M/s Kalpataru Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai

M/s Kalpataru Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1460 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/86913/2018 – A/87125/2018
Service Tax
SHRI RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Mehul Jivani, C.A. for Appellant
Shri M.P. Dixit, AC (AR) for Respondent
ORDER
Per: Raju
This appeal has been filed by M/s Kalpataru Ltd. against denial of CENVAT Credit of certain services received by them in relation to general insurance, repair and maintenance of motor vehicles and those utilized for staff welfare.
2. Learned C.A. for the appellant argued that they are not contesting the demand confirmed in respect of services used for staff welfare. He pointed out that two show-cause notices were issued, one for the period 2010 to 2014 and another for 2014-15. Both the notices were adjudicated by same original adjudicating authority but different first appellate authority. He pointed out that in respect of impugned show-cau

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d/intimated that, abiding to the show-cause notice they have admitted their liability and paid total liability of Rs. 11,05,801/- along with interest of Rs. 8,83,714/- vide Challan No. 05214 dated 05.11.2015 and 05218, 05216, 05213 all dated 05.11.2015. As the assessee has admitted the liability and paid the same along with interest. I am not discussing the admissibility/inadmissibility of individual services covered by the show-cause notice.”
2.1 He further pointed out that Commissioner (Appeals) has also not given any findings in respect of individual services in respect of which credit was taken and observed as follows: –
8. I have considered the submissions made by appellants which are available on records and findings and reasoning's and stand taken by the Adjudicating Authority. In this case appellant stated that they were eligible to avail/take CENVAT credit on the various employees and business related insurances charges as per the definition of the input service given in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

para 25 onwards in respect of these very services.
4. I have gone through the rival submissions. I find that the Order-in-Original confirms the demand without given any specific finding on the admissibility/inadmissibility of individual services covered by the impugned show-cause notice by observing that the assessee had admitted the liability and paid the same along with interest. The assessee had indeed paid liability and informed the Joint/Additional Commissioner on 17.11.2015 about the payment made, however, on 29.2.2015 in its reply to the showcause notice contested all the issues before original adjudicating authority. In these circumstances, the observation of the original adjudicating authority to the effect that the appellants are not contesting the demand is incorrect. In so far as findings given in para 25 onwards are concerned, the same relate to a different show-cause notice and different period.
5. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. S.M. Niryat Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST-Kolkata

M/s. S.M. Niryat Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST-Kolkata
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 73 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 21-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/75952/2018 – FO/76526/2018
Service Tax
SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri Dilip Kumar Singh, CA for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. Mukhopadhyay, Suptd. (A. R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
PER SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY
Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
2. I find that the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax Division-III Service Tax Commissionerate, Kolkata vide OIA No. 14/ST/DIVIII/ Kol/2014-15 dated 02/04/2014 had allowed the exemption by way of sanctioning an amount of Rs. 4,48,188/- claimed by the appellant as refund of whole of Service Tax paid on taxable specified services for export of goods against Shipping Bills in terms of Notification No. 41/2012-ST dated 29/06/2012 as amended.
3. The Revenue filed appeal before the First Appellate Authority.
4. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gs are observed:
01. -that the claimant has certified on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans in terms of para-3(h) of the said notification, since the amount of claim i.e. Rs. 4,48,148/- for refund is 0.47% of the total FOB value amounting to Rs. 95717088/- which is below 0.50% of the declared FOB value of export.
02. -that from the certification made on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans, it is observed that the said claimant declared that they have received and used the specified services for export of the said goods by mentioning specific chipping bill nos. as well as taxable specified services.
03. -that from the certification made on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans and in the declaration made in the Form- A1, it is observed that the said claimant declared that they have actually paid the service tax on the specified services to the respective service providers.
04. -that the said claimant sought for refund of whole of service tax amo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

) iii) 4432548 dt. 13.03.2013 (LEO Date 14.03.2013) iv) 4297347 dt.0503.2013 (LEO Date 13.03.2013) v) 4297347 dt. 05.03.2013 (LEO Date 13.03.2013) vi) 4298180 Dt.05.03.2013 (LEO Date 13.03.2013) along with all the documents furnished by the said claimant in support of their refund claim of service tax under Notification No.41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 and my findings are:
I.-that the said claimant filed the claim for refund of Service Tax paid on taxable specified service for export on 14.02.2014 for an amount of Rs. 4,48,188/- which I find has been filed within the stipulated time limit in terms of the said notification.
II.- that the said claimant has certified on all the original copy of invoices/bills/challans in terms of para-3(h) of the said notification, since the amount of claim i.e. Rs. 4,48,188/- for refund is 0.47% of the total FOB value amounting to Rs. 95717088/- which is not more than 0.50% of the declared FOB value of export.
III-that the said claimant filed their clai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eign convertible currency in terms of para 4 of the said notification according to Final Commercial Invoice.
VII.-that the said claimant declared in their letter regarding non-availment of electronic refund of service tax from customs as per the said notification.
VIII.-that the said claimant submitted the claim papers accompanied by relevant documents and co-relation and nexus between input services and exports made for the said period of claim for refund as well as payment of Servie Tax made by them has been established in terms of the said notification read with Mof, DoR (TRU) Circular No.120/01/2010-ST dt.19.01.2010 and para VII of circular no. 112/06/2009-ST dt. 12.03.09.
IX-that the claimed amount of Rs. 4,48,188/- as refund of Service Tax paid on taxable specified services provided, as detailed at Annexure-A of the brief fact above, I find that services in respect of the said invoices mentioned at the brief fact above are the taxable specified services in terms of the said no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit

Input tax credit
Query (Issue) Started By: – DK AGGARWAL Dated:- 20-8-2018 Last Reply Date:- 28-8-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 12 Replies
GST
Dear Sir
GST-Input Tax Credit
1Please clarify if the ITC is available on replacement or repair of Tube lights, electric wire, in the office. In the purchase invoice of supplier GST number is appearing of buyer and in GSTR- 2A the ITC is shown.
2Similarly, in repair of godown, expenses are incurred for replacement of roof sheet etc and the ITC is appearing in GSTR- 2A. Please note its not a new construction .
3-Similarly, is ITC available on replacement of CAR tyres, battery or service bill. ITC is available in GSTR- 2A as we have given our GST number to the supplier ?
Kindly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ell.
Reply By DK AGGARWAL:
The Reply:
OK
Thanks Sir
Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani:
The Reply:
Input tax credit is allowed on query 1 & 2. Third one is covered under ineligible list.
Reply By Pavan Mahulkar:
The Reply:
It may not be available for 2 also…
Please read section 17
(c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service;
(d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.
Explanation.For

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d sub-section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:-
(a) motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used
(i) for making the following taxable supplies, namely:-
(A) further supply of such vehicles or conveyances ; or
(B) transportation of passengers; or
(C) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) for transportation of goods;
So it is clearly mentioned in the section that "ITC shall not be available in respect of" which indicates that neither on the purchases of the same nor on the parts there of
Reply By Ramaswamy S:
The Reply:
1 ITC on replacement or repair of Tube lights, electric wire, in the offi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Warehouse Services for Tea Not GST Exempt; Processed Tea Not Considered Agricultural Produce.

Warehouse Services for Tea Not GST Exempt; Processed Tea Not Considered Agricultural Produce.
Case-Laws
GST
Warehouse services – claim of benefit of exemption – agricultural produce or not – Whether the supply of warehouse services used for packing & storage of tea, was/is exempted from GST – Held No. – the activity of M/s. Unilever of processing of raw tea leaves into tea results in emergence of a new product having distinct name i.e. Tea, which has distinct name, character and use – I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Reviews If FSSAI-Mandated Name on Goods Counts as Brand Name for GST Exemption Under Exemption Notification.

Court Reviews If FSSAI-Mandated Name on Goods Counts as Brand Name for GST Exemption Under Exemption Notification.
Case-Laws
GST
Branding of goods – Whether mention of name of the Appellant on the goods, as required by FSSAI regulations and Legal Metrology Rules, amounts to brand name or not? – Claim of exemption from GST – The use or words ‘VALUE’, ‘CHOICE’ or ‘ SUPERIOR’ on the proposed packing, without altering the surrounding environment to take advantage of brand ‘MOR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Uninterruptible Power Supply and Battery Not Classified as Mixed or Composite Supply Under GST Regulations.

Uninterruptible Power Supply and Battery Not Classified as Mixed or Composite Supply Under GST Regulations.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of the supply – supply of UPS along with the battery – Mixed supply or not – naturally bundled goods – The storage battery has multiple uses and can be put to different uses and when supplied separately with static converter (UPS) it cannot be considered as a composite supply or a naturally bundled supply.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, mar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commission Directs Respondent to Proactively Disclose Information for Enhanced Transparency Under RTI Act Sections 25(4) and 4.

Commission Directs Respondent to Proactively Disclose Information for Enhanced Transparency Under RTI Act Sections 25(4) and 4.
Case-Laws
GST
RTI – GSTN Network – Keeping in view the supervisory powers of the Commission u/s 25(4) of the RTI Act, 2005, the Commission advises the Respondent to suo motu disclose the information sought by the Complainant in compliance with Section-4 of the RTI Act, 2005 to ensure transparency, objectivity and accountability in the functioning of the Public

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Announcement of Special Campaign for GST Migration Pending cases.

Announcement of Special Campaign for GST Migration Pending cases.
21T of 2018 Dated:- 20-8-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Office of the
Commissioner of sales Tax,
Maharashtra State,
8th Flr., Vikrikar Bhavan,
Mazgaon, Mumbai-400010
TRADE CIRCULAR
No. JCST/Mahavikas/GST Enrollment/2018-19/B-719 Mumbai, Dt. 20/08/2018
Trade Circular No. 21T of 2018
Subject: Announcement of Special Campaign for GST Migration Pending cases,
Ref. : 1. Trade Circular 18T of 2018 dated 31-07-2018
2. Trade Circular 19T of 2018 dated 10-08-2018
The GST Council in its 28th meeting approved the proposal to open the migration window for taxpayers, who have filed Part A of FORM GST REG-26, but not Part B of the said FORM. Such taxpayers are requ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nctional till 31st August 2018. If any taxpayer, who have filed Part A of FORM GST REG-26, but not Part B of the said FORM and have not yet submitted their request for opening of Migration Window, may approach these Special Desks with the Request Letter as mentioned in the Trade Circular 18T of 2018. For more details, the taxpayers are requested to refer the Trade Circular 18T of 2018 dated 31-07-2018 & Trade Circular 19T of 2018 dated 10-08-2018.
This circular is clarificatory in nature and cannot be made use of for legal interpretation of provisions of Law. If any member of trade has any doubt, he may refer the matter to this Office for further clarifications.
Rajiv Jalota
Commissioner of Sales Tax,
Maharashtra State
No. JCST/Mahavi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF NAVI MUMBAI And ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF NAVI MUMBAI And ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1267 – SC Order – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. J169 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – SC
Dated:- 20-8-2018
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s). 25203/2018
GST
Mr. A.K. Sikri And Mr. Ashok Bhushan JJ.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., Mr. V. Raghuraman, Adv., Mr. Shailesh Sheth, Adv., Mr. Anand Sukumar, Adv., Mr. S. Sukumaran, Adv., Mr. Bhupesh Pathak, Adv. And Ms. Meera Ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Apollo Screens Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India

Apollo Screens Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India
GST
2018 (8) TMI 1415 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 529 (Guj.)
GUJARAT HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 20-8-2018
R/Special Civil Application No. 11375 of 2018
GST
MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. B.N. KARIA JJ.
Appearance:
MR D K TRIVEDI (5283) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2
for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2,3,4
ORAL ORDER
(PER : MR.AKIL KURESHI)
1. Petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to carry forward balance CENVAT Credit available as on 30.06.2017.
2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the petitioner, a private company is engaged in manufacturing activity. As on 30.06.2017, i.e. the last date of CENVAT regime, the petitioner

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

titioner could not file the necessary declarations. The petitioner was under bona fide belief that such errors would be resolved. The petitioner admitted that no screenshot of having made an attempt to upload the return was maintained.
3. To this communication, the department replied on 03.05.2018 stating that there is no provision for filing physical return. The petitioner had not contacted the department during the time permitted for filing the return pointing out the difficulties in E-filing.
At that stage, this petition was filed.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any reason to interfere. We are conscious, as pointed out by the counsel for the petitioner that some High Courts have intercepted and obvi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of fertilizers supplied for use in the manufacture of other fertilizers at 5% GST rate.

Classification of fertilizers supplied for use in the manufacture of other fertilizers at 5% GST rate.
15/2018-GST Dated:- 20-8-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 15/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 20th August, 2018.
Sub : Classification of fertilizers supplied for use in the manufacture of other fertilizers at 5% GST rate- reg.
No. CT/GST-15/2017/168.- References have been received regarding a clarification as to whether simple fertilizers, such as MOP (Murate of Potash) classified under Chapter 31, and supplied for use in manufacturing of a complex fertilizer, are entitled to the concessional GST rate of 5%, as applicable in general

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e was applied to goods falling under Chapter 31 which are clearly to be used directly as fertilizers or in the manufacture of other fertilizers, whether directly or through the stage of an intermediate product.
3. In the GST regime, tax structure on fertilizers has been prescribed on the lines of pre-GST tax incidence. The wording of the GST notification is similar to the central excise notification except certain changes to meet the requirements of GST. These changes were necessitated as GST is applicable on the supply of goods while central excise duty was applicable on manufacture of goods. Accordingly, fertilizers falling under heading 3102, 3103, 3104 and 3105, other than those which are clearly not to be used as fertilizers, attract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products.

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products.
14/2018-GST Dated:- 20-8-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 14/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 20th August, 2018.
Sub : Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products – regarding
No. CT/GST-15/2017/167.-References have been received regarding the applicability of GST on the petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products during the course of continuous supply, such as Methyl Et

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tained by these manufacturers (recipient of supply), and the remaining quantity is returned to the oil refineries. In this regard, an issue has arisen as to whether in this transaction GST would be leviable on the whole quantity of the principal raw materials supplied by the oil refinery or on the net quantity retained by the manufacturers of petrochemical and chemical products.
3. The GST Council in its 28th meeting held on 21-07-2018 discussed this issue and recommended for issuance of a general clarification for petroleum sector that in such transactions, GST will be payable by the refinery on the value of net quantity of petroleum gases retained for the manufacture of petrochemical and chemical products.
4. Accordingly, it is hereby c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on various goods and services.

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on various goods and services.
13/2018-GST Dated:- 20-8-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES,
ASSAM KAR BHAWAN DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 13/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 20th August, 2018.
Sub : Clarification regarding applicability of GST on various goods and services-reg.
No. CT/GST-15/2017/166.- Representations have been received seeking clarification in respect of applicable GST rates on the following items:
(i) Fortified Toned Milk
(ii) Refined beet and cane sugar
(iii) Tamarind Kernel Powder (Modified & Un-Modified form)
(iv) Drinking water
(v) Plasma products
(vi) Wipes using spun lace non-woven fabric
(vii) Real Zari Kasab (Thread)
(viii) Marine Engine
(ix) Quilt and comforter
(x) Bus body building as supply of motor vehicle or job work
(xi) Disc Brake Pad
2. The matter has been examined. The issue-wise clarifications are discussed below:
3.1 Applicability

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

017/14 dated 29.06.2017], 5% GST rate has been prescribed on all kinds of beet and cane sugar falling under heading 1701.
4.2 Doubts seem to have arisen in view of Sl. No. 32 A of the Schedule Il of notification No. No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017], which prescribes GST rate on “All goods, falling under tariff items 1701 91 and 1701 99 including refined sugar containing added flavouring or colouring matter, sugar cubes (other than those which attract 5% or Nil GST)”.
4.3 It is clarified that by virtue of specific exclusion in Sl. No. 32 A, any sugar that falls under 5% category [at the said Sl. No. 91 of schedule I of notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017] gets excluded from the Sl. No. 32 A of Schedule 11. As all kinds of beet and cane sugar falling under heading 1701 are covered by the said entry at Sl. No. 91 of Schedule I, these would get excluded from Sl. No. 32 A of Schedule Il, and thus would attract GST @ 5%.
4.4 Accordingly, it

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l powder and treated (modified) tamarind kernel powder fall under chapter 13, it is hereby clarified that both attract 5% GST in terms of the said notification.
6.1 Applicability of GST on supply of safe drinking water for public purpose: Representations have been received seeking clarification regarding applicability of GST on supply of safe drinking water for public purpose.
6.2 Attention is drawn to the entry at Sl. No. 99 of notification No. 2/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/15 dated 29.06.2017], by virtue of which water [other than aerated, mineral, purified, distilled, medicinal, ionic, battery, de-mineralized and water sold in sealed container] falling under HS code 2201 attracts NIL rate of GST.
6.3 Accordingly, supply of water, other than those excluded from Sl. No. 99 of notification No. 2/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/15 dated 29.06.2017], would attract GST at “NIL” rate. Therefore, it is clarified that supply of drinking water for public purposes, if it is not supplied in a sealed

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

id notification, not specifically covered in the said List I.
7.4 Thus, a harmonious reading of the two entries would mean that normal human plasma would attract 5% GST rate under List I (Sl. No. 186), whereas plasma products would attract 12% GST rate, if otherwise not specifically covered under the said List.
8.1 Appropriate classification of baby wipes, facial tissues and other similar products: Varied practices are being followed regarding the classification of baby wipes, facial tissues and other similar products, and references have been received requesting for correct classification of these products. As per the references, these products are currently being classified under different HS codes namely 3307, 3401 and 5603 by the industry.
8.2 Commercially, wipes are categorized into various types such as baby wipes, facial wipes, disinfectant wipes, make-up remover wipes etc. These products are generally made by using non-woven fabrics of viscose and polyviscous blend and are s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by the components which are to be mixed with the textile material.
8.4 As per the explanatory notes to the HSN, the HS code 5603 clearly excludes non-woven, impregnated, coated or covered with substances or preparations such as perfumes or cosmetics, soaps or detergents, polishes, creams or similar preparations. The HSN is reproduced as follows :
“The heading also excludes.
Nonwoven, impregnated, coated or covered with substances or preparations [i.e. perfumes or cosmetics (Chapter 33), soaps or detergents (heading 3401), polishes, creams, or similar preparations (heading 3405), fabric, softeners (heading 3809)] where the textile material is present merely as a carrying medium. Further, HS code 3307 covers wadding, felt and non-woven, impregnated, coated or covered with perfumes or cosmetics. The HS code 3401, would cover paper, wadding, felt and non-woven impregnated, coated or covered with soap or detergent whether or not perfumed”.
8.5 Further, as per the explanatory notes to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

05 attracts 12% GST, as per entry 137 of the Schedule-II-12% of the notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017], while specified embroidery product falling under 5809 and 5810 attracts GST @ 5%, as per entry no. 220 of the Schedule-I-5% of the above-mentioned notification.
9.2 The heading 5809 and 5810 cover embroidery and zari articles. These heading do not cover yarn of any kinds. Hence, while these headings apply to embroidery articles, embroidery in piece, in strips, or in motifs, they do not apply to yarn, including Kasab yarn.
9.3 Further all types of metallised yarns or threads are classifiable under tariff heading 5605. Kasab (yarn) falls under this heading. Under heading 5605, real zari manufactured with silver wire gimped (vitai) on core yarn namely pure silk and cotton and finally gilted with gold would attract 5% GST under tariff item 5605 00 10, as specified at entry no. 218A of Schedule-I-5% of the GST rate schedule. Other goods falling under this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f item 8408 1093 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 would attract a GST rate of 5% by virtue of SI. No. 252 of Schedule 1 of the notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017].
10.2 Therefore, it is clarified that the supplies of marine engine for fishing vessel (being a part of the fishing vessel), falling under tariff item 8408 10 93 attracts 5% GST.
11.1 Applicable GST rate on cotton quilts under tariff heading 9404-Scope of the term “Cotton Quilt”.
11.2 Cotton quilts falling under tariff heading 9404 attract a GST rate of 5% if the sale value of such cotton quilts does not exceed ₹ 1000 per piece [as per SI. No. 257 A of Schedule I of the notification No. 1/2017- (Rate) [FTX.56/2017/14 dated 29.06.2017]. However, such cotton quilts, with sale value exceeding ₹ 1000 per piece attract a GST rate of 12% (as per Sl. No. 224A of Schedule Il of the said notification), Doubts have been raised as to what constitutes cotton quilt, i.e. whether a quilt filled w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t, it is mentioned that the services of bus body fabrication on job work basis attracts 18% GST on such service. Thus, fabrication of buses may involve the following two situations:
(a). Bus body builder builds a bus, working on the chassis owned by him and supplies the built-up bus to the customer, and charges the customer for the value of the bus.
(b). Bus body builder builds body on chassis provided by the principal for body building, and charges fabrication charges (including certain material that was consumed during the process of job-work).
12.3 In the above context, it is hereby clarified that in case as mentioned at Para 12.2(a) above, the supply made is that of bus, and accordingly supply would attract GST @28%. In the case as mentioned at Para 12.2(b) above, fabrication of body on chassis provided by the principal (not on account of body builder), the supply would merit classification as service, and 18% GST as applicable will be charged accordingly.
13.1 Applicable GST r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, disc, etc.) and parts thereof (plates, drums, cylinders, mounted linings, oil reservoirs for hydraulic brakes, etc.); servo-brakes and parts thereof, while Chapter 68 covers articles of Stone, Plaster, Cement, Asbestos, Mica or similar materials. Further, HSN Explanatory Notes to the heading 6813 specifically excludes:
(i). Friction materials not containing mineral materials or cellulose fibre (e.g., those of cork);
(ii). Mounted brake linings (including friction material fixed to a metal plate provided with circular cavities, perforated tongues or similar fittings, for disc brakes) which are classified as parts of the machines or vehicles for which they are designed (e.g. heading 8708).
13.4 Thus, it is clear, in view of the HSN Explanatory Notes that the said goods, namely “Disc Brake pad” for automobiles, are appropriately classifiable under heading 8708 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and would attract 28% GST.
This Circular is clarificatory in nature and not meant for any in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

To prescribe the due dates for quarterly furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover of upto 1.5 crores for the period from July, 2018 to March, 2019.

To prescribe the due dates for quarterly furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 for those taxpayers with aggregate turnover of upto 1.5 crores for the period from July, 2018 to March, 2019.
33/2018-State Tax Dated:- 20-8-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya,
Mumbai 400 032, dated the 20th August 2018.
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 33/2018-State Tax
No. GST-1018/C.R. 34/Taxation 1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the “said Act”), the Government of Maharashtra, on the recommendations of the Council

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: SAMPADA CATERERS PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HEDAOO

IN RE: SAMPADA CATERERS PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HEDAOO
GST
2018 (9) TMI 439 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
GST-ARA-45/2018-19/B-97
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by SAMPADA CATERERS, PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HEDAOO the applicant, seeking an advance ruling i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e with request to allow withdrawal of the application filed on 25.06.2018 due to changes in the circumstances as per Notification No. 13/2018-Central Tax (Rate) and press release by the GST Council
The request of the applicant to withdraw the application voluntarily and unconditionally is hereby allowed without going into the merits or detailed facts of this advance ruling application by this authority.
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-45/2018-19/B-97
Mumbai, dt. 20/08/2018
The Application in GST ARA form No. 01 of M/s. SAMPADA CATERERS, PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HFDAOO vide reference ARA No. 45 dated 25.06.2018 is disposed o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Sodexo Food Solutions India Private Limited

In Re: Sodexo Food Solutions India Private Limited
GST
2018 (9) TMI 440 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
GST-ARA-46/2017-18/B-90
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Sodexo Food Solutions India Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the followi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2017) ?
The preliminary hearing in the matter was held on 1804.2018 and the Final hearing was held on 05.06.2018. However the applicant has filed letter dated 14.08.2018 received on 20.082018 in this office with request to grant the permission to withdraw application.
The request of the applicant to withdraw the application voluntarily and unconditionally is hereby allowed without going into the merits or detailed facts of this advance ruling application by this authority.
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-46/2017-18/B-90
Mumbai, dt. 20/08/2018
The Application in GST ARA form No. 01 of Sodexo Food Solutions India Private Limited, vi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: M/s. MAGARPATTA CLUB AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.

IN RE: M/s. MAGARPATTA CLUB AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 441 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
GST-ARA-39/2018-19/B-95
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Magarpatta Club And Resorts Pvt Ltd , the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following quest

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ant stated that they would be making further submissions with respect to matter latest by 13.08.2018, However the applicant has filed letter dated 13.08.2018 received on in this office by email requesting to allow withdrawal of the application filed on 15.06.2018.
The request of the applicant to withdraw the application voluntarily and unconditionally is hereby allowed without going into the merits or detailed facts of this advance ruling application by this authority.
ORDER
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-39/2018-19/B-95
Mumbai, dt. 20/08/2018
The Application in GST ARA form No. 01 of Magarpatta Club And Resorts Pvt. Ltd., vide referenc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: M/s. GURUDEV SIDDHA PEETH

IN RE: M/s. GURUDEV SIDDHA PEETH
GST
2018 (9) TMI 442 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
GST-ARA-35/2017-18/B-93
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Gurudev Siddha peeth, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question
Does service involving nurtu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: M/s. ICA PIDILITE PVT. LTD.

IN RE: M/s. ICA PIDILITE PVT. LTD.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 479 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
GST-ARA-47/2018-19/B-96
GST
SHRI B. V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CCST Act and MGST Act”] by ICA Pidilite Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the questions asked were in relation to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited

In Re: M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited
GST
2018 (10) TMI 747 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, PUNJAB – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 278 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, PUNJAB – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
AAR/GST/PB/002
GST
NAVDEEP BHINDER AND G.S. BAINS, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sh. Parveen Kashyap and Sh. Adarsh Gupta, Consultant of the firm
(Note: An Appeal against this order lies with the Appellate Authority in terms of Section 99 and Section 100 of the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 99 and Section 100 of the PGST Act, 2017 within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this order.)
M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited, Plot No. 372, Industrial Area, Phase-9, Mohali, SAS Nagar, Punjab-160062 hereinafter referred to as 'applicant' had submitted an application for advance ruling in form GST ARA-01 vide his letter dated 02.04.2018 received on 04.04.2018 seeking to know.
1. Whether free tickets given as “Complimentary Ti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t were discussed at length. The consultants requested for adjournment for submission of documents. On their request. the case was adjourned with the directions to submit written submission by 30-07-2018. The applicant has sent written submission through e-mail received on 30-07-2018, which is reproduced as under:
Written submissions & synopsis by the Applicant in respect of application for Advance Ruling:
1. That, M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited, (for short “applicant” or “KPH”), having its registered office at Plot No. 372 Industrial Area. Phase-9, Mohall, SAS Nagar, Punjab-160062 is a franchisee of Board of Control for Cricket in India (for short “BCCI”) for the purpose of establishing and operating a cricket team to participate in Indian Premier League T20 cricket tournament (for shod “IPL”), under the title of “kings XI Punjab”.
2. That IPL is a domestic professional Twenty-20 cricket tournament in India, organized by BCCI-IPL every year under the gaming rules as presc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ther free tickets given as “Complimentary Tickets” falls within the definition of supply under CGST Act, 2017 and thus, whether the applicant is required to pay GST on such free tickets?
b. Whether the applicant is eligible to claim Input Tax credit (for short “ITC”) in respect of complimentary tickets?
In furtherance to our justification stated in our above stated application for Advance ruling, the Applicant wishes to submit following additional submissions with a request to be taken into consideration to decide the matter,
ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS
7. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime has introduced a concept of 'supply' as a taxable event and done away with the erstwhile taxable events of sale, service, manufacture etc. This inter-alia require fresh thoughts for treatment of various transactions and events.
8. While the term free supply' is not defined under GST law or the erstwhile indirect tax laws, a 'free supply' as the name suggests is a supply of goods or services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

elating to credit of free supply of services.
Free supply and its taxability under GST
9. Under GST, the incidence of tax is 'supply'. The term 'supply' has been defined in an inclusive manner under Section 7 of the CGST Act. What this effectively means is that the definition is not exhaustive, and there may be some supplies which are not specified within the definition of the term
10. The term 'supply' is defined to include all forms of sale, transfers, exchanges, barters etc. made or agreed to be made for a consideration in the course or furtherance of business. However, supplies between related persons or distinct persons (different offices of the same entity) in the course or furtherance of business even if not for a consideration are supplies (in terms of Schedule I to the CGST Act). As a result, free supplies between unrelated persons. cannot be said to 'supplies', therefore, not taxable. Whereas free supplies between related persons are 'supplies' and therefore, taxable.
11.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

wsoever described, of the other, shall be deemed to be related. ”
On perusal of above cited definition of the term 'related person', one may safely conclude that the applicant and the ticket holder (recipient) cannot be covered under any entry and thus cannot be said to a related person.
12. In light of the above stated legal provisions and discussion, it is view of the applicant that the activity of providing complimentary tickets without any consideration on account of courtesy/public relationship/business promotion would not fall under the definition of supply as given under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017 and thus not exigible to GST.
Input tax credit
13. One of the major advantages sought to be achieved from implementation of GST is the removal of cascading effect by facilitating seamless flow of credit. The “statement of Objects and Reasons” to the Constitution (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014, enacted as the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d.
15. As regards free supply of services, the CGST Act does not prescribe any credit restriction. Therefore, in view of the applicant even though the output (free supplies of) services are not taxed, there is no need for reversal of input tax credit.
16. Section 16 provides that every registered taxable person shall in the manner specified in section 44, be entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business. In case any inward supply of goods and/ or services is used for non-business purpose, the credit thereon is not allowed. Therefore, section 17(1) provides that where the goods and/or services are used partly for the purpose of any business and partly for other purposes, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the purpose of his business. Supply of complimentary tickets is pad and parcel of the business of the ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ness in a better and effective way, thus corresponding credit is allowed.
18. Section 17(2) provides that where the goods and /or services are used partly for effecting taxable supplies including zero-rated under this act or under the IGST Act, 2016 and partly for effecting exempt supplies under the said acts, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies. Supply of complimentary tickets is not a supply in itself and thus cannot be said to be an exempt supply.
19. Further Section 17(3) provides that the value of exemption supply under sub section (2) shall be such as may be prescribed Reference to chapter V (Input Tax credit) of CGST Rules 2017, there is no valuation mechanism prescribed for free supplies. Explanation to Rule 42 of CGST Rules 2017 clarifies 'For the purpose of this clause, it is hereby clarifies that the aggregate values of exempt supplies and the total turnover shall

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lies and there is no revenue loss as such to the government. Similar observation has been made by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Para 17, in the case of Ruby Laboratories [Ruby Laboratories vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax on 26 November, 1970 (1971 27 STC 326 Guj]) = 1970 (11) TMI 90 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT.
22. If business promotion and advertisement expenses are not specifically excluded and are considered as 'in the course or furtherance of business' then in view of the applicant same treatment is available for free supplies.
23. following are some of the similar transactions wherein the question of claiming ITC for free supply of services could arise and have possible implications.
a. Free consultancy services by a lawyer/ chartered accountant
b. Complimentary movie tickets in a FM Radio show
c. First night free on Hotel booking on various online portals.
Thus if ITC is eligible for the above listed events, similar treatment should be available for free supplies of complimentary

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uld be claimed. The House of Lords held that where a direct link could be shown between the giving of those assets and consideration received by the taxpayer from persons other than the recipients, that the awards dinner had been organized as a self-supporting event, for which the ticket receipts were intended to cover the total cost including the provision of trophies; and that accordingly, the purchase of the tickets provided the consideration for the supply of trophies to the award winners and output tax was not payable separately by the company on that value.
Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 8th June 2018
25. We, respectfully wish to bring to your notice that CBIC has issued a clarification vide Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 8th June 2018 vide which it has been clarified that supply of FOC basis does not constitute a supply as there is no consideration involved It also clarifies that where FOC supply is made in the course o/ furtherance of business, there is no requirement

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

14.08.2018, the applicant requested for withdrawal of the application attaching their letter dated 13.08.2018 which read as follows:
27. “We, M/S K.P.H Dream Cricket Private Limited, (for shod “applicant” or “KPH”), having its Corporate office at C-115, 1st Floor, L & T Elante Office, Plot No. 178/178A, Industrial & Business Park, Area Phase-I, Chandigarh 160002 is an IPL franchisee to participate in Indian Premier league T20 cricket tournament (for short “IPL”), under the title of “Kings Xl Punjab”
The applicant has filed an application under Section 97 of Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (for short “CGST Act”) seeking an advance ruling. The questions for which advance ruling is sought are –
a. Whether free tickets given as “Complimentary Tickets” falls within the definition of supply under CGST Act, 2017 and thus, whether the applicant is required to pay GST on such free tickets?
b. Whether the applicant is eligible to claim Input Tax Credit (for shod “ITC”) in respect of c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Further, since the moulds and dies are provided on FOC basis by the OEM to the component manufacturer in the course or furtherance of his business, there is no requirement for reversal of input tax credit availed
The two questions on which we have sought advance ruling from your good office are the same which have been clarified by the above cited circular. ”
Discussions and findings:
We have carefully gone through the facts of the case, the contentions of the applicant and legal provisions relevant to the questions raised in the present application. It is interesting to note that after submission of the application, personal hearing and further additional submissions made by the applicant, after the applicant had been spiritedly arguing as to how handing out of complementary tickets would not amount to supply under the GST Act, 2017, the applicant suddenly withdrew his advance ruling application. It is also interesting to note that the applicant has cited the Circular No. 47/21/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rder to him. In the present scenario, the applicant has withdrawn his Advance Ruling application while indicating that his case is similar to the case of an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) which has been discussed by the said circular as not constituting a supply, and the 'concerned officer' has reached a conclusion diametrically opposite that the activity of the applicant of supplying complementary tickets free of charge would amount to supply. Therefore, allowing for withdrawal of the present application in terms of the applicant, without discussing the case on merits would not be in public interest. Hence, circumstances call for discussion on merits rather than allowing withdrawal, especially when both interested parties to the Advanced Ruling application hold contrary views. While, the said Circular dated 8.6.2018 clarifies the case of an OEM where he is providing Dies and Moulds owned by him free of cost to a component manufacturer, who further uses these to make components

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Act 2017 and the parallel section 7 of the Punjab GST Act 2017 which lays down the scope of supply.
4. As per Section 7(1)(a) 01 the CGST Act, 2017, the expression supply includes “all forms of supply of…. services ……as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business”
The word consideration has also been defined in Section 2(31) of the CGST Act as under:
“(a) any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government;
(b) the monetary value of any act or forbearance, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sons not receiving the 'complementary tickets' for availing the same services. This would also be in consonance of Rule 32 (6) of CGST Rules, 2017 which lay down that “(6) The value of a token, or a voucher, or a coupon, or a stamp (other than postage stamp) which is redeemable against a supply of goods or services or both shall be equal to the money value of the goods or services or both redeemable against such token, voucher, coupon, or stamp. ”
The complementary ticket given by the applicant to various persons would certainly be covered by the term 'token' and 'voucher' which are both defined relatedly in the Oxford English Dictionary. On website https://en.oxforddictioners.com/defination/token token is defined as 'a voucher that can be exchanged for goods or services, typically one given as a gilt or forming part of a promotional offer'; and on website https://en.oxforddictioners.com/defination/token/voucher voucher is defined as a small printed piece of paper that entitles the ho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

luded in the expression 'supply'. Perusal of Schedule-I. however, shows that the present case would not fall into any of the four activities mentioned in Schedule l.
8. However, as per provisions of Section 7(1)(d), the activities referred to in Schedule II are to be treated as supply of goods or services and would be included in the expression 'supply' for the purposes of the CGST Act, 2017. Para 5 of the Schedule II deals with supply of services and lays down, in clause (e), that agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act or to tolerate an act or situation, or to do an act would be treated as supply of services. It is noteworthy that provisions of Section 7(1)(d) read with para 5 of Schedule II do not mention the word consideration for qualifying the mentioned activities as supply of services. While 'consideration' is used as a factor to determine supply under Section 7 (1)(a), the word being mentioned in the said provision, it is absent from the provisions of Section 7(1)(d)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by the applicant free of charge and the applicant is also agreeing to the obligation of doing the act of allowing entry to the complementary ticket holder to enjoy services being provided by the applicant when he issues such complementary ticket, Thus, it is seen that the activity of the applicant in issuing complementary tickets to persons is covered under each limb of para 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, by this measure too, the activity of the applicant of providing complementary tickets free of charge to some persons for enjoying cricket matches would also be covered under the scope of supply as per section 7(1)(d).
9. In view of the above discussion and findings, it would be clear that the activity of the applicant of providing complementary tickets free of charge to some persons would be considered supply of service as per provisions of both Section 7(1)(a) and 7(1)(d) and would therefore be leviable to tax as per provisions of Section 9 of the CGST Act, 20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sions of Section 16 of the CGST Act,2017. However it is clarified that the Input Tax Credit for which the applicant is eligible would be in the context of input and input service as defined in Section 2(59) and 2(60) of the CGST Act,2017 read with Section 16 wherein it is clearly mentioned that credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both has to be given 'to him' which are used in the course of his business. And would therefore not extend to services where the applicant himself is the service provider and leviable to an output tax for such outward supply. Therefore in the present case, the applicant would not be eligible to take credit on the tax leviable on supply of complementary tickets by him, but would be eligible to avail credit of input and input service going into provision of supply of the impugned complementary tickets.
11. Accordingly we pronounce the following Advance Ruling under section 98(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 and section 98(4) of the Punjab

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

State Bank of Hyderabad Versus CCT, Hyderabad – GST

State Bank of Hyderabad Versus CCT, Hyderabad – GST
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 165 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – 2019 (29) G. S. T. L. 330 (Tri. – Hyd.)
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 20-8-2018
Appeal No. ST/1349/2010 – A/31191/2018
Service Tax
Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri S. Ananthan, CA (Representative) for the Appellant.
Shri B. Guna Ranjan, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: P.V. Subba Rao.
1. The appellant herein is a nationalized bank with Head Quarters at Hyderabad. They carried out various Government transactions on behalf of the Central and the State Governments and have received commission from the RBI for these services known as agency services. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant demanding service tax on these services and they paid the same under protest. A show cause notice was issued demanding the service tax on these services and proposing to appropriate the amoun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lfully suppressed facts with an intention to evade tax without bringing out any tangible evidence on record.
(3) The learned Commissioner has wrongly levied penalties under Sec.77 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 in contravention to Sec.80 thereof.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently argued as above. He further contended that earlier a show cause notice was issued for the same transactions demanding duty under 'Business Auxiliary Services' and the demand was dropped. Thereafter this show cause notice was issued demanding duty under 'Banking and other financial services'. He, therefore, contends that the department was fully aware of the nature of their activities and had themselves examined whether service tax was payable under Business Auxiliary services and found it was not. He further submits that the issue of taxability of commission received from the RBI by the banks has been finally settled by the Tribunal in the case of Canara Bank [2012 (6) TMI 274 (CESTAT-Ahmedabad)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n our view as the respondent assessee is an agent of RBI, exemption granted by notification No. 22/2006-ST, needs to be extended to respondent. In our view the claim of the respondent from exemption of the service tax on the commission received for undertaking the activity of receiving various taxes on behalf of the Govt. of India, seems to be justified inasmuch as that the provisions of Section 45 of RBI Act categorically mandated for appointing national bank or a State Bank by the RBI for specified purposes as directed by Government; and the said Section also mandates that such Banks will be agents of RBI. As whether an agent will be eligible for exemption or otherwise is being contested in the appeal, in our view the question does not arise as Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, in Section 65 (7), the term assessee has been defined which is reproduced:-
Section 65 (7) – Assessee means a person liable to pay the service tax and includes his agent
7.6 It can be seen from the above

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able to Service Tax.
7.8 In our considered view the judgement of the Tribunal in the case of Canara Bank 2012-TIOL-790-CESTAT-Ahm has correctly interpreted notification no. 22/2006-ST and is correct exposition of the law. In our view the said judgement does not require any reconsideration.
7.9 As regards the case law cited by the learned D.R. and reliance placed in the case of Malwa Industries Ltd (supra) we find that in that case, the Apex Court was considering the situation of exemption by a notification from a countervailing duty. Learned Commissioner (A.R.) was relying upon this decision to canvass his point that exemption notification should be read literally and should be construed liberally once it is concluded that benefits the notification is applicable. We do not find any merits in the said submission made by the learned D.R. inasmuch as that the definition of assessee in the Finance Act in Section 65(7) clearly states that assessee means a person liable to pay service ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

along with interest and penalty.
4. Learned departmental representative reiterates the Order-in-Original.
5. We have considered the arguments on both sides. Notification No. 22/2006-ST dated 31.05.2006 clearly exempts taxable services provided or to be provided by any person to the Reserve Bank of India when the service tax for the service is liable to be paid by the Reserve Bank of India under Sub-Sec. (2) of Sec.68 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 2 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. It further exempts taxable services provided or to be provided to any person by the Reserve Bank of India. The aforesaid order of the larger bench of the CESTAT clearly held that the banks receiving commission for the services rendered as an agent to the RBI are not liable to the service tax. This decision has been followed in the other case laws cited above. We find no reason to deviate from this settled legal position. We respectfully follow the same and consequentially find the appeal is liable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Synthite Industries

In Re: M/s. Synthite Industries
GST
2018 (11) TMI 403 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 142 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
AAR/AP/8(GST)/2018 in Application No. AAR/13(GST)/2018
GST
SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sri. Sri. P. Chaitanya (Authorized Representative)
Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: Received Remarks
Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act'2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section 99 of APGST Act'2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
M/s. SYNTHITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, GST: 37AADCS5616E1ZG, Survey No. 42/4B 542/1, Tammavam, Medarametla, Bodduvanipalem Mandal Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh 523212, Andhra Pradesh, India(hereinafter also referred as applicant-job worker), having GSTIN: 37AADCS5616E1Z

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by his Principal- foreign customer at free of cost and the processed output will be exported to them. The goods contains caffeine which is being removed by the applicant-job worker through extraction process. The de-caffeinated goods will be exported to the Principal as per their requirement and instructions.
4. The applicant sought for clarification on the following issues :-
* Whether the process of providing job work service to foreign customer as explained above is taxable under GST. Is such transaction attracts GST?
* If applicable to GST, whether they have to pay IGST or SGST+CGST?.
* Is the job work service provided by them is exempted from service fax under Mega exemption list as per Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.20 72 and not chargeable to GST?
5. This application is forwarded to the jurisdictional officer i.e Superintendent, Central Board of Excise & Customs, Ongole Range, apart from marking a copy to the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Ongole, to offer their rem

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

worker is required to carry out the process specified by the principal, on the goods.”
With regard to IGST liability, Sec. 13 of IGST Act, 2017 reads as under:-
13. (1) The provisions of this section shall apply to determine the place of supply of services where the location of the supplier of services or the location of the recipient of services is outside India.
(2) The place of supply of services except the services specified in sub-sections (3) to (13) shall be the location of the recipient of services:
Provided that where the location of the recipient of services is not available in the ordinary course of business, the place of supply shall be the location of the supplier of services.
(3) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely:-
(a) services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or to a person act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al is supplied by the foreign Principal to the factory premises of the applicant-job worker, and after the process, the de-caffeinated tea will be exported to the Principal ( i.e., to Germany) as per the instructions entered at the time of agreement.
Question No. 1 for clarification:
* Whether the process of providing job work service to foreign customer as explained above is faxable under GST. Is such transaction attracts GST?
With regard to the process of providing job work service by the applicant to the foreign principal, shall be classified under the HSN Code services Heading 9988, which reads as under:
“9983 – Manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others The services included under Heading 9988 are performed on physical inputs owned by units other than the units providing the service. As such, they are characterized as outsourced portions of a manufacturing process or a complete outsourced manufacturing process. Since this Heading covers manufacturing services,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Act 20 1 7 which reads as under:-
13. (1) The provisions of this section shall apply to determine the place of supply of services where the location of the supplier of services or the location of the recipient of services is outside India.
(3) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely:-
(a) services supplied jn respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or
……….”
Hence, the place of supply for this transaction is location of the service where actually performed i.e., business premises of the applicant which is located in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Hence the tax liability under SGST Act/CGST Act 2017 only applies.
Question No.3 for clarification:
* Is the job work service provided by them is exempted from service tax under Mega exemption list as per Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 and not chargeable to GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. J Abdul Rawoof Khan & Brothers

In Re: M/s. J Abdul Rawoof Khan & Brothers
GST
2018 (11) TMI 485 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 138 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
AAR/AP/9(GST)/2018 In Application No. AAR/14(GST)/2018
GST
SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sri. J. Rasool Khan (Authorized Representative)
Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: Received Remarks
Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act'2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section 99 of APGST Act'2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
M/s. J Abdul Rawoof Khan & also referred as applicant), having GSTIN: 37AABFJ4031B1Z0 are engaged in manufacturing of Biris, for that the necessary raw material i.e. Biri leaves and Tobacco powder mostly purchases from both the registered and unregistered deale

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rities to offer their remarks as per the Sec. 98(1) of CGST/APGST Act'2017 and requested for the information.
In response to this communication, the concerned jurisdictional officer, offered their remarks, and stated that there are no proceedings pending relating to the applicant, and no proceedings are passed on the issue, for which the advance ruling sought by the applicant.
A personal hearing is called for on 19th July 2018 to hear from the applicant. Sri.J. Rasool Khan, an authorized representative has attended on behalf of the applicant and submitted the facts of case as under:
The applicant is purchasing Biri leaves and tobacco powder, mostly from the registered dealers of within an outside the state of Andhra Pradesh, and manufacturing the same in to Biris. The resultant Biris are sold within the state of Andhra Pradesh Only.
Prior to introduction of APGST Act, 2017, the applicant is registered under the Central Excise Act, and used to pay the duties and taxes thereon re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, mostly from the registered dealers of within an outside the state of Andhra Pradesh, and manufacturing the same in to Biris. The resultant Biris are sold within the state of Andhra Pradesh Only.
The aggregate turnover of the applicant from the past (3) three years is less than Rs. 20 lakhs
At the time of hearing, the applicants submitted that he is aware about the liabilities arising on Reverse Charge, if he purchases of Beedi leaves or Tobacco powder from on-registered dealers and he is also aware about compulsory registration if supplies made to outside the State of Andhra Pradesh.
Statutory provisions:
The provisions of Sec. 22 of Registration under APGST Act, 2017 reads as under;
“22. (1) Every supplier shall be liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory, other than special category States, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees:
Provided that whe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rom where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees:
Since the applicant reported that his turnovers from the past (3) years are below Rs. 20 lakhs, he may continue the GSTIN registration or may cancel the registration as per the provisions of Sec.29 of APGST Act 2017, which reads as under:
“29. (7) The proper officer may, either on his own motion or on an application filed by the registered person or by his legal heirs, in case of death of such person, cancel the registration, in such manner and within such period as may be prescribed, having regard to the circumstances where,-
(a) the business has been discontinued, transferred fully for any reason including death of the proprietor, amalgamated with other legal entity, demerged or otherwise disposed of:”
In the light of the facts submitted by the applicant, and legal position, the ruling is given as under:
RULING
The Registration under Sec.22

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Fairmacs ShipStores Private Limited

In Re: M/s. Fairmacs ShipStores Private Limited
GST
2018 (11) TMI 486 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 844 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – AAR
Dated:- 20-8-2018
AAR/AP/10(GST)/2018 in Application No. AAR/15(GST)/2018
GST
SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR, MEMBER
Present for the Applicant: Sri. K.V.J.L.N Sastry
Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: Received Remarks
Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act'2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section 99 of APGST Act'2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
M/s. FAIRMACS SHIP STORES PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter also refer red as an applicant), having GSTIN 37AAACF1406C1ZC are holders of Special Warehouse License No. 14/2016, issued under Section 58 (A) of The Customs Act, 1962, duty free ship store supplier through special warehouse a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reign run, Indian Naval Ships and Indian Coast Guard Ships.
(ii) The applicant can collect the applicable GST from their customers, in case it is not exports. However, in case of exports the option lies with the applicant based on manner of exports i.e. whether they intend to export under bond or on payment of tax.
2.3 Aggrieved by the above order, the applicant filed an appeal before Appellate Authority, primarily for the authority to decide whether their transaction falls under 'export' or not. They further prayed in their appeal to remand back to the Advance Ruling Authority to decide whether their transaction falls under export (zero rated) or not.
2.4 Appellate Authority, vide Order/AAR/AP/01 (GST)/2018, dated 31st May, 2018 observed that applicant has raised a new issue for clarification which was not placed before the Advance Ruling Authority i.e. to decide whether the transactions are export (zero rated) or not and directed the Advance Ruling Authority to issue necessary rul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ware house or duty free ship store supplier. For example the brands like Marlboro, L&M, Bond street they are not having any manufacturing units in India. All these goods are manufactured outside India arid the manufacturer will maintain a hub at SEZ unit from there they will supply to the applicant. Further the applicant also imports the same from foreign also. The goods so imported will be kept in special warehousing without collecting duties. The applicant is permitted to export the above goods which were kept in special warehouse as duty free to the
* Ocean going merchant vessels on foreign run.
* Indian Naval Ships
* Indian Coast Guard Ships or from their authorized agents
The Captain/ Master of the foreign going vessel will raise an indent on supplier, in accordance with the indent; the supplier will file a shipping bill for export of duty free goods, with the customs authority. The customs authority upon verification and on satisfaction they will permits the supplier to su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r aircraft. Any imported stores on board a vessel or aircraft (other than stores to which section 90 applies) may, without payment of duty, be consumed thereon as stores during the period such vessel or aircraft is a foreign-going vessel or aircraft.
Section 88(a) of Indian Customs Act, 1962: for the words “exported to any place outside India” or the word “exported”, wherever they occur, the words ” taken on board any foreign-going vessel or aircraft as stores” shall be substituted
Section : 90 of Indian Customs Act, 1962. Concessions in respect of imported stores for the Navy.-
(1) Imported stores specified in sub-section (3) may without payment of duty be consumed on board a ship of the Indian Navy.
(2) The provisions of section 69 and Chapter X shall apply to stores specified in subsection (3), as they apply to other goods, subject to the modifications that-
(a) for the words “exported to any place outside India” or the word “exported” wherever they occur the word “taken on boa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Kheriwal Enterprises Versus Union of India and others

M/s. Kheriwal Enterprises Versus Union of India and others
GST
2018 (11) TMI 1566 – JHARKHAND HIGH COURT – TMI
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 20-8-2018
W. P. (T) No. 3028 of 2018
GST
MR. D.N. PATEL AND MR. AMITAV K. GUPTA JJ.
For the Petitioner : Mr. M.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Varsha Ramsisaria, Advocate Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent-UOI : Mr. Neeraj, A.C. to A.S.G.I.
For the Respondent-State : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A.  
Oral Order
Per D.N. Patel, J.
1. This writ petition has been preferred mainly seeking permission upon the respondents to accept the FORM GST TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 of the petitioner so as to avail Input Tax Credit/CENV

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =