VALIDITY OF E-WAYBILL

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN – Dated:- 9-7-2018 – Validity of e-way bill The e-way bill shall not be valid for movement of goods by road unless the information in Part B of Form GST EWB – 01 has been furnished except in the case of movements covered except in the following types of movements- Movement less than 10 kilometers within the State or the Union Territory from the place of business of the consignor to the place of business to the transporter for further transporter; Where the goods are transported for a distance of less than 10 kilometers within the State or the Union Territory from the place of business of the transporter finally to the place of business of the consignee, the details of conveyance may not be updated in the e-way bill. Validity period Rule 138(10) provides the validity period of e-way bill generated through e-way bill portal. The said rule provides that an a-way bill or a consolidated e-way bill generated shall be valid for the per

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o be covered is 500 kms., the validity period starts from 15.00 hours on 05.02.2018 and it is valid up to 14.59 hours on 10.02.2018. Over dimensional cargo The explanation 2 to Rule 138 (10) defines the expression over dimensional cargo as a cargo carried as a single indivisible unit and which exceeds the dimensional limits prescribed in rule 93 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, made under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988). Rule 93 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 provides that the overall width of a motor vehicle, measured at right angles to the axis of the motor vehicle between perpendicular planes enclosing the extreme points, 3shall not exceed 2.6 meters. For purposes of this rule, a rear-view mirror, or guard rail or a direction indicator rub-rail (rubber beading) having maximum thickness of 20 mm on each side of the body shall not be taken into consideration in measuring the overall width of a motor vehicle. The overall width of a construction equipment v

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

articulated (vestibule type) passenger transport vehicle, 18 meters (In the case of single articulated passenger transport vehicles of 18 meters length and double articulated passenger transport vehicles up to 25 meters, permission of the State Government shall be obtained regarding their plying on selected routes depending upon local road conditions, width, maneuverability of the vehicle in traffic, as deemed fit. These passenger transport vehicles will also be required to have a closed circuit TV system for proper visibility in and around the passenger transport vehicle by the driver to maintain safety. Intercom system shall also be provided in such passenger transport vehicle. In addition, the standing passenger will be allowed only on the lower deck of double articulated passenger transport vehicle.) in the case of double articulate passenger transport vehicles, 25 meters In the case of an articulated vehicle or a tractor-trailer combination specially constructed and used for the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sanjay Kumar Bhuwalka, Neeraj Jain Versus Union of India

2018 (7) TMI 589 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – 2018 (362) E.L.T. 568 (Cal.) , 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 582 (Cal.) – Fraudulent issuance of tax invoices under GST – allegation of business of generating and selling of fake tax invoices to various entities without supplying the underlying goods or services – Arrest of persons – Grant of Bail – “reasons to believe” – Based on such reasonable belief, the Additional Director General directed the officers concerned to arrest the petitioners in terms of the provisions stipulated under Section 69 of the said Act and they were arrested on 12.05.2018 – Held that:- ‘Reasonable belief’ or reason to believe as a standard to arrest requires that arresting officer subjectively believe that the suspect has committed the offence and that objectively reasonable person would reach the same conclusion. Reasonable grounds do not require as much evidence as a prima facie case but do require that thing believed to be more likely than not.

It is settled position

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mukherjee Mr. K.L. Mukherjee Mrs. Aroshi Rathore Mrs. Kriti Mehorotra For the Opposite Party : Mr. K.K. Maity ORDER Shivakant Prasad, J. The above two cases under provision of Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed by two separate petitioners under the same Memo of Arrest by the opposite party, Union of India whereunder petitioners have prayed for enlarging them on bail, inter alia, on the grounds stated in the petitions. Both the cases were heard analogously as the legal issue and the factual aspects of the case are common. So they can be disposed of by a common judgment. To speak precisely, the applications are directed against the order dated 28.05.2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sealdah in connection with Case No. C 216 of 2018 arising out of DGCEI F. No. 29/KZU/KOL/GR.D/2018 dated 12.5.2018 under Section 132(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 whereby prayer of the petitioners to enlarge them on bail was turned down. Mr. K.K. Ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e input tax credit leading to loss of Government revenue. It is contended that the investigation revealed that all the above fake companies were being controlled and run by a group of persons including Shri Sanjay Kumar Bhuwalka and Shri Neeraj Jain being the petitioners herein. Summons were issued to the petitioners under Section 70 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 174(2) of the said Act and in their statements, they have admitted that they were looking after and controlling the business activities of the companies. It was further revealed that various companies were controlled by them who have passed on fake input GST credit to the tune of ₹ 27 crore and ₹ 12 crore respectively to the recipient entities. Accordingly, it is submitted by Mr. Maity that in view of such fraudulent activities by the petitioners, the Additional Director General had reasons to believe that the petitioners have committed the offences stipulated under Section 132 sub-section (1)(a), (b) and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erson is arrested under sub-section (1) for an offence specified under subsection (5) of section 132, the officer authorised to arrest the person shall inform such person of the grounds of arrest and produce him before a Magistrate within twenty-four hours. (3) Subject to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 174),- (a) where a person is arrested under sub-section (1) for any offence specified under sub-section (4) of section 132, he shall be admitted to bail or in default of bail, forwarded to the custody of the Magistrate; (b) Commissioner or the Assistant Commissioner shall, for the purpose of releasing an arrested person on bail or otherwise, have the same powers and be subject to the same provisions as an officer-in-charge of a police station." Mr. Sekhar Basu, learned senior counsel for the petitioners stressed on the word reasons to believe appearing in section 69(1) of the Act contending that a Statute, be it of any nature, civil, criminal, quasi cri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Act. It has been argued that it is trite law that a provision of law which seeks to apply will lead to deprivation of liberty of a citizen, ought to be construed strictly regard being had to the mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, namely, the observance of "procedure established by law . Under Section 69 of the Act the functionary is the Commissioner as defined in Section 2(24) of the Act, Commissioner means the Commissioner of central tax and includes the Principal Commissioner of central tax appointed under section 3 and the Commissioner of integrated tax appointed under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act. My attention is invited to the said provision contending that there has been a delegation of the power of the Commissioner or Additional Director General Goods and Service Tax Intelligence and that delegatee has exercised the power of the delegator under Section 69 of the Act. Common law principles which are in vogue in our country accepts and in law en

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Parshad vs. State of Haryana reported in 1993 Supp(2) Supreme Court Cases 497 at paragraph 4 of extract of the observation in the cited judgment which reads thus- 4. Under the Indian penal law, guilt in respect of almost all the offences is fastened either on the ground of "intention" or "knowledge" or "reason to believe". We are now concerned with the expressions "knowledge" and "reason to believe". "Knowledge" is an awareness on the part of the person concerned indicating his state of mind. "Reason to believe'" is another facet of the state of mind. "Reason to believe" is not the same thing as "suspicion" or "doubt" and mere seeing also cannot be equated to believing. "Reason to believe" is a higher level of state of mind. Likewise "knowledge" will be slightly on higher plane than "reason to believe". A person can be supposed to know where there is a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in the case…… Bearing in mind the principle laid in the said observation, it is suffice to say such "reasons to believe" has to be formed by the Commissioner after the records of such inspection and search are communicated to him under sub-section 10 of section 67 of the Act or in any other manner the materials are placed before him for the formation of his "reason to believe". When the Commissioner or the delegatee has reason to believe that the person concerned has committed an offence which necessitates arrest, an order has to be passed and such order logically, reasonably and prudentially must be informed by reasons or must contain the reasons which have emanated from "reasons to believe" entertained by the authority concerned. Adverting to the Memo of Arrest and the order endorsed thereon it is urged by Mr. Basu that in unmistakable terms the Additional Director General Goods and Service Tax Intelligence has merely exercised his authorit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of the offences mentioned in section 69 of the Act and come to his own conclusion for effecting arrest unhindered, unaffected by interference from any quarter. It is further contended that the entire exercise by the officers sub-ordinate to the Additional Director General Goods and Service Tax Intelligence and the ultimate signature on the document by the Additional Director General Goods and Service Tax Intelligence are merely topsy-turvy, deplorable administrative exercise of power and a threat to the Constitutional observance of "procedure established by law". It is further submitted that despite delegation of powers of the Commissioner on officers sub-ordinate to him, the structural edifice of the statute presents the Commissioner to be at the helm of affairs. To buttress such contention, the attention of this Court has been drawn to Section 134 of the Act which is couched in a negative language and says that no cognizance of any offence punishable under the Act shall b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vested them with all the powers under the said Act and the Rules made thereunder. In terms of the said Notification, the post of Additional Director General, Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, is equivalent to the post of Commissioner. Accordingly, the said Additional Director General, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, has been empowered under section 69 of the Act to exercise all the powers invested in the Commissioner of Central Tax. Therefore, he was well within his jurisdiction while directing the concerned officers to arrest the said persons. In response to the interpretation as to reasonable belive Mr. Maity submitted that the office note reveals that the said Additional Director General, based on the facts brought out from the investigation conducted by the DGGI, had reasons to believe that the petitioners have committed the offence specified under clauses (a), (b) and (c) of sub- section (1) of section 132 of the said Act. Based on such reasonable be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

der a reasonable belief or not is a justiceable one, but once it is held that there was material, relevant and germen the sufficiency of the material is not open to judicial review. Having regard to rival contentions I am of the considered opinion that reasonable belief or reason to believe as a standard to arrest requires that arresting officer subjectively believe that the suspect has committed the offence and that objectively reasonable person would reach the same conclusion. Reasonable grounds do not require as much evidence as a prima facie case but do require that thing believed to be more likely than not. Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid contentions, the submission of the petitioners that no reason has been assigned for arrest has no legs to stand upon, particularly in view of the fact that the said office note itself clearly provides the reasons to believe that such arrests were warranted. In the given facts of the case as per the Memo of Arrest it is crystal clear that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

submitted that they are either labourer of jute mill or tea seller or unemployed aged between 20 to 30. In their statement, they stated that through agent of the accused Shri Sanjay Bhuwalka they met the accused and submitted copies of their personal documents like PAN Card, Voter Id Card etc. and signed many other documents. In exchange, the accused promised to pay them ₹ 4,000/- per month. Further, the Department has recorded statement of Bank Manager of Laxmivilas Bank on 11.05.2018, where he categorically mentioned that Bank accounts relating to the fake/shell companies were operated either by the accused themselves or by their employee and in the event petitioners are enlarged on bail, there is every probability of tampering the documents and the recipient who have received the fake tax invoices from them and wrongfully availed the input tax credit will destroy the documents resulting in loss of Government revenue to the Exchequer. It is further submitted that during investi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e case of Rajesh Goyal -Vs- Union of India reported in 2012 (284) E.L.T. 164 Raj it has been observed that the accused petitioner has evaded the excise duty causing a great loss to the public exchequer. Hence, the offence being of grave nature, the petitioner should not be allowed bail. The Hon'ble Court also held that the act of the petitioners may be termed as Royal Thievery' which is opposed to both democracy and society. In the case of Subhas Chandra Bal Chandra Badjata -Vs- DGCE (Intelligence) Mumbai reported in 2015(324) E.L.T 307-Born the Hon'ble Court has observed that the material collected shows that false record was created for evasion of excise duty. Thus it is case of forgery and fraud. In the case of Directorate of revenue Intelligence -Vs- Chander Prakash Verma reported in 2016 (332) E.L.T 693 Del. the Hon'ble Court has held that custody of accused person in a case like the instant one is not to be measured in days but it has to be seen whether the grant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the provision of compounding nature of the offence under Section 138 of the Act. I am fully aware of the observation of the Hon ble Supreme Court that economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the mater of a bail. The economic offence having deep rooted conspiracy and involving huge loss of public funds needs to be viewed seriously and considerd as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing a serious threat to the financial health of the country. While granting bail, the Court has to keep in mind the nature of the accusations, the nature of evidence in support thereof the severity of the punishment which conviction will entail, the character of the accused, reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tampered with, the larger interest of the public/ State and others similar consideration are requied to be taken into consideration. Nevertheless, bearing in mind the evidence having been collect

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Hinduja Foundries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

2018 (7) TMI 610 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – CENVAT Credit – capital goods sent to job-worker premises not brought back – Held that:- The appellants after shifting the capital goods to their job worker in 2005 has issued a returnable delivery challan with central excise invoice and also paid duty. Thereafter in 2011, though invoices were issued showing that the capital goods were turned to the appellant’s factory, they have not been actually returned – The only explanation given by the appellant is that the documents evidencing that the goods have been returned is not traceable. Such a flimsy explanation is not acceptable.

Demand upheld – appeal dismissed – decided against appellant. – Appeal No. E/40354/2018 – Final Order No. 41953 / 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ks and reversed the same while removing the capital goods. Later, basing on three invoices dated 9.5.2011, the appellant again availed credit on these capital goods, although the goods were not received back into the appellant s factory. It is seen again that the appellant raised further three invoices dated 17.5.2011 so as to shift the capital goods to M/s. Shanthi Casting Works by paying duty of ₹ 82,400/-. Since the availment of credit on 9.5.2011, without receiving the inputs into the factory was ineligible, show cause notice was issued to the appellant for recovery of the credit to the tune of ₹ 5,92,946/- along with interest and for imposing penalties. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

,946/- showing that the capital goods are returned to the appellant s factory. However, the goods were not returned. The appellant has availed credit of the said amount though the goods were not returned. Further, another invoice of ₹ 82,400/- was raised showing that the capital goods are again shifted to the job worker for which also they have availed credit. Therefore, the appellant is guilty of wrongful availment of credit and the demand, interest and the penalty imposed is legal and proper. 4. Heard both sides. 5. After hearing the submissions and perusing the records, it is brought out that the appellants after shifting the capital goods to their job worker in 2005 has issued a returnable delivery challan with central excise invo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Rane Brake Lining Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

2018 (7) TMI 611 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – CENVAT Credit – input services – Director Sitting Fees – premium for product liability insurance – Revenue claims that the insurance is post manufacturing activity – Held that:- The risk covers the defects with the product. In such cases, when there are defects to the product, the appellant / manufacturer will have to recall the product and thereby incur huge financial loss. The insurance is for covering the financial loss of the appellant / manufacturer and it cannot be considered as a post-manufacturing activity – This cannot be said to be a post-manufacturing activity for the reason that such insurance policies addresses the financial risks of the manufacturer – denial of credit unjustified.

Director Sitting Fees – Held that:- It is the duty of the director to attend the meetings and therefore the service tax paid on such fees is eligible for credit – credit allowed.

Appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. E

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f the product defects if any. The said insurance covers the risk which includes product liability, product guarantee, financial loss and product risk insurance for product linings, disc pads, clutch facings and railway brake blocks. This service was availed and service tax was paid on such expenses in order to cover the financial loss if any occurred because of defects in the finished products manufactured and cleared by the appellant and thus it has a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity carried out by them. Thus the denial of credit on product liability insurance is incorrect. She relied upon the decision in the case of Granules India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad – 2017 (5) TMI 1079 – CESTAT Hyderabad. With regard to the disallowance of credit on fees paid for director sitting, she submitted that they have discharged the liability under reverse charge mechanism and it is incumbent upon the Director to attend the meetings and therefore the same is directl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t-manufacturing activity and the liability arose only when the goods are handed over to the buyers. In fact, as per the explanation given by the appellant, it can be seen that the risk covers the defects with the product. In such cases, when there are defects to the product, the appellant / manufacturer will have to recall the product and thereby incur huge financial loss. The insurance is for covering the financial loss of the appellant / manufacturer and it cannot be considered as a post-manufacturing activity. The finance / raising a capital or adjustment of finances by way of taking insurance etc. falls within the inclusive part of the definition. This cannot be said to be a post-manufacturing activity for the reason that such insurance policies addresses the financial risks of the manufacturer. Further, in the case of Granules India Ltd. (supra), the Tribunal has held that the credit availed on directors liability insurance is eligible. I find that the disallowance of credit on th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Esskay Design & Structures Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

2018 (7) TMI 621 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit – Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – rejection on the ground that the premises has not been registered by the appellant before availing the credit – Held that:- The issue stands settled in the case of COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX-III, CHENNAI VERSUS REED ELSEVIER PRIVATE LIMITED, CUSTOM, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI [2017 (4) TMI 1234 – MADRAS HIGH COURT], where it was held that Rule 5 of the 2004 Rules does not stipulate registration of premises as a necessary prerequisite for claiming a refund – refund cannot be rejected on this ground – appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal Nos. ST/42235 & 42236/2017 – Final Order Nos. 41956-41957 / 2018 – Dated:- 9-7-2018 – Hon ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) Shri M. Kannan, Advocate for the Appellant Shri R. Subramaniam, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in providing c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

four grounds. Hence the appellant is now before the Tribunal. 3. The ld. counsel Shri M. Kannan submitted the details of the relevant claims which is as under:- S. No. Period of claim Amount claimed as refund 1. July 2014 to Sep. 2014 Rs.10,76,487/- 2. Jan. 2015 to March 2015 Rs.8,56,326/- 3.1 He submitted that the adjudicating authority had considered all the grounds in the adjudication order and held that the assessee is not required to fulfill the condition of filing declaration and therefore the proposal for rejection of the refund claim on this ground is not correct. With regard to the second ground that the service recipient and assessee are the same entity, it was clarified by the adjudicating authority that both these are different and distinct entities. In regard to the ground for rejection that the appellant has not mentioned the quantum of export in their ST-3 returns for April 2014 to September 2014, it was held by the adjudicating authority that this was merely an error in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

findings in the impugned order. He submitted that the grounds proposed for rejection are legal and proper and therefore the adjudicating authority ought not to have allowed the refund. 5. Heard both sides. 6. The foremost contention put forward by the ld. counsel for the appellant is that although the adjudicating authority has given a clear cut finding that rejection of refund on three grounds are not legal and proper, the Commissioner (Appeals) has traversed into these grounds and held against the appellant which is not proper. The department having not filed any appeal against the Order-in-Original, I find force in the contention of the ld. counsel. Thus, the rejection of refund as held by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order on the three grounds is incorrect and requires to be set aside, for the reason that the department has not appealed against the order passed by the adjudicating authority. 6.1 The issue that remains for consideration is whether the appellant is elig

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Chamunda Papers Pvt. Ltd Versus Union Of India And 4 Others

2018 (7) TMI 665 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI – Extension of time for filing GST Tran-1 – case of petitioner is that despite making several efforts on the last date for filing of the application, the electronic system of the respondent no.2 did not respond – Held that:- The respondents are directed to reopen the portal within two weeks from today. In the event they do not do so, they will entertain the GST TRAN-1 of the petitioner manually and pass orders on it after due verification of the credits as claimed by the petitioner – Petition allowed. – WRIT TAX No. 944 of 2018 Dated:- 9-7-2018 – Hon'ble Bharati Sapru And Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh, JJ. For the Petitioner : Suyash Agarwal For the Respondent : A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Ramesh Cha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

filing of the application, the electronic system of the respondent no.2 did not respond, as a result of which the petitioner is likely to suffer loss of the credit that it is entitled to by passage of time. In view of the above, the respondents are directed to reopen the portal within two weeks from today. In the event they do not do so, they will entertain the GST TRAN-1 of the petitioner manually and pass orders on it after due verification of the credits as claimed by the petitioner. They will also ensure that the petitioner is allowed to pay its taxes on the regular electronic system also which is being maintained for use of the credit likely to be considered for the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the respondents may file a counter af

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Alkraft Thermotechnologies Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

2018 (7) TMI 686 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – CENVAT Credit – input services – outward transportation of goods for the goods cleared from their factory gate to their own units at Jamshedpur and Uttarakhand – Stock transfer – place of removal – periods September 2009 to February, 2010 and October 2014 to April 2015, May 2015 to February 2016.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ultratech Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 117 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] had laid the law that after 1.4.2008 CENVAT credit on GTA service is not eligible from the factory to buyer’s premises and eligible only upto the place of removal which is the factory gate – credit cannot be allowed.

Appeal dismissed – decided against appellant. – Appeal Nos. E/40311 to 40313/2018 – Final Order Nos. 41949-41951 / 2018 – Dated:- 9-7-2018 – Hon ble Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member ( Judicial ) Shri R. Anish Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER The issue in all these ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he appellant, ld. counsel Shri Ashwin Kumar submitted that the appellant in the present cases are contesting the issue of disallowance of credit on GTA services for outward transportation of goods which were stock transferred to their own factory which is a manufacturing unit located at Jamshedpur and Uttarakhand. He referred to Section 4(3)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and submitted that the place of removal is defined as a factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of the excisable goods. In terms of Rule 2(qa) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 also the place of removal means a factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of the excisable goods. The place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale . In the case of stock transfer, the entire goods are transferred to the other manufacturing unit of the appellant and therefore at the factory gate no sale takes place. Thus, in the case when the goods are stock

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

premises after 1.4.2008 is not eligible. 5. Heard both sides. 6. For better appreciation, the relevant provisions of law are reproduced as under:- Place of removal means – (i) a factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of the excisable goods; (ii) a warehouse or any other place or premises wherein the excisable goods have been permitted to be deposited without [payment of duty;] [(iii) a depot, premises of a consignment agent or any other place or premises from where the excisable goods are to be sold after their clearance from the factory;] from where such goods are removed . Input services after 1.4.2008 Input service means,- (i) services provided or agreed to be provided by a person located in non-taxable territory to a person located in non-taxable territory by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India where service tax is paid by the manufacturer or the provider of output service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o the place of removal. [but excludes], – [(A) service portion in the execution of a works contract and construction services including service listed under clause (b) of section 66E of the Finance Act (hereinafter referred as specified services) in so far as they are used for – (a) construction or execution of works contract of a building or a civil structure or a part thereof; or (b) laying of foundation or making of structures for support of capital goods, except for the provision of one or more of the specified services; or] [(B) [services provided by way of renting of a motor vehicle], in so far as they relate to a motor vehicle which is not a capital goods 7. With effect from 1.4.2008, in the definition of input services the words upto the place of removal has been substituted instead of from the place of removal . The ld. counsel has strenuously argued that since there is no sale of goods from the factory gate when the goods are stock transferred to their own unit for further ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wn unit on payment of duty. The relevant portion of the order is reproduced as under:- 6. I find that both lower authorities have confirmed demand of Cenvat credit on GTA only on the ground that clearances to the job worker and their own unit made on payment of duty, for this reason it was contended that factory of the appellant is place of removal and credit cannot be allowed beyond the place of removal. I find that though the goods were cleared on payment of duty but it is admittedly not clearance for sale of the goods. In terms of Section 4(3)(c) of Central Excise Act, 1944, definition of place of removal is as under : Place of removal means :- (i) a factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of excisable goods; (ii) a warehouse or any other place or premises wherein the excisable goods have been permitted to be deposited without payment of duty; (iii) a depot, premises of a consignment agent or any other place or premises from where the excisable goods are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ualified as input service. As per this clear position in law, I am of the view GTA in the present case being used up to the place of removal covered under the definition of input service and hence admissible for Cenvat credit. I therefore, set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal with consequential relief, if any, in accordance with law. 8. In Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd. (supra), the Tribunal referring to Roofit Industries Ltd. (supra), has observed that credit of service tax paid on transportation of clinker to their sister unit is admissible as there is no case of sale and transfer of property in goods at the factory gate. The relevant portion is as follows:- 6. After careful consideration of the facts, the submissions of both the sides and the case laws cited, it appears that the facts do not involve any sale of the goods in question. The goods viz. clinker is to be transported from party s premises to their sister unit premises and the respondent viz. Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd. i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

le Apex Court in the case of Ultratech Ltd. (supra) had laid the law that after 1.4.2008 CENVAT credit on GTA service is not eligible from the factory to buyer s premises and eligible only upto the place of removal which is the factory gate. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced as under:- 7. It may be relevant to point out here that the original definition of input service contained in Rule 2(l) of the Rules, 2004 used the expression from the place of removal . As per the said definition, service used by the manufacturer of clearance of final products from the place of removal to the warehouse or customer s place etc., was exigible for Cenvat Credit. This stands finally decided in Civil Appeal No. 11710 of 2016 (Commissioner of Central Excise Belgaum v. M/s. Vasavadatta Cements Ltd.) vide judgment dated January 17, 2018. However, vide amendment carried out in the aforesaid Rules in the year 2008, which became effective from March 1, 2008, the word from is replaced by the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

MGI Infra Private Limited. Versus Assistant Commissioner State Goods and Service Tax Others

2018 (7) TMI 754 – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT – 2018 (15) G. S. T. L. 481 (Cal.) , [2018] 59 G S.T.R. 169 (Cal) – Extension of time to obtain the final registration – CGST Act, 2017 and the WB GST Act, 2017 – Held that:- The Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 are new in their operation. In the facts of the present case, it appears that, the petitioner has suffered under circumstances beyond its control, preventing the petitioner to take appropriate steps under the two Acts of 2017 – It would be appropriate to request the first respondent so far as the State authorities are concerned and 4th respondent so far as the central authorities are concerned to consider and decide the request of the peti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ppearing for the petitioner submits that, although the petitioner enjoys provisional registration, the final registration could not have done as the office of the petitioner is located at a very remote area. Such area had faced various political problems over a considerable period of time, preventing the petitioner from taking appropriate steps with regard to obtaining of final registration. The State and the Central authorities are represented. The Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 are new in their operation. In the facts of the present case, it appears that, the petitioner has suffered under circumstances beyond its control, preventing the petitioner to take appropriate steps under the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Versus M/s. Visual Graphics Computing Services India Pvt Ltd

2018 (7) TMI 1394 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI – Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit – Rule 5 of CCR 2004 – rejection of refund on the ground of non-registration of premises – Held that:- Reliance was placed in the case of mPortal India Wireless Solutions Private Limited V. Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore [2011 (9) TMI 450 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT], where it was held that Registration not compulsory for refund – refund cannot be denied – appeal dismissed – decided against Revenue. – C.M.A. No. 1457 of 2018 Dated:- 9-7-2018 – S. Manikumar And Subramonium Prasad, JJ. For the Appellant : Mrs. R. Hemalatha JUDGMENT ( Judgment of this Court was made by S. Manikumar, J. ) Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Final Order No.42324 of 2017, dated 11/10/2017, on the file of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench, Chennai. 2. Short facts leading to the appeal are that, M/s.Visual Graphics Computing Services India Pvt Ltd., Chennai are the provider of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ted 11/10/2017, in allowing refund of CENVAT Credit even without registration is correct? 2. Whether the CESTAT is correct in not considering the safeguards, conditions and limitations as stipulated in the Appendix to the Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT), dated 18/6/2012 5. Supporting the prayer, Ms.R.Hemalatha, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that registration is an act by which every manufacturer/assessee/service provider, comes under the ambit of Central Excise Act, 1944 / Finance Act, 1994. In order to avail any substantive benefit, like, CENVAT Credit available under the statute, registration of premises from which the taxable service is rendered is a pre-requisite. Therefore, when registration has not been done as per Section 69 of the Act, the respondent is not entitled for refund of CENVAT read with rule 4(1) of the Rules which render them ineligible far CENVAT credit an input services accumulated prior to registration. 6. Learned counsel for the appellant further sub

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) vide para 5.16 held as follows: "Modvat law has codified procedure far adjustment of duty liability against Modvat Account. That is required to be carried out In accordance with law and unadjusted amount is not expressly permitted to be refunded. In absence of express provision to grant refund, that is difficult to entertain except in the case of export. There cannot be presumption that in the absence of debarment to make refund, in other cases that is permissible. Refund results in outflow from treasury, which needs sanction of law and an order of refund for such purpose is sine qua non. Law has only recognized the event of export of goods for refund of Modvat credit as has been rightly pleaded by Revenue and present reference is neither the case of "otherwise due" of the refund nor the case of exported goods. Similarly absence of express grant in statute does not imply ipso facto entitlement to refund. So also absence of express grant is an implied bar for refund. Wh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

adras, for deciding the appeal in favour of the respondent, was accepted by the department due to monetary limit and not on merits, and therefore, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the ratio of the said judgment, should not have been taken as a binding precedent, in view of Section 35R (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The subsequent decision of CESTAT, Madras, vide FO No. 42500/2016 dated 20/12/2016 in the case of the same party viz., M/s Scioinspire Consulting Services (India) P Ltd. was also appealed in this Hon'ble Court, by the department vide CMA. Sr. No.54980 of 2017. 9. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Vs Sutham Nylocots, vide final order in CMA No.926/2006, dated 09.01.2014, reported in 2014 (306) E.L.T. 255 (Mad) held that 'if at all the assessee is entitled to any credit it would

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

i.e.Respondent No.1 is correct in applying the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of M/s.mPortal Wireless Solutions Private Limited when the said judgment was not accepted on merits but due to low revenue effects?" 12. After considering the provisions, relevant notifications and decisions in M/s.mPortal India Wireless Solutions Private Limited V. Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore, reported in 2012 (27) S.T.R.134 (Kar.); in Commissioner of Service Tax V. Tavant Technologies India Private Limited, reported in 2016 (3) TMI 535; in Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate V. Atrenta India Private Limited, reported in 2017 (2) ADJ 590; and in Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Vs. Sutham Nylocots, reported in 2014 (306) E.L.T. 255 (Mad), a Hon'ble Division Bench, answered the above said substantial questions of law, raised therein, against the revenue. Following the decision in C.M.A.No.860 of 2017, dated 10/4/2017, instant Civi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s I.T.I. Ltd. Versus Commissioner CGST & Central Excise, Allahabad

2018 (8) TMI 85 – CESTAT ALLAHABAD – TMI – CENVAT Credit – common input services used in manufacture of excisable goods as well as in providing trading activities – Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules – extended period of limitation – penalty – Held that:- The learned Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the part demand but set aside the penalty imposed upon appellant and Revenue is not in appeal against that part of the impugned order – The circumstances for imposition of penalty as also for the invocation of extended period are identical inasmuch as both pre-suppose a mala fide mind with intention to evade payment of duty. It is well settled that if penalty has been set aside, thus leading to believing the bona fide of the appellant, the normal period of limitation would not be available to the Revenue – the demand raised beyond the normal period of limitation is not justified, the same is set aside.

However, a part of a demand would fall within the limitation period and the learne

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eedings were initiated against them by way of issuance of a show cause notice dated 15.03.2016 raising demand of ₹ 43,44,778/- for the period from 2010-11 to 2014-15. The said show cause notice stands culminated into an order passed by the Original Adjudicating Authority confirming the demand along with confirmation of interest and imposition of penalty. This order was upheld by Commissioner (Appeals) to the extent of confirmation of demand and interest to the tune of ₹ 27,15,988/- on the ground that prior to 01.04.2011 trading activities cannot be considered to be exempted services. He also set aside the penalty imposed upon the appellant by observing that the appellant simplicitor did not reverse the amount in terms of Rule 6(3), which cannot be considered to be mala fide on their part. The said order of Commissioner (Appeals) is impugned order before Tribunal. 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant assails the impugned order on the point of limitation. He submit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of extended period are identical inasmuch as both pre-suppose a mala fide mind with intention to evade payment of duty. It is well settled that if penalty has been set aside, thus leading to believing the bona fide of the appellant, the normal period of limitation would not be available to the Revenue. As such on this ground as also by taking into account the Tribunal s decisions in the case of Krishna Auto Sales vs. Commissioner of C. EX. S.T., Chandigarh reported at 2015 (40) S.T.R. 1121 (Tri.-Del.) and Commissioner of C. EX., Mangalore reported at 2011 (270) E.L.T. 305 (S.C.), I hold that the demand raised beyond the normal period of limitation is not justified, the same is set aside. 5. However, a part of a demand would fall within the limitation period and the learned advocate has given undertaking to reverse the proportion Cenvat Credit in respect of common services, so utilized by them. It stand held in the above referred judgments that if the credit is reversed it amounts as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commission of Central GST Versus Jay Chemical Industries Ltd.

2018 (8) TMI 1392 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 459 (Guj.) – Manner in which the learned Tribunal has disposed of the appeals – matter decided pending appeals – Held that:- The procedure adopted by the learned Tribunal disposing of the appeals without deciding the same on merits with liberty approach the Tribunal after decision of this Court in the pending appeal is neither correct not proper and the same deserves to be quashed and set aside.

The impugned common order passed by the learned Tribunal is hereby quashed and set aside and the appeals are restored to the file of the learned Tribunal and to avoid any further multiplicity of proceedings /appeals before this Court, it is directed that the appeals on remand be kept pending till the decision of this Court in the case of Essar Steel India Ltd. [2016 (6) TMI 1305 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT] – appeal allowed in part. – R/TAX APPEAL NO. 767 to 770 of 2018 and 814 of 2018, 815 of 2018 Dated:- 9-7-2018 – MR. M.R. SHAH

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er appeals, without deciding the appeals on merits with liberty to approach the Tribunal after disposal of the appeal pending before this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Surat- II Vs. Essar Steel India Ltd., being Tax Appeal No.444 of 2016, the Revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeals to consider the following questions of law:- [a] Whether the CESTAT is right in law not to decide on merits though there a Jurisdictional High Court decision in case of Commissioner of C.Ex., Ahmedabad-II Vs. Cadila Healthcare Ltd. 2013 (3) STR 3 (Guj.) and Astik Dyestuff Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C.Ex. & Customs, reported in 2014 (34) STR 814 (Guj.)? [b] Whether the CESTAT is right in law passing an order for no recovery or any refund of Cenvat Credit of Service Tax paid on Sales Commission during the period? 2. Shri Nirzar Desai, learned Advocate has appeared on behalf of the Revenue in each of the appeals and Shri Dhaval Shah, learned Advocate, has appear

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

assessee in the case of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. (supra) and Astik Dyestuff Pvt. Ltd. (supra). It is submitted that however, the subsequent notification No.2/2016-CE(NT) dated 03.02.2016, by which explanation has been inserted to the definition of input service shall be made applicable retrospectively or not, the said question is at large before this Court in the case of Essar Steel India Ltd., being Tax Appeal No. 444 of 2016. It is submitted that if ultimately, it is held that the Notification No.2/16 dated 03.02.2016, by which explanation is inserted to the definition of input service, is held to be made applicable retrospectively, in that case, decisions of this Court in the case of Cadila Healthcare Ltd. (supra) and Astik Dyestuff Pvt. Ltd. (supra), shall not be applicable and that the assessee shall be entitled to the Cenvat credit on the service tax paid on sales commission. It is submitted that therefore the learned Tribunal has rightly not decided the appeals on merits, pending

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the opinion that in view of subsequent notification No.2/16 dated 03.02.2016, by which explanation has been inserted to the definition of input service and the question whether such notification shall be applicable retrospectively or not is at large before this Court in the case of Essar Steel India Ltd., being Tax Appeal No.444 of 2016 and it is not appropriate to decide the appeals on merits, in that case, the learned Tribunal ought to have kept the appeals pending till decision of this Court in the case of Essar Steel India Ltd., being Tax Appeal No.444 of 2016. Instead, the learned Tribunal has disposed of the appeals even without deciding the appeals on merits with liberty to both sides to approach the Tribunal after decision of this Court in the pending appeal in the case of Essar Steel India Ltd., being Tax Appeal No.444 of 2016. Such an order would not help either the Revenue /Department and even the assessee. Such a procedure adopted by the learned Tribunal would cause hara

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. TVS Motor Company Limited, rep. by its Authorized Signatory Versus The Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Hosur, The Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax, Salem And The Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry

M/s. TVS Motor Company Limited, rep. by its Authorized Signatory Versus The Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Hosur, The Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax, Salem And The Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi – 2018 (9) TMI 371 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 17 (Mad.) – Transitional Credit – Section 140 of the Central General Sales Tax Act, 2017 – violation of Principles of Natural Justice – Held that:- The respondent states that the impugned order is only a show cause notice. This Court is unable to agree with the said stand taken by the learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the Revenue, as a show cause notice cannot pre-judge the issue. Had the first respondent issued a notice calling upon the petitioner to state as to why the transitional credit claimed by them cannot be granted or should be directed to be reversed, then it would be a different matter.

In the impugned proceedings, the first responden

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

w cause notice, but a demand, which has been made on the petitioner without considering the objections filed by the petitioner and that it is not in the nature of a show cause notice, as a final decision has been taken and communicated to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the impugned order denying a legitimate transitional credit eligible to the petitioner in accordance with Section 140 of the Central General Sales Tax Act, 2017 is illegal and arbitrary and has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. It is also submitted that the the first respondent has only made a decision by denying the transitional credit, which the petitioner is statutorily entitled to under Section 140(1) of the said Act. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on facts, the petitioner has got an excellent case and when a notice was issued on 04. 1. 2018 to reverse the credit, within 24 hours, the petitioner submitted a reply dated 04. 1. 2018, followed by another

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

how cause notice. This Court is unable to agree with the said stand taken by the learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the Revenue, as a show cause notice cannot pre-judge the issue. Had the first respondent issued a notice calling upon the petitioner to state as to why the transitional credit claimed by them cannot be granted or should be directed to be reversed, then it would be a different matter. However, in the impugned proceedings, the first respondent denied the credit and all that has been granted is 15 days' time to reverse the credit, which, according to the first respondent, is inadmissible. These are sufficient grounds to hold that the impugned order is in violation of the principles of natural justice. On this ground alone, the petitioner is entitled to succeed. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and it is open to the first respondent to proceed afresh in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected WMP is c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Dev Indus Paints rep. by its Proprietor K. Revathy Versus The Commissioner (CT) , Commercial Taxes Department And The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

2018 (9) TMI 683 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 45 (Mad.) – Attachment of Bank Account – recovery of tax and penalty in the assessment orders for the years from 2015-16 to 2017- 18 – It was found that there was no assessment order – Held that:- This Court considered the first ground and directed the learned Government Advocate to verify and report as to whether any assessment orders have been passed in respect of the relevant years. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions from the officer, who is present in court, has informed that the assessment orders have not been passed in respect of all the three relevant assessment years. Then, there cannot be a demand notice nor there can be any attachment of the petitioner's b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ommunicated to the petitioner so far as the three relevant assessment years are concerned and that the last assessment, which was made, was only for the year 2014-15. 4. Other contentions have also been raised with regard to the validity of the impugned notice invoking the provisions of the Puducherry Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 5. However, this Court considered the first ground and directed the learned Government Advocate to verify and report as to whether any assessment orders have been passed in respect of the relevant years. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions from the officer, who is present in court, has informed that the assessment orders have not been passed in resp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Suryadev Alloys and Power Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai Outer Commissionerate

2018 (9) TMI 900 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – Demand of Interest – CENVAT credit, availed wrongly, was reversed before utilization – Held that:- The appellant had reversed the credit before utilization – the demand of interest and the findings with regard to penalty cannot sustain – reliance placed in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. Strategic Engineering [2014 (11) TMI 89 – MADRAS HIGH COURT] – Demand of Interest do not sustain – appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. E/40356/2018 – Final Order No. 41954/2018 – Dated:- 9-7-2018 – Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) Ms. S. Yogalakshmi, Advocate for the Appellant Shri R. Subramaniam, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Brief facts are that the app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the appellant, ld. counsel Ms. S. Yogalakshmi submitted that the appellant had reversed the credit immediately on being pointed out. There was sufficient balance in their CENVAT account and therefore the demand of interest and the finding with regard to penalty cannot sustain. She relied upon the judgment of the Hon ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. Strategic Engineering (P) Ltd. – 2014 (310) ELT 509 (Mad.) and the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Bay Forge Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry vide Final Order No.4 1766/2018 dated 11.6.2018. 3. The ld. AR Shri R. Subramaniam supported the findings in the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides. 5. It is brought out from

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Membrane Filters (I) Pvt. Ltd.

2018 (10) TMI 684 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 156 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of Services – Rate of GST – contract for supply of water after removal of excess iron and to supply all goods and services for achieving the objective of supplying water after removing excess iron – contract entered into by the applicant with the Public health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar.

What is the rate & HSN code of GST applicable (after it's introduction from 1st July 2017) when Extracting water from tube well, passing it through treatment plant of removing unwanted contaminants like Iron from ground water and eventually lifting it to overhead tank (in short the scheme) runs on solar power?

Held that:- The issue pertains to a contract entered into by the applicant with the Public health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar. Vide letter dated 31.10.2014, the Executive Engineer of the Public health Engineering Department, Purn

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s and which therefore would be the main part of the contract. Here it would not be out of place to mention that the applicant is claiming that the work performed by them are 'water treatment schemes' and not 'water purification schemes'.

The work done by them is a composite supply which attracts the provisions of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The said Notifications has specified the rate of central tax to be levied on Intra State supply of services of description specified in Column 3 of the Table in the said Notfn, falling under scheme of classification of services mentioned therein.

'Composite supply of WCS supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of, pipeline, conduit or plant for (i) water supply (ii) water treatment, or (iii) sewerage treatment or disposal attracts a tax rate of 6% each of CGST and SGST. However, the benefit of 12% tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST ACT ] by M/S/ Membrane Filters(l) Pvt Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. What is the rate & HSN code of GST applicable (after it's introduction from 1st July 2017) when Extracting water from tube well, passing it through treatment plant of removing unwanted contaminants like Iron from ground water and eventually lifting it to overhead tank (in short the scheme) runs on solar power. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the GST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST GST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pes for house to house connections of Size 80 mm 40 mm 8) Automatic multiport valves operating on battery that is charged through solar energy 9) House to house connections Nature & scope of work: It's an assembly work involving drilling of tube well, construction of civil plinth at site, supply of pre-fabricated structure, Iron removal treatment plant and the solar system comprising of solar panel, its mounted steel structure, Battery operation to run the night light for security and operate the treatment plant that runs only during the day hours & supply water to villagers; that specifically comes under composite supply category. Incidentally highest cost of any Single assembly also happens to be that of Solar System. Issues Involved as on date: The contract is issued by Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) Of Bihar Government and till now (30th June 2017) they have been deducting TDS of WCT (works Contract Tax) and we have been filing returns in Bihar State throug

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

me) runs on solar power. Our technology has been not only vetted but recognized as one of the innovation by department of Rural Drinking Water through a wing of CSIR-GOI in the year 2015 and published through the Compendium of Innovative Technologies. Issues Involved as on date: The contract is issued by Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) of Bihar Government and till now (30h June 2017) they have been deducting VAT against each of supply and the work carried out and we have been filing VAT returns in Bihar State through proper channel. This has been a composite supply that needs to be noted specifically. Till date no import duty not excise duty was laviable since this was executed under Govt. of India's Notification. Notification 47/2002, 91-92-93/2002 cus, 6/2002 Excise and amended time to time and also followed by various circulars by Ministry of Finance and Company Affairs Department of Revenue, Tax Research Units etc. of Government of India clearly states that the duty

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

R. Following explanation clearly spell out that the total supply has been in two parts with sub items where SOLAR POWER is the pivot point since the scheme works only when there is solar power. SO also each sub system is billed separately and each item is paid separately based on its completion and final bill is paid once the scheme is commissioned. We have attached detailed explanation with the kind of billing that is carried out at each item and each sub assembly work Nature of Work, Design, Construction, Supply & commissioning of 200 nos. of mini piped water supply schemes with solar operated pump & suitable treatment plant for removal of excessive Iron in Iron affected habitations of nine districts in the State of Bihar s comprising of various sub-assemblies and the final assemblies are carried out as following. Each assembly is billed separately and the department also makes the payment for each of the sub assembly. Sr.No Description Unit Price RS Lakhs each 1. Tube well 1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

supplied and the assembly work of various sub-assemblies and thereafter integration of such sub-assemblies together is done at site in a rural village allotted by the local Govt. Tube Well: A tube well is dug in the ground and thereafter PVC pipes are inserted and assembled in the tube well by putting gravel around the pipes with strainer assembly at the bottom end of the tube well. Thereafter flushing of the tube well is done by an air compressor to ensure smooth supply of water flowing out. Once this work is carried Out payment is done for this part of the item mentioned in the price bid. RCC Plinth: This part of the work is civil work where our own employees hire the labor locally and carry out the work according to the drawing where Cement, Steel & other material are purchased and supplied from Our Purchase department. Once this work is completed including laying of foundation both on the plinth, we get paid for the work carried out as mentioned in the price bid. This is a sta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y available to carry out such work. Payment of this item is also done once assembly work is carried out at site. 5. Solar Panel Assembly: Designing and engineering of Solar system is one of the specialties of this technology and such large size of panels are assembled and interconnected once the structure is ready. Once this is done on the top of the Structure, safety railing taken to site in prefabricated manner are assembled using appropriate Size of nuts and bolts as seen in above picture. 6. Treatment plant: This is also pre-fabricated in the factory as per special design and assembled at site as per the assembly drawing. This is connected with interconnecting piping and CI'VC unions and fittings are used for assemblies. In fact instruments and flow meters are also interconnected at site with the help of appropriate fasteners. Entire production with prefabrication sequence is worked out in the factory and it is eventually assembled at site just in couple of days. Once the inter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

work only on the solar power. Submissions on 06.07.2018 We have conveyed you our plea & looking forward kind consideration on the following lines that will help to serve to the masses safe drinking water using INNOVATIVE solutions. 1. Reaching safe drinking water to the bottom of the pyramid of our society. 2. Motivate Innovators and help innovations to exhibit its performance in the field & 3. Proving masses (society of our country) that Government is fully aware of such innovations and permits masses to take advantage of it that becomes another aspect of motivation. 4. Also enclosing Custom duty free doc as requested during meeting. Keeping all such aspects we have sincerely requested you just not to squeeze in the INNOVATION that has been recognized at the CSIR body level of DST's wing in one of the old laws but find new place/ avenue in the newly introduced law of GST in the country by creating: a. New HSN code & b. Giving bare minimum duty under GST law if not ful

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the year 2015 as another innovation created by our team in the Company. 3. Benefit Of such innovative technology has reached to the poorest of poor in the country and that too in rural part of India in recent past. 4. These Compact Drinking water schemes are NON RO base (NON REVERSE TECHNOLOGY BASE) solution which are absolutely cost effective and such schemes are being implemented through joint funding of State & Central Government of India. 5. Central Government till date has been giving benefit of Customs & Excise Duty so also Service Tax under till such new law introduced in July 2017. 6. We are offering a solution and thus a product Safe drinking water even as spelt out in the PO given by the State Govt. Of Bihar & through such innovation and by no way we believe can be categorized in the SERVICE group as deemed fit since there is no provision in the new GST law for water & such solutions. In fact this is the reason we have approached eminent apex body like yours

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

w and/or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the questions(s) on which advance ruling is required In our opinion do assembly of various parts of which one of them is manufactured by us. The main item which makes this product fit for marketing is Solar Panel which is the costlier item amongst all parts So this assembly is a composite supply and product is dependent on Solar Panel. Solar Panel should be applicable to the entire assembly 03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus- GSTIN 27AADCM9750FIZA. Name of Applicant Membrane Filters (I) Pvt. Ltd. Address 73/6, Bhakti Marg, Parvati Bunglow, Off Law Collage Road, Pune.411004. Details of Application GST-ARA, No.6/ 11.4.2018. Case allotted desk D.C, PUN-VAT-E-706, Pune. 1] Registration No. of central Excise or service tax or both as applicable. Central Excise- AADCM950FEM001. Service Tax- AADCM950FEM001 2] Period of Registration in case of para (1) above. 09-11-2012/30-10

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sions of central excise or service to the sales tax & there presents status in your company related company or sister concern. Form GST ARA-01, Advance Ruling 7] Copy of show cause Notice/ Adjudication orders in respect of central Excises or service tax if any issued during the last five years, in case of your company related company or sister concern. No. 8] Cases of violation of central excises/ services tax if any booked during last five years. No. 9] Whether any proceeding is pending before authority on said subject. Matter or otherwise. No. Nature of Activity(s) (proposed/ present) in respect of which advance ruling sought. The contract is issued by Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) Of Bihar Government, they have deducted TDS of works contract Tax but it's a composite supply that needs to be noted specifically. Till date no import duty was leviable since this was executed under Gov. of India s Notification Vide No.47/2002, 91-92-93/2002 custom. 6/2002. Issue was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

subject to GST at a rate of 12 percent and shall become the cost of project to the local authority. 4) However rate of GST will become nil when the value of goods supplied under the Work contract services shall not exceed more than 25 percent of the total value of work contract services. 5) Any other construction services shall be chargeable at a rate of 18 percent. 6) Imported equipment and plant required for setting-up drinking water projects (for desalination, Demineralization or purification or of water or any similar process) shall be subject to nil rate of customs duty. \However Integrated GST shall be applicable at a rate of 18 percent on the mentioned imports. 7) All equipment and plant required for setting-up drinking water projects will be subject to GST at a rate of 18 percent when procured domestically; the same shall become a cost for the project. 8) In case, where the output services are exempted from GST, proportionate Input Tax Credit (ITC) attributable to exempted serv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ategory shall be subject to tax at a rate of 18 percent. This will lead to overall increase in the capital expenditure cost for the client. 3) Services provided in relation to the construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting-out, repairs, maintenance, renovation or alteration, etc., are now subject to GST at a rate of 12 percent in general. However, under the old tax regime construction services were exempt from services tax but were subject to Sales Tux/VAT in the range of 4 percent (under composition), or 5 percent – 15 percent VAT (under the normal scheme) on the materials supplied under the construction services activity. This change shall lead to a marginal increase in tax cost as compare to the old tax regime. 4) Any services other than construction services were subject to Service tax at a rate of 15 percent under the old tax regime. After the introduction Of GST, however, pure services – such as architect services, consulting engineer services, manpo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

resentation, lots of amendments have been made in the last six months. On a positive note, we can expect that over time the overall cost for the infrastructure projects will decline. HSN Code Description Rate (%) Effective From Cess (%) Related Export/Import HSN Code 2201 Water (other than aerated, mineral, purified, distilled, medicinal, ionic, battery, demineralized and water sold in sealed container] NIL 28/06/2017 NIL 22011010, 22011020, 22019090 04. HEARING The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on dt. 05.06.2018, with respect to admission or rejection of the application when Sh. Dilip V. Satbhai, C.A. alongwith Sh. Subhash L. Devi Chairman and Smt. Pratibha S Devi, Advocate appeared and requested for admission of application as per their contentions in ARA application. The jurisdictional officer, Sh. M. K. Lawate, Dy. Commr. of S.T.(PUN-VAT-E-706), Pune appeared and made written submissions. The application was admitted and final hearing was held on 04.07.2018, Sh. Dilip V

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed carbon based) for removal of excessive iron from the Iron affected habitations of 9 districts viz……. on TURNKEY basis with 3 months trial runs after commissioning and comprehensive of 60 months after successful completion of trial run period had been approved. Thus from the same it is clearly seen that the applicant has been awarded a contract for supply of water after removal of excess iron and to supply all goods and services for achieving the objective of supplying water after removing excess iron. We find from the submissions made that the applicant, in order to perform the contract has to perform various other functions which are as under:- Digging of Tube Well : A tube well is dug in the ground and thereafter PVC pipes are inserted and assembled in the tube well by putting gravel around the pipes with strainer assembly at the bottom end of the tube well. Thereafter flushing of the tube well is done by an air compressor to ensure smooth supply of water flowing out. RCC Plin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r panels are assembled and interconnected once the structure is ready. Once this is done on the top of the structure, safety railing taken to site in prefabricated manner are assembled using appropriate size of nuts and bolts. Treatment plant: This is also pre-fabricated in their factory as per design and assembled at site as per the drawings. This is connected with interconnecting piping and CPVC unions and fittings are used for assemblies. Instruments and flow meters are also interconnected at site with the help of appropriate fasteners. Entire production with prefabrication sequence is worked out in the factory and it is eventually assembled at site. Once the interconnecting piping is done right from the stage of tube well, overhead tank, treatment plant, and the distribution lines are completed, the scheme is started through connection of solar system. Pipe Laying and house to house connections: GI pipes are laid down in the ground and branches are brought closure to each house and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the above discussions and also in view of the submissions made by the applicant, we find that the work done by them is a composite supply which attracts the provisions of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The said Notifications has specified the rate of central tax to be levied on Intra State supply of services of description specified in Column 3 of the Table in the said Notfn, falling under scheme of classification of services mentioned therein. In our opinion, based on the above discussions, the relevant clause applicable to the subject case would be clauses (iii) of the said Notfn, as amended by Notfn No. 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 22.10.2017 and the relevant clause is reproduced as under:- Sl.No. Chapter, Section or Heading Description of Service Rate (per cent) Condition 3 Heading 9954 (Construction services) (iii) Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, suppli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Territory, or a local authority, as the case may be. A plain reading of Sr. No. 3, clause (iii) reveals that 'composite supply of WCS supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of, pipeline, conduit or plant for (i) water supply (ii) water treatment, or (iii) sewerage treatment or disposal attracts a tax rate of 6% each of CGST and SGST. However, the benefit of 12% tax rate would be available to the applicant only if the Works Contract services provided by them are Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 Of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of, pipeline, conduit or plant for (i) water supply (ii) water treatment. 06.In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Ismail Ahamad Soofi

2018 (11) TMI 1012 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – MAHARASHTRA – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 546 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of services – catering services provided by the Applicant under B2B Model and B2C Model – whether classified as canteen/restaurant services or under the head outdoor catering services? – rate of tax – whether the activities of the applicant would fall under Sr. No. 7, Headings 9963 (iv) or (v) of the N/N. 11 /2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017?

Held that:- The services supplied by the applicant in normal course does not appear to be covered under clause (v) of the N/N. 11 /2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017. From a reading of clause (v) before and after the amendment it is seen that the word 'outdoor catering' does not find a mention post the amendment. Hence it can be inferred that the said clause post the amendment made considers outdoor catering as a Supply, by way of or as part of any service, of goods, being food or any other ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

same anywhere. The said clause (i) has been amended by Notification No. 16/2017 – The amendment has also done away with the condition of “Supply, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, neither having the facility of air-conditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year and therefore the services of the applicant, in view of amendment vide Notification No. 46/2017 dated 14.11 2017 would fall under Serial no. 7(i) of this amended Notification.

Thus, the activity of the applicant would fall under clause (i) of Notification No. 11/2017 as amended and with effect from 14.11.2017 i.e the date on which Notification No. 46/2017- Central Tax(Rate) came into effect.

Ruling:- The activity undertaken by the applicant in the subject case would be classified as canteen services under Entry. No 7(i) or (iv) of Notification No. 11/2017 dated 28th June 2017 depending on whether their canteen has the facility of air air

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) of the Notification No. 11/2017 dated 28th June 2017 as amended by the Notification No. 46/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 14th November 2017 or as outdoor catering services under Entry. No 7(v) of the said Notification? 1.2 At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the GST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST Act / MGST Act would be mentioned as being under the "GST Act". 02. FACTS AND CONTENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT The submission (Brief facts of the case), as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus – Brief details of the services provided by the Applicant 2.1 The Applicant is in the business of providing cat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y the companies directly to the Applicant as per the agreed schedule. 2.5 Under both the Models, the food is prepared either in the kitchen located in the company's premises or in the centralized kitchen located outside the company's premises. 2.6 Under both the Models, the company may provide the facilities such as utensils, electricity, equipment, furniture, pest control services etc. to the Applicant for running the canteen facility in its premises, depending upon the contractual arrangement. 2.7 The Applicant has to maintain the cleanliness in the canteen as per the requirements of the companies. In most of the cases, the Canteen Committee set up by the Company will inspect the quality standards of materials and it can also reject the materials of bad quality. Under both the Models, the food items to be supplied in the canteen and its rates are as per the agreement between the company and the Applicant. 2.8 It is important to note that as per Section 46 of the Factories Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

it under both the Models would amount to supply of canteen/restaurant services or supply of outdoor catering services? Additional submissions on 10.07.2018 Mr. Ismail Ahamad Soofi (Prop, of Chef's Corner) …. Applicant SYNOPSIS 1. Mr Ismail Ahamad Soofi proprietor of 'M/s. Chef's Comer' (hereinafter referred to as 'Applicant') has filed an application before this Hon'ble Authority on 11.04.2018. The Applicant in this regard was granted an opportunity of personal hearing on 27.06.2018 wherein the Applicant through its authorized representative made detailed submissions covering certain additional grounds apart from the submissions made in the application. Therefore, in this regard, the Applicant wishes to make the following additional submissions which are without prejudice to the submissions made in the advance ruling application. SUBMISSIONS A. Under the Service Tax regime, the Revenue has accepted the Applicant's contention that it's business is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ces provided to them. Existing law during the relevant period A.3 In this regard, during the relevant period, the mega-exemption Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012 was issued by the Government to provide exemption from payment of service tax to certain services listed thereunder. Entry No. 19 of the aforesaid Notification provides exemption to services provided in relation to serving of food or beverages by a restaurant, eating joint or a mess, other than those having the facility of air-conditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year. The relevant entry reads as under: "19. Services provided in relation to serving of food or beverages by a restaurant, eating joint or a mess, other than those having (i) the facility of air-conditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year, and (ii) a license to serve alcoholic beverages." A.4 It is further submitted that the legislature

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a new Entry No. 19A vide Notification No. 14/2013-ST dated 22.10.2013 wherein, the legislature specifically granted exemption to the canteens having air-conditioning facility. A.7 During the year 2015, the Applicant was informed by Lear Automotive that service tax is not payable on the canteen services provided by the Applicant as the same were exempted vide the above-referred notifications. Therefore, on a careful perusal of Entry 19 of the Notification and the requirements therein, the Applicant was of the view that the Applicant is fulfilling all essentials of the said Notification and thus, the services of providing food and beverages to canteens maintained under the Factory Act, provided to Lear Automotive is exempt and it is not liable to pay tax on the same. A.8 Since, the Applicant was not liable to pay service tax on its services, it filed a Refund Application dated 27.11.2015 for ₹ 6,63,926/- for claiming the refund of service tax paid by it on the services in relation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

6.2012. It was held that the words contained in the Entry 19 are "restaurant, eating joint or mess." and the same does not include the word 'canteen'. Therefore, taking the inclusivity of the terms into consideration the term 'canteen' could not be read within the ambit of Entry 19. Thus, the Applicant is liable to pay Service Tax for the services being provided at the Bhosari unit. It is pertinent to note here that the exemption was denied to the Applicant on the ground that 'canteen' services are not included in the Entry 19 of the Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012. However, the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had accepted the contention of the Applicant that the services provided by the Applicant are indeed canteen services and it was precisely the reason the Applicant was denied exemption at the Bhosari unit. With regards to the second issue of whether, the exemption could be provided to the Applicant under Entry No. 19A of Notifi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has in-fact proceeded to pass the order on the premise that the Applicant is involved in providing 'canteen' services. As explained in the OIA dated 23.08.2016, the distinction between the entries no. 19 and 19A of the Exemption Notification was the mere fact that entry 19 didn't include canteen services while Entry no. 19A provides exemption to the canteens which have an air-conditioner at any time during the year. A.15 Even though, no explicit definition has been given by to the term 'canteen' in the discussions/findings of the aforesaid order, however, the Applicant has been duly recognized as running a canteen under the earlier service tax regime and the same has been accepted as per the OIA dated 23.08.2016. A.16 However, under the present law even canteen has been included in the same entry as an eating joint, restaurant and canteen under serial no. 7(i) of the Notification No. 11/2017 -Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (here

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

law. Therefore, the Department cannot contend now that the Applicant provides 'outdoor catering' services having accepted the fact that Applicant is providing 'canteen' services. Position under the GST regime B.2 The earlier regime under Service Tax law has now been replaced with the newly introduced Goods & Service Tax. Under the newly introduced GST regime, any supply of goods or services or both such as sale, barter, exchange, license, rental, lease, or disposal which is made for a consideration in the course of furtherance of business is taxable under the Central Goods & Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the "CGST Act") and the respective State GST Acts. B.3 Further, Clause 6(b) of Schedule II of the CGST Act deems the supply of food and beverages for a consideration as a supply of service. The said clause reads as under: "supply by way or as part of any service or in any other manner, whatsoever, of goods, being food or any othe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year nor having licence or permit or by whatever name called to serve alcoholic liquor for human consumption. 6 (iv) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, having the facility of air-conditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year 9 (v) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever in outdoor catering wherein goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink (whether or not alcoholic liquor for human consumption), as a part of such outdoor catering and such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration. 9 – B.5 The above no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ive hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent. Explanation.- "declared tariff" includes charges for all amenities provided in the unit of accommodation (given on rent for stay) like furniture, air conditioner, refrigerators or any other amenities, but without excluding any discount offered on the published charges for such unit. 2.5 Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanation no. (iv)]. B.6 Thus, on a perusal of the above paragraphs, it is understood that the services provided by a restaurant, mess, canteen or an eating joint have been sought to be taxed at 5% (2.5%+2.5%) provided the supplier has not availed any ITC in respect of the same. In this regard, attention is also invited to entry at Serial No. 7(v) of the rate notification which specifies that the services provided in the nature of 'outdoor catering' services are taxable at the rate of 18% (9%+9%)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, shop, or college where meals are served to the people who work or study there. Vocabulary.com A canteen is a store that sells food and drink at an institution like a camp, college, or military base. A canteen can also be a small container used to carry water to drink. ldoceonline.com A place in a factory, school etc where meals are provided, usually quite cheaply B.9 The Applicant humbly submits that in light of the definitions as reproduced above, broadly speaking a canteen is a facility situated in an institution, college or office wherein meals are provided to the members, students or employees, for a consideration. The Applicant's business squarely falls under the definition of canteen services. The Applicant submits that in most of the cases it is involved in cooking the food and beverages at the factory premises and the same is supplied to the employees of the clients for a consideration. whereas in some cases, the Applicant prepares the food elsewhere at a central kitchen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s students, faculty and staff and the said educational institution is covered by the definition given under para 2(y) of notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), then the same is exempt. [SI. No. 66A of notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) refers] 2.2 If the catering services, i.e., supply of food or drink in a mess or canteen, is provided by anyone other than the educational institution, then it is a supply of service at entry 7(i) of notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rale) [as amended vide notification No. 46/2017-CT (Rate) dated 14.11.2017] to the concerned educational institution and attracts GST of 5% provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken, effective from 15.11.2017." B.12 The above corrigendum supports the contention of the Applicant that if food or drinks are supplied in a mess or canteen by anyone other than the institution, college or the company itself then the same is taxable at the rate of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ove-referred circular and the sample agreements makes it sufficiently clear that the services provided by the Applicant are in the nature of canteen services. The Applicant is primarily engaged in the business of supplying food and beverages in the canteen premises of the factory and the consideration for the same is charged from the employees of the factory either directly or indirectly. Further, the food supplied by the Applicant is available only to the employees/ authorized personnel of the factory and is serviced in a designated area. These facts are established in the sample agreements attached above. B.14 The Applicant submits that it has already explained in the preceding paras that it is engaged in providing services which squarely fall under canteen services and the same are liable to be taxed accordingly. Further, in this regard the Applicant submits that the nature of services provided by the Applicant has not changed under the previous regime as well as the existing regime

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

atering' services, the Applicant should be given the benefit of lower rate of tax B. 17 In view of the above, the Applicant further submits that assuming without admitting the services supplied by the Applicant falls under both the Serial No. 7(i) and Serial No. 7(v), the Applicant should be given the benefit of the lower rate of tax. The Applicant submits that referring to the above discussion, it has been clearly established that the services supplied by the Applicant are 'canteen' services. However, the Department's contention is that the services provided by the Applicant are covered under the category of 'outdoor catering' service. B. 18 Assuming, that the services provided by the Applicant contains elements of both 'outdoor catering' and 'canteen' services, the Applicant should be given the benefit of adopting the lower rate of tax. The Applicant submits that it is an established rule of law that when a particular service is capable of fall

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the goods in question are those goods in which more than 25% by weight of one or more of red mud, press mud or blast furnace slag is used. If that be the case, then, in a classification dispute, an entry which is beneficial to the assessee requires to be applied and the same has been done by the adjudicating authority, which has been confirmed by the Tribunal. Alternatively, it can be said that Sub-heading No. 6807 is specific to the goods in which more than 25% by weight, red mud, press mud or blast furnace slag is used. The heading is based entirely on material used on composition of goods. A tariff heading, based on composition of goods, is also specific heading like a heading based on commercial nomenclature. Therefore, we are of the view that the goods in issue are appropriately classifiable under Subheading No. 6807.10 of the tariff entry." B.20 Applying the ratio of the above case to the facts of the present matter, it is clearly understood that in case the Applicant's

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

prayer of the appellant was that earlier, exemption was sought under category 2 of exemption notification, not under category 3 of exemption notification and exemption under category 2 was withdrawn. This is hardly a ground sustainable in law. On the contrary, well settled law is that in case the applicant is entitled to benefit under two different Notifications or under two different Heads, he can claim more benefit and it is the duty of the authorities to grant such benefits if the applicant is otherwise entitled to such benefit. Therefore, non-consideration on the part of the Deputy Director General (Medical), DGHS to the prayer of the appellant in claiming exemption under category 3 of the notification is illegal and improper. The prayer ought to have been considered and decided on merits. Grant of exemption under category 2 of the notification or withdrawal of the said benefit cannot come in the umy of the applicant in claiming exemption under category 3 if the conditions laid do

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ering and supply of food, beverages and other eatables (non-alcoholic drinks) i.e. complete services at various places of their customers who have in-house canteen in their factories. The Applicant i.e. Rashmi Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. had filed an application before the Gujarat Advance ruling authority on the following issues: Issue 1- Whether the rate of tax on supplies made to the recipient would be 12% or 18%? Issue 2- Whether the activity undertaken by the applicant is in nature of supply of service provided by the restaurant eating joint including mess canteen or in nature of supply of outdoor catering? C.2 The Gujarat Advance Ruling Authority finally held that the supply of services by Rashmi Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. is covered by Sr. No. 7(v) of the Notification No. 11/2017- Central Tax (Rate) as outdoor catering, attracting GST @18%. In this regard the Ld. Advance ruling authorities had relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing persons: The Applicant who had sought the Advance Ruling in respect of any matter The concerned officer or the jurisdictional officer in respect of the Applicant. In the present case, the Applicant is different from Rashmi Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. i.e. Applicant involved in the aforesaid application and further even the concerned office is different. Therefore, the aforesaid advance ruling would not be applicable in the present application as it would hold no binding value in the Applicant's matter. C.7 Secondly, the aforesaid ruling has been passed relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Indian Coffee Workers (supra) which is not applicable to the facts of the present case. The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the aforementioned case had held that it is immaterial as to who is the recipient of the service while determining whether a particular service is outdoor catering service or not. The Applicant submits that in light of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

covered by the definition of 'outdoor caterer'. However, in the present case, as already submitted above there are also situations or transactions wherein the Applicant prepares food in a central kitchen and the same is only served at the premises of the client. Therefore, the facts involved in the Indian Coffee Workers case are distinguished from the present case and hence the ratio of the same cannot be applied in the present case. C.10 The Applicant also submits that in the case of B2C transactions of the Applicant, the services provided by the Applicant are akin to a restaurant. The entire risk of running the business lies upon the Applicant since the consideration is paid by the employees and the same is not covered by the client company. However, the Allahabad High Court decision in the above case has not considered the possibility of the present services falling under the category of 'restaurant' service and hence the said decision is not applicable in the presen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under Serial no. 7(i) of the rate notification. D.2 The Applicant submits that even if it is presumed that the Applicant is providing outdoor catering services to its clients, the services supplied under the B2C model would still fall under restaurant/canteen service and cannot be categorised as outdoor catering services. The services provided by the Applicant under its B2C model have been already explained under the application filed by the Applicant and are not being repeated here for the sake of brevity. D.3 The meaning of the term 'Restaurant' is given in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary as 'a place where people pay to sit and eat meals that are cooked and served on the premises.' The meaning of the term 'Canteen' is given in the above referred Dictionary as 'a restaurant in a workplace or educational establishment.' D.4 According to the above referred dictionary meaning, the term Restaurant means the place where people pay for dining out in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicant. A copy of the said agreement dated 23.03.2018 is attached herewith as Annexure-4. Further, the copy of the invoices raised by the Applicant on TCS is attached herewith as Annexure-5. Upon perusal of the said agreement it is clearly understood that the Applicant is in the business of supplying food and beverages at the client's premises and the said supply is restricted to the employees/guests/ any other authorized personnel of TCS and is not available to the general public. Further, the Applicant accepts food card/coupons directly from the employees of the client and encashes the same later on (Annexure B of the aforesaid agreement). D.8 In this regard, the Applicant wishes to further make a reference to the above agreement wherein the predecided menu is attached as Annexure-D to the agreement dated 23.03.2018. It is clear from the perusal of the same that the employees are provided restaurant services as they cannot alter the menu or personalise it to their own choice.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sification of services provided by the Applicant under the B2B Model & B2C Model as canteen/restaurant services chargeable at 5% cumulatively (both CGST & SGST)or outdoor catering services attracting 18% cumulatively (both CGST & SGST). APPLICANT'S INTERPRETATION C. Relevant legal provisions on canteen services under the current GST Regime. C.1 The terms 'canteen'/' 'restaurant' are not defined anywhere in the GST Act or under the erstwhile Service Tax Regime. Hence, reliance is placed on the dictionary meaning of the word 'restaurant'. The meaning of the term 'Restaurant is given in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary as a place where people pay to sit and eat meals that are cooked and served on the premises.' The meaning of the term 'Canteen' is given in the above referred Dictionary as a restaurant in a workplace or educational establishment.' C.2 Some of the Dictionary meanings of the word 'canteen' are as un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the food served in other places like restaurant etc. C.5 At this point, the Applicant would like to bring to your attention the Circular No. 28/02/2018-GST dated 08 th January 2018 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Circular"). The relevant extract of the Circular is given below: " Queries have been received seeking clarification regarding the taxability and rate of GST on services by a college hostel mess. The clarification is as given below: 2. The educational institutions have mess facility for providing food to their students and staff. Such facility is either run by the institution/ students themselves or is outsourced to a third person. Supply of food or drink provided mess or canteen is taxable at 5% without Input Tax Credit Serial No. 7(i) of notification No. 13/207 7-CT (Rate) as amended vide notification No. 46/2017CT (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 refers). It is immaterial whether the service is provided by the educational institution itself or the institution outsourc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

12/2017Central Tax (Rate), then the same is exempt. [SI. No. 66(a) of notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) refers] 2.1 if the catering services, i.e., supply of food or drink in a mess or canteen, is provided by anyone other than the educational institution, then it is a supply of service at entry 7(i) of notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) amended vide notification No. 46/2017-CT (Rate) dated 14.11.2017) to the concerned educational institution and attracts GST of 5% provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken, effective from 15.11.2017." …. Emphasis Supplied. C.7 Therefore, from the above Circular, it is amply clear that the catering services provided by anyone other than the educational institutions (i.e. an outdoor caterer) to the students, staff, etc. of the education institution, is to be treated as canteen' services as covered under Entry No. 7(i) of Notification No.11/2017 – CT (Rate) and woul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n the canteen to the employees of the companies and institutions. Only the primary difference under this model is that the consideration for the food and drinks supplied to the employees is paid by the companies/institutions on monthly basis or at agreed intervals instead of the employees directly. C.12 The intention of the Applicant and the companies/ institutions under the B2B Model, is also to run and provide the canteen services to the employees and staff of such company/institution. C.13 Therefore, regardless of the fact, whether the consideration towards the services is paid directly by the employees or the companies/ institutions, the nature of services remains to be canteen services and not otherwise. D ISSUES RELATING TO ADVANCE RULING AND APPLICANT'S UNDERSTANDING. Question D. 1 Whether the catering services provided by the Applicant under B2B and B2C Models are to be classified as canteen services? Applicant's Understanding D.2 Based on the above discussions and keep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ts of the services provided by the Applicant: The Applicant is engaged in providing catering services under two different models namely Business to Consumer (B2C) and Business to Business (B2B)Model. Under B2C Model, the applicant enters into contract with the companies to provide catering services to employees of the companies. The amount of consideration is paid by the employees directly to the Applicant as per the agreed schedule which is generally on monthly basis. Under B2B Model, the applicant enters into contract with the companies to serve food and beverages to the employees of the companies in the cafeteria designated with the companies premises In this model ,the food is directly served by the Applicant to the employees of the companies. The amount of consideration is paid by the companies directly to the Applicant as per the agreed schedule. Under both the Models, the food is prepared either in the kitchen located in the companies' premises or in the 'centralized kit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicant is an Outdoor caterer because the services which he provides as caterer are at a place other than his own place. The place for catering services is provided by the companies. The Applicant is an outdoor caterer who supplies food and beverages for a purpose. The purpose is to cater to employees of companies who use the facility of a canteen which is provided by the companies to their employees. The Applicant is providing Outdoor Catering services which comes under Entry No.7(v) of the above mentioned Notification No.11/2017 dated 28 th June 2017 and attracts GST at 18% cumulatively (CGST & SGST) as per the Entry No. 7(v) of the said Notification. The Entry No.7(v) of the above mentioned Notification is as follows. "Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever in outdoor catering wherein goods, being food or another article for human consumption or any drink (whether or not alcoholic liquor for human consumption), as a part of such outd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

means a caterer engaged in providing services in connection with catering at a place other than his own but including a place provided by way of tenancy or otherwise by the person receiving such services." The view of Outdoor Caterering services is expressed in the recent Judgement delivered by Hon.High Court, Allahabad on 10.04.2014 in case of M/s. Indian Coffee Workers' Co-operative Society Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax ,Allahabad (Central Excise Appeal No.50 of 2014).As per the Judgement delivered by Hon.High Court, Allahabad , the Assessee was liable to the payment of service tax as an Outdoor Caterer within the meaning of Section 65(105) (zzt) read with clauses (24) and (76a) of the Finance Act, 1994. 04. HEARING 4.1 The case was taken up for preliminary hearing on dt. 16.05.2018, with respect to admission or rejection of the application nobody was present from the side of applicant. The jurisdictional officer, Sh. Y. A. Lokre, Dy. Commr. of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r Business to Consumer (B2C) Model and have further submitted that under B2B Model, they serve food and beverages directly to the employees of the companies in the cafeteria designated within the companies' premises for which consideration is paid by the companies directly to the Applicant as per the agreed schedule and under B2C Model, they provide catering services to the employees of the companies and in this case, the amount of consideration is paid by the employees directly to the applicant as per the agreed schedule, generally on a monthly basis. 5.3 Under both the Models: (a) the food is prepared either in the kitchen located in the company's premises or in a centralized kitchen located outside the company's premises, (b) companies may provide utensils, electricity, equipment, furniture, pest control services etc. depending on the contract, (c) they have to maintain cleanliness in the canteen and in most of cases, a Canteen Committee set up by the Company will inspec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8th June 2017 as amended, or as outdoor catering services under Entry. No 7(v) of the same Notification. In effect they have no doubt about the taxability of the catering services provided by them. 5.7 We find that under Notification No. 11 /2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017, Serial No. 7 Heading 9963(i) covers accommodation, food and beverages services. The nature of services and the applicable tax rate on the same is as under:- 7 Heading 9963 (Accommodation, food and beverage services) i) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, neither having the facility of air-conditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year and nor having licence or permit or by whatever na

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year. 9 – (v) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever in outdoor catering wherein goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink (whether or not alcoholic liquor for human consumption), as a part of such outdoor catering and such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration. 9 – (vi) Accommodation in hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff ………. 9 – (vii) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, including but not limited to food or any other article for human consumption or any drink (whether or not alcoholic liquor for human consumption), where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, in a premises (includi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ly or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whetherfor consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is supplied, other than those located in the premises of hotels, inns, guest houses, clubs, campsites or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes having declared tariff of any unit of accommodation of seven thousand five hundred rupees and above per unit per day or equivalent. Explanation.- "declared tariff" includes charges for all amenities provided in the unit of accommodation (given on rent for stay) like furniture, air conditioner, refrigerators or any other amenities, but without excluding any discount offered on the published charges for such unit. 2.5 Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service has not been taken [Please refer to Explanat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ve amendments it is clear that the services supplied by the applicant in normal course does not appear to be covered under clause (v) of the above said Notification. From a reading of clause (v) before and after the amendment it is seen that the word 'outdoor catering' does not find a mention post the amendment. Hence it can be inferred that the said clause post the amendment made considers outdoor catering as a Supply, by way of or as part of any service, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink, at Exhibition Halls, Events, Conferences, Marriage Halls and other outdoor or indoor functions that are event based and occasional in nature. 5.11 Since the supply of catering services provided by the applicant cannot be considered to be in the nature of "outdoor catering", we shall now discuss whether the activities of the applicant would fall under Sr. No. 7, Headings 9963(i) of the above referred Notification. To understand whether the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in a canteen are as under:- (1) The canteen is inside the premises of the industry/corporate. (2) The canteen building may have cooking facilities inside it and mostly facilities such as LPG cylinder, furniture, refrigerator, water cooler, cooking and serving utensils etc. being all or some of these items are provided by the company on returnable basis in good and proper condition. Also, generally water and electricity is also provided by the company on chargeable or maybe non chargeable basis. (3) Some or all of the food, snacks or tea and coffee may be cooked or prepared in the canteen itself. (4) The items are sold to the employees directly by the contractor at agreed prices which are mostly subsidized and the sale amounts are collected by the contractor themselves. However prepaid meal vouchers may also be given to employees by the company which are to be accepted by the contractor. (5) The contractor may be required to serve to employees by counter service or even table service in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ith its clients namely M/s Renishaw Metrology Systems Limited (RMSL) and M/s Corning Technologies India Private Limited (CTI) and also M/s. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS). 5.14 In their contract with (RMSL) which is wef 01.04.2018 it is clearly seen from a reading of clauses under the heading 'REPRESENTATION OF CONTRACTOR' that the Contractor shall ensure that the food is cooked and carried from outside and no food item is prepared in the company premises using gas/electricity or otherwise. RMSL has under the contract assured the applicant of a minimum of 370 lunch meals. RMSL shall provide space, fixtures, fittings equipment, etc. 5.15 In their contract with CTI, it is again clearly seen from a reading EXHIBIT A to the agreement/contract that the location of the Kitchen of the applicant is at a distance of about 7 kms from the CTI plant and therefore it appears that the food is cooked and carried from outside and sold in CTI's premises. Here too it is seen that the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

would be covered under Serial No. 7 Heading 9963(i) or (iv)of Notification No. 11/2017 dated 28.06.2017 as the applicant can be said to be providing the services of a canteen, but as to the applicant falls under Sr. No.(i) or (iv) of the said Notification would depend on whether the canteen has the facility of is air conditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year, as the applicant has not clarified the same anywhere. The said clause (i) has been amended by Notification No. 16/2017 as ""(i) Supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or drink, where such supply or service is for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, provided by a restaurant, eating joint including mess, canteen, whether for consumption on or away from the premises where such food or any other article for human consumption or drink is Supplied, o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erial no. 7(i) of this amended Notification. 5.18 From the above discussions we find that the activity of the applicant would fall under clause (i) of Notification No. 11/2017 as amended and with effect from 14.11.2017 i.e the date on which Notification No. 46/2017- Central Tax(Rate) came into effect. 06. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows : ORDER (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) NO.GST-ARA- 05/2018-19/B-61 Mumbai, dt. 09.07.2018 For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus – Question :- Whether the catering services provided by the Applicant under B2B Model and B2C Model are to be classified as canteen/restaurant services under Entry. No. 7(i) of the Notification No. 11/2017 dated 28th June 2017 as amended by the Notification No. 46/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 14th November 2017 or as outdoor catering servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. INA Bearings India Private Limited

2018 (12) TMI 226 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 465 (A. A. R. – GST) – Levy of GST – sale of goods outside India – section 7(5) (a) of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – place of supply – entitlement of Input Tax Credit to the recipient of service – Scope of IGST Act – territorial jurisdiction – Held that:- There are two different transactions effected in present matter between the parties for the supply of same tools. One from foreign supplier to the applicant (in short T1) and second between applicants to customer within India (in short T2). The transaction covered by the present application herein after will be referred to as T2 transaction.

The applicant would be purchasing from Schaeffer Germany, who is a manufacturer on principal to principal basis. The ownership of the said goods get transferred to the applicant without any physical movement of the goods from Germany to India. However the goods remain in the possession of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion 7(5)(a) of the IGST Act, it is clear that the transaction referred to as T2 gets covered under the ambit of Interstate trade and commerce. And thus liable to tax as per Section 5 of the IGST Act.

Levy and collection of GST – Held that:- As per Section 7(2) and 7(5) (a) of the [GST Act and proviso to Section 50) Of the IGST Act it is very clear that in respect of imported goods into the territory of India there is no levy and collection except in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 3 of the Custom Tariff Act, 1975. Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that custom duties which includes integrated tax in respect of imported goods would be levied only at the time of import or export of goods – In case of goads supplied on an out an out basis as is in the present case, there is no levy till the time of their customs clearance in compliance with Section 12 of the Customs Act and Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. In view of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST Act ] by INA Bearing India Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. a) Whether the sale of goods, which are located outside India, would be liable to tax in India under section 7(5) (a) of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? b) If answer to (a) is yes, then whether the recipient, to whom such goods are sold, be eligible to avail the input tax credit of such goods? At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the GST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ts of the customers. Using these specially designed tools, child parts are manufactured and supplied to our customer. Typically, while entering into a contract for supply of bearings, the customer issued two purchase orders viz: PO NO. RNAIPL/2013(B4A/PTVT/230 dated 13.09.2013 for supply of tools and PO No. RN15-MP-113W-K316 dated 28.05.2015 for supply of tappets. The Applicant in-turn raised a purchase order on Scaheffler Technologies AG & Co. KG (for the purpose of brevity herein after referred as Scaheffler Germany ) for supply of tools. The tools which are required for manufacturing is developed outside India by Scaheffler Germany. Once the tool was developed, Scaheffler Germany had raised an invoice bearing number 130213462 dated 16.03.2018 on the Applicant for the tools and the ownership of the said tools got transferred to the Applicant, however, there was no physical movement of tools i.e. the tools continue to remain in the possession of Scaheffler Germany. The Applicant h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

whether Applicant s customer would be eligible to avail the input tax credit of IGST charged by the Applicant. The Applicant is making detailed submission herein below to demonstrate why IGST should not be applicable on the transaction under consideration. Statement containing the applicant s interpretation of law and/or facts. as the case may be. in respect of the questions(s) on which advance ruling is required A. Levy of IGST cannot be extended beyond territorial jurisdiction of the said legislation. Evaluating IGST provisions to understand possibility of levying IGST A1. With reference to facts of the applicant summarized in Annexure 2, the transaction of supply of tool to customer in India by Applicant needs to be evaluated in terms of IGST Act to understand nature of transaction and to evaluate applicability of IGST. A2. Section 7 of IGST Act, 2017, lays down the principles to determine nature of transaction as inter-state transaction. In this regard, attention is invited to prov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

supplier in relation to the goods or services or both supplied Accordingly, in case of T2 in question, tool is supplied by Applicant to customer even if there is no movement of tool and hence, Applicant would be construed as Supplier . Place of Supply – Section 10 of IGST Act provides for various scenarios to determine the place of supply of goods. In case of T2, the supply does not Involve movement of goods, Hence. without prejudice to Applicant s submission herein below, it appears that the said supply would get covered under section of IGST Act which is reproduced below: 10. (1) The place of supply of goods, other than supply of goods imported into, or exported from India, shall be as unde,- (a) …… (b) …… (c) where the supply does not involve movement of goods, whether by the supplier or the recipient, the place of supply shall be the location of such goods at the time of the delivery to the recipient; (d) …… (e) …… In view of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

upply and hence could become liable to IGST. A5. However, Applicant intends to draw your kind attention to section 1(2) of IGST Act which determines the extent of applicability of IGST Act. As per the said section IGST Act extends to whole of India except State of Jammu and Kashmir. India has been defined in section 2(56) of CGST Act read with section 2(24) of IGST Act to mean the territory of as referred to in article 1 of the Constitution, its territorial waters, seabed and sub-soil underlying such waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone or any other maritime zone as referred to in the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976, and the air space above its territory and territorial waters; A6. Hence, Applicant wishes to contend that scope of IGST Act is limited to territorial jurisdiction ta which it extends. Thus, IGST levy can be introduced only to supplies within the territorial jurisdiction of the IGST Act. In case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of supply shall be outside India. Hence, the Applicant pleads it is outside the jurisdictional powers of the GST law to determine the place of supply for goods when such goods are not located in India. A8. Given the aforesaid, the tax cannot be said to be payable on the transaction under consideration as the subject i.e. goods (tools), on which tax is payable in outside India i.e. beyond the jurisdictional extent of IGST Act, 2017. B. Tax cannot be demanded on the said transaction as the collection. if at all tax is leviable, itself will be unconstitutional B1. It is no more res-integra that no tax shall be collected unless there is constitutional validity to levy the same. The Constitution of India was amended vide IDISI Constitution (Amendment) Act, 2016 to empower the Central Government and State Governments to levy GST. B2. To empower the Parliament to levy and collect IGST on inter-state transaction, Article 269A was inserted. The said article reads as under: 269A. (1) Goods and s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

union territories. It would be important to note that the Constitution has not defined the above transaction that is, where the supplier is located in India and the place of supply is outside India to be an inter-state supply. The provisions of section 7(5)(a) is ultra vires since the law has defined a specific transaction to be an inter-state supply without having adequate powers to do So. Since the Constitution of India has neither defined such transactions to be an inter-state transaction nor given powers to determine so, the provisions ought to be treated as ultra-vires. C. Cross-border transactions are being covered under Inter-State supply only to exclude the same from purview of State Government. however, that would not conclude IGST applicability unless authorised C1. Applicant wishes to submit that section 7 and section 8 of IGST Act have been enacted to lay down principles to determine nature of supply to be inter-State supply and intra-State supply respectively. Thus, the o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oss the Customs frontiers of India; or (iii) Supplies made to a tourist referred to in section 15 The above mentioned list has been excluded from ambit of intra-State supply so that administrative and Jurisdictional powers would vests with Central Government and not State Government. C3. In view of above submission, Applicant contends that section should be read only to exclude such transactions from the purview of State Government and said section should not be considered as piece of legislation which is empowering Central Government to travel beyond territorial jurisdiction and levy IGST on all transactions covered therein. D. The term Zero-rated supply should be read in liberal manner and should not be restricted only to taking of goods outside India D1. Attention is invited to section 16 of IGST Act, which provides that Zero rated supply means any of the following supplies of goods: 1. Export of goods; or 2. Supply of goods to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit D2. Section 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rictive and would disregard the principle of consumption based tax. Export of goods should be interpreted in a broader way to cover such cross-border transaction where goods are delivered to a customer outside India even if not taken from India. Restricting the concept of export only to cases involving movement from India would mean disregarding the fact that place of supply is outside India. Thus, Applicant pleads for extending the meaning of export of goods even to cases where goods are delivered to customer outside India even if not taken from India. D6. Assuming without accepting that this transaction of tool supply would not qualify as zero rated supply , however. the same should at least be treated as not liable to GST since the concept of exports could be deemed to be covering a case where the goods are consumed/ used outside India. Under erstwhile Service Tax legislation, if the place of provision of service was Outside India but other conditions of Export were not getting fulf

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is invited to proviso to section 12(3) of IGST Act, 2017, which provides that in case of supply of service in relation to immovable property is outside in India and if both the supplier and recipient are in India then the place of supply shall be the location of recipient. E3. For your reference we have reproduced relevant portion of section 12(3) of IGST Act, 2017 (3) The place of supply of services,- (a) directly in relation to an immovable property, including services provided by architects, interior decorators, surveyors, engineers and other related experts or estate agents, any service provided by way of grant of rights to use immovable property or for carrying out or co-ordination of construction work; or (b) by way of lodging accommodation by a hotel, inn, guest house, home stay, club or campsite, by whatever name called, and including a house boat or any other vessel; or (c) by way of accommodation in any immovable property for organising any marriage or reception or matters re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in Rule 8 of Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2011 under Service Tax regime. We have reproduced the said provisions below: 8. Place of provision of services where provider and recipient are located in taxable territory Place of provision of a service, where the location of the provider of service us well us that of the recipient of service in the faxable territory, shall be the location of the recipient of service. E6. It can be observed that in case of services the legislatures have always specifically provided for levying tax basis the location of supplier and recipient. However, in case of goods there is no such provision which states that, even where goods are situated/ used/ consumed outside India and the location of the supplier and the recipient is in India, the place of supply shall be outside India. E7. Accordingly, it can be inferred that for the purpose of levy of GST on services location of supplier and recipient would be relevant and if both are in India then the sam

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oods, whether one or multiple, shall be levied and collected only at the time of importation i.e. when the import declarations are filed before Customs authorities for the customs clearance purposes for the first time. Further, value addition accruing in each such high sea shall form part of the value on which IGST is collected at the time of clearance. F3. The Circular clearly mentions that the tax is leviable only at the time of importation of goods in India and not when the goods the sold while they are in High Seas. Similarly, when the goods are in Germany i.e. outside India, it can be said that since, the goods are outside India, no GST is applicable on the same as the subject on which tax is being levied is outside the territory of India. F4. Another circular was issued by CBEC to clarify the tax applicability of goods lying in bonded warehouse. Circular No. 46/2017-Customs dated 24th November 2017, provided that in case the goods are sold while the same lying in bonded warehouse

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

with section of IGST Act, 2017, is outside India, There is no mechanism in the GST returns to report the transaction in GSTR-1 mentioning the place of supply to be a place outside India. Accordingly, the collection mechanism of such IGST is unclear and consequently it is unclear as to whether only Central Government or both Central and State Government would receive this revenue. G3. In the absence of ambiguity around collection mechanism and revenue sharing of such GST, it appears that intention of legislatures was never to levy and collect IGST on such type of transaction. H. The transaction was not taxable under erstwhile indirect tax laws and hence the same should not be liable to GST. H1. GST has been introduced with a view to subsume majority of indirect taxes applicable in India like service tax, central excise, entry tax, VAT, CST etc. The intention of the legislator has not been to tax the transactions which were not taxable under existing laws but to have a uniform tax regim

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ourse of import, sale in the course of export and intra-State sale out of which only inter-State sale was made liable to CST. H5. Section 5 of CST Act, 1956 provided for the principles to determine whether the transaction is a sale or purchase in the course of import or export and the same are reproduced below: (1) A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export the goods out of the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such export or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India. (2) A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the import of the goods into the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such import or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods before the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India. (3) …….. (4) …….. (5) …&

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Where goods are not dispatched or transported, the place of supply shall be deemed to be the place where the goods are located at the time when the supply takes place. I3. It can be observed from the aforesaid provision of EU VAT that the place of supply for the transaction under consideration will be Germany and has already attracted EU VAT. Hence, the same should not be made liable to GST in India. Levying GST on such transaction in India would lead to supply to same tools being taxed in Germany as well as in India. Globally, various countries are adapting place of supply principles in a way to avoid double taxation. Hence, if the same goods have already been taxed under EU VAT they continue to remain in Germany the same tools should not be made subject to GST. J. If at all tax is applicable on the transaction. than input tax credit of the same should be available to the recipient of supply J1. One of the major objective of introducing GST in India was to allow the seamless flow of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds or services or both. Explanation.-For the purposes of this clause, it shall be deemed that the registered person has received the goods where the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise, before or during movement of goods, either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise- (i) where the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise, before or during movement of goods, either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise; (ii) where the services are provided by the supplier to any person on the direction of and on account of such registered person.] (c) subject to the provisions of section 41, the tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the Government, either in cash or through utilisation of input tax c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

yable thereon. J4. Without prejudice to the aforesaid submission, if at all tax is payable on the transaction under consideration then the recipient of supply should be eligible to avail input tax credit of the supply made to him and the condition of receipt should be deemed to have been complied with by applying explanation to section 16(2)(b) of CGST Act, 2017. J5. The Applicant contends that if a transaction is held to be liable qua the supplier and not the goods or services or both, then in the same analogy on the very transaction, the credit of input tax needs to be allowed based on the recipient and not whether the goods or services or both had been received or not. J6. If the transaction is deemed to be an inter-state supply and if the same is made liable to GST then it should be deemed that such goods have been received from perspective and the credit should accordingly, be made available to him. J7. Further, in order to achieve the objective of introduction of GST, the seamles

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

located outside India would be liable to tax in India u/s 7(5) (a) of IGST Act 2017? Explanation: As per section 7(2) of IGST Act 2017 which is reproduced below: Supply of goods imported into the territory of India, shall be treated to be a supply of goods in the course of inter-state trade or commerce. In this case goods doesn t move into the territory of India. Hence IGST Act will not apply in this case. Also section 10 of IGST Act provides for various scenarios to determine the place of supply of goods. In case of T2, the supply does not involve movement of goods. Hence, without prejudice to Applicant s submission herein below, it appears that the said supply would get covered under section 10(1) (c) of IGST Act which is reproduced below: 10(1) The place of supply of goods, other than supply of goods imported into, or exported from India, shall be as under, (a)………….. (b) ………….. (c) where the supply does not involve movement of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he application when Shi Nitin Shah, Advocate, Sh. Niraj Menon, C.A., and Sh. Anant Joshi, Manager Taxation appeared and requested for admission of application as per their contentions in ARA application. The jurisdictional officer, Shi Y. A. Lokre, Dy. Commr. Of ST. (PUN-VAT-E-610), Pune appeared and made written submissions. The application was admitted and final hearing was held on 26.06.2018, Sh. Nitin Shah, Advocate, Sh. Niraj Menon, C.A., and Sh. Anant Joshi, Manager Taxation appeared and made oral and written submission as per their ARA. The jurisdictional officer, Sh. Sanjay Shinde, Dy. Commr. of S.T. (PUN-VAT-E-610), Pune appeared and made written submissions. 05. OBSERVATIONS We have perused the records on file and gone through the facts of the case and the submissions made by the applicant and the department. The factual matrix of the case is as below: Applicant is engaged in supply of bearings and tools. The Applicant supplies bearings to a wide range of customers which inte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

which are required for manufacturing are developed outside India by Schaeffer Germany. Once the tools are developed, Schaeffer Germany raise an invoice on applicant at Pune and as corollary of this the ownership of the said tools get transferred to the Applicant, without physical movement of tools from Germany to India i.e. the tools continue to remain in the possession of Scaheffler Germany. It means that there is no transfer of goods [Tools] in physical form and the Tool remain under the possession of Schaeffer Germany. The Applicant in turn raises an invoice to their customer M/s. Renault Nissan Automotive India Pvt Ltd, Tamil Nadu and thereby the ownership of the tools get transferred to the customer without physical movement of tools, and the tools physically continue to remain under the possession of Schaeffer Germany. Thus we find that there are two different transactions effected in present matter between the parties for the supply of same tools. One from foreign supplier to th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d supply should be read in liberal manner and should not be restricted only to taking of goods outside India. 5. Place of Supply of Service specifically covers case where recipient is located outside India, unlike Place of Supply of Goods 6. Circular issued for High Sea Sales will be applicable to the transaction under consideration. 7. To state code available in GST returns to mention the Place of Supply in case of these transactions 8. The transaction was not taxable under erstwhile indirect tax laws and hence, the same should not be liable to GST. 9. VAT is payable on the said transaction under European VAT Laws. 10. If at all tax is applicable on the transaction, then input tax credit of the same should be available to the recipient of supply In view of the above, applicant submits that the transaction of sale/supply of goods by the supplier in India should not be made liable to IGST under section 7(5) (a) of IGST Act, 2017 since, the intention behind section 7(5) (a) was to specif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sion of Schaeffer Germany. In short, the order received by the applicant from their customer in India and the order placed by applicant On Schaeffer Germany is in the nature of back to back order. On the basis of the above set facts we would be required to refer to the provisions of IGST Act, 2017. First of all to confirm the nature of supply of present goads i e. whether inter-state or intra-state we are required to refer to Chapter IV of the IGST ACT, 2017, which reads as under:- CHAFTER IV DETERMINATION OF NATURE OF SUPPLY Inter-State supply 7. (1) Subject to the provisions of section 10, supply of goods, where the location of the supplier and the place of supply are in- (a) two different States; (b) two different Union territories; or (c) a State and a Union territory, shall be treated as a supply of goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. (2) Supply of goods imported into the territory of India, till they cross the customs frontiers of India, shall be treated to be a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of India till they cross the customs frontiers of India; or (iii) supplies made to a tourist referred to in section 15. From the reading of Section 7(2) of the IGST Act We find that Supply of goods imported into the territory of India till they cross the customs frontier shall be treated as supply of goods in the course of inter-state trade or commerce. In addition to what is stated above we find that the location of the applicant as a supplier of goods is in India and the place of supply of goods is outside India i.e. Germany and such impugned transaction get clearly covered by the scope of section 7(5) (a) of the Act. As a result the transaction is in the nature of interstate trade and commerce. Thus from the harmonious reading of Section 7(2) and Section 7(5)(a) of the IGST Act and the discussion held in this behalf herein above we clearly find that the transaction referred to as T2 gets covered under the ambit of Interstate trade and commerce. And thus liable to tax as per Section

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas and aviation turbine fuel shall be levied with effect from such date as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council. (3) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify categories of supply of goods or services or both, the tax on which shall be paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient of such goods or services or both and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or services or both. (4) The integrated tax in respect of the supply of taxable goods or services or both by a supplier, who is not registered, to a registered person shall be paid by such person on reverse charge basis as the recipient and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such goods or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

liable to pay tax. From the transactions placed by the applicant before us there is no doubt that the goods of the applicant would be imported goods if they are brought from outside the country into India and it is clear that when the location of the supplier is in India and the said goods are delivered/ supplied from a place outside India to a place outside India, these goods have not crossed the customs frontiers of India, thus clearly the transaction in these goods are in the nature of Inter-state supply as per Section 7(2) and 7(5)(a) of the IGST Act. We find that proviso to Section 5(1) of the IGST Act states that Provided that the integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when duties of customs are levied on the said goods under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 . Thus from the above it is clear that integrate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

present case, there is no levy till the time of their customs clearance in compliance with Section 12 of the Customs Act and Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. In view of this the imported goods sold from and to a non-taxable territory, though they are clearly in the nature of inter-state supply would come in the category of exempt supply as no duty is leviable on them except in accordance with proviso to Section 5(1) of the IGST Act. We find that in the definition of exempt supply as given in Section 2(47) of the CGST Act is as under:- Section 2(47) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, exempt supply means supply of any goods or services or both which attracts nil rate of tax or which may be wholly exempt from tax under section 11, or under section 6 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, and includes non-taxable supply . Further we find that Section 2(78) of the CGST Act defines non-taxable supply which is as under:- As per Section 2(78) of the Central Goo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Lavgan Dockyard Private Limited Versus Commissioner of CGST, Kolhapur

2019 (1) TMI 1303 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI – CENVAT Credit – input services – services of personal insurance of employees – security agency services in respect of the guest house – Held that:- In view of the embargo created in the definition of input service, service tax paid on insurance service for insuring the employees should not be considered as input service for the appellant – credit cannot be allowed.

Security service availed by the appellant for its guest house, which is located outside the factory – Held that:- There is no nexus between such disputed service with the output service provided by the appellant. Hence service tax paid on the security service should not be considered as input service for the purpose of availment of Cenvat benefit – Credit cannot be allowed.

Demand of interest and penalty – irregularly availed CENVAT Credit, not utilized – Held that:- The irregularly availed Cenvat Credit had not been used/utilized by the appellant for payment of service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeal-I), Pune. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in providing various taxable services, defined under the Finance Act, 1994. For providing the taxable services, the appellant got itself registered with the Service Tax Department. The appellant avails Cenvat Credit on service tax paid on various input services. During the disputed period, the appellant had availed Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on services of personal insurance of employees and security agency services in respect of the guest house. Availment of Cenvat benefit by the appellant was disputed by the Central Excise Department on the ground that the disputed services are not confirming to the definition of input service and also have no nexus with the output service provided by the appellant. Accordingly, show cause proceedings were initiated by the department, which culminated into the adjudication order dated 31.03.2017, wherein Cenvat Credit amount

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nput service for the appellant. With regard to security service availed by the appellant for its guest house, which is located outside the factory, there is no nexus between such disputed service with the output service provided by the appellant. Hence service tax paid on the security service should not be considered as input service for the purpose of availment of Cenvat benefit. Therefore the impugned order, to the extent it denied the Cenvat benefit on insurance service and security service sustains. 5. I find that the irregularly availed Cenvat Credit had not been used/utilized by the appellant for payment of service tax on the output services provided by it. In absence of utilization of Cenvat Credit, it cannot be said that there is loss of revenue to the Government exchequer, which can be compensated by way of payment of interest. Further, the Cenvat Credit particulars availed by the appellant were reflected in the books of accounts, which were verified by department for confirmi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gst Refund

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Vinay Jaindani – Dated:- 8-7-2018 Last Replied Date:- 9-7-2018 – Dear Sir, As per notification no. 40/2017 Central Tax Rate the merchant exporter can purchase goods at concessional rate of 0.10 percent from manufacturer exporter subject to certain condition including a condition which states:- ''the registered recipient shall indicate the Goods and Services Tax Identification Number of the registered supplier and the tax invoice number issued by the registered supplier in respect of the said goods in the shipping bill or bill of export, as the case may be'' my merchant exporter has not fulfiled the above condition because of which the jurisdictional officer is not approving my refund a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Conference Sponsorship from Outside India

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Ajay Sachdeva – Dated:- 7-7-2018 Last Replied Date:- 6-8-2018 – We are proprietorship firm. We are organizing an international Conference at New Delhi next year ie Feb 2019. We are expecting to receive sponsorship for the same from some overseas companies. Do we need to charge them GST for the same? – Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN – The Reply = In my view GST is payable on reverse charge basis. – Reply By Ajay Sachdeva – The Reply = Does the reverse charge mean that we charge the client and they can claim back. How does it work? – Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN – The Reply = Under Reverse charge mechanism the service recipient is to pay GST as if he is a service provider and he can claim inpu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

9; by it. This fact, therefore, makes your Indian entity a service provider rather than a service recipient. It is interesting to note that sponsorship service is one category that has created doubts ever since its inception as to who is the service provider and who is the receiver of services. Please note that in case of sponsorship services, the provider is the person who 'receives the sponsorship money' and the person paying the money is 'service receiver'. Even technically, it is only a receiver of services (here sponsorship service in your case) who makes the payment (the foreign companies, in your case). Therefore, RCM applicability is absolutely out of the equation since your proprietorship firm is a service provider

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags – ‘PP Leno Bags’, if specifically made from woven Polypropylene fabric using strips or the like of width not exceeding 5 mm and without any impregnation, coating, covering, or lamination with plastics, a

Goods and Services Tax – Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags – ‘PP Leno Bags’, if specifically made from woven Polypropylene fabric using strips or the like of width not exceeding 5 mm and witho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST on Rakhi – Mere inclusion of “Rakhi” in a Puja Thali at the discretion of either the Customer or the Supplier does not make it an integral and essential part of Puja Samagri – Benefit of exemption not available to Rakhi.

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST on Rakhi – Mere inclusion of “Rakhi” in a Puja Thali at the discretion of either the Customer or the Supplier does not make it an integral and essential part of Pu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of IGST – Concessional rate of tax – supply of goods to specified institutions – Is the concessional tax rate of 5% as given under N.No. 47/2017 is applicable only for Interstate sales i.e., on IGST or also applicable for sales within the s

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of IGST – Concessional rate of tax – supply of goods to specified institutions – Is the concessional tax rate of 5% as given under N.No. 47/2017 is applicable only for In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of goods – Rate of GST – Lyophilizers-Machinery for the plant – classifiable under the heading 8419 – The tax rate leviable on supply of “ Lyophilizers” falling under the tariff heading 8419 of the GST Tariff is 9% CGST + 9% SGST.

Goods and Services Tax – Classification of goods – Rate of GST – Lyophilizers-Machinery for the plant – classifiable under the heading 8419 – The tax rate leviable on supply of “ Lyophilizers” falling

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cancellation of registration

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – bk r – Dated:- 7-7-2018 Last Replied Date:- 9-7-2018 – A ltd company is registered with GST having a principal place of business in Delhi North and also showing/having three additional places of buisness at Delhi south, east and west . The additional place of business was earlier registered with the Central Excise as Registered dealer and we took also cenvat credit in respect of stack available as on 30.06.2017 as transitional credit in respect of purchase made by these Additional place of business. The department asked telephonicaly to submit the record we submit all the documents regarding stock receipt and invoices regarding puchase of material in respect of additional place of business as there was neary about 6 crores of amount was involved in tran-1. There is no physical business activity at the principal place of business and only documents kept here and file return. the business is now being done from additional place of business only i.e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the principal place of business is a vacant plot . Now the department issued order regarding cancellation of GST registration w.e.f. 01.07.2017 and also initiated action for recocvry of trans I credit and other ITC availed during 01.07.2017 till date .Whether the department action for cancellation of registration w.e.f. 01/07/2017 is correct and proposal regarding recovery of Trans 1 credit and other ITC availed during 01/07/2017 to March 2018 is also correct. My additional place of business is working at the declared place. – Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN – The Reply = In my view the action of the Department is correct since your principal place of business is a vacant one. You may file appeal contending that the credit sought to be availed on TRAN-1 is genuine. Or you may file a writ petition seeking the direction to consider the credit by the Asssessing Officer. – Reply By YAGAY and SUN – The Reply = We endorse the view of the expert. – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = I al

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s technical matter and it cannot monetary loss to you. Your invoices were valid and are valid. Substantive right cannot be forfeited due to such technical infractions.There is no other eescape route except to face litigation. – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = Dear Querist, .Two factors can tilt the case in your favour. 1.Date of issuance/communication of order of cancellation of registration retrospectively. 2.Your bona fides. – Reply By bk r – The Reply = Thanks sethi sir,I admitted in the statement tendered before the CGST officer that the plot was vacant on 01.07.2017 and plot owner also give statment that as on 01.07.2017 the plot was vacant . – Reply By bk r – The Reply = Further the department initated action when the 3 letters sent by department for trans 1 enquiry was received back undelivered to the department . and then department came to know about this. – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = O.K. You have admitted the factual position and letters too were received back

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

plot, only boundry wall of 3 feet height with one main gate. There is no rent agreement with the plot owner regarding rent w.e.f. 01.07.2017. however additional place of business was declared at the time of registration and they actually exixts. – Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN – The Reply = When the registered principal place of business is not in existence how the Department will release you. It will do your duty. In respect of credit you have no other option except to file a writ petition before the High Court. – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = I agree with Dr.Govindarajan Sir. You should have not declared such vacant plot as principal place of business. Now this lapse is on records. It puts question mark on genuine transaction for future as well as present. You may not have done any wrong transaction but facts on records indicate othewise. What is the logic or purpose/reason declaring vacant plot as principal place of business ? – Reply By Alkesh Jani – The Reply = Sir, I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =