Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corre

Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 06/2018-GST (State) dated 19.04.2018 – reg.
11/2018 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Tripura SGST
GST – States
NO.F.1-11(8)-TAX/2015/8454-59
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
PANDIT NEHRU COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI
AGARTALA, TRIPURA WEST, PIN-799006.
Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018.
Circular No.11/2018 – GST (State)
To
The Additional Commissioner of State Tax /
Superintendent of State Tax (All)/
Inspectors of State Tax (All)
Subject: Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

49/23/2018-GST
F. No. CBEC/20/16/03/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
****
New Delhi, Dated the 21st June, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners /Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Modifications to the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 -reg.
Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 was issued to clarify the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances.
2. In order to clarify certain issues regarding the specified procedure in this regard and in order to ensure unifor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mation relating to evasion of tax is made available subsequently. Since the requisite FORMS are not available on the common portal currently, any action initiated by the State tax officers is not being intimated to the central tax officers and vice-versa, doubts have been raised as to the procedure to be followed in such situations.
3.1 In this regard, it is clarified that the hard copies of the notices/orders issued in the specified FORMS by a tax authority may be shown as proof of initiation of action by a tax authority by the transporter/registered person to another tax authority as and when required.
3.2 Further, it is clarified that only such goods and/or conveyances should be detained/confiscated in respect of which there is a violation of the provisions of the GST Acts or the rules made thereunder.
Illustration: Where a conveyance carrying twenty-five consignments is intercepted and the person-in-charge of such conveyance produces valid e-way bills and/or other relevant docum

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re. Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.,

In Re. Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.,
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1107 – NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY – TMI
NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY – NAPA
Dated:- 18-9-2018
7/2018
GST
SH. B. N. SHARMA, CHAIRMAN, SH. J. C. CHAUHAN, TECHNICAL MEMBER, MS. R. BHAGYADEVI, TECHNICAL MEMBER
Present:-
S/Shri S. K. Jain, Shri Bharat Bhushan and 12 others on behalf of Applicant No. 1.
S/Sh. Akshat Aggarwal Assistant Commissioner and Sh. Bhupender Goyal Assistant Director (Costs) for the Applicant No. 2.
Shri Dinesh Sharma Managing Director and Shri J. P. Gaur Chief Finance Officer on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1. The brief facts of the this case are that Under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and
Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, 36 applications were filed before the Haryana State Screening Committee alleging that the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) had not been passed on to the Applicants in respect of the construction service supplied by the Respondent. The Applicants ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

urav Kumar Aggarwal*
lavi22oct@gmail.com
23
Ravi Verma
ravics136@gmail.com
24
Sanjeev Chadha*
sanjeev_chadha35@yahoo.co.in
25
Sangam Shukla
er.sangam@gmail.com
26
Udayan Kishore Mishra*
udayankishoremishra@gmail.com
27
Manoj Jangraa
mj.jangraa@gmail.com
28
Ravi Yadav
dear.raviyadav@gmail.com
29
Zeeshan Ali Quazi*
er.zeeshan99@gmail.com
30
Sunil Kumar Jha*
lakshya.skjha@yahoo.com
31
Vikash Gupta*
vikash.gupta7878@gmail.com
32
Anoop Kumar
anoop_0406@yahoo.com
33
Rajesh Kumar*
rajeshkumar.cs06@gmail.com
34
Vikash Garg*
sperry.it@gmail.com
35
Jofin Mathew
jofinmathew@gmail.com
36
Bharat Bhushan Badesra*
bbbadesra@gmail.com
*Applicants who have filed more than one application:-
2. The above Applicants had booked flats with the Respondent under the Haryana Affordable Housing Policy 2013 (here-in-after referred to as the Policy), notified by the State of Haryana vide Notification No. PF-27/48921 dated 19.08.2013. They had alleged that before coming

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ccordingly they had filed several applications with the Haryana Screening Committee for appropriate redressal of their grievance. These applications were examined by the Screening Committee in its meeting held on 30.10.2017 and it was decided to forward these applications to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering for further necessary action. The Standing Committee in its meeting held on 07.11.2017 after confirming that prima facie there was evidence of non-compliance of the provisions of Section 171, had forwarded these applications to the Director General of safeguards (DGSG) now redesignated as Director General of Antiprofiteering(DGAP) for detailed investigation. 102 additional applications against the Respondent were also received by the Standing Committee which were also forwarded to the DGAP for investigation. The following are the names of the additional Applicants who had filed applications with the Standing Committee:-
S.No.
S/Sh.
E-mail ID
1
Rohit Yadav
rohit.yada

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ail.com
24
Praveen Kumar Sharma
praveensha77@gmail.com
25
Abhishek Yadav
abhishekyadav.nnl@gmail.com
26
Ashish Gupta
mnit.ashish2006@gmail.com
27
Rahul Rajoriya
rahul.rajoriya08@gmail.com
28
Gagan Batra
gaganbatra85@gmail.com
29
Manisha Jain
jain5175@gmail.com
30
Parvesh Chopra
parveshchopraa@gmail.com
31
Rakesh Yadav
rakeshdagar83@gmail.com
32
Sunil Saini
sainisunil92@yahoo.com
33
Raj Kumar*
rajkumar032002@yahoo.com
34
Ankur Chawla
aim.ankur@yahoo.co.in
35
Shailendra kumar
skumar_025@yahoo.co.in
36
Shalini Bisht
shaliniissarbisht@gmail.com
37
Santosh Kumar Agarwal
santoshkumar.engg@gmail.com
38
Suresh Kumar
kumarsuresh151979@gmail.com
39
Ashish srivastava
ashishdra@gmail.com
40
Pradip sarin
pradipsarin@yahoo.com
41
Rahul Yadav
rahulrao1206@gmail.com
42
Richa Jha/Priyanka Jha
richaignou95@gmail.com
43
Prem Prakash
prm185@gmail.com
44
Diwakar Singh
diwakar_chahar@yahoo.com
45
Samreen Raza
samreenraza2000@yahoo.com
46
Ra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

om
67
Pankaj Kumar
pankaj@nsk.com
68
Sandeep Sharma
sandeep.121.sharma@gmail.com
69
Kiran Mishra 
kiranmishra.2007@gmail.com
70
Saurabh Jain
saurabhs20@yahoo.com
71
Nitesh Rohilla*
nitesh.rohilla001@gmail.com
72
Rajdeep Yadav
yadav_raj7@rediffmail.com
73
Sachin Batheja
sachin.batheja@yahoo.com
74
Souvik Ghosh
souvik.ghosh@hotmail.co.in
75
Rajendra Singh Chahar/
Anuraj Singh
anuraj2110@gmail.com
76
Rajesh Kumar Jain
rajeshkjain.99@gmail.com
77
Vikas Gupta*
vikas.gupta7878@gmail.com
78
Rahul Kapoor*
rkapoor_87@rediffmail.com
79
Anil Dwivedi*
anilcs250@gmail.com
80
Amit Kumar Thakur
amitthakurlic@yahoo.in
81
Deepak Gupta
deepacgupta@gmail.com
82
Bansi Lal Mahlawat
a_Bansi.Mahlawat@airtel.com
83
Dharam Narayan Tiwari/
Shashi Vir Singh
shashivir@yahoo.com
84
Alok Kumar Singh*
alokmechboy@gmail.com
85
Mridul Verma
mridul_varma@yahoo.co.in
86
Prateek Sharma*
prateek.psharma@gmail.com
87
Paramjeet Singh
param194@gmail.com
8

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the DGAP mentions 109 Applicants out of the 138 Applicants out of which in as much as 26 have filed duplicate applications and 2 have submitted triplicate applications.
4. The DGAP in his report has stated that a notice was issued to the Respondent under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 to submit his reply regarding the allegations that the benefit of ITC had not been passed on to the above Applicants on the purchase of the flats and also to suo moto declare the amount of profiteering. Since the Respondent failed to submit all the documents within the prescribed time extension was sought by the DGAP for completing the investigation. The Standing Committee vide it's minutes of the meeting dated 28.02.2018 had granted extension of 3 months in terms of Rule 129 (6) of the CGST Rules 2017. The DGAP has also reported that after issue of a number of summons the Respondent vide his letters dated 11.01.2018 & 19.02.18 had submitted various documents such as:-
1. Independent Auditor's Repor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent had also submitted the following data as has been depicted in the Table below to show that the ITC on Excise Duty, Countervailing Duty (CVD) and capital goods which was not available earlier was now available:-
S. No.
Nature of pre-GST Tax
Total Amount (In Rs.)
1
Excise Duty/CVD included in cost, now available as ITC
46,91,507/-
2
Credit on Capital Goods capitalized not available earlier but now available
2,05,50,719/-
3
Central Sales Tax (CST) 
For material 12,04,661/- for capital goods 24,47,563/-  Total Rs. 36,52,224/-
4
Total ITC (1+2+3)
2,88,94,450/-
5
ITC part of Cost
46,91,507/-  + 12,04,661/-=58,96,168/-
6
Cost of Sale (before interest)
50,44,57,118/-
7
Interest
44,83,288/-
8
Cost of Sale after interest (6+7)
50,89,40,406/-
9
Net Sales Realization 
1,21,79,69,823/-
10
Profit (9-8)
70,90,29,416/-
11
Percentage of ITC to Sales Realization (4 as % of 9)
2.37%
6. The report also submits that the Respondent had claimed tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lizing the ITC was being paid in cash, therefore, the ITC being allowed was not an additional benefit and the GST liability was not entirely covered by the ITC available to the Respondent. The Respondent had also claimed that he was required to pay GST on the sub-contracted work which was an additional cost to him whereas Service Tax was exempted in the past. He had further claimed that there had been tremendous increase in the prices of inputs including Steel due to which no profiteering could be alleged against him.
7. The DGAP's report also states that two of the Applicants viz. S/Sh. Sukhbir Singh and Ashutosh Fotedar vide their joint letter dated 07.05.2018 had submitted that the Respondent could charge maximum allotment rate of Rs. 4,000/- per sq. ft. carpet area which was inclusive of all costs as was prescribed under the Policy. The DGAP has also informed that one of the Applicants viz. Shri Bharat Bhushan Badesara vide his e-mail dated 12.03.2018 had submitted a copy of the '

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the two projects viz. (1) Urban Homes, Sector 70A, Gurugram and (2) Urban Homes, Sector-86, Gurugram which are being executed by the Respondent under the above Policy. He has further informed that after perusal of the application filed by the Respondent before the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and as per para 5 (i) of the Policy, it was clear that the maximum sale price per sq. feet carpet area had been fixed at Rs. 4,000/- and no minimum rate had been prescribed and hence, the Respondent could not claim that there was restriction on reducing the price. The DGAP has also submitted that the Respondent's claim that Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 relating to benefit of ITC was not attracted, as there was no reduction in the GST rate was also not acceptable because the conditions of passing on the benefit of reduced tax rate and benefit of ITC were two independent conditions and Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 was attracted if both or either of these two condition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-, the DGAP has estimated the VAT liability of the Respondent as 9% of the net taxable value (abated value) and 5.098% of the gross amount of Rs. 2,92,49,55,429/- received from the Applicants.
11. The DGAP has also reported that on examination of the GSTR-3B Returns filed by the Respondent it was revealed that the ratio between the taxable turnover and the ITC availed by him in the post-GST era w.e.f. July 2017 to February 2018 was 7.20%.
12. The DGAP has also mentioned that the Central Government had imposed 18% GST with effective rate of 12% in view of 1/3rd abatement on value on the Construction Service vide Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and the GST rate on the above Service in respect of the Affordable Housing Schemes was reduced to 8% vide Notification No. 1/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018. The DGAP has also analyzed the issue of profiteering for the pre-GST period from April 2016 to June 2017 when VAT was payable @ 5.25% and the post-GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

12%(GST)
8%(GST)
 
13. Based on above data the DGAP has concluded that the ITC available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period from April 2016 to June 2017 was 1.10% of the taxable turnover and during the post-GST period from July 2017 to February 2018, the ITC available to the Respondent was 7.20% of the taxable turnover and thus there was additional benefit of ITC to the tune of 6.10% (7.20%-1.10%) in the post-GST era, covering the period from July 2017 to February 2018 to the Respondent. The DGAP has also stated that for the period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 while the additional ITC available was 6.10% of the taxable turnover, the tax rate had increased by 6.75 % (12%-5.25%), leaving no benefit of ITC to be passed on to the Applicants. On the other hand, during the period between 25.01.2018 to February, 2018, the additional ITC of 6.10% of the taxable turnover was more than the increase in the tax rate by 2.75% (8%5.25%), requiring the Respondent to pass on the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s meeting held on 5.07.2018 had decided to hear the Applicants and the Respondent on 23.07.2018. Accordingly notices were issued to all the interested parties. On behalf of the Applicants Sh. Rajesh Kumar Jain, Bharat Bhushan and 6 other Applicants appeared and the DGAP was represented by Sh. Akshat Aggarwal Assistant Commissioner and Sh. Bhupender Goyal, Assistant Director (Costs). On the request of the parties another hearing was held on 01.08.2018 wherein S/Sh. Bharat Bhushan and R. K. Jain along with 12 other Applicants had appeared.
During both the hearings the Respondent was represented by Sh. Dinesh Sharma, Managing Director along with Sh. J. P. Gaur, Chief Finance Officer, who submitted their written submissions, on 1st August, 2018.
15. In his written submissions, the Respondent has claimed that the amounts of Rs. 50,44,57,118/- and Rs. 50,89,40,406/- mentioned in the report of the DGAP were the costs incurred on construction and not the costs of sales during the period and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and hence the initial payments on application, allotment and few periodical installments were meant for funding the above mentioned costs which on an average amounted to 40-45% of the total revenue from the Applicants. The Respondent has also claimed that the percentage of expenditure on construction was far more than the percentage of collections made from the Applicants. He has also argued that besides construction cost there were other expenses as had been mentioned above which needed to be considered before arriving at the profit margin.
16. The Respondent has further submitted that though the benefit of ITC was made available, the basic cost of the raw material had increased abnormally which had resulted in setting off of the benefit of ITC. the Respondent has also claimed that in the post-GST period basic cost of Steel was higher than the cost of Steel during the pre-GST period which had resulted in extra expenditure of Rs. 4,34,80,082/- while the ITC amounted to only Rs. 3,97,1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount spent on construction during this period was only 25% of the total cost and hence he would receive 37.50% of total payment due during the post-GST period when he would have to spend 75% of the total cost on construction. The Respondent has also claimed that the initial consideration paid by the Applicants was towards the cost incurred/ to be incurred by him against the cost of land, licenses, approvals, administrative and financial expenses which amounted to 40-45% of the total revenue from the Applicants. He has also submitted that while calculating the ITC against the taxable value during the pre-GST period, the taxable value should be accordingly adjusted by giving effect to the above issues during the pre-GST and post-GST period and percentage of ITC should be accordingly recalculated.
19. Finally the Respondent has prayed that the following points needed to be considered by the Authority before concluding that profiteering has been done by him.
a). The taxable value shou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

They also claimed that the Respondent had recovered VAT @ 5.25% from the Applicants but had paid the Government @ 5.09%. They also requested for imposition of penalty and for early disposal of the case so that the benefit if any was provided to them before the last installment was paid to the Respondent.
22. They also claimed that the increase or decrease in cost on account of the factors other than tax rate and ITC was not to be considered for the purpose of profiteering. They further claimed that the maximum rate of Rs. 4,000/- per sq. ft. carpet area was fixed and any escalation in the cost had already been taken into account at the time of fixing of the above rate. They also submitted that any increase or decrease in the raw material prices was a market phenomenon which was not related to the GST and therefore, the cost escalation factor was not required to be considered by the Authority.
23. The Applicants have also argued that the extra liability claimed by the Respondent on a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er, 2017 to February, 2018. This ITC was approximately Rs. 8.70 Crores and was utilized to the extent of Rs. 5.40 Crores for payment of GST by him. They also pleaded that the Respondent was fully aware that the ITC should have been passed on to the buyers after re-calibrating the price, which had not been done deliberately by him which attracted penal provisions under the anti-profiteering law.
25. The Applicants have also attached copies of the e-mail dated 14.07.2018 and reminders dated 21.07.2018 & 26.07.2018 sent by their Association to the Respondent requesting him to extend the benefit of ITC which the Respondent had failed to respond to.
26. Finally the applicants have alleged that during the period between 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 the benefit which had accrued to the Respondent was 6.1% as per the calculations given below:-
Re-calibrated rate – Rs. 4,207 (Rs.3,756 + 12% GST)
Already billed and collected rate – Rs. 4,480 (including 12% GST) Effective rate to be returned to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing the hearing held on 23rd July, 2018, the DGAP in his reply dated 1st August, 2018 has submitted that for the period before 01.07.2017 the output rate of VAT on the Respondent was 5.25% with an ITC of 1.1% and during the period between 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018, the output rate of GST was 12% but an additional ITC of 6.1% (7.2%-1.1%) was available to the Respondent, which should have been passed on to the Applicants and 12% GST should have been charged on such reduced amount and therefore, the effective output rate of tax for the Respondent would be 12% of 93.9 (100-6.1) =11.27%. He has also submitted that similarly, for the period after 25.01.2018, the output rate of GST was 8% but additional ITC of 6.1% (7.2%-1.1%) was available to the Respondent which should have been passed on to the Applicants and 8% GST should have been charged on such reduced amount and hence the effective output rate of GST for the Respondent would be 8% of 93.9 (100-6.1) =7.51%. The DGAP has admitted that th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of = 6.1% (4480-4207/4480 x 100). He has further stated that during the period between 25.01.2018 to 31.03.2018, the installment including GST should be Rs. 3756 + 8% GST= Rs. 4056/- per sq. ft., however, the Applicants had been charged Rs. 4000 + 8% GST i.e. Rs. 4320/- which came to profiteering of = 6.1% (4320-4056/4320 x 100) and hence 6.1% of the amount paid by the Applicants during the entire period from 01.07.2017 to 28.02.2018 was the profiteered amount.
29. We have carefully examined the DGAP's Report, the written and oral submissions of both the Applicants and the Respondent placed on record. The issues to be decided by the Authority are as under:-
(a.) Whether there was any violation of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 in this case?
(b.) If yes then what was the quantum of profiteering?
30. Perusal of Section 171 of the CGST Act shows that it provides as under:-
171. (1) Any reduction in rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

been extended to all the goods and services which were utilized by any builder which was not available in the pre-GST era. This fact has not been denied by the Respondent. Since Section 171 not only deals with passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax but also deals with passing on the benefit of ITC therefore the contention made by the Respondent is legally not correct to the extent that there had been increase in the rate of tax from 5.25% to 12% and then 8% and no benefit could be passed on by him to the Applicants as the Respondent had become entitled to claim ITC the benefit of which was required to be passed on by him to the Applicants as per the provisions of Section 171. The Respondent has also admitted that he had become eligible to claim ITC after coming in to force of the GST and hence he was liable to pass on the benefit to the Applicants.
31. It is also revealed from the submissions made by the Respondent that he was building flats and selling them to the App

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

maximum sale price for each flat would be Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft. carpet area. Therefore, the claim of the Respondent that the price was fixed at Rs. 4000/- by the Haryana Government is incorrect as he had himself made offer of selling the flats at the above rate. It is also clear from the perusal of the above para that the above price was the maximum price and there was no restriction on the Respondent to charge less price. The Respondent had chosen to collect the maximum rate fixed by the Policy and therefore his plea that the rate reduction was not possible was not correct. Moreover the rate offered by the Respondent did not include taxes and it is a fact that the Applicants had paid 5.25% VAT in the pre-GST era and GST @ 12% and 8% for the period between 01.7.2017 onwards. The Buyer's Agreement vide paras 4.1, 5.3 and 5.5 clearly indicates that the Applicants were liable to pay all the taxes as applicable. Para 5.3 of the agreement states that, “the sale consideration does not incl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ability was 9% of the net taxable value and his liability was 5.098% of the unabated gross value of Rs. 2,92,49,55,429/-. During the year 2017-18 for the first quarter the taxable turnover was Rs. 7,69,35,214/- while the output tax liability was Rs. 39,21,893/-. Thus the total taxable turnover of these two periods was Rs. 30,01,89,06,44/- while the output tax liability was Rs. 15,30,26,066/- and the ratio of ITC to the taxable turnover was 1.10%. Similarly the taxable value for the period from July 2017 to February 2018 was Rs. 1,20,78,06,878/- while the tax liability was Rs. 12,56,42,894/- and the ITC ratio to taxable turnover was 7.20%. These facts have also not been disputed by the Respondent but what was disputed was that the above ratio should be calculated taking into account the cost of construction rather than the taxable turnover. This argument does not hold good because the Policy makes it mandatory on him that he could not charge more than Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft., the price w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent has not placed any concrete facts or reasons on record to dispute the same.
33. The Respondent has pleaded that since the cost of Steel one of the major raw materials had increased this increase should have been accounted for before alleging profiteering. This argument of the Respondent is not tenable since he had himself offered the maximum price of Rs. 4000/- and there was no provision of revision of this price on the basis of escalation in the price of the raw material in the Policy. The Applicants have also rightly objected to this pleading stating that the price fluctuations were considered at the time of fixing of the rate of Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft. From the details given by the Respondent no conclusion can be arrived at without considering the cost of all the inputs and their cost since for most of the building material there had been rate rationalization and all the raw material was available without CST across the country. Since he has claimed that 75% construction had bee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pondent, which had not been taken into consideration while fixing the cost of the flats. Therefore the contention of the Respondent that the cost factor should be taken into account is not valid and justifiable as there is no escalation clause in the Agreement and the Respondent has also availed benefit of interest on the amount paid by the Applicants.
34. One of the arguments advanced by the Respondent is that in the pre-GST regime there was no tax liability on the sub-contractors and in the post-GST era the tax levied on the sub-contractors was to be borne by the Respondent. This argument is also not tenable because the entire amount is eligible for ITC to the Respondent which has been admitted by him in his written submissions. Moreover the sub-contractors are also eligible for ITC which was not available to them earlier and on account of rationalization of tax rates many of the inputs were now available at the reduced rates.
35. From the above narration of facts it is absolutely

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lculations and submitted that the actual benefit that the Respondent has to pass on to all of them was to the extent of 6.1% for both the periods when the tax was levied @ 12% as well as when the tax was levied at @ 8%. In his subsequent report called for by the Authority from the DGAP, he has submitted the revised calculations which are reproduced below. The total amount of profiteering as calculated by the DGAP is also mentioned in the subsequent table:-
Particulars
 
Amount (in Rs.)
 Basic Sale Price Collected for both the projects (Rs.) 
 
 
Jul-17
A

Aug-17
B
72,49,48,683
Sep.17
C
1,59,171
Oct,17
D

Nov.17
E
2,58,475
Dec.17
F
2,54,237
Jan.18
G

 Total Basic Sale Price Collected for both the projects during July, 2017 to January, 2018 (Rs.) 
H= Total of A to G
72,56,20,566
GST @ 12% Collected 
I=H*12%
8,70,74,468
 Actual Amount Collected 
J=H+I
81,26,95,034
 Benefit of 6.10% of Basic Sale

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e followed by the DGAP i.e. 6.1% of profiteering and accordingly the amount of profiteering has been calculated for each type of flat to arrive at the profiteering amount for each and every buyer depending upon the type of flat he has purchased. In view of the above the Authority determines the amount of profiteering as Rs. 8,22,80,998/- for all the 2476 flats.
38. The DGAP has calculated the profiteering @ 6.1% on the base price of Rs. 4000/- per sq. ft. and accordingly calculated tax amount on the reduced payment. The calculations made by the DGAP are placed below which are correct and the Authority is in full agreement with the same:-
Head
Row
Profiteering Calculation
 
X
Calculation
GST @12%
GST @8%
Rate (Per Sq. Ft.)
A
 
4000
4000
Profiteering @6.1%
B
 
244
244
New Rate (Per Sq. Ft.)
C
A-B
3756
3756
GST @X%
D
X% of C
450.72
300.48
Total Amount to Be Charged
E
C+D
4206.72
4056.48
Amount Already Charged
F
A + X% of A
4480
4320
P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ting the last installment along with the interest @ 18% per annum to be calculated from the date of the receipt of the excess amount from each buyer, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of this order.
41. It is evident from the above that the Respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the buyers of the flats being constructed by him under the above Policy in contravention of the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus realized more price from them than he was entitled to collect and has also compelled them to pay more GST than that they were required to pay by issuing incorrect tax invoices and hence he has committed an offence under section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, he is liable for imposition of penalty. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice be issued to him directing him to explain why the penalty prescribed under Section 122 of the above Act read with rule 133 (3) (d) of the CGST Rules, 2017 should not be imposed on him.
42.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Real Value Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Ceebros Property Development, Prime Developers Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

Real Value Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Ceebros Property Development, Prime Developers Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1149 – CESTAT CHENNAI – [2018 – TlOL – 2867 – CESTAT]
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 18-9-2018
ST/723/2010, ST/350/2010, ST/528/2010 – 42436-42438/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
For the Appellant : Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate, Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran for Appellant And Shri Ramachandra Rao, Consultant
For the Respondent : Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR)
ORDER
PER BENCH
The issue involved in all these appeals being similar, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order.
2. The appellant M/s. Real Value Promoters (P) Ltd. are involved in activity of constructing commercial projects PRGT and residential projects. The appellants were issued show cause notices alleging short-payment of service tax under Commerc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Name of the Project
Allegation
Tax liability
Commercial PRGT
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to buyers
Rs.34,38,337/-
Residential The Lords Sananda Brindavan Sujeet Surya Skanda
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to buyers
Rs.1,07,33,392/-
Commercial PRGT Amarasri
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to land owners
48,98,579/-
Residential Sai Brindavan
Non-payment of service tax on the services provided to land owners
Rs.15,49,944/-
 
Total
Rs.2,06,20,252/-
2.1 Another Show Cause Notice No. 570/2009 dated 20.10.2009 was also issued in respect of amount received towards construction of residential apartments and commercial complexes for the period from 1.4.2008 to 31.3.2008. It appeared to department from the nature of the services provided, that appellants are liable to pay service tax under construction of complex services or under commercial construction service in terms of section 65(105)(zzzh) and section 6

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re sold by appellant to ultimate buyers under separate agreements. Show cause notice dated 10.8.2009 was issued for the period January 2005 to August 2008 proposing to demand service tax under the category of Construction of Complex Service (CICS). After adjudication, the original authority confirmed an amount of Rs. 1,16,42,448/- holding that for the period prior to 1.6.2007, the appellant has to pay service tax under CICS and not under Works Contract Service (WCS) as the project was launched prior to 1.6.2007 and consideration was also received prior to 1.6.2007. For the period after 1.6.2007, the adjudicating authority held that Commercial or Industrial Construction Services / Construction of Residential Complex Services (RCS) were taxable even after 1.6.2007 and that appellant would have to pay under either RCS or WCS.
2.4 M/s. Ceebros Property Development is the appellant in ST/350/2010. The demand is for the period from 1.7.2007 to 28.2.2008. It was put forward by the ld. consul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of introduction of service tax on various construction services and also made various contentions, submissions in respect of the matter under appeal. The submissions and contentions of the ld. counsel can be broadly summarized as under:-
3.1 Service Tax was introduced on the following taxable services from the dates mentioned against each:
S.No
Name of the service
Section of the Finance Act, 1994
Introduced with effect from
1
Commercial or industrial construction service (CICS)
65 (105) (zzq)
01.07.2003
2
Construction of Complex Service (CCS)
65 (105) (zzzh)
16.06.2005
3
Works Contract Service (WCS)
65 (105) (zzzza)
01.06.2007
3.2 Section 65A of the Act deals with the principles of classification of services. As each of the taxable services are made taxable from different dates and the scope of abatement from value, exemption entitlements, valuation, rate of tax are based on appropriate classification of service, correct classification of service is very important.
3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Section 94 (2) of the Act. An alternative in the form of Works Contract (Composition scheme for payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 has also been introduced to pay service tax at a lesser rate on the gross amount (including the value of transfer of property in goods).
3.5 The issue as to whether a composite contract involving provision of service as well as transfer of property in goods could be covered under CICS and CCS from the date of introduction of service tax levy on such services was, being litigated upon which was finally settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. 2015 (39) STR 913 SC. The Apex Court has observed that in as much as section 67 of the Act, dealing with valuation of taxable services, refers to the gross amount charged for service, the services of CICS and CCS would cover only pure service activities, as any contrary view would imply that the Union Government can levy service tax on the gross amount, including the value o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

er a different category of taxable service as the assesse was not at all put on notice on the new category of taxable service.
These decisions were based on various decisions of higher appellate forums, where it has been held that the show cause notice is the foundation of allegations and the adjudication should be limited to the allegations. Further, as per Section 65 A of the Act, classification of service shall be based on the specific entries and the more specific description has to be preferred. In this connection, he invited attention to CBEC's Circular 128/10/2010 Dt. 24.08.2010.
3.8 If show cause notices are issued demanding service tax under CICS / CCS, on composite contracts, involving transfer of property in goods, for the period post 01.06.2007, the said demands of service tax cannot be sustained, as these services would cover only pure service activities, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Larsen & Toubro (supra). At the stage of adjudication or appeal proce

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CS for the period post 01.06.2007 have been set aside.
a) URC Constructions Vs CCE – 2017 (50) STR 147 Tri-Chennai
b) Mantri Developers VS CCE – 2014 (36) STR 944 Tri-Bang.
c) Skyway Infra Projects VS CST – 2018-TIOL-360-CESTAT-MUM
d) Srishti Constructions VS CCE – 2018-TIOL-337-CESTAT-CHD
e) CST VS Swadeshi Construction Company – 2018-TIOL-1096-CESTAT-DEL
f) Logos Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS CST 2018 (6) TMI 1361 – CESTAT CHENNAI
3.11 In the subject appeal, all the demands confirmed are in respect of composite contracts (commercial buildings, residential buildings, service provided to buyers and service provided to landowners). If the plea that such demands under CICS and CCS for the period both prior to and post 01.06.2007 is not sustainable is upheld, there is no need to advance any further arguments specific to the projects in question.
4. The above arguments advanced by the ld. counsel Shri Natarajan was adopted by ld. counsel Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran and ld. consulta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mponent of composite contracts such as Works Contract only with effect from 1.6.2007. The definition of Commercial Constructions Service (CICS / CCS) have not undergone any change after introduction of service tax on works contracts. While pure construction services (not composite involving supply of goods) which are not in the nature of works contract would be liable to service tax, prior to 1.6.2007, those in the nature of works contract (composite involving supply of goods) would be subject to levy only with effect from 1.6.2007. Let us proceed to examine the same.
7.1 Commercial or industrial construction was made exigible to service tax by insertion of Section 65(25b) of the Finance Act with effect from 1.7.2003.
The definition when introduced read as under:-
The said definition was amended with effect from 1.7.2010 vide Notification No. 24/2010-ST dated 22.6.2010 as under:-
'25(b) commercial or industrial construction'] means –
(a) construction of a new building or a civil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing the period of dispute as under:-
'construction of complex' means –
(a) construction of a new residential complex or a part thereof; or
(b) completion and finishing services in relation to residential complex such as glazing, plastering, painting, floor and wall tiling, wall covering and wall papering, wood and metal joinery and carpentry, fencing and railing, construction of swimming pools, acoustic applications or fittings and other similar services; or
(c) repair, alteration, renovation or restoration of, or similar services in relation to, residential complex;'
7.3 “Residential Complex” was defined in section 65(91a) ibid during the disputed period as under:-
'residential complex' means any complex comprising of –
(i) a building or buildings, having more than twelve residential units;
(ii) a common area; and
(iii) any one or more of facilities or services such as park, lift, parking space, community hall, common water supply or effluent treatment system,
locat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion to the execution of a works contract, excluding works contract in respect of roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams.
Explanation. – For the purposes of this sub-clause, 'works contract' means a contract wherein, –
(i) transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of such contract is leviable to tax as sale of goods, and
(ii) such contract is for the purposes of carrying out, –
(a) erection, commissioning or installation of plant, machinery, equipment or structures, whether prefabricated or otherwise, installation of electrical and electronic devices, plumbing, drain laying or other installations for transport of fluids, heating, ventilation or air-conditioning including related pipe work, duct work and sheet metal work, thermal insulation, sound insulation, fire proofing or water proofing, lift and escalator, fire escape staircases or elevators; or
(b) construction of a new building or a civil structure or a part thereof, or of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion 65(105)(zzh) ibid; 'construction services' under section 65(105)(zzq); construction of complex services under section 65(105)(zzzh) would refer only to service contracts simpliciter and not to composite works contracts; that these five taxable services only would qualify without any other element. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also observed that with introduction of works contract service as a separate taxable service, statutory mechanism to exclude the value of transfer of property of goods has been prescribed. The Apex Court held that since the Finance Act had not laid down any charge or machinery to levy and assess service tax on indivisible works contract prior to 1.6.2007, the levy on such composite works contract prior to that date has no constitutional validity.
7.6 The Larsen & Toubro (supra) judgment has been followed by this Tribunal in many numbers of cases to set aside the demand of service tax on services like commercial or industrial construction service, co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ex Court judgment in Larsen & Toubro, such composite works contract then will not be liable to service tax levy prior to 1.6.2007. On the same ratio, such composite contracts even for the period after 1.6.2007 disputed in these appeals will still have to be held as composite works contract only and not pure service simpliciter contracts that could be classified under commercial or industrial construction service, or construction of complex service. To put in another way, to merit being classified as CICS or CCS, the service provider concerned will be rendering only service simpliciter without any other element in them namely without any material or goods supply involved.
That is definitely not the case in the facts of these appeals. The activities of the appellants will therefore continue to be in the nature of composite works contract services and hence even after 1.6.2007 for the periods disputed in these appeals they cannot be brought within the fold of commercial or industrial con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ch service tax will be levied at only 2 per cent of the total value of the words contract'.
7.10 The issue was analyzed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Larsen & Toubro case (supra) and held that there can be no levy of service tax on composite contracts (involving both service and supply of goods) prior to 1.6.2007. This read together with the budget speech as above would lead to the strong conclusion that composite contracts were brought within the ambit of levy of service tax only with effect from 1.6.2007 by introduction of Section 65(105)(zzzza) i.e. Works Contract Services. As pointed out by the ld. counsels for appellants, there is no change in the definition of CICS/CCS/RCS after 1.6.2007. Therefore only those contracts which were service simpliciter (not involving supply of goods) would be subject to levy of service tax under CICS / CCS / RCS prior to 1.6.2007 and after. Our view is supported by the fact that the method / scheme for discharging service tax on the service port

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

service' was made effective, classification of aforesaid services would undergo a change in case of long term contracts even though part of the service was classified under the respective taxable service prior to 1-6-2007. This is because 'works contract' describes the nature of the activity more specifically and, therefore, as per the provisions of Section 65A of the Finance Act, 1994, it would be the appropriate classification for the part of the service provided after that date.'
7.12 Thus, for example, while construction of a new residential complex as a service simpliciter would find a place under section 65(105)(30b) of the Act, the same activity as a composite works contract will require to be brought under section 65(105)(zzzza) Explanation (c). For both these categories for the definition of residential complex, the definition given in section 65(105)(91a) will have to be adopted as discussed above will have to be taken into account.
7.13 We find sustenance in a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;ble Apex Court in M/s L&T Limited. Even in the appeal, the Revenue submitted that the respondent were engaged in construction services liable to tax under tax entry Section 65(105) (xxq). The grievance of the Revenue is with reference to commercial nature of the construction undertaken by the respondent and not on the correct classification of taxable activity.'
b. In the case of Skyway Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai – 2018-TIOL-360-CESTAT-MUM, in respect of identical issue for the period from 2005 to 2012, the Tribunal in para 7 has held as under:-
'7. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both the sides, we find that the issue falls for consideration is whether the services rendered by the appellant in respect of 52 contracts entered with various Govt. authorities need to be taxed under MMRC/CICS/ECIS or otherwise. It is on record and undisputed that the adjudicating authority has specifically held that all the 52 contracts which h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y the adjudicating authority is liable to be set aside and we do so.'
c. In the case of URC Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem – 2017 (50) STR 147, the Tribunal in paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 has held as under:-
'9. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in re Larsen & Toubro & Ors. has decided thus
'24. A close look at the Finance Act, 1994 would show that the five taxable services referred to in the charging Section 65(105) would refer only to service contracts simpliciter and not to composite works contracts. This is clear from the very language of Section 65(105) which defines 'taxable service' as 'any service provided'. All the services referred to in the said sub-clauses are service contracts simpliciter without any other element in them, such as for example, a service contract which is a commissioning and installation, or erection, commissioning and installation contract.
Further, under Section 67, as has been pointed out above, the value of a taxable ser

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

neither of the two show cause notices adduce to leviability of tax for rendering 'works contract service' On the contrary, the submission of the appellant that they had been providing 'works contract service' had been rejected by the adjudicating authority. Therefore, even as the services rendered by them are taxable for the period from 1st June, 2007 to 30th September, 2008 the narrow confines of the show cause notices do not permit confirmation of demand of tax on any service other than 'commercial or industrial construction service'. It is already established in the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the entry under Section 65(105)(zzd) is liable to be invoked only for construction simpliciter. Therefore, there is no scope for vivisection to isolate the service component of the contract.'
d. In the case of Logos Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise as reported in 2018 (6) TMI 1361, the Tribunal has held as under:-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nder works contract for this period. The only argument brought forth by the Ld. Counsel is that they have discharged an amount of around Rs. 82 lakhs under this category after the visit of the departmental officers and therefore an amount of Rs. 36,88,611/- demanded in the impugned order should be considered as having been discharged. We find merit in his argument and hence the demand of Rs. 26,88,611/- under works contract service for the period 01.04.2008 to 30.09.2008 is required to be considered as having been paid, albeit subsequent to the visit of the officers. However, the interest liability if any that arise on this amount if not paid already will have to be discharged by the appellants. So ordered.'
8. In the light of the discussions, findings and conclusions above and in particular, relying on the ratios of the case laws cited supra, we hold as under:-
a. The services provided by the appellant in respect of the projects executed by them for the period prior to 1.6.2007 bei

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ods in dispute, proposing service tax liability on the impugned services involving composite works contract, under 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Service' or 'Construction of Complex' Service, cannot therefore sustain. In respect of any contract which is a composite contract, service tax cannot be demanded under CICS / CCS for the periods also after 1.6.2007 for the periods in dispute in these appeals. For this very reason, the proceedings in all these appeals cannot sustain.
9. The next issue that arises for consideration is with regard to the demand raised for the reason that appellants did not intimate the department about their intention to opt for payment of service tax under composition scheme under Works Contract Service. The Tribunal vide Final Order No. 50871/2018 dated 6.3.2018 in the case of Vaishno Associates Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise had occasion to consider this issue and held for sole reason of not filing the intimation opting to pay ser

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. L

M/s Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Bharti Airtel Limited, M/s Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ras Polytex Pvt. Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, Rimjhim Ispat Limited, M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd., M/s. Navyug Airconditioning And M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 02 Others And State Of U.P. And 3 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1261 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 193 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 18-9-2018
Writ Tax No. – 587 of 2018, 454 of 2018, 455 of 2018, 462 of 2018, 458 of 2018, 559 of 2018, 560 of 2018, 478 of 2018, 464 of 2018, 551 of 2018, 87 of 2018
GST
Sudhir Agarwal And Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ.
For the Petitioner : Praveen Kumar, Atul Gupta,Utkarsh Malviya, Nishant Mishra, Bipin Kumar Pandey,Aditya Pandey, Ritvik Upadhya,Vinod Kumar Upadhya, Nishant Mishra,Vipin Kumar Kushwaha, Praveen Kumar, Nishant Mishra,Tanmay Sadh
F

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 21st March 2018 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax, Mobile Squad, Unit-I, Shamli in purported exercise of powers under Section 129 (1) of UPGST Act, 2017 on the allegation that in respect of goods transported by Vehicle No. DL-1LW-5527, aforesaid authority has reason to believe that for evasion of State Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as “SGST”) goods have been transported by said vehicle. Estimated value of goods constituting machines and parts, mentioned in the order is Rs. 9,85,000/-. Petitioner M/s. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited has transported six loading/unloading machines from its manufacturing unit situated at Thane, (State of Maharashtra) through two tax invoices dated 16.03.2018, to its Ghaziabad office, for the purpose of being used at Warehouse of M/s. Alstom Manufacturing India Pvt. Limited, Saharanpur as inter unit stock. Aforesaid goods were transporte

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssistant Commissioner, requiring petitioner to show cause up to 28.03.2018 as to why tax and penalty of Rs. 1,87,300/- may not be imposed upon the petitioner. The aforesaid order of seizure has been challenged on the ground that mistake was unintentional, Assistant Commissioner has no jurisdiction to pass order of seizure as there is no requirement of carrying any other E-Way Bill under U.P.G.S.T Act, 2017 and Rules framed thereunder.
(II) Writ Tax No. 454 of 2018
3. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. LG Electronics India Limited assailing interception memo dated 15.03.2018, seizure order dated 16.03.2018 and show cause notice dated 16.03.2018 issued by Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax Division Mobile Squad III, Sonbhadra. This writ petition has also challenged Notification dated 21.07.2017 issued by State of U.P. making carrying on E-Way Bill-01 for import of goods worth Rs. 50,000/- from out side the State in State of U.P. mandatory, and also letters dated 06.02.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HR3SV0769 against G.R. No. 3001-3002 dated 14.03.2018 issued by Transporter to petitioner. Tax invoices issued in respect to aforesaid goods were numbered as STNAKW2018647, STNAKW2018648 and STNAKW2018649 dated 13.03.2018. All the requisite details of transportation of said goods were mentioned in receipts issued by Transporter. Requisite documents were with driver of vehicle. The vehicle was intercepted by Mobile Squad Team of Uttar Pradesh Commercial Tax Division, (hereinafter referred to as “UPCTD”) and detained at Raparganj, District Sonbhadra by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad III. Interception memo dated 15.03.2018 at 10:30 A.M was issued and handed over to driver of vehicle. Memo of interception was issued on the ground that driver of vehicle was not carrying E-Way Bill 01, though in possession of original tax invoices issued by Consignor and LR receipts issued by Transporter. Thereafter physical verification was made by Assistant Commissioner who submitted report dated 16.0

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

It is duly registered under U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 having GSTIN No. 09AAACB2894GIZP.
Petitioner transferred stock by two consignments of eight boxes each, of telecom goods from its New Delhi office to Varanasi. It generated two separate E-Way Bill-01 giving details of both the transactions including details of goods and vehicle number. These two E-Way Bills numbered as 1803W177918800367522 and 1803W177918800369265 dated 12.03.2018. The goods were transported through GIR Movers Pvt. Limited by vehicle no. UP32F/N6684. Petitioner also issued invoices-Cum-Challan no. DLG25723 and DLG25727 dated 12.03.2018 for two transactions after charging Integrated Goods and Service Tax (hereinafter referred to as “I.G.S.T Act”) at the rate of 18%.
When goods were in transit from Delhi to Varanasi, the vehicle in which they were being transported i.e. UP32F/N6684, broke down.
Hence goods were transferred to another vehicle no. DL1GC/3360 at Hathras. Aforesaid vehicle DL1GC/3360 while crossing Commercia

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

thereunder.
The mechanism of E-Way Bill under Central Goods and Service Tax Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Rules 2017”) have not been implemented by Central Government. Hence, E-Way Bill alongwith goods were not carried by Transporter and that cannot be a ground for seizure or imposition of penalty. Hence, there is no violation of any provisions of IGST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017 or the Rules framed thereunder. Therefore, provisions of section 129 (1) of UPGST Act cannot be invoked against petitioner. UPGST Act 2017 cannot transgress upon field occupied by IGST Act 2017 and Notification issued under Rule 129 is beyond the power conferred by UPGST Act 2017.
(IV) Writ Tax No. 46 2 of 2018
5. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India by M/s. Guala Closures (India) Pvt., Ltd., having its Registered Office D-1, Sesa Ghor, Patto, P.O. Box No. 101, Panjim, Goa, challenging order of seizure dated 05.03.2018 and show cause notice of same date. Pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ound that State E-Way Bill- 01, was not being carried by transporter. Thereafter a seizure order was issued on 05.03.2018 alleging that without E-Way Bill- 01 goods were being transported in State of U.P. from outside U.P. A show cause notice under section 129 (3) of U.P.G.S.T. 2017 was also issued on 05.03.2018. It is also challenged on the ground that respondents have no authority to intercept goods, detain, and pass order of seizure as there was no requirement of carrying E-Way Bill- 01 and provisions of provincial Statute cannot override provisions of Central Statute.
(V) Writ Tax No. 458 of 2018
6. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. RAS Polytex Pvt. Ltd having its manufacturing unit E-II, Ramnagar, Industrial Area, Chandauli (State of U.P.). It has assailed seizure order dated 09.03.2018 passed by Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner, Unit Chandauli and notice dated 09.03.2018 passed under section 129 (3) of U.P.G.S.T. Act 2017. It has also sought a writ of certiora

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Way Bill-01.
Seizure order was passed under section 129 (1) on 09.03.2018 and it is also mentioned that U.P. E-Way Bill was not accompanied and Central E-Way Bill dated 07.03.2018 was generated on trial basis, therefore, it was not legally acceptable. Respondent 4 also issued notice under section 129 (3) proposing imposition of tax of Rs. 1,07,460/- and penalty of same amount i.e. Rs. 1,07,460/-.
(VI) Writ Tax No. 559 of 2018 & Writ Tax No. 560 of 2018
7. Both these writ petitions have been filed by same petitioner M/s. Rimjhim Ispat Limited, having its manufacturing unit at Industrial Area, Sumerput, District Hamirpur (U.P.) and registered office at 123/360, Fazalganj, Kanpur. In Writ Petition No. 559 of 2018 seizure order dated 11.03.2018 and show cause notice issued under section 129 (3) dated 17.03.2018 have been challenged, which have been passed by Assistant Commissioner GST/State Tax, Mobile Squad, 7th Unit Kanpur. Here petitioner sold Stainless Steel Bright Bars to M/s. M.R.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ies Limited Unit-II, B-3, Site II, Loni Road Industrial, Mohan Nagar District Ghaziabad were being transported through Transporter M/s. Buland Road Transport Company by Truck no. UP78BT2199. Petitioner has generated tax invoice no. 08440 dated 28.02.2018 for goods worth Rs. 21,31,051/- which includes IGST. E-Way Bill-02 dated 28.02.2018 was also generated by petitioner giving all details. Same were intercepted and detained by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Kannauj on the ground that E-Way Bills had already expired. Consequently seizure order was passed on 07.03.2018 and a show cause notice under section 129 (3) were issued on the same date, proposing tax of Rs. 3,27,420/- and penalty of same amount.
(VII) Writ Tax No. 478 of 2018
9. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Gaurang Products Pvt. Ltd., having its Unit at Industrial Area, Ghaziabad challenging, seizure order dated 19.03.2018 and show cause notice of the same date issued by Assistant Commissioner, State/Commercial

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

posing to impose tax of Rs. 1,23,764/- and equivalent amount of penalty.
(VIII) Writ Tax No. 464 of 2018
10. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., Rave Multiplex Complex, V.I.P. Road, Kanpur.
Petitioner placed an order for supply of certain goods (advertising material) to M/s. J.K. Advertising, J-10, Jahangeerpuri, New Delhi in respect of said goods. 7 invoices were prepared on 11/12.03.2018 and goods were transported through Transporter M/s. Maa Chamunda Devi Transport Service, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, through truck no. HR55AA-0252. Transporter issued four separate GRs on 12.03.2018 and also downloaded a consolidated E-Way Bill for the aforesaid transaction from the website of Central Government on 12.03.2018.
While in transit, goods were intercepted by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad Unit, Etah, in the morning on 13.03.2018 and same were detained on the ground that E-Way Bill-01 of U.P. Government was not available alongwith goods. Aft

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for delivery at Ghaziabad. The goods were intercepted by Assistant Commissioner Mobile Squad, Unit-V, Noida on 24.03.2018 and detained on the ground that goods did not accompany E-Way Bill-01 prescribed under UPGST Rules 2017. A seizure order was passed on 25.03.2018 and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing levy of tax of Rs. 1,54,699/- and penalty of the same amount.
(X) Writ Tax No. 87 of 2018
12. This writ petition has been filed by M/s. Proactive Plast Pvt. Ltd., Plots No. 274, 275, 280, 281, Ecotech-1 Extension, Kasna, Greater Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar. He has filed this writ petition challenging seizure order dated 20.01.2018 and notice issued on same date under section 129 (1) and (3) of UPGST Act 2017.
Petitioner company is engaged in manufacture of packing material and registered under UPGST Act 2017, having GST TIN No. 09AADCP5536C1ZJ. Petitioner placed purchase order of raw material i.e. 2,500 Kg of NUCREAL AE Resin and 7,500 Kg

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under section 129 (1) and notice under section 129 (3) was also issued on the same date proposing tax of Rs. 31,17,500/- and penalty of same amount.
13. In order to give a consolidated bird eye view of details of invoices, seizure orders, show-cause notices and the amount of tax/penalty proposed, a chart is being given as under:
S. N.
Writ Petition No.
Name of petitioner
Date of invoice
Date of interception/seizure order
Date of show cause notice
Amount of tax/penalty proposed
Date of Final order
1.
587/2018
M/s Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing co. Ltd. Hapur.
16.3.18
21.3.18
21.3.18
374600/-

2.
454/2018
LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd.
13.3.18
15.3.18/16.3.18
16.3.18
2326944/-

3.
455/2018
Bharti Airtel Limited
12.3.18
14.3.18
14.3.18
2552310/-

4.
462/2018
Mrs. Guala Closures (India) Pvt. Ltd.
23.2.18
5.3.18
5.3.
18 269378/-

5.
458/2018
M/s RAS Polytex Pvt. Ltd.
7.3.18
9.3.18
9.3.18
209520/-

6.
559/2018
Rimjhim Ispat Ltd.
8.3.18
11

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion.
(ii) Provisions of U.P.G.S.T Act 2017 will have to sub-serve to the provision of I.G.S.T Act 2017 when goods are transported in an Inter-State transaction, which is governed by I.G.S.T Act 2017.
(iii) Fault in any case is unintentional and therefore, there could have been no seizure or imposition of penalty in the exercise of powers under Section 129.
(iv) Tax having already been paid and shown in tax invoices, there is no occasion to levy tax again on aforesaid goods and it is wholly without jurisdiction and illegal.
(v) Demand of penalty is illegal since applicable tax had already been paid prior to transportation of goods in the matters where the allegation is that e-way-bill has expired.
(vi) The fact is that vehicle transporting the goods broke down hence, goods were transferred to another vehicle or after repair transportation resumed therefore delay was neither intentional nor deliberate and hence penalty is not attracted.
(vii) Notification no. 1014 dated 21.07.2017

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll-02 shall remain valid and this prescription by Commissioner is ultra-vires and beyond the power conferred upon him as it is not contemplated either under the Act or the Rules or even Notification dated 21 July, 2017 issued by State Government.
Prescription of time period of validity of e-way-bill-02 could have been done only by the State Government and not the Commissioner and this power exercised by Commissioner vide circular dated 09th August, 2017 is wholly ultra-vires.
(ix) Rule 138 confers no power upon State Government to subdelegate power to Commissioner.
(x) Commissioner in its circular dated 09th August 2017 has prescribed time period of validity for e-way-bill-01 for Inter- State movement and also for e-way-bill-02 for Intra-State movement. However, for the same distance, time period for eway- bill-02 is only 48 hours while for e-way-bill-01 it is ten days. This distinction/different period of time is clearly discriminatory and arbitrary having no rationale and nexus wi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ions on Intra-State transactions and seizure orders and notices issued are wholly without jurisdiction.
15. Per-Contra learned Standing Counsel argued that a valid Notification was issued under Section 129 and petitioners having flouted the provisions thereof, in order to give opportunity, show cause notices have been issued after passing seizure orders and the same warrant no interference.
16. We have heard Sri V.K. Upadhyay, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Praveen Kumar, Sri Nishant Mishra, Sri Ritvik Upadhyay, Sri Tanmay Sadh and Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for Petitioners and Sri Manish Goyal, Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents. We have also perused record of all writ petitions and relevant statutes in depth.
17. Concept of Goods and Services Tax (hereinafter referred to as “G.S.T.”) has been brought by Parliament through One Hundred and First Constitution Amendment vide “Constitution (One Hundred and First

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods and services tax,-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in Articles 246 and 254, Parliament, and, subject to clause (2), the Legislature of every State, have power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or by such State.
(2) Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of Inter-state trade or commerce.
Explanation.- The provisions of this article, shall, in respect of goods and services tax referred to in clause (5) of Article- 279-A take effect from the date recommended by the Goods and Services Tax Council.”
“269-A. Levy and collection of goods and services tax in course of inter-State trade or commerce.-(1) Goods and services tax on supplies in the course of Inter-State trade or commerce shall be levied and collected by the Government of India and such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.”
18. There are corresponding amendments in Articles 248, 249, 250, 268, 269, 270, 271, 286, 366, 368 and in Sixth and Seventh Schedules of the Constitution. Article 268-A has been omitted by the aforesaid Amendment. Provision of Constitution of Goods and Services Tax Council has been made by insertion of article 279-A.
19. Definitions of “Goods and Service Tax” and “Services” had been provided by insertion of clauses 12-A and 26-A in Article 366 and the aforesaid two clauses read as under:
“(12-A) “goods and services tax” means any tax on supply of goods, or services or both except taxes on the supply of the alcoholic liquor for human consumption;',
(26-A) “Services” means anything other than goods;”
20. Section 1 (2) of One Hundred and First Amendment Act 2016 provides that the aforesaid amendment of Constitution shall come into force on such date as Central Government may, by Notification in the Of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

person; to provide for conduct of audit of registered persons in order to verify compliance with the provisions of Act; to provide for recovery of arrears of tax using various modes including detaining and sale of goods, movable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person; to provide for powers of inspection search, seizure and arrest to the officers; to establish G.S.T Appellate Tribunal by Central Government; to make provision for penalties for contravention of the credit; to provide for an anti-profiteering clause in order to ensure that business passes on the benefit of reduced tax incidence on goods and services or both to the consumers and to provide for elaborate for transitional provisions.
23. IGST Act 2017 to some extent has replaced Central Sales Tax Act 1956. Article 269 of Constitution empowered Parliament to make laws on the taxes to be levied on the sale or purchase taking place in the course of Inter-State Trade or Commerce. Consequently Central Sales Tax 1956

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ervices on reverse charge basis; empower Central Government to grant exemptions; determination of nature of supply as to whether it is an Inter-State or an Intra-State supply; to provide elaborate provisions for determining place of supply in relation to goods or services or both; payment of tax by a supplier of online information and data-base access or retrieval services; refund of tax paid on supply of goods to tourist leaving India; apportionment of tax and settlement of funds and for transfer of input tax credit between Central Government, State Government and Union Territory; application of certain provisions of C.G.S.T Act 2017; and transitional transactions in relation to import of services made on or after appointed day.
24. Sections 1, 2, 3, 14, 20 and 22 of IGST Act 2017 were enforced w.e.f 22.06.2017. Sections 4 to 13, 16 to 19, 21, and 23 to 25 were enforced w.e.f 01.07.2017. For the purpose of execution of provisions of CGST Act 2017, Sections 3 to 5 make provisions for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ral Tax or Assistant Directors of Central Tax, and
(i) any other class of officers as it may deem fit: PROVIDED that the officers appointed under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) shall be deemed to be the officers appointed under the provisions of this Act.
4. Appointment of officers.- (1) The Board may, in addition to the officers as may be notified by the Government under Section 3, appoint such persons as it may think fit to be the officers under this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the Board may, by order, authorise any officer referred to in clauses (a) to (h) of Section 3 to appoint officers of central tax below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of central tax for the administration of this Act.
5. Powers of officers.- (1) Subject to such conditions and limitations as the Board may impose, an officer of central tax may exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on him under this Act.
(2) An officer of central

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ubject to the conditions specified in the Notification issued under sub-section (1),
(a) where any proper officer issues an order under this Act, he shall also issue an order under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as authorised by the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, as the case may be, under intimation to the jurisdictional officer of State tax or Union territory tax;
(b) where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by the proper officer under this Act on the same subject matter.
(3) Any proceedings for rectification, appeal and revision, wherever applicable, of any order passed by an officer appointed under this Act shall not lie before an officer appointed under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

therein, in relation to Integrated Tax in the same manner as CGST Act 2017 applies in relation to Section 20 of IGST Act 2017 which reads as under:-
“20. Application of provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act.- Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to,-
(i) scope of supply;
(ii) composite supply and mixed supply;
(iii) time and value of supply;
(iv) input tax credit;
(v) registration;
(vi) tax invoice, credit and debit notes;
(vii) accounts and records;
(viii) returns, other than late fee;
(ix) payment of tax;
(x) tax deduction at source;
(xi) collection of tax at source;
(xii) assessment;
(xiii) refunds;
(xiv) audit;
(xv) inspection, search, seizure and arrest;
(xvi) demands and recovery;
(xvii) liability to pay in certain cases;
(xviii) advance ruling;
(xix) appeals and revision;
(xx) presumption as to documents;
(xxi) offences and penaltie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion to States) Act, if charged separately by the supplier:
PROVIDED ALSO that in cases where the penalty is leviable under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, the penalty leviable under this Act shall be the sum total of the said penalties.”
28. As we have already said section 3 of IGST Act 2017 was made effective from by 22.06.2017 and section 4 was made effective from 01.07.2017. Section 164 of CGST Act 2017 confers Rule framing power upon Central Government and pursuant thereto CGST Rules 2017 were made and enforced w.e.f 22nd June 2017. Similarly section 22 of IGST Act 2017 confers power upon Central Government to makes Rules and pursuant thereto Integrated Goods and Service Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “IGST Rules 2017”) were framed and came into force w.e.f 22.06.2017. It is a small set of Rules containing only two Rules. Rule 1 relates to short title and commencement Rule

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ct 2017
UPGST Act 2017
129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance shall be liable to detention or seizure and after detention or seizure, shall be released,-
(a) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to one hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to two per cent of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of such tax and penalty;
(b) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to the fifty per cent of the value of the goods reduc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.
(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.
(6)Where the person transporting any goods or the owner of the goods fails to pay the amount of tax and penalty as provided in sub-section (1) within seven days of such detention or seizure, further proceedings shall be initiated in accordance with the provisions of Section 130:
PROVIDED that where the detained or seized goods are perishable or hazardous in nature or are likely to depreciate in value with passage of time, the said period of seven days may be reduced by the proper officer.
129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 67 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for detention and seizure of goods and conveyances.
(3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyances shall issue a notice specifying the tax and penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order for payment of tax and penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c).
(4) No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under subsection (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.
(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the notice specified in sub- section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.
(6) Where the person transporting any

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ay be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed.
(2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) Where any conveyance referred to in sub-section (1) is intercepted by the proper officer at any place, he may require the person in charge of the said conveyance to produce the documents prescribed under the said sub-section and devices for verification, and the said person shall be liable to produce the documents and devices and also allow the inspection of goods.
68. Inspection of goods in movement.-
(1) The Government may require the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding such amount as may be specified to carry with him such documents and such devices as may be prescribed.
(2) The details of documents required to be carried under subsection (1) shall be validated in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) Where an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uch time as an E-way-Bill system is developed and approved by the Council, the Government may, by Notification, specify the documents that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage.
33. U.P. Government in purported exercise of powers under Rule 138 of UPGST Rules 2017, issued a Notification no. KA.NI-1014/XI- 9(52)/17-UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(31)-2017-Lucknow dated 21st July 2017 specifying documents required be carried by a person in charge of conveyance carrying any consignment of goods while in movement or in transit, storage in U.P. and it reads as under:-
“Uttar Pradesh Shashan
Sansthagat Vitta, Kar Evam Nibandhan Anubhag -2
Notification
No.-K.A.NI.-1014/XI-9(52)/17-U.P.GST Rules-2017-
Order-(31)-2017
Lucknow : 21 July 2017
In exercise of the powers under Rule 138 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 framed under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the goods during the transportation or transit storage of the goods:
a) Mentha Oil, Menthol and D.M.O.,
b) Supari,
c) Iron and Steel,
d) All types of edible oils and Vanaspathi ghee.
(3) In case of transportation of taxable goods by ecommerce operators or their authorized transporters, courier agents or agents for delivery to a person within Uttar Pradesh, the enclosed form e-way bill-03 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or transit storage within State.
(4) In case of transportation of taxable goods valuing Rs. 5,000 or more from a place outside Uttar Pradesh to a place outside the State, the form TDF-01 shall be carried with such goods during the transportation of goods or their transit storage within the State and on the exit of goods from the State, the information shall be provided in Form TDF-02.
(5) The forms mentioned in clauses (1), (2), (3) and (4) above shall be downloaded by the procedure prescribed by the Commissioner State Tax/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7 was issued amending procedure for downloading relevant forms and it was also declared that Government Notification dated 21.07.2017 shall be effective from 16.08.2017.
35. Further in exercise of powers under Section 164 of UPGST Act 2017, U.P. Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'UPGST (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017') were published vide Notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/17- UPGST-Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017-Lucknow dated 20th September 2017 and Rule 138 was substituted by following Sub Rule 1 to 14:-
“138. Information to be furnished prior to commencement of movement of goods and generation of e-way bill.-
(1) Every registered person who causes movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees-
(i) in relation to a supply; or
(ii) for reason other than supply; or
(iii) due to inward supply from an unregistered person.
shall, before commencement of such movement, furnish information relating to the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rate and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees:
Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this rule
Provided also that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union territory from the place of business of the consignor to the place of business of the transporter for further transportation, the supplier or the transporter may not furnish the details of conveyance in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation I. For the purposes of this sub-rule, where the goods are supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (1), where multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated FORM GST EWB-01 in accordance with the provisions of subrule
(1) and the value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter shall generate FORM GSTEWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able
Sr. no.
Distance
Validity period
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Upto 100 km
One day
2.
For every 100 km or part thereof thereafter
One additional day
 
Provided that the Commissioner may, by Notification, extend the validity period of e-way bill for certain categories of goods as may be specified therein: Provided further that where, under circumstances of an exceptional nature, the goods cannot be transported within the validity period of e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01
Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the “relevant date” shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours.
(11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the recipient, if registered, on the common portal, who

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d within such areas in the State and for values exceeding such amount as the Commissioner of State Tax in consultation with the Chief Commissioner of Central Tax may notify.
Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS.”
36. Rules 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 provides that amendment in the Rules notified on 20th September 2017 shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in official gazette appoint, By the aforesaid Amendment it also inserted Rules 138-A, Rule 138-B, Rule 138-C and Rule 138-D.
37. In furtherance of Rule 1 (2) of UPGST (4th Amendment) Rules 2017 read with section 164 of UPGST Act 2017 and 21 of U.P. General Clauses Act, Governor by Notification No. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17- U.P. Act-1-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30.01.2018 appointed 1st February 2018 enforcing the amendment made in the provisions at serial no. 10 and 11 of notification no. KA.NI-2-1359/XI-9(42)/1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-U.P. GST Rules-2017-Order-(45)-2017 dated 20-10-2017, shall come into force.”
38. Perhaps this mistake was noticed by Government subsequently and, therefore, it issued another Notification no. KA.NI-177/XI-9- (42)/17-UP Act-1-2017-Order-(109)-2018-Lucknow- dated 6th February 2018, whereby Notification no. KA.NI-2-138/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1- 2017-Order-(101)-2018-Lucknow dated 30th January 2018 was rescinded. Notification dated 6th February 2018 reads as under:
“Notification
KA.NI.177/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER (109)-2018,
DATED 6-2-2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services tax Act, 2017 (U.P. Act no 1 of 2017) read with section 21 of the Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 (U.P. Act no. 1 of 1904), the Governor hereby rescinds, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such rescission, the Notification no. KA.NI.-2-138/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P.Act-l-2017-Order-(101)-2018 dated 30-1-2018.”
39. Before 06.02.2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e common portal along with such other information as may be required at the common portal and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State to a job worker located in any other State, the e-way bill shall be generated by tie principal irrespective of the value of the consignment:
Provided further that where handicraft goods are transported from one State in another by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of obtaining registration under clauses (i) and (ii) of section 24, the e-way bill shall be generated by the said person irrespective of the value of the consignment,
Explanation 1.-For the purposes of this rule, the expression “handicraft goods” has the meaning as assigned to it in Notification No. KA.NI.-2-1414/XI-9(15)/17-U.P. Act-1-2017- Order-(48)-2017 dated 27-09-2017 as amended from time to time.
Explanation 2.-For the purposes of this rule, the consignment value of goods shall be t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d date of the Railway Receipt or the Air Consignment Note or Bill of lading, as the case may be.
(3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relating to the transporter on the common portal and the e-way bill shall be generated by the transporter on the said portal on the basis of the information furnished by the registered person in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that the registered person or, the transporter, as the case may be may, at his option, generate and carry the e-way bill even if the value of the consignment is less than fifty thousand rupees:
Provided further that where the movement is caused by an unregistered person either in his own conveyance or a hired one or through a transporter, he or the transporter may, at their option, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the common portal in the manner specified in this

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal. (5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consigner or the recipient, who has provided information in Part- A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter shall, before such transfer and further movement of goods, update the details of conveyance in the e-way bill on the common portal in FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that where the goods are transported for a distance of less than ten kilometers within the State or Union Territory from the place of business of the transporter finally to the place of business of the consignee, the details of conveyance may not be updated in the e-way bill.
(5A) The consignor or the recipient, who has furnished the information in Part-A of FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter, may assign the e-way bill number to another registered or enrolled transporter for updating the information in Part-B of FORM G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

upees, the transporter shall generate FORM GST EWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case maybe, and may also generate a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 on the common portal prior to the movement of goods:
Provided that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such ecommerce operator.
(8) The information furnished in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 shall be made available to the registered supplier on the common portal who may utilize the same for furnishing details in FORM GSTR-1:
Provided that when the information has been furnished by an unregistered supplier or an unregistered recipient in FORM GST EWB-01, he shall be informed electronically, if the mobile number or the e-mail is available.
(9) Where an e-way bill has been generated under this rule, but goods are either not transported or are not transported as per the details furnis

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecified therein:
Provided further that where, under circumstances of an exceptional nature, the goods cannot be transported within the validity period of the e-way bill, the transporter may generate another e-way bill after updating the details in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this rule, the “relevant date” shall mean the date on which the e-way bill has been generated and the period of validity shall be counted from the time at which the e-way bill has been generated and each day shall be counted as twenty-four hours.
(11) The details of e-way bill generated under sub-rule (1) shall be made available to the –
(a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or
(b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter,
on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ustoms;
(d) in respect of movement of such goods and within such areas in the State as the Commissioner of state tax, in consultation with the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of central tax, may notify;
(e) where the goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported are specified in the Schedule appended to Notification No.KA.NI-2-837/XI-9(47)/17-UP Act-1-2017- Order-(07)-2017 dated 30.6.2017 as amended from time to time;
(f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel; and
(g) where the goods being transported are treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act.
Explanation- The facility of generation and cancellation of eway bill may also be made available through SMS.”
41. To complete the chain of the events, we may mention that UPGST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 (hereinafter referred to as “(Fourteenth

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST EWB-01, electronically, on the common portal along with such other information as may be required on the common portal and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided further that where the goods to be transported are supplied through an e-commerce operator or a courier agency, on an authorization received from the consignor, the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 may be furnished by such e-commerce operator or courier agency and a unique number will be generated on the said portal:
Provided also that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State or Union territory to a job worker located in any other State or Union territory, the e-way bill shall be generated either by the principal or the job worker, if registered, irrespective of the value of the consignment:
Provided also that where handicraft goods are transported from one State or Union territory to another State or Union territory by a person who has been exempted from the requirement o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tered person as a consignor or the recipient of supply as the consignee, whether in his own conveyance or a hired one or a public conveyance, by road, the said person shall generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 electronically on the common portal after furnishing information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
(2A) Where the goods are transported by railways or by air or vessel, the e-way bill shall be generated by the registered person, being the supplier or the recipient, who shall, either before or after the commencement of movement, furnish, on the common portal, the information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01:
Provided that where the goods are transported by railways, the railways shall not deliver the goods unless the eway bill required under these rules is produced at the time of delivery,
(3) Where the e-way bill is not generated under sub-rule (2) and the goods are handed over to a transporter for transportation by road, the registered person shall furnish the information relat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nsporter may not furnish the details of conveyance in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
Explanation 1- For the purposes of this sub-rule, where the goods are supplied by an unregistered supplier to a recipient who is registered, the movement shall be said to be caused by such recipient if the recipient is known at the time of commencement of the movement of goods.
Explanation 2.-The e-way bill shall not be valid for movement of goods by road unless the information in Part-B of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished except in the case of movements covered under the third proviso to sub-rule (3) and the proviso to sub-rule (5).
(4) Upon generation of the e-way bill on the common portal, a unique e-way bill number (EBN) shall be made available to the supplier, the recipient and the transporter on the common portal.
(5) Where the goods are transferred from one conveyance to another, the consignor or the recipient, who has provided information in Part A of the FORM GST EWB-01, or the transporter s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

assign the e-way bill number to another transporter.
(6) After e-way bill has been generated in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (1), where multiple consignments are intended to be transported in one conveyance, the transporter may indicate the serial number of e-way bills generated in respect of each such consignment electronically on the common portal and a consolidated e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-02 may be generated by him on the said common portal prior to the movement of goods.
(7) Where the consignor or the consignee has not generated the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 and the aggregate of the consignment value of goods carried in the conveyance is more than fifty thousand rupees, the transporter, except in case of transportation of goods by railways, air and vessel, shall, in respect of inter-State supply, generate the e-way bill in FORM GST EWB-01 on the basis of invoice or bill of supply or delivery challan, as the case may be, and may also generate a consolidated e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f the e-way bill:
Provided that an e-way bill cannot be cancelled if it has been verified in transit in accordance with the provisions of rule 138B:
Provided further that the unique number generated under sub-rule (1) shall be valid for a period of fifteen days for updation of Part B of FORM GST EWB-01.
(10) An e-way bill or a consolidated e-way bill generated under this rule shall be valid for the period as mentioned in column (3) of the Table below from the relevant date, for the distance, within the country, the goods have to be transported, as mentioned in column (2) of the said Table:-
Sr. No.
Distance
Validity period
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Upto 100 km.
One day in cases other than Over Dimensional Cargo
2.
For every 100 km. or part thereof thereafter
One additional day other than Over Dimensional Cargo
3.
Upto 20 km.
One day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo
4.
For every 20 km. or part thereof thereafter
One additional day in case of Over Dimensional Cargo:

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

unit and which exceeds the dimensional limits prescribed in rule 93 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, made under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988).
(11) The details of the e-way bill generated under this rule shall be made available to the-
(a) supplier, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the recipient or the transporter; or
(b) recipient, if registered, where the information in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01 has been furnished by the supplier or the transporter,
on the common portal, and the supplier or the recipient, as the case may be, shall communicate his acceptance or rejection of the consignment covered by the e-way bill.
(12) Where the person to whom the information specified in subrule
(11) has been made available does not communicate his acceptance or rejection within seventy two hours of the details being made available to him on the common portal, or the time of delivery of goods whichever is earlier,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods, other than de-oiled cake, being transported, are specified in the Schedule appended to Notification No. KA.NI.-2-837/XI-9{47)/17-U.P.Act-l- 2017-Order-(07)-2017 dated 30-06-2017 as amended from time to time;
(f) where the goods being transported are alcoholic liquor for human consumption, petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas or aviation turbine fuel;
(g) where the supply of goods being transported is treated as no supply under Schedule III of the Act;
(h) where the goods are being transported-
(i) under customs bond from an inland container depot or a container freight station to a customs port, airport, air cargo complex and land customs station, or from one customs station or customs port to another customs station or customs port, or
(ii) under customs supervision or under customs seal;
(i) where the goods being transported are transit cargo from or to Nepal or Bhutan;
(j) where the goods being transported are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

updation and assignment of e-way bill shall be made available through SMS to the supplier, recipient and the transporter, as the case may be.”
42. Rule 1 (2) of 14th Amendment Rules, 2018 provides that the provisions in said Notification shall come into force on such date as State Government may by Notification in the gazette, appoint. In furtherance thereof, State Government has issued Notification no. KA.NI-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-UP-Act-1-2017-Order-(121)-2018-Lucknow dated 27.03.2018 appointing 01.04.2018 for giving effect to Rule 3 [other than sub-rule(7)] and rules 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 on (Fourteenth Amendments) Rules 2018. The said Notification reads as under:-
“Notification
KA.NI.-2-498/XI-9(42)/17-U.P. ACT-1-2017-ORDER-(121)-
2018, Lucknow Dated March 27, 2018
In exercise of the powers under sub-rule (2) of rule 1 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018 published with Notification No. KA.NI.-2-487/XI- 9(42)/17-U.P. GST Rules-2017, Order-(120)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat till such time e-way bill system is developed and approved by GSTC, the Government may, by Notification, specify the documents that a person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods shall carry while the goods are in movement or in transit storage. This rule 138 in U.P. GST Rules, 2017 came into force on 29.06.2017. In furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, first Notification was issued by Governor on 21.07.2017 but this Notification also declares that Notification itself shall be effective from such date as Commissioner, State Tax/Commercial Tax may mention in the circular prescribing procedure of downloading the forms mentioned in the said Notification. Thus in furtherance of Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017, which came into force on 29.06.2017, first Notification though issued on 21.07.2017 but it was not made effective from that date and, on the contrary, it was to be declared by Commissioner State Tax/Commercial Tax. In furtherance of State Governm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

16.08.2017.
45. Then comes amendment by substitution of Rule 138 by Notification dated 20.09.2017. However, it was not made effective and operative since for the said purpose, Rule-1(2) of U.P. GST (Fourth Amendment) Rules 2017 requires another Notification by State Government, appointing date of enforcement of substituted Rule 138.
This substituted Rule 138 as notified on 20.9.2017 was sought to be enforced with effect from 01.02.2018 by Notification dated 30.01.2018 but a glaring error was committed and instead of giving effect to Notification dated “20.09.2017”, it mentioned the date as “20.10.2017”.
Thus Notification dated 20.09.2017 did not come into effect and Rule 138 as sought to be substituted by Notification dated 20.09.2017 remained unenforced and inoperative. On 31.01.2018 UPGST (Thirteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, were published which came into force w.e.f. 23.1.2018, except otherwise provided in the Notification dated 31.01.2018. Substituted Rule 138 made by Notificatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.2.2018), were different than what was alleged to be non-possessed or obtained by Petitioners or Transporters, carrying goods in dispute by making reference to Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circular dated 09.08.2017. Even the authorities concerned, it is evident, were not clear as to what are the correct Forms in these cases.
47. Further, it is not the case of respondents that the Forms consistent with Rule 138 made effective from 01.02.2018 were made available on the portal.
48. We also find that under Rule 138 (10) period of validity of e-way bill was clearly different than what was mentioned in Commissioner's Circulars dated 09.08.2017. Thus, Rule 138 as was brought in by Notification dated 31.01.2018 w.e.f. 01.02.2018 was operative during the period of transactions with which we are concerned in the present set of writ petitions, except writ petition no. 87 of 2018 which is governed by Rule 138, as initially enacted read with Government

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and, hence, adhered to compliance of provisions which stood already substituted by new provisions and earlier ones had become otiose. Insistence upon petitioners, at the time of issue of seizure memos and show cause notices to have downloaded E-way-bill 01 and/or 02 and its non compliance by referring to Government's Notification dated 21.07.2017 read with Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 and also Rule 138 as substituted vide Government Notification dated 20.09.2017, though it was never imposed and made operative, was/is clearly erroneous and illegal.
Notification dated 31.01.2018 whereby Rule 138 was completely changed by substitution and made effective from 01.02.2018, it appears, escaped attention of authorities concerned, though it is this provision which had to be complied by petitioners. Unfortunately, authorities concerned have completely failed to observe the same. It appears that for the field authorities there was a gross chaos on account of q

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

matter of fact, never became operative. The first amendment by substitution of Rule 138 is by way of U.P. GST (Thirteenth Amendment) Rules 2018 vide Notification dated 31.01.2018 which came into force on 01.02.2018 and it continued upto 31.03.2018. Thereafter, it stands substituted by another Rule 138 vide U.P. GST (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules 2018, Notification dated 26.03.2018, made effective from 01.04.2018. Probably, the above pace of change derailed respondent authorities also in their understanding as to which provision has to be followed and implemented and what has to be observed/applied/obeyed by Petitioners and their Transporters. That is how impugned orders have been passed under a clear misconception of non-downloading of e-way bill 01 or 02, as the case may be, though under Rule 138, which had come into force on 01.02.2018, the Form(s) required to be downloaded by Dealers or Transporters are different.
53. In these peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in our vie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te, provisions could not have been made by State Government of U.P. GST Act, 2017, hence Rule 138 of U.P. GST Rules, 2017 read with Notification dated 21.07.2017 and Commissioner's Circulars dated 22.07.2017 and 09.08.2017 are ultra vires.
55. We have already discussed relevant provisions of various Statutes and it is evident that the provisions are pari materia. Officers of State are also competent for search, seizure and imposition of penalty in respect of violation of Central Enactments. Moreover, provisions relating to search and seizure are not for the purpose of imposition of a new liability but to regulate fiscal statutory provisions in order to avoid evasion of tax. Nothing has been placed on record to show that similar requirement of relevant documents was not provided by Central Government also in respect of inter-state transactions. There is also a principle that mere mention of a wrong provision will not make an order bad, if otherwise, power exists in the Statute. In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Governor of Haryana appoints the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall come into force

Governor of Haryana appoints the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall come into force
87/GST-2 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 18th September, 2018
No.87/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Under section 1(3) to bring Section 51 of the HGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force with effect from 01.10.2018 under HGST Act, 2017

Under section 1(3) to bring Section 51 of the HGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force with effect from 01.10.2018 under HGST Act, 2017
86/GST-2 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 18th September, 2018
No.86/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017) and in supersession of the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification no. 84/ST-2, dated the 22nd September, 2017 except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Governor of Haryana hereby appoints the 1st day of October,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Under section 148 to extend the due date for filling of FORM GSTR-1 for taxpayer having aggregate turnover up to 1.5 crores under HGST Act, 2017

Under section 148 to extend the due date for filling of FORM GSTR-1 for taxpayer having aggregate turnover up to 1.5 crores under HGST Act, 2017
84/GST-2 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 18th September, 2018
No.84/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act), and in supersession of –
(i) the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification No. 129/ST-2, dated the 22nd November, 2017;
(ii) the Haryana Government, Excise and Taxation Department, Notification No. 47/ST-2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Services Tax Rules, 2017, effected during the quarter as specified in column (2) of the Table below till the time period as specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table, namely:-
Table
Serial No.
Quarter for which details in FORM GSTR-1 are furnished
Time period for furnishing details in FORM GSTR-1
(1)
(2)
(3)
1
July – September, 2017
31st October, 2018
2
October – December, 2017
31st October, 2018
3
January – March, 2018
31st October, 2018
4
April – June, 2018
31st October, 2018
5
July – September, 2018
31st October, 2018
6
October – December, 2018
31st January, 2019
7
January – March, 2019
30th April, 2019:
Provided that the details of outward supply of goods or services or both in FO

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to bring section 52 of the MGST Act (provisions related to TCS) into force w.e.f 01.10.2018.

Seeks to bring section 52 of the MGST Act (provisions related to TCS) into force w.e.f 01.10.2018.
51/2018-State Tax Dated:- 18-9-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya
Mumbai 400 032, dated 18th September 2018
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 51/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. GST.1018/C.R.93/Taxation-1. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extending time to submit declaration in form GST TRAN-1

Extending time to submit declaration in form GST TRAN-1
12894/CT.,/Pol-41/1/2017-Policy Dated:- 18-9-2018 Orissa SGST
GST – States
Orissa SGST
Orissa SGST
Commissionerate of CT and GST, Odisha (At Cuttack)
(Finance Department, Government of Odisha)
No. 12894/CT.,/Pol-41/1/2017-Policy
Dated 18.09.2018
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1A) of rule 117 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 read with section 168 of the Odisha Goods and Serv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
49/2018-State Tax Dated:- 18-9-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya
Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September, 2018
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 49/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. GIST.1018/C.R.91/Taxation-1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Maharashtra Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall come into force with effect from 13th September, 2018.
2. In the FORMS to the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, after FORM GSTR-9A, the following shall be inserted,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not permissible under GST
(+)
G
Turnover from April 2017 to June 2017
(-)
H
Unbilled revenue at the end of Financial Year
(-)
I
Unadjusted Advances at the beginning of the Financial Year
(-)
J
Credit notes accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but are not permissible under GST
(-)
K
Adjustments on account of supply of goods by SEZ units to DTA Units
(-)
L
Turnover for the period under composition scheme
(-)
M
Adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder
(+/-)
N
Adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations
(+/-)
O
Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not listed above
(+/-)
P
Annual turnover after adjustments as above

Q
Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
R
Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P)
AT1
6
Reasons for Un – Reconciled difference in Annual Gross Turnover
A
B
C
Reason 1
<>
Reason 2
<>
Reason 3
<>
7
Reconciliation of Taxable Turnover
A
Annual

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as per tables above




Total amount paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9)
Un-reconciled payment of amount
PT 1
10
Reasons for un-reconciled payment of amount
A
B
C
Reason 1
<>
Reason 2
<>
Reason 3
<>
11
Additional amount payable but not paid (due to reasons specified under Tables 6,8 and 10 above)
To be paid through Cash
Description
Taxable Value
Central tax
State tax / UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicable
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Interest
Late Fee
Penalty
Others (please specify)
Pt. IV
Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC)
12
Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC)
A
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN this should be derived from books of accounts)
B
ITC booked in earlier Financial Years claimed in current Financial Year
(+)
C
ITC booked in current Financial Year to be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

enance
Other Miscellaneous expenses
Capital goods
Any other expense 1
Any other expense 2
R
Total amount of eligible ITC availed
<>
S
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9)
T
Un-reconciled ITC
ITC 2
15
Reasons for un – reconciled difference in ITC
A
B
C
Reason 1
<>
Reason 2
<>
Reason 3
<>
16
Tax payable on un-reconciled difference in ITC (due to reasons specified in 13 and 15 above)
Description
Amount Payable
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
IntegratedTax
Cess
Interest
Penalty
Pt.V
Auditor's recommendation on additional Liability due to non-reconciliation
To be paid through Cash
Description
Value
Central tax
State tax/UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicable
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Input Tax Credit
Interest
Late Fee
Penalty
Any other amount paid for supplies not included in Annual Return (GSTR 9)
Erroneous refund to be paid back
Outstanding demands to be settled
Other (Pl. spec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

filed for.
4. Part II consists of reconciliation of the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement with the turnover as declared in the Annual Return furnished in FORM GSTR-9 for this GSTIN. The instructions to fill this part are as follows :-
Table No.
Instructions
5A
The turnover as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. There may be cases where multiple GSTINs (State-wise) registrations exist on the same PAN. This is common for persons/entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their GSTIN wise turnover and declare the same here. This shall include export turnover (if any). It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons/entities having presence over multiple States.
5B
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting in the last fi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ccounted in the current financial year but such credit notes were reflected in the annual return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here.
5F
Trade discounts which are accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but on which GST was leviable(being not permissible) shall be declared here.
5G
Turnover included in the audited Annual Financial Statement for April 2017 to June 2017 shall be declared here.
5H
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting during the current financial year but GST was not payable on such revenue in the same financial year shall be declared here.
5I
Value of all advances for which GST has not been paid but the same has been recognized as revenue in the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here.
5J
Aggregate value of credit notes which have been accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but were not admissible under Section 34 of the MGST Act shall be declar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rted in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to foreign exchange fluctuations shall be declared here.
5O
Any difference between the turnover reported in the Annual Return (GSTR9) and turnover reported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to reasons not listed above shall be declared here.
5Q
Annual turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be declared here. This turnover may be derived from Sr. No. 5N, 10 and 11 of Annual Return (GSTR 9).
6
Reasons for non-reconciliation between the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement and turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be specified here.
7
The table provides for reconciliation of taxable turnover from the audited annual turnover after adjustments with the taxable turnover declared in annual return (GSTR-9).
7A
Annual turnover as derived in Table 5P above would be auto-populated here.
7B
Value of exempted, nil rated, non-GST and no-supply turnover shall

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

consists of reconciliation of the tax payable as per declaration in the reconciliation statement and the actual tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9). The instructions to fill this part are as follows :-
Table No.
Instructions
9
The table provides for reconciliation of tax paid as per reconciliation statement and amount of tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9). Under the head labelled “RC”, supplies where tax was paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient (i.e. the person for whom reconciliation statement has been prepared) shall be declared.
9P
The total amount to be paid as per liability declared in Table 9A to 9O is auto populated here.
9Q
The amount payable as declared in Table 9 of the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here. It should also contain any differential tax paid on Table 10 or 11 of the Annual Return (GSTR9).
10
Reasons for non-reconciliation between payable / liability declared in Table 9P above and the amount payable in Table 9Q

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r which the reconciliation statement is being filed for shall be declared here. This shall include transitional credit which was booked in earlier years but availed during Financial Year 2017-18.
12C
Any ITC which has been booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement of the current financial year but the same has not been credited to the ITC ledger for the said financial year shall be declared here.
12D
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of accounts as derived from values declared in Table 12A, 12B and 12C above will be auto-populated here.
12E
Net ITC available for utilization as declared in Table 7J of Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here.
13
Reasons for non-reconciliation of ITC as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account (Table 12D) and the net ITC (Table12E) availed in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be specified here.
14
This table is for reconciliation of ITC declared in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) against the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t V consists of the auditor's recommendation on the additional liability to be discharged by the taxpayer due to non-reconciliation of turnover or non-reconciliation of input tax credit. The auditor shall also recommend if there is any other amount to be paid for supplies not included in the Annual Return. Any refund which has been erroneously taken and shall be paid back to the Government shall also be declared in this table. Lastly, any other outstanding demands which is recommended to be settled by the auditor shall be declared in this Table.
8. Towards, the end of the reconciliation statement taxpayers shall be given an option to pay their taxes as recommended by the auditor.
PART – B-CERTIFICATION
I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by the person who had conducted the audit :
* I/we have examined the-
(a) balance sheet as on ………
(b) the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the per

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hellip;…………………….
…………………………………….
3. (b) *I/we further report that,-
(A) *I/we have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit/information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit were not provided/partially provided to us.
(B) In *my/our opinion, proper books of account *have/have not been kept by the registered person so far as appears from*my/our examination of the books.
(C) I/we certify that the balance sheet, the *profit and loss/income and expenditure account and the cash flow Statement are *in agreement/not in agreement with the books of account maintained at the Principal place of business at …………………&helli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lip;……………………………
(c) ……………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor)
Place: ……………
Name of the signatory …………………
Membership No. ……………
Date: ……………
Full address ………………………
II. Certification in cases where t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from ………..…to ending on …….,
(c) the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ……..…to ending on ………, and
(d) documents declared by the said Act to be part of, or annexed to, the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account and balance sheet.
2. I/we report that the said registered person-
*has maintained the books of accounts, records and documents as required by the IGST/CGST/MGST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder
*has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/MGST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder:
1.
2.
3.
3. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the MGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the MGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No.G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

p;….………………………
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor)
Place: ……………
Name of the signatory …………………
Membership No. ………………
Date: ……………
Full address ………………………”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra,
J. V. DIPTE,
Deputy Secretary to Government.
Note.-The principal rules were published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette, Extraordinary No. 170, Part IV-B, dated 22nd June 2017, vide notification No. MGST-1017/C.R. 90/Taxation-1, dated 22nd June 2017 and were last amended vide Finance Department Notification No. GST-1018/C.R.87/Taxation-1, dated 18th S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to bring section 51 of the CGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force w.e.f 01.10.2018.

Seeks to bring section 51 of the CGST Act (provisions related to TDS) into force w.e.f 01.10.2018.
50/2018-State Tax Dated:- 18-9-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya,
Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September 2018.
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 50/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. GST.1018/C.R.90 /Taxation-1. – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of Maharashtra, Notification No. MGST.1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
48/2018-State Tax Dated:- 18-9-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya,
Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September 2018
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 48/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. GST. 1018/C.R.87/Taxation-1.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017), the Maharashtra Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Maharashtra G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.”;
(ii) in rule 142, in sub-rule (5), after the words and figures “of section 76”, the words and figures “or section 125” shall be inserted.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra,
J. V. DIPTE,
Deputy Secretary to Government.
Note.-The principal rules were published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette, Extraordinary No. 170, Part IV-B, dated the 22nd June, 2017, vide notification No. MGST. 1017/C.R. 90/Taxation-1, dated the 22nd June, 2017 and were last amended vide Finance Department Notification No. GST-1018/C.R.86/Taxation-1, dated the 18 th September, 2018 [Notification No. 39/2018-State Tax] which was published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette, Extraordinary No. 327, Part-IV-B, dated the 18th September 201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR – 1 for taxpayers having aggregate turnover up to 1.5 crores.

Seeks to extend the due date for filing of FORM GSTR – 1 for taxpayers having aggregate turnover up to 1.5 crores.
43/2018-State Tax Dated:- 18-9-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk
Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, dated the 18th September 2018
NOTIFICATION
Notification No.43/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. GST.1018/C.R. 92/Taxation-1.-In exercise of the power conferred by section 148 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (XLIII of 2017), (hereafter in this notification referred to as the “said Act”), and in supersession of,-
(i) Notification No. MGST.1017/C.R. /Taxation-1 [Notification N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ecommendations of the Council, notifies the registered persons having aggregate turnover of up to 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year, as the class of registered persons who shall follow the special procedure as detailed below for furnishing the details of outward supply of goods or services or both.
2. The said persons may furnish the details of outward supply of goods or services or both in FORM GSTR-1 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, effected during the quarter as specified in column (2) of the Table below till the time period as specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table, namely :-
TABLE
Sr.No.
Quarter for which the details in FORM GSTR-1 are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Seeks to waive the late fee paid for specified classes of taxpayers for FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTR-4 and FORM GSTR-6.

Seeks to waive the late fee paid for specified classes of taxpayers for FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTR-4 and FORM GSTR-6.
41/2018-State Tax Dated:- 18-9-2018 Maharashtra SGST
GST – States
Maharashtra SGST
Maharashtra SGST
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Madam Cama Marg, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya
Mumbai 400 032, dated 18th September 2018
NOTIFICATION
Notification No. 41/2018-State Tax
MAHARASHTRA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017.
No. GST.1018/C.R.94/Taxation 1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Mah. XLIII of 2017),(hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), the Government of Maharashtra, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby waives the late fee paid unde

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

In Re : Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1342 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, WEST BENGAL – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 486 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, WEST BENGAL – AAR
Dated:- 18-9-2018
17/WBAAR/2018-19
GST
MR VISHWANATH, Member, West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling And MR PARTHA SARATHI DEY, Member, West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling
For The Applicant's : Sri Sunil Kumar Gupta, Authorized Representative
1. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, stated to be in the activity of refining crude petroleum oil into, inter alia, High Speed Diesel (HSD), Motor Spirit (petrol), and Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF), no tax on supply of which is leviable date under the CGST/WBGST Acts, 2017, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the GST Act”) is seeking a ruling on whether or not GST paid on the railway freight for transportation of the above goods from the its Haldia Refinery to the its export warehouse

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of West Bengal is 19AAACI1681G1ZM. For purpose of this Advance Ruling the West Bengal Unit of Indian Oil Corporation, holding GSTIN 19AAACI1681G1ZM, will be considered as the Applicant.
3. The Application states that:
a. The Applicant exports HSD, ATF and other refined petroleum products to Nepal under the terms and conditions laid down in an agreement dated 27/03/2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Agreement”) between Indian Oil Corporation and Nepal Oil Corporation Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “NOC”). ATF, Motor Spirit and HSD, sourced from the Applicant's manufacturing unit (refinery) at Haldia in West Bengal are transported by Rail to the Indian Oil Corporation's warehouse at Raxaul in Bihar.
The supply from Haldia to Raxaul is made in accordance to the procedure laid down in Circular No. 581/18/2001-CX dated 29/06/2001 issued by CBEC. The receiving location at Raxaul provides Haldia Refinery CT-2 for a lump sum quantity. Haldia Refinery prepares ARE-3 on the basis of suc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as interstate exempt supplies from Indian Oil Corporation's West Bengal Unit, and export of Indian Oil Corporation's Bihar Unit.
d. The Applicant has been paying GST on the input service of Railway Freight for the above transportation. As the freight is charged for booking and transportation from West Bengal, it is billed on the Applicant, as the place of supply of the input service is West Bengal.
4. The Application argues that the Applicant is eligible to claim credit of such GST paid on input services since the transportation from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot is occasioned by an agreement for export of goods to Nepal. According to the Applicant, the goods are transferred to the export warehouse at Raxaul in terms of an export agreement with no scope of diversion for home consumption. It is export within the meaning of Section 5 of the CST Act. Supply to the Bihar unit of Indian Oil Corporation by the Applicant is, therefore, zero rated supply within the meaning of section 16(1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r its Bihar Unit. GST paid on inward supplies of inputs and input services in Bihar can, therefore, be claimed by the Bihar Unit. But the GST paid on freight for transportation from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot is billed on the Applicant, Indian Oil Corporation's West Bengal Unit, place of supply of the input service being located in West Bengal. The Applicant cannot claim credit of such GST on his exempt supplies to Indian Oil Corporation's Bihar Unit, since the transfer of goods from Haldia to Bihar is stock transfer of non GST goods and not export and, therefore, not zero rated supplies of the Applicant.
7. In the Applicant's reply to the submissions of the officer concerned it is argued that the officer has failed to appreciate the true nature of the transaction. Transfer of ATF and other non-taxable goods from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot is not supply from the Applicant's Unit to the Bihar Unit of the same Company. Movement of goods for export commences from West Bengal an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicant further says that the goods are moved based on the MOU between the Governments of India and Nepal followed by the Agreement between Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Nepal Oil Corporation Limited. Actual export occurs under the authentication by the Excise Authority and the Bihar Unit has no control to dispose of the goods otherwise.
It is, therefore, according to the Applicant, sale in course of export in terms of Section 5 of the CST Act.
8. The main issues which need to be considered in the Application can be briefly summarized as follows:
a. Whether or not the products transported and supplied by the Applicant are “non- GST products”, “non-taxable supplies” “exempt supplies” or “zero rated supply of goods”
b. Whether the transportation to Raxaul warehouse is to be considered to be for export of supply to Nepal or transfer of goods to Indian Oil Corporation's Bihar Unit for ultimate export to Nepal.
9. Art 366 of the Constitution has been amended by the 101st Amen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a taxable person. Petroleum products, being non-taxable supplies, are, therefore, included in the turnover of the Applicant, who is a taxable person.
10. In the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 the definition of goods has been amended by the Taxation laws (Amendment) Act, 2017 to exclude all moveable goods out of its ambit, except petroleum products and alcoholic liquor for human consumption. It has not been repealed and continues to be the statute for levying taxes on sales of petroleum products in course of inter-State trade or commerce. The Applicant is, therefore, entitled to claim benefit of export under the CST Act, if admissible.
However, unless the Applicant's transportation of non-taxable goods to the export warehouse at Raxaul is 'export of goods' within the meaning of section 2(5) of IGST Act, it cannot be treated as zero rated supply, and credit of GST paid on input services is not admissible. In the present context, therefore, discussion on export as defined under section 5 o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lace of supply of goods exported from India shall be, under section 11(b) of the IGST Act, the location outside India. Clearly, export as defined under section 5(3) of the CST Act, is not relevant under the GST. The defining character of an export transaction both under section 5(1) of the CST Act and section 2(5) of the IGST Act is that it occasions movement of the goods to a place outside India.
12. In the present context, the question, therefore, boils down to whether movement of goods from Haldia Refinery terminates at Raxaul Depot in Bihar when it takes delivery from the Railways, or continues after trans-shipment to other modes of transport for taking it out of India to Nepal. The goods are supplied to the recipient (in this case the Bihar Unit) in India if the movement terminates at Raxaul. In such cases it will be an inter-state supply to a distinct person as defined under section 25(4) of the GST Act, and the place of supply shall be determined under section 10(1)(a) of the I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Agreement states that NOC shall furnish at least thirty days before commencement of each quarter, their month-wise, product-wise, location-wise requirement, so that the Applicant can keep the supply points well stocked to meet the requirement. NOC can depute an independent surveyor at the supply point to cross check, verify, inspect the quality and quantity of the goods.
14. Other than the Agreement the Applicant has submitted or referred to no specific export order. Obviously tankers loaded with ATF or HSD cannot move under a general agreement on terms and conditions of business. Such movement requires specific orders placed either by NOC or the Raxaul Depot. It is also clear from the above discussion that NOC places PDO only on the supply points like Raxaul Depot, which needs to be kept well stocked in line with the agreed allocation and communication from NOC. Raxaul Depot places order on Haldia Refinery to keep the supply at the optimum level.
15. The Applicant's submission tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in Form CT-2 indicating the details of the Bond executed by the exporter. The exporter fills up the relevant information in CT-2 and makes provisional debit in the Running Bond Account equivalent to the duty payable. The consignor (i.e. Haldia Refinery) prepares an application for removal in Form ARE-3, indicating the serial number of the corresponding CT-2. On receipt of the goods at Raxaul Depot the officerin- charge of the warehouse countersign the ARE-3 and dispatch it to the Haldia Range Excise Authority as proof of re-warehousing of the goods. At the exporter's end the provisional debit in the Running Bond Account is converted into actual debit.
If the goods received under ARE-3 are to be exported, an application for export in ARE-1 is to be prepared and submitted to the Customs Authority for endorsement. The Running Bond Account will be credited by an amount equivalent to the duty for the goods mentioned in ARE-1.
If the goods are cleared for home consumption, the exporter pay

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d before the appropriate Excise Authority at the export warehouse, failing which the exporter is liable to pay the duty with interest.
Removal without paying duty (under Bond) from Haldia Refinery to the export warehouse at Raxaul, therefore, does not as such amount to export.
Movement from the Applicant's factory at Haldia to the export warehouse at Raxaul is not, therefore, 'inextricably linked' to ultimate export to Nepal. The scope for diversion for home consumption, whether or not has actually been diverted, breaks the link and makes them separate supplies.
Movement from Haldia Refinery to the export warehouse at Raxaul is not a transit movement in course of export to Nepal. In fact, the Applicant has not claimed on such transportation from Haldia to Raxaul the benefit of exemption from paying GST, as available under serial no. 9B of Notification No. 30/2017 – CT (Rate) dated 29/09/2017 for services associated with transit cargo to Nepal, but has actually been charged and paid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is no measure of actual export.
The Applicant himself is well aware of the anomaly and has not reported in his returns the transaction as export under section 5 of the CST Act either. Apparently, the Applicant's arguments are at variance with what he and the Bihar Unit have reported in their returns under both the CST Act and the GST Act.
19. The Applicant refers to a few judgments in support of his argument, which are discussed below.
In Nipha Export Pvt Ltd (8 VST 466), pursuant to an export order received at the Head Office in Kolkata, the branch office purchased goods in Haryana and sent them to Kolkata, which exported the goods outside the territory of India. The apex court concurs with the High Court that the movement of goods from Faridabad in Haryana to Kolkata was occasioned in the course of export out of India. The case, however, is of little help to the Applicant, as it is already discussed that the movement of goods from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot is not occasioned

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the Applicant, who are distinct persons in terms of section 25(4) of the GST Act.
21. Sections 16(1)(a) and 16(2) of the IGST Act are, therefore, not applicable. The Applicant cannot claim credit of the GST paid on the input services like railway freight on ATF and other non-taxable supplies from West Bengal to his Bihar Unit.
In view of the foregoing we rule as under
RULING
ATF and other non-taxable supplies from the Applicant's Haldia Refinery to the export warehouse of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd at Raxaul are not zero rated supplies. They are non-taxable supplies from the Applicant to the Bihar Unit of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, who are distinct persons in terms of section 25(4) of the GST Act. The Applicant cannot claim credit of the GST paid on the railway freight for transportation of ATF and other non-taxable supplies from West Bengal to the Bihar Unit.
This ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103(2) until and unless declared void under Section 104(

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re : SMVD Polypack Pvt. Ltd

In Re : SMVD Polypack Pvt. Ltd
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1343 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, WEST BENGAL – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 144 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, WEST BENGAL – AAR
Dated:- 18-9-2018
16/WBAAR/2018-19
GST
MR VISHWANATH, Member, West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling And MR PARTHASARATHI DEY, Member, West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling
For The Applicant's : Sri Samaresh Koley, Accountant
1. The Applicant stated to be, inter alia, a manufacturer of Polypropylene Leno Bags (or mesh bags) seeks a Ruling on Classification of the above goods under the CGST/WBGST Acts, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “the GST Act”).
Advance Ruling is admissible under Section 97(2)(a) of the GST Act.
The Applicant submits that the question raised in the Application has neither been decided by nor is pending before any authority under any provisions of the GST Act.
The officer concerned raises no objec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lengths and stitched to form the bags.
The Applicant is of the opinion that the PP Leno Bags manufactured is classifiable under Tariff Head 63053300 of the GST Tariff which is aligned to the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the “the said Tariff Act”).
3. There is no specific Tariff Code for PP Leno Bags and/or Leno Bags. In the context of textiles the word “Leno” refers to a particular kind of weave in which the warp yarns are twisted together in pairs between the wefts of filling yarns.
4. Tariff Sub Heading 39232990 under the GST Tariff covers articles for the conveyance or packing of goods, of plastics; stoppers, lids, caps and other closures, of plastics, namely, sacks and bags (including cones) made of plastics other than polymers of ethylene but not of poly (vinyl chloride). Tariff Sub Heading 63053300 under the GST Tariff covers sacks and bags, of a kind used for packing of goods, made, not of jute or of other textile bust fibres of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tware or wickerwork of such monofilament or strip (chapter 46)”
The Applicant also refers to Note 1 (h) to Section XI of the Tariff Act which states that the Section of Textile and Textile Articles covering Chapters 50 to 63 does not include, “Woven, knitted or crocheted fabrics, felt or nonwovens, impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, or articles thereof, of chapter 39”
6. In the light of the above Section and Chapter Notes, the Applicant interprets that, to be included in Chapter 63, the width of the tapes, manufactured from Plastics or articles thereof of Chapter 39, used to weave the fabric should be less than or equal to 5mm and should not be impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics or articles thereof, of chapter 39.
7. The Application submits that the Applicant manufactures PP Leno Bags with tapes not exceeding 5mm and the same are not impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with particles and articles thereof, of Chapter 39.
8. From the e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Shree Rama Newsprint Limited Through Executive Director Siddharth Ganpatraj Chowdhury Versus Union Of India Through Secretary

Shree Rama Newsprint Limited Through Executive Director Siddharth Ganpatraj Chowdhury Versus Union Of India Through Secretary
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1475 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 592 (Guj.)
GUJARAT HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 18-9-2018
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14155 of 2018
GST
MR. ANANT S. DAVE AND MR. BIREN VAISHNAV JJ.
Appearance:
MR MIHIR JOSHI SR. ADV. With MS AMRITA M THAKORE(3208) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2,3
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE)
Heard Mr. Mihir Joshi, learned senior counsel with Ms. Amrita Thakore, learned advocate for the petitioners.
In the context of nature of challenge vis-a-vis prayer clause 17 to hold and declare Rul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e Act and Rule 89 about application for refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount so existed which came to be later on amended vide notification No.21/2108 dated 18.4.2018 and notification No.26/2018 dated 13.6.2018 and without disputing the fact about existence of power of amending the Rule with retrospective effect, contentions are raised based on grounds of challenge that impugned amended Rule 89(5) denies the benefit of refund of unutilized input tax credit and demand notice dated 21.6.2018 is illegal.
Considering the above, prima facie, we are inclined to issue Notice returnable on 10.10.2018.
Meanwhile there shall be ad-interim relief as prayed for in para 17(D) meaning thereby the impugned demand notice dated 21.6.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2018.
83/GST-2 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 18th September, 2018
No.83/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the Governor of Haryana, hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Haryana Goods and Services Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
85/GST-2 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 18th September, 2018
No. 85/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the Governor of Haryana, hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
(1) These rules may be called the Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, after FORM GSTR-9A, the following FORM shall be inserted, namely:-
“FORM GSTR-9C
See rule 80(3)
PART – A – Reconciliation Statement
Pt. I
Basic Details
1
Financial Year
2
GSTIN
3A
Legal Name
< Auto>
3B
Trade Name (if any)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

inancial Year
(-)
J
Credit notes accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but are not permissible under GST
(-)
K
Adjustments on account of supply of goods by SEZ units to DTA Units
(-)
L
Turnover for the period under composition scheme
(-)
M
Adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder
(+/-)
N
Adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations
(+/-)
O
Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not listed above
(+/-)
P
Annual turnover after adjustments as above

Q
Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR-9)
R
Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P)
AT1
6
Reasons for Un – Reconciled difference in Annual Gross Turnover
A
Reason 1
<>
B
Reason 2
<>
C
Reason 3
<>
7
Reconciliation of Taxable Turnover
A
Annual turnover after adjustments (from 5P above)

B
Value of Exempted, Nil Rated, Non-GST supplies, No-Supply turnover
C
Zero rated supplies without payment of tax
D
Supplies on whic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reason 1
<>
B
Reason 2
<>
C
Reason 3
<>
11
Additional amount payable but not paid (due to reasons specified under Tables 6,8 and 10 above)
To be paid through Cash
Description
Taxable Value
Central tax
State tax/UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicable
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Interest
Late Fee
Penalty
Others (please specify)
Pt.IV
Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC)
12
Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC)
A
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN this should be derived from books of accounts)
B
ITC booked in earlier Financial Years claimed in current Financial Year
(+)
C
ITC booked in current Financial Year to be claimed in subsequent Financial Years
(-)
D
ITC availed as per audited financial statements or books of account

E
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR-9)
F
Un-reconciled ITC
ITC 1
13
Reasons for un-r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for un – reconciled difference in ITC
A
Reason 1
<>
B
Reason 2
<>
C
Reason 3
<>
16
Tax payable on un-reconciled difference in ITC (due to reasons specified in 13 and 15 above)
Description
Amount Payable
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
Integrated-Tax
Cess
Interest
Penalty
Pt.V
Auditor's recommendation on additional Liability due to non-reconciliation
To be paid through Cash
Description
Value
Central tax
State tax/UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicable
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Input Tax Credit
Interest
Late Fee
Penalty
Any other amount paid for supplies not included in Annual Return (GSTR-9)
Erroneous refund to be paid back
Outstanding demands to be settled
Other (Pl. specify)
Verification:
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from.
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll this part are as follows :-
Table No.
Instructions
5A
The turnover as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. There may be cases where multiple GSTINs (State-wise) registrations exist on the same PAN. This is common for persons / entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their GSTIN wise turnover and declare the same here. This shall include export turnover (if any). It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons / entities having presence over multiple States.
5B
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting in the last financial year and was carried forward to the current financial year shall be declared here. In other words, when GST is payable during the financial year on such revenue (which was recognized earlier), the value of such revenue shall be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s leviable (being not permissible) shall be declared here.
5G
Turnover included in the audited Annual Financial Statement for April 2017 to June 2017 shall be declared here.
5H
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting during the current financial year but GST was not payable on such revenue in the same financial year shall be declared here.
5I
Value of all advances for which GST has not been paid but the same has been recognized as revenue in the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here.
5J
Aggregate value of credit notes which have been accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but were not admissible under Section 34 of the HGST Act shall be declared here.
5K
Aggregate value of all goods supplied by SEZs to DTA units for which the DTA units have filed bill of entry shall be declared here.
5L
There may be cases where registered persons might have opted out of the composition sch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al Statement due to reasons not listed above shall be declared here.
5Q
Annual turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be declared here. This turnover may be derived from Sr. No. 5N, 10 and 11 of Annual Return (GSTR 9).
6
Reasons for non-reconciliation between the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement and turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be specified here.
7
The table provides for reconciliation of taxable turnover from the audited annual turnover after adjustments with the taxable turnover declared in annual return (GSTR-9).
7A
Annual turnover as derived in Table 5P above would be auto-populated here.
7B
Value of exempted, nil rated, non-GST and no-supply turnover shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of credit notes, debit notes and amendments if any.
7C
Value of zero rated supplies (including supplies to SEZs) on which tax is not paid shall be declared here. This shall be reported net of c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The table provides for reconciliation of tax paid as per reconciliation statement and amount of tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9). Under the head labelled “RC”, supplies where tax was paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient (i.e. the person for whom reconciliation statement has been prepared) shall be declared.
9P
The total amount to be paid as per liability declared in Table 9A to 9O is auto populated here.
9Q
The amount payable as declared in Table 9 of the Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here. It should also contain any differential tax paid on Table 10 or 11 of the Annual Return (GSTR-9).
10
Reasons for non-reconciliation between payable / liability declared in Table 9P above and the amount payable in Table 9Q shall be specified here.
11
Any amount which is payable due to reasons specified under Table 6, 8 and 10 above shall be declared here.
6. Part IV consists of reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The instructions to fill Part IV are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dited Annual Financial Statement of the current financial year but the same has not been credited to the ITC ledger for the said financial year shall be declared here.
12D
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of accounts as derived from values declared in Table 12A, 12B and 12C above will be auto-populated here.
12E
Net ITC available for utilization as declared in Table 7J of Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be declared here.
13
Reasons for non-reconciliation of ITC as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account (Table 12D) and the net ITC (Table12E) availed in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) shall be specified here.
14
This table is for reconciliation of ITC declared in the Annual Return (GSTR-9) against the expenses booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account. The various sub-heads specified under this table are general expenses in the audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account on which ITC may or may not be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount to be paid for supplies not included in the Annual Return. Any refund which has been erroneously taken and shall be paid back to the Government shall also be declared in this table. Lastly, any other outstanding demands which is recommended to be settled by the auditor shall be declared in this Table.
8. Towards, the end of the reconciliation statement taxpayers shall be given an option to pay their taxes as recommended by the auditor.
PART – B- CERTIFICATION
I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by the person who had conducted the audit:
* I/we have examined the-
(a) balance sheet as on ………
(b) the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from ………..…to ending on ……., and
(c) the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ……..…to ending on ………, -attached herewith, of M/s &h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

I/we have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit/ information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit were not provided/partially provided to us.
(B) In *my/our opinion, proper books of account *have/have not been kept by the registered person so far as appears from*my/ our examination of the books.
(C) I/we certify that the balance sheet, the *profit and loss/income and expenditure account and the cash flow Statement are *in agreement/not in agreement with the books of account maintained at the Principal place of business at ……………………and ** ……………………additional place of business within the State.
4. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the HGST Act and Reconciliation Statement

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ellip;………………………………………
………………………………………
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor)
Place: ……………
Name of the signatory …………………
membership No………………
Date: ……………
Full address ………………………
II. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by a person other than the person who had conducted the audit of the accounts:
*I/we report that the audit of the books of accounts and the financial statements of M/

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

…to ending on ………, and
(d) documents declared by the said Act to be part of, or annexed to, the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account and balance sheet.
2. I/we report that the said registered person-
*has maintained the books of accounts, records and documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued there under
*has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued there under:
1.
2.
3.
3. The documents required to be furnished under section 35 (5) of the HGST Act and Reconciliation Statement required to be furnished under section 44(2) of the HGST Act is annexed herewith in Form No.GSTR-9C.
4. In *my/our opinion and to the best of *my/our information and according to examination of books of account including other relevant documents and explanations given to *me/us, the particulars given in t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the Assam GST Act.

Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the Assam GST Act.
17/2018-GST Dated:- 18-9-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 17/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 18th September, 2018.
Subject : Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the Assam GST Act – regarding.
No. CT/GST-15/2017/182.- In terms of Schedule I of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Assam GST Act”), the supply of goods by an agent on behalf of the principal without consideration has been deemed to be a supply. In this connection, various representations have been received regarding the scope and ambit of the principal-agent relationship under GST. In order to clarify some of the issues and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across the field formations, the Commissioner, in exercise of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es on the business of supply or receipt of goods or services or both on behalf of another.
4. The following two key elements emerge from the above definition of agent:
(a) the term 'agent' is defined in terms of the various activities being carried out by the person concerned in the principal-agent relationship; and
(b) the supply or receipt of goods or services has to be undertaken by the agent on behalf of the principal.
From this, it can be deduced that the crucial component for covering a person within the ambit of the term “agent” under the Assam GST Act is corresponding to the representative character identified in the definition of “agent” under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
5. Further, the two limbs of any supply under GST are “consideration” and “in the course or furtherance of business”. Where the consideration is not extant in a transaction, such a transaction does not fall within the ambit of supply. But, in certain scenarios, as elucidated in Schedule I of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pal” has been retained in this entry.
7. It may be noted that the crucial factor is how to determine whether the agent is wearing the representative hat and is supplying or receiving goods on behalf of the principal. Since in the commercial world, there are various factors that might influence this relationship, it would be more prudent that an objective criteria is used to determine whether a particular principal-agent relationship falls within the ambit of the said entry or not. Thus, the key ingredient for determining relationship under GST would be whether the invoice for the further supply of goods on behalf of the principal is being issued by the agent or not. Where the invoice for further supply is being issued by the agent in his name then, any provision of goods from the principal to the agent would fall within the fold of the said entry. However, it may be noted that in cases where the invoice is issued by the agent to the customer in the name of the principal, such agent sh

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds. Hence, in accordance with the provisions of this Act, Mr. B is not an agent of Mr. A for supply of goods in terms of Schedule I.
Scenario 2
M/s. XYZ, a banking company, appoints Mr. B (auctioneer) to auction certain goods. The auctioneer arranges for the auction and identifies the potential biddery. The highest bid is accepted and the goods are sold to the highest bidder by M/s. XYZ. The invoice for the supply of the goods is issued by M/S XYZ to the successful bidder. In this scenario, the auctioneer is merely providing the auctioneering services with no role played in the supply of the goods. Even in this scenario, Mr. B is not an agent of M/S XYZ for the supply of goods in terms of Schedule I.
Scenario 3
Mr. A, an artist, appoints M/S B (auctioneer) to auction his painting. M/S B arranges for the auction and identifies the potential bidders. The highest bid is accepted and the painting is sold to the highest bidder. The invoice for the supply of the painting is issued by M/S

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ells the agricultural produce on behalf of Mr. A for which he charges a commission from Mr. A. As per the APMC Act, the commission agent is a person who buys or sells the agricultural produce on behalf of his principal, or facilitates buying and selling of agricultural produce on behalf of his principal and receives, by way of remuneration, a commission or percentage upon the amount involved in such transaction.
In cases where the invoice is issued by Mr. B to the buyer, the former is an agent covered under Schedule I. However, in cases where the invoice is issued directly by Mr. A to the buyer, the commission agent (Mr. B) doesn't fall under the category of agent covered under Schedule I.
9. In scenario 1 and scenario 2, Mr. B shall not be liable to obtain registration in terms of clause (vii) of section 24 of the Assam GST Act. He, however, would be liable for registration if his aggregate turnover of supply of taxable services exceeds the threshold specified in sub-section (1)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC).

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC).
21/2018-GST Dated:- 18-9-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM :: KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 21/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 18th September, 2018.
Subject : Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC) – regarding
No. CT/GST-15/2017/186.- Representations have been received requesting to clarify the following:
(i) Mechanism for discharge of tax liability on trading of Priority Sector Lending Certificate (PSLC) for the period 01-7-2017 to 27-05-2018.
(ii) GST rate applicable on trading of PSLCs.
2. The representations have been examined. With the approval of the GST Implementation Com

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/99 dated 12nd June

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/99 dated 12nd June, 2018) and Circular No. 11/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/117 dated 22nd June, 2018)
22/2018-GST Dated:- 18-9-2018 Assam SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM :: KAR BHAWAN
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
CIRCULAR NO. 22/2018-GST
Dated Dispur the 18th September, 2018
Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/99 dated 12nd June, 2018) and Circular No. 11/2018-GST (CT/GST-15/2017/117 dated 22nd June, 2018) – regarding
No. CT/GST-15/2017/187.- Kind attention is invited to Circular No. 10/2018-GST (CT/GST- 15/2017/99 da

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

17 (hereinafter referred to as “the Assam GST Rules”) requires that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding ₹ 50,000/- should carry a copy of documents viz., invoice/bill of supply/delivery challan/bill of entry and a valid e-way bill in physical or electronic form for verification. In case such person does not carry the mentioned documents, there is no doubt that a contravention of the provisions of the law takes place and the provisions of section 129 and section 130 of the Assam GST Act are invocable. Further, it may be noted that the non-furnishing of information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 amounts to the e-way bill becoming not a valid document for the movement of goods by road as per Explanation (2) to rule 138(3) of the Assam GST Rules, except in the case where the goods are transported for a distance of upto fifty kilometres within the State or Union territory to or from the place of business of the transporter to the pla

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the name of the consignor or the consignee but the GSTIN, wherever applicable, is correct;
b) Error in the pin-code but the address of the consignor and the consignee mentioned is correct, subject to the condition that the error in the PIN code should not have the effect of increasing the validity period of the e-way bill;
c) Error in the address of the consignee to the extent that the locality and other details of the consignee are correct;
d) Error in one or two digits of the document number mentioned in the e-way bill;
e) Error in 4 or 6 digit level of HSN where the first 2 digits of HSN are correct and the rate of tax mentioned is correct;
f) Error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number.
6. In case of the above situations, penalty to the tune of ₹ 500/- each under section 125 of the Assam GST Act and the CGST Act should be imposed (Rs. 1000/- under the IGST Act) in FORM GST DRC-07 for every consignment. A record of all such consignments where procee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC)

Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC)
45/2018 Dated:- 18-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 45/2018 (Circular No. 62/36/2018-GST)
DATED: 18.09.2018
Subject: Levy of GST on Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLC)
Representations have been received requesting to clarify the following:
(i) Mechanism for discharge of tax liability on trading of P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.
04/2018-State Tax Dated:- 18-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA -700015
Order No. : 03/WBGST/PRO/2018
Dated: 18/09/2018
Order No. 04/2018-State Tax
Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases.
04/2018-GST Dated:- 18-9-2018 Himachal Pradesh SGST
GST – States
File No. 12-19/2017-18-EXN-GST-(519)-27801
Government of Himachal Pradesh
Excise & Taxation [Department
Order No. 04/2018-GST
Dated: Shimla- 171009,
the 18th Sep., 2018
Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =