would adopt the provisions relating to Tribunal in respective SGST Act.
(xxx) Provision for penalties for contravention of the provision of the proposed legislation has been made.
(xxxi) Advance Ruling Authority would be constituted by States in order to enable the taxpayer to seek a binding clarity on taxation matters from the department. Centre would adopt such authority under CGST Act.
(xxxii) An anti-profiteering clause has been provided in order to ensure that business passes on the benefit of reduced tax incidence on goods or services or both to the consumers.
(xxxiii) Elaborate transitional provisions have been provided for smooth transition of existing taxpayers to GST regime.
BENEFITS OF GST:
(A) Make in India

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

age between neighboring States and that between intra and inter-State sales;
(ix) Average tax burden on companies is likely to come down which is expected to reduce prices and lower prices mean more consumption, which in turn means more production thereby helping in the growth of the industries. This will create India as a “Manufacturing hub”.
(B) Ease of Doing Business:
(i) Simpler tax regime with fewer exemptions;
(ii) Reduction in multiplicity of taxes that are at present governing our indirect tax system leading to simplification and uniformity;
(iii) Reduction in compliance costs – No multiple record keeping for a variety of taxes- so lesser investment of resources and manpower in maintaining records;
(iv) Simplified and automated procedures for various processes such as registration, returns, refunds, tax payments, etc;
(v) All interaction to be through the common GSTN portal- so less public interface between the taxpayer and the tax administration;
(vi) Will improve env

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onsumption.
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK:
9. Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has been set up by the Government as a private company under erstwhile Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. . GSTN would provide three front end services to the taxpayers namely registration, payment and return. Besides providing these services to the taxpayers, GSTN would be developing back-end IT modules for 27 States who have opted for the same. The migration of existing taxpayers has already started from November, 2016. The Revenue department of both Centre and States are pursuing the presently registered taxpayers to complete the necessary formalities on the IT system operated by GSTN for successful migration.
10. GSTN has selected 73 IT, ITeS and financial technology companies and 1 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CCT, Karnataka), to be called GST Suvidha Providers (GSPs). GSPs would develop applications to be used by taxpayers for interacting with the GSTN.
OTHER LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMEN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nsation to States) Act respectively. Similar notifications have been issued by all the States under the respective SGST Act.
13. Apart from the notifications, 41 circulars and 13 orders have also been issued by CBEC on various subjects like proper officers, ease of exports, and extension of last dates for filling up various forms, etc.
ROLE OF CBEC:
14. CBEC is playing an active role in the drafting of GST law and procedures, particularly the CGST and IGST law, which will be exclusive domain of the Centre. This apart, the CBEC has prepared itself for meeting the implementation challenges, which are quite formidable. The number of taxpayers has gone up significantly. The existing IT infrastructure of CBEC has been suitably scaled up to handle such large volumes of data. Based on the legal provisions and procedure for GST, the content of work-flow software such as ACES (Automated Central Excise & Service Tax) would require reengineering. The name of IT project of CBEC under GST is '

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rained in this training programme. More than 52000 officers (including around 20000 officers from States) have already been trained. Out of these 7000 officers have attended refresher-training course also.
17. It is expected that a momentous reform like GST is popularized and familiarized to the trade and industry who are the vital stakeholders in successful implementation of this reform.
18. CBEC would be responsible for administration of the CGST and IGST law. In addition, excise duty regime would continue to be administered by the CBEC for levy and collection of central excise duty on five specified petroleum products as well as on tobacco products. CBEC would also continue to handle the work relating to levy and collection of customs duties.
19. Director General of Safeguards, CBEC has been mandated to conduct detailed enquiry on anti-profiteering cases and should give his recommendation for consideration of the National Anti-profiteering Authority.
20. CBEC has been instrumen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

6,964
12
No. of 3(B) returns filed for September, 2017
70,50,408
13
No. of 3(B) returns filed for October, 2017
67,01,752
14
No. of 3(B) returns filed for November, 2017
66,80,408
15
No. of 3(B) returns filed for December, 2017
66,37,923
16
No. of 3(B) returns filed for January, 2018
65,27,602
17
No. of 3(B) returns filed for February, 2018
61,65,324
18
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for July, 2017
59,71,488
19
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for August, 2017
22,14,857
20
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for September, 2017
59,71,488
21
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for October, 2017
22,16,652
22
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for November, 2017
22,01,501
23
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for December, 2017
55,65,273
24
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for January, 2018
18,44,980
25
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for February, 2018
6,63,351
26
No. of GSTR 2 returns filed for July, 2017
25,72,552
27
No. of GSTR 4 returns filed for quarter JulySeptember, 2017
9,04,81

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =