In Re: M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited

2018 (10) TMI 747 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, PUNJAB – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 278 (A. A. R. – GST) – Levy of GST – Supply or not? – free tickets given as “Complimentary Tickets” – input tax credit – Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 8th June 2018 – CGST Act, 2017.

The applicant has withdrawn his Advance Ruling application while indicating that his case is similar to the case of an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) which has been discussed by the said circular as not constituting a supply, and the ‘concerned officer’ has reached a conclusion diametrically opposite that the activity of the applicant of supplying complementary tickets free of charge would amount to supply. Therefore, allowing for withdrawal of the present application in terms of the applicant, without discussing the case on merits would not be in public interest. Hence, circumstances call for discussion on merits rather than allowing withdrawal, especially when both interested parties to the Advanced Ruling

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntiated from the case of the OEM which is the basis of Circular, and hence the contention of the applicant that the questions posed by him in the present Advance Ruling application stand answered by the said Circular does not hold any force.

Perusal of the definition of the word ‘consideration’ shows that it is an inclusive definition and covers not only payments made in money terms or otherwise as mentioned in section 2(31)(a) but also the monetary value of any act of forbearance in respect of supply of services, whether by the recipient (in this case the complimentary ticket receiver) or by any other person (which in this case would also include the applicant) in terms of Section 2(31)(b) – In the present case when the applicant issues a ‘complimentary ticket’ to any person, the applicant is certainly displaying an act of forbearance by tolerating persons who are receiving the services provided by the applicant without paying any money, which other persons not receiving such co

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sure too, the activity of the applicant of providing complementary tickets free of charge to some persons for enjoying cricket matches would also be covered under the scope of supply as per section 7(1)(d).

The activity of the applicant of providing complementary tickets free of charge to some persons would be considered supply of service as per provisions of both Section 7(1)(a) and 7(1)(d) and would therefore be leviable to tax as per provisions of Section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the parallel Section 9 in the Punjab Act, 2017.

Input tax credit – Held that:- Since the activity of providing the complementary tickets would amount to supply under provisions of CGST Act and parallel provisions of Punjab GST Act, 2017 and would be leviable to tax under section 9 of the said Acts. the question of whether Input Tax Credit would be available on inputs going into such complementary tickets would be answerable in affirmative.

The question of proportional availment of ITC

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

licant including complementary tickets would be taxable, the applicant would clearly be eligible for claim of Input Tax Credit as per the provisions of Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017. – AAR/GST/PB/002 Dated:- 20-8-2018 – NAVDEEP BHINDER AND G.S. BAINS, MEMBER Present for the Applicant: Sh. Parveen Kashyap and Sh. Adarsh Gupta, Consultant of the firm (Note: An Appeal against this order lies with the Appellate Authority in terms of Section 99 and Section 100 of the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 99 and Section 100 of the PGST Act, 2017 within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this order.) M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited, Plot No. 372, Industrial Area, Phase-9, Mohali, SAS Nagar, Punjab-160062 hereinafter referred to as applicant had submitted an application for advance ruling in form GST ARA-01 vide his letter dated 02.04.2018 received on 04.04.2018 seeking to know. 1. Whether free tickets given as Complimentary Tickets falls within the definition of supp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ted for adjournment for submission of documents. On their request. the case was adjourned with the directions to submit written submission by 30-07-2018. The applicant has sent written submission through e-mail received on 30-07-2018, which is reproduced as under: Written submissions & synopsis by the Applicant in respect of application for Advance Ruling: 1. That, M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited, (for short applicant or KPH ), having its registered office at Plot No. 372 Industrial Area. Phase-9, Mohall, SAS Nagar, Punjab-160062 is a franchisee of Board of Control for Cricket in India (for short BCCI ) for the purpose of establishing and operating a cricket team to participate in Indian Premier League T20 cricket tournament (for shod IPL ), under the title of kings XI Punjab . 2. That IPL is a domestic professional Twenty-20 cricket tournament in India, organized by BCCI-IPL every year under the gaming rules as prescribed by the BCCI-IPL and International Cricket Council

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the definition of supply under CGST Act, 2017 and thus, whether the applicant is required to pay GST on such free tickets? b. Whether the applicant is eligible to claim Input Tax credit (for short ITC ) in respect of complimentary tickets? In furtherance to our justification stated in our above stated application for Advance ruling, the Applicant wishes to submit following additional submissions with a request to be taken into consideration to decide the matter, ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS 7. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime has introduced a concept of supply as a taxable event and done away with the erstwhile taxable events of sale, service, manufacture etc. This inter-alia require fresh thoughts for treatment of various transactions and events. 8. While the term free supply is not defined under GST law or the erstwhile indirect tax laws, a free supply as the name suggests is a supply of goods or services without any consideration (Monetary or Kind). We find it pertinent here to un

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r GST, the incidence of tax is supply . The term supply has been defined in an inclusive manner under Section 7 of the CGST Act. What this effectively means is that the definition is not exhaustive, and there may be some supplies which are not specified within the definition of the term 10. The term supply is defined to include all forms of sale, transfers, exchanges, barters etc. made or agreed to be made for a consideration in the course or furtherance of business. However, supplies between related persons or distinct persons (different offices of the same entity) in the course or furtherance of business even if not for a consideration are supplies (in terms of Schedule I to the CGST Act). As a result, free supplies between unrelated persons. cannot be said to supplies , therefore, not taxable. Whereas free supplies between related persons are supplies and therefore, taxable. 11. The term related persons has been defined in the explanation to Section 15 of the CGST Act. The said defi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

may safely conclude that the applicant and the ticket holder (recipient) cannot be covered under any entry and thus cannot be said to a related person. 12. In light of the above stated legal provisions and discussion, it is view of the applicant that the activity of providing complimentary tickets without any consideration on account of courtesy/public relationship/business promotion would not fall under the definition of supply as given under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017 and thus not exigible to GST. Input tax credit 13. One of the major advantages sought to be achieved from implementation of GST is the removal of cascading effect by facilitating seamless flow of credit. The statement of Objects and Reasons to the Constitution (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014, enacted as the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016 categorically includes elimination of cascading effect This would be achieved by providing for the availment of Input tax credit to the purc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the output (free supplies of) services are not taxed, there is no need for reversal of input tax credit. 16. Section 16 provides that every registered taxable person shall in the manner specified in section 44, be entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business. In case any inward supply of goods and/ or services is used for non-business purpose, the credit thereon is not allowed. Therefore, section 17(1) provides that where the goods and/or services are used partly for the purpose of any business and partly for other purposes, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the purpose of his business. Supply of complimentary tickets is pad and parcel of the business of the applicant and cannot be said to be used for non-business purpose. 17. The meaning of supply made in course or furtherance of business given in the FAQ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

effecting taxable supplies including zero-rated under this act or under the IGST Act, 2016 and partly for effecting exempt supplies under the said acts, the amount of credit shall be restricted to so much of the input tax as is attributable to the said taxable supplies including zero-rated supplies. Supply of complimentary tickets is not a supply in itself and thus cannot be said to be an exempt supply. 19. Further Section 17(3) provides that the value of exemption supply under sub section (2) shall be such as may be prescribed Reference to chapter V (Input Tax credit) of CGST Rules 2017, there is no valuation mechanism prescribed for free supplies. Explanation to Rule 42 of CGST Rules 2017 clarifies For the purpose of this clause, it is hereby clarifies that the aggregate values of exempt supplies and the total turnover shall exclude the amount of any duty or tax levied under entry 84 of List I of the seventh schedule to the constitution and entry 51 and 54 of list II of the said sch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ries [Ruby Laboratories vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax on 26 November, 1970 (1971 27 STC 326 Guj]) = 1970 (11) TMI 90 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT. 22. If business promotion and advertisement expenses are not specifically excluded and are considered as in the course or furtherance of business then in view of the applicant same treatment is available for free supplies. 23. following are some of the similar transactions wherein the question of claiming ITC for free supply of services could arise and have possible implications. a. Free consultancy services by a lawyer/ chartered accountant b. Complimentary movie tickets in a FM Radio show c. First night free on Hotel booking on various online portals. Thus if ITC is eligible for the above listed events, similar treatment should be available for free supplies of complimentary tickets and in view of the applicant ITC should be freely available. 24. The eligibility of credit on free supply also has undergone the test of judicial interpretation by Hou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

an the recipients, that the awards dinner had been organized as a self-supporting event, for which the ticket receipts were intended to cover the total cost including the provision of trophies; and that accordingly, the purchase of the tickets provided the consideration for the supply of trophies to the award winners and output tax was not payable separately by the company on that value. Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 8th June 2018 25. We, respectfully wish to bring to your notice that CBIC has issued a clarification vide Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 8th June 2018 vide which it has been clarified that supply of FOC basis does not constitute a supply as there is no consideration involved It also clarifies that where FOC supply is made in the course o/ furtherance of business, there is no requirement of reversal of credit Relevant abstract of the circular is re-produced hereunder- SLNo. Issue Clarification 1.1 Whether moulds and dies owned by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

icant or KPH ), having its Corporate office at C-115, 1st Floor, L & T Elante Office, Plot No. 178/178A, Industrial & Business Park, Area Phase-I, Chandigarh 160002 is an IPL franchisee to participate in Indian Premier league T20 cricket tournament (for short IPL ), under the title of Kings Xl Punjab The applicant has filed an application under Section 97 of Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (for short CGST Act ) seeking an advance ruling. The questions for which advance ruling is sought are – a. Whether free tickets given as Complimentary Tickets falls within the definition of supply under CGST Act, 2017 and thus, whether the applicant is required to pay GST on such free tickets? b. Whether the applicant is eligible to claim Input Tax Credit (for shod ITC ) in respect of complimentary tickets ? We, respectfully wish to bring to your notice that CBIC has issued a clarification vide Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 8th June 2018 vide which it has been clarified that sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The two questions on which we have sought advance ruling from your good office are the same which have been clarified by the above cited circular. Discussions and findings: We have carefully gone through the facts of the case, the contentions of the applicant and legal provisions relevant to the questions raised in the present application. It is interesting to note that after submission of the application, personal hearing and further additional submissions made by the applicant, after the applicant had been spiritedly arguing as to how handing out of complementary tickets would not amount to supply under the GST Act, 2017, the applicant suddenly withdrew his advance ruling application. It is also interesting to note that the applicant has cited the Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 8.6.2018 while withdrawing the application, which circular he had already referred to in his written submissions. Therefore, no new fact has been added by the applicant while requesting for withdrawal whil

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the said circular as not constituting a supply, and the concerned officer has reached a conclusion diametrically opposite that the activity of the applicant of supplying complementary tickets free of charge would amount to supply. Therefore, allowing for withdrawal of the present application in terms of the applicant, without discussing the case on merits would not be in public interest. Hence, circumstances call for discussion on merits rather than allowing withdrawal, especially when both interested parties to the Advanced Ruling application hold contrary views. While, the said Circular dated 8.6.2018 clarifies the case of an OEM where he is providing Dies and Moulds owned by him free of cost to a component manufacturer, who further uses these to make components for the OEM and supply such components back, this situation cannot be compared to the situation of handing out complementary tickets for viewing Cricket matches by any stretch of imagination. In the present case, there is no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

llip;…as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business The word consideration has also been defined in Section 2(31) of the CGST Act as under: (a) any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government; (b) the monetary value of any act or forbearance, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government….. Perusal of the definition of the word consideration shows that it is an inclusive definition and covers not only payments made in mone

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tamp (other than postage stamp) which is redeemable against a supply of goods or services or both shall be equal to the money value of the goods or services or both redeemable against such token, voucher, coupon, or stamp. The complementary ticket given by the applicant to various persons would certainly be covered by the term token and voucher which are both defined relatedly in the Oxford English Dictionary. On website https://en.oxforddictioners.com/defination/token token is defined as a voucher that can be exchanged for goods or services, typically one given as a gilt or forming part of a promotional offer ; and on website https://en.oxforddictioners.com/defination/token/voucher voucher is defined as a small printed piece of paper that entitles the holder to a discount or that may be exchanged for goods or services . 6. Therefore. the contention of the applicant that since complementary ticket recipient does not make any payment to the applicant. it can be said that supply of ticke

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in Schedule II are to be treated as supply of goods or services and would be included in the expression supply for the purposes of the CGST Act, 2017. Para 5 of the Schedule II deals with supply of services and lays down, in clause (e), that agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act or to tolerate an act or situation, or to do an act would be treated as supply of services. It is noteworthy that provisions of Section 7(1)(d) read with para 5 of Schedule II do not mention the word consideration for qualifying the mentioned activities as supply of services. While consideration is used as a factor to determine supply under Section 7 (1)(a), the word being mentioned in the said provision, it is absent from the provisions of Section 7(1)(d) which is an independent clause under Section 7 while laying down the scope of supply. Hence, legal interpretation of Section 7(1)(d) read with para 5(e) of Schedule II makes it clear that agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hus, it is seen that the activity of the applicant in issuing complementary tickets to persons is covered under each limb of para 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, by this measure too, the activity of the applicant of providing complementary tickets free of charge to some persons for enjoying cricket matches would also be covered under the scope of supply as per section 7(1)(d). 9. In view of the above discussion and findings, it would be clear that the activity of the applicant of providing complementary tickets free of charge to some persons would be considered supply of service as per provisions of both Section 7(1)(a) and 7(1)(d) and would therefore be leviable to tax as per provisions of Section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the parallel Section 9 in the Punjab Act, 2017. 10. The second question of the applicant as to whether he is eligible to claim Input Tax credit in respect of complementary tickets also flows from the first question regarding taxability of com

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ction 16 wherein it is clearly mentioned that credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both has to be given to him which are used in the course of his business. And would therefore not extend to services where the applicant himself is the service provider and leviable to an output tax for such outward supply. Therefore in the present case, the applicant would not be eligible to take credit on the tax leviable on supply of complementary tickets by him, but would be eligible to avail credit of input and input service going into provision of supply of the impugned complementary tickets. 11. Accordingly we pronounce the following Advance Ruling under section 98(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 and section 98(4) of the Punjab GST Act, 2017 to the question raised by the applicant: The activity of the applicant of providing complementary tickets free of charge to some persons would be considered supply of service as per provisions of both Section 7(1)(a) and 7(1)(d) and would

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

State Bank of Hyderabad Versus CCT, Hyderabad – GST

2018 (11) TMI 165 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI – Business Auxiliary services – commission received from the RBI by the banks – appellant carried out various Government transactions on behalf of the Central and the State Governments and have received commission – taxability – N/N. 22/2006-ST dated 31.05.2006 – Held that:- The Notification exempts taxable services provided or to be provided by any person to the Reserve Bank of India when the service tax for the service is liable to be paid by the Reserve Bank of India under Sub-Section (2) of Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 2 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 – It further exempts taxable services provided or to be provided to any person by the Reserve Bank of India.

Demand set aside – appeal allowed – decided in favor of appellant. – Appeal No. ST/1349/2010 – A/31191/2018 – Dated:- 20-8-2018 – Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical) Shri S. Ananthan, CA (Representative) f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

78. He refrained from imposing any penalty under Sec.78. Aggrieved, by this order the appellant filed this appeal on the following grounds: (1) The commission which they have received from Reserve Bank is for maintenance of pension accounts of Government employees which is a sovereign function carried out on behalf of the Government and hence as such not liable to tax. (2) That the Notification No. 22/2006-ST dated 31.05.2006 is applicable to them as they are acting as an agent of Reserve Bank of India and were receiving commission from them. The learned Commissioner erred in holding that appellant had wilfully suppressed facts with an intention to evade tax without bringing out any tangible evidence on record. (3) The learned Commissioner has wrongly levied penalties under Sec.77 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 in contravention to Sec.80 thereof. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently argued as above. He further contended that earlier a show cause notice was issued for the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

regard to public interest, convenience of banking and other factors, can appoint a national bank or the State Bank to transact business as its agent at any place in India. Drawing power from this Section, RBI appoints various national banks/public sector banks for collection of various taxes and making payment of pension etc. This would mean that various national banks are agents of the RBI. 7.5 The Central Govt. of India by Notification No. 22/2006-ST has given exemption from the payment of service tax of any taxable services provided to or by RBI either in India or under Reverse Charge Mechanism. In our view as the respondent assessee is an agent of RBI, exemption granted by notification No. 22/2006-ST, needs to be extended to respondent. In our view the claim of the respondent from exemption of the service tax on the commission received for undertaking the activity of receiving various taxes on behalf of the Govt. of India, seems to be justified inasmuch as that the provisions of Se

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from the service tax liability in respect of various services, its agent for doing such services also needs to be extended the same benefit. 7.7 We may also look at the present controversy from another angle. State Bank of Patiala has been appointed by RBI as its agent under Section 45 of the RBI Act. RBI itself has been entrusted by the Central Government to transact Government business. Hence once State Bank of Patiala has been appointed as agent of RBI, it is transacting Government business which is in the nature of a sovereign function performed on behalf of the Government and hence not liable to Service Tax. 7.8 In our considered view the judgement of the Tribunal in the case of Canara Bank 2012-TIOL-790-CESTAT-Ahm has correctly interpreted notification no. 22/2006-ST and is correct exposition of the law. In our view the said judgement does not require any reconsideration. 7.9 As regards the case law cited by the learned D.R. and reliance placed in the case of Malwa Industries Lt

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oner (A.R.) in the case of Uttam Industries (supra) may also not carry the case of revenue any further as facts were totally different, than the facts in the case in hand. 8. In view of the foregoing discussion, we answer the reference in favour of the respondent and hold that the law as laid down by the Tribunal in the case of Canara Bank (supra) is correct exposition of law. Present appeal has no merit and dismissed. 3. He also relied on the case of Syndicate Bank [2018 (8) TMI 699] and State Bank of Hyderabad [2017 (2) TMI 1347]. He therefore argued that the demand may be set aside along with interest and penalty. 4. Learned departmental representative reiterates the Order-in-Original. 5. We have considered the arguments on both sides. Notification No. 22/2006-ST dated 31.05.2006 clearly exempts taxable services provided or to be provided by any person to the Reserve Bank of India when the service tax for the service is liable to be paid by the Reserve Bank of India under Sub-Sec. (

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Synthite Industries

2018 (11) TMI 403 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 142 (A. A. R. – GST) – Levy of GST – job work service to foreign customer – IGST or SGST+CGST? – Applicability of exemption under N/N. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 – Held that:- the process of providing job work service to the foreign customer, in the premises of the applicant as per the specifications of the recipient of services is taxable under APGST Act 2017, as per Entry No.26 (HSN Code 9988) Proviso (iv), and liable to tax @ 18%.

Applicability of IGST or SGST+CGST? – Held that:- The place of supply for this transaction is location of the service where actually performed i.e., business premises of the applicant which is located in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Hence the tax liability under SGST Act/CGST Act 2017 only applies.

Exemption as per N/N. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 – Held that:- As the Service Tax Act itself subsumed under Goods & Services Tax Act 2017, the Notification referred

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Jurisdictional Officer: Received Remarks Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the appellate authority for advance ruling constituted under section 99 of APGST Act 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. M/s. SYNTHITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, GST: 37AADCS5616E1ZG, Survey No. 42/4B 542/1, Tammavam, Medarametla, Bodduvanipalem Mandal Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh 523212, Andhra Pradesh, India(hereinafter also referred as applicant-job worker), having GSTIN: 37AADCS5616E1ZG, are engaged in Job work of removing Caffeine from Tea powder imported from foreign Company viz., HTH Hamburger Teehandel GmbH Im. & Export, Hamburg, Germany, (herein after called Principal) and exporting the de-caffeinated tea to his Principal. Apart, the applicant-job worker is also engaged in the manufacture, export of Spice Oils and Oleoresins from India. Their annual turnover is reported as more than ₹ 1500 Crores. 2. T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vice to foreign customer as explained above is taxable under GST. Is such transaction attracts GST? If applicable to GST, whether they have to pay IGST or SGST+CGST?. Is the job work service provided by them is exempted from service fax under Mega exemption list as per Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.20 72 and not chargeable to GST? 5. This application is forwarded to the jurisdictional officer i.e Superintendent, Central Board of Excise & Customs, Ongole Range, apart from marking a copy to the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Ongole, to offer their remarks, whether any proceedings are pending or passed by any authority. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Ongole, in his remarks not clearly mentioned in remarks whether there are any pending or passed proceedings before any authority. Similarly, no remarks have been offered by Superintendent, Central Board of Excise & Customs, Ongole Range, Ongole, so far. 6. However, in response to a hearing notice issued to the applicant-job wor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

-sections (3) to (13) shall be the location of the recipient of services: Provided that where the location of the recipient of services is not available in the ordinary course of business, the place of supply shall be the location of the supplier of services. (3) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely:- (a) services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or to a person acting on behalf of the supplier of services in order to provide the services: Provided that when such services are provided from a remote location by way of electronic means, the place of supply shall be the location where goods are situated at the time of supply of services: Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied in respect of goods which are temporarily imported into India for repair

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

process of providing job work service by the applicant to the foreign principal, shall be classified under the HSN Code services Heading 9988, which reads as under: 9983 – Manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others The services included under Heading 9988 are performed on physical inputs owned by units other than the units providing the service. As such, they are characterized as outsourced portions of a manufacturing process or a complete outsourced manufacturing process. Since this Heading covers manufacturing services, the output is not owned by the unit providing this service. Therefore, the value of the services in this Heading is based on the service fee paid not the value of the goods manufactured. Further, the process of providing job work service to the foreign customer, in the premises of the applicant as per the specifications of the recipient of services is taxable under APGST Act 2017, as per Entry No.26 (HSN Code 9988) Proviso (iv), and liable to tax @ 18%.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

recipient of services to the supplier of services, or ………. Hence, the place of supply for this transaction is location of the service where actually performed i.e., business premises of the applicant which is located in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Hence the tax liability under SGST Act/CGST Act 2017 only applies. Question No.3 for clarification: Is the job work service provided by them is exempted from service tax under Mega exemption list as per Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 and not chargeable to GST? As the Service Tax Act itself subsumed under Goods & Services Tax Act 2017, the Notification referred to, is no more applicable. In the light of the above facts and legal provisions, the ruling is given as under:- RULING 1. The process providing job work service to the foreign principal, in the premises of the applicant as per the specifications of the recipient of services, is taxable under APGST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017, as per Entry No.26 (HSN Code

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. J Abdul Rawoof Khan & Brothers

2018 (11) TMI 485 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 138 (A. A. R. – GST) – Registration u/s 22 of CGST, SGST Acts 2017 – manufacturer of Biris – annual business turnover is less than ₹ 20 lakhs – no inter-state outward taxable supply – Held that:- Since the applicant reported that his turnovers from the past (3) years are below ₹ 20 lakhs, he may continue the GSTIN registration or may cancel the registration as per the provisions of Sec.29 of APGST Act 2017.

Ruling:- The Registration under Sec.22 of APGST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017 is not mandatory for applicant, as per the existing provisions of law. – AAR/AP/9(GST)/2018 In Application No. AAR/14(GST)/2018 Dated:- 20-8-2018 – SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR, MEMBER Present for the Applicant: Sri. J. Rasool Khan (Authorized Representative) Present for the Jurisdictional Officer: Received Remarks Note: Under Section 100 of the APGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2018 towards CGST Fee. On verification of basic information of the applicant available on record, it is observed that the applicant falls under State jurisdiction, i.e Kurnool II Circle, of Kurnool Division (as per the bifurcation lists of tax payers between the Centre and State in the prescribed manner). Accordingly, the application has been forwarded to the jurisdictional officers and also a copy marked to the Central Tax authorities to offer their remarks as per the Sec. 98(1) of CGST/APGST Act'2017 and requested for the information. In response to this communication, the concerned jurisdictional officer, offered their remarks, and stated that there are no proceedings pending relating to the applicant, and no proceedings are passed on the issue, for which the advance ruling sought by the applicant. A personal hearing is called for on 19th July 2018 to hear from the applicant. Sri.J. Rasool Khan, an authorized representative has attended on behalf of the applicant and submitted t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed dealers/agriculturists. Question for clarification: The applicant requested to clarify the following; (1) He is manufacturer of Biris and his annual business turnover is less than ₹ 20 lakhs. He does not have any inter-state outward taxable supply. He requested to clarify whether he is liable for registration under Sec.22 of CGST, SGST Acts 2017? Facts of the case: The applicant is purchasing Biri leaves and tobacco powder, mostly from the registered dealers of within an outside the state of Andhra Pradesh, and manufacturing the same in to Biris. The resultant Biris are sold within the state of Andhra Pradesh Only. The aggregate turnover of the applicant from the past (3) three years is less than ₹ 20 lakhs At the time of hearing, the applicants submitted that he is aware about the liabilities arising on Reverse Charge, if he purchases of Beedi leaves or Tobacco powder from on-registered dealers and he is also aware about compulsory registration if supplies made to outsi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, to another person as a going concern, the transferee or the successor, as the case may be, shall be liable to be registered with effect from the date of such transfer or succession. With regard to threshold limit of turnover, Sec.22 (1) of the APGST Act 2017, reads as under: Section.22. (1) Every supplier shall be liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory, other than special category States, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees: Since the applicant reported that his turnovers from the past (3) years are below ₹ 20 lakhs, he may continue the GSTIN registration or may cancel the registration as per the provisions of Sec.29 of APGST Act 2017, which reads as under: 29. (7) The proper officer may, either on his own motion or on an application filed by the registered person or by his legal heirs, in case of death of such person, cancel the registration,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Fairmacs ShipStores Private Limited

2018 (11) TMI 486 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA PRADESH – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 844 (A. A. R. – GST) – Exemption from GST – outward supplies made to ocean going merchant vessels on foreign run, Indian Naval Ships and Indian Coast Guard Ships – zero rated supplies or not – Collection of GST from Ocean going merchant vessels on foreign run/ Indian Naval Ships/ Indian Coast Guard Ships or from their authorized agents.

Held that:- As per section 88(A) of Customs Act, 1962, the goods supplied to merchant ships on foreign run will be treated as export. As per section 16 of IGST Act’2017, the exports will be treated as ‘zero’ rated supplies.

Ruling:- The outward supplies made by the applicant to a) ocean going merchant ships which are in foreign run, b) Indian Navy ships, c) Indian Coast guard ships, will be treated as ‘exports’. – AAR/AP/10(GST)/2018 in Application No. AAR/15(GST)/2018 Dated:- 20-8-2018 – SRI. J.V.M SARMA AND SRI. AMARESH KUMAR, MEMBER Present for the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on their outward supplies whether they can collect the GST from the recipient for the goods namely: Ocean going merchant vessels on foreign run. Indian Naval Ships Indian Coast Guard Ships or from their authorized agents 2.2 After following due process of law this advance ruling authority vide Ruling No. AAR/AP/01(GST)/2017 dated 25.01.2018 = 2018 (6) TMI 623 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – ANDHRA PRADESH had given the following ruling on the applicant s question: (i) The applicant are not exempted from tax under GST on their outward supplies made to ocean going merchant vessels on foreign run, Indian Naval Ships and Indian Coast Guard Ships. (ii) The applicant can collect the applicable GST from their customers, in case it is not exports. However, in case of exports the option lies with the applicant based on manner of exports i.e. whether they intend to export under bond or on payment of tax. 2.3 Aggrieved by the above order, the applicant filed an appeal before Appellate Author

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rehoused goods between the importer and other person which is squarely applies the present transaction. It was submitted that as per his own assessment the transactions dealt by him fall under exports only and requested the Advance Ruling Authority to decide in the light of facts and legal position whether their transaction falls under exports or not. FACT S OF THE CASE : 4.1 The applicant is importing cosmetics, toiletries food products like confectioneries and cigarettes etc,. The Foreign manufacturers will maintain stores in SEZ units and the same will be supplied to bonded ware house or duty free ship store supplier. For example the brands like Marlboro, L&M, Bond street they are not having any manufacturing units in India. All these goods are manufactured outside India arid the manufacturer will maintain a hub at SEZ unit from there they will supply to the applicant. Further the applicant also imports the same from foreign also. The goods so imported will be kept in special wa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rocedures of customs authorities 4.2 The relevant legal provisions are as under. Definition of Export of goods : As per Section 2(5) of IGST Act 2017, export of goods with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means taking goods out of India to a place outside India; Definition of Customs frontier of India : As per Section 2(4) customs frontiers of India means the limits of a customs area as defined in section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962. Section: 87 of Indian Customs Act, 1962 : Imported stores may be consumed on board a foreign-going vessel or aircraft. Any imported stores on board a vessel or aircraft (other than stores to which section 90 applies) may, without payment of duty, be consumed thereon as stores during the period such vessel or aircraft is a foreign-going vessel or aircraft. Section 88(a) of Indian Customs Act, 1962: for the words exported to any place outside India or the word exported , wherever they occur, the words taken on board any foreign-going vessel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Kheriwal Enterprises Versus Union of India and others

2018 (11) TMI 1566 – JHARKHAND HIGH COURT – TMI – Acceptance of FORM GST TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 of the petitioner (hard copy) – Input Tax Credit/CENVAT credit – period running from 1st April, 2017 to 30th June, 2017 – pre Goods and Service Tax (GST) regime – Held that:- The GST portal of the Central Government was not accessed by the petitioner for varieties of reasons, as stated in Annexures-5, 6, 7 and 8 of this writ petition. Time and again, there is correspondence to that effect.

The respondents are directed to accept the hard copies of the FORM GST TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 and to scrutinize the same on or before the next date of hearing. – W.P. (T) No. 3028 of 2018 Dated:- 20-8-2018 – MR. D.N. PATEL AND MR. AMITAV K. GUPTA JJ. For the Peti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat Section 140 of the JGST Act, 2017, which is pertaining to transitional arrangements for Input Tax credit to be read with Rule 117 of the JGST Rules, 2017 provides that within 90 days application should be preferred for receiving credit of the Input Tax/CENVAT. 3. Thus, from 1st July, 2017 onwards within 90 days such application should have been preferred by the petitioner, but, this date has been extended up to 27th December, 2017, thereafter, up to 31st May, 2018 for TRAN-1 and filing date has been extended up to 30th June, 2018 for TRAN-2. 4. Looking to the facts, it appears that the GST portal of the Central Government was not accessed by the petitioner for varieties of reasons, as stated in Annexures-5, 6, 7 and 8 of this writ petit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: SEGOMA IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

2018 (12) TMI 650 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI – Levy of GST – zero rated export supply or not – export of service – photography service of diamonds – diamonds received on returnable basis – interstate supply or intrastate supply – Held that:- There is no doubt that the supply of service in the present case satisfies conditions at (i) and (ii) of Section 2(6) of the IGST Act. However, to qualify as an ‘export of services’ all the conditions must be satisfied simultaneously

As per condition at (iii) above, which pertains to place of supply of service and that the place of supply of service shall be outside India. Section 13 of the IGST Act contains provisions for determining the place of supply of services where the location of the supplier of the services or the location of the recipient of services is outside India – The place of supply of service shall be determined as per the provision contained in section 13 of the IGST Act. The said section has been div

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

clause, recipient of service who want to avail services has to make goods physically available on direct or indirect directions to the service provider and it does not matter who owned the goods.

It is the cordial rule of interpretation that where the language used by the legislature is clear and unambiguous then the plain and natural meaning of the words should be supplied to the language used and resort to any rule of interpretation to unfold the intention is permissible only where there is any ambiguity.

There is no need that the goods physically required for rendering services must be owned by the recipient of the services, on the other hand it is sufficient for the recipient to make them physically available to the service provider for rendering services – Thus in this case the event of photography services pertaining to diamonds made physically available by the recipient of services to the provider of services is over and the service is clearly provided in India wher

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST Act ] by SEGOMA IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, the application seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whether the supply of photography service is liable to SGST under the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (MGST Act, 2017) and CGST under Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or IGST under Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act, 2017) 2. Or is it a zero rated export supply within the meaning of Section 2(23) r/w Section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017? At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unles

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

te www.jamesallen.com. As per agreement between R2 Net and customers of R2Net, R2NET lists on the system only those diamonds that are photographed with R2Net s proprietary Diamond Display Technology. Customer agrees to send its diamonds and/or gemstones to be photographed in R2Net s photography centers on a regular basis. R2Net has appointed Segoma Israel for photography service. Intern, Segoma Israel has made agreement with Segoma India to do photography service. Customers of R2Net give diamond on returnable basis to Segoma India. Segoma Israel does not have role in receiving diamond. Segoma India issues memo of receipt of diamonds to customers of R2Net. Segoma India takes photos of diamonds and upload photos of diamond on software of Segoma Israel. Segoma India charges Segoma Israel for providing above service of photography. Segoma Israel makes payment in convertible foreign exchange to Segoma India. Segoma India does not give copy of photos to customers of R2Net and does not charge

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with explanation 1 in section 8 of IGST Act 1.3. Testing of conditions Condition 1: Based on above facts, Segoma India is located in India. Condition 2: Segoma Israel is located outside India. Condition 3: Based on above facts, diamonds are physically required to do photography service. Section of IGST Act, states that the place of supply of service supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services in order to provide the service shall be the location where the services are actually performed. Segoma India performs photography service in India. However, diamonds are not owned by Segoma Israel. As per section 13(3)(a) of IGST Act recipient of services should make available physically goods to service provider. However, in above transaction of photography, diamonds are made available by third party. Segoma Israel does not have ro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ing on a business through a branch or an agency or a representational office in any territory shall be treated as having an establishment in that territory. Based on above facts, Segoma India is established under India company Act and it is not branch, agency or representational office of Segoma Isreal. So Segoma India is distinct person for section of 2(6)(v) of IGST Act and not covered under explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act. 1.4 Conclusion on Condition of export If all following conditions are satisfied then only transaction can be considered as export of service: Conditions Satisfy or not The supplier of service is located in India Yes The recipient of service is located outside India Yes The place of supply of service is outside India Yes The payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange Yes The supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with explanat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ferred as Segoma India) is an Indian private limited company set up under Indian Companies Act. Segoma India is 100% Subsidiary of Segoma Ltd (hereinafter referred as Segoma Israel) which is based in Israel. Segoma Israel is subsidiary of R2Net which is based in US R2Net has appointed Segoma Israel for photography service. For all over the world, Segoma Israel has made agreement with Segoma India to do photography service in India. Segoma India provides Diamond Photography Services. R2Net has agreement with vendors for listing Diamonds online on website www.jamesallen.com. . R2Net is based in USA. R2Net has customer base in USA. As per agreement between R2Net and vendors of R2Net, R2NET lists on the system only those diamonds that are photographed with R2Net s proprietary Diamond Display Technology or Segoma photography centres. Vendor agrees to send its diamonds and/or gemstones to be photographed in R2Net s photography centers or Segoma photography centres on a regular basis. It is a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

by Segoma India by compressing 500MB heavy size images to a single Image. Segoma Israel further processes and makes the image more compatible. R2Net further processes the images after receiving from Segoma Israel. Point 16 Statement containing the applicant s interpretation of law and/or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the aforesaid questions (i.e. applicant s view point and submission on issues on which the advance ruling is sought) 1. Export of service 1.1. As per section 16 of Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred as IGST Act ), zero rated supply means any of following supplies of goods or services or both namely; – (a) export of goods or services or both 1.2. Condition of export of service As per section 2(6) of IGST Act, export of services means the supply of any service when, The supplier of service is located in India i. The recipient of service is located outside India ii. The place of supply of service is outside India iii. The payment for

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds to service provider. However, in above transaction of photography, diamonds are made available by third party. Segoma Israel does not have role in receiving diamond. Segoma India issues memo of receipt of diamonds to vendors of R2Net. Accordingly, section 13(3)(a) of IGST Act should not be applied in above transaction. Then as per section 13(2) of IGST Act, the place of supply of services except the services specified in sub-section (3) to (13) shall be the location of the recipient of services. Service recipient is located outside India. Accordingly, place of supply of service will be outside India. Condition 4: Segoma Israel makes payment to Segoma India in convertible foreign exchange. Condition 5: as per section 2(6)(v) of IGST Act, the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with explanation 1 in section 8. Explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act, which is as follow: Where a person has an establishment in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

a. The place of supply of services except the services specified in sub-sections (3) to (13) shall be the location of the recipient of services: Provided that where the location of the recipient of services is not available in the ordinary course of business, the place of supply shall be the location of the supplier of services. 3) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely: – (a) services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or to a person acting on behalf of the supplier of services in order to provide the services: Provided that when such services are provided from a remote location by way of electronic means, the place of supply shall be the location where goods are situated at the time of supply of services: Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

R2Net s or Segoma photography centres on a regular basis . Segoma has no relation with diamond vendors or R2Net it only provides photography services to Segoma Israel as per agreement with Segoma Israel. Photography of Diamonds is a service in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by recipient of service (directly to Segoma Israel). Section 2 (93) of CGST Act, 2017: Recipient of Supply of goods or services or both, means- (a) Where a consideration is payable for the supply of goods or services or both, the person who is liable to pay that consideration; (b) Where no consideration is payable for the supply of goods, the person to whom the goods are delivered or made available, or to whom possession or use of goods is given or made available; and (c) Where no consideration is payable for the supply of service, the person to whom the service is rendered, and any reference to a person to whom a supply is made shall be construed as a reference to the recipient

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

goods or services or both, or securities, between two or more persons, but does not include a person who supplies such goods or services or both or securities on his own account; As per above definition Intermediary does not include a person who supplies the goods or services on his own account. Segoma India provides photography services to Segoma Israel and Segoma Israel has contract to provide service to R2Net hence Segoma India provides service on principal to principal basis to Segoma Israel on its own account. Segoma India works on Principal to Principal basis as they take the risk of loss of diamonds, damage to diamonds, theft of diamonds during there possession and in case of defective service it is a loss to them and their efforts would be wasted. Advance Ruling Related to Intermediary Services: 1. Provision of marketing support services, call centre services, payment processing etc does not amount to provision of intermediary services (M/s. GoDaddy India Web Services Pvt. Ltd

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GoDaddy US through International Credit Card, wherein applicant is not in the picture. This fact further shows that the applicant is not providing any service to Indian Customers and hence could not be said to be an intermediary for the purpose of POPS rules. Reimbursements of salary and other emoluments of employees under deputation contracts with Group companies is not a service itself. Incidentally it can inferred that mere presence of three parties involved (individual, group company and subsidiary company) does not make the service as intermediary service (M/s North American Coal Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. V. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III, Advance Ruling No. AAR/ST/13/2015, Application No. AAR/44/ST/2/2014) = 2015 (12) TMI 420 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS In this case, certain employees of the US Company were sent on deputation to its Indian subsidiary. The Salary payment of US Company s employee was continued to be paid in the US and recovered from the Indian compa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

no liability to pay service tax on the salary and the allowances payable by the applicant to the employee in terms of the dual employment agreement and such salary will not be eligible to levy the service tax as per the provisions of the Finance Act. Customer support and payment processing services provided by the service provider does not make the service provider an intermediary, as long as the Services are provided on own account. (M/s. Universal Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Service Tax. Gurgaon, Ruling No.AAR/ST/07/2016 in Application No. AAR/44/ST/14/2014) = 2016 (5) TMI 750 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS In this case, the applicant proposed to assist WWD US with the processing of payments made by their Customers in India through their internet banking facilities/ credit cards. The detailed facts were as follows – WWD US would provide its services and products to customers in India through its website. In respect of such services, the customers would make the p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ts of the customer remitted directly through the payment gateway. Since the service is being provided on own account, the service is not covered by Rule 9 (intermediary services) but covered under Rule 3 of the POPS rules, 2012. The Advance Ruling Authority relying on the CBEC Education Guide dated 20th June 2012 issued by Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Tax Research unit ( TRI] ) held that normally a service receiver is the person is legally entitled to receive the service and is therefore obliged to make payment of the service received whether or not he actually makes the payment or someone else makes the payment on his behalf. In the facts of the present case, even though the applicant processed the payment of the customer, the service was being rendered to WWD US who was legally entitled receive the service and obliged to make payment for the same. Hence as per above it is amply Clear that Segoma India does not fall under intermediary. 03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCER

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange; and (v) the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8. As per Section 97(2) of CGST MGST Act 2017, The question on which the advance ruling is sought under this Act. Whether a transaction is Export of Services or not is dependent upon the fact as to whether Supply of Services is out of India or Not. Consequently, if the MAAR proceeds ahead with examination and consideration of this fact, discussion and findings on aspect of place of supply will be inevitable. The Act limits AAR to decide issued earmarked for it under Section 97(2) of MGST/CGST Act. Therefore, where a question also involves examination of place of Supply (which is not amongst the issued which can be decided by AAR), the question cannot be taken by the authority for lack of jurisdiction. (Ref:- Decision by Haryana Authority for Advance Ruling HAR/HAAR/R/201

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y way of electronic means, the place of supply shall be the location where goods are situated at the time of supply of services: Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied in respect of goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs and are exported after repairs without being put to any other use in India, than that which is required for such repairs; C. The dealer has contended in point No.15 that As per Agreement between R2Net and Vendors, R2NET lists on the system ONLY those diamonds that are photographed ……………. Segoma India currently catering to Indian vendor s f R2Net only . Vendors of R2Net give diamond on returnable basis to Segoma India Point 2.4 of Operating Policy of R2Net categorically describes – R2Net lists on the system ONLY those diamonds that are photographed with its proprietary Diamond Display Technology-Segoma It is to note that Segoma India does NOT have liberty

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ment copy submitted by dealer, M/s. Segoma India is Service provider, wholly owned subsidiary of Service recipient. M/s. Segoma Limited and Segoma India are fixed establishment as per section 2(7) of IGST Act 2017. Thus it does not satisfy the condition V of Section 2(6) IGST Act 2017. E. Also, the Tax invoice shows that M/s. Segoma Limited has been charged in Indian Rupees and has received consideration in foreign currency, figures of which do not match. It is contravention with condition (iv) of Section 2(6) of IGST Act 2017. Hence dealer s application cannot be maintained under heading with question of law that whether said transaction is Export of Services or not. Dealer s application may please be rejected. In Addition, the location of Supplier is in Mumbai. Thus, the type of supply should be Intra-state. Hence he is liable to pay CGST+SGST for supply of Services as per section 13(3) (a). Additional submissions of Applicant in connection with contention of officer dt 23.08.2018- 1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

photography. The diamonds are made available by vendors of R2Net in India and not by any means by the R2Net. Segoma India provides service to Segoma Israel and hence Segoma Israel is the recipient and not R2Net. As per section 13(3)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017 The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely: (a) services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or to a person acting On behalf of the supplier of services in order to provide the Services. Therefore, as per above extract of section 13(3)(a) of the CGST Act, it is very clear that goods are not made available by R2Net.In fact, diamonds for photography are provided as per vendors convenience. There is no control of R2Net for providing the diamonds for photography to Segoma or R2 Net s proprietary firm. As per above clause, R2Net is not providing the diamonds nor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

A person carrying on a business through a branch or an agency or a representational office in any territory shall be treated as having an establishment in that territory. Based on above facts, Segoma India is established under Indian companies Act having separate PAN number and it is not branch, agency or representational office of Segoma Israel. So Segoma India is distinct person for section 2(6)(v) of IGST Act and not covered under explanation 1 of section 8 of IGST Act. There is no question of fixed establishment of as per 2(7) of the IGST Act, 2017. 2. Learned Deputy Commissioner of State Tax(E-907) believes that Segoma Limited has been charged in Indian Rupees and has received consideration in foreign currency, figures of which do not match thus Segoma India is in contravention with condition(iv) of section 2(6) of IGST Act 2017. In the above context we would like to submit as under: Following are the conditions for the export export of services means the supply of any service whe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ase was taken up for Preliminary hearing on dt. 03.072018 with respect to admission or rejection of present application when Sh. Pathik Shah, C.A. alongwith Sh. Mukhtar Shaikh, Asstt. Manager appeared and made contentions for admission of application as made in their ARA. jurisdictional Officer, Sh. Manoj Ohekar, Dy. Commissioner of S.T. (E- 907) Nodal Division -5, Mumbai appeared and stated that they would be making written submissions in due course. The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 31.07.2018, Sh. Madhukar P. Khandekar, C.A. along with Sh. Rajesh Mehta, C.A. Sh. Mukhtar Shaikh, Asstt. Manager, Sh. Dharmesh Padnabhan, Vice President and Sh. Gaurav Shetty, Employee of the company appeared and made oral and written submissions. Jurisdictional Officer, Sh. Manoj Ohekar, Dy. Commissioner of S.T. (E- 907) Nodal Division – 5, Mumbai appeared and made written submissions. 05. OBSERVATIONS We have gone through the facts of the case. The issue was heard at length fr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Net send their diamonds and or gem stones to be photographed to Segoma India who issues memo of receipt of diamonds to customers of R2Net. At last Segoma India takes photos of diamond and upload photos of diamond on software of Segoma Israel. It is this transaction between Segoma India and Segoma Israel of providing photography service which is claimed as a zero rated export supply within the meaning of section 16 of the IGST Act and exempt from levy of tax. It is the view point of the applicant that impugned transaction of photography service satisfies all the conditions of export of services within the meaning of section 2(6) and section 16 of the IGST Act. In view of their submissions we are required to ascertain whether applicant satisfies all the conditions simultaneously as mentioned in Section 2(6) of the IGST Act. In this case admittedly the location of the provider of services is in India and the location of the recipient of service is in Israel and therefore we take this oppo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e satisfies conditions at (i) and (ii) of Section 2(6) of the IGST Act. However as stated above, to qualify as an export of services all the conditions must be satisfied simultaneously and therefore we now take upon ourselves to discuss whether applicant satisfies (iii), (iv) and (v) of section 2(6) of the IGST Act. As per condition at (iii) above, which pertains to place of supply of service and that the place of supply of service shall be outside India. Section 13 of the IGST Act contains provisions for determining the place of supply of services where the location of the supplier of the services or the location of the recipient of services is outside India. The place of supply of service shall be determined as per the provision contained in section 13 of the IGST Act. The said section has been divided into two parts. The subsections (3) to (13) provides for determination of place of supply of service, for service other than those listed in sub-sections (3) to (13). In the instant ca

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ich are temporarily imported into India for repairs and are exported after repairs without being put to any other use in India, than that which is required for such repairs; (b) services supplied to an individual, represented either as the recipient of services or a person acting on behalf of the recipient, which require the physical presence of the recipient or the person acting on his behalf, with the supplier for the supply of services. In this transaction we find that diamonds are physically required to do photography service and this fact is not denied by the applicant. However it is the contention of the applicant that diamonds are not owned by Segoma Israel. He further submits that the recipient of services should make available physically goods to service provider and on the contrary in this case diamonds are made available by third party. Accordingly he submits that provision of section 13 (3) (a) of the IGST Act should not be applied in his case. The main contention of the ap

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ds of the statute are clear, plain and unambiguous then it must be given their ordinary meaning. It is the cordial rule of interpretation that where the language used by the legislature is clear and unambiguous then the plain and natural meaning of the words should be supplied to the language used and resort to any rule of interpretation to unfold the intention is permissible only where there is any ambiguity. Plethora of decisions of the Apex Court are there to support the proposition, for e.g. Smt. Tarulata Shyam Vs CIT 108 ITR 345 (SC) = 1977 (4) TMI 3 – SUPREME COURT. This concept is explained in detail by the Hon. SC in M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. vs Collector of Customs, Bombay on 4 April, 2002 in Appeal (Civil) 1951 of 1998. = 2002 (4) TMI 52 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA The court held that – The elementary principle of interpreting any word while considering a statute is to gather the mens or sententia legis of the legislature. Where the words are clear and there is no obscurity, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of services is over and the service is clearly provided in India where the services are actually performed. The next condition to be satisfied is that the payment for services in question must have been received in convertible foreign exchange. The condition (iv) reads as the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of services in convertible foreign exchange. The jurisdictional officer submits that the tax invoice shows that Segoma India has charged in Indian Rupees and has received consideration in foreign currency, figures of which do not match and come to the conclusion that condition (iv) is not satisfied. As per this condition the payment received by the supplier of services should be in convertible foreign exchange. Applicant has submitted sample FIRC (Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate) and invoices and as such we find that applicant has satisfied this condition. The condition (v) of the definition of export of services as per section 2(6) reads as: the su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at they are established under the Indian Companies Act having separate PAN number and therefore it is not a branch, agency or representational office of Segoma Israel. However, the statutory compliances made by an applicant in a country, in this case India, would in no way alter the status or relationship between parties as discussed above. Thus applicant also failed to satisfy this condition as well. We have already stated that all the conditions stipulated in section 2(6) shall be simultaneously complied with in order to consider any services as export of services. As a matter of fact we have noticed that conditions at (iii) and (iv) have notbeen complied with, in this case and as such impugned supply is not export of services within the scope of section 2(6) of the IGST Act. In the case before us it is seen that the location of the supplier of service is in Mumbai and the place of supply as determined as per provisions of section 13(3) (a) of the IGST Act is also in Mumbai, a place

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Signature International Foods India Private Limited

2018 (12) TMI 892 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – TMI – Classification of goods – Rates of GST – Unleavened Flatbreads – Leavened Flatbreads – Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips – Pancakes – Pizza Base – Applicability of entry No.99A of Schedule to the Notification No. 1/2017 – IGST Act dated 28/06/2017.

Whether Unleavened Flatbreads treated as ‘Khakra, plain chapatti or roti under Entry No. 99A of Schedule or as ‘bread’ as mentioned under Entry No. 97 or as Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis or under any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit? – Held that:- The food product paratha as is available in hotels and restaurants is plain, folded or stuffed. By applying the common parlance test we understand paratha as different and distinct food commod

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bread has been defined as a usually baked and leavened food made of a mixture whose basic constituent is flour or meal – Pita is a yeast leavened round flatbread baked from wheat flour, sometimes with a pocket. From the ingredients and the manufacturing chart, we find that applicant uses similar/ same ingredients and same manufacturing process as that of bread – As there is no difference in the conventional bread and pita bread with respect to ingredients and manufacturing process, it is held that Pitta bread would squarely fall under entry 97 of the exemption notification.

Whether Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips be treated as ‘wafer’ under Entry No. 16 of Schedule III of Rate Notifications or as Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis or under any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

III of Rate Notifications or classified any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit? – Held that:- The pancakes are manufactured by using ingredients like wheat flour, water, sugar, salt, milk, syrup, oil etc. Similarly we find that cake is an item soft sweet food made from a mixture of flour, fat, eggs, sugar, and other ingredients, baked and sometimes iced and decorated – Cake is mentioned under the chapter heading 1905 of customs and tariff Act 1975. The product cake is mentioned in the entry 16 under the head of “All Goods “i.e. waffles and wafers other than coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, biscuits; Pastries and cakes (other than pizza bread, khakhra, plain chapatti or roti, Waffles and wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, papad, bread] – the impugned the product “Pancakes” is covered under the chapter heading 19059010 under the entry 16 of schedule Ill of GST ACT and liable to tax at app

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

try 99 of schedule I of GST Act and would be liable to tax rate at appropriate rate.

Ruling:- The Unleavened Flatbreads products such as plain chapatti, Tortilla, Tortilla Wraps, roti, Roti rolls , Wraps, Paratha and Paratha wraps are covered under Entry No. 99 A of Schedule 1 and they would be liable to tax @ 5% (2.5 % each for CGST and MGST and 5 % for IGST).

The product Leavened Flatbreads stated in application such as Naan, Kulcha and Chalupa are not covered by the expression ‘bread’ as mentioned under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notifications but they would be covered under residual entry 453 of schedule Ill of GST ACT and they would be liable for taxes @ 18 %( 9% CGST and 9% MGST ). However Pita Bread is covered by the expression ‘bread’ as mentioned under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notifications.

The products like Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn , Taco Strips would be treated as ‘wafer’ under Entry No. 16 of Schedule III of Rate Notifications and it would be liable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ce ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Unleavened Flatbreads be treated as Khakra, plain chapatti or roti under Entry No. 99A of Schedule / of Notification No. 01/2017-lntegrated Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 1/2017-CentraI Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 and Notification Number 1/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. MGST 1017/C.R. 104/Taxation-1, dated 29 June 2017 (collectively referred to as the Rate Notifications ) if not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Unleavened Flatbreads be classified: (i) as bread as mentioned under Entry No. 97 of Notification Number 02 Number 2/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 and Notification Number 2/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. MGST1017/ C.R. 103(1)/Taxation-1, dated 29 June 2017 (collectively referred to as the Exemption Notifications); or (ii) as Malt extract, food preparations of f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntioned under Entry No. 99 of Schedule of Rate Notifications; or (ii) as Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 190510n a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905) under Entry No. 13 of Schedule III of Rate Notification or (iii) Any Other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit 3. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips supplied be treated as wafer under Entry No. 16 of Schedule III of Rate

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

lied be treated as All Goods i.e. Waffles and wafers other than coated with chocolate or containing chocolate; biscuits; Pastries and cakes (other than pizza bread, khakhra, plain chapatti or roti, Waffles and wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, papad, bread) as mentioned under Entry No. 16 of Schedule III of Rate Notifications, If not whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Pancakes be classified any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit 5. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, Pizza Base supplied be treated as Pizza Bread as mentioned under Entry No. 99 of Schedule / of Rate Notifications. If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Pizza Base be classified any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

harashtra. 1.2. The company is engaged in the business of, inter alia, manufacturing, trading and exporting bakery products which includes flatbreads. 1.3. The products are available in an ambient and frozen format with a shelf life ranging from a few days to one year depending on the customers requirements. The Applicant supplies products to customers and distributors in India and in overseas markets including the Middle East, South East Asia, Africa and Australia. 1.4. Presently, the Applicant supplies flatbreads to retailers, canteens, airlines, hotels, hospitals, schools, restaurants, wholesalers, distributors and other foodservice operators located in India and overseas. Unleavened Flatbread information 1.5. The Applicant has been engaged in manufacturing and supplying unleavened flatbreads including Plain Chapatti and variants of Chapatti flatbreads referred to internationally in different countries as Tortilla, Tortilla Wraps, Wraps, Roti Rolls, Roti, Chapatti, Paratha and Parat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hibit 1. Leavened Flatbread information ( Bread Products ) 1.8. The Applicant has been engaged in manufacturing and supplying leavened flatbreads including Naan, Kulcha and variants of these type of leavened breads referred to internationally in different countries as Pitta bread, Chalupa, Corn bread, Leavened Flatbreads and Unfolded Leavened FIatbread. 1.9. While manufacturing these leavened flatbreads, the Applicant uses various raw materials such as maida, tandoori atta, atta, water, rice flour, oil, yeast, salt, sugar etc. The bakery process can be defined as a succession of steps that ensure the proper transformation of basic ingredients into leavened flatbread. The baking processes the Applicant uses follow the same basic steps as, traditional baking processes used for thousands of years. 1.10. The traditional process of baking bread involves preparation of dough from various ingredients such as maida, tandoori atta, atta, water, rice flour, oil, yeast, salt, sugar etc. The dough

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ic acid, guar gum etc. upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the products are packed, the packets are labelled and subsequently stored and transported at -18 Degree Celsius temperature. 1.14. Upon receipt of these products, the customer or end consumer fries the product, which is similar to products such as wafers. We have attached herewith the manufacturing process flow as Exhibit 1. Pancake s information 1.15. In addition to above, the Applicant also manufactures pancakes , a flat cake, often thin and round, prepared from a starch-based batter that may contain milk baked on a hot surface such as a griddle or frying pan. 1.16. The products are manufactured by the Applicant using various ingredients including wheat flour, water, sugar, salt, milk, syrup, oil etc. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, dough dividing, baking

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has approached the Hon ble authority to determine the classification of Unleavened Flatbreads such as Plain Chapatti, Tortilla, Tortilla Wraps, Wraps, Roti Rolls, Roti, Chapatti, Paratha and Paratha Wraps Leavened Flatbreads such as Naan, Chalupa, Pita Bread, Kulcha, Leavened Flatbread, Unfolded Leavened Flatbread Wafer products such as Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips Pancakes Pizza bread in terms of Rate and Exemption notifications. 2.2 The Applicant strongly believes that the products being supplied should be classified under the below mentioned schedule entry: Sr.No. Product Supplied Schedule Entry No Description Unleavened Flatbreads Entry No. 99A of Schedule I Khakhra, Plain Chapatti or Roti Leavened Flatbreads Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification Bread Corn Chips, Corn Taco, Corn Taco Strips, Entry No. 16 of Schedule III All goods i.e. Waffles and wafers other than coated with chocolate or containing chocolate; biscuits; Pastries and cakes (other than pizza bread, k

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

llowing, among other grounds, each of which is taken in separately and without prejudice to the others. 1. Applicants interpretation of law or facts with regards to Question No. 1 Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Unleavened Flatbreads be treated as Khakra, plain chapatti or roti under Entry No. 99 A of Schedule I of Notification 01/2017-lntegrated Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 1/2017-CentraI Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 and Notification Number 1/2017-state Tax (Rate) No. MGST1017/ C.R. 104/Taxation-1, dated 29 June 2017 (collectively referred to as the Rate Notifications ) If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Flatbreads be classified: (i) as bread as mentioned under Entry No. 97 of Notification Number 02 Number 2/2017 Integrated Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 and Notification Number 2/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. MGST10171 C.R. 103(1)/Taxation-1, dated 29 Jun

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ated 28 June 2017 providing taxability on intra-state supplies of goods, the description of which is specified in the corresponding entry in Column (3) of the said schedules, falling under the tariff item, sub-headings, headings or chapter, as the case may be, as specified in column no (2) of the said schedules. Similar notifications have been issued under Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 1.2. In exercise of the power conferred by Section 9(1) of the Act, the Central Government on the recommendations of the councils made further amendments to the above mentioned notification in the form of introducing Entry No. 99A as Kharkhra, plain chapatti or roti vide Notification No. 34/2017 dated 13 October 2017. The said notification does not define the term Khakhra, Plain Chapatti or roti . However, it has mentioned that the tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and cha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alt and water (iii) Roti: a flatbread made from stone ground whole meal flour, traditionally known as atta 1.5. In this regard, we wish to submit that the Applicant follows similar processes while manufacturing unleavened flatbreads. The products are manufactured by the Applicant using various ingredients including atta, maida, water, palmolein oil, salt, sugar, baking powder, wheat gluten etc. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, proofing, dough dividing, baking and cooling, After the cooling process, the unleavened flatbread is packed and labelled and subsequently stored and transported at -18 Degree Celsius temperature or transported ambient. 1.6. Further, we wish to reiterate the fact that the Applicant uses atta, maida, water, palmolein Oil, salt, sugar, baking powder, wheat gluten etc. while manufacturing the range of unleavened flatbreads. We have attached herewith Exhibit 3 providing the list of ingredients used for each of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f there is no meaning attributed to the expressions used in the particular enacted statute then the items in the customs entries should be judged and analysed on the basis of how these expressions are used in the trade or industry or in the market or, in other words, how these are dealt with by the people who deal in them, provided that there is a market for these types of goods. This principle is well-known as classification on the basis of trade parlance. This is an accepted form of construction- It is a well-known principle that if the definition of a particular expression is not given, it must be understood in its popular or common sense, viz., in the sense how that expression is used everyday by those who use or deal with those goods. The copy of the judgement is attached as Exhibit 4. 1.9. The Apex Court has laid down as to when the common parlance test can be used. It has provided that the following conditions need to be satisfied to call for common parlance test. These are; No

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ce tests are the generally accepted tests, various other tests have been evolved from time to time to interpret items of taxing statutes. One of such tests is commonsense test or commonsense rule of interpretation On the basis of the above judgments, it can be concluded that either the common parlance or the user test should be applied in interpreting a word not defined by the statute. 1.11. In the present instance, the conditions laid down for applying the common parlance test as described above (i.e. not defined in the statute and having an open market) are satisfied. Hence, it is humbly submitted that the word Plain Chapatti or Roti should be understood in the sense in which it is understood by the common man and by any common trader in the food industry, 1.12. In this regard, the Applicant wishes to submit that they are engaged in manufacturing and supplying unleavened flatbreads including Plain Chapatti and variants of Chapatti flatbreads referred to internationally in different c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

etation evolved by Courts is that of the end-user. As discussed above, the Hon ble Bombay High Court has reiterated the validity of this test in the case of Pharm Aromatic Chemicals (supra), The relevant observations of the High Court are reproduced below: Another test, which is sometimes applied by the Courts is user test . According to this test the use to which the goods can be put can also be considered in interpreting an item. However, this rule of interpretation has got its own limitations because certain goods may be put to certain uses by different persons. That, however, should not entitle the revenue to apply different rates of tax to the sales of same goods by different persons depending upon the use to which they will be put by the purchasers. Basis the above observations, it is humbly submitted that the word Plain Chapatti or Roti should be interpreted in light of the end-use made by consumers. 1.16. It is, humbly submitted that people use plain chapatti, roti or variants

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ved for consumption and pizza bread; or (ii) Entry No. 13 of Schedule III of Rate Notification, which stands for Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or included (Other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905]on a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905); or (iii) Any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit. 2. Applicants interpretation of facts or law with regards to Question No. 2 Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Leavened Flatbreads be treated as as bread as menti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fit Applicant s facts and interpretation of law 2.1. The Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, has issued a notification number 02/2017-CentraI Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017 providing exemptions on intra-state supplies of the description of which is specified in the schedule appended to the said notification from the whole of the central tax leviable thereon under the section 9 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017). Similar notifications have been issued under Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2.2. The Schedule Entry No. 97 of the above mentioned notification provides the exemption on supply of Bread (branded or otherwise), except when served for consumption and pizza bread classifiable under Chapter Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) 1905. The said notification does not define the term bread and pizza bread . However, it has mentioned that the tariff item, subheading, heading and chapter shall mean

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

itions, the leavened flatbreads would be classified as bread. 2.5. In this regard, we wish to submit that the Applicant follows similar process while manufacturing leavened flatbreads. The products are manufactured by the Applicant using various ingredients including maida, tandoori atta, atta, water, rice flour, oil, yeast, salt, sugar etc. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, proofing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the leavened flatbread is packed and labelled and subsequently stored and transported at – 18 Degree Celsius temperature or transported ambient. 2.6. Further, we wish to reiterate the fact that the Applicant uses maida, tandoori atta, atta, water, rice flour, oil, yeast, salt, sugar etc. while manufacturing the range of leavened flatbreads. We have attached herewith Exhibit 3 providing the list of ingredients used during manufacturing process for each of the leavened flatbreads. 2.7. In th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of how these expressions are used in the trade or industry or in the market or, in other words, how these are dealt with by the people who deal in them, provided that there is a market for these types of goods. This principle is well known as classification on the basis of trade parlance. This is an accepted form of construction. It is a well-known principle that if the definition of a particular expression is not given, it must be understood in its popular or common sense viz. in the sense how that expression is used everyday by those who use or deal with those goods. The copy of the judgment is attached as Exhibit 4. 2.9. The Apex Court has laid down as to when the common parlance test can be used. It has provided that the following conditions need to be satisfied to call for common parlance test. These are; No meaning has been attributed in the statute There is an open market for such goods The above position has been succinctly encapsulated by the Hon ble Bombay High Court in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

st or commonsense rule of interpretation One the basis of the above judgments, it can be concluded that either the common parlance or the user test should be applied in interpreting a word not defined by the statute. 2.11 In the present instance, the conditions laid down for applying the common parlance test as described above (i.e. not defined in the statute and having an open market) are satisfied. Hence, it is humbly submitted that the word bread should be understood in the sense in which it is understood by the common man and by any common trader in the food industry. 2.12. In this regard, the Applicant wishes to submit that it has been engaged in manufacturing and supplying leavened flatbreads including Naan, Kulcha, and variants of these type of leavened flatbreads referred to internationally in different countries as Pitta bread, Chalupa, Corn bread, Leavened Flatbreads and Unfolded Leavened Flatbread. 2.13. Basis the above, we wish to further submit that the Applicant has been

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

understand the said phrase. 2.16. The phrase Served for consumption in common parlance indicates served in hotels, restaurants, eating houses and meant for immediate consumption. In this regard, the Applicant wishes to submit the fact that it does not serve any of its leavened flatbreads for immediate consumption to its customers. 2.17. In this regard, the Applicant places reliance on the judgement delivered by tribunal in case of East India Hotel on 31 March, 2009. The issue before the said tribunal was whether bread sold from the shop in the shopping arcade of the Five Star Hotel as counter sale is covered by the schedule entry A-4 of the BST Act or as covered by the schedule entry C-II-1 5. The entries A-4 & C-11-15 at the time of decision were as follows: A-4: Bread in loaf or rolls or in slices, toasted or otherwise except when sewed for consumption in any public restaurant including any eating house, hotel, refreshment room or boarding establishment or any part thereof which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on. Thus, we strongly believe that these products are covered under Schedule Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification and are eligible for exemption on supply of GST. 2.19. We wish to further submit that the Applicant craves leave to make/edit/modify submissions before the hearing or to elaborate upon the above submitted submissions at or before the hearing of the application, as may be relevant. 2.20: Without prejudice to the above mentioned submission, in case the leavened flatbreads manufactured by the Applicant does not qualify as bread within the meaning of Rate Notification, we request your good office to provide ruling on its possible alternate classification under below mentioned entry considering the facts and circumstances of the case (i) Entry No. 99 of Schedule of Rate Notification, which stands for Pizza Bread; or (ii) Entry No. 13 of Schedule Ill of Rate Notification, which stands for Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not contain

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Strips be classified (i) as Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905]on a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905) under Entry No. 13 of Schedule III of Rate Notification; or (ii) Any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit Applicant s interpretation of law or facts 3.1 The Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, has issued a notification number 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017 providing exemptions on intra-state

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion provided under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with respect to Heading 1905 32 90. The relevant entry is attached herewith as Exhibit 2. The said Chapter 19 does not provide any clarification with respect to the phrase Waffles and Wafers in the chapter notes, heading notes etc. Dictionary meaning of the term Wafers 3.4 The Webster Dictionary has defined the term wafers as a thin crisp cracker. In this regard, we wish to draw your kind attention towards the Exhibit 1 wherein we have provided additional information on the manufacturing process for Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips. The products are manufactured by the Applicant using various ingredients including masa flour, water, small quantities of cellulose gum, citric acid, guar gum etc. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the products are packed and labelled and subsequently stored and transported at -18 De

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s to be interpreted by understanding its meaning under the common parlance. It has provided that the following conditions need to be satisfied to call for common parlance test. No meaning has been attributed in the statute There is an open market for such goods. 3.9 Another test akin to the common parlance test is the commercial parlance test . According to this test, items in taxing statutes should be judged and analysed on the basis of how these expressions are used in the trade or industry or in the market or, in other words how these are dealt with by the people who dealt in them. Though the common parlance or commercial parlance tests are the generally accepted tests, various other tests have been evolved from time to time to interpret items of taxing statutes. One of such tests is commonsense test or commonsense rule of interpretation 3.10 In the present instance, wafers are not defined in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Further, there is a common market for trade in such goods. He

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aphs, the user test can be used to determine the appropriate classification of a product. 3.15 The use of wafers is as an snack. It is generally enjoyed by consumers as a tasty interlude between meals. Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips are similarly used as snacks that can be enjoyed in between meals. 3.16 It is also worthwhile noting that these products are on sale on online platforms in the same category that wafers like Lays, Kurkure etc. are sold. Hence, it can be inferred that users perceive such products as Wafers and consume them in the same fashion as they consume any other wafers. 3.17 Hence, it is humbly submitted that even on the basis of the end-use based test, Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips products manufactured by the Applicant should be classified as wafers under Chapter 1905 32 90 subject to GST accordingly. Contextual interpretation 3.18 Snacks such as Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips are seen as an alternative to potato chips, cream wafe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oung children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905] on a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905); or (ii) Any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit. Applicants Interpretation of facts or law with regards to Question No. 4 Question 4- Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, Pancakes supplied be treated as All Goods ie. Waffles and wafers other than coated with chocolate or containing chocolate; biscuits; Pastries and cakes (other than pizza bread, khakhra, plain chapatti or roti, Waffles and wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, papad, bread] as mentioned under Entry No. 16 of Schedule III of Rate Notifications. If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t to understand the clarification as provided under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to understand the meaning of the term Pancake. However, the said term has not been defined anywhere in Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Thus, it is necessary to refer to meaning of Pancake as known in common parlance as the said term is not defined under Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Dictionary meaning of term Pancakes 4.4 In this connection, we refer to dictionary meaning of the term Pancake . The Webster Dictionary defines it as a flat cake made of thin batter and cooked (as on a griddle) on both sides . Pancakes are generally prepared from starch based batter. 4.5 The products are manufactured by the Applicant using various ingredients including flour, water, sugar, salt, milk, syrup, vegetable oil etc. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, dough dividing, baking on a hot plate on both sides and cooling- After the cooling process, the pancake is packed and labelle

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t your good office to provide ruling on its possible alternate classification under any other Schedule Entry as Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit. Applicants interpretation of facts or law with regards to Question No. 5 Question 5- Whether based on the facts and circumstances of the case, pizza bread supplied by the Applicant be covered under Entry No. 99 of Schedule / of Rate Notifications If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the caser the Pizza Base be classified any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit Applicant s interpretation of law or facts 5.1 Basis the plain reading of Rate Notification, the Applicant believes that pizza bread should get classified under the entry number 99 of Schedule / of the Rate Notifications 5.2 The term Pizza Bread has not been defined in the Rate Notification. However, it is mentioned that the tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s Tariff Act, 1975. Common Parlance Theory 5.5 It is humbly submitted that the Applicant manufactures pizza bread . The pizza bread is subsequently used as the bread on which toppings such as cheese and sauce are added by the customer or end consumer. Such bread is commonly known as pizza bread in grocery stores across the country, people purchase pizza bread in order to prepare pizzas at home using their own ingredients for toppings. Customers in the foodservice channel, such as restaurants, also purchase pizza bread that they apply a topping to before heating it up or cooking it and sending the finished product to their customers. 5.6 Basis the plain reading of the notification and the meaning of the word pizza bread under common parlance, the Applicant submits that entry number 99 of Schedule I to the Rate Notifications should apply and GST to be levied accordingly. 5.7 Without prejudice to the above mentioned submission, in case the product manufactured by the Applicant does not qu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. Ingredients S. No. Ingredients 1. Maida 1. Maida 2. Water 2. Atta 3. Glycerine 3. Water 4. Wheat Gluten 4. Vanaspati Ghee 5. Salt 5. Palmolein Oil 6. Sugar 6. Glycerine 7. Yeast 7. L-Cysteine HCI 8. Baking Powder 8. Salt 9. Kalonji Seed 9. Powerflex 10. Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose 10. Dimodaan 11. Ultrasoft 11. Sugar 12. Calcium Propionate 12. Sodium Acid Pyro Phosphate 13. Kalonaji Oil 13. Acecol Gaur Gum Leavened Flatbread-Unfolded Unleavened Flatbread- Tortilla S. No. Ingredients S. No. Ingredients 1. Maida – High Protein 1. Maida 2. Water 2. Water 3. Glycerine 3. Palmolein Oil 4. Wheat Gluten 4. Glycerine 5. Salt 5. L-Cysterine 6. Sugar 6. Sodium Bi Carbonate 7. Yeast 7. Salt 8. Baking Powder 8. Powerflex 9. Kalonji Seed 9. Dimodaan 10. Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose 10. Sugar 11. Ultrasoft 11. Sodium Acid Pyro Phosphate 12. Calcium Propionate 12. Acecol Gaur Gum 13. Kalonaji Oil 13. Calcium Propionate 14. Fumaric Acid 15. Grindsted Protex Unleavened Flatbread-Chapati Leavened

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

um propionate 9. Raising Agent 9. Milk 10. Yeast 10. Sunflower Oil 11. Acidity regulator 11. Golden Syrup 12. Preservative 12. Vanilla Flavor 13. Thickener 13. Whey Powder 14. Flour treatment agent 14. Detam List of Ingredients Leavened Flatbread-Pita Bread Corn Taco S. No. Ingredients S. No. Ingredients 1. Tandoori Atta 1. Masa flour 2. Atta 2. Water 3. Water 3. Cal. Prop 4. Wheat Gluten 4. Citric Acid 5. Salt 5. Cellulose Gum 6. Yeast 6. Guar Gum Leavened Flatbread-Chalupa Leavened Flatbread-Kulcha S. No. Ingredients S. No. Ingredients 1. Maida 1. Maida 2. Sunflower Oil 2. Vinegar 3. Water 3. Water 4. Rice Flour 4. Sugar 5. TBBI 5. Salt 6. Yeast 6. Yeast 7. Salt 7. Baking Powder 8. Sugar 8. Kalonji 9. Gluten Gluten FLOW CHART ¯ Raw Material Intake ¯ Raw Materials Storage ¯ Premixing and sieving ¯ Mixing ¯ Dough Dividing ¯ Baking In Oven ¯ Online Cooling for 25 mins @ 15-20 oc ¯ Online inspection (Sorting) ¯ Stacking ¯ Packaging &

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ited (the Applicant or Company ) a private limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 holding GST registration number 27AACCH2133E1Z3, have filed an advance ruling application on 23 May 2018 for the classification of products manufactured by and supplied by the Company. In this connection, we have attended a personal h earing for the acceptance or rejection of the application of advance ruling under sub section (2) of section 98 of Central and Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (the Act) on 3 July 2018. During the course of the personal hearing, the authorized representative of the Office of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (the Nodal Officer) has submitted a letter providing views on the classification of bakery products manufactured and supplied by the Applicant. In the letter, the learned Nodal Officer has given his opinion in respect of the classification of bakery products, as under: a. Indian food stuff like Roti, Plain Roti to be cla

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. 16 of Schedule III under Chapter heading 1905; and h. Pizza Bread qualify as Pizza Bread under Entry No. 99 of Schedule l. i. At the outset, the Applicant most respectfully wishes to submit that the letter has been prepared without giving due regards to all the facts of the case and the submissions made by the Company till date. The Applicant has provided a detailed list of ingredients, manufacturing process charts, purchase orders, tax invoices and detailed interpretation about the proposed classification of bakery products to enable your office to arrive at a conclusion with respect to the classification of the bakery products under consideration. After reviewing the letter issued by the learned Nodal Officer, we have observed that their interpretation on the classification of bakery products such as Wafer Product, Pancakes and Pizza Bread are in consensus with the Applicant. However, the Applicant has different views to the opinions expressed by the learned Nodal Officer on the c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tha Rolls 1.1 The Applicant wishes to submit that learned Nodal Officer has not considered ingredients and the manufacturing processes used while manufacturing unleavened flatbreads. In the letter, it was mentioned that (i) the food stuff such as Paratha, Paratha Rolls, Roti Rolls shall be classified as per the common parlance test as laid down by the Hon ble Supreme Court of India (ii) Indian food stuff products such as Paratha, Paratha Rolls, Roti Rolls cannot be identified as Plain Roti or Roti. (iii) The manufacturing process and ingredients are different than that of Plain Roti or Roti. Thus, the same would be covered under Residual Entry. 1.2. Basic the review of submissions of learned Nodal Officer, we have observed that they have applied following tests to classify unleavened flatbreads during GST regime under: a. Common Parlance Test; b. Ingredient Test; and c. Manufacturing process Test. Common Parlance Test 1.3 With respect to Common Parlance Test, we wish to reiterate our s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tion of such as Roti Rolls, Paratha, Paratha Rolls, Tortilla Wraps, Tortilla, Wraps, Paratha Wraps are the same or similar to Plain Chapatti or Roti. 1.5 At this juncture, it is also important to note the ruling of the Apex Court of India in the case of M/s. O K Play (India) Limited V. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III, Gurgaon = 2005 (2) TMI 114 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA wherein it was mentioned that it is important to bear in mind that functional utility, design, shape and predominant usage have also got to be taken into account while determining the classification of an item . These aid and assistance of the Apex Court of India would be more important than the names used in the trade or common parlance in the context of Classification. A copy of the same is enclosed as Annexure 2. The size, shape and weight of the unleavened flatbreads produced by the Company are the same or similar and the predominant usage or function of the unleavened flatbreads is as an underlying carrier

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ied by protein or vegetables and sauce and hence, shall be classified as Plain Chapatti or Roti. Ingredient Test 2. the learned Nodal Officer has further mentioned that the ingredients used for variants of unleavened flatbreads such as Roti Rolls, Paratha and Paratha Rolls are different than Plain Roti or Roti as mentioned under Entry No. 99 A of Schedule I of Notification No. 01/2017-lntegrated Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 and Notification Number 1/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. MGST1017/ C.R. 104/Taxation-1, dated 29 June 2017 (collectively referred to as the Rate Notifications ). 3. We wish to reiterate the fact that the essential ingredients for preparation of Plain Chapatti and Roti are the same as those are used for manufacturing Tortilla, Tortilla Wraps, Wraps, Roti Rolls, Paratha and Paratha Wraps. The essential ingredients shall be taken to mean those ingredients which gives essential and basic character of the pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed manufacturing flow charts in respect of all variants of unleavened flatbread in its original application. 6. The range of unleavened flatbreads manufactured by the Company, including Roti, Roti Rolls, Paratha, Tortilla, Tortilla Wraps and Wraps are produced on the same production line using the same or similar production methods and processes. The flow chart included in the original application shows that the Applicant follows the same or similar processes for all variants of unleavened flatbreads. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, proofing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the unleavened flatbread is packed and labelled and subsequently stored and transported at -18 Degree Celsius temperature or transported ambient. 7. It shall be noted that the residual category was introduced for those product categories, which cannot be classified under any of the schedules of Rate Notification. The learned Noda

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d under residual entry 2. Naan 1. Naan cannot fall under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification as it is commonly used as a Roti in South Asia Region 2. By applying common parlance test, common man cannot say Naan as Bread 3. It is used as a Roti eaten with curry in South East Asia 4. Accordingly, the same cannot be classified under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification. Hence, the same shall be covered under residual entry 3. Pita Bread and Kulcha 1. Dealer has itself applied tax rate at 2.5% in the invoices raised by him and Kulcha 2. Accordingly, the same cannot be classified under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification. Hence, the same shall be covered under residual entry 2.2. In addition to above, while denying exemption under Entry No. 97 of Notification Number 02 Number 2/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 and Notification Number 2/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. MGST 1017/C.R. (103)(1)/Taxation-1, dated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

missions made in the application for advance ruling from Para 2.1 till Para 2.18 in Annexure III wherein we have provided our submissions with respect to applicability of exemption in respect of all variants of leavened flatbreads considering above mentioned tests. We have provided below our additional responses to the contentions of learned Nodal Officer with respect to the classification of leavened flatbread. Leavened Flatbread – Chalupa 2.5. The learned Nodal Officer has mentioned that: a Chalupa is a specialty of Mexico. Traditional Chalupa are small, thick, boat shaped fried maza topped only with salsa, cheese and shredded lettua. These are filled with various ingredients such as chicken, pork, chopped onion etc. So, in view of the manufacturing process and type of ingredients used in it, so the Chalupa could not fall under Entry No. 97 of the Exemption Notification. It would be covered under residual entry and taxable at 9% in CGST and MGST Act . 2.6. In this connection, we wish

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the customer can include their own sauce, filling, protein and vegetables in the bread before serving the final product to the end consumer. Thus, the said contention will not hold good factually. 2.8. Additionally, the Applicant follows the same or similar manufacturing processes as those applicable for manufacturing bread. The Applicant strongly believes that all variants of leavened flatbread shall be classified as Bread within the meaning of Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification. Leavened Flatbread – Naan 2.9. The learned Nodal Officer has further mentioned that Naan cannot fall under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification as it is commonly used as Roti in South Asia region. By applying common parlance test, common man cannot say Naan as a bread. It is used as a Roti, eaten with curry in South Asia. So, in my opinion Naan cannot be held as leavened flatbread and treated as exempted product. In my opinion the food products ie. Naan would be covered under residual entry and taxable

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

all variants of leavened flatbreads. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, proofing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the leavened flatbread is packed and labelled and subsequently stored and transported at -18 Degree Celsius temperature or transported ambient. 2.13. Without prejudice to above mentioned submissions and submissions made in application for advance ruling, we wish to submit that the learned Nodal Officer confirmed that Naan is used as a Roti, which is eaten with curry in South Asia. Considering the same, it shall be classified under Entry NO. 99A of Schedule I of Rate Notification ie. Plain Chapatti or Roti. However, the learned Nodal Officer has classified the same under residual category without providing any legal justification to the same. 2.14. In addition to above, we wish to further highlight the fact that the learned Nodal Officer did not apply the End-User Test while determining the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7. Moreover, the Applicant has discharged GST liability for leavened flatbread to the extent of 2.5% of CGST and MGST on a conservative basis. Leavened flatbreads not served for immediate consumption 2.18. While denying the exemption under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notification, it was further mentioned that food products like Naan, Pita Bread, Kulcha, Leavened Bread can be served for consumption. These food products are ready for consumption. They are not raw or unfinished form. Ready to serve foods should be construed as a food which is ready to eat. The Schedule Entry No. 97 refers to bread except when served for immediate consumption. However, it is clear that ready to serve means ready to eat . There is no distinction between them. Food is not necessarily served only in Hotel. Food is also served at home. Hence, dealers contention regarding served for immediate consumption is misinterpretation of the term . 2.19. In this connection, we wish to reiterate our submissions made in the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In addition, frozen bread does not taste good. The points above are relevant if the bread is bought by a customer in the foodservice channel such as hotels and restaurants or if the frozen bread is consumed in the home. Therefore, the breads that the Company supplies are not served for immediate consumption and are not ready to serve. 2.21. The customer or end consumer the thaws the frozen bread and in many cases then heats the bread up using an oven, microwave, tawa or grill. After this customers or the end consumer will add a sauce and filling to the bread which acts as a carrier. The bread does not taste very good if is supplied without any sauce or a filling because the product would be very dry and not taste good. 2.22. Considering the points above, the Applicant strongly believes that it fulfils all the necessary conditions, which are eligible for claiming exemptions under Exemption Notification. 2.23. Without prejudice to above submissions, we wish to further submit the fact tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

est and ingredient test. Should your office require any additional information / documentation in order to enable your office to arrive at a final conclusion, we shall be glad to furnish the same, 03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus- It is submitted that, Issue on which advance ruling is required: M/s. Signature International Foods India Pvt. Ltd. is the company engaged in the business of trading and exporting bakery product including flat breads. The dealer has been engaged in manufacturing and supplying of the unleavened flat breads, which include plain chappati, Roti, Paratha Wraps, Tortilla wraps, wraps, Roti Rolls. The dealer also trader in manufacturing of bread products, Pancake, Pizza Bread, wafers, corn chips corn taco, corn taco strips. The dealer seeks clarification of tax rate in respect of following commodities. 1 Unleavened flat breads 2 Leavened flat breads. 3 Corn chips, Corn Taco, Corn Taco strips. 4

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rolls, Roti Rolls, we can t identify these food products as plain Roti or Roti The manufacturing process and ingredients are different than that of plain Roti or Roti. Common man can t say Paratha or Roti Rolls as a plain Roti, Roti. So impugned product Paratha, Paratha Rolls, Roti Rolls would not fall under entry 99(A) of CGST/MGST Act. In my opinion these food products i.e. paratha, Paratha rolls, Roti Rolls would be covered under residuary entry and taxable at 9% in CGST and MGST. Leavened flat bread – Dealer has treated leavened flat bread under Entry No. 97 of CGST Act. Entry No.97 stands for Bread (branded or otherwise) except when served for consumption and pizza bread. In Leavened flat breads such as Naan, Chalupa, Pita bread, Kalucha, unfold leavened flat breads are also manufactured & sold by the dealer. Chalupa -A chalupa is speciality of south central Mexico. Traditional Chalupas are small, thick, boat shaped fried maza topped only with salra, cheese and shredded lettua

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ood products i.e. Naan would be covered under residuary entry and taxable at 9% in CGST and MGST. Pita bread and Kulcha -Pita bread & Kulcha are leavened bread. But dealer himself applied tax rate at 2.5% in the invoices raised by him. But these product could not be classified under entry 97 as exempted goods. Pita bread and Kulcha cannot be termed as bread. So the products like Naan, Pita Bread, Kulcha, levened bread can be served for consumption. These food products are ready for consumption. They are not raw or unfinished from. Ready to serve foods should be construed as a food which is ready to eat. The schedule entry No. 97 refer to breads except when served for consumption. Dealer has taken meaning of served for Consumption as in food served in hotel, restaurant etc. However it is clear that ready-to-serve means ready-to-eat . There is no distinction between ready-to-eat foods and ready to serve foods Food is not necessarily served only in a Hotel. Food is also served in a ho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pizza Bread -Pizza Bread supplied by the applicant is covered under entry No. 99 of schedule I. Dealer has rightly clarified the food product ie. Pizza Bread under entry No.99 of schedule I having tax rate @ 2.5% CGST and 2.5 MGST. Hence I reproduce following clarification of various food product. Sr. No. Schedule entry Tax rate 1. Unleavened Flat breads i) Roti, Plain Roti 99 (A) 2.5% CGST 2.5% MGST ii) Paratha, Paratha Rolls, Roti Rolls Residual 9% CGST 9% MGST 2. Leavened Flat breads Residual 9% CGST 9% MGST i) Naan, ii) Chalupa, iii) Pita Bread iv) Kulcha 3. Corn chips, Corn Taco, Corn Taco Strips Entry No. 16 Schedule III 9% CGST 9% MGST 4. Pancake Entry No. 16 Schedule III 9% CGST 9% MGST 5. Pizza Bread Entry No. 99 Schedule I 2.5% CGST 2.5% MGST Additional submissions made by concern officer on 25.07.2018 The dealer has been engaged in manufacturing and supplying of the unleavened flat breads, which include plain chappati, Roti, Paratha Wraps, Tortilla wraps, wraps, Roti Rolls.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oti rolls) Mixing (Atta+ water+ palmolein oil+wheat gluten+salt+dimodaanHp-1+ sugar+ baking powder) ¯ Dough dividing ¯ Baking in oven ¯ Online cooling for 25min@15-20c ¯ Online inspection (sorting) ¯ Stacking ¯ Packaging and labelling Blast freezing@-30oto 350c ¯ Metal detection ¯ Packaging ¯ Collation to pallets ¯ Finished goods storage @-18 c ¯ Dispatch in frozen vehicle@-18c Opinion of Jurisdiction Officer-So far as Indian food stuffs like Roti, Plain Roti is concerned it can be classified under Tariff heading 2106 as per notification no.35/2017 Integrated tax (Rate) Dt. 13/10/2017 under Schedule-I entry no.99 (A) and should be taxed at CGST 2.5% and SGST 2.5% So if we apply common parlance test to these Indian food stuffs like paratha , Paratha rolls, Roti Rolls , we can identify these food products as plain roti or roti The manufacturing process is same, but ingredients are different than that of plain Roti or Roti. In my opin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ould not fall under Entry no-97 of Exemption notification. It cannot be classified as a bread. In my opinion this chalupa would be covered under Schedule- Ill entry no,453 i.e. residuary entry and taxable at 9% in CGST and MGST. B) Naan – A typical Naan recipe involves mixing wheat flour with salt, a yeast culture and enough yogurt to make smooth, elastic enough. The dough is kneaded for few minutes. Then dough is divided into balls which are flattered and cooked. So this product Naan can t fall under entry no.97 of Exemption notification as it is commonly used as roti in South Asia region. By applying common parlance test to this product, common man can t say Naan as a bread. It is used as a Roti, eaten with curry in South East Asia. So in my opinion Naan cannot be held as leavened bread and treated as exempted product. In my opinion the food products i.e. Naan would be covered under residuary entry under Schedule -III entry n.453 and taxable at 9% in (CST and MGST. C) Pita bread and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n of the term so all the food product like Naan, Chalupa, Pita bread, Kulcha will fall under residual entry i.e. Schedule -III entry n.453 and would be taxable at 9% CGST and 9% MGST Act. III. Corn Chips, Corn Taco, Corn Taco strips – Applicant s interpretation- Dealer is manufactures of food products like corn chips, corn Taco, Corn Taco strips. Dealer has classified these products under entry No. 16 of schedule Ill. Manufacturing process- (Corn chips, Corn taco, Corn taco strips) Mixing (Masa flour+ water+ calcium prop. + citric acid+ cellulose gum+ gaur gum) ¯ Dough sheeting ¯ Baking in oven ¯ Online cooling @ambient temperature ¯ Online inspection (sorting) ¯ Stacking ¯ Packaging and labelling ¯ Spiral blast freezing@-30 to 35 ¯ Metal detection ¯ Packaging ¯ Collation to pallets ¯ Finished goods storage @<-18 c ¯ Dispatch in frozen vehicle @.18 0 Opinion of Jurisdiction Officer- Dealer has rightly classified these produ

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

milk, butter. Pancake are known as cakes . In many opinion Pancake manufactured by the applicant qualify as cakes within the meaning of Rate notification clarifying the product under entry 16 schedule III under chapter heading 1905. V) Pizza Bread – Applicant s interpretation- Dealer has classified Pizza bread as Entry no.99 of Schedule-I of CGST Act. Opinion of Jurisdiction Officer Pizza Bread supplied by the applicant is covered under entry No. 99 of schedule l. Dealer has rightly classified the food product ie. Pizza Bread under entry No. 99 of schedule-I having tax rate @ 2.5% CGST and 2.5%MGST. Hence I reproduce following clarification of various food product. Sr. No. Products Supplied Schedule entry Tax rate 1. Unleavened Flat breads i) Roti, Plain Roti Schedule-1 Entry no. 99 (A) 2.5% CGST 2.5% MGST ii) Paratha, Paratha Rolls, Roti Rolls Schedule-1 Entry no. 99 (A) 2.5% CGST 2.5% MGST 2. Leavened Flat breads Schedule-III Entry no. 453 (A) 9% CGST 9% MGST i) Naan, ii) Chalupa, i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

written submissions. 05. OBSERVATIONS We have perused the records on file and gone through the facts of the case and the submissions made by the applicant and the department. We find that:- 1. The Applicant, a private limited company, holding the GST registration number (GSTIN ) 27AACCH2133E1Z3 with effect from 01 July 2017, is located in Nashik, Maharashtra. The company is engaged in the business of, inter alia, manufacturing, trading and exporting bakery products which includes flatbreads. The Applicant supplies products to customers and distributors in India and in overseas markets including the Middle East, South East Asia, Africa and Australia. Applicant supplies two types of flatbreads like Unleavened and leavened flatbreads to retailers, canteens, airlines, hotels, hospitals, schools, restaurants, wholesalers, distributors and other food service operators located in India and overseas. The details of manufacturing process and ingredients required are in short as thus, A) Unleav

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

redients including maida, tandoori atta, atta, water, rice flour, oil, yeast, salt, sugar etc. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, proofing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the leavened bread is packed, the packet is labelled and subsequently stored and transported at -18 Degree Celsius temperature or transported ambient. C) Wafer s includes the – Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips to its customers and distributors. The products are manufactured by the Applicant using various ingredients including masa flour, water, small quantities of cellulose gum, citric acid, guar gum etc. Upon raw material intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the products are packed, the packets are labelled and subsequently stored and transported at -18 Degree Celsius temperature. Upon receipt of these products, the customer or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

intake, the ingredients go through various processes including mixing, proofing, dough dividing, baking and cooling. After the cooling process, the pizza bread is packed and labelled and subsequently stored and transported at – 18 Degree Celsius temperature. Applicant has approached this authority and has raised questions as above with a request to classify the products. The Central Point of discussion in this application is the applicability of entry No.99A of Schedule to the Notification No. 1/2017 – IGST Act dated 28/06/2017. By virtue of this notification the food products such as Khakara, Plain Chapatti or Roti are liable to GST @ 5%. The Applicant has approached this authority with a prayer to classify the various food products sold by the appellant and the applicable rate of tax. We shall now discuss and examine each question separately as below: Que. 1. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Unleavened Flatbreads be treated as Khakra, plain chapatti or roti under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uded [other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905]on a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905) under Entry No. 13 of Schedule III of Rate Notification or (iii) Any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit. With respect to this question applicant submits that the company is engaged in the manufacturing trading and exporting of bakery products i.e. on Unleavened Flat Brads such as plain chapatti and variants of chapatti such as Tortilla, Tortilla wraps, roti rolls, wraps, roti, chapatti and paratha and paratha wraps. During the course of final hearing applicant was instructed to provide products, detailed list of ingredients, manufacturing process chart

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST and SGST Act. However, with respect to food stuffs such as paratha, paratha wraps, roti rolls, cannot be classified in the above entry and by applying common parlance test these would be covered under residual entry and taxable@9% each under CGST and SGST Act. From the perusal of notification 1/2017 and 34/2017 cited supra we find that the expression khakara, plain chapatti or roti are stated as covered by these notifications but we find that no details as to what products, apart from these would be covered or, no definition of these products are given in these Notifications. It is therefore necessary to refer to the meaning of this term as per dictionary meaning or Wikipedia Merriam Webster- Chapatti -a round flat unleavened bread of India i.e. usually made of whole wheat flour and cooked on a griddle. Chapatti is also called fulka. Roti- a roti is generally made out of refined flour and is cooked in tandoor. This roti may be called tandoori roti. Applicant has raised question bef

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

htra) and Rotla (in Gujrat). In view of this we agree to the contention that the products such as Tortilla wraps. Roti rolls, paratha and paratha wraps are covered by the scope of entry 99A of notification 34/2017. During the course of hearing, revenue officer has strongly opposed the contention of the applicant that paratha or paratha wraps are covered by the scope of entry 99A cited supra. However the officer in the additional submissions on 25/07/2018 submitted that in view of common parlance test food stuffs like paratha, paratha rolls, roti rolls, can be identified as plain roti or roti and thus opined that these food products would be covered under entry99A and taxable @2.5% each. We find that the food product paratha as is available in hotels and restaurants is plain, folded or stuffed. By applying the common parlance test we understand paratha as different and distinct food commodity from roti, chapatti etc. The product before us is examined from this view point. The product is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e classified: (i) Pizza Bread as mentioned under Entry No. 99 of Schedule I of Rate Notifications; or (ii) as Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905]on a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905) under Entry No. 13 of Schedule III of Rate Notification or (iii) Any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit In connection with the products covered by this question which are leavened Flatbreads including Naan, Kulcha, and variants of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

atbreads and crepes which are an integral part of Indian cuisine. Definition of naan (COLLINS ENGLISH DICTIONARY) Naan or naan bread is a type of bread that comes in a large, round, flat piece and is usually eaten with Indian food. Source: Wikipedia Naan is a leavened oven-baked flatbread found in the cuisines mainly of Middle East, Central Asia and Indian subcontinent. MERRIAM WEBSTER DICTIONARY : a round flat leavened bread especially of the Indian subcontinent THE FREE DICTIONARY BY FARLEX: A flat, leavened bread of northwest India, made of wheat flour and baked in a tandoor. Source: Wikipedia KULCHA: Kulcha is a type of mildly leavened flatbread that originated in the Indian subcontinent. It is a Punjabi variation of naan. Recipe Kulcha is made from maida flour, water, a pinch of salt and a leavening agent (yeast or old kulcha dough), mixed together by hand to make a very tight dough. In order to classify the products under a fiscal statue and in the absence of any such definition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

to the fitness of the matter of the statute. (3) On the other hand, . …. if it is a word which is of a technical or scientific character then it must be construed according to that which is its primary meaning, namely, its technical or scientific meaning. Applying the above principles, we have to find whether the product Naan and Kulcha can be treated as bread and covered by the scope of entry 97 of the exemption notification. It is true that as per dictionary meaning or Wikipedia large number of food items including Naan and Kulcha have been refereed as Indian breads. But the case before us is that the above product has not been defined under the Act or the notifications issued and in the absence of any such definitions it would be advisable to refer to the principals as referred above. Having regard to the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in case of M/s. Ramawatar cited supra we find that while classifying the product under fiscal statute the resort has to be to their pop

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or immediate consumption. We also agree with the applicant that the product does not use chicken, pork chopped onion etc. while manufacturing or supplying these products. Now we turn to another product – CHALUPA: MERRIAM WEBSTER DICTIONARY Definition of chalupa a fried corn tortilla sometimes shaped like a boat and usually filled with a savory mixture(as of meat, vegetables, or cheese) OXFORD ENGLISH LIVING DICTIONARY: A fried tortilla in the shape of a boat, with a spicy filling Source: Wikipedia CHALUPA: A chalupa (Spanish pronunciation: is a specialty of south-central Mexico, including the states of Puebla, Guerrero, and Oaxaca. Chalupas are made by pressing a thin layer of masa dough around the outside of a small mould, in the process creating a concave container resembling the boat of the same name, and then deep frying the result to produce crisp, shallow corn cups. These are filled with various ingredients such as shredded chicken, pork, chopped onion, chipotle pepper, red salsa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

de like a pocket, which can be filled with food Source: Wikipedia In many languages, the word pita refers not to flatbread, but to flaky pastries. Pita Bread is a yeast-leavened round flatbread baked from wheat flour, sometimes with a pocket. THE FREE DICTIONARY (Cookery) a flat rounded slightly leavened bread, originally from the Middle Fast, with a follow inside like pocket, which can be filled with food. Also called: Arab bread or Greek bread CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY a round or oval flat bread that is hollow and can be filled with other food OXFORD ENGLISH LIVING DICTIONARY; Flat, hollow, slightly leavened bread which can be split open to hold a filling. With regards to Pita bread applicant is of the opinion that the product is bread covered by the scope of entry no. 97 of exemption notification. As per Webster dictionary the term bread has been defined as a usually baked and leavened food made of a mixture whose basic constituent is flour or meal. On the contrary as per definition and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips be classified. (i) as Malt ex-tract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905]on a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905) under Entry No. 13 of Schedule III of Rate Notification; or (ii) Any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit As observed by us in case of other products discussed herein above we also find that the term corn chips, corn taco, corn taco strips have not been defined under the A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

per Customs Tariff Heading as below: Entry -16 All goods i.e. Waffles and wafers other than coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, biscuits; Pastries and cakes (other than pizza bread, khakra, plain chapatti or roti, Waffles and wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, papad, bread]. The details of tariff head as below, S.No. Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading Tariff item Description as per Schedule Heading Description in Custom Tariff Entire Customs Tariff Heading with sub Heading and Tariff Item 1 2 3 4 5 16. 1905 Pastry, cakes, biscuits and other bakers wares, whether or not containing cocoa; communion wafers, empty cachets of a kind suitable for pharmaceutic al use, sealing wafers, rice paper and similar products[other than pizza bread, khakhra, plain chapatti or roti, bread, rusks, toasted bread and similar toasted products BREAD, PASTRY, CAKES, BISCUITS AND OTHER BAKERS WARES, WHETHER OR NOT CONTAINING COCOA; COMMUNION WAFERS, EMPTY CACHETS OF KIND SUITABLE FOR PHAR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bly. Further from the facts submitted by the applicant that the end consumer fry the chip products which make them crispy similar to the product such as wafers. The Corn chips, Corn taco and corn taco chips are variants of chips eaten as a snack. Considering the above facts we hold that the term wafers would include impugned products. And therefore these products would be classifiable under chapter 1905 3290 and liable to tax at @ 9% each under CGST and SGST Act. Que 4: Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, Pancakes supplied be treated as All Goods i.e. Waffles and wafers other than coated with chocolate or containing chocolate; biscuits; Pastries and cakes (other than pizza bread, khakhra, plain chapatti or roti, Waffles and wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, papad, bread) as mentioned under Entry No. 16 of Schedule III of Rate Notifications. If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Pancakes be classified in any other Schedule Entry as p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. We find that, Cake is mentioned under the chapter heading 1905 of customs and tariff Act 1975. The product cake is mentioned in the entry 16 under the head of All Goods i.e. waffles and wafers other than coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, biscuits; Pastries and cakes (other than pizza bread, khakhra, plain chapatti or roti, Waffles and wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate, papad, bread]. Therefore, we are of the view that the impugned the product Pancakes is covered under the chapter heading 19059010 under the entry 16 of schedule Ill of GST ACT and liable to tax at appropriate rate. Que 5: Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, Pizza Base supplied be treated as Pizza Bread as mentioned under Entry No. 99 of Schedule / of Rate Notifications. If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Pizza Base be classified in any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit The products a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e rate. 06. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows: ORDER (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) No. GST-ARA-26/2018-19/B-91 Mumbai, dt. 20.08.2018 Question 1:- Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Unleavened Flatbreads be treated as Khakra, plain chapatti or roti under Entry No. 99 A of Schedule / of Notification No. 01/2017-lntegrated Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017 and Notification Number 1/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. MGST1017/ C.R. 104/Taxation-1, dated 29 June 2017 (collectively referred to as the Rate Notifications ) If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Unleavened Flatbreads be classified: (i) as bread as mentioned under Entry No. 97 of Notification Number 02 Number 2/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017, Notification Number 2/2017-CentraI Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

products such as plain chapatti, Tortilla, Tortilla Wraps, roti, Roti rolls , Wraps, Paratha and Paratha wraps are covered under Entry No. 99 A of Schedule 1 and they would be liable to tax @ 5% (2.5 % each for CGST and MGST and 5 % for IGST). Question 2:- Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Leavened Flatbreads be treated as as bread as mentioned under Entry No. 97 of Exemption Notifications If not, whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Leavened Flatbreads be classified: (i) Pizza Bread as mentioned under Entry No. 99 of Schedule I ofRate Notifications; or (ii) as Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905]on a totally defatted basi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s If the same is not classifiable as wafer , whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn Taco Strips be classified (i) as Malt extract, food preparations of flour, groats, meal, starch or malt extract not containing coca or containing less than 40% by weight of coca calculated on a totally defatted basis, not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905]on a totally defatted basis not elsewhere specified or included (other than preparations for infants or young children, put up for retail sale and mixes and doughs for the preparation of bakers wares of heading 1905) under Entry No. 13 of Schedule III of Rate Notification; or (ii) Any other Schedule Entry as per Rate Notification or Exemption Notification as your good office thinks fit Answer :- The products like Corn Chips, Corn Taco and Corn , Taco Strips woul

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

How to return the claimed ITC on Purchase return?

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Shravan Kumar – Dated:- 19-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 19-10-2018 – An invoice raised in the month of June 2018 has been canceled by raising Credit note in July 2018 by a vendor. We have claimed ITC in the June 2018 for the received invoice.As the vendor cancelled the Invoice by raising Credit note, how we can return the ITC claimed in June for the said invoice? – Reply By SHIVKUMAR SHARMA – The Reply = While filing your Next month GSTR3B Return, you can reduce your Inputs Tax Credit in Table 4 Eligible ITC. – Reply By Shravan Kumar – The Reply = How does Claiming Less ITC in the next month GSTR 3B, will resolve the issue? If I claim less ITC, the GST will treat it as the full availed credit, but no ju

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Do i need to pay GST on Advance Payment?

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Harish GV – Dated:- 19-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 25-8-2018 – Im a self employee, my job is to exporting services to outside the India, all my export services fall under 0% GST, Now if i am receiving 100% full advance payment before raising the invoice do i need to pay any GST on advance payment? – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = Export being zero rated no GST is required to pay on advance. – Reply By ANITA BHADRA – The Reply = Yes , You need to pay GST on advance payment . As per the explanation 1 to Section 12 of the CGST Act, 2017 a supply shall be deemed to have been made to the extent it is covered by the invoice or, as the case may be, the payment. Government has come out with Notification

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

if considerd do i need to pay tax for advance payment?Thank you – Reply By SHIVKUMAR SHARMA – The Reply = It is not the advance payment because the transaction is Completed in the same month i.e.In August. – Reply By ANITA BHADRA – The Reply = It is not an advance . Since you had exported without filing LUT ( Letter of Undertaking ) , You need to pay IGST and then claim refund for taxes paid – Reply By Harish GV – The Reply = Thank you Shivkumar Sharma Sir and Anita Bhadra Mam for replyingAbove replay is just example for me to understnad and the original transaction happened belowI received 100% full payment on July 27th 2018 from foreign clientIm going to generating the invoice and exporting the software on 25th August 2018I already regist

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

not. Accordingly, GST needs to be paid with reference to the time at which advance is received,If a service exporter receives advances, it is beneficial to him to apply for refund at that stage itself. – Reply By KASTURI SETHI – The Reply = Govt. is very liberal regarding export whether of goods or services. Such procedural requirements do nit create hurdle in exporting under LUT ( without payment of tax). Govt. has been liberal since the inception of Central Excise Act. – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = LUT is easy to apply and it beneficial as the exporter need not have to pay IGST. In my view, the querist is not liable to pay tax as he is in possession of lut. – Reply By Ramaswamy S – The Reply = Not liable to tax.RegardsS.Ramasw

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit – purchase of motor vehicles i.e. cash carry vans – ITC is not available to CMS Info Systems Limited on purchase of motor vehicles i.e. cash carry vans, which are purchased and used for cash management business and supplied post

Goods and Services Tax – Input tax credit – purchase of motor vehicles i.e. cash carry vans – ITC is not available to CMS Info Systems Limited on purchase of motor vehicles i.e. cash carry vans, which

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of an item – Modelling dough – The impugned product being a dough used for amusement of children, the Heading 3407 would be the correct classification.

Goods and Services Tax – Classification of an item – Modelling dough – The impugned product being a dough used for amusement of children, the Heading 3407 would be the correct classification. – TMI Updates – Highlights

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST on used cars

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Ethirajan Parthasarathy – Dated:- 18-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 28-8-2018 – As per notification No.8/2018 Central Tax (rate )GST on used cars will be levied on margin. The Margin has to be arrived at by deducting the WDV as on the date of supply from the consideration. The income tax adopts Block system for allowing depreciation. The WDV of The Block in which car being sold is clubbed, might have been wiped out, or brouht down substantially because sale value of any one asset included in the Block. A question araises how to arrive at WDV of car being sold for purpose of GST. Even otherwise, the income tax Act does not allow any proportioante Depreciation upto date on sale of any asset. Any suggestion

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

shall be ignored; – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = The date of purchase of car can be found out from the books of accounts. The formula for depreciation which you are applying to a block of asset as per income tax need to be applied to a particular asset under sale. You will get the written down value of the car. Now you can apply the formula as per the notification no. 8/2018 CTR to arrive as the gst payable. – Reply By Ramaswamy S – The Reply = If the selling price is higher than the book value, GST is payable on the difference between the book value and the selling price. If the selling price is less than the book value, GST is not payable.RegardsS.Ramaswamy – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = Book value means written dow

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Tag Solar System,

2018 (9) TMI 1333 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 532 (A. A. R. – GST) – Rate of tax on supply of goods/services/both – Solar Power Generating Systems and parts – Works Contract – Whether Supply, commissioning, installation and maintenance of Solar Water Pumping System would be taxable at the rate of 5% considering it as a composite supply where the principle supply being that of goods i.e. supply of Solar Power generating system having HSN Code 84 or 85? – Whether separate bills can be raised by the Applicant with respect to Supply and Goods and Supply of Services Purely in respect of the contract of the Applicant with RHDS enclosed herewith? – Will the said transaction be classified as a “Works Contract” and taxable at the rate of 18% being Supply of Services?

Held that:- Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system has a permanent location (at specified farmer’s field in Rajasthan) as its works is undertaken on instructions of the Rajasthan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

as set out in Scope of work and in the Technical Specifications. Civil structure cannot be dismantled and moved away.

The applicant has to supply a “Functional Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system” as a whole which includes supply, installation and commissioning, maintenance for 10 years, hence instant transaction is neither a supply of i) “Solar Power Generating System” and nor a supply of ii) “Solar Power Based Devices” – the above entry under the notification describes the Tax rate on ‘Goods’. If the transaction is supply of goods i.e. supply of either “Solar Power Generating System” or supply of “Solar Power Based Devices” then the applicable Schedules would have to be seen but the intent of parties in instant case is always for supply of a “Functional Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system” as a whole which includes supply, installation and commissioning at the site of farmer along with maintenance for 10 years and is not chattel sold as chattel. Hence canno

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cordingly it is not getting covered under supply of ‘Solar Power Generating System’ under Entry 234 of Schedule I of the Notification no. 1/2017 – Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th of June, 2017 under HSN code 84 or 85. “Supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of Solar Water Pumping Systems” falls under the purview of Works Contract as per Section 2(119) of GST Act.

In instant case as per terms and conditions of agreement, it is a single contract of supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of Solar Water Pumping Systems and hence cannot be split in two separate contracts. Hence in instant case separate bills for supply of goods and supply of services cannot be raised.

The contract for “supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of Solar Water Pumping Systems” falls under the ambit of “Works Contract Services” which comes under the purview of Works Contract as per Section 2(119) of CGST Act and attracts 18% rate of tax under IGST Act, or 9%

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nce ruling. 1. Submission of the Applicant: Statement of relevant facts having a bearing on the question(s) raised. 1. M/s. Tag Solar System, a partnership firm which is engaged in Supply, Commissioning, Installation, Maintenance of Solar Water Pumping System within a stipulated time period. 2. Such Supplies are given on the instructions of the Rajasthan Horticulture Development Society under subsidy scheme wherein the Solar Water Systems are required to be installed at the farmer s field. The scope of work is reproduced hereunder: supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of Solar Water Pumping Systems 3. Accordingly the Applicant Supplies, Installs, Commissions and Maintains the said systems and perform end to end activities in this regard. 4. There may be a consolidated price for all the activities undertaken by the Applicant which involves both the Supply of Goods and Supply of Services. 5. Applicant has no clarity with respect to the rate of tax on such Supply. As per th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or not assembled in modules or made up into panels As per the above Entry in the Rate Schedule, the supply of item under consideration i.e. Solar Water Pumping System falls squarely under the definition of Solar power generating System and such supply should be taxable at the rate of 5% as they are systems which absorb sunlight and convert it into electricity which can be put to further use. The above mentioned Entry Solar Power Based Devices under Chapter heading 84 or 85 or 95, the item in question i.e. Solar Water Pumping System can also be covered under this category as it is a device run by solar power. Solar Water Pumping System is an apparatus used for pumping water which runs on solar energy. The dictionary meaning of device is reproduced as under: a thing made or adapted for a particular purpose, especially a piece of mechanical or electronic equipment Solar Water Pumping System is an equipment which harnesses solar energy in order to pump water. Therefore, it can also be alt

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s factory site was immovable property as something attached to earth like a building or a tree. The Tribunal has pointed out that it was for the operational efficiency of the machine that it was attached to earth. If the appellant wanted to sell the paper making machine it could always remove it from its base and sell it. Apart from this finding of fact made by the Tribunal, the point advanced on behalf of the appellant, that whatever is embedded in earth must be treated as immovable property is basically not sound. For example, a factory owner or a house-holder may purchase a water pump and fix it on a cement base for operational efficiency and also for security. That will not make the water pump an item of immovable property. Some of the components of water pump may even be assembled on site. That too will not make any difference to the principle. The test is whether the paper making machine can be sold in the market. The Tribunal has found as a fact that it can be sold. In view of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

achment of that to which it is attached. Doors, windows and shutters of a house are attached to the house, which is imbedded in the earth. They are attached to the house which is imbedded in the earth for the beneficial enjoyment of the house. They have no separate existence from the house. Articles attached that do not form part of the house such as window blinds, and sashes, and ornamental articles such as glasses and tapestry fixed by tenant, are not affixtures. 24. Applying the above tests to the case at hand, we have no difficulty in holding that the manufacture of the plants in question do not constitute annexation hence cannot be termed as immovable property for the following reasons: (i) The plants in question are not per se immovable property. (ii) Such plants cannot be said to be "attached to the earth" within the meaning of that expression as defined in Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act. (iii) The fixing of the plants to a foundation is meant only to give s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cts and judgments Solar Water Pumping Systems cannot be categorized as Immovable Property and the activity in relation to movable property cannot in any way be categorized as a Works Contract as the definition of Works Contract under CGST Act, 2018 does not cover activities in relation to movable property. Hence, the whole transaction cannot be termed as a Works Contract. Applicant has stated that the instant case is of Composite Supply where in the present scenario, it is very important to see what the Principal Supply is as the rate of tax of such transactions depends on the rate of tax of the Principal Supply. Applicant has interpreted that predominant element of the Supply being made in the instant case relates to Supply of Solar Water Pumping Systems. There is one single Supply Tender which involves the Supply of the Systems to the recipient and the work of installation, maintenance, commissioning is ancillary to the activity of Supply of the Solar Water Pumping Sets. Since, the s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the rate of 18% being Supply of Services? 4.1 Personal Hearing (PH): In the matter personal hearing was given to the applicant Shri Pankaj Ghiya (Authorised Representative) who appeared for personal hearing on 08.07.2018. During the PH he submitted EOI Document of Empanelment Report, copy of a circular of CBEC dated 15.01.2002 and Supreme court judgment of M/s. Sirpur Paper Mills containing the applicant s interpretation of law and facts in respect of the aforesaid questions which was placed on record. They reiterated the submission already made in the application for Advance Ruling and further requested that the case may be decided as per the submission made earlier in Advance Ruling Application. Applicant was instructed to submit copy of Work Order and some sample bill which was done by them on a later date. 4.2 The jurisdictional officer in her comments has stated that the contract given to the applicant is of supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of Solar Water pumpi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntion in the instant case is not to procure goods of Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system but to procure a completely functional Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system as a whole wherein applicant undertakes end to end responsibility of supply of equipments including installation and commissioning to a defined technical specifications and testing, commissioning of a fully functional Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system. d) Under General Condition of Contract (IV) in clause IV.2 of EOI all risk and liabilities (insurance charges) accruing in relation of works (temporary or permanent), and of all equipments, machinery, materials, shall be with applicant until occurrence of the Final Acceptance. e) Schedule IV -(Scope of works) of EOI clearly spells out the terms and conditions where contractor has to undertake works of supply installation and commissioning of Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system as per specific demands of the owner. So it is not the some

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pumping system as a whole which includes supply, installation and commissioning and it is not chattel sold as chattel. i) Applicant has submitted that under GST, there is a monumental shift in concept of Works Contract which was prevalent under erstwhile VAT and Service Tax regime. In GST, as per definition of works contract service if construction, fabrication, completion, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair, maintenance, renovation, alteration or commissioning is for immovable property, then only it would classify as works contract service . Hence it means that if aforesaid activities are undertaken for a movable property then it will not be works contract service. j) Applicant has relied upon following judgment and Circular in furtherance of their arguments of Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system being movable property and not immovable: i) Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. Collector – 1998 (97) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) = 1997 (12) TMI 109 – SUPREME COUR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oning of the system and further has a obligation of maintenance for a certain period. The transaction is a work contract but it is for us to decide whether it is a work contract in terms of GST Act. So, we come to the crux of the issue and which is as to whether the transaction results into any immovable property. The term immovable property has not been defined under the GST Act. However, there are a plethora of judgments of the Hon. Supreme Court and the Hon. High Courts which have helped understand the term immovable property . 1. In decision of Allahabad High Court in Official Liquidator v. Sri Krishna Deo and Ors. [AIR 1959 All. 247] = 1958 (5) TMI 35 – HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, wherein, the Court held that a machinery fixed to their bases with bolts and nuts although easily removable are not movable property when they have been set up with definite object of running an oil mill and not with intention of being removed after a temporary use. 2. In decision of M/s. T.T.G. Industries

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ommissioned on site. In their reply to the show cause, the respondents explained the processes involved, the manner in which the equipments were assembled and erected as also their specifications in terms of volume and weight. It was explained that the function of the drilling machine is to drill hole in the blast furnace to enable the molten steel to flow out of the blast furnace for collection in ladles for further processing. After the molten material is taken out of the blast furnace, the hole in the wall of the furnace has to be closed by spraying special clay. This function is performed by the mudgun which is brought to its position and locked against the wall for exerting a force of 240-300 tons to fill up the hole in the furnace. The blast furnace in which the inputs are loaded is a massive vessel of 1719 m cubic metre capacity and the size of its outer diameter is 10.6 metres, and the height 31.25 metres. Hot air at 1200 degrees centigrade is fed into the blast furnace at vari

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t 25 feet above ground level. After welding the columns, the base plate has to be secured to the concrete platform. This is achieved by getting up a trolley way with high beams in an inclined posture so that base plate could be moved to the concrete platform and secured. The same trolley helps in the movement of various components to their determined position. The various components of the mudgun and drilling machine are mounted piece by piece on a metal frame, which is welded to the base plate. The components are stored in a store-house away from the blast furnace and are brought to site and physically lifted by a crane and landed on the cast house floor 25 feet high near the concrete platform where drilling machine and mudgun has to be erected. The weight of the mudgun is approximately 19 tons and the weight of the drilling machine approximately 11 tons. The volume of the mudgun is 1.5 x 4.5 x 1 metre and that of the drilling machine 1 x 6.5 x 1 metre. Having regard to the volume and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e, and also considering the fact that there is no space available for moving the machines in assembled condition due to their volume and weight. She considered the authorities on the subject and came to the conclusion that erection of mudgun and tap hole drilling machine results in erection of immovable property. She noticed the judgment of this Court in Narne Tulaman Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and also noticed the judgment of the Tribunal in Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Weaving) Co. Ltd. v. CCE – 1993 (65) E.L.T. 121 = 1992 (10) TMI 188 – CEGAT, NEW DELHI; which held that the issue of immovable property was never raised before the Supreme Court in Narne Tulaman Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd = 1988 (9) TMI 51 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. She found support for her conclusion in the decision of this Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. v. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (1991) Supp. (2) SCC 18 = 1990 (11) TMI 407 – SUPREME COURT; and held that the twin tests laid d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he definition of goods and, therefore, excise duty is not leviable thereon". The core question that still survives for consideration is whether the processes undertaken by the appellant at Bhilai for the erection of mudguns and drilling machines resulted in the emergence of goods leviable to excise duty or whether it resulted in erection of immovable property and not "goods" The appellant has placed considerable reliance on the principles enunciated and the test laid down by this Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (supra) to determine what is immovable property. In that case the facts were that the respondent had taken on lease land over which it had put up, apart from other structures and buildings, six oil tanks for storage of petrol and petroleum products. Each tank rested on a foundation of sand having a height of 2 feet 6 inches with four inches thick asphalt layers to retain the sand. The steel plates were spread on the asphalt layer and the tank was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sition or liable to be dismantled and re-erected at the later place? If the answer is yes to the former it must be a movable property and thereby it must be held that it is not attached to the earth. If the answer is yes to the latter it is attached to the earth. If the answer is yes to the latter it is attached to the earth." Applying the permanency test laid down in the aforesaid decision, counsel for the appellant contended that having regard to the facts of this case which are not in dispute, it must be held that what emerged as a result of the processes undertaken by the appellant was an immovable property. It cannot be moved from the place where it is erected as it is, and if it becomes necessary to move it, it has first to be dismantled and then re-erected at another place. This factual position was also accepted by the Adjudicating Authority. The technical member, however, held that the aforesaid decision was of no help to the appellant inasmuch as a leading international

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

or of Central Excise, UP – 1995 (75) E.L.T. 17 (S.C.) = 1994 (12) TMI 75 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA; the facts were that a tube mill and welding head were erected and installed by the appellant, a manufacturer of steel pipes and tubes by purchasing certain items of plant and machinery in market and embedding them to earth and installing them to form a part of the tube mill and purchasing certain components from the market and assembling and installing them on the site to form part of the tube mill which was also covered in the process of welding facility. After noticing several decisions of this Court, the Court observed that the twin tests of exgibility of an article to duty under the Excise Act are that it must be a goods mentioned either in the Schedule or under Item 68 and must be marketable. The word "goods" applied to those which can be brought to market for being bought and sold and therefore, it implied that it applied to such goods as are movable. It noticed the decisi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d in sugar factories to exhaust molasses of sugar. The material on record described the functions and manufacturing process. A mono vertical crystaliser is fixed on a solid RCC slab having a load bearing capacity of about 30 tons per square meter. It is assembled at site in different sections and consists of bottom plates, tanks, coils, drive frames, supports, plates etc. The aforesaid parts were cleared from the premises of the appellants and the mono vertical crystalliser was assembled and erected at site. The process involved welding and gas cutting. The mono vertical crystalliser is a tall structure, rather like a tower with a platform at its summit. This Court noticed that marketability was a decisive test for dutiability. It meant that the goods were saleable or suitable for sale, that is to say, they should be capable of being sold to consumers in the market, as it is, without anything more. The Court then referred to the decision in Quality Steel Tubes (supra) and distinguished

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

at installation or erection of turbo alternator on the platform constructed on the land would be immovable property, as such it cannot be an excisable goods falling within the meaning of Heading 85.02. In reaching this conclusion this Court considered the earlier judgments of this Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, Quality Steel Tubes and Mittal Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. (supra) as also the earlier judgment of this Court in Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad – 1998 (97) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) = 1997 (12) TMI 109 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. This Court observed :- "There can be no doubt that if an article is an immovable property, it cannot be termed as "excisable goods" for purposes of the Act. From a combined reading of the definition of 'immovable property' in Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 3(25) of the General Clauses Act, it is evident that in an immovable property there is neither mobility nor marketa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hat the mudguns and the drilling machines erected at site by the appellant on a specially made concrete platform at a level of 25 feet above the ground on a base plate secured to the concrete platform, brought into existence not excisable goods but immovable property which could not be shifted without first dismantling it and then re-erecting it at another site. We have earlier noticed the processes involved and the manner in which the equipments were assembled and erected. We have also noticed the volume of the machines concerned and their weight. Taking all these facts into consideration and having regard to the nature of structure erected for basing these machines, we are satisfied that the judicial member of the CEGAT was right in reaching the conclusion that what ultimately emerged as a result of processes undertaken and erections done cannot be described as "goods" within the meaning of the Excise Act and exigible to excise duty. We find considerable similarity of facts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

answer the description of "goods" within the meaning of the term in the Excise Act. Thus, it can be seen that the Hon. Supreme Court while holding the machines as immovable property took into account facts such that the machines could not be shifted without first dismantling it and then re-erecting it as another site. It was also sought to distinguish as to how a concrete base meant just to prevent wobbling of the machine would not place the machine in the category of immovable property as something attached to the earth. 6. In light of above judgments and scope of work it is observed: 1) That Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system has a permanent location (at specified farmer s field in Rajasthan) as its works is undertaken on instructions of the Rajasthan Horticulture Development Society under subsidy scheme wherein the Solar Water Systems are required to be installed at the farmer s field meant for supply of water using solar energy. Such plant would therefore have

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ity and its maintenance and after sales services for 10 years (It includes 5 years guarantee period). The applicant has himself agreed to be bound by this clause which reflects permanency of the installed Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system. Contract between applicant and the counter-party is entered into on the premise that the system would continue to be situated at the place of construction; 6. Case laws citied by applicant has to be understood in terms of the facts as available therein. As in the case of M/S Solid and correct Engineering Works (citied Supra) the plant was not intended to be permanent and was to be shifted after completion of road repair and Construction work hence was regarded as moveable. But in instant case the solar power water pumping system has an element of permanency. 7. The applicant has laid claim under notification No 01/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, at S.No. 234, under HSN Classification 84, 85 and 94 and has regarded the instant transaction

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

intenance for 10 years and is not chattel sold as chattel. Hence cannot be treated as Composite Supply as contended by the applicant. 10. An overview of all makes us observe that the impugned transaction for supply of Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system which includes procurement, supply, development, testing, commissioning and providing maintenance service for 10 years is a works contract in terms of clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act. 11. Since the impugned transaction for supply and commissioning of Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumping system is a works contract u/s 2(119) as supply of services, hence question of principal supply does not arise and so GST tax rate of Solar power Generating System or Solar Power Based Devices under notification No 01/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, at S.No. 234, under HSN Classification 84, 85 and 94 is not applicable. Based on above facts along with provision of law the ruling is as follows: RULING 1 As per the statement of facts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: SMITA GUPTA

2018 (9) TMI 1418 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN – [2018] 59 G S.T.R. 242 (AAR), 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 438 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of goods/services/both – rate of tax – coverage of various items used in the sprinklers and drip irrigation systems sold individually as well as part of a complete system – N/N. 01/2017 dated 28.06.2017 as inserted vide N/N. 06/2018 dated 25.01.2018 – applicant has contended that along with nozzles later vide notification no. 06/2018 dated 25.01.2018 a new entry was introduced as entry no 195B “Sprinklers; drip irrigation system including laterals; mechanical sprayers” which included all the lateral parts of these irrigation systems into Schedule II also.

Held that:- The laterals related only to drip irrigation systems have been covered under this entry and laterals of sprinklers are not covered under the amended entry – Sprinklers is not in itself a complete irrigation system but constitutes an essential component of a Sprinkler

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notification No. 27/2017 CT- (Rate) dated 22.09.2017 and 6/2018 – CT (Rate) dated 25-1-2018 respectively covers only “Nozzles for Sprinkler” and “Sprinklers” which would attract GST 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%) – Risers ( which connects sprinkler to laterals) along with all other laterals such as adopter, bend, coupler ,end cap, PCN(C-Type), group nipple, reducer bare, socket, Bush, Y(bere) , Latch clamps ,C clamps, Riser Pipes, Rubber Rings, Tee, Clamps, Foot button, Ripit, Nozzle etc. are not covered under entry no. 195A and 195 B.

Ruling:- As per entry No. 195 B of the schedule II of Notification No. 1/2017 – CT (Rate) dated 28-6-2017, as amended by Notification No. 06/2018 – CT (Rate) dated 25-1-2018, Laterals of sprinklers such as clamps, bends, tee, coupler, bush, foot button, latch, clamp, riser pipe, socket etc. are not covered to attract GST 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%) but instead will attract GST at 18% (CGST 9% + SGST 9%).

Laterals of drip irrigation system will attract

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

NT: 1. The applicant Smita Gupta (M/s. Vinay Irrigation) (here in after referred to as Applicant ) has sought an Advance Ruling on the Entry No. 195B of Schedule II of notification no 01/2017 dated 28.06.2017 as inserted vide notification no 06/2018 dated 25.01.2018. The applicant seeks advance ruling over the coverage of various items used in the sprinklers and drip irrigation systems sold individually as well as part of a complete system. 2. The applicant is engaged in manufacturing and trading of various plastic and metallic items which are used in agricultural irrigation. These items are Adopter, coupler, Tee, Clamps, Foot button, Ripit, Nozzle etc. All these items are used as part of sprinkler or Drip irrigation system depending upon the requirement of each farmer. These items are supplied as part of a complete sprinkler or drip irrigation system and also as spares separately as and when required by farmer for replacement. 3. All above items are used by the farmers and most of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nozzles for 6% 195B** 8424 Sprinklers; drip irrigation system including laterals; mechanical sprayers ; 6% *-inserted by Noti. No. 27/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 22.09.2017. **-inserted by Noti. No. 06/2018 Central Tax (Rate) dated 25-01-2018. Schedule III – 9% S.No. Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff item Description of Goods CGST rate (1) (2) (3) (4) 325. 8424 Mechanical appliances (whether or not hand-operated) for projecting, dispersing or spraying liquids or powders; fire extinguishers, whether or not charged; spray guns and similar appliances; steam or sand blasting machines and similar jet projecting machines 9% Mechanical sprayer; nozzles for drip irrigation euipment or nozzles ***-Amended vide notification no 27/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 22.09.2017 and 06/2018 Central Tax (Rate) dated 25-01-2018 5. Till 22.09.2017 all the items listed under tariff heading 8424 were taxable @ 18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST) vide entry no 345 of schedule III of notification no 01/2017. 6. Vide no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ter through its lateral roots Designers added more storage space, with lateral expansion of the rear compartment In the case of applicant, laterals in relation to irrigation system mean all such devices and equipment which help in the working of the system and without which it may not work. All the products of the applicant are laterals to the sprinkler and drip irrigation. 9. The applicant further submitted that, sprinkler and drip irrigation are 2 different system designed for distinct uses. Sprinkler is in itself a complete system designed for irrigation by use of water pumping. It has not been defined in the law. Dictionary/ internet definitions are as follows:- An Irrigation sprinkler is a device used to irrigate agricultural crops, lawns, landscapes, golf courses, and other areas. They are also used for cooling and for the control of airborne dust. Sprinkler irrigation is a method of applying irrigation water which is similar to natural rainfall. Water is distributed through a sy

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1. The applicant has sought advance ruling on the coverage of the items covered under Annexure 1 under entry no. 195B of schedule II of notification no 01/2017 dated 28.06.2017 as amended vide notification no. 06/2018 dated 25.01.2018. S.No. Chapter/Heading/Sub-heading/Tariff item Description of Goods CGST rate (1) (2) (3) (4) 325. 8424 Mechanical appliances (whether or not hand-operated) for projecting, dispersing or spraying liquids or powders; fire extinguishers, whether or not charged; spray guns and similar appliances; steam or sand blasting machines and similar jet projecting machines [other than sprinklers; drip irrigation systems including laterals; mechanical sprayer; 9% 3 Personal Hearing (PH) In the matter personal hearing was given to the applicant, Mr. Ranjan Mehta, CA, (Authorised Representative) of applicant appeared for personal hearing on 20.07.2018. During the PH he reiterated that the case may be decided as per submission already made in the application for Advance R

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s a device with a lot of small holes that you put on the end of a hose in order to water plants, grass, etc. Sprinkler may range from small single nozzle sprinklers to multiple nozzle sprinklers and can be used for irrigation, fire fighting, powder spraying etc. b) Sprinkler Irrigation System Sprinkler Irrigation is a method of applying irrigation water which is similar to rainfall. Water is distributed through a system of pipes usually by pumping. It is then sprayed into the air and irrigated entire soil surface through spray heads so that it breaks up into small water drops which fall to the ground. Components of a sprinkler irrigation system. A sprinkler system usually consists of the following components: (i) A Pumping Unit (ii) Tubings- main/sub-mains and laterals (iii) Couplers (iv) Sprinkler head (v) Other accessories and laterals such as valves, bends, plugs and risers. (i) Pumping Unit: Sprinkler irrigation systems distribute water by spraying it over the fields. The water is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tees, reducers, elbows, hydrants, butterfly valve and plugs. (e) Fertilizer applicator. It is clear from above that Sprinkler Irrigation system mainly consists of a functional assembly of pump unit, mainline and sub lines tubing, laterals and sprinkler connected to each other. Nozzles and sprinklers covered in entry no. 195A and 195B are just one of the components of Sprinkler irrigation system hence to consider or equate Sprinkler as Sprinkler irrigation system will not be correct. c) Drip Irrigation System: Drip irrigation is a type of micro-irrigation system that has the potential to save water and nutrients by allowing water to drip slowly to the roots of plants, either from above the soil surface or buried below the surface. The goal is to place water directly into the root zone and minimize evaporation. Drip irrigation systems distribute water through a network of valves, pipes, tubing, and emitters. Components of Drip Irrigation System: A typical system consists of a source of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

int in the mainline to release the entrapped air during the start of system and to break the vacuum during shut off. 9. Non- return valve: It is used to prevent the damage of pump from back flow of water in rising main line of drip irrigation system. 10. Pressure gauge: It is used to indicate the operating pressure of the drip system. The pressure gauges are installed at the inlet and outlet of the san and screen filters 11. Grommet and take-off: These are used to connect the lateral to submain. A hole is pinched with hand drill of pre determined size in submain. Grommet is fixed into the hole on submain. Take-off is pressed into the grommet. Grommet acts as a seal. The sizes are different for 12 mm and 16 mm laterals. 12. End cap: They are used to close the lateral ends, submain ends or main ends. Submains and mains are preferably provided with flush valve. 13. Fertilizer system: It is used to add the chemicals (nutrients, herbicides, pesticides etc.) to the irrigation water. d) Later

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onent of a Sprinkler Irrigation System which when assembled with other laterals and accessories makes a complete functional sprinkler irrigation system. The applicant contented that the items supplied by him are necessarily part of the sprinkler and drip irrigation system which is true but unlike the entry relating to drip irrigation which clearly specifies drip irrigation system including laterals this entry confines only to sprinklers and neither includes laterals of sprinkler nor sprinkler irrigation system. Risers, adopter, bend, coupler ,end cap, PCN(C-Type), group nipple, reducer bare, socket, Bush, Y(bere), Latch clamps, C clamps, Riser Pipes, Rubber Rings, Tee, Clamps, Foot button, Ripit, Nozzle are all laterals to the sprinklers which when assembled with sprinkler constitutes Sprinkler Irrigation System. In case of drip irrigation system as per entry No.195A and 195 B of the schedule II of Notification No. 1/2017 – CT (Rate) dated 28-6-2017, later amended by Notification No.27

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ively But Risers ( which connects sprinkler to laterals) along with all other laterals such as adopter, bend, coupler ,end cap, PCN(C-Type), group nipple, reducer bare, socket, Bush, Y(bere) , Latch clamps ,C clamps, Riser Pipes, Rubber Rings, Tee, Clamps, Foot button, Ripit, Nozzle etc. are not covered under entry no. 195A and 195 B. Based on above facts along with provision of law the ruling is as follows: RULING: As per entry No. 195 B of the schedule II of Notification No. 1/2017 – CT (Rate) dated 28-6-2017, as amended by Notification No. 06/2018 – CT (Rate) dated 25-1-2018, Laterals of sprinklers such as clamps, bends, tee, coupler, bush, foot button, latch, clamp, riser pipe, socket etc. are not covered to attract GST 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%) but instead will attract GST at 18% (CGST 9% + SGST 9%). Laterals of drip irrigation system will attract GST 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%). – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements – Orders – Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption from Payment of Customs Duty and IGST to specified free gifts, donations, relief and rehabilitation materials imported by Charitable Organisations

Customs – 29/2018 – Dated:- 18-8-2018 – GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS CUSTOM HOUSE, WILLINGDON ISLAND, COCHIN-682009 F.No. S. 65/13/2018 CCU Cus. Dated: 18.08.2018. Public Notice 29/2018 Sub: Exemption from Payment of Customs Duty and IGST to specified free gifts, donations, relief and rehabilitation materials imported by Charitable Organisations- reg. In light of the widespread floods which has devastated the lives of the people of Kerala and has necessitated urgent rescue operations and setting up of relief camps to bring succour to the affected people, several organizations have approached this office to issue clarification

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bilitation of people affected by floods have been exempted from the whole of Customs Duty and Integrated Tax. It is to be noted that the above exemption will be in addition to issuance of General Exemption, if any, by CBIC in due course. 3. The above exemption can be claimed by any Charitable Organisations in Compliance of the Conditions mentioned in the Notification No. 148/94-Customs dated 13.07.1994, as reproduced below: (i) The said goods have been imported by a charitable Organisation in India as free gift to it from abroad or purchased out of donations received abroad in foreign exchange by it; (ii) The said goods are for free distribution to the poor and the needy without any distinction of caste, creed or race; (iii) The importer, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

food and sartorial habits of the people amongst whom the imported goods are to be distributed; that the goods are bonafide gifts for free distribution to the poor and the needy without any distinction of caste, creed or race; (v) The importer gives an undertaking to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs to the effect that he would furnish from the State Government concerned or from person or institution specified by the Central Board of Excise and Customs within six months from the date of importation of the said goods or such extended period as the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs may allow, a certificate stating that the said goods have been distributed to the poor and t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – Whether the money paid by the customer to the driver of the cab for the services of the trip is liable to GST and whether the applicant company is liable to pay GST on this amount? – Held Yes

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – Whether the money paid by the customer to the driver of the cab for the services of the trip is liable to GST and whether the applicant company is liable to pay

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Audit Report u/s 44AB – Form 3CD – the proposed clause 30C and proposed clause 44 of the Tax Audit Report shall be kept in abeyance till 31st March, 2019 – Accordingly reporting of information regarding GAAR and GST deferred.

Income Tax – Tax Audit Report u/s 44AB – Form 3CD – the proposed clause 30C and proposed clause 44 of the Tax Audit Report shall be kept in abeyance till 31st March, 2019 – Accordingly reporting of in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – Supply or not – The conversion of e-Units into diamonds would constitute a supply of diamonds liable to tax under the Goods and Services Tax Act.

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – Supply or not – The conversion of e-Units into diamonds would constitute a supply of diamonds liable to tax under the Goods and Services Tax Act. – TMI Updates – Highlights

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – diamonds – e-units – The derivative contracts in e-Units and settlement thereof would be treated as transactions in securities in case it involves only e-Units without any involvement of physical diamonds and thereby would remain o

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – diamonds – e-units – The derivative contracts in e-Units and settlement thereof would be treated as transactions in securities in case it involves only e-Units w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Reverse charge liability u/s 9(3) and 9(4) of CGST Act, 2017

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Ganeshan Kalyani – Dated:- 17-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 13-3-2019 – Normally, GST is payable by a taxable person supplying goods or services or both. However, in some cases, GST is payable by the person receiving the goods or services or both. This is termed as reverse charge mechanism. The term reverse charge as defined in the Act is reproduced below: reverse charge means the liability to pay tax by the recipient of goods or services or both instead of the supplier of goods or services or both under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) of section 9, or under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) of section 5 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act; There are two provisions under which GST is payable under reverse charge: A) The first one is payable under section 9(3) of CGST Act, 2017. A list of goods and services on which the tax is payable under the said section is notified thru notification. B) The second provision to pay tax is provided under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

being the recipient of supply of said goods. The category of services enumerated in the notification no. 13/2017 are discussed below in detail: Goods Transport Agency (GTA): A Goods Transport Agency (GTA) means any person who provides service in relation to transport of goods by road and issues consignment note, by whatever name called. The tax on GTA service is payable by the recipient being any factory registered under or governed by the Factories Act, 1948; or any society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 or under any other law for the time being in force in any part of India; or any co-operative society established by or under any law; or any person registered under the CGST Act or IGST Act or the SGST Act or the UTGST Act; or any body corporate established, by or under any law; or any partnership firm whether registered or not under any law including association of person; or any casual taxable person, located in the taxable territory. A service provided by a G

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vice means any service supplied in relation to advice, consultancy or assistance in any branch of law, in any manner and includes representational services before any court, tribunal or authority. Any business entity located in the taxable territory receiving legal service from an individual advocate including a senior advocate or firm of advocates by way of legal services, directly or indirectly shall pay tax under reverse charge basis. A service provided by a partnership firm of advocate or an individual as an advocate other than a senior advocate, by way of legal service to an advocate or partnership firm of advocates providing legal services; or to any person other than a business entity; or to a business entity with an aggregate turnover up to twenty lakh rupees (ten lakh rupees in the case of a special category states) in the preceding financial year; or to the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory, local authority, Government Authority or Government Entity is exe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and agency services provided to a person other than Central Government, State Government or Union territory or local authority; services in relation to an aircraft or a vessel, inside or outside the precincts of a port or an airport; and transport of goods or passengers. A person registered under the CGST Act, 2017 shall pay tax on the services of renting of immovable property received from the Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority, services Service supplied by a Director of a company or a body corporate: The company or a body corporate located in the taxable territory shall pay GST under reverse charge on receiving service from a director of a company or a body corporate. Service supplied by an insurance agent: Any person carrying on insurance business, located in the taxable territory shall pay GST under reverse charge on the services supplied by an insurance agent. Service supplied by a recovery agent: A banking company or a financial institution

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reverse charge on receiving service from an individual direct selling agent other than a body corporate, partnership or limited liability partnership firm. B) GST liability u/s 9(4) of CGST Act, 2017 The second method of payment of GST under reverse charge is provided u/s 9(4) of CGST Act. As per the said provision a registered person shall pay tax on receiving goods or services or both from a person who is not registered under GST. Further, vide Notification no. 8/2017-CTR dated 28.06.2017 the tax payment as required u/s 9(4) was exempted if the aggregate value of the supplies of goods or services or both received by a registered person from any or all the suppliers, who is or are not registered does not exceeds ₹ 5000/-. Thereafter, the provision of section 9(4) of CGST Act, was suspended till 31.03.2018 vide Notification no. 38/2017-CTR dated 13.10.2017. It was again suspended till 30.06.2018 vide notification no. 10/2018-CTR dated 23.03.2018. The Government of India has furt

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he Reply = In that situation, only FCM is applicable. – Reply By GAJESH GUPTA – The Reply = Sir, As per recent notification Government has finally imposed the Reverse Charge Mechanism starting from 01.02.2019. Please confirm whether it is for 9(3) and 9(4) and both of GST act. – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = It is for Section 9(4). However, the list of person who shall pay tax under reverse charge on purchase from an unregistered dealer is not yet notified. – Reply By SHUBHAM AHUJA – The Reply = DEAR SIR AS PER LATEST NOTIFICATION OF RCM UNDER SECTION 9(4) IS IT EFFECTIVE FROM 01.02.2019 , CAN YOU PLEASE RCM UNDER SECTION 9(3) WAS SUSPENDED OR NOT – Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani – The Reply = RCM under Sec 9 (3) is already inforce. Security service is being added from 1st Jan 2019. – Reply By SHUBHAM AHUJA – The Reply = DEAR SIR AS I AM DEALING IN SALE AND PURCHASE OF MOTOR VEHICLE AS I RECEIVE ADVANCE FROM MY CUSTOMERS ON BOOKING WHETHER I AM LIABLE TO PAY RCM UNDER THE HEAD ADV

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Can i Claim

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Harish GV – Dated:- 17-8-2018 Last Replied Date:- 20-8-2018 – Im a self employee & providing software services to inside/outside India, all my services transactions was credited to my personal saving bank account, but first time I provided software service to US within few days ago and received very big amount to my personal saving bank account and not yet converted to Indian currency(Bank needs disposal instructions for FOREX department to convert it into Indian currency and credit to my bank account).Later I opened current account with trade name(sole proprietorship), registered the GST, Taken LUT Bond, within a one or two days i'm getting Import Export Code(IEC) also. After receiving IEC, i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

?Thanks – Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN – The Reply = Whether the invoices were issued in the name of sole proprietorship or in the name of individual? – Reply By Harish GV – The Reply = Thank you for replying Dr. Mariappan GovindarajanFrom the buyer side i received invoice in the name of individual – Reply By ANITA BHADRA – The Reply = Dear Sirpoint wise reply to your query :-(a) Point of taxable event for software exporter is – Earliest of Advance Received,/ Provision of services/Invoice raised ..In your case point of taxable event is PROVISION OF SERVICES (b) GST REGISTRATION FOR SOFTWARE EXPORT SERVICES export service is an inter-state taxable supply and liable for registration.Time Limit to take registration – You are required to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, use of money is not restricted . As long as you are paying applicable GST , The only concern is availing Input Tax Credit on payment for business purpose . You can claim refund for input expenditure made in course of export of services. – Reply By Harish GV – The Reply = Thank you Anita Bhadra mam for replyingand thank you clarifying about the Advance Payment, what i received is a full payment of service and service was exported before receiving the payment itself, i listed details below with time frame Service was exported on 25th July 2018 July 27th 2018 i received amount to my personal saving bank account, invoice sent from the buyer in my name not on sole proprietorship trade name, but still amount is not credited to my bank account(

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Audit Report – For 3CD – reporting of information regarding GAAR and GST deferred.

Tax Audit Report – For 3CD – reporting of information regarding GAAR and GST deferred. – Income Tax – 06/2018 – Dated:- 17-8-2018 – Circular No. 6/2018 F. No. 370142/9/2018-TPL Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes TPL Division **** New Delhi, Dated the 17th of August, 2018 Order under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( the Act ) read with rule 6G of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 ( the Rules ) requires prescribed persons to furnish the Tax Audit Report along with the prescribed particulars in Form No. 3CD. The existing Form No. 3CD was amended vide notification no. GSR 666(E) dated 20th July, 2018 with effect from 20th August, 2018. Representa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IN RE: AAKASH ENGINEERS

2018 (9) TMI 699 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, DAMAN, DIU AND DADAR AND NAGAR HAVELI – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 40 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of goods – Cargo Trolley – whether the product of the applicant in question i.e. Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload, the trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated for outdoor use is to be classified under HS Code 87169090 or otherwise? – CBEC Circular No. 696/10/2003 dtd 19.02.2003.

Held that:- HSN 8716 covers product Trailers and Semi Trailers; Other Vehicles, Not Mechanically Propelled; Paris thereof whereas the assessee manufacture product Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload. The trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated for outdoor use which is n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nd treated for outdoor use is correctly classifiable under HSN 87168090.

Ruling:- Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload. The trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated for outdoor use is correctly classifiable under HSN 87168090. – Order No. 03/AR/Daman-Silvassa/2018 Dated:- 17-8-2018 – SHRI SATISH KUMAR AND SHRI KANNAN GOPINATHAN, IAS MEMBER Any person deeming himself aggrieved by this Advance Ruling may appeal against the Ruling before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, in terms of Section 100 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017. Such appeal shall be done within 30 days from the date of the communication of the order. The appeal papers shall bear fee of ₹ 10,000/- as provided under Rule 106(1) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules,2017. The Appeal should be filed in Form GST ARA-02, prescribed under sub-

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

payments of required fee of ₹ 10,000/-. In the said application the assessee has sought clarification for correct classification of their goods i.e. a Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre design for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload. The trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated for outdoor use. To verily the facts, application of the assessee was forward vide letter F.No. V/AR-07/Aakash/DUM/2017-18 dtd 24.05.2018 to the Assistant commissioner, Div-VI, GST& CR Silvassa, Daman Commissionerate for examination and their detailed reports on the following points was called for:- I. Classification of the said goods under Central Excise Tariff Act,1985; II. Whether any issue on the subject matter has been decided by the appellate Authority In their own case of the assessee or other cases. If Yes, please furnish the copy of the said orders; Ill. What is prevalling practice of classificatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

urer of the subject goods in their jurisdiction. D. From the photograph provided by the assessee, the product under consideration appears to be a baggage/cargo trolly used at Air Cargo Complex/Airport for shifting baggage/goods/parcels from airline warehouse to on board the flights and vice versa. On going through the GST Tariff Act, 2017, it is noticed that there is no specific entry for the said product. However, it appears to be classifible under heading 87168090. 3. Defence submission and records of personal Hearing: To abide by the law of natural justice, the assessee were given a chance to be heard in person vide letter dtd.24.07.2018. they were also requested vide said letter to submit documentary evidence in support of their claim, if any, In compliance of the said PH letter. Shri Milan R. Shah, authorized representative of the applicant appeared for personal hearing on 06.08,2010. During the personal hearing, he submitted that as per their understanding the correct classificat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under the said HSN. 4.1.1 First of all we discuss HSN 84279000. On going through the GST Tariff Act, 2017 we find that major head of HSN 8427 covers Fork-lift trucks; other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment . It is very clear that major head 8427 covers fork lift trucks or other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment which is different from the product manufactured by the assessee. Therefore, it is concluded that the product i.e. Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload. The trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated for outdoor use, does not fall under HSN 84279000 which is specifically classified for other trucks. 4.2 Now we refer to the Chapter Note of Heading 8716 under GST Tariff which reads as under- 8716: Trailers and Semi Trailers; Other Vehicles, Not Mechanically Propelled; Parts Thereof 87161000 : Trail

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

and Propelled Vehicles (E.G. Hand Carts, Rickshaw s And The Like) 87169020: Trailers And Semi Trailers; Other Vehicles, Not Mechanically Propelled; Parts Thereof Other Vehicles Animal Drawn Vehicles 87168090: Trailers And Semi Trailers; Other Vehicles, Not Mechanically Propelled; Parts Thereof Other Vehicles Other 87169010: Trailers And Semi Trailers; Other Vehicles, Not Mechanically Propelled; Parts Thereof: Parts And Accessories of Trailers 87169090: Trailers And Semi Trailers; Other Vehicles, Not Mechanically Propelled; Parts Thereof parts Other 4.2.1 On going through the HSN description of 8716, we find that HSN 8716 covers product Trailers and Semi Trailers; Other Vehicles, Not Mechanically Propelled; Paris thereof whereas the assessee manufacture product Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload. The trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

examined once by the Board for defending the Writ Petition filed by M/s jaldoot Material Handling Pvt. Itd., it was then clarified that the appropriate classification of the item would be under heading 87.16. The CEGAT however has held in this case that the correct classification of Hand Pallet Trucks is under chapter heading 84.27 of CETA, 1985. An appeal against the CEGAT judgement has been filed before Apex Court. 2. In case of a similar product described as Hand Trolley, the CEGAT has held (in the case of Gujrat Industrial Trucks Ltd. Vs. CCE Baroda = 2000 (9) TMI 473 – CEGAT, MUMBAI) that the correct classification of the item is under chapter heading 87.16 of CETA 1985. 3. The matter has been examined by the Board. In view of Ministry s stand to appeal against the CEGAT decision in the case of jaldoot Material Handling Pvt. Ltd., and also the Judgement in the case of Gujrat Industrial Trucks Ltd. Vs. CCE Baroda, it is clarified that the correct classification of the Hand Pallet T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

oduct in question i.e. Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload. The trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated for outdoor use is merit classification under major bead 8716. 4.3.2 Now we discuss the product presently classified by the assessor under the HSN 87169090 is correct or otherwise. On going through the major head for HSN 871690 which is specifically cover parts whereas the detail description given under HSN sub heading 87169010 is meant for Parts and accessories of trailers and HSN code 871690920 for other. Here it is worth mention that the eight digit HSN for sub heading 87169090 is also a type of specification for parts only. Hence, it can not be the correct eight digit HSN for the product in question i.e. Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of bagga

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

product of animal drawn vehicle hence it can not be classified under sub heading 87168020. Now the last sub beading under the major head of 6 digit HSN for the product is 87168090 is meant for Others . Therefore, we are of the view that the product in question i.e. Cargo Trolley used to carry Cargo from one place to another, towable in nature and has solid tyre designed for transportation of baggage and light cargo with a minimum payload. The trolley is rugged and is suitable and treated for outdoor use is correctly classifiable under HSN 87168090. 6. We note that Harmonized System or Nomenclature (HSN) is internationally recognized product/items coding system which has also been accepted in India. From the above detailed Chapter Sub Heading wise classification of the product in the existing law i.e under Central Excise it is found that the classification of the above said product is one and the same under GST regime as well as under Customs law. No change in the classification under a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. KOG-KTV Food Products India P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Tirunelveli

2018 (9) TMI 1655 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI – CENVAT Credit – inputs – HR coil, steel plates, MS channel, MS plates etc. for the construction of three storage tanks of 3600 MT each in capacity which are used for storing crude palm oil, palm oil and palmolein oil – Whether the appellants are eligible for credit on the impugned steel items which were used for fabrication of storage tanks used for storing refined palm oil, crude palm oil?

Held that:- The said issue has been considered in the case of Thiru Arooran Sugars [2017 (7) TMI 524 – MADRAS HIGH COURT], where the Hon’ble High Court of Madras has held that the credit on such items used for manufacture of capital goods is eligible – credit allowed – appeal allowed – decided in favor of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

l. Department was of the view that the said items do not fit into the definition of inputs and therefore are not eligible for credit. Show cause notice was issued for the period August 2008 to January 2009 proposing to disallow CENVAT credit of ₹ 21,34,709/- availed on MS sheets, steel plates, MS angles etc. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand, interest and also imposed penalties. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence this appeal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, ld. counsel Shri Hari Radhakrishnan submitted that the appellant had used the impugned steel items for fabrication of storage tanks at site. The storage tanks so manufactured is mentioned as capital goods in definition of CEN

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ttached to the earth and being immovable property are non-excisable. Therefore, the credit is not eligible on such steel items. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The issue is whether the appellants are eligible for credit on the impugned steel items which were used for fabrication of storage tanks used for storing refined palm oil, crude palm oil. The said issue has been considered in various decisions and in the case of Thiru Arooran Sugars (supra), the Hon ble High Court of Madras has held that the credit on such items used for manufacture of capital goods is eligible. The decision in Vandana Global (supra) was also referred to by the Hon ble High Court. Following the said decision, we are of the view that the disallowance of credit is unjustified

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =