Pre Primary Education

Pre Primary Education
Query (Issue) Started By: – Ravikumar Doddi Dated:- 5-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 6-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Dear sir,
Applicant is a proprietor running a Pre primary educational institution ( Kinder garden school) neither it is a trust or society is liable for GST or exempted, HSN Code, rate of tax, if any exemption Notification Number and date, please clarify
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
HSN 999210 Fully exempted as per Bo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st December 2018)

GST – CONCEPT & STATUS (Updated as on 01st December 2018)
GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (GST)
CONCEPT & STATUS
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS (CBIC)
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
AS ON 1st DECEMBER, 2018
The uniform system of taxation, which, with a few exceptions of no great consequence, takes place in all the different parts of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, leaves the interior commerce of the country, the inland and coasting trade, almost entirely free. The inland trade is almost perfectly free, and the greater part of goods may be carried from one end of the kingdom to the other, without requiring any permit or let-pass, without being subject to question, visit, or examination from the revenue officers. ……This freedom of interior commerce, the effect of uniformity of the system of taxation, is perhaps one of the principal causes of the prosperity of Great Britain; every great country being n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nbsp;
2.    CONSTITUTIONAL SCHEME OF INDIRECT TAXATION IN INDIA BEFORE GST :
2.1      Article 265 of the Constitution of India provides that no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. As per Article 246 of the Constitution, Parliament has exclusive powers to make laws in respect of matters given in Union List (List I of the Seventh Schedule) and State Government has the exclusive jurisdiction to legislate on the matters containing in State List (List II of the Seventh Schedule). In respect of the matters contained in Concurrent List (List III of the Seventh Schedule), both the Central Government and State Governments have concurrent powers to legislate. 
2.2      Before advent of GST, the most important sources of indirect tax revenue for the Union were customs duty (entry 83 of Union List), central excise duty (entry 84 of Union List), and service tax (entry 97 of Union List). Although entry 92C was i

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

entry 52 of the State List) and electricity tax ((entry 53 of the State List). CST was also an important source of revenue though the same was levied by the Union.
3.    HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF INDIRECT TAXATION IN POSTINDEPENDENCE INDIA TILL GST:
3.1      In post-Independence period, central excise duty was levied on a few commodities which were in the nature of raw materials and intermediate inputs, and consumer goods were outside the net by and large. The first set of reform was suggested by the Taxation Enquiry Commission (1953-54) under the chairmanship of Dr. John Matthai. The Commission recommended that sales tax should be used specifically by the States as a source of revenue with Union governments' intervention allowed generally only in case of inter-State sales. It also recommended levy of a tax on inter-State sales subject to a ceiling of 1%, which the States would administer and also retain the revenue. 
3.2    &

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

addition but in the beginning it was limited to select inputs and manufactured goods only with one-to-one correlation between input and manufactured goods for eligibility to take input tax credit. The comprehensive coverage of MODVAT was achieved by 1996-97. 
3.4      The next wave of reform in indirect tax sphere came with the New Economic Policy of 1991. The Tax Reforms Committee under the chairmanship of Prof. Raja J Chelliah was appointed in 1991. This Committee recommended broadening of the tax base by taxing services and pruning exemptions, consolidation and lowering of rates, extension of MODVAT on all inputs including capital goods. It suggested that reform of tax structure must have to be accompanied by a reform of tax administration, if complete benefits were to be derived from the tax reforms. Many of the recommendations of the Chelliah Committee were implemented. In 1999-2000, tax rates were merged in three rates, with additional rates on a few lux

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

     Before state level VAT was introduced by States in the first half of the first decade of this century, sales tax was levied in States since independence. Sales tax was plagued by some serious flaws. It was levied by States in an uncoordinated manner the consequences of which were different rates of sales tax on different commodities in different States. Rates of sales tax were more than ten in some States and these varied for the same commodity in different States. Inter-state sales were subjected to levy of Central Sales Tax. As this tax was appropriated by the exporting State credit was not allowed by the dealer in the importing State. This resulted into exportation of tax from richer to poorer states and also cascading of taxes. Interestingly, States had power of taxation over services from the very beginning. States levied tax on advertisements, luxuries, entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling. 
3.7      A report, titled “Refo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e first preliminary discussion on transition from sales tax regime to VAT regime took place in a meeting of Chief Ministers convened by the Union Finance Minister in 1995. A standing Committee of State Finance Ministers was constituted, as a result of meeting of the Union Finance Ministers and Chief Ministers in November, 1999, to deliberate on the design of VAT which was later made the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers (EC). Haryana was the first State to implement VAT, in 2003. In 2005, VAT was implemented in most of the states. Uttar Pradesh was the last State to implement VAT, from 1st January, 2008.
4.    INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON GST / VAT:
4.1      VAT and GST are used inter-changeably as the latter denotes comprehensiveness of VAT by coverage of goods and services. France was the first country to implement VAT, in 1954. Presently, more than 160 countries have implemented GST / VAT in some form or the other. The most popular

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

dministered by the Central government (Germany, Switzerland, Austria), or dual GST structure wherein both Centre and States administer tax independently (Canada) or with some co-ordination between the national and sub-national entities (Brazil, Russia). While a centralized structure reduces fiscal autonomy for the States, a decentralized structure enhances compliance burden for the taxpayers. Canada is a federal country with unique model of taxation in which certain provinces have joined federal GST and others have not. Provinces which administer their taxes separately are called 'non- participating provinces', whereas provinces which have teamed up with the Federal Government for tax administration are called 'participating provinces'. 
4.3      The rate of GST varies across countries. While Malaysia has a lower rate of 6% (Malaysia though scrapped GST in 2018 due to popular uproar against it),  Hungary has one of the highest rate of 27%. Australia levie

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

w the stage of production. Similarly, in the State-level VAT, CENVAT load on the goods has not yet been removed and the cascading effect of that part of tax burden has remained unrelieved. Moreover, there are several taxes in the States, such as, Luxury Tax, Entertainment Tax, etc. which have still not been subsumed in the VAT. Further, there has also not been any integration of VAT on goods with tax on services at the State level with removal of cascading effect of service tax.  
5.3      CST was another source of distortion in terms of its cascading nature. It was also against one of the basic principles of consumption taxes that tax should accrue to the jurisdiction where consumption takes place. Despite remarkable harmonization in VAT regimes under the auspices of the EC, the national market was fragmented with too many obstacles in free movement of goods necessitated by procedural requirement under VAT and CST. 
5.4      In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

towed upon both Union and States in the Constitution itself. As a natural corollary of this, any unification of the taxation system required a dual GST, levied and collected both by the Union and the States. 
6.    GST : A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE:
6.1      The Kelkar Task Force on Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) recommended in 2005 introduction of a comprehensive tax on all goods and service replacing Central level VAT and State level VATs. It recommended replacing all indirect taxes except the customs duty with value added tax on all goods and services with complete set off in all stages of making of a product. 
6.2      An announcement was made by the then Union Finance Minister in Budget  (2007-08) to the effect that GST would be introduced with effect from April 1, 2010 and that the EC, on his request, would work with the Central Government to prepare a road map for introduction of GST in In

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

discussions in the EC and the written observations, certain modifications were considered necessary and were discussed with the Co-conveners and the representatives of the Department of Revenue of Union Finance Ministry. With the modifications duly made, a final version of the views of EC on the model and road map for the GST was prepared (April 30, 2008). These views of EC were then sent to the Government of India, and the comments of Government of India were received on December 12, 2008. These comments were duly considered by the EC (December 16, 2008), and it was decided that a Committee of Principal Secretaries/Secretaries of Finance/Taxation and Commissioners of Trade Taxes of the States would be set up to consider these comments, and submit their views. These views were submitted and were accepted in principle by the EC (January 21, 2009). Based on discussions within the EC and between the EC and the Central Government, the EC released its First Discussion Paper (FDP) on GST in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

d to the State of origin where production or sale happened and not to the State where consumption happened. Many manufacturing States expressed concerns over the loss of revenue on account of shift from origin based taxation to destination based taxation. 
7.2.1      An argument put forward on behalf of producing states in support of origin based taxation is that they need to collect at least some tax from inter-State sales in order to recover the cost of infrastructure and public services provided by the State Governments to the industries producing the goods which are consumed in other states. This line of reasoning is based on the assumption that in the absence of a tax on inter-State sales, the location of export industries within their jurisdiction would not contribute to the tax revenues of the exporting state. This view was missing the fact that any value addition in a jurisdiction necessarily means extra income in the hands of the residents of tha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

bsp;   A Committee headed by the Chief Economic Adviser Dr. Arvind Subramanian on possible tax rates under GST suggested RNR (Revenue Neutral Rate). The term RNR refers to that single rate, which preserves revenue at desired (current) levels. This would differ from the standard rate, which is the rate that would apply to a majority of goods and services. In practice, there will be a structure of rates, but for the sake of analytical clarity and precision it is appropriate to think of the RNR as a single rate. It is a given single rate that gets converted into a whole rate structure, depending on policy choices about exemptions, what commodities to charge at a lower rate and what to charge at a very high rate. 
7.3.2      The Committee recommended RNR of 15-15.5% (to be levied by the Centre and States combined). The lower rates (to be applied to certain goods consumed by the poor) should be 12%.  Further, the sin or demerit rates (to be appl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

of the Parliament and the State Legislatures. The Constitution (One Hundred Twenty Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 departed from the previous GST amendment bill and proposed that the Goods and Services Tax Council may decide about the modalities to resolve disputes arising out of its recommendations. 
7.5      Alcohol and Petroleum products: Alcoholic liquor for human consumption and petroleum products are major contributor to revenue of States. As States were uncertain about impact of GST on their finances and moreover loss of autonomy in collection of tax revenue, States unanimously argued for exclusion of these products from the ambit of GST. In the 115th Amendment Bill alcoholic liquor for human consumption and five petroleum products namely crude petroleum, high speed diesel, motor spirit or petrol, aviation turbine fuel and natural gas were kept out of GST. But in the 122nd Amendment Bill, only alcoholic liquor for human consumption was kept outside GST and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

he complete supply chain from production to distribution, and both goods and services. The scheme of the Constitution did not provide for any concurrent taxing powers to the Union as well as the States and for the purpose of introducing goods and services tax amendment of the Constitution conferring simultaneous power on Parliament as well as the State Legislatures to make laws for levying goods and services tax on every transaction of supply of goods or services was necessary. 
8.2      The Constitution (115th Amendment) Bill, 2011, in relation to the introduction of GST, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 11th March, 2011. The Bill was referred to the Standing Committee on Finance on 29th March, 2011. The Standing Committee submitted its report on the Bill in August, 2013. However, the Bill, which was pending in the Lok Sabha, lapsed with the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha. 
8.3      The Constitution (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

.
* Article 268A of the Constitution has been omitted. The said article empowered the Government of India to levy taxes on services. As tax on services has been brought under GST, such a provision was no longer required.
* Article 269A has been inserted which provides for goods and services tax on supplies in the course of inter-State trade or commerce which shall be levied and collected by the Government of India and such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as may be provided by Parliament by law on the recommendations of the Goods and Services Tax Council. It also provides that Parliament may, by law, formulate the principles for determining the place of supply, and when a supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of interState trade or commerce.
* Article 270 has been amended to provide for distribution of goods and services tax collected by the Union between the Union and the States.
* Article 271 has been amended

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST.
* Parliament shall, by law, on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council, provide for compensation to the States for loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of the goods and services tax for five years.
* In case of petroleum and petroleum products, it has been provided that these goods shall not be subject to the levy of Goods and Services Tax till a date notified on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council.
9.    GOODS & SERVICE TAX COUNCIL:
9.1      As provided for in Article 279A of the Constitution, the Goods and Services Tax Council (the Council) was notified with effect from 12th September, 2016. The Council is comprised of the Union Finance Minister (who will be the Chairman of the Council), the Minister of State (Revenue) and the State Finance/Taxation Ministers as members. It shall make recommendations to the Union and the States on the following issues:
* the taxes, cesses and surch

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

onferred by this article, the Goods and Services Tax Council shall be guided by the need for a harmonized structure of goods and services tax and for the development of a harmonized national market for goods and services. 
9.3      One half of the total number of Members of the Goods and Services Tax Council shall constitute the quorum at its meetings. The Goods and Services Tax Council shall determine the procedure in the performance of its functions. Every decision of the Goods and Services Tax Council shall be taken at a meeting, by a majority of not less than three-fourths of the weighted votes of the members present and voting, in accordance with the following principles, namely: – 
(a)      the vote of the Central Government shall have a weightage of one-third of the total votes cast, and 
(b)      the votes of all the State Governments taken together shall have a weightage of two-thirds of the total vo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntral or State governments may be continued by respective government by way of reimbursement through budgetary route. The schemes, in the present form, would not continue in GST. Further, 50% exemption of the CGST portion will be provided to CSD (Defense Canteens).
(iv)     Recommending GST laws, namely CGST Law, UTGST Law, IGST Law, SGST Law and GST Compensation Law paving the way for implementation of GST.
(v)      In order to ensure single interface, all administrative control over 90% of taxpayers having turnover below Rs. 1.5 crore would vest with State tax administration and over 10% with the Central tax administration. Further all administrative control over taxpayers having turnover above Rs. 1.5 crore shall be divided equally in the ratio of 50% each for the Central and State tax administration. 
(vi)     Powers under the IGST Act shall also be cross-empowered on the same basis as under CGST and SGST Acts with few excep

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ion 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 and under sub-section (4) of section 5 of the IGST Act, 2017 has been suspended till 30.09.2019.
(xii)    There shall be no requirement on payment of tax on advance received for supply of goods by all taxpayers.
(xiii)   Supply from GTA to unregistered persons has been exempted from tax.
(xiv)   TDS/TCS provisions to be implemented from 01.10.2018. Further, to provide some more time to TDS deductor to familiarize themselves with the new system, last date for furnishing return in FORM GSTR-7 for the months of October, November & December has been extended upto 31st January, 2019. Further, exemption from TDS for been made for supply made by PSU to PSU.
(xv)    E-Wallet Scheme shall be introduced for exporters from 01.04.2019 and till then relief for exporters shall be given in form of broadly existing practice. 
(xvi)   All taxpayers are required to file return FORM GSTR-3B & pay tax on mont

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;Late fee for delayed filing of return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of July, 2017 to September, 2017 has been waived. The amount of late fee already paid but subsequently waived off shall be re-credited to the Electronic Cash Ledger of registered person under “Tax” head instead of “Fee” head. 
(xxi)   From October 2017 onwards, the amount of late fee for late filing of GSTR-3B payable by a registered person is as follows:
* whose tax liability for that month was 'NIL' will be Rs. 20/- per day instead of Rs. 200/- per day;
* whose tax liability for that month was not 'NIL' will be Rs. 50/- per day instead of Rs. 200/- per day.
(xxii)      Facility has been introduced for manual filing of refund application. (xxii) Supply of services to Nepal and Bhutan shall be exempted from GST even if payment has not been received in foreign convertible currency – such suppliers shall be eligible for input tax credit.
(xxiii)     Centrali

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e.
9.5 In its 28th meeting held in New Delhi on 21.07.2018, the GST Council recommended certain amendments in the CGST Act, IGST Act, UTGST Act and the GST (Compensation to States) Act. These amendments have been passed by Parliament and have been enacted, after receiving the assent of the Hon'ble President of India on 29.08.2018, as the Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Act, 2018, respectively. The major amendments brought about by these Acts are as below: 
(i)    Upper limit of turnover for opting for composition scheme to be raised from Rs. 1 Cr to Rs. 1.5 Cr. Present limit of turnover can now be raised on the recommendations of the Council.
(ii)   Composition dealers to be allowed to supply services (other than restaurant services), for up t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

;Registration to remain temporarily suspended while cancellation of registration is under process, so that the taxpayer is relieved of continued compliance under the law.
(viii)   The following transactions to be treated as no supply (no tax payable) under Schedule III: 
(a)      Supply of goods from a place in the non-taxable territory to another place in the non-taxable territory without such goods entering into India;
(b)      Supply of warehoused goods to any person before clearance for home consumption; and
(c)   Supply of goods in case of high sea sales.
(ix) Scope of input tax credit is being widened, and it would now be made  available in respect of the following:
(a)      Most of the activities or transactions specified in Schedule III;
(b)      Motor vehicles for transportation of persons having seating capacity of more than thirteen (including driver), ve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nbsp;  Place of supply in case of job work of any treatment or process done on goods temporarily imported into India and then exported without putting them to any other use in India, to be outside India.
(xv)    Recovery can be made from distinct persons, even if present in different State/Union territories.
(xvi)   The order of cross-utilisation of input tax credit is being rationalized.
(xvii)      The amount of IGST not apportioned to the Centre or the States/UTs may, for the time being, on the recommendations of the Council, be apportioned at the rate of fifty per cent. to the Central Government and fifty per cent. to the State Governments or the Union territories, as the case may be, on ad hoc basis and this amount shall be adjusted against the amount finally apportioned.
(xviii)     Fifty per cent of such amount, as may be recommended by the Council, which remains unutilised in the Compensation Fund, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ated changes in law.  These changes have been carried out in the law vide the Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018. The main features of the new return filing format are as follows:
(i)    All taxpayers excluding small taxpayers and a few exceptions like ISD etc. shall file one monthly return. 
(ii)   The return is simple with two main tables. One for reporting outward supplies and one for availing input tax credit based on invoices uploaded by the supplier.
(iii)      Invoices can be uploaded continuously by the supplier and can be continuously viewed and locked by the buyer for availing input tax credit. This process would ensure that very large part of the return is automatically filled based on the invoices uploaded by the buyer and the supplier. Simply put, the process would be “UPLOAD – LOCK – PAY” for most tax payers.
(iv)     Taxpayers would have facility to create his profile based on nat

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n called amendment return. Payment would be allowed to be made through the amendment return as it will help save interest liability for the taxpayers.
In order to ensure that the above changes in the Centre and the State GST laws are brought into force simultaneously, these amendments will be made effective from a date to be notified in the future.
10. THE DESIGN OF INDIAN GST:
10.1    Concurrent dual model of GST: India has adopted dual GST model because of its unique federal nature. Under this model, tax is levied concurrently by the Centre as well as the States on a common base, i.e. supply of goods or services or both. GST to be levied by the Centre would be called Central GST (Central tax / CGST) and that to be levied by the States would be called State GST (State Tax / SGST). State GST (State Tax / SGST) would be called UTGST (Union territory tax) in Union Territories without legislature. CGST & SGST / UTGST shall be levied on all taxable intra-State supplies.&n

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pective governments to transfer the funds. The major advantages of IGST Model are:
(i)    Maintenance of uninterrupted ITC chain on inter-State transactions.
(ii)   No upfront payment of tax or substantial blockage of funds for the interState supplier or recipient.
(iii)      No refund claim in exporting State, as ITC is used up while paying the tax.
(iv)     Self-monitoring model.
(v)      Model takes 'Business to Business' as well as 'Business to Consumer' transactions into account. 
10.3    Tax Rates: Owing to unique Indian socio-economic milieu, four rates namely 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% have been adopted. Besides, some goods and services are exempt also. Rate for precious metals is an exception to 'four-tax slabrule' and the same has been fixed at 3%. In addition, unworked diamonds, precious stones, etc. attracts a rate of 0.25%. A cess over the peak rate of 28% on certain specifi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s' tax revenues from: (i) State Value Added Tax (VAT), (ii) central sales tax, (iii) entry tax, octroi, local body tax, (iv) taxes on luxuries, (v) taxes on advertisements, etc.  However, any revenue among these taxes arising related to supply of alcohol for human consumption, and five specified petroleum products, will not be accounted as part of the base year revenue. A GST Compensation Cess is levied on the supply of certain goods and services, as recommended by the GST Council to finance the compensation cess. 
10.5    E-Way Bill System: The introduction of e-way (electronic way) bill is a monumental shift from the earlier “Departmental Policing Model” to a “SelfDeclaration Model”. It envisages one e-way bill for movement of the goods throughout the country, thereby ensuring a hassle free movement for transporters throughout the country. The e-way bill system has been introduced nation-wide for all inter-State movement of goods with effect from 1st April,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Authority shall cease to exist after the expiry of two years from the date on which the Chairman enters upon his office unless the Council recommends otherwise.
10.6.2    The Authority may determine whether any reduction in the rate of tax or the benefit of input tax credit has been passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. It can order reduction in prices, imposition of penalty, cancellation of registration and any other decision as may deem fit, after inquiry into the case. 
10.7    Concept of Supply: GST would be applicable on supply of goods or services as against the present concept of tax on manufacture of goods or on sale of goods or on provision of services. It includes all sorts of activities like manufacture, sale, barter, exchange, transfer etc. It also includes supplies made without consideration when such supplies are made in certain specified situations. 
10.8    Threshold Exemption: A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ry amendments in the GST Acts. The amendment shall be effective from a date to be notified in the future.
10.10     Zero rated Supplies: Export of goods and services are zero rated. Supplies to SEZs developers and SEZ units are also zero-rated. The benefit of zero rating can be taken either with payment of integrated tax, or without payment of integrated tax under bond or Letter of Undertaking. 
10.11     Cross-utilization of ITC: IGST credit can be used for payment of all taxes. CGST credit can be used only for paying CGST or IGST. SGST credit can be used only for paying SGST or IGST. 
The credit would be permitted to be utilized in the following manner:
(a)      ITC of CGST allowed for payment of CGST & IGST in that order;
(b)      ITC of SGST allowed for payment of SGST & IGST in that order;
(c)   ITC of UTGST allowed for payment of UTGST & IGST in that order;
(d)   &

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

    Tax Deduction at Source: Obligation on certain persons including government departments, local authorities and government agencies, who are recipients of supply, to deduct tax at the rate of 1% from the payment made or credited to the supplier where total value of supply, under a contract, exceeds two lakh and fifty thousand rupees. The provision for TDS has been operationalized wef 01st October 2018. Exemption from the provisions of TDS has been given to certain authorities under the Ministry of Defence.  
10.15     Refunds: Refund of tax to be sought by taxpayer or by any other person who has borne the incidence of tax within two years from the relevant date. Refund of unutilized ITC also available in zero rated supplies and inverted tax structure.
10.16   Tax Collection at Source: Obligation on electronic commerce operators to collect 'tax at source', at such rate not exceeding two per cent of net value of taxable supplies

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

es including detaining and sale of goods, movable and immovable property of defaulting taxable person.
10.19     Appellate Tribunal: Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal would be constituted by the Central Government for hearing appeals against the orders passed by the Appellate Authority or the Revisional Authority. States would adopt the provisions relating to Tribunal in respective SGST Act.
10.20     Advance Ruling Authority: Advance Ruling Authority would be constituted by States in order to enable the taxpayer to seek a binding clarity on taxation matters from the department. Centre would adopt such authority under CGST Act.
10.21     Transitional Provisions: Elaborate transitional provisions have been provided for smooth transition of existing taxpayers to GST regime.
10.22   Subsuming of taxes, duties etc.: Among the taxes and duties levied and collected by the Union, Central Excise duty, Duties of E

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t J&K) and Union territories with legislature have passed their respective SGST Acts. The economic integration of India was completed on 8th July, 2017 when the State of J&K also passed the SGST Act and the Central Government also subsequently extended the CGST Act to J&K. 
11.2.      In its 28th meeting held in New Delhi on 21.07.2018, the GST Council recommended certain amendments in the CGST Act, IGST Act, UTGST Act and the GST (Compensation to States) Act. These amendments have been passed by Parliament and have been enacted, after receiving the assent of the Hon'ble  President of India on 29.08.2018, as the Central Goods and Services Tax  (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018, the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Amendment Act, 2018, respectively. In order to ensure that the above changes in the Centre and the Sta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

rious forms, etc.
12.      ROLE OF CBIC:
12.1 CBIC is playing an active role in the drafting of GST law and procedures, particularly the CGST and IGST law, which will be exclusive domain of the Centre. This apart, the CBIC has prepared itself for meeting the implementation challenges, which are quite formidable. The number of taxpayers has gone up significantly. The existing IT infrastructure of CBIC has been suitably scaled up to handle such large volumes of data. Based on the legal provisions and procedure for GST, the content of work-flow software such as ACES (Automated Central Excise & Service Tax) would require re-engineering. The name of IT project of CBIC under GST is 'SAKSHAM' involving a total project value of Rs. 2,256 Cr.
12.2 Augmentation of human resources would be necessary to handle large taxpayers' base in GST scattered across the length and breadth of the country. Capacity building, particularly in the field of Accountancy and Information Techn

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

et up the Feedback and Action Room which monitored the GST implementation challenges faced by the taxpayer and act as an active interface between the taxpayer and the Government.
13.      GOODS & SERVICES TAX NETWORK:
13.1 Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has been set up by the  Government as a private company under erstwhile Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956. GSTN would provide three front end services to the taxpayers namely registration, payment and return. Besides providing these services to the taxpayers, GSTN would be developing back-end IT modules for 27 States who have opted for the same. Infosys has been appointed as Managed Service Provider (MSP). GSTN has selected 73 IT, ITeS and financial technology companies and 1 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CCT, Karnataka), to be called GST Suvidha Providers (GSPs). GSPs would develop applications to be used by taxpayers for interacting with the GSTN. The diagram below shows the work distribution

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

s per GST law, can access the data. Data can be accessed by audit authorities as per law. No other entity can have any access to data available with GSTN.
14.      GST: A GAME CHANGER FOR INDIAN  ECONOMY:
14.1 GST will have a multiplier effect on the economy with benefits accruing to various sectors as discussed below.
14.2 Benefits to the exporters: The subsuming of major Central and State taxes in GST, complete and comprehensive setoff of input goods and services and phasing out of Central Sales Tax (CST) would reduce the cost of locally manufactured goods and services. This will increase the competitiveness of Indian goods and services in the international market and give boost to Indian exports. The uniformity in tax rates and procedures across the country will also go a long way in reducing the compliance cost.
14.3 Benefits to small traders and entrepreneurs: GST has increased the threshold for GST registration for small businesses. Those units havin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

n an average dealer in industry, trade and agriculture.
14.5 Benefits for common consumers: With the introduction of GST, the cascading effects of CENVAT, State VAT and service tax will be more comprehensively removed with a continuous chain of set-off from the producer's point to the retailer's point than what was possible under the prevailing CENVAT and VAT regime.  Certain major Central and State taxes will also be subsumed in GST and CST will be phased out. Other things remaining the same, the burden of tax on goods would, in general, fall under GST and that would benefit the consumers.
14.6 Promote “Make in India”: GST will help to create a unified common national market for India, giving a boost to foreign investment and “Make in India” campaign. It will prevent cascading of taxes and make products cheaper, thus boosting aggregate demand. It will result in harmonization of laws, procedures and rates of tax. It will boost export and manufacturing activity, generate more emp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

exemptions along with reduction in multiplicity of taxes that are at present governing our indirect tax system will lead to simplification and uniformity. Reduction in compliance costs as multiple record-keeping for a variety of taxes will not be needed, therefore, lesser investment of resources and manpower in maintaining records. It will result in simplified and automated procedures for various processes such as registration, returns, refunds, tax payments. All interaction shall be through the common GSTN portal, therefore, less public interface between the taxpayer and the tax administration. It will improve environment of compliance as all returns to be filed online, input credits to be verified online, encouraging more paper trail of transactions. Common procedures for registration of taxpayers, refund of taxes, uniform formats of tax return, common tax base, common system of classification of goods and services will lend greater certainty to taxation system.    
1

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

14.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for February, 2018
73,86,339
15.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for March, 2018
74,44,829
16.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for April, 2018
74,05,472
17.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for May, 2018
74,89,674  
18.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for June, 2018
75,22,043
19.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for July, 2018
75,15,731
20.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for August, 2018
74,84,227  
21.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for September, 2018
73,53,188
22.
No. of 3(B) returns filed for October, 2018
69,60,318
23.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for July, 2017
59,41,377
24.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for August, 2017
24,63,078
25.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for September, 2017
66,32,774
26.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for October, 2017
25,30,098
27.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for November, 2017
25,59,048
28.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for December, 2017
66,59,016  
29.
No. of GSTR 1 returns filed for January, 2018
25,38,847

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

8
12,94,450
15.2    Revenue Collection Snapshot:
S. No.
Revenue Collected in the Month of
 Amount  (in Rs. Thousand crore)
1.  
August, 17
95,633
2.  
September, 17
94,064
3.  
October, 17
93,333
4.  
November, 17
83,780
5.  
December, 17
84,314
6.  
January, 18
89,825
7.  
February, 18
85,962
8.  
March, 18
92,167
9.  
April, 18
1,03,459
10.  
May, 18
94,016
11.  
June, 18
95,610
12.  
July, 18
96,483
13.  
August, 18
93,960
14.  
September, 18
94,442
15.  
October, 18
1,00,710
16.  
November, 18
97,637
 
16.      CHALLENGES & FUTURE AHEAD:
16.1    Any new change is accompanied by difficulties and problems at the outset. A change as comprehensive as GST is bound to pose certain challenges not only for the government but also for business community, tax administration and even common

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ntra-State supplies last being NCT of Delhi where it was introduced w.e.f. 16th June, 2018. 
16.3    NAPA has initiated investigation into various complaints of anti-profiteering and has passed orders in some cases to protect consumer interest. 
16.4    To expedite sanction of refund, manual filing and processing of refunds has been enabled. Clarificatory Circulars and notifications have been issued to guide field formations of CBIC and States in this regard. The government has put in place an IT grievance redressal mechanism to address the difficulties faced by taxpayers owing to technical glitches on the GST portal.
16.5    The introduction of GST is truly a game changer for Indian economy as it has replaced multi-layered, complex indirect tax structure with a simple, transparent and technology-driven tax regime. It will integrate India into a single, common market by breaking barriers to inter-State trade and commerce. By eli

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners

Examination for Confirmation of Enrollment of GST Practitioners
GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

Reference is invited to Press Releases dated 1.11.2018 and 29.11.2018 regarding exam to be conducted on 17.12.2018 for GST Practitioners (GSTPs) covered under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 83 of CGST Rules 2017, i.e. those enrolled as a sales tax practitioners or tax return preparer under the existing law for a period not less than five years, and enrolled under sub-rule (2) of Rule 83 of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Credit eligibility – cases where no payment liability exists

Credit eligibility – cases where no payment liability exists
By: – Shilpi Jain
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

Under GST, any registered person would be eligible to claim ITC of taxes paid on goods or services procured, which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business and to the extent used for effecting taxable supplies, unless specifically restricted u/s 17(5) of the Act.
Apart from the restrictions specified in section 17(5) of the Act, there could be situations where credit would become ineligible, like non-payment within 180 days in certain cases, non-receipt of proper tax invoice, etc. However, it can be said that the provisions are not as stringent as under the earlier laws where receipt of the capital goods in the premises/factory of the manufacturer was required. Further, under GST there could be some situations where, say, in spite of non-receipt of the goods in the premises of the recipient or non-payment of con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

charged on import of goods, in the instant case, even though not paid for by the Indian company, falls under the purview of input tax credit. Further, the goods are used by the Indian company for business purpose and for effecting taxable supplies as required by section 16(1) and 17(2) of the Act. Hence, prima facie ITC is eligible.
Further, section 16(2) of the Act prescribes conditions for availing ITC, which are as follows:
Condition
Applicability in the instant case
The registered person is in possession of a tax invoice or debit note issued by a supplier registered under this Act, or such other taxpaying documents as may be prescribed
As per rule 36 of CGST Rules 2017, BoE is a prescribed document.
The registered person has received the goods or services or both
The Indian company has received the goods.
The tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the Government, either in cash or through utilization of input tax credit admissible in respect of the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

e to pay tax also to the supplier. However, in case of BoEs, the recipient is not required to pay the taxes to the supplier, but the same has to be paid to the Government directly. Thus, it can be said that this proviso is not applicable.
Therefore, as all the conditions prescribed for availing ITC are satisfied and credit is not restricted under section 17(5) of the Act, it can be said that the credit of the taxes mentioned in the BoE will be eligible to the Indian company irrespective of the fact that no amount has been paid by such company to either the Government or to the supplier, in respect of the BoE.
Case-2: A company has purchased machinery for which the supplier has given 3 years warranty. After 1 year, the machinery was damaged. Since, the machine was in the warranty period, the supplier replaced the machinery free of cost. However, while sending the spare parts for replacement, the supplier has discharged GST liability at its end by treating such replacement as supply in

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

AN UPDATER ON RECENT CHANGES IN GST

AN UPDATER ON RECENT CHANGES IN GST
By: – Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 5-12-2018

With general elections in the country slated to be in May, 2019 will have interim budget only before the Lok Sabha elections. According to convention, the Budget speeches immediately preceding a Lok Sabha election do not have a distinct Part B, and only a very limited number of tax related announcements are made. So far as indirect taxes are concerned, there may not be much in the coming Budget as it is the GST Council who makes the final recommendations to be carried out by the Parliament or by way of delegated legislation.
The report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) on performance of GST is likely to be tabled before Parliament in the ensuing winter session thereof, which begins on 11th December, 2018. The CAG is in process of auditing the functioning of GST since its inception on 1st July, 2017. It would include aspects like registration,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

has been made.
* For Export supply type, the 'Bill To' Party will be URP or GSTIN of SEZ Unit with state as 'Other Country' and shipping address and PIN code will be of the location (airport/shipping yard/border check post) from where the consignment is moving out from the country.
* For Import supply, the 'Bill From' Party will be URP or GSTIN of SEZ Unit with state as 'Other Country' and dispatching address and PIN code will be of the location (airport/shipping yard/border check post) from where the consignment is entered the country
* Enhancement in 'Bill To – Ship To' transactions: EWB generation is now categorized to four types now Regular and Bill to Ship to, Bill from Dispatch from & combination of both.
* Facility of EWB generation through the Bulk Generation Tool has been enhanced.
GSTN Portal Updates
Provisional Assessment
Following forms have been made available on GST Portal:
* Form GST ASMT 01 for provisional assessment by taxpayers who are not able to deter

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

STR-4 filed during the financial year.
* Part III requires details of tax paid as declared in returns filed during the financial year.
* Part IV consists of summary of amendments/corrections relating to entries of previous FY.
* Part V requires other information such as particulars of demand and refunds & details relating to late fees payable and paid.
Extension in due dates of returns
* CBIC has extended the last date for filing FORM GSTR-3B for the month of September, 2018 and October, 2018 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in Srikakulam district in the State of Andhra Pradesh to 30th November, 2018 and has also extended the last date for filing FORM GSTR-3B for the month of October, 2018 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in 11 districts of Tamil Nadu* to 20th December, 2018.
* CBIC has extended the due date for filing FORM GSTR-1 for the month of September, 2018 and October, 2018 for registered persons whose principal pl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-II) CGST & Central Excise, Chennai

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-II) CGST & Central Excise, Chennai
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 438 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 5-12-2018
Appeal No. E/40788/2018 – FINAL ORDER No. 42996/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Ms. S. Sridevi, Advocate For the Appellant
Shri L. Nandakumar, AC (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
The issue involved in this appeal is with regard to the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on various services.
2. The Ld. Advocate, Ms. S. Sridevi appearing for the appellant submitted that the department has denied the credit alleging that it is not established that the services on which credit has been availed on the basis of ISD invoices have been used directly or indirectly in or in relation to manufacture and clearance of final products. She submitted that the details of the services availed and the nexus with the manufacturing activity alongwith the decisions whic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

35 (Tri Hyd);
Virchow Laboratories – 2017 (51) STR 443 (Tri Hyd)
5
Erection commission/installation service
For installation of servers, generators, ups and other equipments
GE India technology Centre-2014-TIOL-1931-CESTAT-BANG Orient Cement Ltd., – 2017 (51) STR 459 (Tri Hyd)
6
Civil works services/Repairs and maintenance
Used for repairs/modernization and maintenance of office building
Zydus Nycomed Healthcare 2013 (3) STR 197 (Tri Mum);
7
Designing and printing services
Printing of tender docs/in house journals etc.,
Ultratech Cements Ltd., vs CCE., Jaipur – 2015 (40) STR 523 (Tri Del)
8
Cleaning services/Housekeeping
For maintaining the office
Xlinx India Tech – 2016 (44) STR 635 (Tri Hyd);
CCE., vs Maruthi Suzuki – 2015 (38) STR 503 (Tri Del)
9
Sponsorship services
Publication of booklet, banner and conductive events in relation to business development etc.,
Xlinx India Tech – 2016 (44) STR 635 (Tri Hyd.)
10
Finance Lease services /
Purchase of computers/p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

sponsorship service and finance lease service are eligible for credit. These issues were considered by the Tribunal in Xilinx India Tech. Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs CC., CE. & ST., Hyderabad-IV 2016 (44) S.T.R.635 (tri. – Hyd.). Following the said decision, I hold that the credit availed on the above services are legal and proper. The disallowance being unjustified, is set aside.
6. The Ld.Counsel for the appellant has produced the invoices relating to the services availed on membership fees. It is submitted by her that the appellant company had to take membership in Associated Chamber of Commerce and Industry of India. This is to enable the company to have connections with similar persons in the very same field of commerce and industry. This helps to develop the business and also to get updated with the trends in the industry and is therefore related to the activity of manufacture. It is not for personal membership in a Club. Similarly the appellant has taken membership in spending on con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appeals) has remanded to the adjudicating authority to reconsider the issue of various services. In para 8.4 of the Order in Original it is mentioned that works contract services as well as civil works services are disallowed. It is not possible to make out from the SCN or the order as to the services which come under works contract service and civil works services. This aspect needs to be reconsidered. Therefore this issue with respect to credit availed on works contract service / civil works service / repair and maintenance of xerox machine is remanded to the adjudicating authority.
8. So also the appellant contends that the accommodation services are availed for hotel accommodation for the employees who are on official duty. The appellant has to establish with necessary documents that the accommodation was availed for official purposes only. The Counsel for appellant submitted that the appellant would be able to furnish documents to establish that this was availed for official purp

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Satya Prakash Singh @ S.P. Singh Versus The Union of India through GST Council.

Satya Prakash Singh @ S.P. Singh Versus The Union of India through GST Council.
GST
2018 (12) TMI 708 – JHARKHAND HIGH COURT – TMI
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-12-2018
B. A. No. 9077 of 2018
GST
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN J.
For the Petitioner: Mr. N.K.Pasari, Advocate
For the State: A.P.P.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel for opposite party, who opposes the prayer for bail. The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017.
There is an allegation against this petitioner that he illegally availed Input Tax Credit. The petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2018. Learned counsel appe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

M/s. SWARNASHILPI Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (TAXES), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OFREVENU

M/s. SWARNASHILPI Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (TAXES), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE, NEW DELHI AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAXES DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR, TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (12) TMI 839 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-12-2018
RP. No. 991 of 2018 In WP(C). 13090/2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. RUBEN GEORGE ROCK
For The Respondent : DR THUSHARA JAMES, GP. SRI. T. V. VINU, CGC.
ORDER
In W.P.(C) No.13090 of 2018, the petitioner challenged the Ext.P6 a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

According to the petitioner's counsel, as the petitioner bona fide pursued its remedy before this Court in W.P.(C) No.13090 of 2018, there occurred some delay, which would be fatal if the petitioner goes before the appellate authority. There ought to be an observation on that delay from this Court. According to him, the judgment in the earlier writ petition, based on which this writ petition was disposed of, contained no reference to the delay.
4. Heard the petitioner's counsel and the learned Government Pleader.
5. I reckon the petitioner's apprehension is genuine. I, therefore, in modification of the judgment dated 23rd October 2018 in W.P.(C) No.13090 of 2018, hold that if the petitioner approaches the appellate authority-t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

In Re: Shri Dhananjay Kumar Singh

In Re: Shri Dhananjay Kumar Singh
GST
2019 (2) TMI 64 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH – 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 219 (A. A. R. – GST)
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH – AAR
Dated:- 5-12-2018
STC/AAR/06/2018
GST
SHRI S.K. BUXY AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, MEMBER
PROCEEDINGS
[U/s 98 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGGST Act, 2017)]
Sub:- Chhattisgarh GST Act, 2017 – Advance Ruling U/s 98 – Regarding the GST rates applicable in case of supply of services to Solid waste management, Garbage Collection, Disposal, Water Supply, Cleaning of Colony.
Read:-Application dated 08-09-2018 from Shri Dhananjay Kumar Singh, H.N -13, Sanyasi Para, Khamtarai, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492001
PROCEEDINGS
[U/s 98 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGGST Act, 2017)]
No. STC/AAR/06/2018
Raipur, Dated 05/12/2018
 
The applicant M/s. Dhananjay Kumar Singh HN 13, Sa

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ead tank), cleaning of common area of residential area developed by Chhattisgarh Housing Board and not handed over to the local authority for its maintenance. The applicant is providing all those services to the CGHB that a local authority usually provides to the common resident under their jurisdiction. There are certain localities which are developed by CGHB for which maintenance work is given to contractor till they are handed over to the local authority.
II. The applicant sought Advance Ruling (AAR) on whether the services provided in relation to solid waste management, water supply operations, garbage collection door to door and disposal, cleaning of colony i.e. garden, street and open area, drainage system, sewerage cleaning of water tank (all UG Sump & Over head tank), cleaning of common area of residential area developed by Chhattisgarh Housing Board and not handed over to the local authority by Chhattisgarh Housing Board (CGHB) are exempt, under as per notification no. 12/20

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

“Government entity”.
III. Further CGHB is also engaged in performing various functions required to be performed by Municipality under article 243W of the Constitution like slum improvement, up gradation and also facilities like solid waste management, Water supply for domestic purpose etc. till the time the developed areas are officially handed over to the local authority for maintenance.
IV. The above view is supported by the recent judgment in case of M/s. Vinod Kumar Panday, Raipur O/A No. BHO-EXUS-002APP-037-17-18 dated 03.05.2017 passed by Hon. Commissioner (Appeals) Raipur where the appellate authority held that the CGHB is covered under the definition of Government Authority for the purpose of Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012.
V. The Definition of Government authority under service tax regime is also produced below as defined in Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 and as amended from time to time.
“Governmental authority” means an authority or a board or a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

(CGHB) is exempt under as per notification no. 12/2017 dated 28th June 2017 as updated and amended time to time. However, in case they are not covered under the said exemption notification, the applicant has sought clarification as regards the applicable rate of GST for the above services rendered by them.
4. Personal Hearing:-
In keeping with the established principles of natural justice, personal hearing in the matter was extended to the authorized representative of the applicant and accordingly, Shri Ramandeep Singh Bhatia (CA) appeared before us for hearing on 30.10.2018 and reiterated their contention. They also furnished a written submission dated 30.10.2018, which has been taken on record.
I. The applicant has quoted the judgment of M/s. The Nursery Men Co-operative Society, Lalbagh, Lalbagh Double Gate Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka in case no. KAR ADRG 18/2018, order dated 06-08-2018 = 2018 (9) TMI 1037 – AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA as pronounced by Authority fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nicipality. Hence exempt under as per notification no. 12/2017 dated 28th June, 2017
5. The legal position, Analysis and Discussion:-
5.1 The provisions for implementing the CGST Act and CGGST Act, 2017 are similar. Now we sequentially discuss the provisions that are applicable in the present case.
Notification No. 12/2017-state Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017, Serial No. 3, Chapter 99 reads as under:-
Sl.No.
Chapter, Section, Heading, Group or Service Code (Tariff)
Description of Services
Rate (per cent)
Condition
3.
Chapter 99
“Pure services (excluding works contract service or other composite supplies involving supply of any goods) provided to the Central Government, State Government or Union territory or local authority or a Government by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution or in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under article 243W of the C

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

pply of goods is involved herein along with provision of service, the work order issued by Chhattisgarh Housing Board has been verified. The applicant has shown the nature work order to be solely provision of services, and no supply of goods has been mentioned. This gets further clear from the invoices submitted to the Chhattisgarh Housing Board. Thus it is evident from the work order itself that the same is solely for provision of service and no supply of good is involved.
Following two points needs ascertainment in order to determine the applicable tax rate on the impugned services to be provided by the applicant:-
i. Whether the Authority issuing work order to the applicant i.e. Chhattisgarh Housing Board is an established 'Governmental Board' under State or Central Government or not; and
ii. Whether the service supplies to be provided by the applicant falls under public utility services enumerated under 12th schedule, Article 243W of the Indian Constitution or not.
5.4 In thi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

minent in the field of Housing, Engineering Architecture of Town Planning to be appointed by the State Government.
(h) Housing Commissioner;
5.5 Thus it gets amply clear that Chhattisgarh Housing Board is a “Government Authority” as per No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10- 43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017 and as amended by Notification No. 31/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-82/2017/CT/V(146), Naya Raipur, Dated 13.10.2017.
“(ix) “Governmental Authority” means an authority or a board or any other body, –
(i) set up by an Act of Parliament or a State Legislature; or (ID established by any Government,;) with 90 percent. or more participation by way of equity or control, to carry out an)' function entrusted or a Municipality/ under article 243 W of the Constitution or to a Panchayat under article 243 G of the Constitution.
Thus Chhattisgarh Housing Board is a Government Authority fully owned by the State Government.
5.6 Now for arriving at a decision as to whether

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

th such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule
APPENDIX-3
Twelfth Schedule [Article 243W of the Constitution (Seventy-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992]
1. Urban planning including town planning.
2. Planning of land- use and construction of buildings.
3. Planning for economic and social development.
4. Roads and bridges.
5. Water supply for domestic, industrial and commercial purposes.
6. Public health, sanitation conservancy and solid waste management.
7. Fire services.
8. Urban forestry, protection of the environment and promotion of ecological aspects.
9. Safeguarding the interests of weaker sections of society, including the handicapped and mentally retarded.
10. Slum improvement and up gradation.
11. Urban poverty alleviation.
12. Provision of urban amenities and facilities such as parks, gardens, playgrounds.
13. Pro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

t, water supply operation, garbage collection door to door and disposal, cleaning of colony i.e. garden, street and open area, drainage system, sewerage, water tank (All UG Sump & Overhead Tank), cleaning of common area in multistoried building, etc. and all other related work pertaining to operation and maintenance.
The service supply to be provided by the applicant by their very nature appear to fall in the list of services enumerated under serial no. 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 17 of 12th schedule of Article 243W of the Indian Constitution, thus qualifying the admissibility criterion. It has also been categorically stated by the applicant that the said services to be provided to Chhattisgarh Housing Board does not involve any transfer/sale of any goods. Services specified under serial no. 3, chapter 99 of Notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017 provides exemption, as under :-
“Pure services (excluding works contract service or ot

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

terms of Notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017, Serial No. 3, Chapter 99 :-
(i) Supply of Services of Colony maintenance work to C.G. Housing Board Colony, Sector 29, Naya Raipur with regard to solid waste management, water supply operation, garbage collection door to door and disposal, cleaning of colony i.e. garden, street and open area, drainage system, sewerage, water tank (All UG Sump & Overhead Tank), cleaning of common area in multistoried building, etc. and all other related work pertaining to operation and maintenance will be treated as exempt supply as per notification No 12/2017-State Tax (Rate) No. F-10-43/2017/CT/V(80), Naya Raipur, Dated 28.06.2017, Serial No. 3, Chapter 99.
(ii) The aforesaid exemption is not available in case any transfer of property in goods involved therein or if the said service is provided to persons other than State Government, Central Government or a local Authority or a Governmental

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

To charge GST or Not -reference section 13 of IGST Act.

To charge GST or Not -reference section 13 of IGST Act.
Query (Issue) Started By: – Vijay Kumar Dated:- 4-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 7-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 3 Replies
GST
Dear Experts
One of my client received an offer for creation/shooting of a animation film from a Canadian person. My client is registered GST Service Provider in India. Film will be shot/created in India but will be intended for the Canadian audience only. Canadian person has no Business connecti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Admisibility of Input Tax Credit on Hotel Stay

Admisibility of Input Tax Credit on Hotel Stay
Query (Issue) Started By: – Kaustubh Karandikar Dated:- 4-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 7 Replies
GST
XYZ (Maharashtra) had arranged a Customer meet in a Hotel in Bangalore towards sales promotion. The Hotel is ready to issue to separate bills viz. one for food and other for stay. The Hotel will be charging IGST in the invoice issued to XYZ in the name of XYZ, Maharashtra. Can XYZ take input tax credit against the bill for hotel stay?
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
Since it is in furtherance of busines ITC is eligible.
Reply By Alkesh Jani:
The Reply:
Dear Sir,
In this regards my point of view is that, the Hotel cannot cha

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Guidance on GST for Casual Taxable Persons and Rectifying Excess ITC Distribution by Input Service Distributors.

Guidance on GST for Casual Taxable Persons and Rectifying Excess ITC Distribution by Input Service Distributors.
Circulars
GST – States
Clarifications of issues under GST related to casual ta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Streamlined Procedure for GST Registration Cancellation Applications via FORM GST REG-16 to Enhance Efficiency and Compliance.

Streamlined Procedure for GST Registration Cancellation Applications via FORM GST REG-16 to Enhance Efficiency and Compliance.
Circulars
GST – States
Processing of Applications for Cancellati

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Security Services for Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation Exempt from GST Under Article 243W; Classified as Pure Service.

Security Services for Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation Exempt from GST Under Article 243W; Classified as Pure Service.
Case-Laws
GST
Exemption from GST – Security Services rendered to P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Commission for Intermediary Services Between Foreign Exporter and Indian Importer Subject to GST, Not “Export of Service.

Commission for Intermediary Services Between Foreign Exporter and Indian Importer Subject to GST, Not “Export of Service.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – export of service or not – intermediary services – The “Commission” received by the Applicant in convertible Foreign Exchange for rendering services as an “Intermediary” between an exporter abroad receiving such services and an Indian importer Of an Equipment, is not an “export of service” and GST will be levied.
TMI Update

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Goods Sold Outside India Are Non-Taxable Until Customs Clearance u/s 12 of Customs Act, 1962. No GST Applied.

Goods Sold Outside India Are Non-Taxable Until Customs Clearance u/s 12 of Customs Act, 1962. No GST Applied.
Case-Laws
GST
Levy of GST – sale of goods outside India – The goods sold in the subject transaction are non-taxable supply as no tax is leviable on them till the time of customs clearance in accordance with and compliance of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 3 of the Customs Tariff act, 1975
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, aler

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ocean freight paid rcm applicability

ocean freight paid rcm applicability
Query (Issue) Started By: – satbir singhwahi Dated:- 4-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 9-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 4 Replies
GST
EXPORTING GARMENTS FIRM , PAYING OCEAN FREIGHT ON IMPORTS AND EXPORTS. PLS GUIDE THE APPLICABILITY OF RCM FOR JULY 2017 TO TILL DATE.
Reply By DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN:
The Reply:
Your query requires some more details.
Reply By satbir singhwahi:
The Reply:
SIR
GARMENTS EXPORTING FIRM :
1. PAYING OCEAN FR

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Status of GST Refunds

Status of GST Refunds
GST
Dated:- 4-12-2018

Total GST refunds to the tune of ₹ 91,149 crores have been disposed by CBIC and State authorities out of the total refund claims of ₹ 97,202 crores received so far. Thus, the disposal rate of 93.77 per cent has been achieved. The pending GST refund claims amounting to ₹ 6,053 crores are being expeditiously processed so as to provide relief to eligible claimants. Refund claims without any deficiency are being cleared expeditiously.
In case of IGST refunds, about 95 % (Rs 48,455 crores) of the total IGST refund claims (Rs. 50,928 crore) transmitted to Customs from GSTN as on 28.11.2018 have already been disposed. The remaining claims amounting to ₹ 2,473 crores

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Responsibilities of the management and GST auditor in GST audit

Responsibilities of the management and GST auditor in GST audit
By: – Sandeep Rawat
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 4-12-2018

Appointment of the GST Auditors under section 35(5) and section 44(2) of the CGST Act read with Rule 80(3) of the CGST Rules [read with the corresponding provisions of the State / Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Acts] is to certify the Reconciliation Statement in GSTR 9-C prepared for the financial year ended 31st March 2018.
In this context, clear responsibilities play a very important role to implement the bonafide purpose of the GST audit.
I have prepared the scope of the management as well as GST auditor responsibilities in GST audit under the GST laws.
Management Responsibilities
Compliance with GST laws and preparation of GSTR 9C in compliance of those laws
The Management is responsible for compliances with the GST laws, comprising the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax / Central Goods and Services Tax / State Goods and

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

that they are free of any material mis-statement.
Audit- auditing standards generally accepted in India and in line with the requirements under the GST laws and assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Management in the presentation of financial statements
The audit will be conducted in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India and in line with the requirements under the GST laws. Those standards require that GST auditor plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the relevant GSTR 9C is free of material mis-statements. An audit includes examination on a test basis, using the concept of materiality, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in GSTR 9C. The audit may also include assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Management in the presentation of financial statements.
Consider- internal control.
GST auditor will consider, solely for the purpo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

nagement about the representations contained in the financial statements and other reports as may be applicable and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Auditing standards generally accepted in India also require that, at the conclusion of the audit, GST auditor obtain representation letters from certain members of management about these matters. The responses to those inquiries, the written representations, and the results of the audit tests comprise the evidential matter GST auditor will rely upon in forming an opinion on the GSTR 9C or other reports. Owing to the importance of Management's representations to an effective audit and review, the enterprise agrees liability and costs relating to the services under the letter attributable to any misrepresentations by Management. Management is responsible for providing him with all financial records and related information / documents on a timely basis, and its failure to do so may cause him to delay the report,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Regarding Transfer Of Motor Vehicle Without Consideration.

Regarding Transfer Of Motor Vehicle Without Consideration.
Query (Issue) Started By: – Shyam Agarwal Dated:- 4-12-2018 Last Reply Date:- 5-12-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 2 Replies
GST
Sir, Mr.A purchased a Motor Car as a business assets in GST Era. But as ITC is blocked,He has not taken the ITC of the same. Now, He wants to Gift the same to his relative WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.
1.Whether GST is payable on Gift of such car as clause 4(a) of Schedule-II says about applicabili

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Vaibhav Global Ltd. Versus CGST & CE, Jaipur

Vaibhav Global Ltd. Versus CGST & CE, Jaipur
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 341 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 4-12-2018
Service Tax Appeal Nos. ST/52143, 52144 & 52145/2018 [SM] – FINAL ORDER NO. 53352-53354/2018
Service Tax
MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present for the Appellant: Mr. Sanjiv Agarwal & Mr. MB Maheshwari, Advocates
Present for the Respondent: Mr. P.R. Gupta, DR
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
Three of the above mentioned Appeals are disposed of vide this Order as the Commissioner (Appeals) has passed a common Order with respect to three Show Cause Notices in three of these Appeals. Common Order dated 16.02.2018 has been challenged before this Tribunal.
2. Relevant facts for the purpose are:
The appellant herein is engaged in manufacturing and export of gems and jewellery. He had filed a refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2000 and Notification No. 27/2012-CE dated 18.06.2012 in respect of the cenvat credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

are as follows:-
Appeal No.
SCN
Period
Refund amount & date
Ex-parte OIO No./ Date
Common OIA No./ Date
ST/52143/2018
C.No. V(71)R-5/Ref/246/2015/5603 dated 10.12.2015
July 2014 to September 2014
Rs.5,14,709/- 30.09.2015
380/Ref./2015 dated 31.12.2015
37 to 39 (NG) ST/JPR/2018 dated 16.02.2018
ST/52144/2018
C.No. V(71)R-5/Ref/261/2015/5601 dated 10.12.2015
October 2014 to December 2014
Rs.4,97,807/-
08/Ref./2016 dated 05.01.2016
37 to 39 (NG) ST/JPR/2018 dated 16.02.2018
ST/52145/2018
C.No. V(71)R-5/Ref/307/2015/5827 dated 21.12.2015
January 2015 to March 2015
Rs.1,11,374/-
09/Ref./2016 dated 11.01.2016
37 to 39 (NG) ST/JPR/2018 dated 16.02.2018
3. I have heard Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Ld. Advocate for the appellant and Mr. P.R. Gupta, Ld. DR for the Department.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that the refund claim was filed of accumulated cenvat on inputs/ input services used for export under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 read with Notification No. 27 d

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ted goods. Thus, the goods of the appellants may be excluded from the scope of exempted goods and may be made eligible to the refund claim under Rule 5 read with Rule 7 of CCr, 2004.
4.2 Ld. Counsel has also mentioned that as per the definition of exempted goods in Rule 2(d) of CCR, 2004 those goods which are under entry no. 67 and 128 of Notification No. 12 dated 17.03.2012 (as has been relied upon by the Commissioner(Appeals) by the Adjudicating Authorities below) but the goods of the appellant fall under none of those categories for this reason also the goods cannot be held as exempted goods and the claim cannot be rejected in accordance thereof.
The Order under challenge is therefore prayed to be set aside; Appeal is prayed to be allowed.
5. Ld. DR on the other hand has justified the order and prayed for the dismissal of Appeal.
6. After hearing both the parities my observations and opinion is as follows:-
The appellant had filed the refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

tantly, any manufacturer who clears a final product or an intermediary product for export is entitled for credit subject to above conditions. The appellant in the present case admittedly is engaged in clearing excisable goods however the controversy is whether the goods i.e. gems and jewellery were fully exempted or not. The appellant has drawn attention to the Ministry of Law advice dated 29.10.1974 as circulated vide CBEC Circular No. 278/112/96-CX dated 11.12.1996 which reads as follows:-
Under Central Excise, “exemption” means exemption by Notification No. under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 thus goods exported under bonds are not exempted from duty. A conjoint reading of this Circular with the above requirements of Rule 5 makes it clear that a manufacturer who clears a final product or an intermediate product for export without payment of duty under bond or letter of undertaking which is exported without payment of service tax shall not be an exempted goods and as such s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Amendment in the order number F16 (21) Tax/Juris(GST)/CCT/2017/3261 dated 11.07.2017.

Amendment in the order number F16 (21) Tax/Juris(GST)/CCT/2017/3261 dated 11.07.2017.
F16 (21) Tax/Juris(GST)/CCT/2017/1377 Dated:- 4-12-2018 Rajasthan SGST
GST – States
Government of Rajasthan
Commercial Taxes Department
Order
Jaipur, Dated: December 4, 2018
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Rajasthan Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017(Act No. 9 of 2017), I, Alok Gupta, Commissioner of State Tax, Rajasthan, hereby, make the following amendment

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pappu Construction Versus CGST, C.C. & C.E., Jabalpur

Pappu Construction Versus CGST, C.C. & C.E., Jabalpur
Service Tax
2018 (12) TMI 366 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 4-12-2018
Excise Appeal No. E/52523/2018 [SM] – FINAL ORDER NO. 53351/2018
Service Tax
MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Present for the Appellant: Mr. Z.U. Alvi, Advocate
Present for the Respondent: Mr. K. Poddar, DR
ORDER
PER: RACHNA GUPTA
The Appeal in hand has been filed being aggrieved of Order of Commissioner(Appeals) No. 18-19 dated 20.04.2018. Relevant facts for the adjudication are that the appellants are registered for providing services in the category of mining of mineral, oil or gas services. On the basis of intelligence gathered, it was noticed that the appellant is providing the said services to Madhya Pradesh State Mining Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter called as Corporation), however is not discharging the whole tax liability. Notices were accordingly served to the appellant to provide the requisite do

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ppellant proposing the aforesaid demand and a late fee of Rs. 7,200/-. In addition, the interest at the appropriate rate and the penalty of the same amount was also proposed to be levied. The said Show Cause Notice was initially adjudicated vide Order No. 22-34 dated 12.01.2018 vide which the demand of alleged short amount of service tax of Rs. 11,43,240/- was dropped. However, all the remaining demands were confirmed. Being aggrieved, the Appeal was filed before Commissioner(Appeals) who vide the Order under challenge has upheld the initial Order. Still being aggrieved, the Appeal is before this Tribunal.
2. We have heard Mr. Z.U. Alvi, Ld. Advocate for the appellant and Mr. K. Poddar, Ld. DR for the Department.
3. It is submitted on behalf of appellant that during the relevant period of time, appellant were executing mining contracts at Hirapur, District Sagar as well as at Megh Nagar District Jhabua. For the purpose of excavation of rock phosphate and crushing the same, appellant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Del.). He has also relied upon Circular No. 211/45/96-CX dated 14.05.1996 clarifying about the problem faced in availing modvat in the name of registered office/ head office but actually availed by the factory. The Order to the extent of denial of the availment of cenvat credit and imposition of late fee alongwith the penalties is therefore prayed to be set aside, Appeal is prayed to be allowed.
4. Ld. DR has justified the Orders of adjudicating authorities below. It is impressed upon that the proposed demand has partially been dropped by the authorities below. The demand confirmed has sufficient reasoning in the Order under challenge. There is the apparent non compliance of Rules 9, 7 and 12 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 on part of the appellant. There is no infirmity, as alleged, in the Order under challenge. Appeal is prayed to be dismissed.
5. After hearing both the parties and perusing the entire record, we are of the opinion that the demand of alleged short levy has already been

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ines though were purchased for Megh Nagar site however were diverted to Hirapur site. The ST-3 returns for both the sites are not denied to be produced by the appellant on record. Perusal thereof makes it abundantly clear that the cenvat credit for both these machines has been availed only with respect to Hirapur site. There is no dispute about these machines to be the capital goods used for providing the output service. The only controversy remains is as to whether the invoices bearing different address of the service provider than the one for which the credit has been availed is the violation of Rule 9 of CCR, 2004. We are of the opinion that the service provider for both the sites is same and has been commonly registered for both the sites. In the given circumstances, the credit is rather permissible to be taken on both these machines by the appellants in another unit irrespective of the invoices showing the different address of the appellant. We draw our support from the decision o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ed in captive consumption for manufacture of final product merely because original and duplicate copy as required by Rules were lost, the claim could not be defeated. The Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the case Kamakhya Steel Vs. C.C.E. 2000 (121) E.L.T. 247 has consistently held that once duty paid character of goods, receipt at works and utilisation thereof stood established, credit ought not to be denied on procedural lapses/ minor deviations. Based thereupon we are of the opinion that findings of Commissioner(Appeals) that the invoices produced by appellant are not containing correct address of the appellants registered premises but are having address of their other premises has wrongly been considered as a ground to deny the availment of cenvat credit on the capital goods used by the appellants for providing the output service. Similarly, the findings about absence of all the particulars as prescribed under Central Excise Rules, 2002 / Rule 9(2) of CCR, 2004 are not sustainable.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Nelcast Ltd Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai-Outer Commissionerate

Nelcast Ltd Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai-Outer Commissionerate
Central Excise
2018 (12) TMI 367 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 4-12-2018
Appeal No. E/41556/2018 – FINAL ORDER No. 42990/2018
Central Excise
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial)
Sh. K. Vijayasimhudu, Sr. Advisor – Indirect Tax. For the Appellant
Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, ADC (AR) For the Respondent
ORDER
Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in manufacture of Machined and Unmachined Iron Castings. They avail the facility of Cenvat credit on inputs, goods and input services. During the course of scrutiny of records, it was noticed that they availed Cenvat credit of service tax paid on Employe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

hudu appeared and argued the matter. He submitted that the insurance policies are aimed to compensate the workforce in the event of any accident or untoward incident that may lead to injury or demise during the course of employment. Such insurance is not merely a welfare measure, but the appellant is duty bound to have such policies as envisaged under Workmen Compensation Act. Even the policy is specifically taken as under the Workmen Compensation Insurance Scheme. Therefore the credit is eligible. He further submitted that in the appellant's own case for the period after 1/4/2011 also, vide OIA No.58/2013 (M-II) dated 21.10.2013 the said services were held to be eligible for credit. This was not considered by the lower authority.
3. The L

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

udicating authority dropped the demand. In the appellant's own case for the period October 2007 to May 2011, the department has allowed credit as per OIA No.58/2013 (M-II) dt.21.2.2013. The Commissioner (Appeals) have totally disregarded this decision. Instead of analysing the reason for allowing credit on such services after 1/4/2011, the Commissioner (Appeals) has brushed aside this order stating that major part is prior to 1/4/2011. I do not think this is sufficient reason to deviate from abiding the judicial discipline. The mechanical approach to issues without application of mind increases litigations.
6. The Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the recent decision in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2926/2017 dt.19/9/2018 in the case of M/s.

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The Commissioner, Goods And Service Tax Act, Up Versus M/s. Aneja Cargo

The Commissioner, Goods And Service Tax Act, Up Versus M/s. Aneja Cargo
GST
2018 (12) TMI 416 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – TMI
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 4-12-2018
WRIT TAX No. – 1538 of 2018
GST
SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Bipin Kumar Pandey
1. Present writ petition has filed against the order passed by the the Appellate Authority dated 05.11.2018, by which the penalty imposed by the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad), Jhansi under Section 129 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') has been deleted.
2. Learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner revenue submits that, in the first place, in the absence of any Tribunal having b

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

iscrepancy in quantity of goods has been found to be established and, therefore, in his submission, the first Appellate Authority has erred in overlooking that vital aspect of the matter and in deleting the penalty.
5. Matter requires consideration.
6. Shri Subham Agarwal, learned counsel for the assessee (respondent) may file counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
7. List thereafter.
8. In the meanwhile, subject to the respondent depositing Rs. 4,00,000/- in cash and furnishing security, other than cash and bank guarantee, for another Rs. 4,00,000/-, the goods in question alongwith vehicle shall be released in favour of the respondent.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Ord

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =