M/s. Ankit Ispat Private Limited Versus The GST Council Represented by its Finance Secretary, The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, The Governmen

M/s. Ankit Ispat Private Limited Versus The GST Council Represented by its Finance Secretary, The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, The Government of Puducherry
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1736 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
W. P. No. 21337 of 2018
GST
K. Ravichandrabaabu, J.
For the Petitioner  : Mr.S.Muthuvenkataraman
For the Respondents : Mrs.R.Hemalatha, Mr.V.Sundareswaran, Mr.J.Kumaran
ORDER
Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 3 & 4. Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. Mr.J.Kumaran, le

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tioner is that even though they are entitled to claim transitional credit as per Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017 r/w Section 140 of the TNGST Act, 2017, such input tax credit fails to appear in the electronic credit, despite the fact that the petitioner duly complied with the requirements for transition of credit on input tax, the un-utilized amount in the return relating to the period ending with the day immediately preceding the date on which GST Act, 2017 came into force. It is contended that the petitioner had duly filled declaration electronically in Form GST TRAN-I on 05.09.2017. Therefore, it is stated that the petitioner vide their communication sent by E-mail dated 26.01.2018, informing the respondents that due credit which ought

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

petitioner/Assessee, to submit their application ventilating their grievance in accordance with the said circular, before the concerned Nodal Officer.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, only with the following directions:
(a) The petitioner shall submit their application in accordance with the circular dated 03.04.2018 to the respective Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
(b) On receipt of such application, the Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer is directed to forward the application to the respective Nodal Officer within a period of one week.
(c) The N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendment in the Notification No. F.17(131) ACCT/GST/2017/3765, dated 10th August, 2018.

Amendment in the Notification No. F.17(131) ACCT/GST/2017/3765, dated 10th August, 2018.
F17 (131) ACCT/GST/2017/3791 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Rajasthan SGST
GST – States
Rajasthan SGST
Rajasthan SGST
Government of Rajasthan
Commercial Taxes Department
NOTIFICATION
Jaipur, Dated: 21 August, 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act No. 9 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Rajasthan Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Chandra Kishor Singh Govt. Contractor And General Order Supplier Versus The Director, Construction And Design Services UP Jal Nigam And 4 Others

M/s Chandra Kishor Singh Govt. Contractor And General Order Supplier Versus The Director, Construction And Design Services UP Jal Nigam And 4 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 233 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
WRIT TAX No. 1159 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal And Hon'ble Saral Srivastava, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Shailesh Kumar Shukla,Sheo Kinkar Singh
For the Respondent : Pranjal Mehrotra
ORDER
The petitioner is a co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notifies the dates for furnishing the return in form GSTR 3B for the months form July,2018 to March, 2019.

Notifies the dates for furnishing the return in form GSTR 3B for the months form July,2018 to March, 2019.
CCW/GST/74/2015 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Andhra Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Commercial Taxes Department
Proceedings of the Chief Commissioner of State Tax
Present: Sri. J. SyamalaRao, I.A.S.
Office of
The Chief Commissioner of State Tax,
Andhra Pradesh,
Eedupugallu, Krishna District.
CCTs Ref. in CCW/GST/74/2015 Dt. 21.08.2018
In exercise of the powers

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

MSR Iron and Steel Industries India Private Limited, Balu Iron and Steels Company, M/s. Ramesh Iron and Steel Company India Private Limited Versus The Joint Commissioner of Sales taxes Coimbatore Division Coimbatore, The Commissioner of GST and

MSR Iron and Steel Industries India Private Limited, Balu Iron and Steels Company, M/s. Ramesh Iron and Steel Company India Private Limited Versus The Joint Commissioner of Sales taxes Coimbatore Division Coimbatore, The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise GST Bhavan, Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) ast Wing, Goods and Service Tax Council (GST Council), The Union of India And The Government of Tamil Nadu
GST
2018 (9) TMI 543 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
W. P. Nos. 21321 to 21323 of 2018
GST
Mr. K. Ravichandrabaabu J.
For the Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Krishnan (in WP. Nos.21321 to 21323 of 2018)
For the Respondents : Mrs.G.Dhana Madhri Government Advocate (Tax) For R1 & R6 Mr.S.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion in FORM GST TRAN-1, so as to enable the petitioners to submit the FORM GST-TRAN 1 in Column No.7(a) or electronically or manually by correcting the error of filing in Column 7(d) and accept the same as being in compliance with the provisions of Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 / Section 140 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017 / Rule 117 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017.
3. Heard both sides.
4. The main grievance in all these writ petitions is that the respective writ petitioner is not in a position to take excise duty credit in the stock of goods on the appointment of GST (as on 30.06.2017) in view of certain

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of Indirect Taxes and consequently, a Nodal Officer is also appointed by the State Government, it is for the petitioners/Assessees, to submit their applications in accordance with the said circular before the concerned Nodal Officer.
5. Accordingly, all these writ petitions are disposed of, without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, only with the following directions:
(a) The respective writ petitioner shall submit their application in accordance with the circular dated 03.04.2018 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to the respective Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer.
(b) On receipt of such application, the Assessing Officer/Jurisdictional Officer/GST Officer i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Priyanka Agencies Versus Union of India, The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi, The General Manager, The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination), The Principal Financial Advisor & Chief Accounts Officer, The Principal Chief Commissioner

M/s. Priyanka Agencies Versus Union of India, The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi, The General Manager, The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination), The Principal Financial Advisor & Chief Accounts Officer, The Principal Chief Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, The State of Tamil Nadu And The Commissioner of State Goods and Service Tax, Ezhilagam
GST
2018 (9) TMI 544 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Writ Petition No. 21272 of 2018 And WMP. Nos. 24940 & 24941 of 2018
GST
Mr. K. Ravichandrabaabu J.
For the Petitioner : Mr.Velayutham Pichaiya
For the Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar Standing Counsel for R1 to R5 Ms.Aparna Nandakumar, Standing Counsel for R6 Mrs. G.Dhana Madhi,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

apter Heading No. 995421 referred to in the Top Sheet pertains to the General Construction Services and therefore, the petitioner will not fall under such services. By contending so, the petitioner made a representation dated 14.06.2018 before the fifth respondent seeking clarification, more particularly, with regard to the relevant Chapter Heading applicable to the case of the petitioner. It is stated that the said representation is not considered so far.
4. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner raised very many grounds touching upon the merits of such clarification, as sought for by the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 to 5 submitted that in view of the letter of acceptance d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as raised an issue with regard to the Chapter Heading in consonance with the work executed by him, certainly, it is for the authorities concerned to clarify the same as, at this stage, this Court, is not inclined to go into such issue and express any view.
Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the contentions raised by this Court, this writ petition is disposed of, by giving liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the Senior Divisional Engineer, Chennai Division (West), within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the said official viz., the Senior Divisional Engineer, Chennai Division (West), shall consider the same and pass appropr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Coffee Day Global Limited,

In Re: M/s. Coffee Day Global Limited,
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1042 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 121 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 64 G S.T.R. 139 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – AAR
Dated:- 21-8-2018
AAR No. KAR ADRG 21/ 2018
GST
SRI. HARISH DHARNIA, AND DR. RAVI PRASAD. M.P. MEMBER
Represented by: Sri S Vishnumurthy, Chartered Accountant
ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017
M/s Coffee Day Global Limited, 23/2, 6th Floor, Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore – 560 001, having GSTIN number 29AABCA5291P1Z3, have filed an application, on 18.01.2018, for advance ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017, KGST Act, 2017 & IGST Act, 2017 read with rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01. They also enclosed copy of challan for Rs. 5,000/- bearing CIN number SBIN18012900060425

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ut tax credit and it would not apply in the circumstances if the supplier wants to avail input tax credit. If the restaurateur avail input tax credit, the transaction would get classified under Sl.No.35 of Notification No.11/2017 and chargeable to tax at 18% (CGST – 9% and SGST – 9%). Hence the restaurateur has the option of paying output tax @ 5% without availing input tax credit or paying output tax @ 18% by availing input tax credit. Therefore the applicant filed this instant application seeking advance ruling on the following issue:
“Whether the applicant is entitled to pay GST @ 18% (CGST-9% and SGST-9%) and claim input tax credit?”
PERSONAL HEARING: / PROCEEDINGS HELD ON 30.01.2018.
4. The Applicant submitted power of attorney, issued by Sri. Jayraj C Hubli, Director, M/s Coffee Day Global Ltd., authorizing Sri. S Vishnumurthy, Chartered Accountant to represent the applicant before the Authority for Advance Ruling in connection with the instant application for Advance Ruling.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the case of State of Kerala Vs Builders Association of India [(1997)104 STC 134 (SC)] = 1996 (11) TMI 355 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA].
5.3 Holding the notification under reference as mandatory would render it being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India (which guarantees equality before law) and violative of Section 16(1) of CGST Act'2017, which provides for input tax credit.
5.4 Restaurants inside Five Star hotels will be eligible for input tax credit. This would mean that persons consuming it there would end up paying lower than what they pay in stand alone restaurants, which have to treat the tax paid on inputs & input services as cost of supplies being made.
5.5 Reduction is made by invoking the powers in Section 9, which does not confer any power to reduce the rate of tax.
FINDINGS & DISCUSSION:
6. We have considered the submissions made by the Applicant in their application for advance ruling as well as the submissions made by Sri. S Vishnumurthy, Chartered Acc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ccommodation services provided by Hotels, Inn, Guest House, Club and the like 
74
 
996312
Camp site services 
75
 
996313
Recreational and vacation camp services 
76
Group 99632
 
Other accommodation services  
77
 
996321
Room or unit accommodation services for students in student residences
78
 
996322
Room or unit accommodation services provided by Hostels, Camps, Paying Guest and the like 
79
 
996329
Other room or unit accommodation services nowhere else classified 
80
Group 99633
 
Food, edible preparations, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages serving services  
81
 
996331
Services provided by restaurants, cafes and similar eating facilities including takeaway services, room services and door delivery of food 
82
 
996332
Services provided by Hotels, Inn, Guest House, Club and the like including room services, takeaway services and door deli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

umn (3) of the Table in the notification, falling under Chapter, Section or Heading of scheme of classification of services as specified in column (2).
8.2 The restaurant services provided by the applicant are squarely covered under serial number 7 of the aforesaid Notification.
8.3 The entries at serial number 7 of the aforesaid Notification were amended through Notification No 46/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 14th November, 2017 levying a central tax of 2.5% on restaurant services as provided by the applicant under the condition that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service have not been taken. The entry is reproduced below for ease of reference:
(ii) against serial number 7,-
(a) for item (i) in column (3) and the entries relating thereto in columns (3), (4) and (5), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
(3)
(4)
(5)
“(i) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)].”;
We also find that in the same Notification the following explanation is provided:
Explanation.- For the removal of doubt, it is hereby clarified that, supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent shall attract central tax @ 2.5% without any

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al well -being services; and other miscellaneous services including services nowhere else classified).  
9

The various services covered under the scope of Heading 9997 as per the Annexure to Notification 11/2017 are reproduced below for reference.
700
Heading 9997  
 
Other services  
701
Group 99971  
 
Washing, cleaning and dyeing services  
702
 
999711 
Coin-operated laundry services 
703
 
999712 
Dry-cleaning services (including fur product cleaning services) 
704
 
999713 
Other textile cleaning services 
705
 
999714 
Pressing services 
706
 
999715 
Dyeing and colouring services 
707
 
999719 
Other washing, cleaning and dyeing services nowhere else classified 
708
Group 99972  
 
Beauty and physical well-being services  
709
 
999721 
Hairdressing and barbers se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

als by persons 
722
 
999799 
Other services nowhere else classified 
A reading of the above classification of services makes it clear that the applicant contends that his services shall fall under serial number 722 under the category of other services not elsewhere classified.
9. The question put forth by the applicant is “Whether the applicant is entitled to pay GST @ 18% (CGST @ 9% and SGST @ 9%) and claim input tax credit?”. The rate of tax is notified in Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017. The scheme of the Notification is such that the rate of tax is described in direct conjunction with the classification of the service represented by the Chapter, Section or Heading under which the relevant service falls. Further the explanation given under serial number 4 of the notification reads “Reference to “Chapter”, “Section” or “Heading”, wherever they occur, unless the context otherwise requires, shall mean respectively as “Chapter,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r services which are not specifically described under any other entry in the Annexure. The services provided by the applicant are classifiable under Heading 9963 and such services covered under heading 9963 are squarely covered under serial number 7 of the Notification. As the services provided by the applicant are covered under a specific heading and the Notification carves out a specific rate of tax for that heading, the same shall be applicable to the applicant. Serial number 35 would qualify for invocation only in respect of services that do not find classification elsewhere. Therefore the applicant is covered by serial number 7 and not 35.
9.2 In this regard the applicant has argued that the words 'provided that' (refer para 7.3 above) give them an option to not to avail concessional rate of 5% and avail input tax credit. In this context we find the explanation given in Notification 46/2017 (para 7.3 above) relevant. The explanation clearly stipulates that '…..shall attract cen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2018
CT/LEG/GST-NT/12/17/750 Dated:- 21-8-2018 Nagaland SGST
GST – States
Nagaland SGST
Nagaland SGST
GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
NAGALAND: DIMAPUR
Dated Dimapur, the 21st August, 2018
NOTIFICATION- 13/2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the Nagaland Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (4 of 2017) read with sub-rule (5) of rule 61 of the Naga

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. KTV Oil Mills Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Madurai and Chennai

M/s. KTV Oil Mills Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Madurai and Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1665 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/251/2010, ST/269/2010, ST/595/2010 – Final Order Nos. 42298-42300/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri Hari Radhakrishnan, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
All these appeals relate to the same appellants, they are heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of edible palm oil. Appellants were refining crude edible palm oil and selling the same under their own brand name 'ROOBINI'. They also refined crude edible palm oil belonging to others, affixed their brand name 'ROOBINI' on the packages and collected brand royalty commission of Rs. 100/- per MT from such c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

same. Hence appeal Nos.. ST/251/2010 and ST/269/2010. The appellant had paid up the amount of Rs. 1,74,782/- along with interest of Rs. 19,545/- totaling to Rs. 2,03,355/-. They preferred refund claim for the said amount, which was rejected by the original authority vide order dated 31.10.2008. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence Appeal No. ST/595/2010.
3. Today, when the matter came up for hearing ld. counsel Shri Hari Radhakrishnan submitted that they are not contesting the demand of Rs. 1,02,139/- under Intellectual Property Right relating to appeal No. ST/251/2010. However, the appellant is praying for relief from penalties on the ground that the dispute is one of interpretation.
3.1 In respect of Appeal No. ST/269/2010, the appellants are not pressing the demand of service tax under Intellectual Property Right for the normal period of limitation. However, it is contended that the extended period of limitation was invoked in this case; that penalties als

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed with. However, we find merit in the contention put forward by the appellant regarding penalty. As the issue was interpretational, the penalties imposed in this regard vide Order-in-Original No. 5/2008 dated 15.9.2008 is set aside. So ordered.
6.1 In respect of Appeal No. ST/269/2010, the service tax demand on Intellectual Property Right has also been conceded for the normal period. The said demand has already been confirmed and the extended period has been set aside by Commissioner (Appeals) vide Order-in-Appeal No. 113 & 114/2010 dated 31.3.2010, against which the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed on monetary grounds by the Tribunal. We find that it is not the case that the appellant had informed the department about these transactions in ER-I returns. This being so, the extended period, in our view, can very well be invoked and hence the entire demand of service tax of Rs. 1,74,782/- with interest thereon is not being interfered with. However, taking into consideration

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited.

In Re: M/s. Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1044 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GOA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 359 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 64 G S.T.R. 258 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GOA – AAR
Dated:- 21-8-2018
ARN No. GOA/GAAR/1 of 2017-18/2018-19/1929
GST
ASHOK V. RANE AND S.K. SINHA, MEMBER
Person Present for Hearing : Shri Ragavendra Singh Butola, Chief Financial Officer alongwith Shri Rajesh Sukla, Head of Indirect Tax of Tata Motors
PROCEEDING
(Under Section 98 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax, Act 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Goa Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax, Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the SGST Act and CGST Act) by Automobile Corporation of Goa Limited, seeking an Advance Ruling in respect of the following question:
“Whether the activity of building and mounting of the body on the chassis by the Applicant will result in supply of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

esult in supply of goods under HSN 8707 or supply of services under HSN 9988? To examine the issue, the applicant had referred provision of section 2(68) and Schedule Il of the of the CGST and SGST Act.
As per section 2(68) of the CGST and SGST Act, the term job work means;
 “any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person and the expression 'job worker' shall be construed accordingly.”
As per para 3 of the Schedule II of the CGST Act, which specifies certain activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services – 'Any treatment or process which is applied to another person's goods is a supply of service.
Hence as per the application the chassis is sent to the applicant for building body. The question arises for consideration is
1. Is the chassis complete without a body? -If the answer is affirmative then anything added more by anyone is the sale of goods.
2. If answer is negative, -It is a semi-finished goods then

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In this connection, it is relevant to refer explanation provided under section 143 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 which is read as under:
“For purpose of job work, input includes intermediate goods arising from any treatment or process carried out on the inputs by the principal or job worker.”
As per the ratio of the judgement held in case of Prestige Engineering (India) Ltd vs CCE on Meerut [1994 (73) ELT 497 (SC)] = 1994 (9) TMI 66 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, addition or application of items by job worker would not detract from the nature and character of his work.
GST law does not distinguish between raw material, finished goods and semi-finished goods. It talks about input and Capital goods. Even, semi-finished goods or intermediates are goods and in turn 'Input' by the principal or the job worker.
So, the argument of the applicant that they use their own material, hence, they should not be treated as job worker is not tenable under the provision of law.
Moreover, it is clarified t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Kalpataru Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai

M/s Kalpataru Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1460 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/86913/2018 – A/87125/2018
Service Tax
SHRI RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Mehul Jivani, C.A. for Appellant
Shri M.P. Dixit, AC (AR) for Respondent
ORDER
Per: Raju
This appeal has been filed by M/s Kalpataru Ltd. against denial of CENVAT Credit of certain services received by them in relation to general insurance, repair and maintenance of motor vehicles and those utilized for staff welfare.
2. Learned C.A. for the appellant argued that they are not contesting the demand confirmed in respect of services used for staff welfare. He pointed out that two show-cause notices were issued, one for the period 2010 to 2014 and another for 2014-15. Both the notices were adjudicated by same original adjudicating authority but different first appellate authority. He pointed out that in respect of impugned show-cau

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d/intimated that, abiding to the show-cause notice they have admitted their liability and paid total liability of Rs. 11,05,801/- along with interest of Rs. 8,83,714/- vide Challan No. 05214 dated 05.11.2015 and 05218, 05216, 05213 all dated 05.11.2015. As the assessee has admitted the liability and paid the same along with interest. I am not discussing the admissibility/inadmissibility of individual services covered by the show-cause notice.”
2.1 He further pointed out that Commissioner (Appeals) has also not given any findings in respect of individual services in respect of which credit was taken and observed as follows: –
8. I have considered the submissions made by appellants which are available on records and findings and reasoning's and stand taken by the Adjudicating Authority. In this case appellant stated that they were eligible to avail/take CENVAT credit on the various employees and business related insurances charges as per the definition of the input service given in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

para 25 onwards in respect of these very services.
4. I have gone through the rival submissions. I find that the Order-in-Original confirms the demand without given any specific finding on the admissibility/inadmissibility of individual services covered by the impugned show-cause notice by observing that the assessee had admitted the liability and paid the same along with interest. The assessee had indeed paid liability and informed the Joint/Additional Commissioner on 17.11.2015 about the payment made, however, on 29.2.2015 in its reply to the showcause notice contested all the issues before original adjudicating authority. In these circumstances, the observation of the original adjudicating authority to the effect that the appellants are not contesting the demand is incorrect. In so far as findings given in para 25 onwards are concerned, the same relate to a different show-cause notice and different period.
5. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. S.M. Niryat Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST-Kolkata

M/s. S.M. Niryat Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST-Kolkata
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 73 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/75952/2018 – FO/76526/2018
Service Tax
SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri Dilip Kumar Singh, CA for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. Mukhopadhyay, Suptd. (A. R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
PER SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY
Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
2. I find that the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax Division-III Service Tax Commissionerate, Kolkata vide OIA No. 14/ST/DIVIII/ Kol/2014-15 dated 02/04/2014 had allowed the exemption by way of sanctioning an amount of Rs. 4,48,188/- claimed by the appellant as refund of whole of Service Tax paid on taxable specified services for export of goods against Shipping Bills in terms of Notification No. 41/2012-ST dated 29/06/2012 as amended.
3. The Revenue filed appeal before the First Appellate Authority.
4. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gs are observed:
01. -that the claimant has certified on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans in terms of para-3(h) of the said notification, since the amount of claim i.e. Rs. 4,48,148/- for refund is 0.47% of the total FOB value amounting to Rs. 95717088/- which is below 0.50% of the declared FOB value of export.
02. -that from the certification made on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans, it is observed that the said claimant declared that they have received and used the specified services for export of the said goods by mentioning specific chipping bill nos. as well as taxable specified services.
03. -that from the certification made on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans and in the declaration made in the Form- A1, it is observed that the said claimant declared that they have actually paid the service tax on the specified services to the respective service providers.
04. -that the said claimant sought for refund of whole of service tax amo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) iii) 4432548 dt. 13.03.2013 (LEO Date 14.03.2013) iv) 4297347 dt.0503.2013 (LEO Date 13.03.2013) v) 4297347 dt. 05.03.2013 (LEO Date 13.03.2013) vi) 4298180 Dt.05.03.2013 (LEO Date 13.03.2013) along with all the documents furnished by the said claimant in support of their refund claim of service tax under Notification No.41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 and my findings are:
I.-that the said claimant filed the claim for refund of Service Tax paid on taxable specified service for export on 14.02.2014 for an amount of Rs. 4,48,188/- which I find has been filed within the stipulated time limit in terms of the said notification.
II.- that the said claimant has certified on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans in terms of para-3(h) of the said notification, since the amount of claim i.e. Rs. 4,48,188/- for refund is 0.47% of the total FOB value amounting to Rs. 95717088/- which is not more than 0.50% of the declared FOB value of export.
III-that the said claimant filed their clai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eign convertible currency in terms of para 4 of the said notification according to Final Commercial Invoice.
VII.-that the said claimant declared in their letter regarding non-availment of electronic refund of service tax from customs as per the said notification.
VIII.-that the said claimant submitted the claim papers accompanied by relevant documents and co-relation and nexus between input services and exports made for the said period of claim for refund as well as payment of Servie Tax made by them has been established in terms of the said notification read with Mof, DoR (TRU) Circular No.120/01/2010-ST dt.19.01.2010 and para VII of circular no. 112/06/2009-ST dt. 12.03.09.
IX-that the claimed amount of Rs. 4,48,188/- as refund of Service Tax paid on taxable specified services provided, as detailed at Annexure-A of the brief fact above, I find that services in respect of the said invoices mentioned at the brief fact above are the taxable specified services in terms of the said no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit

Input tax credit
Query (Issue) Started By: – DK AGGARWAL Dated:- 20-8-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-8-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 12 Replies
GST
Dear Sir
GST-Input Tax Credit
1Please clarify if the ITC is available on replacement or repair of Tube lights, electric wire, in the office. In the purchase invoice of supplier GST number is appearing of buyer and in GSTR- 2A the ITC is shown.
2Similarly, in repair of godown, expenses are incurred for replacement of roof sheet etc and the ITC is appearing in GSTR- 2A. Please note its not a new construction .
3-Similarly, is ITC available on replacement of CAR tyres, battery or service bill. ITC is available in GSTR- 2A as we have given our GST number to the supplier ?
Kindly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ell.
Reply By DK AGGARWAL:
The Reply:
OK
Thanks Sir
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Input tax credit is allowed on query 1 & 2. Third one is covered under ineligible list.
Reply By Pavan Mahulkar:
The Reply:
It may not be available for 2 also…
Please read section 17
(c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service;
(d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.
Explanation.For

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d sub-section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
So it is clearly mentioned in the section that "ITC shall not be available in respect of" which indicates that neither on the purchases of the same nor on the parts there of
Reply By Ramaswamy S:
The Reply:
1 ITC on replacement or repair of Tube lights, electric wire, in the offi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Warehouse Services for Tea Not GST Exempt; Processed Tea Not Considered Agricultural Produce.

Warehouse Services for Tea Not GST Exempt; Processed Tea Not Considered Agricultural Produce.
Case-Laws
GST
Warehouse services – claim of benefit of exemption – agricultural produce or not – Whether the supply of warehouse services used for packing & storage of tea, was/is exempted from GST – Held No. – the activity of M/s. Unilever of processing of raw tea leaves into tea results in emergence of a new product having distinct name i.e. Tea, which has distinct name, character and use – I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Reviews If FSSAI-Mandated Name on Goods Counts as Brand Name for GST Exemption Under Exemption Notification.

Court Reviews If FSSAI-Mandated Name on Goods Counts as Brand Name for GST Exemption Under Exemption Notification.
Case-Laws
GST
Branding of goods – Whether mention of name of the Appellant on the goods, as required by FSSAI regulations and Legal Metrology Rules, amounts to brand name or not? – Claim of exemption from GST – The use or words ‘VALUE’, ‘CHOICE’ or ‘ SUPERIOR’ on the proposed packing, without altering the surrounding environment to take advantage of brand ‘MOR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Uninterruptible Power Supply and Battery Not Classified as Mixed or Composite Supply Under GST Regulations.

Uninterruptible Power Supply and Battery Not Classified as Mixed or Composite Supply Under GST Regulations.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of the supply – supply of UPS along with the battery – Mixed supply or not – naturally bundled goods – The storage battery has multiple uses and can be put to different uses and when supplied separately with static converter (UPS) it cannot be considered as a composite supply or a naturally bundled supply.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, mar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commission Directs Respondent to Proactively Disclose Information for Enhanced Transparency Under RTI Act Sections 25(4) and 4.

Commission Directs Respondent to Proactively Disclose Information for Enhanced Transparency Under RTI Act Sections 25(4) and 4.
Case-Laws
GST
RTI – GSTN Network – Keeping in view the supervisory powers of the Commission u/s 25(4) of the RTI Act, 2005, the Commission advises the Respondent to suo motu disclose the information sought by the Complainant in compliance with Section-4 of the RTI Act, 2005 to ensure transparency, objectivity and accountability in the functioning of the Public

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Announcement of Special Campaign for GST Migration Pending cases.

Announcement of Special Campaign for GST Migration Pending cases.
21T of 2018 Dated:- 20-8-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Office of the
Commissioner of sales Tax,
Maharashtra State,
8th Flr., Vikrikar Bhavan,
Mazgaon, Mumbai-400010
TRADE CIRCULAR
No. JCST/Mahavikas/GST Enrollment/2018-19/B-719 Mumbai, Dt. 20/08/2018
Trade Circular No. 21T of 2018
Subject: Announcement of Special Campaign for GST Migration Pending cases,
Ref. : 1. Trade Circular 18T of 2018 dated 31-07-2018
2. Trade Circular 19T of 2018 dated 10-08-2018
The GST Council in its 28th meeting approved the proposal to open the migration window for taxpayers, who have filed Part A of FORM GST REG-26, but not Part B of the said FORM. Such taxpayers are requ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nctional till 31st August 2018. If any taxpayer, who have filed Part A of FORM GST REG-26, but not Part B of the said FORM and have not yet submitted their request for opening of Migration Window, may approach these Special Desks with the Request Letter as mentioned in the Trade Circular 18T of 2018. For more details, the taxpayers are requested to refer the Trade Circular 18T of 2018 dated 31-07-2018 & Trade Circular 19T of 2018 dated 10-08-2018.
This circular is clarificatory in nature and cannot be made use of for legal interpretation of provisions of Law. If any member of trade has any doubt, he may refer the matter to this Office for further clarifications.
Rajiv Jalota
Commissioner of Sales Tax,
Maharashtra State
No. JCST/Mahavi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF NAVI MUMBAI And ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF NAVI MUMBAI And ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1267 – SC Order – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. J169 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – SC
Dated:- 20-8-2018
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s). 25203/2018
GST
Mr. A.K. Sikri And Mr. Ashok Bhushan JJ.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., Mr. V. Raghuraman, Adv., Mr. Shailesh Sheth, Adv., Mr. Anand Sukumar, Adv., Mr. S. Sukumaran, Adv., Mr. Bhupesh Pathak, Adv. And Ms. Meera Ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Apollo Screens Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India

Apollo Screens Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1415 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 529 (Guj.)
GUJARAT HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 20-8-2018
R/Special Civil Application No. 11375 of 2018
GST
MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. B.N. KARIA JJ.
Appearance:
MR D K TRIVEDI (5283) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2
for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2,3,4
ORAL ORDER
(PER : MR.AKIL KURESHI)
1. Petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to carry forward balance CENVAT Credit available as on 30.06.2017.
2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the petitioner, a private company is engaged in manufacturing activity. As on 30.06.2017, i.e. the last date of CENVAT regime, the petitioner

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

titioner could not file the necessary declarations. The petitioner was under bona fide belief that such errors would be resolved. The petitioner admitted that no screenshot of having made an attempt to upload the return was maintained.
3. To this communication, the department replied on 03.05.2018 stating that there is no provision for filing physical return. The petitioner had not contacted the department during the time permitted for filing the return pointing out the difficulties in E-filing.
At that stage, this petition was filed.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any reason to interfere. We are conscious, as pointed out by the counsel for the petitioner that some High Courts have intercepted and obvi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of fertilizers supplied for use in the manufacture of other fertilizers at 5% GST rate.

Classification of fertilizers supplied for use in the manufacture of other fertilizers at 5% GST rate.
15/2018-GST Dated:- 20-8-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 15/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 20th August, 2018.
Sub : Classification of fertilizers supplied for use in the manufacture of other fertilizers at 5% GST rate- reg.
No. CT/GST-15/2017/168.- References have been received regarding a clarification as to whether simple fertilizers, such as MOP (Murate of Potash) classified under Chapter 31, and supplied for use in manufacturing of a complex fertilizer, are entitled to the concessional GST rate of 5%, as applicable in general

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e was applied to goods falling under Chapter 31 which are clearly to be used directly as fertilizers or in the manufacture of other fertilizers, whether directly or through the stage of an intermediate product.
3. In the GST regime, tax structure on fertilizers has been prescribed on the lines of pre-GST tax incidence. The wording of the GST notification is similar to the central excise notification except certain changes to meet the requirements of GST. These changes were necessitated as GST is applicable on the supply of goods while central excise duty was applicable on manufacture of goods. Accordingly, fertilizers falling under heading 3102, 3103, 3104 and 3105, other than those which are clearly not to be used as fertilizers, attract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products.

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products.
14/2018-GST Dated:- 20-8-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 14/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 20th August, 2018.
Sub : Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products – regarding
No. CT/GST-15/2017/167.-References have been received regarding the applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products during the course of continuous supply, such as Methyl Et

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tained by these manufacturers (recipient of supply), and the remaining quantity is returned to the oil refineries. In this regard, an issue has arisen as to whether in this transaction GST would be leviable on the whole quantity of the principal raw materials supplied by the oil refinery or on the net quantity retained by the manufacturers of petrochemical and chemical products.
3. The GST Council in its 28th meeting held on 21-07-2018 discussed this issue and recommended for issuance of a general clarification for petroleum sector that in such transactions, GST will be payable by the refinery on the value of net quantity of petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products.
4. Accordingly, it is hereby c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on various goods and services.

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on various goods and services.
13/2018-GST Dated:- 20-8-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES,
ASSAM KAR BHAWAN DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 13/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 20th August, 2018.
Sub : Clarification regarding applicability of GST on various goods and services-reg.
No. CT/GST-15/2017/166.- Representations have been received seeking clarification in respect of applicable GST rates on the following items:
(i) Fortified Toned Milk
(ii) Refined beet and cane sugar
(iii) Tamarind Kernel Powder (Modified & Un-Modified form)
(iv) Drinking water
(v) Plasma products
(vi) Wipes using spun lace non-woven fabric
(vii) Real Zari Kasab (Thread)
(viii) Marine Engine
(ix) Quilt and comforter
(x) Bus body building as supply of motor vehicle or job work
(xi) Disc Brake Pad
2. The matter has been examined. The issue-wise clarifications are discussed below:
3.1 Applicability

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

017/14 dated 29.06.2017], 5% GST rate has been prescribed on all kinds of beet and cane sugar falling under heading 1701.
4.2 Doubts seem to have arisen in view of Sl. No. 32 A of the Schedule Il of notification No. No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017], which prescribes GST rate on “All goods, falling under tariff items 1701 91 and 1701 99 including refined sugar containing added flavouring or colouring matter, sugar cubes (other than those which attract 5% or Nil GST)”.
4.3 It is clarified that by virtue of specific exclusion in Sl. No. 32 A, any sugar that falls under 5% category [at the said Sl. No. 91 of schedule I of notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017] gets excluded from the Sl. No. 32 A of Schedule 11. As all kinds of beet and cane sugar falling under heading 1701 are covered by the said entry at Sl. No. 91 of Schedule I, these would get excluded from Sl. No. 32 A of Schedule Il, and thus would attract GST @ 5%.
4.4 Accordingly, it

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l powder and treated (modified) tamarind kernel powder fall under chapter 13, it is hereby clarified that both attract 5% GST in terms of the said notification.
6.1 Applicability of GST on supply of safe drinking water for public purpose: Representations have been received seeking clarification regarding applicability of GST on supply of safe drinking water for public purpose.
6.2 Attention is drawn to the entry at Sl. No. 99 of notification No. 2/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/15 dated 29.06.2017], by virtue of which water [other than aerated, mineral, purified, distilled, medicinal, ionic, battery, de-mineralized and water sold in sealed container] falling under HS code 2201 attracts NIL rate of GST.
6.3 Accordingly, supply of water, other than those excluded from Sl. No. 99 of notification No. 2/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/15 dated 29.06.2017], would attract GST at “NIL” rate. Therefore, it is clarified that supply of drinking water for public purposes, if it is not supplied in a sealed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

id notification, not specifically covered in the said List I.
7.4 Thus, a harmonious reading of the two entries would mean that normal human plasma would attract 5% GST rate under List I (Sl. No. 186), whereas plasma products would attract 12% GST rate, if otherwise not specifically covered under the said List.
8.1 Appropriate classification of baby wipes, facial tissues and other similar products: Varied practices are being followed regarding the classification of baby wipes, facial tissues and other similar products, and references have been received requesting for correct classification of these products. As per the references, these products are currently being classified under different HS codes namely 3307, 3401 and 5603 by the industry.
8.2 Commercially, wipes are categorized into various types such as baby wipes, facial wipes, disinfectant wipes, make-up remover wipes etc. These products are generally made by using non-woven fabrics of viscose and polyviscous blend and are s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by the components which are to be mixed with the textile material.
8.4 As per the explanatory notes to the HSN, the HS code 5603 clearly excludes non-woven, impregnated, coated or covered with substances or preparations such as perfumes or cosmetics, soaps or detergents, polishes, creams or similar preparations. The HSN is reproduced as follows :
“The heading also excludes.
Nonwoven, impregnated, coated or covered with substances or preparations [i.e. perfumes or cosmetics (Chapter 33), soaps or detergents (heading 3401), polishes, creams, or similar preparations (heading 3405), fabric, softeners (heading 3809)] where the textile material is present merely as a carrying medium. Further, HS code 3307 covers wadding, felt and non-woven, impregnated, coated or covered with perfumes or cosmetics. The HS code 3401, would cover paper, wadding, felt and non-woven impregnated, coated or covered with soap or detergent whether or not perfumed”.
8.5 Further, as per the explanatory notes to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

05 attracts 12% GST, as per entry 137 of the Schedule-II-12% of the notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017], while specified embroidery product falling under 5809 and 5810 attracts GST @ 5%, as per entry no. 220 of the Schedule-I-5% of the above-mentioned notification.
9.2 The heading 5809 and 5810 cover embroidery and zari articles. These heading do not cover yarn of any kinds. Hence, while these headings apply to embroidery articles, embroidery in piece, in strips, or in motifs, they do not apply to yarn, including Kasab yarn.
9.3 Further all types of metallised yarns or threads are classifiable under tariff heading 5605. Kasab (yarn) falls under this heading. Under heading 5605, real zari manufactured with silver wire gimped (vitai) on core yarn namely pure silk and cotton and finally gilted with gold would attract 5% GST under tariff item 5605 00 10, as specified at entry no. 218A of Schedule-I-5% of the GST rate schedule. Other goods falling under this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f item 8408 1093 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 would attract a GST rate of 5% by virtue of SI. No. 252 of Schedule 1 of the notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017].
10.2 Therefore, it is clarified that the supplies of marine engine for fishing vessel (being a part of the fishing vessel), falling under tariff item 8408 10 93 attracts 5% GST.
11.1 Applicable GST rate on cotton quilts under tariff heading 9404-Scope of the term “Cotton Quilt”.
11.2 Cotton quilts falling under tariff heading 9404 attract a GST rate of 5% if the sale value of such cotton quilts does not exceed ₹ 1000 per piece [as per SI. No. 257 A of Schedule I of the notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017]. However, such cotton quilts, with sale value exceeding ₹ 1000 per piece attract a GST rate of 12% (as per Sl. No. 224A of Schedule Il of the said notification), Doubts have been raised as to what constitutes cotton quilt, i.e. whether a quilt filled w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t, it is mentioned that the services of bus body fabrication on job work basis attracts 18% GST on such service. Thus, fabrication of buses may involve the following two situations:
(a). Bus body builder builds a bus, working on the chassis owned by him and supplies the built-up bus to the customer, and charges the customer for the value of the bus.
(b). Bus body builder builds body on chassis provided by the principal for body building, and charges fabrication charges (including certain material that was consumed during the process of job-work).
12.3 In the above context, it is hereby clarified that in case as mentioned at Para 12.2(a) above, the supply made is that of bus, and accordingly supply would attract GST @28%. In the case as mentioned at Para 12.2(b) above, fabrication of body on chassis provided by the principal (not on account of body builder), the supply would merit classification as service, and 18% GST as applicable will be charged accordingly.
13.1 Applicable GST r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, disc, etc.) and parts thereof (plates, drums, cylinders, mounted linings, oil reservoirs for hydraulic brakes, etc.); servo-brakes and parts thereof, while Chapter 68 covers articles of Stone, Plaster, Cement, Asbestos, Mica or similar materials. Further, HSN Explanatory Notes to the heading 6813 specifically excludes:
(i). Friction materials not containing mineral materials or cellulose fibre (e.g., those of cork);
(ii). Mounted brake linings (including friction material fixed to a metal plate provided with circular cavities, perforated tongues or similar fittings, for disc brakes) which are classified as parts of the machines or vehicles for which they are designed (e.g. heading 8708).
13.4 Thus, it is clear, in view of the HSN Explanatory Notes that the said goods, namely “Disc Brake pad” for automobiles, are appropriately classifiable under heading 8708 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and would attract 28% GST.
This Circular is clarificatory in nature and not meant for any in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

To prescribe the due dates for quarterly furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover of upto 1.5 crores for the period from July, 2018 to March, 2019.

To prescribe the due dates for quarterly furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover of upto 1.5 crores for the period from July, 2018 to March, 2019.
33/2018-State Tax Dated:- 20-8-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya,
Mumbai 400 032, dated the 20th August 2018.
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 33/2018-State Tax
No. GST-1018/C.R. 34/Taxation 1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the “said Act”), the Government of Maharashtra, on the recommendations of the Council

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: SAMPADA CATERERS PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HEDAOO

IN RE: SAMPADA CATERERS PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HEDAOO
GST
2018 (9) TMI 439 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
GST-ARA-45/2018-19/B-97
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by SAMPADA CATERERS, PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HEDAOO the applicant, seeking an advance ruling i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e with request to allow withdrawal of the application filed on 25.06.2018 due to changes in the circumstances as per Notification No. 13/2018-Central Tax (Rate) and press release by the GST Council
The request of the applicant to withdraw the application voluntarily and unconditionally is hereby allowed without going into the merits or detailed facts of this advance ruling application by this authority.
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-45/2018-19/B-97
Mumbai, dt. 20/08/2018
The Application in GST ARA form No. 01 of M/s. SAMPADA CATERERS, PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HFDAOO vide reference ARA No. 45 dated 25.06.2018 is disposed o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =