In Re: M/s. Ernakulam Medical Centre Pvt. Ltd.

2018 (10) TMI 511 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 142 (A. A. R. – GST) – Levy of GST – supply of medicines and allied items through the pharmacy – composite supply – health care services by a clinical establishment – exemption under N/N. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 – Held that:- Health care services provided by a clinical establishment, an authorized medical practitioner or para medics are exempted vide Sl.No.74 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The word 'clinical establishment' means a hospital, nursing home, clinic, sanatorium or any other institution by whatever name called, that offers services or facilities requiring diagnostics or treatment or care for illness, injury, deformity, abnormality or pregnancy in any recognized system of medicines in India or a place established as an independent entity or a part of an establishment to carry out diagnostic or investigative services of diseases.

In case of inpatient as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

part of composite supply of health care treatment and hence not separately taxable.

The supply of medicines and allied items provided by the hospital through the pharmacy to the out-patients is taxable. – AAR No. KER/16/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – SHRI. B.G. KRISHNAN AND SHRI. B.S. THYAGARAJABABU MEMBER Authorized Representative: Adv. K.N. Sreekumar. The applicant is rendering medical services with professionals like doctors, nursing staff, lab technicians etc. In GST scenario health care services by a clinical establishment, an authorized medical practitioner or para medicals have been exempted vide classification 9993. Medicines supplied through pharmacy to both inpatients and outpatients under the prescription of the doctors are incidental to the health care services rendered in the hospital and beyond the ambit of taxation. Hence the petitioner sought for an advance ruling on the liability of hospital under GST Act on the supply of medicines and allied items through the pharm

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ail. Health care services provided by a clinical establishment, an authorized medical practitioner or para medics are exempted vide Sl.No.74 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The word 'clinical establishment' means a hospital, nursing home, clinic, sanatorium or any other institution by whatever name called, that offers services or facilities requiring diagnostics or treatment or care for illness, injury, deformity, abnormality or pregnancy in any recognized system of medicines in India or a place established as an independent entity or a part of an establishment to carry out diagnostic or investigative services of diseases. Pharmacy is an outlet to dispense medicines or allied items based on prescriptions. Patients are admitted to a hospital only when they are extremely ill or have severe physical trauma. As far as an inpatient is concerned, hospital is expected to provide lodging, care, medicine and food as part of treatment under supervision till discha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ospitals that are dispensing medicine to outpatients. Therefore pharmacy run by hospital dispensing medicine to outpatient or bye standers or others can be treated as individual supply of medicine and not covered under the ambit of health care services. Hence such supply of medicines and allied goods are taxable. Vide clarifications issued based on the approval of 25th GST Council Meeting held on 18-01-2018 [F.No.354/17/2018-TRU Dt.12-02-2018), it was clarified that food supplied to the inpatients as advised by the doctor/nutritionist is a part of composite supply of health care and not separately taxable. Other supplies of food by hospital to patients not admitted are taxable. The same principle is applicable in the case of dispensing of medicines also. In view of the observations stated above, the following rulings are issued: i) The supply of medicines and allied items provided by the hospital through the pharmacy to the in-patients is part of composite supply of health care treatme

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. New RV Enterprises.

2018 (10) TMI 512 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 108 (A. A. R. – GST) – Rate of Tax – Classification of goods – Tile Adhesive and Joint Filler – whether classified under HSN 3214 or under HSN 3824?

Held that:- HSN 3214 includes non-refractory surfacing preparations, whereas HSN 3824 consist of products of natural mixtures. The product is manufactured by mixing natural products like silica sand, dolomite powder, cement and chemicals. The firm has obtained mining lease license from Mining & Geology Department for manufacturing value addition products like tile adhesive, joint filler etc from silica sand. The product is manufactured by mixing natural products like Silica Sand and Dolomite powder with cem

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t and chemical. Hence it is a prepared binder' specified under HSN 3824 which is taxable @ 18% GST. However assessing authority pointed out that this item will come under HSN 3214, which stands for glaciers putty, grafting putty, resign cement, caulking compound etc. Hence the petitioner sought for advance ruling on the tax rate applicable for the Tile Adhesive and Joint Filler manufactured by him. The authorized representative was heard. He has stated the product manufactured such as Tile Adhesive and Joint Filler is a mixture of natural products. whereas the putty is a material with high plasticity and used extensively for glazing. The prepared binders for foundry modules or cores; chemical products and preparation of the chemical or

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Geojith Financial Services Ltd.

2018 (10) TMI 513 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 154 (A. A. R. – GST) – Input tax credit – migration to GST regime – transitional provisions – Whether computers, laptops etc. used by the applicant for providing output service would qualify as inputs for the purpose of availing transitional ITC under Section 140(3) of KSGST Act? – If the goods are physically available as closing stock as on 30th June, 2017, can the applicant avail ITC for the VAT paid?

Held that:- The applicant being a service provider had no tax liability under VAT regime. As per the proviso to Sub-Section (2) of Section 140 of the GST Act, a registered person shall not be allowed to take credit unless such credit was admissible as input tax credit under the existing law and is also admissible as input tax credit under GST Act – As per Section 2(59) of GST Act, 'input' means any goods other than capital goods used or intended to be used by a supplier in the course or furtherance

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

. – AAR No. KER/13/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – SHRI. B.G. KRISHNAN AND SHRI. B.S. THYAGARAJABABU MEMBER Authorized Representative: Adv. Jose Jacob The applicant is engaged in providing various retail financial services like stock broking, share broking, marketing of initial public offering of companies and mutual funds, corporate advisory services etc. which were not taxable under VAT Law. Based on the transitional provisions, they have claimed input tax credit on closing stock of computers, laptops and other goods lying in the physical possession of the applicant as on 30th June 2017. In the circumstances advance ruling is sought for on the following: i) Whether computers, laptops etc. used by the applicant for providing output service would qualify as inputs for the purpose of availing transitional ITC under Section 140(3) of KSGST Act? ii) If the goods are physically available as closing stock as on 30th June, 2017, can the applicant avail ITC for the VAT paid? The authorized represen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sed for making taxable supplies under this Act; (ii) the said registered person is eligible for input tax credit on such inputs under this Act; (iii) the said registered person is in possession of invoice or other prescribed documents evidencing payment of tax under -the existing law in respect of such inputs; and (iv) such invoices or other prescribed documents were issued not earlier than 12 months immediately preceding the appointed day. The issue was examined in detail. The applicant being a service provider had no tax liability under VAT regime. As per the proviso to Sub-Section (2) of Section 140 of the GST Act, a registered person shall not be allowed to take credit unless such credit was admissible as input tax credit under the existing law and is also admissible as input tax credit under GST Act. As per Section 2(59) of GST Act, 'input' means any goods other than capital goods used or intended to be used by a supplier in the course or furtherance of business. The compu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Elambrancheri Khaldoon

2018 (10) TMI 595 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 152 (A. A. R. – GST) – Renting of immovable property service – Small Business Exemption – Co-owners – Whether small business exemption under Section 22 of the GST Act is available to all owners separately in case of jointly owned property?

Whether engaging a co-owner to collect and distribute rent among all the owners for administrative convenience will have any implication on the business exemption under Section 22 of the GST Act for individual co-owners?

Held that:- The rent collected from joint property is equally distributed among the co-owners. Each co-owner received a rent income of below ₹ 20 Lakhs, which is below the threshold limit under GST. By mere joining of hands of two or more persons, a different and distinct legal entity or legal personality does not come into existence, unless there is an intention to do so.

A co-owner holding immovable property jointly with other

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

KER/12/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – SHRI. B.G. KRISHNAN AND SHRI. B.S. THYAGARAJABABU MEMBER Authorized Representative: Mr. Rinu Padat, Chartered Accountant. The petitioner is one of the co-owners of a jointly owned immovable property. There are 13 co-owners holding equal share in 86.78 Cents of land and building. They have rented out these properties to different parties. Total rent from all these properties exceed twenty lakh rupees in a financial year. But, individual share is not exceeding the said threshold. Now, the owners are planning to engage one of the co-owners to collect rent and distribute among them for the purpose of administrative convenience through execution of a power of attorney. In the circumstances, an advance ruling is sought in respect of the following: i) Whether small business exemption under Section 22 of the GST Act is available to all owners separately in case of jointly owned property. ii) Engaging a co-owner to collect and distribute rent among all the owne

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t. In this case also, a co-owner is engaged to collect rent from tenants and distribute among others just for administrative convenience, but the share of each owner is definite and ascertainable. The issue is examined in detail. The rent collected from joint property is equally distributed among the co-owners. Each co-owner received a rent income of below ₹ 20 Lakhs, which is below the threshold limit under GST. By mere joining of hands of two or more persons, a different and distinct legal entity or legal personality does not come into existence, unless there is an intention to do so. It is settled law under Section 26 of the IT Act that where the property, consisting of buildings and land appurtenant, is owned by two or more persons and their respective shares are definite and ascertainable, such persons shall not, in respect of such property, be assessed as an association of persons, but the share of each such person in the income from the property is included in his total in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Compass Group (India) Support Services Private Limited

2018 (10) TMI 596 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – TMI – Application for withdrawal of Advance Ruling application – Classification of supply – Supply of cooked food and beverages to the employees of the customers within designated area (generally the cafeteria / canteen) of the client’s premises – Over the counter supply of food and beverages to the employees of clients / customers.

Held that:- The application filed by the Applicant for advance ruling is dismissed as withdrawn. – AAR No. KAR ADRG 22/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – HARISH DHARNIA AND DR. RAVI PRASAD. M.P. MEMBER ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERV

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

00/-) bearing CIN number SBIN18042900080695 dated 12.04.2018. 2. The Applicant is engaged in supply of cooked food & beverages and undertakes the following two, separate nature of transactions for its customers. a) Transaction 1 : Supply of cooked food and beverages to the employees of the customers within designated area (generally the cafeteria / canteen) of the client s premises. b) Transaction 2 : Over the counter supply of food and beverages to the employees of clients / customers, which include products which are required to have Maximum Retail Price (MRP) mentioned on the packages under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. 3. In view of the above, the Applicant has sought for Advance Ruling on the following four questions : i. Whether,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

under Transaction 2 is classifiable as supply provided by eating joint / mess / canteen etc., and be exigible to GST @ 5% in the light of the Circular No.28/02/2018-GST dated 08.11.2018 and Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018. iv. Whether, over the counter supply of food & beverages (including MRP Products) by the Applicant on a stand alone basis in establishments other than educational institutions under Transaction 2 is classifiable as supply provided by eating joint/mess / canteen etc., and be exigible to GST @ 5% in the light of the Circular No.28/02/2018-GST dated 08.11.2018 and Corrigendum dated 18.01.2018. 4. The Applicant vide their letter dated 10.08.2018 requested to permit them to withdraw the advance ruling application, filed by t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: M/s. Toshniwal Brothers (SR) Private Limited,

2018 (10) TMI 597 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 129 (A. A. R. – GST) – Classification of supply – Intermediary Services or not – pure and mere promotion and marketing services – determination of place of supply of services – Composite supply – zero rated supply – export of services or not – POPOS Rules.

Whether pure and mere promotion and marketing services will be “intermediary services” for the purposes of section 12 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for determining the place of supply of such services?

If after sale support services are also provided under a composite contract, would it then be composite supply? What will be the principal supply for such contracts?

Whether the above contracts would qualify as exports if the client is overseas entity, in terms of clause (6) of section 2 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and will be a zero-rated supply as provided in section 16 of IGST Act, 2017?

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

travelling expenses. It is also stated that for spare parts, the commission would be paid for values equal or superior to € 250 and repairs are not subject to commission.

In sub-clause 6 of Clause IV, it is seen that the consideration is payable for the services which include pre-sales, marketing, sales, installation and warranty period services and the commission payable is for the complete bundle of services.

Intermediary services – Held that:- The agreement copy provided by the applicant shows clearly that the price is negotiated by the applicant for the machinery or equipments and intimated to the overseas supplier. It is also seen that the Principal who is the overseas supplier reserves the right to conclude or reject or change the contract, but he shall inform the decisive reasons to the applicant – Even the agreement entered by the applicant with the Principal, call the applicant an agent and since he is facilitating the supply of goods between the overseas supplier

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is related to the supply of goods, as no consideration flows to the applicant without a supply being effected by the Principal and hence it is tightly bound to supply of goods to the Principal.

Export of services or not? – Held that:- The issue has to be decided on the basis of the place of supply applicable to each of the transaction. This Authority is not competent to decide on this issue of determination of place of supply and hence does not answer this question.

Ruling:- The contract of services supplied are not pure and mere promotion and marketing services and the services provided is of the nature of facilitating the supply of goods, and hence would amount to “intermediary services” for the reasons enumerated in the aforesaid paragraphs for the purposes of determination of place of supply of such services.

The after-sale services provided are not in the nature of a composite contract and they are independent from the services provided in paragraph 1 above and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ee of ₹ 5,000-00 each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act. 2. The Applicant is a Private Limited Company and is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017. The applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the following questions: a) Whether pure and mere promotion and marketing services will be intermediary services for the purposes of section 12 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for determining the place of supply of such services? b) If after sale support services are also provided under a composite contract, would it then be composite supply? What will be the principal supply for such contracts? c) Whether the above contracts would qualify as exports if the client is overseas entity, in terms of clause (6) of section 2 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and will be a zero-rated supplt as provided in section 16 of IGST Act, 2017? 3. The applicant furnishes some facts relevant to the stated activity: 3. The applicant states that he is

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e goods in India. The orders for the products would be placed directly by the prospective customers on the overseas entity. The applicant is not engaged in trading of such goods, either on his own account or on the account of the overseas client. The promotion and marketing of the products included the following activities: i. Applicant would advertise the details of the goods to the prospective customers; ii. Demonstration of the products to the various prospective customers located in India; iii. Communicate and correspond about all the relevant information to the prospective customers in connection with the goods; iv. Communication to the overseas clients about comments and queries of the prospective customers; and v. Review the credit rating of the prospective customers of the overseas entity on regular basis; b. After sale support services On the basis of the order issued by the prospective customer to the overseas entity, the overseas entity supplies the products to their custome

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

placement and expected delivery dates and long term project and prospect lists; ii. Results of regular observation of marketing conditions, information in the public domain relating to the activities of competitors; and iii. Results of participation in trade fairs. 5. The assessee has submitted that intermediary means a person who arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or services or both, between two or more persons, but does not include a person who supplies such goods or services or both on his own account. In this regard, the following are to be considered: a. Services provided by the applicant to overseas entity (service recipients) is on principal-to-principal basis; b. Applicant is providing services to service recipients and not on behalf of the service recipients to any other person, say, the prospective customers in India; c. Service recipients would be dealing with Indian customers directly and the applicant is not authorised to enter into any contract or arrangement o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AAR/ST/08/2016, Application No. AAR/44/ST/15/2014) = 2016 (3) TMI 355 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS wherein the Authority had clearly demarcated the meaning of intermediary services and ruled that pure marketing and promotion services would not be intermediary services. 6. The applicant submits that in the aforesaid Advance Ruling, it is stated as under: The definition of intermediary as envisaged under Rule 2 (f) of POPS does not include a person who provides the main service on his own account. In the present case, applicant is providing main service i.e. business support services to WWD US and on his own account. Therefore, applicant is not an intermediary and the service provided by him is not intermediary service. Further, during arguments, applicant drew our attention to one of the illustration given under paragraph 5.9.6 of the Education Guide, 2012 issued by CBEC. Relevant portion is extracted as under: Similarly, persons such as call centres, who provide services to their cl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pplicant submitted that clause (30) of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017, provides the meaning of composite supply which reads as under: Composite supply means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply. In this case where after-sale support services are also provided along with the promotion and marketing services under a composite contract, it will be in the nature of composite supply because of the following reasons: (i) Two taxable supplies of services is being made under a single service agreement; (ii) There is a single price for both the services; (iii) The different elements of the services are not available separately; (iv) The different elements are integral to one overall supply – if one or more is removed, the nature of supply wou

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tep in the complete process; b. After-sale support services can be given only once the product is sold; c. Customer will place order to the service recipients on the basis of promotion and marketing services provided by the applicant – it is only after the products are sold that after-sale services arises; d. The supply of the product by the overseas entity to the customer in India embeds within itself, the provision of after-sale support; e. Marketing determines the very sale of the product and as a complete offering, post-sales support is ancillary and incidental to the sale; f. The essential characteristic of the services provided by the applicant are marketing, sales promotion and brand building; co-ordination and providing all other support once the product is sold are by-products of the sale of the product; g. In terms of service agreement, promotion and marketing services is the predominant component while installation and warranty services are ancillary to such promotion and ma

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

on is payable for the supply of goods, the person to whom the goods are delivered or made available, or to whom possession or use of the goods is given or made available; and (c) Where no consideration is payable for the supply of services, the person to whom the service is rendered, And any reference to a person to whom a supply is made shall be construed as a reference to the recipient of the supply and shall include an agent acting as such on behalf of the recipient in relation to the goods or services or both supplied. In the present case, the consideration is payable for the supply of such services and the overseas entity is liable to pay that consideration for both promotion and marketing services and after-sale support services. So the recipient of both the services will be the overseas entity, which is located outside India. 10. The applicant submits that the place of supply shall be determined as provided in section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017 because the location of the supplier

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The payment of such service would be received by the supplier of services in convertible foreign exchange; and (e) The supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8 of IGST Act, 2017. Thus the supply of said services is export of services and consequently will become a zero-rated supply as provided in section 16 of IGST Act, 2017. 12. The applicant has made additional submissions and the same are as under 12.1 The activities of the applicant are limited to functioning as an agent of the overseas principals and the applicant does not and is not engaged in the business of buying and selling of the products. In this regard, the following are important to note: (a) Majority of the customers are research institutes or R&D centres. Under the Customs Law, they are eligible for exemptions / concessions with respect to custom duties on import of goods. Accordingly, they would always directly

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nstallation and warranty support) are normally undertaken as a bundle of services. The principals, i.e. overseas clients do not have any presence in India and the applicant is the sole representative in the Indian territory for the contracted products. 13.1 On the question as to why in certain cases, only marketing services are undertaken and the post-sale support services are not provided, the applicant submitted that the equipment that are manufactured by the applicant s principals and marketed by him in India are specialized equipment. Most of the equipment would need installation support. The applicant confirms in all such cases, he is the one providing the same and nevertheless, there could be certain equipment: Which donot need any installation: they are typically in the nature of plug and play; Which are installed more appropriately termed as configured remotely through computer or online networks or which requires specialized knowledge, in which cases, the same are undertaken b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e could be treated as naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business Majority of service providers in a particular area of business provide similar bundle of services The nature of the various services in a bundle of services will also help in determining whether the services are bundled in the ordinary course of business. If the nature of services in such that one of the services is the main service and the other services combined with such service are in the nature of incidental or ancillary services which help in better enjoyment of a main service Other illustrative indicators, not determinative but indicative of bundling of services in ordinary course of business are – o There is a single price or the customer pays the same amount, no matter how much of the package they actually receive or use; o The elements are normally advertised as a package; o The different elements are not available separately; o The different elements are integral to one overall supply – if one or more

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

is regard, the same being specialized equipment, the spares also would have to be procured from the suppliers of equipment itself. It is in this context, that the agreement with the principals contains clauses with respect to discount that would be offered for purchase of spares from them. The applicant reiterates that the import of spares is not in connection with the marketing activities. 16. FINDINGS & DISCUSSION: 16.1 The applicant has provided a copy of the agency contract and the following are noted from the contract: (a) In clause II relating to the Duties of the Agent, in paragraph 1, the applicant is referred to as Agent – shall be act as intermediary on behalf of principal in negotiating business transactions with prospective customers in his territory, but the applicant shall not be entitled to conclude contracts on behalf of the principal. It is also seen that the applicant acting as an Agent shall take care of the interests of the principal and regularly visit the cust

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that the commission is calculated on the basis of the amount invoiced for the business transaction, free of VAT and rebates are deductible. Additional costs such as freight, cartage, packing insurance, custom duties, and all other charges and dues, costs for installation, expenses resulting from putting into operation and similar services which are essentially work and labour shall be deducted, even if they are not invoiced separately, shall also be deducted. It is also stated in the contract, where the agent orders goods from the principal at his own expense, the commission due can be deducted directly from the value of goods. Further, it is also stated that any expenses and spendings of the Agent resulting from his activities (regardless of whether they arise generally or in connection with a particular business transaction) shall be regarded as covered by commission that the Agent is entitled to, and such expenses excludes travelling expenses. It is also stated that for spare parts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ction 2 of the IGST Act, 2017 defines an intermediary as under: (13) intermediary means a broker, an agent or any other person, by whatever name called, who arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or services or both, or securities, between two or more persons, but does not include a person who supplies such goods or services or both or securities on his own account. The agreement copy provided by the applicant shows clearly that the price is negotiated by the applicant for the machinery or equipments and intimated to the overseas supplier. It is also seen that the Principal who is the overseas supplier reserves the right to conclude or reject or change the contract, but he shall inform the decisive reasons to the applicant. Also the commission payable to the applicant is tied to the amount of sales that the applicant solicits and is typically an agency transaction. Even the agreement entered by the applicant with the Principal, call the applicant an agent and since he is facilitat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e applicant to the principal and hence cannot be called as a naturally bundled services. Hence this does not amount to a composite supply and the same are treated as two supplies independent of each other and the valuation of each has to be computed as per Section 15 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. Both these independent supplies are only linked to the supply of goods from the ultimate supplier to the consumer and till that happens the transaction of after-sales supplies do not come into existence at all. But the supply of services in the form of intermediary services is related to the supply of goods, as no consideration flows to the applicant without a supply being effected by the Principal and hence it is tightly bound to supply of goods to the Principal. 16.5 The question relating to the whether the above contracts would amount to export of services has to be decided on the basis of the place of supply applicable to each of the transaction. This Authority is not competen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Udaipur Versus Mangalam Cement Limited

2018 (10) TMI 829 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI – CENVAT credit – input services or not – Goods Transport Agency Services in respect of which the assessee had availed the Cenvat credit of service tax during the period from July, 2014 to March, 2015 for outward transportation of cement – place of removal – Held that:- In view of the amended definition of “input service” w.e.f. 01.03.2008 as also in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 117 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], judgment of the Tribunal cannot be sustained in law and the demand is liable to be revived – It was held by the Supreme Court that Cenvat Credit on goods transport agency service availed for transport of goods from place of removal to buyer’s premises was not admissible to the respondent.

The matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for consideration of the question of penalty to decide the same after hearing both the parties in accordance with law – appeal allowed by way of

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are eligible input services within the meaning of input service and whether upon determination of the phrase i.e. place of removal defined under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the assessee had availed the Cenvat Credit on the GTA service correctly or not? The respondent-assessee is manufacturer of cement classifiable under Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Upon perusal of the assessee s record, it was noticed that for the period from July, 2014 to March, 2015, the respondent-assessee availed CENVAT Credit of service tax paid by it towards Goods Transport Agency Services (for short GTA Services ), from factory to customers, from railway siding to godown and from godown to customers, amounting to ₹ 1,24,75,315/-. It appeared that these services were not covered under the definition of input service under the provisions of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (for short the Rules of 2004 ). Therefore, a show cause notice dated 28.07.2015 was issued to the responde

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y Notification No. 10/2008-CE(NT), dated 01.03.2008 by substituting the same with the words, clearance of final products upto the place of removal . Thus, if any ambiguity, which was there in respect of GTA Services upto the place of removal, the same has already been removed by the Government and therefore, the aforesaid services taken upto the place of removal can only be covered under the definition of input service . The Tribunal has failed to notice this change in the definition while deciding the appeal of the assessee, while judgment has been given in the context of earlier definition of input service . Reference to definition of place of removal in Section 4(3)(c) of the Act of 1944 was also given. Since the present matter was covered by the aforesaid notification, the Tribunal was wholly unjustified in allowing the appeal filed by the assessee. Learned counsel argued that since the question raised in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

decided the issue against the Revenue not only in this matter but also in the matter arising out of previous assessment year wherein the main demand was set aside, the question of penalty would therefore not arise for consideration. Learned counsel argued that as per the law that was prevalent at the time when the Tribunal passed the impugned judgment, the respondent-assessee was not required to satisfy the demand and acted throughout that impression, therefore, there was no question of any penalty to be paid on that. Mr. Siddharth Ranka, learned counsel for the appellant rejoined and submitted that the penalty is consequential as the issue raised in this matter is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court. In case the judgment of the Tribunal is set aside and demand is revived, the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority is also liable to be restored. Learned counsel submitted that the submission of the respondent that the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (su

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

INDUSIND MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LTD. & ANOTHER & ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 (10) TMI 996 – DELHI HIGH COURT – TMI – Transitional credit/input tax credit – filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 – technical/system errors – Held that:- The present petitioner is one of the 213 entities which were allowed the facility and benefit of transitional credit – It is urged that the petitioner should first ensure that the credits which it otherwise is entitled to – both transitional and input credit as on 01.07.2017, are duly claimed and reflected in the place of its registration i.e. Mumbai in order to ensure that thereafter, the other centres where it is registered, can claim it.

List on 16.10.2018. – W.P.(C) 8691/2018, CM APPL. 38569/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND MR. A. K. CHAWLA JJ. Petitioners Through: M

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t is stated that the transitional credit (input tax credit) otherwise available to it is set to lapse in September, 2018. The counsel for the GST Commissioner appearing on advance notice submits that the meeting of the IT Grievance Redressal Committee (ITGRC) on 21.08.2018 has sought to redress this problem. Learned counsel has relied upon the minutes of the meeting which records the issue as follows: 3.2 EVP, GSTN further elaborated the cases under the Category B, where no technical issues were found on the basis of logs in GST system, as below: xxx xxx xxx (d) In 2 cases sent by Nodal Officers, taxpayer had attempted downward revision of distributed credit in Table 8 of TRAN-1. The system was designed to allow only upward revision and not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tails as per Annexures indicated in column No.4 and 6 of Table-1 respectively, subject to Law Committee recommendations regarding consequential benefits related to filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 and suggest ways to handle such situations, in a time bound manner as referred to it in 1st IT-GRC Meeting. Simultaneously, the IT-GRC decided not to allow remaining 127 cases mentioned at Table-2 in absence of evidence of technical/system errors in these cases as explained at para 3.2 above and details as per Annexures indicated in column No.4 and 6 of Table-2 respectively. It is pointed out that the present petitioner is one of the 213 entities which were allowed the facility and benefit of transitional credit. Learned counsel has drawn our attention at

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CHAITHANYA GRANITES AND MARBLES Versus TTHE ASST STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO 5, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESE

CHAITHANYA GRANITES AND MARBLES Versus TTHE ASST STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO 5, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI – 2018 (11) TMI 331 – KERALA HIGH COURT – [2019] 61 G S.T.R. 38 (Ker) – Detention of goods with vehicle – delay in transporting the consignment after filing E-way bill due to flood – Held that:- The petitioner has every document to transport the goods safely, save the expiry of the time prescribed in the e-way bill. It is preposterous to contend that the petitioner delayed the transport deliberately-for no purpose. Granted, I cannot find fault with the authorities in detaining the goods. But once the petitioner has explained the circumstances through Exts.P8 and P8(a), they ought to have taken a leni

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

aught in an unprecedented flood. To reach Edapally, Ernakulam, the transporter had no motorable road because most roads, by then, were inundated-even breached. The transport thus took more than usual time to reach Edapally. By then, the e-way bill had expired. 3. In that background, the respondent authorities intercepted the vehicle at Kasaragod and detained the goods under Section 129 of the GST Act. Faced with the Ext.P7 order of detention, the petitioner submitted the Exts.P8 and P8(a) replies. Later, after failing in its effort to have the interim custody of the goods, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 4. In response to the submissions made by the petitioner's counsel, the Government Pleader has submitted that the petitioner had ample time to have the consignment transported to Edappally, on time. According to her, the vehicle was ready by 13.08.2018. And from Surathkal in Karnataka, it would not have taken the transporters so many days to reach Kerala-that is, beyon

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y 16.08.2018 the flood situation in Kerala worsened. Perhaps, the transporter must have played safe and waited for the roads to clear. And that did not immediately happen. 8. I reckon that the petitioner has every document to transport the goods safely, save the expiry of the time prescribed in the e-way bill. It is preposterous to contend that the petitioner delayed the transport deliberately-for no purpose. Granted, I cannot find fault with the authorities in detaining the goods. But once the petitioner has explained the circumstances through Exts.P8 and P8(a), they ought to have taken a lenient view-rather a practical view, at that. Under these circumstances, I dispose of the writ petition, holding that the respondents will release the goods after securing personal bond from the petitioner-that is, without insisting on the bank guarantee. This arrangement, I clarify, will not affect the adjudication under Section 129 of the Act. – Case laws – Decisions – Judgements – Orders – Tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED

M/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI – 2018 (11) TMI 398 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI – Detention of goods with vehicles – Vires of Rule 140 of the CGST/SCST Rules – collection of security in the form of simple bond for the value of goods and bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of applicable tax, interst and penalty payable as a mandatory condtiion for the release of the goods de

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Petitioner : BY ADVS. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) RAJAGOPAL M For The Respondent : N NAGARESH ASGI JUDGMENT The petitioner, a dealer, faced detention proceedings under Section 129 of the Goods and Services Tax Act. After failing to secure interim release of the goods, it has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs : i) declare Rule 140 of the CGST/SCST Rules, to the extent to which it directs collection of security in the form of simple bond for the value of goods and bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of applicable tax, interst and penalty payable as a mandatory condtiion for the release of the goods detained under section 129(3) of the Act as violative of Article 301 of the Constitution ; ii) issue a writ of cer

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax Versus Mangalam Cement Limited

2019 (2) TMI 81 – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – TMI – CENVAT Credit – input services – Outward Goods Transportation Service (from factory to customers, from railway siding to godown and from godown to customers) – October, 2011 to March, 2012 – place of removal – Held that:- In view of the amended definition of “input service” w.e.f. 01.03.2008 as also in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 117 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], judgment of the Tribunal cannot be sustained in law and the demand is liable to be revived. However, the present matter deserves to be remanded to the Tribunal to consider the question of penalty.

The matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for consideration of the question of penalty to decide the same after hearing both the parties in accordance with law – Petition allowed by way of remand. – D.B. Central Excise Appeal No. 79/2018 Dated:- 19-9-2018 – Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq And Mr. Justice Goverdhan Bardhar For the A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ether the assessee had availed the Cenvat Credit correctly or not? The respondent-assessee is manufacturer of cement classifiable under Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Upon perusal of the assessee s record, it was noticed that for the period from October, 2011 to March, 2012, the respondentassessee availed CENVAT Credit of service tax paid by it towards (a) Goods Transport Agency Services (for short GTA Services ), from factory to customers, from railway siding to godown and from godown to customers; (b) Auction Services and (c) Rent-a- Cab Services amounting to ₹ 53,66,338/-. It appeared that these services were not covered under the definition of input service under the provisions of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (for short the Rules of 2004 ). Therefore, a show cause notice dated 02.11.2012 was issued to the respondentassessee proposing recovery of the CENVAT Credit wrongly availed along with interest under Rule 14 of the Rules of 2004 read with

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

vide impugned judgment dated 10.10.2017 allowed the appeal and set aside the demand order dated 28.09.2015. Hence, this appeal. Mr. Siddharth Ranka, learned counsel for the appellantrevenue has submitted that the Tribunal has failed to take into consideration that the words, clearance of final products from the place of removal appearing in the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Rules of 2004 prior to 01.03.2008 were amended by Notification No. 10/2008-CE(NT), dated 01.03.2008 by substituting the same with the words, clearance of final products upto the place of removal . Thus, if any ambiguity, which was there in respect of (a) GTA Services; (b) Auction Services and (c) Rent-a-Cab Services upto the place of removal, the same has already been removed by the Government and therefore, the aforesaid services taken upto the place of removal can only be covered under the definition of input service . The Tribunal has failed to notice this change in the definition while decid

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

erred SLP against the said decision of this Court. Therefore, hearing of the present matter may be deferred till the final decision of the Supreme Court, as according to learned counsel for the respondent, the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Service Tax Vs. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra) has not noticed many important aspects, the matter therefore is required to be reconsidered. So far as the question of penalty is concerned, learned counsel argued that since the Tribunal has decided the issue against the Revenue not only in this matter but also in the matter arising out of the previous assessment year wherein the main demand was set aside, the question of penalty would therefore not arise for consideration. Learned counsel argued that as per the law that was prevalent at the time when the Tribunal passed the impugned judgment, the respondent-assessee was not required to satisfy the demand and acted throughout under that impression, therefore, there was no q

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Supply to SEZ unit in USD

Goods and Services Tax – Started By: – Yatin Bhopi – Dated:- 18-9-2018 Last Replied Date:- 20-9-2018 – Dear expertWe are manufacturer and supplying goods to SEZ unit under LUT. One of our SEZ customer requested to supply goods in USD. Please let me know1. Is this allowed2. Are we need to raised GST invoice in USD.If this is allowed please share circular \ Act \ Rules references – Reply By PAWAN KUMAR – The Reply = Dear sir,No such provision in GST Rules as per my understanding. You may issue gst tax invoice supported with other commercial invoice which currency of USD can be written. – Reply By Yash Jain – The Reply = Sir, For point no. 1: Yes, invoice can be raised in USD or any other freely convertible currency for export to SEZ. Refer p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases

Goods and Services Tax – Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases – TMI Updates – Highlights

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners

Goods and Services Tax – GST – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – The National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics (NACIN) has been authorized to conduct an examination for confirmation of enrollment of Goods and Services Tax Practitioners (GSTPs) in terms of the sub-rule (3) of rule 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, vide Notification No. 24/2018-Central Tax dated 28.5.2018. The GSTPs enrolled on the GST Network under sub-rule (2) of Rule 83 and covered by clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 83, i.e. those meeting the eligibility criteria of having enrolled as sales tax practitioners or tax return preparer under the existing law for a period not less than five years, are required to pass the said examination before 31.12.2

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit (ITC) – rate of tax – restaurant services – The Applicant is not entitled to pay the GST @ 18% with input tax credit as the services being offered by the Applicant are classified under a heading attracting GST @ 5%, without inpu

Goods and Services Tax – Input tax credit (ITC) – rate of tax – restaurant services – The Applicant is not entitled to pay the GST @ 18% with input tax credit as the services being offered by the Appl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of goods – Parts of Fuel Injection Pumps – The “Parts of Fuel Injection Pumps for diesel engines” are classifiable under Tariff Heading 8413 91 90 as per the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. – Liable to be taxed at the rate of 18% under

Goods and Services Tax – Classification of goods – Parts of Fuel Injection Pumps – The “Parts of Fuel Injection Pumps for diesel engines” are classifiable under Tariff Heading 8413 91 90 as per the Cu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – landscaping and gardening work for government departments – if it is in the nature of pure services then eligible for exemption – if it is in the nature of works contract, not eligible for exemption and GST is payable accordingly.

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – landscaping and gardening work for government departments – if it is in the nature of pure services then eligible for exemption – if it is in the nature of works

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Levy of GST – sub-let of Toll Collection work of certain road by NHAI – The Toll Charges collected by the applicant are not “Toll Charges” per se in the hands of the applicant, but held in fiduciary capacity by the applicant, for onward remittan

Goods and Services Tax – Levy of GST – sub-let of Toll Collection work of certain road by NHAI – The Toll Charges collected by the applicant are not “Toll Charges” per se in the hands of the applicant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption from GST – Executive Post Graduate Programme in Management (EPGP) conducted by IIM – there is no iota of ambiguity in the language of the impugned notification – The Executive Post Graduate Programme will not be eligible for exemption

Goods and Services Tax – Exemption from GST – Executive Post Graduate Programme in Management (EPGP) conducted by IIM – there is no iota of ambiguity in the language of the impugned notification – The

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exemption from GST – Educational services – The services provided by the applicant in affiliation to specified universities and providing degree courses to students under related curriculums to its students exempt from Goods and Services Tax.

Goods and Services Tax – Exemption from GST – Educational services – The services provided by the applicant in affiliation to specified universities and providing degree courses to students under rela

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

LEVY OF LATE FEE UNDER ‘GST’

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN – Dated:- 18-9-2018 Last Replied Date:- 20-9-2018 – Late fee Section 47 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ( Act for short) provides for the levy of late fee in case of belated filing of returns that are required to be filed under the Act. Section 47(1) provides that any registered person who fails to furnish the details of outward or inward supplies required under section 37 or section 38 or returns required under section 39 or section 45 by the due date shall pay a late fee of one hundred rupees for every day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum amount of five thousand rupees. Section 47(2) provides that any registered person who fails to furnish the return required under section 44 by the due date shall be liable to pay a late fee of one hundred rupees for every day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum of an amount calculated at a quarter per cent of his turnover in the Sta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

which the tax is payable on reverse charge basis under this Act and inward supplies of goods or services or both taxable under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act or on which integrated goods and services tax is payable under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) , and credit or debit notes received in respect of such supplies during a tax period after the tenth day but on or before the fifteenth day of the month succeeding the tax period in Form GSTR – 2. Return – Form GSTR – 3B Rule 61(5) provides for filing form GSTR – 3B every month since the time limit for furnishing of details in Form GSTR-1 under section 37 and in Form GSTR-2 under section 38 has been extended within 20th of the following month. Return under section 39 Section 39 provides that the following registered person shall file returns in the required form periodically within the due dates as mentioned below- Quarterly return The service providers who opted to pay tax under composition scheme is t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

, tax paid and such other particulars as may be prescribed on or before 20th of the following month. Final Return under section 45 Section 45 provides that every registered person who is required to furnish a return under section 39(1) and whose registration has been cancelled shall furnish a final return within three months of the date of cancellation or date of order of cancellation, whichever is later, in Form GSTR – 10. Annual Return under section 44 Section 44(1) provides that every registered person, other than an Input Service Distributor, a person paying tax under section 51 or section 52, a casual taxable person and a non-resident taxable person, shall furnish an annual return for every financial year electronically in Form GSTR – 9 on or before the thirty-first day of December following the end of such financial year. Section 44(2) provides that every registered person who is required to get his accounts audited in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5) of section

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed. Vide Notification No.28 /2017 – Central Tax, dated 01st September, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the late fee payable, for all registered persons who failed to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the month of July, 2017 by the due date. Vide Notification No. 50/2017 – Central Tax, dated 24th October, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the late fee payable for all registered persons who failed to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August and September, 2017 by the due date. Vide Notification No. 22 /2018 – Central Tax, dated 14.05.2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the late fee payable for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B by the due date for each of the months from October, 2017 to April, 2018, for the class of registered persons whose declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 was submitted but not filed on the common portal on or bef

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

every day during which such failure continues. Vide Notification No. 73/2017 – Central Tax, dated 29th December, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the amount of late fee payable, by any registered person for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-4 by the due date, which is in excess of an amount of twenty five rupees for every day during which such failure continues. Where the total amount payable in lieu of central tax in the said return is nil, the amount of late fee payable, by any registered person for failure to furnish the said return by the due date shall stand waived to the extent which is in excess of an amount of ten rupees for every day during which such failure continues. Vide Notification No. 4/2018 – Central Tax 23rd January, 2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the amount of late fee payable by any registered person for failure to furnish the details of outward supplies for any month/q

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

waived to the extent which is in excess of an amount of ten rupees for every day during which such failure continues. Vide Notification No. 6/2018 – Central Tax, dated 23rd January, 2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the amount of late fee payable by any registered person for failure to furnish the return in FORM GSTR 5A by the due date which is in excess of an amount of twenty-five rupees for every day during which such failure continues. Where the total amount of integrated tax payable in the said return is nil, the amount of late fee payable by such registered person for failure to furnish the said return by the due date shall stand waived to the extent which is in excess of an amount of ten rupees for every day during which such failure continues. Vide Notification No. 7/2018 – Central Tax, dated 23.01.2018, the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, waived the amount of late fee payable by any registered person for fail

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

prevent uploading of the returns were cited. The High Court held that this is not a case where the petitioners are espousing the cause of a weaker section of the society who, on account of hardships and handicaps inherently faced by them, is unable to knock the door of justice. The public interest jurisdiction of the High Court and the Supreme Court, over a period of time, has been considerably expanded to take within its sweep range of issues not confined to the assertion of rights of weaker sections of the society or the marginalized groups. The petitioners who are themselves active tax consultants and tax practitioners indirectly concerned with the same. There is no reason why such an issue should be examined in a public interest petition when, as noted above, the group of persons whom the statute affects does not suffer from any handicap preventing them from taking up the litigation themselves and pursuing it. The High Court dismissed the writ petition. – Reply By pankaj singla – T

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Annual Return- A Surgical Strike by Government

Goods and Services Tax – GST – By: – Nikhil Mohan Jhanwar – Dated:- 18-9-2018 Last Replied Date:- 18-9-2018 – If you think GST is a Good and Simple Tax , you are mistaken. GST is all about technical glitches, daily amendments, and confusions. More the Government tries to put to rest the confusions, the poorer its implementation becomes. If you think Annual Return is just another return seeking consolidation of data filed in GSTR-3B & GSTR-1 in Financial Year 2017-18, you are again mistaken. Imagine you studied the whole year and all of sudden, during exam time, the syllabus is changed. That s what the Annual Return format is. The Government is liberal enough to seek as much as details they could in 5-page Annual Return Format coupled with 5-page instructions notified on 4th September 2018. If you think you have time till 31st December 2018 to file Annual Return that would be your third mistake, Sir. Because, if I state that you have time till 20th October 2018, would you believe m

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GSTR-3B and other from GSTR-1. Similarly, the way details have been sought, it would be very difficult for the ERP systems to fetch data in the same fashion as demanded in the Annual Return. For example, Exports made with payment of IGST and without payment of IGST is filed in Table 6A of GSTR-1. However, Annual Return Format seeks details in Separate Tables. It would have been easier for taxpayers if most of the details could be auto-populated by GSTN from GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 filed in sequential or appropriate manner. This will surely slog various hours of extra nights for taxpayers and for professionals as well. In the instructions for filing Annual Returns, reference of Table No s of GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B has been mentioned at most of the places. If all details are to be taken from 1 & 3B, would not be it prudent to auto-populate the data from returns directly. In other words, the Annual Return should have been formulated in a way which facilitates auto-population of data in resp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

om where this part of the world, Annual Return is asking for these details. The Instructions also states to obtain these figures from Table 9B of GSTR-1. If you refer to Table 9B, it comprises of details only in respect of B2B taxable supplies and Exempt, Nil rated & Non-GST Supply. Details of Input tax credit- Real Mess Input tax credit is like a spoiled brat of rich Dad which has all the luxury in-house as it is not less than a hard cash. But when this brat is excessively exploited, he gives you dangerous results. That s what happened with Part III seeking details of ITC in Annual Return. This Part is so confusing that even lawmakers appear to be clueless about their purpose and intention about kind of disclosure required. Table No. 6: Bifurcate details of Input, Capital goods & Input services Table seeks separate bifurcation for inputs, capital goods & input services in respect of Input tax credit. This is beyond my imagination as these details were never part of GSTR-1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ld have been paid by him as one of the conditions to avail ITC. GSTR-2A is created from GSTR-1 filed by the Supplier. But does it ensure payment of tax by the Supplier? There may be a situation where Supplier has filed GSTR-1 but has not filed GSTR-3B for corresponding supply and thus, not paid tax. Ideally, GSTR-2A is required to be verified whether a tax on these supplies have been paid or not to enable complete compliance of the conditions of availment of input tax credit. Lapse of ITC- Innovative thought This is an interesting thing. The Annual return calculates for you the input credit lapsed in last financial year i.e. 2017-18. It comprises of 3 things: The difference in ITC available as GSTR-2A and ITC actually availed in GSTR-3B filed for the period July 2017 to September 2018 which is further classified into : ITC available but not availed ITC available but ineligible The difference in ITC available on the import of goods and ITC actually availed in GSTR-3B Note: However, no c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ssional to have an easy life. The task of digging HSN wise details of Inward supply is like repeating the same Semester not because we failed in exams but because syllabus has changes. This will only add to compliances woes of taxpayers. Before parting……… It would not be out of context if this Annual Return format is terms a Surgical Strike by the Government. Two quick recommendation for GST Council: To introduce an online facility wherein details of GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 filed for July, 2018 to March, 2018 is made available on consolidated basis. To mandate filing of Annual return first year only for Taxpayers having Aggregate Turnover of more than 1.5 crs. This would ease compliance burden and increasing costs of small taxpayers About Author: CA. Nikhil M. Jhanwar is practicing Chartered Accountant and Faculty Member of GST by ICAI in Delhi/NCR specializing in GST, UAE VAT, end-to-end start-up formation, compliances & advisory. He has deliberated his views on va

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases

GST – States – F.1-11(100)-TAX/GST/2017/8475-80 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – NO.F.1-11(100)-TAX/GST/2017/8475-80 GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX P.N. COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI, AGARTALA Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018. ORDER Subject: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 in certain cases. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1A) of rule 117

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corres

Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Central Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 06/2018-GST (State) dated 19.04.2018 and Central Circular No. 49/23/2018-GST dated 21.06.2018 corresponding State Circular No. 11/2018-GST (State) dated 17.09.2018 – regarding. – GST – States – 12/2018 – Dated:- 18-9-2018 – NO.F.1-11(8)-TAX/2015/8460-66 GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX PANDIT NEHRU COMPLEX, GURKHABASTI AGARTALA, TRIPURA WEST, PIN-799006. Dated, Agartala, the 18th September, 2018. Circular No.12/2018 – GST (State) To The Additional Commissioner of State Tax / Superintendent of State Tax (All)/ Inspectors of State Tax (All) Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t No. 9 of 2017) for the purpose of uniformity in the implementation of the Act it is instructed to follow the clarifications issued vide Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST dated 14th September, 2018 by the Department of Revenue, GST Policy Wing. Enclo.: Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST. (Nagesh Kumar B, IAS) Chief Commissioner of State Tax Government of Tripura Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST CBEC/20/16/03/2017-GST Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs GST Policy Wing New Delhi, Dated the 14th September, 2018 To, The Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners / Principal Commissioners / Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Directors General / Directors General (All) Madam/Sir, Subject: Modification of the procedure for interception of conveyances for inspection of goods in movement, and detention, release and confiscation of such goods and conveyances, as clarified in Circular Nos. 41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Act read with rule 138A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the CGST Rules ) requires that the person in charge of a conveyance carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding ₹ 50,000/- should carry a copy of documents viz., invoice/bill of supply/delivery challan/bill of entry and a valid e-way bill in physical or electronic form for verification. In case such person does not carry the mentioned documents, there is no doubt that a contravention of the provisions of the law takes place and the provisions of section 129 and section 130 of the CGST Act are invocable. Further, it may be noted that the non-furnishing of information in Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 amounts to the e-way bill becoming not a valid document for the movement of goods by road as per Explanation (2) to rule 138(3) of the CGST Rules, except in the case where the goods are transported for a distance of upto fifty kilometres within the State or Union territory to

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tions: a) Spelling mistakes in the name of the consignor or the consignee but the GSTIN, wherever applicable, is correct; b) Error in the pin-code but the address of the consignor and the consignee mentioned is correct, subject to the condition that the error in the PIN code should not have the effect of increasing the validity period of the e-way bill; c) Error in the address of the consignee to the extent that the locality and other details of the consignee are correct; d) Error in one or two digits of the document number mentioned in the e-way bill; e) Error in 4 or 6 digit level of HSN where the first 2 digits of HSN are correct and the rate of tax mentioned is correct; f) Error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number. 6. In case of the above situations, penalty to the tune of ₹ 500/- each under section 125 of the CGST Act and the respective State GST Act should be imposed (Rs.1000/- under the IGST Act) in FORM GST DRC-07 for every consignment. A record of all s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =