M/s. Zuari Cement Ltd Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai North

M/s. Zuari Cement Ltd Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai North
Central Excise
2018 (10) TMI 691 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 3-10-2018
E/41547/2018 – 42516/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
For the Appellant : Shri Sai Prashanth, Advocate
For the Respondent : Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR)
ORDER
The appellant is aggrieved by the denial of input service credit on the following services:-
S. No.
Service
Amount (Rs.)
1.
Hiring of male nurse
1,87,536/-
2.
Housekeeping and office boy
69,902
3.
Road cleaning work
41,455/-
4.
Packing plant external colour wash
37,080/-
5.
Professional services
37,080/-
6.
Plantation work
7,895/-
7.
Drain

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

1 With regard to housekeeping services, he submitted that such services were availed for upkeep of the factory premises in a clean and hygienic manner. Road cleaning services were availed for cleaning the roads in the factory premises which connected various destinations inside the factory. The painting services availed are in the nature of white washing the factory walls so as to upkeep the maintenance of the factory and also in compliance of the provisions of Factories Act. The professional services were availed by the appellant for liaisoning with Government office with regard to the land revenue aspects. The plantation work services were availed to keep the area green as mandated by the Pollution Control Board. Drainage cleaning and sew

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

des.
5. The issue with regard to eligibility of credit on hiring of male nurse stands decided in the case relied by the ld. counsel for the appellant. Further, the housekeeping service, road cleaning service etc. are availed by the appellant for keeping the factory as well as the roads in a clean and hygienic manner as also as a part of the upkeep of the factory premises. The white washing services were also availed for renovation and upkeep. The professional services were availed for liaisoning activities with regard to land related matter. The plantation work is also availed by the appellant for keeping the factory premises green as mandated by the Pollution Control Board. Similar services were availed for cleaning drainage and sewage of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SRF Limited Versus Additional Commissioner

SRF Limited Versus Additional Commissioner
GST
2018 (10) TMI 778 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-10-2018
D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13986/2018
GST
Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq And Mr. Justice Goverdhan Bardhar JJ.
For the Petitioner(s) : Shri Sanjay Jhanwar
For the Respondent(s) : Shri R.D. Rastogi, Addl. Solicitor General with Shri Samit Bishnoi, Shri Nikhil Simlote for Shri R.B. Mathur, Shri Siddhartha Ranka and Ms. Manjeet Kaur
ORDER

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Biogenetic Drugs Private Limited Versus Union of India Through The Commissioner (GST), Ministry Of Finance (Department Of Revenue)

Biogenetic Drugs Private Limited Versus Union of India Through The Commissioner (GST), Ministry Of Finance (Department Of Revenue)
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1136 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-10-2018
D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15274/2018
GST
Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq And Mr. Justice Goverdhan Bardhar
For the Petitioner(s) : Shri Naresh Kumar
For the Respondent(s) : Shri R.D. Rastogi, Addl. Solicitor, General with Shri Samit Bishnoi, Shri Nik

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Kichha Sugar Company Ltd. Versus CGST CC & C.E., Dehradun

Kichha Sugar Company Ltd. Versus CGST CC & C.E., Dehradun
Central Excise
2018 (10) TMI 1151 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 3-10-2018
Excise Appeal No.E/52210 & 52211/2018 -EX [SM] – A/53107-53108/2018
Central Excise
Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial)
For the Appellant : Mr.Himanshu Bansal, Advocates
For the Respondent : Mr.P. Juneja, D.R.
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
Present order dispose of 2 appeals against Order-in-Appeal No. DDN – CE-000-APPL-DDN-RUDRAPUR -24-25 17-18 dated 12.03.2018. Though there have been 2 show cause notices and 2 Orders-in-Original but both the Order in Originals have been adjudicated vide one common Order-in-Appeal. Hence, a common order for both these appeals. Details are as follows:-
Sl.No.
Appeal No.
SCN date
Period involved
Amount involved
O-I-O Date
O-I-A Date
1
E/52210/18
24.06.18
June 15 to March 16
12,22,586/- & same amt. Of penalty
31.03.2017
12.03.2018
2.
E/52211/'18
29.09.15
September

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

alty was also proposed. The demand confirmed by the Order-in- Original dated 31.03.2017 & 23.11.2016 were Rs. 12,22,586 & Rs. 3,41,336/-.
3. Being aggrieved of both the orders, appellant moved an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals), who dismissed both the appeals vide the impugned common order. Being aggrieved is the present appeal.
4. I have heard Mr. Himanshu Bansal, ld. Advocate for the appellant and Mr.P. Juneja, ld. DR for the Department.
5. It is mentioned on behalf of appellant that the goods in dispute are bagasse and press-mud. These goods are impressed upon to be the waste being by-product of manufacture of V P Sugar & molasses. Department is alleged to have confirmed the demand for an amount of 6% to be required to be paid on the clearance of such waste relying upon Rule 6 (3) of CCR.
5.1 Ld. Counsel has submitted the following case laws:-
1. Union of India vs. DSCL Sugar Ltd. – 2015 (322) |E.L.T. 769 (S.C.)
2. M/s. Simbhaoli Sugar Ltd. vs. CCE, Noida in Appeal No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

re. These are only an agricultural waste and residue which itself is not the result of any process and in the absence of manufacture, there cannot be any excise duty. The Hon'ble Apex Court further clarified that since it is not a manufacture, Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules shall have no application. For the better appreciation Rule 6 is reproduced herein below:-
“Rule 6(1) The Cenvat credit shall not be allowed on such quantity of inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted goods or for provision of exempted services, or input service used in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted goods and their clearance upto the place of removal or for provision of exempted service except in the circumstances mentioned in sub-rule (2):
Provided that the CENVAT credit on inputs………………
8.1 This rule was amended w.e.f. 01.03.2015 by inserting:
Explanation 1:- For the purposes of this rule, exempted goods or final products as defined in clauses (d) and (h) o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s AS Steel Traders Versus Union of India

M/s AS Steel Traders Versus Union of India
GST
2018 (10) TMI 1240 – TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 414 (A. P.)
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 3-10-2018
Writ Petition Nos. 32259 and 33573 of 2018
GST
Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan And Smt Justice Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi
For the Petitioner : Venkata Rangadas Kanuri
For the Respondent : K Lakshman Ast Sol Gen
COMMON ORDER:
{PER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN}
Heard Sri K.S.Ravi Shankar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CGST and, with their consent, both these writ petitions are disposed of at the stage of admission.
The dispute, in both these writ petitions, relate to the validity of the order passed by the Joint Commissioner, Visakhapatnam on 27.06.2018 rejecting the petitioners' request to receive their return in FORM GST TRAN-1 which would enable them to claim in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nding Counsel, would draw our attention to the letter addressed by the petitioners on 19.02.2018 to submit that, even on their own admission, the petitioners did not seek to file the return in FORM GST TRAN-1 by 27.12.2017; and they had, in fact, admitted having attempted to do so only on 28.12.2017. The fact, however, remains that the question, whether or not the petitioners had attempted to file their return in FORM GST TRAN-1 on 27.12.2017, has not been examined by the Joint Commissioner in the impugned order.
In the impugned order dated 27.06.2018, the Joint Commissioner rejected the petitioners' plea of server error/technical difficulties in filing FORM GST TRAN-1 on 27.12.2017, holding that the statistics showed that several such returns were filed between 24.12.2017 and 27.12.2017; and there appeared to be no technical glitch/system related matter that prevented the petitioners from filing their TRAN-1 in time.
The Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Cus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7(1A) of the CGST Rules, power has been conferred on the Commissioner, on the recommendations of the GST Council, to extend the date for submitting the declaration electronically in FORM GST TRAN-1 by a further period not beyond 31.03.2019 in respect of registered persons who could not submit the said declaration by the due date on account of technical difficulties on the common portal, and in respect of whom the Council has made a recommendation for such extension.
The very fact that the Government of India has, itself, issued a notification amending the Rules is its recognition of the fact that certain dealers were unable to electronically submit their declarations in FORM GST TRAN-1 on 27.12.2017. Pursuant to Notification No.48/2018, the Commissioner (GST) issued Order No.4/2018-GST dated 17.09.2018 exercising his powers under Rule 117(1A) of the CGST Rules, to extend the period for submitting the declarations in FORM GST TRAN-1 till 31.01.2019 for the class of registered persons w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
G.S.R. 74/P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(20)/2018 Dated:- 3-10-2018 Punjab SGST
GST – States
Punjab SGST
Punjab SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
(EXCISE AND TAXATION-II BRANCH)
NOTIFICATION
The 3rd October, 2018
No. G.S.R.74/P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(20)/2018.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Punjab Act No.5 of 2017), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab, on the recommendations of the Council, is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
RULES
1. (1) These rules may be called the Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
(2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, they shall be deemed to have come into force on and with effect from the 04th September, 2018.
2. In the Punjab Goods and Services

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

registered person.”.
4. In the said rules, in rule 55, in sub-rule (5), after the words “completely knocked down condition”, the words “or in batches or lots” shall be inserted.
5. In the said rules, in rule 89, in sub-rule (4), for clause (E), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-
'(E) “Adjusted Total Turnover” means the sum total of the value of-
(a) the turnover in a State or a Union territory, as defined under clause (112) of section 2, excluding the turnover of services; and
(b) the turnover of zero-rated supply of services determined in terms of clause (D) above and non-zero-rated supply of services, excluding-
(i) the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies; and
(ii) the turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under sub-rule (4A) or sub-rule (4B) or both, if any, during the relevant period.'.
6. In the said rules, with effect from the 23rd October, 2017, in rule 96, for sub-rule (10), the following sub-rule shall be s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

f India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R 1272(E), dated the 13th October, 2017 or notification No. 79/2017-Customs, dated the 13th October, 2017 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R 1299 (E), dated the 13th October, 2017.”.
7. In the said rules, in rule 138A, in sub-rule (1), after the proviso the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided further that in case of imported goods, the person in charge of a conveyance shall also carry a copy of the bill of entry filed by the importer of such goods and shall indicate the number and date of the bill of entry in Part A of FORM GST EWB-01.”.
8. In the said rules, for FORM GST REG-20, the following FORM shall be substituted, namely:-
“FORM GST REG-20
[See rule 22(4)]
Reference No. –
Date –
To
Name
Address
GSTIN/UIN
Show Cause Notice No. Date-
Order for dropping the proceedings for cancellation of registration
Th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

b worker and received back
1. GSTIN –
2. (a) Legal name –
(b) Trade name, if any –
3. Period: Quarter – Year –
4. Details of inputs/capital goods sent for jobwork (includes inputs/capital goods directly sent to place of business /premises of job worker)
GSTIN/State in case of Unregistered job-worker
Challan No.
Challan date
Description of goods
UQC
Quantity
Taxable value
Type of goods (Inputs/capital goods)
Rate of tax (%)
Central tax
State/UT tax
Integrated tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
5. Details of inputs/capital goods received back from job worker or sent out from business place of job work (A) Details of inputs/ capital goods received back from job worker to whom such goods were sent for job work; and losses and wastes:
GSTIN/ State of job worker if unregistered
Challan No. issued by job worker under which goods have been received back
Date of challan issued by job worker under which goods have been received back
Description of goods
UQC

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

remises of job worker; and losses and wastes:
GSTIN/State of job worker if unregistered
Invoice
No. in case supplied from premises of job worker issued by the Principal
Invoice date in case supplied from premises of job worker issued by the Principal
Description of goods
UQC
Quantity
Original challan no. under which goods have been sent for job work
Original challan date under which goods have been sent for job work
Nature of job work done by job worker
Losses & wastes
UQC
Quantity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7*
8*
9
10
11
Instructions:
1. Multiple entry of items for single challan may be filled.
2. Columns (2) & (3) in Table (A) and Table (B) are mandatory in cases where fresh challan are required to be issued by the job worker. Otherwise, columns (2) & (3) in Table (A) and Table (B) are optional.
3. Columns (7) & (8) in Table (A), Table (B) and Table (C) may not be filled where one-to-one correspondence between goods sent for job work and goods received back after job wor

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

2C)
B
Supplies made to registered persons (B2B)
C
Zero rated supply (Export) on payment of tax (except supplies to SEZs)
D
Supply to SEZs on payment of tax
E
Deemed Exports
F
Advances on which tax has been paid but invoice has not been issued (not covered under (A) to (E) above)
G
Inward supplies on which tax is to be paid on reverse charge basis
H
Sub-total (A to G above)
I
Credit Notes issued in respect of transactions specified in (B) to (E) above (-)
J
Debit Notes issued in respect of transactions specified in (B) to (E) above (+)
K
Supplies / tax declared through Amendments (+)
L
Supplies / tax reduced through Amendments (-)
M
Sub-total (I to L above)
N
Supplies and advances on which tax is to be paid (H + M) above
5
Details of Outward supplies on which tax is not payable as declared in returns filed during the financial year
A
Zero rated supply (Export) without payment of tax
B
Supply to SEZs without payment of tax
C
Supplies on which tax is to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rom SEZs)
Inputs
Capital Goods
Input Services
C
Inward supplies received from
Inputs
unregistered persons liable to reverse charge (other than B above)on which tax is paid & ITC availed
Capital Goods
Input Services
D
Inward supplies received from registered persons liable to reverse charge (other than B above) on which tax is paid and ITC availed
Inputs
Capital Goods
Input Services
E
Import of goods (including supplies from SEZs)
Inputs
Capital Goods
F
Import of services (excluding inward supplies from SEZs)
G
Input Tax credit received from ISD
H
Amount of ITC reclaimed (other than B above) under the provisions of the Act
I
Sub-total (B to H above)
J
Difference (I – A above)
K
Transition Credit through TRAN-I (including revisions if any)
L
Transition Credit through TRAN-II
M
Any other ITC availed but not specified above
N
Sub-total (K to M above)
O
Total ITC availed (I+N above)
7
Details of ITC Reversed and Ineligible ITC as declared in returns f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rrent financial year (E + F + J)
Pt. IV
Details of tax paid as declared in returns filed during the financial year
9
Description
Tax Payable
Paid through cash
Paid through ITC
Central Tax
State Tax/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
Cess
Interest
Late fee
Penalty
Other
Pt. V
Particulars of the transactions for the previous FY declared in returns of April to September of current FY or upto date of filing of annual return of previous FY whichever is earlier
10
Description
Taxable Value
Central Tax
State Tax/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
Supplies/tax declared through Amendments (+) (net of debit notes)
11
Supplies/ tax reduced through Amendments (-) (net of credit notes)
12
Reversal of ITC availed during previous financial year
13
ITC availed for the previous financial year
14
Differential tax paid on account of declaration in 10 & 11 above
Description
Payable
Paid
1
2
3
Integra

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Wise Summary of Inward supplies
HSN Code
UQC
Total Quantity
Taxable Value
Rate of Tax
Central Tax
State Tax/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
19
Late fee payable and paid
Description
Payable
Paid
1
2
3
A
Central Tax
B
State Tax
Verification:
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from and in case of any reduction in output tax liability the benefit thereof has been/will be passed on to the recipient of supply.
Signature
Name of Authorised Signatory
Designation / Status
Place
Date
Instructions: –
1. Terms used:
a. GSTIN: Goods and Services Tax Identification Number
b. UQC: Unit Quantity Code
c. HSN: Harmonized System of Nomenclature Code
2. The details for the period between July 2017 to March 2018 are to be provided in this return.
3. Part II consists of the details of all outward supplies & advance

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

harge basis. Details of debit and credit notes are to be mentioned separately. Table 4A and Table 4C of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
4C
Aggregate value of exports (except supplies to SEZs) on which tax has been paid shall be declared here. Table 6A of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
4D
Aggregate value of supplies to SEZs on which tax has been paid shall be declared here. Table 6B of GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
4E
Aggregate value of supplies in the nature of deemed exports on which tax has been paid shall be declared here. Table 6C of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
4F
Details of all unadjusted advances i.e. advance has been received and tax has been paid but invoice has not been issued in the current year shall be declared here. Table 11A of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
4G
Aggregate value of all inward supplies (including advances and net of credit and debit note

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

4J) and refund vouchers shall be declared here. Table 9A and Table 9C of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
5A
Aggregate value of exports (except supplies to SEZs) on which tax has not been paid shall be declared here. Table 6A of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
5B
Aggregate value of supplies to SEZs on which tax has not been paid shall be declared here. Table 6B of GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
5C
Aggregate value of supplies made to registered persons on which tax is payable by the recipient on reverse charge basis. Details of debit and credit notes are to be mentioned separately. Table 4B of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details.
5D,5E and 5F
Aggregate value of exempted, Nil Rated and Non-GST supplies shall be declared here. Table 8 of FORM GSTR-1 may be used for filling up these details. The value of “no supply” shall also be declared here.
5H
Aggregate value of credit notes issued in respect of sup

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

reverse charge basis.
4. Part III consists of the details of all input tax credit availed and reversed in the financial year for which the annual return is filed. The instructions to fill Part III are as follows:
Table No.
Instructions
6A
Total input tax credit availed in Table 4A of FORM GSTR-3B for the taxpayer would be auto-populated here.
6B
Aggregate value of input tax credit availed on all inward supplies except those on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis but includes supply of services received from SEZs shall be declared here. It may be noted that the total ITC availed is to be classified as ITC on inputs, capital goods and input services. Table 4(A)(5) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details. This shall not include ITC which was availed, reversed and then reclaimed in the ITC ledger. This is to be declared separately under 6(H) below.
6C
Aggregate value of input tax credit availed on all inward supplies received from unregistered persons (o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ort of services (excluding inward supplies from SEZs) shall be declared here. Table 4(A)(2) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
6G
Aggregate value of input tax credit received from input service distributor shall be declared here. Table 4(A)(4) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
6H
Aggregate value of input tax credit availed, reversed and reclaimed under the provisions of the Act shall be declared here.
6J
The difference between the total amount of input tax credit availed through FORM GSTR-3B and input tax credit declared in row B to H shall be declared here. Ideally, this amount should be zero.
6K
Details of transition credit received in the electronic credit ledger on filing of FORM GST TRAN-I including revision of TRAN-I (whether upwards or downwards), if any shall be declared here.
6L
Details of transition credit received in the electronic credit ledger after filing of FORM GST TRAN-II shall be declared here.
6M
Details of I

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

shall be auto-populated in this table. This would be the aggregate of all the input tax credit that has been declared by the corresponding suppliers in their FORM GSTR-I.
8B
The input tax credit as declared in Table 6B and 6H shall be auto-populated here.
8C
Aggregate value of input tax credit availed on all inward supplies (except those on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis but includes supply of services received from SEZs) received during July 2017 to March 2018 but credit on which was availed between April to September 2018 shall be declared here. Table 4(A)(5) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
8E & 8F
Aggregate value of the input tax credit which was available in FORM GSTR-2A(table 3 & 5 only) but not availed in any of the FORM GSTR-3B returns shall be declared here. The credit shall be classified as credit which was available and not availed or the credit was not availed as the same was ineligible. The sum total of both the rows should be

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ts to any of the supplies already declared in the returns of the previous financial year but such amendments were furnished in Table 9A, Table 9B and Table 9C of FORM GSTR-1 of April to September of the current financial year or date of filing of Annual Return for the previous financial year, whichever is earlier shall be declared here.
12
Aggregate value of reversal of ITC which was availed in the previous financial year but reversed in returns filed for the months of April to September of the current financial year or date of filing of Annual Return for previous financial year, whichever is earlier shall be declared here. Table 4(B) of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
13
Details of ITC for goods or services received in the previous financial year but ITC for the same was availed in returns filed for the months of April to September of the current financial year or date of filing of Annual Return for the previous financial year whichever is earlier shall be d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

value of taxes paid out of the total value of confirmed demand as declared in 15E above shall be declared here. Aggregate value of demands pending recovery out of 15E above shall be declared here.
16A
Aggregate value of supplies received from composition taxpayers shall be declared here. Table 5 of FORM GSTR-3B may be used for filling up these details.
16B
Aggregate value of all deemed supplies from the principal to the job-worker in terms of sub-section (3) and sub-section (4) of Section 143 of the CGST Act shall be declared here.
16C
Aggregate value of all deemed supplies for goods which were sent on approval basis but were not returned to the principal supplier within one eighty days of such supply shall be declared here.
17 & 18
Summary of supplies effected and received against a particular HSN code to be reported only in this table. It will be optional for taxpayers having annual turnover upto ₹ 1.50 Cr. It will be mandatory to report HSN code at two digits level fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

yable as declared in returns filed during the financial year
A
Taxable
B
Exempted, Nil-rated
C
Total
7
Details of inward supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis (net of debit/credit notes) declared in returns filed during the financial year
Description
Taxable Value
Central Tax
State Tax/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
6
A
Inward supplies liable to reverse charge received from registered persons
B
Inward supplies liable to reverse charge received from unregistered persons
C
Import of services
D
Net Tax Payable on (A), (B) and (C) above
8
Details of other inward supplies as declared in returns filed during the financial year
A
Inward supplies from registered persons (other than 7A above)
B
Import of Goods
Pt.III
Details of tax paid as declared in returns filed during the financial year
9
Description
Total tax payable
Paid
1
2
3
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State/UT Tax
Cess
Interest
Late fee
Penalty
Pt.IV
Pa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

5
6
7
8
A
Total Refund claimed
Total Refund sanctioned
B
C
Total Refund Rejected
D
Total Refund Pending
E
Total demand of taxes
F
Total taxes paid in respect of E above
G
Total demands pending out of E above
16
Details of credit reversed or availed
Description
Central Tax
State Tax/UT Tax
Integrated Tax
Cess
1
2
3
4
5
A
Credit reversed on opting in the composition scheme (-)
B
Credit availed on opting out of the composition scheme (+)
17
Late fee payable and paid
Description
Payable
Paid
1
2
3
A
Central Tax
B
State Tax
Verification:
I hereby solemnly affirm and declare that the information given herein above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed there from and in case of any reduction in output tax liability the benefit thereof has been/will be passed on to the recipient of supply.
Place
Signature
Name of Authorised Signatory
Designation / Status
Date
Instructions: –
1. The de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

these details.
6B
Aggregate value of exempted, Nil Rated and Non-GST supplies shall be declared here.
7A
Aggregate value of all inward supplies received from registered persons on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis shall be declared here. Table 4B, Table 5 and Table 8A of FORM GSTR-4 may be used for filling up these details.
7B
Aggregate value of all inward supplies received from unregistered persons (other than import of services) on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis shall be declared here. Table 4C, Table 5 and Table 8A of FORM GSTR-4 may be used for filling up these details.
7C
Aggregate value of all services imported during the financial year shall be declared here. Table 4D and Table 5 of FORM GSTR-4 may be used for filling up these details.
8A
Aggregate value of all inward supplies received from registered persons on which tax is payable by the supplier shall be declared here. Table 4A and Table 5 of FORM GSTR-4 may be used for filling up these det

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ared here.
5. Part V consists of details of other information. The instruction to fill Part V are as follows:
Table No.
Instructions
15A, 15B, 15C and 15D
Aggregate value of refunds claimed, sanctioned, rejected and pending for processing shall be declared here. Refund claimed will be the aggregate value of all the refund claims filed in the financial year and will include refunds which have been sanctioned, rejected or are pending for processing. Refund sanctioned means the aggregate value of all refund sanction orders. Refund pending will be the aggregate amount in all refund application for which acknowledgement has been received and will exclude provisional refunds received. These will not include details of non-GST refund claims.
15E, 15F and 15G
Aggregate value of demands of taxes for which an order confirming the demand has been issued by the adjudicating authority has been issued shall be declared here. Aggregate value of taxes paid out of the total value of confirmed de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.

The Punjab Goods and Services Tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2018.
G.S.R. 76 /P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(22)/2018 Dated:- 3-10-2018 Punjab SGST
GST – States
Punjab SGST
Punjab SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
(EXCISE AND TAXATION BRANCH-II)
NOTIFICATION
The 3rd October, 2018
No. G.S.R.76 /P.A.5/2017/S.164/Amd.(22)/2018.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Punjab Act No.5 of 2017), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab, on the recommendations of the Council, is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely:-
RULES
1. (1) These rules may b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Waive the late fee FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTR-4, FORM GSTR-6.

Waive the late fee FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTR-4, FORM GSTR-6.
S.O. 143/P.A.5/2017/S.128/2018 Dated:- 3-10-2018 Punjab SGST
GST – States
Punjab SGST
Punjab SGST
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
(EXCISE AND TAXATION-II BRANCH)
NOTIFICATION
The 3rd October, 2018
No. S.O. 143/P.A.5/2017/S.128/2018.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Punjab Act No.5 of 2017), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab, on the recommendations of the Council, is pleased to waive the late fee paid under section 47 of the said Act, by the following classes of taxpayers:-
(i) the registered persons whose return in FORM GSTR-3B of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai North

M/s. Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai North
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 813 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 3-10-2018
Appeal No. E/42330/2017 – Final Order No. 42518/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Shri M. Kannan, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
The appellants are engaged in manufacture of radiator caps and are availing the facility of CENVAT credit of service tax paid on various input services. During the period from April 2015 to June 2015, it was noticed that they have availed CENVAT credit, inter alia, on Clearing & Forwarding domestic supply, travel agents service and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

al services paid to M/s. McKinsey & Co. for the market analysis and related services done by them. Such services were availed by the appellant for the manufacture of products and the appellant had produced the invoices supporting their contention. The authorities below has disregarded the invoices stating that the scope of the services provided by the service provider is not coming forth from such invoices. He also relied upon Order-in-Original No. 62/2018 dated 15.5.2018, in their own case, to argue that for the subsequent period the adjudicating authority had allowed the input service credit in respect of the very same service.
3. The ld. AR Shri S. Govindarajan supported the findings in the impugned order.
4. Heard both sides.
5. The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in relation to after-market acceleration, which indicates that these are services for market analysis. The said services fall within the inclusive part of the definition. Therefore, I am of the view that the disallowance of credit on such services is not justified. Further, for the subsequent period, as stated in the order-in-original in the appellant's own case, credit on the same services has been allowed. For these reasons, I hold that the impugned order requires to be modified to the extent of allowing the credit in respect of professional (management consultancy) service availed for market analysis service, which I hereby do. The appeal is partly allowed in the above terms, with consequential relief, if any.
(Dictated and pronounced i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CCL Products India Ltd Versus CCT, Guntur – GST

CCL Products India Ltd Versus CCT, Guntur – GST
Central Excise
2018 (11) TMI 814 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – 2019 (369) E.L.T. 780 (Tri. – Hyd.)
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 3-10-2018
E/30739/2018 – A/31270/2018
Central Excise
Mr. P.K. CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri Karan Talwar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri V.R. Pavan Kumar, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
1. The appeal is filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No.GUNEXCUS-000-APP-232-17-18 dated 15.03.2018.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant is a 100% EOU and is engaged in the manufacture of Instant/Soluble Coffee classifiable under Chapter 21 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff, 1985. In the course of its regular business operation, the appellant is availing Cenvat Credit on various inputs, capital goods and input services. The appellant has availed “product recall liability insurance” for its goods manufactured at its facility for the period from

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

penalty under Rule 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On appeal, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant/assessee and hence, the present appeal before the Tribunal.
3. Ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant company submits that the services of “product liability insurance” and “product recall liability insurance” are in relation to manufacturing and are availed before clearing of goods from the factory. It is his submission that they have paid the premium for “product liability insurance” and “product recall liability insurance” before clearance of final product from the factory gate. The premium paid for the insurance is forming part of the cost of final product and products covered under the “product liability insurance” and “product recall liability insurance” are attractive to the distributors of the appellant and hence helps in increasing the marketability of the products. It is further submitted that “product liability insuranc

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onsumer Protection Act, 1986, Legal Metrology Act, 2009, etc., and it is essential for the business of the appellant that the risks are protected through insurance. It is further submitted that “product liability insurance” and “product recall liability insurance” are continuous policies covering risks arising in relation to the manufacture of final products and accordingly, the insurance services fall under the ambit of input services and the appellant had rightly availed credit of the same. The learned advocate relied upon various case laws in support of his submissions.
4. Learned Departmental Representative reiterates the orders of the lower authorities.
5. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records.
6. I find that the issue that arises for consideration is whether the appellant is eligible for credit of the service tax paid on “product liability insurance” and “product recall liability insurance”. The department has denied the same on the ground that it is a post manufactu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tanya Communications Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam – GST

Tanya Communications Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam – GST
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 1520 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 3-10-2018
Appeal No.ST/30777 & 30778/2018 – A/31267-31268/2018
Service Tax
Mr. P.K. Choudhary, Member (Judicial)
Shri Venkata Prasad, Representative (CA) for the Appellant.
Shri B. Guna Ranjan, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent.
ORDER
Per: P.K. Choudhary
1. The appeal is filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No. VIZ-EXCUS- 001-APP-324-325-17-18 dated 28.03.2018.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant is engaged in the activity of civil construction and electrical installation works. They have entered into contracts with their clients which are

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

from 01.09.2004 to 30.09.2007.
4. As far as Appeal No.ST/30777/2018 is concerned, I find that there has been a delay in sanctioning the refund claim beyond the period of three months from the date of filing of the refund claim/application. The appellant is eligible for interest at the applicable rate on the amount of refund sanctioned in terms of Sec. 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants have claimed an amount of Rs. 52,915/-. It is a settled position of law that interest under Sec. 11BB should be allowed to the assessee whenever there is delay in sanctioning the refund beyond the period of three months from the date of filing of the application for refund. It is therefore observed that the interest amount may be recalculated

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Bhutoria Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: M/s. Bhutoria Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (12) TMI 143 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 461 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 3-10-2018
GST-ARA- 64/2018-19/B-125
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, (MEMBER)
PROCEEDINGS
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Bhutoria Refrigeration Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following issue.
“Whether the Fan Coil unit is covered under HSN Code 8418 under Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.”
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act ar

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t exchanger or 'coil' and fan. It consists of three basic components fan motor, heat exchanger and PCB which is connected with the valves to control the flow of water as per the set temperature. FCU are used as the terminal units for centralised System for heat exchanging.
FCU consists of the following components:
Fan Motor and Fan Blower: Fan motor is used for rotating impeller of the fan blower at certain rpm to provide desired air volume for specific capacity of unit. Fan blower could be with plastic impeller or metal impeller depending on requirement. The Fan speed can be changed through PCB of unit.
Heat Exchanger: Heat exchangers are group of copper coils arranged in rows with aluminium fins, where copper tubes carry chilled water, which absorbs heat from air passed over it by fan motor.
PCB: PCB is the printed circuit board, also the brain of the Fan Coil Unit. It controls the fan speed and water flow depending upon logic as per set mode, set temperature, room temperature an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

customers.
STATEMENT CONTAINING APPLICANT'S INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND/OR FACTS, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN RESPECT OF QUESTION(S) ON WHICH ADVANCE RULING IS REQUIRED.
1. That the applicant is registered under GST primarily to pay GST on the outward supply of Refrigerating equipments/ parts such as Fan Coil Unit, Valves, Actuator, Thermostat, etc.
2. That the applicant is engaged to supply “Fan Coil Unit with standard spare parts and accessories”
3. That in the instant case, Fan Coil Unit (FCU) is a device consisting of three basic components fan motor, heat exchanger and PCB which is connected with the valves to control the flow of water as per the set temperature. FCU is used to freeze the water, supplied through pumps, to cool the area where the machine is installed.
4. That as per the General Rules of Interpretation to the First Schedule of Customs Tariff Act 1975, goods are to be satisfied according to the terms of the headings and any relative Section or Chapter Notes. The said

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Hon'ble Authority to pronounce the ruling, i.e. the appropriate HSN Code for the Chilled Water Fan Coil Unit in the instant case, based on the interpretation of law;
9. That the applicant craves leave to add / modify any of the above ground during the course of hearing
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for Preliminary hearing on 04.09.2018 when Shri Mahesh Bhattar, C.A., along with Ms. Nikita Mehta, C.A. appeared and made contentions for admission of application . Jurisdictional Officer Sh. Hemant Deokate, Dy. Commr, Of S.T.(E-501) Nodal division – 10, Mumbai was appeared and stated that they will make submissions in due course.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 19.09.2018, Sh. Mahesh Bhattar, C.A., along with Ms. Nikita Mehta, C.A. and Sh. K. K. Saraf, Advisor and Sh. Manish Banttar, Accounts head appeared and made oral and written contentions.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

in rpm to provide desired air volume for specific capacity of unit. Fan blower could be with plastic impeller or metal impeller depending on requirement. The Fan speed can be changed through PCB of unit.
2. Heat Exchanger: Heat exchangers are group of copper coils arranged in rows with aluminium fins, where copper tubes carry chilled water, which absorbs heat from air passed over it by fan motor.
3. PCB: PCB is the printed circuit board, also the brain of the Fan Coil Unit. It controls the fan speed and water flow depending upon logic as per set mode, set temperature, room temperature and in some cases also water temperature. There are different modes like cooling, dry, heat or fan mode depending upon the application of the unit.
4. Main Drain Pan: Main drain pan are used for collecting condensate water generated at the heat exchanger during process of cooling. This water is drain out through drain pan through drainage lines through gravity of drain or drain water is pumped out usin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

use and whether it itself has independent existence and use and where it is actually used i.e whether in Air Conditioning or Refrigeration.
We find that Fan Coil Unit (FCU) is a simple device consisting of a heating and or cooling heat exchanger or 'Coil' and fan. It is a part of HVAC system found in residential, commercial and industrial buildings. A FCU is a diverse device sometimes using ductwork and is used to control the temperature in space where it is installed or serve multiple spaces. It is controlled either by a manual on/off switch or by a thermostat which controls the throughput of water to the heat exchanger using a control valve and/or the fan speed.
Due to their simplicity and flexibility, FCUs can be more economical to install than ducted 100% Fresh Air Systems (VAV) or Central Heating Systems with air handling units or chilled beams.
FCUs circulate hot or cold water through a coil in order to condition a space. The unit gets its hot or cold water from a central plan

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

therefore in no way they would fall under GST Tariff Heading 8418.
Now we proceed to verify if FCU has a specific Tariff Heading Entry in CTH or Customs Tariff Heading where they would be specifically and clearly covered. On detailed examination and verification we could not locate any specific Tariff Heading under GST where FCUs would be covered.
In view of this we are constrained to ascertain the classification of FCU as per their nature and equipment of which they are specific parts and without which the main equipment cannot be stated to have come into existence.
In view of this now we have a look at the GST Tariff Heading 8415 which reads as under:-
8415 – Air Conditioning machines, comprising a motor driven fan and elements for changing the temperature and humidity, including these machines in which the humidity cannot be separately regulated.
From the detailed discussions about the exact nature and as to of which equipment the FCU is a part, we find that FCUs would clearl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8, 8466, 8473, 8503, 8522, 8529 or 8538 as appropriate. However, parts which are equally suitable for use principally with the goods of headings 8517 and 8525 to 8528 are to be classified in heading 8517;
(c) all other parts are to be classified in heading 8409, 8431, 8448, 8466, 8473, 8503, 8522, 8529 or 8538 as appropriate or, failing that, in heading 8487 or 8548.
Further we find that the plea of the applicant contending that their goods would be covered under 8418 on the basis of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in 2006(7) TMI- Supreme Court of India in the case of CCE Delhi versus Carrier Aircon Ltd. is not sustainable in view of the facts that the goods 'chillers' as discussed in this judgement had the basic function of chilling the water and were thus held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court to fall in Heading 8418 for Refrigerators and Freezers.
But we find that the basic function of a FCU is conditioning the temperature of a place or space and not freezing or refrigerating a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Leena Power Tech Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

In Re: Leena Power Tech Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
GST
2018 (12) TMI 591 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – 2019 (20) G. S. T. L. 309 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA – AAR
Dated:- 3-10-2018
GST-ARA-51/2018-19/B-124
GST
SHRI B.V. BORHADE, AND SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
(under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by LEENA POWER TECH ENGINEERS PVT LTD, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following ISSUE..
1. Whether CIDCO is covered under the definition of the term 'Government Entity' as per Notification No. 31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 October 2017?
2. If CIDCO falls under the definition of Government Ent

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he question(s) raised
1. The Applicant, M/s. Leena Powertech Engineers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the 'Applicant' or Company') is a company engaged in the business of Electrification projects, undertaking development of power supply infrastructure with various Government Entities.
2. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited ('CIDCO'), a 100% Government of Maharashtra owned Public sector Undertaking, is incorporated on 17th March 1970 under company's act 1956 as a Company having CIN – U9999MH1970SGC014574, registered Company limited by shares and as a State Government Company. Copy of the document from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs mentioning details about CIDCO is attached herewith for your reference.
3. CIDCO had invited a bid / tender for Power Supply Infrastructure Development work at various places in Navi Mumbai, including Ulwe. The contract involves composite activities of supply of material, laying of power cables, erection of th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under supporting documents section.
16. Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law and/or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the aforesaid question(s) (i.e. applicant's view point and submissions on issues on which the advance ruling is sought).
Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law and/or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the aforesaid question(s) (i.e. applicant's view point and submissions on issues on which the advance ruling is sought).
A. CIDCO is covered under the definition of “Government Entity” vide Notification No.31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) 13th October 2017
1. Without prejudice to the facts of the case, it is submitted that CIDCO shall be covered under the definition of the term Government Entity.
2. The term Government Entity is defined in the Notification No. 31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 October 2017. The relevant portion of the definition is reproduced below:
“Government Entity” means an authority or a bo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

esolve the problems of urban congestion in Bombay City. The development of these areas will also have to be integrated with the development of an industrial base in Maharashtra for exporting industries. With the growing support that the Central Government is giving to export oriented industries, the contemplated new town development in the above area will not only provide relief to Bombay City but will also accelerate the promotion of industries in the State and open out and speed up industrial development of the Konkan Region. Decongestion of industrial and office concentration in Bombay has now become an urgent problem and the proposed development of the above new township, if undertaken quickly, could save the situation even now from getting out of control. The projects is of such a character that involves planning and development of all sectors including commerce, trade, housing, etc. to combine into a well-balanced and well-planned township.
After careful consideration of the rel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iary company, which would act as an agent of Government for the development of the areas with a view to secure the above objectives.
The subsidiary company will in due course be notified as New Town Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act.
The subsidiary company will work under the control and supervision of the State Government in the General Administration Department.
By and order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra.”
b. Govt. of Maharashtra Notification dt. 20.3.1971, reproduced verbatim :
URBAN DEVELOPMENT. PUBLIC HEALTH AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT Sachivalaya. Bombay, 20the March 1971
Maharashtra Regional Planning and Planning Act, 1966
No. RPB. 1171-18124-1-W-
Whereas, the State Government is satisfied that it is expedient in public interest that the said area should be developed as a site for the proposed new town:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 113 of the said Act, the Governme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ndustrial and Investment Corporation of Maharashtra, a company owned and controlled by the State is at present equipped with the machinery for undertaking and completing the work involved speedily in developing any area as a new town.
Now, therefore in exercise of the power conferred by the sub-section(3A) of section 113 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (Mah. XXXVII of 1966), the Government of Maharashtra hereby declares the said subsidiary company to be the New Town Development Authority for the area comprised in the Site of New Bombay.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra.”
C. Govt. of Maharashtra Resolution dt. 24.1.1972, reproduced verbatim:
General Administration Department
Sachivalaya, Bombay, 24th January, 1972
Resolution No. CID-2072-U
Read: Government Resolution, Industries and Labour Department No. IDL-5770/IND-I, Dated 18th March, 1970
RESOLUTION:
Government has decided to entrust to the City and Industrial Development Corporat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e items referred to in sub-para(1) above, inclusive of administrative expenses thereon, plus agency remuneration at Rs, 3.00 lacs, for the year ended 31st March, 1971 to be increased each year by Rs. 1.00 lacs, subject to a maximum of Rs. 5.00 lacs for any one year, before remitting the remained to the Government.
3) The expenditure incurred by the Government on the acquisition of such lands should be treated as Government's own capital outlay and debited to the appropriate head of account and such lands on acquisition shall vest in the Corporation establishing New Bombay.
4) The Corporation may make “On Account Advance Payment” to Government from the proceeds of land disposal to meet Government expenditure on capital outlayon account of payment of compensation for land acquisition for New Bombay.
5) Such “On Account Advance Payment” made by the Corporation should be adjusted in due course.
This Resolution issues with concurrence of the Finance Department vide its unofficial re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t, Government of Maharashtra (holding 1 share)
7.
Shri. Samadhan Khatkale, Desk Officer, Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra (holding 1 share)
8.
Shri. Vinayak S. Chavan, Desk Officer, Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra (holding 1 share)
6. Further the broad objects of CIDCO are enumerated below:
a. To resolve the problems of urban congestion in Bombay city.; to attract Some of Bombay's population and absorb immigrants who would otherwise come to Bombay;
b. To reduce traffic congestion and burden on Bombay's physical infrastructure such as road transport, mass rapid transportation system
C. To provide physical and social services which would raise living standards and reduce disparities in the amenities available to different sections of the society;
d. To provide an environment which permits the citizens of the proposed new city to live fuller and richer life, free of physical and social tensions commonly associated with urban living;

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mitted that the contract undertaken by the applicant for CIDCO is eligible for 12% GST (CGST 6% + SGST 6%).
2. The relevant extract of the notification no. 31/2017 is reproduced below:
Particulars
Rate of Tax
Conditions
vi) Services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory, a local authority or a governmental authority by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of-
(a) a civil structure or any other original works meant predominantly for use other than for commerce, industry, or any other business or profession;
(b) a structure meant predominantly for use as (i)an educational, (ii) a clinical, or(iii) an art or cultural establishment; or
(c) a residential complex predominantly meant for self-use or the use of their employees or other persons specified in paragraph 3 of the Schedule III of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
6
 
The contract u

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aken is attached herewith for your reference.
5. Given this, the contract undertaken by the Applicant is covered by the term 'Original Works' to qualify for the impugned notification.
The Original Works are meant predominantly for use other than Commerce, Industry, Business or Profession
6. It is submitted that the original works established and constructed by the Applicant are meant predominantly for use other than Commerce, Industry, Business or Profession.
7. It is reiterated and emphasized that CIDCO is a Public Sector Undertaking incorporated as a Company to undertake functions entrusted by the State Government. Further, the basic function of CIDCO is to undertake town planning and development of areas so designated.
8. The supply of electricity to any human settlement township, city or district is a basic infrastructure essential for creation of such township. Given this such activity of establishing power supply networks by CIDCO is for creation of a new town for rehabilita

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

” because in the instant case, it is the State Government which has authorized the assessee to perform the development projects at Navi Mumbai, Vasai, Virar, Waluj and such other places.
40. We cannot agree with the argument of the DR that there is no document which has drawn out the Agent-Principal relationship, because the very first Resolution dated 18th March, 1970 mention in para no. 2 that “…………… which would act as an “agent” of Government for the development of the areas with a view to secure the above objective”, and in para no. 3 of this Resolution clearly say, “The subsidiary company will work under the control and supervision of the State Government in the General Administrative Department”. In our opinion, the first Resolution itself makes it clear that the assessee is to be an agent, but functions as an arm of the State Government, because, if the assessee can only work under the control and supervision of the State Government, meaning thereby that the assessee

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

g to MR&TP Act, 1966, the machinery sections, i.e. sections 113 & 113A talk of appointment of Development Authority and Local Authority and accordingly, through various Resolutions, in compliance of these sections, MR&TP Act has appointed the assessee as the Development Authority for development to new townships and Local Authorities for streamlining the functions of already existing towns like Aurangabad, Nashik, Nagpur etc. This, itself shows that the assessee is acting totally on behalf of the Government. Another distinguishing feature that can be seen in that as soon as the “Project” is complete, the project gets handed back to the State, i.e. when there is a development project, as per phases, and in the case of local authority, as and when the authorizing committee is satisfied, the reins are transferred to the municipal boards, from whom, the project was taken over, as we have seen from Resolution no. 10375 dated 06/08/2010.
43. In tune with these observations, read with secti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed by the Applicant is meant predominantly for use other than commerce, Industry, Business or profession so as to qualify for 12% GSI' rate as per Notification No. 24/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 21 September 2017 read with Notification NO. 31/ 2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 October 2017.
11. Alternatively, it is also submitted that the impugned contracts undertaken by the Applicant for CIDCO are meant for the residential location demarcated by CIDCO. For instance, the Power Supply Infrastructure Development work at R & R (Resettlement & Rehabilitation) Pockets under NMIA (Navi Mumbai International Airport) Projects, Navi Mumbai (Work Order No. CIDCO/EE(Elect-AP)/AP-001/2017/172 dated 21 June 2017] is for the Project Affected People of the Navi Mumbai International Airport Project.
12. Similarly, the following projects are also undertaken for the residential locations of the respective nodes viz„
a. Development of power supply infrastructure distribution network includi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Entity' as per Notification No. 31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 October 2017
Query
2. If CIDCO falls under the definition of Government Entity, Then Kindly also Clarify Whether the tax rate of 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%) is applicable to the contract entered into by the Applicant with CIDCO, in pursuance of Notification No. 24/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 21 September 2017 read with Notification No. 31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 October 2017?
Response
Yes, the contracts undertaken by the Applicant shall be covered by the notification no. 31/2017 for reasons elaborated above.
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be Seen thus-
As required the details with respect to applicant M/s. Leena Powertech Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant for short) and comments on the application filed by them for advance ruling are submitted as under:
(a) Classification of Service/Services as applicable.
i. Works contract service.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

also clarify where the tax rate of 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%) is applicable to the contract entered into by the applicant with CIDCO, in pursuance of Notification No.24/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 21st September; 2017 read with Notification No.31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 13th October, 2017?
(ii) The appellant is a registered company, carrying out the business works contracts which involves supply, erection, commissioning, installation and laying of power cables, transformers, RMU panels & other related civil work essentially leading to setting up of power supply networks with various government authority & entities..
(iii) The applicant has been awarded following work contracts by CIDCO:
a. Power supply infrastructure Development work at R & R (Rehabilitation & Resettlement) Pockets under NMIA (Navi Mumbai International Airport) Projects, Navi Mumbai (Work Order No CIDCO/EE (Elect-AP)/ AP-001/2017/172 dtd.21.06.2017) for the project affected people of the Navi Mumbai Inter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate, where required, by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever is earlier, (Provisions of paragraph 2 of this notification shall apply for valuation of this service)
9

(ii) composite supply of works contract as defined in clause 119 of section 2 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
9

(iii) Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, supplied  to the Governmental Authority or a Government Entity by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of, (a) a historical monument, archaeological site or remains of national importance, archaeological excavation, or antiquity specified under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 (24 of 1958); (b) canal, dam or other irrigation works;

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o the “Beneficiary led individual house construction / enhancement” under the Housing for All (Urban) Mission/Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana;
(e)  a pollution control or effluent treatment plant, except located as a part of a factory; or (f) a structure meant for funeral, burial or cremation of deceased.
6

(v) Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, or installation of original works pertaining to,- (a) railways, excluding monorail and metro; (b) a single residential unit otherwise than as a part of a residential complex; (c) low-cost houses up to a carpet area of 60 square metres per house in a housing project approved by competent authority empowered under the 'Scheme of Affordable Housing in Partnership' framed by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, Government of India; (d) low cost houses up to a carpet area

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

predominantly for use as (i) an educational, (ii) a clinical, or(iii) an art or cultural establishment; or (c) a residential complex predominantly meant for self-use or the use of their employees or other persons specified in paragraph 3 of the Schedule IIII of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
(vii) Construction services other than (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi) above.
6
 
(v) Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 was further amended vide Notification No. 31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017:
(a) to insert “Government Entity” in items (iii) & (vi)
(b) to insert condition in column No. 5 in items (iii) & (vi)
(c) to substitute item No. (vii)
(d) to insert Explanation (ix) & (x) in para 4
(vi) Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 was further amended vide Notification No.46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 to substitute the words 'Service the words “Composite Supply of works contract as defined

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

fined in clause 119 of section 2 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
9
 
 
 
(III) Composite supply of works contract as 6 defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, supplied to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory, a local authority or a Governmental Authority or a Government Entity by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of, -a) a historical monument, archaeological site or remains of national importance, archaeological excavation, or antiquity specified under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 (24 of 1958);(b) canal, dam or Other irrigation works; (c) pipeline, conduit or plant for (1) water supply (ii) water treatment, or (iii) sewerage treatment or disposal
6
Provided that where the services are supplied to Government Entity, they should have been procured by t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ny other original works pertaining to the “Beneficiary led individual house construction / enhancement” under the Housing for All (Urban) mission Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana;
(e) a pollution control or effluent treatment plant, except located as a part of a factory; or
(f) a structure meant for funeral, burial or cremation of deceased
6
 
 
 
(v) composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, or installation of original works pertaining to,
(a) railways, excluding monorail and metro;
(b) a single residential unit otherwise than as a part of a residential complex;
(c) low-cost houses up to ä carpet area of 60 square meters per house in a housing project approved by competent authority empowered under the Scheme of Affordable Housing in Partnership framed by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, Governmen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vation, or alteration of-
(a) a civil structure or any other original works meant predominantly for use other than for commerce, industry, or any other business or profession;
(b) a structure meant predominantly for use as (i) an educational; (ii) a clinical, or(iii) an art or cultural establishment; or
(c) a residential complex predominantly meant for self-use or the use of their employees or other persons specified in paragraph 3 of the Schedule III of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
6
Provided that where the services are supplied To a Government Entity, they should have been procured by the said entity in relation to a work entrusted to it by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority, as the case may be
 
 
(vii) Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, involving predominantly earth work (that is, constituting more than 75 per cent o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt or State Legislature; or ii) established by any Government, with 90per cent. or more participation by way of equity or control, to carry Out a function entrusted by the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or a local authority
(vii) The applicant has now claimed that with effect from 13.10.2017 their services are Covered by item (vi) in view of amendment to No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated attracting Central Tax @6% on the following grounds:
(a) CIDCO is covered by definition of “Government Entity” as per Explanation (x) in para 4 of Notification No. No- 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended.
(b) Their services are covered by item (vi) of Sr. No. 3 of No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017as amended attracting Central Tax @ 6%
(viii) The matter has been examined in the light of Govt. of Maharashtra's resolutions/Notification as below whether CIDCO is covered under the definition of the term “Government Entity” as per Notification No.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ent of Government for the development of the areas with a view to secure the above objectives. The subsidiary company will in due course be notified as New Town Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The subsidiary company will work under the control and supervision of the State Government in the General Administration Department.
b. Govt. of Maharashtra Notification dt 20.3.1971 :
And whereas, the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), a subsidiary company of the State Industrial and Investment Corporation of Maharashtra, a company owned and controlled by the State is at present equipped with the machinery for undertaking and completing the work involved speedily in developing any area as a new town.
Now, therefore in exercise of the potter conferred by the sub-section (3A) of section 113 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (Mah. XXXVII of 1966), t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

March, 1970, on behalf of the Government and to dispose of land to the extent appropriate. It should also rehabilitate the persons displace from the land acquired for the Project.
2) From the proceeds collected out of such disposals, the Corporation should recoup the expenditure it incurs on the items referred to in sub-para(l) above, inclusive of administrative expenses thereon, plus agency remuneration at Rs. 3.00 lacs, for the year ended 31st March, 1971 to be increased each year by Rs. 1.00 lacs, subject to a maximum of Rs. 5.00 lacs for any one year, before remitting the remained to the Government
3) The expenditure incurred by the Government on the acquisition of such lands should be treated as Government's own capital outlay and debited to the appropriate head of account and such lands on acquisition shall vest in the Corporation establishing New Bombay.
4) The Corporation may make “On Account Advance Payment” to Government from the proceeds of land disposal to meet Govern

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

amended by Notification No. 24/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) attracting Central Tax @6% as below:
Sl.No.
Chapter, Section or Heading
Description of Service
Rate (per cent.)
Condition
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
1.
Chapter 99
All Services
 
 
2.
Section 5
Construction services
 
 
3.
Section 5 Heading 9954 (Construction Services)
(vi) Services provided to the Central Government, 6 State Government, Union Territory, a local authority, a Governmental authority or a Government Entity by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of –
(a) a civil structure or any other original works meant predominantly for use Other than for commerce, industry, or any  other business or profession;
(b) a structure meant predominantly for use as (i) an educational, (ii) a clinical, or(iii) an art or cultural establishment; or
(c) a residential complex predominantly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cts.
(xii) As per para 1.3.1 of CPWD Manual, 2014, 'Original works” means (i) all new constructions, (ii) all types of addition, alterations and/or special repairs to newly acquired assets, abandoned or damaged assets that are required to make them workable. (iii) major replacements or remodeling of a portion of an existing structure or installation or other works, which results in a genuine increase in the life and value of the property. Taking into consideration the nature of works contracts allotted to the applicant, it is found that the works to be undertaken by them can be considered as “original work”.
(xiii) The appellant, however, has not mentioned the condition at column No. 5 of the table in their application for advance ruling. For availing concessional rate of Central Tax @6% in terms of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification No. 24/ 2017 – Central Tax (Rate), the condition is where the services are supplied to a Government Entity, they sho

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax read as amended. It is also mentioned that with effect from 14.11.2017 only such activity that is composite supply of works contract as defined in clause 119 of Section 2 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 would be eligible for benefit of the Notification against aforesaid Sr. No. and item NO. in view Of Notification No. 46/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dtd. 14.11.2017.
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for Preliminary hearing on dt. 07.08.2018 when Sh. S. V. Apte Advocate along with Sh. Amit Tekchandani, C. & M.D, and Sh. Ashish Singh Advocate appeared and made written and oral submissions for admission of application as per contentions in their ARA. Jurisdictional Officer, Sh. U. S. Rananaware, Suptt., CGST, Belapur appeared and made written submissions and stated that they do not have any objection with respect to admission of application. .
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 29.08.2018, Sh. S. V. Apte Advocat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ate) dated 13th October, 2017.
The portion relevant for the present case in respect of Notification No. 31/ 2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 13th October, 2017 is reproduced as under:-
Notification No. 31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated the 13th October, 2017
G.S.R….(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9, sub-section (1) of section 11, sub-section (5) of section 15 and sub-section (1) of section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, and on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.11/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 690(E), dated the 28th June, 2017, namely:-
In the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

graph 4, after clause (viii), the following clause shall be inserted, namely: –
“(ix) “Governmental Authority” means an authority or a board or any other body, –
(i) set up by an Act of Parliament or a State Legislature; or
(ii) established by any Government,
with 90per cent. or more participation by way of equity or control, to carry out any function entrusted to a Municipality under article 243W of the Constitution or to a Panchayat under article 243G of the Constitution.
(x) “Government Entity” means an authority or a board or any other body including a society, trust, corporation,
i) set up by an Act of Parliament or State Legislature; or
ii) established by any Government,
with 90per cent. or more participation by way of equity or control, to carry out a function entrusted by the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or a local authority.”.
We find that prior to the amendments as effected by the above Notification No. 31/2017, the original Notification

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

r 3, for item (vi) in column (3) and the entries relating thereto, in columns (3), (4) and (5), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
(3)
(4)
(5)
“(vi)Services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory, a local authority or a governmental authority by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of –
(a) a civil structure or any other original works meant predominantly for use other than for commerce, industry, or any other business or profession;
(b) a structure meant predominantly for use as (i) an educational, (ii) a clinical, or(iii) an art or cultural establishment; or
(c) a residential complex predominantly meant for self-use or the use of their employees or other persons specified in paragraph 3 of the Schedule III of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
6
 
(vii) Construction services other than (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi) ab

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, a Governmental authority or a Government Entity by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of-
(a) a civil structure or any other original works meant predominantly for use other than for commerce, industry, or any other business or profession;
(b) a structure meant predominantly for use as (i) an educational; (ii) a clinical, or(iii) an art or cultural establishment; or
(c) a residential complex predominantly “leant for self-use or the use of their employees or other persons specified in paragraph 3 of the Schedule III of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
6
Provided that where the services are supplied To a Government Entity, they should have been procured
by the said entity in relation to a work entrusted to it by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority, as the case may be
 
 
(vii) Composite supply of works contract as d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

uding a society, trust, corporation,
i) set up by an Act of Parliament or State Legislature; or
ii) established by any Government,
With 90 per cent. or more participation by way of equity or control, to carry out a function entrusted by the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or a local authority.”
From the detailed submissions in respect of the constitution and coming into existence of CIDCO as submitted by the applicant and also considered by the jurisdictional officer in his submission, we find as under:-
(I) Govt. of Maharashtra Resolution dt. 18.3.1970 as reproduced in Applicant's submissions above proposed for constitution of New Company as under:-
'Government has had under consideration the development of the trans-Thana and trans-Harbour areas in uran, Panvel and Thana Tehsils as a new township or new Metro centre with a view to decongesting industrial and other concentrations in Bombay and With a view generally to resolve the problems of urban congest

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

view of the tremendous impact this project will have on the industrial development of Maharashtra, Government has come to the conclusion that a subsidiary company of the State Industrial and Investment Corporation of Maharashtra, Bombay, would be a appropriate agency which would be entrusted with the present project. Government is accordingly pleased to allow the State Industrial and Investment Corporation of Maharashtra Limited, as required under Article 75 of the its Memorandum and Articles of Association, with the object of developing the trans-Thana and capital of Rs. 5 crores, with object of developing the trans-Thana and trans-Harbour areas in the Thana and Kolaba districts as a twin city to provide relief to Bombay City und also to ensure its integrated development with the industrial development of this region and the State. The Land proposed to be acquired by Government in trans-Thana and trans-Harbour areas should be entrusted to the subsidiary company, which would act as an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, the State Government is satisfied that it is expedient in public interest that the said area should be developed as a site for the proposed new town:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(1) of section 113 of the said Act, the Government of Maharashtra hereby designates the said area as the site for the proposed new town, which shall be known by the name of New Bombay”
And, whereas, having regard to the complexity and magnitude of the work involved in developing the area comprised in the site of the new town aforesaid the time which may be required for setting up new machinery for undertaking and completing such work of development and the comparative speed with which such work can be undertaken and completed in the public interest, if the work is done through the agency of a corporation or a company owned or controlled by the State or a subsidiary company thereof; the State Government is of opinion that such work of development of the area comprised in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mbay, 24th January, 1972
Resolution No. CID-2072-U
Read: Government Resolution, Industries and Labour Department No. IDL-5770/IND-I, Dated 18th March, 1970
RESOLUTION:
Government has decided to entrust to the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited, as New Town Development Authority, the task of development of the New City in Thana, Panvel and uran tahsils of Thana and Kolaba districts, and to acquire the privately owned land in that area for that project. The question of financing the development work of City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited has been under consideration for some time. Government is now pleased to issue the following instructions:
1) The Corporation should undertake all the development work, provide the social and physical infrastructure to attain the objectives laid down in the Government resolution, Industries and Labour Department No. IDL-5770/IND-I, dated 18th March, 1970, on behalf of the Government an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ount of payment of compensation for land acquisition for New Bombay.
5) Such “On Account Advance Payment” made by the Corporation should be adjusted in due course.
This Resolution issues with concurrence of the Finance Department vide its unofficial reference No.; 145/72/F-12 dated 24th January, 1972.
Thus from the details as above, we clearly find that CIDCO is constituted and established by the State Government of Maharashtra with 100% participation by way Of Equity or Control to carry out the function of development of new township of New Bombay and therefore CIDCO is clearly covered under the definition of 'Government Entity' ,
Now we proceed to the second question raised by the applicant which is as under:-
Question 2:- If CIDCO falls under the definition of Government Entity, Then Kindly also Clarify Whether the tax rate of 12% (CGST 6% + SGST 6%) is applicable to the contract entered into by the Applicant with CIDCO, in pursuance of Notification No. 24/2017 – Central Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mmerce, industry, or any other business or profession
Further they are claiming that they are fulfilling this condition also which is as under:-
“Provided that where the services are supplied to a Government Entity, they should have been procured by the said entity in relation to a work entrusted to it by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory or local authority, as the case may be”
From the detailed submissions made by the applicant as well as the jurisdictional officer we find that there is no doubt that CIDCO is a Government Entity.
Now we examine their second claim if they are providing services by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintainance, renovation or alteration of any other original works, apart from a civil structure, meant predominantly for use other than for commerce, industry, or any other business or profession.
With regard to the above we find that:-
(a) applicant in their application

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

o consideration the nature of works contracts allotted to the applicant, it is found that the works to be undertaken by them can be considered as “original work”
We find from the contracts that they are undertaking works as under:-
“Power Supply Infrastructure Development work at R&R Pockets under NMI
A Projects, Navi Mumbai. Development of power supply infrastructure distribution network including 33kV substation equipments &  onstruction of 11/0.4 KV HT substations and allied electrical works in Ulwe Node, Navi Mumbai.
Thus their works undertaken by them are in the nature of original works.
Now we proceed to ascertain whether they are fulfilling the conditions in respect of Government Entity as inserted vide Notification No. 31/ 2017 dated 13.10.2017 as referred above. In this respect we find that:-
(i) Appellant has not mentioned the condition at column NO. 5 of the table in their application for advance ruling. For availing concessional rate of Central Tax @6% in terms o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

for development. In this case also, the condition in Column 5 of the Table is fulfilled.
(ii) Therefore applicant is eligible for benefit of Sr. No. 3 of item no (vi)(a) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax read as amended. We find that with effect from 14.11.2017 only such activity that is composite supply of works contract as defined in clause 119 of Section 2 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 would be eligible for benefit of the Notification against aforesaid Sr. No. and item No. in view of Notification No. 46/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dtd. 14.11.2017.
05. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows :
ORDER
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-51/2018-19/B-124
Mumbai, dt. 03/10/2018
For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus –
Question 1:- Whether CIDCO is covered under the definit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST FOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURE IN DELIVERY KITCHEN RESTAURANT

GST FOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURE IN DELIVERY KITCHEN RESTAURANT
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kratant Khandelwal Dated:- 2-10-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-10-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
Dear Sir,
I am launching a delivery kitchen model for a restaurant where I will be only supplying food through my own riders and third party deliveries like zomato etc. Now my query is that I am incurring expenditure for kitchen equipment and construction and various other expenditures and paying GST @ 18% on them, will I be eligible for getting a refund on the same from the government? as my tax bracket lies in 5% under GST, and tax paid is at @ 18% for construction kitchen equipment lighting consultancy etc.
Reply By Yash Jain:

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TDS under gst

TDS under gst
Query (Issue) Started By: – ajit tiwary Dated:- 1-10-2018 Last Reply Date:- 2-10-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear all,
We all know TDS has been implemented under gst. My query is I have a client who runs his business in same state at four different location and taken one GST number now the question arises that whether they require only one registration or four different registration for deduction of TDS under gst. All the return like gate 3b and gate 1 have been filed as consolidated basis. Please suggest
Thanking you
Your faithfully
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
In my view your client is to take registration for each State.
Reply By Yash Jain:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

TDS Deduction and Deposit Rules Updated for DDOs under GST as per Circular No. 65/39/2018-DOR.

TDS Deduction and Deposit Rules Updated for DDOs under GST as per Circular No. 65/39/2018-DOR.
Circulars
GST
Modification to the Guidelines for Deductions and Deposits of TDS by the DDO under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Revenue collection for September 2018 crossed 94,000 crore

GST Revenue collection for September 2018 crossed 94,000 crore
GST
Dated:- 1-10-2018

GST Revenue collection for September 2018 crossed ₹ 94,000 crore
Revenues collected in September shows an upward trend as compared to August, 2018
The total gross GST revenue collected in the month of September, 2018 is ₹ 94,442 crore of which CGST is ₹ 15,318 crore, SGST is ₹ 21,061 crore, IGST is ₹ 50,070 crore (including ₹ 25,308 crore collected on imports)

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leoni Cable Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Versus The Union of India

Leoni Cable Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Versus The Union of India
GST
2018 (10) TMI 255 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – TMI
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 1-10-2018
WRIT PETITION NO. 5410 OF 2018
GST
M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
Mr. Bharat Raichandani with Ms. Ankita Vashistha I/b. UBR Legal, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. J. B. Mishra, for Respondent Nos.1,2, 4 and 5.
P.C:
This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks intervention

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. CRI Pumps Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Additional Commissioner of Customs, The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals – I) And Union of India

M/s. CRI Pumps Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Additional Commissioner of Customs, The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals – I) And Union of India
Central Excise
2018 (10) TMI 317 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – TMI
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 1-10-2018
W.P.No.25417 of 2018 And W.M.P.Nos.29578 & 29579 of 2018
Central Excise
Mr. K. Ravichandrabaabu J.
For the Petitioner : Mr.Raghavan Ramabadran
For the Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel (IT)
ORDER
Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel (IT) takes notice for the respondents and by consent of parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

7.
5. There is no dispute to the fact that before passing the impugned order, the petitioner was served with show cause notice, who in turn filed its reply to the same. Perusal of the impugned order would show that the Adjudicating Authority has considered the merits of the matter in detail and arrived at such conclusion. The contentions raised by the petitioner on merits of the matter, as well as the correctness or otherwise of the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, impugned in this writ petition, cannot be gone into at this stage by this Court, for giving any view on the same for the simple reason, that as against the said order, the petitioner is having a statutory appellate remedy before the Commissioner of Customs and Central

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

the same, on the face of it, is erroneous, so as to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court.
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at this juncture, fairly submitted that the petitioner is willing to file an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority, provided, such liberty is given to the petitioner. He also pointed out that the impugned order was not properly served on the petitioner and therefore, there can be some delay in filing such appeal, which this Court can consider and direct the Appellate Authority to entertain the appeal and decide the same on merits.
8. Considering the fact that this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition on the sole reason that the petitioner has to avail the alternative r

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner of CGST Mumbai West Versus M/s. JMSM Satellite (Singapore) PTE Limited

The Commissioner of CGST Mumbai West Versus M/s. JMSM Satellite (Singapore) PTE Limited
Service Tax
2018 (10) TMI 319 – BOMBAY HIGH COURT – 2019 (368) E.L.T. 61 (Bom.)
BOMBAY HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 1-10-2018
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 243 OF 2017
Service Tax
M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
Mr. M. Dwivedi with Mr. Sham Walve, for the Appellant.
Mr. V. Sridharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal, for the Respondent.
P.C:
Mr. Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel, appears for the Respondent and undertakes to file a Vakalatnama within a week from today.
2. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act), challenges the order dated 31st March, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
3. Mr. Dwivedi, on behalf of the Revenue tenders the following reframed question of law, for our consideration:
“Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rovide any output service in India.
6. The Respondent by its reply dated 20th March, 2015 resisted its show cause notice. However, the Commissioner of Service Tax by an order dated 28th August, 2015 confirmed the show cause notice. This, on the ground that the Respondent is not a service provider and, therefore, not entitled to Cenvat Credit. It proceeds on the basis that it was the Singapore entity which provides the services and not the Indian entity which took the Cenvat Credit. Thus, the Respondent was not entitled to the Cenvat Credit.
7. On Appeal, the Tribunal by the impugned order dated 31st March, 2017, held on facts that the authorities under the Act have proceeded on the erroneous assumption that there are two different entities namely MSS Singapore and MSS India, when in fact, there is only one entity – namely – Respondent herein, which is located in Singapore and also has office in India. Thereafter, it holds that it is an undisputed fact that the Respondent herein, was

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nt of having transacted in a 'taxable service', should such a registrant keep itself out of the purview of the tax net, the obligation to determine liability to tax shifts tot he 'proper officer'. Having registered itself under the appropriate provision, discharged its tax liability, such as it was, and complied with the obligation to submit returns, attempting a foray of the fundament by the two lower authorities is not only not sanctioned by law but is akin to excavation of the foundation after the superstructure is erecteda pointless exercise that only places impediments in the operations of a contributor to the foreign exchange reserves of the country and a provider of daily bread to thousands. With the registration and subsequent compliance with Finance Act, 1994 and Service Tax Rules, 1994, the appellant is clearly and undoubtedly within the ambit of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.”  
9. The observations would apply in the present facts. Therefore, when specifica

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. Charring Cross Hotels (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Salem

M/s. Charring Cross Hotels (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Salem
Service Tax
2018 (10) TMI 561 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 1-10-2018
ST/40558/2014 – 42529/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
For the Appellant : Shri S. Kannappan, Advocate
For the Respondent : Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR)
ORDER
PER BENCH
The appellant is aggrieved by the demand of service tax, interest and penalties confirmed by the adjudicating authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order.
2. On behalf of the appellant, ld. counsel Shri S.Kannappan submitted that the appellant is not contestin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ection 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the reason that during the said period the issue whether renting of immovable property was subject to levy of service tax was under much confusion and there were litigations pending before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The issue is still pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. UTV News Ltd. reported in 2018 (13) GSTL 3 (SC) as well as Mineral Area Development Authority and Others Vs. SAIL – (2011) 4 SCC 450.
3. The ld. AR Shri A. Cletus supported the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that there are no grounds to interfere in the impugned order.
4. Heard both sides.
5. On perusal of the impugned order as well as the submissions made by the appellant, it i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, the appellant would be eligible for exemption of Rs. 8 lakhs as per Notification No. 6/2005-ST dated 1.3.2005. This aspect also requires reconsideration by the adjudicating authority. Further, it is also seen from the records that the appellant has not been given the abatement for the property tax under Notification No.24/2007-ST dated 22.5.2007. The adjudicating authority shall also consider this plea of the appellant if sufficient proof is adduced by the appellant.
5.2 The ld. counsel has prayed for waiver of penalties. On perusal of records, it is seen that the issue whether renting of immovable property is subject to levy of service tax was under litigation during the disputed period and there were litigations filed by the tenants pe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SUNRISE EXPORTS Versus CCT, Guntur GST

SUNRISE EXPORTS Versus CCT, Guntur GST
Service Tax
2018 (10) TMI 657 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 1-10-2018
ST/30775/2018 – A/31252/201
Service Tax
Mr. P.K. Choudhary, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
For the Appellant : Shri P. Venkat Prasad, Advocate
For the Respondent : Shri A.V.L.N. Chary, Superintendent /AR
ORDER
PER: MR. P.K. CHOUDHARY
1. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant is engaged in business of export of granites. They applied for refund of service tax amounting to Rs. 51,440/- paid on Custom House Agency (CHA) services. The services were used for export of goods to foreign countries. The refund sanctioning authority sanctioned the refund. Thereafter, the order was reviewed and an appeal was filed by Revenue before the lower appellate authority. It is the case of Revenue that CHA expenses incurred were not in accordance with notification No. 41/2012-ST, dated 29.06.2012 as the CHA expenses were incurred before the place

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cords, I find that the period of dispute is from January 2014 to October 2014. The appellant has claimed refund of service tax paid in respect of the services availed from their Custom House Agents. These services have been utilised for export of their goods viz; Black Galaxy Cutter Slabs, Black Galaxy Polished Granite Slabs. The Asst. Commissioner/Refund Sanctioning Authority had sanctioned the amount. The whole dispute is in respect of the expenses incurred by the appellant beyond the place of removal, which in the present case is Krishnapttanam/Chennai Port. It is the case of Revenue that the services provided by CHA were beyond the place of removal. I further find that the issue is no more res-integra as has been decided in various decisions of the Tribunal. Furthermore, the amendment to the statutory provisions, vide Finance Act, 2016, has finally put the dispute to rest. The relevant amendment is reproduced.
“Statutory Provisions
FINANCE ACT, 2016
Amendment of notification is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

be granted which has been denied, but which would not have been so denied had the amendment made by sub-section (1) been in force at all material times.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), an application for 2 the claim of rebate of service tax under sub-section (2) shall be made within the period of one month from the date of commencement of the Finance Act, 2016.
Statutory Provisions
FINANCE ACT, 2016
THE TENTH SCHEDULE
(See Section 160)
Notification No.
Amendment
Period of effect of amendment
(1)
(2)
(3)
G.S.R. 519(E), dated the 29th June, 2012 [No.41/2012- Service Tax, dated the 29th June,2012]
In the said notification, in the Explanation,- (a) in clause (A), for subclause (i), the following sub-clause shall be substituted and shall be deemed to have been substituted, namely: “(i) in the case of excisable goods, taxable services that have been used beyond factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-I under rule 117(1A) of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-I under rule 117(1A) of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases
Order No 05-2018 28-17-24(B)-I-GST-298 Dated:- 1-10-2018 Madhya Pradesh SGST
GST – States
Office of the Commissioner, Commercial Tax,
Madhya Pradesh, Indore
No. 28/17/24(B)-I-GST-298
Indore: 01/10/2018
Order No. 05/2018
Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Shri C. Selvam Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Tirunelveli

Shri C. Selvam Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Tirunelveli
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 747 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 1-10-2018
Appeal No. ST/40586/2015 – Final Order No. 42525/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Ms. S. Sridevi, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The appellant is aggrieved by the demand of service tax, interest and penalties confirmed by the adjudicating authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order.
2. On behalf of the appellant, ld. counsel Ms. S. Sridevi submitted that the appellant is not contesting the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

4 for the reason that during the said period the issue whether renting of immovable property was subject to levy of service tax was under much confusion and there were litigations pending before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The issue is still pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. UTV News Ltd. reported in 2018 (13) GSTL 3 (SC) as well as Mineral Area Development Authority and Others Vs. SAIL – (2011) 4 SCC 450.
3. The ld. AR Shri B. Balamurugan supported the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that there are no grounds to interfere in the impugned order.
4. Heard both sides.
5. On perusal of the impugned order as well as the submissions made by the appellant, it is brought out that the appel

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

also seen from the records that the appellant has not been given the abatement for the property tax under Notification No.24/2007-ST dated 22.5.2007. The adjudicating authority shall also consider this plea of the appellant if sufficient proof is adduced by the appellant.
5.2 The ld. counsel has prayed for waiver of penalties. On perusal of records, it is seen that the issue whether renting of immovable property is subject to levy of service tax was under litigation during the disputed period and there were litigations filed by the tenants pending before the various High Courts. The issue is still pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court as per the decisions cited by ld. counsel for the appellant. We also find that in the case of Krishi Up

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner, Punjai Puliampatti Municipality Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Salem

The Commissioner, Punjai Puliampatti Municipality Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Salem
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 748 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 1-10-2018
Appeal Nos. ST/42570/2014 and ST/40505/2015 – Final Order Nos. 42526-42527/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
Shri M. Muthukumar, Consultant for the Appellant
Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR) And Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
ORDER
Per Bench
The appellant is aggrieved by the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) who dismissed the appeals on the ground of being time-barred.
2. Brief facts are that the appellants were pr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n 8.4.2013. The appellant filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) only on 24.7.2013. In Appeal No. ST/40505/2015, the Order-in-Original is dated 18.7.2014.3.2013 and was received by the appellant on 23.7.2014. The appellant filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) only on 26.11.2014. Both the appeals were filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) after the condonable period of 90 days. The Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed the appeals observing that the appeals were filed after the condonable period provided in the law. He has followed the decision in the case of M/s. Singh Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise – 2008 (221) ELT 163 (SC). We do not find any infirmity in the orders passed by Commissioner (Appeals). The impugned

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =