GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XVII)

GIST OF RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS ON GST (PART-XVII)
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 6-11-2018

Goods and Services Tax (GST), introduced from July 1, 2017 is more than thirteen months old now but has resulted in operational and implementation disruptions affecting all stakeholders. GST law, as drafted and legislated, is not free from the interpretational hassles. GST Council is however, making regular changes to fix the anomalies and hardships faced by taxpayers. 30 meetings of GST Council have been held till 31st October, 2018.
Taxpayers have already challenged various provisions of GST laws and rules framed thereunder with our 200 writs being filed in different courts. High courts and Supreme court have taken a liberal stand so far in view of the fact that law is new and is yet evolving. However, CBIC may move to Supreme court where the verdict is against the Government. Recently, CBIC has issued directions to be officers to defend the writs

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under GST applicable at the time of bidding shall be absorbed by it on production of payment receipt of GST towards the Goods and Services on the respective item executed under the tender.
The assessee had completed the work after the implementation of GST regime and paid the GST at the rate of 18 per cent. It made several representations before the Water Authority for payment of the bill amount and the GST already deposited, but no response. The assessee filed writ petition praying that the Water Authority be directed to honour its bill and to pay the GST already deposited by it.
The court observed that so long as the Water Authority does not have a case that the assessee has not paid the GST amount or that it has not completed the works in question satisfactorily, it would not be reasonable on its part to keep these claims pending ad infinitum. A decision in this regard has to be taken by the Competent Authority imperatively and without any further delay.
In view of the aforesa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tes, the same was delayed on account that petitioner furnished PAN number of another firm for purpose of obtaining registration under Kerala Value Added Tax Act and thus registration was granted w.e.f. 12-8-2017 because of which assessee was unable to comply with statutory requirements in relation to business for period from 1-7-2017 to 12-8-2017, authorities were directed to grant registration to petitioner from the date i.e., 1-7-2017 when GST statute came into force.
* In Indo Alusys Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Alwar (2018) 6 TMI 78 (Cestat, New Delhi); where the assessee was engaged in the manufacture of 'Aluminium Hollow Sections'. It sold the said item and paid the duty on the value. Subsequently, the assessee raised supplementary invoice on account of price variation and paid the duty. However, it did not pay interest on delayed payment of duty on account of supplementary invoice. The Adjudicating Authority held that the assessee was liable to pay intere

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t the escalated price as is mentioned in the supplementary invoice and in accordance of section 4 of the Central Excise Act whatever the transaction value is agreed between the parties at the time of clearance is relevant for section 11A and even for the purpose of section 11AB the expression 'ought to have been paid' would mean the time when the price is agreed upon by the seller and the buyer. In other words, the right of the seller to receive the revised price crystallized only when the buyer agrees to sanction the same and only at that time can liability to pay duty, if at all, on the revised price arise. Since both the parties were not aware of escalated price or possibility of escalation at the time the goods were removed, the supplementary invoice could not be taken as a ground to call the said duty paid as the short levied.
Resultantly, it was held that no question of paying the same along with interest arises and as such, the appeal was allowed. The order of the Comm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notification to exempt supply from PSU to PSU from applicability of provisions relating to TDS under HGST Act, 2017.

Notification to exempt supply from PSU to PSU from applicability of provisions relating to TDS under HGST Act, 2017.
100/GST-2 Dated:- 6-11-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 6th November, 2018
No.100/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 read with section 51 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the Governor of Haryana, on th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Fifteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Fifteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
099/GST-2 Dated:- 6-11-2018 Haryana SGST
GST – States
Haryana SGST
Haryana SGST
HARYANA GOVERNMENT
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
Notification
The 6th November, 2018
No. 99/GST-2.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (19 of 2017), the Governor of Haryana, hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Haryana Goods and Services Tax (Fifteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from the 30th October, 2018.
2. In the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter called the said rules), after rule 83, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“83A. Examination of Goods and Services Tax Practitioners.-(1) Every person referred to in clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of rule 83 and who

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mination centers.-The examination shall be held across India at the designated centers. The candidate shall be given an option to choose from the list of centers as provided by NACIN at the time of registration.
(6) Period for passing the examination and number of attempts allowed.- (i) A person enrolled as a goods and services tax practitioner in terms of sub-rule (2) of rule 83 is required to pass the examination within two years of enrolment:
Provided that if a person is enrolled as a goods and services tax practitioner before 1st of July 2018, he shall get one more year to pass the examination:
Provided further that for a goods and services tax practitioner to whom the provisions of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of rule 83 apply, the period to pass the examination will be as specified in the second proviso of sub-rule (3) of said rule.
(ii) A person required to pass the examination may avail of any number of attempts but these attempts shall be within the period as specified in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

shall issue examination guidelines covering issues such as procedure of registration, payment of fee, nature of identity documents, provision of admit card, manner of reporting at the examination center, prohibition on possession of certain items in the examination center, procedure of making representation and the manner of its disposal.
(ii) Any person who is or has been found to be indulging in unfair means or practices shall be dealt in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (10). An illustrative list of use of unfair means or practices by a person is as under: –
(a) obtaining support for his candidature by any means;
(b) impersonating;
(c) submitting fabricated documents;
(d) resorting to any unfair means or practices in connection with the examination or in connection with the result of the examination;
(e) found in possession of any paper, book, note or any other material, the use of which is not permitted in the examination center;
(f) communicating with other

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

satisfied with his result may represent in writing, clearly specifying the reasons therein to NACIN or the jurisdictional Commissioner as per the procedure established by NACIN on the official websites of the Board, NACIN and common portal.
(13) Power to relax.- Where the Board or State Tax Commissioner is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient to do so, it may, on the recommendations of the Council, relax any of the provisions of this rule with respect to any class or category of persons.
Explanation :- For the purposes of this sub-rule, the expressions –
(a) “jurisdictional Commissioner” means the Commissioner having jurisdiction over the place declared as address in the application for enrolment as the GST Practitioner in FORM GST PCT-1. It shall refer to the Commissioner of Central Tax if the enrolling authority in FORM GST PCT-1 has been selected as Centre, or the Commissioner of State Tax if the enrolling authority in FORM GST PCT-1 has been selected as State;
(b)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e 142, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“142A. Procedure for recovery of dues under existing laws. – (1) A summary of order issued under any of the existing laws creating demand of tax, interest, penalty, fee or any other dues which becomes recoverable consequent to proceedings launched under the existing law before, on or after the appointed day shall, unless recovered under that law, be recovered under the Act and may be uploaded in FORM GST DRC-07A electronically on the common portal for recovery under the Act and the demand of the order shall be posted in Part II of Electronic Liability Register in FORM GST PMT-01.
(2) Where the demand of an order uploaded under sub-rule (1) is rectified or modified or quashed in any proceedings, including in appeal, review or revision, or the recovery is made under the existing laws, a summary thereof shall be uploaded on the common portal in FORM GST DRC-08A and Part II of Electronic Liability Register in FORM GST PMT-01 shall be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

file your tax return due for the tax period in which the effective date of surrender of registration falls or furnish an application to the effect that no taxable supplies have been made during the intervening period (i.e. from the date of registration to the date of application for cancellation of registration).”.
5. In the said rules, in FORM GSTR-4, in the Instructions, for serial number 10, the following shall be substituted, namely:-
“10. Information against the Serial 4A of Table 4 shall not be furnished.”.
6. In the said rules, for FORM GST PMT-01 relating to “Part II: Other than return related liabilities”, the following form shall be substituted, namely:-
“Form GST PMT -01
[See rule 85(1)]
Electronic Liability Register of Registered Person
(Part-II: Other than return related liabilities)
(To be maintained at the Common Portal)
Reference No.-
GSTIN/Temporary Id –
Date-
Name (Legal) –
Trade name, if any –
Stay status – Stayed/Un-stayed Period – From To (dd/mm/y

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

recorded accordingly.
3. Reduction or enhancement in the amount payable due to decision of appeal, rectification, revision, review etc. will be reflected here.
4. Negative balance can occur for a single Demand ID also if appeal is allowed/ partly allowed. Overall closing balance may still be positive.
5. Refund of pre-deposit can be claimed for a particular demand ID if appeal is allowed even though the overall balance may still be positive subject to the adjustment of the refund against any liability by the proper officer.
6. The closing balance in this part shall not have any effect on filing of return.
7. Reduction in amount of penalty would be automatic if payment is made within the time specified in the Act or the rules.
8. Payment made against the show cause notice or any other payment made voluntarily shall be shown in the register at the time of making payment through credit or cash. Debit and credit entry will be created simultaneously.”.
7. In the said rules, in FORM G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r date
13.
Date of service of the order (optional)
14.
Name of the officer who has passed the order (Optional)
15.
Designation of the officer who has passed the order
16.
Whether demand is stayed
ð Yes ð No
17.
Date of stay order
18.
Period of stay
From – to –
Part B – Demand details
19.
Details of demand created
(Amount in Rs. in all Tables)
Act
Tax
Interest
Penalty
Fee
Others
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Central Acts
State/UT Acts
CST Act
20.
Amount of demand paid under existing laws
Act
Tax
Interest
Penalty
Fee
Others
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Central Acts
State/UT Acts
CST Act
21. (19-20)
Balance amount of demand proposed to be recovered under GST laws
<< Auto-populated >>
Act
Tax
Interest
Penalty
Fee
Others
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Central Acts
State/UT Acts
CST Act
Signature
Name
Designation
Jurisdiction
To
_______________ (GSTIN/ID)
Name
_______________ (Address)
Copy to –
Note –
1. In case of demands

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of summary of the order creating demand under existing laws
Reference no.
Date –
Part A – Basic details
Serial Number
Description
Particulars
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
GSTIN
2.
Legal name
<>
3.
Trade name, if any
<>
4.
Reference no. vide which demand uploaded in FORM GST DRC-07A
5.
Date of FORM GST DRC-07A vide which demand uploaded
6.
Government Authority who passed the order creating the demand
ð State /UT ð Centre
<>
7.
Old Registration No.
<< Auto, editable>>
8.
Jurisdiction under earlier law
<>
9.
Act under which demand has been created
<>
10.
Tax period for which demand has been created
<>
11.
Order No. (original)
<>
12.
Order date (original)
<>
13.
Latest order no.
<>
14.
Latest order date
<>
15.
Date of service of the order
<>
16.
Name of the officer who has passed the order (optional)
<>
17.
Designation of the officer who has passed the order
<>
18.
Whether demand is stayed
ð Yes ð No
19.
Date of stay order

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s Sri Lakshmi Prasanna Agro Paper Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam – GST

M/s Sri Lakshmi Prasanna Agro Paper Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam – GST
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 906 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 6-11-2018
Appeal No. E/30484/2018 – A/31465/2018
Central Excise
Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri D. Viswanathan, Consultant for the Appellant.
Shri P.S. Reddy, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: P. Venkata Subba Rao
Facts of the case in brief are that the appellants herein are manufacturers of printing and writing paper, newsprint and kraft paper etc., and have being paying excise duty and filing periodical returns. During the months of March, 2013 and April, 2013 there was a delay in payment of excise duty to the tune of Rs. 4,91,507/- and 4,30,040/- for a short period. As the delay in payment of Central Excise duty for the months of March and April 2013 is beyond the grace period of 30 days the assessee /appellant is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he imposition of penalty under Rule 25 for violation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. He would submit that these Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules 2002, has been read down by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Indsur Global Ltd., Vs. Union of India [2014 (12) TMI 585 – Gujarat High Court]. Relying on this judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, the following orders were passed including one by the CESTAT Hyderabad. Endo Labs Ltd., Shri Dheeraj Lulla Director Vs. CCE & ST [2017 (1) TMI 1604 -CESTAT New Delhi], CCE & C, Nashik-II Vs. Nasik Forge Pvt. Ltd., [2018 (9) TMI 1582- Bombay High Court] & CCE, C & ST, Hyderabad -I Vs. Sri Durga Packing Industries [2017 (6) TMI 74- CESTAT-Hyderabad]. The entire penalty was for violation of Rule 8(3A) which has been held ultra vires by the constitutional Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat which decision was followed in other decisions including the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay and by this Bench

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nd the appellant is liable to penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The only point on which the Learned Consultant argues is that Rule 8(3A) has already been read down by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat and hence the demand is not sustainable. Learned Departmental Representative rightly points out that this decision has been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He further submits that this stay was not brought to the notice of the bench in other cases relied upon by the Learned Counsel. The stay granted by the Hon'ble Apex Court leaves me with no option was to hold that the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court does not apply. However, considering overall facts of the case, I find it is fair to reduce the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 from Rs. 50,000/- to Rs. 25,000/-. The impugned order is modified to the extent that the penalty imposed on the appellant reduced to Rs. 25,000/-. The appeal is disposed of as herein above.
(Operative porti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SH Rao Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Guntur – GST

SH Rao Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Guntur – GST
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 976 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 6-11-2018
Appeal No. ST/30844/2018 – A/31466/2018
Service Tax
Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri Y. Sreenivasa Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri V.R. Pavan Kumar, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: P. Venkata Subba Rao
This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. GUNEXCUS- 000-APP-006-18-19, dated 13.04.2018.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. The appellant herein was providing digitization of records and database services and was liable to pay service tax and he was also availing the facility of CENVAT credit under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. During the course of audit, it was found by the department that the assessee has taken irregular CENVAT credit to the extent of Rs. 42,750/- on some services he has also availed an excess amount of Rs. 4,452/- as credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nal of the lower authority. Hence this appeal.
4. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant was a small time operator without adequate knowledge of the service tax procedures and CENVAT Credit Rules and therefore had taken CENVAT credit wrongly on several inputs including the two amounts in dispute. On being pointed he had reversed the amounts along with interest except the interest on these two amounts. The appeal has been filed seeking that the interest under Section 75 and the penalty under Section 78 equal to the demand may also be set aside. They have not disputed the recovery of the CENVAT credit. Insofar as the amount of interest is concerned, it was the contention in their appeal that they had adequate balance in their credit and hence no interest was liable to be paid because they had not utilized the disputed amounts. Learned Counsel fairly concedes that this position is not correct and they had, in fact, utilized the credit and therefore were liable to pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d and they had not maintained any credit balance equivalent to the irregular credit taken during the period in dispute. In fact, the assessee had shown zero closing balance of service tax in their ST-3 returns. He, therefore, submits that the appellant was liable to pay interest as they had wrongly utilized the CENVAT credit. He further argues that in so far as these two amounts were concerned, the appellant had taken CENVAT credit in violation of the rules and had evaded payment of duty to the extent. Therefore they are fully liable for penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, he concedes that the appellant was covered by the proviso to Section 78 is applicable during the relevant period inasmuch as the irregular availment of CENVAT credit by the appellant and consequent evasion of payment of service tax was noticed by an audit of the books of accounts maintained by the appellants themselves.
6. I have considered the arguments on both sides and perused the records.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pr. Commissioner of Customs & Central Tax, Hyderabad – GST Versus M/s Evonik India Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Customs & Central Tax, Hyderabad – GST Versus M/s Evonik India Pvt. Ltd.
Customs
2019 (2) TMI 497 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 6-11-2018
Appeal Nos. C/31010 & 31099/2018 – A/31557-31558/2018
Customs
Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri V.R. Pavan Kumar, Shri Guna Ranjan, Superintendent (ARs) for the Appellant (s).
None for the Respondent (s).
ORDER
Per: P. Venkata Subba Rao
These two appeals and the corresponding stay petitions have been filed by the Revenue against the impugned orders of the First Appellate Authority as follows:
Sl. No.
Appeal No.
Stay petition No.
Impugned Order
1.
C/31010/2018
C/Stay/30700/2018
OIA No. HYD-CUS-000-APP-006-18-19, dated 24.05.2018
2.
C/31099/2018
C/Stay/30739/2018
OIA No. HYD-CUS-000-APP-016-18-19, dated 22.06.2018
2. When these two appeals were called out, none appeared on behalf of the respondent. Since the issue falls in short compass the matter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AD unit is 4%, to claim SAD refund VAT as applicable for the goods in question has to be paid which could be more or less than 4%. In this case the respondent's goods were exempted from VAT and as such nil rate of duty VAT was applicable and they had sold the goods and claimed refund of SAD. The refund applications were rejected by the lower authority holding that they had not fulfilled the conditions of the Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14.09.2007 inasmuch as they had not paid any VAT or sales tax on the goods sold and therefore the exemption notification does not apply to them.
4. Aggrieved, the respondent herein preferred appeals before the First Appellate Authority who, after examining the matter in detail, allowed the appeals of the assessee. The present appeals are against these orders of the First Appellate Authority.
5. Learned Departmental Representative submits that the exemption notification has to be strictly construed and it requires that the appropriate rate of VA

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Nikhil Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Customs [2005 (187) ELT 6 (Cal.)] the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta also held that the term 'appropriate' does not include 'nil'.
iii) Even, if more than one interpretation is possible the exemption notification must be strictly construed and therefore the benefit of the exemption notification No. 102/2007 should not have been given to the respondent herein. Therefore the orders of the first appellate authority may be set aside.
6. I have considered the arguments and perused the records. The short point to be decided is whether the benefit of SAD in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus is available to importers who sell the imported goods on payment of nil rate of VAT when the applicable rate of VAT is nil. The Department asserts that it is not available while the first appellate authority held that it is available. The Department seeks to rely on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dhiren Chemical Industries (supra) to hold t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST TDS Rules Amended: Transactions Between Public Sector Undertakings Now Exempt from TDS Requirements Under GST.

GST TDS Rules Amended: Transactions Between Public Sector Undertakings Now Exempt from TDS Requirements Under GST.
Notifications
GST
TDS under GST – public sector undertaking – supply from on

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Kerala Government exempts quit rent for agricultural land used in coffee plantations from GST under HSN 9986.

Kerala Government exempts quit rent for agricultural land used in coffee plantations from GST under HSN 9986.
Case-Laws
GST
The quit rent / lease rent paid to Kerala Government on the land us

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

'Classic Malabar Parota' & 'Whole Wheat Malabar Parota' fall under 18% GST in Schedule III, Heading 2106.

'Classic Malabar Parota' & 'Whole Wheat Malabar Parota' fall under 18% GST in Schedule III, Heading 2106.
Case-Laws
GST
‘Classic Malabar Parota’ and ‘Whole Wheat Malabar Parota’ class

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Medicines and Implants for In-Patient Care Qualify as Composite Supply, Exempt Under Health Care Services.

Medicines and Implants for In-Patient Care Qualify as Composite Supply, Exempt Under Health Care Services.
Case-Laws
GST
The supply of medicines, consumables and implants used in the course of providing health care services to in-patients for diagnosis or treatment are naturally bundled and are provided in conjunction with each other, would be considered as “Composite Supply” and eligible for exemption under the category ‘health care services’.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Court Bars Revenue Authorities from Forcing ONGC to Deposit GST Dues Amid Petitioner's Financial Hardship.

Court Bars Revenue Authorities from Forcing ONGC to Deposit GST Dues Amid Petitioner's Financial Hardship.
Case-Laws
GST
Recovery of GST dues from the debtors – extreme financial hardship – t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

COMMISSION PAYMENT

COMMISSION PAYMENT
Query (Issue) Started By: – nandankumar roy Dated:- 5-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 20-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 5 Replies
GST
WE ARE PAYING COMMISSION TO PARTY AS A SALES COMMISSION : PARTY IS NOT REGISTERED TO GST AS THEIR ALL TRANSACTION WITH IN TURNOVER LIMIT 20 LACS CITERIA
1ST PARTY INTRA STATE AND PAYING 7 LACS
2ND PARTY INTERSTATE AND PAYING 9 LACS
WHAT WILL BE IMPACT ON TRANSACTION IN GST REGIME AND WHETHER ANY LIABILITY ARISE IN FUTURE WITH US . PL HELP REGARDING THIS MATTER WHO HAVE CLEAR IDEA AND ADVANCE THANKS.
N K ROY
Reply By Nandan Khambete:
The Reply:
No impact in GST till 30.9.2019 as RCM for 9(4) CGST is deferred till 30.09.2019.
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

INSTANT NOODLES: INSTANT PROFITS

INSTANT NOODLES: INSTANT PROFITS
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 5-11-2018

If noodles can be cooked and consumed instantly, why not profit on sale of noodles! In yet another case where anti-profiteering charges have been established, the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) has confirmed that sale of Maggie Noodle pack (Noodles) at same price even after rate of GST on it was reduced from 18% to 12% w.e.f. 15 November, 2017 was a case of anti-profiteering u/s 171 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 128 CGST Rules, 2017 and that the dealer ought to be booked and penalized for indulging in such anti-profiteering act.
In a recent order dated 8th October, 2018, the NAA has in the matter of Ankur Jain and DGAP, CBIC, New Delhi v. Kunj Lub Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Hardoi (UP) (2018) 10 TMI 510; confirmed the allegation of anti-profiteering and penalized the dealer.
The complainant (retailer) lodged an e-mail complaint stating that he had purc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

price reduction would have been around 21 paise to the retailer and around 25 paise to the ultimate consumer which would have been inconvenient to both the retailer and the consumer. However, on Maggi Noodles pack of 70 gms. bearing MRP of ₹ 12/- per pack, the benefit on account of GST rate reduction for the retailer would have been approximately 56 paise against which the distributor had reduced the price by 92 paise with reduced MRP of ₹ 11/- and thus, the benefit in respect of ₹ 5/- MRP pack had been passed on by reducing the price of other packs of Maggi Noodles by more than what was required. It claimed that the benefit of GST rate reduction had been passed on in respect of Maggie Noodles as a whole.
The dealer has contended that it had passed on the benefit of GST rate reduction in respect of 70 gm. pack of Maggi Noodles bearing MRP of ₹ 12/- by reducing the price for the complainant and the ultimate consumer by 92 paise and Re. 1/- respectively, which w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

H
I
J
K
L=112% of E
M=[H-L]
N=[K*M]
1
MAGGI 2-MIN Mas Ndls 35Gms
5.00
4.67
3.96
18%
12468
4.67
4.17
12%
382048
4.43
0.24
90,778/-
Total Profiteering on sale of the Product
90,778/-
The NAA considered the report of DGAP and carved out the following issues to be decided by the Authority:
* Whether the benefit accrued due to reduction in the rate of tax of one product can be passed on via another product or not?
* Whether there was any violation of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 in this case?
* If yes then what was the quantum of profiteering?
It noted that there is no doubt that the benefit of reduction in the GST rate was not passed on to the recipients by way of commensurate reduction in the price charged by the dealer which amounts to violation of the provisions of Section 171 of the Act.
Further, the distributor had no legal sanction to increase the base price of the product on his own and what was required of him was that he should

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in respect of which products he would pass on the benefit and in respect of which products he would not pass such benefit. As per the provisions of Section 171 of the Act the benefit has to be passed on to each recipient and the same can not be selectively granted or denied. It is also clear that the Maggi Noodle pack of 35 Gms. is distinct from a 70 Gms. pack and both the packs may be bought by the different recipients/customers and hence the benefit accruing to one customer can not be given or denied to another nor can the benefit given to one set of customers arbitrarily enhanced and set off against the another. No such adjustments are permissible under the law.
The NAA held that the distributor had denied benefit of the reduction in GST rate to the consumers in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and had thus realized more price from them than he was entitled to collect and had also compelled them to pay more GST than that they were required t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TDS under GST – public sector undertaking – supply from one PSU to another PSU exempted from applicability of provisions relating to TDS

TDS under GST – public sector undertaking – supply from one PSU to another PSU exempted from applicability of provisions relating to TDS
61/2018 Dated:- 5-11-2018 Central GST (CGST)
GST
CGST
CGST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Notification No. 61/2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 5th November, 2018
G.S.R. 1084 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1, read with section 51 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notifi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Scope of principal and agent relationship under Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017 in the context of del-credere agent – Reg.

Scope of principal and agent relationship under Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017 in the context of del-credere agent – Reg.
73/47/2018 Dated:- 5-11-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 73/47/2018-GST
F. No. 20/16/04/2018- GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 5th November, 2018
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners/ Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All)
The Principal Directors General/ Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Scope of principal and agent relationship under Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017 in the context of del-credere agent – Reg.
Post issuance of circular No. 57/31/2018-GST dated 4th September, 2018 from F. No. CBEC/20/16/4/2018-GST, various representations have been received from the trade and industry, as well as from the field formations regarding the scope and ambit of principal agent relatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

paid to a normal agent. In order to guarantee timely payment to the supplier, the DCA can resort to various methods including extending short-term transaction-based loans to the buyer or paying the supplier himself and recovering the amount from the buyer with some interest at a later date. This loan is to be repaid by the buyer along with an interest to the DCA at a rate mutually agreed between DCA and buyer. Concerns have been expressed regarding the valuation of supplies from Principal to recipient where the payment for such supply is being discharged by the recipient through the loan provided by DCA or by the DCA himself. Issues arising out of such loan arrangement have been examined and the clarifications on the same are as below:
Sl. No.
Issue
Clarification
1
Whether a DCA falls under the ambit of agent under Para 3 of Schedule I of the CGST Act?
As already clarified vide circular No. 57/31/2018-GST dated 4th September, 2018, whether or not the DCA will fall under the am

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n cases where the DCA is not an agent under Para 3 of Schedule I of the CGST Act, the temporary short-term transaction based loan being provided by DCA to the buyer is a supply of service by the DCA to the recipient on Principal to Principal basis and is an independent supply.
Therefore, the interest being charged by the DCA would not form part of the value of supply of goods supplied (to the buyer) by the supplier. It may be noted that vide notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017 (S. No. 27), services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount (other than interest involved in credit card services) has been exempted.
3.
Where DCA is an agent under Para 3 of Schedule I of the CGST Act and makes payment to the principal on behalf of the buyer and charges interest to the buyer for delayed payment along with the value of goods being supplied, whether the interest will form a part

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Collection of tax at source by Tea Board of India – Reg.

Collection of tax at source by Tea Board of India – Reg.
74/48/2018 Dated:- 5-11-2018 CGST – Circulars / Ordes
GST
Circular No. 74/48/2018-GST
F. No. 20/16/04/2018- GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
New Delhi, Dated the 5th November, 2018
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners/ Principal Commissioners/Commissioners of Central Tax (All)
The Principal Directors General/ Directors General (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Collection of tax at source by Tea Board of India – Reg.
Tea Board of India (hereinafter referred to as the, “Tea Board”), being the operator of the electronic auction system for trading of tea across the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rged by the auctioneers and also the amount charged by the Tea Board from sellers, auctioneers and buyers. Thereafter, Tea Board pays to the sellers (i.e. tea producers), from the said escrow account, for the supply of goods made by them (i.e. tea) and to the auctioneers for the supply of services made by them (i.e. brokerage). Under no circumstances, the payment is made by the Tea Board to the auctioneers on account of supply of goods i.e., tea sold at auction.
4. A representation has been received from Tea Board, seeking clarification whether they should collect TCS under section 52 of the CGST Act from the sellers of tea (i.e. the tea producers), or from the auctioneers of tea or from both.
5. The matter has been examined. In exercise

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

A SYED ALI FATHIMA Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SUVEILLANCE SQUAD, POOVAR, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GOODS AND

A SYED ALI FATHIMA Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SUVEILLANCE SQUAD, POOVAR, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (11) TMI 484 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-11-2018
WP(C).No. 36047 of 2018
GST
MR A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
For The Petitioner : ADVS. SRI.P.S.SOMAN AND

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the GGST Act.

Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the GGST Act.
CIRCULAR No. 57/2018 Dated:- 5-11-2018 Gujarat SGST
GST – States
CIRCULAR
Commissioner of State Tax,
Gujarat State, Ahmedabad
Dated 5th November, 2018
CIRCULAR No. 57/2018
No.GSL/GST/B.13
Subject: Scope of Principal-agent relationship in the context of Schedule I of the GGST Act.
In terms of Schedule I of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter to as the “GGST Act”), the supply of goods by an agent on behalf of the principal without consideration has been deemed to be a supply. In this connection, various representations have been received regarding the scope and ambit of the principal-agent relationship under GST. In order to clarify some of the issues and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across the field formations, the Commissioner of State Tax, in exercise of its powers conferred under section 168 (1) of the GGST Act hereby cl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lf of another.
4. The following two key elements emerge from the above definition of agent:
a) the term 'agent' is defined in terms of the various activities being carried out by the person concerned in the principal-agent relationship; and
b) the supply or receipt of goods or services has to be undertaken by the agent on behalf of the principal.
From this, it can be deduced that the crucial component for covering a person within the ambit of the term “agent” under the GGST Act is corresponding to the representative character identified in the definition of “agent” under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
5. Further, the two limbs of any supply under GST are “consideration” and “in the course or furtherance of business”. Where the consideration is not extant in a transaction, such a transaction does not fall within the ambit of supply. But, in certain scenarios, as elucidated in Schedule I of the GGST Act, the key element of consideration is not required to be present for treating

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to determine whether the agent is wearing the representative hat and is supplying or receiving goods on behalf of the principal. Since in the commercial world, there are various factors that might influence this relationship, it would be more prudent that an objective criteria is used to determine whether a particular principal-agent relationship falls within the ambit of the said entry or not. Thus, the key ingredient for determining relationship under GST would be whether the invoice for the further supply of goods on behalf of the principal is being issued by the agent or not. Where the invoice for further supply is being issued by the agent in his name then, any provision of goods from the principal to the agent would fall within the fold of the said entry. However, it may be noted that in cases where the invoice is issued by the agent to the customer in the name of the principal, such agent shall not fall within the ambit of Schedule I of the GGST Act. Similarly, where the goods

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ly of goods in terms of Schedule I.
Scenario 2
M/s. XYZ, a banking company, appoints Mr. B (auctioneer) to auction certain goods. The auctioneer arranges for the auction and identifies the potential bidders. The highest bid is accepted and the goods are sold to the highest bidder by M/s. XYZ. The invoice for the supply of the goods is issued by M/s. XYZ to the successful bidder. In this scenario, the auctioneer is merely providing the auctioneering services with no role played in the supply of the goods. Even in this scenario, Mr. B is not an agent of Mis XYZ for the supply of goods in terms of Schedule I.
Scenario 3
Mr. A, an artist, appoints M/s. B (auctioneer) to auction his painting. M/S B arranges for the auction and identifies the potential bidders. The highest bid is accepted and the painting is sold to the highest bidder. The invoice for the supply of the painting is issued by M/s. B on the behalf of Mr. A but in his own name and the painting is delivered to the successfu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

per the APMC Act, the commission agent is a person who buys or sells the agricultural produce on behalf of his principal, or facilitates buying and selling of agricultural produce on behalf of his principal and receives, by way of remuneration, a commission or percentage upon the amount involved in such transaction.
In cases where the invoice is issued by Mr. B to the buyer, the former is an agent covered under Schedule J. However, in cases where the invoice is issued directly by Mr. A to the buyer, the commission agent (Mr. B) doesn't fall under the category of agent covered under Schedule I.
9. In scenario I and scenario 2, Mr. B shall not be liable to obtain registration in terms of clause (vii) of section 24 of the GGST Act. He, however, would be liable for registration if his aggregate turnover of supply of taxable services exceeds the threshold specified in sub-section (1) of section 22 of the GGST Act. In scenario 3, M/s. B shall be liable for compulsory registration in terms

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Scope of principal and agent relationship under Schedule I of GGST Act, 2017 in the context of del-credrc agent.

Scope of principal and agent relationship under Schedule I of GGST Act, 2017 in the context of del-credrc agent.
CIRCULAR No. 73/2018-GST Dated:- 5-11-2018 Gujarat SGST
GST – States
CIRCULAR
Commissioner of State Tax,
Gujarat State, Ahmedabad
Dated 5th November, 2018
CIRCULAR No.73/2018-GST
No. GSL/GST/B.15
Subject: Scope of principal and agent relationship under Schedule I of GGST Act, 2017 in the context of del-credrc agent.
Post issuance of circular No. 57/201 S-GST dated the 5th November, 2018 (effective from 4th September, 2018). various representations have been received from the trade and industry. as well as from the field formations regarding the scope and ambit of principal agent relationship under GST in the context of del-credre agent (hereinafter referred to as “DCA”). In order to clarify these issues and to ensure uniformity of implementation across field formations, the Commissioner of State Tax, in exercise of its powers conferred under section 168 (1) o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h some interest at a later date. This loan is to be repaid by the buyer along with an interest to the DCA at a rate mutually agreed between DCA and buyer. Concerns lune been expressed regarding the valuation of supplies from Principal to recipient where the payment for such supply is being discharged by the recipient through the loan provided by DCA or by the DCA himself. Issues arising out of such loan arrangement have been examined and the clarification on the same are as below:
Sl. No.
Issue
Clarification
1
Whether a DCA falls under the ambit of agent under Para 3 of Schedule I of the GGST Act?
As already clarified vide circular No. 57/31/2018-GST dated 4th September, 2018, whether or not the DCA will fall under the ambit of agent under Para 3 of Schedule I of the GGST Act depends on the following possible scenarios:
In case where the invoice for supply of goods is issued by the supplier to the customer, either himself or through DCA, the DCA does not fall under the ambit of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

supply.
Therefore, the interest being charged by the DCA would not form part of the value of supply of goods supplied (to the buyer) by the supplier. It may be noted that vide notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) dated 30th June, 2017 (S. No. 27), services by way of extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount (other than interest involved in credit card services) has been exempted.
3.
Where DCA is an agent under Para 3 of Schedule I of the GGST Act and makes payment to the principal on behalf of the buyer and charges interest to the buyer for delayed payment along with the value of goods being supplied, whether the interest will form a part of the value of supply of goods also or not?
In such a scenario following activities are taking place:
1. Supply of goods by the supplier (principal) to the DCA;
2. Further supply of goods by the DCA to the recipient;
3. Supply of agency services by the DCA to the su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Corrigendum to Circular No. 57/2018-GST dated the 5th November, 2018 (effective from 4th September, 2018).

Corrigendum to Circular No. 57/2018-GST dated the 5th November, 2018 (effective from 4th September, 2018).
Corrigendum to Circular No. 57/2018-GST Dated:- 5-11-2018 Gujarat SGST
GST – States
CIRCULAR
Commissioner of State Tax,
Gujarat State, Ahmedabad
Dated 5th November, 2018
Corrigendum to Circular No. 57/2018-GST
No.GSL/GST/B.14
Subject: Corrigendum to Circular No. 57/2018-GST dated the 5th November, 2018 (effective from 4th September, 2018).
In para 9 of the Circular No. 57/2018-GST dated the 5th November, 2018 (effective from) 4th September,2018),
for
“However, in cases where the supply of' agricultural produce is not exempted and liable to lax, such commission agent shall be liable for compulsory registration under su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

who supplies produce out of cultivation of' land is not liable for registration and therefore does not fall within the ambit of the term 'taxable person'. Thus a commission agent who is making supplies on behalf of such an agriculturist, who is not a taxable person. is not liable for compulsory registration under clause (vii) of section 24 of the GGST Act. However, where a commission agent is liable to pay under reverse charge, such an agent will be required to get registered compulsorily under section 24(iii) of GGST Act.”
2. Difficulty, if any, in implementation of this Circular may please be brought to the notice of the Commissioner.
(PD Vaghela)
Commissioner of State Tax,
Gujarat State, Ahemdabad
Circular, Trade Notice, Public

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Jeetendra Kantilal Gandhi Versus State of Karnataka By Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bengaluru, Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bengaluru, Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Bangaluru

Jeetendra Kantilal Gandhi Versus State of Karnataka By Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bengaluru, Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bengaluru, Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Bangaluru
GST
2018 (12) TMI 1407 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 410 (Kar.)
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-11-2018
CRL. P No 7465 of 2018
GST
MR P S Dinesh Kumar, J.
For The Petitioner : Sri Chitnis P R, Advocate
For The Respondent : Sri Nitin Ramesh AAG A/w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Has charity included pay gst

Has charity included pay gst
Query (Issue) Started By: – Chiran Kumar Dated:- 4-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-11-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Hello sir … We are running a non profit organisation under registration of 12AAA, and 80G
My doubt is we are running special school in rented building, so has we should pay GST with rent.. by chance if we payed can we reclaimed it..
I hope you oblige my request..
Thank you..
Reply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
The Repl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st November 2018)

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st November 2018)
GST
Dated:- 3-11-2018

CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS (CBIC)
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
AS ON 1st NOVEMBER, 2018
The uniform system of taxation, which, with a few exceptions of no great consequence, takes place in all the different parts of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, leaves the interior commerce of the country, the inland and coasting trade, almost entirely free. The inland trade is almost perfectly free, and the greater part of goods may be carried from one end of the kingdom to the other, without requiring any permit or let-pass, without being subject to question, visit, or examination from the revenue officers. ……This freedom of interior commerce, the effect of uniformity of the system of taxation, is perhaps one of the principal causes of the prosperity of Great Britain; every great country being necessarily the best and most extensive market f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Article 265 of the Constitution of India provides that no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. As per Article 246 of the Constitution, Parliament has exclusive powers to make laws in respect of matters given in Union List (List I of the Seventh Schedule) and State Government has the exclusive jurisdiction to legislate on the matters containing in State List (List II of the Seventh Schedule). In respect of the matters contained in Concurrent List (List III of the Seventh Schedule), both the Central Government and State Governments have concurrent powers to legislate.
2.2 Before advent of GST, the most important sources of indirect tax revenue for the Union were customs duty (entry 83 of Union List), central excise duty (entry 84 of Union List), and service tax (entry 97 of Union List). Although entry 92C was inserted in the Union List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution by the Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003 for levy of taxes on service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

XATION IN POSTINDEPENDENCE INDIA TILL GST:
3.1 In post-Independence period, central excise duty was levied on a few commodities which were in the nature of raw materials and intermediate inputs, and consumer goods were outside the net by and large. The first set of reform was suggested by the Taxation Enquiry Commission (1953-54) under the chairmanship of Dr. John Matthai. The Commission recommended that sales tax should be used specifically by the States as a source of revenue with Union governments' intervention allowed generally only in case of inter-State sales. It also recommended levy of a tax on inter-State sales subject to a ceiling of 1%, which the States would administer and also retain the revenue.
3.2 The power to levy tax on sale and purchase of goods in the course of inter-State trade and commerce was assigned to the Union by the Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act, 1956. By mid-1970s, central excise duty was extended to most manufactured goods. Central excise duty w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ere came with the New Economic Policy of 1991. The Tax Reforms Committee under the chairmanship of Prof. Raja J Chelliah was appointed in 1991. This Committee recommended broadening of the tax base by taxing services and pruning exemptions, consolidation and lowering of rates, extension of MODVAT on all inputs including capital goods. It suggested that reform of tax structure must have to be accompanied by a reform of tax administration, if complete benefits were to be derived from the tax reforms. Many of the recommendations of the Chelliah Committee were implemented. In 1999-2000, tax rates were merged in three rates, with additional rates on a few luxury goods. In 2000-01, three rates were merged into one rate called Central Value Added Tax (CENVAT). A few commodities were subjected to special excise duty.
3.5 Taxation of services by the Union was introduced in 1994 bringing in its ambit only three services, namely general insurance, telecommunication and stock broking. Gradually,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

were more than ten in some States and these varied for the same commodity in different States. Inter-state sales were subjected to levy of Central Sales Tax. As this tax was appropriated by the exporting State credit was not allowed by the dealer in the importing State. This resulted into exportation of tax from richer to poorer states and also cascading of taxes. Interestingly, States had power of taxation over services from the very beginning. States levied tax on advertisements, luxuries, entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling.
3.7 A report, titled “Reform of Domestic Trade Taxes in India”, on reforming indirect taxes, especially State sales tax, by National Institute of Public Finance and Policy under the leadership of Dr. Amaresh Bagchi, was prepared in 1994. This Report prepared the ground for implementation of VAT in States. Some of the key recommendations were; replacing sales tax by VAT by moving over to a multistage system of taxation; allowing input tax credits f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he first State to implement VAT, in 2003. In 2005, VAT was implemented in most of the states. Uttar Pradesh was the last State to implement VAT, from 1st January, 2008.
4. INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON GST / VAT:
4.1 VAT and GST are used inter-changeably as the latter denotes comprehensiveness of VAT by coverage of goods and services. France was the first country to implement VAT, in 1954. Presently, more than 160 countries have implemented GST / VAT in some form or the other. The most popular form of VAT is where taxes paid on inputs are allowed to be adjusted in the liability at the output. The VAT or GST regime in practice varies from one country to another in terms of its technical aspects like 'definition of supply', 'extent of coverage of goods and services', 'treatment of exemptions and zero rating' etc. However, at a broader level, it has one common principle, it is a destination based consumption tax. From economic point of view, VAT is considered to be a superior system ove

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

administer their taxes separately are called 'nonparticipating provinces', whereas provinces which have teamed up with the Federal Government for tax administration are called 'participating provinces'.
4.3 The rate of GST varies across countries. While Malaysia has a lower rate of 6% (Malaysia though scrapped GST in 2018 due to popular uproar against it), Hungary has one of the highest rate of 27%. Australia levies GST at the rate of 10% whereas Canada has multiple rate slabs. The average rate of VAT across the EU is around 19.5%.
5. NEED FOR GST IN INDIA:
5.1 The introduction of CENVAT removed to a great extent cascading burden by expanding the coverage of credit for all inputs, including capital goods. CENVAT scheme later also allowed credit of services and the basket of inputs, capital goods and input services could be used for payment of both central excise duty and service tax. Similarly, the introduction of VAT in the States has removed the cascading effect by giving set-off

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

risdiction where consumption takes place. Despite remarkable harmonization in VAT regimes under the auspices of the EC, the national market was fragmented with too many obstacles in free movement of goods necessitated by procedural requirement under VAT and CST.
5.4 In the constitutional scheme, taxation powers on goods was with Central Government but it was limited upto the stage of manufacture and production while States have powers to tax sale and purchase of goods. Centre had powers to tax services and States also had powers to tax certain services specified in clause (29A) of Article 366 of the Constitution. This sort of division of taxing powers created a grey zone which led to legal disputes. Determination of what constitutes a goods or service is difficult because in modern complex system of production, a product is normally a mixture of goods and services.
5.5 As can be seen from the previous paragraphs, India moved towards value added taxation both at Central and State leve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ril 1, 2010 and that the EC, on his request, would work with the Central Government to prepare a road map for introduction of GST in India. After this announcement, the EC decided to set up a Joint Working Group in May 10, 2007, with the then Adviser to the Union Finance Minister and Member-Secretary of the Empowered Committee as its Co-conveners and four Joint Secretaries of the Department of Revenue of Union Finance Ministry and all Finance Secretaries of the States as its members. This Joint Working Group got itself divided into three Sub-Groups and had several rounds of internal discussions as well as interaction with experts and representatives of Chambers of Commerce & Industry. On the basis of these discussions and interaction, the Sub-Groups submitted their reports which were then integrated and consolidated into the report of Joint Working Group (November 19, 2007).
6.3 This report was discussed in detail in the meeting of the EC on November 28, 2007, and the States were also

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he EC and the Central Government, the EC released its First Discussion Paper (FDP) on GST in November, 2009. This spelled out the features of the proposed GST and has formed the basis for discussion between the Centre and the States.
7. CHALLENGES IN DESIGNING GST:
7.1 In the discussion that preceded amendment in the Constitution for GST, there were a number of thorny issues that required resolution and agreement between Central Government and State Governments. Implementing a tax reform as vast as GST in a diverse country like India required the reconciliation of interests of various States with that of the Centre. Some of the challenging issues, addressed in the run up to GST, were the following:
7.2 Origin-based versus Destination-based taxation: GST is a destination based consumption tax. Under destination based taxation, tax accrues to the destination place where consumption of the goods or services takes place. The existing VAT regime was based on origin principle where Centra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n. Spending of this income on consumer goods expands the sales tax base of the producing states and thereby contributes to their revenues. In fact, to the extent that consumer expenditures are dependent on the level of income of the residents of a State, it is the producing States that stand to gain the most in additional sales tax revenues (even under the destination basis of consumption taxes) from increased export output.
7.3 Rate Structure and Compensation: There was uncertainty about gains in revenue after implementation of GST. Though attempts were made to estimate a revenue neutral rate, nonetheless it remains an estimate only. It was difficult to estimate accurately as to how much the States will gain from tax on services and how much they will lose on account of removal of cascading effect and phasing out of CST. In view of this, States asked for compensation during the first five years of implementation of GST.
7.3.1 A Committee headed by the Chief Economic Adviser Dr. Arvi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

system of taxation necessarily required that all stakeholders stick to the decisions taken by the supreme body, which was later constituted as the Goods and Services Tax Council (the Council). However, the possibility of departure from the recommendations of such body cannot be completely ruled out. Any departure would definitely affect other stakeholders and in such circumstances there must be a statutory body to which affected parties may approach for dispute resolution. The nature of such dispute resolution body was a bone of contention. Under the Constitution (One Hundred Fifteenth Amendment) Bill, 2011, a Goods and Services Tax Dispute Settlement Authority was to be constituted for this purpose. This body was judicial in nature. The proposed constitution of this Authority was challenged because it's powers would override the supremacy of the Parliament and the State Legislatures. The Constitution (One Hundred Twenty Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 departed from the previous GST amen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tax tobacco and tobacco products, though these are also under GST. Thus, to ensure smooth transition and provide fiscal buffer to States, it was agreed to keep alcohol completely out of the ambit of GST.
8. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT:
8.1 As explained above, unification of Central VAT and State VAT was possible in form of a dual levy under the constitutional scheme. Power of taxation is assigned to either Union or States subject-wise under Schedule VII of the Constitution. While the Centre is empowered to tax goods upto the production or manufacturing stage, the States have the power to tax goods at distribution stage. The Union can tax services using residuary powers but States could not. Under a unified Goods and Services Tax scheme, both should have power to tax the complete supply chain from production to distribution, and both goods and services. The scheme of the Constitution did not provide for any concurrent taxing powers to the Union as well as the States and for the purpose

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

015. The Bill with certain amendments was finally passed in the Rajya Sabha and thereafter by Lok Sabha in August, 2016. Further the bill was ratified by required number of States and received assent of the President on 8th September, 2016 and has since been enacted as Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016 w.e.f. 16th September, 2016.
8.4 The important changes introduced in the Constitution by the 101st Amendment Act are the following:
* Insertion of new article 246A which makes enabling provisions for the Union and States with respect to the GST legislation. It further specifies that Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to GST on inter-State supplies.
* Article 268A of the Constitution has been omitted. The said article empowered the Government of India to levy taxes on services. As tax on services has been brought under GST, such a provision was no longer required.
* Article 269A has been inserted which provides for goods and services tax on supplies in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e alcoholic liquor for human consumption from the ambit of GST, and services have been defined.
* Article 368 has been amended to provide for a special procedure which requires the ratification of the Bill by the legislatures of not less than one half of the States in addition to the method of voting provided for amendment of the Constitution. Thus, any modification in GST Council shall also require the ratification by the legislatures of one half of the States.
* Entries in List I and List II have been either substituted or omitted to restrict power to tax goods or services specified in these Lists or to take away powers to tax goods and services which have been subsumed in GST.
* Parliament shall, by law, on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council, provide for compensation to the States for loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of the goods and services tax for five years.
* In case of petroleum and petroleum products, it has been provided that

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ay be exempted from GST;
* the rates including floor rates with bands of GST;
* any special rate or rates for a specified period to raise additional resources during any natural calamity or disaster;
* special provision with respect to the North- East States, J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand; and
* any other matter relating to the GST, as the Council may decide.
9.2 The Council shall recommend the date on which the goods and services tax be levied on petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas and aviation turbine fuel. While discharging the functions conferred by this article, the Goods and Services Tax Council shall be guided by the need for a harmonized structure of goods and services tax and for the development of a harmonized national market for goods and services.
9.3 One half of the total number of Members of the Goods and Services Tax Council shall constitute the quorum at its meetings. The Goods and Services Tax Counc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e 23rd meeting of the Council, this limit shall be raised to Rs. 1.5 Cr after necessary amendments in the Act. Composition scheme shall not be available to inter- State suppliers, service providers (except restaurant service) and specified category of manufacturers. For special category States (except J&K and Uttarakhand) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution, threshold exemption limit has been fixed at Rs. 75 lakh.
(iii) Existing tax incentive schemes of Central or State governments may be continued by respective government by way of reimbursement through budgetary route. The schemes, in the present form, would not continue in GST. Further, 50% exemption of the CGST portion will be provided to CSD (Defense Canteens).
(iv) Recommending GST laws, namely CGST Law, UTGST Law, IGST Law, SGST Law and GST Compensation Law paving the way for implementation of GST.
(v) In order to ensure single interface, all administrative control over 90% of taxpayers having turnover below Rs. 1.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s shall be exempted from obtaining registration:
* Suppliers of services, having turnover upto Rs. 20 lakh, making inter State supplies;
* Suppliers of services, having turnover upto Rs. 20 lakh, making supplies through e-commerce platforms.
(xi) The reverse charge mechanism under sub-section (4) of section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 and under sub-section (4) of section 5 of the IGST Act, 2017 has been suspended till 30.09.2019.
(xii) There shall be no requirement on payment of tax on advance received for supply of goods by all taxpayers.
(xiii) Supply from GTA to unregistered persons has been exempted from tax.
(xiv) TDS/TCS provisions to be implemented from 01.10.2018.
(xv) E-Wallet Scheme shall be introduced for exporters from 01.04.2019 and till then relief for exporters shall be given in form of broadly existing practice.
(xvi) All taxpayers are required to file return FORM GSTR-3B & pay tax on monthly basis.
(xvii) Taxpayers with turnover upto Rs. 1.5 Cr are required to f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

subsequently waived off shall be re-credited to the Electronic Cash Ledger of registered person under “Tax” head instead of “Fee” head.
(xxi) From October 2017 onwards, the amount of late fee for late filing of GSTR-3B payable by a registered person is as follows:
* whose tax liability for that month was 'NIL' will be Rs. 20/- per day instead of Rs. 200/- per day;
* whose tax liability for that month was not 'NIL' will be Rs. 50/- per day instead of Rs. 200/- per day.
(xxi) Facility has been introduced for manual filing of refund application.
(xxii) Supply of services to Nepal and Bhutan shall be exempted from GST even if payment has not been received in foreign convertible currency – such suppliers shall be eligible for input tax credit.
(xxiii) Centralized UIN shall be issued to every Foreign Diplomatic Mission / UN Organization by the Central Government.
(xxiv) Rate of interest on delayed payments and delayed refund has been recommended.
(xxv) Migration window was opened o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Act, 2018, respectively. The major amendments brought about by these Acts are as below:
 (i) Upper limit of turnover for opting for composition scheme to be raised from Rs. 1 Cr to Rs. 1.5 Cr. Present limit of turnover can now be raised on the recommendations of the Council.
(ii) Composition dealers to be allowed to supply services (other than restaurant services), for up to a value not exceeding 10% of turnover in the preceding financial year, or Rs. 5 lakh, whichever is higher.
(iii) Levy of GST on reverse charge mechanism on receipt of supplies from unregistered suppliers, to be applicable to only specified goods in case of certain notified classes of registered persons, on the recommendations of the GST Council.
(iv) The thres

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ply of goods in case of high sea sales.
(ix) Scope of input tax credit is being widened, and it would now be made available in respect of the following:
(a) Most of the activities or transactions specified in Schedule III;
(b) Motor vehicles for transportation of persons having seating capacity of more than thirteen (including driver), vessels and aircraft
(c) Services of general insurance, repair and maintenance in respect of motor vehicles, vessels and aircraft on which credit is available; and
(d) Goods or services which are obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees, under any law for the time being in force
(x) Registered persons may issue consolidated credit/debit notes in respect of multiple invoices issued in a Financial Year.
(xi) Amount of pre-deposit payable for filing of appeal before the Appellate Authority and the Appellate Tribunal to be capped at Rs. 25 Cr and Rs. 50 Cr respectively.
(xii) Commissioner to be empowered to extend the time limit for ret

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ortioned.
(xviii) Fifty per cent of such amount, as may be recommended by the Council, which remains unutilised in the Compensation Fund, at any point of time in any financial year during the transition period shall be transferred to the Consolidated Fund of India as the share of Centre, and the balance fifty per cent. shall be distributed amongst the States in the ratio of their base year revenue.
(xix) In case of shortfall in the amount collected in the Fund against the requirement of compensation to be released for any two months' period, fifty per cent. of the same, but not exceeding the total amount transferred to the Centre and the States as recommended by the Council, shall be recovered from the Centre and the balance fifty per cent. from the States in the ratio of their base year revenue.
In order to ensure that the changes in the Centre and the State GST laws are brought into force simultaneously, these amendments will be made effective from a date to be notified in the fut

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y to create his profile based on nature of supplies made and received. The fields of information which a taxpayer would be shown and would be required to fill in the return would depend on his profile.
 (v) NIL return filers (no purchase and no sale) shall be given facility to file return by sending SMS.
(vi) There shall be quarterly filing of return for the small taxpayers having turnover below Rs. 5 Cr as an optional facility. Quarterly return shall be similar to main return with monthly payment facility but for two kinds of registered persons – small traders making only B2C supply or making B2B + B2C supply. For such taxpayers, simplified returns have been designed called Sahaj and Sugam. In these returns details of information required to be filled is lesser than that in the regular return.
(vii) The new return design provides facility for amendment of invoice and also other details filed in the return. Amendment shall be carried out by filing of a return called amendment r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y of goods or services shall be subjected to integrated GST (Integrated tax / IGST). The IGST model is a unique contribution of India in the field of VAT. The IGST Model envisages that Centre would levy IGST (Integrated Goods and Service Tax) which would be CGST plus SGST on all inter-State supply of goods or services or both. The inter-State supplier will pay IGST on value addition after adjusting available credit of IGST, CGST, and SGST on his purchases. The Exporting State will transfer to the Centre the credit of SGST used in payment of IGST. The person based in the destination State will claim credit of IGST while discharging his output tax liability in his own State. The Centre will transfer to the importing State the credit of IGST used in payment of SGST. The relevant information will also be submitted to the Central Agency which will act as a clearing house mechanism, verify the claims and inform the respective governments to transfer the funds. The major advantages of IGST Mo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The list of goods and services in case of which reverse charge would be applicable has also been notified.
10.4 Compensation to States: The Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 provides for compensation to the States for the loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of the goods and services tax. Compensation will be provided to a State for a period of five years from the date on which the State brings its SGST Act into force. For the purpose of calculating the compensation amount in any financial year, year 2015-16 will be assumed to be the base year, for calculating the revenue to be protected. The growth rate of revenue for a State during the five-year period is assumed be 14% per annum. The base year tax revenue consists of the states' tax revenues from: (i) State Value Added Tax (VAT), (ii) central sales tax, (iii) entry tax, octroi, local body tax, (iv) taxes on luxuries, (v) taxes on advertisements, etc. However, any revenue among these taxes ari

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

018.
10.6 Anti-Profiteering Mechanism: Implementation of GST in many countries was coupled with increase in inflation and the prices of the commodities. This happened in spite of the availability of the tax credit. This was happening because the supplier was not passing on the benefit to the consumer and thereby indulging in illegal profiteering. Any reduction in rate of tax or the benefit of increased input tax credit should have been passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices.
10.6.1 National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAPA) has been constituted under GST by the Central Government to examine the complaints of non-passing the benefit of reduced tax incidence. The Authority shall cease to exist after the expiry of two years from the date on which the Chairman enters upon his office unless the Council recommends otherwise.
10.6.2 The Authority may determine whether any reduction in the rate of tax or the benefit of input tax credit has been passed on to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t shall be effective from a date to be notified in the future. The benefit of threshold exemption is not available in inter-State supplies of goods.
10.9 Composition Scheme: An optional composition scheme (i.e. to pay tax at a flat rate on turnover without credits) is available to small taxpayers (including to manufacturers other than specified category of manufacturers and service providers) having an annual turnover of up to Rs. 1 Cr (Rs. 75 lakh for special category States (except J&K and Uttarakhand) enumerated in article 279A of the Constitution). This limit has been raised to Rs. 1.5 Cr after necessary amendments in the GST Acts. The amendment shall be effective from a date to be notified in the future.
10.10 Zero rated Supplies: Export of goods and services are zero rated. Supplies to SEZs developers and SEZ units are also zero-rated. The benefit of zero rating can be taken either with payment of integrated tax, or without payment of integrated tax under bond or Letter of Unde

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d on B2C supplies would also be transferred by Centre to the destination State. The transfer of funds would be carried out on the basis of information contained in the returns filed by the taxpayers.
10.13 Modes of Payment: Various modes of payment of tax available to the taxpayer including internet banking, debit/ credit card and National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) / Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS).
10.14 Tax Deduction at Source: Obligation on certain persons including government departments, local authorities and government agencies, who are recipients of supply, to deduct tax at the rate of 1% from the payment made or credited to the supplier where total value of supply, under a contract, exceeds two lakh and fifty thousand rupees. The provision for TDS has been operationalized wef 01st October 2018. Exemption from the provisions of TDS has been given to certain authorities under the Ministry of Defence.
10.15 Refunds: Refund of tax to be sought by taxpayer or by any othe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

due date of filing of annual return or from the date of erroneous refund for raising demand for short-payment or non-payment of tax or erroneous refund and its adjudication in case of fraud, suppression or willful mis-statement.
10.18 Recovery of Arrears: Arrears of tax to be recovered using various modes including detaining and sale of goods, movable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person.
10.19 Appellate Tribunal: Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal would be constituted by the Central Government for hearing appeals against the orders passed by the Appellate Authority or the Revisional Authority. States would adopt the provisions relating to Tribunal in respective SGST Act.
10.20 Advance Ruling Authority: Advance Ruling Authority would be constituted by States in order to enable the taxpayer to seek a binding clarity on taxation matters from the department. Centre would adopt such authority under CGST Act.
10.21 Transitional Provisions: Elaborate transitional p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Act, IGST Act and GST (Compensation to States) Act were passed by the Parliament and since been notified on 12th April, 2017. All the other States (except J&K) and Union territories with legislature have passed their respective SGST Acts. The economic integration of India was completed on 8th July, 2017 when the State of J&K also passed the SGST Act and the Central Government also subsequently extended the CGST Act to J&K.
11.2. In its 28th meeting held in New Delhi on 21.07.2018, the GST Council recommended certain amendments in the CGST Act, IGST Act, UTGST Act and the GST (Compensation to States) Act. These amendments have been passed by Parliament and have been enacted, after receiving the assent of the Hon'ble President of India on 29.08.2018, as the Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to Stat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ficers, ease of exports, and extension of last dates for filling up various forms, etc.
12. ROLE OF CBIC:
12.1 CBIC is playing an active role in the drafting of GST law and procedures, particularly the CGST and IGST law, which will be exclusive domain of the Centre. This apart, the CBIC has prepared itself for meeting the implementation challenges, which are quite formidable. The number of taxpayers has gone up significantly. The existing IT infrastructure of CBIC has been suitably scaled up to handle such large volumes of data. Based on the legal provisions and procedure for GST, the content of work-flow software such as ACES (Automated Central Excise & Service Tax) would require re-engineering. The name of IT project of CBIC under GST is 'SAKSHAM' involving a total project value of Rs. 2,256 Cr.
12.2 Augmentation of human resources would be necessary to handle large taxpayers' base in GST scattered across the length and breadth of the country. Capacity building, particularly in th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ng the implementation of GST. It had set up the Feedback and Action Room which monitored the GST implementation challenges faced by the taxpayer and act as an active interface between the taxpayer and the Government.
13. GOODS & SERVICES TAX NETWORK:
13.1 Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has been set up by the Government as a private company under erstwhile Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. GSTN would provide three front end services to the taxpayers namely registration, payment and return. Besides providing these services to the taxpayers, GSTN would be developing back-end IT modules for 27 States who have opted for the same. Infosys has been appointed as Managed Service Provider (MSP). GSTN has selected 73 IT, ITeS and financial technology companies and 1 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CCT, Karnataka), to be called GST Suvidha Providers (GSPs). GSPs would develop applications to be used by taxpayers for interacting with the GSTN. The diagram below shows the work distri

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r GST law, can access the data. Data can be accessed by audit authorities as per law. No other entity can have any access to data available with GSTN.
14. GST: A GAME CHANGER FOR INDIAN ECONOMY:
14.1 GST will have a multiplier effect on the economy with benefits accruing to various sectors as discussed below.
14.2 Benefits to the exporters: The subsuming of major Central and State taxes in GST, complete and comprehensive setoff of input goods and services and phasing out of Central Sales Tax (CST) would reduce the cost of locally manufactured goods and services. This will increase the competitiveness of Indian goods and services in the international market and give boost to Indian exports. The uniformity in tax rates and procedures across the country will also go a long way in reducing the compliance cost.
14.3 Benefits to small traders and entrepreneurs: GST has increased the threshold for GST registration for small businesses. Those units having aggregate annual turnover more tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.
14.5 Benefits for common consumers: With the introduction of GST, the cascading effects of CENVAT, State VAT and service tax will be more comprehensively removed with a continuous chain of set-off from the producer's point to the retailer's point than what was possible under the prevailing CENVAT and VAT regime. Certain major Central and State taxes will also be subsumed in GST and CST will be phased out. Other things remaining the same, the burden of tax on goods would, in general, fall under GST and that would benefit the consumers.
14.6 Promote “Make in India”: GST will help to create a unified common national market for India, giving a boost to foreign investment and “Make in India” campaign. It will prevent cascading of taxes and make products cheaper, thus boosting aggregate demand. It will result in harmonization of laws, procedures and rates of tax. It will boost export and manufacturing activity, generate more employment and thus increase GDP with gainful employment leadin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t are at present governing our indirect tax system will lead to simplification and uniformity. Reduction in compliance costs as multiple record-keeping for a variety of taxes will not be needed, therefore, lesser investment of resources and manpower in maintaining records. It will result in simplified and automated procedures for various processes such as registration, returns, refunds, tax payments. All interaction shall be through the common GSTN portal, therefore, less public interface between the taxpayer and the tax administration. It will improve environment of compliance as all returns to be filed online, input credits to be verified online, encouraging more paper trail of transactions. Common procedures for registration of taxpayers, refund of taxes, uniform formats of tax return, common tax base, common system of classification of goods and services will lend greater certainty to taxation system.
15. EXPERIENCE OF REGISTRATION & RETURN FILING:
15.1 Registration & Returns Sna

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8
 74,02,151
16.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for April, 2018
 73,40,548
17.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for May, 2018
 74,12,201
18.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for June, 2018
 74,25,276
19.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for July, 2018
73,78,868
20.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for August, 2018
72,56,452
21.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for September, 2018
67,45,848
22.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for July, 2017
59,11,994
23.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for August, 2017
24,41,466
24.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for September, 2017
 65,74,840
25.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for October, 2017
25,04,083
26.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for November, 2017
 25,30,097
27.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for December, 2017
65,75,078
28.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for January, 2018
24,98,750
29.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for February, 2018
 24,86,344
30.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for March, 2018
 65,39,245
3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

se certain challenges not only for the government but also for business community, tax administration and even common citizens of the country. Some of these challenges relate to the unfamiliarity with the new regime and IT systems, legal challenges, return filing and reconciliations, passing on transition credit. Lack of robust IT infrastructure and system delays makes compliance difficult for the taxpayers. Many of the processes in the GST are new for small and medium enterprises in particular, who were not used to regular and online filing of returns and other formalities.
16.2 Based on the feedback received from businesses, consumers and taxpayers from across the country, attempt has been made to incorporate suggestions and reduce problems through short-term as well as long-term solutions. After rectifying system glitches, E-way bill for inter-State movement of goods has been successfully implemented from 1st April 2018. As regards intra-State supplies, option was given to States t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Market Fee Valid Post-GST Implementation Under State Law; Supported by Entry 66, List-II, VIIth Schedule.

Market Fee Valid Post-GST Implementation Under State Law; Supported by Entry 66, List-II, VIIth Schedule.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of market fee – Validity of levy after promulgation of Goods and s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST paid under wrong head

GST paid under wrong head
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kaustubh Karandikar Dated:- 3-11-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-11-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 13 Replies
GST
XYZ paid GST wrongly under IGST instead of paying under CGST + SGST for the period July'17 to September'18. Can they adjust the same while paying current months liability by issuing credit notes or they need to again pay CGST + SGST and then claim refund of IGST wrongly paid?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Querist, Are you sure about 'Place of supply' ? More details are required for correct reply.
Reply By Kaustubh Karandikar:
The Reply:
XYZ (Punjab) receiving commission for abroad on which GST is paid. As per Section 13(8) of IGST Act the PO

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

licable.
Reply By Kaustubh Karandikar:
The Reply:
yes received from abroad. But will it not fall under Section 8(2) of IGST Act and if not under which sub-section of Section 7 will it fall?
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
Your client is supplying /providing services, namely, " intermediary services" abroad and getting commission from a foreign service receiver. Service has been consumed outside India. As per Section 13(8) (b) of IGST Act, 2017, place of supply is location of supplier i.e. within India . So it is inter-State supply. and not intra-State. These, being intermediary services, are NOT covered under Section 7 of IGST Act.
Reply By Kaustubh Karandikar:
The Reply:
Sir, i appreciate your views. But Secti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

inter -State supply and reap the benefits of Inter-State inherent in Section 13 instead of thinking about depositing against wrong type of tax.I wish other learned experts intervene to clear the air.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
In this regards, prima facie, I concur with the views of Sh. Kasturiji Sir, that as per the query, it can be treated as inter-state service.
However, few clarification in the matter is required such as
* The services provided is with regards to any goods as given in Section 13(3)(a)?
* Whether payment is received in foreign currency?
* Have you raised any Invoice to Foreign Service recipient?
Further, Section 13 of IGST Act, clearly states that “Place of supply of service where location of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =