K.G. UNNIKRISHNAN Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SUQAD NO. III, SGST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND STATE OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

K.G. UNNIKRISHNAN Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SUQAD NO. III, SGST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND STATE OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (11) TMI 334 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 18-9-2018
WP(C). No. 3973 of 2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI.M.UNNIKRISHNA MENON
For The Respondents : ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act (KVAT Act), migrated to the regime of Goods and Services Tax Act (GST Act). While he was transporting orthopedic implants, the consignment was detained. Faced with proceedings under Section 129 of the GST Act, the petitioner filed this writ petitio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

format and, later, the GST counsel issued clarifications.
5. As per the petitioner's assertion, the authorities were unaware the procedure to be followed. The authorities, according to him, ought not have mechanically mulcted penalty on the petitioner. The Government Pleader, on the other hand, submits that the authorities have followed the procedure and passed the Ext.P8 order. If the petitioner has any grievance against it, he can file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the Act.
4. Under these circumstances, without adverting to the merits of the matter, I hold that the petitioner can pay the demanded tax and penalty under protest, to got the goods released. Then, the petitioner can contest the penalty proceedings before the a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GUIDLINES FOR DEDUCTIONS AND DEPOSITS OF TDS BY THE DDO UNDER GST

GUIDLINES FOR DEDUCTIONS AND DEPOSITS OF TDS BY THE DDO UNDER GST
Circular No. 1819045/604 Dated:- 18-9-2018 Uttar Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Enclosed Circular No. 65/39/2018-DOR
=============
Document 1
पत्राà¤â€šà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Æâ€™ à¤Å“à¥â‚¬.एस.टà¥â‚¬./2018-19/
1819045/18-9-18
604
/ वाणिà¤Å“्य à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°
समस्त à¤Å“à¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â² एडà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â² à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â°, à¤â€”्रà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¡ – 1
एडà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â² à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â° à¤â€”्रà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¡-2 (वि0à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥Â0शा0)
समस्त à¤Å“्वाà¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â°(à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¯0) / (वि0à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥Â0शा0)
वाणिà¤Å“्य àÂ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

¥à¤¦à¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ सà¤â€šà¤¬à¤â€šà¤§ मà¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€š ।
भारत सरà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°, वित्त मà¤â€šà¤¤à¥à¤°à¤¾à¤²à¤¯, राà¤Å“स्व विभाà¤â€” सà¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â² बà¥â€¹Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¡ à¤â€¨à¤« à¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¡Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ टà¥Ë†à¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤Â¸ एण्ड à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸Ã Â¤Â® द्वारा
à¤Å“à¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦ à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤â€”त डà¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤Â¡Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤â€œà¥¦ द्वारा टà¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤Â¡Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥Â¦ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥Å’तà¥â‚¬ तथा à¤Å“मा सà¥â€¡ सà¤â€šàÂ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

€¢Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¯Ã Â¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤â€”त à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¤Ã Â¥â€¡ हुए à¤â€¦Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â²Ã Â¤Â¨ एवà¤â€š विभिन्न व्यापारिà¤â€¢ सà¤â€šà¤â€”ठनà¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€š à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¹ भà¥â‚¬ à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥â€¡ स्तर सà¥â€¡
à¤â€¦Ã Â¤ÂµÃ Â¤â€”त à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â¾ सुनिश्चित à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â€¡Ã Â¤â€šà¥¤
सà¤â€šà¤²à¤â€”्नà¤â€¢Ã Â¤Æâ€™- à¤â€°Ã Â¤ÂªÃ Â¤Â°Ã Â¥â€¹Ã Â¤â€¢Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¤Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¤Â¾Ã Â¤Â°
भवदà¥â‚¬Ã Â¤Â¯,
5
102
18.
(डà¥â‚¬0 à¤â€¢Ã Â¥â€¡0 सचान)
à¤Å“्वाà¤â€¡Ã Â¤Â¨Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Å¸ à¤â€¢Ã Â¤Â®Ã Â¤Â¿Ã Â¤Â¶Ã Â¥ÂÃ Â¤Â¨Ã Â¤Â° (à¤Å“à¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤ÂÃ Â¤Â¸Ã Â¥Â¦Ã Â¤Å¸Ã Â¥â‚¬Ã Â¥Â¦)
वाà

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d in this
regard, from the payment made or credited to the supplier (Deductee) of taxable
goods or services or both, where the total value of such supply, under a contract,
exceeds two lakh and fifty thousand rupees. The amount deducted as tax under
this section shall be paid to the Government by deductor within ten days after
the end of the month in which such deduction is made alongwith a return in
FORM GSTR-7 giving the details of deductions and deductees. Further, the
deductor has to issue a certificate to the deductee mentioning therein the
contract value, rate of deduction, amount deducted etc.
2. As per the Act, every deductor shall deduct the tax amount from the
payment made to the supplier of goods or services or both and deposit the tax
amount so deducted with the Government account through NEFT to RBI or a
cheque to be deposited in one of the authorized banks, using challan on the
common portal. In addition, the deductors are entrusted the responsibility of
fil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to give effect to the above options from 01.10.2018, a process
flow of deduction and deposit of TDS by the DDOs has been finalised in
consultation with CGA for guidance and implementation by Central and State
Government Authorities. The process flow for Option I and Option II are
described as under:
Option I – Individual Bill-wise Deduction and its Deposit by the DDO
6. In this option, the DDO will have to deduct as well as deposit the GST
TDS for each bill individually by generating a CPIN (Challan) and mentioning
it in the Bill itself.
7.
Following process shall be followed by the DDO in this regard:
(i)
(ii)
The DDO shall prepare the Bill based on the Expenditure Sanction.
The Expenditure Sanction shall contain the (a) Total amount, (b)
net amount payable to the Contractor/Supplier/Vendor and (c) the
2% TDS amount of GST.
The DDO shall login into the GSTN Portal (using his GSTIN) and
generate the CPIN (Challan). In the CPIN he shall have to fill in
the desired amo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e DDO will have to request the
payment authority to issue 'A' Category Government Cheque in
favour of one of the 25 authorized Banks. The Cheque may then be
deposited along with the CPIN with any of branch of the
authorized Bank so selected by the DDO.
(viii) Upon successful payment, a CIN will be generated by the
RBI/Authorized Bank and will be shared electronically with the
GSTN Portal. This will get credited in the electronic Cash Ledger
of the concerned DDO in the GSTN Portal. This can be viewed and
the details of CIN can be noted by the DDO anytime on GSTN
portal using his Login credentials.
(ix) The DDO should maintain a Register as per proforma given in
Annexure 'A' to keep record of all TDS deductions made by him
during the month. This Record will be helpful at the time of filing
Monthly Return (FORM GSTR-7) by the DDO. The DDO may
3
(x)
also make use of the offline utility available on the GSTN Portal
for this purpose.
The DDO shall generate TDS Certificate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rtments of GoI or of State Governments for
submission to the respective payment authorities.
(iii) In the Bill, it will be specified
(a)
the net amount payable to the Contractor; and
(b) 2% as TDS
(iv) The TDS amount shall be mentioned in the Bill for booking in the
Suspense Head (8658 – Suspense; 00.101 – PAO Suspense; xx –
GST TDS)
(v)
The DDO will require to maintain the Record of the TDS so being
booked under the Suspense Head so that at the time of preparing
the CPIN for making payment on weekly/monthly or any other
periodic basis, the total amount could be easily worked out.
(vi) At any periodic interval, when DDO needs to deposit the TDS
amount, he will prepare the CPIN on the GSTN Portal for the
amount (already booked under the Suspense Head).
4
(vii) While generating the CPIN, the DDO will have to select mode of
payment as either (a) NEFT/RTGS or (b) OTC. In the OTC mode,
the DDO will have to select the Bank where the payment will be
deposited through OTC

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h of the
authorized Bank so selected by the DDO.
(xii) Upon successful payment, a CIN will be generated by the
RBI/Authorized Bank and will be shared electronically with the
GSTN Portal. This will get credited in the electronic Cash Ledger
of the concerned DDO in the GSTN Portal. This can be viewed and
the details of CIN can be noted by the DDO anytime on GSTN
portal using his Login credentials.
(xiii) The DDO should maintain a Register as per proforma given in
Annexure 'A' to keep record of all TDS deductions made by him
during the month. This Record will be helpful at the time of filing
Monthly Return (FORM GSTR-7) by the DDO. The DDO may
also make use of the offline utility available on the GSTN Portal
for this purpose.
5
(xiv) The DDO shall file the Return in FORM GSTR-7 by 10th of the
following month
(xv) The DDO shall generate TDS Certificate through the GSTN Portal
in FORM GSTR-7A
10. Departments in Central Government should instruct all its DDOS under
them t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Janton Versus Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata

M/s. Janton Versus Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 745 – CESTAT KOLKATA – TMI
CESTAT KOLKATA – AT
Dated:- 18-9-2018
MA(EH)-76964/2018 in Appeal No. ST/75430/2018 – MO/75825/2018 & FO/76662/2018
Service Tax
SHRI P.K.CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND SHRI BIJAY KUMAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Shri Arijit Chakrabarti & Nilotpal Chowdhury, Advocates, for the Appellant (s)
Shri S. Mukhopadhyay, Suptd. (A. R.) for the Revenue
ORDER
This appeal was listed before the Single Member Bench on 31/05/2018 for hearing. The Bench directed the registry to list the appeal before the Division Bench. The appellant filed the Miscellaneous  Application for early hearing on 12/09/2018 vide MA(EH) 76964/2018. The matter was listed for Early Hearing. After hearing both sides, the Miscellaneous Application for Early Hearing was allowed. Further, with the consent of both sides, the appeal itself was taken up for hearing.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the cas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Advocate further submits that the Show Cause Notice was issued purely on the basis of the balance sheet figures as disclosed by the appellant without scrutinizing the relevant documents such as bills, ledgers etc.
The Ld. Advocate vehemently argued that the Adjudicating Authority has erred by not following the relevant provisions of the statute relating to cum-tax Valuation and exemption/abatement available to the appellant. It is his submission that even the Cenvat Credit of Rs. 4,16,374/-, has not been allowed which is legally available to the appellant on the basis of available documents even though when there was no allegation in this regard in the Show Cause Notice.
The Ld. Adv. further argued that the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has not discussed regarding the claim of Cenvat Credit of Rs. 4,16,374/- in the impugned order though a quantification sheet for the Cenvat Credit as available to the appellant, duly supported by the invoices were placed before the First Appellate Author

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he case of the appellant that a portion of the “Carriage Charges” involved expenses incurred for service other than 'transport of goods by road', which merits deduction from the taxable value. Further, there are number of individual consignments below the Threshold Exemption Limit (Rs.750/Rs.1500) which also merits deduction but have not been considered by the Lower Authority.
6. Further, the benefit of cum-tax quantification of tax liability as available under Section 67 (2) of the Act should have been extended to the appellant assessee.
7. The Ld. DR reiterates the orders of the Lower Authorities.
8. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
9. We find that the entire demand of Service Tax is as under:-
SI No.
Category of Service
Amount of Service Tax including Cess
01.
Business Auxiliary Service (Commission on Consignment Sale for the period 2007 to March 2012
7,72,859/-
02.
Renting of Immovable Property Service
4,91,543/-
03.
Transport of Goods by Road Service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e given while calculating the service tax liability under this category.
Regarding the demand of Service Tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for Transportation of Goods by Road, some of the consignments are covered vide Notification No.34/2004-ST dated 03/12/2004 which grants full exemption in the following two situations:-
(i) Where the gross amount charged on all consignments transported in a goods carriage does not exceed Rs. 1500/-.
(ii) Where the gross amount charged on “individual consignment” transported in a goods carriage does not exceed Rs. 750/-.
Further, abatement of 75% on freight paid was allowed in the Show Cause Notice. After calculating the Service liability under all the above categories and complying with the observations made by the Bench in the foregoing paragraphs, the demand may be communicated to the appellant assessee. Further, the amount of Rs. 13,87,701/- as paid by the appellant assessee should be appropriated against the demand, so calculated.
Howev

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Cyient Limited Versus CCT, Rangareddy- GST

Cyient Limited Versus CCT, Rangareddy- GST
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 832 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 18-9-2018
ST/31330/2017, ST/30144-30150/2018, ST/30192/2018, ST/30193/2018 – A/31280-31289/2018
Service Tax
Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
Shri Sai Kumar, Chartered Accountant for the Appellant.
Shri Guna Ranjan, Shri Dass Thavanam & Shri V.R. Pawan Kumar, Superintendent (ARs) for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: P. Venkata Subba Rao
These appeals are arise out of the Orders-in-Appeal passed by the First Appellate Authority as follows:
Sl. No.
Appeal No.
Period
OIO No.
OIA No.
1.
ST/30192/2018
Apr 15 to Jun 15
148/2016 – Refund
072 to 074 – 17-18
2.
ST/30193/2018
Jul 15 to Sep 15
149/2016 – Refund
072 to 074 – 17-18
3.
ST/31330/2017
Jan 16 to Mar 16
442/2016 – Refund
067-17-18
4.
ST/30144/2018
Apr 14 to Jun 14
208/2016 – Refund
068 to 071- 17-18
5.
ST/30145/2018
Jul 14 to Sep 14
207/2016 –

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ation, the appellant produced some documents based on which the refund claims were partly sanctioned to the appellant by the Adjudicating Authority. Thereafter, the appellant approached the First Appellate Authority, who, in his Orders-in-Appeal gave another chance to the appellant to produce the documents. The First Appellate Authority granted relief to the appellant to the extent they were able to produce documents. The appellant is now in appeal seeking refund of the amounts disallowed by the First Appellate Authority.
3. Learned Chartered Accountant for the appellant admits that they had filed refund claims with deficiencies and could not produce all the documents necessary to substantiate their claims of refund. It is his submission that these deficiencies occurred because compilation of the documents and mapping them against the claims took substantial amount of time and they could not complete the exercise within the time given by the Original Authority as well as First Appella

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-067-17-18, dt. 22.09.2017
335182
The requirement to produce relevant documents so as to cause verfication of the nature of the services received as well as the value of goods and service tax liable to be paid by the service provider to the government before sanction of the refund claim has not been the time of personal hearing. With regard to non- submission of bank statements evidencing payments made to service providers will be submitted during personal hearing.
Appellant submits that with regard to Non-submission of Input Invoices, they are in the process of collating and will submit the same at satisfied by the appellants even in the appeal proceedings. There is complete failure on the part of the appellants to submit necessary and satisfactory documents to prove receipt of services. They have also failed to prove the fact of payment of tax by them to the service providers. I do not find any infirmity in the decision made by the original authority to reject part of the claim fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and substantive provisions need to be complied with. Equal importance cannot be given for both substantive and procedural provisions in statute.
3
ST/30145/ 2018
Refund claim of Service Tax paid on specified services utilised in SEZ unit under Notf.12/2013-ST, filed on 31.03.2016
2609752
04/2015 to 06/2015
10/2016- S.Tax
0
2609752
OIA-062-064-17-18, dt. 22.09.2017
2609752
4
ST/30146/ 2018
Refund claim of Service Tax paid on specified services utilised in SEZ unit under Notf.12/2013-ST, filed on 30.06.2016
1917701
07/2015 to 09/2016
11/2016- S.Tax
0
1917701
OIA-062-064-17-18, dt. 22.09.2017
1917701
5
ST/30147/ 2018
Refund claim filed u.Notf.12/ 2013-S.T. for refund of S.Tax paid on specified services used in SEZ on 31.03.2015
3535130
04/2014 to 06/2014
208/2016- Refunds
2911104
624026
OIA No.068071-17-18, dt. 22.09.2017
617846
The appellants had failed to submit proof of compliance with conditions of the Notification. Appellants failed to submit input inv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

said invoices and will submit the same during personal hearing. With regard to Non-submission of bank statement evidencing payments to service providers they will be submitted during personal hearing. Refund not be denied on procedural lapses.
6
ST/30148/ 2018
Refund Filed on 30.06.2015 under Notf.12/2013-ST
1930795
07/2014 to 09/2014
207/2016- Refunds, dt. 09.12.2016
1123675
807120
711821
 
7
ST/30149/ 2018
Refund filed on 30.09.2015 under Notf. 12/2012-ST.
1104255
10/2014 to 12/2014
206/2016- Refunds dt. 09.12.2016
259182
845073
820353
 
8
ST/30150/ 2018
Refund filed on 30.09.2016 under Notf. 12/2013- S.T.
1311850
10/2015 to 12/2015
205/2016- Refunds, dt. 09.12.2016
590847
721003
721003
 
9
ST/30192/ 2018
Refund filed on 24.03.201 6 under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 read with Notf.27/2012-CE (NT0 dt. 18.06.2012
2.3E+07
04/2015 to 06/2015
148/2016, dt. 16.11.2016
22341371
735770
OIA No.072-074-17-18 dt. 22.09.2017
121450
The 1st appellat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ected refund of Rs. 1,21,450/-
10
ST/30193/ 2018
Refund Claim filed on 30.06.2016 under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 read with Notf.27/20 12-CE(NT) dt. 18.06.2012
1.7E+07
07/2015 to 09/2015
149/2016, dt 16.11.2016
16489203
541508
OIA -072074-17-18, dt. 22.09.2017
310230
1st Appellate authority allowed refund of amount of Rs. 2,31,278/- out of Rs. 5,41,508/- on the ground that the Input Services had nexus with the output service of appellant. However, 1st appellate authority rejected refund of Rs. 3,10,230/- due to non-submission of 21 input invoices. Appellants stated that they would be producing the same during personal hearing. They have submitted only 12 invoices during personal hearing, which are not relevant invoices. The said 12 Invoices submitted do not match with the invoices referrred to in OIO 149/2016. Therefore, Comm'r (AP did not find any reason to interfere with the decision of the original authority in rejecting refund of Rs. 3,10,230/-
 
4. Learned Departme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

able to justify their claims with supporting documents. Therefore, the appeals may be rejected and the impugned orders may be upheld.
5. I have considered the arguments on both sides. It is not in dispute that the appellant has not able to fulfilled all the conditions for claiming the refund inasmuch as he has not provided the documentary evidence before the Original Authority as well as the First Appellate Authority to fully justify their refund claim and hence part of their refund claims were rejected. I do not agree with the grounds of appeal which seek to draw a distinction between the procedural requirements and substantial requirement of a notification as the legal position has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court's Constitution Bench in the case of M/s Dilip Kumar and Company (supra) that the exemption notification must be strictly interpreted against the person claiming the benefit of same and any benefit of doubt should go to the Revenue. On the other hand, the appell

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Guidelines for TDS Deduction and Deposit by DDOs under GST: Ensuring Compliance and Reducing Disputes.

Guidelines for TDS Deduction and Deposit by DDOs under GST: Ensuring Compliance and Reducing Disputes.
Circulars
GST
Guidelines for Deductions and Deposits of TDS by the DDO under GST
TMI

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GOODS & SERVICES TAX (GST) – RECENT UPDATES

GOODS & SERVICES TAX (GST) – RECENT UPDATES
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 17-9-2018

New Enactments
The following GST related laws have been enacted on 30th August, 2018 which seek to amend the GST laws from a date to be notified :
* Central Goods and Service Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 – which amends CGST Act, 2017. The Act provides for certain provisions for smooth transition of existing taxpayers to new goods and services tax regime. However, the new tax regime had faced certain difficulties. One of the major inconveniences caused to the taxpayers, especially small and medium enterprises, was the process of filing return and payment of tax under the Goods and Services Tax laws. In this regard, the new return filing system envisages quarterly filing of return and tax payment for small taxpayers along with minimum paperwork.
* Integrated Goods and Service Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 – which amends IGST Act, 2018 which amends IGST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dment Act, 2018 – which amends GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017. Section 10 of the Act provides for distribution of the amount remaining unutilised in Compensation Fund at the end of transition period between Centre and the States. As the said section doesn't provide for distribution of amount remaining unutilised in Compensation Fund at any point of time in any financial year, it has been amended.
The Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Act, 2018 provides for :
* to insert a new sub-section (3A) in section 10 of the Act so as to provide that any amount remaining unutilised in the Compensation Fund may, on the recommendations of the Council, be distributed between Centre and the States at any point of time in a financial year; and
* to provide that in case of shortfall in the amount collected in the Fund against the requirement of compensation to be released under section 7 for any two months' period, fifty percent of the same, but not exceeding

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

:
* Details of outward supplies declared during the financial year
* Details of Input Tax Credit (ITC) as declared in returns filed during the financial year
* Details of tax paid as declared in returns filed during the financial year
* Particulars of the transactions for the previous financial year declared in returns of April to September of current financial year or upto date of filing of annual return of previous financial year, whichever is earlier
* Particulars of Demands and Refunds
* Information on supplies received from composition taxpayers, deemed supply under section 143 and goods sent on approval basis
* HSN Wise Summary of outward supplies
* HSN Wise Summary of inward supplies
* Late fee payable and paid
The last date to file annual return is 31st December, 2018
Obligations for the month of September, 2018
Return/Form
Period
Due Date
GSTR 1
August, 2018
11.09.2018
GSTR-3B
August 2018
20.09.2018
GSTR 5A
August, 2018
20.09.2018
GSTR 5
Augus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d June, 2017 to July, 2018.
Declaration to claim ITC in Form GST ITC-01 can be filed till 04/10/2018
[Notification No. 42/2018- Central Tax, Dated 04-09-2018]
The time limit for making a declaration in FORM GST ITC-01 for the registered persons who have filed the application in form GST CMP-04 between March 2, 2018 and March 31, 2018 has been extended to October 4, 2018.
Filing of GST returns in Kerala extended
[Notification No. 36 to 38 /2018-CT dated 24.08.2018]
Due date for filing of GST returns GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 for July, 2018 and August, 2018 has been extended to 5th October, 2018 and 10th October, 2018 respectively and due date for filing GSTR-1 for quarter July – September 2018 has been extended upto 15th November, 2018 for taxpayers registered in Kerala, Mahe (Pondicherry) and Kodagu (Karnataka) owing to recent floods.
Refund of accumulated credit of ITC on fabrics
[Circular No. 56/30/2018-GST dated 24.08.2018]
The cotton, silk and natural fibre fabrics do not suf

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n FORM GSTR-2A as an evidence of the supply by the corresponding supplier in relation to which the input tax credit has been availed by the claimant.
* It is emphasized that the Proper Officer shall not insist on the submission of an invoice (either original or duplicate) the details of which are present in FORM GSTR-2A of the relevant period submitted by the claimant.
Recovery of arrears of wrongly availed CENVAT credit under the existing law and inadmissible transitional credit
[Circular No. 58/32/2018-GST, dated 04.09.2018]
* In Circular No. 42/16/2018-GST dated 13th April, 2018, it was clarified that the recovery of arrears arising under the existing law shall be made as central tax liability to be paid through the utilization of the amount available in the electronic credit ledger or electronic cash ledger of the registered person, and the same shall be recorded in Part II of the Electronic Liability Register.
* Since the functionality for the same is not working on the po

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Concept and Applicability of TDS and TCS provisions w.e.f. October 1, 2018

Concept and Applicability of TDS and TCS provisions w.e.f. October 1, 2018
By: – Bimal jain
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 17-9-2018

After getting deferred till September 30, 2018, the Central Government vide Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018 and Notification No. 51/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018, has appointed the 1st day of October 2018, as the date on which the provisions of Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 (i.e. Tax deduction at source) and Section 52 (i.e. Tax collection at source) shall come into force.
For easy digests, we are summarizing hereunder the gist of provisions pertaining to TDS and TCS in GST:
Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 66 of the CGST Rules, 2017
Particulars
Applicable Section/ Sub-section/ Notification
Provisions
Who is required to deduct TDS (deductor)?
Section 51(1) r.w. Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax dated September 13, 2018
Fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e of TDS
Section 51(1)
TDS is to be deducted at the rate of 1% [i.e. 2% for CGST+SGST/UTGST or IGST] from the payment made or credited to the deductee
Value of supply
Explanation to Section 51(1)
For the purpose of TDS specified above, the value of supply shall be taken as the amount excluding CGST, CGST/UTGST, IGST and cess indicated in the invoice
Compulsory registration for TDS deductor
Section 24(vi)
TDS deductors, whether or not separately registered, are required to compulsorily register in GST irrespective of threshold limits.
Form for TDS deductor registration
Rule 12(1)
Form GST REG-07 – Registration started from September 18, 2017(The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council, at its 21st meeting in Hyderabad)
TDS applicants who do not have a PAN, can register on basis of TAN
Payment of TDS by deductor
Section 51(2)
The amount of TDS shall be paid to the Government by the deductor within 10 days after the end of the month in which such deduction is made.
TDS Certif

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

per day from the day after the expiry of five days period until the failure is rectified, subject to a maximum amount of INR 5,000/-
[i.e. INR 2,000/- per day subject to maximum of INR 10,000/- for CGST + SGST/UTGST]
Recovery & Refund
Determination of amount in default
Section 51(7)
In accordance with Section 73 (determination of tax in non-fraud cases) or Section 74 (determination of tax in fraud cases) of the CGST Act, 2017
Refund of excess deduction
Section 51(8)
Refund to deductee arising on account of excess or erroneous deduction shall be dealt in accordance with Section 54.
No refund shall be granted if the amount deducted has been credited to electronic cash ledger of deductee.
Collection of tax at Source (TCS) under Section 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 67 of the CGST Rules, 2017
Particulars
Applicable Section/ Sub-section/ Notification
Provisions
Who is required to collect TCS?
Section 52(1)
Every electronic commerce operator (“operator”), not bein

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hall be done by the operator by paying the supplier, the price of the product/ services, less the amount of TDS.
Rate of TCS
Section 52(1)
TCS is to be deducted at the rate not exceeding 1% of the net value of taxable supplies of the goods/services supplied through the portal of the operator
Meaning of 'electronic commerce operator'
Section 2(45)
“Electronic commerce operator” means any person who owns, operates or manages digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce
Meaning of 'electronic commerce'
Section 2(44)
“Electronic commerce” means the supply of goods or services or both, including digital products over digital or electronic network
Meaning of 'Net value of taxable supplies'
Explanation to Section 52(1)
“Net value of taxable supplies” shall mean the aggregate value of taxable supplies of goods or services or both, other than services notified under sub-section (5) of section 9, made during any month by all registered persons through the operat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the operator within 10 days after the end of the month in which such collection is made.
TCS statement
Section 52(4), 52(5) & 52(6) r.w. Rule 67(1) & 80(2)
The operator is required to furnish a monthly statement in Form GSTR-8 by the 10th of the following month.
The operator is also required to file an Annual statement in Form GSTR-9B by the 31st of December following the end of every financial year.
The operator can rectify errors in the statements filed, if any, latest by the return to be filed for the month of September, following the end of every financial year or the actual date of furnishing relevant annual statement, whichever is earlier.
ITC to supplier
Section 52(7)
The tax collected by the operator shall be credited to the cash ledger of the supplier who has supplied the goods/services through the operator. The supplier can claim credit of the tax collected and reflected in the return by the Operator in his [supplier's] electronic cash ledger.
Matching of details of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nal action under Section 122, it shall also be liable for penalty up to ₹ 25,000/-
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavours. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Bimal Jain
FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)
Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com
Reply By Balasubramanian Natarajan as =
Presented in a clear and lucid fashion.
Thanks a lot in presenting in a tabular form
Dated: 18-9-2018
Reply By Prasanna Kumar as =
Nice presentation. Thank you Bimal Jain.
Dated: 20-9-2018
Reply By BRIJMOHAN GOYAL as =
Dear Sir,
Require your opinion on following :
1) Is a separate Notification required for IGST law. Does the CGST notification mutatis mutandis applies (as per Sec. 20 of IGST law)
2) Whether paid or credited is actual payment/credited in bank account or credited can be inferred to be used for credited in Books of Accounts.
3)One transaction: I ask my regional office at Maharashtra to appoi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Affordable Housing Projects enjoy a 12% GST rate, with 8% after land deduction, and can claim ITC under GST Act.

Affordable Housing Projects enjoy a 12% GST rate, with 8% after land deduction, and can claim ITC under GST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
Rate of GST – ITC – The rate of tax to be levied is 12% (8% GST after deducting value of land) in case of Affordable Housing Project. If the project qualifies as an Affordable Housing Project, then registration under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana is not required to avail this benefit – The applicant will be eligible for ITC subject to fulfilment of conditions as pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases
Order No. 4/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 Clarifications / Instructions / Orders
GST
F. No. 349/58/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
***
New Delhi, the 17th September, 2018
Order No. 4/2018-GST
Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the decl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Birla Cotsyn (I) Ltd. Versus CCE & GST, Nagpur

M/s. Birla Cotsyn (I) Ltd. Versus CCE & GST, Nagpur
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1147 – CESTAT MUMBAI – TMI
CESTAT MUMBAI – AT
Dated:- 17-9-2018
ST/85750/18 – A/87298/2018
Service Tax
Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati, Member (Judicial)
For the Appellant : Ms. Lalita Phadke, Advocate
For the Respondent : Shri Suresh, (AR)
ORDER
Confirmation of penalty and invocation of extended period after discharge of duty liability along with interest by the Commissioner (Appeals), CE&GST, Nagpur in his order No. NGP/EXCUS/000/APPL/540/17-18 dated 28.11.2017 is being challenged in this appeal.
2. Facts giving rise to the present appeal can be summed up as violation of provision contained under Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 by the appellant in not paying service tax of `12,78,540/- against payment made to overseas commission agent to the tune of `1,31,89,860/- for services falling under category of Business Auxiliary Service. Under the reverse charge mechanism, appellant company is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ong with interest has already been made by the appellant and they had abandoned their right to contest the tax liability when the matter was before the Commissioner (Appeals). In the present appeal, the appellant is only contesting penalty and the invocation of extended period since appellant, being pointed out by the department, immediately paid the amount of service tax along with interest much prior to the issue of show-cause notice and the said payment being made to the overseas party was duly disclosed in the books of accounts of the appellant, there was no suppression or malafide intention on the part of the appellant to evade tax. He pleads that appellant was under the bonafide belief that the said activity was not chargeable and being pointed out by the auditor, it discharged the tax liability and interest as well as informed the department for which it is entitled to the benefit of Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. In support of his argument several case laws are cited b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n in the appellant's case, lenient view may be taken in respect of penalty imposed on the appellant.
4. Ld. AR on the contrary, in citing judicial decisions reported in 2013 (30) STR 3 (Guj)., 2015(39) STR 386 (Mad.), 2015 (38) STR 249 (Tri-Bang.) argued that duty paid by the assessee prior to issue of show-cause would not ipso facto alter the liability of mandatory statutory penalty. He further argued that when appellant tacitly conceded suppression of fact with intent to evade payment of service tax, though paid prior to issue of show-causes but paid only after investigation launched by the department will not provide him the benefit of section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 and in the instant appeal, contrary to the averment of the appellant that such irregularity was pointed out in the course of routine audit, such evasion of duty was in fact discovered by the preventive branch officer on the basis of intelligence report as can be seen from the show-cause, Order-in-Appeal and order-i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oad and not in India in which case, service tax is not leviable under reverse charge mechanism. Further, it lays emphasis that taxable event is on rendering of services and not on the person for which government cannot levy service tax on the services provided abroad and not received in India. Hence service tax demanded and commission paid to overseas parties for services rendered abroad needs to be interpreted in its true spirit but without explaining the indulgence of the company and merely quoting the sections of law in the impugned show-cause notice, order-in-original was passed that was being confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant further submitted that when there is a clear belief that no liability of service tax is existing, both while computing the service tax payable and filing periodic returns as assumed to be required by law, there would not be any liability towards penalty and interest for non-disclosure of the details in the periodic returns.
6. These abov

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o register and to maintain books of accounts etc.
7. The contention of the appellant that there was no ill intention that can be attributed to evade tax since all the tax liabilities were addressed with due payment of interest after the same being identified by way of audit. This being the circumstantial situation on record, it is imperative to have a look on the provisions contained in Finance Act, 1994 that enables assessment beyond the extended period on grounds of suppression, non-disclosure etc. and to analyse if there was any ill intention on the part of the appellant to evade tax so as to impose penalty contemplated under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994.
8. Proviso to Section 73 reads as follows:-
“PROVIDED that where any service tax has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded by reason of-
(a) fraud; or
(b) collusion; or
(c) wilful mis-statement; or
(d) suppression of facts; or
(e) contravention of any of the provi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

with effect from 08.05.2010 and sub-rule 4 has all along been existing since implementation of Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, there is no need to venture into such debate that explanation 2 providing non-imposition of penalty under any of the provisions of Act and Rule on fulfilment of requirement of sub-rule(3) would have application to sub-rule 4 since subrule 4 starts with an non-obstinate clause “nothing contained in sub-rule 3 shall apply” to a case where service tax has not been levied or paid or short levied or short paid or erroneously refunded by reason of those five grounds mentioned above under proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 73.
9. Be that as it may, it is now to be seen as to how this practice of fraud, collusion, submission of “wilful” misstatement or suppression of fact vis-a-vis contravention of provisions of this chapter and rules made thereunder “with intend to evade tax payment” is to be established and on whom the burden lies. In an adversarial judicial system and a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e the department has levied the service tax on the consideration that appellant is residing in India.
10. During the course of hearing, the ld. Counsel for the appellant has placed his reliance on the Circular no. 137/167/2006/cx-4 dated 03.10.2007 and pleaded that in respect of payment of interest and penalty along with service tax in full, all proceeding against the appellant should have been closed but a close reading of the statute would reveal that in respect of Section 73(1)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994 adjudication proceeding can be concluded in cases of wilful suppression, fraud, collusion etc. if along with tax and interest, penalty equal to 25% of service tax was voluntarily paid by the assessee even one month from the date of issue of show-cause, which in the instant case is not done to make that circular applicable for the appellant. Similarly, in the case law submitted by the ld. AR, as referred supra, neither any reference is available to the circular dated 03.10.2007 nor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o situation for which, a limitation period of six months may apply. In our opinion, the main body of the Section, in fact, contemplates ordinary default in payment of duties and leaves cases of collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts, a smaller, specific and more serious niche, to the proviso. Therefore, something more must be shown to construe the acts of the appellant as fit for the applicability of the proviso.”
11. In view of the above facts and circumstances, and in view of the fact that parameters of proviso to Section 73 and ingredients constituting suppression of fact by the appellant has not been made out and the same had not been established by the respondent department before the authorities adjudicating the matter, it can safely be concluded that Section 4 would have no application to the case of the appellant attracting penalty, in which case explanation 2 to sub-section (3) of Section 73 will have its effect. Hence the order-
ORDER
The appeal is allowe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018

Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018
EXN-F(10)-24/2018 – 49/2018-State Tax Dated:- 17-9-2018 Himachal Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Himachal Pradesh SGST
Himachal Pradesh SGST
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION No. 49/2018-State Tax
Shimla-2, the 17th September, 2018
No. EXN-F(10)-24/2018-Loose.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (10 of 2017), the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the FORMS to the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, after FORM GSTR-9A, the following shall be inserted, namely:-
“FORM GSTR-9C
See rule 80(3)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

+)
G
Turnover from April 2017 to June 2017
(-)
H
Unbilled revenue at the end of Financial Year
(-)
I
Unadjusted Advances at the beginning of the Financial Year
(-)
J
Credit notes accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but are not permissible under GST
(-)
K
Adjustments on account of supply of goods by SEZ units to DTA Units
(-)
L
Turnover for the period under composition scheme
(-)
M
Adjustments in turnover under section 15 and rules thereunder
(+/-
)
N
Adjustments in turnover due to foreign exchange fluctuations
(+/-
)
O
Adjustments in turnover due to reasons not listed above
(+/-
)
P
Annual turnover after adjustments as above
< Auto >
Q
Turnover as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9)
R
Un-Reconciled turnover (Q – P)
AT1
6
Reasons for Un – Reconciled difference in Annual Gross Turnover
A
B
C
Reason 1
<< Text >>
Reason 2
<< Text >>
Reason 3
<< Text >>
7
Reconciliation of Taxable Turnover
A
Annual turnover af

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be paid as per tables above
< Auto >
< Auto >
< Auto >
< Auto >
Q
Total amount paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9)
R
Un-reconciled payment of amount
PT 1
10
Reasons for un-reconciled payment of amount
A
B
Reason 1
<< Text >>
Reason 2
<< Text >>
C
Reason 3
<< Text >>
11
Additional amount payable but not paid (due to reasons specified under Tables
6,8 and 10 above)
To be paid through Cash
Description
Taxable Value
Central tax
State tax / UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicabl e
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Interest
Late Fee
Penalty
Others
(please specify)
Pt.
Reconciliation of Input Tax Credit (ITC)
IV
12
Reconciliation of Net Input Tax Credit (ITC)
A
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement for the State/ UT (For multi-GSTIN units under same PAN this should be derived from books of accounts)
B
ITC booked in earlier Financial Years claimed in current
Financial Year
(+)
C
ITC boo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es
(including postage etc.)
Repair and Maintenance
N
Other Miscellaneous expenses
O
P
Capital goods
Any other expense 1
Q
Any other expense 2
R
Total amount of eligible ITC availed
<>
S
ITC claimed in Annual Return (GSTR9)
T
Un-reconciled ITC
ITC 2
15
Reasons for un – reconciled difference in ITC
A
Reason 1
<< Text >>
B
C
Reason 2
<< Text >>
Reason 3
<< Text >>
16
Tax payable on un-reconciled difference in ITC (due to reasons specified in 13 and 15 above)
Description
Amount Payable
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
Interest
Penalty
Pt.
V
Auditor's recommendation on additional Liability due to non-reconciliation
To be paid through Cash
Description
Value
Central tax
State tax / UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess, if applicabl e
1
2
3
4
5
6
5%
12%
18%
28%
3%
0.25%
0.10%
Input Tax Credit
Interest
Late Fee
Penalty
Any other amount paid for supplies not included in Annual Return (GSTR 9)
Erroneous refun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent is the financial year for which the reconciliation statement is being filed for.
4. Part II consists of reconciliation of the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement with the turnover as declared in the Annual Return furnished in FORM GSTR-9 for this GSTIN. The instructions to fill this part are as follows :-
Table No.
Instructions
5A
The turnover as per the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here. There may be cases where multiple GSTINs (State-wise) registrations exist on the same PAN. This is common for persons / entities with presence over multiple States. Such persons / entities, will have to internally derive their GSTIN wise turnover and declare the same here. This shall include export turnover (if any). It may be noted that reference to audited Annual Financial Statement includes reference to books of accounts in case of persons / entities having presence over multiple States.
5B
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ate value of credit notes which were issued after 31st of March for any supply accounted in the current financial year but such credit notes were reflected in the annual return (GSTR-9)shall be declared here.
5F
Trade discounts which are accounted for in the audited Annual Financial Statement but on which GST was leviable(being not permissible) shall be declared here.
5G
Turnover included in the audited Annual Financial Statement for April 2017 to June 2017 shall be declared here.
5H
Unbilled revenue which was recorded in the books of accounts on the basis of accrual system of accounting during the current financial year but GST was not payable on such revenue in the same financial year shall be declared here.
5I
Value of all advances for which GST has not been paid but the same has been recognized as revenue in the audited Annual Financial Statement shall be declared here.
5J
Aggregate value of credit notes which have been accounted for in the audited Annual Financial St

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rence between the turnover reported in the Annual Return (GSTR9) and turnover reported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to foreign exchange fluctuations shall be declared here.
5O
Any difference between the turnover reported in the Annual Return (GSTR9) and turnover reported in the audited Annual Financial Statement due to reasons not listed above shall be declared here.
5Q
Annual turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be declared here. This turnover may be derived from Sr. No. 5N, 10 and 11 of Annual Return (GSTR 9).
6
Reasons for non-reconciliation between the annual turnover declared in the audited Annual Financial Statement and turnover as declared in the Annual Return (GSTR 9) shall be specified here.
7
The table provides for reconciliation of taxable turnover from the audited annual turnover after adjustments with the taxable turnover declared in annual return (GSTR-9).
7A
Annual turnover as derived in Table 5P above would be auto-popula

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and the taxable turnover declared in Table 7F shall be specified here.
5. Part III consists of reconciliation of the tax payable as per declaration in the reconciliation statement and the actual tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR9). The instructions to fill this part are as follows :-
Table No.
Instructions
9
The table provides for reconciliation of tax paid as per reconciliation statement and amount of tax paid as declared in Annual Return (GSTR 9). Under the head labelled ―RC‖, supplies where tax was paid on reverse charge basis by the recipient (i.e. the person for whom reconciliation statement has been prepared ) shall be declared.
9P
The total amount to be paid as per liability declared in Table 9A to 9O is auto populated here.
9Q
The amount payable as declared in Table 9 of the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here. It should also contain any differential tax paid on Table 10 or 11 of the Annual Return (GSTR9).
10
Reasons for non-reconcili

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l Statement of earlier financial year(s)but availed in the ITC ledger in the financial yearfor which the reconciliation statement is being filed for shall be declared here. This shall include transitional credit which was booked in earlier years but availed duringFinancial Year 2017-18.
12C
Any ITC which has been booked in the audited Annual Financial Statement of the current financial year but the same has not been credited to the ITC ledger for the said financial year shall be declared here.
12D
ITC availed as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of accounts as derived from values declared in Table 12A, 12B and 12C above will be auto-populated here.
12E
Net ITC available for utilization as declared in Table 7J of Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be declared here.
13
Reasons for non-reconciliation of ITC as per audited Annual Financial Statement or books of account (Table 12D) and the net ITC (Table12E) availed in the Annual Return (GSTR9) shall be specified here.
14
T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

yable due to reasons specified in Table 13 and 15 above shall be declared here.
7. Part V consists of the auditor's recommendation on the additional liability to be discharged by the taxpayer due to non-reconciliation of turnover or non-reconciliation of input tax credit. The auditor shall also recommend if there is any other amount to be paid for supplies not included in the Annual Return. Any refund which has been erroneously taken and shall be paid back to the Government shall also be declared in this table. Lastly, any other outstanding demands which is recommended to be settled by the auditor shall be declared in this Table.
8. Towards, the end of the reconciliation statement taxpayers shall be given an option to pay their taxes as recommended by the auditor.
PART – B- CERTIFICATION
I. Certification in cases where the reconciliation statement (FORM GSTR-9C) is drawn up by the person who had conducted the audit:
* I/we have examined the-
(a) balance sheet as on …&he

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

observations/ comments / discrepancies / inconsistencies; if any:
…………………………………….
…………………………………….
3. (b) *I/we further report that, –
(A) *I/we have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit/ information and explanations which, to the best of *my/our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the audit were not provided/partially provided to us.
(B) In *my/our opinion, proper books of account *have/have not been kept by the registered person so far as appears from*my/ our examination of the books.
(C) I/we certify that the balance sheet, the *profit and loss/income and expenditure account and the cash flow Statement are *in agreement/not in agreement with the books of acc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ellip;……………………………………………………………………
(c) ……………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor)
Place: ……………
Name of the signatory …………………
Membership No………………
Date: ………&hellip

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ip;…………. along with a copy of each of :-
(a) balance sheet as on ………
(b) the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account for the period beginning from ………..…to ending on …….,
(c) the cash flow statement for the period beginning from ……..…to ending on ………, and
(d) documents declared by the said Act to be part of, or annexed to, the *profit and loss account/income and expenditure account and balance sheet.
2. I/we report that the said registered person-
*has maintained the books of accounts, records and documents as required by the
IGST/CGST/<<>>HP GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder
*has not maintained the following accounts/records/documents as required by the IGST/CGST/<<>>HP GST Act, 2017 and the rules/notifications made/issued thereunder:
1.
2.
3.
3. The documents required to be furnished under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

p;………………………….…………………………….………………………
………………………………………
**(Signature and stamp/Seal of the Auditor)
Place: ……………
Name of the signatory …………………
Membership No………………
Date: ……………
Full address ………………………"
By order,
JAGDISH CHANDER SHARMA,
Principal Secretary (E&T).
Note:- The principal rules were published notified vide notification No. EXN-F(10)-13/2017, dated the 27th June, 2017, published in the Gazette of Himachal Pradesh vide EXN-F(10)- 13/20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Governor of Himachal Pradesh is appoint the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the HP Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall come into force

Governor of Himachal Pradesh is appoint the 1st day of October, 2018, as the date on which the provisions of section 52 of the HP Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 shall come into force
EXN-F(10)-24/2018 – 51/2018-State Tax Dated:- 17-9-2018 Himachal Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Himachal Pradesh SGST
Himachal Pradesh SGST
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION No. 51/2018-State Tax
Shimla-2, the 17th September, 2018
No. EXN-F(10)-24/2018-Loose.-In exercise of the powers confer

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in CCT Circular No. GST-02/2018-19 dated 16.04.2018

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in CCT Circular No. GST-02/2018-19 dated 16.04.2018
05/2018-19 Dated:- 17-9-2018 Karnataka SGST
GST – States
Government of Karnataka
(Department of Commercial Taxes)
No. KSA/GST/CR-108/2017-18
Office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar,
Bengaluru-560009, Dated: 17-09-2018
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES CIRCULAR No. GST-05/2018-19
Subject: regarding
Attention is invited to CCT Circular No. GST-02/2018-19 dated 16th April, 2018 vide which the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances was specified.
2. In order to clarify certain issues regarding the specified procedure in this regard and in order to ensure uniform implementation of the pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ting to evasion of tax is made available subsequently. Since the requisite FORMS are not available on the common portal currently, any action initiated by the central tax officers is not being intimated to the State tax officers and vice-versa, doubts have been raised as to the procedure to be followed in such situations.
(i) In this regard, it is clarified that the hard copies of the notices/orders issued in the specified FORMS by a tax authority may be shown as proof of initiation of action by a tax authority by the transporter/registered person to another tax authority as and when required.
(ii) Further, it is clarified that only such goods and/or conveyances should be detained/confiscated in respect of which there is a violation of the provisions of the GST Acts or the rules made thereunder.
Illustration: Where a conveyance carrying twenty-five consignments is intercepted and the person-in-charge of such conveyance produces valid e-way bills and/or other relevant documents in re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8377; 50,000/- should carry a copy of documents viz., invoice/bill of supply/delivery challan/bill of entry and a valid e-way bill in physical or electronic form for verification. In case such person does not carry the mentioned documents, there is no doubt that a contravention of the provisions of the law takes place and the provisions of section 129 and section 130 of the KGS T Act are invocable. Further, it may be noted that the non-furnishing of information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 amounts to the e-way bill becoming not a valid document for the movement of goods by road as per Explanation (2) to rule 138(3) of the KGS T Rules, except in the case where the goods are transported for a distance of upto fifty kilometres within the State to or from the place of business of the transporter to the place of business of the consignor or the consignee, as the case may be.
6. Whereas, section 129 of the KGST Act provides for detention and seizure of goods and conveyances and their releas

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that the error in the PIN code should not have the effect of increasing the validity period of the e-way bill;
c) Error in the address of the consignee to the extent that the locality and other details of the consignee are correct;
d) Error in one or two digits of the document number mentioned in the e-way bill'
e) Error in 4 or 6 digit level of HSN where the first 2 digits of HSN are correct and the rate of tax mentioned is correct;
f) Error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number.
8. In case of the above situations, penalty to the tune of ₹ 500/- each under section 125 of the KGST Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act should be imposed (Rs. 1000/- under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act) in FORM GST DRC-07 for every consignment. A record of all such consignments where proceedings under section 129 of the KGST Act have not been invoked in view of the situations listed in paragraph 7 above shall be sent by the proper officer to his controlling

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TVS Automobile Solutions Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Madurai (Vice-Versa)

TVS Automobile Solutions Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Madurai (Vice-Versa)
Service Tax
2018 (9) TMI 1515 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 17-9-2018
ST/41980/2015, ST/41981/2015, ST/42339/2015 – 42427-42429/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
For the Appellant : Shri N. Venkataraman, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri M.N. Bharathi, Advocate
For the Respondent : Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR)
ORDER
PER BENCH
The assessees are inter alia, engaged in servicing of motor vehicles and also trading of automobile parts to franchisees and vehicle customers who avail services at the workshop. Vide a letter dated 1.12.2011, the assessees informed the Central Excise authorities inter alia that
* They are engaged in the business of multi-brand car servicing and also trading of automobile parts to franchisees and to vehicle customers who are availing se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

011, informed the assessees to pay an amount equal to 5% on taxable value determined under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 i.e. 5% of the gross value of the franchisee service and servicing of motor vehicles (both value of goods sold and service charges received). The assessees were reminded by the jurisdictional Superintendent vide letter dated 2.3.2012 asking them to follow the procedure as advised. However, in response, the assessee vide letter dated 8.3.2012, reiterated their reply and further added that:-
* They buy and sell parts as a pure trading activity, which is governed by the definition of „exempted services‟ read with explanation to 1(C) to Rule 6(3) they have remitted 5% amount equivalent to duty after working out differences between sale price and the cost of goods sold;
* They also perform divisible contract of goods and rendition of servicing on motor vehicles. Here again, sale of parts constitute pure trading. They have already remitted a sum equiv

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sought to be re-assessed.
They do not have any other transaction at present to be governed by explanation 1(C) to Rule 6(3) and
Thus, the request to pay a sum equal to duty for the entire sales turnover is clearly impermissible and is sought to be re-assessed.
1.2 A show cause notice dated 11.6.2013 was issued to the assessee inter alia alleging that the goods sold to service recipient of franchisee services and servicing of motor vehicles is not trading of goods but is actually sale of goods in the course of providing taxable service; hence value of such goods sold during the course of providing franchisee service and servicing of motor vehicles it to be included in the gross value of taxable services under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994; that the assessees are liable to pay an amount of 5% of gross value of exempted services as per Explanation 1(a) to Rule 6(3) and Rule 6(3A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 r/w Rule 2(e); in addition to payment of 5% on gross profit of trading a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vice tax liability for the period April 2011 to March 2012 with interest thereon and also for imposition of penalties under various provisions of law. For subsequent period, April 2012 to June 2012, statement of demand dated 23.4.2014 was issued on identical grounds proposing demand of an amount of Rs. 30,69,417/- with interest thereon and for imposition of penalty under Rule 15 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Both the show cause notice and the statement of demand were adjudicated in a common order dated 30.6.2015 (impugned order) wherein the tax proposed in the show cause notice / statement of demand were confirmed along with interest. Penalties were also imposed as proposed in the respective show cause notice / statement of demand.
Aggrieved, the assessee is before Tribunal in Appeal No. ST/41980 & 41981/2015 primarily on the following grounds:-
i) Whether the activity of trading could be considered as falling under the definition of exempted service prior to 1.7.2012 and after 1.7.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case penalty under Rule15 can be sustained.
1.6 Department has also come in appeal against the impugned order before this forum in Appeal No.ST/42339/2015 primarily on the following grounds:-
i. It could be seen from the show cause notice dated 11.06.2013 and the statement of demand dated 23.04.2014 that the charge against TVS was that the method adopted by them for payment of amount under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was wrong as they had adopted the method provided under Explanation 1(C) to Rule 6 instead of Explanation 1(a) to Rule 6 and sought to demand 5% of the total value of spares sold by them during the course of providing the services under MRS/FRA though exempted under Notification No. 12/2003 ST dated 01.03.2003 was covered by the definition of „exempted service‟ value in terms of definition of under cause of Rule 2 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The argument provided in the notice was that the value of goo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

show that the goods were sold and that there was no evidence on record to show that they had availed CENVAT on such goods by TVS, the value of such goods sold during the course of provision of services were eligible for the exemption under Notification No. 12/2003 ST dated 01.03.2003 for the purpose of service tax. However for the purpose Rule 6(3)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 such value had to be treated as an exempted value „in terms of the definition of exempted service which is defined under Rule 2(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
iii. Hence, for the purpose of amount payable under Rule 6(3) (i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 the exempted value had to be taken in to account and therefore the notice was liable to pay an amount equal to 5% of such exempted services „provided under clauseEUR of Rule 2 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The adjudicating authority has not given any findings either to support this aspect or counter the arguments of the notice and has s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

types of activities done by them and also in particular regarding the manner of reversal of CENVAT credit taken in respect of such contracts.
(c) The adjudicating authority instead of providing arguments as to why the method adopted by TVS for payment of amount under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was wrong, has elaborately gave findings to the effect that the value of materials sold by them were to be included in the value of services as per Section 67 of the Act ibid and that as the Assessee had not fulfilled the conditions stated in the notification No. 12/2003 St dated 01.03.2003 namely “credit of duty paid on goods and materials sold has been taken under provisions of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and not paid the amount equal to such credit availed before the sale of such goods and materials” were not eligible for the exemption provided in the said notification. In the further paras also the adjudicating authority had elaborately discussed citing the instructions of the Boa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ween sale price and the purchase price, that no input credit is taken and hence no duty is payable.
2.2 In reply to the show cause notice, the appellant had inter alia made the following submissions:-
2.3 The following are some of the submissions taken by the appellants in their reply to Show Cause Notice:-
(i) The allegation that the method of calculation of amount payable at the rate of 5% is not correct is not tenable in law as they have paid the said amount based on explanation 1(c) of Rule 6(d) of the Cenvat Credit Rules.
(ii) The appellants buy and sell parts as a pure trading activity which is covered under exempted services „read with rule 6(3) and 6(3D).
(iii) The appellants render service under divisible contract for sale of goods and service of motor vehicles. They have not claimed any exemption nor benefit on non-taxable sale transaction. Therefore Cenvat Credit Rule 6(1) and Rule 6(3) do not arise/ They provide pure labour and service contracts which do not i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

letter written to the Deputy Commissioner dated 30.012014 before issuing the statement of demand wherein the case of Ketan Motors td (v) CESTAT, Nagpur was enclosed, in which it was held that, if a transaction involves only sale of parts, question of levying service tax would not arise at all”.
(viii) Since Cenvat Credit Rules themselves use the expression trading as synonymous with sale as seen from the explanation 1(c)to Cenvat Credit Rules 6(3D) as referred to earlier, it is clear that the subject activity of sale of spare parts sold in the course of providing of the service to the vehicles is nothing but trading and falls under definition of exempted service prior to 01.07.2012 and that is the reason why the appellants have chosen to pay 5% of the value of exempted service i.e. on the difference between sale price and cost of goods sold or 10% on the cost of goods sold whichever is more. Similarly after 01.07.2012 for the same reason the appellants have treated sale/trading activ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y are required to pay an amount of 5% on the value of exempted service and at the same time he gives a finding that in addition to the payment of 5% of the gross value of exempted service the appellants should also pay 5% of the gross profit of the trading activity. On the one hand, Commissioner does not consider the activity of sale of parts as „trading‟ falling under the exempted service and on the other hand for the purpose of demand, he treats the same as exempted service and invokes the provision of Cenvat Credit Rules 6(3) and explanation 1(c) to Cenvat Credit Rule 6(3D).
(xi) In para 21 of the impugned order the Commissioner gives a finding that the spares are not directly sold to the customers and there is no sale taking place over the counter and the customer brings a vehicle to the servicing station where the service engineer inspects the vehicles and prepares the job card with the details of the vehicle and the spares are directly delivered to the servicing eng

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rules and Appellants genuinely believed that they had compiled with provisions of Cenvat Credit Rules and provision relating to valuation.
(xiv) Therefore for the above reasons the resort to Cenvat Credit Rule 15 for the imposition of penalty is improper, illegal and unsustainable.
3. On the other hand, ld AR Shri A. Cletus reiterates the grounds of appeal. He also made submissions which can be broadly summarized as under:-
3.1 He submits that it is evident that the adjudicating authority instead of providing arguments as to why the method adopted by the assessee for payment of amount under Rule 6(3) of CCR was wrong, has elaborately gave findings to the effect that the value of materials sold by them were to be included in the value of services as per section 67 of the act ibid and that as the Assessee had not fulfilled the conditions stated in the notification No 12/2003 ST dated 01.03.2003 namely “credit of duty paid on goods and materials sold has been taken under the provision

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

registration number which was serviced in the sale invoice also thus connecting the sales to the services provided by them. In respect franchisee service also the franchise was not given for servicing of motor vehicles under the brand name of TVS and the spares required for such service were also sold by TVS. Thus in respect both types, the sale had a direct connection to the services rendered by TVS and so the value of such goods said would form part of the gross value of service in terms of section 67. But as there is clear evidence in the invoice to show that the goods were sold and that there was no evidence on record to show that they had availed Cenvat on such goods by TVS, the value of such goods sold during the course of provision of services were eligible for the exemption under Notification No12/2003 ST dated 01.03.2003 for the purpose of service tax However for the purpose Rule 6(3) (i) of CCR such value had to be treated as an „exempted value‟ terms of the defin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

first take up the appeal of the department. The main grievance of the department is that the impugned order is a non-speaking order without giving detailed findings either to support or counter the arguments of the noticee but has simply confirmed demands proposed in the notice and the statement of demand. We find that the show cause notice had alleged in para 5.1 that “value of goods (sold during taxable service) is to be included in the gross value of taxable service under section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994”. The same paragraph also alleges that “assessees are liable to pay an amount of 5% of gross value of exempted service as per explanation 1(a) to rule 6(3) and 6(3A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. In para 5.1 (iv) and (v), there is a proposition if the assessee opts to pay an amount of 5% of value of exempted goods under Rule 6(3)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, they are required to pay an amount equivalent to 5% of the gross value (both value of goods sold and service charges r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

003-ST dated 1.3.2003 has been fulfilled by the assessee in this case. Discernibly, non-fulfillment of Notification No. 12/2003-ST was not an allegation or charge raised in the show cause notice. True, para 4.4 of the notice dated 11.6.2013 did reproduce a portion of the Notification 12/2003-ST, however, without making any reference or connection to the facts of the case or making any allegation that the conditions of the notification have been violated by the department. We further find that in para 19, the adjudicating authority has made a reference to Circular No.96/7/2007-ST dated 23.8.2008 which had inter alia clarified that where spare parts are used by a service station for servicing of vehicles, service tax should be levied on the entire bill including the value of the spare parts. That however service provider is entitled to take input credit of excise duty paid on such parts or any goods used in providing service wherein value of such goods has been included in the bill. We a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aken and hence no duty is payable”.
5.4 The assessee also, in their grounds of appeal and other contentions made by them, have consistently found fault with the adjudicating authority which have already been set out above. For example, the appellant has submitted that the Commissioner has contradicted in para 19 of the impugned order, the reason adopted for the demand in question. So also appellant has contended that the reasoning adopted by the Commissioner in para 21 based on alleged bifurcation of value and service of goods is not correct. Appellant has also argued that in para 24 of the impugned order, the Commissioner has totally misunderstood the entire concept of sale and service and inclusion of sale value of the goods in the taxable value of service.
6. From the discussions and findings herein above, it is evident that the order of the adjudicating authority has not addressed the allegations and concerns raised in the show cause notice but has instead veered off into other a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB].

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB].
15/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 15/2018 (Circular No. 12/12/2017-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Clarification regarding applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB].
Briefly stated, references have been received related to applicability of GST on the superior kerosene oil [SKO] retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene [LAB].
2. In this context, LAB manufacturers have stat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l quantity of SKO received from refinery is retained and balance quantity ranging from 83%- 85% is returned back to refinery. The retained SKO is towards extraction of Normal Paraffin, which is used in the manufacturing of LAB. In this transaction consideration is paid by LAB manufactures only on the quantity of retained SKO (n-paraffin).
4. In this context, the GST Council in its 22nd meeting held on 06.10.2017 discussed the issue and recommended for issuance of a clarification that in this transaction GST will be payable by the refinery on the value of net quantity of superior kerosene oil (SKO) retained for the manufacture of Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB).
5. Accordingly, it is here by clarified that, in aforesaid case, GST will be payabl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Procedure regarding procurement of supplies of goods from DTA by Export Oriented Unit (EOU) / Electronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit / Software Technology Park (STP) Unit / Bio-Technology Parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export benefits un

Procedure regarding procurement of supplies of goods from DTA by Export Oriented Unit (EOU) / Electronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit / Software Technology Park (STP) Unit / Bio-Technology Parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export benefits under section 147 of CGST Act, 2017.
17/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 17/2018 (Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Procedure regarding procurement of supplies of goods from DTA by Export Oriented Unit (EOU) / Electronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit / Software Technology Park (STP) Unit / Bio-Technology Parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export benefits under section 147 of CGST Act, 2017.
In accordance with the decisions taken by the GST Council in its 22nd meeting held on 06.10.2017 at New Delhi to resolve certain difficulties being faced by exporters post- GST, it has been d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

orma in “Form-A” (appended herewith) bearing a running serial number containing the goods to be procured, as pre-approved by the Development Commissioner and the details of the supplier before such deemed export supplies are made. The said intimation shall be given to-
(a) the registered supplier;
(b) the jurisdictional GST officer in charge of such registered supplier; and
(c) its jurisdictional GST officer.
(ii) The registered supplier thereafter will supply goods under tax invoice to the recipient EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit.
(iii) On receipt of such supplies, the EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit shall endorse the tax invoice and send a copy of the endorsed tax invoice to-
(a) the registered supplier;
(b) the jurisdictional GST officer in charge of such registered supplier; and
(c) its jurisdictional GST officer.
(iv) The endorsed tax invoice will be considered as proof of deemed export supplies by the registered person to EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit.
(v) The recipient EO

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

eguards are in addition to the terms and conditions to be adhered to by a EOU / EHTP / STP / BTP unit in terms of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015- 20 and the duty exemption notification being availed by such unit.
4. Difficulty, if any, in implementation of the above instructions may please be brought to the notice of the Commissioner.
5. This Circular shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from 06.11.2017.
Sd/-
(Smaraki Mahapatra)
Commissioner,State Tax,
West Bengal
Date: 18.09.2018
Memo. 377CT/PRO
3C/PRO/2018
Form- A
(Intimation for procurement of supplies from the registered person by Export Oriented Unit (EOU)/Electronic Hardware Technology Park (EHTP) Unit/ Software Technology Park (STP) unit/ Bio-Technology Parks (BTP) Unit under deemed export benefits under section 147 of WBGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No. 1853-F.T.dated 18.10.2017 [48/2017- State Tax]
(as per Circular – dated -)
Running Sr. No. of intimation and Date_____________
LOP No. – and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t, use and removal of goods received under deemed export benefit under section 147 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No.1853-F.T dated 18.10.2017 [48/2017- State Tax]
(as per Circulardated)
Name of EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP unit and address
GSTIN No.
Address of Jurisdiction GST Officer
=============
Document 1
FORM-B
For the month of……..
Form to be maintained by EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP unit for the receipt, use and removal of goods received under deemed export
benefit under section 147 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No.1853-F.T dated 18.10.2017 [48/2017- State Tax]
(as per Circular
Name of EOU/EHTP/STP/BTP unit and address
GSTIN No.
Address of Jurisdiction GST Officer
dated)
Sr
Date of
prior
Details of registered
person
No intimation
Jurisdictional GST
officer details of
registered person
Invoice
and date of
registered
no.
Details of supplies received
Amount of GST paid by supplier
Date of
given for
person
sending
endorse
d copy
procuring Nam
Ad

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications regarding applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of certain services.

Clarifications regarding applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of certain services.
18/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 18/2018 (Circular No. 16/16/2017-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Clarifications regarding applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of certain services
Various issues relating to applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of certain services have been received from the stake-holders. Accordingly, clarifications relating to applicability of GST and availability of ITC in respect of the following services are issued as under:
S.No.
Issue
Comment
1.
Is GST applicable on warehousing of agricultural produce such as tea (i.e. black tea, white tea etc.), processed coffee beans or powder, pulses (de-husked or split), jaggery, processed spices, processed dry fruits, processed cashew

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rocessed output of the same.
4. Thus, green tea leaves and not tea is the “agricultural produce” eligible for exemption available for loading, unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of agricultural produce. Same is the case with coffee obtained after processing of coffee beans.
5. Similarly, processing of sugarcane into jaggery changes its essential characteristics. Thus, jaggery is also not an agricultural produce.
6. Pulses commonly known as dal are obtained after dehusking or splitting or both. The process of de- husking or splitting is usually not carried out by farmers or at farm level but by the pulse millers. Therefore, pulses pulses (dehusked or split) are also not agricultural produce. However whole pulse grains such as whole gram, rajma etc. are covered in the definition of agricultural produce.
7. In view of the above, it is hereby clarified that processed products such as tea (i.e. black tea, white tea etc.), processed coffee beans or powder, pulses (dehusked or spl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aft engines, parts & accessories by way of inter-state stock transfers between distinct persons as specified in section 25 of the WBGST Act, notwithstanding that credit of input tax charged on consumption of such goods is not allowed for supply of service of transport of passengers by air in economy class at GST rate of 5%.
3.
Is GST leviable on General Insurance policies provided by a State Government to employees of the State government/ Police personnel, employees of Electricity Department or students of colleges/private schools etc.
(a) where premium is paid by State Government and
(b) where premium is paid by employees, students etc.?
It is hereby clarified that services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory under any insurance scheme for which total premium is paid by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory are exempt from GST under Sl. No. 40 of notification No. 1136-F.T.[12/2017-StateTax (Rate)]. Further, services provided

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exports of fabrics.

Clarification of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exports of fabrics.
19/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 19/2018 (Circular No. 18/18/2017-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Clarification of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exports of fabrics.
Doubts have been raised regarding the restrictions of refund of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs to manufacturer exporters of fabrics [falling under chapters 50 to 55 and 60 and headings 5608, 5801, 5806] under GST.
2.1 The matter has been examined. In this context, sub-section (3

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-State Tax(Rate)] dated 28.06.2017 [as amended from time to time] has been issued under clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 54 of the WBGST Act, 2017, restricting refund of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of certain specified goods, including input tax credit of GST paid on inputs.
2.3 However, the aforesaid notification having been issued under clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 54 of the WBGST Act, 2017, restriction on refund of unutilised input tax credit of GST paid on inputs will not be applicable to zero rated supplies, that is (a) exports of goods or services or both; or (b) supply of goods or services or both to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Ec

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Issue related to classification and GST rate on Terracotta idols.

Issue related to classification and GST rate on Terracotta idols.
21/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 21/2018 (Circular No. 20/20/2017-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Issue related to classification and GST rate on Terracotta idols.
The GST rate on Idols made of clay is nil. (Sl. No. 135A of Schedule notification 1126-F.T. [2/2017 State Tax (Rate)] d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Filing of Returns under GST.

Filing of Returns under GST.
23/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 23/2018 (Circular No. 26/26/2017-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Filing of Returns under GST
The GST Council, in its 23rdmeeting held at Guwahati on 10thNovember 2017, has taken certain decisions in regard to filing of returns by taxpayers. Subsequently, various representations have been received seeking clarifications on various aspects of return filing such as return filing dates, applicability and quantum of late fee, amendment of errors in submitting / filing of FORM GSTR-3B and other related queries. In order to consolidate the information in various notifications and circulars regarding return filing and to ensure uniformity in implementation across field formations (i.e., jurisdictional officers), the Commissioner, in exercise of its powers conferred under section 168

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

No. 26-C.T./GST [72/2017 – ST] both dated 29th December 2017 (superseding Notification No.2032-F.T. [57/2017-ST] and 19-C.T./GST [58/2017-ST] both dated 15thNovember 2017) have been issued to notify the due dates for filing of outward supply statement in FORM GSTR-1 for various months / quarters (as depicted in the calendar above) by registered persons having aggregate turnover in the previous financial year or current financial year of upto1.5 Crores rupees and above 1.5 Crores rupees respectively. Since, the option of quarterly filing was not available earlier, many taxpayers have already filed their FORM GSTR-1 for the month of July, such taxpayers shall not file these details again and shall only file details for the month of August and September, 2017. For those, who have not filed their FORM GSTR-1 for the month of July, they shall also file their FORM GSTR-1 for the month of July separately and then file their FORM GSTR-1 on quarterly basis for the month of August and September

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e FORM GSTR-1 on quarterly basis instead of on monthly basis. It is also clarified that the registered person may opt to file FORM GSTR-1 on monthly basis if he so wishes even though his aggregate turnover is up to ₹ 1.5 Crore. Once he falls in this bracket or if he chooses to file return on monthly basis, the registered person will not have the option to change the return filing periodicity for the entire financial year. In cases, where the registered person wrongly reports his aggregate turnover and opts to file FORM GSTR-1 on quarterly basis, he may be liable for punitive action under the WBGST Act, 2017.
2. Applicability and quantum of latefee:
2.1 The late fee for the months of July, August and September for late filing of FORM GSTR – 3B has already been waived off vide Notification No.1591-F.T.[28/2017-ST] dated 4th September, 2017 and 1888-F.T. [50/2017-CT] dated 24thOctober, 2017.
2.2 It has been decided that for subsequent months, i.e. October 2017 onwards, the amoun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ctified while filing FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 of the same month. Further, in the said circular, it was clarified that the system will automatically reconcile the data submitted in FORM GSTR-3B with FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2, and the variations if any will either be offset against output tax liability or added to the output tax liability of the subsequent months of the registered person.
3.2 Since, the GST Council has decided that the time period of filing of FORM GSTR-2 and FORM GSTR -3 for the month of July 2017 to March 2018 would be worked out by a Committee of officers, the system based reconciliation prescribed under Trade Circular No. 09/2017 [7/7/2017-GST] dated 04.09.2017 can only be operationalized after the relevant notification is issued. The said circular is therefore kept in abeyance till such time.
3.3 The common errors while submitting FORM GSTR-3B and the steps needed to be taken to rectify the same are provided in the table annexed herewith. The registered perso

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

de in the corresponding months.
5. Where the taxpayer has committed an error in submitting (before offsetting and filing) the information in FORM GSTR-3B, a provision for editing the same has been provided. The facility to edit the information can be used only before offsetting the liability and editing will not be permitted after offsetting the liability. Hence, every care should be taken to ensure the accuracy of the figures before proceeding to offset the liabilities.
6. It is further clarified that the information furnished by the registered person in the return in FORM GSTR-3B would be reconciled by the department's system with the information furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and discrepancies, if any, shall be dealt with in accordance with the relevant provisions of the WBGST Act, 2017 and rules made thereunder. Detailed instructions regarding reconciliation of information furnished in FORM GSTR-3B with that contained in FORM GSTR-2 and FORM GSTR-3 will be issued in due course of time.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bility and additional cash, if required (i.e. where sufficient balances are not available in the credit or cash ledgers) may be deposited in the cash ledger by creating challan in FORM GST PMT-06.
Liability may be added in the return of subsequent month(s) after payment of Interest.
Liability was under reported
Company A has four units in Haryana, while filing their return for the month of July, they inadvertently, missed on details of a last minute order. Since, they had already submitted and confirmed their output supply details, they were not sure of how to proceed. What can they do?
The company may use the “edit return” facility to add such liability in their submitted return and then proceed for filing of their return.
Company A has four units in Haryana, while filing their return for the month of July, they inadvertently, missed on details of a last minute order. Since, they had already submitted and confirmed their output supply details, but were not sure of how to proceed.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Confirmed Submission
Cash Ledger Updated
Offset Liability
Return Filed
Return liabilities / Input tax credit availed were confirmed and submitted and therefore no change can be done to the liability. No action was taken after this step.
Cash was added to the electronic cash ledger as per the return liability. No action was taken after this step.
All liabilities were offset by debiting the cash and credit ledger. No action was taken after this step.
Return was filed.
Use “Edit” facility to reduce over reported liability.
Use “Edit” facility to reduce over reported liability and cash ledger may be partially debited to offset such liability.
Remaining balance may either be claimed as refund or used to offset future liabilities.
Liability may be adjusted in return of subsequent month(s) or refund may be claimed where adjustment is not feasible.
Liability was over reported
Company B had reported an inter-State sale but realized that the same sale was counted twice and hence was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ounted twice and hence was not to be reported or taxed. But the return form was already filed and no change could be done to reduce the liabilities. What can company B do?
In this case, they may reduce this liability in the return of subsequent months or claim refund of the same.
Common Error – III
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Confirmed Submission
Cash Ledger Updated
Offset Liability
Return Filed
Return liabilities / Input tax credit availed were confirmed and submitted and therefore no change can be done to the liability. No action was taken after this step.
Cash was added to the electronic cash ledger as per the return liability. No action was taken after this step.
All liabilities were offset by debiting the cash and credit ledger.
No action was taken after this step.
Return was filed.
Use “Edit” facility to rectify wrongly reported liability
Use “Edit” facility to rectify wrongly reported liability and cash ledger may be debited to offset new liability, where su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the company realized that they had inadvertently, shown inter-State supply as intra- State supply and submitted the return. Further, they also had updated their Central Tax and State tax cash ledgers. What can they do?
In this case, the company will have to rectify wrongly reported liability using the edit facility. The company will reduce their Central Tax / State tax liability and add integrated tax liability.
Further, they will have to pay integrated tax and update their cash ledger. They may seek for Central Tax / State tax cash refund in due course or use the same for offsetting future liabilities.
Company C was registered in the State of Haryana. While entering their outward supplies in FORM GSTR-3B, the company realized that they had inadvertently, shown inter-State supply as intra-State supply and submitted the return. The company paid their wrong liability and filed their return in order to avoid late fee and penalty? What can they do?
Since, the return has already been f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

will be added to the credit ledger and may be used for offsetting this month or subsequent month's liability.
No Action required in cash ledger
Input tax credit which was not reported may be availed while filing, return for subsequent month(s).
Input tax credit was under reported
Company D, while filing their FORM GSTR -3B for the month of July, inadvertently, misreported Input tax credit of Rs. They had confirmed and submitted their return. What can they do?
The company may use the "edit" facility to add more Input tax credit to their submitted FORM GSTR-3B. once, this is done, such credit will be reflected in their Electronic Credit ledger and may be utilized to offset liabilities for this month or for subsequent months.
No Action required in cash ledger
Company D, while filing their FORM GSTR -3B for the month of July, inadvertently, misreported Input tax credit of Rs. as ₹ 10,00, 000/-. They had filed their return and paid Rs. in cash. What can they do?

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

over reported
While filing their FORM GSTR 3B for the months of July, 2017, Company E inadvertently, reported their eligible input tax credit, as ₹ 20,00,000/- instead of ₹ 10,00,000/-. What can they do?
Since, the company has submitted details of their input tax credit but not used such credit for offsetting their liabilities, they can reduce their input tax credit by using the "edit" facility.
While filing their FORM GSTR 3B for the months of July, 2017, Company E inadvertently, reported their eligible input tax credit, as ₹ 20,00,000/- instead of ₹ 10,00,000/-. What can they do?
Since, the company has submitted details of their input tax credit but not used such credit for offsetting their liabilities, they can reduce their input tax credit by using the "edit" facility. Since, they have deposited ₹ 10,00,000/- only in their input tax credit ledger they may deposit additional ₹ 10,00,000/- in the cash ledger by creating cha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ere offset by debiting the cash and credit ledger. No action was taken after this step
All liabilities were offset by debiting the cash and credit ledger. No action was taken after this step
* “Edit” facility to be used to rectify such liability.
* New Input tax credit will be added to the credit ledger.
* Input tax credit reduced will be adjusted in the credit ledger without any additional liability
Additional cash, if required, may be deposited in the cash ledger by creating challan in FORM GST PMT-06
Pay(through cash) / Reverse any wrongly reported input tax credit in return of subsequent month(s). For under reported input tax credit, the same may be availed in return of subsequent month(s).
Input Tax Credit of the wrong tax was taken
While filing their FORM GSTR 3B for the months of July, 2017, Company E inadvertently, reported their Central Tax credit of ₹ 20,00,000/-as Integrated tax. What can they do?
Use edit facility to claim correct central tax credit under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

edit of ₹ 20,00,000/- can be availed in return of subsequent month(s).
Change in FORM GSTR-1
No Action
Stage of Return Filing (GSTR – 3B)
Common Error – VII
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Confirmed Submission
Cash Ledger Updated
Offset Liability
Return Filed
Return liabilities / Input tax credit availed were reported correctly and thereafter confirmed and submitted. Therefore no change is required to be done to the liability. No action was taken after this step.
Cash was added to the electronic cash ledger as per the return liability. No action was taken after this step
All liabilities were offset by debiting the cash and credit ledger. No action was taken after this step
Return was filed.
No Action
Add cash under the right tax head and seek cash refund of the cash added under the wrong tax head.
No Action
Cash ledger wrongly updated
No Action
While filing their FORM GSTR-3B return, Company F while generating payment challan added ₹ 5,00,000/- under t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications regarding levy of GST on accommodation services, betting and gambling in casinos, horse racing, admission to cinema, homestays, printing, legal services etc.

Clarifications regarding levy of GST on accommodation services, betting and gambling in casinos, horse racing, admission to cinema, homestays, printing, legal services etc.
24/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 24/2018 (Circular No. 27/01/2018-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Clarifications regarding levy of GST on accommodation services, betting and gambling in casinos, horse racing, admission to cinema, homestays, printing, legal services etc.
Representations were received from trade and industry for clarification on certain issues regarding levy of GST on supply of services.
2. In this context, it is stated that the following clarifications, inter-alia, were published as FAQ at www.wbcomtax.gov.in
S.No.
Questions/ Clarifications sought
Clarifications
1.
1. Will GST be charged on actual tariff or declared tariff for accommodation servi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8000.
3. Tariff declared anywhere, say on the websites through which business is being procured or printed on tariff card or displayed at the reception will be the declared tariff. In case different tariff is declared at different places, highest of such declared tariffs shall be the declared tariff for the purpose of levy of GST.
4. In case different tariff is declared for different seasons or periods of the year, the tariff declared for the season in which the service of accommodation is provided shall apply.
5. Declared tariff at the time of supply would apply.
6. If declared tariff of the accommodation provided by way of upgrade is ₹ 10000, but amount charged is ₹ 7000, then GST would be levied @ 28% on ₹ 7000/-.
2.
Vide notification No. 1135-F.T.[11/2017-State Tax (Rate)] dated the 28th June 2017 entry 34, GST on the service of admission into casino under Heading 9996 (Recreational, cultural and sporting services) has been levied @ 28%. Since the Value of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

entry to casinos as well as on betting/ gambling services being provided by casinos on the transaction value of betting, i.e. the total bet value, in addition to GST levy on any other services being provided by the casinos (such as services by way of supply of food/ drinks etc. at the casinos). Betting, in pre-GST regime, was subjected to betting tax on full bet value.
3.
The provision in rate schedule notification No. 1135-F.T. [11/2017-State Tax (Rate)] dated the 28th June 2017 does not clearly state the tax base to levy GST on horse racing. This may be clarified.
GST would be leviable on the entire bet value i.e. total of face value of any or all bets paid into the totalisator or placed with licensed book makers, as the case maybe.
Illustration: If entire bet value is ₹ 100, GST leviable will be ₹ 28/-.
4.
1. Whether for the purpose of entries at Sl. Nos. 34(ii) [admission to cinema] and 7(ii)(vi)(viii) [Accommodation in hotels, inns, etc.], of notification 1135-F.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ls, inns guest houses or other commercial places meant for residential or lodging purposes provided by a person having turnover below ₹ 20 lakhs (Rs. 10 lakhs in special category states) per annum and thus not required to take registration under section 22(1) of WBGST Act. Such persons, even though they provide services through ECO, are not required to take registration in view of section 24(ix) of WBGST Act, 2017.
6.
To clarify whether supply in the situations listed below shall be treated as a supply of goods or supply of service: –
1. The books are printed/ published/ sold on procuring copyright from the author or his legal heir. [e.g. White Tiger Procures copyright from Ruskin Bond]
2. The books are printed/ published/ sold against a specific brand name. [e.g. Manorama Year Book]
3. The books are printed/ published/ sold on paying copyright fees to a foreign publisher for publishing Indian edition (same language) of foreign books. [e.g. Penguin (India) Ltd. pays fees to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol.

Clarification regarding applicability of GST on Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol.
25/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 25/2018 (Circular No. 29/03/2018-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Clarification regarding applicability of GST on Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol.
References have been received related to the applicability of GST on the Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etained by the manufacturers of Propylene or Di-butyl para Cresol and Poly Iso Butylene.
3. The GST Council in its 25th meeting held on 18.01.2018 discussed this issue and recommended for issuance of a clarification stating that in such transactions, GST will be payable by the refinery on the value of net quantity of polybutylene feedstock and liquefied petroleum gas retained for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl Para Cresol.
4. Accordingly, it is hereby clarified that, in the aforesaid cases, GST will be payable by the refinery only on the net quantity of Polybutylene feedstock and Liquefied Petroleum Gas retained by the manufacturer for the manufacture of Poly Iso Butylene and Propylene or Di-butyl para Cres

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarifications regarding GST in respect of certain services.

Clarifications regarding GST in respect of certain services.
27/2018 Dated:- 17-9-2018 West Bengal SGST
GST – States
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
DIRECTORATE OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
14, BELIAGHATA ROAD, KOLKATA-700015
TRADE CIRCULAR No. 27/2018 (Circular No. 32/06/2018-GST)
DATED: 17.09.2018
Subject: Clarifications regarding GST in respect of certain services
The GST Council during its 25th meeting held on 18thJanuary, 2018, discussed issues in respect of taxability of following services and decided to issue a clarification. According the following clarification relating to the following services is issued:-
S. No.
Issue
Clarification
1.
Is hostel accommodation provided by Trusts to students covered within the definition of Charitable Activities and thus, exempt under Sl. No. 1 of notification No. 1136-F.T. [12/2017-ST (Rate)].
Hostel accommodation services do not fall within the ambit of charitable activities as defined in para 2(r) of notification No. 1136-F.T. [12/2017

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amount imposed by the District Forum or ₹ 25000/- whichever is less, is required to be paid.
Services by any court or Tribunal established under any law for the time being in force is neither a supply of goods nor services. Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions (National/ State/ District) may not be tribunals literally as they may not have been set up directly under Article 323B of the Constitution. However, they are clothed with the characteristics of a tribunal on account of the following: –
(1) Statement of objects and reasons as mentioned in the Consumer Protection Bill state that one of its objects is to provide speedy and simple Redressal to consumer disputes, for which a quasi- judicial machinery is sought to be set up at District, State and Central levels.
(2) The President of the District / State/ National Disputes Redressal Commissions is a person who has been or is qualified to be a District Judge, High Court Judge and Supreme Court Judge respectively.
(3) These

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

service) in which case, the rate of tax on such services will be 18% or under the heading 9996 (recreational, cultural and sporting services) treating them as joy rides, leviable to GST@ 28%?
Elephant / camel joy rides cannot be classified as transportation services. These services will attract GST @ 18% with threshold exemption being available to small service providers. [Sl. No 34(iii) of notification No. 1135-F.T. [11/2017-ST (Rate)] dated 28.06.2017 as amended by notification No. 129-F.T. [1/2018-ST(Rate)] dated 25.01.2018 refers]
4.
What is the GST rate applicable on rental services of self-propelled access equipment (Boom Scissors/ Telehandlers)? The equipment is imported at GST rate of 28% and leased further in India where operator is supplied by the leasing company, diesel for working of machine is supplied by customer and transportation cost including loading and unloading is also paid by the customer.
Leasing or rental services, with or without operator, for any purpose

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or para-medics are exempt.[Sl. No. 74 of notification No. 1136-F.T. [12/2017-ST (Rate)] dated 28.06.2017 as amended refers].
(1) Services provided by senior doctors/ consultants/ technicians hired by the hospitals, whether employees or not, are healthcare services which are exempt.
5.
Retention money: Hospitals charge the patients, say, ₹ 10000/- and pay to the consultants/ technicians only ₹ 7500/- and keep the balance for providing ancillary services which include nursing care, infrastructure facilities, paramedic care, emergency services, checking of temperature, weight, blood pressure etc. Will GST be applicable on such money retained by the hospitals?
Health care services have been defined to mean any service by way of diagnosis or treatment or care for illness, injury, deformity, abnormality or pregnancy in any recognised system of medicines in India [para 2(zg) of notification No. 1136-F.T. [12/2017-ST (Rate)]. Therefore, hospitals also provide healthcare service

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d not separately taxable. Other supplies of food by a hospital to patients (not admitted) or their attendants or visitors are taxable.
6.
Appropriate clarification may be issued regarding taxability of Cost Petroleum.
As per the Production Sharing Contract (PSC) between the Government and the oil exploration & production contractors, in case of a commercial discovery of petroleum, the contractors are entitled to recover from the sale proceeds all expenses incurred in exploration, development, production and payment of royalty. Portion of the value of petroleum which the contractor is entitled to take in a year for recovery of these contract costs is called “Cost Petroleum”.
The relationship of the oil exploration and production contractors with the Government is not that of partners but that of licensor/lessor and licensee/lessee in terms of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959. Having acquired the right to explore, exploit and sell petroleum in lieu of royalty and a share in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =