In Re: M/s. Ernakulam Medical Centre Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: M/s. Ernakulam Medical Centre Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 511 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 142 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 19-9-2018
AAR No. KER/16/2018
GST
SHRI. B.G. KRISHNAN AND SHRI. B.S. THYAGARAJABABU MEMBER
Authorized Representative: Adv. K.N. Sreekumar.
The applicant is rendering medical services with professionals like doctors, nursing staff, lab technicians etc. In GST scenario health care services by a clinical establishment, an authorized medical practitioner or para medicals have been exempted vide classification 9993. Medicines supplied through pharmacy to both inpatients and outpatients under the prescription of the doctors are incidental to the health care services rendered in the hospital and beyond the ambit of taxation. Hence the petitioner sought for an advance ruling on the liability of hospital under GST Act on the supply of medicines and allied items throug

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amined in detail. Health care services provided by a clinical establishment, an authorized medical practitioner or para medics are exempted vide Sl.No.74 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The word 'clinical establishment' means a hospital, nursing home, clinic, sanatorium or any other institution by whatever name called, that offers services or facilities requiring diagnostics or treatment or care for illness, injury, deformity, abnormality or pregnancy in any recognized system of medicines in India or a place established as an independent entity or a part of an establishment to carry out diagnostic or investigative services of diseases.
Pharmacy is an outlet to dispense medicines or allied items based on prescriptions. Patients are admitted to a hospital only when they are extremely ill or have severe physical trauma. As far as an inpatient is concerned, hospital is expected to provide lodging, care, medicine and food as part of treatment under supervisi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ilege for the hospitals that are dispensing medicine to outpatients. Therefore pharmacy run by hospital dispensing medicine to outpatient or bye standers or others can be treated as individual supply of medicine and not covered under the ambit of health care services. Hence such supply of medicines and allied goods are taxable.
Vide clarifications issued based on the approval of 25th GST Council Meeting held on 18-01-2018 [F.No.354/17/2018-TRU Dt.12-02-2018), it was clarified that food supplied to the inpatients as advised by the doctor/nutritionist is a part of composite supply of health care and not separately taxable. Other supplies of food by hospital to patients not admitted are taxable. The same principle is applicable in the case of dispensing of medicines also.
In view of the observations stated above, the following rulings are issued:
i) The supply of medicines and allied items provided by the hospital through the pharmacy to the in-patients is part of composite supply of h

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. New RV Enterprises.

In Re: M/s. New RV Enterprises.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 512 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 108 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 19-9-2018
AAR No. KER/19/2018
GST
SHRI. B.G. KRISHNAN AND SHRI. B.S. THYAGARAJABABU MEMBER
Authorized Representative: Shri. Jacob Joseph STP.
The applicant is a manufacturer of Tile Adhesive and Joint Filler. The raw materials used for the manufacture are silica sand, dolomite. cement and chemicals. The tile adhesive is manufactured by mixing natural products like silica sand and dolomite powder with cement and chemical. Hence it is a 'prepared binder' specified under HSN 3824 which is taxable @ 18% GST. However assessing aut

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r HSN 3824, and hence, taxable @18%.
The issue is examined in detail. HSN 3214 includes non-refractory surfacing preparations, whereas HSN 3824 consist of products of natural mixtures. The product is manufactured by mixing natural products like silica sand, dolomite powder, cement and chemicals. The firm has obtained mining lease license from Mining & Geology Department for manufacturing value addition products like tile adhesive, joint filler etc from silica sand. The product is manufactured by mixing natural products like Silica Sand and Dolomite powder with cement and chemicals and would, therefore, come under the classification 'prepared binder'.
In view of the observations stated above, the following rulings are issued:
The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Geojith Financial Services Ltd.

In Re: M/s. Geojith Financial Services Ltd.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 513 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 154 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 19-9-2018
AAR No. KER/13/2018
GST
SHRI. B.G. KRISHNAN AND SHRI. B.S. THYAGARAJABABU MEMBER
Authorized Representative: Adv. Jose Jacob
The applicant is engaged in providing various retail financial services like stock broking, share broking, marketing of initial public offering of companies and mutual funds, corporate advisory services etc. which were not taxable under VAT Law. Based on the transitional provisions, they have claimed input tax credit on closing stock of computers, laptops and other goods lying in the physical possession of the applicant as on 30th June 2017. In the circumstances advance ruling is sought for on the following:
i) Whether computers, laptops etc. used by the applicant for providing output service would qualify as inputs for the purpos

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

added tax in respect of inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock on the appointed day subject to the condition that:
(i) such inputs or goods are used or intended to be used for making taxable supplies under this Act;
(ii) the said registered person is eligible for input tax credit on such inputs under this Act;
(iii) the said registered person is in possession of invoice or other prescribed documents evidencing payment of tax under -the existing law in respect of such inputs; and
(iv) such invoices or other prescribed documents were issued not earlier than 12 months immediately preceding the appointed day.
The issue was examined in detail. The applicant being a service provider had no tax liability under VAT regime. As per the proviso to Sub-Section (2) of Section 140 of the GST Act, a registered person shall not be allowed to take credit unless such credit was admissible as input tax credit under the existing law and is also

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Sub-Section (2) of Section 140 of the GST Act, is specific to the point that input tax credit not admissible as under the existing law is ineligible to claim input tax credit under GST Act. Section 140(2) of the Act covers transitional credit claim on capital goods by a dealer registered in earlier law.
Section 140(3) of the GST Act covers “credit of eligible duties in respect of inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock on the appointed day”, hence, the transitional credit claim of the assessee in respect of capital goods is not acceptable.
In view of the observations stated above, the following rulings are issued:
i) The computers, laptops etc. used by the applicant for providing output service would not qualify as inputs for the purpose of availing transitional ITC under Section 140(2) /140(3) of the KSGST Act.
ii) The goods, even though physically available as closing stock as on 30th June 2017, ITC is not eligible for the VAT

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Elambrancheri Khaldoon

In Re: Elambrancheri Khaldoon
GST
2018 (10) TMI 595 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 152 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – AAR
Dated:- 19-9-2018
AAR No. KER/12/2018
GST
SHRI. B.G. KRISHNAN AND SHRI. B.S. THYAGARAJABABU MEMBER
Authorized Representative: Mr. Rinu Padat, Chartered Accountant.
The petitioner is one of the co-owners of a jointly owned immovable property. There are 13 co-owners holding equal share in 86.78 Cents of land and building. They have rented out these properties to different parties. Total rent from all these properties exceed twenty lakh rupees in a financial year. But, individual share is not exceeding the said threshold. Now, the owners are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ice attracting 18% GST. But, as per Section 22 of the GST Act, a supplier is exempted from registration, if his aggregate turnover is not exceeding Rs. 20 Lakhs in a financial year. Co-ownership of the property is for financial, administrative and family reasons. In such cases, a property may be divided by metes and bounds or there can be proportionate ownership of each owner. As per the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the case of jointly owned properties, each joint owner is assessed separately for his share and he is also eligible for any relief as an individual owner of his respective share. Thus, in case of individuals, each individual will be entitled to basic exemption up to threshold limit. In this case also, a co-owner is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nite and ascertainable, such persons shall not, in respect of such property, be assessed as an association of persons, but the share of each such person in the income from the property is included in his total income.
A co-owner holding immovable property jointly with other co-owners, but receiving lease rent separately, in proportion to his share in the property, is eligible for the benefit of threshold exemption. There is also Judicial pronouncement under Service Tax that clubbing of rent amount received by each co-owner, as per their share in jointly owned rented property, is not permissible. [2017 (51) STR 38 (Tri.-Chan)] = 2017 (1) TMI 101 – CESTAT CHANDIGARH.
The co-owners jointly owned immovable property and rented out these proper

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Compass Group (India) Support Services Private Limited

In Re: M/s. Compass Group (India) Support Services Private Limited
GST
2018 (10) TMI 596 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – TMI
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – AAR
Dated:- 19-9-2018
AAR No. KAR ADRG 22/2018
GST
HARISH DHARNIA AND DR. RAVI PRASAD. M.P. MEMBER
ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017
M/s Compass Group (India) Support Services Private Limited, (“Compass India”) is a private limited company having its registered office at #426, 4th Floor, Tower-A, Spaze 1-Tech Park, Sohna Road, Sector 49, Gurugram-122 018 and also having local office at #18/1, ITPL Service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

gnated area (generally the cafeteria / canteen) of the client's premises.
b) Transaction 2 : Over the counter supply of food and beverages to the employees of clients / customers, which include products which are required to have Maximum Retail Price (MRP) mentioned on the packages under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009.
3. In view of the above, the Applicant has sought for Advance Ruling on the following four questions :
i. Whether, cooking and subsequent supply of food by the Applicant to educational institutions under Transaction 1 is classifiable as “mess/canteen services” and exigible to GST @ 5% in the light of the Circular No.28/02/2018-GST dated 08.11.2018 and Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018.
ii. Whether, cooking and subsequent supply

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicant on a stand alone basis in establishments other than educational institutions under Transaction 2 is classifiable as supply provided by eating joint/mess / canteen etc., and be exigible to GST @ 5% in the light of the Circular No.28/02/2018-GST dated 08.11.2018 and Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018.
4. The Applicant vide their letter dated 10.08.2018 requested to permit them to withdraw the advance ruling application, filed by them on 20.04.2018, stating the reason that all the transactions of the applicant, that were subject matter of the questions raised in the advance ruling application, have been covered, under Notification No.13/2018- Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018, & are liable to GST @ 5% & accordingly the advance ruling ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Toshniwal Brothers (SR) Private Limited,

In Re: M/s. Toshniwal Brothers (SR) Private Limited,
GST
2018 (10) TMI 597 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 129 (A. A. R. – GST), [2019] 70 G S.T.R. 383 (AAR)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – AAR
Dated:- 19-9-2018
AAR No. KAR ADRG 23/2018
GST
SRI. HARISH DHARNIA, AND DR. RAVI PRASAD M.P. MEMBER
Represented by: Sri Badarinath, Chartered Accountant
ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017
1. M/s Toshniwal Brothers (SR) Private Limited, (called as the 'Applicant' hereinafter), No.11, AECS Layout, 4th Main, 3rd Cross, Sanjay Nagar 1st Stage, Geddalahalli, Bengaluru – 560094, having GSTIN number 29AAACT2881R1ZJ, has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017, KGST Act, 2017 & IGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ant states that he is a supplier of services to overseas clients and is engaged in the business of promotion and marketing and after sale support services as a composite supply. He has entered into an agreement with their customers (Service Recipients), who are located outside India (which is a non-taxable territory in terms of clause (79) of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017) for providing marketing, sales promotion and certain post-sales support services. Consideration for these services would be received in convertible foreign exchange. The said services are provided in respect of scientific instruments used in research and development / quality control primarily in fields of Nano Science, Material Science, Bio Pharma and Polymer Sciences.
4. The applicant provides the details of the service areas and are as follows:
a. Promotion and marketing of the products of the Service Recipients in India:
The applicant would solicit orders for the goods of the overseas customer in India by ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pplies the products to their customer in India. The applicant shall provide the following support services:
i. Advice and assist the customers of the overseas entity in installation, initial start-up of products and demonstration of its satisfactory operation to such customers;
ii. For few product lines, provide complete installation services to the customers of the overseas entity along with necessary advisory and assistance to the customers of the overseas entity in initial start up of the products and demonstration of its satisfactory operation to such customers;
iii. Assistance in operation adjustments, on site services and general customer assistance including warranty services;
c. Submission of Reports
The Applicant shall prepare and submit regular reports within agreed time on its activities to promote and solicit orders for the products in India, to the overseas entity. These business reports would normally include:
i. Short and medium term forecasts detailing prospec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

authorised to enter into any contract or arrangement on behalf of the service recipients;
d. Applicant is not securing any order from the customer in India, but the order would be placed directly by the customer on the Service recipients;
e. Service recipients would directly sell the products to the customers located in India;
f. The customer would import the goods, file the bill of entry and pay the applicable customs duty and GST;
g. Applicant is not engaged in arranging or facilitating the supply of goods, but is engaged for promoting and marketing the goods of the overseas entity in India;
h. The services provided to the service recipients are provided by the applicant on his own account.
In light of the above, the applicant submits that in his view the activity undertaken by him by way of promotion and marketing services is not intermediary services. The applicant refers to the Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority on Advance Rulings under the Service Tax provisions in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ilarly, persons such as call centres, who provide services to their clients by dealing with the customers of the client on the client's behalf, but actually provided these services on their own account, will not be categorized as intermediaries.
Applicant relying on above paragraph submitted that all call centres, by dealing with customers of their clients, on client's behalf, are providing service to their client on their own account. Similarly, applicant is providing business support service such as marketing and other allied services like oversight of quality of third party customer care centre operated in India and payment processing services, on behalf of GoDaddy US. Therefore, these services provided by the applicant to GoDaddy US cannot be categorized as intermediary or services, as intermediary services.”
The applicant submits that the facts and surrounding circumstances of the said case and the applicant's business are same and wholly comparable and thus, the ratio of the sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tegral to one overall supply – if one or more is removed, the nature of supply would be affected;
(v) These services are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business; (vi) These services are naturally bundled because:
a. After sale support services can be provided only when product is sold to the customer;
b. Customer would place order to the service recipients on the basis of promotion and marketing services provided by the applicant;
c. Post purchase, customer would be able to use the products only when after-sale support services are provided;
d. Since all these activities are inter-linked with each other, it is naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business.
8. The applicant submits where after-sale support services are also provided along with promotion and marketing services and being a composite supply, one should be the principal supply. The applicant submits that the principal supply would be the promotion and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

edominant component while installation and warranty services are ancillary to such promotion and marketing services.
9. The applicant submits that the clause (6) of section 2 of the IGST Act defines the meaning of “export of services” which reads as under:
“Export of services” means the supply of any service when, –
(i) The supplier of service in located in India;
(ii) The recipient of service is located outside India;
(iii) The place of supply of service is outside India;
(iv) The payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange; and
(v) The supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act.”
The applicant submits that recipient has been defined in clause (93) of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017, which reads as under:
“Recipient” of supply of goods or services or both means –
(a) Where a consideration is payable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at the place of supply shall be determined as provided in section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017 because the location of the supplier is in India and the location of the recipient is outside India.
The applicant submits that as explained in the earlier paragraphs, services provided by him is not intermediary services and hence the place of supply shall not be determined by section 13(8) of IGST Act, 2017 but in terms of section 13(2) of IGST Act, 2017, which is general clause.
As per section 13(2) of IGST Act, 2017, the place of supply of services shall be the location of the recipient of services and since the location of the recipient of services is a place outside India, the place of supply for promotion and marketing services would be the place outside India.
11. The applicant submits that the services as a whole, would be the export of services provided in clause (6) of section 2 of the IGST Act because:
(a) The supplier of services, i.e. the applicant, is located in India;
(b) The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

they are eligible for exemptions / concessions with respect to custom duties on import of goods. Accordingly, they would always directly import the said goods and would not procure (such imported goods) from any supplier in India (who has imported the same earlier). Such a proposition would disentitle them from availing the customs duty exemptions or concessions.
(b) The activities of the applicant is always limited to functioning as an agent promoting the goods od the overseas principals. This is evident from:
a. The fact that the order for such goods are placed by the companies or institutes etc. in India directly on the overseas suppliers;
b. The bill of entry at the time of import is filed by such companies or institutes and the payment is also made directly by such importers to the overseas suppliers and it is not routed through the applicant;
c. Such importers are always the owners of the equipment at all times; the applicant never holds ownership or title to such equipmen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ately termed as 'configured' remotely through computer or online networks or which requires specialized knowledge, in which cases, the same are undertaken by the manufacturers themselves;
In such cases, the applicant states that the question of providing any installation support does not arise;
14. The applicant also refers to the e-Flyers published by the CBIT on 15.03.2018 on Composite supplies wherein they have given a list of certain indicators for determining when a bundle of supplies should be treated as naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business and consequently as 'composite supplies'. The extract relevant are as under:
“Whether the services are bundled in the ordinary course of business would depend upon the normal or frequent practices followed in the area of business to which services relate. Such normal and frequent practices adopted in a business can be ascertained from several indicators, some of which are listed below:
* The perception of the consumer or t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he elements are normally advertised as a package;
o The different elements are not available separately;
o The different elements are integral to one overall supply – if one or more is removed, the nature of the supply would be affected.”
The applicant submits that above analogy further substantiates the submissions earlier made and squarely applies to the present case and claims that the combination of pre-sales and installation support is a naturally bundled supply in the ordinary course of business and consequently qualifies as 'composite supply'.
15. Regarding the import of spares by the applicant, he submits that the applicant enters into agreements with the companies or institutes in India (customers) for maintenance of such equipments. This is dehors of and disconnected from the marketing activities that the applicant undertakes. The maintenance of such machinery or equipment is another business activity undertaken by the applicant if desired by the importers and the privi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e entitled to conclude contracts on behalf of the principal. It is also seen that the applicant acting as an “Agent” shall take care of the interests of the principal and regularly visit the customers and prospective customers in his territory. Further, in the Clause III – relating to the “Duties of the Principal” – it is clearly stated that the Principal shall be free to conclude or to refuse the conclusion of a contract negotiated by the Agent and it is binding on the Principal to inform the applicant who is acting as “Agent” on acceptance, rejection, nonperformance or different performance of a contract and shall state the decisive reasons underlying his decision, unless prejudicial to his own essential interests.
16.2 In Clause IV of the agreement relating to the Agent's right to a Commission, it is clearly stated as under:
“On all contracts for the sale of goods which the Principal enters into with customers residing in the Agent's territory, the Agent shall receive a commission

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion with a particular business transaction) shall be regarded as covered by commission that the Agent is entitled to, and such expenses excludes travelling expenses. It is also stated that for spare parts, the commission would be paid for values equal or superior to EUR 250 and repairs are not subject to commission.
In sub-clause 6 of Clause IV, it is seen that the consideration is payable for the services which include pre-sales, marketing, sales, installation and warranty period services and the commission payable is for the complete bundle of services. The agreement quotes the principal as declaring to the agent as under
“From our experience for business in your territory it would be commensurate to allocate 25% of total commission earned in each fill system case to address installation and warranty period services which are provided by your company on our behalf to the end customers”.
All the above show that the applicant has been offered commission on the amount of goods sold a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tied to the amount of sales that the applicant solicits and is typically an agency transaction. Even the agreement entered by the applicant with the Principal, call the applicant an agent and since he is facilitating the supply of goods between the overseas supplier who is the principal, and the customer, by soliciting the customers and also by negotiating the prices, terms etc., the predominant nature of the transaction is of “intermediary” nature.
16.4 Further, on the question of whether the contract is a composite supply or not is to be seen from the nature of the contract. When the applicant solicits the prospective purchaser, he is not aware of whether the transaction would ultimately result in a supply of goods. The terms of the contract also makes it very clear that the amount of consideration towards after-sale services and warranty services would not cross 25% of the value and hence there is an element of classification of the value of marketing “intermediary” services and t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.
16.5 The question relating to the whether the above contracts would amount to export of services has to be decided on the basis of the place of supply applicable to each of the transaction. This Authority is not competent to decide on this issue of determination of place of supply and hence does not answer this question.
17.  In view of the foregoing, we rule as follows
R U L I N G
1. The contract of services supplied are not pure and mere promotion and marketing services and the services provided is of the nature of facilitating the supply of goods, and hence would amount to “intermediary services” for the reasons enumerated in the aforesaid paragraphs for the purposes of determination of place of supply of such services.
2. The after-sale services provided are not in the nature of a composite contract and they are independent from the services provided in paragraph 1 above and hence there is no question of determination of what will the principal supply.
3. The third que

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Udaipur Versus Mangalam Cement Limited

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Udaipur Versus Mangalam Cement Limited
Central Excise
2018 (10) TMI 829 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – 2019 (27) G. S. T. L. 648 (Raj.)
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-9-2018
D.B. Central Excise Appeal No. 138/2018
Central Excise
MR. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ AND MR. GOVERDHAN BARDHAR JJ.
For Appellant(s): Mr. Siddharth Ranka.
For Respondent(s): Mr. P.K. Kasliwal.
JUDGMENT
(Per Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant-Revenue assailing judgment dated 09.11.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short 'the Tribunal') with the prayer to set aside the aforesaid judgment and order dated 28.11.2016 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Udaipur (for short 'the Adjudicating Authority') be restored.
This appeal was admitted by this Court vide order dated 10.08.2018 on the following substantial question of law

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t these services were not covered under the definition of 'input service' under the provisions of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (for short 'the Rules of 2004'). Therefore, a show cause notice dated 28.07.2015 was issued to the respondent-assessee proposing recovery of the CENVAT Credit wrongly availed along with interest under Rule 14 of the Rules of 2004 read with Section 11 AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') and penalty under Rule 15 of the Rules of 2004. The Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 28.11.2016 passed demand order, disallowing claim of CENVAT Credit of Rs. 1,24,75,315/- on the aforesaid issue and charged interest and penalty thereon. The respondent-assessee, being aggrieved by the said order, preferred appeal before the Tribunal, which vide impugned judgment dated 09.11.2017 allowed the appeal and set aside the demand order dated 28.11.2016. Hence, this appeal.
Mr. Siddharth Ranka, learned counsel for the appellant-revenue has submit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s covered by the aforesaid notification, the Tribunal was wholly unjustified in allowing the appeal filed by the assessee. Learned counsel argued that since the question raised in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Service Tax Vs. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 11261 of 2016 decided on 01.02.2018), not only demand order is liable to be revived but penalty has to be imposed on the assessee and awarded to the Revenue.
Mr. P. K. Kasliwal, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee submitted that similar question in respect to previous assessment years has been decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue by this Court. The Revenue preferred SLP against the said decision of this Court. Therefore, hearing of the present matter may be deferred till the final decision of the Supreme Court, as according to learned counsel for the respondent, the Supreme Court in the case of Commissione

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

judgment of the Tribunal is set aside and demand is revived, the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority is also liable to be restored. Learned counsel submitted that the submission of the respondent that the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra) has not considered this aspect and the matter requires reconsideration, has to be rejected in view of the fact that the assessee in that case filed review petition, which was also dismissed by the Supreme Court vide order dated 24.04.2018.
On hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, we find that in view of the amended definition of “input service” w.e.f. 01.03.2008 as also in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra), judgment of the Tribunal cannot be sustained in law and the demand is liable to be revived. However, the present matter deserves to be remanded to the Tribunal to consider the question of penalty.
In view of above discussion, present appeal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

INDUSIND MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LTD. & ANOTHER & ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

INDUSIND MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LTD. & ANOTHER & ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
GST
2018 (10) TMI 996 – DELHI HIGH COURT – TMI
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-9-2018
W. P. (C) 8691/2018, CM APPL. 38569/2018
GST
MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND MR. A. K. CHAWLA JJ.
Petitioners Through: Mr. Monish Panda, Mr. Amit Kr. Bhattacharyya & Mr. Mrinal Bharat Ram, Advs.  
Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. Gurpreet Hora, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Narula, SSC for Revenue. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Abhinav Goyal, Advocate.
O R D E R
The petitioner's grievance is that its transitional credit, to which it claims entitlement on account of approved Scheme of Arrangement ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

orated the cases under the Category B, where no technical issues were found on the basis of logs in GST system, as below:
xxx xxx xxx
(d) In 2 cases sent by Nodal Officers, taxpayer had attempted downward revision of distributed credit in Table 8 of TRAN-1. The system was designed to allow only upward revision and not to allow downward revision of the distributed credit in table 8 of TRAN-1. The system was designed in this way as any downward revision would mean that the credit that was distributed to the recipients would have to be modified in their ledgers also. Due to the complexity of design and revision being a new requirement, and shortage of time, the system was designed to handle the revision and modification of the amount only in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

errors in these cases as explained at para 3.2 above and details as per Annexures indicated in column No.4 and 6 of Table-2 respectively.
It is pointed out that the present petitioner is one of the 213 entities which were allowed the facility and benefit of transitional credit. Learned counsel has drawn our attention at Serial No.12 in Annexure 1(A) to the said minutes, which reflects petitioner's claim. It is urged that the petitioner should first ensure that the credits which it otherwise is entitled to – both transitional and input credit as on 01.07.2017, are duly claimed and reflected in the place of its registration i.e. Mumbai in order to ensure that thereafter, the other centres where it is registered, can claim it.
It is also su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CHAITHANYA GRANITES AND MARBLES Versus TTHE ASST STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO 5, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESE

CHAITHANYA GRANITES AND MARBLES Versus TTHE ASST STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO 5, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI
GST
2018 (11) TMI 331 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2019] 61 G S.T.R. 38 (Ker), 2019 (23) G. S. T. L. 191 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-9-2018
WP (C). No. 30007 of 2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM)
For The Respondent : DR THUSHARA JAMES GP, SRI SREELALA N WARRIER SR SC

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

en breached. The transport thus took more than usual time to reach Edapally. By then, the e-way bill had expired.
3. In that background, the respondent authorities intercepted the vehicle at Kasaragod and detained the goods under Section 129 of the GST Act. Faced with the Ext.P7 order of detention, the petitioner submitted the Exts.P8 and P8(a) replies. Later, after failing in its effort to have the interim custody of the goods, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.
4. In response to the submissions made by the petitioner's counsel, the Government Pleader has submitted that the petitioner had ample time to have the consignment transported to Edappally, on time. According to her, the vehicle was ready by 13.08.2018. And from Sur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ader.
7. The record bears out that the e-way bill generated on 01.08.2018 was valid up to 18.08.2018. Undeniably, the petitioner's vehicle, as seen from the Ext.P4, broke down at Surathkal in Karnataka and was ready only on 13.08.2018. If it had begun the journey the next day, by 15.08.2018; it must have been passing through Kerala the next day. But by 16.08.2018 the flood situation in Kerala worsened. Perhaps, the transporter must have played safe and waited for the roads to clear. And that did not immediately happen.
8. I reckon that the petitioner has every document to transport the goods safely, save the expiry of the time prescribed in the e-way bill. It is preposterous to contend that the petitioner delayed the transport deliber

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED

M/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI
GST
2018 (11) TMI 398 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-9-2018
WP (C). No. 30729 of 2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : BY ADVS. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) RAJAGOPAL M
For The Respondent : N NAGARESH ASGI
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a dealer, faced detention proceedings u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

issue of Ext.P7 order and Ext.P7(a) notice and after scrutinizing the same,t o strike down and quash them ;
iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orders or directions idrecting the respondent to refrain from proceedings further under section 129 of the Act based on Ext.P7 and Ext.P7(a) ;
iv) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orders or directions, directing the respondent to release the goods to the petitioner without collecting any security under S.129(1)(c) ;
v) issue such other writ, order or direction which this Court deems fit and necessary in the interest of justice.
Nevertheless, the issue raised in this writ petition stands squarely covered by judgment dated 9th August 2018 in WPC No.26986

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

EXTENTION OF TIME FOR PROVIDING DECLARTION IN GST TRAN-1.

EXTENTION OF TIME FOR PROVIDING DECLARTION IN GST TRAN-1.
Circular No. 1819046/26 Dated:- 19-9-2018 Uttar Pradesh SGST
GST – States
=============
Document 1
à¤â€ Ã Â¤Â¦Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ सà¤â€šà¤â€“्या / à¤Å“à¥â‚¬Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥â‚¬ -2018-19/
1819046 19-9-18
26 / वाणिà¤Å“्य à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°
à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â²Ã Â¤Â¯ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â°, वाणिà¤Å“्य à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°, à¤â€°Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥Â¦
(à¤Å“à¥â‚¬Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥â‚¬ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â­Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤â€” )
लà¤â€“नऊà¤Æâ€™ दिनाà¤â€šà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Æâ€™ 19.
सितम्

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

विस्तार ।
à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â° प्रदà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ माल à¤â€Ã Â¤Â° सà¥â€¡Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â¾ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° नियमावलà¥â‚¬, 2017 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ नियम 117 (1) सपठित à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â°
प्रदà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ माल à¤â€Ã Â¤Â° सà¥â€¡Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â®, 2017 ( à¤â€°0प्र0 à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â§Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â® सà¤â€š0 1 सन् 2017) à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬ धारा
168 मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š प्रदत्त à

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¨Ã Â¤Â¹Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°
सà¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€Ã Â¤Â° à¤Å“िनà¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ मामलà¥â€¡ परिषद द्वारा à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¶Ã Â¤â€šà¤¸à¤¿à¤¤ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€”यà¥â€¡ हà¥Ë†à¤â€š, मà¥Ë†à¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â°, परिषद à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â‚¬
सिफारिशà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š पर, à¤â€°Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â° प्रदà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶ माल à¤â€Ã Â¤Â° सà¥â€¡Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤Â¾ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â° नियमावलà¥â‚¬, 2017 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ नियम 117

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax Versus Mangalam Cement Limited

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax Versus Mangalam Cement Limited
Central Excise
2019 (2) TMI 81 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – 2019 (24) G. S. T. L. 545 (Raj.)
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-9-2018
D.B. Central Excise Appeal No. 79/2018
Central Excise
Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq And Mr. Justice Goverdhan Bardhar
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. P.K. Kasliwal.
JUDGMENT
(PER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant-Revenue assailing judgment dated 10.10.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short 'the Tribunal') with the prayer to set aside the aforesaid judgment and that order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Udaipur (for short 'the Adjudicating Authority') be restored.
This appeal was admitted by this Court vide order dated 06.07.2018 on the following substantial

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

se services were not covered under the definition of 'input service' under the provisions of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (for short 'the Rules of 2004'). Therefore, a show cause notice dated 02.11.2012 was issued to the respondentassessee proposing recovery of the CENVAT Credit wrongly availed along with interest under Rule 14 of the Rules of 2004 read with Section 11 AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') and penalty under Rule 15 of the Rules of 2004. The Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 19.09.2013 passed demand order, disallowing claim of CENVAT Credit of Rs. 53,66,338/- on the aforesaid three issues and charged interest and penalty thereon.
The respondent-assessee, being aggrieved by the said order, preferred appeal before the Tribunal, which vide judgment dated 17.11.2014 allowed the appeal and remanded back the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to re-determine the question as to what is the place of removal. In pursuance of remand order

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as there in respect of (a) GTA Services; (b) Auction Services and (c) Rent-a-Cab Services upto the place of removal, the same has already been removed by the Government and therefore, the aforesaid services taken upto the place of removal can only be covered under the definition of 'input service'. The Tribunal has failed to notice this change in the definition while deciding the appeal of the assessee, while judgment has been given in the context of the earlier definition of “input service”.
Reference to definition of “place of removal” in Section 4(3)(c) of the Act of 1944 was also given. Since the present matter was covered by the aforesaid notification, the Tribunal was wholly unjustified in allowing the appeal filed by the assessee. Learned counsel argued that since the question raised in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Service Tax Vs. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 11261 of 2016 dec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s assessment year wherein the main demand was set aside, the question of penalty would therefore not arise for consideration.
Learned counsel argued that as per the law that was prevalent at the time when the Tribunal passed the impugned judgment, the respondent-assessee was not required to satisfy the demand and acted throughout under that impression, therefore, there was no question of any penalty to be paid on that.
Mr. Siddharth Ranka, learned counsel for the appellant rejoined and submitted that the penalty is consequential as the issue raised in this matter is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court. In case the judgment of the Tribunal is set aside and demand is revived, the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority is also liable to be restored. Learned counsel submitted that submission of the respondent that the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra) has not considered this aspect and the matter requires reconsideration, has to be rejected in view

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Supply to SEZ unit in USD

Supply to SEZ unit in USD
Query (Issue) Started By: – Yatin Bhopi Dated:- 18-9-2018 Last Reply Date:- 20-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear expert
We are manufacturer and supplying goods to SEZ unit under LUT. One of our SEZ customer requested to supply goods in USD. Please let me know
1. Is this allowed
2. Are we need to raised GST invoice in USD.
If this is allowed please share circular \ Act \ Rules references
Reply By PAWAN KUMAR:
The Reply:
Dear sir,
No such provision in GST Rules as per my understanding. You may issue gst tax invoice supported with other commercial invoice which currency of USD can be written.
Reply By Yash Jain:
The Reply:
Sir,
For point no. 1: Yes, invoice can be rais

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST FORM TRAN-1 Submission Deadline Extended for Specific Cases u/r 117(1A), Central GST Rules 2017.

GST FORM TRAN-1 Submission Deadline Extended for Specific Cases u/r 117(1A), Central GST Rules 2017.
Circulars
GST
Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners
GST
Dated:- 18-9-2018

The National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics (NACIN) has been authorized to conduct an examination for confirmation of enrollment of Goods and Services Tax Practitioners (GSTPs) in terms of the sub-rule (3) of rule 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, vide Notification No. 24/2018-Central Tax dated 28.5.2018.
The GSTPs enrolled on the GST Network under sub-rule (2) of Rule 83 and covered by clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 83, i.e. those meeting the eligibility criteria of having enrolled as sales tax practitioners or tax return preparer under the existing law for a period not less than five years, are req

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

payment of examination fee of Rs. 500/- at the time of registration for this exam.
Pattern and Syllabus of the Examination
PAPER: GST Law & Procedures:
Time allowed: 2 hours and 30 minutes
Number of Multiple Choice Questions: 100
Language of Questions: English and Hindi
Maximum marks: 200
Qualifying marks: 100
No negative marking
Syllabus:
* Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
* Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
* State Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017
* Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
* Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017
* Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017
* Integrated Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017
* All State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Restaurant Services Subject to 5% GST Rate Without Input Tax Credit Eligibility, Not 18% with Input Credit.

Restaurant Services Subject to 5% GST Rate Without Input Tax Credit Eligibility, Not 18% with Input Credit.
Case-Laws
GST
Input tax credit (ITC) – rate of tax – restaurant services – The Appl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

University-Affiliated Educational Services Exempt from GST Due to Qualification as Educational Services Under GST Rules.

University-Affiliated Educational Services Exempt from GST Due to Qualification as Educational Services Under GST Rules.
Case-Laws
GST
Exemption from GST – Educational services – The services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IIM's Executive Post Graduate Programme Not Eligible for GST Exemption, Says Notification Language.

IIM's Executive Post Graduate Programme Not Eligible for GST Exemption, Says Notification Language.
Case-Laws
GST
Exemption from GST – Executive Post Graduate Programme in Management (EPGP) conducted by IIM – there is no iota of ambiguity in the language of the impugned notification – The Executive Post Graduate Programme will not be eligible for exemption from GST as the same has been categorically excluded from exemption.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

NHAI Sub-Letting: Toll Charges Collected in Fiduciary Role, GST Applies to Applicant's Operations, Not Ultimate Recipient.

NHAI Sub-Letting: Toll Charges Collected in Fiduciary Role, GST Applies to Applicant's Operations, Not Ultimate Recipient.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – sub-let of Toll Collection work of certain road by NHAI – The Toll Charges collected by the applicant are not “Toll Charges” per se in the hands of the applicant, but held in fiduciary capacity by the applicant, for onward remittance to Highway Infrastructure (P) Limited.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Government Landscaping Services May Be GST-Exempt If Classified as Pure Services, Not Works Contracts.

Government Landscaping Services May Be GST-Exempt If Classified as Pure Services, Not Works Contracts.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – landscaping and gardening work for government departments –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Diesel Engine Fuel Injection Pump Parts Classified Under Tariff Heading 8413 91 90, Subject to 18% GST Tax Rate.

Diesel Engine Fuel Injection Pump Parts Classified Under Tariff Heading 8413 91 90, Subject to 18% GST Tax Rate.
Case-Laws
GST
Classification of goods – Parts of Fuel Injection Pumps – The â€

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Annual Return- A Surgical Strike by Government

GST Annual Return- A Surgical Strike by Government
By: – NikhilMohan Jhanwar
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 18-9-2018

If you think GST is a 'Good and Simple Tax', you are mistaken. GST is all about technical glitches, daily amendments, and confusions. More the Government tries to put to rest the confusions, the poorer its implementation becomes.
If you think Annual Return is just another return seeking consolidation of data filed in GSTR-3B & GSTR-1 in Financial Year 2017-18, you are again mistaken. Imagine you studied the whole year and all of sudden, during exam time, the syllabus is changed. That's what the Annual Return format is. The Government is liberal enough to seek as much as details they could in 5-page Annual Return Format coupled with 5-page instructions notified on 4th September 2018.
If you think you have time till 31st December 2018 to file Annual Return that would be your third mistake, Sir. Because, if I state that you have time till 20th Octob

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

would be fetched from GSTR-3B and other from GSTR-1. Similarly, the way details have been sought, it would be very difficult for the ERP systems to fetch data in the same fashion as demanded in the Annual Return. For example, Exports made with payment of IGST and without payment of IGST is filed in Table 6A of GSTR-1. However, Annual Return Format seeks details in Separate Tables. It would have been easier for taxpayers if most of the details could be auto-populated by GSTN from GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 filed in sequential or appropriate manner. This will surely slog various hours of extra nights for taxpayers and for professionals as well.
In the instructions for filing Annual Returns, reference of Table No's of GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B has been mentioned at most of the places. If all details are to be taken from 1 & 3B, would not be it prudent to auto-populate the data from returns directly. In other words, the Annual Return should have been formulated in a way which facilitates auto-population o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hen from where this part of the world, Annual Return is asking for these details. The Instructions also states to obtain these figures from Table 9B of GSTR-1. If you refer to Table 9B, it comprises of details only in respect of B2B taxable supplies and Exempt, Nil rated & Non-GST Supply.
Details of Input tax credit- Real Mess
Input tax credit is like a spoiled brat of rich Dad which has all the luxury in-house as it is not less than a hard cash. But when this brat is excessively exploited, he gives you dangerous results. That's what happened with Part III seeking details of ITC in Annual Return. This Part is so confusing that even lawmakers appear to be clueless about their purpose and intention about kind of disclosure required.
Table No. 6: Bifurcate details of Input, Capital goods & Input services
Table seeks separate bifurcation for inputs, capital goods & input services in respect of Input tax credit. This is beyond my imagination as these details were never part of GSTR-1 or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uld have been paid by him as one of the conditions to avail ITC. GSTR-2A is created from GSTR-1 filed by the Supplier. But does it ensure payment of tax by the Supplier? There may be a situation where Supplier has filed GSTR-1 but has not filed GSTR-3B for corresponding supply and thus, not paid tax. Ideally, GSTR-2A is required to be verified whether a tax on these supplies have been paid or not to enable complete compliance of the conditions of availment of input tax credit.
Lapse of ITC- Innovative thought
This is an interesting thing. The Annual return calculates for you the input credit lapsed in last financial year i.e. 2017-18. It comprises of 3 things:
* The difference in ITC available as GSTR-2A and ITC actually availed in GSTR-3B filed for the period July 2017 to September 2018 which is further classified into :
* ITC available but not availed
* ITC available but ineligible
The difference in ITC available on the import of goods and ITC actually availed in GSTR-3B
N

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rnment do not let businesses and professional to have an easy life. The task of digging HSN wise details of Inward supply is like repeating the same Semester not because we failed in exams but because syllabus has changes. This will only add to compliances woes of taxpayers.
Before parting………
It would not be out of context if this Annual Return format is terms a Surgical Strike by the Government.
Two quick recommendation for GST Council:
* To introduce an online facility wherein details of GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 filed for July, 2018 to March, 2018 is made available on consolidated basis.
To mandate filing of Annual return first year only for Taxpayers having Aggregate Turnover of more than 1.5 crs. This would ease compliance burden and increasing costs of small taxpayers
About Author:
CA. Nikhil M. Jhanwar is practicing Chartered Accountant and Faculty Member of GST by ICAI in Delhi/NCR specializing in GST, UAE VAT, end-to-end start-up formation, compliances

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LEVY OF LATE FEE UNDER ‘GST’

LEVY OF LATE FEE UNDER ‘GST’
By: – DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 18-9-2018

Late fee
Section 47 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('Act' for short) provides for the levy of late fee in case of belated filing of returns that are required to be filed under the Act. Section 47(1) provides that any registered person who fails to furnish the details of outward or inward supplies required under section 37 or section 38 or returns required under section 39 or section 45 by the due date shall pay a late fee of one hundred rupees for every day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum amount of five thousand rupees.
Section 47(2) provides that any registered person who fails to furnish the return required under section 44 by the due date shall be liable to pay a late fee of one hundred rupees for every day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum of an amount calculated at a quarter per cent of hi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds or services or both on which the tax is payable on reverse charge basis under this Act and inward supplies of goods or services or both taxable under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act or on which integrated goods and services tax is payable under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) , and credit or debit notes received in respect of such supplies during a tax period after the tenth day but on or before the fifteenth day of the month succeeding the tax period in Form GSTR – 2.
Return – Form GSTR – 3B
Rule 61(5) provides for filing form GSTR – 3B every month since the time limit for furnishing of details in Form GSTR-1 under section 37 and in Form GSTR-2 under section 38 has been extended within 20th of the following month.
Return under section 39
Section 39 provides that the following registered person shall file returns in the required form periodically within the due dates as mentioned below-
Quarterly return
* The service providers who opted to pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vices or both, input tax credit availed, tax payable, tax paid and such other particulars as may be prescribed on or before 20th of the following month.
Final Return under section 45
Section 45 provides that every registered person who is required to furnish a return under section 39(1) and whose registration has been cancelled shall furnish a final return within three months of the date of cancellation or date of order of cancellation, whichever is later, in Form GSTR – 10.
Annual Return under section 44
Section 44(1) provides that every registered person, other than an Input Service Distributor, a person paying tax under section 51 or section 52, a casual taxable person and a non-resident taxable person, shall furnish an annual return for every financial year electronically in Form GSTR – 9 on or before the thirty-first day of December following the end of such financial year.
Section 44(2) provides that every registered person who is required to get his accounts audited in acco

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent gave the details of the month(s) for which waival is granted.
Vide Notification No.28 /2017 – Central Tax, dated 01st September, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the late fee payable, for all registered persons who failed to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2017 by the due date.
Vide Notification No. 50/2017 – Central Tax, dated 24th October, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the late fee payable for all registered persons who failed to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August and September, 2017 by the due date.
Vide Notification No. 22 /2018 – Central Tax, dated 14.05.2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the late fee payable for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B by the due date for each of the months from October, 2017 to April, 2018, for the class of registered persons whose declaration in FORM GS

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aived to the extent which is in excess of an amount of ten rupees for every day during which such failure continues.
Vide Notification No. 73/2017 – Central Tax, dated 29th December, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the amount of late fee payable, by any registered person for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-4 by the due date, which is in excess of an amount of twenty five rupees for every day during which such failure continues. Where the total amount payable in lieu of central tax in the said return is nil, the amount of late fee payable, by any registered person for failure to furnish the said return by the due date shall stand waived to the extent which is in excess of an amount of ten rupees for every day during which such failure continues.
Vide Notification No. 4/2018 – Central Tax 23rd January, 2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the amount of late fee payable by any registered perso

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

person for failure to furnish the said return by the due date shall stand waived to the extent which is in excess of an amount of ten rupees for every day during which such failure continues.
Vide Notification No. 6/2018 – Central Tax, dated 23rd January, 2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the amount of late fee payable by any registered person for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR 5A by the due date which is in excess of an amount of twenty-five rupees for every day during which such failure continues. Where the total amount of integrated tax payable in the said return is nil, the amount of late fee payable by such registered person for failure to furnish the said return by the due date shall stand waived to the extent which is in excess of an amount of ten rupees for every day during which such failure continues.
Vide Notification No. 7/2018 – Central Tax, dated 23.01.2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Counc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rns including such as malfunctioning of the official portal which often times, prevent uploading of the returns were cited.
The High Court held that this is not a case where the petitioners are espousing the cause of a weaker section of the society who, on account of hardships and handicaps inherently faced by them, is unable to knock the door of justice. The public interest jurisdiction of the High Court and the Supreme Court, over a period of time, has been considerably expanded to take within its sweep range of issues not confined to the assertion of rights of weaker sections of the society or the marginalized groups. The petitioners who are themselves active tax consultants and tax practitioners indirectly concerned with the same. There is no reason why such an issue should be examined in a public interest petition when, as noted above, the group of persons whom the statute affects does not suffer from any handicap preventing them from taking up the litigation themselves and purs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases
F.1-11(100)-TAX/GST/2017/8475-80 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Tripura SGST
GST – States
NO.F.1-11(100)-TAX/GST/2017/8475-80
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
P.N. COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI, AGARTALA
Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018.
ORDER
Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corres

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 06/2018-GST (State) dated 19.04.2018 and Central Circular No. 49/23/2018-GST dated 21.06.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 11/2018-GST (State) dated 17.09.2018 – regarding.
12/2018 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Tripura SGST
GST – States
NO.F.1-11(8)-TAX/2015/8460-66
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
PANDIT NEHRU COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI
AGARTALA, TRIPURA WEST, PIN-799006.
Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018.
Circular No.12/2018 – GST (State)
To
The Additional Commissioner of State Tax /
Superintendent of State Tax (All)/
Inspectors of State Tax (All)
Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ces Tax Act, 2017 (Tripura Act No. 9 of 2017) for the purpose of uniformity in the implementation of the Act it is instructed to follow the clarifications issued vide Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST dated 14th September, 2018 by the Department of Revenue, GST Policy Wing.
Enclo.: Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST.
(Nagesh Kumar B, IAS)
Chief Commissioner of State Tax
Government of Tripura
Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST
CBEC/20/16/03/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 14th September, 2018
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners / Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s the said issue hereunder.
3. Section 68 of the CGST Act read with rule 138A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CGST Rules') requires that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding ₹ 50,000/- should carry a copy of documents viz., invoice/bill of supply/delivery challan/bill of entry and a valid e-way bill in physical or electronic form for verification. In case such person does not carry the mentioned documents, there is no doubt that a contravention of the provisions of the law takes place and the provisions of section 129 and section 130 of the CGST Act are invocable. Further, it may be noted that the non-furnishing of information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 amounts to the e-way bill becoming not a valid document for the movement of goods by road as per Explanation (2) to rule 138(3) of the CGST Rules, except in the case where the goods are transported for a distance of upto fift

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ay not be initiated, inter alia, in the following situations:
a) Spelling mistakes in the name of the consignor or the consignee but the GSTIN, wherever applicable, is correct;
b) Error in the pin-code but the address of the consignor and the consignee mentioned is correct, subject to the condition that the error in the PIN code should not have the effect of increasing the validity period of the e-way bill;
c) Error in the address of the consignee to the extent that the locality and other details of the consignee are correct;
d) Error in one or two digits of the document number mentioned in the e-way bill;
e) Error in 4 or 6 digit level of HSN where the first 2 digits of HSN are correct and the rate of tax mentioned is correct;
f) Error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number.
6. In case of the above situations, penalty to the tune of ₹ 500/- each under section 125 of the CGST Act and the respective State GST Act should be imposed (Rs.1000/- under the IGST Ac

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =