M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Trichy

M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Trichy
Central Excise
2018 (8) TMI 1667 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 30-5-2018
Appeal No. E/40030/2013 – Final Order No. 41675/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Ms. S. Nandita Das, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniam, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Brief facts are that the appellants filed rebate claim for Rs. 4,81,194/- under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 in respect of excise duty paid on Monochloro Difluoro Methana HCFC – R11. Show cause notice was issued proposing to adjust the rebate against the dues to the extent of Rs. 24,109/- arisen out of the Order-in-Appeal No. 6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeal No. 67/2010 dated 30.6.2010. Thus, the appropriation of the amount in consequence of the above order is no longer sustainable. She submitted that the Appeal No. E/583/2010 was field by the appellant along with stay petition before Tribunal. The appropriation was done during the pendency of the appeal as well as stay petition. The Board vide Circular No. 7/90-CX6 dated 2.3.1990 has clarified that no recovery proceedings shall be taken when the appeal and stay petition is pending. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Arviva Industries (I) Ltd. reported in 2007 (209) ELT 5 (SC) has also clarified the same. The jurisdictional High Court in the case of Givaudan India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India – 2013 (292) ELT 161 (M

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Correction / rectification in the Shipping Bill where exporters mentioned the status of IGST payment as “NA” instead of “P” and in the case of IGST refund cases stuck into Error Code SB003.

Correction / rectification in the Shipping Bill where exporters mentioned the status of IGST payment as “NA” instead of “P” and in the case of IGST refund cases stuck into Error Code SB003.
21/2018 Dated:- 30-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CUSTOMS HOUSE, NAVARANGPURA, AHMEDABAD, 380009.
F. NO. VIII/48-16/Cus/SYS/2017-18
DATE: 30-05-2018
PUBLIC NOTICE No. 21/2018
Sub: Correction / rectification in the Shipping Bill where exporters mentioned the status of IGST payment as "NA" instead of "P" and in the case of IGST refund cases stuck into Error Code SB003.
Attention of the Exporters, Custom House Agents and Trade is invited to Board's Circular 08/2018 dt. 23.03

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r mismatch exists shall be available for rectification.
3. Additionally, IGST Refund in respect of SBS with error code SB003, where the exporter has either declared a different GSTIN in the SB or has only declared PAN, and the corresponding returns have been filed through another GSTIN with the same PAN, can also be sanctioned through the Officer Interface. In such Cases, the GST registered unit have to submit an undertaking an undertaking which has filed the returns that "they have no objection to the refund being granted to the exporter who has filed the Shipping Bill and that they will not claim any IGST Refund for exports under that SB separately". Once satisfied, the Customs officer may sanction the applicable IGST Refund th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Special Drive Fortnight to rectify errors relating to IGST refunds.

Special Drive Fortnight to rectify errors relating to IGST refunds.
20/2018 Dated:- 30-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CUSTOMS HOUSE, NAVARANGPURA, AHMEDABAD, 380009.
F. No. VIII/48-21/Cus/Sys/2017-18
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 20/2018
DATE 30-05-2018
Sub: Special Drive Fortnight to rectify errors relating to IGST refunds.
Attention of the Exporters, Custom House Agents and Trade is invited towards the Special Drive Fortnight launched during 15th March to 31st March 2018 which resulted into sanction of huge amount of IGST refunds by way of rectification of error code SB005 and SB006 through officer interface.
2. Looking to the grand success of the above "Special Drive Fortnight",

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Special Drive “IGST Exports Refund fortnight” beginning from 31st May, 2018 to 14th June, 2018

Special Drive “IGST Exports Refund fortnight” beginning from 31st May, 2018 to 14th June, 2018
14/2018 Dated:- 30-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CITY CUSTOMS COMMISSIONERATE, P.B. NO. 5400, C.R. BUILDING QUEEN'S ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.
C.NO.VIII/09/06/2018 City Cus. Tech
Dated: 30.05.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 14/2018
Subject: Special Drive "IGST Exports Refund fortnight" beginning from 31st May, 2018 to 14th June, 2018 -Reg.
Attention of all Customs Brokers, Exporters, Importers, Members of the Trade and other stake holders is invited to the IGST export refund fortnight held from 15.03.2018 to 29.03.2018.
2. The Board has decided to further intensify the efforts to liquidate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IGST refund- Officer Interface for errors other than SB005

IGST refund- Officer Interface for errors other than SB005
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 17/2018/CCP/JMR Dated:- 30-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS (PREV.), JAMNAGAR
SARDA HOUSE', OPP.PANCHAVATI SOCIETY, BEDI BUNDER ROAD, JAMNAGAR – 361008
PHONE NO.: 0288 2757509/10, FAX NO.: 0288 2757538/39
WEBSITE: www.jamnagarcustoms.gov.in E-Mail: custechjmr@gmail.com
F.No.VIII/48-168/Cus-T/2017
Date: 30.05.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 17/2018/CCP/JMR
Subject: regarding.
Attention of all the Importers/exporters, Customs Brokers, members of the Trade and all other concerned is invited to Board's Circular no. 08/2018 dated 23.03.2018. A Special Drive Fortnight was launched during 15TH March to 31st March, 2018 that resulted

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Accordingly, a Refund Cell which was created at Customs House – Pipavav to deal with the pending cases of export related refund claims, in addition to special camp at Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Customs(Prev.) Commissionerate, 'Sarda House', Bedi Bunder Road, Jamnagar for disposing off the IGST refund on export stuck up on account of above error codes.
4. In case of any difficulties faced during this Special Drive, the exporters / stake holders may contact the below mentioned Nodal Officer:
Name and designation of the Nodal Officer
Email Id
Shri P.K. Rameshwaram, Joint Commissioner
prabhat.rameshwaram@icegate.gov.in
5. The exporters and other stake holders are requested to avail the advantage of the said Special Drive for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 16/2018 Dated:- 30-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS (PREV.), JAMNAGAR
SARDA HOUSE', OPP.PANCHAVATI SOCIETY, BEDI BUNDER ROAD, JAMNAGAR – 361008
F.No.VIII/48-168/Cus-T/2017
Date: 30.05.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 16/2018
Subject: reg.
Attention of the Exporters, Customs Brokers and other stake holders is invited to various efforts being made by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC) to liquidate pendency in IGST refund claims. Attention is also invited to CBIC Circular No. 12/2018 dated 29.05.2018 which is issued for the pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems.
2. A number of representations have been received from the exporters / trade associations seeking resolution of problems which have hindered sanction of refund of IGST paid on exports. From

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

liability declared in GSTR1. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases.
4. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under:
A. Cases where there is no short payment:
(i) The Customs policy wing would prepare a list of exporters whose cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies, for the period. July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is greater than or equal to the cumulative IGST amo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.
(v) Non submission of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter.
(vi) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board.
B. Cases where there is short payment:
(i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-1 for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs.
(ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each exporter referred in para (i) above so as to inform the exporter that their records are held up due to short payment of IGST. The e-mail shall also advise the exporters to observe the procedure under this circular.
(iii) The exporters would have to make the payment of IGST equ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uld give an undertaking they would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date.
(vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements.
(vii) The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system.
(viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed/ sanctioned as above would be required to submit another certificate from Chartered Accountant before 31st October, 2018 to the same Customs office at the port of export to the effect that there is no discrepancy between the IGST amount refunded on exports and the actual IGST amount paid on exports of goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund Of1GST on Exports- CBEC Circular No. 08/2018 -Customs dated 23.03.201S – Officer Interface for Shipping Bills with other errors

Refund Of1GST on Exports- CBEC Circular No. 08/2018 -Customs dated 23.03.201S – Officer Interface for Shipping Bills with other errors
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 20/2018 Dated:- 30-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
GOVERNMENTT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
OFFICE THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (AIR CARGO), CHENNAI – VII COMMISSIONERATE,
NEW CUSTOM HOUSE, MEENAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI – 600027.
F. No.: S.Misc.09/75/2017- EXP. (Air)
Dated: 30.05.2018
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 20/2018
Sub: Reg.
Attention of Exporters/ Customs Brokers/ Steamer Agents/ Other Stakeholders and the Trading Public is invited to Board Circular No. 08/2018- Customs dated 23.03.2018. In Consonance with Para 2(ii) of the said Circular, an option has b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

those SBS where no other mismatch exists shall be available for rectification.
3. Additionally, IGST Refund in respect of SBS with error code SB003, where the exporter has either declared a different GSTIN in the SB or has only declared PAN, can also be sanctioned through the Officer Interface. In such cases, an undertaking may be obtained from the GST registered unit which has filed the returns that they have no objection to the refund being granted to the exporter who has filed the Shipping Bill and that they will not claim any IGST Refund for exports under that SB separately. Once satisfied, the officer may sanction the applicable IGST Refund through the Officer Interface.
4. Exporters are hereby advised to utilize this opportunity as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Special Drive to liquidate all pending IGST Refunds by observing a special drive “IGST Refunds Fort-night” beginning from 31.05.2018 to 14.06.2018

Special Drive to liquidate all pending IGST Refunds by observing a special drive “IGST Refunds Fort-night” beginning from 31.05.2018 to 14.06.2018
TRADE NOTICE NO. 07/2018 Dated:- 30-5-2018 Trade Notice
Customs
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
GST BHAVAN, 41/A, SASSON ROAD, PUNE-411001
F. No. VIII/Cus/Tech/PN&SI/48-47/2016
Pune Dated: – 30.05.2018
TRADE NOTICE NO. 07/2018
Sub:- Special Drive to liquidate all pending IGST Refunds by observing a special drive "IGST Refund

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Business Unit Transfer as Going Concern Exempt from GST; Considered Supply of Service Under GST Rules.

Business Unit Transfer as Going Concern Exempt from GST; Considered Supply of Service Under GST Rules.
Case-Laws
GST
GST – Intent to sell unit along with all assets and liabilities – The tran

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Update: PSLC Transactions Now Under Reverse Charge Mechanism, Shifting GST Payment Responsibility to Service Recipients.

GST Update: PSLC Transactions Now Under Reverse Charge Mechanism, Shifting GST Payment Responsibility to Service Recipients.
Notifications
GST
GST – levy of Priority Sector Lending Certificat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on Liquidated Damages

GST on Liquidated Damages
Query (Issue) Started By: – SARAVANAN RENGACHARY Dated:- 29-5-2018 Last Reply Date:- 29-5-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Experts,
As per recent Maharastra Advance Ruling, GST is applicable on Liquidated Damages.
Generally, Invoices are raised for full value with applicable GST as per the PO. Though the delivery is delayed and i.e. 10% LD is applicable, as accounting practice, invoice is raised for full value and GST on such full value is paid.
Customer will release the payment after deducting 10% LD. Such deducted amount will be treated as expenses in the books of supplier.
Scenario after Advance ruling:
It seems that the supplier has to raise the invoice for full value

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t customer has deducted the amount of liquidated damages then tax liability on such amount shall be discharged by the receiver of services under reverse charge mechanism provided the recipient of services must be a business entity located in taxable territory.
In order to substantiate our view, we would like to draw your kind attention towards entry no 5 of Notification No. -13/2017-Central Tax Rate dated 28.06.2017 and the same reads as under:-
5
Services supplied by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority to a business entity excluding, –
(1) renting of immovable property, and
(2) services specified below-
(i) services by the Department of Posts by way of speed post, express parcel post, life ins

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

INPUT TAX CREDIT (ITC) IN GST (PART-II)

INPUT TAX CREDIT (ITC) IN GST (PART-II)
By: – Alkesh Jani
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 29-5-2018

In our earlier discussion, we have gone through the conditions, restriction and manner by which ITC can be taken. In this session, we shall discuss Section 17 of CGST Act, 2017. The whole Section exhibits the different scenario for availing ITC and also goods and/or services, although said goods and/or services has passed the conditions and restriction, for which ITC is not available. In simple language, it can be said that negative list of goods and/or services, for which ITC is not available.
2. Let's start with sub-section (1) of Section 17 of the said Act, which reads as under:-
“(1) Where the goods or services or both are used by the registered person partly for the purpose of any business and partly for other purposes, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the purposes of his business”.
From above, it is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

section (2) shall be such as may be prescribed, and shall include supplies on which the recipient is liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, transactions in securities, sale of land and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building”.
The above sub-section reveals that, when goods and/or services are used for taxable as well as exempted goods or services, the ITC can be utilized to the proportionate to taxable supplies (including exports). To arrive at the eligibility of ITC available in terms of sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 17 of the said Act, the formulae are given in Rule 42 of CGST Rules, 2017. It is important to note that for sub-section (2) the value of goods and/or services includes, the value on which the tax is paid on reverse charge, transaction of securities and sale of land and /or building.
4. The GST Act, is said to be very specific Act. The sub-section (4) of Section17 of the said Act, deals with the ITC available by the banking and fi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r registered or are approved by the Reserve Bank of India and are statutorily under the supervision of RBI. The banking services is limited to the activities covered by the definition of the term “banking” given at Section (5) (b) of The Banking Regulation Act,1949, which is as under:-
“(b) "banking" means the accepting, for the purpose of lending or investment, of deposits of money from the public, repayable on demand or otherwise, and withdrawal by cheque, draft, order or other wise;”
In view of above, it implies that as the above mentioned entities may be providing services other than banking services which are classified under HSN code 9971, which may be taxable and/or other than taxable. The sub-section (4) of Section17 of the said Act, stipulates that the entities mentioned therein, shall have the option to comply with sub-section (2) i.e. taxable supply (including export of goods and/or service) and exempted services (please refer Notification No.12/2017-CT (Rates)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

xcept when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A)further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C)imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
(b) the following supply of goods or services or both-
(i) food and beverages, outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery except where an inward supply of goods or services or both of a particular category is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply;
(ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre;
(iii) rent-a-cab, life insurance and health insurance except where
(A) the Government notifies the services which are obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees under any law for the time being in force; or
(B) su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able property;
(e) goods or services or both on which tax has been paid under section 10;
(f) goods or services or both received by a non-resident taxable person except on goods imported by him;
(g) goods or services or both used for personal consumption;
(h) goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples; and
(i) any tax paid in accordance with the provisions of sections 74, 129 and 130″.
5.1 The very first in the negative list for which ITC is not available is “motor vehicle”. This has been defined at Section 2(28) of Motor Vehicle Act, and is as under:-
“28. Motor vehicle" or "vehicle" means any mechanically propelled vehicle adapted for use upon roads whether the power of propulsion is transmitted thereto from an external or internal source and includes a chassis to which a body has not been attached and a trailer; but does not include a vehicle running upon fixed rails or a vehicle of a special type adapted for use on

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t not to the end user, further, if this car is used for further supply of taxable services, i.e. one cab operator to another, for transportation of passengers, imparting training, the ITC is available. Here the question arises is that if the said car is booked as a capital goods in the book of accounts, the depreciation under Income Tax Act, may be availed or else ITC under GST. The useful life under GST for capital goods is termed for five years, so before availing ITC proper calculation is required (please refer Rule 43 of CGST Rules,2017). Moreover, ITC is made available if the said motor vehicle is used for imparting training on driving i.e. ITC available for driving school. The ITC is also available if the said vehicle is used for transportation of goods. Summarizing above, it can be said that ITC on motor vehicle or conveyance is available only if it is used for further supply, for transportation of passengers or goods and for imparting training.
5.3 Further, in terms of clause

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g outward services ITC is available. Here, it is surprising to learn that although motor vehicle or conveyance is mentioned, rent-a-cab, which is not mentioned in HSN code, is mentioned under this clause. The reason may be under any guise, ITC is not available. The most discussed issue is transportation facility extended to employee by staff bus or whatever name called, ITC is not available as Motor vehicles if used for supply of above mentioned taxable services namely, transportation of passengers, imparting training or transportation of goods. The pickup and drop of the employee is not notified under any law and same is not falling within the ambit of above clause. The ITC for any travel benefit extended to employee on vacation such as leave or home travel concession, is also not available. Here, it is pertinent to note that services and/or goods from employer to employee is specifically mentioned at various section and schedules, any other than those shall be dealt with one's own wi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be included for capitalization of immovable property.
5.7 The sub-section (e) to (i) stipulates that ITC is not available for composition scheme, under Section10, goods and/or services is supplied by non-resident taxable person, other than goods and/or services imported by him. Moreover, if goods and/or services are used for personal consumption, ITC is not available, the same concept of erstwhile law.
5.8 If goods are lost, stolen, destroyed or written off or gifted or free sample, ITC if availed is required to be reverse. The same concept continues in GST regime. No ITC is available if taxes paid in terms of notice for non-payment, short payment or erroneously refunded, or taxes paid on detention, seizure of goods and/or conveyance, or confiscation of goods and conveyance (Section 74,129 and 130 of the said Act.).
6. As plant and machinery has already been discussed in our earlier session, it is not wise to repeat the same here. The sub-section (6) of Section17, mandates for mann

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tor to principal or main contractor.
(vii) Goods and / or services used for construction of immovable property although used in the course or furtherance of business or on his own account.
(viii) Goods and /or services provided by composition dealer or non-resident taxable person, however, if goods are imported by non-resident taxable person ITC is available and not for the services imported by him.
(ix) Goods and/or services if used for personal consumption, if goods are lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples, ITC if availed is required to be reversed.
(x) Any taxes paid in terms of section 74,129 and 130 of CGST Act, 2017, ITC not available.
8. In conclusion of this session, it is reiterated that as no case law has attained its finality and each case has its own facts and circumstances, therefore, to arrive at any conclusion one must rely on own wisdom and knowledge. We shall deal with Section 18 in our next part. A small effort has be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XII)

GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XII)
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 29-5-2018

Goods and Services Tax (GST), introduced from July 1, 2017 is more than ten months old now but has resulted in operational and implementation disruptions affecting all stakeholders. GST law, as drafted and legislated, is not free from the interpretational hassles. GST Council his however, making regular changes to fix the anomalies and hardships faced by taxpayers.
Taxpayers have already started challenging various provisions of GST laws and rules framed thereunder with more than 180 writs being filed in different courts. High courts and Supreme court have taken a liberal stand so far in view of the fact that law is new and is yet evolving. However, CBIC may move to Supreme court where the verdict is against the Government. This has also been indicated in Circular No. 39 dated 03.04.2018 wherein it is has been hinted in relation to resolution of stru

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ttles during services provided to their customers while in hotels and restaurants.
Appellant pleaded that transaction consisting predominantly of a service, and not of a sale of drinking water and consisted of a composite charge which included incidental charges for food, drinks etc.
The Single Judge finally held that charging prices for mineral water in excess of MRP printed on the packaging, during the service of customers in hotels and restaurants does not violate any of the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 as this does not constitute a sale or transfer of these commodities by the hotelier or restaurateur to its customers.
Appellant association filed Writ Petition seeking a declaration that provisions of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976, Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 and Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 were not applicable to services rendered in premises of hotels/restauran

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fficer (Works Contracts), Palakkad (2018) 4 TMI 1010 (Kerala), where the petitioner was an assessee under Kerala VAT Act and desired to file revised returns for the period 2014-15 and 2015-16 and permission for revision was pending with authorities, the court directed the authorities to decide application within one month from date of receipt of this order in terms of Circular No. 14/2017 issued under SGST Act, 2017 on right of assessees to submit revised return.
* In M. Bagulayan v. Superintendent of Central GST & Central Excise (2018) 2 TMI 194 (Madras); where the petitioner had been levied with tax. The demand so raised was accepted by petitioner and same was duly paid. However, petitioner was still liable to pay interest thereon. Since petitioner submitted that he had paid 25 per cent of interest liability, he was permitted to remit balance payment in five equal monthly installments by the Court.
* In Etten Craft Holding Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala 2018 (5) TMI 1280 (Kerala),

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ned the goods of the assessee under transport on the ground that the consignment of goods was not accompanied by the \necessary declaration in Form KER II.
The assessee filed a writ seeking release of goods. It was contested that the competent authority had not enabled the generation of KER II declaration in the website and as such, it was impossible for the transporter to download the KER II declaration electronically and it was under those circumstances that the detention was necessitated.
It was directed to the adjudicating authority to complete the adjudication process in connection with the detention within a period of one week. While adjudicating the matter, the Adjudicating Authority shall take note of the contention of the assessee that it was on account of the non-availability of Form KER II in the website that the transporter was disabled from producing the same at the time of transportation of the goods.
The challenge to the vires of the rules was kept open. Court foll

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems -reg.

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems -reg.
12/2018 Dated:- 29-5-2018 Circular
Customs
Circular No. 12/2018-Customs
F. No. 450/119/2017-Cus IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs)
Room No. 227-B, North Block,
New Delhi dated 29th May, 2018
To,
All Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of Customs/ Customs & Central Tax / Customs (Preventive)
All Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs/ Customs & Central Tax / Customs (Preventive)
All Director Generals under CBIC.
Subject: Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems -reg.
Sir/ Madam,
A number of representations have been received from the exporters / trade associations seeking resolution of problems which have hindered sanction of refund of IGST paid on exports. From time to time, Board has

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in GSTR-1. As a result of these mismatches in the amount of IGST paid on export goods between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, the transmission of records from GSTN to Customs EDI system has not happened and consequently IGST refunds could not be processed. The problem is compounded by the fact that the facility to adjust GSTR-3B in subsequent months is not available in all cases.
3. In view of the above following procedure is being prescribed to overcome the problem of refund blockage. This would be an interim solution subject to undertakings/ submission of CA certificates by the exporters as given below and post refund audit scrutiny. The proposed procedure is as under:
A. Cases where there is no short payment:
(i) The Customs policy wing would prepare a list of exporters whose cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies, for the period July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is greater than or equal to the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of CA certificate shall affect the future IGST refunds of the exporter.
(vi) The list of exporters whose refunds have been processed as above shall be sent to DG (Audit)/ DG (GST) by the Board.
B. Cases where there is short payment:
(i) In cases where there is a short payment of IGST i.e. cumulative IGST amount paid against exports and interstate domestic outward supplies together, for the period of July' 2017 to March' 2018 mentioned in GSTR-3B is less than the cumulative IGST amount indicated in GSTR-1 for the same period, the Customs policy wing would send the list of such exporters to the GSTN and all the Chief Commissioner of Customs.
(ii) e-mails shall be sent by GSTN to each exporter referred in para (i) above so as to inform the exporter that their records are held up due to short payment of IGST. The email shall also advise the exporters to observe the procedure under this circular.
(iii) The exporters would have to make the payment of IGST equal to the short payment in G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

would return the refund amount in case it is found to be not due to them at a later date.
(vi) The Customs zones shall compile the list of exporters (GSTIN only), who have come forward to claim refund after making requisite payment of IGST towards short paid amount and complied with other prescribed requirements.
(vii) The compiled list may be forwarded to Customs policy wing, DG (Audit) and DG (GST). Customs policy wing shall forward the said list of GSTINs to GSTN. On receipt of the list of exporters from Customs policy wing, GSTN shall transmit the records of those exporters to Customs EDI system.
(viii) The exporters whose refunds are processed/ sanctioned as above would be required to submit another certificate from Chartered Accountant before 31st October, 2018 to the same Customs office at the port of export to the effect that there is no discrepancy between the IGST amount refunded on exports and the actual IGST amount paid on exports of goods for the period July' 2017 to Ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Alwar Versus Shre Nath Life Science P Ltd

Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Alwar Versus Shre Nath Life Science P Ltd
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 6 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Excise Appeal No. 50982 of 2018 SM – Final Order No. 52064 /2018-(SM)
Central Excise
Hon'ble Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member ( Judicial )
Shri H C Saini, AR for the Appellants
None for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa
Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeals. Nobody appeared for the respondent. Accordingly, I heard learned AR appearing for the Revenue and have gone through the impugned order.
2. The sole issue required to be decided in the present appeal is as to whether the services of 'Sales Commission Agents' can be held to be cenvatable and the Service Tax paid on the same is available as a credit to the assessee.
3. The appellate authority has held in favour of the respondent by observing as under:
6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of dutiable goods on commission basis.” From this clarification itself it is understood that if a commission agent is paid commission on account of sales of goods, his services qualify to be input service and cenvat credit of service tax paid on such services is admissible to the recipient of service. I find that the issue stand settled after the said clarification itself. I find that the Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of CCE, Jallandhar vs. Ambika Overseas reported in [2010 (20) STR 514 (Tri-Del)] held that the subject activity of Commission Agent is a service used in relation to sales promotion and is covered under the definition of input services. This order of the Hon'ble Tribunal was affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana as reported in 2012 (25) STR 348 (P&H). Regarding the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. reported in [2013 (30) STR 3 (Guj)] relied upon by the adjudicating authority, I find that in that case the Hon'b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Courts – Explanation inserted in Rule 2(l) ibid is declaratory in nature, hence, effective retrospectively. Since at this point of time, statutory provisions / grounds are available to deal with the issue in the form of clarification and Notification as discussed above, conclusion can be drawn beyond the findings of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, that the services of commission agent for sales of goods can also be considered as services used in relation to sales promotion that too when the above said notification clearly provides that „…sales promotion includes services by way of sale of dutiable goods on commission basis.” In view of the findings narrated in foregoing para, I am of the view that the cenvat credit of service tax paid on the amount of commission paid to the commission agents is available to the appellants. I do not find force in the plea of the Revenue that the subject explanation would have only prospective effect because, as recorded in the findings abo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Pixstone Images Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

M/s. Pixstone Images Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (6) TMI 45 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Appeal No. ST/42460 & 42461/2017 – Final Order Nos. 41644-41645 / 2018
Service Tax
Hon'ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member ( Judicial )
Ms. S. Yogalakshmi, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniam, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
The issue involved in both the appeals being the same, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. The appellant had filed Rule 5 refund claim and part of the claim was rejected on the ground of being time-barred. Hence this appeal.
3. The ld. counsel Ms. S. Yogalakshmi submitted that the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e date of invoice in the case of export of services. That the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Span Infotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. – 2018 (2) TMI 946 has held that the relevant date for the purposes of deciding the time limit for consideration of refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules has to be taken the end of the quarter in which the FIRC is received and not the date of invoice. She also relied upon the decision in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai Vs. CESTAT, Chennai – 2017 (3)GSTL 45 (Mad.). wherein the jurisdictional High Court had held the issue in favour of the assessee holding that the relevant date could be the date of receipt of FIRCs.
4. The ld. AR Shri R. Subra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eived since the refund claim is filed for the quarter.
13. Revenue has expressed the view that relevant date in the case of export of services may be adopted on the same lines as the amendment carried out in the Notification No. 27/2012 w.e.f 1.3.2016. Essentially after this amendment the relevant date is to be considered as the date of receipt of foreign exchange. While this proposition appears attractive, we are also persuaded to keep in view the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vatika Township (supra), in which the Constitutional Bench has laid down the guidelines that any beneficial amendment to the statute may be given benefit retrospectively but any provision imposing burden or liability on the public can be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Silicon Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Manimajra, Chandigarh Versus Union of India and others

Silicon Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Manimajra, Chandigarh Versus Union of India and others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 71 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 164 (P&H)
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 29-5-2018
CWP-13927-2018
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ AND MR TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
For The Petitioner : Mr. Amit Jhanji, Advocate
ORDER
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ.
1. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reopen the online portal enabling the petitioner to file its Trans-1 return on the portal and credit the Input Tax Credit (ITC) being the transitional

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

P-2) which was processed with error. The petitioner contacted the jurisdictional officer who informed the petitioner to sent a mail. Accordingly, the petitioner sent a mail dated 23.12.2017 (Annexure P-3) at helpdesk@gst.gov.in. In response thereto, the petitioner had received e-mail dated 23.12.2017 acknowledging the mail and allotted the request ID. It was mentioned in the said e-mail that they were working on the issue and would update the same to the petitioner. Further, vide e-mail dated 25.1.2018 (Annexure P-4), the petitioner was informed that since the last date of filing the Trans-1 Return was 27.12.2017 and, therefore, the same had been disabled. Accordingly, the petitioner sent a letter dated 8.3.2018 (Annexure P-5) to responden

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : M/s. JJ Fabrics

In Re : M/s. JJ Fabrics
GST
2018 (6) TMI 560 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 444 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 51 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 29-5-2018
ORDER No. CT 15492/18-C3
GST
Senthil Nathan S IRS, Member, CGST And N. Thulaseedharan Pillai, Member, SGST
RULING
1. M/s. JJ Fabrics, Ernakulam, manufacturer of carry bags made of poly propylene non-woven fabrics, has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on the rate of tax of the same.
2. The applicant has submitted that the primary raw materials for polypropylene sheets are polypropylene granules, color master batches and filter content (calcium carbonate). These raw materials are sucked th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

abrics.
4. The applicant has submitted a copy of the test report from Centre for Biopolymer Science & Technology wherein it is certified that non woven carry bags made by the applicant is a polypropylene product with filler content 42.29%.
5. The applicant further asserted that as per the clarification issued by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Madurai the said non-woven bags comes under HSN 6305 90 00 with 2.5% CGST & 2.5% SGST if sale value does not exceed Rs. 1,000/- per piece.
6. The applicant has also referred to the clarification order C3/17556/09 dated 29.09.2009, wherein it was clarified that packing bags, textile bags, and carry bags made out of non-woven fabrics of polypropylene is covered by the HSN code 6305.33.00

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, of polyethylene or polypropylene strip or the like
9. The above HSN code appears both in Schedule I and Schedule II of Notification No. 01/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and State Notification 360/2017 dated 30.06.2017 based on the sale value of the product. The entry reads as under:
SCHEDULE 1
224
63 [other than 6309]
other made up textile articles, sets, of sale value not exceeding Rs. 1000/- per piece
SCHEDULE 2
171
63 [Other than 6309]
Other made up textile articles, sets of sale value exceeding Rs. 1,000/- per piece [other than Worn clothing and other worn articles; rags]
10. In the present case, since the sale value of non-woven carry bags made of polypropylene is less than Rs. 1,000/- per piece, it will attract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Shri Gopal Gireesh, Veena Chemicals

In Re : Shri Gopal Gireesh, Veena Chemicals
GST
2018 (6) TMI 705 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 469 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 53 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 29-5-2018
ORDER No. CT/4683/2018-C3
GST
Mr. Senthil Nathan S, IRS, Joint Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Central Tax & Cental Excise, Thiruvananthapuram And Mr. N. Thulaseedharan Pillai, Joint Commissioner (General), Office of the Commissioner of State Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram
RULING
1. Shri. Gopal Gireesh, Veena Chemicals, Thiruvananthapuram a retail dealer of implants for joint replacements (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered person having GSTIN 32ADXPG4961E1ZF. The applicant has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on the rate of tax in respect of the commodities listed in the Annexure to the Application.
2. The applicant has stated in the application that all the commodities listed in the Annex

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

enclosed as Annexure are implants for joint replacements falling under HSN Code 90213100. The question to be decided is whether the products get covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GST at the rate of 5% or Serial No. 221 of Schedule II of the Notification No.' 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GST at the rate of 12%. The products listed in Annexure are falling under Customs Tariff Head 90213100 – Artificial Joints. Such implants for joint replacement are specifically covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Sl. No.
Chapter/Heading/Sub -Heading/Tariff Item
Description of goods
(1)
(2)
(3)
257
90 or any other Chapter
Assistive devices, rehabilitation aids and other goods for disabled, specified in List 3 appended to this Schedule
List 3:
E(9): I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s and Chapter Notes under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 has been adopted by Notification No. 01/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Explanation appended to the Notification No. 01/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 reads as follows;
“Explanation: –
(1) In this Schedule, tariff item, heading, sub-heading and Chapter shall mean respectively a tariff item, heading, sub-heading and Chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).
(2) The rules for the interpretation of the first Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act, 1975, including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of above table.”
Accordingly, the appropriate classification as determined under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 including on an application of the Chapter Notes and General Explanatory Notes, would apply for the purpose of levy of GST.
6. As per Rule 3 of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

90 or any other Chapter
Assistive devices, rehabilitation aids and other goods for disabled, specified in List 30
List 30:
E(9): Instruments and implants for severely physically handicapped patients and joints replacement and spinal instruments and implants including bone cement.
The industry dealing in joint replacement products also avails benefit of Nil BCD on import of implants for joint replacement under the above entry.There needs to be harmonization in the interpretation I applicability I coverage of entries under the Customs Tariff and GST. Shri. Lalji Vijayan, Chartered Accountant representing the applicant further reiterated and confirmed that all the commodities as listed in the Annexure to the application by their technical I trade names are nothing but implants for joint replacement falling under Customs Tariff Heading 90213100 – Artificial Joints. In support of the above, the applicant produced sample copies of the invoices issued by M/s Johnson and Johnson Pvt Ltd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

evident that joint replacements are specifically covered under the entry at Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I whereas the entry at Sl. No. 221 of Schedule II is a general entry that covers artificial parts of body. Therefore, applying the principle under Rule 3 of the General Rules of Interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975; that the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description we hold that the joint replacements falling under HSN Code 90213100 are covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GSTat the rate of 5%.
RULING
The implants for joint replacements falling under HSN Code 90213100 are covered under Serial No. E(9) of List 3 of Entry 257 of Schedule I of Notification No. 0112017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 attracting GST at the rate of 5%.
Case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. A One Nuts and Edibles Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jaipur I

M/s. A One Nuts and Edibles Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jaipur I
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 775 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Excise Appeal No. 51006 of 2018 SM – A/52113/2018-SM[BR]
Central Excise
Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial)
Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate for the Appellants
Shri H C Saini, AR for the Respondent
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa:
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in manufacture of Processed Food (Amla Candy) falling under Chapter Heading No. 20 of the First Schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It was alleged that the appellant had cleared the finished goods in bulk quantity for storage and preservation to various cold storages and the same was not processed by the cold storages except storage and preservation for time being on rental basis without obtaining permission under Rule 4(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 resulting in clearance of good

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y for storage and preservation to various cold storages and the same was not processed by the cold storages except storage and preservation for time being on rental basis without obtaining permission under Rule 4(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. I have seen the copies of declarations filed by the appellant on 12.03.2012 with the Jurisdictional Divisional Officer and I find that the appellant has declared that they have appointed the cold storage to undertake job work/ preservation/ processing of their inputs namely Amla candy falling under tariff heading No. 20060000 into intermediate product namely Amla candy falling under tariff heading No. 20060000. The appellant further given the undertaking that the intermediate product which will be manufactured by the job worker will be used for manufacture of final product in their factory and shall be removed on payment of duty. It is an admitted fact in this case that the goods in question were sent to the cold storages for keeping under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Act, 1944 or of the Rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of duty. Hence, the charges of clandestine removal of goods are not sustainable. Thus, the provisions of Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 are not applicable in this case. Accordingly, penalty in this case is imposable under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. In this regard, I place reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of Weldon Cello Plast Ltd. vs CCE Delhi-IV [2013(287)ELT0141] and Shivam Pressings vs CCE Pune-I [2015(326)ELT 351 (Tri. Mum.)] wherein it has been held that penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 can be imposed without any mens rea or wilful intention.”
4. As is seen from the above, the appellate authority has arrived at a finding that there was no malafide on the part of the assessee in the entire procedure so adopted after intimating the Revenue.
5. In such a scenario, imposition of penalty on the sole ground of non-observing of procedur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. NVIS Technology Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Indore

M/s. NVIS Technology Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Indore
Central Excise
2018 (6) TMI 877 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Excise Appeal No. 50946 of 2018 SM – A/52085/2018-SM[BR]
Central Excise
Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial)
Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate for the Appellants
Shri P Juneja, AR for the Respondent
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa :
The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods and also trading activity. They were availing the benefit of cenvat credit of service tax paid on various services which are common in both the activities.
2. Revenue by entertaining a view that trading activity is an exempted service and as such the asses

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that they have not exercised an option of maintaining separate accounts, in terms of Rule 6(3). As such, they are not under legal obligation to pay such percentage of the value of the goods.
4. I find issue is no more res integra and stand decided in the following Tribunal's decisions:
1) M/s. Zim Laboratories Ltd. vs. CCE & ST, Nagpur [2018 (1) TMI 254 – CESTAT Mumbai];
2) CCE, Ghaziabad vs. Avon International Pvt. Ltd. [2017 (5) TMI 1289 -CESTAT Allahabad];
3) M/s. Orient Bell Ltd. & others vs. CCE & ST, NOIDA [2018 (3) TMI 7 – CESTAT Allahabad];
4) M/s. Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. vs. CCE & ST, Raipur [2016 (12) TMI 841-CESTAT, New Delhi]; and
5) JSW Jaigarh Port Ltd. vs. CCE, Kolhapur [2018 (2) TMI 137 -CESTAT, Mumbai]
5. It

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : IT Development Agency (ITDA), Govt of Uttrakhand

In Re : IT Development Agency (ITDA), Govt of Uttrakhand
GST
2018 (6) TMI 1126 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – 2018 (14) G. S. T. L. 317 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND – AAR
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Ruling No. 04/2018-19 In Application No. 03/2018-19
GST
MR ANIL SINGH (MEMBER) AND MR AMIT GUPTA (MEMBER)
For The Applicant : Shri Damanpreet Singh, FCA
RULING
1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST Act and the rules made thereunder filed by Project Co-ordinator (Finance & Admin.), ITDA, Govt, of Uttrakhand, Dehradun registered under GST bearing No. 05MRTPO1359B1DC seeking an advance ruling on the question whether the services or material procured by ITDA from Govt./Govt. Authority is exempt from GST.
2. Advance Ruling under GST means a decision provided by the authority or the appellate authority to an applicant on matters or on questions specified in sub section (2) of section 97 or sub secti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the question whether the services or material procured by ITDA from Govt./Govt. Authority is exempt from GST. In this regard we find that as per Section 97(2)(e) of CGST/SGST Act, 2017 the advance ruling can be given on “determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both. In the present case applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of leviability of GST, if any, on the services or material procured by them from Govt./Govt. Authority. Therefore, in terms of said Section 97(2)(e) of CGST/SGST Act, 2017: the present application is hereby admitted.
4. Accordingly opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the applicant on 28.05.2018. Shri Damanpreet Singh, FCA appeared for personal hearing on behalf of the applicant and reiterated his submission as given in the application.
5. In the present application, applicant has requested for advance ruling on leviability of GST on procurement of services or material from Govt./Govt. Authority which is discussed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1 Further the applicant has submitted an MOU with IIT, Mumbai which relates to design, development and field testing of “Aerostat Based Last Mile Communication System”. To determine the status of IIT, Bombay, we find that the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) are autonomous public institutes of higher education, located in India. They are governed by the Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 which has declared them as institutions of national importance and lays down their powers, duties, and framework for governance etc. Each IIT is an autonomous institution, linked to the others through a common IIT Council, which oversees their administration. The Minister of Human Resource Development is the ex-officio Chairperson of IIT Council. The President of India is the most powerful person in the organisational structure of IITs, being the ex officio Visitor and having residual powers. Directly under the President is the IIT Council, which comprises the minister-in-charge of technical educ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Sri. Dharsak. V.P. And Saraswathi Metal Industries

In Re : Sri. Dharsak. V.P. And Saraswathi Metal Industries
GST
2018 (7) TMI 142 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 426 (A. A. R. – GST), [2018] 2 GSTL (AAR) 52 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 29-5-2018
Advance Ruling ORDER No. CT/5496/18-C3
GST
Mr. Senthil Nathan S, IRS, Member, CGST And Mr. N. Thulaseedharan Pillai, Member, SGST
Ruling
1. Sri. Dharsak.V.P., Saraswathi Metal Industries, Alappuzha, manufacturer of marine propeller, rudder set, stern tube set, propeller shaft and M.S. Shaft for couplings, has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on the rate of tax of the above commodities used in fishing / floating vessels.
2. The applicant has argued that a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

0 00 under.
Marine Propellers
8487 10 00
 
371
8487
Machinery parts, not containing electrical connectors, insulators, coils, contacts or other electrical features not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter
Rudder set for fishing boats
7325
Other cast articles of iron or steel
Stern Tube set for fishing boats
 
7304
218
7304
Tubes, pipes and hollow profiles, seamless, (other than cast iron) or steel
Propeller Shaft
 
7222
209
7221, 7222
All bars and rods, of stainless steel
M.S.Shaft for Couplings
 
7214
204
7213 to 7215
All bars and rods, of iron or non-alloy steel
5. However, parts of fishing vessels, factory ships and other vessels for processing or preserving fishery products are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =